DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents 1 Coastal & Environmental Services TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................5 2. THE GREATER ADDO ELEPHANT NATIONAL PARK PROPOSAL ................7 2.1 What is the greater addo elephant national park? .............................................7 2.2 Rationale behind the creation of the gAENP ................................................... 10 2.2.1 Terrestrial environment................................................................................ 10 2.2.2 Freshwater environment.............................................................................. 12 2.2.3 Marine environment...................................................................................... 12 2.2.4 Socio-economic and eco-tourism............................................................... 13 2.3 The mission and objectives of the park ............................................................ 14 2.4 Support base for the gaenp ................................................................................ 14 2.4.1 Government................................................................................................... 14 2.4.2 Financial support .......................................................................................... 15 2.4.3 Public.............................................................................................................. 15 2.5 What guarantees are there that the interests of third parties will be considered? .......................................................................................................... 16 3. THE GREATER ADDO ELEPHANT NATIONAL PARK STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT...................................................................... 19 3.1 What is an SEA? .................................................................................................. 19 3.2 How was this sea undertaken? .......................................................................... 20 3.3 Who was involved in the sea?............................................................................ 22 3.4 What were the Goals and objectives of specific tasks?................................. 23 3.5 How was the Public involved?............................................................................ 25 3.5.1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 25 3.5.2 Approach to public participation................................................................. 25 3.6 What are the Constraints and limitations of an SEA? .................................... 27 3.7 What are the major information gaps?.............................................................. 28 3.7.1 Information gaps limiting the SEA.............................................................. 29 3.7.2 Information gaps to be instigated at the implementation phase ........... 30 4. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................... 31 4.1 What is conservation planning?......................................................................... 31 4.2 How biodiverse is the planning domain? .......................................................... 31 4.2.1 terrestrial environment ................................................................................. 31 4.2.2 Freshwater Environment ............................................................................. 34 4.2.3 Marine Environment ..................................................................................... 36 4.3 What Ecological processes will be conserved?............................................... 39 4.3.1 Terrestrial processes.................................................................................... 39 4.3.2 Freshwater processes.................................................................................. 41 4.3.3 Marine processes ......................................................................................... 42 4.4 What are the limitations to biodiversity conservation in the planning domain?................................................................................................................. 44 4.4.1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 44 4.4.2 Terrestrial environment................................................................................ 44 4.4.3 Freshwater environment.............................................................................. 44 4.4.4 Marine environment...................................................................................... 45 4.5 What are the conservation targets for the gAENP?........................................ 46 4.6 What are the opportunities and constraints presented by the natural environment for gAENP?.................................................................................... 48 The gAENP Strategic Environmental Assessment: FINAL 1 Coastal & Environmental Services 4.6.1 Opportunities................................................................................................. 48 4.6.2 Constraints..................................................................................................... 51 4.7 Conservation planning outputs........................................................................... 