DOCSLIB.ORG

BIGFOOT! a New Look at Bigfoot from the Ice Age" Exhibited in a Block of BENJAMIN RADFORD Ice As a Sideshow Attraction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIGFOOT! a New Look at Bigfoot from the Ice Age BOOK REVIEWS known as Micronesia. As Menzies pre- evidence we have on Nan Madol sup- understandable appeal to many readers, sents his theory, the fifteenth-century ports the orthodox scholarly theory that and it contains the kernels of some ideas Chinese had to have built large stone well-organized Micronesians had that are probably valid, such as the structures in their circumnavigational planned, built, and occupied Nan notion that the medieval world was voyages in order to take sun and star Madol approximately 200 years prior to more interconnected than we tend to readings for their maps. And, as his par- the fifteenth century, without the help recognize. But its weaknesses are signifi- ticular brand of circular logic seems to of any known outside group—European cant, and the danger is that the book, demand, since this theory is correct, or Asian. and so many others in its genre, pro- then every important archaeological While it is not possible to say that all motes wishful dunking and circular rea- complex, such as Nan Modal in the pre- of the existing evidence is explained by soning as a replacement for sound con- sent day state (and island) of Ponape in the current theory, certainly there is no clusions based on the scientific method. Micronesia, was built by the Chinese. data from Nan Madol itself that requires In today's world, we can ill afford to allow There is one serious problem with the presence of fifteenth-century such practices to emerge unchallenged this claim. There is not single shred of Chinese, and no one who studies the and dominate public discourse, and must internal evidence from Nan Madol that data would need such a presence, with continue to support informed thinking connects it with fifteenth-century the sole exception of Gavin Menzies. and critical review through periodicals China. On the contrary, every bit of A book such as this one has an such as SKEPTICAL INQUIRER. Minnesota Iceman, a "man left over BIGFOOT! A New Look at Bigfoot from the Ice Age" exhibited in a block of BENJAMIN RADFORD ice as a sideshow attraction. The Iceman's background is too fantastic and Bigfoot! The True Story of Apes in North America. By Loren involved to go into here, but suffice it to Coleman. Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York. 2003. say that it involves an anonymous mil- ISBN 0-7434-6975-5. 278 pp. Softcover, $14. lionaire, a creationist conspiracy, a Bigfoot shot and killed in Minnesota, a showman known for spinning wild LDIIN C O I I M A N tales, and a fake Iceman/Bigfoot that was deviously switched for the "real" one. Despite its thoroughly dubious circumstances, though some of his oren Coleman has been investigat- provenance, two respected cryptozoolo- descriptions are a little subjective. For ing mysterious animals for decades, gists, Ivan Sanderson and Bernard example he says Roger Patterson's pony Land is author of several books on Heuvelmans, were certain it was not a the topic, including Cryptozoology A to Z "smelled the creature and reared, bring- sideshow illusion but a real, modern and The Field Guide to Bigfoot, Yeti, and ing both pony and rider to the ground" human ancestor. (Heuvelmans believed Other Mystery Primates Worldwide. His (p. 82). (We know the pony reared, but it to be a Neandertal killed in Vietnam.) latest is Bigfoot! The True Story of Apes in there's no way to know if it was because One of die questions surrounding die North America The book is light on hard it smelled a Bigfoot, as Coleman matter- Iceman is, if it really was a Bigfoot (and evidence—there are no in-depth discus- of-factly states.) This subtle shift from not a faked dummy), why hadn't anyone sions of hair fibers or footprint finds— reporting to advocacy appears in other else noticed it during the years it had and instead deals with the general phe- places as well. been on public exhibition in many states? nomena of Bigfoot, including the crea- Coleman says of the Patterson crea- Coleman answers by quoting Sanderson: ture's cinematic history and a survey of ture that "this filmed Bigfoot does not "Just how many people with proper Bigfoot researchers. lock its knees; this would be extremely training in any of the biological sci- Coleman discusses the famous 1967 difficult for a hoaxer to do and yet look ences. .go to such shows? If any do, how Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot film and its as smooth as this creature's walk" (p. many are trained physical anuSropoIo- 96). Yet experiments conducted by gists or primatologists?... The answer is: practically no one who attended the Benjamin Radford wrote about Bigfoot in David Daegling and Daniel Schmitt exhibit (p. 112)." Yet this simply begs the March/April 2002 SKEPTICAL (and published in the May/June 1999 die question; one could as well ask how INQUIRER. His book Media Mythmakers: SKEPTICAL INQUIRER) found it was much Sanderson and Heuvelmans know How Journalists, Activists, and Adver- instead quite easy to duplicate the about carnival exhibits and illusions. tisers Mislead Us was published in smooth gait seen in the film. September by Prometheus Books. Coleman includes a chapter on the 5 8 November/Oecember 2003 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER BOOK REVIEWS They would not be the first scientists to be gay and more randy males are said to of scat. Expert Craig Newton gave the be fooled by tricksters. have a bent for bovine buggery.) results: the scat turned up nothing Coleman claims that the Iceman "was In chapter 2, Coleman discusses usable; "we couldn't conclude anything" never a carnival exhibit," (p. 115) and "The Strange Cast of