DOCSLIB.ORG

HISTORIC PRESERVATION SURVEY MASTER PLAN Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HISTORIC PRESERVATION SURVEY MASTER PLAN Final Report HISTORIC PRESERVATION SURVEY MASTER PLAN Final Report 4 APRIL 2019 TOWN OF ARLINGTON HISTORIC PRESERVATION SURVEY MASTER PLAN FINAL REPORT Historic & Cultural Resources Working Group Peter Howard (Finance Committee) Ann LeRoyer (Master Plan Implementation Committee) Steve Makowka (Chairman, Historic Districts Commission) JoAnn Robinson (Chairman, Historical Commission) Diane Schaefer (Historical Commission) Department of Planning & Community Development Kelly Lynema, Senior Planner and Project Coordinator Allison Carter, Economic Development Coordinator Erin Zwirko, Assistant Director Jennifer Raitt, Director Geographic Information System (GIS) Adam Kurowski, Director of GIS/Systems Analyst Arlington Historical Society Richard Duffy Consultant Team Wendy Frontiero and Kathleen Kelly Broomer, Architectural Historians and Preservation Consultants The Historic Preservation Survey Master Plan, and copies of the survey documentation (inventory forms, base maps, and final reports) produced according to the recommendations of this plan, will be available for public inspection and archived in the office of the Department of Planning and Community Development, Town Hall Annex, 730 Massachusetts Avenue, with copies at Robbins Library, 700 Massachusetts Avenue, and the Whittemore-Robbins House, 670R Massachusetts Avenue, Arlington CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Town Overview & Identification Of Neighborhood Survey Units .................................................... 5 Existing Inventory Documentation ...................................................................................................... 10 Survey Activity to Date ........................................................................................................................... 11 Geographic Distribution of Inventoried Resources ............................................................ 13 Resource Types and Uses Represented in Inventory ........................................................ 14 Representation of Historic Periods & Themes in Inventory ........................................... 15 Quality of Inventory Documentation ..................................................................................... 16 Existing National Register & Local Historic District Designations ............................................... 18 Historic Themes & Periods Of Development In Arlington .............................................................. 22 Overviews Of Neighborhood Survey Units ......................................................................................... 25 Center Survey Unit .................................................................................................................... 25 East Survey Unit ......................................................................................................................... 29 West Survey Unit ....................................................................................................................... 33 North Survey Unit ...................................................................................................................... 38 Threats to Historic Resources .............................................................................................................. 42 Analysis of Survey Methodologies ....................................................................................................... 44 Survey Priorities, Selection Criteria, & Coverage Goals .................................................................. 47 Areas & Properties Recommended for Survey ................................................................................. 50 Townwide (Thematic) ............................................................................................................................. 50 Center Survey Unit .................................................................................................................... 56 East Survey Unit ......................................................................................................................... 59 West Survey Unit ....................................................................................................................... 62 North Survey Unit ...................................................................................................................... 65 Recommendations for Corrections ..................................................................................................... 67 State & Local Coordination ................................................................................................................... 70 Survey Action Plan with Cost Estimates ........................................................................................... 72 Annotated Bibliography for Survey Research ................................................................................... 75 Appendices ................................................................................................................................................ 84 1 MACRIS Street Index for Arlington (Excerpt) .................................................................. 84 2 Properties Added to MHC Inventory in 2017-2018 Survey Project ............................ 86 3 Sample Scope of Work for Town-Funded Survey Projects ........................................ 