Rare Earth Element Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Preliminary Resource Assessment of the Khanneshin Carbonatite Complex, Helmand Province, Afghanistan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rare Earth Element Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Preliminary Resource Assessment of the Khanneshin Carbonatite Complex, Helmand Province, Afghanistan Prepared in cooperation with the Task Force for Business and Stability Operations, under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Defense and the Afghanistan Geological Survey Rare Earth Element Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Preliminary Resource Assessment of the Khanneshin Carbonatite Complex, Helmand Province, Afghanistan Robert D. Tucker, Harvey E. Belkin, Klaus J. Schulz, Stephen G. Peters, and Kim P. Buttleman Open-File Report 2011–1207 USGS Afghanistan Project Product No. 200 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Tucker, R.D., Belkin, H.E., Schulz, K.J., Peters, S.G., and Buttleman, K.P., 2011, Rare earth element mineralogy, geochemistry, and preliminary resource assessment of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex, Helmand Province, Afghanistan: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1207, 50 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Geology of the Khanneshin Carbonatite Complex ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Geologic Setting ................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Geology ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Rocks of the Central Vent ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Volcanic and Volcano-Sedimentary Rocks ................................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Satellitic Vents, Dikes, and Minor Intrusive Rocks ...................................................................................... 9 2.3 History of Igneous Activity ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Metallogeny ......................................................................................................................................................10 3.0 The Zone of LREE Enrichment ............................................................................................................................10 3.1 Styles of LREE Mineralization ..........................................................................................................................21 3.2 Whole-Rock Geochemistry ...............................................................................................................................21 3.3 Mineralogy ........................................................................................................................................................30 3.4 Structural Control on Alkaline Igneous Magmatism and LREE Mineralization ..................................................41 4.0 Estimation of LREE Resources ............................................................................................................................42 4.1 Analysis of the Soviet-Defined Zone .................................................................................................................42 4.2 Analysis by Remote Sensing ............................................................................................................................47 5.0 Conclusions .........................................................................................................................................................48 6.0 References Cited .................................................................................................................................................49 Figures 1. Maps of southern Afghanistan showing the location of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex and the permissive tract of uranium-phosphorus-rare earth element mineralization in the Helmand Basin ................... 4 2. Geologic map of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ..................................................................................... 5 3. Cross-sections through the Khanneshin carbonatite complex .......................................................................... 6 4. Field photographs showing the key rock types and relationships within the intrusive central vent and volcanic apron of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex .................................................................................... 7 5. Photographs of examples of type-1 rare earth element mineralization in the marginal zone of the intrusive central vent of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ...................................................................22 6. Photographs of examples of type-2 mineralized dikes in the zone of light rare earth element enrichment of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ........................................................................................26 7. Ternary diagrams of major-element concentration data at the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ....................27 8. Variation diagrams illustrating the difference in major and trace element concentrations among igneous rocks of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ....................................................................................28 9. Graphs showing the magnitude of rare earth element enrichment in the marginal zone of the intrusive central vent of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex .......................................................................................30 10. Mineralogy and crystallization sequence of sample RT-11K-2, type-1 mineralization of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ........................................................................................................................................32 11. Mineralogy and crystallization sequence of sample RT-11K-5, type-1 mineralization of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ........................................................................................................................................35 12. Mineralogy and crystallization sequence of fluorite-bearing rocks of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ...........................................................................................................................................................36 13. Mineralogy and crystallization sequence of the fluorine-rich intrusive dikes of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ........................................................................................................................................38 iii 14. Mineralogy and crystallization sequence of the apatite-rich intrusive dikes of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ........................................................................................................................................40 15. Maps showing the area of the identified light rare earth element prospect in the northeastern part of the central intrusive vent and the digital elevation topography of the northern part of the Khanneshin carbonatite complex ........................................................................................................................................45 Tables 1. Whole-rock major-, trace-, and rare earth element (REE) concentration data, traverses 1A and 1B, Khanneshin carbonatite complex, Afghanistan. ...............................................................................................11 2. Major-, trace-, and rare earth element (REE) concentration data, traverse 2, Khanneshin carbonatite complex, Afghanistan. .....................................................................................................................................................13 3. Major- and trace- , and rare earth element (REE) concentration data, traverse 3, Khanneshin carbonatite complex, Afghanistan. .....................................................................................................................................17 4. Table of minerals containing rare earth elements (REE), Sr, and Ba as major elements, Khanneshin carbonatite complex, Afghanistan. ...................................................................................................................26 5. Summary of barium, strontium, and light rare earth element (LREE) concentrations, barite-ankerite alvikite, Khanneshin carbonatite
Recommended publications
  • The Sedimentology and Mineralogy of the River Uranium Deposit Near Phuthaditjhaba, Qwa-Qwa
    PER-74 THE SEDIMENTOLOGY AND MINERALOGY OF THE RIVER URANIUM DEPOSIT NEAR PHUTHADITJHABA, QWA-QWA by J. P. le Roux NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD NUCOR PRIVATE MO X2M PRETORIA 0001 m•v OCTOBER 1982 PER-74- THE SEDIMENTOLOGY AND MINERALOGY OF THE RIVER URANIUM DEPOSIT NEAR PHUTHADITJHABA, QWA-QWA b/ H.J. Brynard * J.P. le Roux * * Geology Department POSTAL ADDRESS: Private Bag X256 PRETORIA 0001 PELINDABA August 1982 ISBN 0-86960-747-2 CONTENTS SAMEVATTING ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SEDIMENTOLOGY 1 2.1 Introduction 1 2.2 Depositional Environment 2 2.2.1 Palaeocurrents 2 2.2.2 Sedimentary structures and vertical profiles 5 2.2.3 Borehole analysis 15 2.3 Uranium Mineralisation 24 2.4 Conclusions and Recommendations 31 3. MINERALOGY 33 3.1 Introduction 33 3.2 Procedure 33 3.3 Terminology Relating to Carbon Content 34 3.4 Petrographic Description of the Sediments 34 3.5 Uranium Distribution 39 3.6 Minor and Trace Elements 42 3.7 Petrogenesis 43 3.8 Extraction Metallurgy 43 4. REFERENCES 44 PER-74-ii SAMEVATTING 'n Sedimentologiese en mineralogiese ondersoek is van die River-af setting uittigevoer wat deur Mynboukorporasie (Edms) Bpk in Qwa-Qwa, 15 km suaidwes van Phu triad it jnaba, ontdek is. Die ertsliggaam is in íluviale sand-steen van die boonste Elliot- formasie geleë. Palleostroomrigtings dui op 'n riviersisteem met 'n lae tot baie lae 3d.nuositeit en met "h vektor-gemiddelde aanvoer- rigting van 062°. 'n Studie van sedimentere strukture en korrelgroottes in kranssnitte is deuir to ontleding van boorgatlogs aangevul wat die sedimentêre afsettingsoragewing as h gevlegte stroom van die Donjek-tipe onthul.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Mineral Information Package for the Khanneshin Carbonatite Area of Interest
