DISTRICT a (8) Total DISTRICT B (8) Total DISTRICT C (7) Total DISTRICT D (13) Total
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
District B Area Map PRECINCT BOUNDAR G
2015-2016 168 Clark County, Nevada Y U. Perkins MESC U. Perkins BOARD of SCHOOL TRUSTEES Mesquite Virgin RR Virgin 0 0.5 1 2 UP VValleyalley Clark County School District Miles Moapa 169 Moapa Bowman Pioneer Reservoir Falcon Ridge Mesquite Sandhill VVirginirgin District B Area Map PRECINCT BOUNDAR G. Bowler VValleyalley LLooggaannddaallee Moapa Valley Blvd. HughesHughes Full Name Address City ZIP Code Phone Moapa Valley MOCASSIN Elementary Schools PRECINCT BOUNDARY UP Adams, Kirk L. 580 N. Fogg St. Las Vegas . 89110. 702-799-8800 RR J.J. BowlerBowler Antonello, Lee. 1101 W. Tropical Pkwy. North Las Vegas . 89031. 702-799-8380 Nevada State Line State Nevada * Bowler, Grant . 1425 Whipple Rd. Logandale . 89021. 702-398-3233 O’Roarke LLyonyon * Bowler, Joseph L., Sr. 451 Vincen Leavitt Ave. Bunkerville. 89007. 702-346-1900 Moapa V BBuunnkkeerrvviillllee Scherkenbach ShadowShadow RidgeRidge Brookman, Eileen B.. 6225 E. Washington Ave.. Las Vegas . 89110. 702-799-7250 alley Blvd. Carl, Kay. 5625 Corbett St.. Las Vegas . 89130. 702-799-6650 DURANGO OOvveerrttoonn Bilbray Cozine, Steve . 5335 Coleman St. North Las Vegas . 89031. 702-799-0690 Riverside Dickens, D. L. “Dusty”. 5550 Milan Peak St.. North Las Vegas . 89081. 702-799-3878 K.K. WWardard Duncan, Ruby. 250 W. Rome Blvd. North Las Vegas . 89084. 702-799-7100 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE Goynes, Theron H. and Naomi D. 3409 Deer Springs Way. North Las Vegas . 89084. 702-799-1770 ACKERMAN SavilleSaville Guy, Addeliar . 4028 La Madre Way. North Las Vegas . 89031. 702-799-3150 Grand Teton ArborArbor VViewiew Hayden, Don E. 150 W. Rome Blvd. -
MAC Commissioner Districts Chairman Rick King District A
MAC Commissioner Districts Chairman Rick King The Chair serves in an at-large capacity and doesn’t represent a specific geographic area of the state. District A - Commissioner Carl Crimmins District A includes the Hennepin County cities of Champlin, Corcoran, Dayton, Greenfield, Independence, Loretto, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Plymouth, and Rogers, and the town of Hassan. In Anoka County, District A includes the cities of Columbia Heights, Fridley, Hilltop, and Spring Lake Park, and the Hennepin County cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Osseo, and Robbinsdale. District B – Commissioner Braj Agrawal District B includes the Hennepin County cities of Chanhassen, Deephaven, Eden Prairie, Excelsior, Greenwood, Hopkins, Long Lake, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzata, and Woodland. District B also includes Carver County, the Hennepin County cities of Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius, and that portion of Scott County in the metropolitan area. District C – Commissioner Katie Clark Sieben District C includes the Hennepin County cities of Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield, and the unorganized territory of Fort Snelling, as well as the Hennepin County cities of Crystal, Golden Valley, New Hope and St. Louis Park, and that portion of the city of Minneapolis lying within a line described as follows: commencing at the intersection of the southern boundary of the city of Minneapolis and Lyndale Avenue, northerly along Lyndale Avenue to its intersection with Interstate Hwy -
City Council Districts
City Council Districts A city council district is a political subdivision encompassing multiple electoral precincts. Districts should be approximately equal in population and contiguous. Districts are a common feature in Massachusetts political organization, featured in at least 6 city charters in Massachusetts and many others nationwide. As part of our deliberations, the Charter Commission elected by a 5 to 4 vote to put district residency requirements on 4 of the 12 city council seats in our proposed charter, such that they would no longer be elected in a “pool”. The pool is a proposed system in which 4 city councilors would be elected by the entire city, with voters able to choose between giving up to 4 or as few as 0 votes