NESTOR and Tile HONOR of ACHILLES (Iliad 1.247-84) by Line 245 of the First Book of the Iliad the Quarrel Between Achilles and A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NESTOR AND TIlE HONOR OF ACHILLES (Iliad 1.247-84) by CHARLES SEGAL By line 245 of the first book of the Iliad the quarrel between Achilles and Agamemnon has reached an impasse. Anger has mounted stage by stage, the pitch of the insults has increased, and Achilles, drawing his sword, is restrained only by Athena. He swears solemnly that the Greeks will regret his absence (1.225-44) and hurls the gold-studded scepter to the ground (1.245-6). Agamemnon is equally gripped by "wrath" (1.247): 'A-'PELO'l1C; 0' E..EPWi}E\I E~1)\lLE. At this point Nestor arises, his intervention announced in the middle of line 247: -.oLG'L oE NEG''t'WP / f}OUE1t'i)C; c1\16pouG'£ (247-8). Nestor's speech (254-84) resembles in function the appearance of Athena: it brings no resolution, but .calms the rising passions: Yet, unlike Athena, Nestor is a mortal who addresses the entire assembly. Athena appeared to Achilles alone (OLctl cpaL\lO~E\I'l1, 198), but Nestor focuses the issue decisively on the public, rather than the private, realm.2 Homer obviously had to find some way of getting beyond the impasse of the quarrel and adjourning the assembly (cf. 305) in order to allow the action to advance. Nestor's speech not only performs this function, but also serves several additional purposes which relate to the presentation of Achilles at the very outset of the action. It is with these purposes that this paper is primarily concerned. Nestor's speech not only avoids the monotonous continuation of an already drawn out quarrel and prevents a premature climax; it also establishes the book's rhythmic alternation between tight, dramatic dialogue and broader, 1 See U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Die Was und Homer (Berlin 1916) 250-1; L.A. Post, "The Moral Pattern in Homer," TAPA 70 (1939) 174. 2 See Wilamowitz (preceding note) 251. Nestor and the honor of Achilles 91 more open scenes. In this easing, broadening function Nestor more closely resembles Hephaestus at the end of the book than Athena, to whom we have compared him above. Both Nestor and Hephaestus are mediators in a tense quarrel and restore a certain measure of harmony to a temporarily disrupted social order. The two speeches begin with a broader perspective and an assertion of shame or regret at the present quarrel (cf. 1.254-8 and 573-4).3 Like so many of the parallels between the human and divine action, this one too dramatizes the gulf between the urgency and finality of human affairs and the almost comic triviality of divine. Nestor's first line stresses the consequences of such a quarrel and places it within its social perspective (1.254): ... Ti IJ.EyCX 1tE'IIt}O~ , Axcxttocx YCXLCX'll i.Xa.'IIEt. The "Greek land" reminds the contestants of their responsi bilities to the entire army and its purpose. This concern with the Achaean cause as a whole bears indirectly on the character of Achilles. It had been Achilles, not the selfish Agamemnon, who first expressed a similar sense of communal responsibility. In fact, Achilles was the first to speak of the "Achaeans" collectively (61) as he tried to stir Agamemnon to take positive action against the plague {59-67). Nestor's similar concern with the welfare of the whole Achaean expedition at this crucial point brings up again the contrast between Achilles' generous motives and Agamemnon's selfish ones and thus prepares for the justification of Achilles which the speech implies.4 Nestor's theme is order: yielding and obeying.s That sense of order has both a spatial and temporal dimension: spatial in its appreciation of the strife between the" Achaean land" and "Priam and Priam's sons" (254-5); temporal in that it rests upon the traditions of the heroic past which is Nestor's recurrent theme in the Iliad. Again and again he cites the examples of the great heroes who are the paradigms of arete; and in this passage his exempla are, among others, Theseus, Peirithous, Caeneus. The battle against the bestial Lapiths, the "mountain-dwelling beast men" 6 whom these heroes "gloriously destroyed," affirms the worth and the duration of heroic achievement (1.267-8): 3 For the parallels between Nestor and Hephaestus see ]. T. Sheppard, The Pattern of the Iliad (London 1922) 27; E. T. Owen, The Story of the Iliad (Toronto 1946) p. 15 with n. 2. 4 So later in the poem Nestor is indirectly responsible for reawakening in Achilles a sense of responsibility for the army as a whole: see 11.656-805, especially 790-805. See also C. H. Whitman, Homer and the Heroic Tradition (Cambridge, Mass. 1958) 195. 