DOCSLIB.ORG

Dear Honorable John B. Tunheim, Chairman of ARRB 3/22/97 One Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dear Honorable John B. Tunheim, Chairman of ARRB 3/22/97 One Of Dear Honorable John B. Tunheim, Chairman of ARRB 3/22/97 One of the greatest frauds constituted against the United States of America will be the sale of the Abraham Zapruder film to our government for 16 million dollars. The reason why it is a forged film? In fact, our government will pay 17 million for the film based on the claim it is authentic. Based, in part, on the chain of Custody it is too embarrassed to admit it will purchase a forgery holding the status of being a "out of camera original". In that way the purchasers of the film (our government) could retain its reputation, and not deal with the many government documents that suggest otherwise stored in the National Archives. Because the film was used by the Warren Commission as the ultimate time piece to link a 6.5mm Mannlicher-Carcano to the President's assassination it would prove highly embarrassing to our government if the film were proven to be altered. In the following text the proof of the Zapruder film being altered will be made clear. Please, be the judge, and if you feel by the supporting evidence contained in this letter contact the President of the United States, Bill Clinton, to help expose the Zapruder film as being a forgery to deceive the American public. In 1982, l first became interested in the Abraham Zapruder film, and little by little learned tidbits about the film possibly being a first class forgery. Today l am convince of it have enough proofs of it to prove that my theory of film alteration is correct. Contained in this excerpt from my book, "The Slaying of Camelot". Contained in it is enough evidence to support my findings that the Abraham Zapruder film was completely altered and sold shortly afterwards to LIFE magazine the weekend of President John F. Kennedy's assassination. Because much of the proofs are currently at the National Archives please take the time to study this brief synopsis of material taken from my book proving the Abraham Zapruder film was altered while in the hands of the FBI. Because of the seriousness of this charge, overwhelming proof is needed. l feel its long past time for the American public to know this fact before the Kennedy assassination slips in oblivion. On Friday, November 29, 1963 LIFE Magazine published thirty one frames of the Zapruder film (unnumbered) exactly one week after President Kennedy was assassinated. While working at the Dayton Daily News l personally handled six photoengravings of the Abraham Zapruder film that had just finished being made in the Photoengraving Department at the newspaper by Sonny Delater, a photoengraver. The six engravings appeared as artwork on the Dayton Daily News Camera page, a weekly page on Friday, November 29,1963. The page is used to display photographs taken each week capturing recent news worthy photographs. Frame Z157 (155) It was not until by chance I noticed one black and white frame Z-157 that appeared in a book JFK, "The Case For Conspiracy“, by Peter Model and Robert Groden (1976). I purchased the paperback book from a local book store in 1978. Upon reading the book l became aware of the possibility of the Abraham Zapruder film being a forgery. This was because noticed the front passenger side wheel of a 1964 Mercury being off the pavement. At first, l thought that the frame Z157 appeared odd in appearance because of a single frame reflex camera mounting not returning into its exact focal plane alignment when someone copied the Abraham Zapruder frame using an optical printer. No mention of the front wheel being off the ground was ever mentioned in the photo caption in the book, “JFK: The Case for Conspiracy." In 1985 I wrote Jim Garrison about trying to obtain a copy of the Zapruder film, and in 1989 at my request he mailed me a copy of the standard 8mm Zapruder film used at the Clay ,Shaw trial. The copy he sent me was made off the so-original film shown during the Shaw trial in the sixties. Upon painstakingly examining the 8mm film I noticed that my 8mm copy was exactly the same as the original, and contained the same defect as seen in frame Z-157 found in ‘The Case For Conspiracy.