DOCSLIB.ORG

AUTOMORPHIC FORMS on GL This Is an Introductory Course to Modular

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AUTOMORPHIC FORMS on GL This Is an Introductory Course to Modular AUTOMORPHIC FORMS ON GL2 This is an introductory course to modular forms, automorphic forms and automorphic representations. (1) Modular forms (2) Representations of GL2(R) (3) Automorphic forms on GL2(R) (4) Ad`elesand id`eles (5) Representations of GL2(Qp) (6) Automorphic representations of GL2(A) This is a set of notes for my class "Automorphic forms on GL(2)" in the University of Chicago, Spring 2011. There is obviously no originality in the content and presentation of this very classical materials. 1. Modular forms As usual in representation theory, the letter G is overused . In each chapter, G will denote a different group. In this chapter G = SL2(R), K = SO2(R), H = G=H is the upper half- ¯ plane, D is the open unit disc. Γ will denote a discrete subgroup of SL2(R), Γ its image in ¯ PGL2(R). In particular, Γ(1) = SL2(Z) and Γ(1) is its image in PGL2(R). 1.1. Geometry of the upper half-plane. The points of projective line are one-dimensional subspaces of a given two-dimensional vector space. The group GL2 of linear transformations of that two-dimensional vector space thus acts on the corresponding projective line. The action of a 2 × 2-matrix is given the formula of homographic transformation a b az + b (1.1.1) z = c d cz + d if z denotes the standard coordinate of P1. This formula is valid for any coefficients fields. 1 1 In particular, GL2(R) acts on P (R) and GL2(C) acts compatibly on P (C). It follows that GL2(R) acts on the complement of the real projective line inside the complex projective line 1 1 − P (C) − P (R) = H [ H where H (resp. H−) is the half-plane of complex number with positive (resp. negative) + imaginary part. Let GL2 (R) denote the subgroup of GL2(R) of matrices with positive determinant; it is also the neutral component of GL2(R) with respect to the real topology. + 1 1 − Since GL2 (R) is connected, its action on P (C) − P (R) preserves H and H . Of course, the above assertion is a consequence of the formula az + b ad − bc (1.1.2) = = =(z): cz + d jcz + dj2 1 which derives from a rather straightforward calculation az + b (az + b)(cz¯ + d) = cz + d jcz + dj2 bd + aczz¯ + bc(z +z ¯) + (ad − bc)z = jcz + dj2: This equation becomes even simpler when we restrict to the subgroup SL2(R) of real coefficients matrix with determinant one az + b =(z) (1.1.3) = = : cz + d jcz + dj2 From now on in this chapter, we will set G = SL2(R). Lemma 1.1.1. The group G acts simply transitively on the upper half-plane H. The isotropy group of the point i 2 H is the subgroup K = SO2(R) of rotations : cos θ sin θ (1.1.4) k = θ − sin θ cos θ Proof. The equation ai + b = i ci + d implies that a = d, b = −c in which case the determinant condition ad − bc = 1 becomes a2 + b2 = 1. Thus the matrix is of the form (1.1.4). Let z = x + iy with x 2 R and y 2 R+. It is enough to prove that there exists a; b; c; d 2 R with ad − bc = 1 such that ai + b = z: ci + d We set c = 0. We check immediately that the system of equations ad = 1, a = yd, b = xd has real solutions with d = y−1=2, a = y1=2 and b = xy−1=2. We observe that this calculation shows in fact G = BK where B is the subgroup of G consisting of upper triangular matrices. This is a particular instance of the Iwasawa decomposition. Lemma 1.1.2. The metric dx2 + dy2 (1.1.5) ds2 = y2 on H, as well as the density µ = dxdy=y2 is invariant under the action of G. a b Proof. With the notations γ = and z0 = γz, we have c d (ad − bc) (1.1.6) dz0 = dz: (cz + d)2 This calculation has the following concrete meaning. The smooth application g : H ! 0 H maps z 7! z . It induces linear application on tangent spaces TzH ! Tz0 H and its ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ dual linear application Tz0 H ! TzH. The cotangent space Tz0 H (resp. TzH) is a one- dimensional C-vector space generated by dz0 (resp. dz). The linear application sends dz on ((ad − bc)=(cz + d)2)dz. 2 2 2 The element dz induces the canonical quadratic form dx + dy on TzH viewed as 2- 02 02 dimensional real vector space. Similarly, we have the quadratic form dx + dy on Tz0 H. The equation (1.1.6) implies that (cz + d)2 dx02 + dy02 = (dx2 + dy2): jcz + dj4 It follows that the metric ds2 = (dx2 + dy2)=y2 is invariant under G, according to (1.1.2). 2 The same argument applies to the density µ = dxdy=y . Lemma 1.1.3. The Cayley transform 1 −i z − i (1.1.7) z 7! cz = z = : 1 i z + i maps isomorphically H onto the unit disk D = fz 2 C j jzj < 1g. The inverse transformation is 1 1 1 i(1 + w) (1.1.8) w 7! c−1w = w = : 2 i −i 1 − w The metric ds2 = (dx2 + dy2)=y2 on H transports on the metric 4(du2 + dv2) (1.1.9) d s2 = D (1 − jwj2)2 where w = u + iv. We also have 4dudv (1.1.10) dxdy=y2 = : (1 − jwj2)2 Proof. See [5, Lemma 1.1.2] Since c and c−1 are inverse functions of each other, it is enough to check that c(H) ⊂ D and c−1(D) ⊂ H. For every z 2 H, we have jz − ij < jz + ij so that jc(z)j < 1. It follows that c(H) ⊂ D. For every w 2 D, the straightforward calculation i(1 + w) −2=(w) + i(1 − jwj2) (1.1.11) = 1 − w j1 − wj2 shows 1 − jwj2 (1.1.12) y = > 0: j1 − wj2 if z = c−1w and y = =(z). It follows that c−1(D) ⊂ H. By using the chain rule we have 2idw dz = : (1 − w)2 If we write w = u + iv in cartesian coordinates, then we have 4(du2 + dv2) dx2 + dy2 = : j1 − wj4 It follows that dx2 + dy2 4(du2 + dv2) = : y2 (1 − jwj2)2 The same calculation proves the expression of the measure on the disc (1.1.10). 3 Lemma 1.1.4. Any two points of H are joined by a unique geodesic which is a part of a circle orthogonal to the real axis or a line orthogonal to the real axis. Proof. See [5, Lemma 1.4.1]. Instead of H we consider the unit disc. We assume that the first point is 0 and the second point is a positive real number a < 1. Let φ : [0; 1] ! D with φ(t) = (x(t); y(t)) denote a parametrized joining 0 = (x(0); y(0)) and a = (x(1); y(1)). Its length is Z 1 2(1 − jφ(t)j2)−1p(dx(t)=dt)2 + (dy(t)=dt)2dt 0 that is at least Z 1 Z a 2 −1 2dt 2(1 − x(t) ) jdx(t)=dtjdt = 2 0 0 (1 − t ) The shortest curve joining 0 and a is thus a part of a radius in the unit disc. For every two points x0; x1, there is g 2 SL2(R) that maps H on D, cg(x0) = 0 and cg(x1) = a where a is a positive real number satisfying a < 1. Here c : H ! D is the Cayley transform. The geodesic joining x0 with x1 is a part of the preimage of the radius from 0 to a. That preimage is necessarily part of a circle or a strait line. Moreover as the transformation cg is conformal, that circle or line must be orthogonal with the real line as the radius [0; a] is orthogonal to the unit circle. Exercice 1.1.5. [2, Ex. 1.2.5] Let SL(2; C) acts of bP 1(C) by the homographic transforma- tion (1.1.1). Prove that the subgroup that map the unit disc D onto itself is a b (1.1.13) SU(1; 1) = j jaj2 − jbj2 = 1 : ¯b a¯ Prove that the subgroup SU(1; 1) is conjugate to SL(2; R) in SL(2; C). Prove that the subgroup of SU(1; 1) that fixes 0 2 D is the rotation group eiθ 0 : 0 e−iθ 1.2. Fuschian groups. We will be mainly interested on the quotient of H by a discrete subgroup of G. The most important examples of discrete subgroups are the modular group SL2(Z) and its subgroup of finite indices. We will call Fuchsian group a discrete subgroup of SL2(R). Proposition 1.2.1. A Fuchsian group Γ acts properly on the upper half-plane H. Proof. Recall that the action Γ on H is proper means that the map Γ × H ! H × H defined by (γ; x) 7! (x; γx) is proper i.e. the preimage of a compact is compact. We need to prove that for every compact subsets U; V ⊂ H, the set fγ 2 ΓjγU \ V 6= ;g is a finite. Because the group G = SL2(R) acts on H with compact stabilizer, the subset fg 2 GjγU \ V 6= ;g is compact. Its intersection with the discrete subgroup Γ is finite. Corollary 1.2.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Automorphic Forms on GL(2)