    Chapter 21A. Summary of the Mineral Information Package for the Khanneshin Carbonatite Area of Interest Contribution by Robert D. Tucker, Harvey E. Belkin, Klaus J. Schulz, Stephen G. Peters, and Kim P. Buttleman Abstract The Khanneshin carbonatite is a deeply dissected igneous complex of Quaternary age that rises approximately 700 meters above the flat-lying Neogene sediments of the Registan Desert, Helmand Province, Afghanistan. The complex consists almost exclusively of carbonate-rich intrusive and extrusive igneous rocks, crudely circular in outline, with only three small hypabyssal plugs of leucite phonolite and leucitite outcropping in the southeastern part of the complex. The complex is broadly divisible into a central intrusive vent (or massif), approximately 4 kilometers in diameter, consisting of coarse-grained sövite and brecciated and agglomeratic barite-ankerite alvikite; a thin marginal zone (less than 1 kilometer wide) of outwardly dipping (5°–45°). Neogene sedimentary strata; and a peripheral apron of volcanic and volcaniclastic strata extending another 3–5 kilometers away from the central intrusive massif. Small satellitic intrusions of biotite-calcite carbonatite, no larger than 400 meters in diameter, crop out on the southern and southeastern margin of the central intrusive massif. In the 1970s several teams of Soviet geologists identified prospective areas of interest for uranium, phosphorus, and light rare earth element (LREE) mineralization in four regions of the carbonatite complex. High uranium concentrations are reported in two regions; the greatest concentrations are confined to silicified shear zones in sandy clay approximately 1.1 kilometers southwest of the peripheral part of the central vent. An area of phosphorus enrichment, primarily occurring in apatite, is present in coarse-grained agglomeratic alvikite, with abundant fenite xenoliths, approximately 750 meters south of the periphery of the central vent.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Nairobi Region, Kenya
    % % % % % % % % %% %% %% %% %% %% %% % GEOLOGIC HISTORY % %% %% % % Legend %% %% %% %% %% %% %% % % % % % % HOLOCENE: %% % Pl-mv Pka %%% Sediments Mt Margaret U. Kerichwa Tuffs % % % % %% %% % Longonot (0.2 - 400 ka): trachyte stratovolcano and associated deposits. Materials exposed in this map % %% %% %% %% %% %% % section are comprised of the Longonot Ash Member (3.3 ka) and Lower Trachyte (5.6-3.3 ka). The % Pka' % % % % % % L. Kerichwa Tuff % % % % % % Alluvial fan Pleistocene: Calabrian % % % % % % % Geo% lo% gy of the Nairobi Region, Kenya % trachyte lavas were related to cone building, and the airfall tuffs were produced by summit crater formation % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Pna % % % % %% % (Clarke et al. 1990). % % % % % % Pl-tb % % Narok Agglomerate % % % % % Kedong Lake Sediments Tepesi Basalt % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %% % % % 37.0 °E % % % % 36.5 °E % % % % For area to North see: Geology of the Kijabe Area, KGS Report 67 %% % % % Pnt %% % PLEISTOCENE: % % %% % % % Pl-kl %% % % Nairobi Trachyte % %% % -1.0 ° % % % % -1.0 ° Lacustrine Sediments % % % % % % % % Pleistocene: Gelasian % % % % % Kedong Valley Tuff (20-40 ka): trachytic ignimbrites and associated fall deposits created by caldera % 0 % 1800 % % ? % % % 0 0 % % % 0 % % % % % 0 % 0 8 % % % % % 4 % 4 Pkt % formation at Longonot. There are at least 5 ignimbrite units, each with a red-brown weathered top. In 1 % % % % 2 % 2 % % Kiambu Trachyte % Pl-lv % % % % % % % % % % %% % % Limuru Pantellerite % % % % some regions the pyroclastic glass and pumice has been
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroglyph National Monument: Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Petroglyph National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2017/1547 ON THE COVER Photograph of Albuquerque volcanoes. Three spatter cones, known as the Sisters, form a distinctive skyline west of Albuquerque, New Mexico. These small volcanoes are part of the Albuquerque volcanic field and occur in the Volcanoes area of Petroglyph National Monument. The volcanic field was active about 156,000 years ago. NPS photograph by Chanteil Walter (Petroglyph National Monument). THIS PAGE Photograph of the West Mesa escarpment along the Rinconada Canyon Trail. Erosion of the Santa Fe Group sediments that underlie a basaltic cap rock has caused large blocks of rock to tumble down the eastern escarpment of the mesa. Most of the petroglyphs were chiseled into the dark patina of desert varnish on these large boulders, exposing the lighter colored basaltic rock beneath. NPS photograph by Dale Pate (Geologic Resources Division). Petroglyph National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2017/1547 Katie KellerLynn Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 November 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Magnetism: Providing New Insights
    Mineral Magnetism: Providing New Insights into Geoscience Processes ABOVE : Single-domain grain (50 nm) of magnetite from a magnetotactic 1 2 bacteria displaying a Richard J. Harrison and Joshua M. Feinberg dipole-like external magnetic field and a 1811-5209/09/0005-0209$2.50 DOI: 10.2113/gselements.5.4.209 uniformally magnetized interior agnetic minerals are ubiquitous in the natural environment, and glacial and interglacial cycles and they are also present in a wide range of biological organisms, from variations in the Asian monsoon stretching back 2 million years. More bacteria to human beings. The last ten years have seen a striking M recently, magnetic measurements improvement in our ability to detect and image the magnetization of minerals of marine sediments have been used in geological and biological samples. These minerals carry a wealth of information to determine paleooceanographic encoded in their magnetic properties. Mineral magnetism (together with circulation patterns by constraining the geographical extent of ice- the related disciplines of rock magnetism, paleomagnetism, environmental rafted detritus during the last glacial magnetism, and biomagnetism) decodes this information and applies it to maximum. Even the spread of an ever increasing range of geoscience problems, from the origin of magnetic anthropogenic pollutants can be anomalies on Mars to quantifying variations in Earth’s paleoclimate. traced throughout a city environ- ment by measuring the magnetic KEYWORDS : magnetism, magnetic minerals, magnetism theory, electron holography properties of leaves, which trap magnetic particles from passing MAgnETIC minERALS ARE EVERYWHERE! vehicles (Maher 2009 this issue). Look closely enough at any geological sample and you will In addition to the many geoscience applications, the find traces of magnetic minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Mineralogy in a Nutshell
