Friday 1 October
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland
Herpetological Conservation and Biology 11:408–425. Submitted: 26 January 2016; Accepted: 2 September 2016; Published: 16 December 2016. Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland Joanne F. Ocock1,4, Richard T. Kingsford1, Trent D. Penman2, and Jodi J.L. Rowley1,3 1Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia 2Centre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, Institute of Conservation Biology and Environmental Management, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia 3Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia 4Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—Amphibian abundance and occupancy are often reduced in regulated river systems near dams, but com- paratively little is known about how they are affected on floodplain wetlands downstream or the effects of actively managed flows. We assessed frog diversity in the Macquarie Marshes, a semi-arid floodplain wetland of conserva- tion significance, identifying environmental variables that might explain abundances and detection of species. We collected relative abundance data of 15 amphibian species at 30 sites over four months, coinciding with a large natural flood. We observed an average of 39.9 ± (SE) 4.3 (range, 0-246) individuals per site survey, over 47 survey nights. Three non-burrowing, ground-dwelling species were most abundant at temporarily flooded sites with low- growing aquatic vegetation (e.g., Limnodynastes tasmaniensis, Limnodynastes fletcheri, Crinia parinsignifera). Most arboreal species (e.g., Litoria caerulea) were more abundant in wooded habitat, regardless of water permanency. -
Terrestrial Fauna Assessment
Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project EnvironmentalEnvironmental Values Assessment Assessment APPENDIX E Terrestrial Fauna Assessment Cameby Downs Continued Operation Project Terrestrial Fauna Assessment May 2018 Syntech Resources Pty Ltd ecology / vegetation / wildlife / aquatic ecology / GIS Executive summary The Cameby Downs Mine is owned and operated by Syntech Resources Pty Ltd (Syntech) and is managed by Yancoal Australia Ltd (Yancoal). Syntech are considering expanding their operation area as part of the Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project (the Project) and an environmental values statement is being prepared to accompany a major Environmental Authority Amendment application. Syntech commissioned Ecosure Pty Ltd (Ecosure) to undertake terrestrial fauna field surveys and ecological assessments to address the minimum requirements in the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage (DEHP) Information Request for an Amendment Application for an Environmental Authority. To supplement previous fauna surveys undertaken over the last decade, Ecosure undertook preliminary surveys and targeted surveys in July 2016. More comprehensive surveys followed in October 2016. Overall, six detailed trapping sites, 50 observational surveys and 56 targeted surveys were undertaken across the study area to determine the likelihood of occurrence of species listed as conservation significant species under State legislation and/ or threatened under Commonwealth legislation. A total of five conservation significant species have been recorded during field surveys (including previous surveys) conducted in the study area. These were: • koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) • glossy black-cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami lathami) • grey snake (Hemiaspis damelii) • short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) • yakka skink (Egernia rugosa) (during previous surveys only). A total of 192 species were recorded during the field surveys, including 13 amphibians, 101 birds, 25 mammals and 26 reptiles. -
ARAZPA YOTF Infopack.Pdf
ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Information pack ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Printing: The ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign pack was generously supported by Madman Printing Phone: +61 3 9244 0100 Email: [email protected] Front cover design: Patrick Crawley, www.creepycrawleycartoons.com Mobile: 0401 316 827 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo: Pseudophryne pengilleyi, Northern Corroboree Frog. Photo courtesy of Lydia Fucsko. Printed on 100% recycled stock 2 ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Contents Foreword.........................................................................................................................................5 Foreword part II ………………………………………………………………………………………… ...6 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................9 Section 1: Why A Campaign?....................................................................................................11 The Connection Between Man and Nature........................................................................11 Man’s Effect on Nature ......................................................................................................11 Frogs Matter ......................................................................................................................11 The Problem ......................................................................................................................12 The Reason -