52 5. THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT......................................................... 59 5.1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 59 5.2 The social environment of the planning domain.............................................. 59 5.2.1 Demographics............................................................................................... 59 5.2.2 Local communities........................................................................................ 60 5.3 What are the major Economic activities in the Eastern Cape and planning domain?................................................................................................................. 62 5.3.1 Economic activities in the Eastern Cape .................................................. 62 5.3.2 Economic activities in the planning domain............................................. 64 5.4 Summary................................................................................................................ 67 5.5 What opportunities and constraints does the socio-economic environment present?................................................................................................................. 67 5.5.1 Opportunities................................................................................................. 68 5.5.2 Optimising opportunities.............................................................................. 69 5.5.3 Constraints..................................................................................................... 70 5.5.4 Measures to mitigate constraints ............................................................... 70 6. THE FINANCIAL VIABIL ITY OF THE GAENP .................................................... 75 6.1 Is the proposed gAENP financiallly viable? ..................................................... 75 6.1.1 Land ................................................................................................................ 75 6.1.2 Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 76 6.1.3 Roads ............................................................................................................. 76 6.1.4 Building and other infrastructure ................................................................ 76 6.1.5 Equipment...................................................................................................... 76 6.1.6 Game.............................................................................................................. 76 6.1.7 Operating costs............................................................................................. 77 6.1.8 Conclusion..................................................................................................... 77 6.2 What income can be expected from the park?................................................ 77 6.2.1 Income............................................................................................................ 77 6.3 What is the tourism potential? ............................................................................ 80 6.3.1 Established eco-tourism in the planning domain..................................... 80 6.3.2 the economics and sustainability of eco-tourism/ conservation as a form of land use......................................................................................... 83 6.4 what are the opportunities and constraints presented by tourism?.............. 84 6.4.1 Opportunities................................................................................................. 85 6.4.2 Constraints..................................................................................................... 87 6.4.3 Mitigation measures ..................................................................................... 87 7. THE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT ....................................... 89 7.1 What is the legal framework for developing the gAENP?.............................. 89 7.2 What is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of the Subtropical Transitional Thicket in the Eastern Cape, Based on Syntaxonomic and Structural Attributes
    S. Afr. J. Bot., 1987, 53(5): 329 - 340 329 A classification of the subtropical transitional thicket in the eastern Cape, based on syntaxonomic and structural attributes D.A. Everard Department of Plant Sciences, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140 Republic of South Africa Accepted 11 June 1987 Subtropical transitional thicket, traditionally known as valley bushveld, covers a significant proportion of the eastern Cape. This paper attempts to classify the subtropical transitional thicket into syntaxonomic and structural units and relate it to other thicket types on a continental basis. Twelve sites along a rainfall gradient were sampled for floristic and structural attributes. The floristic data were classified using TWINSPAN. Results indicate that the class subtropical transitional thicket has at least two orders of vegetation, namely kaffrarian thicket and kaffrarian succulent thicket. Two forms of thicket were recognized for both these orders viz. mesic kaffrarian thicket and xeric kaffrarian thicket for the kaffrarian thicket and mesic succulent thicket and xeric succulent thicket for the kaffrarian succulent thicket. Ordination of site data by DECORANA grouped sites according to these vegetation categories and in a sequence along axis 1 to which the rainfall gradient can be clearly related. Variation within the mesic kaffrarian thicket was however greater than between some of the other thicket types, indicating that more data are required before these forms of thicket can be formalized. Composition, endemism, diversity and the environmental controls on the distribution of the thicket types are discussed. 