DOCSLIB.ORG

DISTRICT a (8) Total DISTRICT B (8) Total DISTRICT C (7) Total DISTRICT D (13) Total

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DISTRICT a (8) Total DISTRICT B (8) Total DISTRICT C (7) Total DISTRICT D (13) Total 2010 FALL ELECTION RESULTS SEPTEMBER 28 & 29 * BOLD INDICATES WINNERS * TOTAL BALLOTS CASTS: 7,526 DISTRICT A (8) Total DISTRICT B (8) Total PROGRESS INDEPENDENT Miguel Lopez 283 Justin Fisch 176 UNITE UNITE Christina Bonarrigo 1,762 Albert Kaminsky 769 Limary Gonzalez 1,789 Grant Kerwit 780 Shelley Greenspan 1,789 Micah S. Lewis 782 Cecelia Hardwick 1,793 Matt Mountjoy 760 Joseph Lancos 1,788 Patrick J. Murphy 781 Alexandra Moore 1,797 David Neukamm 780 Emily O’Keefe 1,804 Andy Schein 761 Ingrid Tojanci 1,714 TJ Villamil 768 DISTRICT C (7) Total DISTRICT D (13) Total PROGRESS PROGRESS Timothy Johnson 144 Richard Blake 241 Jeanna Lee 158 Sean Larson 249 Dave M. Schneider 142 INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT Jordan Ball 270 Gillian Leytham 212 Gary Benedix 246 Lane Brown 255 UNITE Jonathan L. Gordon 243 Tyler Bertot 341 Jordan Greenberg 267 Justin Kelly 367 Chris Kodadek 244 Logan Harrison 341 Jessica Poulsen 261 Taylor Nicole Parker 352 Gene Sautin 233 Monya Sharp 350 Richard Skandera 230 Matthew Soberano 346 Bret Yaw 364 UNITE Nancy Flores 490 Amanda Jones 517 Lauren Lundberg 499 Andy Mason 490 Miguel Mejia 495 Michelle Miller 487 Juan Rodriguez 493 Jillian Rogers 497 Trimaine Sheffield 518 Nishant Srivastava 494 Leonard Thompson 503 Jason Tiemeier 477 Carly Wilson 505 1 DISTRICT E (1) Total UNITE Amanda Ford 65 BEATY (1) Total BROWARD (1) Total INDEPENDENT PROGRESS Ford Dwyer 158 Mary Velasquez 23 UNITE INDEPENDENT Shayla Davis 211 Jesse Schmitt 38 UNITE Severin Walstad 334 GRAHAM (1) Total HUME (1) Total PROGRESS PROGRESS Hannah Pohlmann 151 Michael A. Sand 27 UNITE INDEPENDENT Ashley Florestal 179 Rockford Dias 43 UNITE Michele Lis 188 JENNINGS (1) Total KEYS (1) Total INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT Sydney Gorodetsky 23 Alan Yanuck 60 UNITE UNITE John Wilkins 202 Shannon Pringle 67 LAKESIDE (1) Total MURPHREE (1) Total INDEPENDENT PROGRESS Michael Morales 108 Brandon Lee Gagné 42 UNITE INDEPENDENT Chanoukah Olivier 95 Jimmy McClellan 58 UNITE Trevor Abbott 142 2 RAWLINGS (1) Total REID/YULEE/MALLORY (1) Total UNITE UNITE Scott Salzman 151 Hillary Harlan 83 SPRINGS (1) Total TOLBERT (1) Total INDEPENDENT UNITE Stephanie Jones 60 Christine M. Walker 129 UNITE Jordan Mullings 148 FAMILY HOUSING (1) Total PROGRESS José R. Soto 7 UNITE Katherine O’Brien 2 3 2011 FALL ELECTION RESULTS SEPTEMBER 27 & 28 * BOLD INDICATES WINNERS * TOTAL BALLOTS CASTS: 8,271 DISTRICT A (8) Total DISTRICT B (8) Total THE STUDENTS PARTY UNITE PARTY Kyle Collins 251 Jake “Rex” King 685 Eric Conrad 231 Albie Kaminsky 723 Mitchell Norton 222 Daniel Landesberg 687 Max D. Stein 228 Andy Mason 668 Morgan W. Vollrath 217 Andy Schein 666 Jason Patrick Tiemeier 678 UNITE PARTY PARTY Cayman Weimer 664 Trevor Abbott 1593 Rob Wheeler 681 Christina Bonarrigo 1594 Alex Cohen 1583 Brooke Eubanks 1600 Shelley Greenspan 1571 Alexa Lipke 1587 Oliver Moll 1537 Missy Perez 1557 DISTRICT C (7) Total DISTRICT D (13) Total THE STUDENTS PARTY THE STUDENTS PARTY Tim ‘Ananda’ Johnson 184 Priscila Acosta 419 Matt Pesek 183 Mahmuda Akhter 360 Jason Rosen 184 Umair Asghar 359 Carly Wilson 203 Jordan “Stonewall” Ball 397 Lane Brown 378 UNITE PARTY Atif J. Butt 340 Nha-Uyen Hua 297 Jonathan Gordon 377 Carolina Padron 319 Irfaan J Hafeez 342 Khalil Quinan 286 Naumaan J. Hafeez 353 Juan Rodriguez 313 Muaaz Hassan 336 Monya Sharp 298 Richard Paz 372 Palveshay Tariq 278 Kevin R. Persad 382 Morton Zhou 273 Gerard Robinson 376 UNITE PARTY DISTRICT E (1) Total Antoinetta Brailsford 471 UNITE PARTY Ana Dominguez 498 Brett Rowland 501 Nancy Flores 476 Logan Harrison 473 Marissa Hartman 470 Daniel Jim 456 Hrishikesh Kumbhojkar 452 Amanda Norman 480 1 John Rausch 445 Kelley Rojas 468 Jayce Victor 475 Hilary Webb 451 Lily Wong 494 BEATY (1) Total BROWARD (1) Total THE STUDENTS PARTY INDEPENDENT Alexander Cohen 62 Rich K. Gallione, Jr. 45 UNITE PARTY UNITE PARTY Joey Michaels 272 Jaclyn Rosen 382 GRAHAM (1) Total HUME (1) Total THE STUDENTS PARTY THE STUDENTS PARTY Eric Brandon Brown 61 Stephanie Kreitzer 128 INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT Toffi Jacobi 9 Will Baldock 17 UNITE PARTY UNITE PARTY Sara Delahunty 131 Sofia Shepard 81 JENNINGS (1) Total KEYS (1) Total THE STUDENTS PARTY THE STUDENTS PARTY Jenna Goldman 176 T. J. Boyd 32 INDEPENDENT UNITE PARTY Jeremy M. Adams 3 Janasuela Mitchell 33 Hunter Futch 11 UNITE PARTY Joshua Comiter 209 LAKESIDE (1) Total MURPHREE (1) Total THE STUDENTS PARTY THE STUDENTS PARTY Aimee Dolan 121 Ford Dwyer 232 UNITE PARTY UNITE PARTY Ricky Salabarria 81 Dylan Fisher 207 RAWLINGS (1) Total REID/YULEE/MALLORY (1) Total UNITE PARTY THE STUDENTS PARTY Danielle Lehrer 159 Jose Giron 67 2 UNITE PARTY Nhi Tran 108 SPRINGS (1) Total TOLBERT (1) Total THE STUDENTS PARTY THE STUDENTS PARTY Daniella Saetta 79 Karina Manoogian 65 UNITE PARTY UNITE PARTY Kayla King 129 Nikki Swanson 147 FAMILY HOUSING (1) Total INDEPENDENT Justin Runac 14 UNITE PARTY Amber Atkinson 9 REFERENDUM QUESTION Do you support repealing the 15% tuition increase at the University of Florida? YES 6299 NO 930 3 Results https://vote.sg.ufl.edu/s/admin/election/Results/14 Election Administration University of Florida Results as of 10/5/2012 10:59:20 AM 9197 total ballots Beaty Towers Senator - 1 seats Elizabeth Chauncey Swamp Party 200 - 78.13% Sean Thomas Students Party 50 - 19.53% 2 losing write-in candidates with 6 votes Broward Area Senator - 1 seats Lucas Feignbaum Swamp Party 362 - 87.23% Rebecca Cooper Students Party 50 - 12.05% 3 losing write-in candidates with 3 votes District A Senator - 9 seats Sydney Kaplan Swamp Party 1488 - 9.28% Mallory Alonso Swamp Party 1481 - 9.24% Joey Michaels Swamp Party 1476 - 9.2% Danielle Lehrer Swamp Party 1468 - 9.15% Kelly Vidal Swamp Party 1460 - 9.11% Jaclyn Rosen Swamp Party 1456 - 9.08% Christina Bonarrigo Swamp Party 1447 - 9.02% Justin Shifrin Swamp Party 1442 - 8.99% Quinn Richman Swamp Party 1427 - 8.9% Christina Ford Students Party 341 - 2.13% Will Baldock Students Party 337 - 2.1% Rachel McGovern Students Party 332 - 2.07% Paul Rice Students Party 314 - 1.96% 1 of 6 10/5/2012 11:00 AM Results https://vote.sg.ufl.edu/s/admin/election/Results/14 Kerry Stern Students Party 314 - 1.96% Daniel J Kennedy Students Party 312 - 1.95% Rockford Dias Students Party 310 - 1.93% Nigel Woodfork Students Party 297 - 1.85% Jonathan Metzger Students Party 290 - 1.81% 42 losing write-in candidates with 43 votes District B Senator - 7 seats Austin Sherman Swamp Party 668 - 11.41% Josh