Lower Mainland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lower Mainland Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Lower Mainland Including The Greater Vancouver Area, Abbotsford, Chilliwack, Powell River, Harrison Lake, and parts of and Similkameen Valley NAPPC Table of CONTENTS Why Support Pollinators? 4 Getting Started 5 Lower Mainland 6 Meet the Pollinators 8 Plant Traits 10 Developing Plantings 12 Farms 13 Public Lands 14 Home Landscapes 15 Plants That Attract Pollinators 16 Habitat Hints 21 Habitat and Nesting Requirements 22 This is one of several guides for Checklist and Resources 23 different regions of North America. We welcome your feedback to assist us in making the future guides Feedback 24 useful. Please contact us at [email protected] Cover bee photo by Julie Baker 2 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Ecological Region of the Lower Mainland Including The Greater Vancouver Area, Abbotsford, Chilliwack, Powell River, Harrison Lake, and parts of Similkameen Valley a nappc and Pollinator Partnership™ Publication This guide was funded by The Stanley Smith Horticultural Trust with oversight by the Pollinator Partnership Canada (www.pollinator.org), in support of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC–www.nappc.org). Lower Mainland 3 Why support pollinators? IN THEIR 1996 BOOK, THE FORGOTTEN POLLINATORS, Buchmann and Nabhan estimated that animal pollinators are needed for the reproduction “Flowering plants of 90% of fl owering plants and one third of human food crops. Each of us depends on these industrious pollinators in a practical way to provide us with the wide range of foods we eat. In addition, pollinators are part of the across wild, intricate web that supports the biological diversity in natural ecosystems that helps sustain our quality of life. farmed and even Abundant and healthy populations of pollinators can improve fruit set and quality, and increase fruit size. In farming situations this increases production per hectare. In the wild, biodiversity increases and wildlife food urban landscapes sources increase. Pumpkins, broccoli, squash, and cabbage are some of the crops raised actually feed the in the Lower Mainland that rely on honey bees and native bees for pollination. Domestic honey bees pollinate more than $1 billion worth of crops in Canada each year. terrestrial world, Unfortunately, the numbers of both native pollinators and domesticated bee populations are declining. They are threatened by habitat loss, and pollinators disease, and the excessive and inappropriate use of pesticides. The loss of commercial bees during the winter has highlighted how severe the issues of proper hive management are to reduce stresses caused by disease, pesticide are the great use, insuffi cient nutrition, and transportation practices. Currently, the pollination services that the commercial beekeeping industry provides are receiving much needed research and conservation resources. The efforts to connectors who understand the threats to commercial bees should help us understand other pollinators and their roles in the environment as well. enable this giant It is imperative that we take immediate steps to help pollinator populations thrive. The beauty of the situation is that by supporting pollinators’ need for habitat, we support our own needs for food and support diversity in the food system to natural world. Thank you for taking time to consult this guide. By adding plants to your work for all who landscape that provide food and shelter for pollinators throughout their active seasons and by adopting pollinator friendly landscape practices, you can make a difference to both the pollinators and the people that rely on them. eat... Including us.” Laurie Davies Adams – Roger Lang, Chairman, Executive Director Pollinator Partnership Pollinator Partnership 4 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Getting Started THIS REGIONAL GUIDE IS just one The Canadian ecoregions are winter months and reanges from in a series of plant selection tools based on the National Ecological 850mm to 2000mm annually. designed to provide information Framework Report. The National The Lower Mainland is character- on how individuals can infl uence Ecological Framework for Canada ized primarily by forests including pollinator populations through is a system created as a management western red cedar, western hemlock, choices they make when they farm tool and is used to predict responses Long before there were homes a plot of ground, manage large to land management practices and farms in this area, natural tracts of public land, or plant a throughout large areas. This guide vegetation provided essential garden. Each of us can have a addresses pollinator-friendly land feeding opportunities for wildlife, positive impact by providing the management practices in what is including pollinators. In choosing essential habitat requirements for known as the Lower Mainland. plants, aim to create habitat for pollinators including food, water, The Lower Mainland ecoregion is pollinators that allow adequate food, shelter, and enough space to raise part of the larger Pacifi c Maritime shelter, and water sources. Most their young. 