DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidance for Macros in Powerpoints

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidance for Macros in Powerpoints Guidance for Macros in PowerPoints We use macros within PowerPoints to increase the interactivity of our presentations. Follow this simple process to get the most out of this resource. What to do: Open the PowerPoint file and enable editing. A security warning box may appear. Click yes. Click enable content. Enter presentation mode (start the slide show). Science Scientists and Inventors Science | Year 6 | ScientistsYear and Inventors One | Mary Leakey | Lesson 5 Aim • To understand the life of Mary Leakey and her work about fossils. Success Criteria • I can describe what I know about the evolution of humans. • I can sort facts about Mary Leakey’s life and work. • I can describe what the fossils found by Mary Leakey tell us about human evolution. Evolution of Humans ThereEvolution is much is a scientificdiscussion theory, between or scientistsan explanation about ofthe evolutionhow living of things humans. developed Scientists on Earth.analyse It the is supported fossils of earlyby an ancestorsoverwhelming of humans, bank of called evidence. hominins, to find out the stages that led to the evolution of Homo sapiens, or modern-day humans. Evolution explains the changes that occur in a species living in a particular area over time. These changes Althoughare inherited scientists changes sometimes that are disagreepassed on from one aboutgeneration the analysis to another. of particular fossils, they agree on the overall picture of human evolution. How Did Humans Evolve? Scientists have analysed the DNA of humans and apes, such as chimpanzees. They have found that humans are related to these apes, but humans have not evolved from them. This means that humans and apes shared a common ancestor, but humans evolved separately and differently to the apes. The shared ancestor of humans and chimpanzees lived around the time of a creature called Sahelanthropus tchadensis. Some scientists believe that Sahelanthropus tchadensis is our shared ancestor. How Did Humans Evolve? Can you place the different species of hominins in the order they evolved? Start with Sahelanthropus tchadensis and end with Homo sapiens (modern-day humans). Click on each species, to find out if you are right. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sahelanthropus Homo Ardipithecus Homo Australopithecus Homo tchadensis habilis ramidus erectus afarensis sapiens Mary Leakey Mary Leakey was a British paleoanthropologist who discovered many fossils of early hominins and their tools. These fossils provide evidence for the evolution of humans. Leakey worked with her husband Louis at various archaeological sites. For much of her career, she worked at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania in Africa. After Louis died, Leakey became director of excavations at Olduvai. Mary Leakey EarlyIn 1926, Life Mary and her mother returned to live in London Maryafter herLeakey father was died born of Marycancer. Douglas Mary attended Nicol in Londonan English in February 1913. school for the first time, but she did not settle in well. She was expelled from two different schools, and eventuallyAs a child, hershe motherspent lots hired of timea nanny in France to tutor her. with her family. On one of their visits, Mary was allowed to join in an Maryarchaeological continued excavation, to be very interestedand took a in archaeology,tour of a cave but to viewno university prehistoric would accept her applicationpaintings. These because experiences of her school began record. her interest in prehistory and archaeology. Mary Leakey Career InsteadThe Leakeys of continuing moved to herAfrica education, and Mary applied to join in archaeologicalbegan an excavation excavations project around in England. At the age of 17, she got a jobOlduvai as an Gorge illustrator in Tanzania. at a Stone In 1948,Age dig in Hembury. Her illustrations of toolsMary wereLeakey so madegood thather firstother anthropologists and archaeologists wanted toincredible employ discovery.her. SheIn the found 1930s, a fossilised Louis Leakey skull employedfrom Mary to Proconsulillustrate his africanus, book about an ancestor human evolution.of They humanssoon became and apes.a couple It was and believed got married to in 1937. beThey 18 formedmillion oneyears of old.the science world's most famous teams. Mary Leakey Later Life and Legacy In 1959, Mary Leakey made another Louisdiscovery, Leakey this died time in while 1972, herbut husbandMary continued was her research.resting in Intheir 1979, camp. she discoveredShe discovered a trail a newof early homininspecies of footprints hominin thatat Laetoli, she and about Louis 45km called from OlduvaiZinjanthropus Gorge. boisei, but is now known as Australopithecus boisei or Paranthropus boisei. The fossil was dated at 2 million Maryyears Leakeyold. died in 1996 in Kenya. Her