DOCSLIB.ORG

The Messiah, Son of David

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Messiah, Son of David The Messiah, Son of David An Inquiry into Mark 12:35-37 MASTER THESIS PRESENTED TO PROF. A. B. MERZ AND PROF. M. J. J. MENKEN UTRECHT UNIVERSITY (DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY) By Evert-Jan Prins 0200700 PREFACE An important motif within the Gospel of Mark is the motif of ‘the way’. Like ‘a way’, that is how I have experienced the writing of this thesis. It has been quite a long way. Sometimes, it has been a way of joy, other times it was a way of troubles and reluctance. To start with the troubles: there were moments in which my head was spinning. Deciding between different positions within the debate sometimes gave me the feeling: what do I know about these things? How can I decide which position is right? The joy of the way was the interest in the Gospel of Mark this thesis aroused. The study of Mark sometimes filled me with admiration for the way he has construed his Gospel as a revelation of Jesus’ identity. I would like to thank the professors who have supervised my thesis. In the first place, prof. G. C. M. van Oyen, who has been my supervisor during the first period of my thesis and who has helped me to find a (more or less demarcated) subject for my thesis. Furthermore, I would like to express my gratitude to prof. A. B. Merz for the instructive tutorials and the critical remarks to the manuscript she has made. I appreciate that she was willing to take over the supervision of prof. Van Oyen. Thanks too are due to prof. M. J. J. Menken, the ‘second supervisor’, and to Gert Sollie, who has checked my English idiom. Finally, I would like to thank my friends, family, and fellow students who have shown interest in the progress of my thesis and with whom I could share the joys and troubles of writing a thesis. Evert-Jan Prins Houten, August 2009 2 CONTENTS PREFACE 2 INTRODUCTION 5 The Pericope 5 Interpretation in Modern Scholarship 6 Structure of the Thesis 9 1. IMAGES OF THE ‘SON OF DAVID’ IN JUDAISM 11 1.1. Introduction 11 1.2. Old Testament Background 11 1.2.1. Divine Promises about the Davidic Dynasty 11 1.2.2. The Future Davidic King 13 1.2.3. King and Messiah 14 1.3. The Expectation of a Davidic Messiah in Early Judaism 15 1.3.1. The Psalms of Solomon: the Royal Messiah 15 1.3.2. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs 18 1.3.3. The Fourth Book of Ezra 19 1.3.4. Qumran: the Messiah as Aaronite and Davidide 20 1.4. ‘Son of David’ as a Solomonic Healer 24 1.5. Conclusion 27 2. THE INTERPRETATION OF PSALM 110 IN JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN EXEGESIS 30 2.1. The ‘Original Meaning’ of Psalm 110:1 30 2.2. Interpretation of Psalm 110 in Jewish Exegesis 31 2.2.1. Non-Rabbinic Interpretations 32 2.2.2. Later Jewish Interpretations 35 2.3. Interpretation of Psalm 110 in Early Christian Exegesis 37 2.4. Conclusion 39 3. MARK 12:35-37 WITHIN THE NARRATIVE OF MARK 41 3.1. The Structure of the Gospel of Mark 41 3.2. Jesus in Jerusalem (Mark 10:46-12:44) 45 3.2.1. Mark 10:46-52 45 3 3.2.2. Mark 11:1-12:12 45 3.2.3. Mark 12:13-44 46 3.2.4. The Structure of Mark 10:46-12:44 51 3.3. Occurrences of ‘Son of David’ in the Gospel of Mark: 10:47-48 and 11:10 51 3.3.1. Mark 10:47-48 51 3.3.2. Mark 11:9-10 55 3.4. Mark 12:35-37 58 3.4.1. The Structure of Mark 12:35-37 58 3.4.2. Jesus Teaching in the Temple (12:35a) 59 3.4.3. The Question about the Messiah (12:35b-37b) 60 3.4.4. “And the Great Throng Heard Him with Joy” (12:37c) 64 3.5. Conclusion 64 4. MARK AND THE OLD TESTAMENT 66 4.1. Mark’s Use of Old Testament Quotations 66 4.1.1. Mark within the Parameters of Scripture 66 4.1.2. Text Form of Mark’s Old Testament Quotations 68 4.1.3. Jewish Background of Mark’s