DOCSLIB.ORG

On 28 August 2006 Media Watch Included These References to Gerard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On 28 August 2006 Media Watch Included These References to Gerard On 28 August 2006 Media Watch included these references to Gerard Henderson amongst its comments on media coverage of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the conviction of Jack Thomas. And Gerard Henderson said the verdict drew a line between those who get the problem of terrorism and those who don't. Unanimous verdict in democracy divided The Thomas case outlines the division between civil libertarian types (trial lawyers, artists, humanities academics, comedians and the like) who focus on legal process and others who take terrorists at their word and regard them as a genuine threat to democratic societies. — Sydney Morning Herald, Unanimous verdict in democracy divided, 22nd August, 2006 Well it goes without saying that if you're with the comedians you're not taking this seriously enough. But Mr Henderson went further and queried the background of one of the three Appeal Court judges, Justice Maxwell. According to Who's Who in Australia, he is a former staffer to a federal Labor attorney-general and a past president of Liberty Victoria. Maxwell was appointed to his present position by Steve Bracks's Labor Government, which has good relations with the civil liberties lobby. — Sydney Morning Herald, Unanimous verdict in democracy divided, 22nd August, 2006 And he wasn't alone. Here's Alan Jones, parroting Gerard Henderson, on 2GB. Mr Justice Maxwell in the Court of Appeal was a former staffer to a federal Labor attorney-general, a past president of Liberty Victoria, appointed by the Bracks Labor government. Do these judges bring their baggage with them as well in the determinations that they reach? — Radio 2GB, Breakfast show, 23rd August, 2006 But the commentators weren't all of one view… [read or view the whole story here http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s1726396.htm] Media Watch’s passing reference to Gerard Henderson provoked this email from him. TO : PETER McEVOY Executive Producer, Media Watch - ABC FROM : GERARD HENDERSON DATE : 31 AUGUST 2006 Dear Peter Background As you may, or may not, recall – on a couple of occasions in the past decade you have asked me whether I would like to be considered as a presenter of the ABC TV Media Watch program. I have no idea whether I would have got the gig – frankly, I very much doubt it. However, as you will recall, on both occasions I declined to express an interest. My position was that the Media Watch format was tired. I proposed that, instead, Media Watch should have two presenters and that it should be the occasion of debate and discussion about journalism – rather than a pulpit from which a presenter lays down the Media Watch line. You indicated to me that ABC TV was committed to the current format – and that was that. Media Watch and Jack Thomas As you are aware, Media Watch devoted most of its program on Monday 28 August 2006 to fanging critics of the Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision in The Queen v Joseph Terrence Thomas (2006 VSCA 165). Monica Attard criticised – in order – The Australian (particularly editor- in-chief Chris Mitchell and legal affairs editor Chris Merritt), myself, broadcaster Alan Jones and finally Peter Faris QC. Naturally enough, she disagreed with all of the above. Then Ms Attard praised the likes of The Australian’s reporter Mike Steketee, Sydney Morning Herald columnist Richard Ackland and, in passing, the Crikey newsletter along with The Age. Naturally enough, she agreed with all of this group. At least there was debate on this issue in The Australian, the Sydney Morning Herald and Crikey (but not The Age). However, Media Watch did not even concede that those who were critcised by Monica Attard had any case at all. They were dismissed as simply wrong. Just like the Pope ruling against those who do not follow orthodoxy, as defined by the Vatican. As you will be aware, I was not contacted by Media Watch prior to last Monday’s program going to air. Nor was I given any opportunity to state my case on the program – or even on the Media Watch website. The continuing Media Watch format suggests that you are not interested in debate and discussion on the program. Even so, I wish to put on record the comments I would have made had you approached me before Ms Attard editorialised against me. This is the only possible means of doing so – since Media Watch allows no right of reply on (taxpayer funded) ABC television. First up, Monica Attard bagged me for writing the following in my syndicated column on 22 August 2006 viz: The Thomas case outlines the division between civil libertarian types (trial lawyers, artists, humanities academics, comedians and the like) who focus on legal process and others who take terrorists at their word and regard them as a genuine threat to democratic societies. Ms Attard dismissed my comment – not with argument, but, rather