Environmental Review: Unimak Caribou Herd Management Options

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Review: Unimak Caribou Herd Management Options State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game Environmental Review Unimak Caribou Herd Management Options April 2010 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... i Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 Need .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Law and Policy ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 State ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Federal .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Cooperative Agreement .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Permits and Approvals ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Management Options.................................................................................................................. 18 No action ................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Actions common to all management options .......................................................................................................... 18 Actions to improve breeding success ...................................................................................................................... 18 Bull Translocation ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Actions to improve calf survival ............................................................................................................................. 19 Immunocontraception or surgical sterilization .................................................................................................... 19 Targeted Wolf Removal ...................................................................................................................................... 20 Broad Scale Wolf Removal ................................................................................................................................ 22 Actions considered but dismissed ........................................................................................................................... 23 Bear and wolf removal ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Monitoring, assessment, future decision points ...................................................................................................... 26 Affected Environment ................................................................................................................ 27 Physical Environment ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Geography ........................................................................................................................................................... 27 Land Status ......................................................................................................................................................... 28 Climate ................................................................................................................................................................ 28 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................................... 29 Biological Environment .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................................................... 29 Birds .................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Human Environment ............................................................................................................................................... 35 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................................. 35 Subsistence Uses ................................................................................................................................................. 36 Recreational Uses ............................................................................................................................................... 37 Wilderness .......................................................................................................................................................... 38 Environmental Affects ................................................................................................................ 38 Dismissed from further review ............................................................................................................................... 40 Endangered Species Act ..................................................................................................................................... 40 Climate Change ................................................................................................................................................... 40 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................................. 40 Reviewed in detail .................................................................................................................................................. 41 Birds .................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Caribou ............................................................................................................................................................... 42 Bears ................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Wolves ................................................................................................................................................................ 46 Subsistence Uses ................................................................................................................................................. 48 Recreational Uses ............................................................................................................................................... 49 Wilderness Character .......................................................................................................................................... 51 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................................... 52 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................ 55 Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 59 Alaska Board of Game Regulations ........................................................................................................................ 59 Caribou Calving Area ............................................................................................................................................. 71 NEPA 1 ................................................................................................................................................................... 72 NEPA 2 ................................................................................................................................................................... 73 NEPA 3 ................................................................................................................................................................... 78 Department Action Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 81 Department Study Plan ..........................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Die-Off of Common Murres on the Alaska Peninsula and Unimak Island
