sign in sign up
<<
Home , Binary black hole, Through the Wormhole, Wormhole

The Sound of Clearing the Throat: Gravitational Waves from a Orbiting in a Geometry

James B. Dent,1, ∗ William E. Gabella,2, † Kelly Holley-Bockelmann,2, ‡ and Thomas W. Kephart2, § 1Department of Physics, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA 2Department of Physics and , Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA (Dated: July 20, 2020) Current ground-based detectors are tuned to capture the collision of compact objects such as stellar origin black holes and neutron stars; over 20 such events have been published to date. Theoretically, however, more exotic compact objects may exist, collisions of which should also generate copious gravitational waves. In this paper, we model the inspiral of a stellar mass black hole into a stable, non-spinning, traversable wormhole, and find a characteristic waveform – an anti-chirp and/or burst – as the black hole emerges, i.e., outspirals, into our region of the Universe. This novel waveform signature may be useful in searches for in gravitational wave data or used to constrain possible wormhole geometries in our Universe.

INTRODUCTION frequency profile with (this can be a short burst of a signal when the time for the object to begin its new infall phase is small enough that the WH does not ex- The discovery of black hole-black hole (BH-BH) merg- ecute a complete orbit), and subsequent repetitions of ers [1], mergers of black holes with neutron stars (BH-NS) the chirp/anti-chirp cadence could result with diminish- [2], and NS-NS mergers [3] has opened the new branch of ing amplitude from GW energy loss. Alternatively, in our gravitational wave (GW) astronomy. As well as testing region of we could observe an anti-chirp with- strong-field , GWs have unveiled a class out a preceding chirp signal as a BH emerges through of stellar origin black holes in the 30 60 M range[4], a WH throat. This could be followed by a chirp signal underlining the promise of GW observations− to open new in the case of a bounded orbit, or remain an isolated discovery . anti-chirp for an unbounded situation. Our goal in the Beyond inspiraling and present work is to explore a simple traversable wormhole systems, it has been suggested that gravitational waves geometry that can lead to these types of signatures. can be used to detect a variety of objects ranging from cosmic defects [5] to exoplanets [6]. The possibility of de- tecting exotic compact objects such as wormholes (WHs) [7,8] from an inspiral has also been put forth, with stud- ies implying that such a scenario could produce a signal WORMHOLE CONSTRUCTION that is observationally distinguishable from other inspi- raling binary systems [9]. Thus far, investigations of binary systems within a Here we consider a type of Lorentzian wormhole wormhole spacetime have focused on the quasi-normal (WH) that may have a very distinctive GW signa- modes produced during the ringdown phase of the in- ture. Specifically we focus on Lorentzian wormholes that spiral and the subsequent echo that is produced in the are traversable [16–18] and constructed surgically from horizonless geometry (see for example [10–15]). In this Schwarzschild black hole (BH) . We then con- arXiv:2007.09135v1 [gr-qc] 17 Jul 2020 work we argue that, in addition to the initial ringdown sider a BH of mass MBH falling into the wormhole of ap- phase and echo, a massive object inspiraling within a parent mass MWH , where we require MBH < MWH . For technical reasons we take the ratio ρ MWH /MBH traversable wormhole geometry, and passing through the ≡ & throat, could exhibit novel features with an unmistakable O(10), as will be discussed below. This range could be observational signature. Namely, we will follow the orbit extended to larger ρ at the expense of longer simulation of an object as it proceeds , out- run , or to smaller ρ with further theoretical anal- spirals into another region of spacetime, and then (in the ysis and more careful approximations. In Figure1, we case of an object gravitationally bound to the wormhole show an embedding diagram for a wormhole, following in the spacetime region across the throat) back into ours. [17] for how the embedding is done. This will produce a gap within the post-chirp GW signal Let us begin with a brief review of the simplest surgical when the object has passed through the throat. Continu- construction of a Schwarzschild wormhole [19, 20]. (A ing to follow the orbital process, however, the object will variety of other types of wormholes that can be surgically eventually pass back into our spacetime region, leading constructed can be found in [20].) Starting with two to an “anti-chirp” signal characterized by a decreasing Schwarzschild black holes of equivalent ADM mass M = 2

