Rdumijiet u L -
In ħawi ta’ Ta’ Ċenċ
Annex
Www www.natura2000malta.org.mt
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVE LOPMENT 4 A.1.1 Summary of Methodology 4 A.1.2 Data Collection 5 A.1.3 Formulation of Management Objectives 6 A.1.4 Formulation of Management Actions 6 A.1.5 Work Plan Structure and Reporting and Review Plan 7 ANNEX 2 RELEVANT PLANNING PO LICIES 8 A.2.1 Structure Plan and Local Plan Policies 8 ANNEX 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY OF CONSE RVATION STATUS 18 ANNEX 4 SPECIFICATIONS OF MA NAGEMENT ACTIONS 26 A.4.1 Guidelines for Standard Monitoring Plans for Annex I Habitats and Annex II Species of the Habitats Directive and Annex I Species of the Birds Directive 26 A.4.2 Guidelines for the Elaboration of National Species Action Plans 32 A.4.3 Guidelines for Habitat Restoration Actions 35 P7. Elaboration of a programme and its implementation for the scientific monitoring of the viability of the seed bank of the population of C. lanfrancoi 35 P17. Prepare an alien/invasive plant species control / eradication programme 36 A.4.4 Guidelines for the Signposting and Site promotion 39 A.4.5 Patrolling Schedule 44 ANNEX 5 COST RECOVERY MECHAN ISMS 57 A.5.1 Revenue Generating and Self -financing Opportunities 57 A.5.2 Funding Opportunities 59 ANNEX 6 MAPS 62 A.6.1 Boundary Map 63 A.6.2 Hydrology Map 64 A.6.3 Geology Map 65 A.6.4 Cultural Heritage Map 66 A.6.5 Land Use Map 67 A.6.6 Habitats Map 68 A.6.7 Signage Map 69 A.6.8 Species Map 70 A.6.9 Visitor Access Map 71 A.6.10 Actions Map 72 ANNEX BIBLIOGRAPHY 73
Tables Table A-1: Structure Plan policies; Rdumijet u L -Inħawi ta’ Ta’ Ċenċ ...... 9 Table A-2: Gozo and Comino Local Plan policies applicable to Rdumijiet u L-In ħawi ta’ Ta’ Ċenċ ...... 15 Table A-3: Evaluating the current condition of a habitat type ...... 19 Table A-4: Evaluating the current condition of a species ...... 22 Table A-5: Maltese Islands Annex I Habitats and Annex II Species to be monitored ...... 26 Table A-6: Maltese Islan ds Bird Species to be monitored ...... 28 Table A-7: FRVs to be established for the following habitats and species ...... 29
page A-2 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Table A-8: Parameters for determining Favourable Conservation Status according to Article 17 of the Habitats Directive ...... 30 Table A-9: Content explanation of Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure ...... 46 Table A-10: Content explanation of Table A-13: Activities per site ...... 46 Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure ...... 47 Table A-12: Half-year patrolling schedule ...... 51 Table A-13: Activities monitored through patrolling ...... 54
Figures Figure A-1: Map showing indicative location of sign posting 43
Epsilon-Adi page A-3
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
A standardised methodology has been developed for the development of all Natura 2000 Management Plans. The use of a standardised methodology allows for facilitated quality assurance and control. This chapter outlines the management planning methodology.
A.1.1 SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY
Step -1 Information acquisition, evaluation : One of the first tasks that w as undertaken was the identification of information requirements for the management planning process. Once this was done, the team acquired information available for the site from MEPA, literature, available reports, interviews, team experts and academia contacts. In addition to the above, a data gap analysis was carried out to determine what supplementary information was required to be gathered from the field / other sources ( Information and Gap Analysis ).
Step -2 Site/s visit & field work : The team conduc ted site visits as necessary to verify the information collected in Step-1 and collected additional information and data (Surveys and Data Gathering Exercise ) whilst concluding the gap analysis
Step -3 Database development and drafting of Chapter 2 : The team evaluated all information for consistency, quality and reliability, drafted Chapter 2 and stored information in an ArcGIS system. All baseline information was submitted to MEPA for their feedback. This information was thoroughly reviewed and revised as the Management Plan was drafted and was revisited each time new information was made available through additional site visits, stakeholder consultation and expert input ( Εvaluation of Data and Information Gathered ).
Step -4 Drafting of Chapter 3 : Based on the above, the team drafted Chapter 3 of the Management Plan. The 1 st draft was peer reviewed by the team and external consultants ( Evaluation of Data and Information Gathered , Setting Conservation Objectives ). This Chapter was circulated to MEPA for their feedback and revised following MEPA feedback.
Step -5 Drafting of Chapters 4 to 6, Draft -1: Based on the above , the team drafted Chapters 4, 5 and 6, by following the steps described below and produced a 1 st Draft of the Management Plan, including the Introductory Chapter 1 (Management Planning ). The draft was made available to MEPA for their comments and revised following MEPA feedback.
Step -6 Public consultation & stakeholders meetings : This is a horizontal action carried out concurrently with the above steps. The team organized public consultation meetings and public information days with stakeholders and the MEPA, presented the Natura 2000 programme for Malta, and acquired general and specific information for the sites. It also discussed the vision, management objectives, and actions for the site ( Stakeholder Involvement ).
Step -7 2nd site visit, verification, Draft -2; Consultation and Draft -3; Database update,
page A-4 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
maps, Live.Doc : The team conducted a 2 nd site visit to verify measures proposed in Draft-1 and produced a Draft-2 Management Plan. Draft-2 was peer reviewed by consultants and experts and the team used the feedback from these to produce Draft-3. Based on the above, the team updated the site database and GIS system and produced maps and other information ( Management Planning, update/contribution of/to the Surveys and Data Gathering Exercise and the Evaluation of Data and Information Gathered )
Step -8 Delivery of the Live.doc to the MEPA : The Live .doc was delivered for review to MEPA. Comments by MEPA were addressed as required.
Step -9 The final document is then produced : The live.doc has been circulated, comments have been incorporated and the Final Report has been produced which includes the Executive Summary.
A.1.2 DATA COLLECTION
Data has been collated for:
• Physical features • Management infrastructure • Relevant plans, policies and legislation • Ecology • Geology, Geomorphology, Hydrology, Climate • Cultural and heritage elements • Landscape features • Human uses within and around the site • Land Ownership • Tourism • Accessibility • Economic and social aspects including stakeholder consultation.
The data has been collated from various sources according to the procedures:
• A desk study was first carried out to gather all relevant data related to the site. • Typical information sources used are MEPA databases, maps and documents, information from the Lands Department, information from the Agriculture Department, information from the Malta Resources Authority. • Field surveys were carried out to support the desk study. • Surveys were carried out for land use and habitat mapping, in particular to confirm or update the habitats maps available at MEPA. • Meetings were held with relevant stakeholders during which the site was discussed and information as well as feedback was obtained. • Survey methodologies and details of the consultation carried out are described in detail in Chapter 2.
Epsilon-Adi page A-5
Natura 2000 Management Plan
A.1.3 FORMULATION OF MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES
Compiled data is evaluated in Chapter 3, leading to the vision of the site with the help of a SWOT analysis as described in the equivalent sections.
The essence of conservation management is the ability to improve the weak features (weaknesses) and to control the negative factors (threats) impacting a particular feature or group of features, while enhancing the strengths and increasing the probability of the opportunities identified.
To aid the process a Prospects Matrix is employed. Principal features targeted for conservation are plotted against the ecological, social and institutional prospects that can be contemplated for them and for the site as a whole.
In Natura 2000 sites the ecological prospects are well defined and refer to:
• The natural habitat types listed in Annex I of the Habitats Directive • The species listed in Annex II of the Habitats Directive • The species listed in Annex I of the Birds Directive and migratory birds as per Article 4 of the Birds Directive • Other important species defined for the site.
Institutional and social prospects, such as archaeological elements, cultural elements and landscape value, are site specific and derived from the evaluation of the features (other than habitats and species) and the factors influencing the site. Ideally every issue identified in the SWOT analysis should appropriately fit in a cell of the Prospect Matrix so that a formula for addressing weaknesses and threats and building on strengths and opportunities can be later constructed.
A vision for the site is then created to summarise the ideal situation after a period of management of the protected area. The vision is based on the evaluation of the prospects that can be contemplated for each of the features and the factors identified for the site.
The vision is composed of discrete vision statements. Each vision statement corresponds to a line in the Prospect Matrix.
The above led to the formulation of the Management Objectives and, subsequently, Operational Objectives. The Management Objectives define the policies through which the vision will be achieved and are long-term objectives to be attained over a long period of time. For every Management Objective defined, a number of Operational Objectives are assigned.
The Operational Objectives are basically the objectives to which all the management work is directly related and are to be attainted during the 5-year period of the plan. The Operational Objectives also lay the groundwork for the Management Actions.
A.1.4 FORMULATION OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
Operational Objectives are given a priority rating, based on urgency for addressing certain conservation problems (as they have been identified during the evaluation process) and
page A-6 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
subsequently lead to the formulation of Management Actions as described in Chapter 4. In most cases certain actions can be grouped together so that a more comprehensive final list of Management Actions is produced.
For each action a brief description is given together with expected results, priority ratings and foreseen constraints. For a number of Management Actions, some of which would be best implemented horizontally across sites, the aforementioned brief description is supplemented by specifications which are included in Annex 4. The specifications elaborate further on the needs of the implementation to facilitate future work.
A.1.5 WORK PLAN STRUCTURE AND REPORTING AND REVIEW PLAN
Prior to the Management Plan implementation a detailed Work Plan must be prepared by the relevant entity and site manager, on annual basis and reviewed at the end of each year, which makes clear what is expected to be achieved over specific periods of the plan and how much it will cost, as is indicated in Chapter 5.
To facilitate the elaboration of the Work Plan the following are provided:
• An indication of the financial resources needed annually for the implementation of each action. • The annual time schedule for the implementation of each action, checklist of the expected deliverables and year of delivery of each action and the entity proposed as responsible to deliver the actions.
In addition, cost recovery mechanisms are identified, both per site and horizontally, to facilitate securing resources for the subsequent implementation of the actions suggested within the Management Plan. These are included in Annex 5.
The management plan should be reviewed on an annual basis and given an in-depth review immediately after its five year period of validity, as indicated in Chapter 6. It is important to review the management plan on a regular basis since this:
• Makes clear whether or not all the objectives and targets are being achieved efficiently and effectively • Allows resource shifting and re-prioritisation if necessary • Assists forward planning for the following year or period, so that uncompleted projects can be added in and tasks re-timed in the light of experience.
To facilitate the five year revision plan and specifically to assist the evaluation of the effectiveness of the actions in achieving the objectives, a list of initial performance indicators is also provided.
