CASE 0:07-cv-01297-ADM-JSM Document 1 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 4

United States District Court District of Minnesota

Christopher Roller (Plaintiff) vs. Civil Action No. ANGEL PRODUCTIONS INC. c/o Magician Criss Angel (Defendant)

Complaint

Criss Angel is the most impressive magician around. I'm a huge fan.

But I believe Criss Angel has godly powers. I may be wrong. I took a guess with David Copperfield and it was true.

You see, I have a patent on godly powers - Pat#20070035812. http://www. objectforce.com/php/MyTrumanShow__/Legal/Patent/Patent.html. I believe Criss has been infringing on that patent effective 29July2005 in accordance with U.S.C 35 § 271.

People would make fun of me, "Chris, it doesn't make sense that a god or God would have to sue people to prove himself or have money". I think I've figured out the reason. I am under the impression that people can't lie to me under oath. Now that would be impressive if true, since everybody is full of it or corrupt. Imagine, no more Clintonitis (Clinton lied under oath). Wow! After all, David Copperfield fessed up to godly powers. I seriously doubt he wanted to do that. "I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God." Well, I'm God, and I'm going to help you tell the truth. How beautiful! I think CASE 0:07-cv-01297-ADM-JSM Document 1 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 4 that's my trick to be displayed in the courtroom. And it's the ultimate trick. I think I'm going to call it the "fess-up ". The theory is that people will only say the truth to me, or if it not good, avoid saying anything at all. No answer means the uncomfortable insinuation. To test this theory, I'd like to pose some statements for the reply by the defense.

1. Criss Angel does not have godly powers. 2. Criss Angel does not have any knowledge of the use of godly powers for financial gain on planet Earth. 3. Criss Angel has never seen www.mytrumanshow.com and Chris Roller's

notice of patent pending on godly powers. 4. The defense does not appreciate what Chris Roller is doing. 5. The defense wants Chris Roller to dismiss this case.

This is to test my "fess up" phenomenon theory. I'm betting the farm on this experiment. If the reply to the complaint has, in verbatim (simple copy and paste), the above statements 1-2, I will dismiss this case immediately. If any of these statements are missing in the reply, then the opposite will be true ("does not" mean "does", "has no" mean "has", etc.). If statements 1-2 are missing in the reply, then we have a case of patent infringement, and I will need to ask Criss Angel more questions.

I don't want to hear any lame excuses by the defense that a lack of statement means nothing. It means you cannot lie to me with a false statement. This is to test my "fess up" phenomenon theory.

Again, this is very important. If any of these statements above are missing in the CASE 0:07-cv-01297-ADM-JSM Document 1 Filed 02/23/07 Page 3 of 4 reply, then it will mean an admission of the opposite ("does not" means "does", "has no" means "has", etc.). It's very simple - copy and paste all the statements into the reply, if you can, and I will dismiss this case (with my apologies).

Disregard the following if no infringement...

U.S.C 35 § 287 (b) (5) (A) For purposes of this subsection, notice of infringement means actual knowledge, or receipt by a person of a written notification, or a combination thereof, of information sufficient to persuade a reasonable person that it is likely that a product was made by a process patented in the United States.

U.S.C 35 § 287 (b) (5) (D) For purposes of this subsection, a person who obtains a product made by a process patented in the United States in a quantity which is abnormally large in relation to the volume of business of such person or an efficient inventory level shall be rebuttably presumed to have actual knowledge that the product was made by such patented process.

Criss's product/trick/illusion is entirely godly - he rebuttably knew it was patented, and thus notified. He owes me royalties for the use of my godly powers effective 29July2005.

To calculate the %, follow... http://www.objectforce.com/php/MyTrumanShow__/Legal/Patent/Magicians/

RoyaltyCalculation.html

The scale resembles a curve similar to the current tax code, where you're taxed more if you make more. This is a fair system since magician's illusions/tricks and CASE 0:07-cv-01297-ADM-JSM Document 1 Filed 02/23/07 Page 4 of 4 their salary are 100% a result of my godly powers. Notice, a magician making $50,000 only has to pay 13.76%, $200,000, just 23.96%. Very fair to the poor. Scale maxes out at 87% for cases who make an extraordinary amount. Minimum % is 30% for magicians who I have to take to court.

The scale is experimental and will need some adjusting I'm sure. Of course, I will need pay records from Criss's accountant to determine royalty amount.

CONCLUSION

I'm suing Criss Angel for patent infringement in accordance with U.S.C 35 § 271. If true, I want past royalties - amount to be determined.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: __22 Feb 2007______s/_Christopher A. Roller______Christopher Roller (pro se) 13150 Harriet Ave. S #273 Burnsville, MN 55337 952.239.6410