where Θ(η) is a step function. For Einstein , the matter required on the wormhole throat invariably vio- lates one or more energy conditions [23], depending on its equation of state. This can lead to instabilities in some cases [19, 20, 24, 25]. As a simple example of a Schwarzschild wormhole, we envision material with equation of state σ = τ on the throat, where σ is a negative surface and τ is a negative pressure, i.e., surface tension. While this equation of state is similar to a density classical membrane, the matter need not be a membrane; it could consist of particles with attractive interactions. Hence, the stress-energy tensor on the throat hypersur- face where η = 0 is σ 0 0  FIG. 1: The embedding diagram for a Schwarzschild-like worm- i S j = 0 τ 0 (5) hole, with the asymptotically flat spacetimes at the top and at the   0− 0 τ bottom of the figure, and a throat at radius r = 3MWH , where − . M is the effective mass for the spacetime curvature on both WH The Einstein equations for σ and τ on the throat lead to sides of the throat. There is no spacetime for r < 3MWH . a throat radius a = 3M = 3MWH [19], identifying the mass M with the effective wormhole mass MWH .

MWH [21], the line element is of the generic form: Now consider a black hole falling into a wormhole of the type just described. Since the WH looks just like   2 2M dr another BH outside of a radius of 3MWH , the infall is in- ds2 = 1 dt2 + +r2(dθ2 +sin2θ dϕ2). r 2M  distinguishable from a BH-BH merger to an observer in − − 1 r − (1) Universe 1 until the BH reaches that radius. However, at We excise the interiors of both by removing everything that point the BH encounters the material on the throat. inside a sphere of radius of a > 2M, which creates a The interaction may be rather benign or not, depend- boundary for each BH and where a will be determined ing on the properties of the material. Again we assume below. Next we identify the two boundaries, making sure the simplest possibility: that there are only gravitational the resulting manifold remains orientable. Finally we dis- interactions between the throat matter and the infalling tribute exotic energy density at the boundary as required BH, and that the throat matter is made up of particles by the junction formalism [22] to keep the Einstein equa- confined to the throat, but are otherwise interacting and tions satisfied everywhere. On converting to Gaussian free to move. Since the throat matter has negative energy normal coordinates for the static case, the metric for the density, it is repelled by the positive mass BH, causing complete space is: it to simply move aside as the BH passes through. After the BH transit, the throat matter will redistribute itself  2M  in its original state with only minimal temporary disrup- ds2 = 1 WH dt2+dη2+R(η)2(dθ2+sin2θ dϕ2), − − R(η) tion of the WH. The BH then passes through and spirals (2) out the other end of the WH into Universe 2. Depending where the Gaussian normal coordinate η is the proper on the radial component of the BH’s momentum, the BH radius and R(η) satisfies can either move off to infinity in Universe 2 or be trapped in a series of transits through the WH. r R 2M What would we expect to observe from the above sce- = 1 WH . (3) η ± − R nario? We assume the mouths of the wormhole in Uni- verse 1 and Universe 2 are well separated so that an ob- The wormhole is composed of three regions: the exteriors served GW signal in Universe 1 will not overlap with a of the Schwarzschild BHs where the stress–energy tensor signal associated with the emergence of the BH in Uni- is known (denoted here as Universe 1 and Universe 2), verse 2, unless a shortcut is taken through the WH. The and the boundary, where the surface stress–energy tensor initial inspiral of the BH looks to an observer in Uni- is to be determined by assumption or experiment. η is verse 1 like a typical BH-BH inspiral and merger with positive in Universe 1, negative in Universe 2, and zero a normal GW chirp until the BH reaches the throat at on the boundary or throat. 3MWH . At that point the BH passes through the throat The stress–energy tensor is into Universe 2 and the gravitational wave signature in Universe 1 fades quickly as the BH is now radiating pre- T µν = Sµν δ(η) + T µν Θ(η) + T µν Θ( η), (4) dominantly into Universe 2. An observer in Universe 2 · 1 · 2 · − 3 sees a very strong signal that decreases in amplitude and tion reaction on the system [27]. However, one could ex- frequency, an anti-chirp, until the BH reaches apogee and tend this approach to consider systems with eccentricity falls back into the WH. The frequency reaches a maxi- developed, for example, via the Kozai-Lidov mechanism mum again at the throat as it passes from Universe 2 to [28, 29]. 