‘ Because of this I began to number the the six individual frames that appeared in the Dayton Daily News Camera page on November 29, 1963. In comparing each of the six frames with my copy, the frames were Z-232, 269, 321,343, 361, and Z-371. In comparing these frame against my copy I found that they were identical in all aspects. I also checked the frames the thirty-one frames that appeared in LIFE on November 29, 1 963. For my artwork, out of the thirty one frames I chose fifteen frames: They were Z-123, Z-144, Z- 166, Z-232, Z-258, Z-261, Z-325, Z-328, Z-337, Z-340, Z-343, Z-349, Z-357, Z-359, Z-368. All thirty-one frames matched my 8mm copy. At that time I also noticed four guillotine splices contained in the film, two at Z-155-158 and two at Z-208-212, and that frame Z-155, 156, and Z-209-211 had been removed from my copy, where the splices occurred. FBI Agent Lyndal Shaneyfelt determined that the Zapruder film contained 486 frames when the Zapruder film was sold to LIFE on Saturday morning, November 23, 1963. By using this information I was able to number each frame in my copy of the film. In doing this, I discovered by using the LIFE November 29 edition that between Z-349-357 Malcolm Summers is seen falling on his right knee and then gaining his balance moved into a squatting position in eight frames in ONE HALF SECOND. A truly impossible feat. Also, on my copy, I noticed that three separate scenes appeared. The first was a park bench scene (14 1/2 frames not counted in the original) the second, a Dallas Police motorcycle scene containing 132 frames, the third the Presidential limousine scene containing 353 frames. In running the film on my 8mm projector I noticed that the Presidential limousine magically popped into view at Z-133 giving the effect that the scene was continuous. Upon checking the testimony of Abraham Zapruder before the Warren Commission he said "he first picked up the motorcade as it made the tum onto Elm Street from Houston Street". Mr. Wesley J. Liebeler of the Warren Commission never followed up on the question of why the Presidential limousine was not seen when the Presidential limousine turned onto Elm Street from Houston Street . Through research, I found that a car driven by Chief Jesse Curry was in front of Presidential limousine and following Curry's car were the three motorcyclist seen in frames Z- 001-132. The first question I asked myself why were these frames removed from the beginning of the Presidential limousine scene. By watching other film taken of the motorcade passing along the motorcade route from Love Field to the Dallas Trade Mart the emergency blinking lights contained in the front fender grill of the Presidential limousine appeared to blinking back and forth, however in the Zapruder film the blink rate pattern can not be discerned. Because of that feature I decided to plot the blinking red lights on the front grill of the Presidential limousine and Chief Curry's car. The blinking lights in front of Curry's car when plotted shows three frames on four off in the Marie Muchmore. This film shows the Presidential limousine turning from Main Street t H ' g on 0 Houston. So if Curry's car was seen on Elm Street in front of the Presidential the blink rate could be easily discerned. In the Zapruder film both emergency lights when l plotted are seen alternating in the film from Z-133 to Z-238. The two emergency lights when plotted basically had a blink rate pattern of ten frames on (passenger side) and nine frames on (driver's side) in the Zapruder film. Th ' ' m e exception to this pattern is between Z-219-238. The red lights on driver's side were ON from Z-219 to Z-225, and on the passenger side were ON from Z-226-238 This clearly proved an uneven pattern and explained why the: blinking lights aren‘t seen in the film, and explains why the Chief Curry's car was edited from the film. All the film containing the red emergency lights attached to Curry front grill had a shorter distinctive blink rate pattern that would have been easily detected if Curry's car remained in the Zapruder film which would automatically drawn ones attention to the Presidential blink rate pattern being askew and not observed because of its uneven pattern. I also discovered in other films after comparing them to the Zapruder film that the basic film speed of Zapruder's camera was 23 frames per second, or for one complete blink cycle of 18 frames in .82 seconds. (NOT ONE SECOND) In a Federal Bureau of Investigation document signed by Robert M. Barrett on 12-4-63.Zapruder stated that his camera ran at a speed of 24 fps. The problem with this statement Zapruders camera a model 414PD Zoomatic Director Series spring wound, 8mm movie camera Serial No AS13486 only had three settings, one AUTOMATIC (48 fps), RUN (16 fps), and single frame feature.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sourcenotes 01-02.07
