DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Abbreviations Aint a = Ai — Algebraic Interior (Or Core) of the Set a A∞ — Asymptotic Cone of the Nonempty Set a A⊥B — Orthogonal Closed Linear Subspaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Abbreviations Aint a = Ai — Algebraic Interior (Or Core) of the Set a A∞ — Asymptotic Cone of the Nonempty Set a A⊥B — Orthogonal Closed Linear Subspaces List of Abbreviations aint A = Ai — algebraic interior (or core) of the set A A∞ — asymptotic cone of the nonempty set A A⊥B — orthogonal closed linear subspaces. H = A⊕B — complementary subspaces, see under line (4.24) a.c. — asymptotically compact A∗ — adjoint operator to A AT — adjoint operator in Hilbert spaces (AT )−1 — inverse operator of the adjoint operator AT to A lin A — linear hull of a nonempty set A aff A — affine hull of a nonempty set A conv A — convex hull of a nonempty set A A + B — addition of sets, see Section 2.1 [A]C — see full set, Definition 2.1.21 Ac — Y \ A, where A ⊂ Y Ar — see Theorem 3.10.12 Ax — {y ∈ Y | (x, y) ∈ A}, where A ⊂ X × Y is nonempty a.s.P . — almost surely w.r.t. probability P α(y) — sup-support function B(x) — neighborhood base of x B0 — unit ball B(x, r) — (closed) ball of center x and radius r BEff(D; C) — the set of Benson-efficient points of D B-function — Bregman function cl B or B — closure of the set B τ-clB — closure of the set B w.r.t. the topology τ ∆ ◦ Γ — composition of multifunctions ∆ and Γ ∂B — B \ int B, see Section 3.3 bd B — usual (topological) boundary of B β(y) — inf-support function Cε — Henig dilating cone C-l.c. — C-lower continuous C-l.s.c. — C-lower semicontinuous C+ — continuous dual cone of the cone C infC A — infimum of A w.r.t. C C# — quasi interior of the cone C+ C[0, 1] — see Example 2.1.12 C1[0,T] — see inverse Stefan problem ≤C — see Section 3.2.3 k0 — a preorder, see Section 3.10 and Theorem 3.10.7 C-seq-b-regular — see under Corollary 3.10.16 (CP) — containment property C : X ⇒ Y — multifunction, whose values are pointed convex cones Cc — see Section 3.5.2 320 List of abbreviations CP — complementarity problem |P | — cardinality of P D⊥ — orthogonal space to a linear subspace D ≤ ∂ f(x0) — subdifferential of f at x0 ∈ dom f ≤ ∂ C f(x0) — subdifferential of f at x0 ∈ dom f dim — dimension DΓ(x, y)(u) — Dini upper derivative of Γ at (x, y) in the direction u DΓ (x, y)(u) — Dini lower derivative of Γ at (x, y) in the direction u SΓ(x, y)(u) — derivative in the sense of Shi in the direction u f (x)(v) — directional derivative of f at x in the direction v dist(x, A), d(x, A) — infa∈A d(x, a), where A ⊂ X and d a metric on X dom f — domain of f (DP) — domination property ϕcl B,k0 (y) — scalarization functional, see Section 2.3 Eff(M,Bεk0 ) — the set of approximately efficient points ε-Effϕ(M,C) — see Definition 3.1.2 EffMin(P, C) — see Remark 2.1.3 or Section 3.7 EffMax(D, C) — see Remark 2.1.3 or Section 3.7 EffMin(F, B, e)—(B,e)-minimal elements; see Section 3.11.2 EffMax(F, B, e) — the set of all (B,e)-maximal elements of F ∅ — empty set EP — equilibrium problem EVP — Ekeland’s variational principle epi f — epigraph of f e(A, B) — excess of A over B yε — see Section 3.1.1 E — expectation operator Ft — σ-algebra F(M) — the family of all nonempty finite subsets of M F(M,x) — the family of all finite subsets of M containing x ∇xf(x)—Fr´echet derivative of f w.r.t. x gr Γ — graph (of a multifunction Γ ) ΓC — see Section 2.4 Γf,C — see Section 2.4 Γ P — see Theorem 