History of the Sri Lanka Armoured Corps

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of the Sri Lanka Armoured Corps Sri Lankan 4th ARMOURED REGIMENT – Wheels to Tracks by Brigadier C S N B Mudannayake RWP USP psc edited by Ivan Welch, FMSO Foreign Analyst DEDICATED TO THE GALLANT MEN OF 4th ARMOURED REGIMENT WHO MADE THE SUPREME SACRIFICE The long fought battle against story of their proud beginnings as told separatist insurgency was in its first by their first commanding officer. decade when the Sri Lanka Army introduced the main battle tank into its arsenal. Their effort in creating a new unit, procuring the vehicles, and preparing this unit for combat is a heroic episode in modern armour history. The lessons of combat are hard won and should be studied by those who take up 1 Type: T-55A MBT the profession in defense of their own countries. The 4th Armoured Regiment’s story is one of leadership, dedicated 1 http://www.armouredcorps.lk/index.php?option= service, and final victory. This is the com_content&view=article&id=122%3Aour- old-memories&catid=25&Itemid=9 1 surmounting earth mounds in paddy fields. The 76mm main armament of the Saladin armoured car became less effective against a determined and ruthless enemy fighting from hardened shelters and underground bunkers. Heavier firepower, on a mobile platform with better cross-country capability was desperately needed. Though the need was recognized Evolution of the Concept and supported by serving officers in The separatist conflict in the operational areas, senior Armoured north and east intensified in the late Corps officers had strong reservations eighties. This created a growing need for about introducing tracked vehicles to Sri greater fire power and cross country Lanka. One retired senior Armoured mobility in the battlefield. The Corps officer holding high government undulating sandy terrain of the Jaffna position in an emotional outburst said Peninsula, the western sea-board of “Tanks over my dead body!” Aversion Mannar District, and open dry paddy to tanks was difficult to understand. It fields with earth bunds of the Eastern could have been the emotional Province were impediments for wheels. attachment to wheels, false They became increasingly vulnerable to apprehensions about tracked vehicles, or RPGs as they slowed down on sandy soil lack of understanding about modern or when the bellies were exposed in 2 tracked vehicles. A reluctance to considerations that impacted the decision introduce battle tanks to fight a home- on the type of tank needed. grown insurgency or the inability to In early January 1991, I was break loose from the “wheels mentality” serving as Commanding Officer 1st may have been other reasons. Reconnaissance Regiment. Major The term “tank” is generally General Waidyaratne, Chief of Staff of viewed with concern and caution. It is a the army, and serving senior Armoured weapon system with enormous Corps officer, summoned me and destructive power and the employment Commanding Officer 3rd of tanks has both political and military Reconnaissance Regiment Lt Col Nihal implications. Such concerns kept the Marambe for a discussion on main battle debate on tracks versus wheels alive but tanks (MBT). Inquiries were made about did not make much headway. As the war the T-55 MBT. Lt Col Marambe and I escalated and the need for heavy fire had been exposed to the tank briefly support for the infantry became more during the Young Officer Course in evident, the army began to re-examine 1974 at the India Armoured Corps the need for tanks. Capital expenditure Centre and School, Ahmednagar, India, and prohibitive support and maintenance but had no hands-on experience on them. cost were major concerns. Type of The T-55s were front – line battle tanks armament, combat weight, night-fighting of the Indian Army during the early capability, fuel type, and the Navy’s sea seventies and were classified (off limits) lift capacity were tactical and technical for foreign students. Consequently, we 3 had received training on the older Paranagama, two officers from Sri Centurion MBT. Lanka Electrical and Mechanical The end of the Cold War in early Engineer Regiment, an Ammunition nineties saw down sizing of Warsaw Technical Officer from Sri Lanka Pact armies with thousands of ‘T Series’ Ordnance Corps, a Technical Officer battle tanks available for sale in the cash from Signal Corps, myself, Lt Col NR strapped former communist bloc Marambe, Commanding Officer 3rd countries. One such country was Recce Regiment and Majors Aruna Czechoslovakia. The Sri Lanka Army Perera and Milinda Peiris left for examined the available options and Czechoslovakia. The mission was to decided to procure a less sophisticated evaluate the T-55 MBT and submit a but versatile battle tank. After much report to the Ministry of Defence. deliberation, debate and discussion, a Czechoslovakia was an East decision