UNIVERSITY OF SYSTEM Facilities, Construction & Master Planning Committee

10:45 a.m. — 12:30 p.m. August 16, 2011 AGENDA

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM FACILITIES, CONSTRUCTION AND MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING

DATE: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 TIME: 10:45a.m. PLACE: Hilton Hotel Waldorf Astoria Ballroom E, Second Floor 4800 Calhoun Houston, Texas 77204

Chair: Tilman J. Fertitta Vice Chair: Nelda Luce Blair Members: Welcome W. Wilson, Sr. Tamecia Glover Harris Carroll Robertson Ray, Ex Officio

FACILITIES, CONSTRUCTION AND MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE

A. Call to Order

B. Approval of Committee Minutes May 17, 2011, Facilities, Cons. and Master Planning Committee Meeting

Action: Approval

C. Approval of Site and Scope for University of Houston Multi-Modal FCMP - C

Garage 1 — University of Houston

Action: Approval

D. Approval of Naming of Building No. 9A at the Energy Research Park at FCMP - D the University of Houston to be named ConocoPhillips Petroleum

Engineering Building — University of Houston

Action: Approval

- E. University of Houston Master Plan Update — University of Houston FCMP E

Action: Information

F. Adjourn 08/16/2011 FCMP AGENDA -1 UNWERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM BOARD OF REGENTS AGENDA

COMMITTEE: Facilities, Construction and Master Planning

ITEM: Approval of Site and Scope for University of Houston Multi Modal Garage I

DATE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED:

SUMMARY: Approval is requested of site and scope for construction of a multi modal parking garage near Calhoun Road and Wheeler. The project will be a base bid of 1,500 parking spaces and approximately 500,000 GSF with an option for up to an additional 500 spaces for a total of 2,000 parking spaces and approximately 670,000 GSF.

In addition the project will acconnnodate and link multiple modes of transportation including UH Shuttle Buses, Metro Buses and access to the Metro Light Rail Station on Wheeler.

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION: Multi Modal Garage #1 Program, Description and Site Plans

FISCAL NOTE: See corresponding Finance and Administration agenda item

RECOMMENDATION! Administration recommends approval of this item ACTION REQUESTED:

COMPONENT: University of Houston

I - PRESIDE DATE

// EXEC VIC CHANCELLOR Carl Carlucci

JA CIIANCELLO Renu Kjiator DATE

08/16/2011

FCMP - C-i University of Houston

Multimodal Garage #1 Program and Description

Introduction/Program: The Campus Framework Plan adopted by the Board of Regents in 2007 and the Campus Transportation and Parking Plan both include a major parking structure at the corner of Wheeler and Calhoun as part of the Wheeler Precinct and as an anchor for the Southeast entry into campus. This project follows those plans and will replace parking space previously lost with the construction of the Health Biomedical Building and Cougar Village land that will be lost with the construction of Metro’s light rail lines and Cougar Village IL It will provide needed spaces for faculty, staff, commuter students and residence hall students.

The project will provide a minimum of 1500 parking spaces and approximately 500,000 GSF with an option for up to an additional 500 spaces for a total of 2000 parking spaces and approximately 670,000 GSF.

In addition the project will accommodate and link multiple modes of transportation including UH Shuttle Buses, Metro Buses and access to a Metro Light Rail Station.

UN Transportation Plan: UN currently experiences approximately 125,000 vehicle trips per weekday, with an expected increase to over 160,000 within the next decade. To mitigate the impact of this growth, the University collaborated with regional transportation agencies (City of Houston, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Houston- Galveston Area Council, and Texas Department of Transportation) to develop the UN Transportation Plan. This Plan was utilized to project campus needs and potential transportation capital projects. These projects then formed the basis for Parking Fee recommendations.

The current UH Transportation Plan calls for a reduction in vehicle trips by a minimum of 10% (12,500 to 16,000 vehicle trips per day) by providing convenient access to rail and bus transit, van and carpools, pedestrian walkways, and bicycle transportation. To achieve this goal a significant segment of trips to UN must be by modes other than individuals driving alone. By reducing vehicle trips, the University’s transportation plan will reduce congestion, reduce the need for more parking garages, conserve energy, reduce the University’s carbon footprint, and help to improve air quality.

