Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment MARCH 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment MARCH 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment MARCH 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was developed by a team led by Azeb donor community, who ensured fruitful and produc- Fissha Mekonnen, Agricultural Specialist of the tive discussions of the findings of this assessment at Agriculture Global Practice at the World Bank. The various workshops. activities were supported by Carlos E. Arce and Jorge The team also extends its appreciation to the Caballero as lead consultants for the overall study. stakeholders from major agricultural supply chains Eija Peju, Alejandra Campero, Ramiro Iturrioz, and that participated at various stages of the fieldwork Easther Chigumira provided specialized analysis and in workshops to discuss the findings. The team is during the risk assessment. indebted to them for encouraging the team to main- Special thanks are due to the team of Zimbabwean tain a realistic and practical perspective. consultants who carried out field assessments for Valuable and constructive comments were various agricultural commodities and livestock received from Diego Arias Carballo, Lead Agriculture and for the valuable and practical comments and Economist (World Bank); John Luke Plevin, contributions they provided to this study: Carren Financial Sector Specialist (World Bank); and Niels Pindiriri, Jacqeline Mutambara, Jacob Gusha, and Balzer, Deputy Country Director (World Food Vimbai Audrey Chandiwana. Willem Janssen, Lead Programme, Zimbabwe), acting as peer reviewers Agricultural Specialist, and Julie Dana, Practice for the study. Mukami Karuki, Country Manager Manager for the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction for Zimbabwe; Mark Cackler, Practice Manager, and Recovery, Barry Patrick Maher, Senior Financial Agriculture Global Practice; and Holger Kray, Lead Sector Specialist, of the World Bank, provided advice Agriculture Economist, Agriculture Global Practice at various stages. provided important guidance and support. This The team is grateful to the Ministry of Land, activity is financed by the EU-funded ACP-EU Agriculture, Water, Climate and Rural Resettlement Africa Disaster Risk Financing Program, managed for leadership and support, as well as to the par- by the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and ticipants from the private sector, government, and Recovery. This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Abbreviations and Acronyms xi Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Overview of the Agricultural Sector 5 1.2 Methodology Used for This Risk Assessment 6 Chapter 2 Agricultural Risk Exposure 9 2.1 Production Losses 9 2.2 Production Losses for Different Return Periods 10 Chapter 3 Sources of Risk 13 3.1 Agro-ecological Regions 13 3.2 Risk Identification 14 3.3 Risk Prioritization 16 Chapter 4 Capacity to Manage Agricultural Risk 21 4.1 Vulnerability Factors 21 4.2 Agricultural Services for Strengthening Resilience 22 4.3 Assessing Disaster Risk Management Capacity 23 Chapter 5 Toward a Risk Management Strategy 31 5.1 Risk Mitigation 32 5.2 Agricultural Insurance 38 5.3 Sovereign Disaster Risk Management 40 Chapter 6 Concluding Remarks 45 Bibliography 47 vii viii Contents Appendix A Description of Agricultural Supply Chains Used in the Risk Assessment 49 Appendix B Methodology Used to Estimate the Value of Crop Losses 57 Tobacco Crop Loss Estimates 57 Maize Crop Loss Estimates 59 Appendix C Methodology for the Risk Assessment for Various Return Periods 63 Materials and Methods 63 Main Findings and Discussion 66 Appendix D Risks for Crop and Livestock Supply Chains 83 Crops 83 Cattle Production 89 Poultry Industry 91 Tables 1 Land Holdings Before and After the Introduction of Fast Track Land Reform, Zimbabwe 6 2 Zimbabwe: Main Agricultural Commodities Included in the Risk Assessment 7 3 Estimated Volume and Value of Crop Losses in Zimbabwe (Average of 30 Years, 1986-2016) 10 4 Estimated Loss at Risk (LaR) for a Portfolio of Crops at Different Return Periods 10 5 Production Risks and Current Risk Management Practices by Stakeholder Group, Zimbabwe 17 6 Basic Legislation for Disaster Risk Management 24 7 Additional Legislation Supporting Disaster Risk Management 25 8 Policy and Strategies Related to Disaster Risk Management and Financing 25 9 Allocations from the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development Contingency Fund to the Department of Civil Protection for Disaster Operations 28 10 Budget allocations (in US$) from the Civil Protection Fund 28 11 Maize Imports and Their Value, 2015–18 29 12 Annual Budget for Agricultural Services 33 13 Estimated Financing Gap in Disaster Risk Management in Zimbabwe 41 Appendix Tables B.1 Data for Estimating Tobacco Crop Losses and Their Value 57 B.2 Data for estimating Maize Crop Losses and Their Value 59 C.1 Zimbabwe Crop Portfolio: Exposure–Expected Gross Value of Production (US$) 68 C.2 Zimbabwe: Whole Crop Complex: Expected LaR Values for Different Return Periods 69 C.3 Zimbabwe: Contribution of each Crop to the Portfolio Risk 70 C.4 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Maize for Different Return Periods 71 C.5 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Tobacco for Different Return Periods 72 C.6 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Sugarcane for Different Return Periods 74 C.7 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Groundnuts for Different Return Periods 76 C.8 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Cotton for Different Return Periods 78 C.9 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Sorghum for Different Return Periods 80 C.10 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Wheat for Different Return Periods 81 C.11 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR Values for Soybeans for Different Return Periods 82 D.1 Variation in Maize Yields by Province, Zimbabwe 85 Figures 1 Relationship Between Agriculture Value Added and Overall GDP Growth 7 2 Agro-Ecological Regions and Soil Map 14 3 Correlation Between Rainfall and Crop Yields, Zimbabwe 15 4 Prioritized Agricultural Risks, Zimbabwe 18 5 Structure of Zimbabwe’s emergency Management System 26 Contents ix 6 Zimbabwe Humanitarian Response Plan, 2008–16 30 7 A Risk Layering Strategy for the Government of Zimbabwe 32 8 Grouping Farmers to Develop Different Strategies for Agricultural Innovation 34 9 Zimbabwe: Financial Risk Layering to Respond to Natural Disasters 41 Appendix Figures A.1 Tobacco Growers and Area 50 A.2 Tobacco Supply Chain Actors 50 A.3 Cotton Supply Chain 51 A.4 Sugarcane Supply Chain 52 A.5 Wheat Supply Chain 53 A.6 Horticulture Supply Chain 55 A.7 Beef Supply Chain 56 B.1 Yield Trends and Crop Losses, Tobacco 58 B.2 Yield Trends and Crop Losses in Relation to Severe Weather Events, Maize 60 B.3 Maize Yields Over Time (National Yields and Yields at Different Scales of Production) 61 C.1 Zimbabwe: Historic Evolution of Maize Yields 64 C.2 Zimbabwe: Maize Yield Deviations from Expected Yields 65 C.3 Zimbabwe: Detrended Maize Yields 65 C.4 Zimbabwe Maize: Best Fit Probability Distribution Function Over Detrended Yields 65 C.5 Methodology Used for the Assessment 67 C.6 Zimbabwe: Production of Main Crops (t), 1986–2015 68 C.7 Zimbabwe: Yields of Main Crops (kg/ha), 1986–2015 69 C.8 Expected LaR for Different Recurrence Periods for the Whole Crop Portfolio in Zimbabwe 69 C.9 Zimbabwe: Maize Production (t), 1986–2015 70 C.10 Zimbabwe: Maize Yields (kg/ha), 1986–2015 70 C.11 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR for Maize for Different Recurrence Periods 71 C.12 Zimbabwe: Tobacco Production (t), 1986–2015 71 C.13 Zimbabwe: Tobacco Yields (kg/ha), 1986–2015 72 C.14 Expected LaR for Different Recurrence Periods for Tobacco in Zimbabwe 72 C.15 Zimbabwe: Sugarcane Production (t), 1986–2015 73 C.16 Zimbabwe: Sugarcane Yields (kg/ha), 1986–2015 74 C.17 