3.5.12 GEff(F) — the set of properly efficient points in the sense of Geoffrion GVEP — generalized vector equilibrium problem GVVI — generalized vector variational inequality HEff(D; C) — the set of Henig-proper efficient points of D w.r.t. C H-C-u.c. — Hausdorff C-upper continuous (w.r.t. cone C) H.l.c.s. — Hausdorff locally convex space H-l.c. — Hausdorff lower continuous H.t.v.s. — Hausdorff topological vector space H-u.c. — Hausdorff upper continuous HVIS — hemivariational inequalities system; see line (3.101) List of abbreviations 321 Im Γ — image (of a multifunction Γ ) χD — indicator function of D int C — interior of the set C Γ +1(B) — inverse image; see Section 2.4 Γ −1(B) — inverse image; see Section 2.4 ∞ — element adjoined to Y to get Y • Ker A — kernel of an operator A KKM-lemma — Knaster, Kuratowski, and Mazurkiewicz lemma (K, L)-monotonicity — see Definition 3.8.5 Φ(x, z∗) — Lagrangian (see Remark 3.11.5) Λα for α ∈ ]0, 1[ — see under Definition 2.4.1 ∞, p — see Example 2.2.3 p L or Lp — see Example 2.2.3 lim infx→x0 Γ (x) — limit inferior of Γ at x0 L(X, Y ), L(X, Y ) — the set of linear continuous mappings from X in Y L1(xε), L2(xε) — see Section 4.1.2 levΓ (y) — sublevel set; see Section 2.4 < levΓ (y) — strict sublevel set; see Section 2.4 l.c. — lower continuous l.c.s. — locally convex space l.s.c. — lower semicontinuous (X, P) — l.c.s. with a family P of seminorms + 2 — the common ordering cone in the Hilbert space 2 meas A — measure of a set A Γ : X ⇒ Y — multifunction Max(M0, R) — the class of maximal elements of M0 with respect to R Min(M0, R) — the class of minimal elements of M0 with respect to R HMax(Y ; C) — see Section 3.2.6 PrMax(Y ; C) — see Section 3.2.6 (xi)i∈I — net or generalized sequence Nτ (x) — the class of all neighborhoods of x w.r.t. a topology τ N — the set of nonnegative integers N∗ — the set of positive integers · ∗ — dual norm to · ||| · ||| — vector-valued norm 0 0 ND(x ) — normal cone to D at x ∈ X (X, · ) — normed space X n.v.s. — normed vector space (a, b) — open interval [a, b) — half open interval P(X) — the class of subsets of X p-Eff(F, Z) — the set of properly efficient points w.r.t. a family Z P -pseudomonotonicity — see Lemma 3.8.29 PrEff(Y ; C) — the set of properly efficient points of Y w.r.t. C PC r (r ≥ 1) — see Section 4.4.3 322 List of abbreviations pA — Minkowski functional of the set A U 0 — polar of the set U PX — projection of X × Y onto X PD(e) — projection of e onto a set D Pu — probability measure; see Section 4.5.3 R — R ∪{+∞} ∪ {−∞} R• — R ∪{+∞} R(PA) — range of the operator PA raint — relative algebraic interior (of a set) r : X × X → P —aP -valued metric, P a cone Rn — the real n-dimensional vector space R+ := [0, ∞[ — the set of nonnegative real numbers n n R+ — usual ordering cone of R R−1 — inverse of the relation (or multifunction) R + ⊂ ∈ Yt (x) — upper section of Y X with respect to t and x X − ⊂ ∈ Yt (x) — lower section of Y X with respect to t and x X S◦R — composition of two relations R and S — compare “directed set” X FSD Y — see Section 4.6 X SSD Y — see Section 4.6 SEP — scalar equilibrium problem SGVEP — strong generalized vector equilibrium problem S(f,P) — the set of solutions of a GVEP (cn) → c — sequence (cn) converging to c M × M — set of ordered pairs of elements of M (M,R) — set M with order structure R Min(F, y∗,e) — the set of all (y∗,e)-minimal elements of F Max(F, y∗,e) — the set of all (y∗,e)-maximal elements of F s.t. — subject to