DOCSLIB.ORG

Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual And Third WorldQuarterly, Vol21, No 5, pp 795 – 814, 2000 Governance,good governance and globalgovernance: conceptual and actualchallenges THOMASG WEISS ABSTRACT This article takes seriously the propositionthat ideas andconcepts, bothgood and bad, have an impacton international publicpolicy. It situates the emergenceof governance,good governance and global governance, as well as the UN’s role in the conceptualprocess. Although‘ governance’is as oldas humanhistory, this essay concentrates onthe intellectual debatesof the 1980s and1990 sbutexplores suchearlier UN-related ideas asdecolonisation,locali- sation andhuman rights, againstwhich more recent thinkinghas been played out.A central analytical perspective is the tension betweenmany academics and international practitioners whoemploy ‘ governance’to connotea complexset of structures andprocesses, bothpublic and private, while morepopular writers tendto use it synonymouslywith ‘government’. ‘Governance’is nowfashionable, but the conceptis as oldas humanhistory. 1 This essay concentrates onthe intellectual debates ofthe 1980sand1990 s, essentially since the term becamewidespread in developmentcircles and prominentin the international publicpolicy lexicon. Many academics and international practitioners employ‘ governance’to connotea complexset of structures andprocesses, bothpublic and private, while morepopular writers tendto use it synonymouslywith ‘government’. Governancefor the latter refers to characteristics that are generallyassociated with asystem ofnational administration. The New Webster’s International Dictionary denes the term in muchthe same wayas journalists fromthe New York Times or TheEconomist :‘act, manner,of ce, or power of governing; government’, ‘state ofbeing governed’ , or‘ methodof government or regu- lation’. As MortenBø aÊ s has shown,before being studied at the globallevel, governancewas employedgenerically in academic discourse. 2 It was, for instance, widelyused in relationship to business literature aboutthe micro- behaviourof rms. 3 GoranHyden has arguedthat it refers mainly to running governmentsand other public agencies orprivate oneswith social purposes. 4 Analysts ofinternational relations andinternational civil servants, in contrast, nowuse the term almost exclusively to describe phenomenathat gobeyond asynonymfor ‘ government’and the legal authoritywith whichsuch polities are vested.For instance, the Commission onGlobal Governance de nes ThomasG Weiss is atthePolitical Science Department,the CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue— Suite 5203,New York,NY10016-4309, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. ISSN0143-6597 print; 1360-2241 online/ 00/050795-20 Ó 2000 ThirdWorld Quarterly 795 THOMAS GWEISS ‘governance’as ‘the sum ofthe manyways individuals andinstitutions, public andprivate, manage their commonaffairs. It is the continuingprocess through whichcon icting ordiverse interests maybe accommodated and co-operative action maybe taken.’ 5 James Rosenauis the USacademic most closely associated with the term. Andfor him, whether at the grassroots orgloballevels, it ‘encompasses the activities ofgovernments, but it also includes the manyother channelsthrough which “ commands” owin the formof goals framed,direc- tives issued, andpolicies pursued’. 6 Somethingof an intellectual cottage industryhas arisen aroundthe term over the past twodecades. Since the early 1980s, ‘governance’and increasingly ‘good governance’have permeated development discourse andespecially research agendasand other activities fundedby public and private banksand bilateral donors.Moreover, publications byscholars andeminent commissions have extensively usedthe term forcontemporary global problem solving. 7 Theemergence of governance can be traced at the countrylevel to a disgruntlement with the state-dominated models ofeconomic and social developmentso prevalentthroughout the socialist blocand much of the Third Worldin the 1950s, 1960sand 1970 s. At the international level ‘global governance’can be traced to agrowingdissatisfaction amongstudents of international relations with the realist andliberal – institutionalist theories that dominatedthe studyof international organisationin the 1970sand1980 s. In particular, these failed to captureadequately the vast increase, in bothnumbers andin uence, of non-state actors andthe implications oftechnology in anage ofglobalisation. This article takes seriously the propositionthat ideas andconcepts, both good andbad, have an impact. Inpointing to the role ofpolicy and academic ‘scribblers’, JohnMaynard Keynes wrote in 1936that ‘the ideas ofeconomists andpolitical philosophers,both when they are right andwhen they are wrong, are morepowerful than is commonlyunderstood’ . 8 This essay thus seeks to correct the fact that ideas, whethereconomic or otherwise, have until recently beenignored by students ofinternational relations. 