DOCSLIB.ORG

Spark for HPC: a Comparison with MPI on Compute-Intensive Applications Using Monte Carlo Method

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IT 18 048 Examensarbete 30 hp November 2018 Spark for HPC: a comparison with MPI on compute-intensive applications using Monte Carlo method Huijie Shen Tingwei Huang Institutionen för informationsteknologi Department of Information Technology Abstract Spark for HPC: a comparison with MPI on compute-intensive applications using Monte Carlo method Huijie Shen and Tingwei Huang Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet UTH-enheten With the emergence of various big data platforms in recent years, Apache Spark - a distributed large-scale computing platform, is Besöksadress: perceived as a potential substitute for Message Passing Interface Ångströmlaboratoriet Lägerhyddsvägen 1 (MPI) in High Performance Computing (HPC). Due to the limitations in Hus 4, Plan 0 fault-tolerance, dynamic resource handling and ease of use, MPI, as a dominant method to achieve parallel computing in HPC, is often Postadress: associated with higher development time and costs in enterprises such Box 536 751 21 Uppsala as Scania IT. This thesis project aims to examine Apache Spark as an alternative to MPI on HPC clusters and compare their performance in Telefon: various aspects. The test results are obtained by running a compute- 018 – 471 30 03 intensive application on both platforms to solve a Bayesian inference Telefax: problem of a extended Lotka-Volterra model using particle Markov chain 018 – 471 30 00 Monte Carlo methods. As is confirmed by the tests, Spark is demonstrated to be superior in fault tolerance, dynamic resource Hemsida: handling and ease of use, whilst having its shortcomings in http://www.teknat.uu.se/student performance and resource consumption compared with MPI. Overall, Spark proves to be a promising alternative of MPI on HPC clusters. As a result, Scania IT continues to explore Spark on HPC clusters for use in different departments. Handledare: Erik Lönroth Ämnesgranskare: Sverker Holmgren Examinator: Mats Daniels IT 18 048 Tryckt av: Reprocentralen ITC Acknowledgement We would like to express gratitude to the following people for their involvement and contributions in this thesis project: Erik Lönroth and Jimmy Hedman at Scania IT and Mohammadtaghi Rezaei at KTH, for their continuous guidance as supervisors of the project Prof. Sverker Holmgren at Uppsala University for his valuable feedback on the report Prof. Darren Wilkinson at Newcastle University, for providing use case on our application Fredrik Hurtig, Lars Kihlmark, Daniel Sigwid, Mats Johansson at Scania IT, for their help in solving technical and process issues throughout the project Justin Pearson and Edith Ngai at Uppsala University, for their help on practical issues in the thesis process Acronym HPC High Performance Computing LV Lotka-Volterra MCMC Markov chain Monte Carlo method MH Metropolis-Hastings algorithm MPI Message Passing Interface ODE ordinary differential equation PMMH particle marginal Metropolis-Hastings algorithm PDF probability density function RDD Resilient Distributed Dataset Contents Acknowledgement .............................................................................................................................. v Acronym ............................................................................................................................................ vi 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1 Project Motivation .......................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................... 11 2 Background ................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 High Performance Computing ....................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 History of Supercomputer ............................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Supercomputer architecture ............................................................................ 13 2.1.3 Software and system management .................................................................. 14 2.2 Message Passing Interface ............................................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Parallel Computing Model .............................................................................. 15 2.2.2 Evolution of MPI ............................................................................................. 16 2.2.3 Implementation of MPI ................................................................................... 16 2.3 Apache Spark .................................................................................................................. 16 2.3.1 Spark Core ........................................................................................................ 17 2.3.2 Spark Module ................................................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Spark Scheduler ............................................................................................... 18 2.3.4 How Spark works on a cluster ........................................................................ 18 3 The application ........................................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Lotka-Volterra model ..................................................................................................... 20 3.1.1 Deterministic Lotka-Volterra model ............................................................... 20 3.1.2 Stochastic Lotka-Volterra model ..................................................................... 22 3.1.3 An extended Lotka-Volterra model ................................................................. 24 3.2 Monte Carlo methods and Bayesian inference ............................................................. 26 3.2.1 Metropolis-Hastings algorithm ....................................................................... 26 3.2.2 Sequential Monte Carlo method ..................................................................... 26 3.2.3 Bayesian inference ........................................................................................... 27 3.3 Solving the inference problem of LV-12 model using PMMH algorithm .................. 28 3.4 Input and Outcome ......................................................................................................... 31 4 Implementation .......................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 System environment ....................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Set up Spark on HPC cluster ......................................................................................... 34 4.3 Set up MPI on HPC cluster ............................................................................................ 35 4.4 Parallelise the implementation ....................................................................................... 36 4.4.1 Parallelise the implementation in Spark ......................................................... 37 4.4.2 Parallelise the implementation in MPI ........................................................... 39 5 Results and discussion ............................................................................................................... 41 5.1 Performance and scalability ........................................................................................... 41 5.2 Fault tolerance ................................................................................................................ 42 5.3 Dynamic resource handling ........................................................................................... 44 5.4 Resource consumption ................................................................................................... 48 5.4.1 CPU consumption ............................................................................................ 48 5.4.2 Memory consumption ...................................................................................... 50 5.4.3 Network usage .................................................................................................. 52 5.5 Ease of use ...................................................................................................................... 56 5.6 Tuning the Spark application ......................................................................................... 57 5.6.1 Deploy mode .................................................................................................... 57 5.6.2 Number of partitions ........................................................................................ 58 5.6.3 Memory tuning ................................................................................................. 58 6 Related work .............................................................................................................................. 61 7 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 62 7.1 Distribution of work ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • MVAPICH2 2.2 User Guide