The University of Houston’s goal is to implement a transportation plan that links multiple transportation mode- a “multimodal” plan- to achieve a seamless integration of Metro light rail, buses and UH shuttles with the campus and surrounding community. This coordination will significantly increase ridership for Metro, improve access to and from the University, reduce the need for parking garages, and enable the University to handle a larger portion of its projected increase in campus enrollment and activity without a corresponding increase in vehicle trips. With additional mobility choices, the UN Transportation Plan will produce economic, environmental and quality of place” benefits for the region.

Multimodal Description: In order to accomplish these goals, UN proposes a coordinated transportation plan that includes developing transportation centers linking all of the various at each of the three proposed Metro light rail stations that will be constructed along the perimeter of the campus. The Campus loop circulation road will provide the pathway for the campus shuttle bus and cross campus trips.

08/16/2011

FCMP — C-1.1.1 This project is the first of those “multi-modal centers”. It combines this coordinated transportation effort with a campus information center. It will provide grade-separated access to the Metro Light Rail Station, Metro bus access, and direct connection to the UH Shuttle. Connections to pedestrian walkways and bicycle paths will serve all areas of the campus, greatly enhancing the desirability of commuting to campus via mass transit.

The Garage will be accessed from Calhoun and will include space for the UH Shuttle Busses and pedestrian walkways to the Metro Light Rail Station on Wheeler. A comprehensive traffic analysis will determine the exact size, layout, entrances and resulting traffic accommodations. It will also study what layout will best accommodate Metro buses.

Proiect Details: The southeast corner of the project at Calhoun and Wheeler will include special design features in recognition of the importance, visibility and marketing possibilities of this prime corner of campus. The security design of the garage will include extensive security cameras and emergency phones all tied to and monitored by University Police. It will also feature upgraded lighting levels, glass stair towers and glass rear elevator cab walls as well as well lit pedestrian circulation leading form all entrances and exits. The exterior of the building will utilize the materials utilized elsewhere on campus and that are part of the University’s standardized material and design palette.

08/16/2011

FCMP - C-1.1.2 — h— c C ?--< •1

-I

‘N’- - -

-1-

—C .1

cr2

C eq.-’ Sc’

iJnq) • -3”- C •‘—j• -. 1 ,, ,• ——•-- — h_h. - EAST END

- Mt-’ if 49/

EASTWOOD • -. THIRD WARD n C 00 ii

C I

U’IVERSIfl of HOUSTON A

A UHERP

a 1 A

BRAYS BAYOU —I- fo

NEIGHBORHOOD MAP_EXHIBIT1 3OJ’JN.2O1 CAMPUS&SURROUNDINGAREA CENTERS 10105 FALL LEER dEE LCC4ThYRS [lArVA OPENING CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION COPI000R RLATFOIRM MOVEMENT NETWORK HALLS 0LLtS MI.. PAJL GARAGE RAIL MODAl. SAD HOUSPEG LIGHT MOLE’) JCHl oAc’)TMors OJA&NGtE LP3F AIKEWAV RESIDENCE STADIUM SHUTTLE MULTI GARAGE PEACE PEDESTRIAN A_A4TRI,T3 RAYOUTRRIL OARS •AA__ LOPTAPARTMENTS CAR OPENS 0ECP0TGV1 ADAGE TOWER OARS PRIRESNG ZOOS 000C,RR LA1-VEASy MAJOR SOUThEAST PEROT SMMTCS PROPOSED ORAlS HOUSTON CALHOUN OJ.EE%OWSARA.fleflS CADISNOG NEW NEW IWtS EAVCEJ MOOD’) COUGAR EEGO[’ECE NAST CNFLS - 10- II IS LEGEND 07 09. DI. St 09- 01. 54 RZ — — ._. — — NORTH -

1111111111 —

1 P--i

2 UA001

! —l

MAP_EXHIBIT

‘1

PLAN

AREA

INTEGRATION R

SURROUNDING

& J1TH -

CAMPUS - —‘ wn__

TRANSPORTATION - -*‘ ç

OF -- - ‘A 04 --

MODES H - -‘ - 1 -: -A. OOJUNE201 CAMPLIS METRORU500UTE CRMPUSLOOPRD. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM BOARD OF REGENTS AGENDA

COMMITTEE: Facilities, Construction and Master Planning

ITEM: Approval of the Naming of Building No. 9A at the Energy Research Park at the University of Houston to be named ConocoPhillips Petroleum Engineering Building

DATE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED: NA

SUMMARY:

Approval is requested, consistent with Board policy 32.02, for naming Building No. 9A at the Energy Research Park at the University of Houston the ConocoPhillips Petroleum Engineering Building.