to candidates for the 4 seats in the pool. A. Advantages of “Districts” vs. “Pool” Advantages of district residency requirements ● Head to head races - Each of the 4 city councilors run for one seat, elected separately from the other 3. This allows residents to give an up or down vote to a councilor. ● 100% Geographic diversity - All city councilors would live in one specific area of the city, with no part of the city represented by a larger proportion of councilors. ● Majority rule - Each race, when contested, would be won by a city councilor having received a majority of the votes cast in that district. Advantages of a “pool” ● More potential candidates - All 4 “pool” city councilors could come from anywhere in the city, potentially giving voters a larger number of candidates to choose from. ● No head to head races - Each of the 4 city councilors together for 4 seats. -
Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood, Planning District Six
Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood Planning District 6 Rebuilding Plan Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood, Planning District Six Introduction Table of Contents Approximately 100 days after Hurricane Katrina Basic assumptions also formed the basis for the Acknowledgements Introduction 2 struck, Motion M-05-592 was unanimously neighborhood rebuilding plan: passed by the City Council of New Orleans. This 1. That a flood protection system will be With grateful appreciation the planning team A. Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood motion ensured that community-based, designed to withstand future catastropic would like to thank all the residents of Location & History 3 neighborhood-by-neighborhood planning would loss from a 1 in 100 year storm and that District 6 who participated in this planning Recovery Vision & Goals 4 be central to decisions associated with the this is a commitment by the federal process and without whose participation this Planning Process 5 recovery of the most devastated areas of New government. plan would not be possible. Neighborhood Concerns 7 Orleans. The City Council was adamant that the people most impacted by the storm would play a 2. That stringent building codes will be Project Directory B. Pre-Hurricane Katrina central role in defining the future of their implemented to further limit wind Neighborhood Existing Conditions 9 communities. Overall, 47 of the 73 damage. City of New Orleans Land-Use and Zoning 9 neighborhoods delineated by the City’s Planning C. Ray Nagin, Mayor Pre-Katrina Demographic Profile 10 Commission have had plans prepared as part of 3. That the basic urban structure of the city Income & Household Characteristics 10 this process. -
DAVID W. ROBINSON | AT-LARGE POSITION 2 Dear Friends
VOLUME 3 | ISSUE 4 Dear Friends, As always, we are keeping busy at City Hall and supporting exciting projects that are happening across the city. I’d like to share with you a few things that I’ve been involved with recently. On November 14-18, the National Trust for Historic Preservation held their annual conference in Houston for the first time. On behalf of Mayor Turner, I was pleased to accept an award certificate from the National Park Service. This event was a wonderful opportunity to promote our city’s history and celebrate what’s uniquely Houston. We have also been busy promoting public art in Houston. I attended the dedication of “Soaring in the Clouds” by local artist Ed Wilson, displayed in the lobby of the George R. Brown Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to recognize another local artist, Floyd Newsum, with a proclamation at City Hall this month. Two of Floyd’s paintings are on view at the new Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, DC. Finally, I want to extend a warm welcome to Mayor Turner’s new appointees to lead four city departments. Art Acevedo of Austin will assume the position of police chief and Samuel Pena of El Paso will be the new fire chief. Tom McCasland, the interim director at the Housing and Community Development Department since July, will assume the role permanently, and Judge Elaine Marshall will be the new presiding judge of Houston Municipal Courts. Thank you for reading, and please stay in touch. -