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR for Sugarcane for Different Recurrence Periods 74 C.18 Zimbabwe: Groundnut Production (t), 1986–2015 75 C.19 Zimbabwe: Groundnut Yields (kg/ha), 1986–2015 75 C.20 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR for Groundnuts for Different Recurrence Periods 76 C.21 Zimbabwe: Cotton Production (t), 1986–2015 77 C.22 Zimbabwe: Cotton Yields, 1986-2015 77 C.23 Zimbabwe: Expected LaR for Cotton for Different Recurrence Periods 78 C.24 Zimbabwe: Coffee Production (t), 1986–2015 78 C.25 Zimbabwe: Coffee Yields (kg/ha), 1986-2015 79 C.26 Zimbabwe: Sorghum Production (t), 1986–2015 79 C.27 Zimbabwe: Sorghum Yields (kg/ha), 1986-2015 80 C.28 Zimbabwe: Wheat Production (t), 1986–2015 81 C.29 Zimbabwe: Wheat Yields (kg/ha), 1986–2015 81 C.30 Zimbabwe: Soybean Production (t), 1986–2015 82 C.31 Zimbabwe: Soybean Yields (kg/ha), 1986–2015 82 D.1 Maize: Estimated Annual Yield Losses 84 D.2 Groundnuts: Estimated Annual Yield Losses 84 D.3 National Retail Maize Prices in Zimbabwe 85 D.4 Seed Cotton: Estimated Annual Yield Losses 86 x Contents D.5 Wheat: Estimated Annual Losses 86 D.6 Tobacco: Estimated Annual Yield Losses
Recommended publications
  • Mothers of the Revolution
    Mothers of the revolution http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.crp3b10035 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org Mothers of the revolution Author/Creator Staunton, Irene Publisher Baobab Books (Harare) Date 1990 Resource type Books Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) Zimbabwe Source Northwestern University Libraries, Melville J. Herskovits Library of African Studies, 968.9104 M918 Rights This book is available through Baobab Books, Box 567, Harare, Zimbabwe. Description Mothers of the Revolution tells of the war experiences of thirty Zimbabwean women. Many people suffered and died during Zimbabwe's war of liberation and many accounts of that struggle have already been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of Contract Farming As a Mechanism for the Commercialisation of Smallholder Agriculture
    POTENTIAL OF CONTRACT FARMING AS A MECHANISM FOR THE COMMERCIALISATION OF SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE THE ZIMBABWE CASE STUDY REPORT PREPARED FOR: FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION (FAO) John J. Woodend September 2003 1 Acknowledgements The ongoing initiative on contract farming has largely resulted from the unstinting efforts of Dr. Tobais Takavarasha who has worked tirelessly to promote contract farming in Zimbabwe. I am grateful to the many people (Appendix 2) who took time of their busy schedules to either meet with me or answer several questions over the phone. I am particularly grateful to David Mfote (MoLARR); Roy Bvekerwa (Hortico); Rob Jarvis (Quton); Chris Lightfoot (Tanganda Tea Estates); E. Chenyika (Southdown Tea Estates); A. Gagiano (Mkwasine Sugar Estates); Kristian Jensen (Khula Sizwe Trust); Atwell Muropa (IDC); Phil Cunningham, Dave Irvine and Graeme Murdoch (Irvines Day Old Chicks); Ian Goggin (ZIMACE); and Raphael Zuze and B. Chipanera (ARDA) who generously shared their views on contract farming with me The study has also benefited from the advice and guidance provided by members of the interim Steering Committee on Contract Farming, i.e. Dr. Tobias Takavarasha, David Mfote (MoLARR), Reggie Mugwara (SADC FANR Hub), Dr. David Rohrbach (ICRISAT), Basilio Sandamu (HPC) and Susan Minae (FAO). However, the opinions expressed herein are those of the Consultant and should not be attributed to any member of the Steering Committee. The following people readily provided relevant reports and publications at short notice: Alexandra Rottger (FAO, Rome); Thomas Jayne (Michigan State University, USA); Clive Drew (USAID Agribusiness Development Unit, Kampala, Uganda); Christopher Delgado and Nicholas Minot (IFPRI, USA); Andrew Dorward (Wye College,UK); and Jonathan Coulter, Rachel Springfellow and Anne Tallontire (Natural Resources Institute, UK).
