<<

Authentication

slide 1 Topics today

Background: Hash Functions Password Graphical passwords Challenge-Response Biometrics

slide 2 HASH FUNCTIONS

slide 3 Hash Functions: Main Idea

hash function H message “message x. digest” .y x’’. .y’ x’.

bit strings of any length n-bit bit strings  Hash function H is a lossy compression function  H(x) should look “random” • Every bit (almost) equally likely to be 0 or 1

slide 4 Collisions

Collision: H(x)=H(x’) for some inputs x≠x’

Collisions must happen • Length of x unlimited, length of H(x) is n-bits ! • Even if length of x is bounded |x| = b, and b > n, there will be collisions "עקרון שובך היונים" ”Pigeonhole principle“ • A hash function cannot be 1-to-1 Cryptographic hash function must have certain properties

slide 5 Property 1: One-Way

Intuition: hash should be hard to invert • “Preimage resistance” • Given random y, it should be “hard” to find any x such that h(x)=y How hard? • Brute-force: try every possible x, see if h(x)=y • SHA-1 (common hash function) has 160-bit output – Suppose have hardware that’ll do 230 trials a pop – Assuming 234 trials per second, can do 289 trials per year – Will take 271 years to invert SHA-1 on a random image

slide 6 Probability background: “Birthday Paradox”

How likely is it that some people have the same birthday in a class of T students?

If there are T=366 people in class then • Prob(not all different birthdays | T people) = 0

How big should T be so • Prob(not all different birthdays | T people) >= ½ ??

Let’s experiment ! “Birthday Paradox” analysis

How many possibilities that are all different?

• (K)T = K(K-1)…(K-T+1) - samples without replacement Probability of no repetition? 푘 ∗ 푘 − 1 ∗ 푘 − 2 ∗ ⋯ (푘 − 푡 + 1) = 푘 ∗ 푘 ∗ 푘 … ∗ 푘

푘 푘 − 1 푘 − 푡 + 1 1 2 푡 − 1 ∗ ∗ ⋯ ∗ = 1 ∗ 1 − ∗ 1 − ∗ ⋯ ∗ 1 − ≤ 푘 푘 푘 푘 푘 푘 1 2 3 푡−1 푡2 푒−푘 ∗ 푒−푘 ∗ 푒−푘 ∗ ⋯ ∗ 푒− 푘 ≅ 푒−2푘 Birthday Paradox continued

푡2 2 − 1 푡 푒 2푘 ≤ ≥ ln 2 2 2푘

푡2 ≥ 2 (ln 2)푘 = 1.38푘

푡 ≥ 1.38푘

Bottom line: For k=365, t=23 suffices In general 푡 = 훀( 푘) suffices

slide 9 Property 2: Collision Resistance

Hard to find some x≠x’ such that h(x)=h(x’) Brute-force collision search is O(2n/2), not O(2n) • n = number of bits in the output of hash function • For SHA-1, this means O(280) vs. O(2160) Reason: birthday paradox • Let T be the number of values x1, x2, x3, … we need to look at before finding the first pair xi≠xj s.t. h(xi)=h(xj) • Assuming h is random, how big should T be so the probability of finding a repetition >= ½ ? • Total number of possible values? K=2n • Conclusion: T  2n/2 slide 10 Property 3: Weak Collision Resistance

Given a randomly chosen x, hard to find x’ such that h(x)=h(x’) • Attacker must find collision for a specific x… • by contrast, to break collision resistance, enough to find any collision • Brute-force attack requires O(2n) time Weak collision resistance does not imply collision resistance (why?)

slide 11 Hashing vs. Encryption

Hashing is one-way. There is no “uh-hashing”! • In contrast, encryption is two-way: can decrypt a ciphertext with the decryption key • Hashes have no equivalent of “decryption” Hash(x) looks “random”… but can be compared for equality with Hash(x’)

Hashes are also known as “cryptographic checksums”

slide 12 Application: Password Hashing

Instead of user password, store H(password) When user enters password, compute its hash and compare with entry in password file • System does not store actual passwords! • Difficult to go from hash to password!

System cannot “restore” your password!

slide 13 Application: Software Integrity

VIRUS

badFile goodFile

The Times BigFirm™ hash(goodFile) User

Software manufacturer wants to ensure that the executable file is received by users without modification… Sends out the file to users and publishes its hash in the NY Times The goal is integrity, not secrecy Idea: given goodFile and hash(goodFile), very hard to find badFile such that hash(goodFile)=hash(badFile) slide 14 Which Property Do We Need?

UNIX passwords stored as hash(password) • One-wayness: hard to recover entire password • Are passwords random? Integrity of software distribution • Weak collision resistance • But software images are not really random… maybe need full collision resistance

slide 15 Common Hash Functions

MD5 • 128-bit output • Still used very widely • Completely broken by now RIPEMD-160 • 160-bit variant of MD-5 SHA-1 (Secure Hash Algorithm) • 160-bit output • US government (NIST) standard as of 1993-95 – Also the hash algorithm for Standard (DSS)

slide 16 Overview of MD5

Designed in 1991 by Ron Rivest Iterative design using compression function

M1 M2 M3 M4 IHV0

Com- Com- Com- Com- press press press press

IHV4

slide 17 History of MD5 Collisions

2004: first • Only difference between colliding messages is 128 random-looking bytes 2007: chosen-prefix collisions • For any prefix, can find colliding messages have this prefix and differ up to 716 random-looking bytes 2008: rogue certificates • End of MD5 • Talk about this in more detail when discussing PKI

slide 18 Basic Structure of SHA-1

Against padding attacks

Split message into 512-bit blocks

160-bit buffer (5 registers) Compression function initialized with magic values • Applied to each 512-bit block and current 160-bit buffer • This is the heart of SHA-1 slide 19 How Strong Is SHA-1?

Every bit of output depends on every bit of input • Very important property for collision-resistance Brute-force inversion requires 2160 ops, birthday attack on collision resistance requires 280 ops • Some recent weaknesses (2005) • Collisions can be found in 263 ops

slide 20 AUTHENTICATION: PASSWORDS AND SECURITY QUESTIONS

slide 21 Basic Problem

?

How do you prove to someone that you are who you claim to be?

Any system with access control must solve this problem slide 22 Many Ways to Prove Who You Are

What you know • Passwords • Answers to questions that only you know Where you are • IP address What you are • Biometrics What you have • Secure tokens

slide 23 Password-Based Authentication

User has a secret password. System checks it to authenticate the user. How is the password communicated? • Eavesdropping risk How is the password stored? • In the clear? Encrypted? Hashed? How does the system check the password? How easy is it to guess the password? • Easy-to-remember passwords tend to be easy to guess • Password file is difficult to keep secret

slide 24 Passwords and Computer Security

Physical intrusion: install sniffer or keylogger to steal passwords

Run cracking tools on password files • Cracking needed because modern systems usually do not store passwords in the clear (how are they stored?) In Mitnick’s “Art of Intrusion”, 8 out of 9 exploits involve password stealing and/or cracking

slide 25 Default Passwords

Pennsylvania ice cream shop phone scam • Voicemail PIN defaults to last 4 digits of phone number; criminals change message to “I accept collect call”, make $8600 on a 35-hour call to Saudi Arabia Examples from Mitnick’s “Art of Intrusion” • U.S. District Courthouse server: “public” / “public” • NY Times employee database: pwd = last 4 SSN digits • “Dixie bank”: break into router (pwd=“administrator”), then into IBM AS/400 server (pwd=“administrator”), install keylogger to snarf other passwords – “99% of people there used ‘password123’ as their password”

slide 26 Storing Passwords

“cypherpunk” user system password file

t4h97t4m43 hash fa6326b1c2 function N53uhjr438 Hgg658n53 …

slide 27 Password Hashing

Instead of user password, store Hash(password) When user enters password, compute its hash and compare with entry in password file • System does not store actual passwords! • Difficult to go from hash from password! Hash function H must have some properties • Given H(password), hard to find string X such that H(X)=H(password) - why?

slide 28 UNIX Password System

Uses DES encryption as if it were a hash function • Encrypt NULL string using password as the key – Truncates passwords to 8 characters! • Artificial slowdown: run DES 25 times (why?) • Can instruct modern UNIXes to use MD5 hash function Problem: passwords are not truly random • With 52 upper- and lower-case letters, 10 digits and 32 punctuation symbols, there are 948  6 quadrillion possible 8-character passwords • Humans like to use dictionary words, human and pet names  1 million common passwords

slide 29 Dictionary Attack

Password file /etc/passwd is world-readable • Contains user IDs and group IDs which are used by many system programs Dictionary attack is possible because many passwords come from a small dictionary • Attacker can pre-compute H(word) for every word in the dictionary – this only needs to be done once!! – This is an offline attack – Once password file is obtained, cracking is instantaneous • With 1,000,000-word dictionary and assuming 10 guesses per second, brute-force online attack takes 50,000 seconds (14 hours) on average slide 30 Old Password Surveys

Klein (1990) and Spafford (1992) • 2.7% guessed in 15 minutes, 21% in a week • Much more computing power is available now! U. of Michigan: 5% of passwords were “goblue” • (cheer for their football team) Zviran and Haga (1999) • Password usage at a DoD facility in California • 80% of passwords were 4-7 characters in length, 80% used alphabetic characters only, 80% of the users had never changed their password

slide 31 Password Guessing Techniques

Dictionary with words spelled backwards First and last names, streets, cities Same with upper-case initials All valid license plate numbers in your state Room numbers, telephone numbers, etc. Letter substitutions and other tricks • If you can think of it, attacker will, too

slide 32 Storing Passwords : Salt shmat:fURxfg,4hLBX:14510:30:Vitaly:/u/shmat:/bin/csh

/etc/passwd entry salt (chosen randomly when password is first set)

Password hash(salt,pwd)

• Users with the same password have different entries in the password file • Offline dictionary attack becomes much harder slide 33 Advantages of Salting

Without salt, attacker can pre-compute hashes of all dictionary words once for all password entries • Same hash function on all UNIX machines; identical passwords hash to identical values • One table of hash values works for all password files With salt, attacker must compute hashes of all dictionary words once for each combination of salt value and password • With 12-bit random salt, same password can hash to 4096 different hash values

slide 34 Shadow Passwords shmat:x:14510:30:Vitaly:/u/shmat:/bin/csh

/etc/passwd entry Hashed password is not stored in a world-readable file

• Store hashed passwords in /etc/shadow file which is only readable by system administrator (root) • Add expiration dates for passwords • Early Shadow implementations on Linux called the login program which had a buffer overflow!

slide 35 How People Use Passwords

Write them down Use a single password at multiple sites • Do you use the same password for Amazon and your bank account? Do you remember them all? Forget them… many services use “security questions” to reset passwords • “What is your favorite pet’s name?” • Paris Hilton’s T-Mobile cellphone hack

slide 36 Problems with Security Questions [Rabkin, “Security questions in the era of Facebook”] Inapplicable • What high school did your spouse attend? Not memorable • Name of kindergarten teacher? Price of your first car? Ambiguous • Name of college you applied to but did not attend? Easily guessable • Age when you married? Year you met your spouse? Favorite president? Favorite color? Automatically attackable (using public records!)

slide 37 Answers Are Easy to Find Out…

 Make of your first car? • Until 1998, Ford had >25% of market  First name of your best friend? • 10% of males: James/Jim, John, Robert/Bob/Rob  Name of your first / favorite pet? • Max, Jake, Buddy, Bear… • Top 500 (covers 65% of names) available online Information available from Facebook, etc. • Where you went to school, college athletic rivals, favorite book/movie/pastime, high school mascot

slide 38 GRAPHICAL PASSWORDS

slide 39 Graphical Passwords

Images are easy for humans to remember • Especially if you invent a memorable story to go along with the images Dictionary attacks on graphical passwords are believed to be difficult • Images are very “random” (is this true?) Still not a perfect solution • Need infrastructure for displaying and storing images • Shoulder surfing

slide 40 How Passfaces Works

Library of Faces User Interface

Users Are Assigned a Set of 5* Passfaces

* Typical implementation – 3 to 7 possible as standard How Passfaces Works

 5 Passfaces are Associated with 40 associated decoys  Passfaces are presented in five 3 by 3 matrices each having 1 Passface and 8 decoys Empirical Results

Experimental study of 154 computer science students at Johns Hopkins and Carnegie Mellon Conclusions: • “… faces chosen by users are highly affected by the race of the user… the gender and attractiveness of the faces bias password choice… In the case of male users, we found this bias so severe that we do not believe it possible to make this scheme secure against an online attack…” 2 guesses enough for 10% of male users 8 guesses enough for 25% of male users

slide 43 User Quotes

“I chose the images of the ladies which appealed the most” “I simply picked the best looking girl on each page” “I picked her because she was female and Asian and being female and Asian, I thought I could remember that” “I started by deciding to choose faces of people in my own race…” “… Plus he is African-American like me”

slide 44 CHALLENGE - RESPONSE

slide 45 Security Against Eavesdropping

Idea: use a shared secret to derive a one-time password If the attacker eavesdrops on the network, he’ll learn this password but it will be useless for future logins

slide 46 Challenge-Response

secret secret user system

challenge value

f(secret,challenge)

Why is this better than the password over a network? slide 47 Challenge-Response Authentication

User and system share a secret (key or password) Challenge: system presents user with some string Response: user computes response based on the secret and the challenge • Secrecy: difficult to recover key from response – One-way hashing or symmetric encryption work well • Freshness: if challenge is fresh, attacker on the network cannot replay an old response – For example, use a fresh random number for each challenge Good for systems with pre-installed secret keys • Car keys; military friend-or-foe identification slide 48 SecurID

Setup: generate random key

KEY KEY

Counter: Counter: 0 1 … 0 1 … v= F(KEY, 0) ? v= F(KEY, 1) Verifies v=F(KEY,0) ? Verifies v=F(KEY,1) Alice … Bob

RSA uses a custom function  Advancing the counter Input: 64-bit key, 24-bit ctr • Time-based (60 seconds) or Output: 6-digit value every button press  Allow for skew in the counter value • RSA SecurID: 5-minute clock skew by default slide 49 BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATION

slide 50 Biometric Authentication

Nothing to remember Passive • Nothing to type, no devices to carry around Can’t share (usually) Can be fairly unique • … if measurements are sufficiently accurate

slide 51 Problems with Biometrics

How hard are biometric readings to forge? • Difficulty of forgery is routinely overestimated • Analysis often doesn’t take into account the possibility of computer-generated forgery Revocation is difficult or impossible

slide 52 Biometric Error Rates (Benign)

“Fraud rate” vs. “insult rate” • Fraud = system accepts a forgery (false accept) • Insult = system rejects valid user (false reject) Increasing acceptance threshold increases fraud rate, decreases insult rate For biometrics, U.K. banks set target fraud rate of 1%, insult rate of 0.01% [Ross Anderson] • Common signature recognition systems achieve equal error rates around 1% - not good enough!

slide 53 Biometrics (1)

Face recognition (by a computer algorithm) • Error rates up to 20%, given reasonable variations in lighting, viewpoint and expression Fingerprints • Traditional method for identification • 1911: first US conviction on fingerprint evidence • U.K. traditionally requires 16-point match – Probability of false match is 1 in 10 billion – No successful challenges until 2000 • Fingerprint damage impairs recognition – Ross Anderson’s scar crashes FBI scanner

slide 54 Biometrics (2)

Iris scanning • Irises are very random, but stable through life – Different between the two eyes of the same individual • 256-byte iris code based on concentric rings between the pupil and the outside of the iris • Equal error rate better than 1 in a million • Best biometric mechanism currently known Hand geometry • Used in nuclear premises entry control, INSPASS (discontinued in 2002) Voice, ear shape, vein pattern, face temperature slide 55 Surgical Change

slide 56 Stealing Biometrics

slide 57 Involuntary Cloning

Clone a biometric without victim’s knowledge or assistance

“my voice is my password” cloned retina Fingerprints from beer bottles Bad news: it works! Eye laser scan slide 58 Cloning a Finger [Matsumoto]

slide 59 Molding [Matsumoto]

slide 60 The Mold and the Gummy Finger [Matsumoto]

slide 61