DOCSLIB.ORG

HUMOR and PSYCHOLOGY (Post-2006) Prepared in APA Style

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HUMOR and PSYCHOLOGY (Post-2006) Prepared in APA Style HUMOR AND PSYCHOLOGY (Post-2006) Prepared in APA Style by Martin Lampert (Department of Psychology, Holy Names University) for the International Society for Humor Studies Abrams, J. R., & Bippus, A. (2011). An intergroup investigation of disparaging humor. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 30(2), 193-201. doi:10.1177/0261927X10397162 Aillaud, M., & Piolat, A. (2012). Influence of gender on judgment of dark and nondark humor. Individual Differences Research, 10(4), 211-222. Anzieu-Premmereur, C. (2009). The development of a sense of humor in a young child during psychoanalysis. Journal Of Infant, Child & Adolescent Psychotherapy, 8(3-4), 137-144. doi:10.1080/15289160903417725 Apter, M. J., & Desselles, M. (2012). Disclosure humor and distortion humor: A reversal theory analysis. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 25(4), 417-435. doi:10.1515/humor-2012-0021 Augutis, M., & Anderson, C. (2012). Coping strategies recalled by young adults who sustained a spinal cord injury during adolescence. Spinal Cord, 50(3), 213-219. doi:10.1038/sc.2011.137 Barelds, D. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2010). Humor in intimate relationships: Ties among sense of humor, similarity in humor and relationship quality. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(4), 447-465. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2010.021 Bartolo, A., Benuzzi, F., Nocetti, L., Baraldi, P., & Nichelli, P. (2006). Humor comprehension and appreciation: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1789-1798. Baughman, H. M., Giammarco, E. A., Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Martin, N. G., Lynskey, M., & Vernon, P. A. (2012). A behavioral genetic study of humor styles in an Australian sample. Twin Research & Human Genetics, 15(5), 663-667. doi:10.1017/thg.2012.23 Bazzini, D. G., Stack, E. R., Martincin, P. D., & Davis, C. P. (2007). The effect of reminiscing about laughter on relationship satisfaction. Motivation & Emotion, 31(1), 25-34. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9045-6 Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009). How virtuous is humor? Evidence from everyday behavior. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(4), 395-417. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2009.023 Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009). How virtuous is humor? What we can learn from current instruments. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 528-539. doi:10.1080/17439760903262859 Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2011). Can people really “laugh at themselves?”—Experimental and correlational evidence. Emotion, 11(3), 492-501. doi:10.1037/a0023444 Beins, B. C., & O'Toole, S. M. (2010). Searching for the sense of humor: Stereotypes of ourselves and others. Europe's Journal of Psychology, , 267-287. Bell, D., & Malhi, G. S. (2009). Humour: crying out to be taken seriously?. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 21(1), 34- 35. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5215.2008.00354.x Bell, D., Coulston, C. M., & Malhi, G. S. (2010). Mentalizing, mental illness and mirth: Linking the psychology of theory of mind and humour in psychotic illness disorders. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 22(1), 35-37. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5215.2009.00441.x Bergen, D. (2007). Humor as a facilitator of social competence in early childhood. In O. N. Saracho, & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on socialization and social development in early childhood education (pp. 19-38). Charlotte, NC US: IAP Information Age Publishing. Bergen, D. (2009). Gifted children's humor preferences, sense of humor, and comprehension of riddles. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(4), 419-436. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2009.024 Berger, A. (2010). What’s So Funny About That?. Society, 47(1), 6-10. doi:10.1007/s12115-009-9281-y Berger, A. (2013). Why We Laugh and What Makes Us Laugh: The Enigma of Humor. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 210-213. doi:10.5964/ejop.v9i2.599 Berger, A. (2013). Why We Laugh and What Makes Us Laugh: The Enigma of Humor. Europe's Journal Of Psychology, 9(2), 210-213. doi:10.5964/ejop.v9i2.599 Humor and Psychology (Post-2006), Page 1 Berk, R. A., & Nanda, J. (2006). A randomized trial of humor effects on test anxiety and test performance. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19(4), 425-454. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2006.021 Bertini, M., Iani, L., De Santo, R. M., Scaramuzzi, C., Petramala, L., Cotesta, D., et al. (2010). Stress- moderating effects of positive emotions: Exposure to humorous movies during hemodialytic sessions decreases blood levels of stress hormones. Journal of Chinese Clinical Medicine, 5(2), 61-70. Besser, A., Luyten, P., & Mayes, L. C. (2012). Adult attachment and distress: The mediating role of humor styles. Individual Differences Research, 10(3), 153-164. Bing, J. (2007). Liberated jokes: Sexual humor in all-female groups. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20(4), 337-366. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2007.017 Bippus, A. M., Young., S. L., & Dunbar, N. E. (2011). Humor in conflict discussions: Comparing partners' perceptions. Humor: International Journal Of Humor Research, 24(3), 287-303. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2011.018 Birkelund, R., & Larsen, L. (2013). Patient-patient interaction - caring and sharing. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(3), 608-615. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01072.x Birkelund, R., & Larsen, L. S. (2013). Patient-patient interaction - caring and sharing. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(3), 608-615. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01072.x Bonaiuto, P. (2006). Art, science, and humor: The study of humorous experience at the intersection between psychology and the art world. Empirical Studies Of The Arts, 24(1), 3-41. doi:10.2190/47F3-NKJ0- ER8L-KKVH Booth-Butterfield, M., Booth-Butterfield, S., & Wanzer, M. (2007). Funny students cope better: Patterns of humor enactment and coping effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 55(3), 299-315. doi:10.1080/01463370701490232 Bosacki, S. L. (2013). A longitudinal study of children’s theory of mind, self-concept, and perceptions of humor in self and other. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(4), 663-673. doi:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.663 Brumbaugh, C., & Fraley, R. (2010). Adult attachment and dating strategies: How do insecure people attract mates?. Personal Relationships, 17(4), 599-614. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01304.x Butzer, B., & Kuiper, N. A. (2008). Humor use in romantic relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction and pleasant versus conflict situations. Journal of Psychology, 142(3), 245-260. Cain, C. L. (2012). Integrating dark humor and compassion: Identities and presentations of self in the front and back regions of hospice. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(6), 668-694. doi:10.1177/0891241612458122 Cameron, E. L., Fox, J. D., Anderson, M. S., & Cameron, C. A. (2010). Resilient youths use humor to enhance socioemotional functioning during a day in the life. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(5), 716-742. doi:10.1177/0743558410366595 Cameron, E., Fox, J. D., Anderson, M. S., & Cameron, C. (2010). Resilient Youths Use Humor to Enhance Socioemotional Functioning During a Day in the Life. Journal Of Adolescent Research, 25(5), 716-742. doi:10.1177/0743558410366595 Campbell, L., Martin, R. A., & Ward, J. R. (2008). An observational study of humor use while resolving conflict in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 41-55. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00183.x Canestrari, C., & Bianchi, I. (2012). Perception of Contrariety in Jokes. Discourse Processes, 49(7), 539-564. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.710524 Cann, A., & Etzel, K. C. (2008). Remembering and anticipating stressors: Positive personality mediates the relationship with sense of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 21(2), 157-178. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2008.008 Cann, A., Stilwell, K., & Taku, K. (2010). Humor styles, positive personality and health. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 213-235. Humor and Psychology (Post-2006), Page 2 Cann, A., Zapata, C. L., & Davis, H. B. (2009). Positive and negative styles of humor in communication: Evidence for the importance of considering both styles. Communication Quarterly, 57(4), 452-468. doi:10.1080/01463370903313398 Capps, D. (2006). The psychological benefits of humor. Pastoral Psychology, 54(5), 393-411. doi:10.1007/s11089-005-0007-9 Capps, D. (2008). Mother, melancholia, and dreams in erik H. Erikson’s insight and responsibility. Journal of Religion & Health, 47(1), 103-117. doi:10.1007/s10943-007-9122-5 Capps, D. (2012). Child's play: The creativity of older adults. Journal of Religion & Health, 51(3), 630-650. doi:10.1007/s10943-012-9625-6 Carlson, K. A. (2011). The impact of humor on memory: Is the humor effect about humor? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(1), 21-41. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2011.002 Carretero-Dios, H., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Rubio, V. J. (2010). The Spanish version of the GELOPH<15>: Properties of a questionnaire for the assessment of the fear of being laughed at. International Journal of Clinical Health & Psychology, 10(2), 345-357. Cater, J. K. (2012). Traumatic amputation: Psychosocial adjustment of six Army women to loss of one or more limbs. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 49(10), 1443-1455. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2011.12.0228 Chan, Y., Chou, T., Chen, H., & Liang, K. (2012). Segregating the comprehension and elaboration processing of verbal jokes: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 61(4), 899-906. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.052 Chen., G. H. & Yong, L. (2012). Gelotophobia and thinking styles in Sternberg’s theory. Psychological Reports, 110(1), 25-34. doi:10.2466/04.09.20.PR0.110.1.25-34 Cheung, C., & Xiao Dong, Y. (2013). Humor styles, optimism, and their relationships with distress among undergraduates in three Chinese cities. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26(2), 351- 370. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0015 Coetzee, O., & Cilliers, F. (2012). Humour as defence against the anxiety manifesting in diversity experiences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FINAL Program
    FINAL PROGRAM 29TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ANXIETY DISORDERS ASSOCIATION OF AMERIca ANXIETY DISORDERS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA HIGHLIGHTS: 2008 Everyone is concerned with numbers these days. Take a look at some of our highlights from last year: 126 MILLION Number of people reached through ADAA public relations efforts about anxiety disorders and their treatment 13 MILLION Listeners who heard how to treat OCD through ADAA radio public service announcements 5 MILLION Hits each month to the ADAA main website (www.adaa.org) 987,000 Dollars distributed to 152 recipients in ADAA’s Award Program since 1999 24,000 Number of Treat OCD Resource Kits distributed to primary care physicians 10,000 Number of Got Anxiety? brochures distributed to college campuses and through students for National Stress Øut Day in partnership with Active Minds 1,311 Number of ADAA professional members 2 ANXIETY DISORDERS ASSOCIATION OF AMERIca welCoMe Dear Colleagues, Welcome to New Mexico for the This Conference is for you—researchers and clini- 29th Annual Conference of the cians, established professionals and students, long- Anxiety Disorders Association of time attendees, and first-timers. I hope you will take America (ADAA). Whether this is advantage of the many opportunities throughout the your first ADAA Conference or Conference to meet new colleagues and learn more your 29th, we sincerely appreciate about the ADAA community. The evening activities— your participation and trust that S’mores Night on Friday and the Georgia O’Keeffe ADAA provides you an outstanding educational and Museum on Saturday—lend themselves to casual con- collegial experience. versations and to making the most of the extraordinary Many thanks to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychopathology-Madjirova.Pdf
    NADEJDA PETROVA MADJIROVA PSYCHOPATHOLOGY psychophysiological and clinical aspects PLOVDIV 2005 I devote this book to all my patients that shared with me their intimate problems. © Nadejda Petrova Madjirova, 2015 PSYCHOPATHOLOGY: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL ASPECTS Prof. Dr. Nadejda Petrova Madjirova, MD, PhD, DMSs Reviewer: Prof. Rumen Ivandv Stamatov, PhD, DPS Prof. Drozdstoj Stoyanov Stoyanov, PhD, MD Design: Nadejda P. Madjirova, MD, PhD, DMSc. Prepress: Galya Gerasimova Printed by ISBN I. COMMON ASPECTS IN PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY “A wise man ought to realize that health is his most valuable possession” Hippocrates C O N T E N T S I. Common aspects in psychophysiology. ..................................................1 1. Some aspects on brain structure. ....................................................5 2. Lateralisation of the brain hemispheres. ..........................................7 II. Experimental Psychology. ..................................................................... 11 1. Ivan Petrovich Pavlov. .................................................................... 11 2. John Watson’s experiments with little Albert. .................................15 III. Psychic spheres. ...................................................................................20 1. Perception – disturbances..............................................................21 2. Disturbances of Will .......................................................................40 3. Emotions ........................................................................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Fear of Being Laughed At: Components of Gelotophobia*
