DOCSLIB.ORG

Directive 98/34 Information Brochure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Directive 98/34 Information Brochure ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY Directive 98/34/EC: An instrument of co-operation This booklet is intended as a guide to the system set up to prevent barriers to the free movement NB-57-03-273-EN- between institutions and enterprises to ensure of products as well as the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services as far as the smooth functioning of the Internal Market Information Society services are concerned. The booklet provides a commentary on Directive 98/34/ EC, the legislation adopted to implement this mechanism. It covers the amendments subsequently introduced on 20 July 1998 by Directive 98/48/EC which brought about an important change to the procedure by extending it to rules on Information Society services. Each of the Directive’s provisions C is quoted in full and accompanied by a detailed commentary explaining its meaning and its implications for all interested parties: Member States, national and European standardisation bodies A guide to the procedure and, last but not least, present or potential economic operators within the European Union. for the provision of information This booklet has been prepared by the Commission departments and does not commit the Commission in any way. The text of Directive 98/34/EC, as amended by Directive 98/48/EC, is alone in the field of technical legally binding. The original language of this booklet is English. standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services European Commission http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/ European Commission Directive 98/34/EC: An instrument of co-operation between institutions and enterprises to ensure the smooth functioning of the Internal Market Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2005 — 89 pp. — 29.7 x 21 cm ISBN 92-894-6917-X SALES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS Publications for sale produced by the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities are available from our sales agents throughout the world. You can find the list of sales agents on the Publications Office website (http://publications.eu.int) or you can apply for it by fax (352) 29 29-42758. Contact the sales agent of your choice and place your order. Directive 98/34/EC: An instrument of co-operation between institutions and enterprises to ensure the smooth functioning of the Internal Market A guide to the procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services European Commission 1 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005 ISBN 92-894-6917-X © European Communities, 2005 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Italy PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER Table of contents Introduction Directive 98/34/EC, an instrument of transparency at the service of the Internal Market 10 Chapter I The scope of the Directive 16 Definition of terms (Article 1) 16 – product, 16 – service, 16 – technical specification, 18 – other requirement, 18 – rule on services, 19 – standard, 21 – standards programme, 23 – draft standard, 23 – European standardisation body, 23 – national standardisation body, 27 – technical regulation, 28 – draft technical regulation 32 Chapter II The procedure for the provision of information with regard to standards 34 – The provision of information to the Commission and the standardisation bodies on new subjects in the national standards programmes (Article 2) 34 – Communication of draft standards to the European and national standardisation bodies and the Commission (Article 3) 37 – Measures for which the Member States are competent (Article 4) 37 – The Member States’ obligation to ensure that European technical harmonisation is not impeded (Article 7) 39 3 Chapter III The procedure applicable to technical regulations 42 – The communication and distribution of information on draft technical regulations and the possible reactions open to the Commission and Member States (Article 8) 42 1. First stage: the obligation to inform 43 a) The Member States’obligations: 43 General rules 43 Specific cases 44 b) The obligations of the Commission 46 2. Second stage: possible reactions open to the Commission and the Member States (comments, detailed opinions, ‘blockage’) 47 The obligation to observe the standstill periods (Article 9) 48 Exceptions to the obligation to notify or observe standstill periods (Article 10) 52 Chapter IV The Standing Committee (Articles 5 and 6) 58 1. General powers 59 2. Specific powers under the procedure applicable to technical regulations 60 3. Specific powers under the standards procedure 60 Chapter V The Application of the Directive 64 – Reports and statistics (Article 11) 64 – Reference to the Directive at the time of adoption of technical regulations (Article 12) 64 – Timetable and application methods 65 Chapter VI Access to