Epsilon-Adi page A-7
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 2 RELEVANT PLANNING POLICIES
A.2.1 STRUCTURE PLAN AND LOCAL PLAN POLICIES
page A-8 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Table A-1: Structure Plan policies; Rdumijet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’ Ċenċ Relevance to management Policy Description plan process SET 11 No form of urban development will be permitted outside existing and committed built-up areas, and primary Planning application development areas as designated in the Structure Plan evenwhere roads and public utilities are available. Permitted PA/05277/96 was submitted for forms of non urban development outside such areas are restricted to the categories referred to in Paragraph 7.6 the development of the area into Malta's first 'Heritage park' and 'Multi-ownership tourist hotel development'. SET 12 Notwithstanding the policy against any form of urbanisation outside areas designated for urban uses in the Structure An Environmental Impact Plan, the Planning Authority will consider applications for permission to develop which ostensibly infringe Policy SET Statement process was 11. In any such casethe onus will be on the applicant to present evidence as to why the policy should be infringed, commenced with relation to giving reasons why from a planning point of view such proposed use cannot be located in areas designated for planning application development. The Planning Authority will additionally require the applicant to submit at his own expense a full PA/05277/96. Environmental Impact Assessment of a form and content satisfactory to the Authority. This policy is not a means of evading policy SET 11 or any other policy. An Environmental Impact Assessment which adequately demonstrates acceptable impacts will not be a reason for the granting of a development permit if the proposed use can be located in an area intended for its development under the Structure Plan or any subsequent approved Planning Authority document. BEN 5 Applications for development permits outside urban areas will be judged against the policies and design guidelines Planning application of the Local Plans for Rural Conservation Areas, and in the interim period, to Structure Plan policies and the PA/05277/96 was submitted for guidelines contained in the Explanatory Memorandum. the development of the area into Malta's first 'Heritage park' and 'Multi-ownership tourist hotel development'. AHF 4 Soil conservation and soil saving measures will continue to be mandatory on all occasions. Soil replenishment Conserving soil is important for measures will be adopted where there are suitable opportunities. safeguarding of the existing landforms. AHF 8 Further measures will be developed to promote the reinstatement and maintenance of random rubble walls Part of the management plan throughout the countryside with priority given to walls alongside rural roads, and for the removal of visual area includes abandoned intrusions. agricultural land. TOU 10 The area of Ta' Ċenċ, Gozo, from east of the Mġarr ix-Xini inlet to the village of Sannat, will be further studied as a The management plan will take potential demonstration project of high quality for both: note of this policy. 1. Malta's first national park, (World Conservation Union definition) covering the majority of the area 2. Malta's first multi ownership tourism hotel development, in the vicinity of the existing Ta' Ċenċ hotel. The national
Epsilon-Adi page A-9
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Relevance to management Policy Description plan process park will have a nature emphasis, including both the protection and enhancement of the natural environment and other heritage items, particularly archaeological remains; a limited amount of careful restocking with species of flora and fauna indigenous to the Maltese Islands; a visitor centre and interpretive facilities. The term `multi ownership tourism hotel' is described in Section 19. A major feature of both the hotel and the national park is that they will have professional management acting on behalf of all owners, and which at Ta' Ċenċ will be a single management company responsible for both the park and the hotel. Further studies of this potential will require a particularly thorough assessment of on and off site impacts, including traffic, utility services, recreation, labour requirements, skills provision, materials supplies, as well as impacts on the natural and cultural heritage, and measures by which adverse impacts will be overcome. The height of buildings will be restricted to one and two storeys with the exception of traditional taller features such as stone built windmills, lookout towers, domes, and spires. The blending of the hotel into the landscape, and the use of the best traditional features which are characteristic of Gozo, are of particular importance. TOU 11 Government will seek the co-operation of relevant public and private sector agencies to ensure that the Islands' The management plan area many heritage items are made more accessible and interesting to tourists. Heritage trails will be identified in Local includes numerous heritage Plans. monuments and sites. TOU 12 A Subject Plan will be prepared for golf courses. The plan will be based on considerations of the demand for and Planning application benefits of golf courses, and on the competing uses for limited land resources in Malta. Any golf course PA/05277/96 included the should be located where: development of a golf course in 1. It can be accommodated without adverse environmental impact or loss of good quality agricultural land the management plan area. 2. Associated development can be satisfactorily accommodated, preferably as part of an adjacent built-up area 3. Suitable vehicle access exists or can be provided potentially suitable locations are those where positive environmental benefits can be achieved by utilising derelict land or other land requiring major environmental improvements. Any development permit application shall require an Environmental Impact Assessment ina form and content suitable to the Planning Authority. TOU 14 The Planning Authority will prepare a Subject Plan aimed at reconciling the conflicting interests of recreational Diving is practised in il-Kantra in diving, other underwater activities, and marine ecological conservation. the management plan area and Mġarr ix-Xini which is found immediately outside the Natura 2000 site. TOU 15 The Planning Authority in co-operation with the Secretariat for the Environment and other relevant bodies will The management plan will take define a comprehensive policy for the coastal zone. This policy should aim at enabling Government to: note of this policy. 1. Assess the different components of the coastal zone considered as a unique ecosystem 2. Identify permissible uses, development criteria, and standards
page A-10 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Relevance to management Policy Description plan process 3. Promote and enforce policies 4. Include the coastal zone as an area requiring mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment procedures RCO 1 Rural Conservation Areas are designated as illustrated in the Key Diagram. Within such areas the following sub areas The site is an Area of Ecological will be designated, using World Conservation Union definitions and criteria where relevant: Importance and a Site of 1. Areas of Agricultural Value: areas comprised of high grade agricultural land including irrigated and partially Scientific Importance ( Table 1 ) irrigated land 2. Areas of Ecological Importance: relatively large areas designated to protect typical and rare habitats 3. Sites of Scientific Importance: sites containing individual species, groups of species, and geological features 4. Areas of Archaeological Importance: concentrations of valuable archaeological sites 5. Sites of Archaeological Importance: individual and/or isolated archaeological sites 6. National Parks: relatively large areas of national significance not materially altered by human use, with managed visitor access and amenities 7. Areas of High Landscape Value RCO 2 Within Rural Conservation Areas and in accordance with Policy SET 11 no form of urban development will be The management plan will take allowed. However, in accordance with Policy BEN 5, applications for permission to develop structures or facilities note of this policy. essential to agricultural, ecological, or scenic interests will be favourably considered as long as the proposed development does not infringe the principles set out in Policy RCO 4 as subsequently detailed in the relevant Local Plan (Policy RCO 3). See also Policies RCO 7 and 8. With regard to existing buildings and other structures in Rural Conservation Areas, and other rural areas, the overall aim is to improve the rural environment. To this end the rehabilitation and suitable change of use of some buildings will be permitted, in conjunction with the removal of other buildings and structures which adversely affect the rural environment. RCO 4 The Planning Authority will not permit the development of any structure or activity which in the view of the The management plan will take Authority would adversely affect scenic value because it would: note of this policy. 1. Break a presently undisturbed skyline 2. Visually dominate or disrupt its surroundings because of its mass or location 3. Obstruct a pleasant and particularly a panoramic view 4. Adversely affect any element of the visual composition - for example, cause the destruction or deterioration oftraditional random stone walls 5. Adversely affect existing trees or shrubs 6. Introduce alien forms, materials, textures, or colours RCO 10 In identifying and designating Areas of Ecological Importance in Local Plans, one or more of the following habitat `The management plan area types must be present: includes garrigue areas and 1. Permanent springs watercourses.
Epsilon-Adi page A-11
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Relevance to management Policy Description plan process 2. Saline marshlands 3. Sand dunes 4. Forest remnants 5. Semi natural woodland 6. Natural freshwater pools and transitional coastal wetlands 7. Deep natural caves 8. Coastal cliffs 9. Representative examples of typical Maltese habitats such as garigue, maquis, valley sides, watercourses, and gently sloping rocky coasts. RCO 11 In identifying and designating Sites of Scientific Importance in Local Plans, one or more of the following features The management plan area is must be present: important for its ornithological 1. The only known locality in the Maltese Islands where certain endemic and/or non endemic species are found and ecological characteristics. 2. A locality where certain endemic and/or non endemic species with a restricted distribution in the Maltese Islands occur (`restricted distribution' is taken to mean occurrence in five localities or less) 3. The type locality of an endemic species 4. An important bird nesting site or of some other major ornithological interest 5. A locality of special palaeontological interest 6. A lithostratigraphical type section 7. A locality of particular geomorphological interest 8. Some other specific feature of scientific importance not listed above RCO 12 In Local Plans, the Planning Authority will give protection ratings to Areas of Ecological Importance and Sites of The management plan area Scientific Importance as follows: contains levels 1, 2 and 3 1. LEVEL 1 zones will include important habitat types present only in small areas and/or sites with unique species or protection statuses ( features 2. LEVEL 2 zones will include important habitat types present in relatively large areas and/or sites with rare species or features 3. LEVEL 3 zones will include areas where control is necessary to preserve habitats/species/features in adjacent sites 4. LEVEL 4 zones will include habitats and/or features of general interest RCO 14 The Planning Authority will promote the designation and development of National Parks which will be protected and The management plan will take managed areas to which the public has access and where reception and interpretation facilities will be provided. note of this policy. These will include areas at Ta' Ċenċ in Gozo (Policy TOU 10), and the Qawra/Dwejra area in Gozo (Policies RCO 35 to 38). All national parks and protected areas in general will be established, maintained, and managed in accordance with the internationally accepted World Conservation Union guidelines and terminology.
page A-12 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Relevance to management Policy Description plan process RCO 25 Positive action will be taken to promote the repair of breached retaining walls on valley sides in order to prevent The area includes Wied Sabbar further soil erosion. valley. RCO 26 The removal of the vegetation cover from abandoned fields and derelict land without good reason will not be This will be kept into permitted. consideration during management planning process as relevant. RCO 28 Valleys will continue to be protected as important water catchment areas. This will be kept into consideration during management planning process as relevant. RCO 29 No new physical development will normally be allowed on the sides of valleys and especially on valley watercourses This will be kept into except for constructions aimed at preventing soil erosion and the conservation and management of water resources. consideration during Also: management planning process 1. Existing dams across valleys to conserve water resources will be repaired in preference to the construction of new as relevant. dams. Dams will be built of durable materials and will be regularly maintained 2. The Planning Authority will have regard to the possible detrimental effect of dredging works in valleys, and will seek to minimise the impact of such works, particularly by leaving the valley banks intact and by promoting selective dredging 3. The Planning Authority will take positive action, in collaboration with the appropriate Government agencies, in order to prevent the dumping of domestic waste, building rubble, and other refuse into valleys 4. The Planning Authority will take positive action to safeguard valleys for walking, cycling, and horseriding through the prohibition of vehicles, other than for agriculture and maintenance, and the establishment of car parks at valley edges. RCO 41 The establishment of Field Centres by recognised educational institutions will be encouraged, and of interpretive This will be kept into Visitor Centres associated with Conservation Areas, providing that these are established in harmony with other consideration during policies and regulations. management planning process as relevant. CZM 3 Public access around the coastline immediately adjacent to the sea or at the top of cliffs (including in bays, harbours, This will be kept into and creeks) will be secured. This will include taking shorelands into public ownership, Government acquisition of consideration during illegal developments and encroachments, and suitable construction works. In the few cases where this is not management planning process practical (for example where security considerations are paramount), nearby detours will be established. All the as relevant. coastline will be brought into public ownership within a specified period.
Epsilon-Adi page A-13
Natura 2000 Management Plan
page A-14 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Table A-2: Gozo and Comino Local Plan policies applicable to Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’ Ċenċ Relevance to the management Policy Description plan process GZ- MEPA will encouragethe preparation of parking management schemes to upgrade and regularize car parking at Mġarr ix-Xini bay is found TRAN-10 the following sensitive areas, situated by the coast: immediately outside the a) Qawra (Dwejra Bay and Inland Sea) management plan area. b) Xwieni Bay (il-Bajja Tax-Xwejni) c) Ramla Bay d) San Blas Bay e) Daħlet Qorrot f) Ħondoq ir-Rummien g) Mġarr ix Xini. These schemes should include measures to stop the encroachment of parking along the coast, strictly define where parking is permitted, and introduce landscaping to screen parking areas. The amount of parking provided should take account of the environmental capacity of the site and the standard of the approach road. The schemes should balance the requirement for parking against the need to safeguard and improve the environment of these sensitive areas. Access to legitimate boathouses and slipways also needs to be considered. The areas where such interventions may be considered are indicated on MAPS 14.2-E to 14.15-E (where applicable). Depending on the extent of the proposal, the nature of the intervention and the sensitivity of the effected area, an environmental planning statement may be required. GZ-RECR- Proposals to encourage informal rural recreation will be given favourable consideration provided that the This will be kept into 1 following consideration during conditions are observed: management planning process a) physical intervention shall be limited to the re-instatement of pre-existing rural features and upgrading of as relevant. existing countryside lanes to facilitate walking for pedestrians; b) proposals to encourage pedestrian and vehicular segregation along existing carriageways will be favourably considered provided that vehicular circulation, safety and environmental considerations are all taken into account; c) proposals to introduce new access for vehicular traffic shall not be considered; the creation of new routes (pedestrian or otherwise) on garrigue, through boulder screes or other environmental sensitive areas shall be prohibited; d) where existing routes pass through ecologically important sites that would be negatively affected by trampling, such as sand dunes and marshlands, their continued use shall be subject to the findings of a detailed ecological impact assessment. If the findings of the assessment indicate that continued use of the route will cause damage to the ecological areas, the route will be closed down and nearby detours considered within the light of the
Epsilon-Adi page A-15
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Relevance to the management Policy Description plan process ecological impact assessment; e) additional soft landscaping of an informal nature will be favourably considered. All planting shall conform to the criteria of the Guidance on Planting. A number of sites which qualify for specific types of informal rural recreation are indicated in the relevant area policies. GZ-RECR- Proposals for upgrading walkways indicated on MAP 10.3.3 will be favourably considered by MEPA provided that This will be kept into 3 all the following criteria are observed: consideration during a) the proposal shall include one or more whole circular routes wherever possible; management planning process b) a management programme that clearly indicates responsibilities and accountabilities, phasing of projects, as relevant. implementation and maintenance programmes, will be prepared and submitted together with the planning application; and c) proposals for the creation of new pedestrian routes (i.e. excluding vehicular access) other than those indicated on MAP 10.3.3will need to be strongly justified. The creation of new pedestrian routes on garrigue or boulder screes shall be prohibited. GZ-RLCN- The valleys indicated on MAP 13.2shall be designated to qualify in terms of Structure Plan Policy RCO 29. The Wied Sabbar is a Category A 2 valleys are designated according to two broad categories. CATEGORY A VALLEYS: Category A Valleys shall be fully Valley. subject to the provisions of Structure Plan policy RCO 29. CATEGORY B VALLEYS: Category B Valleys shall also be generally subject to the provisions of RCO 29 but some flexibility in terms of road upgrading, services upgrading, wind-pumps, small stores (subject to policy GZ-AGRI-3), reservoirs and other limited facilities which are deemed necessary for the continuation of traditional agricultural practices, may be considered. In all such cases, special consideration shall be given to mitigation measures so that the intervention blends well in the rural landscape. The strong presumption against the construction of new structures (including greenhouses) shall be also applicable to Category B valleys. GZ-RLCN- Except for areas specifically earmarked in this plan, there shall be a general presumption against any form of This will be kept into 3 development (including reclamation for cultivation purposes) on garrigue in Gozo or Comino (as shown in MAP consideration during 13.3). management planning process as relevant. GZ- The coastal area delineated in MAP 13.6 shall be designated to safeguard Public Coastal Access in terms of This will be kept into COAS-1 Structure Plan policy CZM 3. The public shall have a right to free and unhindered access to these areas. This right consideration during shall not however be interpreted as a right to the provision of facilities to improve access. A Coastal Viewshed management planning process Protection Zone is also being indicated on MAP 13.6.Unless otherwise specified in this policy document, as relevant. development in these areas shall be restricted to the maintenance of existing traditional coastal features with no
page A-16 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Relevance to the management Policy Description plan process lateral increase in built footprint or vertical increase in height of the built structures. The relevant coastal areas may also be safeguarded for their ecological, natural heritage or landscape importance as indicated through policy GZ-RLCN-1. GZ- The areas shown in MAP 13.8 shall be designated as Dark Sky Heritage Areas. Where relevant, reflective signs shall This will be kept into DARK-1 be employed to guide driving at night, whilst the installation of lighting which is not related to aerial or maritime consideration during navigation, shall be strongly discouraged. management planning process as relevant. GZ-Snat- The area known as Ta’ Ċenċ and indicated on MAP 14.11-E shall be developed according to the provisions of This will be kept into 2 Structure Plan Policy TOU 10. In determining applications for planning permission, MEPA shall have regard to the consideration during following points: management planning process a) safeguard the wealth of archaeological, ecological and scenic heritage found at the top of the plateau from built as relevant. development, trampling and tipping; b) restrict the tourism related development on the eastern flank of the promontory; c) encourage the upgrading of the existing facilities near the hotel provided that development of tourism related orother facilities are maintained at a minimum distance of 50m from the coastal cliffs and sufficiently away from the northern escarpment; d) safeguard the area indicated on MAP 13.6 for free and unhindered coastal access; e) protect a pedestrian path shown on MAP 14.11-Erunning parallel to the northern carriageway route which links the hotel to the Villa Area for free and unhindered public access; f) ensure that the overall height of the development does not increase in the area closest to the northern escarpment or the coastal cliffs; g) restrict development within 50m of the inland most tier of the coastal cliffs anywhere along their length; and h) prohibit developments and/or activities that may negatively affect the colonies of breeding seabirds in the cliffs below Ta’ Ċenċ. This includes both land-based and sea-based activities.