    MVAPICH2 2.2 User Guide

    MVAPICH2 2.2 User Guide MVAPICH TEAM NETWORK-BASED COMPUTING LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu Copyright (c) 2001-2016 Network-Based Computing Laboratory, headed by Dr. D. K. Panda. All rights reserved. Last revised: October 19, 2017 Contents 1 Overview of the MVAPICH Project1 2 How to use this User Guide?1 3 MVAPICH2 2.2 Features2 4 Installation Instructions 13 4.1 Building from a tarball .................................... 13 4.2 Obtaining and Building the Source from SVN repository .................. 13 4.3 Selecting a Process Manager................................. 14 4.3.1 Customizing Commands Used by mpirun rsh..................... 15 4.3.2 Using SLURM..................................... 15 4.3.3 Using SLURM with support for PMI Extensions ................... 15 4.4 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-CH3/OFA-iWARP-CH3/OFA-RoCE-CH3......... 16 4.5 Configuring a build for NVIDIA GPU with OFA-IB-CH3.................. 19 4.6 Configuring a build for Shared-Memory-CH3........................ 20 4.7 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-Nemesis .......................... 20 4.8 Configuring a build for Intel TrueScale (PSM-CH3)..................... 21 4.9 Configuring a build for Intel Omni-Path (PSM2-CH3).................... 22 4.10 Configuring a build for TCP/IP-Nemesis........................... 23 4.11 Configuring a build for TCP/IP-CH3............................. 24 4.12 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-Nemesis and TCP/IP Nemesis (unified binary) . 24 4.13 Configuring a build for Shared-Memory-Nemesis...................... 25 5 Basic Usage Instructions 26 5.1 Compile Applications..................................... 26 5.2 Run Applications....................................... 26 5.2.1 Run using mpirun rsh ...............................
  • Scalable and High Performance MPI Design for Very Large

    Scalable and High Performance MPI Design for Very Large

    SCALABLE AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE MPI DESIGN FOR VERY LARGE INFINIBAND CLUSTERS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sayantan Sur, B. Tech ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Prof. D. K. Panda, Adviser Prof. P. Sadayappan Adviser Prof. S. Parthasarathy Graduate Program in Computer Science and Engineering c Copyright by Sayantan Sur 2007 ABSTRACT In the past decade, rapid advances have taken place in the field of computer and network design enabling us to connect thousands of computers together to form high-performance clusters. These clusters are used to solve computationally challenging scientific problems. The Message Passing Interface (MPI) is a popular model to write applications for these clusters. There are a vast array of scientific applications which use MPI on clusters. As the applications operate on larger and more complex data, the size of the compute clusters is scaling higher and higher. Thus, in order to enable the best performance to these scientific applications, it is very critical for the design of the MPI libraries be extremely scalable and high-performance. InfiniBand is a cluster interconnect which is based on open-standards and gaining rapid acceptance. This dissertation presents novel designs based on the new features offered by InfiniBand, in order to design scalable and high-performance MPI libraries for large-scale clusters with tens-of-thousands of nodes. Methods developed in this dissertation have been applied towards reduction in overall resource consumption, increased overlap of computa- tion and communication, improved performance of collective operations and finally designing application-level benchmarks to make efficient use of modern networking technology.
  • MVAPICH2 2.3 User Guide