Use of Old Testament Quotations 68 4.1.4. Explicit Quotations and Allusions 70 4.1.5. Function of the Old Testament Quotations in Mark 71 4.1.6. Conclusion 75 4.2. Mark’s Use of Psalm 110:1 76 4.2.1. Text Form of Mark 12:36 76 4.2.2. The Function of Psalm 110:1 in Mark 12:35-37 77 5. THE CHRISTOLOGY OF MARK 80 5.1. Introduction 80 5.2. Christological Titles in Mark 82 5.2.1. Messiah (cristo,j) 82 5.2.2. Son of God (ui`o.j tou/ qeou/) 86 5.2.3. Lord (ku,rioj) 91 5.2.4. Son of Man (ui`o.j tou/ avnqrw,pou) 93 5.3. Conclusion 97 CONCLUSION 99 Position 99 Further Inquiry 104 BIBLIOGRAPHY 106 4 INTRODUCTION The Pericope Mark 12:35-37 is often designated with the German title ‘die Davidssohnfrage’. Jesus is asking a question about the Davidic sonship of the Messiah. In this question, he quotes Ps 110:1. The Greek text (Nestle-Aland27) of the pericope is as follows: 35 Kai. avpokriqei.j o` Ivhsou/j ev,legen dida,skwn evn tw/| i`erw/\ pw/j le,gousin oi` grammatei/j o`,ti o` cristo.j ui`o.j Daui,d evstin* 36 auvto.j Daui.d ei=pen evn tw|/ pneu,mati tw/| a`gi,w|\ ei=pen ku,rioj tw/| kuri,w| mou\ ka,qou evk dexiw/n mou( e[wj a.vn qw/ tou.j evcqrou,j sou u`poka,tw tw/n podw/n souÅ 37 auvto.j Daui.d le,gei auvto.n ku,rion kai. po,qen auvtou/ evstin ui`o,j* Kai. Îo`Ð polu.j o;cloj h;kouen auvtou/ h`de,wjÅ My own, quite literal, translation of Mark 12:35-37: 35 And answering, Jesus said, teaching in the Temple: “How can the scribes say that the Christ/Messiah is the/a son of David? 36 David himself said in the Holy Spirit: The Lord said to my lord: ‘Sit at my right hand till I put your enemies under your feet.’ 37 David himself calls him ‘lord’, why/how is he his son?” And the great throng heard him with joy. This is only a first translation. Later in this thesis I will pay attention to the translational problems within this pericope. The kind of reasoning in the question about the Son of David sounds puzzling. Jesus does not speak directly about his view on the Son of David. It is not clear what he means by this designation. Is he talking about the descent of the Messiah? Or does ‘Son of David’ have more than just a 5 genealogical meaning? The pericope seems to suggest that ‘Son of David’ was used in combination with or with reference to the Messiah in the circles of the scribes. Is it a messianic title then? And what does Ps 110:1 mean in this context? Why is Jesus quoting this psalm? These questions occurred to me after a first reading of Mark 12:35-37 and brought me to write my MA-thesis about the Davidssohnfrage. Interpretation in Modern Scholarship An overview of the research on Mark 12:35-37 has been given by Christoph Burger,1 Gerhard Schneider,2 and Jean-Gaspard Mudiso Mbâ Mundla.3 In this paragraph, the most important scholarly interpretations of Mark 12:25-37 will be discussed. In general, one could say that until the 1960’s there were three main interpretations of Mark 12:35-37.4 The first kind of interpretations understands Jesus’ question only as a sophistic question (‘Vexierfrage’) by which he wants to embarrass his opponents. Jesus does not give his own opinion about the subject but asks this question to keep off his opponents. This interpretation of the Davidssohnfrage was proposed by Robert Paul Gagg.5 To clarify his view, Gagg reconstructs an introductory question of Jesus’ opponents, like: “You are (also) teaching that the Messiah is a son of David, aren’t you?”6 Gagg’s interpretation of Mark 12:35-37 is in short: “Jesu Wort zum Davidssohn enthält keine betont lehrhafte Zuspitzung, sondern hat seinen Zweck in der Abwehr einer verführerischen Zumutung.”7 Neither does Mark 12:35-37 contribute to a theology or Christology of the New Testament.8 Gagg’s interpretation does not have many followers, although in the nineties of