Epsilon-Adi page A-17
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY OF CONSERVATION STATUS
The assessment of Conservation Status of habitats and species was done in accordance with methodology provided by the Competent Authority, the Malta Environment and Planning Authority (MEPA).
Table A-3 illustrates each of the parameters that were evaluated individually and were then used to establish the overall Conservation Status for each habitat type at each Natura 2000 site. The table presents the evaluation matrix for this assessment. The evaluated parameters are Area, Structure and Function (including typical species) and Future Prospects (in terms of area covered, structure and function). Typical species were identified with reference to Article 17 reporting sheets for the Maltese Islands and the European Commission’s Interpretation Manual of European Habitats Eur 27 (2007). Habitat evaluation was based on surveys carried out between 2012 and 2013, during which all Natura 2000 sites were visited; desk-top research and expert judgement were also used. The level of confidence in the habitats assessment is generally considered to be moderate.
Table A-4 presents the methodology for evaluation of parameters relevant in the assessment of species; the parameters are Range, Size of Population, Habitat for the Species, and Future Prospects (including range, population, its sustainability and habitat availability). Although during the habitat surveys Annex II species were actively noted, no specific species surveys were carried out. Instead, particularly for Annex II fauna, existing data and expert judgement provided the basis for the evaluation. In many cases, however, insufficient data was available that did not allow for a robust evaluation. In such cases, the Conservation Status was defined as Indeterminate. Due to the lack of data, most Annex II species evaluations were carried out with a low to moderate (in the case of some plants) level of confidence.
Table A-4 was also used to evaluate the conservation status of Annex I birds, breeding birds and migratory birds listed in the Birds Directive. The evaluations carried out on Annex I breeding seabirds were carried out with a high level of confidence given the fact that they were based on trend data for the most part spanning over approximately 25 years (data provided by John J Borg). Evaluations of other birds were carried out with a moderate level of confidence.
It is noted that the evaluation of all Annex I habitats and Annex II species was carried out at site level. Despite this, however, where necessary, the evaluation identifies scenarios where nation-wide data is required in order to obtain a more robust understanding at site level e.g. in the case of bats. Also, even though assessment was carried out at site level, expert judgement and associated desk-top and field surveys included an element of comparison to examples of each habitat-type at various sites. It should also be noted that Favourable Reference Values (FRVs), against which certain parameters used to evaluate habitats and species should be assessed, have not yet been assigned in the Maltese Islands. To reiterate, therefore, all evaluations have been undertaken in the absence of FRVs, and based largely on expert judgement.
page A-18 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Table A-3: Evaluating the current condition of a habitat type Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current Condition Criterion
Favourable Unfavourable – Inadequate Unfavourable – Bad (green / A) (amber / B) (red / C)
Area The area occupied by the habitat type. The area of the habitat is Any other condition other than The area has significantly Evaluation of area includes consideration stable in the long-term or A or C. deteriorated in coverage or of: increasing (based on current decreasing or may decrease due area, previous records or This category could be: to significant pressures and • current area evidence on site or, in the threats. • previous distribution, if available, which case of increasing area, the • B1 if the condition of the may indicate changes or stability in the presence of factors area is inadequate but This category could be: area and any correlation with factors contributing to the increase) improving • evidence on site that the area has • B2 if the condition of the • C1 if the condition of the area changed or is stable or is occupying its area is inadequate and stable is bad but improving full potential • B3 if the condition of the • C2 if the condition of the area • presence of factors which may be area is inadequate and is bad and stable influencing the current area at present deteriorating* • C3 if the condition of the area (e.g. encroaching agricultural land, is bad and deteriorating* competing habitat) (This evaluation is based on current area, previous records (This evaluation is based on or evidence on site or presence current area, previous records of factors contributing to a or evidence on site or presence change in area (positively in the of factors contributing to a case of B1 and negatively in the change in area (positively in the case of B3) case of C1 and negatively in the case of C3) Structure & The structure of a given habitat type can be The structure (including Any other condition other than More than 25% of the area is in function compared with the data of the EU typical species) and function A or C. a bad condition with regard to (including Interpretation Manual, the associated (including ecological its structure and function typical PHYSIS interpretations and the requirements) of the habitat This category could be: (including typical species) species) interpretation of each habitat (and its is in good condition, no typical species) provided at Malta’s significant deteriorations • B1 if the condition of the This category could be:
Epsilon-Adi page A-19
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current Condition Criterion national level through Malta’s reporting are experienced and no structure and function is sheets for Article 17. Not all typical species pressures are present. inadequate but improving • C1 if the condition of listed therein need to be present at the site • B2 if the condition of the structure and function is bad for the habitat to be interpreted as such. structure and function is but improving inadequate and stable • C2 if the condition of the Function refers to the ecological processes • B3 if the condition of the structure and function is bad and capacity of the habitat to maintain its structure and function is and stable structure. inadequate and • C3 if the condition of the deteriorating* structure and function is bad Typical species , as defined above, are also and deteriorating* included in this assessment. In order to (This evaluation is based on the assess the overall condition of the typical structure (including typical (This evaluation is based on the species consideration can be given to species) and function (including structure (including typical typical species richness, coverage of the ecological requirements) of the species) and function (including ruderals, ermes, invasive plant species and habitat and presence of ecological requirements) of the degree of interfloral competition affecting pressures or threats). habitat and presence of the area covered by the habitat. pressures or threats). Future Capacity and probability of the habitat type The habitat prospects for its Any other condition other than The habitat prospects are bad, prospects (as concerned on the site in question to future are excellent / good, A or C. with severe impacts from regards area maintain its structure for the future, given with no significant impacts threats expected. The long-term covered, on the one hand the possible unfavourable from threats expected. The This category could be: viability is not assured. structure & influences and on the other hand all the long-term viability is also function) reasonable conservation effort which is assured. • B1 if the future prospects are This category could be: possible. inadequate but improving • C1 if the future prospects are • B2 if the c future prospects bad but improving are inadequate and stable • C2 if the future prospects are • B3 if the future prospects are bad and stable inadequate and • C3 if the future prospects are deteriorating* bad and deteriorating* OVERALL CONDITION If the condition of all If the condition of one or more If the condition of one or more parameters is evaluated as parameters is Unfavourable- parameters is Unfavourable- favourable (green/A), then Inadequate (amber/B) and Bad (red/C) , then the overall the overall condition of the none of the parameters is condition of the habitat is
page A-20 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current Condition Criterion habitat is FAVOURABLE evaluated as Unfavourable-Bad UNFAVOURABLE –BAD (red/C). (green/A). (red/C) , then the overall condition of the habitat is UNFAVOURABLE – INADEQUATE (amber/B) .
* In certain cases, a sub-category cannot be assigned to this conservation status assessment. Source: MEPA
Epsilon-Adi page A-21
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Table A-4: Evaluating the current condition of a species Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion
Favourable Unfavourable – Inadequate Unfavourable – Bad (green / A) (amber / B) (red / C)
Range Area over which a species is usually to be The range should be stable Any other condition other than Large decline in the range (or found in the protected area being or increasing and must not A or C evidence of loss from one year considered, and shows outer limits of the be contracting (based on to the next), which is foreseen overall area in which the species is found at current range, previous to have a significant impact on present. Useful information to assess range records or evidence on site the survival of the species / includes: or, in the case of increasing This category could be: population range, the presence of factors contributing to the increase) • current range • B1 if the condition of the This category could be: • previous records, if available, which may range is inadequate but indicate changes or stability in the range improving and any correlation with factors; • B2 if the condition of the • evidence on site that the range has range is inadequate is and • C1 if the condition of the changed or is stable/at its full potential stable range is bad but improving • presence of factors (such as abiotic • B3 if the condition of the • C2 if the condition of the factors) which may be influencing the range is inadequate and range is bad and stable current range at present or in the future. deteriorating* • C3 if the condition of the • range required for viability of species, range is bad and including consideration of connectivity (This evaluation is based on deteriorating* current range, previous records or evidence on site or presence (This evaluation is based on of factors contributing to a current range, previous records change in range (positively in or evidence on site or presence the case of B1 and negatively in of factors contributing to a the case of B3) change in range (positively in the case of C1 and negatively in the case of C3)
page A-22 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion
Size of The following information is commonly The size of the population is Any other condition other than Large decline in the size of the population needed for each species: maintained or increasing A or C population and reproduction, • estimate of the population size and reproduction, mortality mortality and age structure are • unit used to express population size and age structure are significantly affecting the long- maintained at a healthy term viability of the species. Examples of units commonly used are given balance. Maintenance This category could be: below: should be at the minimum • number of individuals or estimation necessary to ensure long- thereof - (normally adult individuals) - As term viability of the species. This category could be: for vascular plant species, it is possible to • B1 if the population size is count/estimate the number of flowering inadequate but improving plants only and/or to exclude seedlings. • B2 if the population size is For vegetatively reproducing plants, inadequate is and stable • C1 if the population size is either tufts/clumps or individual shoots • B3 if the population size is bad but improving or rosettes may be regarded as inadequate and • C2 if the population size is ‘individuals’. deteriorating* bad and stable • area covered by population - estimation • C3 if the population size is of the total area covered by the species, bad and deteriorating* expressed in m2; • number of localities - a geographical area inhabited by a set of individuals which are able to reproduce or occur on a long- term basis and cover continuous space in a given period. ‘Continuous space’ means a portion of the territory with suitable biotic and abiotic conditions for the long- term occurrence of the species delimited by natural or artificially made ecological barriers, possibly also by social relationships or by some length of
Epsilon-Adi page A-23
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion distance. Habitat for Area thought suitable for the species, both Area of the habitat is Any other condition other than Area of the habitat is clearly not the species currently occupied and currently sufficiently large, stable or A or C sufficiently large to ensure the unoccupied but suitable. The abiotic increasing and sufficient long term survival of the species features and structure of the habitat and good quality habitat exists OR habitat quality is bad, clearly biological requirements of the species to support the population in not allowing long term survival should be taken into consideration as much the long term. This category could be: of the species. as possible.
