DOCSLIB.ORG

In Ancient Egyptian Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Role of the Lector (Xry-Hbt) in Ancient Egyptian Society A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Life Sciences 2013 Dr Roger Forshaw 2 “ … lector priest coming to this tomb of eternity to do his things … … lector priest doing the preparation according to … he will do everything useful, august … of invocation offerings lord of life upon both feet, as is done for a dignitary …” Tomb of Nyhetep-ptah at Giza (Tomb G 2430) (Badawy 1978: 17) 3 4 List of Contents Contents 5 List of Figures 11 List of Tables 24 List of Appendices 25 Abstract 27 Chronology 28 Abbreviations 29 The Author 30 Acknowledgements 33 Declaration 34 Copyright Statement 35 Chapter 1 Introduction, Literary Review & Methodology 37 1.1 Introduction 37 1.2 Literature Review 37 1.2.1 General 37 1.2.2 Magic 38 1.2.3 Priesthood 39 1.2.4 Funerary Ceremonies 43 1.2.5 Healing 45 1.2.6 Temple and Royal Ritual 46 1.2.7 Miscellaneous 47 1.3 Methodology 48 Chapter 2 Recognition, Origin & Hieroglyphic Representation 53 2.1 Recognition 53 2.1.1 Attire 53 2.1.2 Iconography and Gestures 55 2.1.3 hnw-gesture 57 2.1.4 Chief Lector 58 2.2 Origin and Evolution of the Role of the Lector 59 2.2.1 Early Evidence 59 2.2.2 Old Kingdom 61 2.2.3 Middle Kingdom 64 2.2.4 New Kingdom 65 2.2.5 Late Period 65 5 2.2.6 Ptolemaic Period 66 2.2.7 Evolution of the Title of ‘Chief Lector’ 66 2.2.8 Conclusion 68 2.3 Hieroglyphs 68 2.3.1 Greatest of Chief lectors 69 2.3.2 Senior/Elder Lector 69 2.3.3 Senior Lector of the Robing-Room 71 2.3.4 Lector of the Funerary Workshop 72 2.3.5 Lector of the Funerary Estate 72 2.3.6 Lector of his Father/Chief Lector of his Father 72 2.3.7 Lector of a King 73 2.3.8 Ordinary Lector 73 2.3.9 Lector of Amun 73 2.3.10 Lector who is in his Year 74 2.3.11 Lectors associated with Deities 74 2.3.12 Lectors associated with Temples 75 2.3.13 Lectors associated with Localities 76 2.3.14 Miscellaneous Lectors 77 Chapter 3 Magic and Performance 79 3.1 Magic 79 3.1.1 Definition 79 3.1.2 Heka 79 3.2 Word, ‘Spell’ 80 3.3 Performance 83 3.3.1 Introduction 83 3.3.2 Ritual Performances 85 3.3.3 Execration Rituals 86 3.3.3.1 Definition and History 86 3.3.3.2 Breaking the Red Pots 87 3.3.3.3 Purification Rites 91 3.3.3.4 Rites of Encircling 91 3.3.3.5 Rites of Protection 94 3.3.3.6 Miscellaneous Rites 95 3.3.4 Spitting, Licking and Swallowing 96 Chapter 4 Equipment of the Lector 99 4.1 Old Kingdom Inscriptional Evidence 99 4.2 The Burial Assemblage of Tomb No. 5 at the Ramesseum 106 6 4.2.1 Introduction 106 4.2.2 Objects 110 4.2.2.1 Apotropaic Animal Statuettes/Amulets 110 4.2.2.2 Apotropaic Wands 112 4.2.2.3 Wooden Figurine 115 4.2.2.4 Serpent Wand 117 4.2.2.5 Female Fertility Figurines 122 4.2.2.6 Ivory Dwarf 125 4.2.2.7 Model Food and Vessels 127 4.2.2.8 Ivory Clappers 129 4.2.2.9 Magical Rod or Wand 131 4.2.2.10 Beads 133 4.2.2.11 Ivory Djed Column 133 4.2.2.12 Burnisher 134 4.2.2.13 Seeds 136 4.2.3 Papyri 137 4.2.4 Comparable Burial Assemblages 139 4.2.5 Interpretation 141 Chapter 5 Remuneration 147 5.1 Introduction 147 5.2 Old Kingdom 147 5.3 Middle Kingdom 150 5.4 New Kingdom 152 5.5 Late and Ptolemaic Periods 152 5.6 Conclusion 154 Chapter 6 The Evidence 155 A Temple and Festival Ritual 157 A.1 Introduction 157 A.1.1 Ritual 157 A.1.2 Purification 157 A.2 Temple Ritual 163 A.2.1 Daily Temple Ritual 163 A.2.2 Other Temple Ceremonies 167 A.2.3 Lector in the Foundation of the Egyptian Temple 168 A.2.3.1 Stretching the Cord 168 A.2.3.2 Consecration of the Temple 170 A.2.4 House of Books 171 7 A.2.5 Sacred Drama 172 A.2.6 Summary and Conclusion of Temple Evidence 174 A.3 Festival Rituals 175 A.3.1 Introduction 175 A.3.2 Festival of Sokar 177 A.3.3 Opet Festival and Beautiful Feast of