2 Ecozone,which spans 195,000 km pollinators have very small home Pollinators travel through the along the Canadian Pacifi c Coast. ranges. You can make a difference landscape without regard to The Lower Mainland ecoregion by understanding the vegetation property ownership or provincial is contained entirely in British patterns on the farm, forest, or boundaries. We’ve chosen to use Columbia and is approximately neighbour’s yard adjacent to yours 2 the ecoregional classifi cation system 5,000 km from the foothills of the and by making planting choices to identify the geographic focus Cascade Mountains to the Fraser that support the pollinators’ need of this guide and to underscore River. for food and shelter as they move the connections between climate The summer mean temperature through the landscape. and vegetation types that affect is 15°C and the winter mean the diversity of pollinators in the temperature is 3.5°C. This environment. ecoregion’s precipitation peaks in Lower Mainland 5 Understanding the Lower Mainland n This region is designated number 196 Lower Mainland. To see a map of the other ecoregions go to: http://www.ecozones.ca/english/region/196.html n Not sure about which bioregion you live or work in? Go to www.pollinator.org and click on Ecoregion Locator for help. n 5,067 km2 within British Columbia. n Elevations ranging from sea level to 310 metres. n Summer mean temperature of 15°C and winter mean temperature of 3.5°C n Average year-round precipitation between 850 to 2,000mm. n Diverse soil types including glacial till, silty alluvium and marine sediments. Characteristics n Dominated by dense coniferous forests including Douglas fi r, Western red hemlock and dogwood. n Deciduous trees including oak and large leaf maple. n Understories are characterized by moss, Oregon grape and salal. n Wetter areas are comprised of Douglas fi r, Western red cedar and Western hemlock. n Wildlife include marine birds, black tail deer, racoon, sea otters and coyote. 6 Selecting Plants for Pollinators The Lower Mainland includes: The Greater Vancouver Area Abbotsford Chilliwack Powell River Harrison Lake and parts of Similkameen Valley Lower Mainland 7 Meet the Pollinators Who are the underground. Various species are solitary while others form loose pollinators? colonies. Solitary bees include carpenter Bees bees (Xylocopa spp.), which nest Bees are well documented in wood; digger, (Apidae), which pollinators in the natural and nest underground; leafcutting bees agricultural systems of the Lower (Megachile spp.), which prefer dead Mainland. A wide range of crops trees or branches for their nest including pumpkins, squash, sites; and mason bees (Osmia spp.), broccoli, and cabbage are just a which utilize cavities that they fi nd few plants that benefi t from bee in stems and dead wood. Sunfl ower pollinators. bees (Diadasia spp.) are also solitary Most of us are familiar with the ground nesters. colonies of honey bees that have been the workhorses of agricultural pollination for years in Canada. Butterfl ies They were imported from Europe Gardeners have been attracting almost 400 years ago. butterfl ies to their gardens for some time. These insects tend to be eye- There are over 800 species of native catching, as are the fl owers that ground and twig nesting bees in attract them. Position fl owering Canada. Most bee species live a Flower fl ies, also known as hoverfl ies, plants where they have full sun and mimic the appearance of bees or wasps solitary life while a minority of are protected from the wind. Also, and feed on nectar and pollen like bees, species are social and form colonies. you will need to provide open areas but are classifi ed as fl ies. Native bees currently pollinate (e.g., bare earth, large stones) where many crops and can be encouraged butterfl ies may bask, and moist soil to do more to support agricultural from which they may get needed endeavours if their needs for nesting minerals. By providing a safe place habitat are met and if suitable to eat and nest, gardeners can also sources of nectar, pollen, and water support the pollination role that Western Tiger Swallowtail are provided. Bees have tongues of butterfl ies play in the landscape. It varying lengths that help determine might mean accepting slight damage which fl owers they can obtain nectar to the plants, known as host plants, and pollen from. that provide food for the larval stage The bumble bee (Bombus spp.) forms of the butterfl y. small colonies, usually underground. A diverse group of butterfl ies They are generalists, feeding on a are present in garden areas and wide range of plant material from woodland edges that provide bright April to October and are important fl owers, water sources, and specifi c pollinators of tomatoes.