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 215 SI~~PSON, S., AND J. J. GALBRAITH. 1905. An inves- WETMORE, A. 1921. A study of the body temper- tigation into the diurnal variation of the body tem- ature of birds. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 72:1-51. perature of nocturnal and other birds, and a few mammals. J. Physiol., 38:225-238. Accepted for publication 12 July 1971. A NORTHERLY WINTERING RECORD is more than 500 mi. NW of the nearest reported OF THE ELF OWL wintering locality. The bird was mist-netted in second-growth thorn (MICRATHENE WHITNEYI) forest near a harvested corn field. It was retained alive and taken to Tucson, Arizona. It appeared to be in good CHARLES A. ELY health and fed freely on insects given it on the nights Department of Zoology of 12-13 and 13-14 January, but suddenly fell dead Fort Hays Kansas State College Hays, Kansas 67601 from its perch late on the night of 13-14 January. Upon skinning the specimen, Crossin noted a circular AND area about 10 mm in diameter on the lower stomach. RICHARD S. CROSSIN The area was a dark bluish-green in color and resem- bled dermal tissue which has received a severe bruise. Neotropical Ornithological Foundation 1719 North Huachuca The cause of the affliction was not determined, but Tucson, Arizona 85705 may possibly have resulted from the intake of some chemical poisoning during feeding. The owl might Ligon (Misc. Publ., Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan, No. have been afflicted before its capture, which could 136, 1968) investigated the winter range of the Elf account for its wintering far north of the recorded Owl in Mexico, chiefly by playing sound recordings winter range.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutian Islands Expedition
    ALEUTIAN ISLANDS EXPEDITION Board your expedition ship in the stunning, remote fishing port of Seward, Alaska, and begin exploring the rugged Alaskan Peninsula coast, where deeply incised fjords give access to glaciers tumbling from icefields high above. Brown bears, whales, dolphins and seals are but some that call this coast home, and wildlife only increases as you traverse the Aleutians, a 1900-km chain of 14 large volcanic islands and 55 smaller ones that forms the Pacific Rim of Fire’s northern arc. This natural boundary separates the Pacific Ocean from the Bering Sea—a designated Mission Blue Hope Spot—creating a dynamic environment that supports amazing biodiversity, including caribou, sea otters, Steller sea lions, orca and gray whales. ITINERARY Delight in black-legged kittiwakes, tufted puffins, crested auklets, peregrine falcon, tundra swans and so much more. Day 1 Anchorage Landings reveal historical relics ranging from Aleut villages and Arrive in Anchorage and transfer to our group hotel. Upon check-in at Hilton Russian fur trade depots to remnants of World War II battles Anchorage Hotel, reception staff will provide you with Aurora Expeditions cabin and Cold War bases. Every day promises something to fire your tags. Please fill out the luggage tags clearly, showing your name and cabin passion especially finishing up on Russia’s spectacular number to allow us to deliver your luggage to your cabin. At tonight’s voyage briefing, enjoy a welcome drink and meet fellow expeditioners. Kamchatka Peninsula. Accommodation: Hilton Anchorage Hotel (or similar) Day 2 Embark Sylvia Earle After check-out, discover Anchorage on a sightseeing tour transferring to Seward, where our expedition team will welcome you aboard the Sylvia Earle at approximately 4.00 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregion-Based Conservation in the Bering Sea
    Ecoregion-Based Conservation in the Bering Sea Identifying Important Areas for Biodiversity Conservation Contents Page# PART ONE: INTRODUCTION 3 1.2 Why conduct…. 3 1.3 Description… 4 1.4 Biolog Signif… 4 1.5 Changes…. 4 1.6 Conservation opps.. 5 PART TWO: WORKSHOP REPORT 8 2.1 Methodology: Assessing Biodiversity 8 2.2 Experts Workshop 10 2.3 Selecting Conservation Priorities:The Approach 10 Subregions: Bering Strait Bering Sea Shelf Kamchatka Shelf and Coast Aleutian Islands Aleutian Basin Taxa Birds Mammals Fish Invertebrates 2.4 Threat Assessment Summary 13 2.5 Additional Issues of Concern 16 PART THREE: BEYOND MAPS, TOWARD CONSERVATION 19 3.1 Lessons from Girdwood Workshop 19 3.2 Next Steps 21 Edited by: David Banks, Margaret 3.3 The Nature Conservancy and the Bering Sea 22 Williams John Pearce, Alan Springer, 3.4 WWF and the Bering Sea 22 Randy Hagenstein, and David Olson APPENDIX A: MAPS 2-9 A1 Publication design by Eric Cline 2 Subregions of the Bering Sea A2 3 Priority Bird Areas A3 Maps and GIS Data by: Emma BIRD TABLE A4 Underwood, Jennifer D’Amico, 4 Priority Mammal Areas A5 Carrie Wolfe, and Julie Maier MAMMAL TABLE A6 5 Priority Fish Areas A7 A collaborative effort by the FISH TABLE A8 World Wildlife Fund, 6 Priority Invertebrate Areas A9 The Nature Conservancy of Alaska, INVERT TABLE A10 and Participants in the 7 Overlapping Priority Areas for all Taxa A11 Girdwood Bering Sea Experts 8 Priority Areas for Bering Sea Biodiversity A12 Workshop March 20-23, 1999 9 Existing Protected Areas of the Bering Sea A13 Cover photo of walruses by Kevin APPENDIX B: PRIORITY AREA DESCRIPTIONS B1 Schafer, provided courtesy of the photographer APPENDIX C: LITERATURE CITED IN APP.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ALEUTIAN ISLANDS: THEIR PEOPLE and NATURAL HISTORY
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WAR BACKGROUND STUDIES NUMBER TWENTY-ONE THE ALEUTIAN ISLANDS: THEIR PEOPLE and NATURAL HISTORY (With Keys for the Identification of the Birds and Plants) By HENRY B. COLLINS, JR. AUSTIN H. CLARK EGBERT H. WALKER (Publication 3775) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION FEBRUARY 5, 1945 BALTIMORE, MB., U„ 8. A. CONTENTS Page The Islands and Their People, by Henry B. Collins, Jr 1 Introduction 1 Description 3 Geology 6 Discovery and early history 7 Ethnic relationships of the Aleuts 17 The Aleutian land-bridge theory 19 Ethnology 20 Animal Life of the Aleutian Islands, by Austin H. Clark 31 General considerations 31 Birds 32 Mammals 48 Fishes 54 Sea invertebrates 58 Land invertebrates 60 Plants of the Aleutian Islands, by Egbert H. Walker 63 Introduction 63 Principal plant associations 64 Plants of special interest or usefulness 68 The marine algae or seaweeds 70 Bibliography 72 Appendix A. List of mammals 75 B. List of birds 77 C. Keys to the birds 81 D. Systematic list of plants 96 E. Keys to the more common plants 110 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES Page 1. Kiska Volcano 1 2. Upper, Aerial view of Unimak Island 4 Lower, Aerial view of Akun Head, Akun Island, Krenitzin group 4 3. Upper, U. S. Navy submarine docking at Dutch Harbor 4 Lower, Village of Unalaska 4 4. Upper, Aerial view of Cathedral Rocks, Unalaska Island 4 Lower, Naval air transport plane photographed against peaks of the Islands of Four Mountains 4 5. Upper, Mountain peaks of Kagamil and Uliaga Islands, Four Mountains group 4 Lower, Mount Cleveland, Chuginadak Island, Four Mountains group ..