    Optical Mineralogy in a Nutshell Use of the petrographic microscope Slides borrowed/adapted from Jane Selverstone (University of New Mexico) and John Winter (Whitman College) Why use the petrographic microscope? • Identify minerals (no guessing!) • Determine rock type • Determine crystallization sequence • Document deformation history • Observe frozen-in reactions • Constrain P-T history • Note weathering/alteration • Fun, powerful, and cheap! The petrographic microscope Also called a polarizing microscope In order to use the scope, we need to understand a little about the physics of light, and then learn some tools and tricks… Polarized Light Microscopy Isotropic materials, which include gases, liquids, unstressed glasses and cubic crystals, demonstrate the same From Nikon optical properties in all directions. They have only one refractive index and no restriction on the vibration direction of light passing through them. Anisotropic materials, in contrast, which include 90 percent of all solid substances, have optical properties that vary with the orientation of incident light with the crystallographic axes. Anisotropic materials act as beam splitters and divide light rays into two parts. The technique of polarizing microscopy exploits the interference of the split light rays, as they are re-united along the same optical path to extract information about these materials. What happens as light moves through the scope? plane polarised light (single vibration direction) unpolarised light (all possible vibration directions) 1) Light passes
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars 2020 Candidate Landing Sites: a Magnetic Field Perspective
    The Mars 2020 Candidate Landing Sites: A Magnetic Field Perspective The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Mittelholz, Anna et al. “The Mars 2020 Candidate Landing Sites: A Magnetic Field Perspective.” Earth and Space Science 5, 9 (September 2018): 410-424 © 2018 The Authors As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000420 Publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU) Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118846 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Earth and Space Science RESEARCH ARTICLE The Mars 2020 Candidate Landing Sites: A Magnetic 10.1029/2018EA000420 Field Perspective Key Points: • Mars 2020 offers the opportunity Anna Mittelholz1 , Achim Morschhauser2 , Catherine L. Johnson1,3, to acquire samples that record the Benoit Langlais4 , Robert J. Lillis5 , Foteini Vervelidou2 , and Benjamin P. Weiss6 intensity and direction of the ancient Martian magnetic field 1 • Laboratory paleomagnetic Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2 3 measurements of returned samples Canada, GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA, can address questions about the 4Laboratoire de Planétologie et Geodynamique, UMR 6112 CNRS & Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 5Space Science history of the
    [Show full text]
  • History of Geological Science – Silvia F
    GEOLOGY – History of Geological Science – Silvia F. de M. Figueiroa HISTORY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE Silvia F. de M. Figueirôa Department of Geological Education, Institute of Geosciences / University of Campinas (UNICAMP), P.O. box 6152 13083-970, Campinas-SP, Brazil Keywords: history, geology, mineralogy, paleontology, earth, mining, geological surveys, maps, gemstones, stratigraphy, fossils. Contents 1. Beginnings 2. Middle Ages and the Renaissance 3. The ‘Scientific revolution’ and its long-lasting impacts 4. Industrial Revolution, the search for raw materials and the survey of territories Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary This chapter aims to provide a broad picture of the development of geological science, as detailed as possible. Geology as a modern science started roughly around two centuries ago. But as knowledge of the Earth it has existed since the beginnings of humankind. We begin by mentioning the ideas of ancient peoples – Greeks and Romans. We continue up to the Renaissance (15th century), explaining that practically all schools of thought shared a fairly integrated and unified vision of all the Cosmos. In a Geocentric world, Earth suffered the influence of all other planets and stars and so did everything in it, whether it was human, animal, vegetal or mineral. The planet was not composed only of its own element, but also by fire, water and air, as Aristotle had already postulated. The context of the so-called ‘Scientific Revolution’ implicated profound changes and discoveries that led to a conceptual revision of the knowledge about the Earth: Astronomy redefined by Copernicus denied the central place of the earth in the planetary system. At the same time, the construction and use of the telescope showed that the world was almost infinitely large, and that Earth and the Solar System did not occupy a special place in the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Crater Volcanic Field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA)