    Source Notes ABBREVIATIONS AFIP, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology ARRB, Assassination Records Review Board ARRB MD, Assassination Records Review Board, Medical Deposition ASAIC, assistant special agent-in-charge (Secret Service) CD, Warren Commission document CE, Warren Commission exhibit DA, district attorney DMA, Dallas Municipal Archives DOJ, Department of Justice DOJCD, Department of Justice, Criminal Division DPD, Dallas Police Department FOIA, Freedom of Information Act H, Warren Commission hearings and exhibits (volumes 1–15 are testimony; volumes 16–26 are exhibits) HPSCI, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence HSCA, House Select Committee on Assassinations JCS, Joint Chiefs of Staff LBJ, Lyndon Baines Johnson NARA, National Archives and Records Administration NAS-CBA, National Academy of Science’s Committee on Ballistic Acoustics NSA, National Security Agency ONI, Office of Naval Intelligence SA, special agent SAC, special agent-in-charge (FBI) SAIC, special agent-in-charge (Secret Service) SSCIA, Senate Select Committee on the CIA WC, Warren Commission WCT, Warren Commission testimony WR, Warren Report Z, Zapruder film 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Stephen Ambrose, quoted in John Broder, “Greatness in the Eye of the Beholder?” Los Angeles Times, November 22, 1993, pp.1, 10. 2. O’Donnell and Powers with McCarthy, Johnny, We Hardly Knew Ye, p.472. 3. Ambrose, quoted in Broder, “Greatness in the Eye of the Beholder?” Los Angeles Times, Novem- ber 22, 1993, pp.1, 10. 4. USA Today, November 22, 1993. 5. Dallas Morning News, November 17, 2003, p.14. 6. New York Times, November 4, 2004, p.4; Phillips, “Fat City,” p.49. 7. Ashley Powers, “The Mythical Man of Camelot,” Dallas Morning News, November 16, 2003, pp.1A, 18A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legal-Scientific Analysis of the Warren Commission's Single Bullet
    The Magic Bullet: A Legal-Scientific analysis of the Warren Commission’s Single Bullet Theory Andrew M. Mason1 Since its publication in 1964, the Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy 2 has been mired in controversy. In reaching its conclusion that President Kennedy was the victim of a lone assassin, the Warren Commission adopted the “single bullet theory” to explain the sequence of three shots directed at the President’s limousine. Three of the seven Commission members apparently disagreed with the theory on the grounds that the evidence did not support it. The lack of clear evidence for the theory and its inconsistency with key eyewitness testimony has provided fertile ground for conspiracy theorists who allege that the explanation was concocted to support the Commission’s conclusion that all shots were fired from Oswald’s rifle.3 According to the single bullet theory, a one-inch long, copper jacketed, lead core 6.5 millimeter rifle bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy’s neck, Governor Connally’s chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. In doing so, the bullet traversed 19 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a tie knot, removed 4 inches of rib and shattered a radius bone. Despite leaving several small particles of lead behind in the Governor’s wounds, the missile emerged from its tortuous journey remarkably unscathed. The bullet that is supposed to have done all this damage was found on Governor Connally’s stretcher in the corridor at the Parkland Hospital in Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • Wagner Review 2.Pdf
    1 IN THE COURTROOM WITH ROBERT WAGNER by David W. Mantik, MD, PhD The Mantik View February 18, 2018 Revised August 27, 2018 NOTE: This is my second review of Wagner’s 2016 book; the first was dated December 4, 2017.1 My first review, and Wagner’s response to it, can be found at my website: http://themantikview.com/ 2 § Dr. Mantik states: “It is unique for me to write a second review, but too much remained unsaid after the first review. Wagner’s book clearly required more attention, especially since his profound mistakes are so often duplicated by the unenlightened mainstream media.” § “German judges, very respectable people, who rolled the dice before sentencing, issued sentences 50% longer when the dice showed a high number, without being conscious of it.” -The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (2010), Nassim Nicholas Taleb § “If logic and reason, the hard, cold products of the mind, can be relied upon to deliver justice or produce the truth, how is it that these brain-heavy judges rarely agree? Five-to- four decisions are the rule, not the exception. Nearly half of the court must be unjust and wrong nearly half of the time. Each decision, whether the majority or minority, exudes logic and reason like the obfuscating ink from a jellyfish, and in language as opaque. The minority could have as easily become the decision of the court. At once we realize that logic, no matter how pretty and neat, that reason, no matter how seemingly profound and deep, does not necessarily produce truth, much less justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 the Assassination