1, and the process repeats – with chirps resulting from Following the work of Diemer & Smolarek [30], BH or- the inspiral BH trajectories and anti-chirps from outspi- bits are categorized as: bound orbits (BO) - orbital mo- ral BHs. With sufficient radial velocity, the can BH have tion is around the throat of the wormhole, never passing such a highly eccentric orbit that GW emission near each to the other side; two-world bound (TWB) - orbits pass- apogee will be undetectable, reminiscent of zoom-whirl ing through the throat of the wormhole at least once; two- orbits seen in Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals [26]. If the world escape (TWE) - orbits with enough energy that BH is bound to the WH, it eventually settles near the they go from radial infinity, pass through the wormhole, throat of the WH with consequences depending on the and outspiral to radial infinity on the other side [50]; and properties of the unknown on the throat. escape orbits (EO) which come in from radial infinity, Anti-chirps and gaps in the GW frequency spectrum swing around the wormhole and escape back out to ra- are distinctive signatures that could be used to constrain dial infinity staying in a single universe. In future work, the number of WHs in our Universe. These GW sig- we will consider a suite of trajectory and their natures could be searched for in existing LIGO data by subsequent GW signatures. comparing with anti-chirp-like waveforms. While these In this work, we consider what would be a circular, constraints would only apply to a limited range of worm- bound orbit (BO) in our Universe if the primary mass hole types – namely traversable ones – they could still were a BH, but is a TWB orbit when the primary is have astrophysical and cosmological implications. a WH. Including gravitational radiation, the orbit loses In the example that follows, let us assume the black energy and spirals into the wormhole throat, passes to hole mass is MBH = 5M and the effective mass of the the other Universe, and continues damped oscillations wormhole is MWH = 200M . The throat is at radius between spacetime regions, until it eventually settles to a = 3MWH = 60RBH , leading to a cross sectional area the throat. of the WH throat that is 3600 times as large as the area As a first step to model the dynamics, we use the code of the BH horizon. Thus it may not be unreasonable ARCHAIN written by S. Mikkola [31, 32] for integrat- to consider a BH passing through the WH throat as a ing the two-body equations of motion up to 3.5 post- perturbation of the WH if the interaction with the exotic Newtonian (PN) order, including gravitational radia- matter is not too strong; this would be the case if the tion at 2.5 PN. We treat the wormhole as effectively a exotic matter is composed of evenly distributed particles large mass with a smaller black hole orbiting it. Using on the throat that only interact gravitationally with the the post-Newtonian approximation is not only a conve- BH (σ < 0). Under these constraints, the traversing BH nient choice for explicitly solving for the orbit, but our is not expected to accrete exotic matter, as it is repelled mass ratio of 40:1 makes the problem computationally by the positive mass BH[49]. intractable for current simulations which have calculated ratios only as large as 18:1 with difficulty [33, 34]. One might be concerned with follow- ORBITAL DYNAMICS AND GRAVITATIONAL ing the trajectory up to and through the wormhole, as PN WAVES approximations are thought to breakdown close to BH- BH mergers [35]; here, though, the orbital inspiral stops There is a rich suite of possible WH-BH orbits, even in effectively at 1.5Rs,W H , as it traverses to a new Universe, the relatively simple regime in which MWH MBH. For which mitigates some of the mismatch between NR and a Schwarzschild-like WH, the throat radius is at 1.5 times PN-calculated dynamics. the , Rs,W H for a Schwarzschild BH TableI presents initial conditions for our near cir- of the same mass —we stress, though, that there is no cular orbit. Included are the WH and BH center-of- horizon for the wormhole. For such unequal masses, mass positions and velocities in the xy- for the the BH passing through the exotic matter at the throat starting position near xBH 20 (in units of Rs,W H ) is a minor perturbation to the matter and geometry of which is integrated with a coarse∼ step-size. We take the system, which facilitates a post-Newtonian treatment the positions and velocities from that trajectory near to the dynamics. We find that a bound BH will move xBH 7 as the initial conditions to calculate a more through the WH many times in a damped oscillation, finely-resolved∼ trajectory. We work in the center-of-mass emitting energy into GWs on each side of the throat. coordinates in the figures that follow, with a mass ra- This results in the BH orbit decaying and settling on tio of 40:1 for the MWH : MBH . We use units such the throat of the WH. In this work we will explore non- that 2 MWH = Rs,W H = 1, the gravitational constant eccentric orbits, which is the expected situation for bi- G = 1, and the speed-of-light c = 1. In SI units, one 5 nary systems due to the circularizing effects of the radia- finds the unit of length is Ul = 5.9065 10 m, and of × 4