    [Show full text]
  • Wade Cetacean Assessment and Ecology Program National Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service
    Killer whales of the Aleutian Islands Paul R. Wade Cetacean Assessment and Ecology Program National Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service With contributions from Kim Parsons, Janice Waite, John Durban, Holly Fearnbach 3 types of killer whales in the North Pacific “Residents” “Transients” “Offshores” Fish-eaters Mammal-eaters Upper-trophic fish such as sharks Variation in gray saddle patch Uniform large gray saddle patch Dorsal fin rounded at tip Dorsal fin falcate Dorsal fin triangular Often multiple nicks in fin P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA Killer whale studies in the Aleutian Islands by NMML 2001-2010 2001-03 Systematic line transect surveys (as far west as Amchitka Pass/Delarof Islands) 2004-05 Focused surveys for transient photo-ID and biopsy for chemical studies Obtained data from a few encounters west of Amchitka Pass during a SPLASH humpback whale survey in 2004 2006 First NMML survey west of Amchitka Pass, surveyed out to Attu Island Added satellite tagging 2008-10 Added acoustic monitoring at Steller sea lion rookeries 2010 Second survey of western-half of the Aleutians P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA >330 Encounters with killer whales 2001-2010 “Resident” type killer whales • >220 encounters • Seen more frequently that transients in the Aleutians • Average group size 19 • Nearly exclusively fish- eaters • Dark pigment intrusions into the saddle patch on some whales in the group are diagnostic to residents or offshores P. Wade, NMML/AFSC/NMFS/NOAA “Transient”-type killer whales in the North Pacific are a species that separated from other killer whales ~700,000 years ago (Morin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelp-Fed Beef, Swimming Caribou, Feral Reindeer, and Their Hunters: Island Mammals in a Marine Economy
    sustainability Article Kelp-Fed Beef, Swimming Caribou, Feral Reindeer, and Their Hunters: Island Mammals in a Marine Economy Katherine Reedy Department of Anthropology, Idaho State University, 921 S. 8th Ave, Stop 8005, ID 83209-8005, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-208-282-2629; Fax: +1-208-282-4944 Academic Editor: Werner T. Flueck Received: 8 December 2015; Accepted: 19 January 2016; Published: 26 January 2016 Abstract: Aleutian Islands and Alaska Peninsula residents have selectively introduced land mammals to their primarily marine based economy over the past two centuries. This paper describes these many introductions, contexts, and the longer term roles of these cattle, sheep, reindeer, and other land mammals in discrete island settings and the regional food economy based upon interviews in ten communities and comprehensive household surveys in eight of these. Caribou are indigenous and traditionally hunted in other parts of the state but are legally “invasive” in island contexts now managed by the federal government. Access to land and natural resources by Alaska Natives and rural peoples is regulated by state and federal agencies, but Aleutian residents have shaped their environment and engineered food sources to support their communities. This paper demonstrates that hardline approaches to removing invasive land mammal species will have human consequences and an integrated management policy emphasizing food security and conservation that includes reducing the density of these introduced species is most appropriate. Keywords: aleutians; introduced species; invasive species; subsistence; conservation; food security 1. Introduction In March 2010, former graduate student Crystal Callahan and I were staying in a Port Heiden, Alaska, bed and breakfast working on a subsistence project when the telephone rang.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Volcano-Hazard Assessment for Gareloi Volcano, Gareloi Island, Alaska
    no O lca bs o er V v a a k t o s r a y l A U S S G G S G - AD UAF/GI - Preliminary Volcano-Hazard Assessment for Gareloi Volcano, Gareloi Island, Alaska Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Alaska Volcano Observatory (AVO) was established in 1988 to monitor dangerous volcanoes, issue eruption alerts, assess volcano hazards, and conduct volcano research in Alaska. The cooperating agencies of AVO are the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute (UAFGI) , and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys (ADGGS). AVO also plays a key role in notification and tracking eruptions on the Kamchatka Peninsula of the Russian Far East as part of a formal working relationship with the Kamchatkan Volcanic eruptions Response Team. Cover: Lava flows from a 20th-century eruption drape the south flank of Gareloi’s South Peak crater. The white zone on the crater headwall is an extensive fumarole field. Photograph by R.G. McGimsey, August 2003. Preliminary Volcano-Hazard Assessment for Gareloi Volcano, Gareloi Island, Alaska By Michelle L. Coombs, Robert G. McGimsey, and Brandon L. Browne Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Optic, 07-10-1914 the Optic Publishing Co