information by private individuals and industry and the remedies available to them 68 1. Information published in the Official Journal of the European Union, Series C 68 2. Other sources of information 69 3. The inapplicability of the ‘non notified’technical regulations 69 Conclusion 72 4 Select bibliography 76 Annexes 82 Annex 1 – Contact points at the Commission and in the Member States for the ‘technical regulations’ aspect of the Directive 82 Annex 2 – Contact points for the ‘standards’ aspect of the Directive (Commission, European standardisation bodies, contacts at national level) 84 5 Preface Throughout the past 20 years, the scope of the Directive has been gradually broadened to cover all industrial, agricultural and fishery products. Directive 98/48/EC extended the system to in- clude Information Society services since a need was felt for a In 2000 the European Union launched the Lisbon Strategy – an mechanism for supervising this new and rapidly evolving field, ambitious agenda for reform whose aim was to make the EU while leaving economic operators and the Member States alike the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based econo- as much freedom as possible to prevent obstacles to technolog- my in the world by 2010. At its half-way mark, in 2005, the Com- ical developments in this sector. mission proposed a renewed approach to this strategy focus- ing on growth and jobs. The Commission identified improving This procedure contributes to the application of the subsidi- the quality of European and national regulation to ensure the arity principle, both through enabling improvements to be smooth functioning of the internal market as a key challenge in made to national legislation and identifying areas where har- this respect. monisation is really necessary. Thus, the decision-making proc- ess can take place at the most appropriate level enabling de- One of the most difficult and important tasks in the manage- centralisation which safeguards the diversity of political, ment of the internal market is preventing the adoption of na- cultural and regional traditions. The Directive has provided an tional technical regulations and standards which create new insight into national regulatory initiatives, has led to the crea- barriers to trade. Twenty years after its entry into force the No- tion of a genuine discussion forum, clearing the way for joint tification Directive (Directive 83/189/EEC, codified by Directive action to strengthen the internal market and has recently con- 98/34/EC) has proved to be a fundamental internal market in- tributed to the establishment of the enlarged internal market strument. of 25 Member States. The mechanism set up by the original Directive 83/189/EEC is Furthermore, this mechanism is a tool of better regulation since based on the agreement of the Member States to inform and it allows the different competent authorities, both at Commu- consult each other and the Commission before they adopt nity and national levels, to prevent problems ex ante thus avoid- technical regulations and to modify their drafts if necessary. By ing costly and controversial infringement proceedings which means of transparency and the exchange of information at the can only be launched ex post. The exchange and gathering of legislative proposal stage, the Member States have agreed to information is also an effective way of ensuring that national prevent the emergence of new obstacles to the single market. best practices become known and are used as a model for oth- er regulatory initiatives. A pre-adoption screening procedure for all draft technical regula- tions and standards relating to products was therefore established Following a 2002 Commission Report which analysed barriers to and gradually expanded. The Commission, the Member States, in- the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establish- dustry and individuals thus have an open window upon technical ment in the Internal Market1, the Commission’s services are work- activities, which enables them to eliminate at source any barriers ing on the possible extension of Directive 98/34 to cover services to the free movement of goods. other than Information Society services. 1 COM(2002) 441 final. 7 Industry, as well as the Commission and the Member States, is involved in the notification procedure. Besides being able to examine legislation in their own countries, enterprises in the Member States have the opportunity of examining legislation proposed by countries to which they export or wish to export or to which they provide or envisage to provide Information Society services. As a consequence, they can plan to adapt their products or services to the new requirements; they can also identify protectionist elements in the drafts and take ac- tion to have them eliminated.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Belgium Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxembourg the Netherlands Austria Mmm Portugal Iå; Finland Sweden Mbálí Ui Lited Kingdom