with ridicule – by commenting: “Well, it goes without saying that if you’re with the comedians you’re not taking this seriously enough”. This put- down, delivered with a smirk, overlooks the fact that there is a division within Australian society along the lines set out in my column. On the evidence of her performance last Monday, Ms Attard belongs to the civil libertarian types. I doubt that she would deny this. Following her put-down and attempt at humour, Monica Attard then moved to her essential charge against me. Her editorial comment was followed by a quote from me – as set out below: Monica Attard: But Mr Henderson went further and queried the background of one of the three Appeal Court judges, Justice Maxwell: Gerard Henderson: According to Who’s Who in Australia, he is a former staffer to a federal Labor attorney-general and a past president of Liberty Victoria. Maxwell was appointed to his present position by Steve Bracks’s Labor Government, which has good relations with the civil liberties lobby. The fact is that this quote was not in context. Had Ms Attard excised her attempt at humour, she would have had time to quote from my entire comment about Justice Maxwell – which read as follows: These days it is fashionable in civil liberties circles to analyse the background of High Court judges. Let's try the same practice with the Victorian Supreme Court, for a change. Take the Court of Appeal president, Maxwell, for example. According to Who's Who in Australia, he is a former staffer to a federal Labor attorney- general and a past president of Liberty Victoria. Maxwell was appointed to his present position by Steve Bracks's Labor Government, which has good relations with the civil liberties lobby. Intellectual Dishonesty A comparison of the two quotes underlies Media Watch’s intellectual dishonesty in this instance. Ms Attard dressed me down for daring to query the background of one of the three Appeal Court judges, Justice Maxwell. However, a reference to the full quote would have revealed that I actually wrote that if it was okay to analyse the background of High Court judges – then it was worth trying the same practice with the Victorian Supreme Court. As you should be aware, it has been a common practice for commentators to look at the background of the Howard Government’s appointments to the High Court of Australia – namely Murray Gleeson, Ian Callinan, Dyson Heydon and Susan Crennan. Is Media Watch really editorialising that it would be improper to even mention Justice Callinan’s background before his appointment to the High Court by the Howard Government? Almost certainly not. Or is Media Watch really saying that it is okay to analyse the background of judges appointed by the Coalition government in Canberra but not those appointed by the Labor government in Melbourne? Apparently so. Then there is the matter of public interest. In view of the role played in the current debate by Liberty Victoria as a critic of the Coalition Government’s national security legislation (which enjoys broad support from the Labor Opposition) – surely readers of the Sydney Morning Herald and The West Australian are entitled to know that Chris Maxwell was a president of Liberty Victoria before his appointment as President of the Victorian Court of Appeal. Why should readers be denied this knowledge? It is not as if, when president of Liberty Victoria, Chris Maxwell refrained from a vigorous – and at times, hyperbolic – involvement in the public debate. Mr Maxwell, as he then was: (i) opposed the need for a new offence of terrorism, described the Howard Government’s proposed counter terrorism measures as “intellectually dishonest and profoundly worrying” and even asserted that the legislation was “redolent of Stalinist Russia” (The Australian, 24 December 2001). He also depicted any move by the Attorney-General to detain terrorists for a limited period as “more redolent of the KGB than of Australian civil society” (ABC Radio, The World Today, 28 November 2001). Media Watch’s intellectual dishonesty did not end there. In her editorial, Monica Attard gave the impression that there was only one valid legal position in this instance – namely that of the three Court of Appeal judges who sat on The Queen v Thomas. She did not mention that the Court of Appeal overruled the decision of the experienced trial judge, Justice Philip Cummins, who sat in the case at first instance – DPP v Thomas (2006 VSC 243). Sure, the Court of Appeal overruled Justice Cummins – but this was no reason for Ms Attard to ignore the decision which led to the appeal. Justice Cummins, who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1988, is a very experienced judge – and he held that Jack Thomas’ statement to the Australian Federal Police was voluntary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download and Otherwise Freely Deal with This Work for Any Purpose, Provided That You Attribute the Owner