was made to acquire the Czech European Communist country that was a built T-55 MBT. The Sri Lanka former member of the Warsaw Pact Armoured Corps was on the threshold of military alliance. It manufactured T-55s evolving from wheels to tracks, a much under license from the former Soviet awaited desire of the Army’s Union and was considered to be the most cavalrymen. technologically advanced country among Visit to Czechoslovakia the ten member states. After the fall of In August 1991 an eight-member the Soviet Union in the early nineties the Technical Evaluation Team headed by Warsaw Pact disintegrated and the Regimental Commander Brigadier T. Czechoslovakia broke loose from Soviet 4 influence and became an independent the Czech Armour Centre in Brno for a state. The country had two major ethnic briefing and display of equipment. We communities – Czechs and Slovaks. In later travelled to a picturesque little town the late nineties when Eastern Europe about 200 miles southeast of Prague transformed, many new independent called Zvolen, which housed a huge tank states emerged based mainly on ethnic yard. Next day, the team was taken to composition. Czechoslovakia separated the yard holding hundreds of canopy peacefully and became two Republics – covered tanks. There were T-55s, T-62s The Czech Republic and Slovak and latest T-72s. The Sri Lanka military Republic. delegation was mandated to select twenty-five MBTs, so we were escorted to a corner of the yard and shown some parked tanks. They certainly were not the best in the yard. Sri Lanka’s desire to procure a mere twenty five tanks did not seem to interest them much and the response was naturally lukewarm. It was later known Zvolen, Czech Republic 2 that the Czechs were expecting an The Technical Evaluation Team Iranian military delegation in the arrived in Prague, capital of following week to procure five hundred Czechoslovakia, and we were taken to tanks. Consequently, Sri Lanka’s 2 http://www.tourist- channel.sk/zvolen/indexen.html purchase and the visiting delegation 5 were of little significance. The hosts inquisitively scanning the Gold Leaf spoke very little and expected us to cigarettes smoked by some team accept the twenty five tanks chosen by members. That gave us a hopeful them without causing any breakthrough. Cigarettes were politely inconvenience. Following a casual walk offered and there was a spontaneous around the huge yard, we saw new tanks change in body language and attitude. that had hardly been used. They were They were now willing to move a few of scattered and mixed up in a huge maze the good tanks but not all of them. As of steel. It was stunning spectacle to see time passed team members were able to such a huge collection of battle tanks. break the ice and generate some friendly One wondered what devastation there conversation. It was casually mentioned would have been, had the Warsaw Pact that back home, Sri Lankan military fought a war with NATO in Eastern folks enjoyed a good drink and Scotch Europe. Whiskey was the preference. The Czechs The Sri Lanka team members were told there were enough stocks in had a daunting task ahead of them to the hotel and an invitation was extended persuade the uncompromising Czech for an evening get-together. The hosts Army hosts to agree to sell the better headed by a senior regional tank weapons. It meant churning-up the entire formation commander dropped by at the yard just to pull-out a few good tanks. hotel later in the day. Duty exempted Traditional Sri Lankan charm did not whiskey carried by the team was bring the desired results until one of us generously offered. noticed young Czech soldiers 6 Classic Sri Lankan hospitality hospitality, persuasion and above all and benign diplomacy changed the “Whiskey Diplomacy” seemed to have Czechs. Hard nosed, uncompromising done the needful. attitudes seem to melt faster than the ice cubes in whiskey glasses. Everyone had fun and enjoyed the evening. Late in the night, before saying good- night to the Sri Lankan hosts, the senior Czech army Czechoslovakian T-55 MBT4 officer was heard issuing instructions to The team inspected armament, his junior officers. He spoke in Czech communications equipment and and nothing could be understood, but the automotive areas and examined vehicle departing hand shakes were warm and documents prior to confirming strong. We felt a sense of achievement. acceptance. Discreet offers of additional 3What we saw the next day was a Gold Leaf cigarettes to the young Czech stunning surprise beyond soldiers assigned for fatigue work comprehension. When the team arrived enabled many extra tools and accessories early in the morning to commence from other vehicles in the yard to be technical inspections, twenty five of surreptitiously added to tank bins. The the best tanks chosen by the Sri Lanka bins were overflowing with additional team were meticulously lined up.