    •••s ······ ···■ European Union :ί· il •••3 Regional policy mir' β* •s w Λ w i Ί·:·Ι· ··· I. • ι ·:·.. eî·! ··· ··· «« :·"·■ Regional development studies The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies Belgium Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxembourg The Netherlands Austria mmm Portugal iå; Finland Sweden MbáLí Ui lited Kingdom European Commission 28 Β European Union Regional policy Regional development studies The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies Belgium European Commission Already published in the series 'Regional development studies' 01 — Demographic evolution through time In European regions (Demeter 2015) 02 — Socioeconomic situation and development of the regions In the neighbouring countries of the Community in central and eastern Europe 03 — Les politiques régionales dans l'opinion publique 04 — Urbanisation and the functions of cities in the European Community 05 — The economic and social impact of reductions in defence spending and military forces on the regions of the Community 06 — New location factors for mobile investment in Europe — Final report 07 —Trade and foreign investment in the Community's regions: the impact of economic reform in central and eastern Europe 08 — Estudio prospectivo de las regiones atlánticas — Europa 2000 Study of prospects in the Atlantic regions — Europe 2000 Étude prospective des régions atlantiques — Europe 2000 Estudo prospectivo das regiões atlânticas — Europa 2000 09 — Financial engineering techniques in regions covered by Objectives
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on the Revision of the Constitution of Belgium
    Strasbourg, 20 June 2012 CDL-AD(2012)010 Opinion No. 679 / 2012 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF BELGIUM adopted by the Venice Commission at its 91 st Plenary Session (Venice, 15-16 June 2012) on the basis of comments by Mr Christoph GRABENWARTER (Member, Austria) Mr Peter PACZOLAY (Member, Hungary) Ms Anne PETERS (Substitute Member, Germany) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2012)010 - 2 - I. Introduction 1. On 23 April 2012, after members of a political party belonging to the opposition brought the matter to the attention of the Council of Europe, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe asked the Venice Commission to provide an opinion on the recent constitutional amendment procedure in Belgium, more particularly concerning the amendment to Article 195 of the Constitution relating to the revision of the Constitution. 2. Mr Christoph Grabenwarter, Mr Peter Paczolay and Ms Anne Peters were appointed as rapporteurs. 3. The present opinion was adopted by the Venice Commission at its 91 st plenary session on 15-16 June 2012. II. The amendment procedure of the Belgian Constitution 4. In the Constitution promulgated on 7 th February 1831 the constituent power created a decentralised and unitary State in Belgium. This form of State existed until 1970 when a gradual and comprehensive State reform started. 1 The present amendment of the Constitution was aimed at opening the way for the sixth stage of the State reform that should also contribute to the solution of the governmental and political crisis of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • COLLECTION of EUROPEAN PENAL CODES and the STUDY of COMPARATIVE LAW Marc Ancel T
    University of Pennsylvania Law Review FOUNDED 1852 Formerly American Law Register VOL. 106 JANUARY, 1958 No. 3 THE COLLECTION OF EUROPEAN PENAL CODES AND THE STUDY OF COMPARATIVE LAW Marc Ancel t FOREWORD by Louis B. Schwartz t The essay below was written by M. Marc Ancel as an intro- duction to the four-volume compilation of the penal codes currently in force in Europe, edited by himself and Mlle. Yvonne Marx.' Two of the projected four volumes have now appeared, covering in alpha- betical order, the codes of countries from Germany (Allemand) to Greenland. The project is of extraordinary interest and usefulness, since a French version of codes which would otherwise be available only in Swedish, Greek, Russian, etc., makes them much more acces- sible to Americans. But the enterprise would not be as valuable as it is without M. Ancel's analysis of the great tides of thought which, in their ebb and flow, have carried the penal law first in one direction, then almost in the opposite direction. M. Ancel's essay calls for a foreword for several reasons. To begin with, he had a foreword of his own which is here omitted because t Conseiller a la Cour de Cassation (Justice of the French Supreme Court, civil branch). Formerly Editor-in-Chief, International Review of Comparative Law; Sec- retary General, Institute of Comparative Law of the University of Paris; Secretary General, Society of Comparative Legislation. $ Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School. 1. LEs CODES PENAUX EuRoPEENs (1956) (published by the Centre Frangais de Droit Compare).