children and grandchildren now carry on her work. In 1960, the Leakey team found many stone tools and fossils of Homo habilis in Olduvai Gorge. Mary Leakey Sorting Statements Can you sort the statements on your Mary Leakey Activity Sheet to show whether they are true or false? What Did Leakey's Fossils Prove? Leakey's achievements include the discovery of fossilised footprints and tools used by Homo habilis. Fossilised footprints Olduvai Gorge, where Leakey at Laetoli, Africa. excavated many stone tools. “Earliest known human footprints - australopithecus afarensis - Smithsonian Museum of “Olduvai_2012 05 31_2823” by [Harvey Barrison] is licensed under CC BY 2.0 Natural History - 2012-05-17” by [Tim Evanson] is licensed under CC BY 2.0 What Did Leakey's Fossils Prove? The fossilisedfootprints footprints were so significant that Leakey because found theywere provided extremely important. Shethe oldestfound knownand excavated evidence them of bipedalism at Laetoli (walking in Tanzania on twoin the late 1970s, andlegs), they proving have that been these dated early to 3.7 hominins million yearswalked ago. upright. TheThis footprintsshows a difference were tracked between through this species and their aancestors, layer of volcanicwho would ash, have and walkedwere left on all fours. byLeakey's two or find three proved individuals that changes of the were occurring sameover time, species. proving human evolution. It is not known for certain which species made the footprints. Most scientists think it was likely to have been Australopithecus afarensis. What Did Leakey's Fossils Prove? Leakey explainedfound many that stone this toolsshows at the Olduvai species Gorge, was developing social interactionsuch as hand and axes. communal These tools activity. have Addedbeen dated to the to increased thinking skillsaround needed 2 million to create years the ago. tools, Other this fossils shows found that atHomo habilis was increasinglythe site suggest changing that the to toolsmore were recognisably made and modern used human behaviour. by Homo habilis. The tools were an important discovery because they show another evolutionary change. The tools were found in a central area, along with fossilised animal remains. Explaining Excavations OnImagine your Explainingthat you are Excavations Mary Leakey Activity and you Sheet want you have a grid. Your partnerto identify has the a slightly location different of the missingone. Keep evidence your grids - secret from each other. the footprints or the tools. WithoutOne grid looking shows theat your location partner's of a grid,set of take footprints, turns while the other grid toshows guess the a gridlocation reference. of some If there stone is tools. a fossil there, your partner will tell you what it is and you should draw it in the correct place on your grid. If there is nothing there, your partner will tell you. The aim of this activity is to identify the location of all the missing fossil evidence. Explaining Excavations Once you have identified the location of the missing fossils, explain the importance of the fossils on your activity sheet. Important Discoveries Mary Leakey found many fossils over the course of her career. She discovered 15 new species of fossilised animals, as well as fossils from different hominins. The Laetoli footprints and the Olduvai Gorge tools are two of her most famous discoveries. Which of her finds, the Laetoli footprints or the Olduvai Gorge tools, do you think was most important? Talk to your partner about your ideas and reasons. Aim • To understand the life of Mary Leakey and her work about fossils. Success Criteria • I can describe what I know about the evolution of humans. • I can sort facts about Mary Leakey’s life and work. • I can describe what the fossils found by Mary Leakey tell us about human evolution. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologists Probe Hominid Environments
    1999 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Geologists Probe Hominid Environments Gail M. Ashley, Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT challenging areas of research often lie at artificially imposed disci- pline boundaries. Here lies the potential for synergy and perhaps The study of an early Pleistocene “time slice” in Olduvai even the generation of a new science (Fig. 2). However, integrat- Gorge, Tanzania, provides a successful example of a recon- ing sciences is not as easy as it might first appear. It requires peo- structed paleolandscape that is rich in detail and adds a small ple to learn language, theories, methodologies, and a bit about piece to the puzzle of hominid evolution in Africa. The recon- the “culture” of the other science and to continually walk in the struction required multidisciplinary interaction of sedimen- other person’s shoes. Simply having lots of scientists with differ- tologists, paleoanthropologists, paleoecologists, and geochro- ent backgrounds working in parallel on the same project