32 mass Um = 400 M = 7.9536 10 kg, and finally the ×−3 unit of time is Ut = 1.9702 10 s. The wormhole has × an effective mass of 200 M while the black hole has mass

5 M , or in these units, 0.5 and 0.0125, respectively. All 4 motion is in the xy-plane, and neither the wormhole nor the black hole has . In Figure2, we show the initial inspiral and four passes 2 through the throat of the wormhole in an embedding di- agram, following that of [30]. The upper half of the hy- Y 0 perboloid is Universe 1, it contains the initial position, and the lower half is Universe 2. We show trajectories in 2 Universe 2 as dashed, those in 1 as solid lines. −

4 −

4 2 0 2 4 − − X

FIG. 3: The orbits of a black hole with mass 5 M around and through a wormhole with an effective mass 200 M , same as in Figure2 but in xy-(physical) space. The orbit starts in Universe 1 and traverses to 2, then back in 1, etc. The black circle marks the initial position and the circulation of the orbits are counter- clockwise. The solid gray circle is approximately the wormhole throat–the center of the wormhole executes the small orbit indi- cated by the black dot around the origin. Orbits in Universe 2 are shown dashed.

We assumed a distance of 500 Mpc and an inclination FIG. 2: Embedding diagram for an orbit following Diemer and of the binary orbital plane of ϕ = θ = π/4. The two po- Smolarek[30]. The orbit of a black hole with mass 5 M around larizations are shown in Figure4, with plus-polarization and through a wormhole with an effective mass 200 M . With- h+ shown as solid, and the cross-polarization h× as out GWs this would be a bound, circular orbit in Universe 1 (top half). Initial position is at the top of the hyperboloid; the inspiral dashed. Using the above units one finds the inspiral to of the BH can be seen. As it passes the throat into Universe 2 have a frequency of approximately 14 Hz near t = 0. This (bottom half), we indicate orbits in Universe 2 with dashed lines. is in the frequency band anticipated for future 3-G detec- Five “passes” or “petals” are shown, three in Universe 1 and two tors [37]. We estimate the signal-to-noise for the wave- (dashed) in Universe 2. form in Figure4, with sky and polarization averaging [36] The part of the orbit shown in Figure3 corresponding to be 6 for Advanced-LIGO and 460 for the third genera- to Universe 1 is used to calculate the gravitational strain tion gravitational wave detector Cosmic Explorer[38, 39]. shown in Figure4. The orbits show an interesting prop- This scales inversely with the total mass, so a less massive erty, that the black holes will settle down into a position system could be high enough frequency to be observed by on the throat of the wormhole; presumably this would LIGO. In the figure, we use gray bars to emphasize the also hold for any matter with positive mass. Asymptot- gaps in the GW waveform. Generically, one can see that ically the will radiate away, so the for a wormhole, a somewhat normal inspiral occurs and object stops orbiting and is at a fixed position on the is reflected in the GW signature. However, the BH does throat sphere. The wormhole could potentially collect a not merge but passes through the throat, creating a gap set of compact objects on its throat, the observational in the waveform earlier than it would had the WH been a and theoretical consequences of such has yet to be fully BH. In the case shown, the inspiral is followed by about explored. one cycle bursts of GWs of slightly decreasing amplitude. We calculate the gravitational waves using the mass quadrupole formula given in [36] (see Equation (3.72) 2 2 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION there). Since the strain h d Qij/dt , where Qij is the mass quadrupole moment∼ of the binary, we smooth the orbits using a 4th order spline to have a smooth second Gravitational wave astronomy will continue to expand derivative. This still gives rather poor behavior at the its sensitivity, eventually producing a census of massive discontinuous endpoints of the orbit as it passes through binary inspirals extending to high that could en- the throat, see Figure4, but acceptable behavior else- compass even the first generation of seed BH-BH mergers where. [e.g. 40, 41]. With this increased sensitivity, the possibil- 5

TABLE I: Initial conditions for the Wormhole and Black Hole, showing the center-of-mass positions and velocities in the xy-plane. The first row denotes the initial conditions for a coarsely integrated trajectory used to find the position and velocities in the second row, which are used to start the finely integrated trajectory used for the GW calculation.

xWH yWH vx,W H vy,W H xBH yBH vx,BH vy,BH step size -0.4878 0 0 -3.7611e-3 19.512 0 0 0.15045 4.0 -0.17973 3.4144e-4 -7.3384e-06 -5.8446e-3 7.1894 -0.013658 2.9353e-4 0.23379 0.0001

as a BH crosses a wormhole throat. Overall this would

1.00 imply a higher chance of mergers where the BH starting h+ h × in Universe 1 either escapes into Universe 2 or starts off 0.75 gaps with an eccentric bound orbit in Universe 2. This is just 21 − 0.50 one example of beyond circular orbit signal possibilities

0.25 one could expect for BH-WH mergers. Wormholes offer numerous intriguing scenarios for as- 0.00 tronomy and cosmology. They have been suggested as 0.25 − possible sources of fast radio burst [42] and other phe-