• B1 if the habitat for the This category could be: Pollinators, predators, symbionts and species is inadequate but fructivores of the species should be taken improving into consideration where relevant. • B2 if the habitat for the species is inadequate is and • C1 if the habitat for the stable species is bad but improving • B3 if the habitat for the • C2 if the habitat for the species is inadequate and species is bad and stable deteriorating* • C3 if the habitat for the species is bad and deteriorating*
Future Capacity and probability of the species The species prospects for its Any other condition other than The species prospects are bad prospects (as concerned in the site in question to future are excellent / good, A or C or its future, with severe regards maintain its population dynamics and the with no significant impacts influence of pressures and range, availability of its habitat, given on the one from threats and pressures threats expected. The long-term population, hand the possible unfavourable influences expected. The long-term viability is not assured. including its and on the other hand all the reasonable viability is also assured. This category could be: long-term conservation effort which is possible. sustainability and habitat This category could be: availability) • B1 if the future prospects are inadequate but improving
page A-24 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion • B2 if the c future prospects are inadequate and stable • B3 if the future prospects are inadequate and • C1 if the future prospects are deteriorating* bad but improving • C2 if the future prospects are bad and stable • C3 if the future prospects are bad and deteriorating*
If the condition of all If the condition of one or more If the condition of one or more parameters is evaluated as parameters is Unfavourable- parameters is Unfavourable- favourable (green/A), then Inadequate (amber/B) and none Bad (red/C) , then the overall the overall condition for the of the parameters is evaluated condition of the habitat is habitat is FAVOURABLE as Unfavourable-Bad (red/C) , UNFAVOURABLE –BAD (red/C). (green/A). then the overall condition of the habitat is UNFAVOURABLE – INADEQUATE (amber/B) .
* In certain cases, a sub-category cannot be assigned to this conservation status assessment. Source: MEPA
Epsilon-Adi page A-25
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 4 SPECIFICATIONS OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
A.4.1 GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD MONITORING PLANS FOR ANNEX I HABITATS AND ANNEX II SPECIES OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE AND ANNEX I SPECIES OF THE BIRDS DIRECTIVE
This section provides concise guidelines as regards the scope, the preparatory actions the requirements and deliverables of this action.
The Management Plan (MP) has identified the need for the development of national standard monitoring plans for Annex I habitats and Annex II species of the Habitats Directive, Annex I birds of the Birds Directive and a number of other relevant bird species (see Table A-5 and Table A-6). This monitoring programme consists of the development of standard monitoring plans specific for each habitat and species and the subsequent application of them in the field. The design of the standard monitoring plans will build on the habitat/species conservation assessment work carried during the development of the Management Plans for the terrestrial Natura 2000 sites. The elaboration of the monitoring plans is a once for all action and it is independent of any other action foreseen in the MPs. This task is a responsibility of MEPA in connection with the habitats and species of the Habitats Directive listed in the tables below and the Wild Birds Regulation Unit within the Parliamentary Secretariat for Agriculture, Fisheries and Animal Rights in connection with the bird species listed in the table below and it will be accomplished within the first two years of the MP implementation in order to allow for the subsequent implementation and field testing of the monitoring plans, ideally within the last three years of the first MP period. This monitoring programme will ensure that data continues to be collected and that the data gathered over the MP period informs the re- assessment of the Conservation Status of habitats and species after the first planning period (5 years). Moreover, the data gathered will be used to determine Favourable Reference Values for garrigue and steppe habitats and for four Annex II plant species ( Elatine gussonei , Ophrys melitensis , Anacamptis urvilleana and Linaria pseudolaxiflora ) (see Table A-7).
Table A-5: Maltese Islands Annex I Habitats and Annex II Species to be monitored
Code Name
Annex I habitats
1150 Coastal lagoons 1170 Reefs 1210 Annual vegetation of drift lines 1240 Vegetated sea cliffs of the Mediterranean coasts with endemic Limonium spp. 1310 Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud and sand 1410 Mediterranean salt meadows ( Juncetalia maritimi ) 1420 Mediterranean and thermo-Atlantic halophilous scrubs ( Sarcocornetea fruticosi ) 1510 Mediterranean salt steppes ( Limonietalia ) 2110 Embryonic shifting dunes 2210 Crucianellion maritimae fixed beach dunes
page A-26 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Code Name
2220 Dunes with Euphorbia terracina 3140 Hard oligo-mesotrophic waters with benthic vegetation of Chara spp. 3170 Mediterranean temporary ponds 5230 Arborescent matorral with Laurus nobilis 5330 Thermo-Mediterranean and pre-desert scrub 5410 West Mediterranean clifftop phryganas ( Astragalo-Plantaginetum subulatae ) 5420 Sarcopoterium spinosum phryganas 5430 Endemic phryganas of the Euphorbio-Verbascion 6220 Pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the Thero-Brachypodietea 8210 Calcareous rocky slopes with chasmophytic vegetation 8310 Caves not open to the public 8330 Submerged or partially submerged sea caves 9320 Olea and Ceratonia forests 9340 Quercus ilex and Quercus rotundifolia forests 9540 Mediterranean pine forests with endemic Mesogean pines 9570 Tetraclinis articulata forests 92A0 Salix alba and Populus alba galleries 92D0 Southern riparian galleries and thickets ( Nerio-Tamaricetea and Securinegion tinctoriae )
Annex II Species
P Anacamptis urvilleana P Cremnophyton lanfrancoi P Crepis pusilla P Elatine gussonei P Hyoseris frutescens P Helichrysum melitense P Ophrys melitensis P Linaria pseudolaxiflora P Orobanche densiflora P Palaeocyanus crassifolius P Petalophyllum ralfsii P Riella helicophylla I Armadillidium ghardalamensis I Brachytrupes megacephalus I Lampedusa imitratix I Lampedusa melitensis I Myrmecophilus baronii I Pseudoseriscius cameroni
Epsilon-Adi page A-27
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Code Name
F Aphanius fasciatus R Zamenis situla M Myotis punicus 1 M Rhinolophus hipposideros
Table A-6: Maltese Islands Bird Species to be monitored Other relevant Resident/ birds in Name Wintering Breeding visitors connection with Article 4 Tachybaptus ruficollis √ √ Hydrobates pelagicus √ Puffinus yelkouan √ Calonectris diomedea √ Aythya nyroca √ Accipitridae (Aquila pomarina, Pernis apivorus, Milvus migrans, Circus √ aeruginosus, Circus pygargus, Accipiter nisus) and Pandion haliaetus Falconidae (Falco peregrinus, Falco vespertinus, F.naumanni, F.biarmicus, √ F. eleonorae, F.subbuteo, F. tinnunculus) Ixobrychus minutus √ Himantopus himantopus √ Gallinula chloropus √ Fulica atra √ Alcedo atthis √ Wetland birds –staging (Phoenicopterus ruber, Platalea leucorodia, Pluvialis apricaria, Gallinago media, Philomachus pugnax, √ Porzana porzana, Plegadis falcinellus, Tringa glareola, Charadrius alexandrinus, Actitis hypoleucos) Charadrius dubius √ Larus michahellis √
1 The species referred to in the Annexes of the Habitats Directive is Myotis blythii s.l . Recent taxonomic data has divided this taxon into different species. The Maltese Myotis blythii s.l is now considered as Myotis punicus . Consequently, Myotis punicus is still considered as an Annex II species.
page A-28 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Other relevant Resident/ birds in Name Wintering Breeding visitors connection with Article 4 Gulls/Terns (Larus melanocephalus, √ Larus genei, Sterna caspia) Calandrella brachydactyla √ Acrocephalus scirpaceus √ Cisticola juncidis √ Monticola solitarius √ Sylvia melanocephala √ Sylvia conspicillata √ Passeriformes (Cettia cetti, Hirundo rustica, Muscicapa striata, Passer √ montanus, Emberiza calandra) Passeriformes (Anthus campestris, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, Ficedula albicollis, F. parva, F.semitorquata, Lanius collurio, Phylloscopus sibilatrix , √ Ph. trochilus, Saxicola rubetra , Sylvia communis, Emberiza pusilla, Emberiza schoeniclus, Erithacus rubecula, Phylloscopus collybita, Serinus serinus )
Table A-7: FRVs to be established for the following habitats and species
Code Name
Annex I habitats
5230 Arborescent matorral with Laurus nobilis 5330 Thermo-Mediterranean and pre-desert scrub 5410 West Mediterranean clifftop phryganas ( Astragalo-Plantaginetum subulatae ) 5420 Sarcopoterium spinosum phryganas 5430 Endemic phryganas of the Euphorbio-Verbascion 6220 Pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the Thero-Brachypodietea
Annex II Species
Anacamptis urvilleana Linaria pseudolaxiflora Elatine gussonei Ophrys melitensis
a. Scope
In April 2005, the Habitat Committee (committee created under Article 20 of the Habitats Directive), adopted binding requirements for the compilation of monitoring data and for the assessment of the conservation status of natural habitats and species of common interest (). Member States must ensure that the design of their monitoring programme is harmonized
Epsilon-Adi page A-29
Natura 2000 Management Plan
with the working documents of the European Commission concerning the definition and description of the parameters that are included in the reporting requirements of the EU member states under Article 17 of Directive 92/43/EC and especially with the «Art 17 guidelines» report. (http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/monnat/library?l=/&vm=detailed&sb=Title ).
The following parameters are specified for each of the assessment criteria to determine the Favourable Conservation Status mentioned above and defines an assessment scale (Assessment and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive – Reporting Formats for the period 2007-2012 ):
Table A-8: Parameters for determining Favourable Conservation Status according to Article 17 of the Habitats Directive
Natural habitats Species of common interest
Range (overall distribution) Range Area (actually) covered Population (size of stock) Structure and functions, including characteristic habitat structures and characteristic species Habitat for the species inventory Outlook (including impairments, threats and Outlook (including impairments, threats and long-term survival prospects) long-term survival prospects)
To ensure a unified overall survey design that is adapted to the conditions in Malta, it is important that any existing programmes for surveillance and assessment of habitats and species based on surveys carried out by scientific and nature conservation agencies are consolidated into a comprehensive, nationally uniform monitoring system. This can be done through a research and development project that will also help to appropriately channel efforts in this field.
b. Requirements
The following activities are to be coordinated:
• Adaptation of existing approaches (primarily to arrive at a uniform cross-national survey method) • Cross-national coordination of monitored parameters, field survey methods, survey intervals, sample sizes and sample distribution • Development and coordination of methods for identifying areas and habitat sizes, threats and long term survival prospects. • Utilization of synergies with other ongoing survey programmes (e.g. monitoring under the EU Water Framework Directive, the Nitrates Directive, and spatial mapping programmes) • Design of databases for data aggregation and analysis • Compliance of spatial data to the INSPIRE principles
Steps towards this standardization include preparatory actions and the establishment of monitoring protocols, Conservation Status and Favourable Conservation Status.
page A-30 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
i. Preparatory actions
• Bibliographic reviews, recording and spatial mapping of each habitat type / species. For each habitat type and plant species, MEPA will collect, document and spatially map in GIS, the existing distribution reports at least for the past 40 years, depending on the availability and accuracy of bibliographic data (point, line or surface distribution data), and for the entire national terrain. • Data storage and analysis. All the information collected shall be registered in a database, that will have provision for recording the presence of each habitat type and plant species documented in the literature review. This database will be linked to geographical mapping of information in GIS. • Registration of data gaps concerning habitats and species and the type, intensity, frequency and location of threats/pressures/limiting factors impacting them as they have been identified by the Management Plans. • Compilation of a summary report of existing knowledge and knowledge gaps/ requirements • The above reports will be valid for the first monitoring implementation period and will be updated from the second period and on. The next steps are based on these reports. ii. Establishment of monitoring protocols, Conservation Status and Favourable Conservation Status
Standardization of field survey protocols. At this stage the following will be established per habitat type and species/species group:
• The type of field data to be collected from field sampling specific to each habitat and species/species group (presence / absence, relative abundance, density, physicochemical parameters, threats, other impact factors, etc.). • The number and positioning of sampling stations Determination of the intensity and the sampling distribution pattern of and determination of the grid reference: a) the intensity of the sampling effort, b) the distribution pattern of sampling within and outside N2000 sites and c) the reference grid (grid) per habitat type or species. • The survey intervals to be defined specifically for each species and habitat type, according to their population dynamics • The sampling methods Cross-national survey methods and census parameters will be determined for all species and habitat types justified and supported by relevant international or national standards, or by the international scientific bibliography. Methodologies adopted by existing monitoring programmes (Habitat and plant species evaluation conducted through the Management Plan elaboration, the Aphanius fasciatus monitoring programme, sea birds survey methodologies) will be incorporated. The recording of appropriate environmental parameters and of the threats/pressures/limiting factors is included and given special emphasis.
Establishment of the methodology for the assessment of the conservation status and the definition of Favourable Reference Values for habitats and species/species groups. Selection of the methods (model use, etc) most suited to the Maltese natural territory for the analysis of field data as scheduled to be collected during the implementation of the monitoring plans, justified and supported by the relevant scientific experience recently acquired through the implementation of similar projects throughout the European Union.
Epsilon-Adi page A-31
Natura 2000 Management Plan
NOTE: It is acknowledged that some differentiation in the methodology may occur since some aspects might be site-specific, such as the need for different monitoring frequencies depending on the status of habitats/species and/or the levels of pressures and impacts. These discrepancies will be identified and fully recorded during the site level implementation.
c. Deliverables
The following will be delivered for each habitat and species/species group.