'n Aansienlike gedeelte van die Oos-Kaap word beslaan deur subtropiese oorgangsruigte, wat tradisioneel as valleibosveld bekend is. Hierdie studie is 'n poging om subtropiese oorgangsruigte in sintaksonomiese en strukturele eenhede te klassifiseer en dit op 'n kontinentale basis in verband met ander ruigtetipes te bring.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Trends of Seabirds Breeding in South Africa's Eastern Cape and the Possible Influence of Anthropogenic and Environ
    Crawford et al.: Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa 159 POPULATION TRENDS OF SEABIRDS BREEDING IN SOUTH AFRICA’S EASTERN CAPE AND THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF ANTHROPOGENIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ROBERT J.M. CRAWFORD,1,2 PHILIP A. WHITTINGTON,3,4 A. PAUL MARTIN,5 ANTHONY J. TREE4,6 & AZWIANEWI B. MAKHADO1 1Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Marine and Coastal Management, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay, 8012, South Africa ([email protected]) 2Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa 3East London Museum, PO Box 11021, Southernwood, 5213, South Africa 4Department of Zoology, PO Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa 5PO Box 61029, Bluewater Bay, 6212, South Africa 6PO Box 211, Bathurst, 6166, South Africa Received 28 August 2008, accepted 4 April 2009 SUMMARY CRAWFORD, R.J.M., WHITTINGTON, P.A., MARTIN, A.P., TREE, A.J. & MAKHADO, A.B. 2009. Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa’s Eastern Cape and the possible influence of anthropogenic and environmental change. Marine Ornithology 37: 159–174. Eleven species of seabird breed in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province. Numbers of African Penguin Spheniscus demersus and Cape Gannet Morus capensis in the province increased in the 20th century, but penguins decreased in the early 21st century. A recent eastward displacement of Sardine Sardinops sagax off South Africa increased the availability of this food source to gannets but did not benefit penguins, which have a shorter foraging range. Fishing and harbour developments may have influenced the recent decrease of penguins.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third War of Dispossession and Resistance in the Cape of Good Hope Colony, 1799–1803
    54 “THE WAR TOOK ITS ORIGINS IN A MISTAKE”: THE THIRD WAR OF DISPOSSESSION AND RESISTANCE IN THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE COLONY, 1799–1803 Denver Webb, University of Fort Hare1 Abstract The early colonial wars on the Cape Colony’s eastern borderlands and western Xhosaland, such as the 1799–1803 war, have not received as much attention from military historians as the later wars. This is unexpected since this lengthy conflict was the first time the British army fought indigenous people in southern Africa. This article revisits the 1799–1803 war, examines the surprisingly fluid and convoluted alignments of participants on either side, and analyses how the British became embroiled in a conflict for which they were unprepared and for which they had little appetite. It explores the micro narrative of why the British shifted from military action against rebellious Boers to fighting the Khoikhoi and Xhosa. It argues that in 1799, the British stumbled into war through a miscalculation – a mistake which was to have far-reaching consequences on the Cape’s eastern frontier and in western Xhosaland for over a century. Introduction The eighteenth- and nineteenth-century colonial wars on the Cape Colony’s eastern borderlands and western Xhosaland (emaXhoseni) have received considerable attention from historians. For reasons mostly relating to the availability of source material, the later wars are better known than the earlier ones. Thus the War of Hintsa (1834–35), the War of the Axe (1846–47), the War of Mlanjeni (1850–53) and the War of Ngcayecibi (1877–78) have received far more coverage by contemporaries and subsequently by historians than the eighteenth-century conflicts.2 The first detailed examination of Scientia Militaria, South African the 1799–1803 conflict, commonly known as Journal of Military Studies, Vol the Third Frontier War or third Cape–Xhosa 42, Nr 2, 2014, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Sundays River Valley the Place in Between
