DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimizing Human Performance in Mobile Text Entry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimizing Human Performance in Mobile Text Entry OPTIMIZING HUMAN PERFORMANCE IN MOBILE TEXT ENTRY STEVEN JOHN CASTELLUCCI A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAMME IN COMPUTER SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO DECEMBER 2014 © STEVEN JOHN CASTELLUCCI, 2014 ABSTRACT Although text entry on mobile phones is abundant, research strives to achieve desktop typing performance “on the go”. But how can researchers evaluate new and existing mobile text entry techniques? How can they ensure that evaluations are conducted in a consistent manner that facilitates comparison? What forms of input are possible on a mobile device? Do the audio and haptic feedback options with most touchscreen keyboards affect performance? What influences users’ preference for one feedback or another? Can rearranging the characters and keys of a keyboard improve performance? This dissertation answers these questions and more. The developed TEMA software allows researchers to evaluate mobile text entry methods in an easy, detailed, and consistent manner. Many in academia and industry have adopted it. TEMA was used to evaluate a typical QWERTY keyboard with multiple options for audio and haptic feedback. Though feedback did not have a significant effect on performance, a survey revealed that users’ choice of feedback is influenced by social and technical factors. Another study using TEMA showed that novice users entered text faster using a tapping technique than with a gesture or handwriting technique. This motivated rearranging the keys and characters to create a new keyboard, MIME, that would provide ii better performance for expert users. Data on character frequency and key selection times were gathered and used to design MIME. A longitudinal user study using TEMA revealed an entry speed of 17 wpm and a total error rate of 1.7% for MIME, compared to 23 wpm and 5.2% for QWERTY. Although MIME’s entry speed did not surpass QWERTY’s during the study, it is projected to do so after twelve hours of practice. MIME’s error rate was consistently low and significantly lower than QWERTY’s. In addition, participants found MIME more comfortable to use, with some reporting hand soreness after using QWERTY for extended periods. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to convey my sincerest gratitude to my supervisor, Scott MacKenzie, for his knowledge, guidance, and support. His generous funding of me via his NSERC grant made this research possible. I especially appreciate co-presenting his course Empirical Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction at CHI for the past three years. Thank you to Wolfgang Stuerzlinger for your research advice, your advice on the design of MIME, and for suggesting the communication channel to log IME data in TEMA. Thank you to Burton Ma for serving on my supervisory committee on short notice. Thank you to Rob Allison, Xiangji (Jimmy) Huang, and Mark Green for taking time out of their busy schedules to read this dissertation, provide feedback, and serve on my examination committee. I would also like to thank Hamzeh Roumani for his support of my teaching skills, Ouma Jaipaul Gill for her guidance with administrative procedures, and Susan Cameron for ensuring I received reimbursement for conference and user study expenses as soon as possible. Thank you, Andrew Speers, for encouraging me to apply for the faculty teaching award. Thank you, Ilnaz (Elle) Ameli, for your generous help and guidance with statistics. Thank you, Michelle Brown, for your invaluable contributions to my user studies. Thank you, Kathy Weaver, for your expertise in box plots. Thank you, Robert iv Teather, for being a conference guru. Thank you, Victoria McArthur, for selecting me as a CHI Student Volunteer. I would also like to thank Andriy Pavlovych, Ahmed Arif, Shumon Zaman, and Hoda Dehmeshki for their constructive feedback on my research over the years. Most importantly, I would like to thank my parents, Betty and Sandro, for their love, encouragement, and support. v DISSIMINATION OF THIS DISSERTATION The following chapters (in whole or in part) of this dissertation have been previously published: Chapter 3 Castellucci, S. J. and MacKenzie, I. S., Gathering text entry metrics on Android devices. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 1507-1512. Castellucci, S. J. and MacKenzie, I. S., Encouraging consistency in mobile text entry evaluations. In CHI 2012 Workshop on Designing and Evaluating Text Entry Methods, ACM (2012), 43-46. Castellucci, S. J. and MacKenzie, I. S., Gathering Text Entry Metrics on Android Devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Human Computer Interaction – MHCI 2013, International ASET Inc. (2013), 119.1-119.8. Chapter 4 Castellucci, S. J. and MacKenzie, I. S., Touch Me, Hear Me, Feel Me: Feedback Preferences for Mobile Text Entry. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Human Computer Interaction – MHCI 2013, International ASET Inc. (2013), 123.1-123.6. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv Dissimination of this Dissertation ...................................................................................... vi Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. vii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... xi List of Figures .................................................................................................................. xiii List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................... xviii CHAPTER 1 Introduction and Motivation ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Established Performance Metrics ....................................................................... 2 1.2 A Priori and Post Hoc Power Calculations ......................................................... 6 1.3 Dissertation Contributions .................................................................................. 6 1.4 Dissertation Organization ................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2 Reviewing Touch-Based Mobile Text Entry ................................................. 10 2.1 Character-Based Recognition ........................................................................... 12 2.2 Menu Navigation .............................................................................................. 18 2.3 Mid-Air Techniques .......................................................................................... 33 2.4 Tapping and Hybrid Techniques ....................................................................... 39 vii 2.5 Non-English Text Entry .................................................................................... 46 2.6 Design Rationale for MIME ............................................................................. 49 CHAPTER 3 Gathering Text Entry Metrics on Android Devices ....................................... 52 3.1 Motivation ......................................................................................................... 52 3.2 TEMA Features ................................................................................................. 53 3.3 TEMA Design ................................................................................................... 61 3.4 Encouraging Consistency in Mobile Text Entry Evaluations ........................... 63 3.5 Method .............................................................................................................. 65 3.6 Results and Discussion ..................................................................................... 68 3.7 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 71 CHAPTER 4 Determining Feedback Preferences for Mobile Text Entry ........................... 72 4.1 Motivation ......................................................................................................... 72 4.2 Related Work .................................................................................................... 73 4.3 Method 1 (Survey) ............................................................................................ 74 4.4 Method 2 (User Study)...................................................................................... 75 4.5 Results and Discussion ..................................................................................... 77 4.6 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 82 CHAPTER 5 Compiling Phrase Sets for Mobile Text Entry ............................................... 83 5.1 Motivation ......................................................................................................... 83 5.2 Corpora Sources ................................................................................................ 84 viii 5.3 Digram Frequencies .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enabling Non-Speech Experts to Develop Usable Speech-User Interfaces
    Enabling Non-Speech Experts to Develop Usable Speech-User Interfaces Anuj Kumar CMU-HCII-14-105 August 2014 Human-Computer Interaction Institute School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Copyright © Anuj Kumar 2014. All rights reserved. Committee: Florian Metze Co-Chair, Carnegie Mellon University Matthew Kam Co-Chair, Carnegie Mellon University & American Institutes for Research Dan Siewiorek Carnegie Mellon University Tim Paek Microsoft Research The research described in this dissertation was supported by the National Science Foundation under grants IIS- 1247368 and CNS-1205589, Siebel Scholar Fellowship 2014, Carnegie Mellon’s Human-Computer Interaction Institute, and Nokia. Any findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the above organizations or corporations. KEYWORDS Human-Computer Interaction, Machine Learning, Non-Experts, Rapid Prototyping, Speech-User Interfaces, Speech Recognition, Toolkit Development. II Dedicated to Mom and Dad for their eternal support, motivation, and love III IV ABSTRACT Speech user interfaces (SUIs) such as Apple’s Siri, Microsoft’s Cortana, and Google Now are becoming increasingly popular. However, despite years of research, such interfaces really only work for specific users, such as adult native speakers of English, when in fact, many other users such as non-native speakers or children stand to benefit at least as much, if not more. The problem in developing SUIs for such users or for other acoustic or language situations is the expertise, time, and cost in building an initial system that works reasonably well, and can be deployed to collect more data or also to establish a group of loyal users.
