ON the PERIPHERY of the KLONDIKE GOLO RUSH: CANYON CITY, an ARCHAEOLOGICAL Perspectlve
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE KLONDIKE GOLO RUSH: CANYON CITY, AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PERSPECTlVE Thomas J. Hammer B.A. (Honours), Simon Fraser University, 1994 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Archaeology @ Thomas J. Hammer 1999 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY June 1999 All rights resewed. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. National Library Bibliothèque nationale !*I of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wdlington ûttawaON K1AW OnawaON KlAW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive Licence aiiowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neitber the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. This thesis investigates an Upper Yukon River Klondike Gold Rush site known as Canyon City. Canyon City and other sites like it were integral. but peripheral to the Klondike Gold Rush. This study attempts to integrate the oral. archiva1 and archaeoiogical data to provide insights into the day-to-day life of the resident population at Canyon City during the Klondike Gold Rush, 1897-1900. Over the course of four years, six localities within the former settlement were extensively tested. These include: the West Tent locality, the Canyon Hotel and Saloon, the NWMP Barracks, the Canyon and White Horse Rapids Tramway Co. building, the East Cabin and the Machine/Blacksmith Shop. A total of 17,395 artifacts and 156 faunal specimens were collected during the investigations. lt is argued that the wrnpany structured the inhabitants' day-to-day lives within this single industry tom. This structuring is evident in the settlement characteristics such as the structured settlement layout, the lack of duplication of services, the predorninately male population and the dependence of the residents on the Company for sustenance. Although based on limited data, the settlement also appears ta have been organized socially-the workers and the ovmers. Furtherrnore, the cultural remains and architectural data suggest the general nature of the site was expedient and utilitarian, which not only reflects the logistical problems faced by Klondike era settlements but also the economic motivation of the townsite's owners. ... 111 The abandonment behavior present at Canyon City appears to have largely been determined by company interests. Except for the East Cabin, wtiich burned with much of its contents still intact, the site undervuent planned. permanent abandonment. Since the investigations carried out at Canyon City wre the first of its kind on the Upper Yukon River, it is unknown whether or not Canyon City can be considered a typical settlement in this area. Work is needed at similar settlements along the Upper Yukon to better illuminate their role in the Klondike Gold Rush and their significance in the development of the Yukon. This thesis was made possible by the generous support of the Yukon Heritage Branch, Government of Yukon. The Canyon City Archaeology Project was a joint endeavor of the Yukon Heritage Branch, Department of Tourism, and the Kwanlin Dün First Nation with the support of the MacBrîde Museum and Yukon Conservation Society. I would like to thank Jeff Hunston. Director of Yukon Heritage Branch, for giving me the opportunity to work at the site over a period of four years. I greatly appreciate the continued support from Heritage Branch Archaeologists Ruth Gotthardt and Greg Hare. who provided me with insights, inspiration and edited parts of this thesis several times. I would also like to extend my gratitude to the rest of the staff of Heritage Branch for their assistance. Thanks for the rnap Brent. I am also grateful to my senior supervisor. Dr. David Burley, for his patience and rigorous editing. I would also like to thank Dr. Jack Nance and Dr. Olga Klimko for their comments on my thesis project. 