91 4 Historic Properties Inventory Forms (MHC Know-How #6) ........................................ 98 5 Base Map with Areas and Properties Recommended for Survey ............................. 101 Arlington: Historic Preservation Survey Master Plan Final Report ABSTRACT The Town of Arlington, by and through the Department of Planning and Community Development, utilized Community Preservation Act (CPA) funds to conduct an assessment known as the Historic Preservation Survey Master Plan. The three-phase project provides the town with a plan for updating and expanding its communitywide comprehensive historic resource inventory, which will support preservation advocacy efforts, future work toward achieving potential historic designations for select significant areas and individual properties, and preservation education activities. Historic and cultural resource inventories in Massachusetts – the inventory forms produced and the survey methodology used to create them – must conform to the requirements of the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC). As the State Historic Preservation Office, the MHC administers the historic preservation planning program in the Commonwealth, in accordance with principles and practice established by the National Park Service, U. S. Department of the Interior. Per the Scope of Work developed by the MHC for this project, Arlington’s Survey Master Plan provides recommendations for improving the town’s representation in the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth, which is maintained by the MHC with a duplicate set of inventory forms kept on file in Arlington. During this project, the consultants supplied the Historic and Cultural Resources Working Group of the Master Plan Implementation Committee with information on the goals and products of communitywide comprehensive surveys in Massachusetts. The consultants reviewed survey activity in Arlington to date, and assessed how well the existing Arlington inventory meets current MHC expectations. The town was divided geographically into four neighborhood survey units to guide the selection of areas and individual resources for future documentation, and to facilitate the prioritization of survey recommendations. Brief historic contexts, or frameworks, were developed for each survey area so the relative importance of different types of historic resources present in Arlington could be better understood. The consultants compiled lists of specific areas and individual properties to be surveyed and cost estimates, accompanied by recommendations for correcting inconsistencies between state and town records. This project provides the Town of Arlington with information needed to implement the survey update on a multi-phase basis, as local and matching state funding permits. 1 Arlington: Historic Preservation Survey Master Plan Final Report INTRODUCTION Historic resources are major character-defining features of Arlington’s cultural landscape and heritage. They are inextricably linked with the community’s image and quality of life, and provide tangible evidence of growth and change in Arlington over nearly four centuries. Preservation of Arlington’s historic resources is in the public interest. Preservation planning helps cities and towns articulate their community character, so they can protect that character while managing growth and change. “Saving it all” is not the goal. The preservation planning process is designed to encourage objective analysis of the town’s historic resources, so informed decisions may then be made about which resources are most important to the community and merit preservation. As established by the National Park Service, and administered in Massachusetts by the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC), preservation planning involves three steps: identification, evaluation, and protection. Communities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    The Proceedings of the Cambridge Historical Society, Volume 38, 1959-1960 Table Of Contents OFFICERS............................................................................................................5 PAPERS THE COST OF A HARVARD EDUCATION IN THE PURITAN PERIOD..........................7 ​ ​ BY MARGERY S. FOSTER THE HARVARD BRANCH RAILROAD, 1849-1855..................................................23 ​ BY ROBERT W. LOVETT RECOLLECTIONS OF THE CAMBRIDGE SOCIAL DRAMATIC CLUB........................51 ​ BY RICHARD W. HALL NATURAL HISTORY AT HARVARD COLLEGE, 1788-1842......................................69 ​ BY JEANNETTE E. GRAUSTEIN THE REVEREND JOSE GLOVER AND THE BEGINNINGS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PRESS.............................................................................87 ​ BY JOHN A. HARNER THE EVOLUTION OF CAMBRIDGE HEIGHTS......................................................111 ​ BY LAURA DUDLEY SAUNDERSON THE AVON HOME............................................................................................121 ​ BY EILEEN G. MEANY MEMORIAL BREMER WHIDDON POND...............................................................................131 ​ ​ BY LOIS LILLEY HOWE ANNUAL REPORTS.............................................................................................133 MEMBERS..........................................................................................................145 THE CAMBRIDGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS FOR THE YEARS 1959-60 LIST OF OFFICERS FOR THESE TWO YEARS 1959 President Mrs. George w.