SUPPORTJNG DOCUMENTATION: Naming Justification

FISCAL NOTE: NA

RECOMMENDATION/ Administration recommends approval of this item ACTION REQUESTED:

COMPONENT: University of Houston

f/I//f Renu Khator DATE

712$ ti EXECUTWE ICE CHANCELLOR Carl Carlucci I6ATE I r/i/ti CHANCELLOR Renu Khator DATE

08/16/2011 FCMP-D-1 University of Houston Naming Justification Building No. 9A Energy Research Park at the University of Houston

The University of Houston’s drive toward Tier One Status and increased research activity has centered on key areas that reflect the strength and needs of Houston and Texas. This strategy allows UH to best leverage resources and respond to industry requirements. A key part of this strategy involves Energy and associated Energy Research. It is the prime component of the Research Park the University is developing at the former Schiumberger site and its success depends upon important Energy Industry partners.

ConocoPhillips has stepped forward as a primary partner in all of these University of Houston efforts. They have contributed talent, money and significant resources toward UH developing a Petroleum Engineering Program and in expanding energy research. Their noteworthy gifts have allowed the renovation and finishing of Building 9A for the Petroleum Engineering Department. In addition their areas of Philanthropic Support include significant financial support of the following programs:

C. T. Bauer College of Business • Emerging Leaders Academic Success Program • National Association of Black Accountants Cullen College of Engineering • Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES) • Society of Women Engineers • National Society of Black Engineers • Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics • Scholar Enrichment Program (SEP)

Besides financial support ConocoPhillips and their team have volunteered as advisors, industry experts, academic resources and mentors. The many examples include:

Ryan Lance? SVP Exploration & Production/ B.S., Petroleum Engineering from Montana Tech

• UH President’s Energy Advisory Board • Chairman, Spindletop International • Montana Tech Foundation board

Kelly Talkington, Director of Global Upstream Engineering Recruiting & Development • UH PE Advisory Board • Instrumental in cultivation efforts for $3 million total commitment to UH petroleum engineering

Over the past four years the relationship between the University of Houston and Conoco Phillips has grown. As part of that growth UH has been rewarded as one of ConocoPhillips’ core schools in their college portfolio from which they recruit.

Based on their extensive support to the University of Houston as outlined above it is recommended Building No. 9A at the Energy Research Park at the University of Houston be named the ConocoPhillips Petroleum Engineering Building.

08/16/2011

FCMP — D-1.1.1 UNIVERSITY OF IIOUSTON SYSTEM BOARD OF REGENTS AGENDA

COMMITTEE: Facilities, Construction and Master Planning

ITEM: University of Houston Master Plan Update

DATE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED:

SIJIVIMARY: A presentation will be given to the Board of Regents on the University of Houston Master Plan.

Attached is information on the development of the University of Houston Master Plan.

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION: University of Houston Master Plan Information

FISCAL NOTE:

RECOMMENDATION! Infoimation ACTION REQUESTED:

COMPONENT: University of Houston

tU f/i//i Renu Khator DATE PRESJDEN?% 7/lq/2aii EXECUTIVE CE ANCELLOR Carl Carlucci DATE I ,e/, ii! CHANCELLOR Renu Khator DATE

08/16/2011 FCMP-E-l ______

Design LAB University of Houston

This University of Houston System Master Plan Executive Summary is the work of DesignLAB-Houston. As the professional research arm of the University of Houston Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, DesignLA8 generates preliminary design studies and research and development work across the disciplines of architecture, planning and industrial design. DesignLARs approach to this master planning effort is to make seamless the academic, fiscal and land use plans of each University of Houston System campus.

Patricia 8&ton Oliver, FA/A Dean of the Gerald 0. Hines College of Architecture

Process The master plan process followed for each campus includes the documentation and analysis of current space utilization for each building and floor area within the project scope, mapping the reported utilization on current floor plans and then conducting in-person walkthroughs. (Fig. 1, P9. 12) DesignLAB verified the utilization with the physical facilities conditions and determined additional capacity for teaching and other activities to accommodate growth within the existing facilities.