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Extreme fear of being laughed at: components of gelotophobia Platt, Tracey ; Ruch, Willibald ; Hofmann, Jennifer ; Proyer, Rene T Abstract: The present study investigated individuals with slight, marked and extreme fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia) (Ruch and Proyer 2008a). Altogether 640 individuals filled in the GELOPH<15> (Ruch and Proyer 2008b) online and 228 filled in a paper and pencil version. In both samples principal components analyses of the 15 items were computed for subgroups of individuals exceeding the cut-off point for slight gelotophobia (i.e., 2.5). All solutions between one and five factors were examined buta three-factor-solution seemed most preferable. These positively correlated components were interpreted as coping with derision (by control, withdrawal, internalizing), disproportionate negative responses to being laughed at, and paranoid sensitivity to anticipated ridicule. The latter two are seen specific to gelotophobia while the former might be shared with social anxiety in general. In the hierarchical factor analysis the more unspecific coping factor did split up further into three factors of control, withdrawal, and internalizing, while the two gelotophobia-specific factors stayed stable between the three- and five- factor solutions. These three factors yielded different correlational patterns. Coping with ridicule was higher among females and among the older while there were no differences for the other two factors. Furthermore, people reporting having been bullied were higher in defensive coping with ridicule and had stronger disproportionate negative responses to being laughed at than those who were not bullied.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Program 2 Schedule 4 Summer School and Pre-Congress Events 5 Congress Schedule 6
    program scientific XVI European Congress of 2–5 JULY 2019 MOSCOW, RUSSIA Psychology 2 Schedule 4 Summer school and pre-congress events 5 Congress schedule 6 Floor plan 8 Contents Thematic tracks overview 10 How to read the program 11 Sessions overview 12 Keynote and EFPA Award winner lectures and Presidential addresses 13 EFPA-events: invited symposia and panel discussions 16 Symposia by thematic tracks 20 Panel discussions 30 Satellite meetings & events 34 Scientific program by thematic tracks 36 Psychology + Sciences 37 Psychology + Digital Future 58 Psychology + Education 64 Psychology + Health 78 Psychology + Security 98 Psychology + Society 102 Program of poster presentations 120 ECP 2019 Exhibitors 180 3 4 congress schedule Sunday, June 30 ECP 2019 Summer School 09:00 – 18:00 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MSU 11 Mokhovaya street, building 9 schedule Special interest groups and task force meetings, round tables 10:00 – 18:00 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MSU 11 Mokhovaya street, building 9 Monday, July 1 ECP 2019 Summer School 09:00 – 18:00 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MSU 11 Mokhovaya street, building 9 Special interest groups and task force meetings, round tables 10:00 – 18:00 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MSU 11 Mokhovaya street, building 9 Registration and Opening ceremony tickets collection 10:00 – 20:00 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MSU 11 Mokhovaya street, building 9 summer school and pre-congress summer school and pre-congress Tuesday, July 2 Registration and Opening ceremony tickets collection 09:00 – 17:00 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, MSU 11 Mokhovaya street,
    [Show full text]
  • Dispositions Towards Ridicule and Being Laughed At: Current Research on Gelotophobia, Gelotophilia, and Katagelasticism
    Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, Volume 52, 2010 (1), 49-59 Editorial: Dispositions towards ridicule and being laughed at: Current research on gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism René T. Proyer1 & Willibald Ruch2 This special issue deals with basic questions but also applied aspects of different disposi- tions towards ridicule and being laughed at. Many people will have encountered situa- tions in which it was unclear to them whether people laugh with them or at them. There is a broad variety of reasons why people might get laughed at in their everyday life, starting from their physical appearance to their personality or their behavior and many more reasons. Of course, there is a good-natured variant of laughing at others or teasing others (e.g., playing harmless pranks among friends or sharing memories of situations in which something odd happened to one of the friends). This playful variant of laughing at is commonly enjoyed by people and elicits positive emotions among those who encoun- ter such situations. However, there is also a dark, mean-spirited side, such as ridicule, which may lead to malicious and harmful expressions of humor, which might even count as bullying. Given that this relates to many different domains within psychology (e.g., developmental psychology, health psychology, personality, psychological assessment, psychopathology etc.), it seems rather surprising that there is not much empirical re- search on how people deal with ridicule and being laughed at and that the knowledge about causes and consequences is still rather limited. The present issue of Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling presents current research on three central concepts in this field, namely, gelotophobia (i.e., the fear of being laughed at; from gelos = Greek for laughter), gelotophilia (i.e., the joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (i.e., the joy of laughing at others; from katagelao = Greek for ‘‘laughing at’’).