Skookum," a mud from the saliva sample; and the Bigfoot that it was instead shown at shopping impression discovered in Washington hair sequences were "so human-like as to malls and state fairs (as if the latter did state in September 2000 by the Bigfoot most likely be contaminants." In other not have midways). "The elitist practice Field Researchers Organization words, the cast was largely a bust, little of labeling the Minnesota Iceman a 'car- (BFRO). A large cast was made of the more than another inconclusive (albeit nival exhibit' is a way to immediately impression, said to contain the body large) print find. diminish the possible significance" of the print of a reclining Bigfoot. Hair, saliva, Coleman searches for evidence of Iceman, Coleman writes. Yet Sanderson and waste samples were also collected, Bigfoot in myths, native legends, old himself seems to suggest that the venue raising the possibility of DNA analysis. newspaper reports, and even a novel was less than respectable when he asks If authentic, this find has the potential place: 1930s fruit crate labels. One how many educated, trained biologists to reveal a trove of useful information. curiosity of the history of Bigfoot sight- would "go to such shows." If it was not The BFRO has repeatedly refused to ings is that no contemporary accounts displayed as a carnival attraction, that provide outside investigators—myself exist of Bigfoot in California between would be news to Verne Langdon, a long- included—access to the cast. In stark 1900 and 1957. Such a striking absence time special effects artist whom the contrast to open scientific inquiry, the of reports seems odd, especially given the Iceman exhibitor approached to make a experts who were allowed to examine it fact that four of the top five "best places life-sized fake. Langdon claimed in a were hand-picked by the BFRO to be to see Bigfoot" Coleman lists are in or recent article in Cult Movies magazine filmed for a documentary. Those who near California. Why would creatures (number 38, page 69) that the Iceman wish to see their "evidence" can pay $35 that have presumably lived in the area for was to be used for appearances "on carni- for the documentary on DVD available centuries not be reported for nearly sixty val midways." In fact. Senior Research through a company called Whitewolf years? Coleman makes an interesting (if Fellow Joe Nickell saw the exhibit first Entertainment. The fact that suppos- not entirely compelling) case that a hand at a carnival midway—at Toronto's edly scientific findings must be pur- Bigfoot-like illustration depicted on Canadian National Exhibition on August chased though an entertainment com- crate labels provide "critical evidence for 19, 1973. pany instead of appearing in peer- the awareness of hairy giants." reviewed journals reveals much about Coleman delves into new territory I would have liked more in-depth the BFRO's credibility. with a chapter tided "Sex and the Single (and more critical) analysis; however, Sasquatch." Jokes about large feet aside, Though Coleman spends five pages given its intended audience, Coleman's Bigfoot sex is a legitimate avenue of discussing the Skookum Cast, he stops decision to forego detailed discussions of inquiry—the creatures would have to just short of actually revealing the results Bigfoot evidence is understandable. For have a large enough breeding population of the BFRO's investigation. Aside from the average reader interested in Bigfoot, to survive through generations. (Though the mud imprint, three samples were this book is an accessible introduction apparently not all of them breed; subjected to DNA analysis: unidentified that surveys some interesting, recent, Coleman writes that some Bigfoot might hair, saliva from an apple core, and bits and oft-overlooked Bigfoot topics. • STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND CIRCULATION (Required by 39 U.S.C. 3685) Date of filing: August 26, 2003. Title: The SKEPTICAI INQUIRER. Frequency of issue: Bi-monthly. Complete mailing address of known office of publication: 3965 Rensch Road, Amherst, Erie County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chupacabra Mystery
    SI May June 11 CUT_SI new design masters 3/25/11 11:29 AM Page 45 Slaying the Vampire Solving the Chupacabra Mystery The mysterious vampire beast el chupacabra is said to have terrorized people around the world since at least 1995. A five-year skeptical investigation reveals the surprising origin of this monster, finding that there’s more to this vampire than meets the eye. BENJAMIN RADFORD approximately four-feet tall that had igfoot, the mysterious creature said to roam the thin arms and legs with three fingers or North American wilderness, is named after what it toes at the end of each (Corrales 1997). leaves behind: big footprints. Bigfoot’s Hispanic It had no ears or nose but instead two B small airholes and long spikes down its cousin, el chupacabra, is also known for what it leaves behind: back (see figure 1). When the beast was dead animals mysteriously drained of blood. Goats are said later reported in other countries, it took to be its favorite prey (chupacabra means goat sucker in Span- on a very different form (see figure 2). A few were found dead (for example, in ish), and it is the world’s third best-known mystery creature Nicaragua and Texas), and the carcasses (after Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster). turned out to be small four-legged an- imals from the Canidae family (such as El chupacabra first appeared in 1995 mense confusion and contradiction” dogs and coyotes). after Madelyne Tolentino, an eyewit- surrounding el chupacabra, making it The next step was identifying and ness in Puerto Rico, provided a detailed “almost impossible to distinguish fact analyzing the central claims about el description of the bloodsucker.
