Supreme Court Confirmation Signals Collapse of American Democracy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supreme Court Confirmation Signals Collapse of American Democracy Supreme Court confirmation signals collapse of American democracy. Could it happen here? On paper, America's process for selecting judges is proofed against partisanship and corruption, while ours is open to all kinds of malfeasance. Yet in practice it's a different story altogether. MICHAEL BRADLEY OCT 29, 2020 On Tuesday, Amy Coney Barrett, nominated by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate, was appointed to replace the deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the US Supreme Court. On Wednesday, two new judges were announced for Australia’s High Court (to replace judges about to reach retirement age), appointed by the attorney-general in a process that is obscure, secret and less democratic than how the cardinals choose a pope. The new judges are Jacqueline Gleeson and Simon Steward. Obviously and logically — sunlight being the best disinfectant — America’s method of choosing judges for the peak of its government’s judicial branch is far superior to ours. Theirs is proofed against partisanship, corruption and incompetence in the selection, because of the checks and balances built in.Ours is dependent on the whim of a single politician, not open to review, appeal or even scrutiny. And yet, a passing familiarity is enough to know that, in fact, our system works to reinforce and uphold the rule of law, while theirs simply does not. Appreciating why this is so helps us to understand the inherent fragility of democracy itself, and what actually holds it together. Australia’s High Court has, since Federation, been populated by judges appointed by the federal government. Following the ancient tradition that judges hold their office by gift of the Crown, the power to appoint has devolved to the attorney-general in their capacity as chief law officer of the Commonwealth – in theory, a function distinct from their party-political role as a government minister. The process of selection is invisible to the public eye; we’re allowed to know no more about it than we are the machinations in the Sistine Chapel before the puff of white smoke hits the sky. Like the proverbial duck, beneath the surface there’s a whole lot of churn. High Court appointment remains the pinnacle; there’s no other role, for lawyers of higher status.There’s no shortage of willing applicants.The lobbying is intense. Because of the secrecy, all the conditions one could need for scandal are present.An unscrupulous attorney-general could appoint a judge for favour, bribe, blackmail or political gain.Nothing, legally speaking, protects against it. And yet there’s never been a whiff, attaching to any of the 57 appointments made since 1903.There have been overtly political appointees (Garfield Barwick and Lionel Murphy stand out) but even these are rare.Court-stacking is far more a media obsession than a factual reality. The most one can say is that, in Australia, conservative governments have tended to look for judges they think will be “black letter” — meaning legally, rather than politically, conservative — and Labor governments have been more likely to appoint judges they hope will be a bit adventurous.Hardly radical at either end. In the United States, meanwhile, the Supreme Court is no less political and politicised an institution than the Presidency and Congress.It has become a national obsession to focus on stacking the court with ideological bedfellows of whoever happens to be in power when a sitting judge dies (their appointments are lifetime). Coney Barrett is manifestly poorly qualified, as was Brett Kavanaugh. Trump put them up, and the Republican-controlled Senate confirmed them, for an openly partisan political reason: to dictate America’s destiny by stacking the institution that makes its most far-reaching decisions. All high courts, whatever they say to the contrary, make law.It’s beyond doubt that, while our High Court does so in a manner that is not consciously driven by ideology or political affiliation (accepting that subconscious preference and prejudice always exist and clearly influence judgement), the US Supreme Court barely bothers to conceal its members’ agendas. This is frequently starkly exposed — famously, in the Bush v Gore decision that determined the 2000 presidential election on blatantly political lines, and just this week in a ruling designed to support voter suppression in Republican-controlled states. What this tells us is that checks and balances do not a democracy make or maintain.The theory, that the Senate’s right of confirmation would restrain a president from choosing poorly, fails. At the same time, Australia’s anachronistic process of 2 appointment by personal fiat has produced a stable, uncorrupted and constantly respected High Court. The point is that nothing can protect democracy if those in power do not uphold it and the rest of us aren’t paying attention. America, it is well arguable, is already lost. Along with all the other carnage, its Supreme Court is hopelessly compromised and can no longer serve its function with credibility. Not much keeps us from the same fate.Because the Australian public has largely disengaged from politics altogether (obvious from the open corruption we now tolerate), we’re just reliant on our political leaders to resist the temptation to break the last few conventions of responsible government and do their worst. If our current attorney-general, instead of appointing two eminent and apolitical lawyers to the High Court, had decided to give the jobs to a couple of mates from his old law firm, what would have happened?A bit of noise, some shouting in parliament, then on to the next scandal. 3 .