We also reviewed the academic course schedule for a snapshot semester (Fall 2010) to determine the fill rates for each existing course determining additional capacity within the existing teaching resources.

Once the space utilization of existing facilities was measured, we developed multiple scenarios for growth and expansion within the parameters of enrollment projections, revenue projections, and available resources. (Fig. 2, Pg. 12)

For the investigation of research at UH, DesignLAB mapped the principal investigator space assignments onto the lab floor plans, verified these assignments with in-person walkthroughs, and mapped these assignments’ square footage totals to develop a comparative productivity metric for the research space. Our goal was to identify additional research capacity, assess maintenance and operations concerns related to the flow of DC support, and to assist in the development of campus research policy.

University of Houston Patricia Belton Oliver, FAIA Mark Dillon Patrick Peters, LEED AP John Tsai, AlA, LEED AP Mike Kilpatrick

Erling Cruz Lisa Garrett Sandra Vasquez Raquel Medina

08/16/2011 1

FCMP — E-1.1.1 U N I V E R S I T V of Sustaining Tier One Research

HO U ST0 N. INTRODUCTION The presence of over 24 task forces illustrates the scale and complexity of issues that exist on the U?! campus. In assessing the priorities of the campus, the focus of DesignLAb’s first phase was to analyze a key pressing University issue: research. By using the College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics as a case study, the evaluation sought to identi& findings that would assist in the development of policies for governing Research space utilization, optimization, infrastructure and responsibilities. The evaluation was coupled with coordinating the efforts of the task forces, determining the condition of existing facilities/infrastructure and assessing overall UH Facilities requirements.

This evaluation yielded three major Facility findings: • After current construction is completed no net increase in general Instructional Space will be needed at Ull until significantly after 2015. • Completing current projects, finishing shell space, better utilization, improved space assignment, renovation and increased deferred maintenance can provide significant additional research facilities required to reach the goal of $200 million in annual research expenditures. • Additional Student Success/Student Life facilities are needed to meet the Student Success goals detailed in the UH Mission and Academic Plan.

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Academic Instruction and Support: • UH projects increased graduate, off campus and on line enrollment but anticipates stable on-campus undergraduate enrollment. • Improved space assignments and utilization can accommodate projected enrollments. • Growth in online education is changing the amount and type of space needed on campus. • Outdated lab space should be renovated for additional Academic Support Space. • A collaborative arts building and a replacement building for Sculpture will be required in order to meet LTH Arts Goals and Initiatives.

Research: • To meet Tier One research goals 3 major research clusters- West Science Research Complex, Southeast Campus Health Biomedical Complex and Energy Research Park- should be expanded over the next few years. • The development and implementation of an accurate accounting system synthesizing space utilization and research space allocation data bases will assist in optimizing research space usage and support. • Improved utilization will allow space for greenhouse programs and research incubation. • The clarification of maintenance responsibilities will alleviate long term deferred maintenance impacts and establish a baseline for IDC allocation. • The appropriate distribution of IDC would contribute to maintenance and of research facilities. • Yff? neeäs resources and attention to renovation and infrastructure. Increased

FCMP — E-1.1.2 U N I V E R S I T V of

btJ HEAF distribution to infrastructure and required maintenanace of research Fl 0 U S T 0 facitlities would sustain a viable model moving forward, avoid long term impacts of deferred maintenance, and accelerate future growth. Student Success: • UI-I’s transition to 25% of undergraduates living on campus will dramatically change the nature of UH and significantly impact student life and student success. • UI-I needs additional student support space and student recreational facilities to meet student success goals. • Major increases in student support facilities including Health Services will be required by Fall 2013 when the Freshmen Living Requirement is implemented. • Outdated research and academic space can he renovated for addictional Student Support Space.

Infrastructure/Support: • Major investments in campus circulation and structured parking yielding at least 3000 new spaces are needed. • Metro Light Rail Lines will dramatically change campus access necessitating new campus circulation roads and revised entrances. • Campus Infrastructure and utility systems are past their useful life and have extensive deferred maintenance issues which will require major re-investments in the next few years.