    [Show full text]
  • Bigfoot at 50 Evaluating a Half-Century of Bigfoot Evidence
    B I C F O O T Bigfoot at 50 Evaluating a Half-Century of Bigfoot Evidence The question of Bigfoot's existence comes down to the claim that "Where there's smoke there's fire. " The evidence suggests that there are enough sources of error that there does nc have to be a hidden creature lurking amid the unsubstantiated cases. BENJAMIN RADFORD hough sightings of the North American Bigfoot date back to the 1830s (Bord 1982), interest in Bigfoot Tgrew rapidly during the second half of the twentieth century. This was spurred on by many magazine articles of the time, most seminally a December 1959 True magazine article describing the discovery of large, mysterious foot- prints the year before in Bluff Creek, California. A half century later, the question of Bigfoot's existence remains open. Bigfoot is still sought, the pursuit kept alive by a steady stream of sightings, occasional photos or foot- print finds, and sporadic media coverage. But what evidence has been gathered over the course of fifty years? And what conclusions can we 4mw from that evidence? / SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Manh/Apr**^ 29 Most Bigfoot investigators favor one theory of Bigfoot's ori- gin or existence and stake their reputations on it, sniping at oth- ers who don't share their views. Many times, what one investi- gator sees as clear evidence of Bigfoot another will dismiss out of hand. In July 2000, curious tracks were found on the Lower Hoh Indian Reservation in Washington state. Bigfoot tracker Cliff Crook claimed that die footprints were "for sure a Bigfoot," though Jeffrey Meldrum, an associate professor of bio- logical sciences at Idaho State University (and member of the Bigfoot Field Research Organization, BFRO) decided that there was not enough evidence to pursue the matter (Big Disagreement Afoot 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biography of America's Lake Monster
    REVIEWS] The Biography of America’s Lake Monster BENJAMIN RADFORD obert Bartholomew and his broth- er Paul grew up near the shores Rof Lake Champlain, which not The Untold Story of Champ: A Social History of America’s only sparked an early interest in the Loch Ness Monster. By Robert E. Bartholomew. lake monster said to dwell within the State University of New York Press, lake but also steeped them in the social Albany, New York, 2012. ISBN: 978-1-4384-4484-0. and cultural context of the mysterious 253 pp. Paperback, $24.95. beastie. In his new book, The Untold Story of Champ: A Social History of America’s Loch Ness Monster, Robert, a sociologist, Fortean investigator, and former broadcast journalist, takes a fresh look at Champ, long dubbed “America’s Loch Ness Monster.” Roy Mackal, and others who con- the Mansi photo, “New Information There have only been a handful of vened a 1981 conference titled, “Does Surfaces on ‘World’s Best Lake Mon- other books dealing in any depth or Champ Exist? A Scientific Seminar.” ster Photo,’ Raising Questions,” May/ scholarship with Champ, among them The intrigue between and among these June 2013.) Joe Zarzynski’s Champ: Beyond the Leg- researchers is interesting enough to fill Like virtually all “unexplained” phe- end, and of course Lake Monster Mys- several chapters. nomena, the history of Champ is in teries: Investigating the World’s Most There are several good books about part a history of hoaxes, and the book Elusive Creatures, coauthored by Joe the people involved in the search for examines several of them in detail, in- Nickell and myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistaken Memories of Vampires: Pseudohistories of the Chupacabra As Well-Known Monsters Go, the Chupacabra Is of Very Recent Vintage, First Appearing in 1995