dimensionless GW strain, h, units0 10 .50 nomena. They have the potential to explain observations − that have not yet been fully understood, e.g., the recent 0.75 − LIGO-VIRGO event S190521g observations [43]. They 1.00 − 0 200 400 600 800 1000 also provide another form of compact object as an al- time, t ternative to a , e.g., as the only possibility for Sgr A∗ leading to a consistent explanation FIG. 4: The dimensionless gravitational strain measured for the for the orbits of stars in its neighborhood [44]. Their dis- wormhole-black hole binary shown in Figure3 at a distance of covery could imply the possible existence of exotic matter 500 Mpc and at an angle of ϕ = π/4 and θ = π/4 relative to the binary orbital plane. There is some difficulty working with these [16, 17, 45]—though wormholes in a modified gravity sce- discontinuous petals, so the endpoints are not considered accurate. nario are possible without exotic matter [46, 47]. Worm- The wormhole mass is 200 M and the black hole is 5 M . The holes would also allow shortcuts through our Universe estimated gravitational wave frequency of this example is approx- which has implications for cosmology [48]. imately 14 Hz near t = 0. Smaller total mass would raise the frequency. It is likely the gaps between bursts would fill with GW This initial work posits the unique gravitational signa- leakage from the other Universe, but this involves the exotic matter ture of a potential WH-BH interaction, but it merely interacting with the GWs from Universe 2—here we tacitly assume scratches the surface of this domain. For example, those GWs are blocked completely. we considered a Schwarzschild-like traversable wormhole with a rather simplified choice of exotic matter, but a ity of constraining (or detecting!) exotic phenomena via spinning WH solution is more astrophysically relevant. GW signals has arrived. In the present work we have ex- In addition to mapping more eccentric orbits, future av- amined a novel anti-chirp signature arising from a bound enues include the effect of higher-order modes on the out- binary traversable wormhole system where the bound ob- spiral waveforms; astrophysical implications of such WH ject emerges through the wormhole throat into our region binaries, which can place constraints on WH demograph- of spacetime. Note that that since the WH throat is at ics; and an exploration of the potential multi-messenger a larger radius than the of a BH of the signals of WH-BH systems. same mass, a WH-BH interaction would be distinguish- Acknowledgments- The work of TWK is supported able even during an inspiral, because of this the signal by U.S. DoE grant number DE-SC-0019235. JBD ac- would drop off at a lower frequency than is expected for knowledges support from the National Founda- the same mass BH-BH merger. Also if there is obviously tion under Grant No. NSF PHY-1820801. JBD would no ringdown GW signal from the final, merged BH, and also like to thank the Mitchell Institute for Fundamen- one would expect it, this would also be evidence for some- tal Physics and Astronomy at Texas A&M University for thing other than a BH-BH merger. their generous hospitality during various stages of this We have been assuming near circular orbits for BHs work. The authors would like to thank Dr. near WHs, but this does not always have to be the case. for valuable discussions. For example, Kozai [28] and Lidov [29] have shown that three body effects can give non-zero eccentricities to or- bits that are initially circular. So, even though merger orbits tend to circularize due to the effects of GW radi- ation, if there is another body in the vicinity, the Kozai- ∗ Electronic address: [email protected] Lidov mechanism could lead to a merger that is eccentric † Electronic address: [email protected] 6