08/16/2011 3

FCMP — E-.1.1.3 University of Houston Master Facilities Plan

//

I

0-

-

oJ-’L4r Academics Student Life ‘h FunstonAdditlon!Valenti (2011) 15. West Dining (2012) * Student Life and Infrastructure 2 Classroom Business Building (2012) 16. Health Center (2013) ** Academic and Research 3. Science Teaching Laboratory (2012) 17. Cougar1IIage 2 (2013) 4. BlafferGalleryAddition (2012) 18. Family Housing (2013) 5. ValentiAddition (2015) 19. Childcare (2013) 6. Law Addition (2020) 20. Cougar Place Sophmore HaIl (2013) 7. Fine Arts Building (2020) 21. UC Expansion (2013) and Renovation (2015) 8. Future Project Site (2020) 22. HoffeinzAdditlon (2015) 9. Future Project Site (2020) 23. Robertson Stadium Project (2015) 24. Future Project Site (2020) 25. Jr/Sr. Hall (2020)

Research InfrastructurelSupport 10. Health Biomedical (2012) 26. Stadium Parking Garage (2012 (2013) 11. Pharmacy/Research Center (2015) 27. Power Plant Addition 12. Future Research Buildings (2015) 28. Wheeler Multimodal Center (2013) * 13. West Campus Research Building (2020) 29. Mixed Use Garage (2015) 14. Future Research Buildings (2020) 30. Stadium Multimodal Center (2015) 31. Future Mixed-Use (2020) * 32. N_oØti Campus Garage (2020) OlM6c&LWai Precinct Garage (2020) 4

FCMP — E-1.1.4 U N V E R S I T \T of HOUSTON

PHASING

BUILDING YEAR SF FUNDING Academics Valenti Addition 2015 TBD Gifts Law Addition 2020 TBD Gifts, Tuition Fine Arts Building 2020 TBD Parking Revenue Future Project Sites 2020 TBD TBD

Research Pharmacy/Research Center 2015 TBD Gifts, Tuition, Grants, Real Estate Sale Future Research Buildings 2015 TBD Grants, Gifts, Private Partnerships West Campus Research Building 2020 125,000 Grants, Gifts, Private Partnerships

Student Life Health Center 2013 TBD Housing Revenue Family Housing 2013 178,000 Private Lease Childcare 2013 17,000 Private Lease UC Expansion/Renovations 2013/2015 333,000 Student Fees Hoffeinz Addition 2015 TBD Gifts, Athletic Revenue Robertson Stadium Project 2015 TBD Gifts, Athletic Revenue Future Project Site 2020 TBD TBD Jr/Sr. Hall 2020 TBD Housing Revenue

Infrastructure/Support Wheeler Multimodal Center 2013 790,000 Parking Revenue, Federal Mixed Use Garage 2015 500,000 Gifts, Athletic and Parking Revenue, State Stadium Multimodal Center 2015 TBD Federal Future Mixed-Use 2020 TBD TBD North Campus Garage 2020 790,000 Parking, Dining and Lease Revenue Professional Precinct Garage 2020 NA Parking Revenue, Misc.

Note: UH is currently undertaking an extensive Facility Condition Audit of all existing buildings and all infrastructure. Initial findings from that study and the work of this Master Plan to date indicate there are significant infrastructure, Deferred Maintenance, and Renovation issues throughout which must be addressed. These issues are substantial and many will take precedence over new construction projects. Once the audits are complete, a large number of insrastructure, Deferred Maintenance, and Renovation projects to address these issues will be prioritized and added to the Phasing Plan.

08/16/2011 5

FCMP — E-1.1.5 Academic Facili

.

.‘yX

p.

Proposed Academic Fadiities * Existing Academic Facilities 1. Funston Additlonl Valenti (2011) 2. Classroom Business BuildIng (2012) 3. Science Teaching Laboratory (2012) -Z 4. Blaffer Gallery Addition (2012) 5. Valenti Mdltion (2015) 6. Law Addition (2020) 7. Fine Arts BuIlding (2020) 8. Future Project Site (2020) 9. Future Project SIte (2020) Academic and Research 08/16/2011 6

FCMP — E-1.1.6 Research Facilities Plan

4—-

5-

Proposed Research Existing Research

1. Health Biomedical (2012) 2. Phamiacy/Research Center (2015) 3. Future Research Buildings (2015) 4. West Campus Research Building (2020) 5. Future Research BuIldings (2020)