Recommended publications
  • BRIGADIER LIYANAGE V. CHANDRANANDA DE SILVA SECRETARY, MINISTRY of DEFENCE and OTHERS
    BRIGADIER LIYANAGE v. CHANDRANANDA DE SILVA SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS SUPREME COURT AMERASINGHE, J. WIJETUNGA J. AND BANDARANAYAKE. J. S. C. APPLICATION 5 0 6 /9 9 (F. R.) 2"d NOVEMBER, 1999 Fundamental rights - Failure to promote the petitioner as a Major General - Article 12(1) of the Constitution. The petitioner was suspended from duties until the hearing and determination of the "Embilipitiya disapperances case” and he was not considered for promotion pending the court case. Consequently, he was superceded by two other officers. After trial, he was acquitted. Thereafter, the Commander of the Army made a written recommendation to the Secretary, Ministry of Defence (the Is1 respondent) that the petitioner be, inter alia, promoted to the rank of Major General with'effect from 4lh December. 1997 on a supernumerary vacancy on which date the two officers who had superseded the petitioner were promoted to the rank of Major General and thereafter be absorbed into the permanent cadre with effect from 10lh February. 1999 on which date the High Court judgement was delivered. However, the petitioner was not promoted to the post of Major General on the ground that the promotion was not in the best interest of the Army since the petitioner failed to exercise due control over persons who were convicted by court. The petitioner did occupy a place of authority in the chain of command. But so were others above and below him who were nevertheless pro­ moted. There was also no explanation why a captain Chamarasinghe who had been indicted in the court was promoted with effect from 2"d June 1995 to the rank of temporary major.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka – Colonel Karuna – Abductions – Joseph Pararajasingham
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: LKA31328 Country: Sri Lanka Date: 16 February 2007 Keywords: Sri Lanka – Colonel Karuna – Abductions – Joseph Pararajasingham This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Please provide any information you have about the physical appearance, age, background, etc, of LTTE Commander Karuna. 2. Please provide current information about Karuna. 3. Please provide information about the murder of MP Joseph Pararajasingham. RESPONSE (Note: There is a range of transliteral spelling from non-English languages into English. In this Country Research Response the spelling is as per the primary source document). 1. Please provide any information you have regarding the physical appearance, age, background, etc, of LTTE Commander Karuna. “Colonel Karuna” is the nom de guerre of Vinayagamoorthi Muralitharan. Karuna was born in Kiran in the Batticaloa district of Sri Lanka. A 2004 BBC News profile of Karuna describes him as being 40 years old whilst Wikipedia1 information gives his year of birth as 1966. A photograph of Karuna is printed in the attached BBC News profile (Gopalakrishnan, Ramesh 2004, ‘Profile: Colonel Karuna’, BBC News, 5 March http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3537025.stm – Accessed 7 February 2007 – Attachment 1; ‘Karuna: Rebels’ rebel’ 2004, The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka), 7 March http://www.sundaytimes.lk/040307/ – Accessed 7 February 2007 – Attachment 2; ‘Colonel Karuna’ 2007, Wikipedia, 27 January http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonel_Karuna – Accessed 7 February 2007 – Attachment 3).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File, 139.89 KB
    Armed Forces Equivalent Ranks Order Men Women Royal New Zealand New Zealand Army Royal New Zealand New Zealand Naval New Zealand Royal New Zealand Navy: Women’s Air Force: Forces Army Air Force Royal New Zealand New Zealand Royal Women’s Auxilliary Naval Service Women’s Royal New Zealand Air Force Army Corps Nursing Corps Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Vice-Admiral Lieutenant-General Air Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Rear-Admiral Major-General Air Vice-Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Commodore, 1st and Brigadier Air Commodore No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent 2nd Class Captain Colonel