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Las Vegas Daily Optic, 1896-1907 New Mexico Historical Newspapers 7-10-1914 Las Vegas Optic, 07-10-1914 The Optic Publishing Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/lvdo_news Recommended Citation The Optic Publishing Co.. "Las Vegas Optic, 07-10-1914." (1914). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/lvdo_news/3364 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the New Mexico Historical Newspapers at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Las Vegas Daily Optic, 1896-1907 by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FAIR tonight and Sat- MORE can urday, without much good bo done change In temperature. U U by being good than In any other way. ASSOCIATED LEASED WIRE c EXCLUSIVE FFESS TELT; GRAPH BERVICE .VOL. XXXV. NO. 257. LAS VEGAS DAILY FRIDAY, JULY 1914. OPTIC,. 10, CITY EDITION ME. MS ESI CLOS I N11EXIC0 CITY tihd also deliver lecturea, Cyv these ADMIRAL RETIRES i methods and through interviews in EDITOR ARRESTED Washington, July 10 The last re- KATY the newspapers, he said, he hopedIto maining officer of the United States FLYER" GUAYMAS EVACUATED. CARRANZA convince the American people of the navy who participated in the civil war enormity of the "crime committed not ended his service today, when Rear only by President Wilson but all the FOR TELLING Admiral:' William H.-.H- . Southerland ROBBED BY in political factors the United States, was placed on the retired list by oper- NEAR POTOSWD THREE DIVISIONS regardless dt party." ation of the age limit For some time Senor Moheno added that he did not Pl'st Rear Admiral'1) Southerland has BANDITS agree with the opinion that the oil SECjETS been a member of the general board.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Alternatives for the Unimak Island Caribou Herd
    Management Alternatives for the Unimak Island Caribou Herd Environmental Assessment Prepared by Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service In cooperation with State of Alaska Alaska Department of Fish and Game DECEMBER 2010 GAP Solutions, Inc. Washington, D.C. Page intentionally left blank TABLE of CONTENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page ACRONYMS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE ACTION 1 1.1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.2. PURPOSE 2 1.3. THE NEED FOR ACTION 2 1.4. DECISION TO BE MADE 2 1.5. SCOPE OF THIS ANALYSIS 3 2. CHAPTER 2 – HISTORY OF UNIMAK ISLAND CARIBOU 4 2.1. HISTORICAL TRENDS 4 2.2. CAUSES FOR RECENT POPULATION DECLINE 6 3. CHAPTER 3 – ALTERNATIVES 10 3.1. INTRODUCTION 10 3.1.1. Introduction to Alternatives 10 3.1.2. Rationale Behind Selection of Alternatives 10 3.2. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL 11 3.2.1. Alternative A – No Action (No Predator Control) 11 3.2.2. Alternative B – Selective Predator Management on the Calving Grounds and Calf Mortality Study with Helicopter Support (Alaska Department of Fish and Game Proposed Action) 12 3.2.3. Alternative C – Selective Predator Management on the Calving Grounds Using Either Fixed-wing Aircraft with Marksmen or Ground-based Teams Deployed by Helicopters to Take Wolves and Calf Mortality Study with Helicopter Support 14 3.2.4. Alternative D – Selective Predator Management on the Calving Grounds Using Ground-based Teams 15 3.2.5. Actions Common to Alternatives B, C and D – Supplement Unimak Caribou Herd with Bulls from the Southern Alaska Peninsula Herd 16 3.2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Postglacial Climate and Vegetation of the Western Alaska Peninsula