the Valley 184 A.3.3.1 Opet Festival 184 A.3.3.2 Beautiful Feast of the Valley 186 A.3.4 Summary and Conclusion of Festival Evidence 191 B Royal Involvement 193 B.1 Introduction 193 B.2 The Lector in the Royal Palace 193 B.3 The King and the Sons of the King acting as Lector 193 B.4 Role in establishing the Royal Titulary 194 B.5 The Sed -Festival 195 B.5.1 Introduction 195 B.5.2 Definition 195 B.5.3 History 196 B.5.4 Sources 196 B.5.4.1 Niuserre 197 B.5.4.2 Amenhotep III 200 B.5.4.3 Amenhotep IV 208 B.5.4.4 Osorkon II 211 B.5.4.3.1 Walls A and D 212 B.5.4.3.2 Walls B and C 215 B.5.4.3.3 Walls E and F 215 B.5.5 Summary of the Role of the Lector at the Hb-sd 219 B.5.5.1 Niuserre 219 B.5.5.2 Amenhotep III 219 B.5.5.3 Amenhotep IV 219 B.5.5.4 Osorkon II 219 B.5.6 Interpretation and Conclusion 220 The Sed-Festival Reliefs of Osorkon II 222 C Funerary Ritual and Provisioning the Dead 231 C.1 Introduction 231 C.2 Old Kingdom 231 C.2.1 Transition from Home to the River 232 C.2.2 Crossing the Water 235 8 C.2.3 Embalming Ritual 240 C.2.4 Night before the Funeral 242 C.2.5 Journey to the Tomb 243 C.2.6 Services at the Tomb 243 C.2.6.1 Arrival 243 C.2.6.2 Opening of the Mouth 244 C.2.6.3 Offering Ritual 245 C.2.7 Closure of the Tomb 253 C.3 Role of the Lector in Funerary Ritual in the Middle Kingdom 255 C.4 Role of the Lector in Funerary Ritual in the New Kingdom 259 C.4.1 Rekhmire 260 C.4.2 Amenemhat 262 C.4.3 Amarna Period 266 C.5 Post-New Kingdom 267 C.6 Transfiguration and the Nature of Texts used by the Lector 267 C.7 Interpretation and Conclusion 269 D The Opening of the Mouth Ceremony 273 D.1 Introduction 273 D.2 History and Development of the Ritual 274 D.3 New Kingdom Version of ‘Opening of the Mouth’ 275 D.4 Actors/Officiants 279 D.5 Ritual Implements 279 D.6 Choice of Scenes in Stelae and in Tomb Depictions 280 D.7 Case Study 280 D.7.1 Opening of the Mouth in the Tomb of Rekhmire 280 D.7.2 Analysis of the Rekhmire Scenes 286 D.8 Opening of the Mouth in other Tomb Scenes 288 D.9 Conclusion 290 E The Involvement of the Lector in Healing 291 E.1 Introduction 291 E.2 Medical Papyri 292 E.3 Temple Evidence 295 E.4 Documentary Evidence 304 E.5 Literary Evidence 308 E.6 Summary and Conclusion 309 F Presence of the Lector on Mining Expeditions 311 F.1 Introduction 311 F.2 Sinai 313 9 F.3 Hatnub 314 F.4 Wadi Hammamat 316 F.5 Wadi el-Hudi 317 F.6 Interpretation 318 G The Lector and the Law 323 G.1 Introduction to the Ancient Egyptian Legal System 323 G.2 The Role of the Lector on Temple Councils 325 G.3 As a Judge 328 G.4 The Harem Conspiracy 330 ` G.5 The Lector as a Witness 335 G.6 ‘Great Tomb-Robberies of the 20th Dynasty’ 336 G.7 Summary and Conclusion 337 H Literary Evidence 339 H.1 Introduction 339 H.2 Papyrus Westcar 339 H.3 Papyrus St. Petersburg (the prophecies of Neferty) 341 H.4 Papyrus Vandier (the tale of Meryre) 342 H.5 Papyri Cairo 30646 & BM 604 (Setna Khaemwase Cycle) 343 H.5.1 Written Spells and Magical Books 343 H.5.2 Recitation of Spells 344 H.5.3 Performance of Magic 344 H.5.4 ‘Consumption of Magic’ 344 H.6 Papyrus Chester Beatty 345 7 Summary and Conclusion 347 Appendices 351 Bibliography 367 Word Count 79,950 10 Figures 2.1 Wilkinson’s depiction of a procession of priests with the 54 lector or chief lector at the front depicted with two feathers on his head (Wilkinson 1878: II, fig. 436) 2.2 Scenes from the front of the coffin of Mutirdies 55 (Wieczorek & Rosendahl 2013: fig. 11b) 2.3 Representations of lectors 55 2.4 Scene from the Middle Kingdom tomb-chapel of Ukh-hotep 56 (son of Ukh-hotep and Heny-hery-ib, Tomb C, no. 1) depicting lectors and a chief lector before the tomb owner (Blackman & Apted 1953: pl.
Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Study of the Inner Coffin and Mummy Cover Of