    [Show full text]
  • IJCNLP 2011 Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM 2011)
    IJCNLP 2011 Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM 2011) November 13, 2011 Shangri-La Hotel Chiang Mai, Thailand IJCNLP 2011 Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM 2011) November 13, 2011 Chiang Mai, Thailand We wish to thank our sponsors Gold Sponsors www.google.com www.baidu.com The Office of Naval Research (ONR) Department of Systems Engineering and The Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Devel- Engineering Managment, The Chinese Uni- opment (AOARD) versity of Hong Kong Silver Sponsors Microsoft Corporation Bronze Sponsors Chinese and Oriental Languages Information Processing Society (COLIPS) Supporter Thailand Convention and Exhibition Bureau (TCEB) We wish to thank our sponsors Organizers Asian Federation of Natural Language National Electronics and Computer Technolo- Processing (AFNLP) gy Center (NECTEC), Thailand Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna (SIIT), Thailand (RMUTL), Thailand Chiang Mai University (CMU), Thailand Maejo University, Thailand c 2011 Asian Federation of Natural Language Proceesing vii Preface Welcome to the IJCNLP Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM 2011)! Methods of text input have entered a new era. The number of people who have access to computers and mobile devices is skyrocketing in regions where people do not have a convenient method of inputting their native language. It has also become commonplace to input text not through a keyboard but through different modes such as voice and handwriting recognition. Even when people input text using a keyboard, it is done differently from only a few years ago – adaptive software keyboards, word auto- completion and prediction, and spell correction are just a few examples of such recent changes in text input experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Genetic Algorithms to Design an Optimized Keyboard Layout for Brazilian Portuguese
    Using Genetic Algorithms to Design an Optimized Keyboard Layout for Brazilian Portuguese Gustavo Pacheco1, Eduardo Palmeira1, Keiji Yamanaka1 1Faculdade de Engenharia Eletrica´ – Universidade Federal de Uberlandiaˆ (UFU) Uberlandiaˆ – MG – Brazil fpacheco.gustavo.alves,[email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Currently, keyboards are the most common means of communicating with computers. Despite being the most commonly used keyboard layout, QW- ERTY has had various issues raised concerning its effectiveness, as it is not efficient in English (target language) or in fact other languages. Therefore, this paper presents the development process of a Genetic Algorithm with the inten- tion of generating a more adequate and coherent layout proposal for Brazilian Portuguese, which has its focus on ergonomics and user productivity. Using five ergonomic criteria and a statistical analysis of the characters and sequences of most frequently used pairs in Brazilian Portuguese, a layout approximately 53% better than QWERTY was obtained. 1. Introduction Currently, keyboards are the most common means of communicating with computers. The electronic era has strengthened the unique and dominant position of the QWERTY layout keyboard. This layout had its design conceived in 1874, for typewriters, but it was only in the first decade of the 20th century that it became established as the international keyboard standard. At that time, writers commonly used only their index fingers for typing. The first typists searched for the character and, after finding it, pressed it to make its impression on the paper. It was a slower and more cautious interaction. Only after the 1930s, the typing speed was improved when all ten fingers started to be used as a conventional manner of interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Details
    Home Program Hotel Be an Exhibitor Be a Sponsor Review Committee Press Room Past Events Contact Us Program Details Monday, November 3, 2014 08:30-10:00 MORNING TUTORIALS Track 1: An Introduction to Writing Systems & Unicode Presenter: This tutorial will provide you with a good understanding of the many unique characteristics of non-Latin Richard Ishida writing systems, and illustrate the problems involved in implementing such scripts in products. It does not Internationalization provide detailed coding advice, but does provide the essential background information you need to Activity Lead, W3C understand the fundamental issues related to Unicode deployment, across a wide range of scripts. It has proved to be an excellent orientation for newcomers to the conference, providing the background needed to assist understanding of the other talks! The tutorial goes beyond encoding issues to discuss characteristics related to input of ideographs, combining characters, context-dependent shape variation, text direction, vowel signs, ligatures, punctuation, wrapping and editing, font issues, sorting and indexing, keyboards, and more. The concepts are introduced through the use of examples from Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Hebrew, Thai, Hindi/Tamil, Russian and Greek. While the tutorial is perfectly accessible to beginners, it has also attracted very good reviews from people at an intermediate and advanced level, due to the breadth of scripts discussed. No prior knowledge is needed. Presenters: Track 2: Localization Workshop Daniel Goldschmidt Two highly experienced industry experts will illuminate the basics of localization for session participants Sr. International over the course of three one-hour blocks. This instruction is particularly oriented to participants who are Program Manager, new to localization.