    Mistaken Memories of Vampires: Pseudohistories of the Chupacabra As well-known monsters go, the chupacabra is of very recent vintage, first appearing in 1995. However, some writers have created pseudohistories and claimed a false antiquity for the Hispanic vampire beast. These examples provide a fascinating look at cryptozoological folklore in the making. BENJAMIN RADFORD ost people assume that the chupacabra, like its acy-laden Frankenstein scenario. Not coincidentally, these two origin stories cryptozoological brethren Bigfoot and Nessie, dates are identical to those of Sil, a chupaca- Mback many decades or centuries. However, as dis- bra-like monster in the film Species (see Figure 1 and Radford 2014). cussed in my book Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire The alien/Frankenstein’s monster Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore and in the pages of the explanation, though embraced by SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, the origin of the mysterious vampire many Puerto Ricans and others soon after the chupacabra’s 1995 appear- beast el chupacabra can be traced back to a Puerto Rican ance, was unsatisfactory (and perhaps eyewitness who saw the 1995 film Species, which featured too outlandish) to some, who then offered their own histories of the a nearly identical monster. Though both vampire legends vampire beast. A blank slate history and “mysterious” animal predation date back many centu- creates an information vacuum easily ries, there seems to be no evidence of any blood-sucking filled by mystery-mongering specu- lation. (For analysis of historical ch- “chupacabra” before the 1990s. upacabra claims since the 1950s, see my SI columns “The Mystery of the The beast turned twenty last year, accounts of encounters with unknown Texas Chupacabra” in the March/ and its recent vintage poses a thorny corporeal creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Wars Science and Its Disputers Oprah's Gullibility How
    SI M/A 2010 Cover V1:SI JF 10 V1 1/22/10 12:59 PM Page 1 MARTIN GARDNER ON JAMES ARTHUR RAY | JOE NICKELL ON JOHN EDWARD | 16 NEW CSI FELLOWS THE MAG A ZINE FOR SCI ENCE AND REA SON Vol ume 34, No. 2 • March / April 2010 • INTRODUCTORY PRICE U.S. and Canada $4.95 Climate Wars Science and Its Disputers Oprah’s Gullibility How Should Skeptics Deal with Cranks? Why Witchcraft Persists SI March April 2010 pgs_SI J A 2009 1/22/10 4:19 PM Page 2 Formerly the Committee For the SCientiFiC inveStigation oF ClaimS oF the Paranormal (CSiCoP) at the Cen ter For in quiry/tranSnational A Paul Kurtz, Founder and Chairman Emeritus Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Richard Schroeder, Chairman Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Ronald A. Lindsay, President and CEO Benjamin Radford, Research Fellow Bar ry Karr, Ex ec u tive Di rect or Richard Wiseman, Research Fellow James E. Al cock, psy chol o gist, York Univ., Tor on to David J. Helfand, professor of astronomy, John Pau los, math e ma ti cian, Tem ple Univ. Mar cia An gell, M.D., former ed i tor-in-chief, New Columbia Univ. Stev en Pink er, cog ni tive sci en tist, Harvard Eng land Jour nal of Med i cine Doug las R. Hof stad ter, pro fes sor of hu man un der - Mas si mo Pol id oro, sci ence writer, au thor, Steph en Bar rett, M.D., psy chi a trist, au thor, stand ing and cog ni tive sci ence, In di ana Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Chupacabra Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    CHUPACABRA PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Roland Smith | 304 pages | 20 Jun 2016 | Scholastic US | 9780545178181 | English | United States Chupacabra PDF Book Though goats are said to be its favorite prey chupacabra means "goat sucker" in Spanish , it has have also been blamed for attacks on cats, rabbits, dogs, chickens, and other animals. Visit the state elections site. The name comes from the animal's reported vampirism —the chupacabra is said to attack and drink the blood of livestock , including goats. Retrieved 26 July She noticed some significant differences between the animal and her "Texas Blue Dog. Each of the animals was reported to have had its body bled dry through a series of small circular incisions. External Websites. These chupacabras were smaller and stood upon four feet. El Vocero. Wizards of the Coast. Chupacabra , in Latin American popular legend , a monstrous creature that