    A Preliminary Study of the Inner Coffin and Mummy Cover Of

    A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE INNER COFFIN AND MUMMY COVER OF NESYTANEBETTAWY FROM BAB EL-GUSUS (A.9) IN THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, WASHINGTON, D.C. by Alec J. Noah A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Major: Art History The University of Memphis May 2013 Copyright © 2013 Alec Noah All rights reserved ii For my parents iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I must thank the National Museum of Natural History, particularly the assistant collection managers, David Hunt and David Rosenthal. I would also like to thank my advisor, Dr. Nigel Strudwick, for his guidance, suggestions, and willingness to help at every step of this project, and my thesis committee, Dr. Lorelei H. Corcoran and Dr. Patricia V. Podzorski, for their detailed comments which improved the final draft of this thesis. I would like to thank Grace Lahneman for introducing me to the coffin of Nesytanebettawy and for her support throughout this entire process. I am also grateful for the Lahneman family for graciously hosting me in Maryland on multiple occasions while I examined the coffin. Most importantly, I would like to thank my parents. Without their support, none of this would have been possible. iv ABSTRACT Noah, Alec. M.A. The University of Memphis. May 2013. A Preliminary Study of the Inner Coffin and Mummy Cover of Nesytanebettawy from Bab el-Gusus (A.9) in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Major Professor: Nigel Strudwick, Ph.D. The coffin of Nesytanebettawy (A.9) was retrieved from the second Deir el Bahari cache in the Bab el-Gusus tomb and was presented to the National Museum of Natural History in 1893.
  • Vol. 20 Num. 1 the FARMS Review

    Vol. 20 Num. 1 the FARMS Review

    Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 20 Number 1 Article 19 2008 Vol. 20 Num. 1 The FARMS Review FARMS Review Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Review, FARMS (2008) "Vol. 20 Num. 1 The FARMS Review," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 20 : No. 1 , Article 19. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol20/iss1/19 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The FARMS Review The FARMS Review Editor Daniel C. Peterson Associate Editors Louis C. Midgley George L. Mitton Production Editors Don L. Brugger Larry E. Morris Cover Design Andrew D. Livingston Layout Alison Coutts Jacob D. Rawlins The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Executive Director M. Gerald Bradford Director, FARMS Paul Y. Hoskisson Director, METI Daniel C. Peterson Director, CPART Kristian Heal Director, Publications Alison Coutts The FARMS Review Volume 20 • Number 1 • 2008 ! The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University © 2008 Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1550-3194 To Our Readers The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholar ship encour- ages and supports re search on the Book of Mormon, the Book of Abraham, the Bible, other ancient scripture, and related subjects.
  • The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, Erudite, Living Legend Lecturers

    The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, Erudite, Living Legend Lecturers