    Annual Report 2007-2008 © State of New South Wales through the Administrative Decisions Tribunal, Attorney General’s Department 2008 Copyright: You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this work for any purpose, provided that you attribute the owner. However, you must obtain permission if you wish to (a) charge others for access to the work (other than at cost), (b) include the work in advertising or a product for sale, or (c) modify the work. Disclaimer: This document has been prepared by the Administrative Decisions Tribunal for general information purposes and while every care has been taken in relation to its accuracy, no warranty is given or implied. Further, recipients should obtain their own independent advice before making any decisions that rely on this information. Alternate formats: This information can be provided in alternative formats such as Braille, audiotape, large print or computer disk. Please contact Corporate Services or Diversity Services on (02) 9228 7507 (voice), (02) 9228 7733 (TTY - for people who are Deaf or have a speech impairment) or [email protected] The Hon. John Hatzistergos MLC Attorney General and Minister for Justice Parliament House SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear Attorney, In accordance with section 26 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, I am pleased to present the tenth annual report of the Tribunal, covering the period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008. Yours sincerely, Judge KEVIN O’CONNOR AM President 3 October 2008 Level 15, St James Centre, 111
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA WATCH on Phillip Adams
    ISSUE 39 AUGUST 2011 ANYA POUKCHANSKI with a Gen Y look at The First Stone STEPHEN MATCHETT looks at political biography with Bush, Blair and Howard AYN RAND uncovered – again GERARD HENDERSON versus Brenda Niall – history and the case of Fr Hackett SJ JOHN MCCONNELL unveils Mark Aarons’ rethink on the Australian Communist Party Faith and politics – Enid Lyons as seen by ANNE HENDERSON SANDALISTA WATCH CONTINUES – Margaret Throsby and Haydn Keenan find ASIO under the bed MEDIA WATCH on Phillip Adams. Alan Ramsey and Robert Manne’s memories Published by The Sydney Institute 41 Phillip St. with Gerard Henderson’s Sydney 2000 Ph: (02) 9252 3366 MEDIA WATCH Fax: (02) 9252 3360 The Sydney Institute Quarterly Issue 39, August 2011 l CONTENTS MR SCOTT’S FIVE YEAR PLAN Editorial 2 In July 2006 Mark Scott commenced work as managing director of the Australian Broadcasting Sandalista Watch - Corporation. Initially appointed for a five year term, Mr Scott recently had his contract renewed for a Public Broadcasting, ASIO second term by the ABC Board. Shortly after his aand the Cold War appointment, Mark Scott’s office approached The Sydney Institute with a proposal that he deliver his - Gerard Henderson 3 first major public on the ABC to the Institute. The offer was willingly accepted and the talk took place Government and Freedom - on 16 October 2006. Who is Ayn Rand? In his address, Mark Scott correctly pointed out that i - 6 he was both managing director and editor-in-chief of Anne Henderson the public broadcaster. He acknowledged that there is “a sense that the organisation has issues with Ripples From the First Stone balance and fairness” and conceded that the ABC - Anya Poukchanski 10 had “been at times too defensive in the face of such criticism”.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Ms Kleinig I Refer to Your Recent Phone Call to My Office And
    From: Gerard Henderson Sent: Tuesday, 14 May 2013 4:33 PM To: Xanthe Kleinig Cc: Mark Scott; Richard Finlayson; Michael Millett Subject: RE: query from Media Watch Dear Ms Kleinig I refer to your recent phone call to my office and subsequent email to me (dated 9 May 2013) advising that the ABC 1 Media Watch program “is interested in the declarations or otherwise of expert commentators from institutes and think tanks who contribute frequently to the public conversation, especially in the media”. I watched the Media Watch credits last night. I noted that Media Watch presenter Jonathan Holmes has three journalists/researchers and four librarians in addition to a production team of around ten (not including studio/camera/editing crew). In view of Media Watch’s substantial research staff, I am surprised that you do not seem to be aware of the aims and practices of The Sydney Institute. The Sydney Institute is not a think tank. Rather, it is a policy forum for debate and discussion. The Sydney Institute has no policies, does no lobbying and does not advocate causes. Speakers at the Institute, over the past six months, include Senator Christine Milne, Anthony Albanese, Tony Abbott, Senator Bob Carr and Senator George Brandis. As you should be aware, speakers address the Institute for about 30 minutes and engage in questions/discussion for a further 30 minutes. All talks delivered are published in full (subject to only stylistic editing and/or the rare elimination of defamatory material) in The Sydney Papers Online and downloaded on the Institute’s podcast.