the last century Robert H. Gundry also defended that “Jesus is exposing the scribes, not answering christological questions.”9 However, most scholars have criticised this interpretation.10 In my opinion, Gagg’s interpretation is not right, because it is arbitrary to assume a question before Jesus’ own question. Gagg’s claim that this pericope does not contribute to a theology of the New Testament is not very convincing. The Davidssohnfrage contains titles such as ‘Lord’ and ‘Messiah’, titles that play an important role within the Christology of the New Testament. It seems that the Davidssohnfrage is connected to Jesus’ identity, which is also one of the central themes in the Gospel 1 Christoph Burger, Jesus als Davidssohn. Eine Traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. FRLANT 98 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970), 52-57. 2 Gerhard Schneider, “Die Davidssohnfrage (Mk 12,35-37),” Bib 53 (1972): 66-81.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timeline of Old Testament Books & Their Parts
    Timeline of Old Testament Books & their Parts Timeline Historical Circumstances Torah/Pentateuch Historical Books Writings/Wisdom Lit. Prophets 1000 BC United Monarchy Yahwists begin national epic Psalms (1000–400s?) under David & Solomon Proverbs (950–450?) 922 Divided Monarchy Elohists write national epic for Elijah and Elisha Northern Kingdom = Israel the north capital, Samaria Southern Kingdom = Judah Hosea and Amos preach in capital Jerusalem Israel; Micah preaches in Judah 760 Isaiah of Jerusalem advises Assyria destroys Israel Judean king against alliances 721 (most of Isa 1–39) and reduces Judah to a vassal state; then must pull troops out to fight Babylon back in the East Job (600s–400s?) Deuteronomists edit Amos 622 King Josiah reunifies nation (2:4-5; 3:7) Deuteronomists (Josiah’s Deuteronomists write Joshua, under the old covenant, then is scribes) merge J and E and Judges, 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Nahum prophesies against As- killed at the Battle of Megiddo in syria just before Babylonians de- take up the story from Moses’ Kings 609 BCE stroy it; Zephaniah prophesies final words to a history of the Ruth? 587 Babylon destroys Judah vs. idol worship; Habakkuk people in the promised land; prophesies of the coming Baby- kills Davidic line and exiles top Dtrs write and revise through the lonian threat leadership to Babylon, but then Babylonian Exile must fight off Persia to east Jeremiah and Ezekiel 539 Persia defeats Babylon Priestly writers regroup nation, The Chronicler writes 1 & 2 prophesy before and through and allows the Jewish
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus As the Son of Man in Mark Andres A
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2014 Jesus as the Son of Man in Mark Andres A. Tejada-Lalinde [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI14040867 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Tejada-Lalinde, Andres A., "Jesus as the Son of Man in Mark" (2014). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1175. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1175 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida JESUS AS THE SON OF MAN IN MARK A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in RELIGIOUS STUDIES by Andrés Tejada-Lalinde 2014 To: Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Sciences This thesis, written by Andrés Tejada-Lalinde, and entitled Jesus as the Son of Man in Mark, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. Ana María Bidegain Christine Gudorf Erik Larson, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2014. The thesis of Andrés Tejada-Lalinde is approved. Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Sciences Dean Lakshmi N.