Recommended publications
  • Carolyn's Crown/Shafer Creek Research
    United States Department of Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Area Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Guidebook Supplement 28 Report PNW-GTR-600 December 2003 Reid Schuller Author Reid Schuller is a plant ecologist and executive director of the Natural Areas Association, P.O. Box 1504, Bend, OR 97709. The PNW Research Station is publishing this guidebook as part of a continuing series of guidebooks on federal research natural areas begun in 1972. Abstract Schuller, Reid. 2003. Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Research Natural Area: guidebook supplement 28. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-600. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 p. This guidebook describes the Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Research Natural Area, a 323-ha (798-ac) tract of coniferous forest containing stands of 600- to 900-year-old old- growth Douglas-fir along the transition between the western hemlock zone and the silver fir zone in the Cascade Range in western Oregon. Keywords: Research natural area, old-growth forest, west-side Cascade Range of Oregon. Preface The research natural area (RNA) described in this supplement1 is administered by the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management RNAs are located within districts, which are administrative subdivisions of state offices. Normal management and protective activities are the responsibility of district managers. Scientists and educators wishing to use one of the tracts for scientific or educational purposes should contact the appropriate district office field manager and provide information about research or educational objectives, sampling procedures, and other prospective activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Coptis Trifolia Conservation Assessment
    CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT for Coptis trifolia (L.) Salisb. Originally issued as Management Recommendations December 1998 Marty Stein Reconfigured-January 2005 Tracy L. Fuentes USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT FOR COPTIS TRIFOLIA Table of Contents Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 2 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 4 I. NATURAL HISTORY............................................................................................................. 6 A. Taxonomy and Nomenclature.......................................................................................... 6 B. Species Description ........................................................................................................... 6 1. Morphology ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Reproductive Biology.................................................................................................... 7 3. Ecological Roles ............................................................................................................. 7 C. Range and Sites
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Use and Distribution of Roosevelt Elk and Kodiak Brown Bears on Afognak and Raspberry Islands
    ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Wildlife Restoration MULTI-YEAR GRANT DIVISION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PO Box 115526 INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT Juneau, AK 99811-5526 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Restoration Grant GRANT NUMBER: AKW-12 PROJECT NUMBER: #215793736 PROJECT TITLE: Resource use and distribution of Roosevelt elk and Kodiak brown bears on Afognak and Raspberry Islands PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1 July 2018 – 30 June 2019 PERFORMANCE YEAR: 1 May 2016 – 30 June 2022 REPORT DUE DATE: 30 November 2019 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Nathan Svoboda COOPERATORS: Koniag Native Corporation, Afognak Native Corporation (ANC), Ouzinkie Native corporation (ONC), Natives of Kodiak Native Corporation (NOK), Mississippi State University (MSU), State University of New York (SUNY), Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF), Kodiak Brown Bear Trust (KBBT), and Old Harbor Native Corporation. Authorities: 2 CFR 200.328 2 CFR 200.301 50 CFR 80.90 I. PROGRESS ON PROJECT OBJECTIVES DURING PERFORMANCE YEAR OBJECTIVE 1: Examine habitat and forest stand characteristics impacting elk and brown bear distribution, resource use, and abundance and develop habitat and resource use models to guide forest and wildlife management decisions ACCOMPLISHMENTS: During this reporting period we captured and chemically immobilized 10 brown bears (8 female, 2 male) on Sitkalidak Island and deployed 9 (7 female, 2 male) GPS radio collars, 8 of which had attached accelerometers. No elk collars were deployed during this reporting period. To date, we have deployed collars on 120 (80 females, 40 males) individual bears and 62 (34 females, 28 males) individual elk. All deployed collars were monitored regularly, and all locations collected were downloaded and implemented into ArcMap software.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report January-March 2019
