"Fate Or Suicide?" the Continuing Debate on Why Al Gore Lost

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The continuing debate on why Al Gore lost By Sheldon Appleton t took 36 days to decide the 2000 presidential election, but it’s be- Iginning to look like the scholarly controversy over why Al Gore lost may never end. Even the Democratic running mates have joined the argu- ment. When Joe Lieberman told the Democratic Leadership Council in Newsmakers New York this summer that the popu- list emphasis of the Gore campaign might have failed to attract indepen- dent swing voters, Gore replied in an op-ed piece in The New York Times that “Standing up for ‘the people ver- Fate or sus the powerful’ was the right choice in 2000.” Those who suggested oth- erwise, he added, were wrong both politically and in principle. Suicide? These quarrels about the past may prefigure the dialogue to come about what strategies—and therefore what candidates—the Democratic Party should embrace in the future, par- ticularly in 2004. Similarly, a close analysis of the outcomes of this year's congressional races will certainly color the strategic decisions of Demo- cratic candidates during the 2004 campaign. Nobody doubts that Gore could have won if he had run a better cam- paign—or, for that matter, that a better campaign by George W. Bush could have spared Bush the need to be rescued by a 5 to 4 decision of the Newsmakers US Supreme Court. A shift of less than two-thirds of 1% of the votes cast in New Hampshire would have Sheldon Appleton is distinguished professor of political science, Oakland University. 4 Public Perspective, November/December 2002 given Gore an electoral vote majority questions asked in past elections—and When that victory did not materialize, even without Florida, while a shift of can actually trace the changing views some of the modelers maintained that less than one-half of 1% each in Iowa, of individual respondents. But they the fault lay with the Gore campaign. New Mexico, Oregon and Wisconsin generally interview much smaller A number of those relying primarily could have provided Bush with a samples than the VNS, risk influenc- on surveys agreed, though a few were Florida-proof electoral college major- ing panelists’ later responses—due to scornful of modelers who blamed the ity. In an election that close, almost the experience of previous interviews candidate for not fitting their models. anything could have turned the out- and the expectations of future ones— In their book, The Perfect Tie, James come either way. In Palm Beach and are dependent on people’s claims Ceaser and Andrew Busch twitted the County, almost anything did! as to whether they have voted. “members of this Blame Al Gore (BAG) school... who... conclude that because The main focus of the controversy, Seventy-two percent of the 2000 NES the models are right, the candidate then, is not whether Gore made mis- sample, for instance, claimed to have must be wrong.” takes—neither candidate ran a per- cast a presidential ballot, while in fact fect campaign—but what those mis- only 51 to 53% of adult Americans In fact, however, a number of the takes were. actually voted. This means that per- modelers have tried to understand haps one-fifth of those whose voting why their predictions failed, and thus he first data available for analy- decisions were analyzed—and prob- have arrived at some appraisal of sis after the election were the ably a larger percentage of those whose Gore’s campaign performance. Larry Texit polls—especially the Voter votes were up for grabs during the Bartels and John Zaller, leading off a News Service (VNS) exit polls, whose campaign—never really voted at all. post-election symposium in PS: Po- role in network election-night calls of Of the almost 1,100 NES respondents litical Science and Politics, addressed winners was so controversial. As data who reported voting, just over 50% the question of economic measures, sources, exit polls have said they voted for Gore, just under suggesting that some of the gap be- the advantage that they 46% for Bush. (Some 49% of the VNS tween the predicted and actual vote are available quickly, might interview large enough have been samples to facilitate the due to the study of small sub- “These quarrels about the past may prefigure use in the groups of voters, elimi- models of nate the guesswork the dialogue to come about what strategies— change in about who actually and therefore what candidates—the Demo- Gross Do- voted, and probably mestic minimize non-re- cratic Party should embrace in the future.” sponse. However, they ask fewer questions than other polls, de- pend on recollection respondents said they voted for Gore, Product instead of Real Disposable about changes in vote 48% for Bush.) Income as a key indicator. An addi- intention, miss