Comiter Swamp Party 658 - 11.23% Daniel Landesberg Swamp Party 657 - 11.22% Cayman Weimer Swamp Party 654 - 11.17% Mitchell Elder Swamp Party 651 - 11.11% Abraham Carryl Swamp Party 647 - 11.05% Truman Williams Swamp Party 646 - 11.03% Joy Minchin Students Party 222 - 3.79% Albert Lucas Students Party 205 - 3.5% Alejandro De Los Santos Students Party 204 - 3.48% Cody Starling Students Party 201 - 3.43% Joe Andreoli Students Party 200 - 3.41% Jason Waldman Students Party 199 - 3.4% 45 losing write-in candidates with 45 votes District C Senator - 7 seats Jordan Kellerman Swamp Party 267 - 7.96% Alex Bottone Swamp Party 264 - 7.87% Woodjerry Louis Swamp Party 263 - 7.84% Davis Bean Swamp Party 263 - 7.84% Justin Kelsey Swamp Party 262 - 7.81% 2 of 6 10/5/2012 11:00 AM Results https://vote.sg.ufl.edu/s/admin/election/Results/14 Brandon Pinkston Swamp Party 261 - 7.78% Neha Swaroop Swamp Party 260 - 7.75% Jesse Schmitt Students Party 227 - 6.77% William Farrell Students Party 226 - 6.74% Christian Chessman Students Party 215 - 6.41% Keegan Fletcher Students Party 215 - 6.41% Michael Correia Students Party 214 - 6.38% Cody Futch Students Party 209 - 6.23% Jimmy Moy Students Party 197 - 5.87% 11 losing write-in candidates with 11 votes District D Senator - 13 seats Ford Dwyer Students Party 446 - 4.19% Daniella Saetta Students Party 441 - 4.15% John W Bryan Students Party 437 - 4.11% Maria Pazos Students Party 437 - 4.11% Brittany Bokzam Students Party 432 - 4.06% Juan Zapata Students Party 429 - 4.03% Olga Rodriguez Students Party 427 - 4.02% Elizabeth Stowers Students Party 426 - 4.01% Jalyn Delancy Students Party 425 - 4% Nancy Nguyen Swamp Party 424 - 3.99% Austin Swink Students Party 424 - 3.99% TK Yang Students Party 424 - 3.99% Micaela Montero Dokser Students Party 413 - 3.88% Amit Gangrade Students Party 413 - 3.88% Miriam Miyara Swamp Party 399 - 3.75% Gaines Kyna Gania Swamp Party 396 - 3.72% 3 of 6 10/5/2012 11:00 AM Results https://vote.sg.ufl.edu/s/admin/election/Results/14 Agassy Rodriguez Swamp Party 394 - 3.71% Diego Castillo JR Swamp Party 393 - 3.7% Johnathan German Del-Rio Swamp Party 392 - 3.69% Nhi Tran Swamp Party 389 - 3.66% Logan Harrison Swamp Party 384 - 3.61% Garrett Bruno Swamp Party 384 - 3.61% Theodore "T-Buddy" Miller Swamp Party 381 - 3.58% Andrew Giacini Swamp Party 378 - 3.55% Morton Zhou Swamp Party 369 - 3.47% Tavarus Green Swamp Party 357 - 3.36% 20 losing write-in candidates with 20 votes District E Senator - 1 seats Arielle Claude Swamp Party 1313 - 72.7% Brian Skipper Students Party 462 - 25.58% 30 losing write-in candidates with 31 votes Family Housing Senator - 1 seats Sawyer Hudson Students Party 15 - 62.5% Olufemi Bolarima Swamp Party 9 - 37.5% Graham Area Senator - 1 seats Connor Larkin Swamp Party 143 - 71.5% Steven Evens Students Party 56 - 28% 1 losing write-in candidates with 1 votes Hume Area Senator - 1 seats Steven Elkington Students Party 127 - 52.05% Chris Boyett Swamp Party 115 - 47.13% 2 losing write-in candidates with 2 votes Jennings Area Senator - 1 seats Hanne Staertzel Swamp Party 223 - 73.6% 4 of 6 10/5/2012 11:00 AM Results https://vote.sg.ufl.edu/s/admin/election/Results/14
Load more

Recommended publications
  • District B Area Map PRECINCT BOUNDAR G