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Annual Budget Review for 2016 and the 2017 Outlook
    ZIMBABWE ANNUAL BUDGET REVIEW FOR 2016 AND THE 2017 OUTLOOK Presented to the Parliament of Zimbabwe on Thursday, July 20, 2017 by The Hon. P. A. Chinamasa, M.P. Minister of Finance and Economic Development 1 1 2 FOREWORD In presenting the 2017 National Budget on 8 December 2016, I indicated the need to strengthen the outline of the Budget Statement presentation as an instrument of Budget accountability and fiscal transparency, in the process improving policy engagement and accessibility for a wider range of public and targeted audiences. Accordingly, I presented a streamlined Budget Statement, and advised that extensive economic review material, which historically was presented as part of the National Budget Statement, would now be provided through a new publication called the Annual Budget Review. I am, therefore, pleased to unveil and Table the first Annual Budget Review, beginning with Fiscal Year 2016. This reports on revenue and expenditure outturn for the full fiscal year, 2016. Furthermore, the Annual Budget Review also allows opportunity for reporting on other recent macro-economic developments and the outlook for 2017. As I indicated to Parliament in December 2016, the issuance of the Annual Budget Review, therefore, makes the issuance of the Mid-Term Fiscal Policy Review no longer necessary, save for exceptional circumstances requiring Supplementary Budget proposals. 3 Treasury will, however, continue to provide Quarterly Treasury Bulletins, capturing quarterly macro-economic and fiscal developments, in addition to the Consolidated Monthly Financial Statements published monthly in line with the Public Finance Management Act. This should avail the public with necessary information on relevant economic developments, that way enhancing and supporting their decision making processes, activities and engagement with Government on overall economic policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Jambanja?
    The End of Jambanja? Social Organisation and Agency in ‘fast track’ Areas Tendai Murisa 2012 Copyright © 2012 Tendai Murisa First Printing 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Book and cover design: Isis Designs ISBN 978-0-7974-4754-7. The End of Jambanja? | i Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES vii PREFACE ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x LIST OF ACRONYMS xii -1- SETTING THE SCENE 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Background to the Study 3 1.3 Rural Collective Action 5 1.4 Justification 14 1.5 Research Methods 16 1.6 Background to the Study Area 18 1.6.1 Goromonzi District and Bromley Ward 18 1.6.2 Zvimba District and Banket 20 1.7 The Structure of the Book 22 1.8 Study Approach 23 1.9 Research Objectives and Questions 26 -2- LAND REFORM AND THE QUEST FOR A ‘DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY’ 27 2.1 Introduction 27 2.2 Agrarian Reform and the Democratic Society 28 2.3 The Discourse on Rural Collective Action 30 ii | The End of Jambanja? 2.4 Unravelling the Concepts 33 2.4.1 Rural Communities and Social Organisation 34 2.4.2 Agency and Associational Rural Activities 36 2.4.3 Civil Society in Newly Resettled Areas: Nailing Jelly to the Wall 39 -3- AGRARIAN RESTRUCTURING IN POST-INDEPENDENCE ZIMBABWE 42 3.1 Introduction 42 3.2 Social Reproduction in Customary Tenure Areas 42 3.3 Constraints to Land and Agrarian Reform 45 3.4 Early Attempts at Reform 46
    [Show full text]
  • Musonza-PG.Pdf (1.076Mb)
    BINDURA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE EDUCATION FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF PEACE AND GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES FACED BY A1 FARMERS OF FAST TRACK LAND REFORM PROGRAMME: CASE STUDY OF DUNKERRY FARM, MATEPATEPA AREA IN BINDURA DISTRICT (2000-2014) BY MUSONZA EFFORT B1233404 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PEACE AND GOVERNANCE, FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE BACHELOR OF SCIENCE HONORS DEGREE IN PEACE AND GOVERNCE DECEMBER 2015 1 i DECLARATION AND RELEASE FORM NAME OF AUTHOR: MUSONZA EFFORT STUDENT NUMBER: (B1233404) DISSERTATION TITLE: CHALLENGES FACED BY A1 FARMERS OF FAST TRACK LAND REFORM PROGRAMME, CASE STUDY OF DUNKERRY FARM, MATEPATEPA AREA IN BINDURA DISTRICT (2000- 2014). Degree Title : HBSC PEACE AND GOVERNANCE Year : 2015 I Musonza Effort studying HBSC Peace and Governance, cognizant of the facts that plagiarism is a serious academic offence and that falsifying information is a breach of ethics of the programme being undertaken by the student. I granted permission to the university to use this report for educational purposes. Permanent Home Address: Dombawera Primary School, P. Bag 800, Matepatepa Bindura Student Name ……………………………………………….. Signature ……………………………………………………… Date ……………………………………………………………. i APPROVAL FORM The undersigned certify that they read and recommend to the Bindura University of Science Education for acceptance. A dissertation entitled: Challenges faced by A1 farmers of Fast Track Land Reform Programme, case study of Dunkerry farm, Matepatepa area in Bindura District (2000-2014). Submitted by Musonza Effort in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Bachelor of Science Honors Degree in Peace and Governance. Student Name …………………………….…… Date ……………………… Signature……..………………………………… Supervisor Name…………………………….… Date ……………………… Signature..……………………………….…….