1 am grateful for the financial support for the Department of Archaeology, SFU, for awarding me a Graduate Fellowship and a Teaching Assistant position. Further financial support was provided by the Yukon Heritage Branch, the Canada Employrnent Challenge Program. the Yukon Government Student Training and Employrnent Program, the Yukon Foundation, and DIAND Northern Scientific Training Program. I extend thanks to John Hatch, John Scott and Lawrence Cyr for sharing their knowledge about the old days. Donna Hagen and Sweeney v Scurvey, from the Kwanlin Dun First Nation provided the understanding of the traditional land use of the site through their oral history work. Valuable contributions wre made by elders Mrs. May Hume, Mrs. Julie Joe. Mrs. Lucy Wren, Mrs. Mary James, Jimmy G. Smith, Edwin Scurvey, EMrdGordon. Mrs. Virginia Vallevand, John Suits, Louie Smith, Rose Charlie and Ronald Bill. The project owes its success to the hard work of the field crew and site interpreters. These include: Ty Heffner, vvho also did the faunal work. Megan Williams and Sarah Berquist (Heritage Branch STEP students); Azalea Joe, Henry Taylor, Corey Pope, John Yaklin: Marilee Smarch, Charlie O'Brien. and Michael Smith of Kwanlin Dün; Own Williams, Jacob Jirousek, Hillary Walkley, Sara Neilsen, Sara Bryce, Greg Kubica. Georgina Nicioux. Wilmonica VanBibber, Loic Markley and Hannah Hickling of the Yukon Conservation Society; Andrea Hoyt, Rachel Pugh and Christie Colx of the MacBride Museum. I wouid also like to acknowiedge the Yukon Underwater Divers -ociationJs efforts. Doug Davidge. and Perry Diamond conducted the underwater survey at Canyon City. Thanks also go out to the support and assistance of the Yukon Archives, MacBride Museum; Chief Lena Johns, Chef Joe Jack, Pat Joe. Patty Ann Finlay and Jackie Shortie of the Kwanlin Dun First Nation. David Neufeld of Parks Canada, Flo Whyard and Helene Dobrowolsky openiy shared their knowiedge and resources with me on Canyon City. Mrs. Whyard provided the NWMP log book for Canyon City dated 1899-1900. An important and productive aspect of the project was the enthusiasm of the many volunteers who participated in the Canyon City excavations. Thanks also to the thousands of visitors who took the time to visit Canyon City. Finally, I owe the wrnpletion of this thesis to my family and closest friends. My wife Myra's encouragement, support and patience over the years kept me going and sane. Afthough unknowingly my children, Melissa and Nolan, provided me with much inspiration. And of course, thanks to Jim Slater and Ruth Whitney. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL II .-. ABSTRACT III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v TABLE OF CONTENTS viii LIST OF TABLES X LlST OF FIGURES CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER WO: CANYON CITY IN CONTEXT SITE LOCATIONAND GEOGRAPHICCONTEXT HISTORICAL OVERVIONOF CANYONCITY GOLDRUSH HISTORY- 1800-1 899/1900 Pre-Gold Rush Era Gold Rush Era Canyon City PoST GOLDRUSH ERA - 1900 - PRESENT CHAPTER THREE: FIELDWORK, RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY PREVIOUS WORKAT CANYON CITY ARCHAEOL~GICAL FIELDMETHOOOLOGY DOCUMENTARYRESEARCH METHODOLOGY ARTIFACT ANALYSE MEHTODOLOGY CHAPTER FOUR: HlSTORlC FEATURES AT CANYON ClTV CANYON CITY TOWNSITE WEST TENTLOCALITV: FEATURES CANYON HOTELAND SALOON: FEATURES NORTH-WESTMOUNTED POLICE BARRACKS: FEATURES CANYONAND WHITE HORSERAPIDS COMPANY TRAMWAYOFFICE: FEATURES THE EASTCABIN: FEATURES THE MACHINE/~LACKSMITHSHOP: FEATURES SUMMARY CHAPTER 5: CANYON CITY HlSTORlC ARTIFACT ASSEMBiAGE WEST TENTLOCALITY: ARTIFACTASSEMBLAGE Summary CANYONHOTEL AND SALOON:ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE Summary NORTH-WESTMOUNTEO POLICE BARRACKSARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE Summary CANYONAND WHITE HORSE RAPIDS TRAMWAYOFFICE: ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE Summary EASTCABI N: ARTIFACTASSEMBLAGE Summary MACHINE/BLACKSMITHSHOP: ARTIFACTASSEMBLAGE Summary CHAPTER 6: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS SITE CHARACTERISTICS SETLEMENT SUBSISTENCE ABANDONMENT CONCLUSION REFERENCES ClTED Table 1. Table showing the historic features tested during the archaeological investigations at Canyon City including number of units, area excavated and approximate sampie size. Table 2. Functional groups used in the dassification of the Canyon City Historic Artifact assemblage and their associated artifact types. Table 3. Table of features identified at Canyon City and accompanying identifications. Table 4. Table showing artifact counts and each locality's relative contribution to the histonc artifact assemblage from Canyon City. Table 5. West Tent locality artifact functional groups and counts. Table 6. Faunal rernains coliected from the West Tent locality. Table 7. Canyon Hotel and Saloon artifact functional groups and counts. Table 8. NWMP Barracks artifact functional groups and counts. Table 9. Canyon and White Horse Rapids Tramway Office artifact functional groups and counts. Table 10. East Cabin artifad functional groups and counts. Table 11. East Cabin faunal remains.