    2015-2016 168 Clark County, Nevada Y U. Perkins MESC U. Perkins BOARD of SCHOOL TRUSTEES Mesquite Virgin RR Virgin 0 0.5 1 2 UP VValleyalley Clark County School District Miles Moapa 169 Moapa Bowman Pioneer Reservoir Falcon Ridge Mesquite Sandhill VVirginirgin District B Area Map PRECINCT BOUNDAR G. Bowler VValleyalley LLooggaannddaallee Moapa Valley Blvd. HughesHughes Full Name Address City ZIP Code Phone Moapa Valley MOCASSIN Elementary Schools PRECINCT BOUNDARY UP Adams, Kirk L. 580 N. Fogg St. Las Vegas . 89110. 702-799-8800 RR J.J. BowlerBowler Antonello, Lee. 1101 W. Tropical Pkwy. North Las Vegas . 89031. 702-799-8380 Nevada State Line State Nevada * Bowler, Grant . 1425 Whipple Rd. Logandale . 89021. 702-398-3233 O’Roarke LLyonyon * Bowler, Joseph L., Sr. 451 Vincen Leavitt Ave. Bunkerville. 89007. 702-346-1900 Moapa V BBuunnkkeerrvviillllee Scherkenbach ShadowShadow RidgeRidge Brookman, Eileen B.. 6225 E. Washington Ave.. Las Vegas . 89110. 702-799-7250 alley Blvd. Carl, Kay. 5625 Corbett St.. Las Vegas . 89130. 702-799-6650 DURANGO OOvveerrttoonn Bilbray Cozine, Steve . 5335 Coleman St. North Las Vegas . 89031. 702-799-0690 Riverside Dickens, D. L. “Dusty”. 5550 Milan Peak St.. North Las Vegas . 89081. 702-799-3878 K.K. WWardard Duncan, Ruby. 250 W. Rome Blvd. North Las Vegas . 89084. 702-799-7100 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE Goynes, Theron H. and Naomi D. 3409 Deer Springs Way. North Las Vegas . 89084. 702-799-1770 ACKERMAN SavilleSaville Guy, Addeliar . 4028 La Madre Way. North Las Vegas . 89031. 702-799-3150 Grand Teton ArborArbor VViewiew Hayden, Don E. 150 W. Rome Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • MAC Commissioner Districts Chairman Rick King District A
    MAC Commissioner Districts Chairman Rick King The Chair serves in an at-large capacity and doesn’t represent a specific geographic area of the state. District A - Commissioner Carl Crimmins District A includes the Hennepin County cities of Champlin, Corcoran, Dayton, Greenfield, Independence, Loretto, Maple Grove, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Plymouth, and Rogers, and the town of Hassan. In Anoka County, District A includes the cities of Columbia Heights, Fridley, Hilltop, and Spring Lake Park, and the Hennepin County cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Osseo, and Robbinsdale. District B – Commissioner Braj Agrawal District B includes the Hennepin County cities of Chanhassen, Deephaven, Eden Prairie, Excelsior, Greenwood, Hopkins, Long Lake, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzata, and Woodland. District B also includes Carver County, the Hennepin County cities of Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius, and that portion of Scott County in the metropolitan area. District C – Commissioner Katie Clark Sieben District C includes the Hennepin County cities of Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield, and the unorganized territory of Fort Snelling, as well as the Hennepin County cities of Crystal, Golden Valley, New Hope and St. Louis Park, and that portion of the city of Minneapolis lying within a line described as follows: commencing at the intersection of the southern boundary of the city of Minneapolis and Lyndale Avenue, northerly along Lyndale Avenue to its intersection with Interstate Hwy
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Districts