    [Show full text]
  • Mashonaland Central Province : 2013 Harmonised Elections:Presidential Election Results
    MASHONALAND CENTRAL PROVINCE : 2013 HARMONISED ELECTIONS:PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION RESULTS Mugabe Robert Mukwazhe Ncube Dabengwa Gabriel (ZANU Munodei Kisinoti Welshman Tsvangirayi Total Votes Ballot Papers Total Valid Votes District Local Authority Constituency Ward No. Polling Station Facility Dumiso (ZAPU) PF) (ZDP) (MDC) Morgan (MDC-T) Rejected Unaccounted for Total Votes Cast Cast Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 1 Bindura Primary Primary School 2 519 0 1 385 6 0 913 907 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 1 Bindura Hospital Tent 0 525 0 8 521 11 0 1065 1054 2 POLLING STATIONS WARD TOTAL 2 1,044 0 9 906 17 0 1,978 1,961 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 2 Bindura University New Site 0 183 2 1 86 2 0 274 272 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 2 Shashi Primary Primary School 0 84 0 2 60 2 0 148 146 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 2 Zimbabwe Open UniversityTent 2 286 1 4 166 5 0 464 459 3 POLLING STATIONS WARD TOTAL 2 553 3 7 312 9 0 886 877 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 3 Chipindura High Secondary School 2 80 0 0 81 1 2 164 163 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 3 DA’s Campus Tent 1 192 0 7 242 2 0 444 442 2 POLLING STATIONS WARD TOTAL 3 272 0 7 323 3 2 608 605 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 4 Salvation Army Primary School 1 447 0 7 387 12 0 854 842 1 POLLING STATIONS WARD TOTAL 1 447 0 7 387 12 0 854 842 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 5 Chipadze A Primary School ‘A’ 0 186 2 0 160 4 0 352 348 Bindura Bindura Municipality Bindura North 5 Chipadze B
    [Show full text]
  • Social Organisation, Agency and Self-Help: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects for Community Development in Zimbabwe
    American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) 2019 American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) e-ISSN :2378-703X Volume-3, Issue-4, pp-91-96 www.ajhssr.com Research Paper Open Access Social Organisation, Agency and Self-help: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects for Community Development in Zimbabwe Tom Tom, Emmanuel Munemo Department of Development Studies, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe Department of Disability Studies and Special Needs Education, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe Corresponding author: Tom Tom ABSTRACT: The paper interrogates community organisation, agency and self-help in the context of community development. The paper is informed by the interpretive paradigm and qualitative research design. Basing on self-help development projects in selected 10 wards of Madwiza rural area in Shamva district, Mashonaland Central Province of Zimbabwe, the central argument is that the self-help to community development is increasing due to failure of the government to provide for the citizens, economic meltdown leading to unprecedented levels of unemployment and poverty deepening. Core findings are that the initiatives are important as coping strategies and are supported by several factors within the area (collective existence, norms of reciprocity, agency, social capital, labour availability, road and transport network for transportation of produce and natural conditions among other key variables). Several critical challenges are affecting the effectiveness of community self-help groups and their agency to address development challenges experienced by their members. These include low financial base, savings and (re)investment, limited lucrative markets, shortage of technical expertise, non-ownership of trucks, and conflicts, attrition and disintegration. Capacity building, technical and financial support from multi-stakeholders are essential in improving the functioning and outcomes of the self-help initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Agrarian Reform in Former Settler Colonial Zimbabwe.Indd