SPEff(A; C) — class of strong proper efficient points of set A w.r.t. C SVCP — strong vector complementarity problem TA — partial inverse of T with respect to A TB(A; a) — Bouligand tangent cone (or contingent cone) of A at a TU (A; a) — Ursescu tangent cone (or adjacent cone) of A at a t.l.s. (or t.v.s.) — topological linear (or topological vector) space τ (xi) → x — convergence (w.r.t. topology τ) τ1 × τ2 — product topology aT — transposed vector to a ∈ Rn • U — U \{x0}, where U is a neighborhood of x0 u.c. — upper continuous VOP — vector optimization problem VSP — vector saddle point problem VVI — vector variational inequality w-pointedness — see Section 3.8.1 w := σ(X, X∗) — weak topology of X List of abbreviations 323 w∗ := σ(X∗,X) — weak∗ topology of X∗ w-normal — weakly normal w xi x — weakly convergent net w.r.t. — with respect to WVCP — weak vector complementarity problem WVEP — weak vector equilibrium problem WVSP — weak vector saddle point problem WGVEP — weak generalized vector equilibrium problem. w Eff(A; C) — set of weakly efficient points X∗ — continuous dual space to the space X (X, ρ) — metric space with metric ρ (X, τ) — topological space X equipped with topology τ τ-a.c. set — asymptotically compact set w.r.t. topology τ x∗(x)=x, x∗ — value of linear continuous functional x∗ at x (x | y) — inner product in a Hilbert space Y • — Y ∪ {∞}, see Section 2.4 (Y,CY ) — linear space Y ordered by a cone CY References 1. Amahroq, T., Taa, A.: On Lagrange–Kuhn–Tucker multipliers for multiobjec- tive optimization problems.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CORE View Metadata, Citation and Similar Papers at Core.Ac.Uk
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS Serdica Math. J. 27 (2001), 203-218 FIRST ORDER CHARACTERIZATIONS OF PSEUDOCONVEX FUNCTIONS Vsevolod Ivanov Ivanov Communicated by A. L. Dontchev Abstract. First order characterizations of pseudoconvex functions are investigated in terms of generalized directional derivatives. A connection with the invexity is analysed. Well-known first order characterizations of the solution sets of pseudolinear programs are generalized to the case of pseudoconvex programs. The concepts of pseudoconvexity and invexity do not depend on a single definition of the generalized directional derivative. 1. Introduction. Three characterizations of pseudoconvex functions are considered in this paper. The first is new. It is well-known that each pseudo- convex function is invex. Then the following question arises: what is the type of 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26B25, 90C26, 26E15. Key words: Generalized convexity, nonsmooth function, generalized directional derivative, pseudoconvex function, quasiconvex function, invex function, nonsmooth optimization, solution sets, pseudomonotone generalized directional derivative. 204 Vsevolod Ivanov Ivanov the function η from the definition of invexity, when the invex function is pseudo- convex. This question is considered in Section 3, and a first order necessary and sufficient condition for pseudoconvexity of a function is given there. It is shown that the class of strongly pseudoconvex functions, considered by Weir [25], coin- cides with pseudoconvex ones. The main result of Section 3 is applied to characterize the solution set of a nonlinear programming problem in Section 4. The base results of Jeyakumar and Yang in the paper [13] are generalized there to the case, when the function is pseudoconvex.