    [Show full text]
  • MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-8 OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Mount Auburn Cemetery Other Name/Site Number: n/a 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Roughly bounded by Mount Auburn Street, Not for publication:_ Coolidge Avenue, Grove Street, the Sand Banks Cemetery, and Cottage Street City/Town: Watertown and Cambridge Vicinityj_ State: Massachusetts Code: MA County: Middlesex Code: 017 Zip Code: 02472 and 02318 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): _ Public-Local: _ District: X Public-State: _ Site: Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object:_ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 4 4 buildings 1 ___ sites 4 structures 15 ___ objects 26 8 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 26 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: n/a NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Somerville, Massachusetts Mayor’S Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Joseph A
    CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR’S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOSEPH A. CURTATONE MAYOR MICHAEL F. GLAVIN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE STAFF REPORT Site: 501 Mystic Valley Parkway Case: HPC 2017.042 Applicant Name: POAH LLC Date of Application: June 9, 2017 Recommendation: Significant Hearing Date: July 18, 2017 I. Historical Association Architectural Description: 501 Mystic Valley Parkway is a classic mid-century modern single-story H shaped brick ranch house with a large greenhouse addition located centrally on the roof. The roof is 3-tab asphalt shingle. There is a large chimney. Doors and windows are appropriate for the date of construction and have not been altered. There is also a modern concrete block shed and a garage with a second story modern apartment. See photos. Historical Context: Mystic Valley Parkway is on the National Register of Historic Places as part of the Metropolitan Park System of Greater Boston. According to https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/massachusetts_conservation/metro_park_system_of_greater_boston.html “The Mystic Valley Parkway has adjacent elements that were added to the National Register of Historic Places through the Water Supply System of Metropolitan Boston Thematic Resource Area, including the Medford Pipe Bridge (1897-8), Mystic Dam (1864), Mystic Pumping Station (1862-4), and Mystic Gatehouse (1862-8).” 501-503 Mystic Valley Parkway was acquired by Anthony W. DiCecca in 1949 on land previously been owned by what is now the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority and was attached to the Mystic Water Pumping Station next door. The house was constructed 1950 by Anthony W.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Moderate Rehabilitation Projects As of July 9, 2020
    Potential Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Moderate Rehabilitation Projects As of July 9, 2020 Project Property Property Type of Property Property Property Address Property City Units State Zip Code (If Known) Mod Rehab 131 Horton St 131 Horton St Lewiston ME 04240 10 Mod Rehab 1407 Tami Lee Drive 1407 Tami Lee Drive San Jose CA 95122 0 Mod Rehab 1423 Tami Lee Drive 1423 Tami Lee Drive San Jose CA 95122 0 Mod Rehab 1431 Tami Lee Drive 1431 Tami Lee Drive San Jose CA 95122 0 Mod Rehab 146 MUZZY STREET AND 439 FRANKLIN STREET439 LLC Franklin Street Springfield MA 01104 7 Mod Rehab/SRO 1515 Fairmount 1515 Fairmount Avenue Philadelphia PA 19130 48 Mod Rehab 153 Manhattan Avenue HDFC 161 Manhattan Ave New York NY 10025 18 Mod Rehab 15-46 Summit Street 15-46 Summit Street Springfield MA 01105 41 Mod Rehab 16 N Lorel 16-18 N. Lorel Ave Chicago IL 60644 23 Mod Rehab 17683 Crest Avenue 17683 Crest Avenue Morgan Hill CA 95037 0 Mod Rehab/SRO 1790 Clinton Associates 1790 CLINTON AVENUE Bronx NY 10457 16 Mod Rehab 18 West 103rd St HDFC 18 West 103rd St New York NY 10025 8 Mod Rehab 1912 S 17th St 1912 S 17th St Philadelphia PA 19145 44 Mod Rehab/SRO 1928 LORING PLACE SOUTH LP 1928 LORING PARK SOUTH NY 52 Mod Rehab 100 Passaic Street Partners LLC P.O. Box 387 Cedarhurst NY 11516 0 Mod Rehab 1058 Bank Street 1058 Bank Street Waterbury CT 06708 16 Mod Rehab 11 Crowley Street 11 Crowley Street Farmington NH 03835 10 Mod Rehab 11-15 New Montrose 11-15 New Montrose Avenue Brooklyn NY 11249 31 Mod Rehab 119 East 102 Street 119 East 102 Street New York
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan
    Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan Adopted: July 24, 2002 Framingham Historical Commission Laurie Evans-Daly, Chair Elizabeth Funk, Vice Chair Mary Murphy, Secretary Gerald Couto Waldo Lyon David Marks Robert Snider Stephen Herring, Town Historian Donna Jacobs, Framingham Department of Planning & Economic Development Table of Contents Page 1. Preamble 1.1 Historic Preservation Goals ........................................................................................5 1.2 History of Growth and Development in Framingham .............................................6 1.3 Profile of Framingham ................................................................................................8 2. Framingham's Preservation Planning Efforts 2.1 Municipal ....................................................................................................................14 2.2 Private Preservation Organizations .........................................................................20 2.3 Private Citizens Efforts .............................................................................................24 2.4 State .............................................................................................................................25 2.5 Federal ........................................................................................................................29 2.6 Action Recommendations ............................................................................. 29 3. The Cultural Resources Inventory 3.1 The Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • The Newetowne Chronicle