Volume 37 August 2016 CONSULTING ECOLOGY
Volume 37 August 2016 CONSULTING ECOLOGY www.ecansw.org.au ISSN 1836 – 6813 Newsletter of the Ecological Consultants Association of NSW VOLUME 37 AUGUST 2016 INSIDE THIS ISSUE! 1 ECA Office Bearers 2016-2017 1 Message from the President 2 Photo Competition 3 Euroky - Yet More taxonomic changes to the reptiles of nsw 4 Euroky - Underwater 3D Maps: New Technologies are Precise, Cost-Effective and Openly Available 5 Euroky - Biodiversity Conservation Bill 2016 5 Advertising Opportunities with the ECA 7 ECA Submision for the Biodiversity Conservation Bill 2016 24 Conference 2016 abstracts 29 Upcoming Events in 2017 29 February 2016 ECA Membership Report 30 Experimental Design and Statistics Workshop 31 Recent Literature and New Publications 32 What’s in a trap: An evaluation of various detection methods for terrestrial vertebrate fauna and implications for Environmental Impact Assessments 39 Relevance to Environmental Assessment of the NSW Vegetation Classification and Assessment Project and Comments on Mapping 44 Contributions to the Newsletter, Volume 38 Back cover ECA Photo Gallery Editors: Martin Denny and Brian Wilson Front Cover Photo: Acacia in Sturt National Park. Photo Design and Layout: Amy Rowles Courtesy of Amy Rowles Message from the President ECA Office Bearers 2015-2016 Dear members, President: Martin Denny Most of us are dictated by the passage of years as defined by our [email protected] society. We work within the calendar year and/or the financial year. 1st Vice-President: Other societies use different time scales such as the year of the Belinda Pellow Emperor (I would not like to start thinking that we are in the second [email protected] year of Turnbull). -
Woinarski J. C. Z., Legge S. M., Woolley L. A., Palmer R., Dickman C
Woinarski J. C. Z., Legge S. M., Woolley L. A., Palmer R., Dickman C. R., Augusteyn J., Doherty T. S., Edwards G., Geyle H., McGregor H., Riley J., Turpin J., Murphy B.P. (2020) Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed. Wildlife Research, Vol. 47, Iss. 8, Pp 580-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19182 1 2 3 Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species’ 4 records and estimation of numbers killed. 5 6 7 J.C.Z. Woinarskia*, S.M. Leggeb, L.A. Woolleya,k, R. Palmerc, C.R. Dickmand, J. Augusteyne, T.S. Dohertyf, 8 G. Edwardsg, H. Geylea, H. McGregorh, J. Rileyi, J. Turpinj, and B.P. Murphya 9 10 a NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, 11 Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia 12 b NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, 13 University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; AND Fenner School of the Environment and 14 Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia 15 c Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Bentley, WA 6983, 16 Australia 17 d NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and 18 Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 19 e Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Red Hill, QLD 4701, Australia 20 f Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood campus), Deakin 21 University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia 22 g Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, 23 Australia 24 h NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, 25 Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia i School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. -
Assessing the Sustainability of Native Fauna in NSW State of the Catchments 2010
State of the catchments 2010 Native fauna Technical report series Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Assessing the sustainability of native fauna in NSW State of the catchments 2010 Paul Mahon Scott King Clare O’Brien Candida Barclay Philip Gleeson Allen McIlwee Sandra Penman Martin Schulz Office of Environment and Heritage Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Technical report series Native vegetation Native fauna Threatened species Invasive species Riverine ecosystems Groundwater Marine waters Wetlands Estuaries and coastal lakes Soil condition Land management within capability Economic sustainability and social well-being Capacity to manage natural resources © 2011 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage The State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this technical report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to -
For the Poplar Box Grassy Woodlands on Alluvial Plains
