City of La Mirada Biola University Master Plan Update

Final Environmental Impact Report SCH# 2000091049

Volume II: Appendices

October 2012

Final Environmental Impact Report

Volume II: Appendices

Biola University Master Plan Update

Prepared by:

City of La Mirada Community Development Department 13700 La Mirada Boulevard La Mirada, CA 90638 Contact: Reuben J. Arceo, Director (562) 943-0131

Prepared with the assistance of:

Rincon Consultants, Inc. 180 North Ashwood Avenue Ventura, CA 93003 805-644-4455

October 2012

This report prepared on 50% recycled paper with 50% post-consumer content.

Biola University Master Plan Update EIR Table of Contents

Biola University Master Plan Update EIR

Table of Contents Page

VOLUME I

Executive Summary ...... ES-1

1.0 Introduction ...... 1-1 1.1 Environmental Impact Report Background ...... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority ...... 1-3 1.3 Scope and Content ...... 1-3 1.4 Type of EIR ...... 1-4 1.5 Lead, Responsible, and Trustee Agencies ...... 1-4 1.6 Environmental Review Process...... 1-5 1.7 Areas of Known Controversy ...... 1-8

2.0 Project Description ...... 2-1 2.1 Project Applicant ...... 2-1 2.2 Project Location ...... 2-1 2.3 Current Land Use and Regulatory Setting ...... 2-1 2.4 Project Characteristics ...... 2-5 2.5 Project Objectives ...... 2-19 2.6 Required Discretionary Approvals...... 2-20 2.7 Potential Future Actions ...... 2-20

3.0 Environmental Setting...... 3-1 3.1 Regional and Project Area Setting ...... 3-1 3.2 Cumulative Projects Setting ...... 3-3

4.0 Environmental Impact Analysis ...... 4-1 4.1 Aesthetics ...... 4.1-1 4.2 Air Quality ...... 4.2-1 4.3 Biological Resources ...... 4.3-1 4.4 Cultural Resources ...... 4.4-1 4.5 Geology ...... 4.5-1 4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 4.6-1 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...... 4.7-1 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality ...... 4.8-1 4.9 Land Use and Planning ...... 4.9-1 4.10 Noise ...... 4.10-1 4.11 Population and Housing ...... 4.11-1 4.12 Public Service ...... 4.12-1 4.13 Transportation/Circulation ...... 4.13-1 4.14 Utilities and Service Systems ...... 4.14-1

City of La Mirada i Biola University Master Plan Update EIR Table of Contents

5.0 Growth-Inducing Effects and Other CEQA-Required Discussions 5.1 Growth Effects ...... 5-1 5.2 Irreversible Environmental Effects ...... 5-2

6.0 Alternatives 6.1 Alternative 1: No Project ...... 6-2 6.2 Alternative 2: Alternative Site ...... 6-8 6.3 Alternative 3: Reduced Project Size ...... 6-14 6.4 Alternative 4: Perimeter Setbacks ...... 6-19 6.5 Alternative Sites ...... 6-24 6.6 Alternatives Considered, But Rejected ...... 6-26 6.7 Environmentally Superior Alternative ...... 6-26

7.0 References and Preparers ...... 7-1 7.1 References and Bibliography ...... 7-1 7.2 Persons Contacted ...... 7-6 7.3 List of Preparers ...... 7-6

8.0 Comments and Responses ...... 8-1

List of Figures

Figure 1-1 Environmental Review Process ...... 1-6 Figure 2-1 Regional Location ...... 2-2 Figure 2-2 Project Location ...... 2-3 Figure 2-3 Existing Campus ...... 2-6 Figure 2-4 Existing PUD for Plan Area ...... 2-7 Figure 2-5a Proposed Master Plan Map ...... 2-11 Figure 2-5b Proposed Master Plan Key ...... 2-13 Figure 4.1-1a Plan Area Photographs ...... 4.1-2 Figure 4.1-1b Plan Area Photographs ...... 4.1-3 Figure 4.1-2 Building Heights and Topographical Elevations ...... 4.1-11 Figure 4.3-1 Sensitive Elements Reported by the California Natural Diversity Database ...... 4.3-6 Figure 4.5-1 Active and Potentially Active Earthquake Faults ...... 4.5-5 Figure 4.5-2 Landslide and Liquefaction Hazard Areas ...... 4.5-7 Figure 4.8-1 FEMA Flood Hazard Areas ...... 4.8-4 Figure 4.9-1 Land Use Designations ...... 4.9-3 Figure 4.9-2 Zoning Designations ...... 4.9-4 Figure 4.10-1 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Criteria ...... 4.10-6 Figure 4.10-2 Baseline CNEL Contours...... 4.10-7 Figure 4.10-3 Plan Area Noise Measurement Locations ...... 4.10-8 Figure 4.11-1 Off-Campus University-Owned Residential Properties ...... 4.11-4 Figure 4.13-1 Analyzed Intersections ...... 4.13-3 Figure 4.13-2 Existing Plan Area Transit Service ...... 4.13-5 Figure 4.13-3 Off-Campus University Owned Properties ...... 4.13-8 Figure 4.13-4a Existing (2011) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-12 Figure 4.13-4b Existing (2011) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-13

City of La Mirada ii Biola University Master Plan Update EIR Table of Contents

Figure 4.13-4c Existing (2011) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-14 Figure 4.13-5 Plan Trip Distribution...... 4.13-19 Figure 4.13-6a Plan Only Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-20 Figure 4.13-6b Plan Only Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-21 Figure 4.13-6c Plan Only Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-22 Figure 4.13-7a Existing + Plan (Year 2011) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-24 Figure 4.13-7b Existing + Plan (Year 2011) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-25 Figure 4.13-7c Existing + Plan (Year 2011) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-26 Figure 4.13-8 Location of Related Projects...... 4.13-29 Figure 4.13-9a Cumulative Base (2031) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .... 4.13-30 Figure 4.13-9b Cumulative Base (2031) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .... 4.13-31 Figure 4.13-9c Cumulative Base (2031) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .... 4.13-32 Figure 4.13-10a Plan Only Conditions (Accounting for Entrance Shift) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-46 Figure 4.13-10b Plan Only Conditions (Accounting for Entrance Shift) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-47 Figure 4.13-10c Plan Only Conditions (Accounting for Entrance Shift) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 4.13-48 Figure 4.13-11a Cumulative + Plan (2031) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes. 4.13-49 Figure 4.13-11b Cumulative + Plan (2031) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes. 4.13-50 Figure 4.13-11c Cumulative + Plan (2031) Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes. 4.13-51 Figure 4.14-1 Existing Water Infrastructure ...... 4.14-7 Figure 4.14-2 Existing Wastewater Infrastructure ...... 4.14-8 Figure 4.14-3 Existing Stormwater Infrastructure ...... 4.14-10

List of Tables

Table ES-1 Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...... ES-4 Table 1-1 Scoping Comments Received ...... 1-1 Table 2-1 Project Entitled But Not Yet Built Under PUD #50 ...... 2-4 Table 2-2 Proposed Structural Development ...... 2-15 Table 2-3 Project Parking Facilities ...... 2-17 Table 2-4 Project Building Development Schedule ...... 2-18 Table 3-1 Cumulative Projects ...... 3-3 Table 4.1-1 Height of Proposed Athletic Field Lighting ...... 4.1-10 Table 4.2-1 Current Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards ...... 4.2-2 Table 4.2-2 Ambient Air Quality Data ...... 4.2-4 Table 4.2-3 SCAQMD Operational Air Quality Significance Thresholds ...... 4.2-7 Table 4.2-4 SCAQMD LSTs for Construction ...... 4.2-8 Table 4.2-5 Estimated Construction Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) ...... 4.2-10 Table 4.2-6 Estimated Mitigated Construction Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) ...... 4.2-12 Table 4.2-7 Long-Term Operational Emissions (lbs/day) ...... 4.2-13 Table 4.3-1 Special Status Species in Project Vicinity ...... 4.3-3

City of La Mirada iii Biola University Master Plan Update EIR Table of Contents

Table 4.4-1 Biola University Campus Buildings to be Altered or Demolished ...... 4.4-9 Table 4.6-1 Estimated Construction Emissions of Greenhouse Gases ...... 4.6-12 Table 4.6-2 Estimated Annual Energy-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 4.6-13 Table 4.6-3 Estimated Annual Solid Waste Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 4.6-13 Table 4.6-4 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Water Use ...... 4.6-14 Table 4.6-5 Estimated Annual Mobile Emissions of Greenhouse Gases ...... 4.6-14 Table 4.6-6 Combined Annual Emissions of Greenhouse Gases ...... 4.6-15 Table 4.6-7 Project Consistency with Applicable Climate Action Team Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies ...... 4.6-16 Table 4.6-8 Project Consistency with Applicable Attorney General Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures ...... 4.6-20 Table 4.9-1 General Plan Policy Consistency ...... 4.9-10 Table 4.9-2 Consistency with SCAG Goals, Policies and Principles ...... 4.9-13 Table 4.10-1 Land Use Compatibility for Noise Environments ...... 4.10-4 Table 4.10-2 Noise Monitoring Results ...... 4.10-5 Table 4.10-3 Significance of Changes in Operational Roadway Noise Exposure Ldn or Leq in dBA ...... 4.10-10 Table 4.10-4 Vibration-Related Building Damage Thresholds ...... 4.10-10 Table 4.10-5 Typical Noise Levels at Construction Sites ...... 4.10-12 Table 4.10-6 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ...... 4.10-14 Table 4.10-7 Noise Levels Associated with p.m. Peak Hour Traffic on Area Roadways ...... 4.10-17 Table 4.10-8 Typical Parking Lot Noise Sources ...... 4.10-19 Table 4.11-1 2012 Housing and Population ...... 4.11-1 Table 4.11-2 SCAG Employment, Households and Population Forecasts for La Mirada and Los Angeles County...... 4.11-1 Table 4.11-3 New Residential Development under Master Plan ...... 4.11-2 Table 4.11-4 Off-Campus Biola-Owned Residential Properties ...... 4.11-3 Table 4.12-1 Current Housing and Population ...... 4.12-1 Table 4.13-1 Existing Transit Service ...... 4.13-6 Table 4.13-2 Level of Service Definitions for Signalized intersections – ICU Method ...... 4.13-10 Table 4.13-3 Level of Service Definitions for Unsignalized Intersections – HCM Method ...... 4.13-11 Table 4.13-4 Existing Conditions Intersection Levels of Service ...... 4.13-15 Table 4.13-5 Master Plan Trip Generation ...... 4.13-17 Table 4.13-6 Cumulative Projects Trip Generation...... 4.13-28 Table 4.13-7 Cumulative Base (2031) Conditions Intersection Levels of Service . 4.13-34 Table 4.13-8 Intersection Impact Thresholds ...... 4.13-35 Table 4.13-9 Jurisdiction for Study Intersections ...... 4.13-36 Table 4.13-10 Existing plus Plan Intersection Levels of Service ...... 4.13-39 Table 4.13-11 Mitigation Phasing, Cumulative plus Plan Conditions ...... 4.13-42 Table 4.13-12 Existing Plus Plan With Mitigation ...... 4.13-43 Table 4.13-13 Cumulative Plus Plan Conditions ...... 4.13-44 Table 4.13-14 Cumulative plus Plan With Mitigation ...... 4.13-53 Table 4.13-15 Reoccurring Events of 1,000+ Attendance ...... 4.13-54 Table 4.13-16 Cumulative Plus Plan Event Conditions PM Peak Hour ...... 4.13-57 Table 4.13-17 Existing Traffic Volumes at Study Segments ...... 4.13-58

City of La Mirada iv Biola University Master Plan Update EIR Table of Contents

Table 4.13-18 Existing plus Plan Study Segment Impact Analysis ...... 4.13-59 Table 4.13-19 Cumulative plus Plan Study Segment Impact Analysis ...... 4.13-59 Table 4.13-20 On-Campus Parking Inventory and Occupancy ...... 4.13-61 Table 4.13-21 Master Plan Parking Demand Evaluation ...... 4.13-62 Table 4.14-1 Metropolitan Water Supply in Normal Year and Single and Multiple Dry Years (Thousands of AFY) ...... 4.14-2 Table 4.14-2 Summary of Current Supply Reliability – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 4.14-2 Table 4.14-3 Projected Average/Normal Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 4.14-3 Table 4.14-4 Projected Single-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier /La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 4.14-3 Table 4.14-5 Projected Multiple-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier /La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 4.14-5 Table 4.14-6 2011 Landfill Capacity and Intake Serving the City of La Mirada .... 4.14-9 Table 4.14-7 Estimated Water Demand ...... 4.14-15 Table 4.14-8 Projected Average/Normal Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) and Master Plan Supply . 4.14-16 Table 4.14-9 Projected Single and Multiple-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 4.14-16 Table 4.14-10 Metropolitan Water Supply in Normal Year and Single and Multiple Dry Years (Thousands of AFY) ...... 4.14-17 Table 4.14-11 Estimated Wastewater Generation ...... 4.14-18 Table 4.14-12 Estimated Solid Waste Generation ...... 4.14-20 Table 4.14-13 2011 Landfill Capacity and Intake Serving the City of La Mirada .. 4.14-21 Table 6-1 Comparison of Project Alternatives’ Buildout Characteristics ...... 6-1 Table 6-2 Projects Entitled But Not Yet Built Under PUD #50 ...... 6-3 Table 6-3 Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Alternatives ...... 6-27

VOLUME II

Appendices

Appendix A: Initial Study, Notice of Preparation (NOP), and NOP Response Letters Appendix B: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations Appendix C: Historic and Cultural Resources Information Appendix D: Water Supply Assessment Appendix E: Noise Modeling Results Appendix F: Transportation Impact Study Appendix G: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

City of La Mirada v Biola University Master Plan Update EIR Table of Contents

This page intentionally left blank.

City of La Mirada vi

Appendix A Initial Study, Notice of Preparation (NOP), and NOP Response Letters

City of La Mirada Biola University Master Plan Update

Initial Study

September 2011

Initial Study

Biola University Master Plan Update

Prepared by:

City of La Mirada 13700 La Mirada Boulevard La Mirada, CA 90638 Contact: Reuben J. Arceo, Director of Community Development 562-943-0131

Prepared with the assistance of:

Rincon Consultants, Inc. 180 North Ashwood Avenue Ventura, CA 93003 805-644-4455

September 2011

This report prepared on 50% recycled paper with 50% post-consumer content.

Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

Initial Study Project Title ...... 1 Lead Agency ...... 1 Contact Person...... 1 Project Location ...... 1 Project Sponsor’s Name and Address ...... 1 General Plan Designations ...... 1 Zoning ...... 1 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting ...... 1 Project Description ...... 5 Required Entitlements ...... 13 Other Agencies Whose Approval is Required ...... 13 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ...... 13 Determination ...... 14 Environmental Checklist ...... 15 Aesthetics ...... 15 Agricultural Resources ...... 16 Air Quality ...... 17 Biological Resources ...... 19 Cultural Resources ...... 20 Geology and Soils ...... 22 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 25 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...... 26 Hydrology and Water Quality ...... 28 Land Use and Planning ...... 30 Mineral Resources ...... 31 Noise ...... 31 Population and Housing ...... 33 Public Services ...... 33 Recreation...... 36 Transportation/Traffic ...... 37 Utilities and Service Systems ...... 39 Mandatory Findings of Significance ...... 40 References ...... 42

List of Figures Figure 1 Regional Location ...... 2 Figure 2 Project Location ...... 3 Figure 3 Proposed Master Plan ...... 11

City of La Mirada i Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

List of Tables Table 1 Projects Entitled But Not Yet Built Under PUD #50 ...... 4 Table 2 Project Building Development ...... 6 Table 3 Project Parking Facilities ...... 8 Table 4 Project Building Development Schedule ...... 9

City of La Mirada ii Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

INITIAL STUDY

Project Title: Biola University Master Plan

Lead Agency: City of La Mirada 13700 La Mirada Boulevard La Mirada, CA 90638

Contact Person: Reuben J. Arceo Director of Community Development (562) 943-0131

Project Location: The Master Plan Area consists of the existing campus of Biola University, which is located at 13800 Biola Avenue in the City of La Mirada in southeastern Los Angeles County, California. The existing campus is approximately 95 acres, and is roughly bounded by La Mirada Boulevard on the east; Roma Drive and La Mirada Creek on the south; Biola Avenue on the west; and the back yards of homes along Calpella Street north to Gardenhill Drive on the north. The Master Plan Area is made up of properties with the following Los Angeles County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 8041-001-012; 8062-003-013; and 8062-003-014.

Figure 1, Regional Location, shows the location of the Master Plan Area within Los Angeles County. Figure 2, Project Location, shows the Master Plan Area’s location within the City of La Mirada.

Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639

General Plan Designation: Public Institutional

Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD)

Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The Master Plan Area is the campus of Biola University. Topography on the campus is variable, with elevations ranging from 105 feet to 170 feet above sea level. The eastern part of campus, closest to La Mirada Creek, is within the depressed area cut into the landscape over time by the creek, while the western part of campus is above this area, at an elevation more typical of the surrounding area, which has a relatively level topography, gently sloping to the southwest. The 95-acre campus consists of 45 occupied buildings totaling approximately 1,030,000 gross square feet (gsf) and another 138,000 gsf of parking structures, for a total built square footage of 1,168,000 gsf.

City of La Mirada 1 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

_^

P A C I F I C O C E A N

Map images copyright © 2010 ESRI and its licensors. All rights reserved. Used by permission.

0 84Miles _^ Project Location ±

Regional Location Figure 1 City of La Mirada Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

r T e B D W a v

u Edderton Ave t i c t c A

r e k g Tacuba Dr k d u l b e ba r e D b r e

r i s Aloe Dr a C D f s

e

G Valeda Dr a r n A d u a L l Valeda Dr v r Valeda Dr i B e d M o Val Springford Dr o e r la da Dr D w e a k v d a A le a Ragan Dr O a V c Heflin Dr G e ardenhill Dr s

n

o Gardenhill Dr F d

l R P a rc n Lo Fairvilla Dr r Derwin Dr u

Gardenhill Dr b

s

i

L

Greenworth Dr La Mirada Blvd Fairvilla Dr Greenworth Dr

Dr orth Hardaway Dr enw Foster Rd Gre

Mansa Dr Ave ca La La Mirada Crk e e Hardaway Dr s v n A o n F ia el Espejo Rd Calpella St t Dal ma

Calpella St Un ive rs it y A Dr v Poner St io n d D

R r

o U z n a iverity r Dr

B A lican te Rd

r a D tin or C

r

D

n o d i R v A a d Alicante Rd la Bora Dra Roma Dr Rosa S lita E D d l F r Badlona Dr R m la Barca o

b n

R r s o os e o ec c M Rd k aca Sa ra a av n r n a Fe s Rom D A n a li C c A a r v z ia v F a n e Gandesa Rd e n o i D a D g r S r r es u an E Rd s e te d b r a R a W n Neargrove Rd D s r h C Jalisco Rd R am Biola Ave i pi t llo desa d e s Rd n r a o

c G r k D Los Fuentes Rd lar p D m r e T Jalon Rd Bing Maps Aerial: (c) 2010 Microsoft Corporation and its data suppliers

Project Area ± 0 400 800 Feet

Project Location Figure 2 City of La Mirada Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

The University currently operates under a Planned Unit Development (PUD) entitlement (PUD #50) permitting a total of 1.5 million gsf of building area. The PUD was approved in 2001, in conjunction with an EIR (SCH #2000091049), and modified in 2005 to allow for construction of various facilities. One 31,000 sf classroom/office building (Talbot East) and a parking structure (Structure S) are currently under construction under PUD #50. Structures proposed and entitled under PUD #50, but not yet built, are shown in Table 1, listed by their key number from PUD #50.

Table 1 Projects Entitled But Not Yet Built Under PUD #50

PUD #50 GSF Facility Use Key # Proposed 8 Parking Structure K 134,689 Parking Structure 17 Crowell Hall Addition 15,000 Classrooms and Offices Chase Gym Expansion Classrooms, Lockers, and 20 8,500 East Offices 25 Mailroom 1,100 Mail Services 29A Convocation Center 90,000 Assembly, Multi-Purpose 29B Parking F 70,000 Underground Parking 38 Library/Addition 13,230 Library 48 Myers Expansion 44,000 Classrooms and Offices 51 South Wedge 45,000 Classrooms and Offices 54 South Block 98,000 Classrooms and Offices 57 Tennis Clubhouse 5,000 Classroom, Locker, and Offices Total 524,519 Source: Biola University, September 2011

The campus currently has approximately 28% site coverage, with the remainder of the campus being occupied by landscaped open spaces, recreational fields (including soccer fields, a baseball field, a softball field, tennis courts, and a sand volleyball court) parking lots, and pathways. The built environment of the campus includes uses typical of a college campus including classrooms, offices, residence halls, apartments, and other campus facilities such as a library, bookstore, gymnasium, cafeteria, chapels, and an art gallery. Biola University also includes off-campus apartments along the north side of Rosecrans Avenue west of Biola Avenue, but these apartments would not be affected by the proposed Master Plan update and are not within the Master Plan Area.

The campus of Biola University (the Master Plan Area) is surrounded on all sides by single family residential neighborhoods, except for the area directly across La Mirada Boulevard from the east-central part of the campus, which is occupied by civic, institutional, and recreational uses associated with the La Mirada Civic Center, Olive Lawn Memorial Park, La Mirada Park, and the La Mirada Regional Aquatics Center. Other nearby land uses include apartments along Rosecrans Avenue (some of which are owned by the University); a shopping center at the southeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and La Mirada Boulevard; shopping centers and Kindred Hospital around the intersection of La Mirada Boulevard and Imperial Highway; and

City of La Mirada 4 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

several nearby schools such as Arlee F. Hutchinson Middle School, Gardenhill Elementary School, and La Mirada High School.

Project Description:

The proposed project consists of updates to the Biola University Master Plan. These updates include:

Increasing enrollment from the currently allowed maximum enrollment of 5,000 fulltime equivalent students (FTES) to a maximum allowed enrollment of 6,800 FTES, and Increasing the total square footage of campus buildings by about 30% over the present PUD limits.

Biola University has been operating in La Mirada since 1959 and since the 1980s the school’s enrollment has been capped at 5,000 FTES. Throughout various periods, the University has modified a series of planned unit development (PUD) entitlements to address the school’s developing needs. Biola University’s 95-acre campus consists of 45 occupied buildings totaling approximately 1,030,000 gross square feet (gsf) and another 138,000 gsf of parking structures. One classroom building and a parking structure are currently under construction. The current PUD entitlement, PUD #50, permits a total of 1.5 million gsf of building area. The PUD was approved in 2001. PUD # 50 has been amended since 2001 to allow for construction of various facilities.

A PUD entitlement application for a new Master Plan (the “project”) was submitted in April, 2011. Biola University proposes to demolish 25 existing campus buildings and construct 16 new buildings and three parking structures. New buildings would vary in height up to several stories. The occupiable gross square footage of the campus would increase by approximately 30 percent compared to PUD #50, from 1.5 million to 1.9 million square feet. Under the project, these activities would be carried out over a 20-year time frame, through 2031. The University proposes a growth rate of 2.5% to 3% per year during this time period, which would result in an enrollment of up to 6,734 FTES by 2031.

Figure 3 shows the proposed Master Plan, and Table 2 summarizes the individual projects included in the Master Plan that the University proposes to carry out. The numbers listed under the “Key #” column in Table 1 correspond to the numbers shown on Figure 3. (Table 2 does not include projects currently under construction, such as Talbot East or Parking Structure S.) Table 3 summarizes the proposed parking facilities included in the Master Plan. Table 4 shows the Master Plan’s proposed Building Development Schedule. For a full listing of all improvements currently existing on, under construction, or proposed at Biola University, please see the tables included with Figure 3.

City of La Mirada 5 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Table 2 Project Building Development

Beds at Beds at Project GSF GSF to be Double Triple Key # Name Description Proposed Demolished Net Change Occupancy Occupancy

LED Marquee Digital Sign 1a 20 0 20 NE

5 North Hall Residence Hall 54,000 0 54,000 250 300

9 Bluff South Residence Hall 15,750 0 15,750 70 85

Power Plant Power Plant Expansion 15 5,000 0 5,000 Expansion

Crowell Hall Music Conservatory 0 16,370 -16,370

17 East Hall Residence Hall 54,000 0 54,000 250 300

Gym Expansion: Remodel of classes and 20 17,000 9,121 7,879 Classes/Offices offices

Gym Expansion: Remodel of gymnasium 21 15,000 6,000 9,000 Locker locker space

Mail Room Student mailboxes 0 529 -529

Student Union Demolish existing building 0 20,172 -20,172

24 Student Center New Student Life Center 112,200 0 112,200

Student Bookstore/Student 0 16,299 -16,299 Services Dev/Aux Svcs

Major assembly facility 25 Convocation 125,000 1,650 123,350 seating 5,000

Addition for Cafeteria and 27 Cafeteria South 32,940 5,760 27,180 others

Replacement of existing 31 Bardwell 79,200 20,156 59,044 #31

Existing classroom and Marshburn 0 17,000 -17,000 office building

New classroom and office 34 MarSo Hall 150,000 0 150,000 building

Existing on-campus health Student Health 0 3,206 -3,206 clinic

Existing classroom and Soubirou 0 9,518 -9,518 office building

Sutherland 40 New faculty office wing 12,800 1,554 11,246 Expansion

Underground Subterranean level under 42 14,000 0 archive Quadrangle

New classroom and office 48 Talbot West 44,000 13,800 30,200 building

LED Marquee Digital sign 49b 20 0 20 West

City of La Mirada 6 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Table 2 Project Building Development

Beds at Beds at Project GSF GSF to be Double Triple Key # Name Description Proposed Demolished Net Change Occupancy Occupancy

Science and New classroom and office 51 113,000 5,429 107,571 Health building

52 Arts West Performing Arts Center 56,500 17,074 39,426

Visual Arts classrooms 53 Arts East 51,800 17,167 34,633 and studios

Existing classroom and Locker Building 0 4,968 -4,968 office building

Six modular buildings 54 Grove 0 8,640 -8,640 used for transitional space

Tennis Offices, team rooms, pro 56 7,500 0 7,500 Clubhouse shop

Intercollegiate track with 59 Track and Field 0 0 0 lights

South Concessions and 60 1,000 0 1,000 Concessions restrooms

61 Sand Volleyball Lighting 0 0 0

62 Archery Lighting 0 0 0

63 Softball Field Lighting 0 0 0

Team room, restrooms, 64 Softball Support 1,000 0 1,000 storage

65 Baseball Field Lighting 0 0 0

Baseball Team room, restrooms, 65b 500 0 500 Restrooms storage

Stewart Hall 4 Residence Hall to replace 67 131,000 41,970 89,030 256 300 floors #67

LED Marquee Digital sign 69b 20 0 20 SE

Totals 1,093,250 236,383 297,292 826 985

Source: Biola University, September 2011

City of La Mirada 7 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Table 3 Project Parking Facilities

Description Existing Spaces Future Spaces Parking GSF Subterranean GSF

Lot A Surface 333 310 Lot A Subterranean 0 200 50,000 50,000 Lot B 179 165 Lot C Front 89 150 Tennis Court 35 0 Rear 245 75 Lot D (Visitor) 52 25 Library Street 3 3 Lot E 67 0 Lot F (Soubirou) 54 0 F1 250 50,000 50,000 F2 250 50,000 50,000 Lot G 154 154 Roadway 84 84 Lot H 83 0 Lot I 22 60 Facilities Services 16 16 Lot J (East of Sigma) 113 25 Lot K (East of Alpha) 248 1,000 250,000 Lot L (North of Emerson) 114 114 Roadway 19 0 Lot M (East of Horton) 45 45 Roadway 23 23 Lot N (East of CP) 76 45 Lot O (Crowell) 48 18 Lot P (Bluff) 117 130 9,505 Lot R 470 470 132,500 Stacked 33 33 Lot S 33 823 236,000 Lot T (under Track) 0 300 70,000 70,000 Metzger (Lower Level) 8 5 Talbot Drive 6 0 Totals 2,769 4,773 848,005 220,000

Source: Biola University, September 2011 Note: In addition to the new spaces proposed under the project, Biola proposes to use a ban on car registration for freshman students who live on campus. Based on counts of freshman students who live on campus and have a car registered, Biola estimates that this policy, if imposed in Fall 2014, would prevent the arrival of 500 cars that year. In future years, Biola proposes to increase this parking space "credit" by the same rate as Freshman enrollment, adding a small number of parking space equivalents each year.

City of La Mirada 8 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Table 4 Project Building Development Schedule

Parking New New Parking Year FTE Name Description GSF Spaces Parking Key Ratio Changed Total

2011 5,000 3,586 0.717 Lighting for existing Softball Field intercollegiate softball 2012 5,075 63 Lighting field na

Archery Lighting for existing 62 Lighting archery range na

Softball Team room, restrooms, 64 support storage for na 3,586 0.707

South Concessions and 2013 5,151 60 Concessions restrooms na

Residence Hall for 250 2014 5,228 5 North Hall students 54,000 -88

Freshman car ban 500

Cafeteria Addition for Cafeteria 27 South and support functions 32,940 3,998 0.765

Science & Classroom and office 2015 5,307 51 Health building 113,000 -27 3,971 0.748 Tennis Tennis offices, team 2016 5,386 56 Clubhouse rooms, pro shop 7,500 -35

Sutherland 40 Expansion Add faculty office wing 12,800 -14 3,922 0.728

Classroom and office 2017 5,467 48 Talbot West building 44,000 -23

Power Plant 15 Exp Power Plant expansion 5,000 -29 3,870 0.708

Residence Hall for 70 2018 5,549 9 Bluff South students 15,750 13

Performing Arts Center, 52 Arts West classrooms, offices 56,500 61 3,944 0.711 Remodel and Gym Exp. expansion of classes 2019 5,632 20 Class/Ofc and offices 32,000 3,944 0.700

Student 2020 5,717 24 Center Student life center. 112,200 3,944 0.690 Residence Hall to Stewart Hall replace existing and 2021 5,803 67 4 floors add 256 students 131,000 Lighting for existing Baseball intercollegiate baseball 65 Field field na

Lot S (under Subterranean parking T Track) beneath new track 300

City of La Mirada 9 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Table 4 Project Building Development Schedule

Parking New New Parking Year FTE Name Description GSF Spaces Parking Key Ratio Changed Total

Sand Lighting for existing 61 Volleyball sand volleyball na

Track and Intercollegiate track 59 Field with lights na -170 4,074 0.702

Major assembly facility 2022 5,890 25 Convocation seating 5,000 125,000 Two parking levels Convocation below Convocation F Parking Center 296

La Mirada New driveway across 69 Blvd Exit2 from City Hall north na

Southeast 69A Gatehouse Entry guard house 90

LED 69B Marquee SE Digital sign 20 4,370 0.742

Fine Arts classrooms 2023 5,978 53 Arts East and studios 51,800 4,370 0.731 Lot A Subterranea Subterranean level 2024 6,068 A2 n beneath Lot A na 200 4,570 0.753 Expanded classroom 2025 6,159 34 MarSo Hall and office building 150,000 4,570 0.742

2026 6,251 4,570 0.731

Expanded classroom 2027 6,345 31 Bardwell and office building 79,200 4,570 0.720

2028 6,440 4,570 0.710

2029 6,537 4,570 0.699

Underground Subterranean archives 2030 6,635 42 archive under Quadrangle 14,000 4,570 0.689

Residence Hall for 250 2031 6,734 17 East Hall students 54,000 -30

Add four levels to 13 Structure K current surface lot na 733 5,273 0.783

Source: Biola University, September 2011

City of La Mirada 10 Biola University Master Plan Update initial Study

/ 0 150 300 Feet

Proposed Master Plan Source: Gensler, September, 2011. Figure 3 City of La Mirada Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Required Entitlements:

The proposed project would require approval of a revision to Biola University’s current Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit from the City of La Mirada.

Other Agencies Whose Approval is Required:

The proposed project would include work near La Mirada Creek, including a new bridge over the creek near the current soccer field/track, that would require coordination with several agencies including the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD). The project may also in some cases require permits from these agencies.

Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is “Potentially Significant” or “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Agriculture and Forestry Aesthetics Air Quality Resources Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous Hydrology/Water

Emissions Materials Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Mandatory Findings Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service Systems of Significance

City of La Mirada 13 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potential significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date Reuben J. Arceo Director of Community Development City of La Mirada

City of La Mirada 14 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

I. AESTHETICS – Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a. The La Mirada General Plan (City of La Mirada, March 2003) does not identify any scenic vistas in the community. However, some distant views of potentially scenic resources (such as the Santa Ana Mountains, which are located approximately five miles north of the Master Plan Area, or the Coyote Hills, which are located approximately 1.5 miles east of the Master Plan Area, may be available from the Master Plan Area, particularly from topographically higher locations such as the bluff overlooking La Mirada Creek, or from the upper stories of buildings. This potentially significant impact will be addressed in the EIR. b. There are no state highways either designated as, or eligible for designation as, state scenic highways in the project vicinity. The closest such highways are State Highway 57 (the Orange freeway) north of Imperial Highway, which is about seven miles away from the Master Plan Area; and Pacific Coast Highway (State Highway 1) from Lakewood Boulevard south into Orange County (California Department of Transportation, September 2011), which is about 10 miles away from the Master Plan Area. The proposed project would facilitate future construction that would entail the removal of trees and buildings that may have aesthetic value and could be considered scenic resources. The Master Plan Area does not include any scenic rock outcroppings. It may, however, include historic buildings (see discussion in Section V, Cultural Resources). For these reasons, implementation of the project may involve removal of or substantial damage to scenic resources on the project site, and this potentially significant impact will be addressed in the EIR. c. Although many of the proposed Master Plan elements are specifically intended to enhance the visual character of the campus, implementation of the project would change the visual character of the Biola University campus and, indirectly, its surroundings. For example, implementation of the proposed Master Plan would involve increasing the density and height of campus buildings over time. In addition, the project would facilitate future construction

City of La Mirada 15 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

that would entail the removal of trees and buildings that may have aesthetic value. These activities have the potential to degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. This potentially significant impact will be addressed in the EIR. d. Implementation of the project would include new facilities that would create new, potentially significant, sources of night time light and glare, such as new lighted athletic fields as well as new lighting for existing fields; lighting associated with other new buildings; and glare created by reflections off of new structures or from headlights of vehicles. Impacts related to light and glare are therefore potentially significant and will be addressed in the EIR.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

II. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? a-e. The Master Plan Area is in a highly urbanized, non-agricultural area. It is not zoned for agricultural or forestry purposes, nor is it subject to a Williamson Act contract (California Department of Conservation-Los Angeles County Williamson Act Map, 2009). Moreover, the Master Plan Area is not located in an area designated as Prime or Unique Farmland, or within Farmland of Statewide Importance (California Department of Conservation FMMP, 2009). The

City of La Mirada 16 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Master Plan Area does not meet the definition of forest land or timberland under Public Resources Code section 12220(g), Public Resources Code section 4526, or Government Code section 51104(g). There is no farmland, forest land, or timberland in the Master Plan Area. The proposed use of the Master Plan Area would not produce changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. As such, no impact would occur with respect to farmland, forest land, or timberland. Further analysis of these issues in an EIR is not warranted.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

III. AIR QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?

The Master Plan Area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) which, as the local air quality management agency, is required to monitor air pollutant levels to ensure that state and federal air quality standards are met and, if they are not met, to develop strategies to meet them. Depending on whether or not the standards are met or exceeded, the air basin is classified as being in “attainment” or “nonattainment.” The part of the South Coast Air Basin within which the Master Plan Area is located is in nonattainment for both the federal and state standards for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, as well as the state standard for nitrogen dioxide, PM2.5, and lead (California Air Resources Board, Area Designations Maps/State and National, September 2011). Thus, the basin currently exceeds several state and federal ambient air quality standards and is required to implement strategies to reduce pollutant levels to recognized acceptable standards. This non-attainment status is a result of several factors, the primary ones being the naturally adverse meteorological conditions that limit the dispersion and diffusion of pollutants, the limited capacity of the local airshed to eliminate pollutants from the air, and the number, type, and density of emission sources within the South Coast Air

City of La Mirada 17 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Basin. The SCAQMD has adopted an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) that provides a strategy for the attainment of state and federal air quality standards.

In addition to regional air quality thresholds, the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) in response to the Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative (1-4), which was prepared to update the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. LSTs were devised in response to concern regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an air quality exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the nearest sensitive receptor, taking into consideration ambient concentrations in each source receptor area (SRA), project size, distance to the sensitive receptor, etc. LSTs only apply to emissions within a fixed stationary location, including idling emissions during both project construction and operation. LSTs have been developed for NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5. LSTs are not applicable to mobile sources such as cars on a roadway (SCAQMD, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, June 2003, Revised July 2008). As such, LSTs for construction emissions and fixed stationary source operational emissions would apply to the proposed project. LSTs have been developed for emissions within areas up to 5 acres in size, with air pollutant modeling recommended for activity within larger areas. The Master Plan Area is approximately 95 acres, and is located in SCAQMD Source Receptor Area 5 (SRA-5), Southeast Los Angeles County, which includes the city of La Mirada. According to the SCAQMD’s publication, Final Localized Significant (LST) Thresholds Methodology, the use of LSTs is voluntary, to be implemented at the discretion of local agencies. a-d. The project would involve, over time, demolition of existing structures and construction of new structures, landscaping, and infrastructure. Demolition of existing facilities and construction of the proposed project would generate air pollutant emissions due to both the operation of construction equipment and generation of dust. The project would also accommodate a potential enrollment increase from its current maximum FTE level of 5,000 students to a new maximum FTE level of 6,800 students, and could create significant operational emissions from project-generated vehicle trips and new facilities. Consequently, the project would have potentially significant construction and operational emissions that could conflict with or prevent attainment of the local air quality management plan, violate air quality standards, result in increases in criteria pollutants, and expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. These impacts are potentially significant and will be discussed further in the EIR. e. SCAQMD Rule 402 regarding nuisances states: “A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property.” Land uses called for under the proposed project, such as student housing, athletic facilities, and academic/institutional buildings and uses, would not be expected to generate objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, or otherwise conflict with SCAQMD Rule 402. No industrial uses, agricultural uses, or other uses typically associated with objectionable odors are proposed. No impact related to the creation of objectionable odors is anticipated. Further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

City of La Mirada 18 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? a-d. The Master Plan Area is fully developed as a college campus, including buildings, roads, and landscaping. It is intensively used on a daily basis by students, faculty, and employees. Landscaping is largely ornamental and non-native, and is maintained by grounds crews rather than being left in a natural state. The City of La Mirada General Plan (March 2003), states that La Mirada is a built-out urban community containing no natural resource areas such as forests, wildlife habitat, or agricultural land. However, the Master Plan Area does include other

City of La Mirada 19 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

biological resources and habitats, including a significant number of mature trees that may serve roosting or nesting functions for local or migratory birds, including raptors. La Mirada Creek, which runs along and through the eastern part of campus, also may have habitat value, and water quality in La Mirada Creek has implications for downstream habitat. Implementation of the proposed project may have a potentially significant impact on these resources, and this issue will be further analyzed in the EIR. e. The City of La Mirada General Plan does not contain any policies specifically protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy. Chapter 12.08, Preservation, Protection, and Removal of Parkway Trees, of the La Mirada Municipal Code applies to trees planted or caused to be planted by the City within a parkway strip. The stated purpose of this chapter is “…to preserve and protect the parkway trees of this city that are of aesthetic importance and to provide for the replacement of trees in order to maintain the community's natural environment.” Section 12.08.080 of this Chapter prohibits the injury or destruction of any parkway tree. The Chapter also includes provisions for tree protection during construction, and requirements for permitting from the City for any construction that would cut, trim, prune, plant, remove, injure or interfere with any parkway tree or plant. If the project would have such effects on parkway trees, it would be required to comply with the provisions of this Chapter, which would reduce the potential impacts of the project in this area to a less than significant level. Further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted. f. No natural open space areas are located within the Master Plan Area or in the surrounding area. In addition, no adjacent properties are subject to habitat conservation plans. The Master Plan Area and its surroundings are not subject to a habitat conservation plan or local coastal plan (LCP). Finally, there are no designated Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) located within one mile of the City. As a result, the project would have no impact related to potential conflicts with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?

City of La Mirada 20 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? a. Historic designation as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines may be given to a property by National, State, or local authorities. In order for a building to qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or as a locally significant property in the city of La Mirada, it must meet one or more identified criteria of significance. The property must also retain sufficient architectural integrity to continue to evoke the sense of place and time with which it is historically associated. The project envisions the potential demolition of up to 236,383 square feet of existing buildings, some of which are greater than 40 years of age and may be historical resources for the purposes of CEQA. Impacts to historic resources are therefore potentially significant and this issue will be examined further in the EIR. b. Implementation of the project would involve ground-disturbing activities that could have the potential to disturb sub-surface archaeological resources, if any are present. In most areas, the Master Plan Area has already been subject to ground disturbance during previous development, but the project may involve deeper excavation than previously performed in certain locations, such as the subterranean structures proposed in several locations. Given these facts, the possibility of encountering archaeological resources exists. This impact is potentially significant and will be examined further in the EIR. c. Implementation of the project would involve ground-disturbing activities that could have the potential to disturb sub-surface paleontological resources, if any are present. The Master Plan Area is located on a Late Pleistocene non-marine geologic formation, which has been found to contain numerous terrestrial fossil localities in the region, including in nearby areas such as La Habra, Fullerton, and the Coyote Hills. This impact is therefore potentially significant and will be examined further in the EIR. d. Implementation of the project would involve ground-disturbing activities that could disturb sub-surface human remains, if any were present. In most areas, the Master Plan Area has already been subject to ground disturbance during previous development, but the project may involve deeper excavation than previously performed in certain locations, such as the subterranean structures proposed in several locations. Given these facts, the possibility of encountering previously undiscovered human remains exists. If any such finds were made, required adherence to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 et. seq. would help avoid impacts to such resources. Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered the Coroner shall be contacted and an investigation undertaken. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, or has reason to believe that they are those of

City of La Mirada 21 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

a Native American, he or she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission. However, because the proposed project could potentially disturb human remains, this impact is potentially significant, and will be further analyzed in the EIR.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

VI. GEOLOGY and SOILS – Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,

as delineated on the most recent

Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault

Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?

iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is

unstable, or that would become unstable

as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1-B of the Uniform Building Code, creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately

supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? a(i). Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones include areas along faults capable of producing surface rupture. There are no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones within the City of La

City of La Mirada 22 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Mirada (California Geological Survey, September 2011). Therefore, impacts related to seismic surface rupture would be less than significant and do not require further discussion in the EIR. a(ii). Active and/or potentially active faults exist in the vicinity of the Master Plan Area, the closest of which is the Whittier-Elsinore Fault. Other nearby active or potentially active faults include the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone, the Santa Monica-Hollywood/Raymond Fault Zone, and the Sierra Madre Fault Zone, which are located 10-20 miles from La Mirada. As shown on Figure SCS-I of the Safety and Community Services Element of the La Mirada General Plan (March 2003), the Norwalk Fault lies directly underneath the city, but it is not considered active. The La Mirada General Plan states that the maximum credible event, or the seismic event considered likely to occur on an active fault affecting the city, would generate average bedrock accelerations of approximately 0.2g with a total ground shaking duration of 10 to 20 seconds. It also states that, although the Norwalk Fault which traverses the City at depth is not considered an active fault, historic earthquakes of minor magnitude have possibly occurred on this fault with a magnitude of 4.7.

The Master Plan Area could potentially experience severe seismic ground shaking in the event of an earthquake on these or other nearby faults. Design and construction of future improvements accommodated by the project would be required to adhere to the recommendations listed in the standard procedures of the 2011 County of Los Angeles Building Code (CLABC) to reduce any potential impacts from seismic related activity. Also, because the proposed project is a Master Plan, to be carried out over an approximately 20-year time frame, construction plans for future buildings would be subject to review by the City for compliance with the most current edition of the CLABC at the time of construction. These regulations and standards are specifically designed to ensure that buildings are engineered to reduce seismic hazards to structures, and would reduce potential impacts from ground shaking. However, because of the proximity of earthquake faults and the amount of new construction associated with the project, these impacts would be potentially significant and will be examined further in the EIR. a(iii, iv). Liquefaction describes the phenomenon in which groundshaking works cohesionless soil particles into a tighter packing, which induces excess pore pressure. These soils may acquire a high degree of mobility and lead to structurally damaging deformations. Liquefaction begins below the water table, but after liquefaction has developed, the groundwater table will rise and cause the overlying soil to mobilize. Liquefaction typically occurs in areas where the groundwater is less than 30 feet from the surface and where the soils are composed of poorly consolidated fine to medium sand.

The geologic character of an area determines its potential for landslides. Steep slopes, the extent of erosion, and the rock composition of a hillside all contribute to the potential for slope failure and landslide events. Common triggering mechanisms of slope failure include undercutting slopes by erosion or grading, saturation of marginally stable slopes by rainfall or irrigation, and shaking of marginally stable slopes during earthquakes.

Figure SCS-2 of the La Mirada General Plan (March 2003) shows that parts of the Master Plan Area located along La Mirada Creek are identified as liquefaction hazard areas, but not landslide hazard areas. Because the proposed project would involve a significant amount of new construction, the possibility of new construction being exposed to such soil instability effects

City of La Mirada 23 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

cannot be completely ruled out. This impact would be potentially significant and will be examined further in the EIR. b. Construction activity associated with implementation of the project would include grading and other ground-disturbing activities that would have the potential to result in the erosion of soils from wind and water. These activities would occur on a project-by-project basis throughout the life of the Master Plan. The applicant would be required at the time of construction of individual projects to comply with all applicable City requirements, and also be required to obtain coverage under the applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Activities Storm Water Permit, which would require the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) containing specific actions, termed Best Management Practices (BMPs), to control the discharge of pollutants into local surface water drainages.

Adherence to NPDES General Construction Activities Storm Water Permit and compliance with City of La Mirada requirements would reduce the project’s potential to result in the erosion of soils from wind and water. However, because the project would involve a substantial amount of ground-disturbing activity, impacts related to soil erosion or loss of topsoil cannot be ruled out at this level of analysis. These impacts would be potentially significant, and will be examined further in the EIR. c, d. Because most of the Master Plan Area is located within an urbanized area, the characteristics of the soils in the areas are already known. The 2003 La Mirada General Plan does not identify any areas of collapsible or expansive soils within La Mirada, but the EIR for Biola’s current PUD (City of La Mirada, January 2001) identified areas of clay soils on the campus, which may have the potential to be expansive soils. However, individual construction projects carried out under the Master Plan would be required to comply with the CLABC and standard engineering practices, including compaction of soils to accommodate the weight of buildings and other improvements, as well as provisions relating to expansive soils. The CLABC requires a geotechnical report for new construction projects that would identify potential soil instability hazards at individual construction sites. These practices should provide sufficient soil stability to accommodate the proposed uses. These impacts would be less than significant, and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted. e. The Master Plan Area is fully connected to the City of La Mirada’s wastewater system, and does not, and would not in the future, require the installation or operation of septic systems. No septic systems are proposed; therefore, there is no potential for adverse effects due to soil incompatibility associated with the use of septic systems. No impact would occur. Further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

City of La Mirada 24 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS - Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? a, b. The accumulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere regulates the earth’s temperature. However, it is believed that emissions from human activities, particularly the consumption of fossil fuels for electricity production and transportation, have elevated the concentration of these gases in the atmosphere beyond the level of naturally occurring concentrations. In response to an increase in man-made GHG concentrations over the past 150 years, California has implemented AB 32, the “California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.” AB 32 requires achievement by 2020 of a statewide GHG emissions limit equivalent to 1990 emissions (essentially a 25% reduction below 2005 emission levels) and the adoption of rules and regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emissions reductions.

An individual project (unless it is a massive construction project, such as a dam or a new freeway project, or a large fossil-fuel-fired power plant) does not typically generate sufficient GHG emissions to directly influence global climate change. The analysis of global climate change therefore typically involves an analysis of whether or not a project’s contribution towards a cumulative impact is cumulatively considerable. “Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past project, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Therefore, the analysis provided in this section is based on the proposed project’s potential to emit GHGs.

Construction accommodated under the proposed project would generate GHG emissions from both construction and operational emissions. Construction emissions would be generated by operation of construction equipment and construction worker trips. The project would also accommodate an increased on-campus population and additional buildings and other energy- consuming facilities and activities, including vehicle trips; therefore, project implementation would also generate operational emissions from these sources. This impact is potentially significant and will be further analyzed in the EIR.

City of La Mirada 25 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

VIII. HAZARDS and HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ¼ mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? a, b, c. The improvements called for under the project consist of uses that are consistent with the current use of the Master Plan Area as a college campus. Operation of the University currently involves the use of relatively small amounts of hazardous materials such as

City of La Mirada 26 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

pesticides, fertilizers, and cleaning agents required for routine operation and maintenance of campus grounds and facilities. Use of such materials would continue under the project, but potentially expand as the University grows.

Current and future operations under the proposed project would be required to adhere to applicable local, state, and federal laws regulating the use and transport of hazardous materials. Hazardous waste generators and users in the City are required to comply with regulations enforced by several federal, State, and County agencies. The regulations aim toward reducing risk associated with human exposure to hazardous materials and minimizing adverse environmental effects. The Los Angeles County Fire Department Health Hazardous Materials Division tracks hazardous material handlers to ensure appropriate reporting and compliance (City of La Mirada General Plan, March 2003). The Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration protects workers and the public from safety hazards through its Occupational Safety and Health program and provides consultative assistance to employers. Adherence to all applicable rules and regulations of these bodies concerning hazardous materials would reduce the operational impacts of the project on the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or the release of hazardous materials under reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions, but more analysis is warranted in the EIR to determine the potential significance of these impacts.

Construction of the proposed project would also have the potential to disturb and release hazardous materials such as asbestos and lead into the environment. Such releases could pose significant risks to persons living and working in and around the Master Plan Area, which is largely surrounded by single family residential neighborhoods. One school (Arlee F. Hutchinson Middle School, which is located about 1,215 feet away from the west side of the Biola University campus) is located within ¼ mile (1,320 feet) of the Master Plan Area. The project, while it would be required to comply with all applicable regulations, may therefore potentially use or release hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ¼ mile of an existing or proposed school. These are potentially significant impacts requiring further analysis in the EIR. d. The Master Plan Area is not on a list of active hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, as determined by a search of the following databases on September 9, 2011:

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) database; Geotracker search for leaking underground fuel tanks; Investigations- Cleanups (SLIC) and Landfill sites, Cortese list of Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites; and The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields (Envirostor) Database.

The Master Plan Area is listed on the Geotracker database as the site of a former gasoline LUST (leaking underground storage tank), but this tank was removed in 1995, sampling was conducted in 1997, and the case was closed on September 2, 1997 with issuance of Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board case closure letter number R-04437. This impact would therefore be less than significant, and further analysis of this issue in the EIR is not warranted.

City of La Mirada 27 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

e, f. The Master Plan Area is not within two miles of a public or private airport. The project would therefore not result in a potentially significant safety hazard for people residing or working in the Master Plan Area, and would have no impact in this regard. This issue will not be further analyzed in the EIR. g. The project applicant would be required to comply with all applicable City of La Mirada codes and regulations pertaining to emergency response and evacuation plans maintained by the City police and County fire departments. In addition, the City of La Mirada, through its plan check review process, which includes forwarding plans to applicable police and fire departments, reviews all development proposals to ensure that they will not conflict with the City’s adopted emergency response plan. The project does not propose any changes to circulation patterns, and no critical evacuation routes would be closed or obstructed as part of project implementation. This impact is considered less than significant and further analysis of this issue in the EIR is warranted. h. The Master Plan Area and its surroundings are entirely urbanized. Substantial flammable brush, grass, or dense trees do not exist within the Master Plan Area. Existing landscaping on the Biola University campus is and would continue to be maintained by ground crews for fire safety. There are no wildlands adjacent to the Master Plan Area, and the type and location of envisioned development would not place structures substantially closer to such fire-prone areas. Therefore, significant impacts to people or structures as the result of wildland fires would not occur. There would be no impact and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

IX. HYDROLOGY and WATER QUALITY – Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off- site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including

City of La Mirada 28 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

IX. HYDROLOGY and WATER QUALITY – Would the project: through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in flooding on or off-site? e) Create or contribute water runoff that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or generate substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Expose people or structures to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? a, c-f. Because of the extensive nature of the proposed improvements, which would require considerable ground-disturbing activity over the life of the project, and because of the presence of La Mirada Creek on campus, impacts from the project related to water quality, drainage patterns, and runoff are considered potentially significant and will be examined further in the EIR. b. The project envisions an increase in enrollment and built square footage on the Biola University campus. It could therefore lead to an increase in the amount of water use in the Master Plan Area. Other new uses within the Master Plan Area, such as landscaping, lawns, and playing fields, could create water demand that could also increase water use. Local water supplies are derived from both well water (groundwater) and water imported from the purchased from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). Please see Section XVII. Utilities and Service Systems below for a discussion of potential impacts related to water supply. The proposed increase in impermeable surfaces in the project area could have the potential to interfere with or otherwise adversely affect groundwater recharge. However, as shown on Figure 3, the campus would retain a significant amount of unpaved, permeable

City of La Mirada 29 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

area that would allow recharge on site to continue. For these reasons, the project’s impacts on groundwater recharge would be less than significant and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted. g-i. As shown on Figure SCS-3 of the 2003 La Mirada General Plan, parts of the Master Plan Area in and immediately around La Mirada Creek are within federally designated 100-year and 500-year flood zones. Several buildings proposed under the project are in close proximity to La Mirada Creek. For example, the proposed “Stewart Hall” residence hall is proposed near the creek at the southern end of campus. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project may place housing within these flood zones, or place other structures within these areas that could impede or redirect flood flows, potentially exposing people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding. This is a potentially significant impact, and this issue will be further analyzed in the EIR. j. Due to its distance from the ocean and other large bodies of water, elevation, and topography, the Master Plan Area would not be subject to hazards associated with seiche and tsunami. Therefore, risks from a tsunami wave or seiche would be less than significant and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

X. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with an applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? a. The project would involve changes to the existing campus of Biola University, and does not propose any new construction, such as roads or other linear features through established neighborhoods, that would disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. The project would thus have a less than significant impact in this regard and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted. b. The project would not change the basic land use type of the Master Plan Area, and would be consistent with its General Plan land use designation of “Public Institutional.” However, the

City of La Mirada 30 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

changes to the PUD governing development within the Master Plan Area may have the potential to conflict with currently adopted policies adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, including those of the City’s General Plan, the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG’s) Regional Comprehensive Plan, or adopted policies of the Gateway Cities Council of Governments (Gateway COG). This impact is potentially significant and will be analyzed in the EIR. c. No natural open space areas are located within the Master Plan Area or in the surrounding area. In addition, no adjacent properties are subject to habitat conservation plans. The Master Plan Area and its surroundings are not subject to a habitat conservation plan or local coastal plan (LCP). Finally, there are no designated Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) located within one mile of the City. As a result, the project would have no impact any impact on a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XI. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? a-b. The Master Plan Area is not identified in any local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan as being a locally important mineral resource recovery site, and is not otherwise known to contain any mineral resources that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. The project would thus have no impact in this regard, and further analysis of this issue in the EIR is not warranted.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XII. NOISE – Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?

City of La Mirada 31 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XII. NOISE – Would the project result in: b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise? a-d. Project implementation would generate temporary noise increases during construction of planned new facilities and long-term noise due to the operation of new facilities and associated increases in traffic. Therefore, project impacts related to temporary and permanent increases in ambient noise levels and groundborne vibration would be potentially significant and will be analyzed in the EIR. e, f. The Master Plan Area is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private airport. The project would therefore not expose people residing or working in the Master Plan Area to excessive aircraft-generated noise, would have no impact in this regard, and will not be further analyzed in the EIR.

City of La Mirada 32 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? a. Because the project would, over a 20-year time frame, accommodate an expansion of enrollment and faculty at Biola University, direct and indirect population increases caused by the project are potentially significant and require further analysis in the EIR, which will analyze them in terms of population growth forecasts contained in the La Mirada General Plan and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Comprehensive Plan. b-c. Implementation of the project would accommodate an expansion of enrollment and faculty at Biola University while also expanding the supply of on-campus housing. The project would not displace substantial numbers of people or housing that would necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. The project would therefore have no impact in this regard, and this issue will not be further analyzed in the EIR.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES — Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance

City of La Mirada 33 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES — Would the project: objectives for any of the following public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools?

iv) Other public facilities?

Implementation of the project would lead to an expansion of students, faculty, and built space at Biola University over a 20-year time frame. As such, it would incrementally increase demand for public services. The information in this section was obtained from the City of La Mirada’s website (http://www.cityoflamirada.org/), and Biola University’s website (http://www.biola.edu/) a (i.). The City of La Mirada receives fire and emergency medical services from the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD). Two LACFD Fire Stations are located within the city: Station 49 is located at 13820 La Mirada Boulevard in the City’s Civic Center complex across La Mirada Boulevard from the east side of the Master Plan Area; and Station 194 is located at 13540 South Beach Boulevard about two miles east of the Master Plan Area. According to the “Fire Department” web page on the City’s website, the personnel and first alarm equipment at these two stations are capable of handling most fires in the city, and in the event of a large fire or major disaster, the resources of other nearby stations and ultimately the entire County Fire Department are available.

Because implementation of the project would lead to an expansion of students, faculty, and built space at Biola University over a 20-year time frame, the project may incrementally increase demand for fire protection service. The Master Plan Area is in an already-developed and currently served area of La Mirada, with adequate access to fire-fighting infrastructure such as fire hydrants. However, the project may result in the need for construction of fire protection facilities. This impact is potentially significant, and will be further analyzed in the EIR. a (ii.). Police services in La Mirada are provided by General Patrol services and the Sheriff’s Department. The primary function of General Patrol is crime prevention, and patrol deputies both answer dispatched calls and conduct patrols. The Sheriff’s Department provides police patrol, traffic enforcement, and crime investigation. Additionally, a four-member Special Assignment Team proactively enforces against gang, juvenile, and narcotics activities (City of La Mirada, September 2011).

Biola University also has its own Campus Safety Department. The Campus Safety Department’s primary responsibility is to provide for the safety and protection of Biola

City of La Mirada 34 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

University students, staff and visitors. The Campus Safety Department is the primary law enforcement agency on campus and its officers have full police officer powers of arrest while on duty. The Campus Safety Department has a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, as required by state law (Biola University, September 2011).

Because the project would result in increases in students, faculty, and facilities, it may result in the need to expand existing or build new police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. These impacts are potentially significant, and will be further analyzed in the EIR. a (iii). The population increase created by implementation of the project would consist mostly of college-age students attending Biola University, and would not substantially increase enrollment at other schools or create the need for new or expanded school facilities other than those already provided for under the proposed Master Plan and analyzed in this Initial Study. This impact would be less than significant and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted. a (iv). The population increase created by implementation of the project would consist mostly of college-age students attending Biola University. Implementation of the project would increase the maximum enrollment at Biola University by up to 1,800 FTES over the 20-year life of the Master Plan. Many of these new students may use other public facilities such as off- campus parks and other recreational and cultural facilities. While the project calls for creation of some new on-campus facilities serving these needs (such as a new track and field, a tennis clubhouse, and a Performing Arts Center), it may still create new demand for off campus recreational facilities. La Mirada currently has 193.39 acres of public parks (City of La Mirada, 2004 serving a population of 48,659 (California Department of Finance, May 2011), equating to a ratio of 3.99 acres of public parks per thousand persons. If all 1,800 new students allowed under the project became part of La Mirada’s population, the project would increase the City’s current population to 50,459, and decrease the ratio of public parks acreage per person to 3.84, a 3.8% decline. However, any population growth associated with the project would be spread out over the 20-year life of the project, as shown in Table 3. Additionally, some of these new students will most likely commute to campus from outside La Mirada, and would thus not contribute to the city’s population. Most students would focus their recreational demand on on-campus resources. Also, La Mirada and surrounding areas have other recreational facilities and opportunities not counted in the City’s public parks total. For example, the 140-acre La Mirada Regional Golf Course and 100 acres of joint-use school sites are located within La Mirada’s boundaries and are also available to the public for recreational use (City of La Mirada, March 2003). Other recreational opportunities in the area include Ralph B. Clark Regional Park, located about two miles to the east of the Master Plan Area in Buena Park; several large parks located in the Santa Ana Mountains to the north about five miles away; amusement parks located in northern Orange County 5-10 miles away; and beaches located about 10-15 miles to the south and southwest. Any increased use of off-campus recreational facilities associated with the project would therefore be spread out over a variety of recreational opportunities. There are no other public services that would be significantly affected by the project. For all these reasons, this impact would be less than significant and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

City of La Mirada 35 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XV. RECREATION — Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a. Any population increase created by implementation of the proposed project, as described in Section XIII, Population and Housing, of this Initial Study, would consist mostly of college-age students attending Biola University, as well as some faculty and staff, some of whom may use some off-campus parks and recreational facilities. The project calls for creation of new recreational facilities such as new athletic fields that would accommodate some of the new demand for such facilities created by any population increase associated with the project. However, as discussed in Section XIV, Public Services, the project may still lead to increased use of recreational facilities. Public parks in the City are maintained and operated by the City of La Mirada Public Works Department. As the community of La Mirada grows over the 20-year life of the Master Plan, funding for maintenance of parks and recreation facilities will be provided through the City’s standard funding mechanisms, with parks maintenance being funded through the City’s General Fund (personal conversation, Gary Sanui, City of La Mirada Public Works Department, September 14, 2011). For this reason, any population increase associated with the project is not anticipated to increase the use of off-campus parks and other recreational facilities, or create an increase in maintenance needs, that would significantly contribute to physical deterioration of these facilities. Impacts related to increased use of recreational facilities are therefore less than significant and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted. b. The physical effects of the construction of the recreational facilities proposed under the project are analyzed throughout this Initial Study as part of the overall development impacts of the project. Any environmental impacts of the project that have been determined to be potentially significant in this Initial Study will be analyzed in the appropriate section of the EIR. This impact is less than significant and further analysis of this issue in an EIR is not warranted.

City of La Mirada 36 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XVI. TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location, that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? a, b, d, e. Because the project would accommodate an increased on-campus population and would add new facilities to the Biola University campus, it would generate traffic increases that could have a significant impact on the local vehicular circulation network. These impacts would be potentially significant and will be analyzed in the EIR, which will include a Traffic Impact Study. The Traffic Impact Study will analyze, and the EIR will disclose, the project’s effects related to traffic increases, levels of service, roadway design features, emergency access, , and parking.

City of La Mirada 37 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

c. The project is not within two miles of a public or private use airport. Under the project, the Convocation Center, which is 65 feet high, would remain tallest building on campus. The project would therefore have no impact for any potential to result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location, that would result in substantial safety risks. f. La Mirada has adopted a Master Plan of Bikeways that includes over 14 miles of Class III bicycle routes along streets and Class I dedicated multiuse trails. Figure C-3 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan illustrates the City’s bicycle and trails master plan, and shows that La Mirada Boulevard, Rosecrans Avenue, and Biola Avenue are all designated Type I bicycle paths. Additionally, pedestrian and equestrian trails run through Creek Park and Oak Creek Park along La Mirada Creek, then south through the east side of the Biola University campus on the west side of La Mirada Boulevard, to slightly before Whiterock Drive. These facilities connect to a network of bike lanes, paths, and trails in and around La Mirada.

Local and regional transit service providers serving La Mirada include the following (City of La Mirada, March 2003):

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). La Mirada is within the jurisdiction of the MTA, which provides public transportation throughout Los Angeles County. Local bus routes and Park- and-Ride freeway buses on Interstate 5 serve the City. Buses operate on schedules which vary from 30 minutes to an hour, depending on the day of the week. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Given its location on the Los Angeles/Orange counties border, La Mirada is also served by bus routes operated by the OCTA. La Mirada Transit System. Curb-to-curb transportation service is provided in La Mirada through a contract with MV Transportation, Inc. La Mirada transit vehicles provide residents with curb-to-curb service in the community and offer connections to other transit systems, providing access to surrounding communities as well as direct connections to regional rail service via Metrolink and Metro Green Line. Rides to work, medical appointments, shopping, school, recreation, and other locations are available (City of La Mirada, September 2011). Norwalk Transit. Buses operated by Norwalk Transit travel along Imperial Highway.

The Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan (City of La Mirada, March 2003) contains the following goal and policies related to alternative transportation:

Goal 3.0. Make alternative transportation convenient, safe, and responsive to changing transit demands. Policy 3.1. Continue to accommodate bicycle lanes and pedestrian paths citywide. Policy 3.2. Continue to work with transit service providers to identify and respond to the short- and long-term mobility needs of residents. Policy 3.3. Continue to provide special transit services for seniors, disabled persons, and other special needs groups residing in La Mirada.

City of La Mirada 38 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Policy 3.4. Work with regional and local transit service providers to improve the connectivity of transit service to other regional transportation service.

The Master Plan Area is served by all of the alternative transportation options listed above, to which future students, staff, and faculty would have access. No aspect of the proposed Master Plan would directly conflict with the City’s adopted General Plan policies listed above, or decrease the performance or safety of alternative transportation facilities. These facilities and services would continue to be available to Biola University students. Impacts would be less than significant and further study in an EIR is not warranted.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall consider whether the project is subject to the water supply assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, et. seq. (SB 610), and the requirements of Government Code Section 664737 (SB 221). e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?

City of La Mirada 39 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? a-g. Implementation of the project would add nearly 470,000 gross square feet of new facilities on the Biola University campus and about 1,800 students. As such, it would increase demand for water and generation of wastewater and solid waste. Impacts related to the provision of these utilities would be potentially significant and will be analyzed in the EIR. For regionally significant projects (those consisting of more than 500 residential units or 500,000 square feet of non-residential development), state law requires the preparation of a water supply assessment (WSA) prepared pursuant to the requirements of Senate Bill (SB) 610. Because implementation of the proposed Master Plan would add over 500 beds and nearly 500,000 square feet of non- residential development to the Master Plan Area, a WSA will be needed. The EIR analysis will incorporate the findings of the WSA.

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — Would the project: a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively

City of La Mirada 40 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact

XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — Would the project: considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a. As discussed in Section IV, Biological Resources, the Master Plan Area does include biological resources and some potential habitat, including mature trees that may serve roosting or nesting functions for local or migratory birds, including raptors. La Mirada Creek, which runs along and through the eastern part of campus, also may have habitat value. The project may have potentially significant impacts on these resources, and these will be further examined in the EIR. As discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, implementation of the project would involve ground-disturbing activities that could have the potential to disturb sub-surface archaeological or paleontological resources, if any are present. Also, implementation of the proposed project would involve demolition or relocation of existing buildings, some of which are greater than 40 years of age and may be historical resources for the purposes of CEQA. Impacts to historical and subsurface archaeological resources would therefore be potentially significant and will be further examined in the EIR. b. The proposed project’s goals are long term in nature, and are meant to accommodate the expected growth and need for services of Biola University. However, the proposed project’s potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals depends on the nature of its impacts, most of which will be analyzed in the EIR. The proposed project may therefore have a potentially significant impact in this regard and this issue will be further analyzed in the EIR. c, d. Potentially significant environmental impacts of implementation of the proposed project have been identified in the following impact areas: aesthetics; air quality; biological resources; cultural resources; geology/soils; greenhouse gas emissions; hazards and hazardous materials; hydrology/water quality; land use/planning; noise; population/housing; public services; transportation/traffic; and utilities/service systems. Some of these impact areas, such as air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and traffic, are either cumulative in nature, or have the potential to contribute to cumulative effects. Many of these impacts could also conceivably have the potential to cause substantial adverse effects to human beings, either directly or indirectly. Therefore, these issues are potentially significant and will be further examined in the EIR.

City of La Mirada 41 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

REFERENCES

California Air Resources Board. Area Designations Maps/State and National. Accessed September 2011. Available online at http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm.

California Department of Conservation, 2009. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Los Angeles County Map. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/FMMP/Pages/Index.aspx.

California Department of Conservation, 2009. Los Angeles County Williamson Act Map. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dlrp/lca/Pages/Index.aspx.

California Department of Finance, May 2011. E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State with Annual Percent Change — January 1, 2010 and 2011. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e-1/view.php.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2009. EnviroStor Database. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov.

California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic_highways/index.htm.

California Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. Cortese List Data Resources. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/.

California Geological Survey. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. Available online at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/ap/Pages/affected.aspx.

City of La Mirada General Plan. Adopted March 25, 2003.

City of La Mirada Municipal Code. Available online at: http://www.ci.claremont.ca.us/municipalcode.cfm

City of La Mirada. Community Services Master Plan. 2004.

City of La Mirada. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study, Imperial Highway Corridor Specific Plan. July 2011.

City of La Mirada. Public Safety webpage. Accessed September 2011. Available online at http://www.cityoflamirada.org/index.aspx?page=79.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS). Superfund Information Systems. CERCLIS Database. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/cursites/.

City of La Mirada 42 Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study

Department of Toxic Substances Control. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List- Site Cleanup. (Cortese List). Accessed January 2011. Available online at: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/default.htm.

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). Map Service Center, FIRMettes website. Accessed February 2011. Available online at: http://www.msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/info?storeId=10001&catalogI d=10001&langId=-1&content=firmetteHelp_A&title=FIRMettes.

Powell, C.L. and D. Stevens. Age and Paleoenvironmental Significance of Mega-Invertebrates from the "San Pedro" Formation in the Coyote Hills, Fullerton and Buena Park, Orange County, Southern California. 2000.

South Coast Air Quality Management District, June 2003, Revised July 2008. CEQA, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, SCAQMD. Accessed September 2011. Available online at: http://www.aqmd.gov/CEQA/handbook/LST/Method_final.pdf

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). GeoTracker Database. Accessed January 2011. Available online at: http://geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/.

PERSONS CONTACTED

Gary Sanui. City of La Mirada Public Works Department. September 14, 2011.

Lori Thompson, Community Services Director. City of La Mirada. September 19, 2011.

City of La Mirada 43

From: Yniguez, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:28 AM To: Reuben Arceo Subject: Comments RE Biola University Master Plan Project

Mr. Arceo,

After Tuesday night’s meeting I have many concerns that will affect my family and my neighbors. I would like to see the environmental impact study on the following:

1. The noise that will be created by the construction over the 20 years that this plan is proposed to be implemented. 2. The effect that the proposed increased population will have on the city’s safety services (police and fire). Cost to taxpayers. 3. The effect on the quality of life to the residents who live around the college. By this I mean with more people in the area, more vehicle traffic on the neighborhood streets, more noise, more trash, more pedestrian traffic etc, the impact on the residents environment, their quality of live, will be dramatically affected. I would like to see this studied. 4. The effect that new lighting will have, if installed around the softball field, to the residents that live across the street and in the immediate area of the field. 5. The effect to the surface streets with increased vehicle traffic, not only from student/faculty vehicles but also from construction trucks and delivery trucks over a 20 year period. Cost to taxpayers. 6. How the height of any proposed new buildings effects the environment. Especially for the residents view of the skyline.

These are only a few of the issues I would like answers to. I know I will have more questions in the future. Please, you must understand the concerns I and my neighbors have. This is our city, our neighborhood. This is where we are raising our families. Most of us bought homes in this neighborhood to stay. So our concerns are extremely valid. I will continue to attend the meetings when notified. If you need to contact me please email me at [email protected] or call me at 562 903 9193.

Paul Yniguez Resident 14813 Calpella Street

Appendix B Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emisisons Calculations

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1 Date: 2/22/2012

Biola University Master Plan Update South Coast Air Basin, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric

University/College (4Yr) 1800 Student

Parking Lot 9.51 1000sqft

Parking Structure 470 1000sqft

1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Utility Company Southern California Edison

Climate Zone 9 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31

1.3 User Entered Comments

Project Characteristics - Land Use - 25 acres of total disturbed lot acreage is an estimate based on footprints in MP; 685 from increase in beds on campus; parking totals from MP; 900k occ. gsf from Project Description: 1.03 million gsf currently, 1.93 million gsf at buildout Construction Phase - Construction phase lengths have been adjusted to more accurately reflect the time it would take to conduct these activities over the life of the Master Plan. Grading - 25 acres total disturbed calculated from footprints in Master Plan

1 of 32 Vehicle Trips - 2.41 weekday trip rate from the Traffic Study by Fehr & Peers, January 2012 Water And Wastewater - Indoor and outdoor water use inputs were changed to match the assumptions from the Water Supply Assessment performed for the Master Plan project by Rincon Consultants in January 2012. Solid Waste - Solid waste generation inputs were changed to match the amount of waste generated by the Master Plan project as estimated by using waste generation factors from CalRecycle (http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastechar/wastegenrates/) Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403; NOx control measures require heavy duty diesel-powered const. equipment to be at least Tier 2.

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Year lb/day lb/day

2011 10.20 82.69 48.59 0.08 26.11 4.23 30.34 0.01 4.22 4.22 0.00 8,018.79 0.00 0.91 0.00 8,037.80

2012 12.62 104.02 56.54 0.10 26.11 5.02 30.02 9.93 5.01 14.21 0.00 11,075.63 0.00 1.13 0.00 11,099.44

2013 11.96 97.58 71.02 0.14 7.67 4.60 11.18 3.31 4.60 7.91 0.00 13,875.61 0.00 1.07 0.00 13,898.12

2014 9.56 61.16 66.86 0.14 7.67 3.15 10.82 0.12 3.06 3.18 0.00 13,801.75 0.00 0.81 0.00 13,818.83

2015 69.53 30.17 21.35 0.03 1.20 2.55 2.74 0.02 2.55 2.55 0.00 3,072.38 0.00 0.45 0.00 3,081.77

2016 69.47 2.76 6.55 0.01 1.20 0.24 1.44 0.02 0.24 0.25 0.00 1,214.43 0.00 0.08 0.00 1,216.12

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 of 32 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Mitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Year lb/day lb/day

2011 25.44 59.53 43.36 0.08 25.55 2.60 28.15 0.01 2.59 2.59 0.00 8,018.79 0.00 0.91 0.00 8,037.80

2012 38.27 81.86 58.06 0.10 25.55 3.43 28.13 3.68 3.43 6.24 0.00 11,075.63 0.00 1.13 0.00 11,099.44

2013 38.26 81.85 72.50 0.14 7.67 3.43 10.69 1.23 3.43 4.66 0.00 13,875.61 0.00 1.07 0.00 13,898.12

2014 20.08 61.69 68.60 0.14 7.67 2.91 10.59 0.12 2.83 2.95 0.00 13,801.75 0.00 0.81 0.00 13,818.83

2015 70.56 25.23 19.82 0.03 1.20 1.55 1.74 0.02 1.55 1.55 0.00 3,072.38 0.00 0.45 0.00 3,081.77

2016 70.54 2.81 6.50 0.01 1.20 0.19 1.39 0.02 0.19 0.20 0.00 1,214.43 0.00 0.08 0.00 1,216.12

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 of 32 2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Area 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

Mobile 10.86 25.01 88.25 0.34 36.28 1.56 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.03 27,223.77 0.83 27,241.13

Total 40.31 31.89 94.03 0.38 36.28 1.56 38.36 0.52 1.52 2.55 35,482.59 0.99 0.15 35,550.22

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Area 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

Mobile 10.86 25.01 88.25 0.34 36.28 1.56 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.03 27,223.77 0.83 27,241.13

Total 40.31 31.89 94.03 0.38 36.28 1.56 38.36 0.52 1.52 2.55 35,482.59 0.99 0.15 35,550.22

3.0 Construction Detail

4 of 32 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Use DPF for Construction Equipment Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area

3.2 Demolition - 2011

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.89 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 9.84 79.87 45.95 0.07 4.10 4.10 4.10 4.10 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

Total 9.84 79.87 45.95 0.07 0.89 4.10 4.99 0.00 4.10 4.10 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

5 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2011

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.27 2.72 1.50 0.00 25.02 0.12 25.14 0.00 0.11 0.11 340.30 0.01 340.57

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.10 0.10 1.15 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 167.67 0.01 167.89

Total 0.37 2.82 2.65 0.00 25.22 0.13 25.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 507.97 0.02 508.46

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

Total 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 0.33 2.47 2.80 0.00 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

6 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2011

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.27 2.72 1.50 0.00 25.02 0.12 25.14 0.00 0.11 0.11 340.30 0.01 340.57

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.10 0.10 1.15 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 167.67 0.01 167.89

Total 0.37 2.82 2.65 0.00 25.22 0.13 25.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 507.97 0.02 508.46

3.2 Demolition - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.89 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 0.89 3.80 4.69 0.00 3.80 3.80 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

7 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2012

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.24 2.45 1.34 0.00 25.02 0.11 25.13 0.00 0.10 0.10 341.42 0.01 341.66

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.09 0.09 1.05 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 164.24 0.01 164.45

Total 0.33 2.54 2.39 0.00 25.22 0.12 25.33 0.00 0.11 0.11 505.66 0.02 506.11

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

Total 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 0.33 2.47 2.80 0.00 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

8 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2012

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.24 2.45 1.34 0.00 25.02 0.11 25.13 0.00 0.10 0.10 341.42 0.01 341.66

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.09 0.09 1.05 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 164.24 0.01 164.45

Total 0.33 2.54 2.39 0.00 25.22 0.12 25.33 0.00 0.11 0.11 505.66 0.02 506.11

3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 18.07 0.00 18.07 9.93 0.00 9.93 0.00

Off-Road 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 4.27 4.27 4.27 4.27 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

Total 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 18.07 4.27 22.34 9.93 4.27 14.20 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

9 of 32 3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.11 0.11 1.26 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 197.08 0.01 197.34

Total 0.11 0.11 1.26 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 197.08 0.01 197.34

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 6.69 0.00 6.69 3.68 0.00 3.68 0.00

Off-Road 33.00 61.14 39.79 0.07 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 0.00 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

Total 33.00 61.14 39.79 0.07 6.69 2.55 9.24 3.68 2.55 6.23 0.00 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

10 of 32 3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.11 0.11 1.26 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 197.08 0.01 197.34

Total 0.11 0.11 1.26 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 197.08 0.01 197.34

3.4 Grading - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 6.12 0.00 6.12 3.31 0.00 3.31 0.00

Off-Road 12.50 103.90 55.13 0.10 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

Total 12.50 103.90 55.13 0.10 6.12 5.01 11.13 3.31 5.01 8.32 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

11 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2012

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.12 0.12 1.40 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 218.98 0.01 219.26

Total 0.12 0.12 1.40 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 218.98 0.01 219.26

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 2.27 0.00 2.27 1.23 0.00 1.23 0.00

Off-Road 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 3.43 3.43 3.43 3.43 0.00 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

Total 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 2.27 3.43 5.70 1.23 3.43 4.66 0.00 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

12 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2012

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.12 0.12 1.40 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 218.98 0.01 219.26

Total 0.12 0.12 1.40 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 218.98 0.01 219.26

3.4 Grading - 2013

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 6.12 0.00 6.12 3.31 0.00 3.31 0.00

Off-Road 11.85 97.47 52.85 0.10 4.59 4.59 4.59 4.59 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

Total 11.85 97.47 52.85 0.10 6.12 4.59 10.71 3.31 4.59 7.90 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

13 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2013

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.11 0.11 1.29 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 214.53 0.01 214.79

Total 0.11 0.11 1.29 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 214.53 0.01 214.79

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 2.27 0.00 2.27 1.23 0.00 1.23 0.00

Off-Road 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 3.43 3.43 3.43 3.43 0.00 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

Total 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 2.27 3.43 5.70 1.23 3.43 4.66 0.00 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

14 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2013

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.11 0.11 1.29 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 214.53 0.01 214.79

Total 0.11 0.11 1.29 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 214.53 0.01 214.79

3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.28 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

Total 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.28 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

15 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.67 29.47 17.86 0.05 1.66 1.03 2.68 0.04 0.94 0.99 4,890.12 0.13 4,892.91

Worker 2.57 2.55 29.70 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.18 0.27 4,944.88 0.29 4,950.91

Total 5.24 32.02 47.56 0.10 7.68 1.23 8.90 0.12 1.12 1.26 9,835.00 0.42 9,843.82

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

Total 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

16 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.67 29.47 17.86 0.05 1.66 1.03 2.68 0.04 0.94 0.99 4,890.12 0.13 4,892.91

Worker 2.57 2.55 29.70 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.18 0.27 4,944.88 0.29 4,950.91

Total 5.24 32.02 47.56 0.10 7.68 1.23 8.90 0.12 1.12 1.26 9,835.00 0.42 9,843.82

3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 4.74 32.06 23.20 0.04 2.02 2.02 2.02 2.02 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

Total 4.74 32.06 23.20 0.04 2.02 2.02 2.02 2.02 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

17 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.43 26.78 16.28 0.05 1.66 0.92 2.57 0.04 0.84 0.89 4,902.15 0.12 4,904.68

Worker 2.39 2.32 27.39 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.19 0.27 4,858.99 0.27 4,864.64

Total 4.82 29.10 43.67 0.10 7.68 1.12 8.79 0.12 1.03 1.16 9,761.14 0.39 9,769.32

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

Total 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

18 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.43 26.78 16.28 0.05 1.66 0.92 2.57 0.04 0.84 0.89 4,902.15 0.12 4,904.68

Worker 2.39 2.32 27.39 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.19 0.27 4,858.99 0.27 4,864.64

Total 4.82 29.10 43.67 0.10 7.68 1.12 8.79 0.12 1.03 1.16 9,761.14 0.39 9,769.32

3.6 Paving - 2014

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 5.20 32.09 20.70 0.03 2.74 2.74 2.74 2.74 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 5.20 32.09 20.70 0.03 2.74 2.74 2.74 2.74 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

19 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2014

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.08 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 158.10 0.01 158.29

Total 0.08 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 158.10 0.01 158.29

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

20 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2014

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.08 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 158.10 0.01 158.29

Total 0.08 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 158.10 0.01 158.29

3.6 Paving - 2015

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 4.89 30.10 20.54 0.03 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 4.89 30.10 20.54 0.03 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

21 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2015

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.07 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 154.73 0.01 154.90

Total 0.07 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 154.73 0.01 154.90

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

22 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2015

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.07 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 154.73 0.01 154.90

Total 0.07 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 154.73 0.01 154.90

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.41 2.57 1.90 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 281.19 0.04 281.96

Total 69.09 2.57 1.90 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 281.19 0.04 281.96

23 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.44 0.42 5.03 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 949.01 0.05 950.06

Total 0.44 0.42 5.03 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 949.01 0.05 950.06

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 1.43 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.04 281.96

Total 70.11 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.04 281.96

24 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.44 0.42 5.03 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 949.01 0.05 950.06

Total 0.44 0.42 5.03 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 949.01 0.05 950.06

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.37 2.37 1.88 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 281.19 0.03 281.89

Total 69.05 2.37 1.88 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 281.19 0.03 281.89

25 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.42 0.39 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 933.24 0.05 934.24

Total 0.42 0.39 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 933.24 0.05 934.24

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 1.43 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.03 281.89

Total 70.11 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.03 281.89

26 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.42 0.39 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 933.24 0.05 934.24

Total 0.42 0.39 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 933.24 0.05 934.24

4.0 Mobile Detail

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

27 of 32 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 10.86 25.01 88.25 0.34 36.28 1.56 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.03 27,223.77 0.83 27,241.13

Unmitigated 10.86 25.01 88.25 0.34 36.28 1.56 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.03 27,223.77 0.83 27,241.13

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 University/College (4Yr) 4,338.00 2,340.00 0.00 8,670,130 8,670,130 Total 4,338.00 2,340.00 0.00 8,670,130 8,670,130

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Structure 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 University/College (4Yr) 9.50 7.30 7.30 6.40 88.60 5.00

28 of 32 5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 Mitigated NaturalGas 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 Unmitigated Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 70200 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 (4Yr) Total 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

29 of 32 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 70.2 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 (4Yr) Total 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

30 of 32 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Unmitigated 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

6.2 Area by SubCategory

Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Architectural 6.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 21.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

31 of 32 6.2 Area by SubCategory

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Architectural 6.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 21.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Vegetation

32 of 32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1 Date: 2/22/2012

Biola University Master Plan Update South Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric

University/College (4Yr) 1800 Student

Parking Lot 9.51 1000sqft

Parking Structure 470 1000sqft

1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Utility Company Southern California Edison

Climate Zone 9 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31

1.3 User Entered Comments

Project Characteristics - Land Use - 25 acres of total disturbed lot acreage is an estimate based on footprints in MP; 685 from increase in beds on campus; parking totals from MP; 900k occ. gsf from Project Description: 1.03 million gsf currently, 1.93 million gsf at buildout Construction Phase - Construction phase lengths have been adjusted to more accurately reflect the time it would take to conduct these activities over the life of the Master Plan. Grading - 25 acres total disturbed calculated from footprints in Master Plan

1 of 32 Vehicle Trips - 2.41 weekday trip rate from the Traffic Study by Fehr & Peers, January 2012 Water And Wastewater - Indoor and outdoor water use inputs were changed to match the assumptions from the Water Supply Assessment performed for the Master Plan project by Rincon Consultants in January 2012. Solid Waste - Solid waste generation inputs were changed to match the amount of waste generated by the Master Plan project as estimated by using waste generation factors from CalRecycle (http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastechar/wastegenrates/) Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403; NOx control measures require heavy duty diesel-powered const. equipment to be at least Tier 2.

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Year lb/day lb/day

2011 10.22 82.86 48.61 0.08 26.11 4.23 30.34 0.01 4.22 4.22 0.00 8,003.26 0.00 0.91 0.00 8,022.27

2012 12.63 104.04 56.45 0.10 26.11 5.02 30.03 9.93 5.01 14.21 0.00 11,057.35 0.00 1.13 0.00 11,081.14

2013 11.97 97.60 71.32 0.14 7.67 4.60 11.20 3.31 4.60 7.91 0.00 13,425.56 0.00 1.07 0.00 13,448.06

2014 9.83 62.64 67.22 0.14 7.67 3.16 10.84 0.12 3.07 3.20 0.00 13,357.16 0.00 0.81 0.00 13,374.08

2015 69.56 30.18 21.30 0.03 1.20 2.55 2.74 0.02 2.55 2.55 0.00 3,059.37 0.00 0.45 0.00 3,068.75

2016 69.49 2.82 6.21 0.01 1.20 0.24 1.44 0.02 0.24 0.25 0.00 1,135.93 0.00 0.08 0.00 1,137.56

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 of 32 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Mitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Year lb/day lb/day

2011 25.45 59.70 43.38 0.08 25.55 2.60 28.15 0.01 2.59 2.59 0.00 8,003.26 0.00 0.91 0.00 8,022.27

2012 38.28 81.88 57.97 0.10 25.55 3.43 28.13 3.68 3.43 6.24 0.00 11,057.35 0.00 1.13 0.00 11,081.14

2013 38.27 81.87 72.81 0.14 7.67 3.43 10.71 1.23 3.43 4.66 0.00 13,425.56 0.00 1.07 0.00 13,448.06

2014 20.35 63.17 68.96 0.14 7.67 2.93 10.60 0.12 2.84 2.97 0.00 13,357.16 0.00 0.81 0.00 13,374.08

2015 70.59 25.24 19.76 0.03 1.20 1.55 1.74 0.02 1.55 1.55 0.00 3,059.37 0.00 0.45 0.00 3,068.75

2016 70.56 2.87 6.16 0.01 1.20 0.19 1.39 0.02 0.19 0.20 0.00 1,135.93 0.00 0.08 0.00 1,137.56

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 of 32 2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Area 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

Mobile 11.32 25.59 86.57 0.32 36.28 1.57 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.04 25,401.01 0.74 25,416.51

Total 40.77 32.47 92.35 0.36 36.28 1.57 38.36 0.52 1.52 2.56 33,659.83 0.90 0.15 33,725.60

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Area 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

Mobile 11.32 25.59 86.57 0.32 36.28 1.57 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.04 25,401.01 0.74 25,416.51

Total 40.77 32.47 92.35 0.36 36.28 1.57 38.36 0.52 1.52 2.56 33,659.83 0.90 0.15 33,725.60

3.0 Construction Detail

4 of 32 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Use DPF for Construction Equipment Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area

3.2 Demolition - 2011

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.89 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 9.84 79.87 45.95 0.07 4.10 4.10 4.10 4.10 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

Total 9.84 79.87 45.95 0.07 0.89 4.10 4.99 0.00 4.10 4.10 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

5 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2011

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.27 2.87 1.59 0.00 25.02 0.12 25.14 0.00 0.11 0.12 338.75 0.01 339.03

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.10 0.12 1.08 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 153.69 0.01 153.91

Total 0.37 2.99 2.67 0.00 25.22 0.13 25.34 0.00 0.12 0.13 492.44 0.02 492.94

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

Total 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 0.33 2.47 2.80 0.00 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.82 0.88 7,529.33

6 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2011

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.27 2.87 1.59 0.00 25.02 0.12 25.14 0.00 0.11 0.12 338.75 0.01 339.03

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.10 0.12 1.08 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 153.69 0.01 153.91

Total 0.37 2.99 2.67 0.00 25.22 0.13 25.34 0.00 0.12 0.13 492.44 0.02 492.94

3.2 Demolition - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.89 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

Total 9.34 75.14 44.19 0.07 0.89 3.80 4.69 0.00 3.80 3.80 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

7 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2012

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.25 2.59 1.43 0.00 25.02 0.11 25.13 0.00 0.10 0.10 339.82 0.01 340.07

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.10 0.10 0.99 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 150.52 0.01 150.72

Total 0.35 2.69 2.42 0.00 25.22 0.12 25.33 0.00 0.11 0.11 490.34 0.02 490.79

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

Total 25.07 56.71 40.71 0.07 0.33 2.47 2.80 0.00 2.47 2.47 0.00 7,510.81 0.83 7,528.31

8 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2012

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.25 2.59 1.43 0.00 25.02 0.11 25.13 0.00 0.10 0.10 339.82 0.01 340.07

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.10 0.10 0.99 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 150.52 0.01 150.72

Total 0.35 2.69 2.42 0.00 25.22 0.12 25.33 0.00 0.11 0.11 490.34 0.02 490.79

3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 18.07 0.00 18.07 9.93 0.00 9.93 0.00

Off-Road 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 4.27 4.27 4.27 4.27 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

Total 10.43 84.72 47.82 0.07 18.07 4.27 22.34 9.93 4.27 14.20 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

9 of 32 3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.12 0.13 1.19 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 180.62 0.01 180.87

Total 0.12 0.13 1.19 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 180.62 0.01 180.87

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 6.69 0.00 6.69 3.68 0.00 3.68 0.00

Off-Road 33.00 61.14 39.79 0.07 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 0.00 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

Total 33.00 61.14 39.79 0.07 6.69 2.55 9.24 3.68 2.55 6.23 0.00 7,997.69 0.93 8,017.28

10 of 32 3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.12 0.13 1.19 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 180.62 0.01 180.87

Total 0.12 0.13 1.19 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.01 180.62 0.01 180.87

3.4 Grading - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 6.12 0.00 6.12 3.31 0.00 3.31 0.00

Off-Road 12.50 103.90 55.13 0.10 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

Total 12.50 103.90 55.13 0.10 6.12 5.01 11.13 3.31 5.01 8.32 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

11 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2012

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.13 0.14 1.32 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 200.69 0.01 200.96

Total 0.13 0.14 1.32 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 200.69 0.01 200.96

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 2.27 0.00 2.27 1.23 0.00 1.23 0.00

Off-Road 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 3.43 3.43 3.43 3.43 0.00 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

Total 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 2.27 3.43 5.70 1.23 3.43 4.66 0.00 10,856.65 1.12 10,880.18

12 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2012

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.13 0.14 1.32 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 200.69 0.01 200.96

Total 0.13 0.14 1.32 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 200.69 0.01 200.96

3.4 Grading - 2013

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 6.12 0.00 6.12 3.31 0.00 3.31 0.00

Off-Road 11.85 97.47 52.85 0.10 4.59 4.59 4.59 4.59 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

Total 11.85 97.47 52.85 0.10 6.12 4.59 10.71 3.31 4.59 7.90 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

13 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2013

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.12 0.13 1.21 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 196.57 0.01 196.82

Total 0.12 0.13 1.21 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 196.57 0.01 196.82

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive Dust 2.27 0.00 2.27 1.23 0.00 1.23 0.00

Off-Road 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 3.43 3.43 3.43 3.43 0.00 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

Total 38.15 81.74 56.65 0.10 2.27 3.43 5.70 1.23 3.43 4.66 0.00 10,856.66 1.06 10,878.90

14 of 32 3.4 Grading - 2013

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.12 0.13 1.21 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 196.57 0.01 196.82

Total 0.12 0.13 1.21 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.01 196.57 0.01 196.82

3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.28 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

Total 5.17 34.66 23.45 0.04 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.28 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

15 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.81 30.82 20.08 0.05 1.66 1.05 2.70 0.04 0.96 1.01 4,853.91 0.14 4,856.84

Worker 2.73 2.92 27.78 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.18 0.27 4,531.03 0.27 4,536.80

Total 5.54 33.74 47.86 0.10 7.68 1.25 8.92 0.12 1.14 1.28 9,384.94 0.41 9,393.64

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

Total 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.62 0.46 4,050.31

16 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.81 30.82 20.08 0.05 1.66 1.05 2.70 0.04 0.96 1.01 4,853.91 0.14 4,856.84

Worker 2.73 2.92 27.78 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.18 0.27 4,531.03 0.27 4,536.80

Total 5.54 33.74 47.86 0.10 7.68 1.25 8.92 0.12 1.14 1.28 9,384.94 0.41 9,393.64

3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 4.74 32.06 23.20 0.04 2.02 2.02 2.02 2.02 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

Total 4.74 32.06 23.20 0.04 2.02 2.02 2.02 2.02 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

17 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.56 27.91 18.48 0.05 1.66 0.94 2.59 0.04 0.86 0.90 4,864.94 0.13 4,867.59

Worker 2.53 2.67 25.54 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.19 0.27 4,451.61 0.26 4,456.99

Total 5.09 30.58 44.02 0.10 7.68 1.14 8.81 0.12 1.05 1.17 9,316.55 0.39 9,324.58

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

Total 15.26 32.59 24.94 0.04 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.79 0.00 4,040.61 0.42 4,049.51

18 of 32 3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 2.56 27.91 18.48 0.05 1.66 0.94 2.59 0.04 0.86 0.90 4,864.94 0.13 4,867.59

Worker 2.53 2.67 25.54 0.05 6.02 0.20 6.22 0.08 0.19 0.27 4,451.61 0.26 4,456.99

Total 5.09 30.58 44.02 0.10 7.68 1.14 8.81 0.12 1.05 1.17 9,316.55 0.39 9,324.58

3.6 Paving - 2014

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 5.20 32.09 20.70 0.03 2.74 2.74 2.74 2.74 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 5.20 32.09 20.70 0.03 2.74 2.74 2.74 2.74 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

19 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2014

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.08 0.09 0.83 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 144.85 0.01 145.02

Total 0.08 0.09 0.83 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 144.85 0.01 145.02

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.47 2,927.48

20 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2014

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.08 0.09 0.83 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 144.85 0.01 145.02

Total 0.08 0.09 0.83 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 144.85 0.01 145.02

3.6 Paving - 2015

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 4.89 30.10 20.54 0.03 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 4.89 30.10 20.54 0.03 2.54 2.54 2.54 2.54 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

21 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2015

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.08 0.08 0.76 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 141.73 0.01 141.89

Total 0.08 0.08 0.76 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 141.73 0.01 141.89

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Off-Road 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 14.89 25.16 19.00 0.03 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 0.00 2,917.65 0.44 2,926.87

22 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2015

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.08 0.08 0.76 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 141.73 0.01 141.89

Total 0.08 0.08 0.76 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 141.73 0.01 141.89

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.41 2.57 1.90 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 281.19 0.04 281.96

Total 69.09 2.57 1.90 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 281.19 0.04 281.96

23 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.47 0.49 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 869.25 0.05 870.25

Total 0.47 0.49 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 869.25 0.05 870.25

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 1.43 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.04 281.96

Total 70.11 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.04 281.96

24 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.47 0.49 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 869.25 0.05 870.25

Total 0.47 0.49 4.67 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.05 869.25 0.05 870.25

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.37 2.37 1.88 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 281.19 0.03 281.89

Total 69.05 2.37 1.88 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 281.19 0.03 281.89

25 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.44 0.45 4.33 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 854.74 0.04 855.68

Total 0.44 0.45 4.33 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 854.74 0.04 855.68

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Archit. Coating 68.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 1.43 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.03 281.89

Total 70.11 2.42 1.83 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 281.19 0.03 281.89

26 of 32 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.44 0.45 4.33 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 854.74 0.04 855.68

Total 0.44 0.45 4.33 0.01 1.20 0.04 1.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 854.74 0.04 855.68

4.0 Mobile Detail

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

27 of 32 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 11.32 25.59 86.57 0.32 36.28 1.57 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.04 25,401.01 0.74 25,416.51

Unmitigated 11.32 25.59 86.57 0.32 36.28 1.57 37.84 0.52 1.52 2.04 25,401.01 0.74 25,416.51

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 University/College (4Yr) 4,338.00 2,340.00 0.00 8,670,130 8,670,130 Total 4,338.00 2,340.00 0.00 8,670,130 8,670,130

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Structure 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 University/College (4Yr) 9.50 7.30 7.30 6.40 88.60 5.00

28 of 32 5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 Mitigated NaturalGas 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 Unmitigated Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 70200 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 (4Yr) Total 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

29 of 32 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Land Use kBTU lb/day lb/day

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 70.2 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09 (4Yr) Total 0.76 6.88 5.78 0.04 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 8,258.82 0.16 0.15 8,309.09

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

30 of 32 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Unmitigated 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

6.2 Area by SubCategory

Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Architectural 6.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 21.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

31 of 32 6.2 Area by SubCategory

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Architectural 6.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 21.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 28.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Vegetation

32 of 32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1 Date: 2/22/2012

Biola University Master Plan Update South Coast Air Basin, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric

University/College (4Yr) 1800 Student

Parking Lot 9.51 1000sqft

Parking Structure 470 1000sqft

1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Utility Company Southern California Edison

Climate Zone 9 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31

1.3 User Entered Comments

Project Characteristics - Land Use - 25 acres of total disturbed lot acreage is an estimate based on footprints in MP; 685 from increase in beds on campus; parking totals from MP; 900k occ. gsf from Project Description: 1.03 million gsf currently, 1.93 million gsf at buildout Construction Phase - Construction phase lengths have been adjusted to more accurately reflect the time it would take to conduct these activities over the life of the Master Plan. Grading - 25 acres total disturbed calculated from footprints in Master Plan

1 of 37 Vehicle Trips - 2.41 weekday trip rate from the Traffic Study by Fehr & Peers, January 2012 Water And Wastewater - Indoor and outdoor water use inputs were changed to match the assumptions from the Water Supply Assessment performed for the Master Plan project by Rincon Consultants in January 2012. Solid Waste - Solid waste generation inputs were changed to match the amount of waste generated by the Master Plan project as estimated by using waste generation factors from CalRecycle (http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastechar/wastegenrates/) Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403; NOx control measures require heavy duty diesel-powered const. equipment to be at least Tier 2.

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2011 1.33 10.75 6.32 0.01 3.06 0.55 3.61 0.02 0.55 0.57 0.00 944.22 944.22 0.11 0.00 946.46

2012 1.50 12.22 6.84 0.01 2.11 0.60 2.71 1.13 0.60 1.73 0.00 1,125.16 1,125.16 0.12 0.00 1,127.72

2013 1.47 10.89 8.08 0.02 1.23 0.54 1.77 0.44 0.53 0.97 0.00 1,444.64 1,444.64 0.12 0.00 1,447.08

2014 1.23 7.83 8.54 0.02 0.87 0.41 1.28 0.02 0.40 0.41 0.00 1,551.05 1,551.05 0.09 0.00 1,553.03

2015 5.17 2.04 1.76 0.00 0.09 0.17 0.26 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 242.67 242.67 0.03 0.00 243.30

2016 7.99 0.32 0.73 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.15 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 120.98 120.98 0.01 0.00 121.15

Total 18.69 44.05 32.27 0.06 7.48 2.30 9.78 1.61 2.28 3.88 0.00 5,428.72 5,428.72 0.48 0.00 5,438.74

2 of 37 2.1 Overall Construction

Mitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2011 3.31 7.74 5.64 0.01 2.99 0.34 3.33 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.00 944.22 944.22 0.11 0.00 946.46

2012 4.62 9.23 6.37 0.01 0.81 0.39 1.19 0.42 0.39 0.81 0.00 1,125.16 1,125.16 0.12 0.00 1,127.72

2013 3.94 9.65 8.44 0.02 0.73 0.42 1.15 0.17 0.42 0.59 0.00 1,444.64 1,444.64 0.12 0.00 1,447.08

2014 2.60 7.87 8.75 0.02 0.87 0.37 1.24 0.02 0.36 0.38 0.00 1,551.05 1,551.05 0.09 0.00 1,553.03

2015 5.84 1.73 1.66 0.00 0.09 0.11 0.19 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 242.67 242.67 0.03 0.00 243.30

2016 8.11 0.33 0.72 0.00 0.12 0.02 0.15 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 120.98 120.98 0.01 0.00 121.15

Total 28.42 36.55 31.58 0.06 5.61 1.65 7.25 0.62 1.64 2.25 0.00 5,428.72 5,428.72 0.48 0.00 5,438.74

3 of 37 2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 5.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 4,288.85 4,288.85 0.16 0.08 4,315.48

Mobile 1.52 3.58 12.57 0.05 4.71 0.22 4.94 0.07 0.22 0.29 0.00 3,392.36 3,392.36 0.10 0.00 3,394.39

Waste 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.56 0.00 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56

Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.53 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65

Total 6.90 4.84 13.63 0.06 4.71 0.22 5.04 0.07 0.22 0.39 105.56 8,081.74 8,187.30 7.90 0.12 8,389.08

4 of 37 2.2 Overall Operational

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 5.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Energy 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 4,288.85 4,288.85 0.16 0.08 4,315.48

Mobile 1.52 3.58 12.57 0.05 4.71 0.22 4.94 0.07 0.22 0.29 0.00 3,392.36 3,392.36 0.10 0.00 3,394.39

Waste 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.56 0.00 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56

Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.53 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65

Total 6.90 4.84 13.63 0.06 4.71 0.22 5.04 0.07 0.22 0.39 105.56 8,081.74 8,187.30 7.90 0.12 8,389.08

3.0 Construction Detail

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Use DPF for Construction Equipment Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area

5 of 37 3.2 Demolition - 2011

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 1.28 10.38 5.97 0.01 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.00 885.54 885.54 0.10 0.00 887.72

Total 1.28 10.38 5.97 0.01 0.12 0.53 0.65 0.02 0.53 0.55 0.00 885.54 885.54 0.10 0.00 887.72

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.04 0.35 0.20 0.00 2.92 0.02 2.94 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 40.06 40.06 0.00 0.00 40.09

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.63 18.63 0.00 0.00 18.65

Total 0.05 0.36 0.34 0.00 2.94 0.02 2.96 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 58.69 58.69 0.00 0.00 58.74

6 of 37 3.2 Demolition - 2011

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 3.26 7.37 5.29 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 885.54 885.54 0.10 0.00 887.72

Total 3.26 7.37 5.29 0.01 0.04 0.32 0.36 0.01 0.32 0.33 0.00 885.54 885.54 0.10 0.00 887.72

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.04 0.35 0.20 0.00 2.92 0.02 2.94 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 40.06 40.06 0.00 0.00 40.09

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.63 18.63 0.00 0.00 18.65

Total 0.05 0.36 0.34 0.00 2.94 0.02 2.96 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 58.69 58.69 0.00 0.00 58.74

7 of 37 3.2 Demolition - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.41 3.41 0.00 0.00 3.41

Total 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.41 3.41 0.00 0.00 3.41

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.15

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07

Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.22

8 of 37 3.2 Demolition - 2012

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.41 3.41 0.00 0.00 3.41

Total 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.41 3.41 0.00 0.00 3.41

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.15

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07

Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.22

9 of 37 3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 1.26 0.00 1.26 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.73 5.93 3.35 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 507.74 507.74 0.06 0.00 508.98

Total 0.73 5.93 3.35 0.01 1.26 0.30 1.56 0.70 0.30 1.00 0.00 507.74 507.74 0.06 0.00 508.98

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.79 11.79 0.00 0.00 11.80

Total 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.79 11.79 0.00 0.00 11.80

10 of 37 3.3 Site Preparation - 2012

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.47 0.00 0.47 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 2.31 4.28 2.78 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 507.74 507.74 0.06 0.00 508.98

Total 2.31 4.28 2.78 0.01 0.47 0.18 0.65 0.26 0.18 0.44 0.00 507.74 507.74 0.06 0.00 508.98

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.79 11.79 0.00 0.00 11.80

Total 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.79 11.79 0.00 0.00 11.80

11 of 37 3.4 Grading - 2012

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.75 6.23 3.31 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 590.78 590.78 0.06 0.00 592.06

Total 0.75 6.23 3.31 0.01 0.80 0.30 1.10 0.44 0.30 0.74 0.00 590.78 590.78 0.06 0.00 592.06

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.23 11.23 0.00 0.00 11.24

Total 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.23 11.23 0.00 0.00 11.24

12 of 37 3.4 Grading - 2012

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 2.29 4.90 3.40 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 590.78 590.78 0.06 0.00 592.06

Total 2.29 4.90 3.40 0.01 0.30 0.21 0.51 0.16 0.21 0.37 0.00 590.78 590.78 0.06 0.00 592.06

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.23 11.23 0.00 0.00 11.24

Total 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.23 11.23 0.00 0.00 11.24

13 of 37 3.4 Grading - 2013

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.84 6.92 3.75 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.00 699.09 699.09 0.07 0.00 700.52

Total 0.84 6.92 3.75 0.01 0.80 0.33 1.13 0.44 0.33 0.77 0.00 699.09 699.09 0.07 0.00 700.52

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.01 13.01 0.00 0.00 13.03

Total 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.01 13.01 0.00 0.00 13.03

14 of 37 3.4 Grading - 2013

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Fugitive Dust 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 2.71 5.80 4.02 0.01 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.00 699.09 699.09 0.07 0.00 700.52

Total 2.71 5.80 4.02 0.01 0.30 0.24 0.54 0.16 0.24 0.40 0.00 699.09 699.09 0.07 0.00 700.52

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.01 13.01 0.00 0.00 13.03

Total 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.01 13.01 0.00 0.00 13.03

15 of 37 3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.31 2.06 1.39 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 218.04 218.04 0.02 0.00 218.57

Total 0.31 2.06 1.39 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 218.04 218.04 0.02 0.00 218.57

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.16 1.75 1.15 0.00 0.09 0.06 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 263.14 263.14 0.01 0.00 263.30

Worker 0.15 0.16 1.70 0.00 0.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 251.35 251.35 0.02 0.00 251.67

Total 0.31 1.91 2.85 0.00 0.41 0.07 0.48 0.00 0.07 0.08 0.00 514.49 514.49 0.03 0.00 514.97

16 of 37 3.5 Building Construction - 2013

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.91 1.94 1.48 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 218.04 218.04 0.02 0.00 218.57

Total 0.91 1.94 1.48 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 218.04 218.04 0.02 0.00 218.57

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.16 1.75 1.15 0.00 0.09 0.06 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 263.14 263.14 0.01 0.00 263.30

Worker 0.15 0.16 1.70 0.00 0.32 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 251.35 251.35 0.02 0.00 251.67

Total 0.31 1.91 2.85 0.00 0.41 0.07 0.48 0.00 0.07 0.08 0.00 514.49 514.49 0.03 0.00 514.97

17 of 37 3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.59 4.02 2.91 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 459.91 459.91 0.05 0.00 460.92

Total 0.59 4.02 2.91 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 459.91 459.91 0.05 0.00 460.92

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.32 3.35 2.23 0.01 0.19 0.12 0.30 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.00 556.35 556.35 0.01 0.00 556.65

Worker 0.29 0.31 3.29 0.01 0.68 0.03 0.71 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.00 520.89 520.89 0.03 0.00 521.51

Total 0.61 3.66 5.52 0.02 0.87 0.15 1.01 0.02 0.13 0.14 0.00 1,077.24 1,077.24 0.04 0.00 1,078.16

18 of 37 3.5 Building Construction - 2014

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 1.92 4.09 3.13 0.01 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.00 459.91 459.91 0.05 0.00 460.92

Total 1.92 4.09 3.13 0.01 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.00 459.91 459.91 0.05 0.00 460.92

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.32 3.35 2.23 0.01 0.19 0.12 0.30 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.00 556.35 556.35 0.01 0.00 556.65

Worker 0.29 0.31 3.29 0.01 0.68 0.03 0.71 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.00 520.89 520.89 0.03 0.00 521.51

Total 0.61 3.66 5.52 0.02 0.87 0.15 1.01 0.02 0.13 0.14 0.00 1,077.24 1,077.24 0.04 0.00 1,078.16

19 of 37 3.6 Paving - 2014

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.03 0.16 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 13.23 13.23 0.00 0.00 13.28

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.03 0.16 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 13.23 13.23 0.00 0.00 13.28

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.68

Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.68

20 of 37 3.6 Paving - 2014

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 13.23 13.23 0.00 0.00 13.28

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 13.23 13.23 0.00 0.00 13.28

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.68

Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.68

21 of 37 3.6 Paving - 2015

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.30 1.82 1.24 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 160.09 160.09 0.02 0.00 160.60

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.30 1.82 1.24 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.00 160.09 160.09 0.02 0.00 160.60

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00

Total 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00

22 of 37 3.6 Paving - 2015

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Off-Road 0.90 1.52 1.15 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 160.09 160.09 0.02 0.00 160.60

Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0.90 1.52 1.15 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 160.09 160.09 0.02 0.00 160.60

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00

Total 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00

23 of 37 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 4.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.03 0.18 0.13 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 17.85 17.85 0.00 0.00 17.90

Total 4.84 0.18 0.13 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 17.85 17.85 0.00 0.00 17.90

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.03 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.74 56.74 0.00 0.00 56.80

Total 0.03 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.74 56.74 0.00 0.00 56.80

24 of 37 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 4.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.10 0.17 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 17.85 17.85 0.00 0.00 17.90

Total 4.91 0.17 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 17.85 17.85 0.00 0.00 17.90

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.03 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.74 56.74 0.00 0.00 56.80

Total 0.03 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.74 56.74 0.00 0.00 56.80

25 of 37 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 7.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.04 0.27 0.22 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 29.33 29.33 0.00 0.00 29.40

Total 7.94 0.27 0.22 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 29.33 29.33 0.00 0.00 29.40

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 91.65 91.65 0.00 0.00 91.75

Total 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 91.65 91.65 0.00 0.00 91.75

26 of 37 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Archit. Coating 7.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Off-Road 0.16 0.28 0.21 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 29.33 29.33 0.00 0.00 29.40

Total 8.06 0.28 0.21 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 29.33 29.33 0.00 0.00 29.40

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Worker 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 91.65 91.65 0.00 0.00 91.75

Total 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 91.65 91.65 0.00 0.00 91.75

4.0 Mobile Detail

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 27 of 37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 1.52 3.58 12.57 0.05 4.71 0.22 4.94 0.07 0.22 0.29 0.00 3,392.36 3,392.36 0.10 0.00 3,394.39

Unmitigated 1.52 3.58 12.57 0.05 4.71 0.22 4.94 0.07 0.22 0.29 0.00 3,392.36 3,392.36 0.10 0.00 3,394.39

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 University/College (4Yr) 4,338.00 2,340.00 0.00 8,670,130 8,670,130 Total 4,338.00 2,340.00 0.00 8,670,130 8,670,130

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Structure 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00

28 of 37 Miles Trip %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW University/College (4Yr) 9.50 7.30 7.30 6.40 88.60 5.00

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Electricity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,921.50 2,921.50 0.13 0.05 2,939.81 Mitigated Electricity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,921.50 2,921.50 0.13 0.05 2,939.81 Unmitigated NaturalGas 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 1,367.34 1,367.34 0.03 0.03 1,375.66 Mitigated NaturalGas 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 1,367.34 1,367.34 0.03 0.03 1,375.66 Unmitigated Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

29 of 37 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Land Use kBTU tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 2.5623e+007 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 1,367.34 1,367.34 0.03 0.03 1,375.66 (4Yr) Total 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 1,367.34 1,367.34 0.03 0.03 1,375.66

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Land Use kBTU tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 2.5623e+007 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 1,367.34 1,367.34 0.03 0.03 1,375.66 (4Yr) Total 0.14 1.26 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 1,367.34 1,367.34 0.03 0.03 1,375.66

30 of 37 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Unmitigated

Electricity Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kWh tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 1.0044e+007 2,921.50 0.13 0.05 2,939.81 (4Yr) Total 2,921.50 0.13 0.05 2,939.81

Mitigated

Electricity Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kWh tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 1.0044e+007 2,921.50 0.13 0.05 2,939.81 (4Yr) Total 2,921.50 0.13 0.05 2,939.81

6.0 Area Detail

31 of 37 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 5.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Unmitigated 5.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

6.2 Area by SubCategory

Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 3.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 5.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

32 of 37 6.2 Area by SubCategory

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2

SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coating Consumer 3.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Products Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 5.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

33 of 37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65

Unmitigated 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

7.2 Water by Land Use

Unmitigated

Indoor/Outdoor ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use

Land Use Mgal tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 / 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 45.2412 / 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65 (4Yr) 70.7619 Total 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65

34 of 37 7.2 Water by Land Use

Mitigated

Indoor/Outdoor ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use

Land Use Mgal tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 / 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 45.2412 / 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65 (4Yr) 70.7619 Total 400.53 1.40 0.04 442.65

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

35 of 37 Category/Year

ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

tons/yr MT/yr

Mitigated 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56

Unmitigated 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56

Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

8.2 Waste by Land Use

Unmitigated

Waste ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Disposed

Land Use tons tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 520 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56 (4Yr) Total 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56

36 of 37 8.2 Waste by Land Use

Mitigated

Waste ROG NOx CO SO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Disposed

Land Use tons tons/yr MT/yr

Parking Lot 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Structure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

University/College 520 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56 (4Yr) Total 105.56 6.24 0.00 236.56

9.0 Vegetation

37 of 37

Appendix C Historic and Cultural Resources Information

Biola University

Master Plan Update La Mirada, California

Historic Resources Technical Report DRAFT

Prepared for: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 180 North Ashwood Avenue Ventura, California 93003

Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Inc. Architects, Planners & Conservators 65 N. Raymond Ave. No. 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

February 9, 2012 HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 0

BIOLA UNIVERSITY La Mirada, California

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction ...... 1

2. Regulatory Framework: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ...... 3

3. Site and Building Descriptions ...... 5

4. Historical Background ...... 15

5. Federal, State and Local Evaluation Criteria ...... 21

6. Evaluation of Historical Significance ...... 25

7. Impacts of the Proposed Project ...... 28

8. Bibliography ...... 30

Appendix A: Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Series Forms

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 1

1. Introduction

In response to a request from Rincon Consultants, Inc., Architectural Resources Group, Inc. (ARG) has evaluated the potential impacts to historical resources relating to the proposed Biola University Master Plan Update. The Master Plan Update is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21084.1, which states: “a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.” The Master Plan Update project area includes resources that exceed fifty years of age and thus have the potential to be historic resources for the purposes of CEQA.

ARG evaluated all buildings that both have the potential to be impacted by the proposed project and will meet the 50 year age requirement (delineated by National Register guidelines for evaluating historic significance) within the 20‐year horizon of the Master Plan Update. Resources were evaluated for eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register, or NRHP) and California Register of Historical Resources (California Register, or CRHR).

As a result of this study, ARG recommends that none of the buildings evaluated are eligible for the California or National Registers, and therefore none are historic resources for the purposes of CEQA. As such, the proposed Biola Master Plan Update does not constitute an impact on historic resources.

1.1 Methodology

To prepare the following historic resource evaluation, ARG performed the following research, documentation, and analysis‐related tasks:

 Conducted a site visit to examine and photograph the buildings and site features within the project area on January 18, 2012.  Reviewed alteration and maintenance records from the collection of Biola University’s Department of Facilities, provided by Ken Bascom, Director of Facilities.  Conducted archival research relating to the history and development of Biola University and adjacent neighborhoods at La Mirada City Hall.  Conducted a permit search at the City of La Mirada Building Department, reviewing all building permits pertaining to resources within the project area.  Consulted ARG’s in‐house library of books and periodicals relating to architectural history and the social and developmental history of the region, as well as numerous online repositories of historic periodicals, books, maps and photographs.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 2

 Reviewed the California Historical Resources Inventory System (CHRIS), which includes properties listed or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, listed or determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, California Register Historical Landmarks, Points of Historical Interest, and properties that have been evaluated in historical resources surveys, environmental analyses and other planning activities.  Reviewed pertinent project documents, including the Biola University Master Plan Update Initial Study, dated September 2011, and project maps dated May 2011.

ARG evaluated only those buildings that both have the potential to be impacted by the proposed Master Plan Update and will meet the 50 year age requirement within the 20‐year horizon of the Master Plan Update. There are 20 such buildings on Biola’s campus; each was individually evaluated for potential significance. Extensive development in the 1990s and 2000s has significantly changed Biola’s campus. As a result, it was deemed unnecessary to evaluate the campus as a whole for potential significance as a historic district. The former McNally Junior High School campus, however, was evaluated for potential significance as a historic district since it is complex of related (and in many cases physically connected) buildings constructed at the same time (1957) for a single purpose.

Evaluated buildings were recorded on California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 series forms, which are included in the appendices of this report. A DPR 523A (Primary Record) and 523B (Building, Structure and Object Record) set was completed for 12 of the buildings evaluated. The remaining eight buildings, which comprise the former McNally Junior High School campus, were recorded on a single DPR 523A and 523D (District Record) set.

All analysis was completed by ARG architectural historians and historic preservation planners Katie Horak and Allison Lyons. Both meet the Secretary of the Interior’s professional qualifications standards (36 CFR Part 61) for history and architectural history.

1.2 Prior Studies

The Biola University campus and its buildings have not been evaluated for historic resource eligibility in any previous studies.

1.3 Summary of Findings

ARG’s conclusion is that none of the buildings and site features within the Biola University Master Plan Update project area appears eligible for listing, either individually or as a contributor to a district, in the California or National Registers. Therefore, those buildings and site features should not be considered historical resources for the purposes of CEQA.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 3

The proposed project entails:

 The demolition of 25 existing buildings.  The construction of 16 new buildings and three parking structures, representing an increase in total square footage of campus buildings by about 30 percent over the present Planned Unit Development (PUD) limits and an increase to total parking spaces by 26 percent over existing spaces.

Because none of the buildings, structures and site features identified in this report was identified as eligible for the California Register, the project does not constitute an impact to historical resources under CEQA.

2. Regulatory Framework: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

When a proposed project may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a city or county to carefully consider the possible impacts before proceeding (Public Resources Code Section 21084.1). CEQA equates a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource with a significant effect on the environment (Section 21084.1). The Act explicitly prohibits the use of a categorical exemption within the CEQA Guidelines for projects which may cause such a change (Section 21084).

A “substantial adverse change” in the significance of a historical resource is defined as “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired.” Further, the significance of an historical resource is “materially impaired” when a project:

 “demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources; or

 “demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources... or its identification in an historical resources survey..., unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or

 “demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 4

for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA.” (Guidelines Section 15064.5(b))

CEQA effectively requires preparation of a mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR whenever a project may adversely impact historic resources. Current CEQA law provides that an EIR must be prepared whenever it can be fairly argued, on the basis of substantial evidence in the administrative record, that a project may have a significant effect on a historical resource (Guidelines Section 15064(f)(1)). A mitigated Negative Declaration may be used where all potentially significant effects can be mitigated to a level of insignificance (Guidelines Section 15064(f)(2)). For example, a mitigated Negative Declaration may be adopted for a project that mitigates significant effects on an historical resource by meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and local historic preservation regulations.

For the purposes of CEQA (Guidelines Section 15064.5), the term “historical resources” shall include the following:

1. A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (Pub. Res. Code Section 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et.seq.).

2. A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant.

3. Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4852) as follows:

A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 5

D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. (Guidelines Section 15064.5)

3. Site and Building Descriptions

3.1 Setting

The project site is located in the City of La Mirada, which is located on the eastern edge of Los Angeles County, California. Situated approximately 20 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, the City of La Mirada was mostly ranchland and olive groves from the 1880s until the 1950s, at which time much of the remaining open land in the southeastern reaches of Los Angeles County was subdivided for single‐family residential suburban development. Since its incorporation in 1960, La Mirada has remained primarily a residential, suburban community.

The City of La Mirada is mainly residential north of Stage Road with predominantly manufacturing and regional commercial uses south of Stage Road. The city’s residential development is primarily characterized single‐family subdivisions arranged along curvilinear streets with cul‐du‐sacs. Commercial development is clustered along the major thoroughfares of Telegraph Road and Imperial Highway in the north, La Mirada Boulevard in the east, and Rosecrans Boulevard in the south. The development patterns are characteristic of post‐World War II suburban development throughout Los Angeles and Orange counties. Interstate 5 (Santa Ana Freeway) traverses the City at its southern edge.

3.2 Biola University Campus

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles (for which Biola is an acronym) in 1908. The first classes were held in various locations throughout downtown Los Angeles. In 1914, Biola moved all classes and administrative offices into a single building at Sixth and Hope Streets, where they remained until 1959. At its downtown location, the institute eventually grew to encompass four schools: the Bible Institute, BIOLA Bible College, Talbot Theological Seminary, and the School of Missionary Medicine. The four schools and the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church, shared Biola’s downtown facility. Biola’s enrollment increased dramatically following World War II with the availability of GI Bill funds to cover tuition costs for veterans. The need for more space, preferably in a location with the opportunity for future expansion, prompted Biola’s relocation to La Mirada. After considering other suburban sites around Los Angeles County, the trustees of Biola purchased an initial 50 undeveloped acres in La Mirada in 1954.

Ray A. Myers, chairman of the board of directors and owner of Myers Brothers Construction Company, hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 6

campus in 1954.1 Biola’s president, Dr. Samuel Sutherland, instructed Ullrich to design a campus with buildings sited at a variety of angles in a deliberate departure from the rectilinear street grid of the college’s former location in downtown Los Angeles.2 He also requested that the style of the campus be “a type of building that is non‐dated.”3 Ullrich planned a campus with modest, Mid‐Century Modern style buildings grouped by school around landscaped quadrangles.4 The master plan was unveiled in 1955 and a scale model was used for fundraising efforts at religious organizations around the United States.

By 1957, Biola had raised the three million dollars necessary to build the campus in its entirety and construction began. The first permanent campus buildings were the President’s House, the Ethel Lee Memorial Building (later re‐named Sutherland Hall), and Gamma Chi (renamed Emerson Hall), the men’s dormitory. The La Mirada Campus opened in 1959. However, the oldest buildings on the present‐day campus were constructed in 1957 as McNally Junior High School and are not located on the original acreage purchased by Biola. After leasing them for University use for ten years, Biola purchased the McNally buildings in 1988.

The university grew to encompass approximately 95 acres on an irregularly‐shaped lot bounded roughly by Calpella Street and Imperial Highway to the north, La Mirada Boulevard to the east, Roma Drive to the south, and Biola Avenue to the west. Five buildings originally planned and designed by Ullrich were completed between 1959 and 1962: the Cafeteria, Music in Worship, Sutherland Hall, the Student Health Center, and Myers Hall. Ullrich resigned due to health problems and was replaced by architect John Galbraith of Pasadena, who was also an acquaintance of Ray Myers.5 The campus that took shape following Ullrich’s resignation was less rambling than his original plan outlined, though it still adhered to Sutherland’s request that the campus be a departure from the right angles of the city street grid. Galbraith designed Marshburn Hall and the Student Union Building, both of which were completed in 1966. Five dormitories were completed between 1957 and 1977.

Campus buildings are mostly between one and three stories tall, in keeping with the scale of the surrounding residential neighborhood. A few of the dormitory buildings at the northern portion of campus reach between three and five stories in height. The overall character of the campus is defined by buildings arranged along curving roads and around landscaped quadrangles. A series of roads and pedestrian walkways traverse the campus.

1 Ullrich was the designer of the first permanent structures at Disneyland, located in Anaheim, ten miles from Biola’s campus in La Mirada. “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982, p. 7‐8. 2 Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland, p. 10. 3 Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland, p. 11. 4 Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957. 5 Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland, p. 28.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 7

The building stock is not characterized by a pervasive architectural style. Early campus buildings are generally simple, unornamented Mid‐Century Modern buildings executed with a brick veneer. Later development was executed in modest interpretations of the Mid‐Century Modern style, though subsequent alterations and additions have substantially changed footprints, façades, and fenestration patterns. Most of the buildings constructed before 1990, however, adhere to a consistent low, horizontal massing (often one or two stories in height with long, rectangular, or donut‐shaped plans); brick veneer exteriors; and flat roofs.

3.3 Building Descriptions

For the purposes of this analysis, only those buildings that have the potential to be impacted by the Biola Master Plan are specifically discussed. These buildings are listed in the chart below in alphabetical order (except those of the former McNally campus, which are listed last) with a brief architectural description.

Building Name Date of Dates of Alterations, Original Architect Construction Architect Cafeteria 1959 1977, Coleman William C. Ullrich Caskey; 1997, Lotus Consulting Engineers; 2004, Gensler; 2005, Gensler The Cafeteria is a one‐story building located at the intersection of Rood Way and Sutherland Way. It is a Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a brick veneer. The building has an irregular footprint of contiguous rectangles. It is capped with a complex roof of low‐ pitched gables with sections of flat and shed roofs. The main entrance is located at the southwest façade within a recessed porch with a pierced concrete block screen. This entrance consists of two full‐glazed steel doors and a single fixed sidelight. The rest of the southwest façade consists of a windowless brick wall. The southeast façade is characterized by stepped, fully‐glazed gable walls that face an outdoor seating area. The northeast façade features a sunroom seating area featuring large, steel‐framed windows. There are three entrances at this façade: all consist of fully‐glazed steel doors. The eastern entrance is approached by an accessibility ramp. The northwest façade has no windows and features multiple service entrances and enclosures for garbage receptacles and other service functions. There is an entrance at this façade for the Banquet Room; this entrance features fully‐ glazed double doors and is set within a small porch with a shed roof. The façade within this porch has a blonde, stack‐bond brick veneer.

The Cafeteria has been significantly altered over time. In 1977, a large addition was constructed at the north end of the building, which added approximately 6,800 square feet of additional seating and serving area. In 1997, a large deck with outdoor seating was added to the east side of the building, and in 2003 a sunroom seating area was constructed at the northeast side of the building. In 2005, a large addition was constructed at the northwest side of the building, resulting in the demolition of the existing kitchen and serving area.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 8

Chase Gymnasium & Fitness 1966 2000, AT3; 2005, Tobias Hessert Center (AT3) McDonald Chase Gymnasium and Fitness Center is located at the eastern section of campus, facing west onto Chase Way. The main building has a rectangular footprint; a freestanding fitness center is located to the north of Chase Gym and is connected to the 1966 building by a covered walkway. The gymnasium has a double‐height central volume with a gabled roof and two single‐story volumes at either side (to the north and south). These one‐story wings are covered with shed roofs that slope downward from the central volume. The building has a variety of cladding materials including brick veneer, corrugated metal and painted concrete. The primary entrance is located at the west façade and features a row of fully‐glazed, steel double doors set within a recessed porch. The porch is characterized by simple brick support piers which frame the four openings to the recessed entry. Printed banners span these openings. The main façade is symmetrical, clad with a brick veneer and capped by a painted concrete wall that extends to a simple flat roofline. The southern wing is windowless at its west façade; the south façade is located behind a tall enclosure and is not visible. There is a pool behind the enclosure. The north wing consists of a brick and concrete volume with single metal doors and sliding aluminum windows. The east façade of the gymnasium faces a running track and soccer field. This façade features ribbon windows at the second story separated between flush brick pilasters. There are two entrances set within recessed porches. Steel bleachers are set up against the building at this façade.

Chase Gymnasium has been altered over time. In 2000, a freestanding fitness center was constructed to the north of the building. It is connected to the 1966 building by a covered walkway. In 2005, two large additions were added to the east and west sides of the original building. The west wing consisted of a new two‐story lobby to the west of the gym floor, which created a new primary façade of the building. The east addition consisted of a two‐story addition with bathrooms on the first floor and offices on the second floor. Crowell Hall / Conservatory 1964 2009, Gensler William C. Ullrich of Music Crowell Hall is located at the eastern section of campus, at the intersection of Sutherland Way and Chase Way. It is Mid‐Century Modern in style. It has a T‐shaped footprint and faces southwest toward Chase Way. The building is one‐story tall with a central double‐height volume with a gabled roof. The rest of the building surrounds this central volume and has a low‐pitched gabled roof. The building is clad with brick at all façades. The primary entrance is at the southwest façade and features a double‐height porch enclosure with three barrel vaults. Three globe light fixtures hang within these openings. The entrance is recessed within this porch and features a row of fully‐glazed steel doors. The rest of the façade within this porch is fully glazed with fixed, steel frame windows. Fenestration patterns are generally consistent at all façades and feature tall, vertical windows of three lights set within vertical brick engaged piers. The southeast façade does not have this fenestration pattern; rather, this façade features regularly spaced, tall rectangular windows within a flat brick wall. Secondary entrances are located at the northeast façade and feature partially‐glazed double doors covered with simple canopies. The building is surrounded by a surface parking lot at its northeast and southeast sides.

Crowell Hall is generally unaltered. In 2009, a freestanding building was constructed to the northwest of the 1964 building; the two buildings are connected by a covered walkway.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 9

Education 1977 1998, no architect Pepsico Bldg Systems Education consists of two connected modular structures located along Sutherland Way at the north‐ central area of the Biola University campus. The structures have flat roofs, vertical siding, and small, metal‐frame windows. The buildings have concrete foundations. The smaller structure is rectangular and located along Sutherland Way. The larger building, which houses Campus Safety, has a square footprint and is located parallel and to the west the smaller modular structure. An elevated concrete walkway with a shallow set of stairs connects the two buildings. A handicap ramp with metal railing is located at the rear of the Campus Safety building.

Education originally consisted of a single, square‐shaped modular structure. In 1998, the smaller, rectangular modular was added to the east and connected to the 1977 structure by an elevated walkway. Marshburn Hall 1966 2011, AST John Galbraith Marshburn Hall is a low, reinforced concrete and brick building that is one story in height. It is centrally located on the east side of the main campus quadrangle and south of Sutherland Way. The flat‐roof building has an irregular, T‐shaped footprint with multiple entrances. The style is best described as Mid‐Century Modern. The primary entrance is located at the northeast façade, facing Sutherland Walk. This façade features projecting volumes at a variety of angles capped by a heavy, projecting overhang at the roofline. The overhang creates a porch over multiple entrances of fully‐ glazed steel doors. Walls of floor‐to‐ceiling windows are set between heavy brick piers. The northwest façade off the main quad encloses a volume that is slightly taller than the rest of the building and is clad entirely brick veneer; there are two fully glazed entrances at either end of the façade. The east façade faces a surface parking lot and consists entirely of brick veneer. The east façade has no windows and has a single, fully‐glazed door. The base of the T‐shaped plan is formed by the southeast and southwest façades, which have been sandwiched between Soubirou Hall (built in 1976), a taller two story building to the southeast that is connected to Marshburn by covered walkways, and the Student Health Center (built in 1960), a low‐profile detached building to the northwest.

Alterations to the building in 2010 and 2011 included the replacement of original windows and doors. Music in Worship 1959 William C. Ullrich Music in Worship is located to the southeast of the main academic quad. It is slightly isolated downhill from the quad and nestled against a hill to the northeast. It surrounded by a surface parking lot to the southeast and southwest. A mechanical equipment and shop yard area is located along the building’s northwest side. Music in Worship is a modest building that does not exhibit the characteristics of a particular style. It is one story in height and rectangular in plan, with an asymmetrical, broad front gable roof that extends farther to the southeast. The exterior finish of the building is smooth painted stucco. The building has a horizontal profile with varying fenestration and entrance patterns along each façade that are the result of several phases of additions and modifications. Music in Worship’s two entrances are located on the southwest façade below a shallow, flat canopy that projects from the building’s façade. One solid metal door is centered below the apex of the gable. The other door, a partially‐glazed metal door, is located to the southeast and features metal lettering signage above the entryway. Windows along this façade include three sliding, aluminum‐frame windows. The middle window features a cloth awning. The southeast façade contains two clerestory window openings. The window to the north is a sliding aluminum sash. The

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 10

other window opening has been infilled. The rear façade, which is nestled against a slight hill, features five aluminum sliding windows that are mostly obscured by mature trees.

Music in Worship has been altered over time. Its conversion from a maintenance shop to its present use resulted in the infill of service doors at its southwest (or primary) façade and their replacement with two pedestrian doors, as well as addition of new window openings (exact date of these modifications unknown). Myers Hall 1962 William C. Ullrich Myers Hall is located at the northwestern edge of the campus in the Talbot Seminary quad directly north of the university’s main entrance on Biola Avenue. It was designed in a Mid‐Century Modern style with four distinctly different façades. The rectangular building has a small projecting wing off the rectangular plan to the southeast. The building is two stories tall and features a complex roof of hipped and flat volumes. The primary entrance is oriented to northeast and located within a porch that features a modern colonnade of segmental arch‐shaped openings. The northeast façade is almost entirely glazed, with narrow projecting concrete partitions between bays of fixed aluminum frame windows that reach from the ceiling to a brick water table. The second floor façade is also nearly entirely glazed, with floor‐to‐ceiling aluminum frame windows of tall, wide panels framed by two narrow panels with opaque, colored glass bottom panels. The southeastern façade features brick partitions between narrow floor‐to‐ceiling window bays. Screens of decorative, pierced concrete blocks are located between the brick partitions at the roofline along the southeast façade. The southwestern façade features floor‐to‐ceiling windows, with a brick veneer at the foundation level. A section at the northernmost part of the façade is framed by brick veneer from the ground level to the roofline. At its southern section, the building is clad entirely in brick. The southernmost façade is mostly obscured by mature trees and it is setback from the property line at Biola Avenue by a grass lawn. The northwestern façade features a saw‐tooth patterned edge, with angled window bays containing aluminum frame windows separated by projecting brick partitions. The second floor is set back farther from this façade than the other three and is clad entirely in brick veneer.

Myers Hall has not endured any exterior alterations. Soubirou Hall 1976 McLean & Schultz Soubirou Hall is located to the east of the main campus quad, within the space formed by the southeast corner of the T‐shaped Marshburn Hall. Soubirou Hall is a two‐story, cubical building clad with red brick and painted precast concrete panels. It has a tilt‐slab construction and a flat roof. At the southeast and southwest ends of the building are open‐air stairwells sheathed in red brick. The stairwell at the southwest façade features signage in brushed aluminum lettering. Entrances are located below the stairwells within recessed porches. Fenestration is minimal and consists of tall, narrow, fixed aluminum‐frame windows spaced at wide intervals across all façades. Mechanical equipment on the rooftop has an enclosure of standing‐seam metal siding. The building is connected to Marshburn Hall by covered walkways supported by square brick columns. A parking lot is located to the southwest of Soubirou Hall. To the southwest is a slight hill that descends towards the Music in Worship building.

Soubirou Hall has not endured any exterior alterations. Stewart Hall 1964 1966, John Galbraith William C. Ullrich Stewart Hall is a located at the southern edge of campus, along Stewart Drive. It is an H‐Shaped dormitory building that can best be characterized as Mid‐Century Modern in style. The building

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 11

generally consists of two long, two‐story volumes that are connected by a small volume at the center. The eastern volume has a slightly bowed footprint, while the western building is a true rectangle. The volumes are capped by flat roofs and are sheathed in a combination of brick, concrete block and stucco. Both volumes are characterized by a series of entrances and windows to dormitory units that are in generally the same configuration at the first and second stories. Entrances consist of single wood doors and windows are aluminum sash. The second‐story units are accessed by a continuous balcony that also provides a canopy over the first‐story unit entrances. Balconies feature simple metal balustrades and are accessed by exterior staircases at the ends of the rectangular buildings. A primary entrance to the building itself is located at the center of the eastern volume and features a folded plate roof. The building is surrounded by a brick and metal fence at all façades except for the east façade. The spaces between the two volumes of the H‐plan are landscaped with grass, shrubs and small trees. A surface parking lot is located to the northeast of the building.

Stewart Hall was constructed in 1964 and, at that time, consisted only of the eastern volume of today’s H‐shaped plan. The western “Stewart Hall Suites” addition was constructed in 1966. Additionally, original windows appear to have been replaced (date unknown). Student Health Center 1960 2007, Westberg‐ William C. Ullrich White The Student Health Center is located at the northeast corner of the main academic quad. It was designed in a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style with a broad front gable roof with overhanging eaves. The Student Health Center Building is one story in height and rectangular in plan. The exterior finish is painted stucco with a brick masonry water table at its front façade that wraps around to the first quarter of the long side façades. The building has a horizontal profile with a symmetrical front façade and regularly‐spaced fenestration along its long side façades. The primary entrance to the building consists of a fully‐glazed steel door with sidelights that is centered below the apex of the roof gable and set back in a deeply recessed entry. Large, fixed steel‐frame windows flank the recessed entrance. The long southwest and northwest façades feature evenly spaced, single sliding aluminum windows of varying sizes. The rear (east) façade is symmetrical with a centered, fully‐glazed door with sidelights and large sliding aluminum windows to either side. Wide panels of brick veneer reach from the roofline to the ground level, framing the entryway. Landscape elements include concrete sidewalks along all sides of the building and concrete steps with low brick retaining walls at the front entrance.

The Student Health Center has been altered. In 2007, the front porch was enclosed to add an additional 342 square feet to the interior. In addition, original windows and doors have been replaced and the building appears to have been refinished with textured stucco. Student Union Building 1966 1991, Neptune & John Galbraith Thomas The Student Union Building is located near the center of Biola’s campus, to the east of Sutherland Way. The Student Union is a rectangular reinforced concrete building with brick veneer siding sited on a slight hill. It is one story at its entrance and two stories as it descends down the slope. The symmetrical building is horizontal in its massing and features a wide, overhanging flat roof with a thick projecting overhang. There are entrances at all façades; however the primary entrance appears to be at the northwest façade, facing Sutherland Way. The doors of the primary entrance are fully glazed steel doors that reach the full height of the façade and are framed on either side by panels of floor‐to‐

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 12

ceiling fixed windows arranged in groups of four. On the side façades concrete panels separate the first and second floors in the brick‐lined window bays. The rear of the building is two stories high. The first floor is composed of glass storefronts for various student offices and activities. Doors open onto a concrete patio. The second floor is separated from the first by painted stucco panels between projecting, square brick supports that span the full height of the façade. The exterior of the second floor features fixed windows in groups of four spanning the distance between brick window bays.

In 1991, a 5,000 square foot addition was constructed at the southeast corner of the building. Sutherland Hall 1959 William C. Ullrich Sutherland Hall is located at the northern edge of the central core of Biola’s campus. It fronts southwest onto Sutherland Way. It is two‐stories tall and is best characterized as Mid‐Century Modern in style. The building is donut‐shaped and features a central courtyard. It is generally clad with a brick veneer and covered with a flat roof, although a portion of the building at its northwestern side has a low‐pitched, gabled roof. The primary entrance is located at the southwest façade and consists of an open porch of tall, precast concrete piers through which there is access to the central courtyard. Additional features within the courtyard are simple, round piers that support the second story of the building, an accessibility ramp and integral landscape and hardscape elements. Fenestration generally consists of metal windows that appear to be a combination of fixed light and operable sash. Entrances consist of fully‐glazed, steel doors or single metal doors with no glazing. The building is surrounded at all sides except for its southwest façade by a surface parking lot.

Minor alterations include the addition of an elevator in the courtyard and the replacement of some original windows. McNally Junior High School Art 1961 Kistner, Wright, & Wright The Art building is a rectangular, one‐story building slightly east and outside of the radial plan of the other McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side‐gable roof with projecting eaves that form a covered walkway on the long sides of the rectangular footprint. Entrances consist of single metal doors; several are located on each of the long sides of the rectangular footprint. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel‐frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. The Art building is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat‐roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

The Art building was constructed four years after the original construction of the McNally Junior High Campus. It does not appear to have been altered. Dorothy English Hall 1957 Kistner, Wright, & Wright Dorothy English Hall is a rectangular, one‐story building located at the southern section of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side‐gable roof with projecting eaves

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 13

that form a covered walkway on the long sides of the rectangular footprint. Entrances consist of single metal doors; there are five on each of the long façades of the rectangular building and one on the short façade that faces northwest. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel‐frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the brick veneer‐clad west façade at the juncture of the covered walkway. The Dorothy English Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat‐roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

Dorothy English Hall has not endured any exterior alterations. Duplicating Center 1957 1998, AT3 Kistner, Wright, & Wright The Duplicating Center is a rectangular, one‐story building located in the northern portion of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side‐gable roof with a projecting eave on its east side that forms a covered walkway. Entrances consist of single metal doors on the façades of the long sides of the rectangular building and the short, southerly façade. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel‐frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the brick veneer‐clad west façade at the juncture of the covered walkway. The Duplicating Center is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat‐roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

The Duplicating Center building has not endured any exterior alterations. Fine Arts & Theatre 1957 1998, AT3 Kistner, Wright, & 21 Wright The Fine Arts Building and Theatre 21 is a mostly‐rectangular, one‐story building located at the northernmost portion of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is somewhat irregular in plan with two small shed‐roof wings and a projecting addition at its northern end. It is a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow pitched front gable roof and has slightly shorter, shed roof‐covered volumes on its east and west sides. The entrance to Theatre 21 is located at the center of the southern façade and features a projecting awning over the double doors. Windows are generally a narrow strip of clerestory windows below the roofline of the building on its north, east, and west façades. The Fine Arts Building is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus along its east façade flat‐roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

In 1998, a 1,800 square foot addition was added to the north side of the Fine Arts Building. A large, canvas awning and some non‐original signage have been added to the north façade. Locker Building 1957 Kistner, Wright, & Wright The Locker Building is located southeast of the other McNally buildings at the southwestern

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 14

section of the Biola campus. The Locker Building is surrounded by surface parking lots. It was designed in a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style with a combination side gable roof with a shed roof over the lower southeastern façade. The shed roof on the southeastern façade features a slight overhang. The Locker Building is one story in height and rectangular in plan. The exterior finish of the Locker Building is painted concrete on three façades and a combination of painted concrete and brick veneer along its southeastern façade.

The building has a horizontal profile with varying fenestration and entrance patterns along each façade. Entrances to the building are located on all four façades. The southeast façade, below the shed roof, contains three entrances. Windows along this façade include sliding vinyl clerestory windows, double‐hung vinyl sash windows arranged in groups of three, vinyl sash hopper windows, and wood frame casement windows. The northeastern and southwestern façades each contain two entrances and no windows. On the southwest façade one of the entrances has been infilled. All entrances consist of either a single door with no lights or a single door with a small, vertical light. Clerestory windows line the southeast and northwest façades below the eaves of the roofline of the taller section of the building. Along the northwest façade the windows are a combination of four horizontally stacked steel frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of three or four. Along the southeast façade, the windows are pairs of horizontally stacked steel frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of three or four.

The Locker Building does not appear to have endured any exterior alterations aside from the infill of a single entrance opening and the replacement of some original windows with vinyl windows. Perez Hall 1957 1961, Kistner, Kistner, Wright, & Wright, & Wright); Wright 2005, Jacobsen Associates Perez Hall is a square, one‐story building located at the center of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side‐gable roof with projecting eaves on its east and west sides that form covered walkways. The primary entrances face the central area to the east formed by the radial plan of the other McNally buildings. Entrances consist of single metal doors. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel‐frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms and fixed sidelights. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the north, west, and south façades at the juncture of the covered walkways. Perez Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus flat‐roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

In 2005, a 998 square foot addition was constructed at the north end of the building. It is otherwise unchanged at its exterior. Rood Hall 1957 Kistner, Wright, & Wright Rood Hall is a rectangular, one‐story building located at the eastern portion of the radial plan

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 15

of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side‐gable roof with projecting eaves on its north and south sides that form covered walkways. There are entrances at all four façades of the building; all consist of single, metal doors. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel‐frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the west façade at the juncture of the covered walkway. Rood Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus flat‐roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

Rood Hall has not endured any exterior alterations. White Hall 1957 Kistner, Wright, & Wright White Hall is a rectangular, one‐story building located at the northeastern section of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid‐Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side‐gable roof with projecting eaves on its northwest and southeast sides that form covered walkways. There are entrances at all four façades, which generally consist of single metal doors. At the center of the northeastern façade is a projecting entrance bay with double metal doors. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked steel frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the brick veneer clad southeastern, southwestern, and northwestern façades at the juncture of the covered walkways. White Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat‐roofed, covered walkways supported by metal poles.

White Hall has not endured any exterior alterations.

4. Historical Background

4.1 Early Development of La Mirada

The City of La Mirada is a master planned city created by the subdivision of the Windermere Ranch in 1953. The Windermere Ranch first belonged to Andrew McNally, a publisher from Chicago who purchased the 2,300‐acre site in 1893. 6 McNally grew orange, lemon, olive, and grapefruit trees and set aside portions of the property as shooting grounds for ducks and other fowl.7 McNally planned to create a “millionaire’s colony” of small ranches on the land. A post office and railway station were constructed in 1902, but few home sites were sold and the area

6 Riviera, Carla. “La Mirada Takes Up Modest Plans for Historic McNally Ranch.” Los Angeles Times 21 Nov. 1985. 7 “The Development of the Great Southwest.” Los Angeles Times 26 Nov 1899 p.28.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 16

remained primarily agricultural.8 Oil drilling began on the ranch lands in the 1920s, but no sites for wells were found on the land that became La Mirada.9 McNally’s heirs sold the ranch to the Shaw Construction Company in 1953.10

The Shaw Construction Company, led by Harold Shaw, quickly developed plans for the new, master planned city of La Mirada. Shaw planned to build a city of 8,000 single family and 2,000 multiple rental units, with corridors of commercial and industrial development. Initial plans called for the construction of 13 new schools.11 La Mirada Mill, the first industrial building, opened in June 1953 and produced kitchen cabinets, sinks, and bathroom cabinets for the homes built in the new subdivision.12 To lure residential developers, a shopping center designed by noted architect Welton Beckett and Associates was constructed in 1953.13 The La Mirada Business Center was designed and planned by architect Victor Gruen and completed in 1956.

By 1955, construction was complete on all 8,000 single family homes originally planned by Shaw. The rapid growth of La Mirada was largely attributed to its adjacency to the freeway system; the area was connected to downtown Los Angeles by the Interstate 5 (Santa Ana) Freeway, which enabled commuting to and from the Los Angeles city center.14 After several years of territorial disputes with adjacent towns, the City of La Mirada was incorporated in 1960.15 The civic center site was purchased in 1965 and construction of a city hall, public library, and various recreational and cultural facilities commenced.

4.2 Biola University

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.16 Lyman Stewart was the founder and president of Union Oil Company. In 1912, Horton and Stewart recruited prominent evangelist and author Reuben Archer Torrey to be Biola’s second dean, increasing the institute’s public prominence. Torrey had worked with well‐known evangelist Dwight L. Moody at the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago and Horton and Stewart hoped Biola would develop along the model set by Moody.

8 McNally gave the ranch to his daughter and son‐in‐law, Nannie and Edwin Neff. Their home, the Neff house, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is the only listed historic resource in the City of La Mirada. “Ran Away To La Mirada.” Los Angeles Times 19 April 1896 p.9. 9 “Oil And Mining: Shell Quitting Wildcat Area Quitclaiming All Leases In La Mirada District.” Los Angeles Times 28 Dec 28, 1925 p.13. 10 “La Mirada Ranchos Sold For Nearly $5,000,000.” Los Angeles Times 8 Jan 1953 A1. 11 “Large Business Area Slated For New City” Los Angeles Times 12 April 1953 F5. 12 “First La Mirada Industrial Building Is Now Rising.” Los Angeles Times 7 Jun 1953 E12. 13 “Large Business Area Slated For New City” Los Angeles Times 12 April 1953 F5. 14 “La Mirada Celebrates Its Second Birthday: New City Event.” Los Angeles Times 19 Aug 1956 F10. 15 “La Miranda Hits Snag in Incorporation.” Los Angeles Times 3 April 1957 p.7. 16 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908‐1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 17

Torrey agreed to accept the position if the institute would construct a church with that could accommodate 3,500 people.17 Torrey’s participation greatly increased the visibility of Biola in the early decades of the 20th century.

The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.18 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

Another aspect of the institute was The Biola Press, with a printing plant located west of downtown on Boylston Avenue. Through the press, Stewart financed the publication of The Fundamentals, a multivolume book of conservative Christian philosophy. Published first in 1909 and edited first by AC Dixon and later by Biola’s dean, Reuben Torrey, The Fundamentals is considered to be the foundation of the modern American fundamentalist movement.19 The Biola Press also published The King’s Business, which was associated with many prominent Christian evangelists of the 1910s and 1920s, including Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan who served on the editorial board in the 1920s. The Biola Press also published the sermons of Aimee Semple McPherson, a famous Los Angeles evangelist, in the 1920s.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen‐story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

During the 1910s and 1920s, Biola developed through the work of those trained at the institute, the publications of the Biola Press, a radio station (KTBI) and its affiliations with worldwide missionary activity. The Hunan Bible Institute in China became affiliated with Biola in 1916.

17 Williams and Miller, 32. 18 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles ‐ Biola University." Home Page ‐ Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 19 Scholars of the origins of conservative Christian movements cite The Fundamentals as “a catalyst to the create of fundamentalism” that outlined the essential elements of fundamentalist faith and established a communication infrastructure for the Christian Right. Lienesch, Michael. "The Origins of the Christian Right: Early Fundamentalism as a Political Movement," Sojourners in the Wilderness: The Christian Right in Comparative Perspective, ed. Corwin E. Smidt and James M. Penning (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1997), 3‐20.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 18

The congregation of the Church of the Open Door expanded, adding 500 new members between 1929 and 1931.20

Biola struggled to remain financially sound during the Depression. To raise funds, the institute leased its north dormitory tower to the Willard Hotel Company in 1933.21 The Biola Press was sold to Stationer’s Corporation.22 The institute’s president Dr. Louis Talbot began broadcasting a weekly Bible study radio show, “The Biola Hour,” which provided advertising revenue that helped to support Biola throughout the Depression.23 Though they were ultimately successful at warding off foreclosure, the memory of the near loss of its building would lead Biola’s leaders to resist taking out new loans for future building campaigns.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.24 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.25 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

20 Williams and Miller, 37. 21 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 171. 22 Williams and Miller, 54. 23 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 42. 24 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 65. 25 Henry, 173.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 19

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.26 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.27 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

4.3 Architecture and Campus Development

Campus Development Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus, in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low‐ density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.28 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid‐20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community‐making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile‐oriented design.

Ebenezer Howard’s garden city, although essentially an anti‐urban response to the ills of the city at the dawn of modernity, held remarkable influence on modernist architects and planners who attempted to implement its principles in the creation of new towns and in the redevelopment of existing cities. Howard envisioned garden cities as self‐contained, self‐ sufficient, decentralized towns with civic functions and public space at their core, surrounded by an agricultural green belt. Housing was laid out along concentric bands of ring roads

26 Rooted for One Hundred Years,, 69 27 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 28 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 20

bisected by radiating boulevards that linked the center with the peripheral greenbelt beyond the edge of the city. Industry was placed at the most peripheral band, between the greenbelt and the town. Open space and communal space were within walking distance for all residents.29

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non‐academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern‐era campus planning in America.30 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian‐only rights‐of‐way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architects

William C. Ullrich Very little information could be found about William C. Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

John F. Galbraith Architect John F. Galbraith designed the Student Union Building and Marshburn Hall following the resignation of campus master planner William Ullrich. After serving as a draftsman in the office of architect Harold Bissner in Los Angeles, Galbraith formed his own practice in Pasadena around 1967. He designed a number of smaller corporate buildings, including the Southern California Gas Company Building in Pasadena and Unitek Corporation plant in Monrovia,31 but was primarily an architect of Mid‐Century Modern style homes in the San Gabriel Valley area.

Kistner, Wright, and Wright Formed in 1941 by architects Theodore C. Kistner and Henry L. Wright with structural engineer William T. Wright, the San Diego‐based firm was a prolific designer of school campuses throughout Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties from the 1940s to 1960s. The firm specialized in public buildings that emphasized the advantages of the Southern California climate by creating numerous outdoor spaces and eliminating interior hallways. Theodore

29 Fishman, Robert. Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century. (Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1999), 40‐44. 30 Turner, 267; 271. 31 Michelson, Alan. "Galbraith, John." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. . “Firm Begins Move to Monrovia Plant.” Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1960, G5.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 21

Kistner developed a specialty in designing school buildings shortly after graduating from the University of Illinois in 1897.32 Architect Henry L. Wright served on the AIA’s Advisory Committee on Schoolhouse Planning of California, which examined and standardized school building construction in the California beginning in the 1940s.33 Kistner, Wright, and Wright’s extensive work in Southern California also led to a consulting practice that provided advice to school boards in Tucson and New Orleans. 34

The architecture firm of Kistner, Wright, and Wright designed the McNally Junior High School in La Mirada for the Norwalk School District as part of a multiple‐school building campaign that began in 1956 in conjunction with the master planning of the city of La Mirada. Kistner, Wright, and Wright planned twelve schools for La Mirada in 1956, of which all except the McNally campus continue to operate as schools within the Norwalk‐La Mirada Unified School District.35

The firm continued to work in La Mirada and adjacent cities on educational and institutional buildings following the completion of the 1956 campaign, completing Cerritos Junior College in 1961 and Norwalk City Hall in 1965. This later work of the firm in Norwalk and Cerritos is generally considered the apex of its design practice, classified as being “ultramodern” in design.36

5. Federal, State and Local Evaluation Criteria

The regulatory background provided below offers an overview of federal, state and local criteria used to assess historic significance.

National Register of Historic Places Criteria The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is the nation’s master inventory of known historic resources and includes listings of buildings, structures, sites, objects and districts that possess historic, architectural, engineering, archaeological or cultural significance at the national, state or local level. As described in National Register Bulletin Number 15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, a property must have both historical significance and integrity to be eligible for listing in the NRHP.

32Michelson, Alan. "Kistner, Theodore." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 3 Feb. 2012. . 33 “Former President Henry L. Wright honored by AIA.” Los Angeles Times. 19 Jan 1986. 34 “L.A. Architect to Aid Southern School Planning.” Los Angeles Times 16 August 1953, E9. 35 “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4. 36 National Trust for Historic Preservation. Los Angeles Modern: City of Tomorrow. Washington DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2010. Hess, Alan. Googie Redux: Ultramodern Roadside Architecture. (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2004) 205.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 22

To be significant, a property must be “associated with an important historic context.”37 The National Register identifies four criteria under which a property may be significant, of which at least one must be applicable to the property at the national, state, or local level. As listed under Section 8, “Statement of Significance,” of the NRHP Registration Form, these criteria are:

A. Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.

B. Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.

C. Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction.

D. Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important to prehistory or history.38

Second, for a property to qualify under the National Register’s Criteria for Evaluation, it must also retain “historic integrity of those features necessary to convey its significance.”39 While a property’s significance relates to its role within a specific historic context, its integrity refers to “a property’s physical features and how they relate to its significance.”40 To determine if a property retains the physical characteristics corresponding to its historic context, the National Register has identified seven aspects of integrity:

Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.

Setting is the physical environment of a historic property.

Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property.

Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.

Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.

37 National Park Service, National Register Bulletin 15, 3. 38 National Park Service, National Register Bulletin 16A, 75 39 National Park Service, National Register Bulletin 15, 3. 40 National Park Service, National Register Bulletin 15, 44.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 23

Feeling is a property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.

Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property.41

Since integrity is based on a property’s significance within a specific historic context, an evaluation of a property’s integrity can only occur after historic significance has been established.42

California Register of Historical Resources Criteria The California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) is the authoritative guide to the State’s significant historical and archeological resources. It serves to identify, evaluate, register and protect California’s historical resources. The California Register program encourages public recognition and protection of resources of architectural, historical, archeological and cultural significance, identifies historical resources for state and local planning purposes, determines eligibility for historic preservation grant funding and affords certain protections under the California Environmental Quality Act. All resources listed in or formally determined eligible for the NRHP are automatically listed on the California Register. In addition, properties designated under municipal or county ordinances are eligible for listing in the California Register.

The California Register criteria are modeled on the National Register criteria discussed above. An historical resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following criteria:

1. It is associated with events or patterns of events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States.

2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history.

3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values.

4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, state or the nation.43

41 National Park Service, National Register Bulletin 15, 44‐45. 42 National Park Service, National Register Bulletin 15, 45. 43 California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series 6, 1.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 24

Like the National Register, evaluation for eligibility to the California Register requires an establishment of historic significance before integrity is considered. California’s integrity threshold is slightly lower than the federal level. As a result, some resources that are historically significant but do not meet NRHP integrity standards may be eligible for listing on the California Register.44

California’s list of special considerations is shorter and more flexible than that of the NRHP. It includes some allowances for moved buildings, structures, or objects, as well as lower requirements for proving the significance of resources that are fewer than 50 years old and a more thorough discussion of the eligibility of reconstructed buildings.

Resources may be nominated directly to the California Register; in addition, they are automatically listed in the California Register if they are listed in or have been officially determined eligible for the National Register; State Historic Landmarks #770 and forward are also automatically listed in the California Register.45

The California Historical Resource Status Codes are a series of ratings created by the California Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO) to quickly and easily identify the historic status of resources listed in the State’s historic properties database. These codes were revised in August 2003 to better reflect the many historic status options available to evaluators. The following are the seven major status code headings:

1. Properties listed in the National Register or the California Register. 2. Properties determined eligible for listing in the National Register or the California Register. 3. Appears eligible for National Register or California Register through Survey Evaluation. 4. Appears eligible for National Register or California Register through other evaluation. 5. Properties recognized as historically significant by local government. 6. Not eligible for listing or designation. 7. Not evaluated for National Register or California Register or needs revaluation.

Local Criteria The City of La Mirada does not have a historic preservation ordinance or designation program.

44 Ibid., 2. 45 All State Historical Landmarks from number 770 onward are also automatically listed on the California Register (California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series 5, 1).

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 25

6. Evaluation of Historical Significance

6.1 Prior Evaluations

A search in the California Historical Resources Inventory System revealed that no resources within the study area have been previously determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or for local designation.

6.2 Evaluation of Significance and Integrity

Summary None of the buildings or site features on Biola University’s campus that will be affected by the proposed Master Plan appears eligible for the National Register or the California Register, as discussed below. As a result, none of them should be considered historical resources for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The main campus of buildings was initially planned in 1955; construction began in 1959. However, today’s Biola campus is a collection of buildings that were constructed in multiple phases spanning the five or so decades between 1959 and the present day. The McNally Junior High School campus was constructed in 1957 and acquired by Biola circa 1978. It should be noted that only some of the buildings evaluated are currently 50 years of age; however, all will meet the 50 year age requirement within the projected 20‐year horizon of the proposed Master Plan Update.

Evaluation of Significance

Individual Resource Evaluations Because they have the potential to be impacted by the proposed Master Plan Update, and because they will meet the 50 year age requirement within its 20‐year horizon, the following 11 buildings were evaluated for potential significance as individual resources: Cafeteria, Crowell Hall, Education, Fitness Center, Marshburn Hall, Music in Worship, Myers Hall, Stewart Hall, Student Health Center, Student Union Building and Sutherland Hall.

In summary, none of these buildings appear to meet the eligibility criteria of the National or California Registers. The reasons for ineligibility have been summarized below. For more detailed evaluations of these individual buildings, please see the accompanying DPR 523 A and B form sets.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events The McNally Junior High School campus was one of twelve schools constructed as part of a building campaign of public educational facilities for the Norwalk School District in 1956. It served as a public school from 1957 until 1978, when it was acquired by Biola for university use.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 26

In addition to use as a public junior high school, the campus was also occasionally used as a venue for various public meetings, including the first meeting of La Mirada’s City Council after the city’s incorporation in 1960. It is not unusual for public schools to be used for public functions outside of the academic sphere, such as government meetings, rallies and for voting purposes. Research does not suggest that its use in this way causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the McNally campus does not appear significant as a historic district under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus has no such associations. Therefore, the buildings on campus do not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values In the founding and growth of the college, Biola’s campus design never played a significant role in defining its identity. While, like any institution, its values are reflected in the decisions it made about its building programs, the results are not unusual, rare, or artistically significant. The plan of the campus, which follows quadrangle and garden city planning principles that were popular in mid‐20th century campus design, is neither a significant or rare example of these principles; in addition, continued campus development has deviated from the original campus plan. The architect of the original campus master plan and most of its early buildings, William C. Ullrich, is not considered a master in the field. The same is true of John F. Galbraith, who designed the Student Union Building and Marshburn Hall following Ullrich’s resignation.

None of the buildings achieves a high level of architectural distinction or exemplifies the characteristics of a particular style. In fact, it was the stated intention of then‐campus president, Dr. Samuel Sutherland, that the campus be “a type of building that is non‐dated,”46 implying that they should not exemplify a particular style. The evaluated buildings are generally modest interpretations of the Mid‐Century Modern style and none possesses high artistic values. Therefore, none of the buildings evaluated appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

46 Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland, p. 11.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 27

Historic District Evaluation Although Biola’s La Mirada campus was planned in 1955 and initially constructed in 1959, extensive development in the 1990s and 2000s has significantly changed the campus. Ullrich’s 1955 Master Plan for Biola’s campus is not reflected in the appearance of the campus today, as multiple building campaigns have caused the campus to evolve over time. As a result, it was deemed unnecessary to evaluate the campus as a whole for potential significance as a historic district. The former McNally Junior High School campus, however, was evaluated for potential significance as a historic district since it is complex of related (and in many cases physically connected) buildings constructed at the same time (1957) for a single purpose. Upon evaluation, it does not appear eligible for the California or National Registers for the reasons stated below.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events The McNally Junior High School campus was one of twelve schools constructed as part of a building campaign of public educational facilities for the Norwalk School District in 1956. It served as a public school from 1957 until 1978, when it was acquired by Biola for university use. Research does not suggest that there was a particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with the campus during its years as McNally Junior High School that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the McNally campus does not appear significant as a historic district under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person Research did not suggest that the McNally Junior High School campus is associated with significant individuals. Although it is named for Andrew McNally, it was constructed more than 50 years after his death and therefore cannot be associated with his productive life. Therefore, neither the McNally campus nor any of its buildings is significant as a historic district under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values The McNally Junior High School campus was designed by architects Kistner, Wright & Wright as part of a 12‐campus building campaign for the Norwalk School District in 1956. Its plan and buildings are typical of mid‐20th century public school campus development. Research did not suggest that Kistner, Wright & Wright, though prolific during this era, are considered masters in the field. Additionally, though the McNally campus buildings are Mid‐Century Modern in style, they do not achieve a high level of architectural distinction. Therefore, as a collection the McNally Junior High School campus and its buildings do not appear eligible as a historic district under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 28

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because none of Biola’s individual buildings or its campus as a whole appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

7. Impacts of Proposed Project

7.1 Description of Proposed Project

The Biola University Master Plan calls for changes to the campus plan and modification or removal of many of the campus’s early buildings, most of which were constructed between 1957 and 1977.

Specifically, the proposed project entails:

 The demolition of 25 existing buildings  The construction of 16 new buildings and three parking structures, representing an increase to total square footage of campus buildings by about 30 percent over the present Planned Unit Development (PUD) limits and an increase to total parking spaces by 26 percent over existing spaces.

The proposed Biola Master Plan Update calls for the demolition and alteration of the buildings in the chart below, as noted. The effected buildings are scattered throughout the campus and are not clustered in one specific area. The proposed project does not include development outside of existing campus boundaries.

7.2 Potential Impacts to the Biola University Campus

For the purposes of this study, ARG evaluated all buildings that have the potential to be modified or removed as part of the proposed project and will meet the 50‐year age threshold within the 20‐year horizon of the proposed Biola Master Plan Update. Buildings that meet both of these criteria are listed below:

Biola Campus Building Name Building Year built Historic # Resource Action in Master Plan under CEQA? Dorothy English Hall 52E 1957 No Demolition

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 29

Biola Campus Building Name Building Year built Historic # Resource Action in Master Plan under CEQA? Duplicating Center 52A 1957 No Demolition Fine Arts & Theatre 21 52 1957 No Demolition Locker Building 52F 1957 No Demolition Perez Hall 53 1957 No Demolition Rood Hall 52D 1957 No Demolition White Hall 52B 1957 No Demolition Cafeteria 23 1959 No Addition to existing building Music in Worship 38 1959 No Demolition Sutherland Hall 39 1959 No Addition to existing building Student Health Center 35 1960 No Demolition Art 52C 1961 No Demolition Myers Hall 47 1962 No Demolition Crowell Hall 16 1964 No Demolition Stewart Hall 62 1964 No Demolition Chase Gym & Fitness Center 18 1966 No Addition to existing building Marshburn Hall 34 1966 No Demolition Student Union Building 26 1966 No Demolition Soubirou Hall 36 1976 No Demolition Education 32 1977 No Demolition

7.3 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures

Because none of the buildings within the project study area appear eligible for the California or National Registers, and because none of the buildings on campus appear to be part of a historic district, the proposed Master Plan Update will not have a direct or indirect impact on historical resources. Therefore, the delineation of mitigation measures is not necessary.

7.4 Conclusion Regarding Impacts Under CEQA

Upon evaluation of all buildings that have the potential to be modified or removed as part of the proposed project and will meet the 50‐year age threshold within the 20‐year horizon of the proposed Biola Master Plan Update, ARG recommends that none are historic resources for the purposes of CEQA. Therefore, the proposed Biola Master Plan Update does not constitute an impact on historic resources.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 30

8. Bibliography

Books, Manuscripts, and Archival Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982.

Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007.

City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956‐2011.

Fishman, Robert. Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1999.

Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada.

Hess, Alan. Googie Redux: Ultramodern Roadside Architecture. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2004.

Lienesch, Michael. "The Origins of the Christian Right: Early Fundamentalism as a Political Movement," Sojourners in the Wilderness: The Christian Right in Comparative Perspective, ed. Corwin E. Smidt and James M. Penning (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1997), 3‐20.

National Trust for Historic Preservation. Los Angeles Modern: City of Tomorrow. Washington DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2010.

Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987.

Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908‐1983. La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983.

Newspapers and Periodicals

“Firm Begins Move to Monrovia Plant.” Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1960, G5.

“First La Mirada Industrial Building Is Now Rising.” Los Angeles Times 7 Jun 1953 E12.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 31

“Former President Henry L. Wright honored by AIA.” Los Angeles Times. 19 Jan 1986.

“La Mirada Celebrates Its Second Birthday: New City Event.” Los Angeles Times 19 Aug 1956 F10.

“La Miranda Hits Snag in Incorporation.” Los Angeles Times 3 April 1957 p.7.

“La Mirada Ranchos Sold For Nearly $5,000,000.” Los Angeles Times 8 Jan 1953 A1.

“Large Business Area Slated For New City” Los Angeles Times 12 April 1953 F5.

“L.A. Architect to Aid Southern School Planning.” Los Angeles Times 16 August 1953, E9.

“Oil And Mining: Shell Quitting Wildcat Area Quitclaiming All Leases In La Mirada District.” Los Angeles Times 28 Dec 28, 1925 p.13.

“Ran Away To La Mirada.” Los Angeles Times 19 April 1896 p.9.

Riviera, Carla. “La Mirada Takes Up Modest Plans for Historic McNally Ranch.” Los Angeles Times 21 Nov. 1985.

“Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3.

“Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

“The Development of the Great Southwest.” Los Angeles Times 26 Nov 1899 p.28.

Planning Documents and Government Reports

California Office of Historic Preservation. California Register and National Register: A Comparison, Technical Assistance Series 6. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Parks and Recreation, 2001.

California Office of Historic Preservation. California Register of Historical Resources: The Listing Process, Technical Assistance Series 5. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Parks and Recreation, n.d.

California Office of Historic Preservation. User’s Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historic Resources Inventory Directory, Technical Assistance Bulletin 8. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Parks and Recreation, 2004.

National Park Service. How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, National Register Bulletin 15. Washington, DC: United States Department of the Interior, 1997.

HISTORIC RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FEBRUARY 9, 2012 BIOLA UNIVERSITY, LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA Page 32

National Park Service. How to Complete the National Register Registration Form, National Register Bulletin 16A. Washington, DC: United States Department of the Interior, 1997.

Online Sources

Historic Aerials. http://www.historicaerials.com/ accessed during January 2012.

Michelson, Alan. "Galbraith, John." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. .

Michelson, Alan. "Kistner, Theodore." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 3 Feb. 2012. .

Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles ‐ Biola University." Home Page ‐ Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. .

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cafeteria P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Cafeteria is a one-story building located at the intersection of Rood Way and Sutherland Way. It is a Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a brick veneer. The building has an irregular footprint of contiguous rectangles. It is capped with a complex roof of low-pitched gables with sections of flat and shed roofs. The main entrance is located at the southwest façade within a recessed porch with a pierced concrete block screen. This entrance consists of two full-glazed steel doors and a single fixed sidelight. The rest of the southwest façade consists of a windowless brick wall. The southeast façade is characterized by stepped, fully-glazed gable walls that face an outdoor seating area. The northeast façade features a sunroom seating area featuring large, steel-framed windows. There are three entrances at this façade: all consist of fully-glazed steel doors. The eastern entrance is approached by an accessibility ramp. The northwest façade has no windows and features multiple service entrances and enclosures for garbage receptacles and other service functions. There is an entrance at this façade for the Banquet Room; this entrance features fully-glazed double doors and is set within a small porch with a shed roof. The façade within this porch has a blonde, stack-bond brick veneer.

(continued on page 3) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing northeast, January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1959, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Cafeteria B2. Common Name: Cafeteria B3. Original Use: Educational Building B4. Present Use: Educational Building *B5. Architectural Style Mid-Century Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1 1959: Date of original construction; William C. Ullrich, architect 1977: Addition of 6,830 sq. ft. of dining and serving area on NE and SE sides of the building; Coleman Caskey, architect 1997: Addition of a 2,162 sq. ft. dining deck along the SE side of the building; Lotus Consulting Engineers 2004: Addition of 900 sq. ft. on seating on NRE side of building; Gensler, architect 2005: Kitchen and serving area demolished, building expanded on NW side, entire interior remodeled. Addition of 7,127 sq. ft. Gensler; architect. *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: William C. Ullrich b. Builder: Myers Brothers Construction Company *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance The Cafeteria does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

The Cafeteria was constructed in 1959 by architect William C. Ullrich. It was constructed as part of the initial building campaign for Biola’s La Mirada campus that started in 1957. The building was originally constructed as the student cafeteria; it maintains this use today.

(continued on page 3) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 6. (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

N B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cafeteria Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

*P3a. Description (continued from page 1)

The Cafeteria has been significantly altered over time. In 1977, a large addition was constructed at the north end of the building, which added approximately 6,800 square feet of additional seating and serving area. In 1997, a large deck with outdoor seating was added to the east side of the building, and in 2003 a sunroom seating area was constructed at the northeast side of the building. In 2005, a large addition was constructed at the northwest side of the building, resulting in the demolition of the existing kitchen and serving area.

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007) 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cafeteria Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.7 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.8 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.9 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

The Cafeteria was constructed in the Mid-Century Modern style. Extensive alterations over time were constructed in a style that conforms to the original design. Generally, the style of the building follows the campus vernacular with its low, horizontal massing, brick veneer exterior; and combination flat and gabled roof.

William C. Ullrich Very little information could be found about William C. Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. 7 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 8 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 9 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cafeteria Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, the Cafeteria does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or the Cafeteria building specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the Cafeteria does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically the Cafeteria, has no such associations. Therefore, the Cafeteria does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values The Cafeteria does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, William C. Ullrich, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because none of Biola’s individual buildings or its campus as a whole appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cafeteria Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Cafeteria Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Southeast façade, view looking northeast Southeast façade, view looking north

Northeast façade, view looking west Northeast façade, view looking southeast

Northwest façade, view looking southeast

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Crowell Hall / Conservatory of Music P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Crowell Hall is located at the eastern section of campus, at the intersection of Sutherland Way and Chase Way. It is Mid- Century Modern in style. It has a T-shaped footprint and faces southwest toward Chase Way. The building is one-story tall with a central double-height volume with a gabled roof. The rest of the building surrounds this central volume and has a low-pitched gabled roof. The building is clad with brick at all façades. The primary entrance is at the southwest façade and features a double-height porch enclosure with three barrel vaults. Three globe light fixtures hang within these openings. The entrance is recessed within this porch and features a row of fully-glazed steel doors. The rest of the façade within this porch is fully glazed with fixed, steel frame windows. Fenestration patterns are generally consistent at all façades and feature tall, vertical windows of three lights set within vertical brick engaged piers. The southeast façade does not have this fenestration pattern; rather, this façade features regularly spaced, tall rectangular windows within a flat brick wall. Secondary entrances are located at the northeast façade and feature partially-glazed double doors covered with simple canopies. The building is surrounded by a surface parking lot at its northeast and southeast sides.

Crowell Hall is generally unaltered. In 2009, a freestanding building was constructed to the northwest of the 1964 building; the two buildings are connected by a covered walkway.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing northeast, January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1964, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Crowell Hall B2. Common Name: Crowell Hall / Conservatory of Music B3. Original Use: Educational Building B4. Present Use: Educational Building *B5. Architectural Style New Formalism *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)1 1964: Date of original construction, William C. Ullrich architect 2009: Freestanding practice room wing constructed, connected to the original building by a covered walkway. Gensler, architect *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: William C. Ullrich b. Builder: Myers Brothers Construction Company *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Period of Significance: N/A Property Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance Crowell Hall does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

Crowell Hall was constructed in 1964 by William C. Ullrich. The building was originally constructed as an academic facility and conservatory of music; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5. (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

N B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Crowell Hall / Conservatory of Music Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911. In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Construction began on Crowell Hall, the music conservatory, in 1964. In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.7 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. 7 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Crowell Hall / Conservatory of Music Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.8 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.9 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Early campus buildings are generally simple, unornamented Mid-Century Modern buildings executed with a brick veneer. Crowell Hall, which provided performance and auditorium space, is the only New Formalist style building on the campus. The double-height porch enclosure with three barrel vaults over its primary entrance is a common feature of the style. Otherwise, the building adheres to the campus vernacular of low, horizontal massing; brick veneer exterior; and combination flat and gabled roof.

William C. Ullrich Very little information could be found about William C. Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, Crowell Hall does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

8 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 9 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Crowell Hall / Conservatory of Music Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or Crowell Hall specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore Crowell Hall does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically Crowell Hall, has no such associations. Therefore, Crowell Hall does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values Crowell Hall does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Although it exhibits features of New Formalism, its use of the style is restrained and largely adheres to the modest campus vernacular. The building’s architect, William C. Ullrich, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because Crowell Hall does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Crowell Hall / Conservatory of Music Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Crowell Hall / Conservatory of Music Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Front (southwest) façade, view facing northeast Side (northwest) façade, view facing east

Rear (northeast) façade, view facing southwest Rear (northeast) façade, view facing west

Side (southeast) façade, view facing northwest

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 6

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Education Building P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Education building consists of two connected modular structures located along Sutherland Way at the north-central area of the Biola University campus. The structures have flat roofs, vertical siding, and small, metal-frame windows. The buildings have concrete foundations. The smaller structure is rectangular and located along Sutherland Way. The larger building, which houses Campus Safety, has a square footprint and is located parallel and to the west the smaller modular structure. An elevated concrete walkway with a shallow set of stairs connects the two buildings. A handicap ramp with metal railing is located at the rear of the Campus Safety building.

The Education building originally consisted of a single, square-shaped modular structure. In 1998, the smaller, rectangular modular was added to the east and connected to the 1977 structure by an elevated walkway.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing northwest, January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1977, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 6 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Education Building B2. Common Name: Education Building B3. Original Use: Educational building B4. Present Use: Educational building *B5. Architectural Style None *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)1 Originally constructed in 1977. Altered in 1997. *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: none b. Builder: Pepsico Bldg Systems *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Period of Significance: N/A Property Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance The Education building does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

The Education building was built by Pepsico Building Systems in 1977 and expanded with an additional modular unit in 1998. The building was originally used as an academic and campus safety facility; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3)

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5. (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

 N ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 6

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Education Building Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.7 To meet additional requirements for classroom and administrative space, the Education modular unit was brought onto the campus in 1977 and expanded in 1998. In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. 7 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 6

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Education Building Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.8 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.9 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

The Education building consists of two conjoined modular structures. They were prefabricated by Pepsico Building Systems and assembled on site. They do not bear the characteristics of a particular architectural style.

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, the Education building does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or the Education building specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the Education building does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

8 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 9 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 6

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Education Building Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically the Education building, has no such associations. Therefore, the Education building does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values The Education building comprises two prefabricated modular structures. It is a simple, utilitarian building and does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular type or style. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 6

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Education Building Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Southeast façade (front), view looking northwest Northwest and southwest facades (rear and side elevations), view looking east

Northwest and northeast facades (rear and side elevations), view Northwest façade (rear elevation), view looking southeast looking south

Passageway between northwest and southeast modulars, view facing southwest

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Chase Gymnasium and Fitness Center is located at the eastern section of campus, facing west onto Chase Way. The main building has a rectangular footprint; a freestanding fitness center is located to the north of Chase Gym and is connected to the 1966 building by a covered walkway. The gymnasium has a double-height central volume with a gabled roof and two single-story volumes at either side (to the north and south). These one-story wings are covered with shed roofs that slope downward from the central volume. The building has a variety of cladding materials including brick veneer, corrugated metal and painted concrete. The primary entrance is located at the west façade and features a row of fully-glazed, steel double doors set within a recessed porch. The porch is characterized by simple brick support piers which frame the four openings to the recessed entry. Printed banners span these openings. The main façade is symmetrical, clad with a brick veneer and capped by a painted concrete wall that extends to a simple flat roofline. The southern wing is windowless at its west façade; the south façade is located behind a tall enclosure and is not visible. There is a pool behind the enclosure. The north wing consists of a brick and concrete volume with single metal doors and sliding aluminum windows. The east façade of the gymnasium faces a running track and soccer field. This façade features ribbon windows at the second story separated between flush brick pilasters. There are two entrances set within recessed porches. Steel bleachers are set up against the building at this façade. (continued on page 3) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing northeast, January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1966, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Chase Gymnasium B2. Common Name: Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center B3. Original Use: Gymnasium B4. Present Use: Gymnasium *B5. Architectural Style Late Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1966. Alterations in 2000 and 2005 included addition of a masonry core around the main gym floor.1 *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: Tobias Hessert McDonald b. Builder: unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Period of Significance: N/A Property Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance The Fitness Center does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

The Fitness Center was constructed in 1966 by Tobias Hessert McDonald. The building was originally constructed as a gymnasium; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3)

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

N

ARG, January 18, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

*P3a. Description (continued from page 1)

Chase Gymnasium has been altered over time. In 2000, a freestanding fitness center was constructed to the north of the building. It is connected to the 1966 building by a covered walkway. In 2005, two large additions were added to the east and west sides of the original building. The west wing consisted of a new two-story lobby to the west of the gym floor, which created a new primary façade of the building. The east addition consisted of a two-story addition with bathrooms on the first floor and offices on the second floor.

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 In 1961, students began pressuring the administration to construct a gymnasium on the new campus, and

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update construction began on Chase Gymnasium in 1966.7 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.8 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.9 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.10 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center was originally constructed in the Mid-Century Modern style. Extensive alterations, including a new front façade in the early 2000s, have obscured the original design of the building. Generally, the style of the building follows the campus vernacular with brick veneer exterior and combination flat and gabled roof.

Tobias Hessert McDonald Very little information could be found about Tobias Hessert McDonald outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

7Rooted for One Hundred Years, 76. 8 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 9 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 10 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, the Chase Gymnasium/Fitness Center does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or the Chase Gymnasium/Fitness Center specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the Fitness Center does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically the Chase Gymnasium/Fitness Center, has no such associations. Therefore, the Fitness Center does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values The Chase Gymnasium/Fitness Center does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, Tobias Hessert McDonald, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because the Chase Gymnasium/Fitness Center does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Chase Gymnasium / Fitness Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Front (west) façade, view facing southeast Side (northwest) façade, view facing southeast

Side (south) façade, view facing northeast Rear (east) façade, view facing south

Swimming pool, south side of fitness center site, view facing northeast

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Marshburn Hall P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Marshburn Hall is a low, reinforced concrete and brick building that is one story in height. It is centrally located on the east side of the main campus quadrangle and south of Sutherland Way. The flat-roof building has an irregular, T-shaped footprint with multiple entrances. The style is best described as Mid-Century Modern. The primary entrance is located at the northeast façade, facing Sutherland Walk. This façade features projecting volumes at a variety of angles capped by a heavy, projecting overhang at the roofline. The overhang creates a porch over multiple entrances of fully-glazed steel doors. Walls of floor-to-ceiling windows are set between heavy brick piers. The northwest façade off the main quad encloses a volume that is slightly taller than the rest of the building and is clad entirely brick veneer; there are two fully glazed entrances at either end of the façade. The east façade faces a surface parking lot and consists entirely of brick veneer. The east façade has no windows and has a single, fully-glazed door. The base of the T-shaped plan is formed by the southeast and southwest façades, which have been sandwiched between Soubirou Hall (built in 1976), a taller two story building to the southeast that is connected to Marshburn by covered walkways, and the Student Health Center (built in 1960), a low-profile detached building to the northwest. Alterations to the building in 2010 and 2011 included the replacement of original windows and doors.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing southeast, January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1966, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Missions Alumni Center B2. Common Name: Marshburn Hall B3. Original Use: Educational building B4. Present Use: Educational building *B5. Architectural Style Mid-Century Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1966. Altered in 2010 (windows replaced and addition added).1 *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: John Galbraith b. Builder: unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance Marshburn Hall does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

Marshburn Hall was constructed in 1966 by John Galbraith. The building was originally constructed as a classroom and lecture hall facility; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3)

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 6 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

 N ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Marshburn Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Ullrich resigned due to health problems and was replaced by architect John Galbraith of Pasadena, who was also an acquaintance of Ray Myers.7 Construction began on Marshburn Hall 1966. In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. 7 Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. (Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982), 28. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Marshburn Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.8 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.9 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.10 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Marshburn Hall was constructed by architect John F. Galbraith in a modest Mid-Century Modern style. Generally, the style of the building follows the campus vernacular with its low, horizontal massing; brick veneer exterior; and combination flat and gabled roof.

John F. Galbraith Architect John F. Galbraith designed the Student Union Building and Marshburn Hall at Biola following the resignation of campus master planner William Ullrich. After serving as a draftsman in the office of architect Harold Bissner in Los Angeles, Galbraith formed his own practice in Pasadena around 1967. He designed a number of smaller corporate buildings, including the Southern California Gas Company Building in Pasadena and Unitek Corporation plant in Monrovia,11 but was primarily an architect of Mid-Century Modern style homes in the San Gabriel Valley area.

8 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 9 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 10 Turner, 267; 271. 11 Michelson, Alan. "Galbraith, John." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. . “Firm Begins Move to Monrovia Plant.” Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1960, G5.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Marshburn Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, Marshburn Hall does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or Marshburn Hall specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore Marshburn Hall does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically Marshburn Hall, has no such associations. Therefore, Marshburn Hall does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values Marshburn Hall does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, John Galbraith, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because Marshburn Hall does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Marshburn Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Periodicals “Firm Begins Move to Monrovia Plant.” Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1960, G5. “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Michelson, Alan. "Galbraith, John." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. . Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Marshburn Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Northwest façade, view facing northeast Northeast façade, view facing southeast

Northeast façade, view facing southeast Entrance on northeast façade, view facing west

Southeast façade, view facing northwest

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Music in Worship P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Music in Worship is located to the southeast of the main academic quad. It is slightly isolated downhill from the quad and nestled against a hill to the northeast. It surrounded by a surface parking lot to the southeast and southwest. A mechanical equipment and shop yard area is located along the building’s northwest side. Music in Worship is a modest building that does not exhibit the characteristics of a particular style. It is one story in height and rectangular in plan, with an asymmetrical, broad front gable roof that extends farther to the southeast. The exterior finish of the building is smooth painted stucco. The building has a horizontal profile with varying fenestration and entrance patterns along each façade that are the result of several phases of additions and modifications. Music in Worship’s two entrances are located on the southwest façade below a shallow, flat canopy that projects from the building’s façade. One solid metal door is centered below the apex of the gable. The other door, a partially-glazed metal door, is located to the southeast and features metal lettering signage above the entryway. Windows along this façade include three sliding, aluminum-frame windows. The middle window features a cloth awning. The southeast façade contains two clerestory window openings. The window to the north is a sliding aluminum sash. The other window opening has been infilled. The rear façade, which is nestled against a slight hill, features five aluminum sliding windows that are mostly obscured by mature trees. (continued on page 3) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, Southwest (primary) façade, view facing northeast

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1959, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Maintenance shop B2. Common Name: Music in Worship B3. Original Use: Maintenance building B4. Present Use: Educational building *B5. Architectural Style None *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1959: Date of original construction, William C. Ullrich architect Date unknown, converted from maintenance shop to classroom space1 *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: None

B9a. Architect: William C. Ullrich b. Builder: Myers Brothers Construction Company *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance The Music in Worship building does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

The Music in Worship building was constructed in 1959 by William C. Ullrich. It is one of the campus buildings constructed as part of the initial building campaign for Biola’s La Mirada campus that began in 1957. The building was originally constructed as maintenance facility with a garage space. At an unknown date it was converted into a classroom space; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

N

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Music in Worship Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

*P3a. Description (continued from page 1)

Music in Worship has been altered over time. Its conversion from a maintenance shop to its present use resulted in the infill of service doors at its southwest (or primary) façade and their replacement with two pedestrian doors, as well as addition of new window openings (exact date of these modifications unknown).

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 The Music in Worship building first served the campus as a maintenance shop, but at an unknown date was

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Music in Worship Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update converted for use as classroom space to accommodate the growing academic and extracurricular program at Biola. In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.7 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.8 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.9 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Music in Worship was originally constructed in a modest Mid-Century Modern style. Extensive alterations over time have obscured the original design of the building and it no longer conveys a particular style.

William C. Ullrich Very little information could be found about William C. Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

7 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 8 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 9 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Music in Worship Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, the Music in Worship Building does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or the Music in Worship building specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the Music in Worship Building does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically the Music in Worship building, has no such associations. Therefore, the Music in Worship building does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values Music in Worship does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, William C. Ullrich, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because the Music in Worship Building does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Music in Worship Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Music in Worship Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Southwest (front) and southeast (side) façade, view looking Southwest (front) façade, view looking northeast north

Southeast (side) façade, view looking northwest

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 8

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Myers Hall P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Myers Hall is located at the northwestern edge of the campus in the Talbot Seminary quad directly north of the university’s main entrance on Biola Avenue. It was designed in a Mid-Century Modern style with four distinctly different façades. The rectangular building has a small projecting wing off the rectangular plan to the southeast. The building is two stories tall and features a complex roof of hipped and flat volumes. The primary entrance is oriented to northeast and located within a porch that features a modern colonnade of segmental arch-shaped openings. The northeast façade is almost entirely glazed, with narrow projecting concrete partitions between bays of fixed aluminum frame windows that reach from the ceiling to a brick water table. The second floor façade is also nearly entirely glazed, with floor-to-ceiling aluminum frame windows of tall, wide panels framed by two narrow panels with opaque, colored glass bottom panels. The southeastern façade features brick partitions between narrow floor-to-ceiling window bays. Screens of decorative, pierced concrete blocks are located between the brick partitions at the roofline along the southeast façade. The southwestern façade features floor-to-ceiling windows, with a brick veneer at the foundation level. A section at the

(continued on page 3) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, North façade, view facing southwest

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1962, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 8 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Myers Hall B2. Common Name: Myers Hall B3. Original Use: Educational Building B4. Present Use: Educational Building *B5. Architectural Style Mid-Century Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)1 Originally constructed in 1962. *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: William C. Ullrich b. Builder: Myers Brothers Construction Company *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance Myers Hall does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

Myers Hall was constructed in 1962 by William C. Ullrich. It is one of the campus buildings constructed as part of the initial building campaign for Biola’s La Mirada campus that began in 1957. The building was originally constructed as an classroom building; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3)

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

 N ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 8

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Myers Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

*P3a. Description (continued from page 1) northernmost part of the façade is framed by brick veneer from the ground level to the roofline. At its southern section, the building is clad entirely in brick. The southernmost façade is mostly obscured by mature trees and it is setback from the property line at Biola Avenue by a grass lawn. The northwestern façade features a saw-tooth patterned edge, with angled window bays containing aluminum frame windows separated by projecting brick partitions. The second floor is set back farther from this façade than the other three and is clad entirely in brick veneer. Myers Hall has not endured any exterior alterations.

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 8

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Myers Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Construction began on Myers Hall, the seminary building named after Biola’s board chairman Ray Myers, in 1962. With the additional space, enrollment in the seminary increased from 47 students in 1961 to 224 in 1971.7 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.8 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.9 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design. The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.10 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Marshburn Hall was constructed in a modest Mid-Century Modern style. Generally, the style of the building follows the campus vernacular with its low, horizontal massing; brick veneer exterior; and combination flat and gabled roof.

William C. Ullrich Very little information could be found about William C. Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. 7Rooted for One Hundred Years, 76. 8 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 9 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 10 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 8

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Myers Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, Myers Hall does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or Myers Hall specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore Myers Hall does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically Myers Hall, has no such associations. Therefore, Myers Hall does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values Myers Hall does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, William C. Ullrich, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because Myers Hall does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 8

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Myers Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 8

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Myers Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Northeast (front) façade, view facing southwest Southeast (side) façade, view facing northwest

East façade (side), view facing northwest Southwest (rear) façade, view facing northeast

Northwest (side) façade, view facing southeast

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Soubirou Hall P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Soubirou Hall is located to the east of the main campus quad, within the space formed by the southeast corner of the T- shaped Marshburn Hall. Soubirou Hall is a two-story, cubical building clad with red brick and painted precast concrete panels. It has a tilt-slab construction and a flat roof. At the southeast and southwest ends of the building are open-air stairwells sheathed in red brick. The stairwell at the southwest façade features signage in brushed aluminum lettering. Entrances are located below the stairwells within recessed porches. Fenestration is minimal and consists of tall, narrow, fixed aluminum-frame windows spaced at wide intervals across all façades. Mechanical equipment on the rooftop has an enclosure of standing-seam metal siding. The building is connected to Marshburn Hall by covered walkways supported by square brick columns. A parking lot is located to the southwest of Soubirou Hall. To the southwest is a slight hill that descends towards the Music in Worship building.

Soubirou Hall has not endured any exterior alterations.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, Southeast façade, view facing northwest January 18, 2012 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1976, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Soubirou Hall B2. Common Name: Soubirou Hall B3. Original Use: Educational Building B4. Present Use: Educational Building *B5. Architectural Style Late Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1976.1 *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: McLean & Schultz b. Builder: unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance Soubirou Hall does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

Soubirou Hall was constructed in 1976 by architects McLean and Schultz. The building was originally constructed as an academic hall; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3)

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5. (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

N

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Soubirou Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Construction began on Soubirou Hall in 1976, part of period of general campus expansion in the late 1970s. The building was dedicated and named in 1980 after Dr. Leonie Soubirou, founder of the School of Missionary Medicine. Soubirou Hall houses the academic facilities for the nursing program, one of Biola’s largest academic programs.7 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. 7 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 90.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Soubirou Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.8 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.9 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.10 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Soubirou Hall was constructed in the Late Modern style. It is a modest version of the style and generally adheres to the campus vernacular in terms of its materials (brick and concrete).

McLean & Schultz Very little information could be found about the architecture firm of McLean & Schultz. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects as well as current directories for the American Institute of Architects (AIA) did not reveal any information about this work of this firm.

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, Soubirou Hall does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

8 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 9 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 10 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Soubirou Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or Soubirou Hall specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore Soubirou Hall does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically Soubirou Hall, has no such associations. Therefore, Soubirou Hall does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values Soubirou Hall does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, McLean & Schultz, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because none of Biola’s individual buildings or its campus as a whole appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Soubirou Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Soubirou Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Southeast (primary) façade, view facing northwest Southwest (side) façade, view facing north

Northwest façade, view facing southeast

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Stewart Hall P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 0862-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Stewart Hall is a located at the southern edge of campus, along Stewart Drive. It is an H-Shaped dormitory building that can best be characterized as Mid-Century Modern in style. The building generally consists of two long, two-story volumes that are connected by a small volume at the center. The eastern volume has a slightly bowed footprint, while the western building is a true rectangle. The volumes are capped by flat roofs and are sheathed in a combination of brick, concrete block and stucco. Both volumes are characterized by a series of entrances and windows to dormitory units that are in generally the same configuration at the first and second stories. Entrances consist of single wood doors and windows are aluminum sash. The second-story units are accessed by a continuous balcony that also provides a canopy over the first-story unit entrances. Balconies feature simple metal balustrades and are accessed by exterior staircases at the ends of the rectangular buildings. A primary entrance to the building itself is located at the center of the eastern volume and features a folded plate roof. The building is surrounded by a brick and metal fence at all façades except for the east façade. The spaces between the two volumes of the H-plan are landscaped with grass, shrubs and small trees. A surface parking lot is located to the northeast of the building.

(continued on page 3) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing northwest January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1964, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update

*Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Steward Hall Suites B2. Common Name: Stewart Hall B3. Original Use: Educational Building - Dormitory B4. Present Use: Educational Building - Dormitory *B5. Architectural Style Mid-Century Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)1 1964: Date of original construction. William C. Ullrich, architect 1966: A 24,4000 sq. ft. wing added. John Gallbraith, architect *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features:

B9a. Architect: William C. Ullrich b. Builder: Myers Brothers Construction Company *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Period of Significance: N/A Property Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance Stewart Hall does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

Stewart Hall was constructed in 1962 by William C. Ullrich. It is one of the campus buildings constructed as part of the initial building campaign for Biola’s La Mirada campus that began in 1957. John Galbraith designed a new wing for Stewart Hall in 1967, shortly after its completion to Ullrich’s designs in 1964. The building was originally constructed as a dormitory; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3)

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 6. (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

N B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Stewart Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

*P3a. Description (continued from page 1)

Stewart Hall was constructed in 1964 and, at that time, consisted only of the eastern volume of today’s H-shaped plan. The western “Stewart Hall Suites” addition was constructed in 1966. Additionally, original windows appear to have been replaced (date unknown).

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Construction began on Stewart Hall in 1964. Shortly after its completion, enrollment at Biola increased and

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Stewart Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update an additional wing, designed by John Galbraith, was constructed to accommodate the increasing number of enrolled students. 7 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.8 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.9 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.10 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Stewart Hall and Suites was constructed in the Mid-Century Modern style. As a dormitory building, its design is generally more residential in nature than other campus buildings. The style of the building follows the campus vernacular with its low, horizontal massing; brick and stucco exterior; and flat roof.

William C. Ullrich William C. Ullrich designed Stewart Hall in 1964. Very little information could be found about Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

7Rooted for One Hundred Years, 76. 8 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 9 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 10 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Stewart Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

John F. Galbraith Architect John F. Galbraith designed an addition to Stewart Hall, called Stewart Suites, in 1966. Galbraith became the campus architect in the late 1960s following the resignation of campus master planner William Ullrich. After serving as a draftsman in the office of architect Harold Bissner in Los Angeles, Galbraith formed his own practice in Pasadena around 1967. He designed a number of smaller corporate buildings, including the Southern California Gas Company Building in Pasadena and Unitek Corporation plant in Monrovia,11 but was primarily an architect of Mid-Century Modern style homes in the San Gabriel Valley area.

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, Stewart Hall does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or Stewart Hall specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore Stewart Hall does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically Stewart Hall, has no such associations. Therefore, Stewart Hall does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values Stewart Hall does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architects, William C. Ullrich and John F. Galbraith, are not considered masters in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because Stewart Hall does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

11 Michelson, Alan. "Galbraith, John." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. . “Firm Begins Move to Monrovia Plant.” Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1960, G5.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Stewart Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Stewart Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

North and east façades, view looking southwest. East façade of Stewart Suites, view looking southwest.

East façade, view looking southwest. South facades and courtyard between the two buildings, view looking north.

South façade Stewart Hall, view looking north.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Health Center P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Student Health Center is located at the northeast corner of the main academic quad. It was designed in a modest, Mid-Century Modern style with a broad front gable roof with overhanging eaves. The Student Health Center Building is one story in height and rectangular in plan. The exterior finish is painted stucco with a brick masonry water table at its front façade that wraps around to the first quarter of the long side façades. The building has a horizontal profile with a symmetrical front façade and regularly-spaced fenestration along its long side façades. The primary entrance to the building consists of a fully-glazed steel door with sidelights that is centered below the apex of the roof gable and set back in a deeply recessed entry. Large, fixed steel-frame windows flank the recessed entrance. The long southwest and northwest façades feature evenly spaced, single sliding aluminum windows of varying sizes. The rear (east) façade is symmetrical with a centered, fully-glazed door with sidelights and large sliding aluminum windows to either side. Wide panels of brick veneer reach from the roofline to the ground level, framing the entryway. Landscape elements include concrete sidewalks along all sides of the building and concrete steps with low brick retaining walls at the front entrance.

(continued on page 3) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing northeast, January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1960, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Infirmary B2. Common Name: Student Health Center B3. Original Use: Infirmary B4. Present Use: Infirmary *B5. Architectural Style Mid-Century Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)1 Originally constructed in 1960. Altered in 2007. *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: William C. Ullrich b. Builder: Myers Brothers Construction Company *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance The Student Health Center does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

The Student Health Center was constructed in 1960 by William C. Ullrich. It is one of the campus buildings constructed as part of the initial building campaign for Biola’s La Mirada campus that began in 1957. The building was originally constructed as the student infirmary; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5. (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

N

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Health Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

*P3a. Description (continued from page 1)

The Student Health Center has been altered. In 2007, the front porch was enclosed to add an additional 342 square feet to the interior. In addition, original windows and doors have been replaced and the building appears to have been refinished with textured stucco.

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Construction began on Student Infirmary in 1960. In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Health Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.7 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.8 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.9 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

The Student Health Center was constructed in a modest Mid-Century Modern style. Extensive alterations over time have obscured the original design. Generally, the style of the building follows the campus vernacular with its low, horizontal massing; brick veneer exterior; and combination flat and gabled roof.

William C. Ullrich Very little information could be found about William C. Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

7 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 8 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 9 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Health Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, the Student Health Center does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or The Student Health Center specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the Student Health Center does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically The Student Health Center, has no such associations. Therefore, the Student Health Center does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values The Student Health Center does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, William C. Ullrich, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because the Student Health Center does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Health Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

“Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Health Center Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Northwest (primary) façade, view facing southeast Southwest (side) façade, view facing northeast

Northeast (side) façade, view facing south

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Union P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Student Union Building is located near the center of Biola’s campus, to the east of Sutherland Way. The Student Union is a rectangular reinforced concrete building with brick veneer siding sited on a slight hill. It is one story at its entrance and two stories as it descends down the slope. The symmetrical building is horizontal in its massing and features a wide, overhanging flat roof with a thick projecting overhang. There are entrances at all façades; however the primary entrance appears to be at the northwest façade, facing Sutherland Way. The doors of the primary entrance are fully glazed steel doors that reach the full height of the façade and are framed on either side by panels of floor-to-ceiling fixed windows arranged in groups of four. On the side façades concrete panels separate the first and second floors in the brick- lined window bays. The rear of the building is two stories high. The first floor is composed of glass storefronts for various student offices and activities. Doors open onto a concrete patio. The second floor is separated from the first by painted stucco panels between projecting, square brick supports that span the full height of the façade. The exterior of the second floor features fixed windows in groups of four spanning the distance between brick window bays.

In 1991, a 5,000 square foot addition was constructed at the southeast corner of the building.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing southeast, primary façade January 18, 2012 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1966, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Student Union B2. Common Name: Student Union B3. Original Use: Educational Building B4. Present Use: Educational Building *B5. Architectural Style Late Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)1 Originally constructed in 1966. 5,072 square foot addition at southeast corner of building in 1991 *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: John Galbraith b. Builder: unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance The Student Union does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

The Student Union Building was constructed in 1966 by John Galbraith. The building was originally constructed as a student union facility; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012 N

(This space reserved for official comments.)

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Union Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911.

In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Ullrich resigned due to health problems and was replaced by architect John Galbraith of Pasadena, who was also an acquaintance of Ray Myers.7 Construction began on the Student Union building 1966. The building was completed in 1967 and the facilities housed the student government and publication offices, recreational facilities, a coffee shop, and a mailroom.8 In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools.

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Rooted for One Hundred Years, 69. 7 Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. (Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982), 28. 8Rooted for One Hundred Years, 79. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Union Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.9 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.10 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.11 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture The Student Union building was constructed in a modest Mid-Century Modern style. Generally, the style of the building follows the campus vernacular with its low, horizontal massing; brick veneer exterior; and combination flat and gabled roof.

John F. Galbraith Architect John F. Galbraith designed the Student Union Building and Marshburn Hall for Biola following the resignation of campus master planner William Ullrich. After serving as a draftsman in the office of architect Harold Bissner in Los Angeles, Galbraith formed his own practice in Pasadena around 1967. He designed a number of smaller corporate buildings, including the Southern California Gas Company Building in Pasadena and Unitek Corporation plant in Monrovia,12 but was primarily an architect of Mid-Century Modern style homes in the San Gabriel Valley area.

9 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 10 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 11 Turner, 267; 271. 12 Michelson, Alan. "Galbraith, John." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. . “Firm Begins Move to Monrovia Plant.” Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1960, G5.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Union Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, the Student Union does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or the Student Union specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the Student Union does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically the Student Union, has no such associations. Therefore, the Student Union does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values The Cafeteria building does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, John Galbraith, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because the Student Union does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Union Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

“Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Student Union Building Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Northwest (primary) façade, view facing southeast Northeast (side) façade, view facing southwest

Southeast (rear) façade, view facing northeast Southwest (side) façade, view facing southeast

Southwest (side) façade, view facing southeast Northwest corner showing front and side elevations, view facing southeast

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Sutherland Hall P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-013

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Sutherland Hall is located at the northern edge of the central core of Biola’s campus. It fronts southwest onto Sutherland Way. It is two-stories tall and is best characterized as Mid-Century Modern in style. The building is donut-shaped and features a central courtyard. It is generally clad with a brick veneer and covered with a flat roof, although a portion of the building at its northwestern side has a low-pitched, gabled roof. The primary entrance is located at the southwest façade and consists of an open porch of tall, precast concrete piers through which there is access to the central courtyard. Additional features within the courtyard are simple, round piers that support the second story of the building, an accessibility ramp and integral landscape and hardscape elements. Fenestration generally consists of metal windows that appear to be a combination of fixed light and operable sash. Entrances consist of fully-glazed, steel doors or single metal doors with no glazing. The building is surrounded at all sides except for its southwest façade by a surface parking lot.

Minor alterations include the addition of an elevator in the courtyard and the replacement of some original windows.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, Southwest façade, January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1959, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 7 *NRHP Status Code

B1. Historic Name: Ethel Lee Memorial Building B2. Common Name: Sutherland Hall B3. Original Use: Educational Building B4. Present Use: Educational Building *B5. Architectural Style Mid-Century Modern *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1959. Altered in 2001 (doors replaced), 2005 (addition), and 2008 (additions).1 *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: none

B9a. Architect: William C. Ullrich b. Builder: Myers Brothers Construction Company *B10. Significance: Theme: N/A Area: N/A Property Period of Significance: N/A Type: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

Summary Statement of Significance Sutherland Hall does not appear to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. The following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

Sutherland Hall was constructed in 1959 by William C. Ullrich. It was constructed as part of the initial building campaign for Biola’s La Mirada campus that began in 1957. The building was originally constructed as an academic facility; it maintains this use today.

(continued page 3) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References: See page 5. (Sketch Map with north arrow required.)

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Katie E. Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 220 Pasadena, CA 91103

*Date of Evaluation: January 18, 2012

(This space reserved for official comments.)

N

ARG, January 13, 2012

1 Compiled from campus maintenance records, courtesy of Biola University Department of Facilities and building permits, courtesy of the City of La Mirada. DPR 523B (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Sutherland Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

B10. Significance (continued from page 2)

Early History of Biola

Biola University was founded as the Bible Institute of Los Angeles in 1908 by Lyman H. Stewart, the president of the Union Oil Company, and Thomas Crown Horton, pastor of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles.2 The primary goal of Biola in its early years was to train laypeople to teach the Bible and complete missionary work.3 From 1908 to 1915, Biola held classes in numerous locations throughout the downtown Los Angeles area, including above a pool hall on South Main Street, in the Temple Auditorium at Fifth and Olive Streets, and at the First Lutheran Church at Eighth and Flower Streets. The first class, comprising six students, graduated in 1911. In 1913, Biola began construction on a building with a 3,500 seat auditorium located at Sixth and Hope Streets in downtown Los Angeles. The thirteen-story Renaissance Revival building designed by architects Walker and Vawter was completed in 1914. The large building provided spaces for the Bible Institute as well as the Church of the Open Door, an interdenominational church founded by Biola’s first dean, Rueben Archer Torrey. Classrooms, club space, student housing, and faculty offices were also located in the downtown building. In 1935, a large neon sign proclaiming “Jesus Saves” was added to the top of the downtown building.

The period following World War II was a time of renewed growth and change for Biola. In 1945, Dr. Leonie Soubirou founded the School of Missionary Medicine, which provided training in nursing for students planning missionary work. The influx of students following World War II and the passage of the GI Bill, which provided tuition money for veterans, caused enrollment to increase from 400 students in 1945 to 900 in 1949. Though the institute was able to regain control of the north dormitory tower when the hotel’s lease expired in 1953, the building was still too small to accommodate the expanded student body. Additionally, by the early 1950s the school began to transition from an institute to a college in response to reports that foreign countries were more willing to accept students with college degrees as missionaries. The Bible Institute officially became a baccalaureate degree program in 1952.4 To meet accreditation standards, Biola needed to provide additional facilities, including a larger library and science laboratories.

In 1953, a conversation between school president Samuel Sutherland, chancellor Louis Talbot, and board chairman Ray Myers, who owned Myers Brothers Construction Company, led to the realization that the cost of expanding Biola’s facilities downtown would be equal to the construction of an entirely new campus in a suburban setting.5 Several suburban sites in the Los Angeles County area were considered before Biola’s trustees purchased 50 undeveloped acres in the planned community of La Mirada in 1954. Ray A. Myers hired architect William C. Ullrich of Pasadena to do the initial master plan of the new campus. Funds for the new campus were raised through charitable contributions and through the sale of a downtown lot to the Superior Oil Company.

A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 1957 and Biola officially moved to its new La Mirada campus in 1959. Before the completion of adequate dormitories in La Mirada, students lived in the downtown building and took buses to classes on the new campus.6 Construction began on Sutherland Hall in 1957. The Church of the Open Door played a central role in the growth and development of Biola’s academic and spiritual program downtown; Sutherland Hall, with an 800 seat auditorium, was intended to create a similar gathering space for the community.7 The building was originally called the Ethel Lee Memorial Building and later renamed after Dr. Samuel Sutherland, Biola’s president from 1952 to 1970. In 1977, the Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology was incorporated into Biola’s schools. Through this period of academic growth, the school’s campus continued to expand and develop. The McNally Junior High campus, a former public

2 Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15. 3 Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . 4 Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. (La Mirada: Biola University, 2007), 65. 5 Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. (1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada), 173. 6 Williams and Miller, 83. 7 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 4 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Sutherland Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update school located south of the school’s entrance on Biola Avenue, was acquired for college use and merged with the existing campus in 1977.8 In 1985, Biola College was officially restructured into Biola University.

Campus Development

Biola’s La Mirada campus was a complete departure from its downtown Los Angeles campus in which all of the institution’s functions were clustered under a single roof. With the acquisition of 50 undeveloped acres, Biola’s administration and its architect were able to plan a low-density campus that provided ample breathing room between buildings and departments.

The quadrangle was used by architect Ullrich as a central feature in his 1955 Master Plan. Its precedents can be traced to the medieval English college, which was resurrected in American campus planning in the early 20th century as a response to growing and increasingly impersonal universities. The quadrangle was viewed as a design unit that promoted more intimate educational communities.9 Prototypes for the quadrangles of mid-20th century institutional planning can be found at the 18th century campus of Yale University, and even older examples at Cambridge and Oxford (from which Yale drew its inspiration). Rather than focus on the “community-making” aspects of quadrangles, the plans emphasize their role in creating “places,” public spaces that were functional and memorable.

Despite utilizing the aged tradition of the quadrangles, the Ullrich plan for Biola is also a product of its time, with an emphasis on automobile circulation and parking, as well as the use of projections in enrollment, housing, and parking needs as a basis for planning. They are also reminiscent of important movements in city planning of the modern era, especially the Garden City Movement, but also urban renewal and automobile-oriented design.

The Ullrich plan for Biola was evocative of several garden city planning concepts, chiefly, the concentration of academic functions at the core of the site within a setting of ample public space, with non-academic functions (such as athletic fields and dormitories) located at the periphery. These are two of the key features in the plans that are particularly reflective of modern-era campus planning in America.10 The plans’ particular emphasis on separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic from each other, with dedicated pedestrian-only rights-of-way, is garden city in origin. This same concept is reflected in the 1955 plan’s deviation from a typical urban grid, creating a “super block” campus where internal streets are primarily for pedestrian circulation, and the larger surrounding streets serve to rapidly move automotive traffic.

Architecture

Sutherland Hall was constructed in a modest Mid-Century Modern style by architect William C. Ullrich. Generally, the style of the building follows the campus vernacular with its low, horizontal massing; brick veneer exterior; and combination flat and gabled roof.

William C. Ullrich Very little information could be found about William C. Ullrich outside of his work at Biola. A search in historic periodicals and repositories of data regarding living and deceased architects did not reveal any information about this individual.

Evaluation of Significance

In summary, Sutherland Hall does not appear to be individually eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, due to later campus development in the 1990s and 2000s that has caused continued change to the original Ullrich master plan, it does not appear to be eligible as part of a historic district on Biola’s campus.

8 Biola leased the McNally buildings for campus use in 1977 and purchased the buildings in 1988. 9 Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. 10 Turner, 267; 271. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 5 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Sutherland Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events Biola has been the academic home of many noted scholars and has hosted many distinguished, internationally-known visitors. These people and their interests and backgrounds form an interesting profile of the intellectual life of the university, but their presence over time does not necessarily lend historical significance to the university itself. There is no particular event or pattern of events known to be associated with Biola or Sutherland Hall specifically that causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore Sutherland Hall does not appear significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person There are persons who are associated with the history of Biola who have been invaluable to the development of that institution, but none of the figures intimately related to the development of the campus and the institution is sufficiently significant outside of that context for the campus itself to be significant for such an association. Criterion B is intended to recognize properties that are associated with the work or the life of a significant person. The development or use of the campus or, specifically Sutherland Hall, has no such associations. Therefore, Sutherland Hall does not appear to be significant under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values Sutherland Hall does not convey a high level of architectural distinction or exemplify the characteristics of a particular style. Its architect, William C. Ullrich, is not considered a master in the field. Therefore, it does not appear eligible under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because Sutherland Hall does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

B12. References: (continued from page 2)

Books Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007. Turner, Paul Venable. Campus: American Planning Tradition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987), 215. Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. (La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983), 15.

Periodicals “Firm Begins Move to Monrovia Plant.” Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1960, G5. “Scale Models Made for Bible Institute Campus” Los Angeles Times 6 August 1955 A3. “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

Archives and Other Materials Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982. City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011. DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 6 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Marshburn Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada. Michelson, Alan. "Galbraith, John." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. . Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. . Ullrich, William. Biola Campus Master Plan. Building & Safety Department, City of La Mirada, 1957.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 7

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Sutherland Hall Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: January 18, 2012 Continuation Update

Southwest (primary) façade, view facing northeast Southeast (side) façade, view facing northwest

Northeast (rear) façade, view facing southwest Northeast (rear) façade, view facing southwest

Northwest (side) façade, view facing northeast

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) McNally Junior High School P1. Other Identifier: Biola University *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The former McNally Junior High School campus comprises nine buildings, eight of which are clustered together with a vaguely radial site plan. The ninth building is located in the south part of campus, surrounded by surface parking at all sides. All of the buildings are one story tall and constructed in a modest Mid-Century Modern style. Façade materials generally consist of brick veneer and painted stucco. Fenestration patterns vary by building, but windows are generally horizontally stacked, combination steel-frame fixed lights and operable awning sash. Doors generally consist of single, metal doors, often with transoms. Shallow, side-gable roofs have overhanging eaves which extend past the walls to form covered entryways. The eight buildings that are clustered together are connected by covered walkways with flat roofs supported by metal poles. Triangular open spaces are located between the buildings and are landscaped with grass, a variety of mature trees, and low hedges. Curvilinear concrete paths traverse the lawns between buildings. The campus features large surface parking lots at its southern section and a smaller parking lot to the north of its buildings. An enclosed service yard is located in the surface lot to the south of the main cluster of buildings. The campus has endured very few alterations; exceptions include additions to two of the buildings and some window replacements.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15. Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date, accession #) Aerial image, 2012, courtesy of Google maps

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957-1961, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

DISTRICT RECORD Page 2 of 18 *NRHP Status Code

D1. Historic Name: McNally Junior High School D2. Common Name: Biola University *D3. Detailed Description (Discuss overall coherence of the district, its setting, visual characteristics, and minor features. List all elements of the district.): The former McNally Junior High School is mid-20th century public junior high school campus. Its design and appearance are typical of the property type and era. It comprises nine freestanding, one-story buildings, surface parking, and landscaping features such as lawns, trees and shrubs. It was acquired by Biola and consolidated into its campus circa 1986. The buildings currently house Biola University facilities and are named as follows: Art Department, Dorothy English Hall, Duplicating Center, Fine Arts Building / Theatre 21, Locker Building, Perez Hall, Production Center, Rood Hall, and White Hall.

*D4. Boundary Description (Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.): The former McNally Junior High School campus has an irregular boundary. It is bounded roughly by Biola Avenue to the west, Biola’s Business Building and University Drive to the north, a meandering boundary that follows the site plan of the campus (separating it from the soccer fields) to the east, and another meandering boundary along the edge of the surface parking lots to the south.

*D5. Boundary Justification:

Because the former junior high school has been consolidated into the Biola University campus and is currently used to house university facilities, its original boundaries are difficult to discern. For the purposes of this study, the boundary was roughly drawn around those elements that are known to have originally been part of the McNally Junior High School campus.

*D6. Significance: Theme N/A Area N/A Period of Significance: N/A Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)

The McNally Junior High School campus does not appear eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources. Following is a discussion outlining how this determination was made.

Campus Development and Use McNally Junior High School opened in 1957. It was one of twelve public school campuses constructed as part of a large building campaign for the Norwalk School District in 1956. The architects of all twelve campuses were Kistner, Wright & Wright. In the late 1970s, the school district began to sell a few of its unneeded properties, including McNally Junior High, and neighboring Biola University began to lease the campus for university use. Biola purchased the property and consolidated it with the rest of its campus in 1986.1

As such, McNally was in use as a public junior high school for only 20 years. During this time, the City of La Mirada was incorporated and the Norwalk School District became the Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District. In addition to serving as a public junior high school, a number of public and private meetings were held at McNally Junior High. In 1957, an informal “town hall” meeting to discuss the pros and cons of incorporation of the unincorporated area of Mirada Hills was held at McNally Junior High School.2 In 1960, the city of La Mirada incorporated and the first City Council meeting was held at McNally Junior High.

(continued page 3) *D7. References (Give full citations including the names and addresses of any informants, where possible.):

(see page 5)

*D8. Evaluator: Katie Horak Date: January 18, 2012 Affiliation and Address: Architectural Resources Group, Inc., 65 North Raymond, #220, Pasadena, CA 91103

1 Biola University. "A Century of Giving - Biola University." Biola University Centennial: Stories of Stewardship from Biola's 100 Year History. Biola University. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. . 2 “La Mirada Cityhood Rally Topic,” Los Angeles Times, 8 December 1957, H3. DPR 523D (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

DISTRICT RECORD Page 3 of 18 *NRHP Status Code

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) McNally Junior High School Recorded By: Katie Horak, Architectural Resources Group Date: 1/18/12 Continuation Update

*D6. Significance (continued from page 2):

The availability of the McNally campus in the late 1970s came at a good time for Biola University, which had seen increasing enrollment numbers in the years following World War II and was in need of additional classroom space. The purchase of the property was made possible by a gift from the estate of Biola graduate Inez Kaartinen, a former schoolteacher.3

Under the ownership of Biola University, the buildings of the former McNally campus have been used primarily as classroom space. The former shop classroom was converted into a small black box theatre. Today, the buildings have the following names: Art Department, Dorothy English Hall, Duplicating Center, Fine Arts Building / Theatre 21, Locker Building, Perez Hall, Production Center, Rood Hall, and White Hall.

Architecture The McNally Junior High School campus was designed by architects Kistner, Wright & Wright. Its plan and buildings are typical of mid-20th century public school campus development. The buildings are modest examples of the Mid-Century Modern style.

Formed in 1941 by architects Theodore C. Kistner and Henry L. Wright with structural engineer William T. Wright, the San Diego-based firm of Kistner, Wright and Wright was a prolific designer of school campuses throughout Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties from the 1940s to 1960s. The firm specialized in public buildings that emphasized the advantages of the Southern California climate by creating numerous outdoor spaces and eliminating interior hallways. Theodore Kistner developed a specialty in designing school buildings shortly after graduating from the University of Illinois in 1897.4 Architect Henry L. Wright served on the AIA’s Advisory Committee on Schoolhouse Planning of California, which examined and standardized school building construction in the California beginning in the 1940s.5 Kistner, Wright, and Wright’s extensive work in Southern California also led to a consulting practice that provided advice to school boards in Tucson and New Orleans. 6

The architecture firm of Kistner, Wright, and Wright designed the McNally Junior High School in La Mirada for the Norwalk School District as part of a multiple-school building campaign that began in 1956 in conjunction with the master planning of the city of La Mirada. Kistner, Wright, and Wright planned twelve schools for La Mirada in 1956, of which all except the McNally campus continue to operate as schools within the Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District.7

The firm continued to work in La Mirada and adjacent cities on educational and institutional buildings following the completion of the 1956 campaign, completing Cerritos Junior College in 1961 and Norwalk City Hall in 1965. This later work of the firm in Norwalk and Cerritos is generally considered the apex of its design practice, classified as being “ultramodern” in design.8

3 Biola University. "A Century of Giving - Biola University." 4Michelson, Alan. "Kistner, Theodore." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 3 Feb. 2012. . 5 “Former President Henry L. Wright honored by AIA.” Los Angeles Times. 19 Jan 1986. 6 “L.A. Architect to Aid Southern School Planning.” Los Angeles Times 16 August 1953, E9. 7 “Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4. 8 National Trust for Historic Preservation. Los Angeles Modern: City of Tomorrow. Washington DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2010. Hess, Alan. Googie Redux: Ultramodern Roadside Architecture. (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2004) 205. DPR 523D (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

DISTRICT RECORD Page 4 of 18 *NRHP Status Code

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) McNally Junior High School Recorded By: Katie Horak, Architectural Resources Group Date: 1/18/12 Continuation Update

Eligibility Evaluation

NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1 – Association with a significant event or pattern of events The McNally Junior High School campus was one of twelve schools constructed as part of a building campaign of public educational facilities for the Norwalk School District in 1956. It served as a public school from 1957 until 1978, when it was acquired by Biola for university use. In addition to use as a public junior high school, the campus was also occasionally used as a venue for various public meetings, including the first meeting of La Mirada’s City Council after the city’s incorporation in 1960. It is not unusual for public schools to be used for public functions outside of the academic sphere, such as government meetings, rallies and for voting purposes. Research does not suggest that its use in this way causes it to stand out for its historical associations. Therefore the McNally campus does not appear significant as a historic district under NRHP/CRHR Criterion A/1.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2 – Association with the life of a significant person Research did not suggest that the McNally Junior High School campus is associated with significant individuals. Although it is named for Andrew McNally, it was constructed more than 50 years after his death and therefore cannot be associated with his productive life. Therefore, neither the McNally campus nor any of its buildings is significant as a historic district under NRHP/CRHR Criterion B/2.

NRHP/CRCR Criterion C/3 – Association with a type, period, or method of construction or possessing high artistic values The McNally Junior High School campus was designed by architects Kistner, Wright & Wright as part of a 12-campus building campaign for the Norwalk School District in 1956. Its plan and buildings are typical of mid-20th century public school campus development. Research did not suggest that Kistner, Wright & Wright, though prolific during this era, are considered masters in the field. Additionally, though the McNally campus buildings are Mid-Century Modern in style, they do not achieve a high level of architectural distinction. Therefore, as a collection the McNally Junior High School campus and its buildings do not appear eligible as a historic district under NRHP/CRHR Criterion C/3.

NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 – Potential to yield information NRHP/CRHR Criterion D/4 is generally applied to archeological resources and evaluation of the Biola campus for eligibility under this criterion was beyond the scope of this evaluation.

Integrity Analysis

In order to be eligible for the National or California Registers, a resource must first be significant under one of the four eligibility criteria. It must then retain sufficient integrity to convey its significance under the criteria for which it was found to be eligible. Because the McNally Junior High School campus does not appear to be significant under any of the eligibility criteria, an integrity analysis is not necessary.

DPR 523D (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

DISTRICT RECORD Page 5 of 18 *NRHP Status Code

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) McNally Junior High School Recorded By: Katie Horak, Architectural Resources Group Date: 1/18/12 Continuation Update

*D7. References (continued from page 2):

Books, Manuscripts, and Archival Materials

Bascom, Ken. Interview with Dr. Samuel Sutherland. Transcript of videocassette. 13 October 1982.

Biola University, comp. Biola University: Rooted for One Hundred Years. La Mirada: Biola University, 2007.

City of La Mirada. Building Permits. La Mirada: City Hall, 1956-2011.

Henry, James O., and Inez McGahey. A History of Biola University since 1908. 1996. TS. Biola University, La Mirada.

Hess, Alan. Googie Redux: Ultramodern Roadside Architecture. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2004.

National Trust for Historic Preservation. Los Angeles Modern: City of Tomorrow. Washington DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2010.

Williams, Robert, and Marilyn Miller. Chartered for His Glory: Biola University, 1908-1983. La Mirada, CA: Associated Students of Biola University, 1983.

Newspapers and Periodicals

“First La Mirada Industrial Building Is Now Rising.” Los Angeles Times 7 Jun 1953 E12.

“Former President Henry L. Wright honored by AIA.” Los Angeles Times. 19 Jan 1986.

“L.A. Architect to Aid Southern School Planning.” Los Angeles Times 16 August 1953, E9.

“La Mirada Celebrates Its Second Birthday: New City Event.” Los Angeles Times 19 Aug 1956 F10.

“La Mirada Cityhood Rally Topic.” Los Angeles Times 8 Dec 1957.

“La Mirada Ranchos Sold For Nearly $5,000,000.” Los Angeles Times 8 Jan 1953 A1.

“La Miranda Hits Snag in Incorporation.” Los Angeles Times 3 April 1957 p.7.

“Large Business Area Slated For New City” Los Angeles Times 12 April 1953 F5.

“Oil And Mining: Shell Quitting Wildcat Area Quitclaiming All Leases In La Mirada District.” Los Angeles Times 28 Dec 28, 1925 p.13.

“Panelist to Focus on Human Relations.” Los Angeles Times 5 Feb 1967.

“Ran Away To La Mirada.” Los Angeles Times 19 April 1896 p.9.

“Schools To Enhance Planned Community.” Los Angeles Times. 13 November 1955, E4.

“The Development of the Great Southwest.” Los Angeles Times 26 Nov 1899 p.28.

DPR 523D (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

DISTRICT RECORD Page 6 of 18 *NRHP Status Code

“Two Congregations Plan Joint Pentecost Service.” Los Angeles Times 2 June 1979.

Riviera, Carla. “La Mirada Takes Up Modest Plans for Historic McNally Ranch.” Los Angeles Times 21 Nov. 1985.

Online Sources

Historic Aerials. http://www.historicaerials.com/ accessed during January 2012.

Michelson, Alan. "Kistner, Theodore." Pacific Coast Architecture Database. University of Washington. Web. 3 Feb. 2012. .

Sanders, Fred. "Once Upon a Time in Los Angeles - Biola University." Home Page - Biola University Centennial. Biola University. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. .

Biola University. "A Century of Giving - Biola University." Biola University Centennial: Stories of Stewardship from Biola's 100 Year History. Biola University. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. .

DPR 523D (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 7 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Art Department P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Art Department building is a rectangular, one-story building slightly east and outside of the radial plan of the other McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side-gable roof with projecting eaves that form a covered walkway on the long sides of the rectangular footprint. Entrances consist of single metal doors; several are located on each of the long sides of the rectangular footprint. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel-frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. The Art Department building is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat-roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

The Art Department building was constructed four years after the original construction of the McNally Junior High Campus. It does not appear to have been altered.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing north, south façade January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1961, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 8 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Dorothy English Hall P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Dorothy English Hall is a rectangular, one-story building located at the southern section of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side-gable roof with projecting eaves that form a covered walkway on the long sides of the rectangular footprint. Entrances consist of single metal doors; there are five on each of the long façades of the rectangular building and one on the short façade that faces northwest. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel-frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the brick veneer-clad west façade at the juncture of the covered walkway. The Dorothy English Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat-roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

Dorothy English Hall has not endured any exterior alterations.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing northeast, southwest façade January 18, 2012 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 9 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Duplicating Center P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Duplicating Center is a rectangular, one-story building located in the northern portion of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side-gable roof with a projecting eave on its east side that forms a covered walkway. Entrances consist of single metal doors on the façades of the long sides of the rectangular building and the short, southerly façade. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel-frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the brick veneer-clad west façade at the juncture of the covered walkway. The Duplicating Center is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat-roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

The Duplicating Center building has not endured any exterior alterations.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, View facing north; west and east façades. January 18, 2012 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Katie Horak Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 10 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Fine Arts Building / Theatre 21 P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Fine Arts Building / Theatre 21 is a mostly-rectangular, one-story building located at the northernmost portion of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is somewhat irregular in plan with two small shed-roof wings and a projecting addition at its northern end. It is a modest, Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow pitched front gable roof and has slightly shorter, shed roof-covered volumes on its east and west sides. The entrance to Theatre 21 is located at the center of the southern façade and features a projecting awning over the double doors. Windows are generally a narrow strip of clerestory windows below the roofline of the building on its north, east, and west façades. The Fine Arts Building / Theatre 21 is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus along its east façade flat-roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

In 1998, a 1,800 square foot addition was added to the north side of the Fine Arts Building. A large, canvas awning and some non-original signage have been added to the north façade.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, South façade, view facing north January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page __ of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Locker Building P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Locker Building is located southeast of the other McNally buildings at the southwestern section of the Biola campus. The Locker Building is surrounded by surface parking lots. It was designed in a modest, Mid-Century Modern style with a combination side gable roof with a shed roof over the lower southeastern façade. The shed roof on the southeastern façade features a slight overhang. The Locker Building is one story in height and rectangular in plan. The exterior finish of the Locker Building is painted concrete on three façades and a combination of painted concrete and brick veneer along its southeastern façade.

The building has a horizontal profile with varying fenestration and entrance patterns along each façade. Entrances to the building are located on all four façades. The southeast façade, below the shed roof, contains three entrances. Windows along this façade include sliding vinyl clerestory windows, double-hung vinyl sash windows arranged in groups of three, vinyl sash hopper windows, and wood frame casement windows. The northeastern and southwestern façades each contain two entrances and no windows. On the southwest façade one of the entrances has been infilled. All entrances consist of either a single door with no lights or a single door with a small, vertical light. Clerestory windows line the (continued on page 2) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, Southeast façade, view facing north January 18, 2012 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page __ of 18

*P3a. Description (continued): southeast and northwest façades below the eaves of the roofline of the taller section of the building. Along the northwest façade the windows are a combination of four horizontally stacked steel frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of three or four. Along the southeast façade, the windows are pairs of horizontally stacked steel frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of three or four.

The Locker Building does not appear to have endured any exterior alterations aside from the infill of a single entrance opening and the replacement of some original windows with vinyl windows.

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 13 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Perez Hall P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Perez Hall is a square, one-story building located at the center of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side-gable roof with projecting eaves on its east and west sides that form covered walkways. The primary entrances face the central area to the east formed by the radial plan of the other McNally buildings. Entrances consist of single metal doors. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel-frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms and fixed sidelights. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the north, west, and south façades at the juncture of the covered walkways. Perez Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus flat-roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

In 2005, a 998 square foot addition was constructed at the north end of the building. It is otherwise unchanged at its exterior.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, East façade January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page __ of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Production Center P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

The Production Center is located at the southwest section of the radial plan of the McNally campus. It was designed in a modest, Mid-Century Modern style with a combination side gable and flat roof. The Production Center is one story in height and it has an irregular plan. It has a textured stucco finish at all façades. The building has varying fenestration and entrance patterns at each façade. The primary façade of the Production Center faces northwest, toward Biola Avenue, and is composed of a taller, gabled-roof volume and a one-story flat roofed volume. The taller volume has an overhanging eave that forms a canopy over the façade. This section of the façade is almost entirely covered by windows, which consist primarily of stacked steel-frame windows comprising a combination of fixed light and awning sash. The shorter northern section of the front façade is covered by a flat roof. There are three entrances at the primary façade; one metal double door and two, single fully-glazed metal doors. A triangular canopy with a simple pipe support shades the entrances at the shorter volume. A bronze plaque at this façade notes that the building was the location of La Mirada’s first City Council meeting.

(continued on page 2) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, West façade, view facing south January 18, 2012

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page __ of 18

*P3a. Description (continued):

The southwest elevation is characterized by its jutting roof form, which projects up to create a canopy over a patio which is enclosed by a semi-circular brick wall. There are two visible entrances at this façade; both are single metal doors, one of which is accessed by an accessibility ramp with a metal pipe handrail. There are two vinyl clerestory windows at this façade. The southeast façade features an extended entrance pavilion covered by a cantilevered roof projecting at a steep, upward angle and supported by thin, metal poles. The entrance consists of fully glazed doors and windows extending from floor to ceiling. Vinyl clerestory windows line a section of the façade to the northeast. The northeast façade is a solid concrete wall with a flat roof. There are two entrances at this façade; both are solid metal doors. One entrance is shaded by projecting, triangular canopy that is supported by a thin, metal pole. There are no windows at this façade.

The Production Center has been significantly altered. A continuous canopy has been removed from the primary façade and a new triangular canopy was added over the easternmost entrance. Large additions were added to the southwest and southeast façades. Many original windows have either been replaced or infilled.

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 16 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Rood Hall P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

Rood Hall is a rectangular, one-story building located at the eastern portion of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination of brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side-gable roof with projecting eaves on its north and south sides that form covered walkways. There are entrances at all four façades of the building; all consist of single, metal doors. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked, steel-frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the west façade at the juncture of the covered walkway. Rood Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus flat-roofed covered walkways supported by metal poles.

Rood Hall has not endured any exterior alterations.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, South façade, view facing northwest January 18, 2012 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information

State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial # NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 17 of 18

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) White Hall P1. Other Identifier: McNally Junior High School *P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M. c. Address 13800 Biola Avenue City La Mirada Zip 90639-0001 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) APN: 8062-003-014

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)

White Hall is a rectangular, one-story building located at the northeastern section of the radial plan of the McNally campus buildings. It is a modest, Mid-Century Modern style building constructed of reinforced concrete with a combination brick veneer siding and painted concrete exterior. It is covered by a shallow, side-gable roof with projecting eaves on its northwest and southeast sides that form covered walkways. There are entrances at all four façades, which generally consist of single metal doors. At the center of the northeastern façade is a projecting entrance bay with double metal doors. Windows are generally a combination of horizontally stacked steel frame fixed lights and operable awning sash arranged in groups of five. Solid metal doors feature operable, metal awning sash transoms. A narrow strip of clerestory windows lines the brick veneer clad southeastern, southwestern, and northwestern façades at the juncture of the covered walkways. White Hall is connected to the other buildings of the McNally campus by flat-roofed, covered walkways supported by metal poles.

White Hall has not endured any exterior alterations.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP15: Educational Building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.): *P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, Southwest façade, view facing northeast January 18, 2012 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic Prehistoric Both 1957, Biola University, Dept. of Facilities Planning *P7. Owner and Address: Biola University 13800 Biola Avenue La Mirada, CA 90639-0001 *P8. Recorded by: Name, affiliation, and address) Allison M. Lyons Architectural Resources Group 65 North Raymond Avenue, #220 Pasadena, CA 91103 *P9. Date Recorded: January 18, 2012 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Reconnaissance

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Biola University Master Plan Update, Historic Resources Technical Report *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information

State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# LOCATION MAP Trinomial

Page 18 of 18 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) McNally Junior High School *Map Name: McNally Junior High School Survey Area Map *Scale: 1 1/8 : 1000 *Date of map: 1/18/12

DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information

Appendix D Water Supply Assessment

City of La Mirada Biola University Master Plan Update

Water Supply Assessment

January 2012

Water Supply Assessment for the Biola University Master Plan Update

Prepared for:

City of La Mirada

Prepared by:

Rincon Consultants, Inc. 180 North Ashwood Avenue Ventura, California 93003

January 2012

This report is printed on 50% recycled, post-consumer content paper.

Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ...... 1 Background ...... 1 Project Summary ...... 1

WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT ...... 2 SB 610 Applicability ...... 2 Water Supplier ...... 2 UWMP Applicability ...... 2 Water Supplies and Demand ...... 3 Contingency Plans/Water Conservation ...... 9 Entitlements/Regulatory Approvals ...... 10 Proposed Project Water Demand Projections ...... 11 Supply Availability Analysis and Conclusion...... 11

REFERENCES ...... 14 Publications ...... 14 Persons Contacted ...... 14

List of Tables Table 1 Metropolitan Water Supply in Normal Year and Single and Multiple Dry Years (Thousands of AFY) ...... 4 Table 2 Summary of Water Supply Sources – SWS Whittier/ La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 4 Table 3 Summary of Current Supply Reliability – SWS Whittier/ La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 6 Table 4 Projected Average/Normal Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 6 Table 5 Projected Single-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 7 Table 6 Projected Multiple-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 8 Table 7 Groundwater Pumped 2006-2010 – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 9 Table 8 Water Supply Shortage Stages and Conditions ...... 9 Table 9 Three-Year Estimated Minimum Water Supply – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 10 Table 11 Projected Average/Normal Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/ La Mirada Service Area (AFY) and Master Plan Supply ...... 12 Table 12 Projected Single and Multiple-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) ...... 12 Table 13 Metropolitan Water Supply in Normal Year and Single and Multiple Dry Years (Thousands of AFY) ...... 13

City of La Mirada i Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

This page intentionally left blank.

City of La Mirada ii Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

This water supply assessment (WSA) has been prepared for the proposed Biola University Master Plan Project in the City of La Mirada, pursuant to the requirements of Section 10910 of the State Water Code, as amended by Senate Bill No. 610 (SB 610), Chapter 643 (2001).

BACKGROUND

SB 610 became effective January 1, 2002. The bill requires a city or county which determines that a "project" (as defined in Water Code § 10912) is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to identify any public water system that may supply water for the project and to request those public water systems to prepare a specified WSA. The assessment is required to include an identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, or water service contracts relevant to the identified water supply for the proposed project and water received in prior years pursuant to those entitlements, rights, and contracts. The assessment must be approved by the governing body of the public water system supplying water to the project. If the projected water demand associated with the project was included as part of the most recently adopted urban water management plan (UWMP), the public water system may incorporate the requested information from the UWMP in the WSA. The bill requires the city or county, if it is not able to identify any public water system that may supply water for the project, to prepare the WSA after a prescribed consultation. If it is concluded that water supplies are, or will be, insufficient, plans for acquiring additional water supplies must be submitted to the city or county. The city or county must include the water supply assessment in any environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the act. It also requires the city or county to determine whether project water supplies will be sufficient to satisfy the demands of the project, in addition to existing and planned future uses.

PROJECT SUMMARY

The proposed project is a Master Plan for the campus of Biola University in the City of La Mirada, County of Los Angeles, California. The proposed Master Plan is a long range plan for future improvements to the campus over the next 20 years. Currently, the 95-acre campus (the Plan Area) consists of 45 occupied buildings totaling approximately 1,030,000 gross square feet. The proposed Master Plan would increase occupied building space by 1,093,250 square feet; however, approximately 236,383 square feet of existing occupied building space would be demolished as an element of the Master Plan. Therefore, the net increase in occupied building space resulting from the proposed Master Plan would be 856,867 square feet. A portion of this new building space (212,780 square feet) includes proposed residential halls that would accommodate up to 985 beds. The remainder of this new building space (644,087 square feet) would be non-residential.

The proposed project meets the definition of “project” within Water Code section 10912 and is subject to CEQA. Pursuant to CEQA, the City of La Mirada, acting as lead agency, prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project. Suburban Water Systems (SWS) is the public water system supplier that would supply water to the Plan Area pending approval by the City of La Mirada.

City of La Mirada 1 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT

The following is a discussion of local water supply planning as it relates to the applicable requirements of Section 10910 of the State Water Code.

SB 610 APPLICABILITY

Water Code Section 10910(a) states that projects, as defined in Section 10912, are subject to the requirement to prepare a water supply assessment. A “project” under Section 10912 includes a development that would result in 500,000 square feet or more of non-residential space. Since the proposed Master Plan would result in a net increase of 856,867 square feet, 644,087 square feet of which would be non-residential development, the requirements of Section 10910 of the California Water Code apply to the proposed project.

This WSA is prepared in accordance with the requirements identified by SB 610. Because SWS uses groundwater as a source of water to serve its customers, additional requirements are necessary to comply with SB 610. These include the identification and detailing of the groundwater basins from which water is being drawn and sufficiency of supply.

WATER SUPPLIER

Water Code Section 10910(b) requires the identification of the public water system that would serve the project. SWS provides water to the City of La Mirada and would provide water to the proposed Master Plan project site. SWS also provides water to the cities of Glendora, Covina, West Covina, La Puente, Industry, Walnut, Whittier, La Mirada, La Habra, and Buena Park, as well as sections of unincorporated Los Angeles County (including Valinda and Hacienda Heights) and portions of Orange County. The SWS service area is divided into two main service areas: the San Jose Hills Service Area, and the Whittier/La Mirada Service Area. The Plan Area is located in the Whittier/La Mirada Service area and the focus of the water supply analysis will be related to the this service area.

UWMP APPLICABILITY

Water Code Section 10910(c)(l) requires a determination of whether the proposed project was included in the most recently adopted UWMP. The most recent UWMP prepared by SWS was adopted in June 2011. Population projections within the SWS service were estimated using a per-connection methodology developed by the Department of Water Resources (DWR). This method estimates population by anchoring the year 2000 residential connections to the year 2000 Census population estimates, and then scales this estimate backward and forward using data for active residential connections. As of 2010, the population served by SWS is approximately 293,000. The SWS service area is nearly built-out, and is characterized primarily by residential development as approximately 95 percent of water accounts are residential. Population has remained steady within the SWS service area over the past 15 years and is projected to remain steady in the future (Suburban Water Systems UWMP, 2010).

The proposed Master Plan would include 856,867 square feet of space, including 644,087 square feet of non-residential development and 212,780 square feet of residential halls that would

City of La Mirada 2 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

accommodate up to 985 beds. However, this proposed development was not accounted for in the UWMP.

WATER SUPPLIES AND DEMAND

Water Supplies. The SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area receives a majority of its water supply from two adjudicated groundwater basins. The greatest amount of SWS groundwater comes from the Main Basin through the SWS Plant 201 well field constructed north of the Whittier Narrows Dam. Between 2000 and 2010, water extracted by SWS from the Main Basin ranged between 11,600 and 13,500 acre feet per year (AFY).

SWS also pumps water from the Central Basin wells, which are managed by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California (WRD) and DWR. Between 2000 and 2010, water extracted from the Central Basin ranged between 480 and 3,000 AFY, with an average of 1,800 AFY. SWS is a party to the Central Basin Judgment and has an allowed pumping allocation of 3,721 AFY. However, production capacity currently limits Central Basin supply to 1,860 AFY. An additional well to be constructed by 2020 is expected to increase capacity by 600 AFY (Suburban Water Systems UWMP, 2010).

The Whittier/La Mirada Service Area also receives a major portion of its water supply from California Domestic Water Company (CDWC). CDWC’s water supply source includes groundwater from the Main Basin. Between 2000 and 2010, water purchased from CDWC ranged from 6,700 to 10,200 AFY. SWS owns 2,593 shares in CDWC, which for the 2010-2011 water year entitled SWS to 3,760.94 acre feet (AF). In addition to its owned shares, SWS secured additional leases of 1,236 AF of Main Basin pumping rights to be delivered by CDWC. CDWC is a party to the Main San Gabriel Basin Judgment and is allowed to produce water from the Main Basin in excess of CDWC’s share of the operating safe yield. SWS is allowed to purchase water from CDWC in excess of SWS shares and leases by paying the Replacement Water Assessment on Excess Production as set by the Main San Gabriel Watermaster.

Another supply for the SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area is from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) through the Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD). Between 2000 and 2010, water purchased by SWS from this source averaged 1,350 AFY. SWS has a Purchase Agreement with CBMWD with a Tier 1 rate allocation of 1,482.4 AF. Water delivered in excess of SWS’s Tier 1 allocation would be charged to SWS at Tier 2 rates or penalty rates, but there is not a limit to how much water SWS could purchase. Based on the Regional Urban Water Management Plan (2010), prepared by MWD, it is reported that MWD can provide reliable water supplies during normal, single dry year and multiple dry year conditions, as shown in Table 1 below.1 In addition, as shown in Table 1, there is considerable surplus during each of these scenarios.

1 “Dry” years are those years when supplies are the lowest, which occurs primarily when precipitation is lower than the long-term average precipitation. The impact of low precipitation in a given year on a particular supply may differ based on how low the precipitation is, or whether the year follows a high-precipitation year or another low-precipitation year. For imported MWD supplies, a low precipitation year may or may not affect supplies, depending on how much water is in storage at the beginning of the year.

City of La Mirada 3 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Table 1 Metropolitan Water Supply in Normal Year and Single and Multiple Dry Years (Thousands of AFY)

Normal Year 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Supply Totals 3,485 3,810 4,089 3,947 3,814 Demand Totals 2,006 1,933 1,985 2,049 2,106 Reserves (Supply – Demand) 1,479 1,877 2,104 1,898 1,708 Single Dry Year 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Supply Totals 2,457 2,782 2,997 2,823 2,690 Demand Totals 2,171 2,162 2,201 2,254 2,319 Reserves (Supply – Demand) 286 620 776 569 371 Multiple Dry Year 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Supply Totals 2,248 2,417 2,520 2,459 2,415 Demand Totals 2,236 2,188 2,283 2,339 2,399 Reserves (Supply – Demand) 12 229 237 120 16 Source: Regional Urban Water Management Plan 2010 , Metropolitan Water District of Southern

SWS purchases water from several minor sources: the City of Whittier, the San Gabriel Valley Water Company, and La Habra Heights County Water District for emergency purposes only. In addition, SWS obtains imported MWD water indirectly through connections with the City of Glendora, Walnut Valley Water District, and Rowland Water District. These supplies comprise both MWD supply and groundwater mixed with imported MWD supply. Table 2 summarizes water sources for the Whittier/La Mirada Service area.

Table 2 Summary of Water Supply Sources – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

Water Supply Sources (AFY) 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Imported Wholesale Supplies California Domestic Water Company (a) 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 (CDWC) Central Basin Municipal Water District (b) 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 San Gabriel Valley Water Company (c ) 15 15 15 15 15 15 Supplier Produced Groundwater Main Basin (d) 14,925 14,925 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 Central Basin (e) 1,860 1,860 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 Total Supplies 23,541 23,541 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010. (a) Based on 2010-2011 allocation of 3,760.94 AF and 1,236 AF additional pumping lease. (b) Based on Tier 1 allocation. (c) Based on a yearly commitment of 15 AF. (d) Based on total adjudicated right and overproduction. SWS will produce 34,219 AFY split between both the San Jose Hills and Whittier/La Mirada Service Areas. (e) SWS has an adjudicated right of 3,721 AFY but supply is limited by production capacity.

City of La Mirada 4 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Groundwater. The Main San Gabriel Basin groundwater basin is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, San Jose Hills to the east, Puente Hills to the south, and by a series of hills and the Raymond Fault to the west. The watershed is drained by the San Gabriel River and Rio Hondo, a tributary of the Los Angeles River. Principal water-bearing formations of the basin are unconsolidated and semi-consolidated sediments that range in size from coarse gravel to fine-grained sands. The three primary sources of recharge are: 1) subsurface inflows along the basin boundaries; 2) recharge by precipitation; and 3) infiltration in spreading basins and rivers using imported water from MWD. The spreading facilities are operated by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. The groundwater basin is approximately 167 square miles and has a fresh water storage capacity estimated to be about 8.6 million acre-feet (MAF). Over 300 potable water supply production wells are active and more than 1,000,000 people in the San Gabriel Valley receive their drinking water from this groundwater basin (Suburban Water Systems UWMP, 2010).

The San Jose Hills Service Area currently has all of its wells within the Main Basin. Six wells are active and another six are inactive wells that require treatment for chemical contaminants. The active wells are located along the northwesterly side of the service area. The three newest wells (Plants 121, 142 and 151) were constructed with funds provided by the companies responsible for the contamination plumes in the San Gabriel. SWS receives treated Main Basin groundwater under two separate Project Water agreements with Valley County Water District and La Puente Valley County Water District. Under the agreement with Valley County Water District, SWS receives 5,500 gallons per minute from the Sub-Area One treatment plant. Under the agreement with La Puente Valley County Water District, SWS receives any excess Project Water from the La Puente Treatment Plant. The SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area also currently has a majority of its active wells within the Main Basin.

The Central Basin groundwater basin includes approximately 270 square miles and is bounded on the north by the Hollywood Basin and the Elysian, Repetto, Merced, and Puente hills, to the east by the Los Angeles County/Orange County line, and to the south and west by the Newport-Inglewood Uplift. The major aquifers identified in Central Basin include the following, from shallowest to deepest: 1) The Gaspur and Semiperched aquifers of the Holocene Alluvium Formation; 2) the Exposition, Artesia, Gage, and Gardena aquifers of the Upper Pleistocene Lakewood Formation; 3) the Hollydale, Jefferson, Lynwood, and Silverado aquifers of the Lower Pleistocene Upper San Pedro Formation; and 4) the Sunnyside Aquifer of the Lower Pleistocene Lower San Pedro Formation. Aquifer depths can reach more than 2,000 feet in Central Basin although production wells generally do not need to be drilled this deep to tap sufficient water.

The three primary sources of recharge water for Central Basin include: 1) local water that occurs primarily as precipitation throughout the basin and storm flows of the San Gabriel River through the Whittier Narrows; 2) imported water that originates from the State Water Project and/or the Colorado River; and 3) reclaimed water that serves as an excellent supplement to the sources listed above. Imported water is used at the spreading facilities and for in-lieu replenishment. The Central Basin currently provides approximately 36 percent of the total water supplies used by the overlying population of four million people in 43 cities of southern Los Angeles County. The San Jose Hills Service Area does not have any wells within the Central Basin. The Whittier/La Mirada Service Area has two wells in the Central Basin.

City of La Mirada 5 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Water Demand and Reliability. SWS wholesale imported supplies come from MWD and are either directly or indirectly provided through its two wholesale agencies, the Upper District and CBMWD, as described above. These wholesalers also supply the replenishment water needs to recharge the Main San Gabriel and Central Basins. This practice allows SWS to draw additional groundwater beyond its normal allocations per the terms of the adjudication for both groundwater basins in order to meet its demands. The Upper District, MWD, and CBMWD have indicated in their 2010 UWMPs that they anticipate having adequate supply to meet all direct imported water as well as replenishment water needs through 2035 for normal, single- dry, and multiple-dry years. Thus, SWS will have sufficient water supply to meet its demands for normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years through 2035, as detailed in Tables 4 through 6. Current supply and reliability is shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Summary of Current Supply Reliability – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) Single- Normal Dry Dry Dry Dry Source Water Water Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year Year Imported Wholesale Supplies California Domestic Water Company 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 Central Basin Municipal Water District 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 San Gabriel Valley Water Company 15 15 15 15 15 Supplier Produced Groundwater Main Basin 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 Central Basin 1,860 1,860 1,860 1,860 1,860 Total Available Supply 23,541 23,541 23,541 23,541 23,541 Total Demand 21,200 22,260 22,260 22,260 22,260 Supply/Demand Difference (Supply- Demand) 2,341 1,281 1,281 1,281 1,281 Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010. Note: Demands are estimated to increase by up to 5 percent during dry years based on historical data due to conservation measures.

Table 4 shows projected normal year supply and demand scenarios for the SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area. As shown therein, adequate supply would be available to meet demand through the year 2035.

Table 4 Projected Average/Normal Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

Water Supply Sources 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Imported Wholesale Supplies California Domestic Water Company 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 Central Basin Municipal Water District 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 San Gabriel Valley Water Company 15 15 15 15 15 Supplier Produced Groundwater

Main Basin 14,925 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 Central Basin 1,860 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460

City of La Mirada 6 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Table 4 Projected Average/Normal Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

Water Supply Sources 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Water Supply Total 23,541 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 Water Demand Total 22,420 19,930 19,930 19,930 19,930 Difference (supply minus demand) 1,121 3,064 3,064 3,064 3,064 Difference as Percent of Supply 5% 13% 13% 13% 13% Difference as Percent of Demand 5% 15% 15% 15% 15% Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010.

Table 5 shows projected single-dry year supply and demand scenarios for the SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area. As shown therein, adequate supply would be available to meet demand through the year 2035.

Table 5 Projected Single-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

Water Supply Sources 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Imported Wholesale Supplies California Domestic Water Company 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 Central Basin Municipal Water District 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 San Gabriel Valley Water Company 15 15 15 15 15 Supplier Produced Groundwater

Main Basin 14,925 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 Central Basin 1,860 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 Water Supply Total 23,541 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 Water Demand Total 23,541 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 Difference (supply minus demand) 0 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 Difference as Percent of Supply 0% 9% 9% 9% 9% Difference as Percent of Demand 0% 10% 10% 10% 10% Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010.

Table 6 shows projected multiple-dry year supply and demand scenarios for the SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area. As shown therein, adequate supply would be available to meet demand through the year 2035 in multiple-dry year scenarios.

City of La Mirada 7 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Table 6 Projected Multiple-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Water Supply Sources Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Imported Wholesale Supplies California Domestic Water Company 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 (CDWC) Central Basin Municipal Water 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 District San Gabriel Valley 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Water Company Supplier Produced Groundwater

Main Basin 14,925 14,925 14,925 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,778 Central Basin 1,860 1,860 1,860 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 Water Supply Total 23,541 23,541 23,541 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 Water Demand Total 23,541 23,541 23,541 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 Difference (supply minus demand) 0 0 0 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 Difference as Percent of Supply 0% 0% 0% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% Difference as Percent of Demand 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010

City of La Mirada 8 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Groundwater Pumped. Per SB 610 requirements, if a water supply draws on groundwater sources, five year historic pumping rates must be shown. Table 7 illustrates this information for the years from 2006 to 2010 within the SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area.

Table 7 Groundwater Pumped 2006-2010 – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

Basin 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Main Basin 12,860 12,846 13,482 13,337 12,207

Central Basin 2,044 2,629 2,438 2,137 2,178

Percent of Total 62% 60% 65% 67% 68% Water Supply Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010.

CONTINGENCY PLANS/WATER CONSERVATION

SWS has developed actions to be undertaken in response to water supply shortages, including up to a 50 percent reduction in water supply. Implementation of the actions is dependent upon approval of the Public Utility Commission (PUC), particularly for implementing mandatory water use restrictions. The PUC has jurisdiction over SWS because SWS is an Investor-Owned Water Utility. SWS has grouped the actions to be taken during a water shortage into four stages, I through IV, that are based on the water supply conditions. Table 8 describes the water supply shortage stages and conditions. The stages will be implemented during water supply shortages according to shortage level, ranging from 5 percent shortage in Stage I to 50 percent shortage in Stage IV.

Table 8 Water Supply Shortage Stages and Conditions Water Supply Stage Shortage Percent Conservation Efforts Condition Voluntary Conservation. The drought situation is explained to the public and governmental I Minimum 5-10% bodies. SWS explains the possible subsequent water shortage stages in order to forecast possible future actions for the customer base. Voluntary Conservation Allotments /Possible Mandatory Conservation. Stage II will include actions undertaken in Stage I.SWS may II Moderate 10-20% propose voluntary conservation allotments and/or require mandatory conservation rules. The severity of actions depends upon the percent shortage.

City of La Mirada 9 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Table 8 Water Supply Shortage Stages and Conditions Water Supply Stage Shortage Percent Conservation Efforts Condition Mandatory Percentage Reduction. SWS implements mandatory reductions after receiving approval from the PUC. Rate changes are implemented to penalize excess usage. Water use restrictions are put into effect, i.e., prohibited uses III Severe 20-35% can include restrictions of daytime hours for watering, excessive watering resulting in gutter flooding, using a hose without a shutoff device, use of non- recycling fountains, washing down sidewalks or patios, un-repaired leaks, etc. Intensified Conservation and Monitoring. This is a critical shortage that includes all steps taken in the prior stages regarding allotments and mandatory IV Critical 35-50% conservation. All activities are intensified and production is monitored daily by SWS for compliance with necessary reductions. Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010.

SWS has established a minimum water supply during water shortage emergencies for 2012 through 2014. These values are based on based on the driest three-year historical sequence for SWS’s water supply. The minimum water supplies for multiple dry year conditions will be the same as normal years because purchased water supplies will meet projected demands under all hydrological conditions. Table 9 illustrates the three-year estimated minimum water supply.

Table 9 Three-Year Estimated Minimum Water Supply – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

Average in Source 2011 2012 2013 2005

Total Demand 15,084 15,190 15,296 13,946

Total Supply 15,084 15,190 15,296 13,946 Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010.

ENTITLEMENTS/REGULATORY APPROVALS

Water Code Section 10910(d)(2) requires the identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, or water service contracts, federal, state, and local permits for construction of necessary infrastructure, and any regulatory approvals required in order to be able to deliver the water supply. The provision of water for the proposed project would require approval from

City of La Mirada 10 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

SWS. SWS would review this Water Supply Assessment, as well as any related infrastructure connections or improvements to convey water to the Master Plan area.. In addition, any additional purchases of water from CBMWD or MWD to meet project demands under the multiple dry scenario would need to be approved by the respective wholesaler. Building/grading permits would be required from the City of La Mirada to install or conduct improvements to water distribution facilities to serve the proposed development. No other federal, state, or local permits for construction of necessary infrastructure associated with delivering the water supply would be required.

PROPOSED PROJECT WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS

The proposed Biola University Master Plan is a long range plan future improvements to the campus over the next 20 years. The proposed Master Plan would increase occupied building space by 1,093,250 square feet. However, as an element of the Master Plan, approximately 236,383 square feet of existing occupied building space would be demolished. Therefore, the net increase in occupied building space resulting from the proposed Master Plan would be 856,867 square feet. Of this 856,867 square feet of space, 644,087 square feet would be non- residential development and 212,780 square feet would be residential halls that would accommodate up to 985 beds. Table 10 shows the estimated water demand of the proposed Master Plan. The water demand accounts for existing land uses that would be replaced by new uses under the Master Plan. The Master Plan would result in a net increase in water demand of 356 AFY.

Table 10 Estimated Water Demand

Water Duty Factor Net Increase in Use Square Footage Quantity Unit Water Demand AFY Academic/Administrative Facility 644,087 sf 0.46 AFY/ksf 296 Residence Halls 212,780 sf 0.28 AFY/ksf 60 Total Net Increase in Water Demand 356 1. Water duty factors are based on 2011 water demand factors of a similar private university, Claremont McKenna College, located in the City of Claremont. Note: Parking lot space was not included in these calculations as this use does not generate water demand. Water- consuming uses that would replace parking lot space are reflected in the above calculations. sf = square feet ksf = thousand square feet

SUPPLY AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

As indicated in Table 3 through Table 6 above, water supply within the SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area is expected to meet demand through the year 2035. Beginning in the year 2015, the SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area during normal year conditions would have an estimated 1,121 AFY surplus and beginning in the year 2020 the available surplus would increase to 3,064 AFY, as indicated in Table 11. In addition, beginning in the year 2020 during single-year drought conditions, the SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area would have an available surplus of 2,068 AFY. Similarly, beginning in the year 2020, SWS Whittier/La Mirada service area during multiple dry year conditions would have an available surplus of 2,068 AFY

City of La Mirada 11 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

through the year 2035. As discussed above, the proposed Master Plan is a long range plan for future improvements to the Biola University campus over the next 20 years. Water demand of the Master Plan upon full buildout, which is anticipated to occur by the year 2032, would be approximately 356 AFY. During normal years, 1,121 AFY of surplus would be available and during single and multiple dry years 2,068 AFY of surplus would be available; therefore, adequate and reliable surplus would be available to meet the Master Plan’s water demand of 356 AFY. However, should development under the Master Plan occur during single- or multiple-dry year conditions in 2015, it is possible that adequate water would not be available because the normal year surplus (1,121 AFY) would be consumed by increases in water demand during dry conditions (as stated in the SWS UWMP, historically demand increases by 5 percent during dry conditions) (refer to Table 12). As discussed above, in the event that SWS would need additional water supplies, SWS can purchase water from MWD through CBWMD. As indicated by Table 13, MWD has surplus in normal years and single- and multiple-dry year conditions from 2015 to 2035 that is substantially beyond the demand necessary to meet the Master Plan’s needs in the event that SWS determines the purchase of additional water is required. Therefore, adequate water supply would be available to serve the proposed Biola University Master Plan project.

Table 11 Projected Average/Normal Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY) and Master Plan Supply

Water Supply Sources 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Water Supply Total 23,541 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 Water Demand Total 22,420 19,930 19,930 19,930 19,930 Difference (supply minus demand) 1,121 3,064 3,064 3,064 3,064 Adequate Supply to Serve Project? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010.

Table 12 Projected Single and Multiple-Dry Year Supplies and Demands – SWS Whittier/La Mirada Service Area (AFY)

Water Supply Sources 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Water Supply Total 23,541 22,994 22,994 22,994 22,994 Water Demand Total 23,541 20,927 20,927 20,927 20,927 Difference (supply minus demand) 0 2,068 2,068 2,068 2,068 Adequate Supply to Serve Project? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Source: Suburban Water Systems Urban Water Management Plan, 2010.

City of La Mirada 12 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

Table 13 Metropolitan Water Supply in Normal Year and Single and Multiple Dry Years (Thousands of AFY)

Normal Year 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Supply Totals 3,485 3,810 4,089 3,947 3,814

Demand Totals 2,006 1,933 1,985 2,049 2,106

Reserves (Supply – Demand) 1,479 1,877 2,104 1,898 1,708

Adequate Supply to Serve Project? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Single Dry Year 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Supply Totals 2,457 2,782 2,997 2,823 2,690

Demand Totals 2,171 2,162 2,201 2,254 2,319

Reserves (Supply – Demand) 286 620 776 569 371

Adequate Supply to Serve Project? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Multiple Dry Year 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Supply Totals 2,248 2,417 2,520 2,459 2,415

Demand Totals 2,236 2,188 2,283 2,339 2,399

Reserves (Supply – Demand) 12 229 237 120 16

Adequate Supply to Serve Project? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Source: Regional Urban Water Management Plan 2010 , Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 2010

City of La Mirada 13 Biola University Master Plan Update Water Supply Assessment

REFERENCES

PUBLICATIONS

Suburban Water Systems. Urban Water Master Plan. June 2011.

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Regional Urban Water Management Plan. 2010.

Senate Bill No. 610, Approved by the Governor and filed with the Secretary of State October 9, 2001 and codified in Water Code § 10910.

Central Basin Municipal Water District. Urban Water Management Plan. 2005.

PERSONS CONTACTED

Suburban Water Systems – Jorge Lopez

City of La Mirada 14

Appendix E Noise Modeling Results

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...endices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2227.2 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 46.4 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 46.4 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 66.6

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...ppendix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:18 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...dices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCumBase.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCumBase

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2745.6 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 57.2 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 57.2 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCumBase

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.5

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...ndix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCumBase.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:18 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...ndices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2806.1 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 58.5 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 58.9 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.6

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...endix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:17 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...ices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCum+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCum+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2858.9 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 59.6 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 59.6 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCum+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.7

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...dix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransCum+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:17 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20...ndices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCum+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCum+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2562.2 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 53.4 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 53.4 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCum+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.2

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...pendix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCum+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:16 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...ices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 3326.4 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 69.3 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 69.3 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 69.4

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...dix%20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:16 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms...ppendix%20E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2409.6 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 50.2 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 50.2 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.0

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20...0E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:15 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Mst...dices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2870.4 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 59.8 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 59.8 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 68.8

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...dix%20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:15 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...dices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCumBase.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCumBase

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 3419.5 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 71.2 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 71.2 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCumBase

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 69.5

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...ndix%20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCumBase.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:14 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms...dices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2344.3 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 48.8 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 48.8 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 66.8

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...ndix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:14 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Mst...endices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2229.1 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 46.4 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 46.4 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 66.6

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20...pendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:13 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms...Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2906.9 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 60.6 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 60.6 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 68.8

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20...20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:13 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20...endices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCumBase.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCumBase

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2543.0 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 53.0 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 53.0 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCumBase

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.2

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola...pendix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachCumBase.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:13 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...ces/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 3509.8 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 73.1 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 73.1 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 69.6

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...dix%20E%20Noise/ImperialbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:12 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...es/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2251.2 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 46.9 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 46.9 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 66.7

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...ix%20E%20Noise/LaMiradabtwRose&BeachExisting+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:12 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...s/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2847.4 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 59.3 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 59.3 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.7

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterCumBase+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:11 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms...dices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2888.6 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 60.2 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 60.2 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 68.8

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...ndix%20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:11 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms.../Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2447.0 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 51.0 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 51.0 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.0

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwFoster&RosecransExisting+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:10 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...ices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCum+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCum+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 3454.1 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 72.0 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 72.0 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCum+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 69.6

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...dix%20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertCum+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:10 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...ces/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCumBase.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCumBase

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2744.6 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 57.2 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 57.2 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCumBase

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.5

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...dix%20E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCumBase.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:09 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Mst...ices/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2407.7 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 50.2 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 50.2 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.0

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20...dix%20E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansExisting.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:09 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms...ces/Appendix%20E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2194.6 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 45.7 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 45.7 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.6

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...ix%20E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:08 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...es/Appendix%20E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCum+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCum+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2745.6 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 57.2 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 57.2 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCum+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.5

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...ix%20E%20Noise/ValleybtwImperial&RosecansCum+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:08 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms...ppendix%20E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2337.6 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 48.7 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 48.7 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.9

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20...0E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaExisting+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:07 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...es/Appendix%20E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2636.2 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 54.9 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 54.9 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 68.4

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...x%20E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCum+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:07 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Mst...es/Appendix%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2441.3 Average automobile speed (mph): 25.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 50.9 Average medium truck speed (mph): 20.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 50.9 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 20.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 67.0

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20...x%20E%20Noise/LaMirbtwImperial&FosterExisting+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:06 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20M...ces/Appendix%20E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2540.2 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 52.9 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 52.9 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 68.2

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%...ix%20E%20Noise/RosecransbtwBiola&LaMiradaCumBase.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:06 PM] file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%20Univ%20Ms.../Appendix%20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting+Proj.txt

* * * * CASE INFORMATION * * * *

* * * * Results calculated with TNM Version 2.5 * * * *

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting+Proj

* * * * TRAFFIC VOLUME/SPEED INFORMATION * * * *

Automobile volume (v/h): 2925.1 Average automobile speed (mph): 30.0 Medium truck volume (v/h): 60.9 Average medium truck speed (mph): 25.0 Heavy truck volume (v/h): 60.9 Average heavy truck speed (mph): 25.0 Bus volume (v/h): 0.0 Average bus speed (mph): 0.0 Motorcycle volume (v/h): 0.0 Average Motorcycle speed (mph): 0.0

* * * * TERRAIN SURFACE INFORMATION * * * *

Terrain surface: hard

* * * * RECEIVER INFORMATION * * * *

DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVER # 1

ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting+Proj

Distance from center of 12-ft wide, single lane roadway (ft): 50.0 A-weighted Hourly Equivalent Sound Level without Barrier (dBA): 68.8

file:///L|/ESP/LA%20Co/11-68300%20La%20Mrda%20Biola%2...20E%20Noise/ImpbtwLaMirada&SantaGertExisting+Proj.txt [2/23/2012 2:44:03 PM] C:\LARDAV\SLMUTIL\TERBI.bin Interval Data RMS Peak Uwpk Meas Excd Excd Excd Site Location Number Date Time Duration Leq SEL Lmax Lmin Peak Uwpk L(10) L(33) L(50) L(90) Count Count Count ‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐

0 BIO1 0 07Nov 11 13:43:58 1200 54.6 85.4 72.6 39.8 86.3 102.6 58.1 51.3 48.3 43.2 4 255 59 0 BIO2 0 07Nov 11 14:07:25 1200 62.9 93.7 77.2 43 90.7 109 67 62.5 59.4 50.8 28 255 255 0 BIO3 0 07Nov 11 14:36:25 1200 52.9 83.7 71 46.3 87.4 104.1 54.4 51.2 50.4 48.1 2 255 144 C:\LARDAV\SLMUTIL\TERBI.bin Run/Stop Data

Meas Site Location Number Date Time Type ‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0 TER1 0 07Nov 11 11:58:12 Run 00 07Nov 11 12:18:12 Stop 0 TER2 0 07Nov 11 12:19:42 Run 00 07Nov 11 12:39:42 Stop 0 BIO1 0 07Nov 11 13:43:58 Run 0 0 07Nov 11 14:03:58 Stop 0 BIO2 0 07Nov 11 14:07:25 Run 0 0 07Nov 11 14:27:25 Stop 0 BIO3 0 07Nov 11 14:36:25 Run 0 0 07Nov 11 14:56:25 Stop C:\LARDAV\SLMUTIL\TERBI.bin Time History Data Sample Period (sec): 10.000

Meas Site Location Number Date Time Level SEL ‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐ Run Key 0 0 07Nov 11 11:58:12 50.4 60.4 0 0 07Nov 11 11:58:22 50 60 0 0 07Nov 11 11:58:32 51 61 0 0 07Nov 11 11:58:42 54.6 64.6 0 0 07Nov 11 11:58:52 54.7 64.7 0 0 07Nov 11 11:59:02 52 62 0 0 07Nov 11 11:59:12 53.7 63.7 0 0 07Nov 11 11:59:22 53.6 63.6 0 0 07Nov 11 11:59:32 53.5 63.5 0 0 07Nov 11 11:59:42 51.7 61.7 0 0 07Nov 11 11:59:52 50.2 60.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:00:02 48.9 58.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:00:12 49.3 59.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:00:22 49.2 59.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:00:32 52.2 62.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:00:42 53.3 63.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:00:52 53.8 63.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:01:02 53.6 63.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:01:12 53.3 63.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:01:22 52.8 62.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:01:32 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:01:42 48.5 58.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:01:52 52.9 62.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:02:02 52 62 0 0 07Nov 11 12:02:12 53.1 63.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:02:22 55 65 0 0 07Nov 11 12:02:32 61.9 71.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:02:42 65.4 75.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:02:52 63.3 73.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:03:02 57.8 67.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:03:12 51.8 61.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:03:22 51.5 61.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:03:32 52.7 62.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:03:42 50.3 60.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:03:52 50.7 60.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:04:02 53 63 0 0 07Nov 11 12:04:12 55.6 65.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:04:22 54.4 64.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:04:32 54.6 64.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:04:42 49.8 59.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:04:52 53.1 63.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:05:02 54 64 0 0 07Nov 11 12:05:12 57.8 67.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:05:22 54.9 64.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:05:32 50.7 60.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:05:42 48.6 58.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:05:52 47.8 57.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:06:02 47.6 57.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:06:12 49.5 59.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:06:22 50.5 60.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:06:32 51.4 61.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:06:42 55.5 65.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:06:52 55.7 65.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:07:02 56 66 0 0 07Nov 11 12:07:12 55.9 65.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:07:22 57 67 0 0 07Nov 11 12:07:32 55.6 65.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:07:42 59.7 69.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:07:52 53.4 63.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:08:02 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:08:12 51 61 0 0 07Nov 11 12:08:22 53 63 0 0 07Nov 11 12:08:32 54.4 64.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:08:42 53.8 63.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:08:52 54.8 64.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:09:02 53.7 63.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:09:12 53.4 63.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:09:22 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:09:32 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:09:42 52 62 0 0 07Nov 11 12:09:52 51.7 61.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:10:02 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:10:12 50.2 60.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:10:22 50.4 60.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:10:32 48.9 58.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:10:42 47.3 57.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:10:52 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:11:02 51.6 61.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:11:12 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:11:22 52.3 62.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:11:32 53.2 63.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:11:42 53.7 63.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:11:52 52.3 62.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:12:02 51.7 61.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:12:12 51.6 61.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:12:22 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:12:32 52.2 62.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:12:42 54 64 0 0 07Nov 11 12:12:52 50.2 60.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:13:02 50.9 60.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:13:12 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:13:22 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:13:32 51.7 61.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:13:42 51.4 61.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:13:52 52.9 62.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:14:02 53.2 63.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:14:12 53.4 63.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:14:22 52.8 62.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:14:32 49.1 59.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:14:42 50.4 60.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:14:52 52.8 62.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:15:02 55.4 65.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:15:12 51.6 61.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:15:22 53.3 63.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:15:32 53.3 63.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:15:42 57.1 67.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:15:52 57.5 67.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:16:02 60.3 70.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:16:12 53.6 63.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:16:22 53.8 63.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:16:32 53.4 63.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:16:42 54.4 64.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:16:52 53.5 63.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:17:02 51.9 61.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:17:12 53.6 63.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:17:22 66.8 76.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:17:32 54.2 64.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:17:42 55.1 65.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:17:52 55.8 65.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:18:02 53.9 63.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:18:12 53.3 63.3 Stop Intv Run Key 0 0 07Nov 11 12:19:42 66.3 76.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:19:52 67.6 77.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:20:02 62.2 72.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:20:12 56.3 66.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:20:22 64.8 74.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:20:32 66.3 76.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:20:42 63.2 73.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:20:52 57.8 67.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:02 58.2 68.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:12 56.3 66.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:22 62.1 72.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:32 62.6 72.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:42 63.3 73.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:52 66.8 76.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:22:02 66.3 76.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:22:12 59.8 69.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:22:22 60 70 0 0 07Nov 11 12:22:32 64 74 0 0 07Nov 11 12:22:42 63.2 73.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:22:52 60.5 70.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:02 66.8 76.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:12 62.6 72.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:22 65.3 75.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:32 61.9 71.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:42 55.2 65.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:52 63.5 73.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:24:02 67.9 77.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:24:12 67.3 77.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:24:22 67.7 77.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:24:32 63.5 73.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:24:42 60.9 70.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:24:52 63 73 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:02 67 77 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:12 61 71 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:22 62.5 72.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:32 61.1 71.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:42 58.5 68.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:52 62.6 72.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:26:02 64.9 74.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:26:12 66.6 76.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:26:22 64 74 0 0 07Nov 11 12:26:32 63.8 73.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:26:42 67.7 77.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:26:52 57.1 67.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:02 59 69 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:12 60.3 70.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:22 64 74 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:32 66.3 76.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:42 61.9 71.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:52 64.5 74.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:28:02 64.9 74.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:28:12 54 64 0 0 07Nov 11 12:28:22 56.8 66.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:28:32 61.6 71.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:28:42 60.2 70.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:28:52 62.3 72.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:29:02 55.6 65.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:29:12 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:29:22 69.2 79.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:29:32 66.9 76.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:29:42 66.6 76.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:29:52 65.3 75.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:02 62.7 72.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:12 51.8 61.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:22 60.5 70.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:32 62.2 72.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:42 60.9 70.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:52 64.3 74.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:31:02 65.4 75.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:31:12 63.1 73.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:31:22 62.7 72.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:31:32 57.7 67.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:31:42 59.3 69.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:31:52 61.3 71.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:32:02 65.3 75.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:32:12 65.2 75.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:32:22 66.8 76.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:32:32 64.8 74.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:32:42 62.7 72.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:32:52 54.8 64.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:02 55.3 65.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:12 53.4 63.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:22 64.1 74.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:32 66.1 76.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:42 59.4 69.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:52 65 75 0 0 07Nov 11 12:34:02 68 78 0 0 07Nov 11 12:34:12 68.9 78.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:34:22 68 78 0 0 07Nov 11 12:34:32 63 73 0 0 07Nov 11 12:34:42 53.9 63.9 0 0 07Nov 11 12:34:52 56.3 66.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:02 64.5 74.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:12 62.3 72.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:22 63.6 73.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:32 62.3 72.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:42 60.5 70.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:52 60.2 70.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:36:02 57 67 0 0 07Nov 11 12:36:12 60 70 0 0 07Nov 11 12:36:22 63.2 73.2 0 0 07Nov 11 12:36:32 65.7 75.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:36:42 69.6 79.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:36:52 65.5 75.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:37:02 62.6 72.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:37:12 58.4 68.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:37:22 58.4 68.4 0 0 07Nov 11 12:37:32 57.1 67.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:37:42 54.8 64.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:37:52 66 76 0 0 07Nov 11 12:38:02 67.1 77.1 0 0 07Nov 11 12:38:12 61.3 71.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:38:22 61.3 71.3 0 0 07Nov 11 12:38:32 60.7 70.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:38:42 57.8 67.8 0 0 07Nov 11 12:38:52 56 66 0 0 07Nov 11 12:39:02 62.6 72.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:39:12 59.7 69.7 0 0 07Nov 11 12:39:22 61.5 71.5 0 0 07Nov 11 12:39:32 63.6 73.6 0 0 07Nov 11 12:39:42 61.3 71.3 Stop Intv Run Key 0 0 07Nov 11 13:43:58 56.9 66.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:44:08 62.7 72.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:44:18 53.7 63.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:44:28 52 62 0 0 07Nov 11 13:44:38 52.8 62.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:44:48 61.6 71.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:44:58 52.8 62.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:45:08 52.8 62.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:45:18 47.6 57.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:45:28 47.8 57.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:45:38 44.5 54.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:45:48 45.1 55.1 0 0 07Nov 11 13:45:58 45.2 55.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:46:08 43.9 53.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:46:18 53.4 63.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:46:28 47.4 57.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:46:38 45 55 0 0 07Nov 11 13:46:48 42.3 52.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:46:58 42.1 52.1 0 0 07Nov 11 13:47:08 53.7 63.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:47:18 55.2 65.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:47:28 58.2 68.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:47:38 46.1 56.1 0 0 07Nov 11 13:47:48 57.3 67.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:47:58 48.2 58.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:48:08 54.3 64.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:48:18 56.8 66.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:48:28 57.9 67.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:48:38 45.8 55.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:48:48 49.2 59.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:48:58 49.4 59.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:49:08 55.4 65.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:49:18 52.3 62.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:49:28 60.9 70.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:49:38 53.7 63.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:49:48 58.2 68.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:49:58 52.2 62.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:50:08 51.9 61.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:50:18 61.3 71.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:50:28 54.4 64.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:50:38 48.7 58.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:50:48 55.3 65.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:50:58 49.6 59.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:51:08 43.7 53.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:51:18 44.8 54.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:51:28 43.7 53.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:51:38 42.7 52.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:51:48 43.1 53.1 0 0 07Nov 11 13:51:58 42.6 52.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:52:08 43 53 0 0 07Nov 11 13:52:18 43.6 53.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:52:28 56.7 66.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:52:38 47.9 57.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:52:48 45.8 55.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:52:58 48.5 58.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:53:08 44 54 0 0 07Nov 11 13:53:18 46.5 56.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:53:28 49.4 59.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:53:38 47.7 57.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:53:48 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:53:58 50.4 60.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:54:08 50.3 60.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:54:18 47.9 57.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:54:28 51.2 61.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:54:38 45.5 55.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:54:48 47.4 57.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:54:58 48.5 58.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:55:08 50.9 60.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:55:18 44 54 0 0 07Nov 11 13:55:28 45 55 0 0 07Nov 11 13:55:38 57.7 67.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:55:48 47.3 57.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:55:58 44.1 54.1 0 0 07Nov 11 13:56:08 48 58 0 0 07Nov 11 13:56:18 62.3 72.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:56:28 61.6 71.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:56:38 53.9 63.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:56:48 54.8 64.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:56:58 49.1 59.1 0 0 07Nov 11 13:57:08 60.8 70.8 0 0 07Nov 11 13:57:18 58.2 68.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:57:28 54.7 64.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:57:38 45.5 55.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:57:48 44.4 54.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:57:58 49.7 59.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:58:08 49.4 59.4 0 0 07Nov 11 13:58:18 45.3 55.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:58:28 46.7 56.7 0 0 07Nov 11 13:58:38 46.3 56.3 0 0 07Nov 11 13:58:48 63.2 73.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:58:58 51.5 61.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:59:08 55.5 65.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:59:18 47.5 57.5 0 0 07Nov 11 13:59:28 44.9 54.9 0 0 07Nov 11 13:59:38 56.6 66.6 0 0 07Nov 11 13:59:48 49.2 59.2 0 0 07Nov 11 13:59:58 52.4 62.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:00:08 53.6 63.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:00:18 59 69 0 0 07Nov 11 14:00:28 54.4 64.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:00:38 51.9 61.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:00:48 45.3 55.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:00:58 50.5 60.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:01:08 51.5 61.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:01:18 58.7 68.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:01:28 60.2 70.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:01:38 48.5 58.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:01:48 51.7 61.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:01:58 62.9 72.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:02:08 56.3 66.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:02:18 47.5 57.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:02:28 50.1 60.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:02:38 56.4 66.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:02:48 48.1 58.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:02:58 51.5 61.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:03:08 46.6 56.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:03:18 51.2 61.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:03:28 47.9 57.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:03:38 58.4 68.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:03:48 55.8 65.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:03:58 47.1 57.1 Stop Intv Run Key 0 0 07Nov 11 14:07:25 63.3 73.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:07:35 53 63 0 0 07Nov 11 14:07:45 57.4 67.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:07:55 61.2 71.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:05 60.5 70.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:15 65.4 75.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:25 63.1 73.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:35 63.5 73.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:45 64 74 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:55 65.4 75.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:09:05 66.3 76.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:09:15 54.1 64.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:09:25 57.4 67.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:09:35 61 71 0 0 07Nov 11 14:09:45 62.2 72.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:09:55 67.6 77.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:10:05 67.5 77.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:10:15 58.1 68.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:10:25 67.3 77.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:10:35 58.4 68.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:10:45 63 73 0 0 07Nov 11 14:10:55 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:05 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:15 65.6 75.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:25 64.8 74.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:35 62.6 72.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:45 51.6 61.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:55 58 68 0 0 07Nov 11 14:12:05 63.5 73.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:12:15 59.4 69.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:12:25 64.8 74.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:12:35 59.9 69.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:12:45 61.1 71.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:12:55 56.4 66.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:13:05 55.2 65.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:13:15 62.6 72.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:13:25 63.8 73.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:13:35 57.5 67.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:13:45 49.5 59.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:13:55 64.1 74.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:05 64.4 74.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:15 61.3 71.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:25 64.9 74.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:35 56.1 66.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:45 46.3 56.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:55 46.3 56.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:05 60.8 70.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:15 63.9 73.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:25 58.9 68.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:35 70.2 80.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:45 61.1 71.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:55 60.2 70.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:16:05 59.2 69.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:16:15 61.4 71.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:16:25 58.5 68.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:16:35 64.8 74.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:16:45 61.6 71.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:16:55 64.3 74.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:05 64.9 74.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:15 63.3 73.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:25 61 71 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:35 51.5 61.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:45 45.1 55.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:55 57.6 67.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:18:05 56.8 66.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:18:15 55.1 65.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:18:25 59.8 69.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:18:35 53.3 63.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:18:45 61.3 71.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:18:55 65.5 75.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:19:05 64.9 74.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:19:15 62.5 72.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:19:25 62.4 72.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:19:35 63.7 73.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:19:45 57.6 67.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:19:55 62.4 72.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:05 63.1 73.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:15 63.6 73.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:25 65.4 75.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:35 52.1 62.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:45 48.2 58.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:55 63.4 73.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:05 62.5 72.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:15 68.2 78.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:25 64.6 74.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:35 67.9 77.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:45 64.9 74.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:55 63.1 73.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:22:05 66 76 0 0 07Nov 11 14:22:15 64.5 74.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:22:25 59.8 69.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:22:35 64.2 74.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:22:45 64.6 74.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:22:55 57.2 67.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:05 63.6 73.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:15 57.2 67.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:25 55.1 65.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:35 61.8 71.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:45 65.3 75.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:55 70.5 80.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:05 64.5 74.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:15 63.3 73.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:25 65.3 75.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:35 60.3 70.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:45 62.9 72.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:55 64.8 74.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:25:05 63.1 73.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:25:15 56.6 66.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:25:25 61.1 71.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:25:35 60.7 70.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:25:45 61.4 71.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:25:55 63.8 73.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:05 64.5 74.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:15 58.5 68.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:25 63.6 73.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:35 63.8 73.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:45 56.2 66.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:55 62.7 72.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:27:05 60.3 70.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:27:15 62.4 72.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:27:25 63.1 73.1 Stop Intv Run Key 0 0 07Nov 11 14:36:25 52.1 62.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:36:35 58.8 68.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:36:45 56.5 66.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:36:55 56.7 66.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:37:05 58.6 68.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:37:15 55.1 65.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:37:25 52.7 62.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:37:35 50.1 60.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:37:45 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:37:55 53.3 63.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:38:05 51.8 61.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:38:15 51.1 61.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:38:25 50.9 60.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:38:35 50.9 60.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:38:45 50.1 60.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:38:55 49.8 59.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:39:05 49.6 59.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:39:15 49.4 59.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:39:25 49 59 0 0 07Nov 11 14:39:35 49.5 59.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:39:45 51 61 0 0 07Nov 11 14:39:55 49 59 0 0 07Nov 11 14:40:05 49.6 59.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:40:15 49.3 59.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:40:25 51.1 61.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:40:35 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:40:45 51 61 0 0 07Nov 11 14:40:55 55.2 65.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:41:05 51.6 61.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:41:15 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:41:25 50.7 60.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:41:35 52.4 62.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:41:45 54.3 64.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:41:55 50.5 60.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:42:05 50.7 60.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:42:15 56.3 66.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:42:25 53.6 63.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:42:35 54.3 64.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:42:45 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:42:55 49.9 59.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:43:05 51.8 61.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:43:15 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:43:25 50.3 60.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:43:35 49.9 59.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:43:45 49.1 59.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:43:55 52.2 62.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:44:05 49.4 59.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:44:15 51.1 61.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:44:25 53.7 63.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:44:35 56.8 66.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:44:45 50.1 60.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:44:55 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:45:05 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:45:15 51.1 61.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:45:25 49.5 59.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:45:35 49 59 0 0 07Nov 11 14:45:45 48.9 58.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:45:55 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:46:05 52.2 62.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:46:15 52.7 62.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:46:25 52.5 62.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:46:35 52.4 62.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:46:45 49.8 59.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:46:55 50.1 60.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:47:05 50.9 60.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:47:15 51.4 61.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:47:25 54.6 64.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:47:35 59.7 69.7 0 0 07Nov 11 14:47:45 54.5 64.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:47:55 57.9 67.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:48:05 52.9 62.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:48:15 54.5 64.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:48:25 61.2 71.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:48:35 62.8 72.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:48:45 59.4 69.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:48:55 55 65 0 0 07Nov 11 14:49:05 53.3 63.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:49:15 52.3 62.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:49:25 51.8 61.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:49:35 51.4 61.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:49:45 55.2 65.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:49:55 51.6 61.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:50:05 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:50:15 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:50:25 50.5 60.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:50:35 50 60 0 0 07Nov 11 14:50:45 51 61 0 0 07Nov 11 14:50:55 51.6 61.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:51:05 51.1 61.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:51:15 50.6 60.6 0 0 07Nov 11 14:51:25 50.5 60.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:51:35 50.4 60.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:51:45 50.9 60.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:51:55 51.2 61.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:52:05 51.4 61.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:52:15 50.4 60.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:52:25 50.8 60.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:52:35 51.4 61.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:52:45 51.4 61.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:52:55 49.2 59.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:53:05 48.2 58.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:53:15 48.1 58.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:53:25 48.1 58.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:53:35 48.5 58.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:53:45 47.8 57.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:53:55 47.9 57.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:54:05 47.9 57.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:54:15 47.8 57.8 0 0 07Nov 11 14:54:25 47.9 57.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:54:35 49 59 0 0 07Nov 11 14:54:45 50.2 60.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:54:55 48.5 58.5 0 0 07Nov 11 14:55:05 48.2 58.2 0 0 07Nov 11 14:55:15 48.1 58.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:55:25 51.3 61.3 0 0 07Nov 11 14:55:35 49.4 59.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:55:45 49.4 59.4 0 0 07Nov 11 14:55:55 49.1 59.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:56:05 50.1 60.1 0 0 07Nov 11 14:56:15 48.9 58.9 0 0 07Nov 11 14:56:25 49.6 59.6 Stop Intv C:\LARDAV\SLMUTIL\TERBI.bin Event Data

Meas Time of Site Location Number Date Time Lmax Duration Leq SEL Lmax Peak Uwpk Sym Decay Type ‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐"‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0 0 07Nov 11 12:02:44 12:02:47 13.9 65.6 77 70.2 81.8 0 22.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:19:42 12:19:57 22 66.9 80.3 73.2 85.7 0 68.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:20:24 12:20:27 24.6 65.8 79.7 69.2 85.7 100.6 13.7 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:36 12:21:39 6.3 63.9 71.9 66.7 78.6 0 62.5 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:21:49 12:22:01 24.1 66.2 80.1 70.7 83 98.1 50.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:22:35 12:22:41 9.7 65.9 75.7 69.2 79.8 0 67.2 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:01 12:23:04 14.1 66.4 77.9 69.4 85.1 0 25.8 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:22 12:23:31 13.1 65 76.2 67.8 79.9 0 71.9 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:23:56 12:24:06 39.5 67.4 83.3 71.5 87.5 98.1 25.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:24:51 12:24:56 10.3 63.3 73.4 66.2 78 0 55.9 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:02 12:25:07 14.9 66 77.8 71.3 82.8 0 34.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:24 12:25:26 6.3 63.6 71.6 67 78.4 0 39.5 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:25:56 12:26:00 7.2 63.9 72.4 67.6 79.9 0 59 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:26:05 12:26:45 47.1 65.9 82.6 72.3 85 98.1 86.7 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:22 12:27:33 19 65.6 78.4 71.5 83.5 0 58.2 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:27:51 12:28:05 20.2 64.7 77.8 67.5 82.5 0 73.8 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:29:24 12:29:30 36.8 67.6 83.2 74.2 86.3 0 16.8 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:01 12:30:05 7.8 63.7 72.6 67.5 83 0 57 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:30:58 12:31:11 20.5 65.5 78.6 72.4 94.9 0 63.7 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:31:57 12:32:16 22.8 65.2 78.7 68.5 80.8 98.1 87.5 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:32:22 12:32:24 19.4 66 78.9 69.5 83.8 0 15.2 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:23 12:33:33 18.3 65.5 78.1 71.2 83 98.1 57.8 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:33:53 12:34:24 35.3 68.2 83.7 73.7 85.8 100.6 90.2 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:02 12:35:06 7.7 65.2 74.1 68.7 79.6 0 56.6 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:22 12:35:27 20.7 63 76.1 66 78.3 0 27 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:35:48 12:35:54 8.4 62.2 71.4 64.5 76.8 98.1 83.2 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:36:26 12:36:48 43.6 66.6 83 78.3 91.5 104.1 51.6 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:37:56 12:38:04 18.5 67.1 79.8 70.9 82.5 0 47.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:39:06 12:39:11 9.8 63.8 73.7 68.4 79.7 0 55.5 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 12:39:37 12:39:39 5.8 64.5 72.1 69.1 79.5 0 46.9 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:33 14:08:35 6.6 64.6 72.7 66.8 79.8 0 38.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:08:58 14:09:09 12.9 67.6 78.7 71.7 86.7 0 86.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:09:53 14:10:06 19.7 67.6 80.5 72.2 88.6 107.7 68.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:10:23 14:10:28 11.6 67 77.6 71.4 83.6 0 48.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:18 14:11:24 11.8 66.7 77.4 71.4 83 0 54.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:11:32 14:11:37 7.8 65.2 74 68.4 80.5 0 77 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:12:25 14:12:32 10.7 64.8 75 67.6 80 0 73.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:05 14:14:09 7.2 65.5 74.1 70.5 84.2 0 63.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:14:24 14:14:26 8.4 65.6 74.9 68.5 84 0 35.5 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:11 14:15:18 9.2 65.4 75 68.9 81.7 0 84.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:15:35 14:15:41 11.6 69.9 80.6 75.5 86.4 0 57.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:16:33 14:16:35 8.2 65.1 74.2 67 79.2 0 36.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:07 14:17:12 6.8 66.2 74.6 71 82 0 74.2 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:17:20 14:17:21 7.1 65.8 74.3 68.3 80.9 0 20.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:18:54 14:18:56 6.7 66.8 75.1 71.3 84.7 0 44.5 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:19:02 14:19:07 7.3 66.4 75 71.8 83.2 0 77.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:12 14:20:15 6.7 64.5 72.8 67.3 79.7 98.1 49.6 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:20:24 14:20:31 9.7 65.7 75.6 68.9 83.4 102.6 79.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:17 14:21:21 15.8 67.5 79.5 73.2 85.9 102.6 29.7 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:21:37 14:21:43 13.3 68 79.3 74.7 85 100.6 48.8 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:22:09 14:22:17 9.5 67.8 77.6 72.7 90.7 102.6 87.1 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:03 14:23:06 6.3 65.7 73.7 68.9 81.2 99.4 59.4 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:42 14:23:47 8.3 66.2 75.5 69.7 82.1 0 68 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:23:56 14:23:59 13.4 70.1 81.4 77.2 89.1 98.1 29.3 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:22 14:24:33 14.8 65.2 76.9 68.2 83.1 98.1 77.7 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:24:59 14:25:00 10.8 65.1 75.5 68.4 80.7 0 10.9 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:25 14:26:30 6.9 64.7 73.1 67.5 83.2 0 73 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:26:58 14:27:00 7.5 63.8 72.5 66.6 80 0 34 0 0 0 0 07Nov 11 14:27:19 14:27:23 5.3 62 69.2 64.7 76.3 0 81.6 0 0

Appendix F Transportation Impact Study