    [Show full text]
  • AIX Globalization
    AIX Version 7.1 AIX globalization IBM Note Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page 233 . This edition applies to AIX Version 7.1 and to all subsequent releases and modifications until otherwise indicated in new editions. © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 2010, 2018. US Government Users Restricted Rights – Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents About this document............................................................................................vii Highlighting.................................................................................................................................................vii Case-sensitivity in AIX................................................................................................................................vii ISO 9000.....................................................................................................................................................vii AIX globalization...................................................................................................1 What's new...................................................................................................................................................1 Separation of messages from programs..................................................................................................... 1 Conversion between code sets.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paper, We Describe Three User Studies Undertaken to Investigate Users ’Typing Abilities
    Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 106 (2017) 44–62 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Human-Computer Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhcs Is it too small?: Investigating the performances and preferences of users when typing on tiny QWERTY keyboards Xin Yi a,b,c, Chun Yu a,b,c,∗, Weinan Shi a,b,c, Yuanchun Shi a,b,c a Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, China b Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, China c Beijing Key Lab of Networked Multimedia, China a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Keywords: Typing on tiny QWERTY keyboards on smartwatches is considered challenging or even impractical due to the Text entry limited screen space. In this paper, we describe three user studies undertaken to investigate users ’typing abilities Tiny keyboard and preferences on tiny QWERTY keyboards. The first two studies, using a smartphone as a substitute for a Smartwatch smartwatch, tested five different keyboard sizes (2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 cm). Study 1 collected typing data from QWERTY participants using keyboards and given asterisk feedback. We analyzed both the distribution of touch points Typing pattern (e.g., the systematic offset and shape of the distribution) and the effect of keyboard size. Study 2 adopted a Bayesian algorithm based on a touch model derived from Study 1 and a unigram word language model to perform input prediction. We found that on the smart keyboard, participants could type between 26.8 and 33.6 words per minute (WPM) across the five keyboard sizes with an uncorrected character error rate ranging from 0.4% to 1.9%.
    [Show full text]
  • GNU Texmacs User Manual Joris Van Der Hoeven
    GNU TeXmacs User Manual Joris van der Hoeven To cite this version: Joris van der Hoeven. GNU TeXmacs User Manual. 2013. hal-00785535 HAL Id: hal-00785535 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00785535 Preprint submitted on 6 Feb 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. GNU TEXMACS user manual Joris van der Hoeven & others Table of contents 1. Getting started ...................................... 11 1.1. Conventionsforthismanual . .......... 11 Menuentries ..................................... 11 Keyboardmodifiers ................................. 11 Keyboardshortcuts ................................ 11 Specialkeys ..................................... 11 1.2. Configuring TEXMACS ..................................... 12 1.3. Creating, saving and loading documents . ............ 12 1.4. Printingdocuments .............................. ........ 13 2. Writing simple documents ............................. 15 2.1. Generalities for typing text . ........... 15 2.2. Typingstructuredtext ........................... ......... 15 2.3. Content-basedtags
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM 2)
    COLING 2012 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM 2) Workshop chairs: Kalika Bali, Monojit Choudhury and Yoh Okuno 15 December 2012 Mumbai, India Diamond sponsors Tata Consultancy Services Linguistic Data Consortium for Indian Languages (LDC-IL) Gold Sponsors Microsoft Research Beijing Baidu Netcon Science Technology Co. Ltd. Silver sponsors IBM, India Private Limited Crimson Interactive Pvt. Ltd. Yahoo Easy Transcription & Software Pvt. Ltd. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM 2) Kalika Bali, Monojit Choudhury and Yoh Okuno (eds.) Revised preprint edition, 2012 Published by The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai-400076 India Phone: 91-22-25764729 Fax: 91-22-2572 0022 Email: [email protected] This volume c 2012 The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Nonported license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Some rights reserved. Contributed content copyright the contributing authors. Used with permission. Also available online in the ACL Anthology at http://aclweb.org ii Preface It is our great pleasure to present the proceedings of the Second Workshop on Advances in Text Input Methods (WTIM-2) held in conjunction with Coling 2012, on 15th December 2012, in Mumbai, India. This workshop is a sequel to the first WTIM which was held in conjunction with IJCNLP 2011 in November 2011, Chiang Mai, Thailand. The aim of the current workshop remains the same as the previous one that is to bring together the researchers and developers of text input technologies around the world, and share their innovations, research findings and issues across different applications, devices, modes and languages.
    [Show full text]
  • | Hao Wanata Utilin at Na Malo Mlet
    |HAO WANATA UTILINUS010019435B2 AT NA MALO MLET (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 10 ,019 ,435 B2 Ouyang et al. ( 45 ) Date of Patent : * Jul. 10 , 2018 ( 54 ) SPACE PREDICTION FOR TEXT INPUT (56 ) References Cited ( 71 ) Applicant : Google Inc. , Mountain View , CA (US ) U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS 4 ,534 , 261 A 8 / 1985 Fabrizio ( 72 ) Inventors : Yu Ouyang , San Jose , CA (US ) ; 4 ,833 ,610 A 5 / 1989 Zamora et al. Shumin Zhai , Los Altos, CA (US ) ( Continued ) (73 ) Assignee : Google LLC , Mountain View , CA (US ) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this CN 1133996 A 10 / 1996 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 CN 1761989 A 4 /2006 U . S . C . 154 ( b ) by 1010 days . (Continued ) This patent is subject to a terminal dis claimer . OTHER PUBLICATIONS Notice of Allowance from U . S . Appl. No . 14 / 196 ,552 , dated Jun . 18 , (21 ) Appl. No. : 14 /452 ,035 2015 , 5 pp . (22 ) Filed : Aug . 5 , 2014 (Continued ) Primary Examiner — Steven Sax (65 ) Prior Publication Data (74 ) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Shumaker & Sieffert, US 2015 / 0026628 A1 Jan . 22 , 2015 P . A . (57 ) ABSTRACT An example method includes displaying, at a presence Related U . S . Application Data sensitive device , a virtual keyboard , receiving an indication (63 ) Continuation of application No . 13/ 657 , 574 , filed on of input entered at a presence -sensitive device indicating a Oct . 22 , 2012 , now Pat. No . 8 , 819 ,574 . plurality of characters , determining a sequence of at least three character strings in the plurality such that the sequence ( 51 ) Int.