Recommended publications
  • SA Public Sector Newsletter
    ADVICE | TRANSACTIONS | DISPUTES 17 NOVEMBER 2020 ISSUE 37 PUBLIC SECTOR NEWSLETTER - SOUTH AUSTRALIA Welcome to Issue 37 of the SA Public Sector Newsletter. Cashless Centrelink payment cards “not worth the human cost” Crime Stoppers SA has received an $800,000 investment Cashless debit cards for welfare recipients are over four years from the Marshall Government, to help demeaning and create stress for recipients, senators improve the future safety of South Australians. The have been told as the Morrison Government looks ongoing funding will allow Crime Stoppers to expand its to widen the scheme. (06 November 2020) https:// operations across South Australia, including measures to indaily.com.au/news/2020/11/06/cashless-centrelink- stop rural criminal activity. payment-cards-not-worth-the-human-cost/ In other local news, the laws that will significantly reduce Clive Palmer has lost his WA border battle. What does it the discounts available to serious criminal offenders for mean for state and territory boundaries? early guilty pleas have now come into effect, with the previous available discount of up to 40% for an early guilty The High Court has knocked back billionaire miner Clive plea reduced to a maximum of 25%. Palmer’s challenge against Western Australia’s COVID-19 hard border closure. Chief Justice Susan Kiefel said the This issue of the Newsletter also provides the usual round- court had found the Act complied with the constitution up of practice notes, cases and legislation assistance. and the directions did not raise a constitutional
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    convergence2019.com.au CONFERENCE PROGRAM WEDNESDAY 10 JULY 2019 – optional leisure activities and arrival drinks 6:00 – 7:30pm ARRIVAL DRINKS DAY 1 - Thursday 11 July 2019 8:30 – 9:00am ARRIVAL TEA AND COFFEE Conference Opening Remarks 9:00 - 9.05am Jennifer Batrouney QC, President, Australian Bar Association Plenary I: Welcome Address - Australia in the Asian Century 9:05 - 9:15am Kate Duff, Deputy High Commissioner to Singapore Plenary II: Convergence Joint-Keynote 9:15 - 10:00am The Hon Susan Kiefel AC, Chief Justice of Australia The Hon Sundaresh Menon, Chief Justice of Singapore 10:00 – 10:30am MORNING TEA Plenary III: Working with Corporate Counsel - Tips for a Win/Win Relationship Matthew Howard SC, Vice-President, Australian Bar Association (Moderator) Wong Taur Jiun, Head of Legal, Rabobank Singapore; President, Singapore Corporate Counsel Association 10:30am – 11:30am Cameron Ford, Senior Corporate Counsel, Rio Tinto, Singapore Connie Carnabuci, General Counsel, Australian Broadcasting Corporation Michelle Quigley, Group Manager - Legal and Risk, AusGroup Plenary IV: Ethics in Advocacy - How Far Can You Go? Michael McHugh SC, Vice-President, Australian Bar Association 11:30am – 12:30pm Rebecca Treston QC, President, Bar Association of Queensland Dinesh Dhillon, Partner, Allen & Gledhill, Singapore Sashi Maharaj QC, Victorian Bar 12:30– 1:30pm LUNCH STREAM 1: COMMERCIAL LITIGATION STREAM 2: INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION Deep Dive I: Deep Dive IV: Third Party Funding: A Whole New World? The New Singapore International Mediation Convention 1:30 – 2:15pm – proudly sponsored by Vannin Capital George Lim SC, Chair, Singapore International Mediation Centre [speakers to be announced] Bronwyn Lincoln, Partner, Corrs Chambers Westgarth Deep Dive II: Speed Speak I: Risk and Regulation Hot Topics in International Commercial Arbitration Jimmy Chan, Partner, Clifford Chance V.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Corporate Directory