1. Report and database of bibliographic references consolidating all current knowledge on the conservation status of the specific habitat/species. 2. Geographical extent in which surveys will take place with grid reference for each habitat type and species/species group. 3. Field work protocols for each habitat type and each species/ species group 4. Protocol for the GIS mapping of the existing and potential spread of each species 5. Field work scheduling and repeatability requirements at yearly, monthly and weekly levels. 6. Methodology for the evaluation of the conservation status to be applied during the implementation phase. 7. Methodology for the assessment of the Favourable Reference Values and the Favourable Conservation Status to be applied during the implementation phase.
A.4.2 GUIDELINES FOR THE ELABORATION OF NATIONAL SPECIES ACTION PLANS
Action Plans for threatened species are technical instruments vital to the conservation of flora and fauna. They define the actions that need to be taken to improve the status of a threatened species.
a. Targeted species
For the first period of implementation Action Plans are intended for the following animal taxonomical groups and species.
Invertebrates: All RDB species are presently included. The list may be further refined and species grouped according to experts
Amphibians:
Discoglossus pictus
Being the only amphibian in Malta and belonging to a taxonomic group especially vulnerable to climatic changes and with special water requirements, Discoglossus pictus should be treated with priority and with a cross-country spatial reference.
Reptiles
Chalcides ocellatus tiligugu Podarcis filfolensis maltensis
page A-32 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Telescopus fallax Coluber viridiflavus carbonarius Coluber algirus
Action Plans can be elaborated either for each species or species groups according to the taxonomy and ecology of species.
Mammals :
Suncus etruscus Pipistrellus pipistrellus Pipistrellus kuhlii Pipistrellus pygmaeus Plecotus austriacus Tadarida teniotis Eptesicus serotinus Mustela nivalis
Action Plans can be elaborated either for each species or species groups according to the taxonomy and ecology of species.
b. Geographical scope of Action Plans
Action plans shall take into account species’ habitats both within and outside Natura 2000 sites taking into consideration the specific species’/species groups’ ecological requirements. Especially for Discoglossus pictus and the bat species, due to specific water requirements and mobility respectively, the entire Maltese Islands should be considered as the field of application of certain conservation actions.
c. General characteristics of Action Plans
The Action Plans:
• Aim to make possible in the short and medium term to maintain or even increase number of the targeted species. They clearly define the desirable population level, in order to ensure the sustainable conservation of species in their immediate environment. • Do not contain detailed biological information and they are usually based on the best available scientific knowledge. The emphasis is on conservation (not science) and on the actions required and the changes needed to achieve the targets. • Must have clear objectives, measurable goals and the follow up process (including update of success) should be integrated in the plan and budgeted accordingly. • During the site level implementation species plans need to adapt to site-specific concerns about the species in question as regards the status of its habitat or the levels of pressures and impacts. • Need to be realistic, taking into account the social and cultural characteristics in the areas where the plans will be implemented.
d. List of headings which may be incorporated into an action plan for an animal species
A following format can be adopted:
Epsilon-Adi page A-33
Natura 2000 Management Plan
i. Current status/assessment of future prospects of species
• Taxonomy of the species
• Biological data (reproduction, feeding habits, habitat, optimum population density, relation between species)
• International, national protection status
• Historical causes for decreasing numbers, current status and trends, possibilities for colonization
• Current and potential threats /limiting factors
• Lists of protected/unprotected areas in which the species is present and existing conservation measures taken in favor of the species
• Research work carried out in situ, ex situ and results
ii. Implementation of a restoration plan
• Conservation objectives
• Research work to be implemented in situ (reproduction, feeding habits) justifications, proposed timetable.
• Recovery plans
• Management measures to be put into practice to achieve the proposed conservation objective: - in relation to the species : on- going monitoring of population, feeding, reintroduction or strengthening populations, increase of species distribution. Proposed timetables.
- in relation to its habitat and other species present: review habitat management, creation of new protected areas, establishment of nesting area (trophic improvement, increasing numbers of prey, restricting numbers of predators, adapting infrastructure and modifying numbers of tourists). Proposed timetables.
- Legislative and economic measures
- Information activities to be carried out
- Training courses for administrative officials, local and regional authorities with direct responsibility for managing the species in the field
e. Indicative list of actions
Depending on the taxonomical groups different actions can be proposed, which generally may fall under the following categories
• Policy and legislation • Future research and monitoring • Site safeguard and management
page A-34 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
• Species management and protection • Communications and publicity
Actions can indicatively include:
• Designation of new areas of vital importance for species • Reform and review of management methods for areas which have lost their original capacity to sustain the species • Surveys to determine distribution and population size • Genetic and population dynamics studies • Monitoring • Ex- situ conservation • Reintroduction and translocation • Water quality and quantity improvements • Special habitat management and restoration • Habitat creation • Control of competitors/predators • Wardening of sites • Communication and public awareness campaigns
Text adapted from: Council of Europe (1997). Drafting and implementing action plans for threatened species (Council of Europe publishing, Environmental Encounters No 39). Consulted document: MEPA (2011) Dossier on Wild Fauna in the Maltese Islands: Capture, Killing and Exploitation
A.4.3 GUIDELINES FOR HABITAT RESTORATION ACTIONS
P7. Elaboration of a programme and its implementation for the scientific monitoring of the viability of the seed bank of the population of C. lanfrancoi
a. Trained personnel required: Number and qualifications
1 person with a qualification of at least EQF (European Qualifications Framework) Level 6 in Environmental or Biological Sciences. The person should also have experience in rock climbing in view of the site where the study will be collected.
b. Proposed methodology
A study of the food web, and viability of the seed bank of the population of C. lanfrancoi at Ta’ Ċenċ. This will consist of a two part study. The first will focus on plant-parasite interactions of Cremnophyton lanfrancoi . An inventory of the species feeding on C. lanfrancoi will be collected to develop a food web with C. lanfrancoi being the first trophic level. Species will be collected and analysed to determine their role in the food web and how they affect Cremnophyton lanfrancoi. The dispersal methods of the species will also be determined. The second part of the study will consist of germination trials to determine the viability of the seeds. An analysis of the seed bank should also be done to determine the richness of the seed bank. The plant and animal material will need to be collected in situ from the main populations from
Epsilon-Adi page A-35
Natura 2000 Management Plan
at least two sites. This means that material should be collected not only from an accessible population along the plateau at Ta’ Ċenċ, but also from a health population along the cliff face.
c. Materials and equipment required
Rock climbing equipment will be needed in view of the location of the study site. At least one population from along the cliffs will need to be sampled, from one of the populations that are found 50m below the edge of the cliff. Personal protective equipment will also be required.
d. Information /warning signage required
No information or warning signage is required.
e. Reporting requirements
Any results will be published in a local scientific journal to allow universal distribution of the results. The outcome of the study, together with any recommendations should be reported to MEPA.
P17. Prepare an alien/invasive plant species control / eradication programme
a. Trained personnel required: Number and qualifications
3 persons with a qualification at EQF (European Qualifications Framework) Level 4 in Environmental science or sustainability.
b. Identification of IAS species to be removed
Acacia trees, found especially in the area between tal-Kalkara and ix-Xaghra, Carpobrotus edulis and Agave americana found at ix-Xaghra, in the vicinity of the cliffs. The latter particularly is a problem to habitat 1240 and 8210, which it has completely taken over in some areas. It is even found growing along the cliff face in inaccessible areas.
c. Spotting of treatment area
Acacia trees, found especially in the area between tal-Kalkara and ix-Xaghra, Carpobrotus edulis and Agave americana found at ix-Xaghra, in the vicinity of the cliffs.
d. Suggested method for IAS removal/eradication per species
The method of eradication for these species will vary depending on the species itself, as follows:
i. Acacia : The Acacias found within this SAC are scattered in small isolated populations or individual trees. In accordance with MEPA’s guidelines on managing non-native plant invaders, it is recommended that the trees are all felled. Felling should be carried out by horizontal cutting near ground level. This should be followed by stump grinding up to a depth of 2 feet. The holes produced should be filled in with soil. Stump grinding should only be used where
page A-36 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
the trees are easily accessible with the relevant equipment. Access should not be created where it is currently not available.
All woody material should be removed from the area and disposed of. Burning any vegetation on site is not recommended since fire is known to trigger seed germination in Acacias (MEPA, 2013). It is also recommended that the leaf litter and top 5cm of soil from beneath the trees is removed to deplete the soil seed bank. Trees belonging to this genus are known to accumulate large quantities of seed in their soil seedbank which can lie dormant for many years. Cutting the trees would eliminate shade and increase the light intensity on the ground, which in turn would trigger high germination rates during the following spring. Removing the top 5cm would drastically decrease regeneration potential of the soil seed bank and has been seen to be one of the best ways of reducing regeneration for these species (Le Maitre, et al., 2011). Moreover, the ground below the Acacias is already degraded with most of the seed bank being dominated by an accumulation of over 20 years of Acacia seeds. Thus the benefits of removing the top 5cm of the soil profile will outweigh any minor impacts. The removal of topsoil should however be restricted to immediately below the tree, and any typical garrigue shrubs growing underneath the Acacia should be left untouched.
In order to address resprouting of cut stumps, particularly for those trees which are not accessible to a stump grinder, tarping with heavy black plastic will impede light reaching the trees and will also act as a physical barrier thereby preventing resprouting. All unused plastic should be removed from the site and the site manager should regularly visit the area to ensure that plastic from this activity does not litter the area.
Consistent and timely follow-up treatments to remove germinating seedlings are necessary for a number of years until seed bank is exhausted. Seedlings and saplings can be hand pulled.
Incineration of plant debris is the most desirable option especially when dealing with alien species which are prolific seed producers and/or spread by vegetative growth. Nevertheless, burning of plant material on-site should not be allowed, unless prior authorization for controlled burning on site is given by MEPA. Plant debris which is not able to grow into a new plant can be carried in a registered waste carrier that can be sec urely covered and disposed of in a registered landfill, unless prior authorization for controlled burning and disposal on site is given by MEPA.
ii. Acacia spp. : In accordance with MEPA’s guidelines on managing non-native plant invaders, it is recommended that the trees are all felled. All woody material should be removed from the area and disposed of. Burning any vegetation on site is not recommended since fire is known to trigger seed germination in Acacias (MEPA, 2013). It is also recommended that the leaf litter and top 5cm of soil from beneath the trees is removed to deplete the soil seed bank. Trees belonging to this genus are known to accumulate large quantities of seed in their soil seedbank which can lie dormant for many years. Cutting the trees would eliminate shade and increase the light intensity on the ground, which in turn would trigger high germination rates during the following spring.
Epsilon-Adi page A-37
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Removing the top 5cm would drastically decrease regeneration potential of the soil seed bank and has been seen to be one of the best ways of reducing regeneration for these species (Le Maitre, et al., 2011). Moreover, the ground below the Acacias is already degraded with most of the seed bank being dominated by an accumulation of over 20 years of Acacia seeds. Thus the benefits of removing the top 5cm of the soil profile will outweigh any minor impacts. The removal of topsoil should however be restricted to immediately below the tree, and any typical garrigue shrubs growing underneath the Acacia should be left untouched. In the event that the tree resprouts following cutting, pruning of any shoots should be applied. This will weaken the tree and lead to its death through the depletion of food reserves in its roots. Any seedlings should also be manually uprooted by the first summer.
iii. Agave americana : This population is a result of the accidental introduction and escape of an IAS. Most of the individuals found in the SAC are escaped offspring. The species is highly invasive and has a competitive advantage in competing with native vegetation in karstic terrain and garrigues (MEPA, 2013). Unfortunately, it has also spread down the cliff face in inaccessible sections. It is recommended that this species is completely eradicated from within the SAC within a short to medium time-frame. The recommended method is by cutting down the plant through the use of a chainsaw. All above-ground branches should be cut down, following which a herbicide with the active ingredient Triclopyr (Tunison & Zimmer, 1992) shall be applied on the cut stump with a paint brush. This will kill off the plants whilst restricting herbicide use to specific plants thus reducing any spill-off effect on other plants. All material shall be disposed off-site. Any small plants shall be removed by manual means through the use of a hoe (MEPA, 2013). With regards to the plants growing in the cliff face, it is recommended that an eradication project in collaboration with the rock climbing community be developed. The plants should be pruned down to a stump through the use of a small hand held saw, and any material should be dropped into the sea where it will rapidly decompose, since it would otherwise be too dangerous to carry up the cliff-face. Following pruning of the branches, the herbicide should be applied through the use of a hand-held brush.
iv. Carpobrotus edulis : Eradication of this species is recommended through the uprooting of individual plants using manual tools, followed by the disposal of the removed plant material. All plant material should be removed to avoid having any vegetative remnants resprout in the soil.
e. Suggested method of habitat restoration
This involves active restoration of the cleared areas on the plateau. Removing the alien species and preventing their regeneration is not enough. This approach has been shown to fail to achieve the desired outcome of restoring the habitat since secondary invasions by invasive species (eg Oxalis pes-caprae ) or by ruderals often follow, as they capitalise on the disturbance caused by the eradication and control operations (Le Maitre, et al., 2011). In view of this, the removal of invasive species will be part of a holistic restoration program involving the habitats concerned. The area where these species are found does not have access to a supply of water for irrigation. This inevitably rules out the long-term irrigation of introduced plantlets as a method of restoration. Instead a medium to low intensity restoration program is recommended. This will involve the planting of 6-10 month old potted seedlings, following the
page A-38 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
first rains in late summer. This choice of species is based on the dominant species found in the same habitat within which the alien species were found. This will be followed by active seeding of species typical of this habitat, including endemics.
f. Protective measures required
None.
g. Information /warning signage required
Signage is required in the area of active restoration to inform visitors why species are being removed, what work is being undertaken and to stick to the footpath and avoid trampling on the sections being restored.
h. Monitoring and post- removal monitoring requirements
The areas being restored should be monitored once a year to assess the success of the restoration program and apply it to other areas in the country. The following data should be collected:
i. Quantitative data on coverage, species dominance and diversity through the use of randomly sampled 2m X 2m quadrats in each location that was cleared and plants characteristic of the Annex I habitat were introduced. This will allow the manager to assess the rate of reestablishment of the targeted habitat and the success of the restoration program. This data shall be collected each year in spring for a period of five years after the termination of the restoration program.
ii. The survival rate of planted species should be monitored each year by recording the number of deceased plants. This data shall be collected each year in September for a period of five years after the planting and seeding phase.
iii. The quantity of seedlings of targeted alien species sprouting each year following the clearing up of the alien species. This data shall be collected each year in spring for a period of five years after the termination of the restoration program.
i. Reporting requirements
It is important to document (and also inform MEPA on) attempts made to remove invasive alien species as well as findings in order to serve as a learning tool and to keep track of actions taken across the Maltese Islands.