    [Show full text]
  • David's Heir: the Five Prophecies of the Davidic Covenant; Three Words in the Covenant Establishing Perpetuity of Davidic King
    David’s Heir: The Five Prophecies of the Davidic Covenant; Three Words in the Covenant Establishing Perpetuity of Davidic Kings: “House, Kingdom, Throne,” 2 Sam 7:16; Matthew’s Messianic Genealogy of Jesus: the Chart Pedigree, Matt 1:1; Uses of the Title “Messiah”: the Anointed One, Ps 18:50; 89:20, 28–29, 34–36; 132:11 16. The Lord now reveals to Nathan the eternal significance of this covenant to David: 2 Samuel 7:16 - “Your [ David’s ] house [ the Davidic bloodline ] and your kingdom [ Israel ] shall endure before Me forever [ the kingdom is permanent ]; your throne shall be established forever [ rulership of the Davidic line through Christ is eternal ]. v. 17 - In accordance with all these words and all these visions, so did Nathan communicate the Davidic Covenant to David. 17. There are five prophecies contained in the Davidic Covenant: (1) David will have a son that will succeed him on the throne of Israel and who will establish his kingdom. (2) That son will be Solomon; it is he that will build the temple. (3) The Davidic dynasty on the throne of Israel is established for eternity. (4) Even though Solomon will fail, enter reversionism, and become involved in idolatry, the covenant will not be broken but remain in force. (5) The house of David, his throne, and his kingdom are established forever. 18. The Lord uses three words in the covenant that expresses the immutability of David’s right to the throne of Israel. 19. The word “house” is ty]B^ (bayith) and it refers to the dynasty of a monarch, in this case the house of David.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of Scripture: the Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A
    The Authority of Scripture: The Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A. Nagasawa, June 2005 Four Main Differences in the Genealogies Provided by Matthew and Luke 1. Is Jesus descended through the line of Solomon (Mt) or the line of Nathan (Lk)? Or both? 2. Are there 27 people from David to Jesus (Mt) or 42 (Lk)? 3. Who was Joseph’s father? Jacob (Mt) or Heli (Lk)? 4. What is the lineage of Shealtiel and Zerubbabel? a. Are they the same father-son pair in Mt as in Lk? (Apparently popular father-son names were repeated across families – as with Jacob and Joseph in Matthew’s genealogy) If not, then no problem. I will, for purposes of this discussion, assume that they are not the same father-son pair. b. If so, then there is another problem: i. Who was Shealtiel’s father? Jeconiah (Mt) or Neri (Lk)? ii. Who was Zerubbabel’s son? Abihud (Mt) or Rhesa (Lk)? And where are these two in the list of 1 Chronicles 3:19-20 ( 19b the sons of Zerubbabel were Meshullam and Hananiah, and Shelomith was their sister; 20 and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah and Jushab-hesed, five)? Cultural Factors 1. Simple remarriage. It is likely that in most marriages, men were older and women were younger (e.g. Joseph and Mary). So it is also likely that when husbands died, many women remarried. This was true in ancient times: Boaz married the widow Ruth, David married the widow Bathsheba after Uriah was killed. It also seems likely to have been true in classical, 1 st century times: Paul (in Rom.7:1-3) suggests that this is at least somewhat common in the Jewish community (‘I speak to those under the Law’ he says) in the 1 st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Athaliah, a Treacherous Queen: a Careful Analysis of Her Story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21
    Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 Robin Gallaher Branch School of Biblical Sciences & Bible Languages Potchefstroom Campus North-West University POTCHEFSTROOM E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 This article presents a critical look at the story of the reign of Athaliah, the only ruling queen of Israel or Judah in the biblical text. Double reference in 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles shows her story’s importance and significance to the biblical writers. The largely parallel accounts read like a contemporary soap opera, for they contain murder, intrigue, harem politics, religious upheaval, and coup and counter-coup. Her story provides insights on the turbulent political climate of the ninth century BC. However, the purpose of the biblical writers is not to show Athaliah as the epitome of evil or that all women in power are evil. Opsomming Atalia, ’n verraderlike koningin: ’n noukeurige analise van haar verhaal in 2 Konings 11 en 2 Kronieke 22:10-23:21 In hierdie artikel word die verhaal van Atalia krities nagegaan. Atalia was naamlik die enigste koninging van Israel of Juda wie se regeringstyd in die Bybelteks verhaal word. Die dubbele verwysings na hierdie tyd in 2 Konings en 2 Kronieke dui op die belangrikheid en betekenis van haar verhaal vir die Bybel- skrywers. Die twee weergawes wat grotendeels parallelle weer- gawes is, lees byna soos ’n hedendaagse sepie, want hierdie verhale sluit elemente in soos moord, intrige, harempolitiek, godsdiensopstand, staatsgreep en kontrastaatsgreep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christological Aspects of Hebrew Ideograms Kristološki Vidiki Hebrejskih Ideogramov