Group Captain Superintendent Colonel Matron-in-Chief Group Officer Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Wing Commander Chief Officer Lieutenant-Colonel Principal Matron Wing Officer Lieutentant- Major Squadron Leader First Officer Major Matron Squadron Officer Commander Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Second Officer Captain Charge Sister Flight Officer Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer Senior Commis- sioned Officer Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer (Branch List) { { Pilot Officer Acting Pilot Officer Probationary Assistant Section Acting Sub-Lieuten- 2nd Lieutenant but junior to Third Officer 2nd Lieutenant No equivalent Officer ant Navy and Army { ranks) Commissioned Officer No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Max A.L.T. Nielsen Lieutenant General Military Representative to NATO and EU DATE OF BIRTH: November 6. 1963 PRIVATE: Married to Berit Thorsø Nielsen. Two children and three grandchildren. MILITARY EDUCATION: 1983 Conscript 1984 NCO School 1985 Control, Reporting and Fighter Control Education 1986 - 1988 Officers Basic Course 1991 Junior Joint Staff Course 1991 - 1992 Officers Advanced Course 1995 - 1996 Air Command and Staff College, US 2011 NATO Defense College, Rome, IT. MILITARY CAREER: 1984 Sergeant 1987 Lieutenant 1988 First Lieutenant 1992 Captain 1996 Major 2001 Lieutenant Colonel 2005 Colonel 2008 Brigadier General 2014 Major General 2017 Lieutenant General ASSIGNMENTS: 1984 Section Commander, Training Platoon/Air Base Skrydstrup 1987 Platoon Commander, Training Squadron/Air Base Aalborg 1988 Fighter & SAM Control Officer, C&R Group, 602 SQN Airbase/Skrydstrup 1992 Air Defence Operations Officer/ICAOC 1 Finderup 1993 Staff Officer, Training Branch/Tactical Air Command Denmark 1994 Staff Officer, Policy Branch/Tactical Air Command Denmark 1996 Chief of Air Operations Branch/Tactical Air Command Denmark 1998 Staff Officer and Deputy Head, Policy Branch/Defence Command Denmark 2000 Staff Officer Operations, 1st Office/Ministry of Defence. 2001 Chief of Staff & Acting Commandant/Royal Danish Air Force Academy 2002 Chief of Operations Branch/Defence Command Denmark 2005 Military Assistant to the Deputy Commander/NATO Training Mission-Iraq. Baghdad 2005 Chief of Executive Office/Defence Commander Denmark 2008 Chief
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Army
    RESTRICTED SRI LANKA ARMY ANNUAL REPORT 2005 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED AHQ/DSD/12 ( ) Secretary Ministry Of Defence ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT SRI LANKA ARMY 2005 1. details are forwarded herewith as per the annexure attached here to: a. General Staff Matters. (1) Military operation conducted by the Sri Lanka Army - Annexure „A‟ (2) Training conducted by the Sri Lanka Army - Annexure „ B‟ (3) Financial Matters - Annexure „ C‟ (4) Sports Activities - Annexure „D‟ b. Administrative / Logistic Staff Matters. (1) Administrative matters - progress 2005 - Annexure „E‟ (2) Progress of welfare Activities - Annexure „F‟ (3) Medical - Annexure „G‟ (4) Supply and Transport - Annexure „H‟ (5) Engineer Matters - Annexure „I‟ (6) Land, Air and Naval Facilities - Annexure „J‟ (7) Details of Enlistment - Annexure „K‟ (8) Pay and Allowances - Annexure „L‟ (9) Miscellaneous - Annexure „M‟ GSC FONSEKA RWP RSP rcds psc Lieutenant General Commander of the Army Authenticated by : MCMP SAMARASINGHE RWP RSP USP psc Brigadier Director General General Staff 1 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED GENERAL 1. The objective of publishing this Annual Report is to produce an analysis into General Staff. Administrative and logistic matters carried out by Directorates of Army Headquarters and other establishment during year 2005 and also lapses observed due to certain constraints. 2. Assignments completed and proposals for the following year by respective authorities have been included in this report with a view to provide a broad insight into events during year 2005 and proposal for year 2006. 3. Certain programmes pre- scheduled for year 2005 had been amended to suit unforeseen demands specially in Security Force Headquarters (Jaffna), Security Force Headquarters (Wanni) and Security Force Headquarters (East).
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICERS SENIORITY LIST As at 01St January 2017
    RESTRICTED SRI LANKA ARMY VOLUNTEER FORCE OFFICERS SENIORITY LIST As at 01st January 2017 Published under THE AUTHORITY OF COMMANDANT OF SRI LANKA ARMY VOLUNTEER FORCE M H S B Perera RWP RSP USP ndu psc MAJOR GENERAL COMMANDANT OF SRI LANKA ARMY VOLUNTEER FORCE RESTRICTED RESTRICTED His Excellency Maithripala Sirisena President of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces Minister of Defence i RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Honourable Ruwan Wijewardene State Minister of Defence ii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Eng. Karunasena Hettiarachchi Secretary to the Ministry of Defence iii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Lieutenant General A W J C De Silva RWP VSV USP ndu psc Commander of the Army iv RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Major General M H S B Perera RWP RSP USP ndu psc Major General M H Commandant S B PERERA RWP RSP USP ndu psc Sri LankaCommandant Army Volunteer Force Sri Lanka Army Volunteer Force v RESTRICTEDv RESTRICTED RESTRICTED SER CONTENTS PAGE NO 1. Sri Lanka Army Regiments and Corps - 1 2. Senior Appointments SLAVF - 2 - 6 3. Sri Lanka Army Volunteer Force Units - 7 - 13 4. Abbreviations - 14 5. Field Commissioned Officers a. Major Generals, Brigadiers, Colonels, Lieutenant Colonels - 15 - 20 b. Majors - 21 - 30 c. Captains - 31 - 48 d. Lieutenants - 49 - 72 e. Second Lieutenants - 73 – 78 6. Direct Enlisted Officers a. Sri Lanka Artillery - 81 b. Sri Lanka Engineers - 82 c. Sri Lanka Signals Corps - 83 d. Corps of Engineer Services - 84 – 87 e. Military Intelligence Corps - 88 f. Sri Lanka Army Medical Corps - 89 – 90 g. Sri Lanka Electrical & Mechanical Engineers - 91 h.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Ranks and Units
    US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENTS Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Spring 2013, Vol
    Table of Contents CURRENTS Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Spring 2013, Vol. 23 Looking at Security Through Different ‘Lenses’ ..... 24 Center News Afghanistan and Regional Security ....................... 26 Center News ........................................................ 4-5 APCSS-ACSC Joint Global Security Seminar .......... 25 Hails & Farewells .................................................. 6-7 Thailand Outreach Workshop Focuses on Security Visitors ................................................................8-9 Sector Development ........................................ 26-27 Identity, Cyberspace and their Impact on Courses National Security .................................................. 28 Maritime Security Challenges 2012 ....................... 29 Faculty Publications .............................................. 10 Rebalancing to the Asia-Pacific ............................ 29 Course Calendar .....................................................11 More Workshop News ........................................... 25 Foundations of Fellowship ................................12-13 Outreach Photos ...............................................30-31 Advanced Security Cooperation ........................... 14 Transnational Security Cooperation .......................15 Asia-Pacific Orientation Course ............................ 16 Alumni Connections Comprehensive Crisis Management .......................17 Alumni News ....................................................30-38 Alumni Associations .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Military Rank Equivalency
    Military rank equivalency Although GS civilians do not have military rank by virtue of their GS position, regulations include civilian and military grade equivalencies for pay and protocol comparison purposes. Military rank or civilian grade often have no bearing on supervisory precedence—generally, precedence and authority are guided by situational expertise. For example, a GS-9 is considered comparable to a first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade) (O-2), while a GS-15 (top of the General Schedule) is the equivalent grade of a colonel or captain (O-6). Senior Executive Service (SES) and Senior Level grades correspond for protocol purposes to flag and general officers (admirals and generals). Grade equivalencies were created by the U.S. Department of Defense for the purpose of treating civilians serving alongside the Armed Forces who have been captured as prisoners of war according to the Geneva Convention.[6] Geneva Convention Category GS MILITARY Senior Executive V: General Officer O-7 through O-10 Service GS-15 O-6 IV: Field Grade Officer GS-14/GS-13 O-5 GS-12 O-4 O-3 GS-11/GS-10 O-2 and W-4/W- III: Company Grade Officer GS-9/GS-8 3 GS-7 O-1 and W-2/W- 1 II: Non-commissioned Officer/Staff Non-Comissioned GS-6 E-7 through E-9 Officer GS-5 E-6/E-5 GS-4 E-4 I: Enlisted GS-1 through GS-3 E-1 through E-3 Grade equivalencies have also been issued by the U.S. Department of State for other purposes, such as assignment of permanent and transient housing to eligible civilian employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivalent Ranks of the British Services and U.S. Air Force
    EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Commissioned Ranks Marshal of the Admiral of the Fleet Field Marshal Royal Air Force Command General of the Air Force Admiral Air Chief Marshal General General Vice Admiral Air Marshal Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Rear Admiral Air Vice Marshal Major General Major General Commodore Brigadier Air Commodore Brigadier General Colonel Captain Colonel Group Captain Commander Lieutenant Colonel Wing Commander Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Squadron Leader Commander Major Major Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Captain EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT First Lieutenant Sub Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Second Lieutenant Midshipman Second Lieutenant Pilot Officer Notes: 1. Five-Star Ranks have been phased out in the British Services. The Five-Star ranks in the U.S. Services are reserved for wartime only. 2. The rank of Midshipman in the Royal Navy is junior to the equivalent Army and RAF ranks. EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Non-commissioned Ranks Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Class 1 (RSM) Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Warrant Officer Class 2b (RQSM) Chief Command Master Sergeant Warrant Officer Class 2a Chief Master Sergeant Chief Petty Officer Staff Sergeant Flight Sergeant First Senior Master Sergeant Chief Technician Senior Master Sergeant Petty Officer Sergeant Sergeant First Master Sergeant EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Titled “Sri Lanka As a Hub in Asia: the Way Forward”
    RESTRICTED MILITARY SECRETARY’S BRANCH INTRODUCTION 1. Military Secretary‟s Branch is headed by Military Secretary who is one of the Principal Staff Officers (PSOs) holding the rank of Major General. This Branch executes the human resource management functions of the Officers in the Army. RESPONSIBILITIES 2. Military Secretary‟s Branch is responsible for career planning, postings and transfers, promotions and retirements of all Officers in the Army. This Branch is also responsible to hold the Annual Confidential Reports of Officers and maintain Officers‟ discipline records and handling grievances of Officers. ROLE 3. Carrying out human resource management functions of all Officers in the Army. GENERAL SURVEY OF THE YEAR 4. The Branch completed following boards: a. Promotion Boards. Officers Considered Officers Promoted (1) 2/Lieutenant to Lieutenant (4 Boards) 424 364 (2) Lieutenant to Captain (7 Boards) 393 205 (3) Captain to Major (7 Boards) 418 214 (4) Lieutenant Colonel to Colonel (1 Board) 111 72 (5) Colonel to Brigadier (1 Board) 98 57 (6) Brigadier to Major General (1 Board) 41 4 b. Rank Confirmation Boards. Officers Considered Officers Confirmed (1) Captain (2 Boards) 178 100 (2) Lieutenant Colonel (1 Board) 61 1 (3) Colonel (1 Board) 58 52 (4) Brigadier (1 Board) - - (5) Major General (3 Boards) 3 3 1 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED c. Selection of Officers for Selected Majors List (1 Board): Officers Considered Officers Selected Major 129 60 5. Further to above, this Branch published the Officers Seniority list for 2014. ACHIEVEMENTS 6. Overall co-ordination of the Second Army Symposium 2013 titled “Sri Lanka as a Hub in Asia: the Way Forward”.
    [Show full text]
  • Brig Gen Boone Biography
    Brigadier General Lewis M. Boone Director, U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Brigadier General Lewis Boone was commissioned a second lieutenant of Infantry in 1980 following graduation from the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program at Western Maryland College with a bachelor’s degree in sociology. Following commissioning, he attended the Infantry Officer Basic Course at Fort Benning, Georgia, before heading to his first assignment, at 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division, in Erlangen, Germany. There he served as a platoon leader and company executive officer with the 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry. For his next assignment he returned to Fort Benning to attend the Infantry Officer Advanced Course and Ranger school. He remained at Fort Benning to serve with the 29th Infantry Regiment as armored carrier operations chief, battalion motor officer and company commander in both 1st and 2nd Battalions, 29th Infantry, and later as operations officer for the 29th’s Bradley Training Detachment. Brigadier General Boone next attended the Defense Information School at Fort Benjamin Harrison, Ind., and then moved to Fort Bragg, N.C., where he began his tenure in Army public affairs as commander of the 49th Public Affairs Detachment and later as the XVIII Airborne Corps command information officer. During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, he served as the XVIII Airborne Corps public information officer with the primary duty of escorting media during both operations. Following redeployment from Southwest Asia, he served as the 82nd Airborne Division public affairs officer until departure for Fort Leavenworth, Kan., to attend the Command and General Staff Officer School. Brigadier General Boone next served in a joint assignment, as a public affairs action officer for the U.S.
    [Show full text]