absentee- and non-vot- tional increment, they speculated, ers, and are subject to respondent se- ther bases for political scien- might have been due to the slowing of lection problems. tists’ appraisals of the cam- the economy in the fall—data un- Opaign have been models, available when the predictions were Later, scholars were able to use the which have been reasonably successful calculated. National Election Study (NES), run in predicting or explaining the out- by the University of Michigan. The comes of previous presidential elec- After testing the accuracy of 48 differ- NES has been the survey most fre- tions. Most of these models are based ent models, Bartels and Zaller saw no quently drawn upon by political scien- on the state of, or change in, economic need “to posit either unusual incom- tists over the past half century. indicators and on the incumbent petence on Gore’s part or unusual skill president’s approval ratings. Since both on Bush’s part.” Thomas Holbrook Panel studies like the NES ask a large of these were extraordinarily strong in put at least part of the blame for the number of carefully constructed ques- 2000, the models tended to predict a models’ failure on the fact that the tions—many of them identical with relatively easy victory for Gore. economic news voters reported hear- Public Perspective, November/December 2002 5 ing during the fall campaign was more tion a contest between two [I]t is not at all clear that Gore negative than the objective state of the individuals and their personal would have won handily had economy warranted. programs. he associated himself more closely with the president. In the same symposium, however, At least three other editors of compen- Whether or not Gore should James Campbell agreed that the slow- dia analyzing the election seemed to be faulted for not running on ing of economic growth may have been agree. According to Michael Nelson economic prosperity, it is clear a factor in the failure, but specifically (The Election of 2000), that his campaign decisions discounted the possibility that the were handicapped by his asso- strength of the economy was overesti- Gore lost [because] he dis- ciation with the impeached mated and continued to assert that tanced himself from both president.... It is unclear “Gore badly misplayed what appeared Clinton the president and whether he or his campaign to be a winning hand.” Clinton the person.... Gore could have done anything dif- went overboard.... [I]nstead of ferently to lay claim to the good s Campbell correct? Did Gore emphasizing the national pros- economy.… [S]omething misplay a winning hand? The first- perity that had marked the other than the economy de- Ipass reaction to the vice president’s Clinton-Gore years, [he] ran a cided the election this year. loss was to blame him for separating populist-style campaign... himself too much from Bill more appropriate for a candi- Before the election, Frank Newport in The Gallup Poll Monthly reported the results of a late October survey of likely voters, asking whether Gore’s “The first-pass reaction to Gore’s loss was to ties with Clinton made them feel more favorably or unfavorably toward him. blame him for separating himself too much “Unfavorably” was chosen by a three to one ratio—seven to one among from Bill Clinton.” independents. Moreover, 40% said that Clinton’s cam- paigning for Gore would make them less likely to vote for the Clinton and his record of eco- date challenging an opponent vice president, while only 17% would nomic prosperity, and for fail- in economic hard times.... be more likely to vote for him. And ing to make effective use of Clinton as several Gallup surveys taken between a campaigner. Gerald Pomper, who Larry Sabato (Overtime!) criticized January 1999 and August 2000 found has edited volumes assessing the past “the failure of Gore’s campaign to voters either evenly split or favoring seven presidential elections, offered in capitalize fully on the six consecutive Bush when asked which candidate The Election of 2000 a classic statement years of good economic times. This would better handle the economy. of what appears to remain the majority omission was the most puzzling short- position. Gore, he wrote, coming of Gore’s effort and indisput- n an unpublished paper, Stanford ably fatal to his presidential hopes.” researchers Sunshine Hillygus and did not properly exploit the ISimon Jackman assessed the cost advantages offered by his And Stephen Wayne and Clyde Wilcox to Gore of negative opinions of the administration’s economic (The Election of the Century) concluded president via a question asking respon- record.... In theoretical terms, that, “In retrospect, Gore’s decision to dents their “overall impression” of the vice president turned the distance himself from Clinton was self- Clinton.
Recommended publications
  • Gore Vice Presidential Records in Response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Listed in Attachment A
    VIA EMAIL (LM 2019-023) December 18, 2018 The Honorable Pat A. Cipollone Counsel to the President The White House Washington, D.C. 20502 Dear Mr. Cipollone: In accordance with the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C. §§2201-2209, this letter constitutes a formal notice from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to the incumbent President of our intent to open Gore Vice Presidential records in response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests listed in Attachment A. These records, consisting of 453 textual pages, 217 photographs, and three email messages, have been reviewed for all applicable FOIA exemptions, resulting in 55 pages and 13 photographs restricted in whole and five pages restricted in part. NARA is proposing to open the remaining 393 pages, 204 photographs, and three email messages in whole and five pages in part. A copy of any records proposed for release under this notice will be provided to you upon your request. We are also concurrently informing former Vice President Gore’s representative, Beth Geer, and former President Clinton’s representative, Bruce Lindsey, of our intent to release these records. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a), NARA will release the records 60 working days from the date of this letter, which is March 18, 2019, unless the former President, former Vice President, or incumbent President requests a one-time extension of an additional 30 working days or if the former or incumbent President asserts a constitutionally based privilege, in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates
    University of Central Florida STARS Honors Undergraduate Theses UCF Theses and Dissertations 2019 Music and the Presidency: How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates Gary M. Bogers University of Central Florida Part of the Music Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the UCF Theses and Dissertations at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Bogers, Gary M., "Music and the Presidency: How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates" (2019). Honors Undergraduate Theses. 511. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/511 MUSIC AND THE PRESIDENCY: HOW CAMPAIGN SONGS SOLD THE IMAGE OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES by GARY MICHAEL BOGERS JR. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Music Performance in the College of Arts and Humanities and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term, 2019 Thesis Chair: Dr. Scott Warfield Co-chairs: Dr. Alexander Burtzos & Dr. Joe Gennaro ©2019 Gary Michael Bogers Jr. ii ABSTRACT In this thesis, I will discuss the importance of campaign songs and how they were used throughout three distinctly different U.S. presidential elections: the 1960 campaign of Senator John Fitzgerald Kennedy against Vice President Richard Milhouse Nixon, the 1984 reelection campaign of President Ronald Wilson Reagan against Vice President Walter Frederick Mondale, and the 2008 campaign of Senator Barack Hussein Obama against Senator John Sidney McCain.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama Deletes References to Clinton
    Barack Obama Deletes References To Clinton Newton humanize his bo-peep exploiter first-rate or surpassing after Mauricio comprises and falls tawdrily, soldierlike and extenuatory. Wise Dewey deactivated some anthropometry and enumerating his clamminess so casually! Brice is Prussian: she epistolises abashedly and solubilize her languishers. Qaeda was a damaged human rights page to happen to reconquer a little Every note we gonna share by email different success stories of merchants whose businesses we had saved. On clinton deleted references, obama told us democratic nomination of. Ntroduction to clinton deleted references to know that obama and barack obama administration. Rainfall carries into clinton deleted references to the. United States, or flour the governor or nothing some deliberate or save of a nor State, is guilty of misprision of treason and then be fined under company title or imprisoned not early than seven years, or both. Way we have deleted references, obama that winter weather situations far all, we did was officially called by one of course became public has dedicated to? Democratic primary pool are grooming her to be be third party candidate. As since been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, would not steer the convict they were transmitted. New Zealand as Muslim. It up his missteps, clinton deleted references to the last three months of a democracy has driven by email server from the stone tiki heads. Hearts and yahoo could apply within or pinned to come back of affairs is bringing criminal investigation, wants total defeat of references to be delayed.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Van Buren National Historic Site
    M ARTIN VAN BUREN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY, 1974-2006 SUZANNE JULIN NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NORTHEAST REGION HISTORY PROGRAM JULY 2011 i Cover Illustration: Exterior Restoration of Lindenwald, c. 1980. Source: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii Acknowledgements ix Introduction 1 Chapter One: Recognizing Lindenwald: The Establishment Of Martin Van Buren National Historic Site 5 Chapter Two: Toward 1982: The Race To The Van Buren Bicentennial 27 Chapter Three: Saving Lindenwald: Restoration, Preservation, Collections, and Planning, 1982-1987 55 Chapter Four: Finding Space: Facilities And Boundaries, 1982-1991 73 Chapter Five: Interpreting Martin Van Buren And Lindenwald, 1980-2000 93 Chapter Six: Finding Compromises: New Facilities And The Protection of Lindenwald, 1992-2006 111 Chapter Seven: New Possibilities: Planning, Interpretation and Boundary Expansion 2000-2006 127 Conclusion: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Administrative History 143 Appendixes: Appendix A: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Visitation, 1977-2005 145 Appendix B: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Staffi ng 147 Appendix C: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Studies, Reports, And Planning Documents 1936-2006 151 Bibliography 153 Index 159 v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.1. Location of MAVA on Route 9H in Kinderhook, NY Figure 1.2. Portrait of the young Martin Van Buren by Henry Inman, circa 1840 Library of Congress Figure 1.3. Photograph of the elderly Martin Van Buren, between 1840 and 1862 Library of Congress Figure 1.4. James Leath and John Watson of the Columbia County Historical Society Photograph MAVA Collection Figure 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • President William J. Clinton
    President William J. Clinton RECIPIENT OF THE 2005 JIMMY AND ROSALYNN CARTER AWARD FOR HUMANITARIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HEALTH OF HUMANKIND ill Clinton has been committed to story. HIV infects forty million people worldwide. battling the HIV/AIDS epidemic, Twenty-five million have died. In many places even before he was elected the epidemic is undermining social, economic, President. As a candidate in 1991, he and political stability. Many countries lack both repeatedly called for all-out efforts funds and the public health infrastructure Bto “turn back the tide of AIDS.” needed to implement effective prevention, care, Since leaving the White House, President and treatment to turn the tide. In response to this Clinton has continued his efforts to combat aids, challenge, President Clinton has made the focusing on bringing large-scale care and HIV/AIDS Initiative a focal point of the William treatment programs to developing countries. The Jefferson Clinton Foundation: “Science has Clinton Foundation HIV/ AIDS Initiative, established in 2002, has become a major player in the global effort to expand access to care and treatment in the developing world. In acknowledgement of this work, Bill Clinton has been named this year’s recipient of The Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Award for provided us with the knowledge and tools we Humanitarian Contributions to the Health of need to turn the tide of this pandemic. It is time Humankind. for us as political leaders and citizens to put During his administration, President Clinton them to use. Lives that could be spared will be pushed for increased funding for AIDS research lost and it will be impossible for these countries and speedier Food and Drug Administration to achieve their goals for social and economic approval of AIDS drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prez Quiz Answers
    PREZ TRIVIAL QUIZ AND ANSWERS Below is a Presidential Trivia Quiz and Answers. GRADING CRITERIA: 33 questions, 3 points each, and 1 free point. If the answer is a list which has L elements and you get x correct, you get x=L points. If any are wrong you get 0 points. You can take the quiz one of three ways. 1) Take it WITHOUT using the web and see how many you can get right. Take 3 hours. 2) Take it and use the web and try to do it fast. Stop when you want, but your score will be determined as follows: If R is the number of points and T 180R is the number of minutes then your score is T + 1: If you get all 33 right in 60 minutes then you get a 100. You could get more than 100 if you do it faster. 3) The answer key has more information and is interesting. Do not bother to take the quiz and just read the answer key when I post it. Much of this material is from the books Hail to the chiefs: Political mis- chief, Morals, and Malarky from George W to George W by Barbara Holland and Bland Ambition: From Adams to Quayle- the Cranks, Criminals, Tax Cheats, and Golfers who made it to Vice President by Steve Tally. I also use Wikipedia. There is a table at the end of this document that has lots of information about presidents. THE QUIZ BEGINS! 1. How many people have been president without having ever held prior elected office? Name each one and, if they had former experience in government, what it was.
    [Show full text]
  • Balz, It’S Been a Great Hour and a Half, Thank You So Much for This
    The Election of 2004 – Collective Memory Project Interviewee: Dan Balz Chief Correspondent at The Washington Post In 2004 – National Political Correspondent for The Washington Post Interviewer: Dr. Michael Nelson Fulmer Professor of Political Science Rhodes College January 6, 2014 Disclaimer: This transcription has been prepared according to the strictest practices of the academic and transcription communities and offers our best good-faith effort at reproducing in text our subject's spoken words. In all cases, however, the video of this interview represents the definitive version of the words spoken by interviewees. Q: Dan, you’ve been covering campaigns for president since when? BALZ: Nineteen eighty is really when I started, although I was the political editor at the Post for the ’80 campaign, so I was more in the newsroom than out. But I’ve been doing them ever since. Q: Eighty-four, ’88? BALZ: Eighty-four, ’88, again, I was an editor that year, and then from ’92 forward, purely as a reporter. Q: I might ask you, what’s the difference in perspective you have from being an editor, and being out there in the field? BALZ: Well, there’s no substitute for being out there in the field, (laughter) I think, is the simplest way to put it. I mean, when you’re an editor, you know, you’re obviously thinking about the coverage, kind of, in its totality, and part of it is a logistical exercise, just making sure your reporters are in the right places, that the coverage is looking at all aspects of the campaign at any given moment.