5 Note the recurrence of 1te:£1}EW - 1te:£1}Ecr1}at in the early part of the book (33, 132, 150, 214, 218, 220, etc.), taken up in Nestor's speech (259, 273, 274), and given a climactic force in the replies of Agamemnon (289) and Achilles (296). 6 There is not unanimous agreement that the CP'l1pcrLV OPEcrXtfJOtcrt of 1.268 = 1}npcr' and means "beast" or "beast-men" (i. e. Centaurs), but this is extremely likely in 92 Charles Segal xap'tLO''tOL Il-E,\I £O'a\l xat xap'ttO''tOLe; EIl-&'XO\l'to, Cj>l)pO'tv OPEO'XtilOLO'L, xat EX1t&'y A.We; a.1t6A.EO'O'a\l. Nestor is describing a manly struggle of companions united against a recognized, dangerous foe. His account of his exploits in 262-8, then, is more than senile garrulity: it serves to recall us to the image of a unified heroic society undividedly directing its energies against an external aggressor, an image which, we may hazard, Nestor implicitly regards as valid for the present conflict between Greeks and Trojans with which the speech began (254-5). Against that proper use of heroic energy stand the present quarrel and its consequences for the heroic society to which Nestor belongs. Nestor's language also establishes a point of connection between Achilles and the heroes of Nestor's past. It is a special quality of Achille's that he is karteros, "strong," "valiant," while Agamemnon is pherteros. Agamemnon makes this distinction at 178, and Nestor repeats it at 280. Now this quality of "strength" is possessed by Nestor's heroes in the highest degree. Nestor calls them kartistoi three times in emphatic anaphoric repetition (266-7), and the word does not occur again until the fifth book. Achilles, then, is distinguished for his possession of this attribute of great, remote heroes. Yet we are reminded of his heroic prowess just when it has been insulted. Achilles, therefore, will withdraw from the heroic society in which he could display the karteria that he shares with the great figures of the past. At the same time the reminder of a great and noble battle of the past will add an edge to the longing for "the battle-cry and the fighting" which Achilles is soon to feel (l. 4 9 0-2). Nestor's list of heroes in 262-5 is also a reminder of the glory preserved in song and legend which such heroes win. Achilles, the greatest of the heroes before us, is especially concerned with such glory and is occupied with singing the "fame of heroes" (xAEa a.\lOpGw) when the embassy comes upon him in book 9 (9.189). Nestor's list is a small foretaste of that "rhythmed, name-studded hierarchy" which is the Catalogue of Ships.7 It thus bdngs together the ideal of heroic glory and the sense of a stable order reflected in the preserva tion of legend and perhaps in the combat against a bestial enemy. But it presents these themes just when Achilles has been forced to reject these ideals and when the rapacity of Agamemnon has violated the orderly proce dures and sanctions of heroic society. The first half of Nestor's speech, then, interprets the quarrel in terms view of It. 2.743 and Od. 21.295-304. See Waiter Leaf, The Iliad 12 (London 1900) a.d loco and the scholia ad loco 7 C. R. Beye, The Iliad, the Odyssey, and the Epic Tradition (Garden City, N.Y. 1966) 121. Nestor and the honor of Achilles 93 of the large themes of heroic action, social order, and communal order. These are all issues which Achilles has to face and redefine in his own terms.s It is essential for our judgment of Achilles' position that we have some sense of how his peers view the quarrel. Nestor's is the only voice {since the inception of the quarrel) which we hear from the assembled army.9 He is the only chieftain, outside of the two contestants, to speak. To intervene between two angry, powerful, and violent kings is no task to be assumed lightly; and Nestor, aged, respected, calm and reasonable, is the inevitable choice, probably the only possible choice. This speech, therefore, carries the special burden of showing us how the quarrel might appear in the eyes of the assembled host. Ancient Nestor, the repository of the lore of the past, comes as close as is possible to being the voice of social expectation and approval. lO Agamemnon, now for the second time in the poem (cf. 1.21-2), £latly rejects that voice. Nestor's judgment, though couched in all the tact which this skilled, honey-voiced diplomat can muster, is unambiguous. It is Agamemnon, not Achilles, who has violated the heroic code.ll Agamemnon should not take the girl (1.275-6): (l.1rn: (]'U 't6vS' &,yaiM~ 7tEp EWV &'7tOa£pEO XOUPTJV, &,)..).: ea, wc, ot 7tpw'ta 86(]'av YEpa~ ULE~ 'Axa~wv' Nestor's allegiance must ultimately be with the established authority, Agamemnon, nor is it ever in the slightest doubt.