    CONTENTS YEAR IN REVIEW President’s report 2 Executive director’s report 6 ABOUT US Bar Council and office bearers 10 Bar Association staff 11 Statistics 12 Events 14 REPORTS Arranging & promoting continuing professional development 16 Promoting the interests of practising barristers 20 Making recommendations and promoting the administration of justice 33 Promoting access to justice 48 Professional Conduct Department 55 APPOINTMENTS Bar Association committees, sections, working parties 62 Courts, legal professional bodies, educational institutions, statutory authorities 64 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Bar Association financial statements 70 Barristers’ Benevolent Association 92 Indigenous Barristers’ Trust 106 CORPORATE DIRECTORY Registered office Bankers Lower Ground Floor National Australia Bank Selborne Chambers 75 Elizabeth Street 174 Phillip Street Sydney 2000 Sydney 2000 Ph : + 61 2 9232 4055 Annual General Meeting Fax :+ 61 2 9221 1149 The Annual General Meeting www.nswbar.asn.au will be held at 5.00pm on Auditor 6 November 2014 in the Bar Association Common Room. HLB Mann Judd (NSW Partnership) Level 19 207 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 E-mail: [email protected] www.hlb.com.au YEAR IN REVIEW PRESIDENT’S REPORT Jane Needham SC @NSWBarPresident The New South Wales Bar was privileged to benefit from the leadership of Philip Boulten SC for most of the 2013 and 2014. I was elected president on Boulten SC’s resignation on 22 May 2014, and so a report on the 2013–14 year must draw heavily on his achievements. A matter of focus for the Bar Association has been an improvement in communications. In February 2014, the Bar Council approved social media guidelines for use of the association’s LinkedIn and Twitter presences.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2000/2001 Message from the President
    CONTENTS Bar News Editor’s note . 2 The JOURNAL of the NSW BAR ASSOCIATION Letters to the Editor. 3 Summer 2000/2001 Message from the President. 4 Editorial Board Recent developments Justin Gleeson S.C. (Editor) Sexual assault communications privilege under siege . 6 Andrew Bell Military Aid to the civil power . 13 James Renwick International perspectives on mandatory sentencing . 16 Chris Winslow Appeals from the Court of Arbitration for Sport . 20 (Bar Association) Opinion Editorial Print/Production Access to quality justice . 22 Rodenprint Interviews Layout The Chief Justice of New South Wales . 25 Hartrick’s Design Office Pty Ltd Jeff Shaw QC returns to the bar . 30 Addresses The inaugural Sir Maurice Byers Lecture. 32 The Hon. R J Ellicott QC: 50 years at the Bar . 39 20 years at the NSW Land & Environment Court . 47 Around the Chambers Opening of Maurice Byers Chambers . 51 Appointments Judicial appointments . 53 Senior counsel . 54 ISSN 0817-002 Vale Views expressed by contributors to Bar Peter Seery . 55 News are not necessarily those of the Bar Association of NSW. Features Contributions are welcome and should Barristers’ Benevolent Association . 55 be addressed to the Editor, Justin Barristers hockey match . 57 Gleeson S.C., 7th Floor, Wentworth 58 Chambers, 180 Phillip Street, Sydney, Bench & Bar v Solicitors chess match . NSW 2000. DX 399 Sydney or email: [email protected] Book reviews . 59 Barristers wishing to join the Editorial Committee are invited to write to the Editor indicating the areas in which they are interested in assisting. 1 C O N T E N T S Bar News Editor’s note .