    [Show full text]
  • WORKING PAPERS in LITERACY, CULTURE, and LANGUAGE EDUCATION (WPLCLE) VOLUME 3, April 2014
    WORKING PAPERS IN LITERACY, CULTURE, AND LANGUAGE EDUCATION (WPLCLE) VOLUME 3, April 2014 Department of Literacy, Culture, and Language Education School of Education Indiana University Bloomington EDITORIAL BOARD Founder & Editor‐in‐Chief Serafín M. Coronel‐Molina Managing Editor Leslie Rowland Assistants to the Editors Beth Buchholz Hsiao‐Chin Kuo Alfreda Clegg Erin Lemrow Ying‐Sin Chen Jaehan Park Linda Coggin Stacy Penalva Vesna Dimitrieska Julie Rust Hsiao‐Chun Huang Christy Wessel‐Powell Retno Hendryanti Jae‐Seok Yang Arnell Hammond Pei‐Shan Yu Christina Ivanova Amber Warren Tolga Kargin Bita H. Zakeri Advisory Board Donna Sayers Adomat Larry Mikulecky Stephanie Carter Martha Nyikos James Damico Faridah Pawan D. Ted Hall Beth Lewis Samuelson Mary Beth Hines Raymond Smith Mitzi Lewison Karen Wohlwend Carmen Medina Website Administrators Rebecca Barrett Serafín M. Coronel‐Molina Copyright © 2014 Working Papers in Literacy, Culture, and Language Education (WPLCLE), and the respective authors. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form by any means, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system (except for brief quotations in critical articles or reviews) without written permission from WPLCLE or the respective authors. Working Papers in Literacy, Culture, and Language Education (WPLCLE) School of Education, Indiana University W.W. Wright Education Building 201 N. Rose Ave., Room #3044 Bloomington, IN 47405‐1006 Phone: (812) 856‐8270 Fax: (812) 856‐8287 E‐mail: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • ETS 300 640 TELECOMMUNICATION January 1996 STANDARD
    DRAFT EUROPEAN pr ETS 300 640 TELECOMMUNICATION January 1996 STANDARD Source: TC-HF Reference: DE/HF-01031 ICS: 33.020 Key words: character, keypad, MMI, terminal Human Factors (HF); Assignment of alphabetic letters to digits on standard telephone keypad arrays ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute ETSI Secretariat Postal address: F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE Office address: 650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE X.400: c=fr, a=atlas, p=etsi, s=secretariat - Internet: [email protected] * Tel.: +33 92 94 42 00 - Fax: +33 93 65 47 16 Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media. © European Telecommunications Standards Institute 1996. All rights reserved. Page 2 Draft prETS 300 640: January 1996 Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content, typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to "ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page. Page 3 Draft prETS 300 640: January 1996 Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................5 1 Scope ..................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • DTMF Operated Robot for Space Operation
    International Conference Recent treads in Engineering & Technology (ICRET’2014) Feb 13-14, 2014 Batam (Indonesia) DTMF Operated Robot for Space Operation Jasleen Josan now-defunct menu selector keys. The row in which the key Abstract—Dual-tone Multi-frequency (DTMF) Signals are appears determines the low frequency, and the column used in touch-tone telephones as well as many other areas. determines the high frequency. For example, pressing the '1' Since analog devices are rapidly changing with digital devices, key will result in a sound composed of both a 697 and a digital DTMF decoders become important. In this survey a 1209 hertz (Hz) tone. The original keypads had levers inside, brief review of some DTMF detector implementations is so each button activated two contacts. The Multiple tones are given. The Aim of this paper is to implement a DTMF the reason for calling the system multi frequency. These tones detector, which is ITU complaint, on a fixed point low cost are then decoded by the switching center to determine which DSP. This detector should be able to detect DTMF tones in key was pressed. multiple-channels with as much as possible channels. Microcontrollers, as the name suggests, are small controllers. They are also used in automobiles, washing machines, microwave ovens, toys .etc. where automation is needed. Keywords— DTMF, PWM, Path finder, Radio control , multi- frequency. A DTMF Telephone Keypad I. INTRODUCTION DTMF Keypad Frequencies (With Sound Clips) 1209 Hz 1336 Hz 1477Hz 1633 Hz ADIO control (often abbreviated to R/C or simply RC) is 697 Hz 1 2 3 A R the use of radio signals to remotely control advice.
    [Show full text]