‡ Electronic address: [email protected] [29] M. L. Lidov, Planetary and Space Science 9, 719 (1962). § Electronic address: [email protected] [30] V. Diemer and E. Smolarek, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, [1] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. 175014 (2013), arXiv:1302.1705 [gr-qc]. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]. [31] S. Mikkola and D. Merritt, Monthly Notices [2] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. of the Royal Astronomical Society 372, 219 Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]. (2006), http://oup.prod.sis.lan/mnras/article- [3] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. pdf/372/1/219/5780989/mnras0372-0219.pdf. J. Lett. 892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE] [32] S. Mikkola and D. Merritt, The Astronomical Journal . 135, 2398 (2008). [4] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. [33] S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. P¨urrer,F. Ohme, X 9, 031040 (2019). X. J. Forteza, and A. Boh´e, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044006 [5] A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and (2016). Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, [34] K. Jani, J. Healy, J. A. Clark, L. London, P. Laguna, 2000). and D. Shoemaker, Classical and 33, [6] K. W. K. Wong, E. Berti, W. E. Gabella, and K. Holley- 204001 (2016), arXiv:1605.03204 [gr-qc]. Bockelmann, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 483, L33 [35] L. Blanchet, S. Detweiler, A. Le Tiec, and B. F. Whiting, (2019), arXiv:1808.07055 [astro-ph.EP]. Phys. Rev. D 81, 064004 (2010). [7] J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 97, 511 (1955). [36] M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory [8] J. Wheeler, (Academic Press, 1962). and Experiments, Gravitational Waves (OUP Oxford, [9] V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. 2008). Lett. 116, 171101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. [37] GWIC, “Gravitational-wave astronomy with the next- Lett.117,no.8,089902(2016)], arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]. generation earth-based observatories,” (2019). [10] V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palen- [38] D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Bar- zuela, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D94, 084031 (2016), sotti, G. Billingsley, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, D. Coyne, arXiv:1608.08637 [gr-qc]. R. Eisenstein, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, E. D. Hall, A. Laz- [11] P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, F. Goelen, T. Hertog, and B. Verc- zarini, G. Lovelace, J. Read, B. S. Sathyaprakash, nocke, Phys. Rev. D97, 024040 (2018), arXiv:1711.00391 D. Shoemaker, J. Smith, C. Torrie, S. Vitale, R. Weiss, [gr-qc]. C. Wipf, and M. Zucker, in Bull. of the AAS, Vol. 51 [12] S. Aneesh, S. Bose, and S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D97, 124004 (2019) p. 35, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]. (2018), arXiv:1803.10204 [gr-qc]. [39] “Cosmic explorer website,” https://cosmicexplorer. [13] J. Abedi and N. Afshordi, JCAP 