    POSTGLACIAL CLIMATE AND VEGETATION OF THE WESTERN ALASKA PENINSULA James W. Jordan, Department of Environmental Studies, Antioch New England Graduate School, Keene, NH 03431 Andrea Krumhardt, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99775 Abstract: Pollen analysis of a sediment core at Cold Bay, Alaska, indicates a sequence of four vegetation zones representative of trends in postglacial climate. The sequence suggests cool, relatively dry conditions from 9000 – 6200 yr B.P. (14C years); warmer, moister conditions from 6200 – 3200 yr B.P.; cool, moist conditions from 3200 – 2100 yr B.P.; and cool, wet conditions from 2100 – 0 yr B.P. Vegetation throughout the record consisted of treeless tundra dominated by shrubs, herbs, and grasses. Regional pollen records are influenced both by climatic factors and volcanism. The lack of visible volcanic ash deposits in the core described here, and its evidence of a regionally documented shift toward sedge-dominated vegetation about 3000 yr B.P., suggest that the site provides a good approximation of regional climate change during the Holocene. The transition to cooler moister conditions after 3200 yr B.P. is also recorded by coastal dune stabilization on the western Alaska Peninsula, and is broadly correlative with Neoglacial indicators in southern and western Alaska. Changes in solar radiation and shifts in the position and intensity of the Aleutian low-pressure and North Pacific high-pressure centers are the dominant mechanisms of postglacial climate change. Key words: Disturbance, Effective Moisture, Neoglacial Climate INTRODUCTION Investigations of paleoclimatic change are important compared with previous records from the nearest sites in for understanding the mechanisms and consequences of the region – Umnak Island in the eastern Aleutian chain global environmental change.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Peninsula and Aleutian Islands Management Area Herring Sac Roe Fishery Management Plan, 2002
    ALASKA PENINSULA AND ALEUTIAN ISLANDS MANAGEMENT AREA HERRING SAC ROE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN, 2002 By Charles Burkey Jr. Regional Information Report1 No. 4K02-17 Alaska Department ofFish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries 211 Mission Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 March2002 1The Regional Information Report Series was established in 1987 to provide an information access system for all unpublished division reports. These reports frequently serve diverse ad hoc informational purposes or archive basic uninterpreted data. To accommodate timely reporting of recently collected information, reports in this series undergo only limited internal review and may contain preliminary data; this information may be subsequently finalized and published in the formal literature. Consequently, these reports should not be cited without prior approval of the author or the Division of Commercial Fishe1ies. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................................................................................... ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Ninth North American Caribou Workshop, S1 Kuujjuaq, Québec, Canada, 23–27 April, 2001. Rangifer and man: An ancient relationship Bryan Gordon Canadian Museum of Civilization, 100 Laurier st., Gatineau, Québec, Canada J8X 4H2 ([email protected]); home address: 38 Revol Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 0B9. Abstract: A long-term relationship between Rangifer and humans is documented in three case studies: the Canadian Barrenlands (8000 years ago to Historic period), Ice-Age France (11 000-19 000 years ago) and Mesolithic Russia (7000- 10 000 years ago). Ancient human and herd migration occurred in all areas, based upon Rangifer remains and seasonal variations in tools along reconstructed migration routes, with few if any hunting camps outside the routes. An April peak of ancient human births is inferred from the historic record where we see births occurring nine months after peak nutri- tional states in herds and people. The origin of reindeer domestication and breeding in Eurasia is discussed. Key words: Barrenlands, caribou, herd following, hunters, Magdalenian, Mesolithic, reindeer. Rangifer, Special Issue No. 14: 15-28 Introduction African herds of antelope, zebra and gazelle. It and For most of the year, the Barrenlands are empty – its hunters occupied half the land north of the equa- devoid of movement from freeze up to breakup tor (Fig. 1). Its bond with man cannot be overem- except for windblown snow. In spring, caribou come phasized when we consider the extensive circumpo- north from the forest to their calving ground. In late lar distribution of its tundra and woodland forms in spring, the crash of ice pans and chimes of falling the New and Old Worlds (Banfield, 1961; Spiess, candle ice signal river breakup, followed by the calls 1979).
    [Show full text]