    City Council Districts A city council district is a political subdivision encompassing multiple electoral precincts. Districts should be approximately equal in population and contiguous. Districts are a common feature in Massachusetts political organization, featured in at least 6 city charters in Massachusetts and many others nationwide. As part of our deliberations, the Charter Commission elected by a 5 to 4 vote to put district residency requirements on 4 of the 12 city council seats in our proposed charter, such that they would no longer be elected in a “pool”. The pool is a proposed system in which 4 city councilors would be elected by the entire city, with voters able to choose between giving up to 4 or as few as 0 votes to candidates for the 4 seats in the pool. A. Advantages of “Districts” vs. “Pool” Advantages of district residency requirements ● Head to head races - Each of the 4 city councilors run for one seat, elected separately ​ from the other 3. This allows residents to give an up or down vote to a councilor. ● 100% Geographic diversity - All city councilors would live in one specific area of the ​ city, with no part of the city represented by a larger proportion of councilors. ● Majority rule - Each race, when contested, would be won by a city councilor having ​ received a majority of the votes cast in that district. Advantages of a “pool” ● More potential candidates - All 4 “pool” city councilors could come from anywhere in ​ the city, potentially giving voters a larger number of candidates to choose from. ● No head to head races - Each of the 4 city councilors together for 4 seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood, Planning District Six
    Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood Planning District 6 Rebuilding Plan Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood, Planning District Six Introduction Table of Contents Approximately 100 days after Hurricane Katrina Basic assumptions also formed the basis for the Acknowledgements Introduction 2 struck, Motion M-05-592 was unanimously neighborhood rebuilding plan: passed by the City Council of New Orleans. This 1. That a flood protection system will be With grateful appreciation the planning team A. Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood motion ensured that community-based, designed to withstand future catastropic would like to thank all the residents of Location & History 3 neighborhood-by-neighborhood planning would loss from a 1 in 100 year storm and that District 6 who participated in this planning Recovery Vision & Goals 4 be central to decisions associated with the this is a commitment by the federal process and without whose participation this Planning Process 5 recovery of the most devastated areas of New government. plan would not be possible. Neighborhood Concerns 7 Orleans. The City Council was adamant that the people most impacted by the storm would play a 2. That stringent building codes will be Project Directory B. Pre-Hurricane Katrina central role in defining the future of their implemented to further limit wind Neighborhood Existing Conditions 9 communities. Overall, 47 of the 73 damage. City of New Orleans Land-Use and Zoning 9 neighborhoods delineated by the City’s Planning C. Ray Nagin, Mayor Pre-Katrina Demographic Profile 10 Commission have had plans prepared as part of 3. That the basic urban structure of the city Income & Household Characteristics 10 this process.