    Chapter 7: November 22, 1963 Chapter 7 The assassination 1 Introduction Our interest in reviewing the information that is today available to us regarding the events of November 22, 1963, quite naturally focuses on the question as to whether President Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin or by a conspiracy. Other questions pale by comparison to this first and most important question. As we review the eyewitness testimony, we see that the conclusion is not difficult to reach -- that indeed, the President was shot both from the front and the rear. This conclusion can be reached by a consideration of several kinds of evidence: v where the eyewitnesses heard the shots coming from; v eyewitness accounts of the spacing of the shots, which came too close together for the lone assassin hypothesis to be maintained; v the total number of shots was too large for the lone assassin hypothesis to be maintained; v the early shot hitting the President was not the same as the shot hitting Governor Connally, invalidating the lone assassin hypothesis. 1 The route through Dallas The final decision for the President's route in Dallas was determined by Secret Service agent Winston Lawson, on Thursday, November 14.1 The WCR states that "Lawson was not specifi- cally instructed [on Nov. 8] to select the parade route, but he understood that this was one of his functions. Even before the Trade Mart had been definitely selected, Lawson and Sorrels began to consider the best motorcade route from Love Field to the Trade Mart. On November 14, Law- son and Sorrels attended a meeting at Love Field and on their return to Dallas drove over the route which Sorrels believed best suited for the proposed motorcade."2 The route was reviewed and approved by Chief of Police Jesse Curry, Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • The JFK Assassination and the Politics and Culture of Conspiracy Theory
    A Paranoid Style? : The JFK Assassination and the Politics and Culture of Conspiracy Theory Joseph Broadbent Degree of Masters of Arts by Research University of East Anglia School of American Studies January 2014 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 2 Abstract This thesis analyses the phenomenon of conspiracy theory, using the assassination of President John F. Kennedy as a case study. Doubt is the root cause of conspiracy theory, stemming from both the innate biases all humans exhibit, and a traumatic experience – in this case the assassination of JFK. This thesis argues that conspiracy theories are created and take hold because of a predisposition toward conspiracy theory, a misinterpretation of a central piece of evidence, such as the Zapruder film, and agency panic, where dispossession causes one to feel as if their agency is under threat. Conspiracy theory can provide believers with many emotions which appear to the individual to not be available elsewhere, namely closure, comfort, control, and a sense of leisure. Using the assassination of JFK, this thesis examines the role of conspiracy theory in modern American society. It weighs up the benefits of conspiracy theory, such as it is an example of free speech and it can aid transparency, with the negatives: that it can possibly cause harm to its adherents and their dependants because of a belief in ends justifying the means.
    [Show full text]
  • Novenq-,R 25, 1993 Rebecca Sinkler 4 Yawkey Way Editor Fenway Park
    Novenq-,r 25, 1993 Rebecca Sinkler 4 Yawkey Way editor Fenway Park The New York Times Book Review Boston, MA 02215 229 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 Dear Editor: The purpose of this letter is to issue a respectful but firm dissent to the recent flurry of endorsements of Mr. Gerald Posner's book, Case Closed. Mr. Posner's book is not the "compelling account... of what probably did happen in Dallas," as heralded in the review by Mr. Geoffrey C. Ward in The New York Times, Sunday, November 21, 1993. Neither is it an "always conclusive destruction of one Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory after another," as Tom Wicker writes on the jacket cover. In fact, Case Closed is factually innaccurate and misleading, despite the acclaim granted to Mr. Posner during the last several months in both the electronic and print media. In reality, Case Closed is no less a sham than many books published on both sides of the conspiracy issue since the events in Dallas, 1963. Allow me to demonstrate: The Single Bullet Theory Of all the assassination theories, the Single Bullet Theory is certainly the grandest of them all. It is the cornerstone of any case against Lee Harvey Oswald or any other lone gunman. Conspiracy or not, all scholars of the case can not ignore the inescapable fact that the Single Bullet Theory is, itself, only a theory, not a fact. It is almost universally accepted that the lone gunman scenario requires no more than three shots. It also asks that one bullet be responsible for multiple wounds and physical damage in two men: An entrance and exit wound in the president; an entrance wound beneath the right rear armpit in Governor Connally; a fractured rib in the Governor; an exit wound out the Governors chest; an entrance wound in his wrist; a fractured wrist; an exit wound from his hand; and still a final entrance wound (superficial) in his thigh.