    Resource use and distribution of Roosevelt elk and Kodiak brown bears on Afognak, Raspberry, and Sitkalidak Islands, Alaska Progress Report: January- March 2019 Issued: June 2019 Submitted to: Alaska Department of Fish and Game Prepared by: Shannon Finnegan – Graduate Research Assistant, SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry Principal Investigators: Dr. Jerrold Belant – Camp Fire Professor of Wildlife Conservation, SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry Nathan Svoboda – Area Wildlife Biologist, Alaska Department of Fish and Game The State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse, NY, 13210 Abstract During January–March 2019, we monitored 34 elk and 42 brown bears overall. In February, the project hired a second PhD student, Sarah Schooler, to focus on Roosevelt elk (Cervus canadensis). Student Shannon Finnegan carried out her PhD proposal defense at SUNY ESF in March 2019. In March, we collected 155 fecal samples from 5 herds of elk to examine winter diet. In February, we determined average den entry dates for brown bears, the average den entry date for female brown bears on Afognak and Raspberry Islands was 24 October 2018, and 2 November 2018 for males. On Sitkalidak Island the average den entry date for females was 25 November 2018. We are ordering new equipment and preparing for captures in fall 2019. 2 Summary ➢ We have continued to monitor 34 elk and 42 brown bears collared in 2017 and 2018. ➢ We have continued to update our project website (www.campfirewildlife.com), Facebook page (www.facebook.com/campfirewildlife), and Twitter page (https://twitter.com/campfirewild) with project results.
    [Show full text]
  • Saddle Bag Mountain Research Natural Area Guidebook
    United States Department of Agriculture Saddle Bag Mountain Forest Service Research Natural Area Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report Guidebook Supplement 34 PNW-GTR-731 September 2007 Reid Schuller and Ronald L. Exeter D E E R P A U RT LT MENT OF AGRICU D E E P R A U R LT TMENTOFAGRICU The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Vaccinium in North America
    Agriculture Canada The Genus Vaccinium 630 . 4 C212 P 1828 North America 1988 c.2 Agriculture aid Agri-Food Canada/ ^ Agnculturo ^^In^iikQ Canada V ^njaian Agriculture Library Brbliotheque Canadienno de taricakun otur #<4*4 /EWHE D* V /^ AgricultureandAgri-FoodCanada/ '%' Agrrtur^'AgrntataireCanada ^M'an *> Agriculture Library v^^pttawa, Ontano K1A 0C5 ^- ^^f ^ ^OlfWNE D£ W| The Genus Vaccinium in North America S.P.VanderKloet Biology Department Acadia University Wolfville, Nova Scotia Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication 1828 1988 'Minister of Suppl) andS Canada ivhh .\\ ailabla in Canada through Authorized Hook nta ami other books! or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A0S9 Catalogue No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data VanderKloet,S. P. The genus Vaccinium in North America (Publication / Research Branch, Agriculture Canada; 1828) Bibliography: Cat. No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 I. Vaccinium — North America. 2. Vaccinium — North America — Classification. I. Title. II. Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. III. Series: Publication (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English ; 1828. QK495.E68V3 1988 583'.62 C88-099206-9 Cover illustration Vaccinium oualifolium Smith; watercolor by Lesley R. Bohm. Contract Editor Molly Wolf Staff Editors Sharon Rudnitski Frances Smith ForC.M.Rae Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada http://www.archive.org/details/genusvacciniuminOOvand
    [Show full text]
  • Management & Monitoring Plan for the Enhancement of Big Huckleberry (Vaccinium Membranaceum) in Government Meadows