    [Show full text]
  • DAVID W. ROBINSON | AT-LARGE POSITION 2 Dear Friends
    VOLUME 3 | ISSUE 4 Dear Friends, As always, we are keeping busy at City Hall and supporting exciting projects that are happening across the city. I’d like to share with you a few things that I’ve been involved with recently. On November 14-18, the National Trust for Historic Preservation held their annual conference in Houston for the first time. On behalf of Mayor Turner, I was pleased to accept an award certificate from the National Park Service. This event was a wonderful opportunity to promote our city’s history and celebrate what’s uniquely Houston. We have also been busy promoting public art in Houston. I attended the dedication of “Soaring in the Clouds” by local artist Ed Wilson, displayed in the lobby of the George R. Brown Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to recognize another local artist, Floyd Newsum, with a proclamation at City Hall this month. Two of Floyd’s paintings are on view at the new Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, DC. Finally, I want to extend a warm welcome to Mayor Turner’s new appointees to lead four city departments. Art Acevedo of Austin will assume the position of police chief and Samuel Pena of El Paso will be the new fire chief. Tom McCasland, the interim director at the Housing and Community Development Department since July, will assume the role permanently, and Judge Elaine Marshall will be the new presiding judge of Houston Municipal Courts. Thank you for reading, and please stay in touch.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines Introduction
    CITY OF NEW ORLEANS Historic District Landmarks Commission Guidelines Introduction Historic Preservation Section Index Historic preservation encompasses a broad range of The following information is included in this section: activities related to the protection, maintenance and • Historic Resources – Page 01-2 care of elements of the built environment that reflect its • Historic Designation – Page 01-2 cultural heritage. Each generation is entrusted with the • Historic Preservation in New Orleans – Page 01-3 historical, cultural, architectural, archeological, social and economic heritage of its community. In relation to • Historic District Landmarks Commission – Page 01-3 the built environment, historic preservation activities • HDLC Jurisdiction – Page 01-4 strive to enrich its integrity and embodied cultural • Historic Property Rating – Page 01-5 heritage to ensure that they are passed onto future • Design Guidelines – Page 01-6 generations. • Commissions – Page 01-6 • Architectural Review Committee – Page 01-7 • Certificate of Appropriateness – Page 01-7 Approvals Required Before Starting • CofA Application Process – Page 01-8 • Certificate of Appropriateness Review Process – Page Work 01-9 HDLC approval is required for some work that does not • Types of Applications and Reviews – Page 01-10 otherwise require a building permit. This includes, • Maintenance, Repairs and Replacements – Page 01-10 among other items, maintenance and repairs as well • Alterations, Renovations and Adaptive Reuse – Page 01-12 as roofing and fencing. It should also be noted that a • New Construction and Additions – Page 01-13 Certificate of Appropriateness (CofA) is necessary but • Demolition or Relocation – Page 01-13 not sufficient for the granting of a building permit. Each project is also subject to review for compliance • Retention Applications, Hardship Variances – Page 01-14 with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, building • “Demolition by Neglect” – Page 01-15 and safety codes.
    [Show full text]
  • NH National Register Listing November, 2019 Inventory
    NH National Register Listing November, 2019 Inventory # Property Name Address Town NR Listing Date ACW0001 Acworth Congregational Church Town Common Acworth 6/13/1975 ACW0002 Acworth Silsby Library Cold Pond and Lynn Hill Road Acworth 12/8/1983 ALB0049 Russell-Colbath House Kancamagus Highway Albany 4/23/1987 ALL0007 Allenstown Meeting House Deerfield Road Allenstown 12/6/2004 ALL0013 Bear Brook State Park Civilian Conservation Corps Allenstown-Deerfield Road intersection Allenstown 4/23/1992 ALS0004 Jewett-Kemp-Marlens House North Road Alstead 5/30/1997 ALS0048 Shedd-Porter Memorial Library 3 Main Street Alstead 12/27/2010 ALS0050 Hutchinson House 400 Alstead Center Road Alstead 2/2/2015 ALT0001 Alton Bay Railroad Station Route 11 Alton 9/22/1983 ALT0002 First Congregational Church Church Street Alton 3/9/1990 ALT0003 First Freewill Baptist Church Drew Hill Road Alton 8/1/1978 ALT0004 Second Free Baptist Church Main Street, PO Box 338 Alton 3/9/1990 AMH0028 The Wigwam/The Old Methodist Church Middle/Cross Street Amherst 8/18/1982 AMH0031 Hildreth-Jones Tavern 18 Jones Road Amherst 8/18/1982 AMH0043 Amherst Village Historic District Mack Hill, Amherst Street, Davis, Foundry Amherst 8/18/1982 AND0001 Bog Bridge unidentified road over Pleasant Brook Andover 3/16/1989 AND0002 Keniston Bridge Bridge Road Andover 3/16/1989 AND0003 Potter Place Railroad Station Depot Street Andover 3/16/1989 AND0009 Gershom Durgin House Route 11, just west of Plains Road Andover 10/26/2000 AND0015 Tucker Mountain School Tucker Mountain Road Andover 3/18/2005