    The Newetowne Chronicle Winter 2011 Cambridgeport: Its People and Their Stories Volume XI Number III By Michael Kenney Cambridgeport: Its People and Their Stories Cambridgeport stands, geographically and socially, midway between East Cambridge By Michael Kenney 1 and Old Cambridge, neither a traditional southern European enclave nor the remnants of Puritan New England. This issue of the Newetowne Chronicle focuses on Cambridgeport Ideas Take to the Street for a and its vibrant past through a collection of articles and a report on the celebration of that History Day past on Cambridgeport History Day. By Michael Kenney 2 In the years before the First World War, the neighborhood was dominated by migrants War, Financial Ruin, and from northern New England, “provincials” from Canada, and second-generation Irish. Cambridgeport In the following years, the population growth leveled off before gradually rebounding. By Gavin W. Kleespies 3 New national and ethnic groups arrived and, perhaps most significant, well-educated New Assistant Director - professionals moved into the traditional working-class neighborhood. Islanda Khau 4 A look at the decline and regrowth of the area’s population is a useful starting point. The Brookline Street Rail Line 1920 census counted 26,875 persons in the present Cambridgeport, plus much of what is By Gavin W. Kleespies 4 now considered Area Four. The count was taken after major land-use changes had already Velodrome: A Racing Track for occurred east of Brookline Street, where Simplex Wire & Cable Co. and the National Bicyclists Biscuit Co. had razed some houses during the previous decade. Along the neighborhood By Richard Garver 5 edges lay the Necco candy factory, the Riverside Press, and a Ford Motor Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Discovery Park
    CAMBRIDGE DISCOVERY PARK APPLICATION TO CAMBRIDGE PLANNING BOARD FOR MINOR AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO PLANNING BOARD MASTER PLAN SPECIAL PERMIT PB#198 AND FOR DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING 400-500 20 & 40 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA Volume I – Narrative Materials March 17, 2016 Submitted by BHX, LLC Trustee of Acorn Park Holdings Realty Trust c/o The Bulfinch Companies, Inc. 250 First Avenue, Suite 200 Needham, MA 02494 Tel: 781.707.4000 Fax: 781.707.4001 Contents Project Team List ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Requested Approvals .................................................................................................................. 3 Background and History ................................................................................................................................... 4 Arthur D. Little Company’s Research Campus ........................................................................................ 4 Developing a Shared Vision of the Future ................................................................................................ 5 Implementation of the Shared Vision Begins ........................................................................................... 6 Where We Are Today ................................................................................................................................... 8 Master Plan Special Permit Criteria for Amendments to Master Plan
    [Show full text]
  • MAPC Directions
    Contact Us Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place Boston, MA 02111 Phone: (617) 451-2770 Fax: (617) 482-7185 Click here to visit our staff directory. Experiencing a problem using the web site? Please contact the Communications team. Directions Navigate to MAPC via Google Maps Traveling to MAPC via Public Transportation MAPC is within walking distance from the Park Street and Downtown Crossing subway stations. Navigate using the MBTA Trip Planner. Walking from Park Street Station: 1) Cross Tremont Street and walk down Winter Street to Washington Street (Macy's will be on the corner). Turn right and walk to the end of the block until you see Temple Place; or 2) walk down Tremont Street in the direction of Boylston Street until you see Temple Place on the left. Walk to the end of Temple Place. MAPC is located at the corner of Temple Place and Washington Street. We are located at 60 Temple Place on the 3rd and 6th floors. Walking from Downtown Crossing Station: There are several exits from the station. Exiting from Washington Street: walk right on Washington Street until you see Temple Place on the right. Take a right on Temple. MAPC is located at 60 Temple Place. Exiting from Hawley Street: walk left until you reach Summer Street. Walk right on Summer, towards the intersection of Washington and Summer streets. Take a left onto Washington. Walk one block until you reach Temple Place. MAPC is located at 60 Temple Place. Exiting from Chauncy Street: walk right on Chauncy until you reach Avenue De Lafayette.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pictoral History of the Boston Music Hall and the Great Organ