    [Show full text]
  • Raport De Autoevaluare - 2012
    RAPORT DE AUTOEVALUARE - 2012 - 1. Date de identificare institut/centru : 1.1. Denumire: INSTITUTUL DE MATEMATICA OCTAV MAYER 1.2. Statut juridic: INSTITUTIE PUBLICA 1.3. Act de infiintare: Hotarare nr. 498 privind trecere Institutului de Matematica din Iasi la Academia Romana, din 22.02.1990, Guvernul Romaniei. 1.4. Numar de inregistrare in Registrul Potentialilor Contractori: 1807 1.5. Director general/Director: Prof. Dr. Catalin-George Lefter 1.6. Adresa: Blvd. Carol I, nr. 8, 700505-Iasi, Romania, 1.7. Telefon, fax, pagina web, e-mail: tel :0232-211150 http://www.iit.tuiasi.ro/Institute/institut.php?cod_ic=13. e-mail: [email protected] 2. Domeniu de specialitate : Mathematical foundations 2.1. Conform clasificarii UNESCO: 12 2.2. Conform clasificarii CAEN: CAEN 7310 (PE1) 3. Stare institut/centru 3.1. Misiunea institutului/centrului, directiile de cercetare, dezvoltare, inovare. Rezultate de excelenta in indeplinirea misiunii (maximum 2000 de caractere): Infiintarea institutului, in 1948, a reprezentat un moment esential pentru dezvoltarea, in continuare, a matematicii la Iasi. Cercetarile in prezent se desfasoara in urmatoarele directii: Ecuatii cu derivate partiale (ecuatii stochastice cu derivate partiale si aplicatii in studiul unor probleme neliniare, probleme de viabilitate si invarianta pentru ecuatii si incluziuni diferentiale si aplicatii in teoria controlului optimal, stabilizarea si controlabilitatea ecuatiilor dinamicii fluidelor, a sistemelor de tip reactie-difuzie, etc.), Geometrie (geometria sistemelor mecanice, geometria lagrangienilor pe fibrate vectoriale, structuri geometrice pe varietati riemanniene, geometria foliatiilor pe varietati semiriemanniene, spatii Hamilton etc), Analiza 1 matematica (analiza convexa, optimizare, operatori neliniari in spatii uniforme, etc.), Mecanica (elasticitate, termoelasticitate si modele generalizate in mecanica mediilor continue).
    [Show full text]
  • First Order Characterizations of Pseudoconvex Functions
    Serdica Math. J. 27 (2001), 203-218 FIRST ORDER CHARACTERIZATIONS OF PSEUDOCONVEX FUNCTIONS Vsevolod Ivanov Ivanov Communicated by A. L. Dontchev Abstract. First order characterizations of pseudoconvex functions are investigated in terms of generalized directional derivatives. A connection with the invexity is analysed. Well-known first order characterizations of the solution sets of pseudolinear programs are generalized to the case of pseudoconvex programs. The concepts of pseudoconvexity and invexity do not depend on a single definition of the generalized directional derivative. 1. Introduction. Three characterizations of pseudoconvex functions are considered in this paper. The first is new. It is well-known that each pseudo- convex function is invex. Then the following question arises: what is the type of 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26B25, 90C26, 26E15. Key words: Generalized convexity, nonsmooth function, generalized directional derivative, pseudoconvex function, quasiconvex function, invex function, nonsmooth optimization, solution sets, pseudomonotone generalized directional derivative. 204 Vsevolod Ivanov Ivanov the function η from the definition of invexity, when the invex function is pseudo- convex. This question is considered in Section 3, and a first order necessary and sufficient condition for pseudoconvexity of a function is given there. It is shown that the class of strongly pseudoconvex functions, considered by Weir [25], coin- cides with pseudoconvex ones. The main result of Section 3 is applied to characterize the solution set of a nonlinear programming problem in Section 4. The base results of Jeyakumar and Yang in the paper [13] are generalized there to the case, when the function is pseudoconvex. The second and third characterizations are considered in Sections 5, 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Output Kernels with Block Coordinate Descent
    Learning Output Kernels with Block Coordinate Descent Francesco Dinuzzo [email protected] Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 72076 T¨ubingen,Germany Cheng Soon Ong [email protected] Department of Computer Science, ETH Z¨urich, 8092 Z¨urich, Switzerland Peter Gehler [email protected] Max Planck Institute for Informatics, 66123 Saarbr¨ucken, Germany Gianluigi Pillonetto [email protected] Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy Abstract the outputs. In this paper, we introduce a method that We propose a method to learn simultane- simultaneously learns a vector-valued function and the ously a vector-valued function and a kernel kernel between the components of the output vector. between its components. The obtained ker- The problem is formulated within the framework of nel can be used both to improve learning per- regularization in RKH spaces. We assume that the formance and to reveal structures in the out- matrix-valued kernel can be decomposed as the prod- put space which may be important in their uct of a scalar kernel and a positive semidefinite kernel own right. Our method is based on the so- matrix that represents the similarity between the out- lution of a suitable regularization problem put components, a structure that has been considered over a reproducing kernel Hilbert space of in a variety of works, (Evgeniou et al., 2005; Capon- vector-valued functions. Although the regu- netto et al., 2008; Baldassarre et al., 2010). larized risk functional is non-convex, we show In practice, an important issue is the choice of the ker- that it is invex, implying that all local min- nel matrix between the outputs.
    [Show full text]
  • Invex Sets and Functions
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 263, 355–379 (2001) provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector doi:10.1006/jmaa.2001.7574, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on p r -Invex Sets and Functions Tadeusz Antczak Faculty of Mathematics, University of Łod´ ´z, Banacha 22, 90-238 Łod´ ´z, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Submitted by William F. Ames Received January 22, 2001 Notions of invexity of a function and of a set are generalized.The notion of an invex function with respect to η can be further extended with the aid of p-invex sets.Slight generalization of the notion of p-invex sets with respect to η leads to a new class of functions.A family of real functions called, in general, p r -pre- invex functions with respect to η (without differentiability) or p r -invex functions with respect to η (in the differentiable case) is introduced.Some (geometric) prop- erties of these classes of functions are derived.Sufficient optimality conditions are obtained for a nonlinear programming problem involving p r -invex functions with respect to η. 2001 Academic Press Key Words: p r -invex set with respect to η; r-invex set with respect to η; p r -pre-invex function with respect to ηp r -invex function with respect to η. 1.INTRODUCTION Convexity plays a vital role in many aspects of mathematical program- ming including, for example, sufficient optimality conditions and duality theorems.An invex function is one of the generalized convex functions
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1608.04636V4 [Cs.LG]
    Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Condition Hamed Karimi, Julie Nutini, and Mark Schmidt Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada {[email protected]},{jnutini,schmidtm}@cs.ubc.ca Abstract. In 1963, Polyak proposed a simple condition that is sufficient to show a global linear convergence rate for gradient descent. This condition is a special case of theLojasiewicz inequality proposed in the same year, and it does not require strong convexity (or even convexity). In this work, we show that this much-older Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) inequality is actually weaker than the main conditions that have been explored to show linear convergence rates without strong convexity over the last 25 years. We also use the PL inequality to give new analyses of randomized and greedy coordinate descent methods, sign-based gradient descent methods, and stochastic gradient methods in the classic setting (with decreasing or constant step-sizes) as well as the variance- reduced setting. We further propose a generalization that applies to proximal-gradient methods for non-smooth optimization, leading to simple proofs of linear convergence of these methods. Along the way, we give simple convergence results for a wide variety of problems in machine learning: least squares, logistic regression, boosting, resilient backpropagation, L1-regularization, support vector machines, stochastic dual coordinate ascent, and stochastic variance-reduced gradient methods. 1 Introduction Fitting most machine learning models involves solving some sort of optimization problem. Gradient descent, and variants of it like coordinate descent and stochastic gradient, are the workhorse tools used by the field to solve very large instances of these problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpses Upon Quasiconvex Analysis Jean-Paul Penot
    Glimpses upon quasiconvex analysis Jean-Paul Penot To cite this version: Jean-Paul Penot. Glimpses upon quasiconvex analysis. 2007. hal-00175200 HAL Id: hal-00175200 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00175200 Preprint submitted on 27 Sep 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ESAIM: PROCEEDINGS, Vol. ?, 2007, 1-10 Editors: Will be set by the publisher DOI: (will be inserted later) GLIMPSES UPON QUASICONVEX ANALYSIS Jean-Paul Penot Abstract. We review various sorts of generalized convexity and we raise some questions about them. We stress the importance of some special subclasses of quasiconvex functions. Dedicated to Marc Att´eia R´esum´e. Nous passons en revue quelques notions de convexit´eg´en´eralis´ee.Nous tentons de les relier et nous soulevons quelques questions. Nous soulignons l’importance de quelques classes particuli`eres de fonctions quasiconvexes. 1. Introduction Empires usually are well structured entities, with unified, strong rules (for instance, the length of axles of carts in the Chinese Empire and the Roman Empire, a crucial rule when building a road network). On the contrary, associated kingdoms may have diverging rules and uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Greed Is Good Greedy Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Structured Problems
    Greed is Good Greedy Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Structured Problems by Julie Nutini B.Sc., The University of British Columbia (Okanagan), 2010 M.Sc., The University of British Columbia (Okanagan), 2012 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Computer Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) May 2018 c Julie Nutini 2018 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: Greed is Good: Greedy Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Structured Problems submitted by Julie Nutini in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science Examining Committee: Mark Schmidt, Computer Science Supervisor Chen Greif, Computer Science Supervisory Committee Member Will Evans, Computer Science Supervisory Committee Member Bruce Shepherd, Computer Science University Examiner Ozgur Yilmaz, Mathematics University Examiner ii Abstract This work looks at large-scale machine learning, with a particular focus on greedy methods. A recent trend caused by big datasets is to use optimization methods that have a cheap iteration cost. In this category are (block) coordinate descent and Kaczmarz methods, as the updates of these methods only rely on a reduced subspace of the problem at each iteration. Prior to our work, the literature cast greedy variations of these methods as computationally expensive with comparable convergence rates to randomized versions. In this dissertation, we show that greed is good. Specifically, we show that greedy coordinate descent and Kaczmarz methods have efficient implementations and can be faster than their randomized counterparts for certain common problem structures in machine learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Optimisation for Energy Systems
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Australian National University Global Optimisation for Energy Systems Ksenia Bestuzheva October 2018 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University © Copyright by Ksenia Bestuzheva 2018 All Rights Reserved Except where otherwise stated, this thesis is my own original work. Ksenia Bestuzheva October 2018 1 Abstract The goal of global optimisation is to find globally optimal solutions, avoiding local optima and other stationary points. The aim of this thesis is to provide more efficient global optimisation tools for energy systems planning and operation. Due to the ongoing increasing of complex- ity and decentralisation of power systems, the use of advanced mathematical techniques that produce reliable solutions becomes necessary. The task of developing such methods is com- plicated by the fact that most energy-related problems are nonconvex due to the nonlinear Alternating Current Power Flow equations and the existence of discrete elements. In some cases, the computational challenges arising from the presence of non-convexities can be tackled by relaxing the definition of convexity and identifying classes of problems that can be solved to global optimality by polynomial time algorithms. One such property is known as invexity and is defined by every stationary point of a problem being a global optimum. This thesis investigates how the relation between the objective function and the structure of the feasible set is connected to invexity and presents necessary conditions for invexity in the general case and necessary and sufficient conditions for problems with two degrees of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics ————————————————————————– Volume 15 No
    International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics ————————————————————————– Volume 15 No. 2 2004, 137-250 FUNDAMENTALS OF MIXED QUASI VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES Muhammad Aslam Noor Etisalat College of Engineering P.O. Box 980, Sharjah, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Mixed quasi variational inequalities are very important and sig- nificant generalizations of variational inequalities involving the nonlinear bi- function. It is well-known that a large class of problems arising in various branches of pure and applied sciences can be studied in the general framework of mixed quasi variational inequalities. Due to the presence of the bifunction in the formulation of variational inequalities, projection method and its variant forms cannot be used to suggest and analyze iterative methods for mixed quasi variational inequalities. In this paper, we suggest and analyze various itera- tive schemes for solving these variational inequalities using resolvent methods, resolvent equations and auxiliary principle techniques. We discuss the sensitiv- ity analysis, stability of the dynamical systems and well-posedness of the mixed quasi variational inequalities. We also consider and investigate various classes of mixed quasi variational inequalities in the setting of invexity, g-convexity and uniformly prox-regular convexity. The concepts of invexity, g-convexity and uniformly prox-regular convexity are generalizations of the classical convexity in different directions. Some classes of equilibrium problems are introduced and studied. We also suggest several open problems with sufficient information and references. AMS Subject Classification: 49J40, 90C30, 35A15, 47H17 Key Words: mixed quasi variational inequalities, auxiliary principle, fixed- points, resolvent equations, iterative methods, convergence, dynamical systems, global convergence, stability Received: March 11, 2004 c 2004, Academic Publications Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Cone Approximations in Optimization
    Control and Cybernetics vol. 36 (2007) No. 3 Local cone approximations in optimization by M. Castellani1 and M. Pappalardo2 1 Department of “Sistemi ed Istituzioni per l’Economia” University of L’Aquila 2 Department of “Matematica Applicata” University of Pisa Abstract: We show how to use intensively local cone approxi- mations to obtain results in some fields of optimization theory such as optimality conditions, constraint qualifications, mean value theo- rems and error bound. Keywords: nonsmooth optimization, cone approximations, generalized directional epiderivatives, optimality conditions, con- straint qualifications, mean value theorem, error bound. 1. Introduction Many approaches have been developed in literature for obtaining results in op- timization theory. In this paper we propose a systematic approach to many problems of optimization theory (i.e. necessary and sufficient optimality con- ditions, constraint qualifications, mean value theorems and error bound) which uses local cone approximations of sets. This concept, introduced by Elster and Thierfelder (1988) and studied also in Castellani and Pappalardo (1995), appears to be very useful when used together with separation theorems and generalized derivatives. When intensively applied, we show that it is very flexible in our scope of interest. The first step of this scheme consists in approximating a set with a cone; in particular, when the set is the epigraph of a function, the cone represents the epigraph of a positively homogeneous function, which will be called generalized derivative. The subsequent step consists in considering the case in which the generalized derivative is the difference between two sublinear functions; finally, the most general situation, is the one in which the generalized derivative is a minimum of sublinear functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Output Kernels with Block Coordinate Descent
    Learning output kernels with block coordinate descent Francesco Dinuzzo [email protected] Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 72076 T¨ubingen,Germany Cheng Soon Ong [email protected] Department of Computer Science, ETH Z¨urich, 8092 Z¨urich, Switzerland Peter Gehler [email protected] Max Planck Institute for Informatics, 66123 Saarbr¨ucken, Germany Gianluigi Pillonetto [email protected] Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy Abstract the outputs. In this paper, we introduce a method that We propose a method to learn simultane- simultaneously learns a vector-valued function and the ously a vector-valued function and a kernel kernel between the components of the output vector. between its components. The obtained ker- The problem is formulated within the framework of nel can be used both to improve learning per- regularization in RKH spaces. We assume that the formance and to reveal structures in the out- matrix-valued kernel can be decomposed as the prod- put space which may be important in their uct of a scalar kernel and a positive semidefinite kernel own right. Our method is based on the so- matrix that represents the similarity between the out- lution of a suitable regularization problem put components, a structure that has been considered over a reproducing kernel Hilbert space of in a variety of works, (Evgeniou et al., 2005; Capon- vector-valued functions. Although the regu- netto et al., 2008; Baldassarre et al., 2010). larized risk functional is non-convex, we show In practice, an important issue is the choice of the ker- that it is invex, implying that all local min- nel matrix between the outputs.
    [Show full text]