    [Show full text]
  • Laws for Legal Immigration in the 27 EU Member States
    Laws for Legal Immigration in the 27 EU Member States N° 16 International Migration Law Laws for Legal Immigration in the 27 EU Member States 1 While IOM endeavours to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content of this paper, the views, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and field researchers and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the IOM and their Member States. IOM does not accept any liability for any loss which may arise from the reliance on information contained in this paper. Publishers: International Organization for Migration 17 route des Morillons 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Tel: +41.22.717 91 11 Fax: +41.22.798 61 50 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iom.int ISSN 1813-2278 © 2009 International Organization for Migration (IOM) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. 17_09 N° 16 International Migration Law Comparative Study of the Laws in the 27 EU Member States for Legal Immigration Including an Assessment of the Conditions and Formalities Imposed by Each Member State For Newcomers Laws for Legal Immigration in the 27 EU Member States List of Contributors Christine Adam, International Migration Law and Legal Affairs Department, IOM Alexandre Devillard, International Migration Law and Legal Affairs Department, IOM Field Researchers Austria Gerhard Muzak Professor, Vienna University, Institute of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Austria Belgium Philippe De Bruycker Professor, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institute for European Studies, Belgium Bulgaria Angelina Tchorbadjiyska Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Institute for European Law, Belgium Cyprus Olga Georgiades Lawyer, Lellos P.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive and Legislative Bodies
    Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) Main legislative and executive bodies Since 1970, Belgium has been a federal state made up of communities and regions: some of the powers of the unitary state have been assigned to the regions, others to the communities and finally a third to the federal state. In addition to the federal, Community and regional institutions, the provinces and municipalities should also be considered as subordinate authorities in this section. The federal institutions Legislative/legislative power Legislative power is exercised by the federal parliament, which consists of a Chamber of Deputies and a Senate. In both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, there is a French and a Dutch language group. There is no secure representation in the Chamber for a Member of the German-speaking Community. However, the law stipulates that the Senate must include a senator to be designated by the Parliament of the German-speaking Community (PDG). The German-speaking Community does not have its own constituency for the election of members of parliament and senators, but it does have its own constituency for the election of one of the 21 Belgian MEPs. The Chamber of Deputies The Chamber of Deputies is composed of 150 members who are directly elected by universal suffrage. The Chamber of Deputies is responsible for political control, i.e. the political responsibility of the ministers of the federal government can only be assumed in the Chamber of Deputies. The Chamber of Deputies is also responsible for the federal state budget. It alone enacts the budget law and adopts the budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Kingdom of Belgium
    THE BELGIAN CONSTITUTION This publication contains the text of the Belgian Con- stitution as updated following the constitutional revi- sion of 24 October 2017 (Belgian Official Gazette of 29 November 2017) JULY 2018 BELGIAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Legal Affairs and Parliamentary Documentation Department of the Belgian House of Representatives D/2018/4686/11 2 CONTENTS Title I On federal Belgium, its components and its territory 5 Title Ibis On general political objectives of federal Belgium, the Communities and the Regions 6 Title II On Belgians and their rights 6 Title III On powers 13 Chapter I – On the federal Houses 16 Section I – On the House of Representatives 22 Section II – On the Senate 24 Chapter II – On federal legislative power 30 Chapter III – On the King and the Federal Government 35 Section I – On the King 35 Section II – On the Federal Government 37 Section III – On responsibilities 40 Chapter IV – On Communities and Regions 42 Section I – On bodies 42 Sub-section I – On Community and Regional Parliaments 42 Sub-section II – On Community and Regional Governments 44 Section II – On responsibilities 47 Sub-section I – On the responsibilities of the Communities 47 Sub-section II – On the competences of the Regions 50 Sub-section III – Special provisions 50 Chapter V – On the Constitutional Court, and the prevention and resolution of conflicts 52 Section I – On the prevention of conflicts of competence 52 Section II – On the Constitutional Court 52 Section III – On the prevention and the settlement of conflicts of interest