    [Show full text]
  • List of Mayors, Council Members and City Controllers from 1958 to 2012
    LIST OF MAYORS, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY CONTROLLERS FROM 1958 TO 2012 1958 – 1959 Lewis Cutrer - Mayor George P. Montgomery - District A Bill Ragan - District B Lee McLemore - District C Lou Hassell - District D W. H. Jones - District E Louie Welch - At Large Position #1 Garth Bates - At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen - At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes - Controller 1960 – 1961 Lewis Cutrer – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A Bill Ragan – District B Lee McLemore – District C Bill T. Swanson – District D W. H. Jones – District E Louie Welch – At Large Position #1 Frank E. Mann – At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen – At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes – Controller 1962 – 1963 Lewis Cutrer – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A A. L. “Curly” Miller – District B Lee McLemore – District C Bill T. Swanson – District D W. H. Jones – District E (4-3-63 – Frank O. Mancuso appointed to District E due to the death of Mr. Jones) Lou Hassell – At Large Position #1 Frank E. Mann – At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen – At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes – Controller LIST OF MAYORS, COUNCIL & CITY CONTROLLERS – PAGE 2 1964 – 1965 Louie Welch – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A A. L. “Curly” Miller – District B Lee McLemore – District C Homer L. Ford – District D Frank O. Mancuso – District E Bill Elliott – At Large Position #1 Frank E. Mann – At Large Position #2 Johnny Goyen – At Large Position #3 Roy B. Oakes – Controller 1966 – 1967 Louie Welch – Mayor Robert S. (Bob) Webb – District A A. L. “Curly” Miller – District B Lee McLemore – District C Homer L.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Received Inventory—Nomination Form Date Entered Amoskeag Mfg
    r\ r- -i D >•' O 1 .-"^ 9 x1 n n 1 o NPS Form 10-900-a W1 i s'•••!•• v,: — ;' • « \.J5 ! . --.-—-.» . • X i-'- - rw .- i^ ' ^' Ur ^ <7"81) E)(P. I2/3I/84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory—Nomination Form date entered Amoskeag Mfg. Co. Housing Continuation sheet Thematic Group Nomination |tem number ^strict C page l______ DESCRIPTION District C includes nine blocks sited longitudinally north-south in two groups on a five acre site roughly bounded by Hollis Street, South Hampshire Lane, Bridge and Canal Streets. Blocks #40-43 represent a major departure from the plain Greek Revival exteriors of the earlier blocks found in Districts A and B. Built in 1881, each 196'xSA 1 brick block stands 3-1/2 stories high and contains four units defined on the exterior by projecting brick piers. The blocks are surmounted by hip roofs pierced by two hip roof dormers and corbeled chimneys at each unit. Though the slate roofs have been replaced with asbestos, the dormer walls are still clad in gray slate. Each unit has a centrally positioned Stick Style entry hood that shelters two paired entrances set within a flat arch. Two-over-two sash appears both singly and paired, capped by hood molds and resting on granite sills. Exterior walls are enriched by the use of contrasting black brick on hood molds and belt courses and by a stepped cornice finished with dentils. Rear two-story brick ells incorporate porches for each tenement.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimack Zoning Ordinance and Building Code and Are Hereby Incorporated by Reference