Guidelines Introduction
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS Historic District Landmarks Commission Guidelines Introduction Historic Preservation Section Index Historic preservation encompasses a broad range of The following information is included in this section: activities related to the protection, maintenance and • Historic Resources – Page 01-2 care of elements of the built environment that reflect its • Historic Designation – Page 01-2 cultural heritage. Each generation is entrusted with the • Historic Preservation in New Orleans – Page 01-3 historical, cultural, architectural, archeological, social and economic heritage of its community. In relation to • Historic District Landmarks Commission – Page 01-3 the built environment, historic preservation activities • HDLC Jurisdiction – Page 01-4 strive to enrich its integrity and embodied cultural • Historic Property Rating – Page 01-5 heritage to ensure that they are passed onto future • Design Guidelines – Page 01-6 generations. • Commissions – Page 01-6 • Architectural Review Committee – Page 01-7 • Certificate of Appropriateness – Page 01-7 Approvals Required Before Starting • CofA Application Process – Page 01-8 • Certificate of Appropriateness Review Process – Page Work 01-9 HDLC approval is required for some work that does not • Types of Applications and Reviews – Page 01-10 otherwise require a building permit. This includes, • Maintenance, Repairs and Replacements – Page 01-10 among other items, maintenance and repairs as well • Alterations, Renovations and Adaptive Reuse – Page 01-12 as roofing and fencing. It should also be noted that a • New Construction and Additions – Page 01-13 Certificate of Appropriateness (CofA) is necessary but • Demolition or Relocation – Page 01-13 not sufficient for the granting of a building permit. Each project is also subject to review for compliance • Retention Applications, Hardship Variances – Page 01-14 with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, building • “Demolition by Neglect” – Page 01-15 and safety codes. -
NH National Register Listing November, 2019 Inventory
NH National Register Listing November, 2019 Inventory # Property Name Address Town NR Listing Date ACW0001 Acworth Congregational Church Town Common Acworth 6/13/1975 ACW0002 Acworth Silsby Library Cold Pond and Lynn Hill Road Acworth 12/8/1983 ALB0049 Russell-Colbath House Kancamagus Highway Albany 4/23/1987 ALL0007 Allenstown Meeting House Deerfield Road Allenstown 12/6/2004 ALL0013 Bear Brook State Park Civilian Conservation Corps Allenstown-Deerfield Road intersection Allenstown 4/23/1992 ALS0004 Jewett-Kemp-Marlens House North Road Alstead 5/30/1997 ALS0048 Shedd-Porter Memorial Library 3 Main Street Alstead 12/27/2010 ALS0050 Hutchinson House 400 Alstead Center Road Alstead 2/2/2015 ALT0001 Alton Bay Railroad Station Route 11 Alton 9/22/1983 ALT0002 First Congregational Church Church Street Alton 3/9/1990 ALT0003 First Freewill Baptist Church Drew Hill Road Alton 8/1/1978 ALT0004 Second Free Baptist Church Main Street, PO Box 338 Alton 3/9/1990 AMH0028 The Wigwam/The Old Methodist Church Middle/Cross Street Amherst 8/18/1982 AMH0031 Hildreth-Jones Tavern 18 Jones Road Amherst 8/18/1982 AMH0043 Amherst Village Historic District Mack Hill, Amherst Street, Davis, Foundry Amherst 8/18/1982 AND0001 Bog Bridge unidentified road over Pleasant Brook Andover 3/16/1989 AND0002 Keniston Bridge Bridge Road Andover 3/16/1989 AND0003 Potter Place Railroad Station Depot Street Andover 3/16/1989 AND0009 Gershom Durgin House Route 11, just west of Plains Road Andover 10/26/2000 AND0015 Tucker Mountain School Tucker Mountain Road Andover 3/18/2005 -
List of Mayors, Council Members and City Controllers from 1958 to 2012
