A reprinted article from January/February 2020
Responsible Investing—The World Tour
By Michael Lewis and Robert Bush
© 2020 Investments & Wealth Institute®. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. JANUARY FEBRUARY FEATURE 2020
Responsible Investing—The World Tour
By Michael Lewis and Robert Bush
nvironmental, social, and Japan and Australia/New Zealand post- 2014 it has fallen 10 percentage points governance (ESG) activity is ing the fastest growth over this period. to 48.8 percent. GSIA assigns this Eevolving around the world at This has meant that the concentration of declining trend to stricter definitions as an accelerating pace. In this article, ESG assets held in Europe and the United to how to classify ESG assets. we will investigate the instigators of States combined has moderated some- change—from investors, businesses, what, from 94 percent to 85 percent of As part of effort by the European Union governments, regulators, supervisors, ESG assets globally. (EU) to improve the trust and integrity and civil society—to better understand of the sustainable finance market, we the geographic differences as well as Third, ESG investment styles are expect ESG definitions and standards to trends in the rate of change. dominated by just three strategies: become even stricter, with potential (1) exclusion screens, (2) ESG integra- implications for Europe and further INVESTMENT STYLES AND tion, and (3) corporate engagement and afield if the taxonomy of the EU action GEOGRAPHIC BIAS shareholder action (see figure ).1 This is plan for financing sustainable growth Earlier this year, the Global Sustainable as true today as it was eight years ago. (EU Action Plan) becomes a template for Investment Alliance (GSIA) published other regions.3 its biennial report examining sustainable Fourth, regional biases continue to investment trends around the world.1 persist, with exclusion screens the most GREEN CREDENTIALS The GSIA pools ESG data from regional dominant strategy in Europe, ESG AROUND THE WORLD organizations that enables a comparison integration most prevalent in the United Green credentials vary significantly of ESG assets by region and investment States, and corporate engagement the among financial centers around the style. The GSIA published its first report preferred strategy in Japan, a reflection world. One of the most comprehensive in 2012, providing for some interesting of the importance of Japan’s Stewardship surveys ranking international financial observations. Code.2 centers based on the depth and quality of their green financing activities is con- First, when the inaugural report was Fifth, although sustainability themed ducted by Finance Watch in its Global published eight years ago, the GSIA sur- and impact investing styles continue to Green Finance Index.4 The objective is vey reported on ESG assets across seven show strong growth, volumes remain to assess the penetration of green regions compared to just five today. This trivial relative to other investment styles. finance in a financial center’s overall may reflect the challenges of gathering Moreover, assets in both strategies are financial activities (depth) as well as to robust ESG data for emerging markets. predominantly concentrated in the rate a financial center independently Today, GSIA reports on ESG assets in United States. from its market volumes (quality). Africa separately and via the African Investing for Impact Barometer, which Sixth, the proportion of ESG assets rela- The survey attempts to assess the reveals ESG assets are concentrated in tive to managed assets has grown across degree to which green finance makes up the Republic of South Africa (93 percent) all regions since 2012. The most dra- a significant proportion of the financial with the regions of West Africa matic increase has occurred in Australia center’s activity, or whether the scale (4 percent) and East Africa (2 percent) and New Zealand, where the share has and scope of green finance is limited making up the majority of the balance. leapt from less than 15 percent to and eclipsed by a larger amount of GSIA has just begun to track sustainable 63.2 percent (see figure ).2 Meanwhile in “brown activities” such as fossil fuel investing trends in Latin America. the United States, the ratio has more financing. Consequently, having a than doubled from 11 percent to robust audit of the green and brown Second, since 2012 the size of ESG assets 25.7 percent. Notably, the proportion of financing activities across global finan- in the five key regions has increased by ESG assets relative to total managed cial centers provides a useful assessment 130 percent, with the smaller regions of assets has declined in Europe; since of the risks and opportunities these
48 INVESTMENTS & WEALTH MONITOR
© 2020 Investments & Wealth Institute. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. JANUARY FEATURE | Responsible Investing—The World Tour FEBRUARY 2020
cities may face in the transition to a Figure ESG ASSETS BY STRATEGY AND REGION 2018 (USD TRILLION) low-carbon economy. For example, in 1 the event that technology, regulation, E and carbon pricing schemes trigger a E downward revaluation of fossil fuel assets, those stock exchanges with a dis- E proportionate share of such company N E listings would be particularly exposed. B In its most recent edition published in N March 2019, the Global Green Finance B Index examined 63 financial centers 0 2 20 around the world. It revealed significant ■ urope ■ nited tates ■ apan ■ anada ■ Australia ew ealand divergence in green finance activity, with European cities leading and many Source: GSIA (April 2019). Global Sustainable0 Investment Review 2018 2 20 Asian centers lagging (see figure ).3 0 2 Within the European universe, ■ urope ■ nited tates ■ apan ■ anada ■ Australia ew ealand 0PROPORTION OF ESG ASSETS RELATIVE TO TOTAL MANAGED Amsterdam ranks top overall, but Figure 2 ASSETS 0 London leads when ranked solely on 0 0 green finance quality. North American 0 2 2 centers are typically middle ranking, 0 with San Francisco and Montreal ranked 0 0 0 top in their respective countries, and 20 New York on a par with Tokyo. 0 2 0 0 Other Asian centers are divided between 0 middle ranking centers and laggards. 20 A / E U J N For example, Sydney and Melbourne are 0 competing strongly with Shanghai, 0 Beijing, and Singapore, while Mumbai, A / E U J Bangkok, and Kuala Lumpur are ranked N at the bottom of the list on both depth and quality. Source: GSIA (April 2019). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2018
Between 1970 and 2015, approximately Figure GREEN FINANCE RANKINGS BY DEPTH AND QUALITY AROUND 2,250 unique studies have examined 3 THE WORLD the link between ESG and corporate financial performance (CFP).5 The most 00 Amsterdam compelling result from this DWS- University of Hamburg analysis is the hanghai dne uri h ondon strong correlation between ESG and 0 ei ing CFP in the group of emerging market ran urt studies. The results revealed that, where there was a regional identifier, 00 ong ong aris 65.4 percent of studies showed a 0 an ran is o positive link between ESG and CFP, uala umpur 2 epth inan e reen significantly higher than in developed 0 ingapore 0 markets (see figure4 ). 2 ew or 0 0 ang o o o 2 The more compelling results for emerg- 0 Istan ul 00 um ai 0 ing markets corresponds well with 00 20 0 0 0 00 20 0 0 0 00 0 0 2 survey evidence published by the United N E E A /A / reen inan e ualit A Nations-supported Principles for 0 N Responsible Investment (PRI), which Source: Global Green Finance Index 3 (March 2019) 0 ■ ■ N N E E A /A / INVESTMENTS A & WEALTH MONITOR 49 00 N ■ ■ N 0 © 2020 Investments & Wealth Institute. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. © 2020 Investments & Wealth 00 Institute. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. 2 00 00 200 0 00 2 0 2 00 2 00 0 200 0 2