A.4.4 GUIDELINES FOR THE SIGNPOSTING AND SITE PROMOTION
A national interpretation strategy for the entire Natura 2000 network across the Maltese archipelago will present the required framework through which all aspects of stakeholder communication and education, product development, promotion, on-site and inter-site visitor flow management, visitor experience and revenue generation will be addressed.
Epsilon-Adi page A-39
Natura 2000 Management Plan
The study for the design and technical specifications for signposting and promotional material will therefore be undertaken within this framework. Particularly given Malta’s size, and in recognition of current awareness of Natura 2000, the marketing potential from promoting and creating a movement around the Natura 2000 network as a whole is significant. This will considerably enhance the promotion and revenue generating value of each of the individual sites in the network, as well as serve to achieve the site-specific conservation objectives.
Critically, this approach will build upon the success of the communications and awareness raising campaign for the project, which has succeeded in fostering initial awareness of a network of local nature conservation sites with a range of different and unique attributes and assets but also with certain commonalities. It is essential, at this stage, to build upon the existing knowledge base and therefore to execute a promotional and marketing plan derived from the interpretation strategy, aimed at the promotion of Natura 2000 as a national network, within which individual sites will also be promoted for their specific attributes and assets, as well as for their relationships with other sites where there is a commonality in respect of characteristics / features, habitats and species, tourism/recreational opportunities and / or geographical location.
Another critical advantage to creating a movement around the Natura 2000 network is the ability to use the ‘pull factor’ of the more well known and already frequented sites to garner interest in the less well-known or smaller sites, by drawing on their various common attributes and by promoting these sites together.
The signposting and promotional plan for Rdumijiet u l-Inħawi ta' Ta' Ċenċ will focus on the specific attributes and assets of the site, but will also offer the opportunity to reference and promote the national network and other Natura 2000 sites in Gozo.
Responsibility for delivering and implementing the Natura 2000 promotional and marketing plan, and for the study for the design and technical specifications for signposting and promotional material, will be agreed with MEPA given that the site is privately owned. The interpretation strategy will serve as the basis upon which the marketing and branding strategy for the Natura 2000 network will be developed, ensuring unity and continuity of the Natura 2000 ‘brand’, not only in terms of design (logo and colours) but also its values and overall themes / messages. This brand will be carried through in all signposting and promotional material, as well as all Natura 2000 merchandising, events and activities. Signposting and promotional material for Rdumijiet u l-Inħawi ta' Ta' Ċenċ (as with all Natura 2000 sites) will be designed to deliver ‘edutainment’ – education through entertainment, in line with recreational learning theory. Such communication must provoke interest and thought within visitors and help them to personally relate with the issues at hand, whilst the core message is being naturally developed and revealed within their minds as a result of their experience of the site, guided through the interpretative services. The interpretation strategy will therefore be designed to inform and educate, as well as to guide and warn (particularly on- site signposting), in the interests of the protection and conservation management of the site as well as visitor enjoyment and safety.
An emphasis on interpretative signage will ensure that the information presented brings meaning and interest to the visitor, and that it strengthens their relationship with the site (and the Natura 2000 network generally). Warning signage will convey the necessary regulations and restrictions; however, these messages will be delivered sensitively and with sufficient justification (emphasis on interpretation). The signposting generally will be designed to welcome and encourage the visitor’s enjoyment of the site. As mentioned above, where
page A-40 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
detailed background information is required to be delivered to visitors, trained guides and innovative use of technology may present the most effective and least invasive form of communication media.
Taking account of the emphasis on there being a national interpretation strategy with bespoke branding for the Natura 2000 network as a whole, the signposting regime for individual sites will have regard to any existing signage relating to the ecological, geological, historical, cultural, etc. attributes of that site. There may be the potential to combine signage to communicate information on other projects together with information on Natura 2000, where this is deemed to be appropriate without compromising on the objectives for the national Natura 2000 interpretation strategy.
As a general guide, all communication will reflect the main theme identified through the interpretation strategy by addressing the ‘whole’ in terms of the overall learning, emotional and behavioural objectives, and by striving for message unity through usage of standardised materials, designs, logos, layouts, text, colours, etc.
The amount of information communicated will take account of the method of delivery, whether that be signage, information panels, brochures, etc.; however, signposting and promotional materials generally for Rdumijiet u l-Inħawi ta' Ta' Ċenċ will include:
• Name of the site;
• Written and pictorial description of the particular attributes and assets of the site (ecological, geological, historical, cultural, etc.);
• Written and pictorial description of Natura 2000 in the international and national context;
• Written and pictorial description of the other Natura 2000 sites on Gozo, specifically L- Inħawi tar-Ramla; L-Inħawi ta’ Għajn Barrani; Iċ-Ċittadella; lI-Qortin tal-Magun u il-Qortin il-Kbir; L-Inħawi tad-Dwejra u tal-Qawra, inkluż Ħaġret il-Ġeneral / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux sal-Bajja tax-Xlendi / Il-Ponta ta’ San Dimitri sal-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux; and L-Inħawi tax-Xlendi u tal-Wied tal-Kantra / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Id-Dawra tas-Sanap sa Tal-Ħajt
• Direction / orientation information (in the case of on-site signposting) to aid site navigation; and
• Warning information (in the case of on-site signposting), in terms of the specific ‘dos and don’ts’ to take account of. Such instructions should be imparted to the visitor in as much of an intuitive way as possible, for example, by setting trails that stay clear of sensitive or fragile ecosystems or using site hardening methods (behavioural objective – to stay clear of sensitive species), whilst presenting information on how delicate or rare certain important species may be and how they are negatively affected by external factors (educational and emotional objectives). Given the importance of the site for birds, emphasis should also be made on the requirement to keep to footpaths especially along the cliffs.
Proposed signposting for Rdumijiet u l-Inħawi ta' Ta' Ċenċ
Epsilon-Adi page A-41
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Figure A-1 shows the proposed location for the signposts for this SAC. The figure illustrates two types of signposts:
i. Directional signs positioned along the main roads leading to the site, indicating to drivers where they can access the SAC; these signposts will generally be fixed to existing road signs (where they exist) and will typically be similar to the signs already used to indicate cultural heritage sites
ii. Information signs, positioned at the main entrances to the site and within the site, in areas where important features are located. Two information signs are proposed for this site, one of which related to cultural heritage. The main sign should also indicate the no rock climbing area as shown in Figure A-1.
Should the management team feel the need to introduce additional signs these can be discussed with MEPA. It is advised that signposts are erected in areas that are either already disturbed or where there are existing footpaths, roads, etc.; habitats should not be affected by signposts. Furthermore, since it is recommended that the Natura 2000 network is uniformly branded, it is also advised that any existing information signage be replaced by new composite signs designed in accordance with the branding specifications for the national Natura 2000 interpretation strategy.
page A-42 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Figure A-1: Map showing indicative location of sign posting
Epsilon-Adi page A-43
Natura 2000 Management Plan
A.4.5 PATROLLING SCHEDULE
Safeguarding / wardening of the protected area is the most important conservation action to be performed under the management of the Natura 2000 sites. It is a constant action and subject to continuous adaptations in line with progress in site management. As it relies entirely on the capacity of human resources it has to be regularly re-evaluated in order to remain effective and fulfil its intended objectives.
The main objectives of patrolling the Maltese Natura 2000 sites are:
• Protection of the key features, habitats and wildlife and any other important features that have been identified for each site; • Prevention of illegal actions and activities according to law; • Control of harmful human activities; • Ensuring observance of site rules and regulations by visitors, owners, and users; • Protection and maintenance of management infrastructure; • Contribution to the managers’ knowledge about the protected site; and • Contribution to the knowledge and awareness raising of visitors and users of the area.
Patrolling staff
In order to fulfil the above tasks, it is recommended that the patrolling staff fulfils the following requirements:
• It has law enforcement powers; • It is skilled in outdoor working conditions and can work unsocial hours, including weekends and public holidays; • It has mastered a knowledge of the ecological features of the site, the vision, the conservation objectives and the management principles pertaining to the site; • Accordingly, it has mastered a knowledge on the identified and potential threats to the above features and the site’s integrity; • It possesses adequate communication and interpersonal skills; and • It possesses adequate recording and reporting skills.
As such the minimum requirements for patrolling officers should be:
• Preferably have an undergraduate diploma in natural sciences or similar or, in the absence of academic qualifications, a proven interest and a number of years of experience in nature conservation (persons with no academic qualifications will be required to sit for such courses as may be identified by the site manager / MEPA); • Report writing and computer skills (word processing, spreadsheet, database); • A valid driving license; • Good knowledge of both spoken Maltese and English; • First Aid Certificate (or the willingness to acquire this); • Fire-fighting certificate, especially for shrub fires (or the willingness to acquire this); • A clean police conduct; and • Preferably have map reading and trekking capabilities;
page A-44 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
• Preferably have a medical certificate attesting to the fitness and health of the officers that would not hinder them from carrying out their job or placing them at undue risk.
Staff training
Patrolling staff should undergo a series of training seminars that are prepared and implemented under the auspices of MEPA. It is stressed that the recording and reporting requirements of the job must be taught in detail having in mind that these invaluable field data will feed into the Work Plan at the start of the MP implementation (see below), the habitat/monitoring plans and reports and ultimately all management actions in the following years.
Training of the patrolling staff must be provided both in the office and on the field. It is therefore recommended that a trained ecologist, police officer and a local stakeholder/inhabitant escort the crew team during the first period of implementation and provide knowledge and advice. Annual evaluation and additional/further training is required.
Training will aim at:
• Basic identification of protected habitats and species present in the Maltese Natura 2000 sites; • Dealing with people and preparation of evidence for investigations. • Anthropogenic impacts on the environment; • Knowledge of Maltese environmental legislation; • Professional recording and reporting techniques; • Basic arrest-and-control techniques; and • Self-defence and first aid.
Patrolling scheme
At this stage only preliminary recommendations are provided:
• A patrolling unit consists of at least 2 officers • The patrolling unit is equipped at least with : 1 conventional vehicle, intra/inter- communication equipment, 2 pairs of binoculars, 2 cameras, detailed digital maps, outdoors clothing and equipment, reporting sheets or electronic means of recording and a first aid kit. In addition to this, the text of the actions of the site’s Management Plan and, when applicable, the text of the code of conduct of the site.
Patrolling schedule
The patrolling schedule applicable to each site and to the entire network depends on the resources allocated to this task and, as already discussed, is subject to continuous changes and improvements as management progresses.
Input for the drafting of the site specific initial patrolling schedules is given below; an initial pilot schedule is given for the first six months of implementation (see Table A-11, Table A-12 and Table A-13). Ideally, these schedules should be run in parallel and in collaboration with the drafting of the site specific Work Plans based on the site specific Management Plan. This synergy will provide invaluable input to the author of the Work Plans and guarantee the
Epsilon-Adi page A-45
Natura 2000 Management Plan
drafting of effective and realistic patrolling schedules available at site level very early in the implementation period.
A half-year test period is considered as an adequate time to guide the composition of an effective and realistic annual schedule plan. Note that given frequencies (weekly, fortnightly and monthly) indicate minimum standard patrolling requirements at site level as they have been evaluated by the Management Plan. No attempt has been made to distinguish periods of increased requirements (e.g. hunting periods, first period of infrastructure installation, period of trapping devices removal, etc), or give further timeframe details. This is a task to be accomplished by the patrolling schedule compiler in a trial and error fashion and provided that the required administrative and funding are available.