doesn’t nologists. Geology plays an increasingly important role in produce the same end result as integrative science. unraveling the record of hominid evolution. Key questions This paper describes a study at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania (Fig. regarding paleoclimate, paleoenvironment, and perhaps even 3), using a relatively new approach, landscape paleoanthropol- hominid land use are answered by geology, and these answers ogy, that attempts to interpret the landscape during a geologic provide a basis for multidisciplinary work. Landscape pale- instant in time. The project is the Olduvai Landscape Paleo- oanthropology integrates these data from several disciplines anthropology Project (OLAPP), involving a multidisciplinary to interpret the ecological context of hominids during a nar- team.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Habilis
    COMMENT SUSTAINABILITY Citizens and POLICY End the bureaucracy THEATRE Shakespeare’s ENVIRONMENT James Lovelock businesses must track that is holding back science world was steeped in on surprisingly optimistic governments’ progress p.33 in India p.36 practical discovery p.39 form p.41 The foot of the apeman that palaeo­ ‘handy man’, anthropologists had been Homo habilis. recovering in southern Africa since the 1920s. This, the thinking went, was replaced by the taller, larger-brained Homo erectus from Asia, which spread to Europe and evolved into Nean­ derthals, which evolved into Homo sapiens. But what lay between the australopiths and H. erectus, the first known human? BETTING ON AFRICA Until the 1960s, H. erectus had been found only in Asia. But when primitive stone-chop­ LIBRARY PICTURE EVANS MUSEUM/MARY HISTORY NATURAL ping tools were uncovered at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, Leakey became convinced that this is where he would find the earliest stone- tool makers, who he assumed would belong to our genus. Maybe, like the australopiths, our human ancestors also originated in Africa. In 1931, Leakey began intensive prospect­ ing and excavation at Olduvai Gorge, 33 years before he announced the new human species. Now tourists travel to Olduvai on paved roads in air-conditioned buses; in the 1930s in the rainy season, the journey from Nairobi could take weeks. The ravines at Olduvai offered unparalleled access to ancient strata, but field­ work was no picnic in the park. Water was often scarce. Leakey and his team had to learn to share Olduvai with all of the wild animals that lived there, lions included.
    [Show full text]
  • Hands-On Human Evolution: a Laboratory Based Approach
    Hands-on Human Evolution: A Laboratory Based Approach Developed by Margarita Hernandez Center for Precollegiate Education and Training Author: Margarita Hernandez Curriculum Team: Julie Bokor, Sven Engling A huge thank you to….. Contents: 4. Author’s note 5. Introduction 6. Tips about the curriculum 8. Lesson Summaries 9. Lesson Sequencing Guide 10. Vocabulary 11. Next Generation Sunshine State Standards- Science 12. Background information 13. Lessons 122. Resources 123. Content Assessment 129. Content Area Expert Evaluation 131. Teacher Feedback Form 134. Student Feedback Form Lesson 1: Hominid Evolution Lab 19. Lesson 1 . Student Lab Pages . Student Lab Key . Human Evolution Phylogeny . Lab Station Numbers . Skeletal Pictures Lesson 2: Chromosomal Comparison Lab 48. Lesson 2 . Student Activity Pages . Student Lab Key Lesson 3: Naledi Jigsaw 77. Lesson 3 Author’s note Introduction Page The validity and importance of the theory of biological evolution runs strong throughout the topic of biology. Evolution serves as a foundation to many biological concepts by tying together the different tenants of biology, like ecology, anatomy, genetics, zoology, and taxonomy. It is for this reason that evolution plays a prominent role in the state and national standards and deserves thorough coverage in a classroom. A prime example of evolution can be seen in our own ancestral history, and this unit provides students with an excellent opportunity to consider the multiple lines of evidence that support hominid evolution. By allowing students the chance to uncover the supporting evidence for evolution themselves, they discover the ways the theory of evolution is supported by multiple sources. It is our hope that the opportunity to handle our ancestors’ bone casts and examine real molecular data, in an inquiry based environment, will pique the interest of students, ultimately leading them to conclude that the evidence they have gathered thoroughly supports the theory of evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Lieberman 2001E.Pdf