    [Show full text]
  • Stigmatisation in Patients with Non-Psychotic Mental Disorders and Brain Injuries
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2021.9.2.439 The European Journal of Humour Research 9 (2) 141–153 www.europeanjournalofhumour.org Gelotophobia, attitudes to illness and self- stigmatisation in patients with non-psychotic mental disorders and brain injuries Denis Shunenkov Federal Research and Clinical Centre of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Russia [email protected] Victoria Vorontsova Federal Research and Clinical Centre of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Russia [email protected] Alyona Ivanova Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russia Mental Health Research Centre, Russia [email protected] Abstract Gelotophobia, or the fear of being laughed at, has been described as an inability to enjoy humour and laughter in social interaction. A number of studies have shown its increased levels under various mental disorders. Gelotophobia in psychiatric patients may appear either as a primary syndrome, or as a secondary disorder connected to the patient’s reaction to their social position (self-stigmatisation). In turn, self-stigmatisation is closely related to the personality of the patient and, in particular, to their attitudes to illness. Since the fear of being laughed at has been studied within both the clinical concept and the continual model of individual differences, the question of differentiation between normal and pathological fear of being laughed at is topical, while borderline groups are of particular interest. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between gelotophobia, attitudes to illness, and self-stigmatisation in patients with minor, non-psychotic mental disorders, as well as those with brain injuries, who also had mild mental disorders, without having the status of psychiatric patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Bibliography
    1 INTERPERSONAL ACCEPTANCE-REJECTION BIBLIOGRAPHY Ronald P. Rohner 7/19/2021 A Note to Readers: Abstracts for most references between the 1930's through 1977 are published in: Rohner, R. P., & Nielson C. C. (1978). Parental acceptance and rejection: A review and annotated bibliography of research and theory (2 vols.) New Haven, CT: HRAFlex books, W6-006. A request for help from readers: If you find references pertinent to acceptance and rejection but missing from this bibliography, or if you find errors in this bibliography we would greatly appreciate knowing about them. You can let us know by postal mail, telephone, or e-mail at [email protected]. (To search by author's name or title, please use your computer's find command by pressing Control+F.) BIBLIOGRAPHY A'ande, W. A., & Akane, B. (2006). Child sexual abuse or rape allegations in post-Mandela Southern Africa: How to decide and handle them. Paper presented at the meeting of the First International Congress on Interpersonal Acceptance and Rejection, Istanbul, Turkey. A'ande, W. A., & Akane, B. (2006). Dimensions of fear of AIDS or HIV infection, health promotion perspective: Implication for interpersonal acceptance and rejection. Paper presented at the meeting of the First International Congress on Interpersonal Acceptance and Rejection, Istanbul, Turkey. Abbas, S. H. S. S. (2005). Children’s attitudes toward practices/styles of parental treatment and their relation to depression in a sample of Kuwaiti adolescents. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Psychology, College of Social Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait (in Arabic). Abbott, T. E. (1957). A study of observable mother-child relationships in stuttering and non-stuttering groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Fear of Being Laughed At: Components of Gelotophobia*
    Platt et al., “Extreme fear of being laughed at: Components of Gelotophobia” | 86 Extreme fear of being laughed at: Components of Gelotophobia* Tracey Platt, Willibald Ruch, Jennifer Hofmann, René T. Proyer** Abstract. The present study investigated individuals with slight, marked and extreme fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia) (Ruch and Proyer 2008a). Altogether 640 individuals filled in the GELOPH<15> (Ruch and Proyer 2008b) online and 228 filled in a paper and pencil version. In both samples principal components analyses of the 15 items were computed for subgroups of individuals exceeding the cut-off point for slight gelotophobia (i.e., 2.5). All solutions between one and five factors were examined but a three-factor-solution seemed most preferable. These positively correlated components were interpreted as coping with derision (by control, withdrawal, internalizing), disproportionate negative responses to being laughed at, and paranoid sensitivity to anticipated ridicule. The latter two are seen specific to gelotophobia while the former might be shared with social anxiety in general. In the hierarchical factor analysis the more unspecific coping factor did split up further into three factors of control, withdrawal, and internalizing, while the two gelotophobia-specific factors stayed stable between the three- and five-factor solutions. These three factors yielded different correlational patterns. Coping with ridicule was higher among females and among the older while there were no differences for the other two factors. Furthermore, people reporting having been bullied were higher in defensive coping with ridicule and had stronger disproportionate negative responses to being laughed at than those who were not bullied. Results are discussed within a framework for future studies of individuals with higher levels of this fear.
    [Show full text]