    [Show full text]
  • 322 Final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 2020 Rule
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.9.2020 SWD(2020) 322 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 2020 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Romania Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2020 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union {COM(2020) 580 final} - {SWD(2020) 300 final} - {SWD(2020) 301 final} - {SWD(2020) 302 final} - {SWD(2020) 303 final} - {SWD(2020) 304 final} - {SWD(2020) 305 final} - {SWD(2020) 306 final} - {SWD(2020) 307 final} - {SWD(2020) 308 final} - {SWD(2020) 309 final} - {SWD(2020) 310 final} - {SWD(2020) 311 final} - {SWD(2020) 312 final} - {SWD(2020) 313 final} - {SWD(2020) 314 final} - {SWD(2020) 315 final} - {SWD(2020) 316 final} - {SWD(2020) 317 final} - {SWD(2020) 318 final} - {SWD(2020) 319 final} - {SWD(2020) 320 final} - {SWD(2020) 321 final} - {SWD(2020) 323 final} - {SWD(2020) 324 final} - {SWD(2020) 325 final} - {SWD(2020) 326 final} EN EN ABSTRACT Since accession to the EU in 2007, Romanian reforms in the areas of justice and anti- corruption have been followed by the Commission through the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM), as an important framework for progress towards meeting the set benchmarks. In 2020, the Government continued to affirm its commitment to restore the path of judicial reform after the reverses of 2017-2019. This led to a significant decrease in tensions with the judiciary. The recent appointments of new leadership for the key prosecutorial services could pave the way for more efficient continuation of prosecutorial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • National Ordinance of September 6Th, 2018, for the No
    AFKONDIGINGSBLAD VAN SINT MAARTEN Jaargang 2018 National Ordinance of September 6th, 2018, for the No. 33 temporary establishment of the National Recovery Program Bureau and for regulating its organisation, composition, tasks and powers (Temporary National Ordinance on the National Recovery Program Bureau) IN THE NAME OF THE KING! The Governor of St. Maarten, Whereas: it is necessary to organise a National Recovery Program Bureau and to make it responsible for preparing, coordinating, implementing and evaluating projects financed from the Dutch Recovery Fund for Sint Maarten and for advising the ministries, or other organisational units that fall thereunder, on identifying and implementing additional recovery, reconstruction and resilience projects that can be financed from other resources than the Dutch Recovery Fund for Sint Maarten1; it is necessary due to the manner in which the Netherlands proposes to provide financial resources for the recovery of Sint Maarten following the passage of Hurricanes Irma and Maria, namely through the intermediary of the World Bank; it is also necessary due to the fact that the aforementioned tasks cannot be implemented within the structure of the ordinary civil service; In view of article 98 of the Constitution; Having heard the Council of Advice and after consultation with Parliament, enacts the following national ordinance: Disclaimer: This is a translation of the official Dutch version of the draft Temporary National Ordinance on the National Recovery Program Bureau. According to Instruction 44 of the Instruction for the Legislation of Sint Maarten, regulations should be predominantly written in the Dutch language. The use of other languages is solely possible if a word or expression has found its acceptance in Sint Maarten, and there is not a Dutch equivalent for said word or expression.
    [Show full text]
  • The Belgian Constitution
    THE BELGIAN CONSTITUTION This publication contains the text of the Belgian Constitution as updated following the sixth institutional reform (constitutional revisions of 6 January 2014 – Belgian Official Gazette of 31 January 2014) MAY 2014 BELGIAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Legal Department of the Belgian House of Representatives D / 2014 / 4686 / 08 CONTENTS Title I On federal Belgium, its components and its territory 5 Title Ibis On general political objectives of federal Belgium, the Communities and the Regions 6 Title II On Belgians and their rights 6 Title III On powers 12 Chapter I – On the federal Houses 15 Section I – On the House of Representatives 20 Section II – On the Senate 22 Chapter II – On federal legislative power 27 Chapter III – On the King and the Federal Government 32 Section I – On the King 32 Section II – On the Federal Government 34 Section III – On responsibilities 36 Chapter IV – On Communities and Regions 38 Section I – On bodies 38 Sub-section I – On Community and Regional Parliaments 38 Sub-section II – On Community and Regional Governments 40 Section II – On responsibilities 43 Sub-section I – On the responsibilities of the Communities 43 Sub-section II – On the competences of the Regions 45 Sub-section III – Special provisions 45 Chapter V – On the Constitutional Court, and the prevention and resolution of conflicts 47 Section I – On the prevention of conflicts of competence 47 Section II – On the Constitutional Court 47 Section III – On the prevention and the settlement of conflicts of interest 48 3 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Belgium's Constitution of 1831 with Amendments Through 2014