    news and views Another face in our family tree Daniel E. Lieberman The evolutionary history of humans is complex and unresolved. It now looks set to be thrown into further confusion by the discovery of another species and genus, dated to 3.5 million years ago. ntil a few years ago, the evolutionary history of our species was thought to be Ureasonably straightforward. Only three diverse groups of hominins — species more closely related to humans than to chim- panzees — were known, namely Australo- pithecus, Paranthropus and Homo, the genus to which humans belong. Of these, Paran- MUSEUMS OF KENYA NATIONAL thropus and Homo were presumed to have evolved between two and three million years ago1,2 from an early species in the genus Australopithecus, most likely A. afarensis, made famous by the fossil Lucy. But lately, confusion has been sown in the human evolutionary tree. The discovery of three new australopithecine species — A. anamensis3, A. garhi 4 and A. bahrelghazali5, in Kenya, Ethiopia and Chad, respectively — showed that genus to be more diverse and Figure 1 Two fossil skulls from early hominin species. Left, KNM-WT 40000. This newly discovered widespread than had been thought. Then fossil is described by Leakey et al.8. It is judged to represent a new species, Kenyanthropus platyops. there was the finding of another, as yet poorly Right, KNM-ER 1470. This skull was formerly attributed to Homo rudolfensis1, but might best be understood, genus of early hominin, Ardi- reassigned to the genus Kenyanthropus — the two skulls share many similarities, such as the flatness pithecus, which is dated to 4.4 million years of the face and the shape of the brow.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Goodall: a Timeline 3
    Discussion Guide Table of Contents The Life of Jane Goodall: A Timeline 3 Growing Up: Jane Goodall’s Mission Starts Early 5 Louis Leakey and the ‘Trimates’ 7 Getting Started at Gombe 9 The Gombe Community 10 A Family of Her Own 12 A Lifelong Mission 14 Women in the Biological Sciences Today 17 Jane Goodall, in Her Own Words 18 Additional Resources for Further Study 19 © 2017 NGC Network US, LLC and NGC Network International, LLC. All rights reserved. 2 Journeys in Film : JANE The Life of Jane Goodall: A Timeline April 3, 1934 Valerie Jane Morris-Goodall is born in London, England. 1952 Jane graduates from secondary school, attends secretarial school, and gets a job at Oxford University. 1957 At the invitation of a school friend, Jane sails to Kenya, meets Dr. Louis Leakey, and takes a job as his secretary. 1960 Jane begins her observations of the chimpanzees at what was then Gombe Stream Game Reserve, taking careful notes. Her mother is her companion from July to November. 1961 The chimpanzee Jane has named David Greybeard accepts her, leading to her acceptance by the other chimpanzees. 1962 Jane goes to Cambridge University to pursue a doctorate, despite not having any undergraduate college degree. After the first term, she returns to Africa to continue her study of the chimpanzees. She continues to travel back and forth between Cambridge and Gombe for several years. Baron Hugo van Lawick, a photographer for National Geographic, begins taking photos and films at Gombe. 1964 Jane and Hugo marry in England and return to Gombe.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection
    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, pages 35-21 3 Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection Ceri Shipton Access 3.1 Introduction Louis Seymour Bazett Leakey is considered to be the founding father of palaeoanthropology, and his donation of some 6,747 artefacts from several Kenyan sites to the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) make his one of the largest collections in the Museum. Leakey was passionate aboutopen human evolution and Africa, and was able to prove that the deep roots of human ancestry lay in his native east Africa. At Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania he excavated an extraordinary sequence of Pleistocene human evolution, discovering several hominin species and naming the earliest known human culture: the Oldowan. At Olorgesailie, Kenya, he excavated an Acheulean site that is still influential in our understanding of Lower Pleistocene human behaviour. On Rusinga Island in Lake Victoria, Kenya he found the Miocene ape ancestor Proconsul. He obtained funding to establish three of the most influential primatologists in their field, dubbed Leakey’s ‘ape women’; Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey and Birute Galdikas, who pioneered the study of chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan behaviour respectively. His second wife Mary Leakey, whom he first hired as an artefact illustrator, went on to be a great researcher in her own right, surpassing Louis’ work with her own excavations at Olduvai Gorge. Mary and Louis’ son Richard followed his parents’ career path initially, discovering many of the most important hominin fossils including KNM WT 15000 (the Nariokotome boy, a near complete Homo ergaster skeleton), KNM WT 17000 (the type specimen for Paranthropus aethiopicus), and KNM ER 1470 (the type specimen for Homo rudolfensis with an extremely well preserved Archaeopressendocranium).