9 It situates the emergenceof governance,good governance and global governance, as well asthe role ofthe UnitedNations (UN),in the conceptualprocess. Governanceand good governance Theworld organisation was built onthe basis ofunquestioned national sovereignty.In spite ofarticle 2(7)of the UNCharter, sovereignty and non-interferencein the internal affairs ofstates havecome under re.As formerSecretary-General Boutros-Ghali wrote, ‘ Thetime ofabsolute and exclusive sovereignty,however, has passed’. 10 Sovereignty’s status and relevanceare contested increasingly within international organisations and forums.Moreover, the climate forgovernance has changedimmensely since the UN’s founding.Indeed, de nitions ofgovernance vary substantially, as is evidentfrom views ongovernance of various international organisations shownbelow. 796 GOVERNANCE, GOOD GOVERNANCE AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE World Bank.Governanceis dened as the mannerin whichpower is exercised in the managementof a country’s economicand social resources. TheWorld Bank has identied three distinct aspects ofgovernance: (i) the formof political regime; (ii) the process bywhich authority is exercised in the managementof a country’s economicand social resources fordevelop- ment; and(iii) the capacity ofgovernments to design,formulate, and implement policies anddischarge functions. 11 UNDP.Governanceis viewedas the exercise ofeconomic, political and administrative authorityto managea country’s affairs at all levels. It comprises mechanisms, processes andinstitutions throughwhich citizens andgroups articulate their interests, exercise their legal rights, meet their obligations andmediate their differences. 12 OECD.Theconcept of governance denotes the use ofpolitical authorityand exercise ofcontrol in asociety in relation to the managementof its resources forsocial andeconomic development. This broadde nition encompasses the role ofpublic authorities in establishing the environmentin whicheconomic operators function and in determiningthe distribution of benets as well as the natureof the relationship betweenthe ruler andthe ruled.13 Institute of Governance,Ottawa .Governancecomprises the institutions, processes andconventions in asociety whichdetermine howpower is exercised,how important decisions affecting society are madeand how variousinterests are accordeda place in suchdecisions. 14 Commissionon Global Governance .Governanceis the sum ofthe many waysindividuals andinstitutions, publicand private, manage their common affairs. It is acontinuingprocess throughwhich con icting ordiverse interests maybe accommodated and co-operative action maybe taken. It includes formal institutions andregimes empoweredto enforcecompliance, as well as informal arrangementsthat peopleand institutions either have agreedto orperceive to bein their interest. 15 UNSecretary-General KoAnnan .Goodgovernance is ensuringrespect for humanrights andthe rule oflaw; strengtheningdemocracy; promoting transparencyand capacity in publicadministration. 16 InternationalInstitute of Administrative Sciences .Governancerefers to the process wherebyelements in society wield powerand authority, and inuence and enact policies anddecisions concerningpublic life, and economicand social development.Governance is abroadernotion than government.Governance involves interaction betweenthese formal institu- tions andthose ofcivil society. 17 TokyoInstitute of Technology .Theconcept of governance refers to the complexset ofvalues, norms, processes andinstitutions bywhich society managesits developmentand resolves conict, formally andinformally. 797 THOMAS GWEISS Itinvolvesthe state, butalso the civil society (economicand social actors, community-basedinstitutions andunstructured groups, the media,etc) at the local, national,regional and global levels. 18 Theemphasis is onthe past twodecades, even though there is arich history ofsuch earlier UN-relatedideas as decolonisation,localisation andhuman rights, against whichmore recent thinkinghas beenplayed out. What is important to note hereis the dramatic quantitative andqualitative shiftin the political ambienceat the UNsince the late 1950sand early 1960s.During the ColdWar, governmental representatives ofnewly independent countries weresuccess fully onthe defensive within UNandrelated international fora; theyremained largely untouchedby the rich scholarly debateabout the ‘newpolitical economy’, 19 ‘social capital’, 20 and ‘publicgoods’ . 21 Theyinterpreted virtually anyserious scrutiny oftheir economic andsocial choices as athreat to their newbornand weak states. Andthey remainedimpervious to the international political economyliterature ofthe 1970s and1980s that emphasised publicchoice
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dan Calacci E15-384A MIT Media Lab 75 Amherst St