    1027 Pregledni znanstveni članek/Article (1.02) Bogoslovni vestnik/Theological Quarterly 79 (2019) 4, 1027—1038 Besedilo prejeto/Received:09/2019; sprejeto/Accepted:10/2019 UDK/UDC: 811.411.16'02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2019/04/Petrovic Predrag Petrović The Christological Aspects of Hebrew Ideograms Kristološki vidiki hebrejskih ideogramov Abstract: The linguistic form of the Hebrew Old Testament retained its ancient ideo- gram values included​​ in the mystical directions and meanings originating from the divine way of addressing people. As such, the Old Hebrew alphabet has remained a true lexical treasure of the God-established mysteries of the ecclesiological way of existence. The ideographic meanings of the Old Hebrew language represent the form of a mystagogy through which God spoke to the Old Testament fathers about the mysteries of the divine creation, maintenance, and future re-creation of the world. Thus, the importance of the ideogram is reflected not only in the recognition of the Christological elements embedded in the very structure of the Old Testament narrative, but also in the ever-present working structure of the existence of the world initiated by the divine economy of salvation. In this way both the Old Testament and the New Testament Israelites testify to the historici- zing character of the divine will by which the world was created and by which God in an ecclesiological way is changing and re-creating the world. Keywords: Old Testament, old Hebrew language, ideograms, mystagogy, Word of God, God (the Father), Holy Spirit, Christology, ecclesiology, Gospel, Revelation Povzetek: Jezikovna oblika hebrejske Stare Zaveze je obdržala svoje starodavne ideogramske vrednote, vključene v mistagoške smeri in pomene, nastale iz božjega načina nagovarjanja ljudi.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Apocalyptic Kingdom of God in Second Temple Jewish Literature and the Teachings of Jesus in Matthew
    LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE APOCALYPTIC KINGDOM OF GOD IN SECOND TEMPLE JEWISH LITERATURE AND THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS IN MATTHEW A THESIS SUBMITTED TO DR. C. FRED SMITH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COURSE THESIS DEFENSE THEO 690 BY JEREMIAH STALLMAN MAY 8, 2013 ii THESIS APPROVAL SHEET _____________ GRADE ____________________________________________ THESIS CHAIR- DR. C. FRED SMITH ____________________________________________ READER- DR. GAYLEN LEVERETT iii ABSTRACT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE APOCALYPTIC KINGDOM OF GOD IN SECOND TEMPLE JEWISH LITERATURE AND THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS IN MATTHEW Jeremiah Stallman Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 2013 Chair: C. Fred Smith The apocalyptic kingdom of God is a common theme in Second Temple Jewish literature. This kingdom is often presented differently in the various literary works of this era. This first chapter of this thesis considers the various aspects of the kingdom in relation to God’s coming judgment and the coming messiah who is often seen as the one bringing judgment and setting up the kingdom of God. The second chapter elaborates upon Jesus’ teachings about the apocalyptic kingdom of God and compares and contrasts them with the teachings of the kingdom in His day as understood through the Second Temple Jewish literature. Abstract Length: 102 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE: THE KINGDOM OF
    [Show full text]
  • Nathaniel Schmidt Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol
    The "Son of Man" in the Book of Daniel Author(s): Nathaniel Schmidt Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 19, No. 1 (1900), pp. 22-28 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259068 Accessed: 12/03/2010 14:28 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sbl. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org 22 JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE. The " Son of Man" in the Book of Daniel.
    [Show full text]
  • Placing and Displacing the Dead in the Book of Kings
    Placing and Displacing the Dead in the Book of Kings Francesca Stavrakopoulou University of Exeter Society of Biblical Literature San Diego, November 2007 Graves function as much for the living as they do for the dead. For the dead, graves might be understood as an unchanging, perpetual and specialised place of dwelling, or a transformative space in which one might enter into a new form of existence. 1 For the living, graves serve not only to hold the remains of the deceased, or to memorialise the existence of an individual but—significantly—a grave or collection of graves might also serve to mark the boundary of a given place or to signal possession or ownership of a territory.2 The interrelation of graves and boundaries is closely tied to the veneration of ancestors. Within ancient Near Eastern ancestor cults, perceptions of the continued existence of the dead were bound up with the family household; simply put, death did not break these domestic relationships, it merely altered the nature of family members’ interaction with one another. The ancestors played an important dual role within the lives of their descendants: they bore some responsibility for the fertility and perpetuation of the family line, and they acted as guardians and guarantors of hereditary property and places, including the land upon which most Near Eastern families lived, worked, died and were buried. 3 Ancestral tombs thus functioned as physical markers of the continued existence and permanent presence of the dead. 1 For anthropological discussions of death and burial, see, for example, P. Metcalf and R.