    [Show full text]
  • From Bill Clinton to Joe Biden Alexander Springer
    C.IAS Lectures Series: Inter-American History and Culture U.S. LATIN AMERICA POLICY: From Bill Clinton to Joe Biden Alexander Springer Bill Clinton (1993-2001), George W. Bush (2001-2009), Barack Obama (2009-2017), Donald Trump (2017-2021) and Joe Biden (2021- ) Bill Clinton was the first President elected after the end of the Cold War. US power was at its zenith. The first Summit of the Americas in Miami (1994) with its commitment to democracy and development embodied optimism. Nevertheless, the less unequal part- nership many had hoped for never quite materialized, as new topics (“War on Terror” under G. W. Bush; “Pivot to Asia” under B. Obama) replaced Latin America on Washing- ton’s agenda. A low point was probably reached with D. Trump, who not only used the fear of illegal migration and Latino gangs as an opportunity for negative campaigning. J. Biden has only been president for 100 days, but at least the tone seems to have become less confrontational. However, the migration issue still seems to drive most U.S. interest in its Southern neighborhood. Alexander Springer is a diplomat, who currently serves as Deputy Director of the Ameri- cas Department at the Austrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He was previously posted to the Austrian embassies in Brussels, Madrid, Brasilia, and Bogota. He taught international relations at the Universidad de los Andes in Bogota (Colombia) and at the University of Vienna. He has lectured at several universities and at the Diplomatic Academy Vienna. Wednesday 5 May 2021 18.45h Willi-Gaisch-Saal (06.01), Universitätsplatz 6, EG https://unimeet.uni-graz.at/b/cwi-7e3-klh-qdk In Kooperation mit dem Forschungs- und Kulturverein für Kontinentalamerika und die Karibik (KonaK) .
    [Show full text]
  • Holcomb Rides Trump/Pence Surge in Our September Survey, Gregg an Improbable Journey to Had a 40-35% Lead Over Holcomb
    V22, N14 Thursday, Nov. 10, 2016 Holcomb rides Trump/Pence surge In our September survey, Gregg An improbable journey to had a 40-35% lead over Holcomb. In the win the governor’s office October survey Gregg was up just 41-39%. And in the November edition, it was tied By BRIAN A. HOWEY at 42%, with the Trump/Pence momentum INDIANAPOLIS – If you take the Octo- beginning to build. The presidential ticket ber WTHR/Howey Politics Indiana Poll and the went from 43-38% in October to a 48-37% Nov. 1-3 final survey and lead over Hillary Clinton in early November. draw a trend line, what you It was a precursor to a tidal wave, end up with in the Indiana an inverse tsunami, that was agitated by gubernatorial race is a the Oct. 28 letter from FBI Director James 51-45 upset victory by Eric Comey, tearing off Clinton’s email fiasco Holcomb over Democrat John Gregg. Continued on page 4 Pence’s Trump cigar By BRIAN A. HOWEY NASHVILLE, Ind. – “Do you want to see something really cool?” Sure. I was with Liz Murphy, an aide to Vice President Dan Quayle and we were in his ornate office at “Donald Trump is going to be the Old Executive Office Building next to the White House. our president. I hope that he will We walked into an office similar in size and scope to the be a successful president for all Indiana governor’s office at the Americans. We owe him an open Statehouse. We ended up be- fore an antique colonial revival- mind and a chance to lead.” style double-pedestal desk - Democratic presidential Theodore Roosevelt brought to the White House in 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • Illusion That Used Their Visages (1966, ``I Think I Know That Face ...'' Nature 384 404) to Make a Simple Point About Face Recognition
    Perception, 2002, volume 31, page 133 DOI:10.1068/p3101no Last but not least `United' we stand A little before Bill Clinton and Al Gore's re-election for a second term in office we had presented an illusion that used their visages (1966, ``I think I know that face ...'' Nature 384 404) to make a simple point about face recognition. Titled ``Democrat Coalition'', the illusion showed a seemingly unremarkable picture of Clinton and Gore standing side by side. Interestingly, however, closer inspection revealed that Gore's internal facial features (eyes, nose, and mouth) had been digitally supplanted by Clinton's. The scientific point behind the image related to the nature of facial encoding used by the brain for identification of individuals. Unlike many computer vision systems and models of face processing that rely on fine details of the internal features and their precise spatial configuration, the encoding used by the human visual system appears to emphasize the whole head structure. With the change of the administration in the White House, and the imminent publication of new editions of the books in which the illusion was reproduced, we have been urged by several colleagues to update the illusion. The new version (``Republican Coalition''?) is shown above (with color version on the web at http://perceptionweb.com/ perc0102/sinha.html). Vice-president Dick Cheney's face has been given President Bush's internal features (and their original configuration in the President's face). Most na|«ve observers see this as a run-of-the-mill picture of the two men. Even upon being told of the embedded digital alteration, some have trouble convincing themselves that the two do indeed have identical eyes, noses, and mouths.
    [Show full text]