    Automorphic Forms on GL(2) Herve´ Jacquet and Robert P. Langlands Formerly appeared as volume #114 in the Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1970, pp. 1-548 Chapter 1 i Table of Contents Introduction ...................................ii Chapter I: Local Theory ..............................1 § 1. Weil representations . 1 § 2. Representations of GL(2,F ) in the non•archimedean case . 12 § 3. The principal series for non•archimedean fields . 46 § 4. Examples of absolutely cuspidal representations . 62 § 5. Representations of GL(2, R) ........................ 77 § 6. Representation of GL(2, C) . 111 § 7. Characters . 121 § 8. Odds and ends . 139 Chapter II: Global Theory ............................152 § 9. The global Hecke algebra . 152 §10. Automorphic forms . 163 §11. Hecke theory . 176 §12. Some extraordinary representations . 203 Chapter III: Quaternion Algebras . 216 §13. Zeta•functions for M(2,F ) . 216 §14. Automorphic forms and quaternion algebras . 239 §15. Some orthogonality relations . 247 §16. An application of the Selberg trace formula . 260 Chapter 1 ii Introduction Two of the best known of Hecke’s achievements are his theory of L•functions with grossen•¨ charakter, which are Dirichlet series which can be represented by Euler products, and his theory of the Euler products, associated to automorphic forms on GL(2). Since a grossencharakter¨ is an automorphic form on GL(1) one is tempted to ask if the Euler products associated to automorphic forms on GL(2) play a role in the theory of numbers similar to that played by the L•functions with grossencharakter.¨ In particular do they bear the same relation to the Artin L•functions associated to two•dimensional representations of a Galois group as the Hecke L•functions bear to the Artin L•functions associated to one•dimensional representations? Although we cannot answer the question definitively one of the principal purposes of these notes is to provide some evidence that the answer is affirmative.
    [Show full text]
  • Automorphic L-Functions
    Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics Vol. 33 (1979), part 2, pp. 27-61 AUTOMORPHIC L-FUNCTIONS A. BOREL This paper is mainly devoted to the L-functions attached by Langlands [35] to an irreducible admissible automorphic representation re of a reductive group G over a global field k and to local and global problems pertaining to them. In the context of this Institute, it is meant to be complementary to various seminars, in particular to the GL2-seminars, and to stress the general case. We shall therefore start directly with the latter, and refer for background and motivation to other seminars, or to some expository articles on this topic in general [3] or on some aspects of it [7], [14], [15], [23]. The representation re is a tensor product re = @,re, over the places of k, where re, is an irreducible admissible representation of G(k,) [11]. Accordingly the L-func­ tions associated to re will be Euler products of local factors associated to the 7r:.'s. The definition of those uses the notion of the L-group LG of, or associated to, G. This is the subject matter of Chapter I, whose presentation has been much influ­ enced by a letter of Deligne to the author. The L-function will then be an Euler product L(s, re, r) assigned to re and to a finite dimensional representation r of LG. (If G = GL"' then the L-group is essentially GLn(C), and we may tacitly take for r the standard representation r n of GLn(C), so that the discussion of GLn can be carried out without any explicit mention of the L-group, as is done in the first six sections of [3].) The local L- ands-factors are defined at all places where G and 1T: are "unramified" in a suitable sense, a condition which excludes at most finitely many places.
    [Show full text]
  • Automorphic Forms for Some Even Unimodular Lattices
    AUTOMORPHIC FORMS FOR SOME EVEN UNIMODULAR LATTICES NEIL DUMMIGAN AND DAN FRETWELL Abstract. We lookp at genera of even unimodular lattices of rank 12p over the ring of integers of Q( 5) and of rank 8 over the ring of integers of Q( 3), us- ing Kneser neighbours to diagonalise spaces of scalar-valued algebraic modular forms. We conjecture most of the global Arthur parameters, and prove several of them using theta series, in the manner of Ikeda and Yamana. We find in- stances of congruences for non-parallel weight Hilbert modular forms. Turning to the genus of Hermitian lattices of rank 12 over the Eisenstein integers, even and unimodular over Z, we prove a conjecture of Hentschel, Krieg and Nebe, identifying a certain linear combination of theta series as an Hermitian Ikeda lift, and we prove that another is an Hermitian Miyawaki lift. 1. Introduction Nebe and Venkov [54] looked at formal linear combinations of the 24 Niemeier lattices, which represent classes in the genus of even, unimodular, Euclidean lattices of rank 24. They found a set of 24 eigenvectors for the action of an adjacency oper- ator for Kneser 2-neighbours, with distinct integer eigenvalues. This is equivalent to computing a set of Hecke eigenforms in a space of scalar-valued modular forms for a definite orthogonal group O24. They conjectured the degrees gi in which the (gi) Siegel theta series Θ (vi) of these eigenvectors are first non-vanishing, and proved them in 22 out of the 24 cases. (gi) Ikeda [37, §7] identified Θ (vi) in terms of Ikeda lifts and Miyawaki lifts, in 20 out of the 24 cases, exploiting his integral construction of Miyawaki lifts.
    [Show full text]
  • REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of GL Kand Sn A
    REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of GLk and Sn A character of an irreducible representation of GLk is a polynomial function con- stant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable matrices is dense in GLk, a character is defined by its values on the subgroup of diagonal matrices in GLk. Thus, one can consider a character as a polynomial function of x1,...,xk. Moreover, a character is a symmetric polynomial of x1,...,xk as the matrices diag (x1,...,xk) and diag xs(1),...,xs(k) are conjugate for any s ∈ Sk. For example, the character of the standard representation in E is equal to x1 + ⊗n n ··· + xk and the character of E is equal to (x1 + ··· + xk) . Let λ = (λ1,...,λk) be such that λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ ···≥ λk ≥ 0. Let Dλ denote the λj determinant of the k × k-matrix whose i, j entry equals xi . It is clear that Dλ is a skew-symmetric polynomial of x1,...,xk. If ρ = (k − 1,..., 1, 0) then Dρ = i≤j (xi − xj) is the well known Vandermonde determinant. Let Q Dλ+ρ Sλ = . Dρ It is easy to see that Sλ is a symmetric polynomial of x1,...,xk. It is called a Schur λ1 λk polynomial. The leading monomial of Sλ is the x ...xk (if one orders monomials lexicographically) and therefore it is not hard to show that Sλ form a basis in the ring of symmetric polynomials of x1,...,xk. Theorem 1.1. The character of Wλ equals to Sλ. I do not include a proof of this Theorem since it uses beautiful but hard combina- toric.
    [Show full text]
  • Matrix Coefficients and Linearization Formulas for SL(2)
    Matrix Coefficients and Linearization Formulas for SL(2) Robert W. Donley, Jr. (Queensborough Community College) November 17, 2017 Robert W. Donley, Jr. (Queensborough CommunityMatrix College) Coefficients and Linearization Formulas for SL(2)November 17, 2017 1 / 43 Goals of Talk 1 Review of last talk 2 Special Functions 3 Matrix Coefficients 4 Physics Background 5 Matrix calculator for cm;n;k (i; j) (Vanishing of cm;n;k (i; j) at certain parameters) Robert W. Donley, Jr. (Queensborough CommunityMatrix College) Coefficients and Linearization Formulas for SL(2)November 17, 2017 2 / 43 References 1 Andrews, Askey, and Roy, Special Functions (big red book) 2 Vilenkin, Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations (big purple book) 3 Beiser, Concepts of Modern Physics, 4th edition 4 Donley and Kim, "A rational theory of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients,” preprint. Available on arXiv Robert W. Donley, Jr. (Queensborough CommunityMatrix College) Coefficients and Linearization Formulas for SL(2)November 17, 2017 3 / 43 Review of Last Talk X = SL(2; C)=T n ≥ 0 : V (2n) highest weight space for highest weight 2n, dim(V (2n)) = 2n + 1 ∼ X C[SL(2; C)=T ] = V (2n) n2N T X C[SL(2; C)=T ] = C f2n n2N f2n is called a zonal spherical function of type 2n: That is, T · f2n = f2n: Robert W. Donley, Jr. (Queensborough CommunityMatrix College) Coefficients and Linearization Formulas for SL(2)November 17, 2017 4 / 43 Linearization Formula 1) Weight 0 : t · (f2m f2n) = (t · f2m)(t · f2n) = f2m f2n min(m;n) ∼ P 2) f2m f2n 2 V (2m) ⊗ V (2n) = V (2m + 2n − 2k) k=0 (Clebsch-Gordan decomposition) That is, f2m f2n is also spherical and a finite sum of zonal spherical functions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras
    This page intentionally left blank CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN ADVANCED MATHEMATICS 113 EDITORIAL BOARD b. bollobás, w. fulton, a. katok, f. kirwan, p. sarnak, b. simon, b. totaro An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras With roots in the nineteenth century, Lie theory has since found many and varied applications in mathematics and mathematical physics, to the point where it is now regarded as a classical branch of mathematics in its own right. This graduate text focuses on the study of semisimple Lie algebras, developing the necessary theory along the way. The material covered ranges from basic definitions of Lie groups, to the theory of root systems, and classification of finite-dimensional representations of semisimple Lie algebras. Written in an informal style, this is a contemporary introduction to the subject which emphasizes the main concepts of the proofs and outlines the necessary technical details, allowing the material to be conveyed concisely. Based on a lecture course given by the author at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, the book includes numerous exercises and worked examples and is ideal for graduate courses on Lie groups and Lie algebras. CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN ADVANCED MATHEMATICS All the titles listed below can be obtained from good booksellers or from Cambridge University Press. For a complete series listing visit: http://www.cambridge.org/series/ sSeries.asp?code=CSAM Already published 60 M. P. Brodmann & R. Y. Sharp Local cohomology 61 J. D. Dixon et al. Analytic pro-p groups 62 R. Stanley Enumerative combinatorics II 63 R. M. Dudley Uniform central limit theorems 64 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to L-Functions II: Automorphic L-Functions
    Introduction to L-functions II: Automorphic L-functions References: - D. Bump, Automorphic Forms and Repre- sentations. - J. Cogdell, Notes on L-functions for GL(n) - S. Gelbart and F. Shahidi, Analytic Prop- erties of Automorphic L-functions. 1 First lecture: Tate’s thesis, which develop the theory of L- functions for Hecke characters (automorphic forms of GL(1)). These are degree 1 L-functions, and Tate’s thesis gives an elegant proof that they are “nice”. Today: Higher degree L-functions, which are associated to automorphic forms of GL(n) for general n. Goals: (i) Define the L-function L(s, π) associated to an automorphic representation π. (ii) Discuss ways of showing that L(s, π) is “nice”, following the praradigm of Tate’s the- sis. 2 The group G = GL(n) over F F = number field. Some subgroups of G: ∼ (i) Z = Gm = the center of G; (ii) B = Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices = T · U; (iii) T = maximal torus of of diagonal elements ∼ n = (Gm) ; (iv) U = unipotent radical of B = upper trian- gular unipotent matrices; (v) For each finite v, Kv = GLn(Ov) = maximal compact subgroup. 3 Automorphic Forms on G An automorphic form on G is a function f : G(F )\G(A) −→ C satisfying some smoothness and finiteness con- ditions. The space of such functions is denoted by A(G). The group G(A) acts on A(G) by right trans- lation: (g · f)(h)= f(hg). An irreducible subquotient π of A(G) is an au- tomorphic representation. 4 Cusp Forms Let P = M ·N be any parabolic subgroup of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Math.GR] 21 Jul 2017 01-00357
    TWISTED BURNSIDE-FROBENIUS THEORY FOR ENDOMORPHISMS OF POLYCYCLIC GROUPS ALEXANDER FEL’SHTYN AND EVGENIJ TROITSKY Abstract. Let R(ϕ) be the number of ϕ-conjugacy (or Reidemeister) classes of an endo- morphism ϕ of a group G. We prove for several classes of groups (including polycyclic) that the number R(ϕ) is equal to the number of fixed points of the induced map of an appropriate subspace of the unitary dual space G, when R(ϕ) < ∞. Applying the result to iterations of ϕ we obtain Gauss congruences for Reidemeister numbers. b In contrast with the case of automorphisms, studied previously, we have a plenty of examples having the above finiteness condition, even among groups with R∞ property. Introduction The Reidemeister number or ϕ-conjugacy number of an endomorphism ϕ of a group G is the number of its Reidemeister or ϕ-conjugacy classes, defined by the equivalence g ∼ xgϕ(x−1). The interest in twisted conjugacy relations has its origins, in particular, in the Nielsen- Reidemeister fixed point theory (see, e.g. [29, 30, 6]), in Arthur-Selberg theory (see, e.g. [42, 1]), Algebraic Geometry (see, e.g. [27]), and Galois cohomology (see, e.g. [41]). In representation theory twisted conjugacy probably occurs first in [23] (see, e.g. [44, 37]). An important problem in the field is to identify the Reidemeister numbers with numbers of fixed points on an appropriate space in a way respecting iterations. This opens possibility of obtaining congruences for Reidemeister numbers and other important information. For the role of the above “appropriate space” typically some versions of unitary dual can be taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Automorphic Forms on Os+2,2(R)+ and Generalized Kac
    + Automorphic forms on Os+2,2(R) and generalized Kac-Moody algebras. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Z¨urich, 1994), 744–752, Birkh¨auser,Basel, 1995. Richard E. Borcherds * Department of Mathematics, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720-3840, USA. e-mail: [email protected] We discuss how modular forms and automorphic forms can be written as infinite products, and how some of these infinite products appear in the theory of generalized Kac-Moody algebras. This paper is based on my talk at the ICM, and is an exposition of [B5]. 1. Product formulas for modular forms. We will start off by listing some apparently random and unrelated facts about modular forms, which will begin to make sense in a page or two. A modular form of level 1 and weight k is a holomorphic function f on the upper half plane {τ ∈ C|=(τ) > 0} such that f((aτ + b)/(cτ + d)) = (cτ + d)kf(τ) ab for cd ∈ SL2(Z) that is “holomorphic at the cusps”. Recall that the ring of modular forms of level 1 is P n P n generated by E4(τ) = 1+240 n>0 σ3(n)q of weight 4 and E6(τ) = 1−504 n>0 σ5(n)q of weight 6, where 2πiτ P k 3 2 q = e and σk(n) = d|n d . There is a well known product formula for ∆(τ) = (E4(τ) − E6(τ) )/1728 Y ∆(τ) = q (1 − qn)24 n>0 due to Jacobi. This suggests that we could try to write other modular forms, for example E4 or E6, as infinite products.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation Theory