    Support for SB.1876 & H.2701: a crucial step in ensuring fair future governance in the commonwealth. 1 October, 2019 Dan Calacci E15-384a MIT Media Lab 75 Amherst St. Cambridge, MA 02139 Dear Senator Pacheco, Representative Gregoire, and members of the Committee: I’m writing in strong support of S.1876 and H.2701, An Act Establishing A Commission On Transparency And Use of Artificial Intelligence In Government Decision-Making and An Act Establishing A Commission On Automated Decision- Making, Artificial Intelligence, Transparency, Fairness, And Individual Rights. To shape the future of how we use artificial intelligence and other technologies in governance, we need to understand how they are being used in governing systems right now. This legislation will provide a desperately needed avenue for policymakers, researchers, and the public to understand how algorithms and artificial intelligence are impacting government decision-making and constituents. As a doctoral researcher studying data governance and machine learning at MIT, I have experience working with AI tools and reasoning about fairness and ethics in how they are used. My research experience includes developing cutting-edge machine learning systems, designing smartphone apps that use AI to better understand and prevent chronic disease, measuring segregation in cities using machine learning and big data, and writing about the ethics of collecting large amounts of data about citizen’s behavior, such as their location history, for use in governance. I have had the opportunity to present work on these topics at international conferences on machine learning, social science, and data ethics. My unique research experience has given me expertise on the implications of using algorithms in governance, including its promises and pitfalls, how data is collected from the public to fuel these algorithms, and how these algorithms function.
    [Show full text]
  • Can E-Government Help?
    Improving Governance and Services: Can e-Government Help? RFI Smith, Monash University, Australia Julian Teicher, Monash University, Australia Abstract: E-government can help improve governance and service delivery by refocusing consideration of the purposes and tools of government. However, E-government initiatives pose challenging questions of management, especially about coordination in government and the design of services for citizens. Progress towards implementing e-government raises critical questions about preferred styles of governance and about how governments relate to citizens. At present, interactions between citizens, the institutions of government and information and communications technology raise more agendas than governments can handle. However, trying to find ways through these agendas is to confront questions of wide interest to citizens. At the very least, e-government helps improve governance and services by asking questions. ince the late 1990s the prospect of using Information and Communication Such questions lead directly to a familiar S Technologies (ICTs) to improve effectiveness, dilemma: fairness and accountability in government has attracted widespread enthusiasm. However early hopes that e- How to capture the benefits of coordinated initiatives would bypass intractable questions of action and shared approaches while government organization and transform citizen maintaining individual agency responsibility experience of the delivery of public services have given and accountability for operations and results. way to more modest claims. (OECD 2003: 15) At the same time, thinking about how to use ICTs most effectively in government has generated Many governments have gone to great lengths widening questions about what governments should try to craft pluralist or decentralised strategies for to do and how they should do it.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Corporate Governance Laws & Regulations
    I N S I D E T H E M I N D S Understanding Corporate Governance Laws & Regulations Leading Lawyers on Corporate Compliance, Advising Boards of Directors, and Sarbanes-Oxley Requirements BOOK IDEA SUBMISSIONS If you are a C-Level executive or senior lawyer interested in submitting a book idea or manuscript to the Aspatore editorial board, please email [email protected]. Aspatore is especially looking for highly specific book ideas that would have a direct financial impact on behalf of a reader. Completed books can range from 20 to 2,000 pages – the topic and “need to read” aspect of the material are most important, not the length. Include your book idea, biography, and any additional pertinent information. ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS If you are a C-Level executive or senior lawyer interested in submitting an article idea (or content from an article previously written but never formally published), please email [email protected]. Aspatore is especially looking for highly specific articles that would be part of our Executive Reports series. Completed reports can range from 2 to 20 pages and are distributed as coil-bound reports to bookstores nationwide. Include your article idea, biography, and any additional information. GIVE A VIDEO LEADERSHIP SEMINAR If you are interested in giving a Video Leadership SeminarTM, please email the ReedLogic Speaker Board at [email protected] (a partner of Aspatore Books). If selected, ReedLogic would work with you to identify the topic, create interview questions and coordinate the filming of the interview. ReedLogic studios then professionally produce the video and turn it into a Video Leadership SeminarTM on your area of expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Good Governance?