    3 A Decade of Zimbabwe’s Land Revolution: The Politics of the War Veteran Vanguard Zvakanyorwa Wilbert Sadomba Introduction The Zimbabwe state, governed since 1980 by a nationalist elite with origins in the liberation movement, has experienced complex dynamics and changes regarding class relations and power in a post-colonial settler economy. The state reached a climax of political polarisation during this last decade, from 2000 to 2010. In the first two decades of independence, the ruling nationalist class had enjoyed an alliance with settler capital forged during peace negotiations in 1979 at Lancaster House (see Horne 20011 and Selby 2006). The alliance antagonised and negated the aspirations of the liberation struggle expressed symbolically and concretely in terms of reversing a century old grievance over unequal colonial land ownership structures. War veterans were an ‘embodiment’ of this anti-colonial demand (Kriger 1995), although a scattered peasant movement had dominated land struggles until 1996 (see Moyo 2001). These war veterans, as a social category, were constituted by a movement of former military youth and so-called former refugees, whose nucleus were fighters of the Zimbabwe’s liberation war2. The conflict between the neocolonial state on the one hand and peasants and war veterans, on the other, intensified during the 1990s. The state had successfully managed to suppress the organisation of war veterans during the 1980s. However, in 1997, it conceded to provide for their welfare and financial demands and, LLandand aandnd AAgrariangrarian RReformeform iinn FFormerormer SSettlerettler CColonialolonial ZZimbabwe.inddimbabwe.indd 7799 228/03/20138/03/2013 112:40:392:40:39 80 Land and Agrarian Reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond White-Settler Capitalism as part of the conditions of a truce entered between war veterans and President Robert Mugabe, promised to redistribute land.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture Manual for Zimbabwe, Climate Technology Centre and Network, Denmark, 2017
    Climate-Smart Agriculture supporting low carbon and climate resilient development Climat e-Smart A griculture Manual f or A griculture Educ The Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) fosters technology transfer and deployment at the request of developing countries through three core services: technical assistance, capacity building and scaling up international collaboration. The Centre is the operational arm of the UNFCCC Technology Mechanism, it is hosted and managed by Email: [email protected] the United Nations Environment and the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation Web: www.ctc-n.org (UNIDO), and supported by more than 300 network partners around the world. ation in Zimbab CTCN Supported by: w e United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Climate-Smart Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation Development Department of Agriculture Education and Farmer Training Agriculture Manual Ngungunyana Building No. 1 Borrowdale Road for Agriculture Education in Zimbabwe Harare, Zimbabwe Tel: +263 (0) 4 797390 Email: [email protected] www.moa.gov.zw Ministry of Environment, Water and Climate 11th Floor, Kaguvi Building, Cnr S. V. Muzenda Street and Central Avenue, Harare, Zimbabwe Tel: +263-4-701681/3 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.climatechange.org.zw Climate-SmartClimate-SmartClimate-SmartClimate-Smart AAAgricultureAgriculturegriculturegriculture Manual ManualManual Manual for ffAororgriculturefor AA griculturegricultureAgriculture Educ EducEduc Educationationationation in Zimbab inin
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Zimbabwe
    PARLIAMENT OF ZIMBABWE FIRST SESSION - SIXTH PARLIAMENT FOURTH REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LANDS, LAND REFORM, AGRICULTURE, RESETTLEMENT AND WATER DEVELOPMENT ON THE VIABILITY OF THE SUGAR INDUSTRY Presented to Parliament on 6 June 2006 [S.C 15, 2006] ORDERED IN TERMS OF STANDING ORDER No. 151: (1) At the commencement of every session, there shall be as many select committees to be designated according to government portfolios to examine expenditure, administration and policy of government departments and other matters falling under their jurisdictions as the House may by resolution determine and whose members shall be nominated by the Standing Rules and Orders Committee. Such nominations shall take into account the expressed interests, experience or expertise of the members and the political and gender composition of the House. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF PORTFOLIO COMMITTEES S.O 152 Subject to these Standing Orders a Portfolio Committee shall: a) Consider and deal with all Bills and Statutory Instruments which are referred to it by or under resolution of me House or by the Speaker, consider or deal with an appropriation or money bill referred to it by these Standing Orders or by or under resolution of this House; and b) Monitor, investigate, enquire into and make recommendations relating to any aspect of the legislative programme, budget, rationalization, policy formulation or any other matter it may consider relevant of the government department falling within the category of affairs assigned to it, and may for that purpose consult