    [Show full text]
  • HSCA Volume I: 9/6/78
    62 Sir, will you stand and raise your right hand to be sworn. Do you solemnly swear the testimony you will give before this committee is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Mr. GRODEN. I do. Chairman STOKES. Thank you. You may be seated. TESTIMONY OF ROBERT GRODEN Chairman STOKES. The Chair recognizes Mr. Mickey Goldsmith, counsel for the committee . Mr. GOLDSMITH. Mr. Groden, would you please state your name and occupation for the record? Mr. GRODEN. Robert Groden, photo-optics technician. Mr. GOLDSMrrH. Mr. Groden, would you move the mike closer to you. Thank you. Now, Mr. Groden, in your capacity as a consultant to this com- mittee, what has been your major responsibility? Mr. GRODEN. My major responsibility was to present to the com- mittee those issues dealing with photographic evidence that it was felt could be scientifically addressed, perhaps improved upon as the knowledge of the critics has lasted through these years and per- haps give new information relating to those particular photographs and films. Mr. GOLDSMITH. Mr. Groden, to what extent, if any, has the information you have been giving to this committee been limited to those issues that you personally thought to have merit? Mr. GRODEN. No, all of the issues to which I felt there was merit, I was given freedom to address, but also, additional issues which, perhaps, were not of my belief but certainly were raised by credible critics as well. Mr. GOLDSMITH. So basically, then, you saw your responsibilities as a consultant to advise the committee generally, and not just with regard to those issues with which you had worked; is that correct? Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TAKING of AMERICA, 1-2-3 by Richard E
    THE TAKING OF AMERICA, 1-2-3 by Richard E. Sprague Richard E. Sprague 1976 Limited First Edition 1976 Revised Second Edition 1979 Updated Third Edition 1985 About the Author 2 Publisher's Word 3 Introduction 4 1. The Overview and the 1976 Election 5 2. The Power Control Group 8 3. You Can Fool the People 10 4. How It All BeganÐThe U-2 and the Bay of Pigs 18 5. The Assassination of John Kennedy 22 6. The Assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King and Lyndon B. Johnson's Withdrawal in 1968 34 7. The Control of the KennedysÐThreats & Chappaquiddick 37 8. 1972ÐMuskie, Wallace and McGovern 41 9. Control of the MediaÐ1967 to 1976 44 10. Techniques and Weapons and 100 Dead Conspirators and Witnesses 72 11. The Pardon and the Tapes 77 12. The Second Line of Defense and Cover-Ups in 1975-1976 84 13. The 1976 Election and Conspiracy Fever 88 14. Congress and the People 90 15. The Select Committee on Assassinations, The Intelligence Community and The News Media 93 16. 1984 Here We ComeÐ 110 17. The Final Cover-Up: How The CIA Controlled The House Select Committee on Assassinations 122 Appendix 133 -2- About the Author Richard E. Sprague is a pioneer in the ®eld of electronic computers and a leading American authority on Electronic Funds Transfer Systems (EFTS). Receiving his BSEE degreee from Purdue University in 1942, his computing career began when he was employed as an engineer for the computer group at Northrup Aircraft. He co-founded the Computer Research Corporation of Hawthorne, California in 1950, and by 1953, serving as Vice President of Sales, the company had sold more computers than any competitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum (Draft)
    MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) January 22, 1996 TO: Jeremy Gunn CC: David Marwell FROM: Doug Horne SUBJECT: Issues for ARRB to Pursue with Kodak in Response to the Kodak Letter of January 7, 1997 1. Following review of Kodak’s letter to ARRB dated January 7, 1997, I recommend ARRB consider further pursuit of the following issues with Kodak: a. Highest Priority: (1) Roll of 120 Film from Autopsy: Digitally scan, and enhance to the greatest extent possible, the 3 extremely dark positive images (apparently post mortem autopsy photographs of President Kennedy) found on the roll of 120 Ektachrome color transparency film which is part of the Kennedy family deed-of-gift (i.e., the autopsy photograph collection); produce varied-exposure reproductions of the enhanced images in the most appropriate imaging format(s), preferably 8" X 10" in size. [Furthermore, ask Kodak whether Earl McDonald’s hypothesis--that this is simply a roll of Ektachrome E3 color transparency film which was exposed only to ambient room light (without properly synchronized flash illumination) when the shutter was opened to expose the three images in question, subsequently “flashed” (i.e., intentionally pulled out of the camera and exposed to ambient light), and developed normally--could be valid.] (2) Zapruder Film (Original): Digitally scan the original Zapruder film, analyze the image content, and record the digitized film image content on CD ROM for retention in the National Archives. [Types of analysis should include motion-related questions (such as whether or not the image content
    [Show full text]
  • Zapruder Film