1911, 010 (2019), org, accessed: 2020-07-09. arXiv:1803.10454 [gr-qc]. [40] H. Yu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 141102 (2018), [14] J. Abedi and N. Afshordi, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1712.05417 [astro-ph.IM]. arXiv:2001.00821 (2020), arXiv:2001.00821 [gr-qc] [41] M. Colpi, K. Holley-Bockelmann, T. Bogdanovic, . P. Natarajan, J. Bellovary, A. Sesana, M. Tremmel, [15] A. A. Kirillov, E. P. Savelova, and O. M. Lecian, (2020), J. Schnittman, J. Comerford, E. Barausse, E. Berti, arXiv:2003.13127 [gr-qc]. M. Volonteri, F. Khan, S. McWilliams, S. Burke-Spolaor, [16] M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, Phys. J. Hazboun, J. Conklin, G. Mueller, and S. Larson, arXiv Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988). e-prints , arXiv:1903.06867 (2019), arXiv:1903.06867 [17] M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 [astro-ph.GA]. (1988). [42] D. F. Torres, G. E. Romero, and L. A. Anchordoqui, [18] M. Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Phys. Rev. D58, 123001 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9802106 Hawking (AIP Press, Woodbury, New York, 1995). [astro-ph]. [19] M. Visser, Nucl. Phys. B328, 203 (1989), [43] M. J. Graham et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 251102 (2020), arXiv:0809.0927 [gr-qc]. arXiv:2006.14122 [astro-ph.HE]. [20] M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B242, 24 (1990). [44] D.-C. Dai and D. Stojkovic, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083513 [21] R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Gen. Rel. (2019), arXiv:1910.00429 [gr-qc]. Grav. 40, 1997 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0405109 [gr-qc]. [45] D. Hochberg and T. W. Kephart, Phys. Lett. B268, 377 [22] W. Israel, Nuovo Cim. B44S10, 1 (1966), [Erratum: (1991). Nuovo Cim.B48,463(1967); Nuovo Cim.B44,1(1966)]. [46] F. Duplessis and D. A. Easson, Phys. Rev. D92, 043516 [23] S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Struc- (2015), arXiv:1506.00988 [gr-qc]. ture of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathe- [47] J. B. Dent, D. A. Easson, T. W. Kephart, and matical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011). S. C. White, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1750117 (2017), [24] R. V. Buniy and S. D. H. Hsu, Phys. Lett. B632, 543 arXiv:1608.00589 [gr-qc]. (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0502203 [hep-th]. [48] D. Hochberg and T. W. Kephart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, [25] R. V. Buniy, S. D. H. Hsu, and B. M. Murray, Phys. Rev. 2665 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9211006 [gr-qc]. D74, 063518 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0606091 [hep-th]. [49] If exotic matter has different constraints, or react to ad- [26] K. Glampedakis and D. Kennefick, Physical Review D ditional forces, BH accretion must be reconsidered. 66 (2002), 10.1103/physrevd.66.044002. [50] It is an open question if these exist when GWs are con- [27] L. Blanchet, Living Reviews in Relativity 17, 2 (2014), sidered. arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]. [28] Y. Kozai, Astron. J. 67, 591 (1962).