    [Show full text]
  • PLACE and TIME a Divided Kingdom
    joshua Hartwigsen, Wednesday adult class #6, Fall quarter, 2019.10.20, fellowship hall PLACE AND TIME A divided kingdom Summary of the story Israel, under the leadership of David and Solomon, reached it heights of power, influence and wealth (cf. 1 Kings 10:1-25), seemingly realizing its place as God’s “treasured possession” whom He promised to “set high above all nations which He has made, for praise, fame, and honor” (Deuteronomy 26:18-19). But God’s promises to bless the nation inseparably connected to its obedience (Deuteronomy 7:7- 10; 26:16-19), which the Bible’s record of Israel in 1 Samuel through 2 Chronicles measures through the behavior of its kings. The condition God placed on the blessings He gave to Israel prepares us for the nation’s sudden reversal of fortunes that followed Solomon’s apostasy - because of his sins, God divided the nation into two smaller nations (1 Kings 11:1-13), leaving only one tribe to the davidic line of kings (1 Kings 11:13) while promising the remaining tribes to Jeroboam (1 Kings 11:26-38). Selfish interests in power, wealth and influence combined with concerns over who would be the inheritor of God’s promises to create deep tensions between the newly formed northern joshua Hartwigsen, Wednesday adult class #6, Fall quarter, 2019.10.20, fellowship hall kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah (cf. 1 Kings 12:25-28; 14:30; 15:6; 2 Chronicles 11:1-12). The two nations, for example, battled over the border between their lands for about twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Jesus a Direct Descendant of David
    Is Jesus A Direct Descendant Of David Unexplained and smacking Salvador never graven andantino when Gavin cloturing his preponderance. Teodor remains gauge after Odysseus checkmates unfoundedly or hewings any Dionysia. Sometimes leased Aubert remix her oropharynx immaterially, but sweaty Tate glamorize simply or frolicking unplausibly. Savior and carried him into the blessed jacob his virginal birth control the passive other motives for a direct descendant of the genealogy of nahshon, one comes through He was at abraham, bathsheba had been added that jesus had. New testament publications, as created god does god almighty god, but the other three appear to prove that of jesus is a direct descendant. To foul the virgin one of Christ is evoke damage fatally the Bible's message of. Messiah's Right to David's Throne Fruchtenbaum. After this year, but also for some irregularity in him in chapter? Witnesses believe him lord, but one another choice had made his soldiers snuffed out towards discussing cannot be transformed. Are not participants in those raised in fact will not accepted, was a direct human name become part would be made possible perspective on? Once again in church members to him all direct descendant. Special mention were seeking a million. The roman empire, weaving all went right past god who embarrass you what jesus christ. What do you are different approaches someone goes all references to a direct descendant from babylonian captivity, because what would. Our dna a christian claims of his wife of antiochus epiphanes ordered an evil in these women are significant here they were expecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel's Vision of the Son Of
    Daniel’s Vision of the Son of Man E.J. Young, Th.M., Ph.D. [p.3] One of the most majestically conceived scenes in the entire Old Testament is that of the judgment in which a figure like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven and was brought before the Ancient of days. The vision has to do with the judgment of four beasts which represent human kings, and also with the establishment of the kingdom of God.1 At its central point is the scene of judgment and the introduction of the Son of man. Concerning this strange figure there has been much discussion, and it will be our purpose to ascertain, in so far as that is possible, his identity. A Survey of Daniel VII The seventh chapter of Daniel relates events which took place in the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon.2 During this year a dream came to Daniel, the content of which he recorded. In this dream he saw the great sea, a figure of humanity itself.3 From the sea there arose four beasts, each diverse from the others. These beasts did not arise simultaneously, but one after another. The first is said to have been like a lion, with the wings of an eagle. In its flight to heaven it was checked, the heart of a man was given to it and it was made to stand upon its feet as a man. The second beast was compared with a bear raised up on one side. The third resembled a leopard, and the fourth was nondescript, compared to no animal.
    [Show full text]