LIST OF MAYORS, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY CONTROLLERS FROM 1958 TO 2012 1958 – 1959 Lewis Cutrer - Mayor George P. Montgomery - District A Bill Ragan - District B Lee McLemore - District C Lou Hassell - District D W. H. Jones - District E Louie Welch - At Large Position #1 Garth Bates - At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen - At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes - Controller 1960 – 1961 Lewis Cutrer – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A Bill Ragan – District B Lee McLemore – District C Bill T. Swanson – District D W. H. Jones – District E Louie Welch – At Large Position #1 Frank E. Mann – At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen – At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes – Controller 1962 – 1963 Lewis Cutrer – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A A. L. “Curly” Miller – District B Lee McLemore – District C Bill T. Swanson – District D W. H. Jones – District E (4-3-63 – Frank O. Mancuso appointed to District E due to the death of Mr. Jones) Lou Hassell – At Large Position #1 Frank E. Mann – At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen – At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes – Controller LIST OF MAYORS, COUNCIL & CITY CONTROLLERS – PAGE 2 1964 – 1965 Louie Welch – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A A. L. “Curly” Miller – District B Lee McLemore – District C Homer L. Ford – District D Frank O. Mancuso – District E Bill Elliott – At Large Position #1 Frank E. Mann – At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen – At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes – Controller 1966 – 1967 Louie Welch – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A A. L. “Curly” Miller – District B Lee McLemore – District C Homer L. -
National Register of Historic Places Received Inventory—Nomination Form Date Entered Amoskeag Mfg
r\ r- -i D >•' O 1 .-"^ 9 x1 n n 1 o NPS Form 10-900-a W1 i s'•••!•• v,: — ;' • « \.J5 ! . --.-—-.» . • X i-'- - rw .- i^ ' ^' Ur ^ <7"81) E)(P. I2/3I/84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory—Nomination Form date entered Amoskeag Mfg. Co. Housing Continuation sheet Thematic Group Nomination |tem number ^strict C page l______ DESCRIPTION District C includes nine blocks sited longitudinally north-south in two groups on a five acre site roughly bounded by Hollis Street, South Hampshire Lane, Bridge and Canal Streets. Blocks #40-43 represent a major departure from the plain Greek Revival exteriors of the earlier blocks found in Districts A and B. Built in 1881, each 196'xSA 1 brick block stands 3-1/2 stories high and contains four units defined on the exterior by projecting brick piers. The blocks are surmounted by hip roofs pierced by two hip roof dormers and corbeled chimneys at each unit. Though the slate roofs have been replaced with asbestos, the dormer walls are still clad in gray slate. Each unit has a centrally positioned Stick Style entry hood that shelters two paired entrances set within a flat arch. Two-over-two sash appears both singly and paired, capped by hood molds and resting on granite sills. Exterior walls are enriched by the use of contrasting black brick on hood molds and belt courses and by a stepped cornice finished with dentils. Rear two-story brick ells incorporate porches for each tenement. -
Merrimack Zoning Ordinance and Building Code and Are Hereby Incorporated by Reference
ZONING ORDINANCE & BUILDING CODE TOWN OF MERRIMACK [Revised September 11, 2014] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 Purpose and Definitions 1-1 Section 2 Establishment of Districts 2-1 2.01.1 Industrial District Metes & Bounds 2-1 2.01.2 Limited Commercial District 2-5 2.01.3 General Commercial District 2-5 2.01.4 Residential District 2-5 2.01.5 Wetlands Conservation District 2-6 2.01.6 Flood Hazard Conservation District 2-6 2.01.7 Elderly Zoning District 2-6 2.01.8 Planned Residential District 2-6 2.01.9 Aquifer Conservation District 2-6 2.02 Permitted Uses - All Districts 2-7 2.02.1 Residential - Permitted Uses 2-8 2.02.2 Limited Commercial - Permitted Uses 2-11 2.02.3 General Commercial - Permitted Uses 2-12 2.02.4 I-1 & I-2 Industrial District - Permitted Uses 2-16 2.02.5 I-3 Industrial District - Permitted Uses 2-28 2.02.6 Sexually Oriented Businesses 2-29 2.02.7 Wetlands Conservation District - Permitted Uses 2-32 Wetlands Soil Types 2-33 2.02.8 Flood Hazard Conservation District-Permitted Uses 2-36 2.02.9 Elderly Zoning District - Permitted Uses 2-47 2.02.10 Planned Residential District - Permitted Uses 2-49 2.02.11 Aquifer Conservation District 2-50 2.02.12 Shoreland Protection District 2-54 2.02.13 Town Center Overlay District 2-55 Section 3 Lot and Yard Regulations 3-1 3.02 Table of Lot and Yard Regulations 3-1 3.02.1 Residential Land Use District 3-4 3.02.2 Soil Types to Sanitary Facilities 3-5 3.02.3 Boundaries 3-7 3.02.4 Location of On-Site Disposal Fields 3-7 3.02.5 Multiple Soil Districts Within Lots 3-7 3.02.6 Soil District -