    M392C NOTES: REPRESENTATION THEORY ARUN DEBRAY MAY 14, 2017 These notes were taken in UT Austin's M392C (Representation Theory) class in Spring 2017, taught by Sam Gunningham. I live-TEXed them using vim, so there may be typos; please send questions, comments, complaints, and corrections to [email protected]. Thanks to Kartik Chitturi, Adrian Clough, Tom Gannon, Nathan Guermond, Sam Gunningham, Jay Hathaway, and Surya Raghavendran for correcting a few errors. Contents 1. Lie groups and smooth actions: 1/18/172 2. Representation theory of compact groups: 1/20/174 3. Operations on representations: 1/23/176 4. Complete reducibility: 1/25/178 5. Some examples: 1/27/17 10 6. Matrix coefficients and characters: 1/30/17 12 7. The Peter-Weyl theorem: 2/1/17 13 8. Character tables: 2/3/17 15 9. The character theory of SU(2): 2/6/17 17 10. Representation theory of Lie groups: 2/8/17 19 11. Lie algebras: 2/10/17 20 12. The adjoint representations: 2/13/17 22 13. Representations of Lie algebras: 2/15/17 24 14. The representation theory of sl2(C): 2/17/17 25 15. Solvable and nilpotent Lie algebras: 2/20/17 27 16. Semisimple Lie algebras: 2/22/17 29 17. Invariant bilinear forms on Lie algebras: 2/24/17 31 18. Classical Lie groups and Lie algebras: 2/27/17 32 19. Roots and root spaces: 3/1/17 34 20. Properties of roots: 3/3/17 36 21. Root systems: 3/6/17 37 22. Dynkin diagrams: 3/8/17 39 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Schur Orthogonality Relations and Invariant Sesquilinear Forms
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 130, Number 4, Pages 1211{1219 S 0002-9939(01)06227-X Article electronically published on August 29, 2001 SCHUR ORTHOGONALITY RELATIONS AND INVARIANT SESQUILINEAR FORMS ROBERT W. DONLEY, JR. (Communicated by Rebecca Herb) Abstract. Important connections between the representation theory of a compact group G and L2(G) are summarized by the Schur orthogonality relations. The first part of this work is to generalize these relations to all finite-dimensional representations of a connected semisimple Lie group G: The second part establishes a general framework in the case of unitary representa- tions (π, V ) of a separable locally compact group. The key step is to identify the matrix coefficient space with a dense subset of the Hilbert-Schmidt endo- morphisms on V . 0. Introduction For a connected compact Lie group G, the Peter-Weyl Theorem [PW] provides an explicit decomposition of L2(G) in terms of the representation theory of G.Each irreducible representation occurs in L2(G) with multiplicity equal to its dimension. The set of all irreducible representations are parametrized in the Theorem of the Highest Weight. To convert representations into functions, one forms the set of matrix coefficients. To undo this correspondence, the Schur orthogonality relations express the L2{inner product in terms of the unitary structure of the irreducible representations. 0 Theorem 0.1 (Schur). Fix irreducible unitary representations (π, V π), (π0;Vπ ) of G.Then Z ( 1 h 0ih 0i ∼ 0 0 0 0 u; u v; v if π = π ; hπ(g)u; vihπ (g)u ;v i dg = dπ 0 otherwise, G π 0 0 π0 where u; v are in V ;u;v are in V ;dgis normalized Haar measure, and dπ is the dimension of V π.
    [Show full text]
  • 18.785 Notes
    Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 What is an automorphic form? . 4 1.2 A rough definition of automorphic forms on Lie groups . 5 1.3 Specializing to G = SL(2; R)....................... 5 1.4 Goals for the course . 7 1.5 Recommended Reading . 7 2 Automorphic forms from elliptic functions 8 2.1 Elliptic Functions . 8 2.2 Constructing elliptic functions . 9 2.3 Examples of Automorphic Forms: Eisenstein Series . 14 2.4 The Fourier expansion of G2k ...................... 17 2.5 The j-function and elliptic curves . 19 3 The geometry of the upper half plane 19 3.1 The topological space ΓnH ........................ 20 3.2 Discrete subgroups of SL(2; R) ..................... 22 3.3 Arithmetic subgroups of SL(2; Q).................... 23 3.4 Linear fractional transformations . 24 3.5 Example: the structure of SL(2; Z)................... 27 3.6 Fundamental domains . 28 3.7 ΓnH∗ as a topological space . 31 3.8 ΓnH∗ as a Riemann surface . 34 3.9 A few basics about compact Riemann surfaces . 35 3.10 The genus of X(Γ) . 37 4 Automorphic Forms for Fuchsian Groups 40 4.1 A general definition of classical automorphic forms . 40 4.2 Dimensions of spaces of modular forms . 42 4.3 The Riemann-Roch theorem . 43 4.4 Proof of dimension formulas . 44 4.5 Modular forms as sections of line bundles . 46 4.6 Poincar´eSeries . 48 4.7 Fourier coefficients of Poincar´eseries . 50 4.8 The Hilbert space of cusp forms . 54 4.9 Basic estimates for Kloosterman sums . 56 4.10 The size of Fourier coefficients for general cusp forms .
    [Show full text]