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:18 constituteproject.org Belgium's Constitution of 1831 with Amendments through 2014 Subsequently amended This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:18 Table of contents TITLE I: On Federal Belgium, Its Components and its Territory . 3 TITLE Ibis: On general political objectives of federal Belgium, the communities and the regions . 4 TITLE II: On Belgians and their rights . 4 TITLE III: On powers . 9 Chapter I: On the federal houses . 11 Section I: On the house of Representatives . 15 Section II: On the Senate . 17 Chapter II: On Federal Legislative Power . 22 Chapter III: On the King and the federal government . 26 Section I: On the King . 26 Section II: On the federal government . 28 Section III: On Responsibilities . 30 Chapter IV: On Communities and Regions . 31 Section I: On bodies . 31 Sub-Section I: On Community and Regional Parliaments . 31 Sub-Section II: On Community and Regional Governments . 33 Section II: On Responsibilities . 35 Sub-Section I: On the Responsibilities of the Communities . 35 Sub-Section II: On the Competences of the Regions . 37 Sub-Section III: Special Provisions . 37 Chapter V: On the Constitutional Court, and the Prevention and Resolution of Conflicts . 39 Section I: On the Prevention of Conflicts of Competence . 39 Section II: On the Constitutional Court . 39 Section III: On the Prevention and the Settlement of Conflicts of Interest . 40 Chapter VI: On Judicial Power .
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Democracy in Belgium
    27th SESSION Strasbourg, 14-16 October 2014 CG(27)7FINAL 15 October 2014 Local and regional democracy in Belgium Rapporteurs: 1 Henrik HAMMAR, Sweden (L, EPP/CCE) Urs WÜTHRICH-PELLOLI, Switzerland (R, SOC) Recommendation 366 (2014) ................................................................................................................... 2 Explanatory memorandum ....................................................................................................................... 5 Summary This is the first monitoring report on the situation of local and regional democracy in Belgium since the country ratified the Charter in 2004. It underlines that the constitutional and legislative foundations of self-government are fully complied with throughout the country and that the scope of local self- government is generally respected, in particular in terms of the protection of boundaries, the conditions for the exercise of responsibilities at local level, local authorities’ right to associate and the legal protection of local self-government. In addition, the entry into force of the Sixth State Reform is welcomed, as is the introduction in 2006 of a procedure for the automatic de jure appointment of s elected in the Walloon Region. The report does, however, express concern about the overlapping of some responsibilities between municipal and provincial level in the French and Flemish Communities. With regard to financial resources, municipalities’ and provinces’ resources are inadequate, especially because of the economic crisis and
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law Report the Rule of Law Situation in the European Union
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2021 COM(2021) 700 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2021 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union {SWD(2021) 701 final} - {SWD(2021) 702 final} - {SWD(2021) 703 final} - {SWD(2021) 704 final} - {SWD(2021) 705 final} - {SWD(2021) 706 final} - {SWD(2021) 707 final} - {SWD(2021) 708 final} - {SWD(2021) 709 final} - {SWD(2021) 710 final} - {SWD(2021) 711 final} - {SWD(2021) 712 final} - {SWD(2021) 713 final} - {SWD(2021) 714 final} - {SWD(2021) 715 final} - {SWD(2021) 716 final} - {SWD(2021) 717 final} - {SWD(2021) 718 final} - {SWD(2021) 719 final} - {SWD(2021) 720 final} - {SWD(2021) 721 final} - {SWD(2021) 722 final} - {SWD(2021) 723 final} - {SWD(2021) 724 final} - {SWD(2021) 725 final} - {SWD(2021) 726 final} - {SWD(2021) 727 final} EN EN 1. INTRODUCTION The EU is based on a set of shared values including respect for fundamental rights, democracy, and the rule of law1. These fundamental values are seen by Europeans as amongst the EU’s main assets2, and safeguarding them is a shared responsibility of all EU institutions and all Member States. While the EU is recognised as having very high standards in these areas, these values should never be taken for granted. Promoting and upholding the rule of law requires vigilance and constant improvement, because there is always a risk of backsliding. The rule of law is not only an integral part of the democratic identity of the EU and of the Member States, but also essential for the functioning of the EU, and for citizens and businesses to trust public institutions.
    [Show full text]