Local Historic Districts of New Hampshire with Their Historic District Commissions and Heritage Commissions
PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY Local Historic Districts of New Hampshire With Their Historic District Commissions and Heritage Commissions Julia Ferrari, Nancy Garrison, Audra Klumb, and James Perkins Advised by: Elizabeth Muzzey 9/19/2012 The students in the Preservation Planning and Management course at Plymouth State University researched the locally designated historic districts, Historic District Commissions and Heritage Commissions of New Hampshire. The students used online research and direct communication with the towns of New Hampshire to find fifty‐six towns in New Hampshire have locally designated historic districts. The districts are of varying ages, sizes, and hold differing levels of protection. The districts are managed and governed by Historic District Commissions, Heritage Commissions, and other groups. Forward In New Hampshire, local historic districts range in size and character from large commercial and residential downtowns to riverfront brick industrial complexes and small clusters of public buildings in pristine 19th century village centers. The first districts, established in the 1960s, predate the current state legislation that enables their use as a preservation tool in New Hampshire. In 1983, state law declared that safeguarding a community’s heritage was a public purpose and that local historic districting offered a number of benefits, such as conserving property values, strengthening the local economy, fostering civic beauty and promoting the education and pleasure of residents (NH RSA 674:45). Local historic districts differ from other types of historical designations, such as listing on the National Register of Historic Places or the New Hampshire State Register of Historic Places. Although historical resources may be listed as districts on both of the registers, the listing is honorific, by either the National Park Service or the State of New Hampshire, and carries no regulatory oversight. -
National Register of Historic Places Received Inventory Nomination Form Date Entered Amoskeag Mfg
NPS Form 10-900-a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered Amoskeag Mfg. Co. Housing Continuation sheet Thematic Group Nomination Item number District B __ Page 1 DESCRIPTION District B encompasses an area of seventeen acres, roughly bounded by Canal, Mechanic, Franklin, and Pleasant Streets. Of the forty buildings in the district, thirty were erected by the Amoskeag Manufacturing Company, two are contributing buildings erected in the mid-20th century and eight are intrusions, half of which are small mid-20th century concrete structures. All but one of the Amoskeag-built structures are housing blocks, comprising seventeen tenement blocks and twelve overseers' blocks. The remaining structure, the Employment Office (#16) is described at the end of this section with other contributing buildings. Tenement Blocks Included within the district are seventeen tenement blocks; fourteen were erected between 1838 and 1850, two in 1855-56 and one in 1866. Despite the twenty-eight year span, a consistent approach to design, materials, scale and setting was maintained, creating a strong sense of continuity and harmony. The buildings generally date chronologically from north to south, except for #34-38 which were erected in the 1840s. The fourteen tenement blocks constructed between 1838 and 1850 (#8,9,10,11,12,13,17, 18,21,22,25,28,29,38) all followed the standard design for company housing established by the Boston Associates and employed by Amoskeag. Each is Greek Revival in style, interpreted in a conservative and restrained manner common to urban seacoast cities in New England.