    MVAPICH2 2.3 User Guide

    MVAPICH2 2.3 User Guide MVAPICH Team Network-Based Computing Laboratory Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Ohio State University http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu Copyright (c) 2001-2018 Network-Based Computing Laboratory, headed by Dr. D. K. Panda. All rights reserved. Last revised: February 19, 2018 Contents 1 Overview of the MVAPICH Project1 2 How to use this User Guide?1 3 MVAPICH2 2.3 Features2 4 Installation Instructions 14 4.1 Building from a tarball................................... 14 4.2 Obtaining and Building the Source from SVN repository................ 14 4.3 Selecting a Process Manager................................ 15 4.3.1 Customizing Commands Used by mpirun rsh.................. 16 4.3.2 Using SLURM................................... 16 4.3.3 Using SLURM with support for PMI Extensions................ 16 4.4 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-CH3/OFA-iWARP-CH3/OFA-RoCE-CH3...... 17 4.5 Configuring a build for NVIDIA GPU with OFA-IB-CH3............... 20 4.6 Configuring a build to support running jobs across multiple InfiniBand subnets... 21 4.7 Configuring a build for Shared-Memory-CH3...................... 21 4.8 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-Nemesis......................... 21 4.9 Configuring a build for Intel TrueScale (PSM-CH3)................... 22 4.10 Configuring a build for Intel Omni-Path (PSM2-CH3)................. 23 4.11 Configuring a build for TCP/IP-Nemesis......................... 24 4.12 Configuring a build for TCP/IP-CH3........................... 25 4.13 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-Nemesis and TCP/IP Nemesis (unified binary)... 26 4.14 Configuring a build for Shared-Memory-Nemesis.................... 26 4.15 Configuration and Installation with Singularity....................
  • Slicing (Draft)

    Slicing (Draft)

    Handling Parallelism in a Concurrency Model Mischael Schill, Sebastian Nanz, and Bertrand Meyer ETH Zurich, Switzerland [email protected] Abstract. Programming models for concurrency are optimized for deal- ing with nondeterminism, for example to handle asynchronously arriving events. To shield the developer from data race errors effectively, such models may prevent shared access to data altogether. However, this re- striction also makes them unsuitable for applications that require data parallelism. We present a library-based approach for permitting parallel access to arrays while preserving the safety guarantees of the original model. When applied to SCOOP, an object-oriented concurrency model, the approach exhibits a negligible performance overhead compared to or- dinary threaded implementations of two parallel benchmark programs. 1 Introduction Writing a multithreaded program can have a variety of very different motiva- tions [1]. Oftentimes, multithreading is a functional requirement: it enables ap- plications to remain responsive to input, for example when using a graphical user interface. Furthermore, it is also an effective program structuring technique that makes it possible to handle nondeterministic events in a modular way; develop- ers take advantage of this fact when designing reactive and event-based systems. In all these cases, multithreading is said to provide concurrency. In contrast to this, the multicore revolution has accentuated the use of multithreading for im- proving performance when executing programs on a multicore machine. In this case, multithreading is said to provide parallelism. Programming models for multithreaded programming generally support ei- ther concurrency or parallelism. For example, the Actor model [2] or Simple Con- current Object-Oriented Programming (SCOOP) [3,4] are typical concurrency models: they are optimized for coordination and event handling, and provide safety guarantees such as absence of data races.
  • Automatic Handling of Global Variables for Multi-Threaded MPI Programs