    [Show full text]
  • Paranthropus Through the Looking Glass COMMENTARY Bernard A
    COMMENTARY Paranthropus through the looking glass COMMENTARY Bernard A. Wooda,1 and David B. Pattersona,b Most research and public interest in human origins upper jaw fragment from Malema in Malawi is the focuses on taxa that are likely to be our ancestors. southernmost evidence. However, most of what we There must have been genetic continuity between know about P. boisei comes from fossils from Koobi modern humans and the common ancestor we share Fora on the eastern shore of Lake Turkana (4) and from with chimpanzees and bonobos, and we want to know sites in the Nachukui Formation on the western side of what each link in this chain looked like and how it be- the lake (Fig. 1A). haved. However, the clear evidence for taxic diversity The cranial and dental morphology of P.boisei is so in the human (aka hominin) clade means that we also distinctive its remains are relatively easy to identify (5). have close relatives who are not our ancestors (1). Two Unique features include its flat, wide, and deep face, papers in PNAS focus on the behavior and paleoenvi- flexed cranial base, large and thick lower jaw, and ronmental context of Paranthropus boisei, a distinctive small incisors and canines combined with massive and long-extinct nonancestral relative that lived along- chewing teeth. The surface area available for process- side our early Homo ancestors in eastern Africa between ing food is extended both forward—by having premo- just less than 3 Ma and just over 1 Ma. Both papers use lar teeth that look like molars—and backward—by the stable isotopes to track diet during a largely unknown, unusually large third molar tooth crowns, all of which but likely crucial, period in our evolutionary history.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania.Pdf
    FEATURE Tanzania field school Shaping Students and Communities in Tanzania ummer 2007: 13 students and And, of high importance to students, it costs going way back to when I was an undergrad.” two professors from UC Denver much less than most other field schools. Musiba also reached out to universities are awakened in the middle of All of those benefits and partnerships are around the globe, including the University S the night by noises normally only the result of Musiba’s relationships with locals, of Kyoto in Japan and the Bugando University heard in a zoo. Although many lie awake in his passion for the country and his drive to College of Health Sciences in Mwanza, Tanzania. their tents, one among them sleeps peacefully. create global citizens of his students. “When I talk to people at anthropology Charles Musiba, assistant professor of meetings and tell them that our field school only anthropology, was born in Tanzania, Africa, In the Beginning costs about $4,500, I tell them that it’s because and now directs UCD’s Tanzania Field School. “I was myself a graduate student and saw that we do a lot of cost sharing with these partners.” He’s been taking I could become a bridge to Tanzania and help students to his my fellow graduate students gain access to new country for 11 years. areas for their research,” says Musiba. “But The field most existing field schools in Africa are very school is located expensive. Those run at schools like Rutgers, in the Ngorongoro Harvard and Yale cost between $6,000 to Conservation Area $7,000 just for tuition, not counting airfare.” in northern Tanzania Musiba began collaborating with people he and, according to all knew in Tanzania, and they smoothed out a accounts, it offers normally difficult process.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation of Northern Tanzania During the Plio-Pleistocene: a Synthesis of the Paleobotanical Evidences from Laetoli, Olduvai, and Peninj Hominin Sites
    Quaternary International 322-323 (2014) 264e276 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Vegetation of Northern Tanzania during the Plio-Pleistocene: A synthesis of the paleobotanical evidences from Laetoli, Olduvai, and Peninj hominin sites Doris Barboni CEREGE, Aix-Marseille University, UM34, CNRS, IRD, Europole de l’Arbois, BP80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence cedex 4, France article info abstract Article history: More than 40 years of scientific investigations of the hominin bearing Plio-Pleistocene sediments of Available online 5 February 2014 northern Tanzania have provided a number of paleobotanical data, which, taken as a whole, provide today a way to investigate vegetation changes between 4 and 1 Ma, at a time when our early ancestors emerged. Here, I have integrated the data from all vegetation proxies obtained for the paleontological sites of Laetoli, Olduvai, and Peninj (i.e. macroscopic plant remains, pollen and phytolith assemblages, carbon and oxygen isotopic ratios measured on carbonates, and organic biomarkers). This important, yet discontinuous botanical record suggests some similarities between past and present-day vegetation at the regional scale: Afromontane forests with Olea, Podocarpus, Juniperus, Hagenia abyssinica in the highlands, and wooded grasslands with grasses and drought-adapted Acacia, Commiphora, Cappar- idaceae, and Chenopodiaceae and/or Amaranthaceae in the lowlands were present in the southern SerengetieCrater Highlands region since 4 Ma. Grasses of the C4 photosynthetic type made their first appearance in the record at w3.7 Ma, i.e. during the mid-Pliocene, w700 ky before major pCO2 and temperature decline. C4 grasses became dominant in the vegetation soon after (w3.66 Ma), probably in response to reduced precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrison CV Jan 2018