    [Show full text]
  • Abc Friends Salutes Four Corners
    UpdateDecember 2016 Vol 24, No. 3 Thrice Yearly Newsletter ABC FRIENDS SALUTES FOUR CORNERS t the Annual Award questions of the medical profession. Presentation for Broadcasting Even in her illness, Liz was still the AExcellence on Friday 25th relentless investigative reporter. November, ABC Friends (National) It is these qualities, along with recognised the extraordinary persistence, patience, integrity, contribution of Four Corners to curiosity, thoroughness, balance and Australian life and investigative compassion, the hallmarks of great journalism of the highest quality journalism, that have undoubtedly over the past 55 years. Throughout been a thorn in the side of politicians those 55 years, Four Corners has of all persuasions, and those in consistently and with commendable positions of power and authority courage shone a light into many who have been under the relentless dark places in our national life, and microscope of a Four Corners has, without any doubt, investigation. Very recent examples changed Australia for the come to mind: “Broken Homes” better. The final program examined our totally inadequate and for 2016, A Sense of misnamed Child Protection System; Self, was no exception. and her persistent search for the “The Forgotten Children” painfully Liz Jackson, multi-award best medical options with her documented the evaporation of hope winning journalist with Four partner Martin Butler, displaying amongst refugee children under Corners for 30 years, laid exceptional courage, honesty and detention on Nauru; “Australia’s bare her private and family professionalism. In so doing, she Shame”, in graphic detail, showed life in documenting her struggle with taught us all how to be better patients, the onset of Parkinson’s Disease better carers, and to ask the right Continued on Page 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Foreign News Coverage in the Global News Environment
    Australian Foreign News Coverage in the Global News Environment Author Jordan Perez, Eduardo Roberto Published 2017-08 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Hum, Lang & Soc Sc DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2199 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/376517 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Australian Foreign News Coverage in the Global News Environment An investigation of Australian journalists and gatekeepers Eduardo Roberto Jordan Pérez School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research Arts, Education & Law Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2017 Australian Foreign News Coverage in the Global News Environment 1 Australian Foreign News Coverage in the Global News Environment Abstract This research project will examine whether the cultural training that news editors receive in their organisations affects their international news selection, and whether this ultimately affects international news reportage in Australia. The study is based on previous research focusing on three main areas of scholarship, drawn from a wider range of international theatres. These three bodies of work focus on: (1) factors affecting the selection, construction and presentation of international news; (2) how news editors and news directors function as gatekeepers of international news within newsrooms, and how they prioritise international news; and (3) whether cultural training occurs in Australian newsrooms, and if so, how it influences the gatekeeper’s news selection process, and through it, world news coverage in the Australian news media.
    [Show full text]
  • Monica Attard
    Monica Attard Gold Walkley Award-winning journalist, MC & Facilitator Monica Attard was one of the ABC’s most senior journalists, after a 28-year career with the national broadcaster. She served the corporation overseas and presented some of its most high profile current affairs programs. In 1990 she was posted to Moscow as Soviet Communism was collapsing. She witnessed and reported on the coup against Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, the collapse of Soviet communism and the rise of Boris Yeltsin’s cowboy capitalism. During her posting to the region, she covered countless ethnic wars within the borders of the old Soviet Union, including the first Chechen war. Monica was awarded an Order of Australia for her services to journalism in 1990. In 1991 she scooped the pool with 3 Walkley Awards for her work in Russia, including the Gold Walkley for excellence in journalism. On her return to Australia in 1994, Monica hosted ABC Radio’s PM for four years and then The World Today. In 2001 she created the award-winning radio current affairs show Sunday Profile which quickly established itself as a natural meeting place for newsmakers. The show was heard on two ABC Radio networks – ABC Local Radio nationally and ABC Radio National. Monica was awarded two Walkley Awards for Best Broadcast Interviewing for her work on Sunday Profile, bringing her total Walkley count to five. In 2006 she was appointed host of Media Watch on ABC TV and she returned for a second season in 2007. She has a law degree and is the creator and former Managing Editor of The Global Mail.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    CLIMATE CRISIS AND CORONAVIRUS ARTICLES Reporting Black Lives Matters Deaths in custody journalism in Australia Abstract: George Floyd’s death at the knee of USA police sparked protests and renewed reporting of Indigenous deaths in custody in Australia. As the 30th anniversary of the release of the final report of the Australian Royal Com- mission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody approaches, it is timely to update Wendy Bacon’s 2005 research on deaths in custody journalism. While most deaths in custody continue to pass in judicial and media silence, this article, written from a white journalism academic’s perspective, includes instances of in-depth reporting since 2005, journalism that meets the Royal Commis- sion’s observation that journalism can contribute to justice for Aboriginal people when it places deaths in custody in their social and moral contexts. It also includes mini-case study of the news coverage of Mr Ward’s 2008 death, which demonstrates the relationship between governmental or judicial processes and announcements and patterns of coverage. It also notes the ef- fect that First Nations journalists are having on the prevalence, perspectives and depth of deaths in custody journalism. Information and resources are provided for journalists and journalism students to more effectively report Indigenous deaths in custody, include Indigenous voices in their stories, and to better understand trauma and take care of themselves, their sources and their communities. Keywords: Australia, Black Lives Matter, deaths in custody, deaths in custody journalism, deaths in custody reporting resources, Indigenous, investigative journalism, Mr Ward, Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody BONITA MASON University of South Australia, Adelaide ‘Oh shit, she’s dead.’ HESE were the words spoken when a prison clinic nurse eventually en- tered the cell of an Indigenous prisoner and found her lifeless.
