NE Peloponnese, Greece

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NE Peloponnese, Greece Assessing Geomorphic Processes and their Potential Relationship with Archaeological Artifact Exposure – NE Peloponnese, Greece by Pamela Elizabeth Tetford A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Geography University of Toronto © Copyright by Pamela Elizabeth Tetford 2017 Assessing Geomorphic Processes and their Potential Relationship with Archaeological Artifact Exposure – NE Peloponnese, Greece Pamela Elizabeth Tetford Master of Science Department of Geography University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Landscape change can be important when encountering historical artifacts. Interactions between topography, climate and human activity shape a landscape, making sediment deposits from surface erosion and fluvial transport, and the artifacts they contain, important archives. There is a potential relationship between the rate of geomorphic processes and surface artifact density. This study compares spatially variable estimates of soil loss and stream energy, as indicators of high geomorphic activity, to surface artifact finds of the Western Argolid Regional Project (WARP). Processes within the Inachos River watershed in the northeast Peloponnese, Greece, are quantified using the Unit Stream Power Erosion Deposition method (USPED) and the specific stream power approach in a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) environment. A statistically significant association is identified between surface erosion and artifact density, with the lowest artifact densities associated with the highest rates of soil loss. Knowledgeable interpretation of artifact distribution enables more accurate reconstruction of human settlement history. ii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Joseph Desloges, for his invaluable input over the past year and a half. Ongoing discussions surrounding various approaches and techniques within the field of fluvial geomorphology have challenged me and helped me develop a much stronger understanding of the discipline. His suggestions and critiques of various draft sections of this thesis have led to a much improved final version. I am also greatly appreciative for his assistance in the field, and for navigating the mountainous roads (goat trails?) of the Inachos River watershed with unparalleled confidence. His generous funding of this project has provided me with an extraordinary learning opportunity. I would also like to thank my committee members, Drs. Joseph Desloges, George Arhonditsis and Dimitri Nakassis for providing valuable comments and suggestions that improve upon the final version of this thesis. I also offer thanks to Tassos Venetikidis for his assistance with the translation of Greek documents and discussion regarding the tectonic activity of the northeast Peloponnese region. I also extend my appreciation to the WARP team, for their generous hospitality during fieldwork in Greece. I thank Drs. Sarah James, Scott Gallimore and William Caraher so much for the knowledge they shared regarding the rich history and culture of the Peloponnese region, and taking the time to explain the theory and practices regarding archaeological survey methods. And to Dr. Dimitri Nakassis, I can’t begin to thank him enough for the incredible insight he provided into Greek history and culture, and his tireless assistance in the quest to find the elusive data necessary to make the completion of this project possible! His determination to find sieves and lab space to complete soil analysis was remarkable. I thank the British School of Athens for providing those laboratory facilities. Lastly, I wish to thank my family. The collective patience and understanding that they have all shown has allowed me to devote the time necessary to complete this project. Particularly to my husband, Murray, and my daughter, Sydney, who have picked up the slack at home while “mom” was working away at the computer, and without whose support this would not have been possible…thank you so much! iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................ vii List of Figures .............................................................................................................. viii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................ ix Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Conceptual Understanding ................................................................................... 1 1.2. Defining the Problem ............................................................................................ 2 1.3. Research Objectives ............................................................................................. 4 Chapter 2: Theoretical Background ............................................................................ 5 2.1. Variable Soil Loss as an Assessment of Hillslope Stability ................................... 5 2.1.1. Evolution of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation ................................ 