    United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific What is Good Governance? Introduction institutes, religious leaders, finance institutions political parties, the military etc. The situation in urban areas is much more Recently the terms "governance" and "good complex. Figure 1 provides the governance" are being increasingly used in interconnections between actors involved in development literature. Bad governance is urban governance. At the national level, in being increasingly regarded as one of the addition to the above actors, media, root causes of all evil within our societies. lobbyists, international donors, multi-national Major donors and international financial corporations, etc. may play a role in decision- institutions are increasingly basing their aid making or in influencing the decision-making and loans on the condition that reforms that process. ensure "good governance" are undertaken. All actors other than government and the This article tries to explain, as simply as military are grouped together as part of the possible, what "governance" and "good "civil society." In some countries in addition to governance" means. the civil society, organized crime syndicates also influence decision-making, particularly in Governance urban areas and at the national level. Similarly formal government structures are The concept of "governance" is not new. It is one means by which decisions are arrived at as old as human civilization. Simply put and implemented. At the national level, "governance" means: the process of informal decision-making structures, such as decision-making and the process by "kitchen cabinets" or informal advisors may which decisions are implemented (or not exist. In urban areas, organized crime implemented).
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Poverty: Elites, Citizens and States
    The Politics of Poverty: Elites, Citizens and States Findings from ten years of DFID-funded research on Governance and Fragile States 2001–2010 A Synthesis Paper Acknowledgements This paper was written by DFID Research and Evidence Division Staff, with help and advice from Graeme Ramshaw of IDS and from the directors and staff of the four Re­ search centres. Disclaimer: This synthesis presents some key findings of DFID-funded research and the resulting policy recommendations of the researchers: it does not necessarily reflect DFID policy. Cover Photo: Justice and Peace Commissioners, Masisi, DR Congo. © Sarah MacGregor / DFID The Politics of Poverty: Elites, Citizens, and States EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary Evidence shows that in order to deliver sustainable international development we must be able to understand and work with its politics. Governance describes the way countries and societies manage their affairs politically and the way power and authority are exercised. For the poorest and most vulnerable, the difference that good, or particularly bad, governance, makes to their lives is profound: the inability of government institutions to prevent conflict, provide basic security, or basic services can have life-or-death consequences; lack of opportunity can prevent generations of poor families from lifting themselves out of poverty; and the inability to grow economically and collect taxes can keep countries trapped in a cycle of aid-dependency. Understanding governance, therefore, is central to achieving development and ending conflict. During the 1990s donors came to realise that development required better ‘governance’, and DFID recognised early on the need to work with the research community to identify ways of improving governance for better development outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Organization and Self-Governance Is Not One That Appears If We Look at the Level of Individual Components of a System
    Philosophy of the Social Sciences XX(X) 1 –25 Self-Organization and © The Author(s) 2010 Reprints and permission: http://www. Self-Governance sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0048393110363435 http://pos.sagepub.com J. T. Ismael1,2 Abstract The intuitive difference between a system that choreographs the motion of its parts in the service of goals of its own formulation and a system composed of a collection of parts doing their own thing without coordination has been shaken by now familiar examples of self-organization. There is a broad and growing presumption in parts of philosophy and across the sciences that the appearance of centralized information-processing and control in the service of system- wide goals is mere appearance, i.e., an explanatory heuristic we have evolved to predict behavior, but one that will eventually get swept away in the advancing tide of self-organization. I argue that there is a distinction of central importance here, and that no adequate science of complex