    Zapruder Film Books - Articles - Videos - Collections - Oral Histories - YouTube - Websites Visit our Library Catalog for complete list of books, magazines, and videos. Books Bugliosi, Vincent. Four Days in November: The Assassination of President Kennedy. New York: W.W. Norton, 2007. Chambers, Paul G. Head Shot: The Science Behind the John F. Kennedy Assassination. New York: Prometheus, 2010. Fagin, Stephen. Assassination and Commemoration: JFK, Dallas and The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 2013. Phillips, Sandra S. and Simon Baker. Exposed: Voyeurism, Surveillance and the Camera Since 1870. San Francisco: Yale University Press, 2010. Sullivan, Robert ed. The Day Kennedy Died: 50 years Later LIFE Remembers the Man and the Moment. New York: LIFE, 2013. Trask, Richard B. National Nightmare on Six Feet of Film: Mr. Zapruder's Home Movie and the Murder of President Kennedy. Danvers, MA: Yeoman Press, 2005. The Witnesses: The Highlights of Hearings before the Warren Commission of the Assassination of President Kennedy. New York: Bantam Books, 1964. Wrone, David R. The Zapruder Film: Reframing JFK's Assassination. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2003. United States. The President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy. Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964. [Available online at http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/] Vagnes, Oyvind. Zaprudered: The Kennedy Assassination Film in Visual Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2011. Young, Anne M. ed. Rights & Reproductions: A Handbook for Cultural Institutions. Indianapolis: American Alliance of Museums, 2015. Articles “Did Oswald Act Alone? A Matter of Reasonable Doubt: Frame 230 from the Film.” LIFE 25 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • A 3-D Lighting and Shadow Analysis of the JFK Zapruder Film (Frame 317)
    A 3-D Lighting and Shadow Analysis of the JFK Zapruder Film (Frame 317) Hany Farid Department of Computer Science 6211 Sudikoff Lab Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 603.646.2761 (tel) 603.646.1672 (fax) [email protected] Abstract Claims of a broader conspiracy behind U.S. President John F. Kennedy's assassination have persisted for the past nearly five decades. The Zapruder film is considered to be the most complete recording of JFK's assassination. Many have claimed that this 8mm film was manipulated to conceal evidence of a second shooter, which would invalidate the claim that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, was responsible for JFK's assassination. Here we con- sider the viability of one specific claim of postproduction tampering in the Zapruder film. 1. Introduction United States President John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22nd, 1963 while his procession was driving through Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas. Shortly afterwards, Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested and charged with the crime. Because he was killed before his trial, and the conclusions of the Warren Commission[1] have been challenged, many questions surrounding the assassination remained unanswered. Since this time, numerous theories have circulated suggesting that Oswald acted as part of a larger criminal con- spiracy involving a variety of government, international, or criminal groups. Abraham Zapruder captured the most complete documentation of the events of November 22nd with his Bell & Howell 8mm roll film camera. After Figure 1: Frame 317 of the Zapruder film (left), and a magnified view of JFK { the authenticity of the shadow on the back of JFK's head has been called into question.
    [Show full text]
  • Zapruder Film
    Zapruder film From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Frame 150 from the Zapruder Film The Zapruder film is a silent, 8 mm color home movie shot by Abraham Zapruder in Dallas, Texas, in Dealey Plaza while standing near "the grassy knoll" during the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. It is the definitive, most authoritative footage of the assassination. Contents [hide] • 1 Background • 2 History • 3 Use in "JFK" • 4 External links [edit] Background Zapruder filmed the scene with a Model 414 PD Bell & Howell Zoomatic Director Series Camera that operated via a spring-wound mechanism at an average tested speed of 18.3 frames-per-second. The entire Dealey Plaza exposed film frames lasts 26.6 seconds, with the presidential assassination sequence occupying 19.3 seconds. There are 486 frames altogether. The sequence is recorded on Kodak Kodachrome II 8 mm movie safety film. Zapruder, who suffered from vertigo, made the film while being steadied by his receptionist, Marilyn Sitzman, standing on the most western of two concrete pedestals which extend from the John Neely Bryan north pergola cement structure, overlooking Elm street in Dealey Plaza. President Kennedy's automobile was below and almost exactly in front of Zapruder on Elm Street, at the time of his fatal wound to the head. The film has been used by the Warren Commission and all subsequent investigations of the assassination. The Zapruder frames used by the Commission consist of exhibits 889–899 plus exhibits 901 and 902 (totaling less than 1 second of the actual 26.6 second film), published in the commission supporting volume XVIII.
    [Show full text]