    Automatic Handling of Global Variables for Multi-Threaded MPI Programs

    Automatic Handling of Global Variables for Multi-threaded MPI Programs Gengbin Zheng, Stas Negara, Celso L. Mendes, Laxmikant V. Kale´ Eduardo R. Rodrigues Department of Computer Science Institute of Informatics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Urbana, IL 61801, USA Porto Alegre, Brazil fgzheng,snegara2,cmendes,[email protected] [email protected] Abstract— necessary to privatize global and static variables to ensure Hybrid programming models, such as MPI combined with the thread-safety of an application. threads, are one of the most efficient ways to write parallel ap- In high-performance computing, one way to exploit multi- plications for current machines comprising multi-socket/multi- core nodes and an interconnection network. Global variables in core platforms is to adopt hybrid programming models that legacy MPI applications, however, present a challenge because combine MPI with threads, where different programming they may be accessed by multiple MPI threads simultaneously. models are used to address issues such as multiple threads Thus, transforming legacy MPI applications to be thread-safe per core, decreasing amount of memory per core, load in order to exploit multi-core architectures requires proper imbalance, etc. When porting legacy MPI applications to handling of global variables. In this paper, we present three approaches to eliminate these hybrid models that involve multiple threads, thread- global variables to ensure thread-safety for an MPI program. safety of the applications needs to be addressed again. These approaches include: (a) a compiler-based refactoring Global variables cause no problem with traditional MPI technique, using a Photran-based tool as an example, which implementations, since each process image contains a sep- automates the source-to-source transformation for programs arate instance of the variable.
  • Exascale Computing Project -- Software

    Exascale Computing Project -- Software

    Exascale Computing Project -- Software Paul Messina, ECP Director Stephen Lee, ECP Deputy Director ASCAC Meeting, Arlington, VA Crystal City Marriott April 19, 2017 www.ExascaleProject.org ECP scope and goals Develop applications Partner with vendors to tackle a broad to develop computer spectrum of mission Support architectures that critical problems national security support exascale of unprecedented applications complexity Develop a software Train a next-generation Contribute to the stack that is both workforce of economic exascale-capable and computational competitiveness usable on industrial & scientists, engineers, of the nation academic scale and computer systems, in collaboration scientists with vendors 2 Exascale Computing Project, www.exascaleproject.org ECP has formulated a holistic approach that uses co- design and integration to achieve capable exascale Application Software Hardware Exascale Development Technology Technology Systems Science and Scalable and Hardware Integrated mission productive technology exascale applications software elements supercomputers Correctness Visualization Data Analysis Applicationsstack Co-Design Programming models, Math libraries and development environment, Tools Frameworks and runtimes System Software, resource Workflows Resilience management threading, Data Memory scheduling, monitoring, and management and Burst control I/O and file buffer system Node OS, runtimes Hardware interface ECP’s work encompasses applications, system software, hardware technologies and architectures, and workforce
  • Assessing Gains from Parallel Computation on a Supercomputer

    Assessing Gains from Parallel Computation on a Supercomputer

    Volume 35, Issue 1 Assessing gains from parallel computation on a supercomputer Lilia Maliar Stanford University Abstract We assess gains from parallel computation on Backlight supercomputer. The information transfers are expensive. We find that to make parallel computation efficient, a task per core must be sufficiently large, ranging from few seconds to one minute depending on the number of cores employed. For small problems, the shared memory programming (OpenMP) and a hybrid of shared and distributive memory programming (OpenMP&MPI) leads to a higher efficiency of parallelization than the distributive memory programming (MPI) alone. I acknowledge XSEDE grant TG-ASC120048, and I thank Roberto Gomez, Phillip Blood and Rick Costa, scientific specialists from the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, for technical support. I also acknowledge support from the Hoover Institution and Department of Economics at Stanford University, University of Alicante, Ivie, and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under the grant ECO2012- 36719. I thank the editor, two anonymous referees, and Eric Aldrich, Yongyang Cai, Kenneth L. Judd, Serguei Maliar and Rafael Valero for useful comments. Citation: Lilia Maliar, (2015) ''Assessing gains from parallel computation on a supercomputer'', Economics Bulletin, Volume 35, Issue 1, pages 159-167 Contact: Lilia Maliar - [email protected]. Submitted: September 17, 2014. Published: March 11, 2015. 1 Introduction The speed of processors was steadily growing over the last few decades. However, this growth has a natural limit (because the speed of electricity along the conducting material is limited and because a thickness and length of the conducting material is limited). The recent progress in solving computationally intense problems is related to parallel computation.
  • MVAPICH USER GROUP MEETING August 26, 2020