    [Show full text]
  • Molly Ringwald, Robert Greene and More
    smh.com.au A CRIMINAL , MOLLYMIND RINGWALD & A SEDUCTION WALKARTIST INTO A... HAVE WE GOT A STORY FOR YOU. Tara Moss, Molly Ringwald, Robert Greene and more. Live at Sydney Writers’ Festival May 20–26, 2013. 1HERSA1 S001 2 swf.org.au SYDNEY WRITERS’ FESTIVAL WOULD LIKE TO THANK CORE FUNDERS SUPPORTERS ABL Open Hachette Australia Randwick City Library Service Allen & Unwin HarperCollins Red Room Company Ashfield Library Head On Photo Festival Riverside Theatres Auburn Poets and Writers Group The Hills Shire Library Ryde Library Service Auckland Writers and Readers Service Scholastic Festival History Council of NSW Scribe Australian Poetry Hoopla Simmer on the Bay Australian Publishers Hornsby Central Library South Coast Writers Centre Association Hurstville City Library Stella Prize EXCLUSIVE LEGAL PARTNER Avant Card ICE Sydney Dance Lounge Black Inc Kathy Shand Sydney PEN Blacktown Arts Centre Kogarah Library Sydney Story Factory Blacktown City Libraries Lox & Smith Text Publishing Byteback Computing Macleay Museum The Folio Society Camden Council Library Service Meanjin The Langham Sydney Campbelltown Arts Centre Mont Blanc University of Queensland Press MAJOR PARTNERS Campbelltown City Library Murdoch Media Group University of Technology Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Museum of Contemporary Sydney Chanelle Collier Art UWA Publishing Chatswood Concourse The Nest Varuna, The Writers’ House Children’s Book Council NSW Writers’ Centre Vivid Ideas of Australia Overland Walker Books City of Sydney Libraries Pan Macmillan The Walkley Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • UNAA Media Award Winners and Finalists
    UNAA Media Award Winners and Finalists 2018_____________________________________________ Outstanding Contribution to Humanitarian Journalism: Michael Gordon Promotion of Empowerment of Older People (sponsored by Cbus) WINNER: Japan's Cheerleading Grannies, Dean Cornish and Joel Tozer, Dateline, SBS FINALIST: I Speak Your Language, Stefan Armbruster, SBS World News FINALIST: 40 years fighting for freedom, Patrick Abboud, SBS Promotion of Social Cohesion WINNER: Rough Justice: a new future for our youth? Jane Bardon and Owain Stia-James, ABC News FINALIST: Seeds of Change, Compass, Kim Akhurst, Mark Webb, Philippa Byers, Jessica Douglas-Henry, Richard Corfield, ABC FINALIST: We don’t belong to anywhere, Nicole Curby, ABC Radio National FINALIST: Hear Me Out, ABC News Story Lab Promotion of Gender Equality: Empowerment of Women and Girls WINNER: The Justice Principle, Belinda Hawkins, Sarah Farnsworth, Mark Farnell and Peter Lewis, Australian Story, ABC FINALIST: Strong Woman, NITV Living Black FINALIST: The scandal of Emil Shawky Gayed: gynaecologist whose mutilation of women went unchecked for years, Melissa Davey, Carly Earl, Guardian Australia FINALIST: The Matildas: Pitch Perfect, Jennifer Feller, Garth Thomas, Camera-Quentin Davis,Ron Ekkel, Anthony Frisina, Stuart Thorne, Australian Story, ABC Promotion of Empowerment of Children and Young People WINNER: Speak even if your voice shakes, Waleed Aly, Tom Whitty and Kate Goulopoulos, The Project FINALIST: Rough Justice: a new future for our youth? Jane Bardon and Owain Stia-James, ABC
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program
    Back to the Source A national investigative journalism conference for journalists committed to uncovering state, national and international news stories that go beyond the everyday news feed. #ACIJinvestigate www.conference.investigate.org.au www.acij.uts.edu.au Back to the Source: Investigative Journalism Conference | conference.investigate.org.au | #ACIJinvestigate Welcome On behalf of the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism, a warm welcome to Australia's first national Investigative Journalism Conference, Back to the Source. The ACIJ is located in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of Technology Sydney. We are closely linked to the undergraduate and postgraduate Journalism programs in the Faculty and the Graduate School of Journalism. Our thanks to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation for its generous support and to our many distinguished speakers, chairs and the staff, volunteers and students who've helped make the conference possible. Now let's investigate! Tom Morton Director Australian Centre for Independent Journalism Back to the Source: Investigative Journalism Conference | conference.investigate.org.au | #ACIJinvestigate Robert Rosenthal Executive Director, Centre for Investigative Reporting @rosey18 Before joining the Centre for Investigative Reporting as Executive Director in 2008, Robert Rosenthal worked for the Boston Globe, Philadelphia Inquirer, San Francisco Chronicle and New York Times, where he broke the story on the Pentagon papers. As a reporter, Robert has won numerous awards, including the Overseas Press Club Award for magazine writing, the Sigma Delta Chi Award for distinguished foreign correspondence, the National Association of Black Journalists Award for Third World Reporting, and was a Pulitzer Prize finalist in international reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • FABC Nov 07.Indd
    Ver # 4 Update NOV 07:Update March 07**NEW R5 .qxd 12/11/07 4:01 PM Page 1 Friends of the ABC (NSW) Inc. quarterly newsletter November-December 2007 Vol 16, No. 5 update friends of the abc NSW FABC AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN Enemies of the ABC Darce Cassidy BROADCASTING for 2007 GOES TO While there is little to distin- ROBYN WILLIAMS and the RADIO guish between various parties on the issues of ABC funding, and NATIONAL SCIENCE SHOW advertising on the ABC, there are significant differences with regard to the appointment of the ABC Board. All governments have tended Producer (1972), and included to appoint their own sympathisers and presen- Investigations, Ockham’s Razor to the ABC’s governing body, but ter of The and In Conversation which fea- the Howard government has Science tures leading science writer and taken board stacking to new Show since broadcaster Robyn Williams talk- heights. The Fraser government its launch ing one-on-one with science pro- made generally conservative in August fessionals and other leading figures. appointments, but playwright 1975, David Williamson was a notable Robyn has Robyn describes The Science exception.The Hawke/Keating given 32 Show as follows: government appointed mostly years of outstanding and distin- “The program is essentially Labor sympathisers, but an excep- guished service to both the ABC unpredictable. This is to allow tion was the former Liberal min- and the listening public of maximum flexibility to accommo- ister Ian McPhee. Australia. Working within very date new material and talent. It But for the Howard govern- limited financial resources, Robyn can range from the regular maga- ment selecting a predominatly has, over those 32 years, provided zine program to lectures, scripted conservative board was not us with a program of a consistent- series, of which several by the late enough.
    [Show full text]
  • Dog Whistle’ Journalism: Restraints on the Public Right to Know David Blackall University of Wollongong, [email protected]
    Asia Pacific eM dia Educator Issue 20 Teaching journalism amid the techno hype Article 20 1-1-2010 Anti-terrorism, climate change and ‘dog whistle’ journalism: Restraints on the public right to know David Blackall University of Wollongong, [email protected] Seth Tenkate Transport Workers Union, NSW Recommended Citation Blackall, David and Tenkate, Seth, Anti-terrorism, climate change and ‘dog whistle’ journalism: Restraints on the public right to know, Asia Pacific eM dia Educator, 20, 2010, 203-216. Available at:http://ro.uow.edu.au/apme/vol1/iss20/20 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Anti-terrorism, climate change and ‘dog whistle’ journalism: Restraints on the public right to know David Blackall University of Wollongong, NSW [email protected] Seth Tenkate Transport Workers Union, NSW The original message on the ‘paradigm of prevention’, which obliges government to address the emergency from terrorism, was first coined by former US Attorney General John Ashcroft. Soon after, Australian Prime Minister of the day John Howard was to follow Ashcroft’s call. The new Labor government in 2007 deployed a fresh strategy: ‘the precautionary principle’ where government justifies further intrusive measures to confront the emergencies of climate change. This silent messaging as placed in the news media, by inclusion or omission of certain facts, can be traced and exposed to reveal a quietly agreed process to influence the public to imagine the worst without solid evidence. While such hidden messages will continue to shape public opinion and cause obfuscation, journalism educators can develop learning experiences so their students can notice the detail.
    [Show full text]