Patrolling schedule specifications are explained in Table A-9 and Table A-10.
Table A-9: Content explanation of Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure
COLUMN TITLE CONTENT
Code and Name of each Natura 2000 site CODE / NAME Identification of the extent of the area to be patrolled AREA PROPOSED SITE New area under surveillance to be added whenever applicable ENLARGEMENT MANAGEMENT Wherever other entities apart from MEPA are involved in the site’s SCHEME management, the level and content of cooperation of the patrolling entity STAKEHOLDERS with these entities must be specified. Indications of minimum INVOLVEMENT collaboration requirements are given in the Management Plans at site level Existing wardening schemes are indicated at site level, to be further WARDENING SYSTEM examined and incorporated in the patrolling schedules POLICE PATROLLING Existing police patrolling schemes are indicated at site level, to be further SYSTEM examined and incorporated in the patrolling schedules Existing and proposed cleaning schemes are indicated at site level, to guide CLEANING SCHEME related collaboration and allocation of responsibility
Table A-10: Content explanation of Table A-13: Activities per site
COLUMN TITLE CONTENT
Two main categories of physical objects of safeguarding are indicated: Infrastructure maintenance including existing and proposed visitor MANAGEMENT infrastructure, signposting etc, and physical materials related to habitat ACTIVITIES TO BE manipulation works, ie. fences, seeded plots etc. These features must be SAFEGUARDED listed and mapped in detail at site level together with the key physical features (Annex I habitats, etc) under protection An initial list of the identified major and common illegal – harmful human activities at site level is given. An initial map of identified point factors can be provided based on the information available in the Management Plans. MAJOR The list is not exhaustive and other already identified and newly ILLEGAL/HARMFUL investigated activities must be added progressively after mastering of the HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO recording and reporting skills is secured. BE CONTROLLED It is stressed, that the recording and reporting of the locations, the frequencies and the intensities of these factors is probably the principal patrolling task and it will also provide invaluable field data for the monitoring plans/reports.
page A-46 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME 1 L-Inħawi ta’ Għajn 54.56 LAND OWNERS / Barrani XAGHRA LOCAL COUNCIL / MINISTRY FOR GOZO / MEPA 2 L-Inħawi ta’ 96.75 COMMITTEE COMMITTEE Pembroke 3 Il-Ballut tal-Wardija 20.37 MEPA / LAND
OWNERS 4 Il-Maqluba (limiti tal- 2.62 LAND OWNERS / Qrendi) QRENDI LOCAL COUNCIL / MTA / MEPA 5 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla 7.42 GAIA MEPA / GAIA FOUNDATION FOUNDATION 6 Is-Simar (limiti ta’ 58.38 BIRDLIFE MALTA BIRDLIFE MALTA PARTIAL San Pawl il-Baħar) WETLAND (RESERVE) ENLARGEMENT 7 Is-Salini 23.67 MINISTRY FOR TRANSPORT & INFRASTRUCTUR E / MEPA 8 L-Għadira s-Safra 1.54 SITE MEPA
ENLARGEMENT 9 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla 74.91 BIRDLIFE MALTA BIRDLIFE MALTA tat-Torri u tal-Irdum tal-Madonna 10 Ix-Xagħra tal-Kortin 12.61 LAND OWNERS /
ST PAUL’S BAY
Epsilon-Adi page A-47
Natura 2000 Management Plan
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME LOCAL COUNCIL / MEPA 11 Għar Dalam 0.17 HERITAGE MALTA HERITAGE MALTA 12 Wied il-Miżieb 24.66 MEPA / COMMITTEE 13 Iċ-Ċittadella 2.07 MINISTRY FOR MINISTRY FOR GOZO GOZO 14 Il-Ballut ta’ 23.3 MEPA MEPA
Marsaxlokk 15 L-Inħawi tal-Għadira 97.94 BIRDLIFE MALTA BIRDLIFE MALTA (part of the site) / MEPA PARTIAL DIN L-ART (RESERVE) HELWA (part of the site) 16 Filfla u l-Gżejjer ta’ 6.58 MEPA Madwarha 17 Kemmuna u l-Gżejjer 294.66 MEPA ta’ Madwarha
18 L-Inħawi tal-Buskett 244.71 ELC (part of the MEPA / PARKS PARTIAL PARTIAL u tal-Girgenti SAC) (BUSKETT (BUSKETT PARKS (part of GARDENS) GARDENS) the SAC) 19 L-Inħawi tad-Dwejra 86.93 MANAGEMENT MEPA u tal-Qawra, inkluż COMMITTEE Ħaġret il-Ġeneral / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’
page A-48 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME Ħarrux sal-Bajja tax- Xlendi / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ San Dimitri sal-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux 20 L-Inħawi tax-Xlendi u 296.3 MEPA tal-Wied tal-Kantra / Rdumijiet ta’Għawdex: Id- Dawra tas-Sanap sa tal-Ħajt 21 L-Inħawi tal- 176.4 MELLIEHA LOCAL MEPA Imġiebaħ u Tal- COUNCIL (part of Miġnuna the site) 22 Il-Gżejjer ta’ San Pawl 10.75 MEPA
(Selmunett) 23 Il-Magħluq tal-Baħar 4.42 MEPA/ ta’ Marsaskala LOCAL COUNCIL 24 Rdumijiet ta’Malta: MAJJISTRAL COMMITTEE Ir-Ramla taċ- PARK BOARD PARTIAL PARTIAL
Ċirkewwa sar-Ramla (part of the site) (MAJISTRAL) (MAJISTRAL) tal-Mixquqa 25 Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: GAIA COMMITTEE/ Għajn Tuffieħa FOUNDATION GAIA FOUNDATION 26 Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: COMMITTEE Ir-Ramla ta’ Għajn Tuffieħa sax-Xaqqa 27 Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: COMMITTEE
Mix-Xaqqa sal-Ponta
Epsilon-Adi page A-49
Natura 2000 Management Plan
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME ta’ Bengħisa
28 L-Għar tal-Iburdan u 69.13 MEPA / OWNER
l-Inħawi tal-Madwar 29 Il-Qortin tal-Magun u OWNER / MEPA
il-Qortin il-Kbir 30 Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi OWNER OWNER / MEPA ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
page A-50 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Table A-12: Half-year patrolling schedule SIX MONTH PATROLLING SCHEDULE SITE IDENTITY (Monthly – Weekly) Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 CODE NAME W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
1 L-Inħawi ta’ Għajn Barrani √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 2 L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 3 Il-Ballut tal-Wardija √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Il-Maqluba (limiti tal- 4 √ √ √ √ √ √ Qrendi) 5 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Is-Simar (limiti ta’ San 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Pawl il-Baħar) 7 Is-Salini √ √ √ √ √ √ 8 L-Għadira s-Safra √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ L-Inħawi tar-Ramla tat- 9 Torri u tal-Irdum tal- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madonna 10 Ix-Xagħra tal-Kortin √ √ √ √ √ √ 11 Għar Dalam 12 Wied il-Miżieb √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 13 Iċ-Ċittadella √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 14 Il-Ballut ta’ Marsaxlokk √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 15 L-Inħawi tal-Għadira √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Filfla u l-Gżejjer ta’ 16 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madwarha Kemmuna u l-Gżejjer ta’ 17 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madwarha L-Inħawi tal-Buskett u tal- 18 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Girgenti
Epsilon-Adi page A-51
Natura 2000 Management Plan
SIX MONTH PATROLLING SCHEDULE SITE IDENTITY (Monthly – Weekly) Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 CODE NAME W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
L-Inħawi tad-Dwejra u tal- Qawra, inkluż Ħaġret il- Ġeneral / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ 19 Ħarrux sal-Bajja tax- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Xlendi / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ San Dimitri sal-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux L-Inħawi tax-Xlendi u tal- Wied tal-Kantra / 20 Rdumijiet ta’Għawdex: √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Id-Dawra tas-Sanap sa tal-Ħajt L-Inħawi tal-Imġiebaħ u 21 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Tal-Miġnuna Il-Gżejjer ta’ San Pawl 22 √ √ √ √ √ √ (Selmunett) Il-Magħluq tal-Baħar ta’ 23 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Marsaskala Rdumijiet ta’Malta: Ir- 24 Ramla taċ-Ċirkewwa sar- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Ramla tal-Mixquqa Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: 25 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Għajn Tuffieħa Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Ir- 26 Ramla ta’ Għajn Tuffieħa √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ sax-Xaqqa
page A-52 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
SIX MONTH PATROLLING SCHEDULE SITE IDENTITY (Monthly – Weekly) Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 CODE NAME W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Mix- 27 Xaqqa sal-Ponta ta’ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Bengħisa L-Għar tal-Iburdan u l- 28 √ √ √ √ √ √ Inħawi tal-Madwar Il-Qortin tal-Magun u il- 29 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Qortin il-Kbir Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ 30 Ta’Ċenċ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Epsilon-Adi page A-53
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Table A-13: Activities monitored through patrolling MAIN MANAGEMENT MAJOR ILLEGAL / HARMFUL HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO BE MONITORED / CONTROLLED THROUGH SITE IDENTITY ACTIVITIES TO BE PATROLLING SAFEGUARDED
CODE NAME SPECIES HABITAT HABITAT HUNTING HUNTING TRAPPING ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES TRAMPLING TRAMPLING OFF-ROADING OFF-ROADING MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT UNCONTROLLED CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OF IAS OF PLANTING HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE OUTDOOR LEISURE INSTALLATION AND AND INSTALLATION DUMPING / LITTERING / DUMPING MANAGEMENT WORKS MANAGEMENT 1 L-Inħawi ta’ Għajn Barrani √ √ √ √ √ √ 2 L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke √ √ √ √ √ √
3 Il-Ballut tal-Wardija √ √
4 Il-Maqluba (limiti tal-Qrendi) √ √ √ 5 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Is-Simar (limiti ta’ San Pawl il- 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ Baħar) 7 Is-Salini √ √ √ √ √ 8 L-Għadira s-Safra √ √ √ √ L-Inħawi tar-Ramla tat-Torri u 9 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ tal-Irdum tal-Madonna 10 Ix-Xagħra tal-Kortin √ √ √ √ 11 Għar Dalam √ √ 12 Wied il-Miżieb √ √ √ √ √ 13 Iċ-Ċittadella √ √ √
14 Il-Ballut ta’ Marsaxlokk √ √ √ √ √ √
15 L-Inħawi tal-Għadira √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Filfla u l-Gżejjer ta’ 16 √ Madwarha
page A-54 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
MAIN MANAGEMENT MAJOR ILLEGAL / HARMFUL HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO BE MONITORED / CONTROLLED THROUGH SITE IDENTITY ACTIVITIES TO BE PATROLLING SAFEGUARDED
CODE NAME SPECIES HABITAT HABITAT HUNTING HUNTING TRAPPING ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES TRAMPLING TRAMPLING OFF-ROADING OFF-ROADING MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT UNCONTROLLED CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OF IAS OF PLANTING HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE OUTDOOR LEISURE INSTALLATION AND AND INSTALLATION DUMPING / LITTERING / DUMPING MANAGEMENT WORKS MANAGEMENT Kemmuna u l-Gżejjer ta’ 17 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madwarha L-Inħawi tal-Buskett u tal- 18 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Girgenti L-Inħawi tad-Dwejra u tal- Qawra, inkluż Ħaġret il- Ġeneral / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux 19 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ sal-Bajja tax-Xlendi / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il- Ponta ta’ San Dimitri sal- Ponta ta’ Ħarrux
L-Inħawi tax-Xlendi u tal- Wied tal-Kantra / Rdumijiet 20 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ta’Għawdex: Id-Dawra tas- Sanap sa tal-Ħajt
L-Inħawi tal-Imġiebaħ u Tal- 21 √ √ √ √ √ √ Miġnuna Il-Gżejjer ta’ San Pawl 22 √ √ √ (Selmunett) Il-Magħluq tal-Baħar ta’ 23 √ √ √ Marsaskala
Epsilon-Adi page A-55
Natura 2000 Management Plan
MAIN MANAGEMENT MAJOR ILLEGAL / HARMFUL HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO BE MONITORED / CONTROLLED THROUGH SITE IDENTITY ACTIVITIES TO BE PATROLLING SAFEGUARDED
CODE NAME SPECIES HABITAT HABITAT HUNTING HUNTING TRAPPING ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES TRAMPLING TRAMPLING OFF-ROADING OFF-ROADING MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT UNCONTROLLED CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OF IAS OF PLANTING HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE OUTDOOR LEISURE INSTALLATION AND AND INSTALLATION DUMPING / LITTERING / DUMPING MANAGEMENT WORKS MANAGEMENT Rdumijiet ta’Malta: Ir-Ramla 24 taċ-Ċirkewwa sar-Ramla tal- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Mixquqa PARTIAL Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Għajn (MAJISTRAL 25 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Tuffieħa / GHAJN TUFFIEHA) Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Ir-Ramla 26 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ta’ Għajn Tuffieħa sax-Xaqqa Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Mix- 27 √ √ √ √ Xaqqa sal-Ponta ta’ Bengħisa L-Għar tal-Iburdan u l-Inħawi 28 √ √ tal-Madwar Il-Qortin tal-Magun u il- 29 √ √ √ Qortin il-Kbir Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ 30 Ta’Ċenċ √ √ √ √ √
page A-56 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
ANNEX 5 COST RECOVERY MECHANISMS
Revenue generating mechanisms and self-financing opportunities for Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ are suggested. These initiatives can additionally contribute to promoting and establishing the concept of a network of Natura 2000 sites in Malta. Other funding mechanisms are also identified, excluding reference to governmental funding which could be induced in other ways, e.g. through the police undertaking patrol duties.