    MVAPICH USER GROUP MEETING August 26, 2020

    APPLICATION AND MICROBENCHMARK STUDY USING MVAPICH2 and MVAPICH2-GDR ON SDSC COMET AND EXPANSE MVAPICH USER GROUP MEETING August 26, 2020 Mahidhar Tatineni SDSC San Diego Supercomputer Center NSF Award 1928224 Overview • History of InfiniBand based clusters at SDSC • Hardware summaries for Comet and Expanse • Application and Software Library stack on SDSC systems • Containerized approach – Singularity on SDSC systems • Benchmark results on Comet, Expanse development system - OSU Benchmarks, NEURON, RAxML, TensorFlow, QE, and BEAST are presented. InfiniBand and MVAPICH2 on SDSC Systems Gordon (NSF) Trestles (NSF) 2012-2017 COMET (NSF) Expanse (NSF) 2011-2014 GordonS 2015-Current Production Fall 2020 (Simons Foundation) 2017- 2020 • 324 nodes, 10,368 cores • 1024 nodes, 16,384 cores • 1944 compute, 72 GPU, and • 728 compute, 52 GPU, and • 4-socket AMD Magny-Cours • 2-socket Intel Sandy Bridge 4 large memory nodes. 4 large memory nodes. • QDR InfiniBand • Dual Rail QDR InfiniBand • 2-socket Intel Haswell • 2-socket AMD EPYC 7742, • Fat Tree topology • 3-D Torus topology • FDR InfiniBand HDR100 InfiniBand • MVAPICH2 • 300TB of SSD storage - via • Fat Tree topology • GPU nodes with 4 V100 iSCSI over RDMA (iSER) • MVAPICH2, MVAPICH2-X, GPUs + NVLINK • MVAPICH2 (1.9, 2.1) with 3-D MVAPICH2-GDR • HDR200 Switches, Fat torus support • Leverage SRIOV for Virtual Tree topology with 3:1 Clusters oversubscription • MVAPICH2, MVAPICH2-X, MVAPICH2-GDR Comet: System Characteristics • Total peak flops ~2.76 PF • Hybrid fat-tree topology • Dell primary
  • Infiniband and 10-Gigabit Ethernet for Dummies

    Infiniband and 10-Gigabit Ethernet for Dummies

    The MVAPICH2 Project: Latest Developments and Plans Towards Exascale Computing Presentation at Mellanox Theatre (SC ‘18) by Dhabaleswar K. (DK) Panda The Ohio State University E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~panda Drivers of Modern HPC Cluster Architectures High Performance Interconnects - Accelerators / Coprocessors InfiniBand high compute density, high Multi-core Processors <1usec latency, 100Gbps Bandwidth> performance/watt SSD, NVMe-SSD, NVRAM >1 TFlop DP on a chip • Multi-core/many-core technologies • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)-enabled networking (InfiniBand and RoCE) • Solid State Drives (SSDs), Non-Volatile Random-Access Memory (NVRAM), NVMe-SSD • Accelerators (NVIDIA GPGPUs and Intel Xeon Phi) • Available on HPC Clouds, e.g., Amazon EC2, NSF Chameleon, Microsoft Azure, etc. Summit Sunway TaihuLight Sierra K - Computer Network Based Computing Laboratory Mellanox Theatre SC’18 2 Parallel Programming Models Overview P1 P2 P3 P1 P2 P3 P1 P2 P3 Logical shared memory Memory Memory Memory Shared Memory Memory Memory Memory Shared Memory Model Distributed Memory Model Partitioned Global Address Space (PGAS) SHMEM, DSM MPI (Message Passing Interface) Global Arrays, UPC, Chapel, X10, CAF, … • Programming models provide abstract machine models • Models can be mapped on different types of systems – e.g. Distributed Shared Memory (DSM), MPI within a node, etc. • PGAS models and Hybrid MPI+PGAS models are gradually receiving importance Network Based Computing Laboratory Mellanox Theatre SC’18 3 Designing Communication Libraries for Multi-Petaflop and Exaflop Systems: Challenges Application Kernels/Applications Co-Design Middleware Opportunities and Programming Models Challenges MPI, PGAS (UPC, Global Arrays, OpenSHMEM), CUDA, OpenMP, across Various OpenACC, Cilk, Hadoop (MapReduce), Spark (RDD, DAG), etc.
  • Instruction Level Parallelism Example