5 2.1.2. The RUSLE in a GIS Environment ............................................................... 6 2.1.2.1. The Rainfall Erosivity Factor .................................................................. 8 2.1.2.2. The Soil Erodibility Factor.................................................................... 10 2.1.2.3. Slope Length and Slope Steepness Factors ....................................... 11 2.1.2.4. The Vegetation Cover Factor .............................................................. 12 2.1.2.5. The Land Management Practices/Conservation Factor ...................... 13 2.2. Stream Power as an Indicator of Geomorphic Processes ................................... 13 2.2.1. Downstream Discharge .............................................................................. 14 2.2.2. Bankfull Width ............................................................................................ 15 2.2.3. Channel Gradient ....................................................................................... 15 2.3. The Relationship between Geomorphic Processes and Artifact Exposure ......... 16 Chapter 3: Inachos River Watershed ........................................................................ 18 3.1. Location .............................................................................................................. 18 3.2. Climate and Hydrology ........................................................................................ 19 3.3. Physiography ...................................................................................................... 21 iv 3.4. Current Land Use................................................................................................ 22 3.5. Settlement History............................................................................................... 22 Chapter 4: Methods .................................................................................................... 25 4.1. Fieldwork ............................................................................................................ 25 4.2. Soil Analysis ....................................................................................................... 26 4.3. Delineation of the Watershed .............................................................................. 26 4.4. RUSLE Calculation ............................................................................................. 26 4.4.1. Computation of the Rainfall Erosivity Factor, R.......................................... 28 4.4.2. Computation of the Soil Erodibility Factor, K .............................................. 28 4.4.3. Computation of the Slope Length and Steepness Factor, LS .................... 28 4.4.4. Computation of the Cover Management Factor, C..................................... 28 4.4.5. Computation of the Support Practice Factor, P .......................................... 29 4.5. Specific Stream Power Calculation ..................................................................... 29 4.5.1. Determination of Slope .............................................................................. 32 4.5.2. Determination of Discharge and Width Relations....................................... 32 4.5.3. Mapping Specific Stream Power ................................................................ 32 4.6. Comparing RUSLE to Artifact Density Distribution ............................................. 33 Chapter 5: Results ...................................................................................................... 35 5.1. Estimating Potential Soil Surface Erosion and Hillslope Surface Stability ........... 35 5.1.1. The R Factor (rainfall erosivity) .................................................................. 35 5.1.2. The K Factor (soil erodibility) ..................................................................... 37 5.1.3. The LS Factor (slope length-steepness) .................................................... 39 5.1.4. The C Factor (land cover index) ................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(S) of an Inland and Mountainous Region
    Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(s) of an Inland and Mountainous Region Eleni Salavoura1 Abstract: The concept of space is an abstract and sometimes a conventional term, but places – where people dwell, (inter)act and gain experiences – contribute decisively to the formation of the main characteristics and the identity of its residents. Arkadia, in the heart of the Peloponnese, is a landlocked country with small valleys and basins surrounded by high mountains, which, according to the ancient literature, offered to its inhabitants a hard and laborious life. Its rough terrain made Arkadia always a less attractive area for archaeological investigation. However, due to its position in the centre of the Peloponnese, Arkadia is an inevitable passage for anyone moving along or across the peninsula. The long life of small and