    A PICTORIAL HISTORY OF THE BOSTON MUSIC HALL AND THE GREAT ORGAN by Ed Sampson, President, Methuen Memorial Music Hall, Inc. 2018 Few instruments in the history of pipe organs in America have had as long, or as distinguished, a career as the Boston Music Hall Organ. The first concert organ in the country, it remains today one of the outstanding organs in America. The need for a large and centrally-located concert hall for Boston was discussed at the annual meeting of the Harvard Musical Association, founded in 1837 (Henry White Pickering (1811-1898), President) on January 31, 1851. A "Music Hall Committee", comprised of members Robert East Apthorp (1812-1882), George Derby (1819-1874), John Sullivan Dwight (1813-1893), Charles Callahan Perkins (1822-1886), and Dr. Jabez Baxter Upham (1820- 1902), was appointed to address the matter. The Boston Music Hall was built in 1852 by the Boston Music-Hall Association, founded in 1851 (Jabez Baxter Upham, President) and by the Harvard Musical Association, that contributed $100,000 towards its construction. It stood in the center of a block that sloped downward from Tremont Street to Washington Street; and was between Winter Street on the south and Bromfield Street on the north. Almost entirely surrounded by other buildings, only glimpses of the hall's massive granite block foundation and plain brick walls could be seen. There were two entrances to the Music Hall: the Bumstead Place entrance, (named after Thomas Bumstead (1740-1828) a Boston coachmaker), off Tremont Street (later Hamilton Place) opposite the Park Street Church; 1 and the Central Place or Winter Place (later Music Hall Place) entrance off Winter Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Setting
    and 35 percent hold a graduate or professional degree. Town residents work in both blue collar and professional occupations. As in Arlington's surrounding communities, the Town has a large segment of aging people 3 and a growing segment of couples with young children. Map 3-1. Arlington and Surrounding Communities Community Setting A. Regional Context Physical Location The Town of Arlington is located in eastern Massachusetts and lies at the edge of the Boston Basin (a broad, flat, flood plain). Located about six miles northwest of Boston, Arlington's population of 42,844 (2010 U.S. Census) occupies five and one half square miles or 3,509.9 acres. Arlington is part of Middlesex County and the Boston metropolitan area; its neighboring communities are Lexington, Winchester, Medford, Somerville, Cambridge, and Belmont (see Map 3-1). The commercial corridors of Massachusetts Avenue and Broadway bisect the Town and connect it to Cambridge and Somerville on the east and Lexington on the west. Arlington is a Town governed by a five-member Board of Selectmen, an elected legislative Town Meeting of 252 members, and an appointed Town Manager, similar in governance to the adjacent towns of Lexington, Winchester, and Belmont. Like the cities of Cambridge, Somerville, and Medford, Arlington is densely developed with a high level of population Source: Town of Arlington Open Space and Recreation Plan2007-2012. per square mile (see Population Characteristics, Section 3C, for statistics on regional population density). Community Development Many factors have shaped Arlington's natural and recreational open space Arlington residents' median family income is not as high as neighboring as the Town developed from a small farming community in the colonial towns (Lexington, Winchester, Belmont), but is higher than neighboring period to the densely developed suburban community it is today (see cities (Cambridge, Somerville, Medford).
    [Show full text]
  • Weight and Height Restrictions That Impact Truck Travel
    ON REG ST IO O N B BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION M Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair E N T R O I Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director, MPO Staff O T P A O IZ LMPOI N TA A N G P OR LANNING TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: December 21, 2017 TO: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: William S. Kuttner RE: Weight and Height Restrictions that Impact Truck Travel 1 INTRODUCTION This memorandum presents information about bridges in the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area that have signs restricting the weight or height of vehicles permitted to pass over or under them. MassDOT personnel monitor these weight and height restrictions, along with a bridge’s physical condition, or rating, and summarize them as inspection reports in MassDOT’s internal database. However, the physical condition or rating of bridges is not the direct concern of this study. The concern of this study is that truck restrictions cause trucks that are otherwise fully compliant with Massachusetts and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) size guidelines to use more circuitous routes than necessary to reach their various commercial destinations. Forced circuitous truck travel increases expenses for freight carriers and customers, increases the total environmental impact for a given level of freight traffic, and increases the negative impacts on local residents and communities. This study characterizes the severity of height and weight restrictions on trucks in the MPO region. The information developed will be used to evaluate projects considered for inclusion in two MPO planning documents: the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation , Sheet Water Supply System Thematic Nomination 9 7 Section Number ___ Page J ___
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 10244018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Water Supply System of Metropolitan Boston, Themptir Mult.ipTp___________ other names/site number_______Properti es Submi ssi on_________________________________ 2. Location street & number Multiple N/ft I not for publication city, town See District Data Sheet iv ft I vicinity state MA code county code 027, 017, Norfolk. (J2T 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private G3 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing fXI public-local f"Xi district buildings I I public-State I [site __ ____ sites I I public-Federal r~Xl structure Qfi A structures I I object . objects .Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register >ee Continuation Sheet 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this H nomination l_j request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]