systems can dispense with it. Keywords self-organization, self-governance, selves, dynamics, intentional systems theory, Dennett The Advancing Tide of Self-organization When we see behavior that looks coordinated and directed at an end, we tend to assume that there is a guide, that is, a central intelligence collecting infor- mation, formulating goals, and choreographing the movements of its parts. So, for example, armies are led by central command, cars are guided by drivers, countries are run by governments. But the intuitive difference between a system that choreographs the motion of its parts in the service of goals of its own Received 4 March 2009 1University of Sydney, Centre for Time, Sydney, Australia 2University of Arizona, Tucson, USA Corresponding Author: J.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Good Governance, Bad Governance
    RESEARCH ASSOCIATION for INTERDISCIPLINARY RMARA CH I 2021S STUDIES DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4640767 Good Governance, Bad Governance: The Politics of Coronavirus Pandemic in Nigeria Muyiwa Samuel Adedayo The Polytechnic, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper examines the influence of good governance on coronavirus pandemic in Nigeria. The kernel of this article is the intrinsic nexus between good governance, bad governance and coronavirus pandemic in a democratic state. It reviews articles on how democracy has influenced good governance and/or promotes bad governance. It examines the individual perspective and understanding of the virus, state of lockdown and the welfare of the populace by the political leaders; to what extent is the palliative being distributed among other welfare packages useful to the populace. The paper clearly explained the notion of good governance in the context of the Nigerian milieu and links it with how welfare of the citizens could assist in building their confidence. The paper provided evidence from around the world of the nexus between the three variables under examination and it shows that there is a yawning gap in trust and accountability between citizens and the government because the need of the populace has overtime been ignored and neglected by government. This is evident in that Nigeria is yet to comply with the inextricable indices of good governance due to lack of trust and committed leadership. The paper recommended amongst others that government and political leaders, as well as the institutions in the country, must strive to promote participatory, consensus-oriented, accountability, transparency, responsiveness, effectiveness and efficiency; equitable, inclusive and follows the rule of law to deliver good governance in Nigeria, and Africa in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntarism and Civil Society: Ethiopia in Comparative
    www.ssoar.info Voluntarism and civil society: Ethiopia in comparative perspective Hyden, Goran; Hailemariam, Mahlet Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Hyden, G., & Hailemariam, M. (2003). Voluntarism and civil society: Ethiopia in comparative perspective. Afrika Spectrum, 38(2), 215-234. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-107841 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de afrika spectrum 38 (2003) 2: 215-234 Goran Hyden Mahlet Hailemariam Voluntarism and civil society Ethiopia in Comparative Perspective1 Abstract This article examines the challenges to building a civil society based on strong voluntary associa- tions in Ethiopia, a country like most others in sub-Saharan Africa where neither the social struc- tures nor the institutional setting is congenial to the growth and sustenance of a civic tradition. Drawing on the practical experience of Oxfam-Canada’s work with voluntary associations in Ethiopia, this article
    [Show full text]
  • Global Technology Governance a Multistakeholder Approach
    White Paper Global Technology Governance A Multistakeholder Approach In collaboration with Thunderbird School of Global Management and Arizona State University October 2019 World Economic Forum 91-93 route de la Capite CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0)22 869 1212 Fax: +41 (0)22 786 2744 Email: [email protected] www.weforum.org This white paper has been published by the World Economic Forum as a contribution to a project, © 2019 World Economic Forum. All rights insight area or interaction. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are a re- reserved. No part of this publication may be sult of a collaborative process facilitated and endorsed by the World Economic Forum, but whose reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any results do not necessarily represent the views of the World Economic Forum, nor the entirety of its means, including photocopying and recording, or Members, Partners or other stakeholders. by any information storage and retrieval system. Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Part 1: What is governance and why is it necessary? 6 1.1 Definitions 7 1.2 Technology governance frameworks 8 1.3 The dynamics of emerging technology governance 10 An overview of agile governance 11 Part 2: Sketching the technology governance landscape 12 2.1 An overview of global technology governance in 2019 12 How do research scientists experience the governance of emerging technologies? 14 2.2 Priority cross-cutting issues in technology governance 14 2.2.1 Delivering privacy and security while enabling