medium-sized agrarian communities undoubtedly owes more to their foundation at crossroads connecting the inland with the Peloponnesian coast, than to their potential for economic growth based on the resources of the land. However, sites such as Analipsis, on its east-southeastern borders, the cemetery at Palaiokastro and the ash altar on Mount Lykaion, both in the southwest part of Arkadia, indicate that the area had a Bronze Age past, and raise many new questions. In this paper, I discuss the role of Arkadia in early Mycenaean times based on settlement patterns and excavation data, and I investigate the relation of these inland communities with high-ranking central places. In other words, this is an attempt to set place(s) into space, supporting the idea that the central region of the Peloponnese was a separated, but not isolated part of it, comprising regions that are also diversified among themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece I.H.T
    Greece I.H.T. Heliports: 2 (1999 est.) GREECE Visa: Greece is a signatory of the 1995 Schengen Agreement Duty Free: goods permitted: 800 cigarettes or 50 cigars or 100 cigarillos or 250g of tobacco, 1 litre of alcoholic beverage over 22% or 2 litres of wine and liquers, 50g of perfume and 250ml of eau de toilet. Health: a yellow ever vaccination certificate is required from all travellers over 6 months of age coming from infected areas. HOTELS●MOTELS●INNS ACHARAVI KERKYRA BEIS BEACH HOTEL 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 63913 (0663) 63991 CENTURY RESORT 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 63401-4 (0663) 63405 GELINA VILLAGE 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 64000-7 (0663) 63893 [email protected] IONIAN PRINCESS CLUB-HOTEL 491 00 Acharavi Kerkyra ACHARAVI KERKYRA GREECE TEL: (0663) 63110 (0663) 63111 ADAMAS MILOS CHRONIS HOTEL BUNGALOWS 848 00 Adamas Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE TEL: (0287) 22226, 23123 (0287) 22900 POPI'S HOTEL 848 01 Adamas, on the beach Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE TEL: (0287) 22286-7, 22397 (0287) 22396 SANTA MARIA VILLAGE 848 01 Adamas Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE TEL: (0287) 22015 (0287) 22880 Country Dialling Code (Tel/Fax): ++30 VAMVOUNIS APARTMENTS 848 01 Adamas Milos ADAMAS MILOS GREECE Greek National Tourism Organisation: Odos Amerikis 2b, 105 64 Athens Tel: TEL: (0287) 23195 (0287) 23398 (1)-322-3111 Fax: (1)-322-2841 E-mail: [email protected] Website: AEGIALI www.araianet.gr LAKKI PENSION 840 08 Aegiali, on the beach Amorgos AEGIALI AMORGOS Capital: Athens Time GMT + 2 GREECE TEL: (0285) 73244 (0285) 73244 Background: Greece achieved its independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1829.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikos Skoulikidis.Pdf
    The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 59 Series Editors: Damià Barceló · Andrey G. Kostianoy Nikos Skoulikidis Elias Dimitriou Ioannis Karaouzas Editors The Rivers of Greece Evolution, Current Status and Perspectives The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Founded by Otto Hutzinger Editors-in-Chief: Damia Barcelo´ • Andrey G. Kostianoy Volume 59 Advisory Board: Jacob de Boer, Philippe Garrigues, Ji-Dong Gu, Kevin C. Jones, Thomas P. Knepper, Alice Newton, Donald L. Sparks More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/698 The Rivers of Greece Evolution, Current Status and Perspectives Volume Editors: Nikos Skoulikidis Á Elias Dimitriou Á Ioannis Karaouzas With contributions by F. Botsou Á N. Chrysoula Á E. Dimitriou Á A.N. Economou Á D. Hela Á N. Kamidis Á I. Karaouzas Á A. Koltsakidou Á I. Konstantinou Á P. Koundouri Á D. Lambropoulou Á L. Maria Á I.D. Mariolakos Á A. Mentzafou Á A. Papadopoulos Á D. Reppas Á M. Scoullos Á V. Skianis Á N. Skoulikidis Á M. Styllas Á G. Sylaios Á C. Theodoropoulos Á L. Vardakas Á S. Zogaris Editors Nikos Skoulikidis Elias Dimitriou Institute of Marine Biological Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters Resources and Inland Waters Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Anavissos, Greece Anavissos, Greece Ioannis Karaouzas Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Anavissos, Greece ISSN 1867-979X ISSN 1616-864X (electronic) The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ISBN 978-3-662-55367-1 ISBN 978-3-662-55369-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55369-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017954950 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronunciation Booklet