    “Pure intellectual stimulation that can be popped into Topic Subtopic the [audio or video player] anytime.” History Ancient History —Harvard Magazine The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, erudite, living legend lecturers. Academia’s best lecturers are being captured on tape.” —The Los Angeles Times The History “A serious force in American education.” —The Wall Street Journal of Ancient Egypt Course Guidebook Professor Bob Brier Long Island University Professor Bob Brier is an Egyptologist and Professor of Philosophy at the C. W. Post Campus of Long Island University. He is renowned for his insights into ancient Egypt. He hosts The Learning Channel’s popular Great Egyptians series, and his research was the subject of the National Geographic television special Mr. Mummy. A dynamic instructor, Professor Brier has received Long Island University’s David Newton Award for Teaching Excellence. THE GREAT COURSES® Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, VA 20151-2299 Guidebook USA Phone: 1-800-832-2412 www.thegreatcourses.com Cover Image: © Hemera/Thinkstock. Course No. 350 © 1999 The Teaching Company. PB350A PUBLISHED BY: THE GREAT COURSES Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfi elds Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, Virginia 20151-2299 Phone: 1-800-TEACH-12 Fax: 703-378-3819 www.thegreatcourses.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 1999 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of The Teaching Company.
  • The Ancient Use of Faïence in Paediatric Illness FORUM

    The Ancient Use of Faïence in Paediatric Illness FORUM

    FORUM HISTORY OF MEDICINE The ancient use of faïence in paediatric illness R J Bittle, C C Bittle We examine the treatment of urinary incontinence in Ancient Egypt with faïence in the light of current concerns regarding the treatment of dysfunctional elimination in children with milk of magnesia. The origins of medical science in Africa and their influence on Western medicine are attested to by surviving documents from the XVIII Dynasty of the New Kingdom period of Pharaonic Egypt. One such document is the Ebers Papyrus, an ancient medical treatise containing 108 columns of text, that represents the then current and ancient medical knowledge in Egypt from about 1536 BC, during the reign of Amenhotep I. Its translation1 provides insight into the art and science of the early practice of historical medicine – some of which still applies to modern medical practice. One ancient practice of interest to the modern practising physician can be found in Rubric #273 (Column 49, Line 21) of the Ebers Papyrus, that involves the treatment of bed-wetting or urinary incontinence in a child. ‘Do this for a child suffering from bed-wetting: Boil faïence beads until they form a pellet; if he be an older child, he should swallow it in a gulp, [but] if he be in swaddling clothes, one should rub [it] together for him in the milk, just as it flows forth from his nurse for four days.’2 Ancient Egyptian faïence (or tjehnet) was one of the first artificial substances created by man (Figs 1 and 2). Used mainly as jewellery, Fig.
  • An Investigation of the Pharmacological Applications Used for the Ancient Egyptian Systemic Model ' Ra-Ib ' Compared with Mo

    An Investigation of the Pharmacological Applications Used for the Ancient Egyptian Systemic Model ' Ra-Ib ' Compared with Mo

    Journal of Ethnopharmacology 265 (2021) 113115 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Ethnopharmacology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jethpharm An investigation of the pharmacological applications used for the Ancient Egyptian systemic model ‘ra-ib’ compared with modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Jonny Russell a,c,1, Mengmeng Sun b,h,1, Wen Liang d, Min He b,h, Yan Schro¨en e, Wenjun Zou f, Tanja Pommerening c,g,**, Mei Wang b,d,i,* a Leiden Institute for Area Studies, Leiden University, Matthias de Vrieshof 4, 2311 BZ, Leiden, the Netherlands b LU-European Center for Chinese Medicine and Natural Compounds, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 BE, Leiden, the Netherlands c Graduiertenkolleg 1876 ‘Frühe Konzepte von Mensch und Natur’, Johannes Gutenberg Universitat¨ Mainz, Hegelstraße 59, 55099, Mainz, Germany d SU BioMedicine, Post Bus 546, 2300 AM, Leiden, the Netherlands e Oxrider B.V, Diessenseweg 51, 5081 AE, Hilvarenbeek, the Netherlands f Chengdu University of TCM, No.1166, Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 610000, China g Institut für Altertumswissenschaften, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat¨ Mainz, Hegelstraße 59, 55122, Mainz, Germany h Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, No. 1035, Boshuo Rd, Jingyue Economic Development District, 130117, Changchun, China i Shenzhen HUAKAI TCM and Natural Medicine Research Center, NO. 2, Boya Building, Zone A, Dawang Cultural and Creative Industrial Park, Wutong Mountain, No. 197, Kengbei Village, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518114,
  • Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”

    Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”

    “Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
  • The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible Has Never Told

    The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible Has Never Told

    Ghana Journal of Linguistics 9.1: 72-96 (2020) ______________________________________________________________________________ http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v9i1.4 EDITORIAL BOOK CRITIQUE: THE ORIGIN OF THE WORD AMEN: ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE THE BIBLE HAS NEVER TOLD Ọbádélé Bakari Kambon Editor-in-Chief Abstract: The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told is a book that promises to pique the interest of any reader interested in classical Kmt ‘Black Nation/Land of the Blacks’, mdw nTr ‘Hieroglyphs,’ the Akan language, and historical-linguistic connections between the three. Specifically, the book promises to deliver information about how the word imn ‘Amen,’ as attested in classical Kmt ‘Black Nation/Land of the Blacks,’ persists in the contemporary Akan language. While under a steady hand this should be a simple enough thesis to substantiate, unfortunately, the authors’ obvious lack of grounding in historical linguistics, their lack of knowledge of mdw nTr ‘Hieroglyphs’ as well as their lack of understanding the morphology (word structure) of the Akan language all mar the analyses presented in the book. Keywords: Amen, Heru Narmer, historical linguistics, folk etymology Osei, O. K., Issa, J., & Faraji, S. (2020). The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told. Long Beach, CA: Amen-Ra Theological Seminary Press. 1. Introduction In The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told, what should be an open-and-shut case is saddled with a plethora of spurious look-alikes and folk etymologies prompted by attempts to analyze one language with another without actually having studying the language to be analyzed itself.
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology.Pdf

    Ancient Egyptian Chronology.Pdf

    Ancient Egyptian Chronology HANDBOOK OF ORIENTAL STUDIES SECTION ONE THE NEAR AND MIDDLE EAST Ancient Near East Editor-in-Chief W. H. van Soldt Editors G. Beckman • C. Leitz • B. A. Levine P. Michalowski • P. Miglus Middle East R. S. O’Fahey • C. H. M. Versteegh VOLUME EIGHTY-THREE Ancient Egyptian Chronology Edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2006 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ancient Egyptian chronology / edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton; with the assistance of Marianne Eaton-Krauss. p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental studies. Section 1, The Near and Middle East ; v. 83) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-90-04-11385-5 ISBN-10: 90-04-11385-1 1. Egypt—History—To 332 B.C.—Chronology. 2. Chronology, Egyptian. 3. Egypt—Antiquities. I. Hornung, Erik. II. Krauss, Rolf. III. Warburton, David. IV. Eaton-Krauss, Marianne. DT83.A6564 2006 932.002'02—dc22 2006049915 ISSN 0169-9423 ISBN-10 90 04 11385 1 ISBN-13 978 90 04 11385 5 © Copyright 2006 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
  • The Historicity of Papyrus Westcar*

    The Historicity of Papyrus Westcar*

    The Historicity of Papyrus Westcar Hays, H.M. Citation Hays, H. M. (2002). The Historicity of Papyrus Westcar. Zeitschrift Für Ägyptische Sprache Und Altertumskunde, 129, 20-30. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16163 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16163 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). 20 H. M. Hays: Historicity of p\X"e~tcar zAs 129 (2002) HAROLD M. HAYS The Historicity ofPapyrus Westcar* An approach first explicitly evident 1n treated as exhibiting an "historisch vollig richti­ Meyer's monumental 1909 Geschichte des Al­ gen Kern," as representing a 'Widerspiegelung tertums" Papyms Westcar has been persistently' der realen Vorgiinge"; from Dynasty 4 to 5. This has been done even in the face of the tale's fabulous elements - when these are mentioned, * A version ofthis article was presented on 28 April it is only in order to dismiss them from the 2000 at the University of California, Berkeley, at the equation· of a historical inquiry'. As this ap­ 51st Annual Meeting of the American Research Center proach endures~ despite protestations made in in Egypt. It has benefited from comments nude by John Brinkmann, Peter F. Donnan, Janet JOh0500, and passing by Goedicke recently in this journal", David O'Connor, though responsibility for the work there are grounds for a concentrated inquiry into remains mine. the text's worth as a historical trace. For my own 2 1 E. Merer, Geschichte
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis

    Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis

    Answers Research Journal 4 (2011):127–159. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v4/ancient-egyptian-chronology-genesis.pdf Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis Matt McClellan, [email protected] Abstract One of the most popular topics among young earth creationists and apologists is the relationship of the Bible with Ancient Egyptian chronology. Whether it concerns who the pharaoh of the Exodus was, the background of Joseph, or the identity of Shishak, many Christians (and non-Christians) have wondered how these two topics fit together. This paper deals with the question, “How does ancient Egyptian chronology correlate with the book of Genesis?” In answering this question it begins with an analysis of every Egyptian dynasty starting with the 12th Dynasty (this is where David Down places Moses) and goes back all the way to the so called “Dynasty 0.” After all the data is presented, this paper will look at the different possibilities that can be constructed concerning how long each of these dynasties lasted and how they relate to the biblical dates of the Great Flood, the Tower of Babel, and the Patriarchs. Keywords: Egypt, pharaoh, Patriarchs, chronology, Abraham, Joseph Introduction Kingdom) need to be revised. This is important During the past century some scholars have when considering the relationship between Egyptian proposed new ways of dating the events of ancient history and the Tower of Babel. The traditional dating history before c. 700 BC.1 In 1991 a book entitled of Ancient Egyptian chronology places its earliest Centuries of Darkness by Peter James and four of dynasties before the biblical dates of the Flood and his colleagues shook the very foundations of ancient confusion of the languages at Babel.
  • Ancient History

    Ancient History

    2002 HIGHER SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION Ancient History Total marks – 100 Section I Pages 2–5 Personalities in Their Times – 25 marks • Attempt ONE question from Questions 1–12 •Allow about 45 minutes for this section Section II Pages 9–22 Ancient Societies – 25 marks • Attempt ONE question from Questions 13–25 General Instructions •Allow about 45 minutes for this section • Reading time – 5 minutes Section III Pages 25–31 •Working time – 3 hours •Write using black or blue pen Historical Periods – 25 marks • Attempt ONE question from Questions 26–44 •Allow about 45 minutes for this section Section IV Pages 33–45 Additional Historical Period OR Additional Ancient Society – 25 marks • Attempt ONE question from Questions 45–63 OR ONE question from Question 64–76 • Choose a different Ancient Society from the one you chose in Section II, or a different Historical Period from the one you chose in Section III •Allow about 45 minutes for this section 104 Section I — Personalities in Their Times 25 marks Attempt ONE question from Questions 1–12 Allow about 45 minutes for this section Answer the question in a writing booklet. Extra writing booklets are available. Page Question 1 — Option A – Egypt: Hatshepsut ................................................................. 3 Question 2 — Option B – Egypt: Akhenaten .................................................................. 3 Question 3 — Option C – Egypt: Ramesses II ................................................................ 3 Question 4 — Option D – Near East: Sennacherib ..............................................................
  • Who Was Who at Amarna

    Who Was Who at Amarna

    1 Who was Who at Amarna Akhenaten’s predecessors Amenhotep III: Akhenaten’s father, who ruled for nearly 40 years during the peak of Egypt’s New Kingdom empire. One of ancient Egypt’s most prolific builders, he is also known for his interest in the solar cult and promotion of divine kingship. He was buried in WV22 at Thebes, his mummy later cached with other royal mummies in the Tomb of Amenhotep II (KV 35) in the Valley of the Kings. Tiye: Amenhotep III’s chief wife and the mother of Akhenaten. Her parents Yuya and Tjuyu were from the region of modern Akhmim in Egypt’s south. She may have lived out her later years at Akhetaten and died in the 14th year of Akhenaten’s reign. Funerary equipment found in the Amarna Royal Tomb suggests she was originally buried there, although her mummy was later moved to Luxor and is perhaps to be identified as the ‘elder lady’ from the KV35 cache. Akhenaten and his family Akhenaten: Son and successor of Amenhotep III, known for his belief in a single solar god, the Aten. He spent most of his reign at Akhetaten (modern Amarna), the sacred city he created for the Aten. Akhenaten died of causes now unknown in the 17th year of his reign and was buried in the Amarna Royal Tomb. His body was probably relocated to Thebes and may be the enigmatic mummy recovered in the early 20th century in tomb KV55 in the Valley of the Kings. Nefertiti: Akhenaten’s principal queen. Little is known of her background, although she may also have come from Akhmim.