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Indicators Can Make Sense: Under-Five Mortality Rates Are an Example Faculty Research Working Paper Series
    Governance Indicators Can Make Sense: Under-five Mortality Rates are an Example Faculty Research Working Paper Series Matt Andrews Harvard Kennedy School Roger Hay Jerrett Myers Institute for Government April 2010 RWP10-015 The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu GOVERNANCE INDICATORS CAN MAKE SENSE1 Under-five mortality rates are an example Matt Andrews,2 Roger Hay3 and Jerrett Myers4 ABSTRACT Governance indicators have come under fire in recent years, especially the World Governance Indicators (WGIs). Critics present these indicators as a-theoretical and biased. Critics of the critics counter that no better alternatives exist. We suggest otherwise, arguing that more appropriate ‘governance’ indicators will (i) have theoretical grounding, (ii) focus on specific fields of engagement, (iii) emphasize outcomes, and (iv) control for key contextual differences in comparing countries. Such measures can help indicate where countries seem to have governance problems, allowing second stage analyses of what these problems are. We present under national five mortality rates adjusted for country income groups as an example of such measure, presenting data for contextually controlled outcomes in this specific field to show where governance seems better and worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Corruption and Governance
    Political Corruption and Governance Series Editors Dan Hough University of Sussex Brighton, UK Paul M. Heywood University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK This series aims to analyse the nature and scope of, as well as possible remedies for, political corruption. The rise to prominence over the last 20 years of corruption-related problems and of the ‘good governance’ agenda as the principal means to tackle them has led to the develop- ment of a plethora of (national and international) policy proposals, inter- national agreements and anti-corruption programmes and initiatives. National governments, international organisations and NGOs all now claim to take very seriously the need to tackle issues of corruption. It is thus unsurprising that over couple of decades, a signifcant body of work with a wide and varied focus has been published in academic journals and in international discussion papers. This series seeks to provide a forum through which to address this growing body of literature. It invites not just in-depth single country analyses of corruption and attempts to com- bat it, but also comparative studies that explore the experiences of dif- ferent states (or regions) in dealing with different types of corruption. We also invite monographs that take an overtly thematic focus, analysing trends and developments in one type of corruption across either time or space, as well as theoretically informed analysis of discrete events. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14545 Richard Rose · Caryn Peiffer Bad
    [Show full text]
  • Good Governance: the Inflation of an Idea Faculty Research Working Paper Series
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea Faculty Research Working Paper Series Merilee Grindle Harvard Kennedy School June 2010 RWP10-023 The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea Merilee Grindle Harvard University May 2008 Good governance is a good idea. We would all be better off, and citizens of many developing countries would be much better off, if public life were conducted within institutions that were fair, judicious, transparent, accountable, participatory, responsive, well-managed, and efficient. For the millions of people throughout the world who live in conditions of public insecurity and instability, corruption, abuse of law, public service failure, poverty, and inequality, good governance is a mighty beacon of what ought to be. Due to this intuitive appeal, good governance has grown rapidly to become a major ingredient in analyses of what’s missing in countries struggling for economic and political development. Researchers have adopted the concept as a way of exploring institutional failure and constraints on growth.
    [Show full text]