A.5.1 REVENUE GENERATING AND SELF -FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES
Revenue generating mechanisms and self-financing opportunities for the site are suggested. These initiatives can additionally contribute to promoting and establishing the concept of a network of Natura 2000 sites in Malta. Other funding mechanisms are also identified, excluding reference to governmental funding which could be induced in other ways, e.g. through the police undertaking patrol duties.
The revenue generating and self-financing potential of Ta’ Ċenċ derives from the multi- pronged promotion and marketing of the Natura 2000 network, as set by the national interpretation strategy, which considers the importance and contribution of each site at the national level, the local (individual site) level, and at the group level (groups of related sites with commonalities). Within this context, the Natura 2000 interpretation strategy will take forward a cohesive implementation programme of innovative mechanisms aimed at direct and indirect revenue generation as well as at the network and individual site level.
Examples of direct revenue-generating initiatives that could be implemented for Ta’ Ċenċ include:
• Introduction of a discretionary entrance fee, or donation. Where there may be a reluctance to introduce a mandatory entrance fee, the practice of suggesting that visitors leave a donation towards the upkeep a heritage site has proven to be very successful nationally and internationally, often proving to yield more revenue than a small mandatory entrance fee.
• Publication and sale of a guidebook(s) on Ta’ Ċenċ, and other advertising material, including postcards, badges, fridge magnets, and similar souvenirs.
• Sale on-site of other merchandise not directly related to Natura 2000 but which is environment-related and / or supports sustainable industries, for example, local artisan and cottage industry foods and crafts products; these could be sourced from and showcase Mellieha, thereby also serving to encourage diversification and economic opportunity for local producers.
Examples of network-wide direct revenue-generating initiatives which can be adapted to individual sites, such as Ta’ Ċenċ, may include:
• Designation of an annual ‘Natura 2000 Day’. This would be added to the local calendar of events and, similar to events such as ‘Birgu by Candlelight’, would involve the holding of fairs / activities in a number venues, including within Natura 2000 sites, exposing Natura 2000 by a number of means, including guided tours, talks, promotional stands,
Epsilon-Adi page A-57
Natura 2000 Management Plan
and generating revenue through the display and sale of Natura 2000 related merchandise.
• A ‘Friends of Natura 2000’ badge scheme similar to established charity schemes (such as the ‘Poppy Appeal’), with badges on sale at the visitors centre and elsewhere in Gozo (or nationally).
• An initiative with hotels and other tourism accommodation providers, as part of their corporate social responsibility programmes, to offer guests the opportunity to round-up their bill, or to give small donation, with the monies going towards the management of the Natura 2000 network (adapted at the local level to apply to hotels in Gozo and with monies directed to Natura 2000 sites). The MTA’s Eco-certification Scheme could be very influential in respect of this initiative, and a number of hotels in the Gozo are already part of this Scheme. The initiative could also be applied to restaurants and other service providers.
• Creation of one or more ‘Natura Cafes’. Located in popular tourist locations and locations frequented by locals, and not necessarily within Natura 2000 sites, these could be already established cafes, or new cafes, which would act as a showcases and potentially as interpretations centre for the Natura 2000 network. Revenue would be generated from the sale of food and drink and from promotional merchandise / souvenirs. There would be set criteria for qualification as a Natura Cafe, with an emphasis on a sustainable business model (from the products on offer through to environmental management best practise); extension of the MTA’s Eco-certification Scheme to cover cafes and restaurants would be beneficial.
• An initiative with the Malta Crafts Council to produce and market a nature-themed range of crafts product (possibly a Natura 2000 themed range) that would be available on sale at Natura 2000 visitor centres, Natura cafes, and at other heritage and tourist sites.
• Initiatives with local farmers and producers to produce, market and sell food and drink (for example, honey, cheese, fruit and vegetables, wine, olive oil, etc.) and artisan crafts produced within and in the vicinity of Natura 2000 sites, marketed under the Natura 2000 brand. This would also serve to encourage diversification and economic opportunity for local producers. As an extension of direct-point sale, non-perishable food products and crafts could also be sold on-line.
• Publication and sale of a high-quality photo book showcasing the Natura 2000 network, possibly commissioning professional photographers, but alternatively produced as the product of a photographic competition; this ‘coffee table’ book could be published in conjunction with postcards and other promotional images from the range.
Examples of network-wide in-direct revenue-generating initiatives which can be adapted to individual sites, such as Ta’ Ċenċ, may include:
• Recruitment of ‘Natura 2000 Ambassadors’. These ambassadors would be tasked with raising awareness of the Natura 2000 network (or of individual sites or groups of sites, for example, wetlands) through their everyday activities; the ambassadors could be media personalities, experts in the field, educators, local people (particularly for individual sites), etc.
page A-58 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
• Exposure of Natura 2000 at visitor gateways, such as Malta International Airport and all ferry terminals (adapted at the local level at Mgarr, the Mgarr bus interchange, and various bus stops). This could be delivered together with exposure at key tourist locations and in key tourist publications, including il-Bizzilla, the Air Malta in-flight magazine.
• Initiatives with the Government’s Health Promotion Unit to encourage physical exercise and healthy lifestyles through the enjoyment of the natural environment within the Natura 2000 network. Initiatives could include low intensity sporting events / activities (marathons, triathlons, cycling, walks, etc) organised within the network and promoted to advertise Natura 2000 (for example, an annual sporting / recreation activity organised in conjunction with ‘Natura 2000 Day’). It must be ensured that such activities do not negatively affect the site.
• Initiatives with the Department of Education and / or with local schools education facilities to establish better access to nature conservation and the Natura 2000 network. Adapting international best practice, initiatives could include following the ‘nature kindergarten’ models which are a growing trend in Europe and the US, where exposure to and experimentation in nature is seen to significantly benefit child development. Trained nature conservation professionals (possibly site wardens) could host nature sessions with school children of all ages. Additionally, and very applicable to the local level, schools could decide to ‘adopt’ a Natura 2000 site.
• Targeted tourism and recreation initiatives aimed at promoting the Natura 2000 network through working off the existing marketing capacity for rural and coastal recreation activities, for example, walking, cycling, snorkelling, diving, etc.
• Creation of a Natura 2000 Loyalty Card (potentially operating with the ‘Friends of Natura 2000’ scheme), which would allow visitors to earn points as they visit different sites in the network, affording them discounts on Natura 2000 products and services, on activities carried out within or in the vicinity of Natura 2000 sites (for example, bicycle hire, diving, etc.), and possibly on hotels and restaurants / cafes in the localities, including the Natura Cafes.
A.5.2 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
In addition to the revenue generating initiatives on a national level, the following funding programmes provide opportunities for funding of the management and interpretation of Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ, and of the Natura 2000 network:
LIFE
A number of the management actions proposed for the site are eligible for co-funding under the Nature and Biodiversity component of the LIFE initiative.
LIFE is the EU’s financial instrument supporting environmental and nature conservation contributing approximately €3.1 billion to the protection of the environment. Since 1992, LIFE has co-financed some 3954 projects. Recently (09 December 2013) the European Council adopted a new regulation that establishes the Environment and Climate Action sub-
Epsilon-Adi page A-59
Natura 2000 Management Plan
programmes of the LIFE Programme for the next funding period, 2014–2020. The budget for the period is set at €3.4 billion in current prices.
The programme will contribute to sustainable development and to the achievement of the objectives and targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy, the 7th Union Environmental Action Programme and other relevant EU environment and climate strategies and plans.
The ‘Environment’ strand of the new programme covers three priority areas: environment and resource efficiency; nature and biodiversity; and environmental governance and information. The new regulation is in force from the 1st of January 2014.
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development
The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) is an important funding source for the taking forward of management actions for the site, providing for direct payments to farmers to compensate for implementing Natura 2000 related management requirements.
The EAFRD will continue to provide this and several other opportunities to fund Natura 2000 management and interpretation related activities during the EU 2014-2020 funding period. As during 2007-2013, the new round of EAFRD funding includes specific provisions for the LEADER approach, supporting the implementation of EAFRD objectives through the local action groups (LAGs). The new round also includes a provision to support the implementation of European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability, with the objective of promoting a resource efficient, productive, low emission, climate friendly and resilient agricultural sector, and improving processes to preserve the environment, adapt to climate change and mitigate it. This opens up new opportunities for financing Natura 2000 related activities, for example, in the support of innovative approaches for agriculture and farming within and in the vicinity of Natura 2000 sites.
Structural Funds
The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) provides some opportunities to fund Natura 2000 management activities during the period 2014-2020, with a number of actions eligible under the ‘Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services’ stream of the initiative; the ERDF provides for direct support for the protection of biodiversity and ecosystem services. There is also potential for funding for management and interpretation activities indirectly, through the ERDF’s support for broader sustainable development, for example, through the protection and promotion of cultural heritage.
The Cohesion Fund delivers a wide range of measures linked to the management of Natura 2000, as well as wider green infrastructure, and will continue to provide an important funding opportunity for Natura 2000 management actions during the 2014-2020 funding period. These funds can directly support restoration and conservation measures as well as support investments in sustainable tourism, awareness-raising, training and education, and communication and information activities relating to Natura 2000. Opportunities for Natura 2000 management are also available through investment support in the broader sustainable development sphere, for example, supporting investment in the adaptation to climate change.
The European Social Fund (ESF) addresses the support of economic and social cohesion but offers the opportunity for funding of actions and activities with possible indirect links to Natura
page A-60 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
2000 management, for example, enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized Natura 2000-related enterprises.
Horizon 2020
Horizon 2020 is the new EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, aimed at contributing to the creation of growth and jobs in research, innovation and technological development. The Programme will run from 2014 to 2020, with approximately €80 billion budgeted for this period. Thematic areas of interest for Natura 2000 include health, sustainable agriculture, the bio-economy, climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials.
Horizon 2020 offers opportunities for Natura 2000 management-related activities in respect of the research, development and testing of new management approaches and the evaluation and monitoring of management regimes.
Epsilon-Adi page A-61
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 6 MAPS
This section includes the maps of the site in A3 format.
page A-62 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
A.6.1 BOUNDARY MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-63
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.2 HYDROLOGY MAP
page A-64 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
A.6.3 GEOLOGY MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-65
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.4 CULTURAL HERITAGE MAP
page A-66 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
A.6.5 LAND USE MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-67
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.6 HABITATS MAP
page A-68 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
A.6.7 SIGNAGE MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-69
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.8 SPECIES MAP
page A-70 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
A.6.9 VISITOR ACCESS MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-71
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.10 ACTIONS MAP
page A-72 Epsilon-Adi
Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
ANNEX BIBLIOGRAPHY
Council of Europe (1997). Drafting and implementing action plans for threatened species (Council of Europe publishing, Environmental Encounters No 39).
Le Maitre, D. C. et al. (2011). Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration . Diversity and Distributions, Volume 17, pp. 1015-1029.
MEPA (2011). Dossier on Wild Fauna in the Maltese Islands: Capture, Killing and Exploitation. St Francis Ravelin: MEPA.
MEPA (2013). Guidelines on managing plant invaders and restoring Native Plant Communities , St Francis Ravelin: MEPA.
Tunison, T. J. & Zimmer, N. G., (1992). Success in controlling localized alien plants in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. In: Alien Plant Invasions in Native Ecosystems of Hawaii: Management and Research . Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, pp. 506-524.
Epsilon-Adi page A-73
Rdumijiet u L-
Inħawi ta’
Ta’ Ċenċ
This is the Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ Ta’Ċenċ Management Plan that contains available information retrieved up to 2013 for the site. The Management Plan details on site conservation and protection.
The Natura 2000 Management Planning for Malta and Gozo project is funded by the EAFRD and pioneered by MEPA. It is aimed to establish management plans and legal provisions for the management of all terrestrial Natura 2000 sites in the Maltese Islands and to increase awareness of Natura 2000 amongst the general public and stakeholders.
The project started in October 2012 and ended in March 2014. It is considered a milestone in the protection of Malta’s rural environment, as it undertakes necessary actions required in management planning for the 34 terrestrial Natura 2000 sites.
The project involved gathering information, carrying out surveys, defining conservation objectives and identifying management measures, with intensive stakeholder involvement. These management plans are not intended to restrain recreational or other economical activities within these sites, but rather to support the sustainable use of Malta’s natural resources with the involvement of stakeholders.