    Management & Monitoring Plan for the Enhancement of Big Huckleberry (Vaccinium membranaceum) in Government Meadows Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Cover photos courtesy of Warren KingGeorge, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Department of Anthropology Management & Monitoring Plan for Big Huckleberry ~ Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Laura Potash Martin, Joyce LeCompte-Mastenbrook, Warren KingGeorge, and Tracy Fuentes. 2008. Management & Monitoring Plan for the Enhancement of Big Huckleberry (Vaccinium membranaceum) in Government Meadows, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Snoqualmie Ranger District, North Bend, WA Available to the public on line at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/mbs/projects/ 0 Management & Monitoring Plan for Big Huckleberry ~ Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Origin, Introduction, and Setting ………………………………………………………..3 Species General Description …………………………………...…………………………………8 Ecological Characteristics of Big Huckleberry…………………………………………………..8 Habitat Types Supporting Big Huckleberry on the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie……………………..9 Management of Big Huckleberry ………………………………..………………………………10 Huckleberry Monitoring Design…………………………………………………………………14 Data Analysis and Management Implications…………………………………………………20 Estimated Timeline………………………………………………………………………………20 Conclusions and Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………21 References Cited……………………………………………………………………………………………22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity map…………………………………………………………………………….5 Figure 2. Close-up of Huckleberry Enhancement
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Native Plant List
    NORTHWEST NATIVE PLANT LIST Part Approximate Full Sun/ Full Drought Height Sun Shade Shade Tolerant Wetlands Buffers Evergreen Trees Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 100-250' X X X X grand fir Abies grandis 100-250' X X X madrone Arbutus menziesii 30-50' X X X X shore pine Pinus contorta 15-50' X X X X X Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis 100-210' X X X X western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla 225' X X X X western red cedar Thuja plicata 200' X X X X X X western white pine Pinus monticola 80-130' X X X X western yew Taxus brevifolia 6-45' X X X Deciduous Trees bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum 40-100' X X X bitter cherry Prunus emarginata v. mollis 20-50' X X X X black cottonwood Populus balsamifera v. trichocarpa 100-200' X X X X choke cherry Prunus virginiana 20-50' X X X X Garry oak (Oregon white oak) Quercus garryana 75' X X X X Oregon ash Fraxinus latifoia 40-80' X X X X Pacific crabapple Malus fusca (Pyrus fusca) 40' X X X Pacific willow Salix lucida spp. lasiandra 40-60' X X X X Pacific dogwood Cornus nuttallii 20-30' X X X X quaking aspen Populus tremuloides 75' X X X X western red alder Alnus rubra 30-120' X X X X X X Evergreen Shrubs evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum 3-5' X X X X X Labrador tea Ledum groenlandicum 1-5' X X low Oregon grape Mahonia nervosa 2' X X X X Pacific rhododendron Rhododendron macrophyllum 24' X X X X salal Gualtheria shallon 3-7' X X X X X tall Oregon grape Mahonia aquifolium 5-10' X X X X Pierce County Planning and Public Works, 2401 South 35th Street, Tacoma, Washington 98409 www.piercecountywa.org/pals 1 Part Approximate Full Sun/ Full Drought Height Sun Shade Shade Tolerant Wetlands Buffers Deciduous Shrubs baldhip rose Rosa gymnocarpa 6' X X X beaked hazelnut Corylus cornuta 20' X X X X X black gooseberry Ribes lacustre 2-7' X X black hawthorn Crataegus douglasii v.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Description Tsuga Heterophylla / Vaccinium Alaskaense
    Forest / Forêt Association CNVC00053 Tsuga heterophylla / Vaccinium alaskaense / Hylocomium splendens Western Hemlock / Alaskan Blueberry / Stairstep Moss Pruche de l'Ouest / Airelle d'Alaska / Hypne éclatante Subassociations: none CNVC Alliance: not yet determined CNVC Group: not yet determined Type Description Concept: Within the wet maritime climate of north-central coastal British Columbia, this coniferous association occupies poorly productive forested sites, usually on exposed ridge crests and upper slopes. CNVC00053 is found on dry to mesic, nutritionally poor to medium soils at elevations between near sea level and approximately 600 mASL. The open canopy is dominated by western hemlock ( Tsuga heterophylla ), with a minor presence of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis ). The shrub layer consists mostly of regenerating western hemlock and Alaskan blueberry ( Vaccinium alaskaense ), with some false azalea ( Menziesia ferruginea ). The sparse herb layer mainly includes bunchberry ( Cornus canadensis ) and five-leaved dwarf bramble ( Rubus pedatus ). The dominant mosses are lanky moss ( Rhytidiadelphus loreus ) and stairstep moss ( Hylocomium splendens ). These exposed low-canopy forests can offer valuable habitat in the form of complex vertical structure, variable sizes and decay stages of snags, and coarse woody debris. Vegetation: The canopy of CNVC00053, a coniferous old-forest association, is characteristically patchy due to the presence of rock outcrops or colluvium that support a variety of non-forested ecosystems. The tree layer is dominated by Tsuga heterophylla , with a minor presence of Picea sitchensis and, at lower elevations, Thuja plicata . The open canopy supports formation of a moderately well-developed shrub layer containing Tsuga heterophylla regeneration and a low-diversity ericaceous mixture of Vaccinium alaskaense and Menziesia ferruginea , often with Vaccinium parvifolium and/or V.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Fork Vascular Plant List
    Middle Fork Snoqualmie Natural Resources Conservation Area Vascular Plant List Courtesy of DNR staff. List compiled by Erin Kenny and Gerry Amandes for Northwest Wilderness Programs. Nomenclature follows Flora of the Pacific Northwest 2nd Edition (2018). Scientific Name Common Name Family Abies amabilis Pacific Silver Fir Pinaceae Abies grandis Grand Fir Pinaceae Acer circinatum Vine Maple Aceraceae Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple Aceraceae Actaea rubra Red Baneberry Ranunculaceae Adiantum aleuticum Western Maidenhair Fern Pteridaceae Alnus rubra Red Alder Betulaceae Anaphalis margaritacea Pearly Everlasting Asteraceae Aquilegia formosa Red Columbine Ranunculaceae Aruncus dioicus var. acuminatus Goats Beard Rosaceae Asarum caudatum Western Wild Ginger Aristolochiaceae Athyrium filix-femina Lady Fern Athyriaceae Chamaenerion angustifolium Fireweed Onagraceae Chimaphila menziesii Little Prince's Pine Ericaceae Circaea alpina Enchanter's Nightshade Onagraceae Cirsium vulgare * Bull Thistle Asteraceae Claytonia siberica Siberian candyflower Montiaceae Clintonia uniflora Queen's Cup Liliaceae Corallorhiza maculata Spotted Coral-root Orchidaceae Corallorhiza mertensiana Merten's Coral-root Orchidaceae Cornus unalaschkensis Creeping Dogwood Cornaceae Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Cystopteridaceae Delphinium burkei Tall Meadow Larkspur Ranunculaceae Digitalis purpurea * Purple Foxglove Plantaginaceae Dryopteris expansa Spreading Wood-fern Dryopteridaceae Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail Equisetaceae Galium aparine Cleavers, Bedstraw Rubiaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Communities in the Old-Growth Forests of North Coastal Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF WILLIAM WESTER HINESfor the MASTER OF SCIENCE (Name i (Degree) in RANGE MANAGEMENT presented ontvl,coror, kat t (Major) (Date) Title: PLANT COMMUNITIES IN THE OLD-GROWTH FORESTS OF NORTH COASTAL OREGON Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Dr. .Poulton This study was conducted in the old-growth forests of Clatsop, Tillamook, and Lincoln counties, Oregon.The three objectives of the research were to describe and classify the near-climax plant communities found within the forests, to relate the associes described by a previous study to the forest communities characterized by the present study, and to relate the present elk distribution to the dis- tribution of plant communities identified. Vegetation, soils, and physiographic data were collected from a large number of timbered stands of variable sizesscattered through- out the area bounded on the north by Youngs River and on the south by the Siletz River.Sampling was stratified within each tract to obtain homogeneous vegetation- soil sampling locations.Vegetation data, recorded from 137 locations, formed the basis for the plant community classification.Society tables were used for a phytosociological synthesis of vegetation data. Eleven plant communities were identified within the timbered areas studied.All were within what might be termed a broad Tsuga heterophylla forest association.Plant species useful for identifying community stands were used in naming the eleven plant communities: Tsuga heterophylla-Picea sitchensis/Oplopanax .horridum/ Athyrium filix-femina
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Propagation Methods and the Effectiveness of Fungal Inoculation on Vaccinium Species Native to Central British Columbia Irene McKechnie B.Sc., University of Northern British Columbia, 2003 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Natural Resources and Environmental Studies (Biology) The University of Northern British Columbia June 2009 © Irene McKechnie, 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothgque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-60824-1 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-60824-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]