attacks animals and consumes their blood. See Article History. Parapsychology Death and culture Parapsychology Scientific literacy. Dead chupacabras were subjected to DNA tests and in every instance the body has been identified as a dog, coyote, raccoon, or other common mammal — usually stricken with a parasitic infection that caused the animal to lose its fur and take on a gaunt, monstrous appearance. Forum posts. They characterized it has having large oval red eyes that sometimes glowed, gray skin, a long snake-like tongue, fangs, and long spinal quills that may double as wings. Archived from the original on 14 September For the Nov 3 election: States are making it easier for citizens to vote absentee by mail this year due to the coronavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Bar for Investigating Paranormal Claims ROBERT CARROLL
    SI Sept/Oct pgs_SI MJ 2010 7/22/10 4:42 PM Page 56 B O O K R E V I E W S Raising the Bar for Investigating Paranormal Claims ROBERT CARROLL Scientific Paranormal Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries. By Benjamin Radford. Rhombus Publishing Co., Corrales, New Mexico, 2010. 311 pp. Softcover, $16.95. n a chapter on how not to investigate Scien tific Paranormal Investigation would the paranormal in his new book, be a valuable addition to the library of IScientific Paranormal Investigation, every journalist and skeptic. But the thou- Benjamin Radford jokes that the entire sands of people who investigate weird or chapter could consist of just two words: mysterious things and the millions of watch television. He could have advised readers and viewers who follow their in - the reader to pick up almost any book vestigations would benefit the most. on ghosts, demons, spirits, aliens, lake I won’t relieve the lazy reader of the monsters, crop circles, the chupacabra, obligation to read Radford’s book by or other “strange and bizarre” things. summarizing the principles of a proper The bar for paranormal investigation in scientific investigation. Here I will sim- the popular media has been set very low, ply note that the goal of a proper inves- as evidenced by the overall poor quality tigation of the paranormal is neither to of work produced so far. Radford hopes prove nor disprove any particular claim. to raise the bar by clarifying and exem- Radford puts it this way: “Good science plifying the standards that should guide regularly reports on his field investiga- is not about advocacy; while all scien- a scientific investigator.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Human Body Really Replace Itself Every 7 Years? by Benjamin Radford, Live Science Contributor | April 04, 2011 11:33Am ET
    Does the Human Body Really Replace Itself Every 7 Years? by Benjamin Radford, Live Science Contributor | April 04, 2011 11:33am ET 438 141 18 Submit 151 Reddit Credit: Dreamstime View full size image It's a neat idea, and one that has caught the popular imagination. Here's how the story goes: Every seven years (or 10, depending on which story you hear) we become essentially new people, because in that time, every cell in your body has been replaced by a new cell. Don't you feel younger than you were seven years ago? It is true that individual cells have a finite life span, and when they die off they are replaced with new cells. As The New York Public Library's Science Desk Reference (Stonesong Press, 1995) notes, "There are between 50 and 75 trillion cells in the body.... Each type of cell has its own life span, and when a human dies it may take hours or day before all the cells in the body die." (Forensic investigators take advantage of this vaguely morbid fact when determining the cause and time of death of homicide victims.) Red blood cells live for about four months, while white blood cells live on average more than a year. Skin cells live about two or three weeks. Colon cells have it rough: They die off after about four days. Sperm cellshave a life span of only about three days, while brain cells typically last an entire lifetime (neurons in the cerebral cortex, for example, are not replaced when they die).