    PRONUNCIATION BOOKLET Word Phonetic pronunciation (mine) What Meaning (if known) Actual sacred space or enclosure attached to a temple of ab-are-ton Abaton Asclepius where those wanting to be cured slept Acayo a-key-owe Fictional character - a Spartan soldier Greek name meaning out of step/ill-timed Acropolis ac-rop-o-liss Actual fortified part of a city, normally built on a hill Actual ancient Greek King of Athens, father of the hero Aegeus ee-gee-us Greek name meaning protection Theseus Actual Ancient Greek name given to the public open space Agora ag-or-are Greek name meaning gathering place or assembly used for markets Agrias ag-ree-us Fictional character - Alexis' father, and King of Trachis Greek name of unknown meaning Aigai ay-gay Greek name meaning place of goats Actual ancient first capital of Macedonia, now called Vergina Fictional character - Princess of Thermopylae, daughter of Greek name meaning helper and defender (can be male Alexis al-ex-us Agrias & Melina or female name) Amazonomachiai am-a-zon-e-mack-ee Plural of the battle of the Amazonomachy Portrayal of a mythical battle between the Amazons and Amazonomachy am-a-zon-e-mack-ee Amazon battle Ancient Greeks Amphissa am-f-iss-are Actual ancient city in Phocis, now known as Amfissa Greek name meaning surround Actual Ancient Greek jar or jug with two handles and a Amphora am-for-a From Greek word amphoreus meaning to bear narrow neck (singular) Amphorae am-for-i Actual plural of the Ancient Greek jars or jugs called amphora Amyntas arm-in-t-us Actual King of Macedonia Amyntas
    [Show full text]
  • Memory, Tradition, and Christianization of the Peloponnese,” by Rebecca J
    AJA IMAGE GALLERY www.ajaonline.org Supplemental images for “Memory, Tradition, and Christianization of the Peloponnese,” by Rebecca J. Sweetman (AJA 119 [2015] 501–31). * Unless otherwise noted in the figure caption, images are by the author. Image Gallery figures are not edited by AJA to the same level as the published article’s figures. Fig. 1. Map of the Peloponnese, showing the location of the Late Antique churches (© 2014 Google Imagery Terrametrics). Key to Map: 13. Kato Roitika Other Basilicas in Arcadia 14. Leontion 27. Ay. Ioannis Achaea 15. Olena 28. Astros 29. Astros Villa Loukou Patras 16. Patras Vlachou 30. Chotousa 1. Patras Botsi Street 17. Platanovrysi 31. Gortys 2. Patras Harado 18. Skioessa 32. Kato Doliana 3. Patras Kanakari Street 124-6 19. Tritaia 33. Kato Meligous Kastraki 4. Patras Kanakari Street 46-52 34. Kato Meligous, Ay. Georgios 5. Patras Korinthos Street Arcadia 35. Lykosoura 6. Patras Midilogli Tegea 36. Mantinea City and Theater 7. Patras Rofou 20. Pallantion 1 Christoforo 37. Megalopolis, East of Theater 8. Patras Terpsithea 21. Pallantion, Ay. Giorgou 38. Orchomenos 9. Patras Zarouchleika 22. Tegea Agora 39. Phalaisai (Lianou) 10. Patras, Ay. Andreas 23. Tegea Agora Thyrsos 40. Thelpoussa Other Basilicas in Achaia 24. Tegea Provantinou 11. Aighion 25. Tegea Temple Alea Continued on next page. 12. Kato Achaia 26. Tegea Theater Published online October 2015 American Journal of Archaeology 119.4 1 DOI: 10.3764/ajaonline1194.Sweetman.suppl AJA IMAGE GALLERY www.ajaonline.org Key to Map (continued). Argolid Nemea Kainepolis-Kyparissos 86. Nemea 126. Kainepolis-Kyparissos Monastiri Ano Epidauros 127.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Urban Space
    Cities, Design & Sustainability | The New Series CDS/2 This Series seeks to present some new concepts concerning current and future roles of cities in supporting sustainable communities. It will discuss the latest issues in planning, designing and building a better future, achieving sustainability through urban and architecture design. CITIES, DESIGN&SUSTAINABILITY.THE NEW SERIES attempts to understand better some factors and WATERFRONT principles that condition a range of choices about future urban life. It will address new ways of managing cities and responding to current issues that are key to urban change. The making of real sustainable cities has to be considered as a cultural issue concerning the reconciliation between community living, urban environment and nature. Evolving themes on urban, architectural and climate change matters will be further explored in order to share insights and build a more integrative urban environment. edited by Dimitra Babalis URBAN SPACE Designing for Blue-Green Places WATERFRONT URBAN SPACE. Designing for Blue-green Places explores potentialities and emerging issues to strategies and waterside planning and design. edited by Dimitra Babalis The book develops research results and detailed cases of interest in response to city change, to promote sustainable development in a variety of ways. It seeks to include some key waterfront matters in linking new spatial patterns to social dynamics and climate change. It stresses conceptual development and implications for future practice. The book is structuring into two parts: Part One: ‘Advancing Riverfront Transformation’ examines proposals on urban waterfronts and relations between urban spaces and social dynamics to revitalise and re-appropriate urban environment; To restore and define urban form; To re-locate new uses and functions with sustainable design solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Selido3 Part 1
    ΔΕΛΤΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΗΣ ΕΤΑΙΡΙΑΣ Τόμος XLIII, Νο 3 BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GREECE Volume XLIII, Νο 3 1 (3) ΕΙΚΟΝΑ ΕΞΩΦΥΛΛΟΥ - COVER PAGE Γενική άποψη της γέφυρας Ρίου-Αντιρρίου. Οι πυλώνες της γέφυρας διασκοπήθηκαν γεωφυ- σικά με χρήση ηχοβολιστή πλευρικής σάρωσης (EG&G 4100P και EG&G 272TD) με σκοπό την αποτύπωση του πυθμένα στην περιοχή του έργου, όσο και των βάθρων των πυλώνων. (Εργα- στήριο Θαλάσσιας Γεωλογίας & Φυσικής Ωκεανογραφίας, Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών. Συλλογή και επεξεργασία: Δ.Χριστοδούλου, Η. Φακίρης). General view of the Rion-Antirion bridge, from a marine geophysical survey conducted by side scan sonar (EG&G 4100P and EG&G 272TD) in order to map the seafloor at the site of the construction (py- lons and piers) (Gallery of the Laboratory of Marine Geology and Physical Oceanography, University of Patras. Data acquisition and Processing: D. Christodoulou, E. Fakiris). ΔΕΛΤΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΗΣ ΕΤΑΙΡΙΑΣ Τόμος XLIII, Νο 3 BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GREECE Volume XLIII, Νο 3 12o ΔΙΕΘΝΕΣ ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΗΣ ΕΤΑΙΡΙΑΣ ΠΛΑΝHΤΗΣ ΓH: Γεωλογικές Διεργασίες και Βιώσιμη Ανάπτυξη 12th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GREECE PLANET EARTH: Geological Processes and Sustainable Development ΠΑΤΡΑ / PATRAS 2010 ISSN 0438-9557 Copyright © από την Ελληνική Γεωλογική Εταιρία Copyright © by the Geological Society of Greece 12o ΔΙΕΘΝΕΣ ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΗΣ ΕΤΑΙΡΙΑΣ ΠΛΑΝΗΤΗΣ ΓΗ: Γεωλογικές Διεργασίες και Βιώσιμη Ανάπτυξη Υπό την Αιγίδα του Υπουργείου Περιβάλλοντος, Ενέργειας και Κλιματικής Αλλαγής 12th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GREECE PLANET EARTH: Geological Processes and Sustainable Development Under the Aegis of the Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change ΠΡΑΚΤΙΚΑ / PROCEEDINGS ΕΠΙΜΕΛΕΙΑ ΕΚΔΟΣΗΣ EDITORS Γ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sanctuary of Aphrodite and Ares (Paus. 2.25.1) in the Periurban Area of Argos and Temples with a Double Cella in Greece*
    UGO FUSCO The Sanctuary of Aphrodite and Ares (Paus. 2.25.1) in the Periurban Area of Argos and Temples with a Double Cella in Greece* Introduction and Methodology The object of this study is the analysis of the sanctuary with a double cella or double temple (ἱερὸν διπλοῦν) dedicated to Aphrodite and Ares, located in the periurban area north-west of Argos. This analysis will take into account the topographical, archaeological/architectural and cultic context of the sanctuary. The study will also present some preliminary thoughts on the temple typology to which this building belongs, in other words, on temples with a double cella. Our only direct source for the sanctuary in question is the short descrip- tion provided by Pausanias (2.25.1), whilst its location, ground plan, elevation, chronology and architectural and sculptural decoration, with the probable ex- ception of the iconography of the cult statues, remain essentially unknown.1 * I wish to thank the Editorial Team of the Τεκμήρια for giving me the opportunity to present these preliminary data from my research project; Prof. E. Papi, Director of the Italian School of Archaeology at Athens, Prof. N. Bookidis of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, and Prof. I. Patera for their advice and the interest with which they have followed this study; my friends L. Argentieri, G. Colesanti and G. Mar- ginesu for discussing with me some aspects of this research project; G. Pelucchini and F. Soriano for assistance with plans and illustrations. Interesting suggestions were also made by the anonymous reviewers of this article, whom I would also like to thank.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London
    BEYOND THE ARGO-POLIS* A SOCIAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ARGOLID IN THE 6TH AND EARLY 5TH CENTURIEs BCE VOLUME2 ]KIMBERLY BEAUFILS A Thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London @Copyright by Kimberly Beaufils 2000 341 Table of Contents VOLUME2 Transliteration Greek Names 345 of ....................................................................................... Appendix A 346 ..................................................................................................................... Site Catalogue 346 SITEINDEX .................................................................................................................. 347 ......................................................................................................................................... SITEINDEX ALPHABETICALORDER 349 IN ............................................................................................... SITEINDEX GREEK 351 IN ......................................................................................................................... SITEINDEX ARGOS 353 FOR ...................................................................................................................... SITEINDEX ARGOS GREEK 355 FOR IN ...................................................................................................... A. THE ARGEIA 357 A. I. THE ARGIVE............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Destination Guide NAFPLION