    Instruction Level Parallelism Example

    Instruction Level Parallelism Example Is Jule peaty or weak-minded when highlighting some heckles foreground thenceforth? Homoerotic and commendatory Shelby still pinks his pronephros inly. Overneat Kermit never beams so quaveringly or fecundated any academicians effectively. Summary of parallelism create readable and as with a bit says if we currently being considered to resolve these two machine of a pretty cool explanation. Once plug, it book the parallel grammatical structure which creates a truly memorable phrase. In order to accomplish whereas, a hybrid approach is designed to whatever advantage of streaming SIMD instructions for each faction the awful that executes in parallel on independent cores. For the ILPA, there is one more type of instruction possible, which is the special instruction type for the dedicated hardware units. Advantages and high for example? Two which is already present data is, to process includes comprehensive career related services that instruction level parallelism example how many diverse influences on. Simple uses of parallelism create readable and understandable passages. Also note that a data dependent elements that has to be imported from another core in another processor is much higher than either of the previous two costs. Why the charge of the proton does not transfer to the neutron in the nuclei? The OPENMP code is implemented in advance way leaving each thread can climb up an element from first vector and compare after all the elements in you second vector and forth thread will appear able to execute simultaneously in parallel. To be ready to instruction level parallelism in this allows enormous reduction in memory.
  • MVAPICH2 2.2Rc2 User Guide

    MVAPICH2 2.2Rc2 User Guide

    MVAPICH2 2.2rc2 User Guide MVAPICH TEAM NETWORK-BASED COMPUTING LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu Copyright (c) 2001-2016 Network-Based Computing Laboratory, headed by Dr. D. K. Panda. All rights reserved. Last revised: August 8, 2016 Contents 1 Overview of the MVAPICH Project1 2 How to use this User Guide?1 3 MVAPICH2 2.2rc2 Features2 4 Installation Instructions 13 4.1 Building from a tarball .................................... 13 4.2 Obtaining and Building the Source from SVN repository .................. 13 4.3 Selecting a Process Manager................................. 14 4.3.1 Customizing Commands Used by mpirun rsh..................... 15 4.3.2 Using SLURM..................................... 15 4.3.3 Using SLURM with support for PMI Extensions ................... 15 4.4 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-CH3/OFA-iWARP-CH3/OFA-RoCE-CH3......... 16 4.5 Configuring a build for NVIDIA GPU with OFA-IB-CH3.................. 19 4.6 Configuring a build for Shared-Memory-CH3........................ 20 4.7 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-Nemesis .......................... 20 4.8 Configuring a build for Intel TrueScale (PSM-CH3)..................... 21 4.9 Configuring a build for Intel Omni-Path (PSM2-CH3).................... 22 4.10 Configuring a build for TCP/IP-Nemesis........................... 23 4.11 Configuring a build for TCP/IP-CH3............................. 24 4.12 Configuring a build for OFA-IB-Nemesis and TCP/IP Nemesis (unified binary) . 24 4.13 Configuring a build for Shared-Memory-Nemesis...................... 25 5 Basic Usage Instructions 26 5.1 Compile Applications..................................... 26 5.2 Run Applications....................................... 26 5.2.1 Run using mpirun rsh ...............................
  • Combining Openmp and Message Passing: Hybrid Programming

    Combining Openmp and Message Passing: Hybrid Programming

    Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem Combining OpenMP and Message Passing: Hybrid Programming Michael Hanke Summer School on High Performance Computing Hybrid, p. 1/20 Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem Outline Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem Hybrid, p. 2/20 Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem What You Already Know • Parallelizing programs on shared memory computers using OpenMP • Parallelizing programs on distributed memory computers using MPI Hybrid, p. 3/20 Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem What Is Covered in This Module? • Multithreaded MPI • Support provided by the implementation • How to use it • Programming recommendations Hybrid, p. 4/20 Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem Mainstream HPC Architecture • General purpose processors are not getting (very much) faster • The optimal (price/performance) HPC hardware goes to massively parallel computers (MPPs): • many compute nodes coupled by high-speed interconnects • each compute node is a multi-socket shared memory node • each socket holds a multi-core processor • Hybrid architectures: • Coupling of “standard” compute nodes with highly specilized computes nodes (cell processors, general purpose GPUs) Hybrid, p. 5/20 Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem Programming Models OpenMP Shared memory, symmetric multi-processors • Corresponds to one multi-core processor MPI Distributed memory, processing nodes coupled via comunication channels • Corresponds to MPPs These are logical programming models and can be mapped to any hardware! Problem Can one combine these two models in order to obtain faster codes by using the architecture specifics? Hybrid, p. 6/20 Overview Introduction Basic Hybrid Programming A Benchmark Problem Reasons to Combine MPI and OpenMP 1.