    January 4, 2018 Terry Harrison CURRICULUM VITAE CONTACT INFORMATION * Center for the Study of Human Origins Department of Anthropology 25 Waverly Place New York University New York, NY 10003-6790, USA 8 [email protected] ) 212-998-8581 WEB LINKS http://anthropology.as.nyu.edu/object/terryharrison.html http://csho.as.nyu.edu/object/terryharrison.html https://nyu.academia.edu/TerryHarrison http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4224-0152 zoobank.org:author:43DA2256-CF4D-476F-8EA8-FBCE96317505 ACADEMIC BACKGROUND Graduate: 1978–1982: Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Anthropology, University College London, London. Doctoral dissertation: Small-bodied Apes from the Miocene of East Africa. 1981–1982: Postgraduate Certificate of Education. Institute of Education, London University, London. Awarded with Distinction. Undergraduate: 1975–1978: Bachelor of Science. Department of Anthropology, University College London, London. First Class Honours. POSITIONS 2014- Silver Professor, Department of Anthropology, New York University. 2003- Director, Center for the Study of Human Origins, New York University. 1995- Professor, Department of Anthropology, New York University. 2010-2016 Chair, Department of Anthropology, New York University. 1995-2010 Associate Chair, Department of Anthropology, New York University. 1990-1995 Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology, New York University. 1984-1990 Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, New York University. HONORS & AWARDS 1977 Rosa Morison Memorial Medal and Prize, University College London. 1978 Daryll Forde Award, University College London. 1989 Golden Dozen Award for excellence in teaching, New York University. 1996 Golden Dozen Award for excellence in teaching, New York University. 2002 Distinguished Teacher Award, New York University. 2006 Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic Evidence for the Timing of the Dietary Shift Toward C4 Foods in Eastern African Paranthropus Jonathan G
    Isotopic evidence for the timing of the dietary shift toward C4 foods in eastern African Paranthropus Jonathan G. Wynna,1, Zeresenay Alemsegedb, René Bobec,d, Frederick E. Grinee, Enquye W. Negashf, and Matt Sponheimerg aDivision of Earth Sciences, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA 22314; bDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; cSchool of Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdom; dGorongosa National Park, Sofala, Mozambique; eDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794; fCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052; and gDepartment of Anthropology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80302 Edited by Thure E. Cerling, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved July 28, 2020 (received for review April 2, 2020) New approaches to the study of early hominin diets have refreshed the early evolution of the genus. Was the diet of either P. boisei or interest in how and when our diets diverged from those of other P. robustus similar to that of the earliest members of the genus, or did African apes. A trend toward significant consumption of C4 foods in thedietsofbothdivergefromanearliertypeofdiet? hominins after this divergence has emerged as a landmark event in Key to addressing the pattern and timing of dietary shift(s) in human evolution, with direct evidence provided by stable carbon Paranthropus is an appreciation of the morphology and dietary isotope studies. In this study, we report on detailed carbon isotopic habits of the earliest member of the genus, Paranthropus evidence from the hominin fossil record of the Shungura and Usno aethiopicus, and how those differ from what is observed in later Formations, Lower Omo Valley, Ethiopia, which elucidates the pat- representatives of the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Mammal Evidence for the Paleoenvironment of the Upper Laetolil and Upper Ndolanya Beds of Laetoli, Tanzania
    Chapter 19 Large Mammal Evidence for the Paleoenvironment of the Upper Laetolil and Upper Ndolanya Beds of Laetoli, Tanzania Denise F. Su Abstract There has been much debate on the environment of faunal and paleoecological analyses (papers in Leakey and Pliocene Laetoli. These disagreements reflect the complexity Harris 1987; Reed 1997; Kovarovic and Andrews 2007; Su and of the paleoenvironment and the difficulties in reconciling Harrison 2007, 2008), it is clear that Pliocene Laetoli was most contradictory evidence. In this paper, the community struc- likely ecologically heterogenous, but it is unclear as to the ture of the large mammal fauna at Laetoli is compared to that proportion and the changes in the geographical and temporal of modern faunal communities and the relative abundances distribution of the different habitats. Taphonomic and geologic of bovid tribes are examined. The results of these analyses analyses suggest that the heterogeneity seen in the Laetoli large are interpreted within the context of other lines of evidence, mammal fauna was not the result of time-averaged and trans- including those based on rodents, gastropods, phytoliths, sta- ported assemblages, but rather a reflection of the mosaic nature ble isotopes and mesowear. The balance of evidence suggests of the environment at the time of deposition (Su and Harrison that the ecology of the Upper Laetolil Beds was a mosaic of 2007, 2008). The lack of higher-level resolution in the data and grassland-shrubland-open woodland habitats with extensive the difficulty in resolving and integrating the contradictory woody vegetation in the form of shrubs, thickets, and bush. inferences from different lines of evidence are major factors in There was also a significant presence of dense woodland and the debate.
    [Show full text]