— Pcadenlc C Reseaitti 08/16/2011 7

FCMP — E-1.1.7 ______

Student Life Facilities Plan

I V

F

- ‘—I - - — -- -

Proposed Student Life Facilities Existing Student Life Facilities 1. West Dining (2012) 2. Health Center (2013) 3. Cougar Village 2 (2013) 4. Family Housing (2013) 5. Childcare (2013) 6. Cougar Place Sophmore HaIl (2013) 7. UC Expansion (2013) and Renovation (2015) 8. HoffeinzAddition (2015) 9. Robertson Stadium Project (2015) 10. Future Project Site (2020) 11. Jr./Sr. HaIl (2020) 08/16/2011 8

FCMP — E-1.1.8 Infrastructure/Support Facilities Plan

*

Proposed Infrastructurel Support Existing InfrastructurelSupport

1. Stadium Parking Garage (2012)* 2. Power Plant Addition (2013) 3. Wheeler Multimodal Center (2013) 4. Mixed Use Garage (2015) * 5. Stadium Multimodal Center (2015) 6. Future Mixed-Use (2020) 7. North Campus Garage (2020) *

* Student Life and Infrastructure 08/16/2011 9

FCMP — E-1.1.9 U N I V E R S I T V of HOUSTON College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics

Science Building Floors: 3 Total SF: 61,713

Science and Engineering Annex Floors: 1 Total SF: 12,034

Susanna Garrison Gymnasium Floors: 2 Total SF: 69,892

Science & Engineering Research Center Floors: 5 Total SF: 155,124

Philip Guthrie Hoffman Hall Floors: 7 Total SF: 128,781

Science and Research Building I Floors: 8 Total SF: 214,496

Science and Research Building 2 Floors: 7 Total SF: 169,758

Lamar Fleming Jr. Building Floors: 4 Total SF: 117,155

University of Houston Science Cen Floors: 5 Total SF: 123,149

,_p, IU/IgUIT 10

FCMP — E-.1.1.1O U N I V E R S I T V of HOUSTON

COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICS CASE STUDY! BUILDING INVENTORY

S&R1 Life Safely Upgrade Health Biomedical Sciences (floors 4—6) I (Jan. 2013 Completion) S&R2 Vivarium Restoration (Substantial Completion)

-J ®

L1) Old Science Renovations F-. planning SERC Phase 3 Build-out (Project in for CLASS.) (half of floors 3 & 5 Feb. 2011 future use by Substantial Completion) Fleming Renovation SERC Phase 4 Build-out (Project in planning) (floors 2 & 3 with 4th floor pending) Science Teaching Laboratory Building (Jan. 2012 completion)

08/16/2011 11

FCMP — E-1.1.11 U N I V E R S I T Y ot HOUSTON

:: SAMPLE SPACE ANALYSIS

—ri I E4tH’ a fr { I _-t1 r I

UTILIZED INSTRUCTIONAL SPACE: FALL 2010 THECO SPACE USE DISTRIBUTION: FALL 2010

SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BUILDING 1 SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BUILDING I FIRST FLOOR FIRST FLOOR

505mo,w Facirias Cass:cons w9t Sclethjled Classes fo Fal 2010 aid,90 & Eiocrserrisyy S.cn-g boa th care & Re scenpa I C Laboratory Facilities Specal Use ntIs SoredaJed Classes for FaM 2010 Ci2ChemnIry NonAsa,gnabte fleas - -. Faciles Croilaliol Labs eli Sotedued Classes for Fat 2010 Earl & Atmospheric Ses:ss Stay FacIsies Msit.ab4e Peonn wisloat Sdecuied Classes t 7aI 200 -Soecial Use Faubles COLIC Areas M SM Gereral Us. Faco too LclasSLtO

Figure I Sample Analysis of 5paoe Use

SOCNCAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY

0% 0% :50 lOS -

-

- 0% 0% 210 - 040 -

10 116 - 51% 76% - - III III AL 4IIIIIIIlAL III Eli AL - 4111111114k III sc :117 41141111 A 1111111111 41 11111 4k 1111 ‘ 126 lId All I I I Itilil 411141 11111 25) 339 1111k 11111k I II I I 411111k 3 60% 210 1 136 411111k 4111! 41111 41111k 41111 41111 - lit C 138 111111 411k 1111111111k I II III 411k 41111 111111k I II 62% 56% 10 140 I II 111411 11111111111 II 111411 11111111111 I II I 60% 80% ROOM SCHEDULE USE RATE FILL RATE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BUILDING 1 FIRST FLOOR