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA) 1 2,3 4 5 4 5 1 GEOSPHERE; v. 13, no. 2 Greg A. Valentine , Joaquín A. Cortés , Elisabeth Widom , Eugene I. Smith , Christine Rasoazanamparany , Racheal Johnsen , Jason P. Briner , Andrew G. Harp1, and Brent Turrin6 doi:10.1130/GES01428.1 1Department of Geology, 126 Cooke Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA 2School of Geosciences, The Grant Institute, The Kings Buildings, James Hutton Road, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH 3FE, UK 3School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK 31 figures; 3 tables; 3 supplemental files 4Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Shideler Hall, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 5Department of Geoscience, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA CORRESPONDENCE: gav4@ buffalo .edu 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 610 Taylor Road, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8066, USA CITATION: Valentine, G.A., Cortés, J.A., Widom, ABSTRACT some of the erupted magmas. The LCVF exhibits clustering in the form of E., Smith, E.I., Rasoazanamparany, C., Johnsen, R., Briner, J.P., Harp, A.G., and Turrin, B., 2017, overlapping and colocated monogenetic volcanoes that were separated by Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake The Lunar Crater volcanic field (LCVF) in central Nevada (USA) is domi­ variable amounts of time to as much as several hundred thousand years, but Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA): nated by monogenetic mafic volcanoes spanning the late Miocene to Pleisto­ without sustained crustal reservoirs between the episodes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boring Volcanic Field of the Portland-Vancouver Area, Oregon and Washington: Tectonically Anomalous Forearc Volcanism in an Urban Setting
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on April 29, 2010 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 15 2009 The Boring Volcanic Field of the Portland-Vancouver area, Oregon and Washington: Tectonically anomalous forearc volcanism in an urban setting Russell C. Evarts U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA Richard M. Conrey GeoAnalytical Laboratory, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA Robert J. Fleck Jonathan T. Hagstrum U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA ABSTRACT More than 80 small volcanoes are scattered throughout the Portland-Vancouver metropolitan area of northwestern Oregon and southwestern Washington. These vol- canoes constitute the Boring Volcanic Field, which is centered in the Neogene Port- land Basin and merges to the east with coeval volcanic centers of the High Cascade volcanic arc. Although the character of volcanic activity is typical of many mono- genetic volcanic fi elds, its tectonic setting is not, being located in the forearc of the Cascadia subduction system well trenchward of the volcanic-arc axis. The history and petrology of this anomalous volcanic fi eld have been elucidated by a comprehensive program of geologic mapping, geochemistry, 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, and paleomag- netic studies. Volcanism began at 2.6 Ma with eruption of low-K tholeiite and related lavas in the southern part of the Portland Basin. At 1.6 Ma, following a hiatus of ~0.8 m.y., similar lavas erupted a few kilometers to the north, after which volcanism became widely dispersed, compositionally variable, and more or less continuous, with an average recurrence interval of 15,000 yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Island Agglomerate
    February 2018 BACKGROUND INFORMATION PINE ISLAND AGGLOMERATE (part Block 1 Section 47 and part Block 16 Section 46, GREENWAY) At its meeting of 8 February 2018 the ACT Heritage Council decided that the Pine Island Agglomerate was not eligible for provisional registration. The information contained in this report was considered by the ACT Heritage Council in assessing the nomination for the Pine Island Agglomerate against the heritage significance criteria outlined in s10 of the Heritage Act 2004. HISTORY The Pine Island Agglomerate (the Agglomerate) is a localised rock formation but has many unusual features that make identifying its origin difficult. An agglomerate consists of rounded volcanic rocks, usually formed by liquid flying through the air, embedded in a volcanic ash matrix. However, the most likely explanation is that it is a volcanic mudslide, or a lahar, that occurred during the formation of the Laidlaw Volcanics; however it is very localised, not as well sorted as would be expected and has a larger variety of rock types than would be expected for a typical lahar (Finlayson, 2012). Finlayson (2012) in the Significant Geological Features in the Australian Capital Territory describes the Agglomerate: “The agglomerate exposed at this locality shows several puzzling features, and interpretation of its origin remains problematic at present. The rock occurs within the Laidlaw Volcanics, an ignimbrite unit noted for its extreme uniformity over tens of kilometres, and appears to represent a very localized deposit during a lull in the ignimbritic activity. A feature of the deposit is the variety of clasts present, which include chert, granite, quartzite, and volcanic porphyry in a medium-grained crystal and lithic matrix.
    [Show full text]