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture in Zimbabwe
    Climate-Smart Agriculture in Zimbabwe Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) considerations •A Agriculture is the mainstay of Zimbabwe’s economy, yet biogas production. Rearing of small livestock (such as recurrent droughts and the impact of climate change goats) is also increasingly common as an adaptation P through temperature increases and reduced rainfall are strategy. However, animal health management, improved already negatively affecting Zimbabwe’s agricultural breeds and improved feed have the most potential to sector particularly due the high reliance on rainfed crop enhance resilience in the sector. production I• The agriculture sector requires USD $2.3 billion M• The livestock sector is largest source of agricultural for implementation of the proposed adaptation and GHG emissions at 71% followed by cropland at 29%. In $ mitigation action plans in the country’s Climate Change livestock, emissions are mostly from enteric fermentation Response Strategy. However, financing for CSA projects (38.6%) and manure left on pastures (28.4%). In crops, is constrained by the limited government funding toward high emissions emanate from savanna burning (20.5%), agriculture and limited enabling conditions for leveraging compounded by deforestation from tobacco production capital investments. Public and private sector partnership and curing by smallholder farmers, while burning of are needed to ensure adequate financing for CSA sugarcane fields before harvest is also common. practices. A• Against a backdrop of securing national food security A• Services to support CSA have included weather index and projections that all production systems are expected based crop and livestock insurance and provision of M to be somewhat negatively affected by climate change, M improved climate information targeted at smallholder P the adoption of Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) as P farmers, through use of information technology an agricultural adaptation and mitigation strategy is I (particularly cell phones).
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment MARCH 2019
    Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment MARCH 2019 Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment Zimbabwe: Agriculture Sector Disaster Risk Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was developed by a team led by Azeb donor community, who ensured fruitful and produc- Fissha Mekonnen, Agricultural Specialist of the tive discussions of the findings of this assessment at Agriculture Global Practice at the World Bank. The various workshops. activities were supported by Carlos E. Arce and Jorge The team also extends its appreciation to the Caballero as lead consultants for the overall study. stakeholders from major agricultural supply chains Eija Peju, Alejandra Campero, Ramiro Iturrioz, and that participated at various stages of the fieldwork Easther Chigumira provided specialized analysis and in workshops to discuss the findings. The team is during the risk assessment. indebted to them for encouraging the team to main- Special thanks are due to the team of Zimbabwean tain a realistic and practical perspective. consultants who carried out field assessments for Valuable and constructive comments were various agricultural commodities and livestock received from Diego Arias Carballo, Lead Agriculture and for the valuable and practical comments and Economist (World Bank); John Luke Plevin, contributions they provided to this study: Carren Financial Sector Specialist (World Bank); and Niels Pindiriri, Jacqeline Mutambara, Jacob Gusha, and Balzer, Deputy Country Director (World Food Vimbai Audrey Chandiwana. Willem Janssen, Lead Programme, Zimbabwe), acting as peer reviewers Agricultural Specialist, and Julie Dana, Practice for the study. Mukami Karuki, Country Manager Manager for the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction for Zimbabwe; Mark Cackler, Practice Manager, and Recovery, Barry Patrick Maher, Senior Financial Agriculture Global Practice; and Holger Kray, Lead Sector Specialist, of the World Bank, provided advice Agriculture Economist, Agriculture Global Practice at various stages.
    [Show full text]