0000 30:15 3030 4 00:40- C 01-00

USE RATE (#HRS 100)) 70 HRS FILL RATE = (Stsioests Enrolled a 10011 MAX (Maximam Er,rotrment Room Capacity)

Room Schedule FigUre 2 Sample 08/16/2011 12

FCMP — E-1.1.12 U N I V E R S I T V of HOUSTON

INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION

The case study of research in the College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics resulted in the following diagrams which are the syntheses of the National Institute of Health grant funding description, interviews with the UH Associate Vice President of Research Operations and the Chair of the Department of Chemistry, and in-person walkthroughs of the research laboratories and floor plates. These sources revealed absent funding streams essential to support the maintenance of laboratory buildings research infrastructure.

Funds are expected to flow from the indirect costs of federal grants to UH Plant Operations in order to fund incidental and periodic building shell, base utilities, and core maintenance. Additional funds are expected to flow from the indirect costs of federal grants to the respective research teams in order to fund project-specific equipment, infrastructure and maintenance. HEAF funds designated for renovation and maintenance are also expected to provide additional funds for maintaining the laboratory buildings shell and core. These funds were largely absent from those available to support laboratory maintenance and repairs.

Numerous areas of ambiguity exist between the university’s responsibility for the building shell and core versus each research team’s responsibility for project-specific equipment, infrastructure and maintenance. These ambiguities exacerbate the problems of absent funding streams and underscore the need for a clear definition of responsibilities for maintenance at the initiation of each new research laboratory and funded grant.

08/16/2011 13

FCMP — E-.1.1.13 __

U N I V E R S I T V of HOUSTON

::PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR COMPARISONS

.I--1i I I

;n_,_ I -r •‘— - I

- t_.4itrr. n-r —

‘C0rH FUCtIA 9’tH L00R

,--ao el ‘1:

Ht’t ‘- 4,49 iJ -- i;4 I I

“Is.,.

SIXTH FLOOR SEVENTh FLOOR

SCIENCE 0190 RESEARCH EULDINS SNW99.E 19 COOMBOSISON eRApan

2011 Total 2211 Total

-P1010911 -Investiaatir l’ype - Fpvj. no. Stafl Da9,Totai-ExI Proj. no. .10 2007 TO 2008 112009 -10 2005 192011 08 2012 sq,ft. top. S/of telal Dl DC 2409 -IDC 2015 400 2011 -9002012 -lOG 5/si

- fiinoJ 103156 2021 2012. 40,009 - 20.455 20,855 19661493101 A 105455 2010 2022 105,202 35.401 39,402 35,302 101752 2010 2022 2S010 12,I3t) 12,500 s-log 2.579 2.579 100766 1109 2115 93.000 31,100 31,000 31009- Ph9oks làlzii 3100 fl11 72.126 32.116 841 343 :11417 1011 2211 67,23 57.973 2 98241, 1218 2115 00.lxX2 25, 1S, 25. 2251 0 10205: 2210 2020 99.980 49920 43,925 29569 9.79% 9395 556990 25, 2S,0 149929 170,250 66,958 7,050 83114/4 I 12,374 13.217 I 8.45/14

p a I 9195 1206 2111 303,300 50505 50,500 50500 90,512 80.500 95790 2008 2015 303)22 7S, 75830 75205 75,275 96,717 24.929 24,929 24.929 80991 2003 2011 239348 26,376 26,376 26,376 76,376 26,376 Physics 100229 2009 1011 100,000 66,667 86.667 66,667 66,857 22,222 22,122 12.212 211555 2010 20:1 50030 750240 75 040 I .095,050 76876 152,628 219. 348 141.388 244,388 10.5941 1307/U 144.184 47.158 47,251 47.151 4.45/Oil

Polo opal 190241 2210 2015 2ççN. 66,657 69,687 06,667 0 I•500IilI.I1o C o1137 2012 437,901 121.885 121,995 132.985 121.995 160,877 40,219 40,219 40.119 40.159 102491 7010 2011 13.666 6,933 5,833 103348 2010 ‘fl1 ,173 42,365 ‘1,340 0 B 100966 099 lucy 100694 2009 2211 129,153 2,713 41,733 41,773 103276 2111 2011 28,997 28,092 111735 2020 7011 114,4072 212,000 212,000 0 100696 2009 1011 113,942 93,772 59.773 0

- 100746 1009 2011 84,164 41,142 6,14 0 100635 2009 1021, 127,161 61,581 92,591 0