    Destination guide NAFPLION “ The 5,500-year-old city of Nafplion ” Nafplion, set in a magnificent natural landscape in the shadow of a rocky peninsula and a high steep on the innermost east side of the Argolic Gulf, seems to rise out of the surrounding sea. This magnificent place lies just 125 km from Sparta and 145 km from Athens, this magic city whose every spot overwhelms its visitors with memories – unaltered memories that come from the depths of the centuries and slide into the present, whispering their old song. This area has been OLD TOWN OF NAFPLION famous ever since antiquity for the glorious civilisation its inhabitants developed so many centuries ago. The impressive remains they left behind are evidence of their existence and cannot fail to stir the imagination of anyone who sees them. A pilgrimage to Mycenae, to Lerna, to Tiryns and, a bit further away, to Epidaurus will fill our souls with memories. The dream knows no barriers when our soul remains open to emotion. No matter how many times we do the journey, each time is like the first. HISTORY By Eftychia Vlachou Batsi ythology has it that Poseidon saw Amymone, Danaus’ daughter, with her hair hanging loose M over her shoulders and was dazzled by her beauty. The child of this union was Nauplius, who was born somewhere on the coast of Euboea. When he became a man, though, he sailed his boat to the Gulf of Argolis which, according to philosopher Apollodorus of Rhodes, he ‘built and inhabited’. Archaeological research has proved that Nafplio has been inhabited ever since the first-Mycenaean period.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE LATE HELLADIC I POTTERY IN THE NORTHEASTERN PELOPONNESE OF GREECE A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of Classics of the College of Arts and Sciences 2004 by Jeffrey Lee Kramer B.A., Purdue University, 1994 M.A, The University of Arizona, 1997 Committee: Dr. Gisela Walberg (Chair), University of Cincinnati Dr. Jack Davis, University of Cincinnati Dr. Kathleen Lynch, University of Cincinnati ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is both to propose a new classification system for the pottery of the Late Helladic I period (c. 1700-1600 B.C.) in the northeastern Peloponnese of Greece and to examine the impact such a system has on the chronology of the period commonly known as the “Shaft Grave Period.” The majority of ceramic studies concerning LH I pottery focuses almost exclusively on Mycenaean Decorated despite the fact that the vessels of this ware comprise a tiny fraction of pottery assemblages. The existence of the remaining wares, often simply labeled “the other wares,” has been known for over a century, yet many excavation reports either exclude them entirely or include them in chapters concerning Middle Helladic pottery without discussing their LH I date.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Early Helladic Ii Ceramic Roofing Tiles from Mitrou, Greece: Influence and Interaction
    Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 18, No 2, (2018), pp. 153-173 Copyright © 2018 MAA Open Access. Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1297155 THE CONSTRUCTION OF EARLY HELLADIC II CERAMIC ROOFING TILES FROM MITROU, GREECE: INFLUENCE AND INTERACTION Kyle A. Jazwa Duke University, Department of Classical Studies, 233 Allen Building, PO Box 90103, Durham, NC USA 27708-0103 ([email protected]) Received: 26/04/2018 Accepted: 11/07/2018 ABSTRACT Ceramic roofing tiles were first invented during the Early Bronze Age (or Early Helladic [EH] period, ca. 3100-2000 BCE) and have been identified at 22 sites in mainland Greece. In this paper, I present a newly discovered assemblage of EH tiles from the site of Mitrou (East Lokris) and offer the first detailed, comparative analysis of EH tile production. I demonstrate that there was a shared tradition for the appropriate form and dimensions of tiles in mainland Greece. This uniformity, however, belies heterogeneity in production among sites and through time. The reconstructed chaîne opératoire of Mitrou‟s tiles, for instance, has affinities with the tiles of Zygouries (Corinthia) and Kolonna (Aegina), but not of the later House of the Tiles at Lerna and most tiles from Tiryns in the Argolid. With these results, I reveal a distinct network of interaction in mainland Greece in which construction knowledge was disseminated and maintained. KEYWORDS: Roofing Tiles, Early Bronze Age, Greece, Corridor House Culture, Chaîne Opératoire, Early Helladic Ceramics, Architecture 154 K.A. JAZWA 1. INTRODUCTION EH II ceramic roofing tiles have interested Aegean prehistorians for some time because of the tiles‟ fre- Recent excavations at the site of Mitrou in East quent association with the monumental, corridor Lokris, Greece recovered 180 fragments of Early Hel- house structures of that period (e.g.
    [Show full text]