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Celebrates Carl Sagan in Gala Event DAVID MORRISON
    [ NEWS AND COMMENT Library of Congress Celebrates Carl Sagan in Gala Event DAVID MORRISON Carl Sagan died eighteen years ago, and Academy of Sciences, to three former he is still greatly missed. We scientists, PhD students of Carl’s (Chris Chyba, educators, and skeptics sometimes ask Steven Soter, and me). Although their ourselves how Carl would respond to brief talks were not coordinated, sev- today’s world, especially the apparent eral speakers commented on Carl’s de- increase in irrationality in public dis- votion to encouraging young scientists. course. Some of these questions were Both Neil deGrasse Tyson (Director raised by the speakers at a special event of the Hayden Planetarium) and Jon- honoring Sagan held at the Library athan Lunine (Carl’s successor as the of Congress in Washington, D.C., David Duncan Professor of Astronomy November 12, 2013, attended by 800 at Cornell University) brought with invitees. them their original letters they received Carl Sagan was the best-known sci- from Carl when they were in high entist of his time and a master teacher David Morrison school. These letters provided friendly, A young Carl Sagan (c.1969) and popularizer of science. Through straightforward encouragement for his elegant writing and speaking and these two young students, whom Carl Americans still deny the reality of bio- his mastery of the then-new medium had never met, to pursue careers in sci- logical and cosmological evolution and of television, he became the world’s ence. Carl even hosted a visit to Cornell of global warming. There has always guide to the first great era of plane- by Tyson, who decided, however, to been public misunderstanding of sci- tary exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Terrifying Collaboration
    A TERRIFYING COLLABORATION ANNA ALEXANDER, CSU EAST BAY HISTORY JOSH FUNK, CSU CHICO ART & ART HISTORY We always have, and we always will live in a time of task. They come to life in folklore and oral monsters. While monsters have taken different traditions, rather than official documents preserved shapes and served different purposes depending on by librarians, thus presenting the history students the time and culture, their existence helps us more with the added challenge of finding reliable sources. clearly understand humanity. To be human is to When the history students finished their research, fear. And the presence of monsters tells us about a they gave their essays to the CSU Chico art students society’s greatest anxieties at any given time. Today, to illustrate. we may not fear sea monsters or trolls under bridges, but for many, our newsfeeds and Editorial illustration, or the art that accompanies the nightmares are beginning to blend. written text found in magazines and newspapers, heightens the ideas in the text and entices viewers to When, in the early stages of collaboration, we tried learn more. Since the monsters in this exhibition to find a topic that would resonate with our students have historically been described in multiple and —history majors at CSU East Bay and art majors at sometimes contradictory ways, the artists had the CSU Chico—monsters immediately came to mind. difficult task of interpreting the text and creating a We had to find a topic that would be challenging to coherent image. Students in the digital illustration research but would pique the interests of students course first highlighted visually descriptive words in different disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets and Lies
    SI M-J 2007 pgs 3/28/07 10:21 AM Page 21 SPECIAL REPORT Secrets and Lies MARY CARMICHAEL and BENJAMIN RADFORD ast year, Rhonda Byrne dis- blance of scientific accuracy. Out covered the secret of the of this patchwork she made a universe. It is based on a movie (available for download L online for just $4.95!) and accom- principle of quantum mechanics and lies in a force with direct panying book. physical effects on matter. If The problem is that neither the you’re thinking it’s odd that such film nor the book has any basis in a momentous discovery hasn’t scientific reality. The Secret, Byrne been publicized—surely it de- states, lies in a New Age idea called serves at least a journal article or the “Law of Attraction”: that simi- two?—you clearly haven’t been lar things attract each other, so spending much time in the self- positive thoughts bring positive help section of your local book- things and negative ones bring store, where Byrne’s new book is negative things. Of course, in found. Tantalizingly titled The physics, it is opposites that attract, Secret, it’s probably the most but never mind that: according to slickly marketed idea to draw on Byrne, our thoughts send out quantum physics in all of history. vibrations that the universe (or Alas, though, it won’t be appear- some unspecified power) can ing in Science or Nature. “The somehow decipher and respond Secret,” it turns out, is a lie. “secret” to a downtrodden period in her to.
    [Show full text]
  • A Slam-Dunk Debunk MATT CROWLEY
    SI July August 11_SI new design masters 5/25/11 12:18 PM Page 57 REVIEWS] A Slam-Dunk Debunk MATT CROWLEY enjamin Radford is a longtime sci - Bentific investigator of fringe-science Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Beast in Fact, topics with an emphasis on cryptozool - Fiction, and Folklore ogy. The University of New Mexico By Benjamin Radford. University of New Mexico Press, Press has published Radford’s latest Albuquerque, 2011. ISBN: 978-0-82635-015-2. book, Tracking the Chupa cabra: The Vam - 202 pp. Softcover, $24.95. pire Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore . Though modestly titled, this book is ar - guably the greatest cryptozoological book ever written. It’s a winner in every way, a slam-dunk debunk of the mystery surrounding the new monster on the of the 1970s, virtually all cases of alleged ent from normal, healthy animals. block: el chupacabra . chupacabra attacks involve animals dying The real death blow to the chu - Radford builds his case methodically, by ordinary predation, not by having pacabra legend was Radford tracking starting off with a history of vampire leg - their blood sucked. Using both photo - down and personally interviewing the ends in general. After all, chupacabra lit - graphs and drawings, Rad ford illustrates first known chupacabra eyewitness, a erally means “goat sucker” in Spanish and how an untrained individual might Puerto Rican woman named Madelyne as such falls squarely within the realm of come to misinterpret an animal’s death Tolentino. To borrow a term from epi - vampiric tradition. Many people become as the result of a blood-sucking beast.
    [Show full text]