    SUNDAYS RIVER VALLEY THE PLACE IN BETWEEN Somewhere in-between the Northern production areas and the aptly named Citrusdal, lies an area that is somehow often overlooked in spite of the very significant contribution it makes to the South African citrus industry. erhaps it is because its people are quietly going about the area and was inspired by a vision of the Sundays River Val- their business without feeling the need to assert them- ley as an organised irrigation scheme. He set out to achieve this P selves, or perhaps it is simply because it has been a long but things did not go his way and when he died in 1889 he was time since the Eastern Cape has produced a competitive rug- financially and spiritually broken. by team! Whatever the reason for its sometimes obscure iden- The first irrigation infrastructure in the Sundays River tity, the numbers speak for themselves. The following table was completed in the Kirkwood area in 1913 and could irri- illustrates the SRV’s contribution to the 2007 season’s national gate ca. 3 500 ha. In 1906 the Addo Land and Irrigation Co. crop: was formed in the lower end of the Valley by Messrs. Hume and Babcock. Mr. Babcock was the first person to start planting Product S.R. Valley National Crop % citrus in commercial quantities in 1908. He was also the first exporter of citrus fruit to England. In the 1920’s the Addo area Grapefruit 285,391 14,308,033 2% Lemons 4,011,775 7,349,753 55% benefitted from an initiative of Sir Percy Fitzpatrick’s aimed Navels 5,000,000 18,700,000 27% at attracting retired British soldiers to the area after the First Valencias 6,095,026 43,554,707 14% World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Labeo Capensis (Orange River Mudfish) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Orange River Mudfish (Labeo capensis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 2014 Revised, May and July 2019 Web Version, 9/19/2019 Image: G. A. Boulenger. Public domain. Available: https://archive.org/stream/catalogueoffres01brit/catalogueoffres01brit. (July 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Africa: within the drainage basin of the Orange-Vaal River system [located in Lesotho, Namibia, and South Africa] to which it is possibly restricted. Hitherto thought to occur in the Limpopo system and in southern Cape watersheds [South Africa] which records may be erroneous.” From Barkhuizen et al. (2017): “Native: Lesotho; Namibia; South Africa (Eastern Cape Province - Introduced, Free State, Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Northern Cape Province, North-West Province)” 1 Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. There is no indication that this species is in trade in the United States. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. Remarks A previous version of this ERSS was published in 2014. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2019): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Labeo Species Labeo capensis (Smith, 1841)” From Fricke et al. (2019): “Current status: Valid as Labeo capensis (Smith 1841). Cyprinidae: Labeoninae.” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Max length : 50.0 cm FL male/unsexed; [de Moor and Bruton 1988]; common length : 45.0 cm FL male/unsexed; [Lévêque and Daget 1984]; max.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish to Sundays ISP, February 2005
    Fish to Sundays Internal Strategic Perspective CHAPTER 2 - OVERVIEW OF THE ISP AREA 2.1 INTRODUCTION This ISP area has very little water of its own and the underlying geology also results in much of this being of very poor quality. The Kat and Koonap rivers, and to a lesser extent the Tarka River, are the only tributaries with significant own resources. The Orange-Fish-Sundays scheme, implemented in the 1970s, moves over 600 million m3 of water each year out of the Orange River Basin, primarily for irrigation in the Fish and Sundays catchments but with water going as far as Port Elizabeth. The hydrology, water balance and economy of the Fish-Sundays system are completely dominated by this imported water. A further allocation of 38 million m3 of water for the irrigation of an additional 4 000 ha of land by resource-poor farmers has been added to the region, but this allocation must still be implemented (26). There are very significant losses through the transfer of water through the system, and saline return flows pose a serious problem for downstream users. Our knowledge of these losses, and the necessary releases and compensations that must be made, is poor, and is further complicated by the variable natural yield of the Fish and Sundays systems. Very significant work is required to improve our knowledge if this system is to be efficiently managed. Areas removed from the main rivers are mainly supplied from groundwater. 2.2 PHYSICAL FEATURES 2.2.1 Locality For practical reasons the Fish to Tsitsikamma WMA was divided into two ISP areas, the Fish to Sundays area, which is the subject of this report, and the Tsitsikamma to Coega area which is covered in DWAF report P WMA 15/000/00/0304.
    [Show full text]
  • Bleisure Tourism South Africa