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC SECTOR NEWSLETTER - NEW SOUTH WALES Welcome to Issue 100 of the NSW Public Sector Newsletter
    ADVICE | TRANSACTIONS | DISPUTES 20 NOVEMBER 2020 ISSUE 100 PUBLIC SECTOR NEWSLETTER - NEW SOUTH WALES Welcome to Issue 100 of the NSW Public Sector Newsletter. PS corruption watchdog a step closer Clive Palmer was unsuccessful in his attempt to overturn The Attorney-General has announced that work the Western Australian Border Closures that have been has begun to establish a Commonwealth Integrity legislated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In his application Commission (CIC) to strengthen anti-corruption to the High Court of Australia, Mr Palmer argued that the measures and law enforcement directed at the border closures offended s92 of The Constitution that trade national Public Service to keep it free from criminal within the Commonwealth be free. The Court constituted corruption. https://www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/ by Justices Gageler, Keane, Gordon, Edelman and Chief media/media-releases/release-commonwealth- Justice Kiefel held that on their proper construction integrity-commission-consultation-draft-2- ss56 and 67 of The Emergency Management Act 2005 november-2020 (WA), in their application to an emergency constituted by We need movement on the Commonwealth Integrity the occurrence of a hazard in the nature of a plague or Commission epidemic, comply with the constitutional limitation of s92 of The Constitution in each of its limbs and that the exercise The Law Council of Australia is calling on the Federal of the powers given by these provisions did not raise a Government to move forward with the establishment constitutional issue. of a Commonwealth Integrity Commission, by releasing the Exposure Draft of the Bill as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Careers Guide
    CAREERS GUIDE THE 2016 EDITION SYDNEY UNIVERSITY LAW SOCIETY Enormous thanks to all those who made this production and publication of the 2016 Sydney University Law Society Careers Guide possible. We would like to thank the Sydney Law School and the University of Sydney Union for their continued support of SULS and its publications. SULS EXECUTIVE GOLD SPONSORS Evangeline Woodforde (Vice President, Careers) Allen & Overy Spencer Land (Sponsorships Director) Allens Kieran Hoyle (Publications Director) Ashurst Eric Van Winssen (International Officer) Baker & McKenzie Alison Xiao (Design Director) Corrs Chambers Westgarth Henry Davis York CAREERS GUIDE TEAM MinterEllison William Khun (Editor-in-Chief) CORPORATE SPONSORS Nicola Borton Angela Cartwright Arnold Bloch Leibler Aria Kim A.T. Kearney Nikita Malhotra Bain & Co Longen Lan The Boston Consulting Group Vivian Wei College of Law DLA Piper DESIGN Gadens Johnson Winter & Slattery Judy Zhu K&L Gates Lander & Rogers SULS SUBCOMMITTEES Maddocks Norton Rose Fulbright International Subcommittee PwC Thomson Geer PRINTING TurksLegal UTS Faculty of Law Megacolour PLATINUM SPONSORS Clayton Utz Gilbert + Tobin Herbert Smith Freehills King & Wood Mallesons COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER © Sydney University Law Society 2016 This publication is copyright. Except where permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced or stored by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the Sydney University Law Society. The cover photo was taken by Maksym Kozlenko, sourced under a Creative Commons license (CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index. php?curid=47252349). The text of the Creative Commons license is available at creativecommons.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Rise2018 RELEVANT / RESILIENT / RESPECTED CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS 15 – 17 November 2018 International Convention Centre Sydney
    REGISTRATIONS CLOSING NEXT WEEK: 5 NOVEMBER rise2018 RELEVANT / RESILIENT / RESPECTED CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS 15 – 17 November 2018 International Convention Centre Sydney Saturday Friday 17 November 16 November 2018 2018 Planar Restaurant Friday ICC Sydney ICC Sydney 16 November 2018 The Cutaway In conversation with Celebrating Women in Law An evening with Barangaroo Dr Richard ‘Harry’ Harris breakfast with Julia Baird Anaesthetist and expert cave diver of Host of The Drum on ABCTV, a columnist for The The Hon “mission impossible” the Tham Luang cave New York Times, the Age and the Sydney Morning rescue of the ‘Wild Boars’ football team. Herald and critically acclaimed, best-selling author. Malcolm Turnbull Former Prime Minister of Australia NATIONALCONFERENCE.AUSTBAR.ASN.AU MEDIA PARTNER PROUDLY SPONSORED BY TO REGISTER, PLEASE VISIT WWW.NATIONALCONFERENCE.AUSTBAR.ASN.AU The Hon The Hon The Hon Justice The Hon Prof Hilary Allan Myers Tony Jones Julia Baird The Hon Jamelle Wells Bret Walker SC The Hon Justice David Marr Susan Kiefel AC T F Bathurst AC Virginia Bell AO J L B Allsop AO Charlesworth AC QC Journalist Journalist, Mark Speakman Journalist Fifth Floor Susan Glazebrook Journalist Chief Justice Chief Justice High Court Chief Justice University of Barrister Broadcaster SC MP ABC St James’ Hall DNZM High Court Supreme Court of Australia Federal Court Melbourne Victorian Bar & Author Attorney General Supreme Court of of Australia of NSW of Australia NSW New Zealand thursday 15 november day 2 : saturday 17 november WELCOME RECEPTION • Pier One Sydney Harbour 5.30-8.00pm PLENARY CRIMINAL LAW FUTURE PRACTICE The Hon Mark Speakman SC MP M.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Cain Sibley, Partner Deborah Mak, Senior Lawyer
    Presented by Cain Sibley, Partner Deborah Mak, Senior Lawyer February 2021 L\338913784.3 1. Introduction 1.1 It goes without saying that 2020 was a year like no other. While the coronavirus pandemic wreaked havoc on lives and livelihoods, administrative law continued in its (generally) cautious, evolutionary approach. 1.2 Throughout 2020, courts continued to grapple with the concept of materiality and we examine a number of cases on that issue. In addition, procedural fairness received a significant amount of attention as courts refine and apply the standard by which adherence to the hearing rule is judged. As noted in last year's Year in Review, we see that there is room for further clarification on whether notice of the substance of an allegation is sufficient or whether detailed particulars are required. 1.3 The reasoning grounds of review also received attention in 2020. We see that the courts have continued with a narrower view of unreasonableness and have typically exercised restraint in scrutinising the reasons of decision-makers. 1.4 In this paper, we also consider how administrative law responded directly to coronavirus issues in challenges to public health orders made in the context of controlling the spread of the virus. We also look at some recent decisions on statutory interpretation and see that there is perhaps a subtle shift away from the more literal trends to construction which have been dominant recently. Finally, our paper also considers developments in information law. 1.5 We are enormously grateful to Isabel Farronato (summer clerk) and Rachael Grivas (Lawyer) who assisted us with the preparation of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon Justice Jacqueline Gleeson
    The Hon Justice Jacqueline Gleeson Jacqueline Gleeson SC was sworn in as a judge of the Federal Court of Australia on 22 April 2014. Her Honour is the eldest of four siblings and the daughter of the construction law and professional disciplinary proceedings. former chief justice of New South Wales and then of Australia, Her Honour had been practising at the bar for nine years the Honourable Murray Gleeson AC QC. Nevertheless, as when she was briefed to appear for Mr Alan Jones at the Jane Needham SC who spoke at her Honour’s swearing-in Australian Broadcasting Authority’s cash for comment inquiry. reminded, her Honour’s success in the law was not to be taken !is appearance led to her Honour being approached with for granted: the o#er of the role of general counsel at the ABA, which she Justice Gleeson, it would be easy only to speak about your accepted, allowing her to pursue her interests in public law and lineage in the profession of law and the seeming inevitability broadcasting law. In 2003 her Honour was o#ered a position as that your Honour would follow in the footsteps of your senior executive lawyer for the Australian Government Solicitor esteemed father, the honourable Murray Gleeson, but to in 2003 where she advised and acted for regulatory agencies, do so would overlook the struggle and austerity of your including APRA, the Tax Agents Board, the Companies, "rst years as a junior barrister. Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board, the ABA and the It would gloss over the diligence and determination O$ce of Film and Literature Classi"cation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. Scott Morrison MP the Hon. Christian Porter MP JOINT MEDIA
    The Hon. Scott Morrison MP Prime Minister The Hon. Christian Porter MP Attorney-General Minister for Industrial Relations JOINT MEDIA RELEASE Wednesday 28 October 2020 APPOINTMENTS TO THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA His Excellency the Governor-General has accepted the advice of the Government to appoint the Honourable Justice Simon Steward and the Honourable Justice Jacqueline Gleeson as Justices of the High Court of Australia. Justice Steward and Justice Gleeson will respectively fill the vacancies that will arise upon the retirements of the Honourable Justice Geoffrey Nettle AC on 30 November 2020 and the Honourable Justice Virginia Bell AC on 28 February 2021. Justice Steward completed a Bachelor of Laws (First Class Honours) in 1990 and a Masters of Law in 2000, at the University of Melbourne. He was admitted to practice as a legal practitioner of the Supreme Court of Victoria in 1992 and signed the High Court Roll in the same year. Justice Steward was called to the Victorian Bar in 1999 and was appointed Silk in 2009. In 2009 he commenced as a Senior Fellow in the Faculty of Law at the University of Melbourne. He was appointed as a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia in 2017 and commenced his career on the Bench in 2018. Justice Gleeson graduated from the University of Sydney with a Bachelor of Arts in 1986 and a Bachelor of Laws in 1989. She began practising at the New South Wales Bar in 1991. Justice Gleeson left the Bar in late 2000 to practise as a solicitor, firstly with the Australian Broadcasting Authority and later the Australian Government Solicitor, before returning to the Bar in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Conference
    NEWS The national conference By Penny Thew Relevant. Resilient. Respected. In his increasingly electronic era. opening address to the ABA’s national The notion of resilience was aimed at conference, rise2018, the president of the need for and ability of the profession the Australian Bar Association Noel to adapt to change and disruption, includ- Hutley SC spoke of these three themes ing in response to the ‘drumbeat’ of the of the conference in the context of threat of technological change, in order to emerging national and international retain its relevance and respected position. legal issues. In this respect, the Honourable James Allsop AO, chief justice of the Federal The themes of relevance, resilience and Court of Australia, spoke about the future respect were chosen by the ABA in an of the independent bar in Australia. The attempt to focus the work of women and president said that the ABA in this context men in the legal field on addressing divi- has a duty and is committed to identifying sive and disruptive issues confronting the opportunities for, and promoting the skill proposals from Royal Commissions and profession. and competence of, Australian counsel other inquiries, the solutions available in The notion of relevance was aimed at and judiciary in international jurisdic- evoking the role of the profession not response require not only political will but tions. To that end a number of sessions only in the practise of law but also in law also legal knowledge and expertise. were dedicated to international commer- reform, with practitioners being both In this context there were conference cial arbitration.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter [2020]
    NEWSLETTER [2020] No. 9 Annual General Meeting Deductible Gift Recipient (DGR) Status The Academy held its AGM by Microsoft Teams The commencement date of the legislation was 1 on Thursday, 22 October 2020 at 4 PM. October 2020. The Secretariat is in the process of The directors for the year 2020-2021 were elected setting up the necessary bank account. Many unopposed and are as follows: thanks to Michael Murray and to Kevin Lindgren for overseeing this lengthy process. The Hon Alan Robertson SC (President) The Hon Kevin Lindgren AM, QC (Deputy In the next Newsletter I will set out how tax- President deductible donations to the Academy may be made. The Hon Justice G John Digby (Treasurer) Emeritus Professor David Barker AM (Secretary) Events The Hon Justice Tony Besanko Most AAL events have been going ahead remotely. The Hon Justice Mark Moshinsky This means that Fellows may register and attend The Hon Emeritus Professor Ralph Simmonds wherever they are, time zones permitting. Professor Gino Dal Pont Professor Erika Techera Forthcoming Professor Melissa De Zwart The Legal Implications of Brexit Professor Bee Chen Goh Professor Les McCrimmon The next Michael Coper Roundtable will be held Mr Russell Miller AM in Canberra at 5:15 PM on Wednesday 28 Dr Nuncio D'Angelo October 2020. Mr Michael Murray Professor Sally Wheeler OBE, MRIA, FAcSS, Annual Essay Prize – the winners FAAL will discuss the Legal Implications of Brexit for the United Kingdom. The topic for the 2020 Essay Prize was: The venue will be the ANU College of Law “The impact of a new and widespread contagious disease on pre-existing contractual obligations.
    [Show full text]