- 102261 2010 2011 19,440. 14,710 14.720 0 101455 2010 2011 45,330 22.669 21,692 0 101493 2010 2011 56,274 18.101 18.132 100907 2010 2011 74,018 24.013 0 1,898,286 263,718 311,567 934,137 I 92,852 3.579 130.31/sI 060,877 40,119 40.184 40,219 43.213 11.14188 08/16/2011

FCMP — E-l.l.14 U N I V E R S I T V of HOUSTON

RESEARCH SPACE ALLOCATION P1 SPACE ALLOCATION -551 SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BUILDING 2- SECOND FLOOR

JEFPf•_;Er, H:’ r1nHr1_LHLi fl zH: DzLZ1 • ! 4’ rim_;;1L—

i -< ar AR j ac 4 ‘IliJLri E’Tart I r L,LH Li 1 AS- H

SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 0ULDING 2 SCIENCE AND RESEARCH DIJILDING 2 SECOND FLOOR P1 SPACE ALLOCATION SECOND FLOOR Pt SPACE ALLOCATION

* hIkthrougii Evaiaadon March 18. 2011 CcMActiveProjecls - NSM - C3 01 - 2011 - Ver31l

Nsa o Deviatkn between CoiNs ePrejeos rd Wac1Irotgi

‘V 3136668 I 049577 0080360 -- -

• c - 2080735 0163320 .. 0193645

- 0089295 0111042 0151730 0009026 0172707 It 0195895 0090676 ccc

IDC % of Total Expenditures per SF

4.9% 19.3% 4.9%’

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR A PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR B PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR C SOLO CENTER HIGH YIELD

08/16/2011 15 FCMP — E-1.1.15 liD -0 -1 >Ln 0 F?, C 0o — n -o 0 0 z [1”P 0 m z CO 0 I 0 CO n -o CD x V -o C?, CD 0; C, 3 CD -0 nj I C’) On 0 n a H m 03 C 0 z 0M C) Cl)C,, I n n n -< -C C) CD -I -I I za -4 C 0 CD 0 C) -I0 0 UI z UI H Cl? •0? —-4 1-4 -< 00I-C,0’o’Nja — UI Do a — 0 00 DO DO -4 — Cl > 0 z C nio2-I. ci Go UIa ma0 13 nmm C) nU.m 03 C 0. —4 ;;mm m ‘-3 N 0 U, U. a C t.J,o In: — z C r5-°j-.-e 0 —-3 C) 0 00 CO 00 - 00 0 0 0 > I a0. cz 0 > ,.R 7; is’ O0 II

NI Do n Va an II L.a ‘-3 I 0 L.a ‘0 0-1 C, tflWW I; I3 94 0. N 0I too O0 0 CI -400 t° 0 0’C 0 DOC1 F--4—4w tb -2 N 0’O C a o 0 0 Ci’ 0 C -. I r’ 0• L— a ? i-., ‘-4 NL.a 0 0

C) U N I V E R S I T •1’ of HOUSTON

:: EXISTING CAPACITY AND IDC BENCHMARK

New university metrics of both total expenditures/sf and total IDC s/sf are important in supporting a sustainable research practice. The College of NSM will measure its success in part against the benchmark of $100 IDC/ sf of lab. As the college moves toward this institutional benchmark, funding more representative of Tier One research will support the maintenance and operations of the valuable research infrastructure. By increasing maintenance funding streams, better maintained research assets will support increased research activity and provide a model for sustaining appropriate standards for each building.

Although a comparison of three characteristic principal investigators demonstrates a range of current IDC yield from $445 to $11.24/sf, the aggregate across the College of NSM is $32 IDC/sf. Nonetheless, movement toward the benchmark of $100 [DC/sf and better utilization of space currently available and new space coming online means that there is significant capacity in the research space toward meeting the university goal of $200,000,000 in total expenditures.

DesignLAB is drafting a policy to establish the means by which to manage this research and achieve these goals while incorporating faculty committee recommendations as to how lab space should be allocated across NSM and within parallel centers of research.

I CU E -C C-) a)C

• improved utilization of existing research space • improved accounting current database charting system for space use of DC/SF distribution and distribution • refinement of governing policy for reseach space r

A A A 0 1- a) a) a c’J C çt) C

08/16/2011 17

FCMP - E-1.1.17