    1 Bleisure Tourism South Africa The Global Travel and Tourism Partnership Research Competition 2017 2 CONTENT 1. Acknowledgements P. 3 2. Case study authors P. 4 3. South Africa P. 5 4. Eastern Cape P. 6 5. Sundays River Valley/ Greater Addo P. 9 6. Case Study: Bleisure Tourism in the Sundays River Valley 6.1 Introduction P. 11 6.2 The profile of business travellers in the P. 12 Sundays River Valley: 6.2.1 Citrus-related P. 12 6.2.2 Trophy Hunting- related P. 13 6.3 Arrive as business travellers but leave as holiday makers P. 15 6.4 Opportunities available: 6.4.1 Accommodation P. 16 6.4.2 Transport P. 16 6.4.3 Activities P. 17 6.4.4 Technology P. 21 6.4.5 Marketing P. 22 6.5 The benefits of Bleisure Tourism for our area – now and in the future P. 22 6.6 Recommendations P. 23 6.7 Conclusion P. 23 7. List of resources P. 24 8. Appendix: Teachers’ Guide P. 25 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This case study on Bleisure Tourism in the Sundays River Valley was developed by Miké Hechter and Yandré Tibshraeny from Kirkwood High School in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. It won the 2017 Global Travel & Tourism (GTTP) Research Award in South Africa. The authors would like to thank GTTP and its sponsors for this unique opportunity and experience. A special word of gratitude to Mrs Elsabé Engelbrecht from GTTPSA for all her support and encouragement. They would also like to thank the following: GTTPSA Addo Tourism Kirkwood Wildsfees African Wildlife Kronenhof Guest House Africanos Country Estate Kududu Guest House Anneke Binneman Mayogi Safaris Blaauwkrantz Safaris Sitrusoewer River Camp Bosnes Safaris Sonsitrus Daniell Cheetah Breeding Project Sunvalley Transport Hitgeheim Country Lodge & Eco Reserve Tweeeling Kwekery Hoërskool Kirkwood Ondersteunersklub Tweeling Plaaskombuis KG Properties Umlilo Safaris Kirkwood Round Table Unifrutti 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Addo Elephant National Park – Geology
    Addo Elephant National Park – Geology Introduction Before we start, one must remember that we live on a dynamic planet, which is permanently changing and evolving. The earth has a radius of about 6 300km and is covered by a 40km thick crust. The surface crust is continuously being driven by convection currents in the underlying mantle. This causes the crustal plates (continents and oceans) to move relative to each other, a process called “continental drift”. Crustal plates can drift (float) from the warmer tropics to the colder pole regions, all the time changing the way in which a landscape evolves. The combination of earth processes and climatic conditions has a significant impact on the final landscape appearance. The oldest rocks – Peninsula formation quartzitic sandstone The easiest way to describe the geological evolution of the Park is to start with the oldest rocks and work our way towards the present. Our story begins when Africa was joined to a number of other continents to form a super continent called “Pangea”. We (South Africa) were stuck in the middle of this land mass and our landscape was, therefore, very different to what one sees today. The oldest rocks encountered in the Park occur as small islands in Algoa Bay. The Bird Island complex comprises Black Rock, Stag, Seal and Bird Islands and occurs about 10 km south of the Woody Cape cliffs. These rocky islands are made up of quartzitic sandstone of the Peninsula Formation, which forms part of the Table Mountain Group, which in turn forms part of the Cape Supergroup.
    [Show full text]
  • White Settlement and Irrigation Schemes: CF Rigg and the Founding of Bonnievale in the Breede River Valley, 1900-C.19531
    CF Rigg and the founding of Bonnievale in the Breede River Valley White settlement and irrigation schemes: CF Rigg and the founding of Bonnievale in the Breede River Valley, 1900-c.19531 Wessel Visser University of Stellenbosch, South Africa [email protected] Abstract The idea to initiate irrigation development as part of a white colonisation scheme and a political movement to settle Britons on land in South Africa dates back to the culmination of British imperialism in the late nineteenth century. Such schemes were envisaged by imperialists such as Cecil Rhodes, Thomas Smartt and Percy Fitzpatrick and became more viable with the promulgation of the Cape Colony’s Irrigation Act of 1893 which extended the facility of government loan funds to private individuals. In 1900 a Scottish immigrant, CF Rigg, obtained land on the Breede River in the Western Cape which was divided after a survey into irrigation plots for private purchase. Thus, Rigg began one of the first private real estate schemes in South Africa. Apart from a number of poor white Afrikaner ostrich farmers, who left the drought- stricken Oudtshoorn district in search of better agricultural conditions by purchasing plots from Rigg, he also targeted British World War One veterans. Rigg compiled an elaborate and professional recruitment brochure which included detailed information on aspects such as soil conditions, climatology and geographical features, agricultural possibilities, transport facilities and shipping fares from Britain to South Africa. This article explores the historical development of Rigg’s irrigation settlement and infrastructural development such as the construction of a weir and canal system (which included the drilling and blasting of an irrigation tunnel) under the guise of white colonisation and settlement in the age of empire in early twentieth century South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Research Commission Working Group for Mineralization