    ZONING ORDINANCE & BUILDING CODE TOWN OF MERRIMACK [Revised September 11, 2014] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 Purpose and Definitions 1-1 Section 2 Establishment of Districts 2-1 2.01.1 Industrial District Metes & Bounds 2-1 2.01.2 Limited Commercial District 2-5 2.01.3 General Commercial District 2-5 2.01.4 Residential District 2-5 2.01.5 Wetlands Conservation District 2-6 2.01.6 Flood Hazard Conservation District 2-6 2.01.7 Elderly Zoning District 2-6 2.01.8 Planned Residential District 2-6 2.01.9 Aquifer Conservation District 2-6 2.02 Permitted Uses - All Districts 2-7 2.02.1 Residential - Permitted Uses 2-8 2.02.2 Limited Commercial - Permitted Uses 2-11 2.02.3 General Commercial - Permitted Uses 2-12 2.02.4 I-1 & I-2 Industrial District - Permitted Uses 2-16 2.02.5 I-3 Industrial District - Permitted Uses 2-28 2.02.6 Sexually Oriented Businesses 2-29 2.02.7 Wetlands Conservation District - Permitted Uses 2-32 Wetlands Soil Types 2-33 2.02.8 Flood Hazard Conservation District-Permitted Uses 2-36 2.02.9 Elderly Zoning District - Permitted Uses 2-47 2.02.10 Planned Residential District - Permitted Uses 2-49 2.02.11 Aquifer Conservation District 2-50 2.02.12 Shoreland Protection District 2-54 2.02.13 Town Center Overlay District 2-55 Section 3 Lot and Yard Regulations 3-1 3.02 Table of Lot and Yard Regulations 3-1 3.02.1 Residential Land Use District 3-4 3.02.2 Soil Types to Sanitary Facilities 3-5 3.02.3 Boundaries 3-7 3.02.4 Location of On-Site Disposal Fields 3-7 3.02.5 Multiple Soil Districts Within Lots 3-7 3.02.6 Soil District
    [Show full text]
  • Local Historic Districts of New Hampshire with Their Historic District Commissions and Heritage Commissions
    PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY Local Historic Districts of New Hampshire With Their Historic District Commissions and Heritage Commissions Julia Ferrari, Nancy Garrison, Audra Klumb, and James Perkins Advised by: Elizabeth Muzzey 9/19/2012 The students in the Preservation Planning and Management course at Plymouth State University researched the locally designated historic districts, Historic District Commissions and Heritage Commissions of New Hampshire. The students used online research and direct communication with the towns of New Hampshire to find fifty‐six towns in New Hampshire have locally designated historic districts. The districts are of varying ages, sizes, and hold differing levels of protection. The districts are managed and governed by Historic District Commissions, Heritage Commissions, and other groups. Forward In New Hampshire, local historic districts range in size and character from large commercial and residential downtowns to riverfront brick industrial complexes and small clusters of public buildings in pristine 19th century village centers. The first districts, established in the 1960s, predate the current state legislation that enables their use as a preservation tool in New Hampshire. In 1983, state law declared that safeguarding a community’s heritage was a public purpose and that local historic districting offered a number of benefits, such as conserving property values, strengthening the local economy, fostering civic beauty and promoting the education and pleasure of residents (NH RSA 674:45). Local historic districts differ from other types of historical designations, such as listing on the National Register of Historic Places or the New Hampshire State Register of Historic Places. Although historical resources may be listed as districts on both of the registers, the listing is honorific, by either the National Park Service or the State of New Hampshire, and carries no regulatory oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Received Inventory Nomination Form Date Entered Amoskeag Mfg
    NPS Form 10-900-a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered Amoskeag Mfg. Co. Housing Continuation sheet Thematic Group Nomination Item number District B __ Page 1 DESCRIPTION District B encompasses an area of seventeen acres, roughly bounded by Canal, Mechanic, Franklin, and Pleasant Streets. Of the forty buildings in the district, thirty were erected by the Amoskeag Manufacturing Company, two are contributing buildings erected in the mid-20th century and eight are intrusions, half of which are small mid-20th century concrete structures. All but one of the Amoskeag-built structures are housing blocks, comprising seventeen tenement blocks and twelve overseers' blocks. The remaining structure, the Employment Office (#16) is described at the end of this section with other contributing buildings. Tenement Blocks Included within the district are seventeen tenement blocks; fourteen were erected between 1838 and 1850, two in 1855-56 and one in 1866. Despite the twenty-eight year span, a consistent approach to design, materials, scale and setting was maintained, creating a strong sense of continuity and harmony. The buildings generally date chronologically from north to south, except for #34-38 which were erected in the 1840s. The fourteen tenement blocks constructed between 1838 and 1850 (#8,9,10,11,12,13,17, 18,21,22,25,28,29,38) all followed the standard design for company housing established by the Boston Associates and employed by Amoskeag. Each is Greek Revival in style, interpreted in a conservative and restrained manner common to urban seacoast cities in New England.
    [Show full text]