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (s266B) Draft Conservation Advice (including listing advice) for the Poplar Box Grassy Woodland on Alluvial Plains 1. The Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) was established under the EPBC Act and has obligations to present advice to the Minister for the Environment (the Minister) in relation to the listing and conservation of threatened ecological communities, including under sections 189, 194N and 266B of the EPBC Act. 2. The Committee provided its advice on the Poplar Box Grassy Woodland on Alluvial Plains ecological community to the Minister as a draft of this <approved> conservation advice. In <year>, the Minister <accepted/rejected> the Committee’s advice, <and adopted this document as the approved conservation advice>. 3. <If accepted> The Minister amended the list of threatened ecological communities under section 184 of the EPBC Act to include the Poplar Box Grassy Woodland on Alluvial Plains ecological community in the <Endangered> category. It is noted that components of this ecological community are listed as threatened in Queensland. 4. <A draft conservation advice for this ecological community was made available for expert and public comment for a minimum of 30 business days. The Committee and Minister had regard to all public and expert comment that was relevant to the consideration of the ecological community.> 5. This <approved> conservation advice has been developed based on the best available information <at the time it was approved>; this includes scientific literature, advice from consultations, and existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this ecological community. Poplar Box Grassy Woodland on Alluvial Plains. -
Amphibian Community Response to Flow and Rainfall on a Dryland Floodplain Wetland
Linking frogs with flow: Amphibian community response to flow and rainfall on a dryland floodplain wetland Joanne Ocock A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Australian Wetlands, Rivers and Landscapes Centre School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales, Australia September 2013 …But he’d be sitting by the campfire, trying out a simple conversation, and suddenly people would get upset over nothing at all and drive him off. You didn’t expect people to get nasty just because you’d said something like, ‘My word, when did it last rain here?’ did you? “The Last Continent” by Terry Pratchett i Abstract Floods structure the biota of floodplain wetlands, driving spatial and temporal patterns of vegetation, invertebrates, and waterbirds. Flood pulses trigger ‘booms’ in productivity and biodiversity as aquatic biota respond to abundant freshwater habitat and resources. Water extraction and river regulation have decreased the magnitude, duration and frequency of floods, and reduced floodplain extent. To address this problem, environmental water management aims to restore wetland functioning by mimicking the natural flow regime but this requires knowledge of broad ecological responses and associations to flows. Despite amphibians forming a significant component of wetland foodwebs, their response to river flows is poorly known. My work focused on understanding this response in the Macquarie Marshes, a dryland floodplain wetland in Australia. The Macquarie Marshes are a wetland of international significance, severely affected by river regulation. They currently benefit from significant public environmental water investment initiatives. In this thesis I aimed to: (1) investigate variations in relationships between flooding and responses of amphibian species, and quantify the contribution amphibians make to the flood-pulse derived resource ‘boom’; and (2) assess the threat river regulation poses compared to other known amphibian threats across Australia. -
Frog Project Report 2012/13
Frogs of the Holbrook Region A report for Holbrook Landcare Network regarding the results of amphibian surveys undertaken in 2012 and 2013 Alexandra Knight, School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury [email protected] This project was funded as part of the Frogs, Fish and Fertiliser Project by the Raymond Borland Bequest and Landcare Australia Grant/ Catchment Action Grant. Figure 1: Spotted Marsh Frog calling in a wetland in the Wantagong Valley near Holbrook, NSW. (Kylie Durant) Citation Knight, Alexandra (2013) Frogs of the Holbrook Region. A report for Holbrook Landcare Network regarding the results of amphibian surveys undertaken in 2012 and 2013 , Holbrook Landcare Network, 2013. Acknowledgements This work would not have been undertaken without the encouragement and support of Kylie Durant and Chris Cumming. Kylie Durant also provided field assistance and her knowledge of the area was very valuable. My thanks go to the landholders and land managers throughout the Holbrook Region who provided access to their properties and support for this project. Simon McDonald of CSU’s SPAN assisted with developing the map for this report. Luke Pearce provided help with survey locations and general information. Licenses and Ethics Approvals This work was undertaken under CSU Animal Ethics protocol number 10/053 and NSW scientific licence SL101019. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 What -