    Water Research Commission Working Group for Mineralization SUMMARY REPORT CA. BUCKLEY f?eoT Dept cf Dub i:: 62'1 SA Tel: 0314i3L20 Fax: O1-161I1$ STUDIES OF MINERALIZATION IN THE GREAT FISH AND SUNDAYS RIVERS OOO4DD Pretoha April 1985 C.A. BUCKLEY Asaociate R xch Profeaaor Dept of C'emicxl Engneolng UNIVER51TY OF N;TAL Duoban 4001 Teltx: 621 31 SA Tel: 031-8163120 Fax: 031 161118 Water Research Commission Working Group for Mineralization SUMMARY REPORT STUDIES OF MINERALIZATION IN THE GREAT FISH AND SUNDAYS RIVERS Edited by Garth C.HaIl formerly of the National Institute for Water Research Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Pretoria April 1985 FOREWORD Over the past twenty to thirty years the salinity of a number of South African rivers has increased so significantly as to present serious problems to various users of the waters. Along the Witwatersrand and on the coal fields of the Eastern Transvaal and parts of Northern Natal saline discharges from both point and diffuse sources, usually associated with mining and industrial activity, have been largely responsible for these increases in salinity, but mineralization (salinization) from natural non-point sources has also played a deleterious role in rivers draining certain semi-arid catchment areas. Among the latter rivers are the Berg, Breg and Olifants of the Western Cape and the Fish, Sundays, Bushmans and Kowie of the Eastern Cape Province. The significance of the effects of non-point mineralization is illustrated by the serious damage to apricot orchards in the Golden Valley area of the Great Fish River during the sixties and the relatively recent deleterious effects of high chloride concentrations on citrus crops in the Klrkwood area of the Sundays River.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment (Aia) For
    0 A PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (AIA) FOR THE PROPOSED POWER LINE ALTERNATIVES FOR THE SCARLET IBIS WIND ENERGY FACILITY (WEF), NEAR PORT ELIZABETH, NELSON MANDELA METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY (NMMM), EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE. Prepared for: EOH Coastal & Environmental Services 67 African Street Grahamstown Eastern Cape South Africa Tel: +27 (46) 622 2364 Fax: +27 (46) 622 6564 Contact person: Ms Caroline Evans Email: [email protected] Compiled by: Ms Celeste Booth t/a Booth Heritage Consulting 5 Queens Terrace 12 Chapel Street Grahamstown 6139 Tel: 082 062 4655 Email: [email protected] Contact person: Ms Celeste Booth Date: September 2017 1 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3. 1.1. Purpose of the Study 3. 1.2. Brief Summary of Findings 3. 1.3. Recommendations 4. 1.4. Declaration of Independence and Qualifications 5. 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5. 2.1. Applicant 6. 2.2. Consultant 6. 2.3. Terms of Reference 6. 3. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 6. 3.1. Early Stone Age (ESA) - 1.5 million to 250 000 years ago 7. 3.2. Middle Stone Age (MSA) – 250 000 – 30 000 years ago 8. 3.3. Later Stone Age (LSA) – 30 000 years ago – recent (100 years ago) 9. 3.4. Last 2 000 years – Khoekhoen Pastoralism 11. 3.5. Last 2 000 Years - The Iron Age 12. 3.6. Human Remains 12. 3.7. Rock Art (Paintings and Engravings) 13. 3.8. Historical Background 13. 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY 15. 4.1. Location data 15. 4.2. Map 15. 5. ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION 20. 5.1. Methodology 20. 5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTAGU's ROADS to CAPITALISM: the DISTRIBUTION of LANDED PROPERTY in the CAPE COLONY, 1845 Robert Ross
    MONTAGU'S ROADS TO CAPITALISM: THE DISTRIBUTION OF LANDED PROPERTY IN THE CAPE COLONY, 1845 Robert Ross The gentry of the Cape Colony were able to maintain their domination over the countryside of the colony as a result of their control over both labour and land. Until 1834 the former was guaranteed, in part though not totally, by the institution of slavery and by the quasi-legal methods used to retain many of the nominally free in bondage. After 1834 (or, to be more precise, after 1838, with the ending of the period of "apprenticeship" during which the: ex- slaves were required to work for their former owners) many of the informal means of control were maintained. Equally important, though, was the near-monopoly which the farmers were able to maintain over the land of the colony. This allowed them largely to exclude the labourers from independent access to ground on which they could grow their own food, or keep their own stock, so that they had no option but to work for the farmers, for much of the year at least. The mission stations could provide accommodation for the families of some of the workers - and, as in the United States, emancipation allowed the partial withdrawal of women and children from the agricultural labour force - but were never large enough to allow anything like full subsistence to their residents. Thus only a few areas of mountain slope and semi-desert were outside the supervision of the farming community, and these areas, though still registered as crown land, were under continual attack from the farmers, as much to give them control over their unruly inhabitants as to engross the land for their farming operations.
    [Show full text]