Martensconsulting Engineers Since 1989 P0802296JR01 V2 – November 2009 Page 100
19 Attachment H – Estimation of K from PSD Analysis Surface Water and Groundwater Assessment: Roach Road, Wagga Wagga Quarry, Wagga Wagga, NSW. martensconsulting engineers since 1989 P0802296JR01_V2 – November 2009 Page 100 Estimation of K (hydraulic conductivity) from Particle Size Distribution Analysis Method ST-41 Revised 29.09.2009 s PROJECT DETAILS consulting engineers consulting Project Wagga Wagga Quarry - Hydrogeological Investigation Test Date unknown Project Ref P0802296JS08_V1 Field Testing Hanson Borehole Ref Hole 1 (WG0901) Data Analysis B. Rose marten Sample Depth 2.7 to 3.0 mBGL Reviewed A. Norris DATA Analysis Kozeny-Carman Equation (1956) 3 2 2 D10 0.20 mm K = (pg /u)*[n /(1-n) ]*(dm /180) D50 0.60 mm D90 1.80 mm pg /u (density*gravity/fluid viscosity) 99300 cm/s (at 20 °C) n (porosity) 0.30 dm (effective grain size) 0.20 mm K (hydraulic conductivity) 0.0122 cm/s K (hydraulic conductivity) 10.51 m/d DATA PLOT Particle Size Distribution Plot 10 1 Series1 Sieve Dia (mm) Dia Sieve 0.1 0.01 0 102030405060708090100 % Passing Head Office Unit 6 / 37 Leighton Place Hornsby NSW 2077, Australia Ph 02 9476 8777 Fax 02 9476 8767 > [email protected] www.martens.com.au MARTENS & ASSOCIATES P/L ABN 85 070 240 890 ACN 070 240 890 Estimation of K (hydraulic conductivity) from Particle Size Distribution Analysis Method ST-41 Revised 29.09.2009 s PROJECT DETAILS consulting engineers consulting Project Wagga Wagga Quarry - Hydrogeological Investigation Test Date unknown Project Ref P0802296JS08_V1 Field Testing Hanson Borehole Ref Hole 2 (WG0902) Data Analysis B. -
2018–19 Basin-Scale Evaluation of Commonwealth Environmental Water – Biodiversity
Murray-Darling Basin Long Term Intervention Monitoring Project 2018–19 Basin-scale evaluation of Commonwealth environmental water – Biodiversity Contributors: Jennifer Hale, Nick Bond, Shane Brooks 20 20 May 2019 March Final Report CFE Publication 252 Murray–Darling Basin Long Term Intervention Monitoring Project 2018–19 Basin-scale evaluation of Commonwealth environmental water — Biodiversity Report Report prepared for the Department of the Environment and Energy, Commonwealth Environmental Water Office by La Trobe University, Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems. Department of the Environment and Energy, Commonwealth Environmental Water Office John Gorton Building King Edward Terrace Parkes ACT 2600 Ph: 1800 803 772 For further information contact: Nick Bond Nikki Thurgate Project Leader Project Co-ordinator Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems (formerly Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre) PO Box 821 Wodonga VIC 3689 Ph: (02) 6024 9640 (02) 6024 9647 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Web: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/freshwater-ecosystems/research/projects/ewkr Enquiries: [email protected] Report Citation: Hale J, Bond N, Brooks S (2020) Murray–Darling Basin Long Term Intervention Monitoring Project — Biodiversity Report. Report prepared for the Department of the Environment and Energy, Commonwealth Environmental Water Office by La Trobe University, Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems, CFE Publication 252 May 2020 76pp. Cover Image: Cormorants at War Plain, Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Photographer: Keith Ward Traditional Owner acknowledgement: La Trobe University Albury-Wodonga and Mildura campuses are located on the land of the Latje Latje and Wiradjuri peoples. The Research Centre undertakes work throughout the Murray-Darling Basin and acknowledge the traditional owners of this land and water. -
Macquarie Marshes Nature Reserve
MACQUARIE MARSHES RAMSAR SITE: Ecological character description – Macquarie Marshes Nature Reserve Marshes and U-block components Nature character description – Macquarie RAMSAR SITE: Ecological MARSHES MACQUARIE Macquarie Marshes Ramsar site Ecological character description Macquarie Marshes Nature Reserve and U-block components Disclaimer The Office of Environment and Heritage NSW (OEH) has compiled this document in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. OEH does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NSW Government, the Australian Government or the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities or the NSW Minister for the Environment, or the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia. This information does not create a policy position to be applied in statutory decision-making. Further it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision on any action. This report is not a substitute for professional advice, rather it is intended to inform professional opinion by providing the authors’ assessment of available evidence on change in ecological character. This information is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention.