DOCSLIB.ORG

Brechfa Forest Connection Recommendation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Planning Act 2008 Brechfa Forest Connection Project Examining Authority’s Report of Findings and Conclusions and Recommendation to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change _______________________________________ Examining Authority Martin Broderick 6 July 2016 This page intentionally left blank Examining Authority’s findings and conclusions and recommendation in respect of an application by Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc for an Order granting Development Consent for the Brechfa Forest Connection Project. File Ref EN020016 The application, dated 29 May 2015 was made under section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 and was received in full by The Planning Inspectorate on 29 May 2015. The applicant is Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc. The application was accepted for examination on 24 June 2015. The examination of the application began on 6 October 2015 and was completed on 6 April 2016. The development proposed is to construct, operate and maintain a new 132,000 volt (132kV) electric line connection of the consented Brechfa Forest West Wind Farm to an existing overhead line near Llandyfaelog, 10 km south of Carmarthen approximately 28.6km above and below ground located in Carmarthenshire, Wales. Summary of Recommendation: The Examining Authority recommends that the Secretary of State should make the Order in the form at Appendix D. Report to the Secretary of State 1 Brechfa Forest Connection Report Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 5 1.1 PREAMBLE ........................................................................... 5 1.2 APPOINTMENT OF EXAMINING AUTHORITY ...................................... 5 1.3 THE EXAMINATION AND PROCEDURAL DECISIONS ............................. 5 1.4 SITE INSPECTIONS ................................................................. 8 1.5 LOCAL IMPACT REPORTS .......................................................... 9 1.6 STATEMENTS OF COMMON GROUND ............................................. 9 1.7 OTHER CONSENTS REQUIRED..................................................... 9 1.8 UNDERTAKINGS/OBLIGATIONS GIVEN TO SUPPORT APPLICATION ......... 10 1.9 REQUESTS TO BECOME OR WITHDRAW FROM BEING AN INTERESTED PARTY (S102A, S102B AND S102(ZA)) ..................................... 11 1.10 STRUCTURE OF REPORT ......................................................... 12 2 MAIN FEATURES OF THE PROPOSAL AND SITE ....................... 14 2.1 THE APPLICATION AS MADE ..................................................... 14 2.2 YAPPLICATION AT THE CLOSE OF EXAMINATION ............................. 16 2.3 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY ................................................. 21 3 LEGAL AND POLICY CONTEXT ................................................. 23 3.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 23 3.2 PLANNING ACT 2008 (AS AMENDED) ......................................... 23 3.3 NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENTS ................................................ 24 3.4 WELSH LEGISLATION, POLICY AND GUIDANCE ............................... 25 3.5 EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES AND RELATED UK REGULATIONS ................... 30 3.6 OTHER LEGAL AND POLICY PROVISIONS ...................................... 35 3.7 MADE DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDERS ...................................... 37 3.8 LISTED BUILDINGS, CONSERVATION AREAS AND SCHEDULED MONUMENTS ...................................................................... 38 3.9 TRANSBOUNDARY EFFECTS ..................................................... 38 3.10 LOCAL IMPACT REPORT ......................................................... 39 4 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN RELATION TO POLICY AND FACTUAL ISSUES .................................................................... 44 4.1 MAIN ISSUES IN THE EXAMINATION ........................................... 44 4.2 STATEMENTS OF COMMON GROUND (SOCG) ................................. 49 4.3 THE PRINCIPLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 49 4.4 CONFORMITY WITH NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENTS AND OTHER KEY POLICY STATEMENTS ............................................................ 52 4.5 ADEQUACY OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) .................................................... 56 4.6 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES ........................................... 59 4.7 MITIGATION MEASURES ......................................................... 81 5 GOOD DESIGN ........................................................................ 82 5.1 POLICY ............................................................................. 82 5.2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS ............................................. 84 5.3 BIODIVERSITY AND GEOLOGICAL CONSERVATION ......................... 111 Report to the Secretary of State 2 Brechfa Forest Connection 5.4 WATER QUALITY AND RESOURCES ........................................... 118 5.5 FLOOD RISK ..................................................................... 125 5.6 HEALTH AND ELECTRIC MAGNETIC FIELDS .................................. 128 5.7 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT ..................................................... 130 5.8 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ..................................................... 134 5.9 LAND USE ....................................................................... 138 5.10 SOCIO-ECONOMIC EFFECTS .................................................. 143 5.11 COMMON LAW NUISANCE ,STATUTORY NUISANCE AND OTHER POTENTIAL NUISANCE ......................................................... 149 5.12 CIVIL AND MILITARY AVIATION AND DEFENCE INTERESTS ................ 151 5.13 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION ......................... 152 5.14 NOISE AND VIBRATION ........................................................ 156 5.15 AIR QUALITY AND EMISSIONS ................................................ 158 5.16 OTHER MATTERS ............................................................... 159 5.17 POLLUTION CONTROL AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY REGIMES ........................................................................ 160 5.18 SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ................................................. 162 5.19 WASTE MANAGEMENT .......................................................... 162 5.20 SUMMARY ON NEED AND IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .... 163 6 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN RELATION TO HABITATS REGULATIONS ...................................................................... 164 6.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 164 6.2 PROJECT LOCATION IN RELATION TO RELEVANT EUROPEAN SITES ...... 167 6.3 ASSESSMENT OF LIKELY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS RESULTING FROM THE PROJECT ALONE AND IN-COMBINATION ............................... 168 6.4 CONCLUSION ................................................................... 174 7 THE EXA'S CONCLUSION ON THE CASE FOR DEVELOPMENT CONSENT .............................................................................. 176 7.1 THE PLANNING BALANCE ...................................................... 176 7.2 THE GENERIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............... 179 7.3 HABITAT REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT MATTERS ........................... 186 7.4 MATTERS WEIGHING SIGNIFICANTLY IN FAVOUR .......................... 187 7.5 MATTERS WEIGHING SIGNIFICANTLY AGAINST ............................. 187 7.6 THE BALANCE OF ISSUES...................................................... 188 7.7 OVERALL CONCLUSION ........................................................ 188 8 COMPULSORY ACQUISITION AND RELATED MATTERS .......... 189 8.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 189 8.2 THE REQUEST FOR COMPULSORY ACQUISITION POWERS ................. 189 8.3 THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH THE LAND RIGHTS AND RESTRICTIONS ARE REQUIRED ................................................................. 192 8.4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANNING ACT 2008 ........................ 196 8.5 HOW THE EXA EXAMINED THE CASE FOR COMPULSORY ACQUISITION ................................................................... 198 8.6 CONCLUSION IN RESPECT OF APS WHO MADE REPRESENTATIONS IN WRITING AND VERBAL REPRESENTATIONS AT THE OFHS AND CAHS AND OTHER INTERESTS WHICH WERE NOT IDENTIFIED ................... 225 8.7 THE EXA'S OVERALL CA CONCLUSIONS ...................................... 234 Report to the Secretary of State 3 Brechfa Forest Connection 8.8 THE EXA'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE GRANTING OF COMPULSORY ACQUISITION AND TEMPORARY POSSESSION POWERS (OPTIONS A AND B) .......................................................................... 237 9 DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER AND RELATED MATTERS .............................................................................. 238 9.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 238 9.2 THE RECOMMENDED DCO ..................................................... 241 9.3 ARTICLES ........................................................................ 242 9.4 DESCRIPTION OF WORKS ..................................................... 253 9.5 REQUIREMENTS - SCHEDULE 3 ............................................... 254 9.6 PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS - SCHEDULE 9 ................................... 261 9.7 OTHER SCHEDULES ............................................................ 265 9.8 OTHER LEGAL AGREEMENTS/RELATED DOCUMENTS ....................... 266 9.9 OTHER CONSENTS REQUIRED................................................
Recommended publications
  • 1 Knowledge and Landscape in Wind Energy Planning

    1 Knowledge and Landscape in Wind Energy Planning

    Knowledge and landscape in wind energy planning Maria Lee* ‘Landscape’ is relatively underexplored in legal scholarship,1 notwithstanding its occasional centrality to legal analysis, and the ways in which law contributes to the shaping of landscape.2 Landscape is also intriguing from the perspective of one of the key preoccupations of environmental lawyers, exposing starkly the perennial tension between expert and lay discourses: whilst intuitively open to lay intervention, diverse values, and local experiences of the world, landscape is simultaneously subjected to highly technical, expert-based discourses and assessments. This makes landscape a promising area in which to explore ideas of knowledge in law. Most of the legal literature on ‘knowledge’ focuses on the ways in which different ‘expert’ knowledges find their way into, and then shape, legal processes and decisions. In this paper, I am more concerned with the ways in which the planning system, and planning law, receives different knowledge claims, and accepts some of them as things we ‘know’ about the world for the purposes of reason giving. Although the planning system does not ‘find facts’, planning, like other areas of law, inevitably both shapes and is based on an inextricable combination of facts and values. Wind energy is an especially fruitful area for the exploration of landscape, since wind farms consistently raise concerns about landscape and seascape. In this paper, I explore knowledge claims on landscape within the context of applications for development consent for large wind farms, those which fall within the criteria for a ‘nationally significant infrastructure project’ (NSIP) under the Planning Act 2008.3 My discussion turns around four tentative categories of knowledge claim, categories that are not fixed or easily separated, and are irretrievably mixed with other (non-knowledge) types of claim; even their description as ‘knowledge’ may be contested.
  • Alwen Forest Wind Farm

    Alwen Forest Wind Farm

    Alwen Forest Wind Farm Scoping Report 28 June 2018 1171877 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Document history Author Ffion Edwards, Senior Project Manager 28/06/2018 Checked Lesley Rice, Project Support Officer 04/07/2018 Approved John Woodruff, Head of Projects 03/08/2018 Client Details Contact Jeremy Smith Client Name Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Address Baglan Bay Innovation Centre, Central Avenue, Baglan Energy Park, Port Talbot. SA12 7AX Issue Date Revision Details A 28/06/2018 First Draft to innogy B 05/07/2018 Second Draft issued to NRW C 03/08/2018 Final Scoping Report submitted to PINS NATURAL POWER CONSULTANTS LIMITED, THE NATURAL POWER CONSULTANTS LIMITED, NATURAL POWER SARL, NATURAL POWER CONSULTANTS (IRELAND) LIMITED, NATURAL POWER LLC, NATURAL POWER S.A, NATURAL POWER SERVICES LIMITED AND NATURAL POWER OPERATIONS LIMITED (collectively referred to as “NATURAL POWER”) accept no responsibility or liability for any use which is made of this document other than by the Client for the purpose for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. The Client shall treat all information in the document as confidential. No representation is made regarding the completeness, methodology or current status of any material referred to in this document. All facts and figures are correct at time of print. All rights reserved. VENTOS® is a registered trademark of NATURAL POWER. Melogale™, WindCentre™, ControlCentre™, ForeSite™, vuWind™, WindManager™ and OceanPod™ are trademarks of NATURAL POWER. Copyright © 2018 NATURAL POWER. For full details on our ISO and other certifications, please visit: naturalpower.com/company Local Office: Registered Office: Harbour House The Natural Power Consultants Limited Y Lanfa The Green House Aberystwyth Forrest Estate, Dalry SY23 1AS Castle Douglas, Kirkcudbrightshire WALES DG7 3XS UK Tel: +44 (0) 1970 636 869 Reg No: SC177881 VAT No: GB 243 6926 48 Contents 1.
  • Explanatory Memorandum T

    Explanatory Memorandum T

    RAMPION 2 OFFSHORE WIND FARM RAMPION 2 OFFSHORE WIND FARM ORDER _______________________________________ EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM THE PLANNING ACT 2008 THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (APPLICATIONS: PRESCRIBED FORMS AND PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS 2009 _______________________________________ REGULATION 5(2)(c) 1. Introduction 1.1 This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared on behalf of Rampion Extension Development Limited (“the Applicant”) to explain the purpose and effect of each article of and Schedule to the draft Rampion 2 Offshore Windfarm Order (“Order”). It forms part of the application (“Application”) for a Development Consent Order ('DCO'), that has been submitted to the Secretary of State (the 'SoS') for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, under section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 (the '2008 Act'). 1.2 The Applicant is seeking development consent for an offshore generating station and all infrastructure required to transmit the power generated to the existing Bolney National Grid substation (the 'Authorised Project'). It will comprise a maximum of 116 wind turbine generators. The Authorised Project array area is approximately 270km2, and is located approximately 13km off the Sussex coast in the south of England. A detailed description of the Proposed Development is set out in the Environmental Statement submitted with the Application (Application document xx) 1.3 As the Order seeks to apply and modify statutory provisions, including concerning the compulsory acquisition of land and the treatment of certain requirements as planning conditions, in accordance with sections 117(4) and 120(5) of the Planning Act 2008 (2008 Act), it has been drafted as a statutory instrument. 1.4 It is anticipated that subject to the DCO having been made by the SoS, construction work on the Authorised Project would commence in [20xx].The construction phase would be for a period of up to 4 years.
  • Local Impact Report

    Local Impact Report

    Carmarthenshire County Council Local Impact Report Brechfa Forest Connection 1 A Context 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Planning Committee is requested to endorse the content of this Local Impact Report (LIR) relating to the proposed Brechfa Forest Connection Project. The development proposal comprises a new electricity connection from Brechfa Forest West Wind Farm to an existing overhead line near Llandyfaelog, 10km south of Carmarthen. 1.2 The proposed development is classified as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) under the terms of the Planning Act 2008 and the applicant, Western Power Distribution (WPD) has submitted an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to construct the connection. 1.3 Carmarthenshire County Council (the Council) are the host authority for this development however the application for the DCO will be processed and examined by the Planning Inspectorate (Pins) who will make a recommendation on whether the DCO should be granted to the Secretary of State (SoS) for Energy and Climate Change. The SoS will make the final decision on the application. Members will recall that the Brechfa Forest West Wind Farm (which this proposal intends to connect) went through the same consenting process. The application was accepted for consideration by the Planning Inspectorate on 24th June 2015. The Examination stage of the process commenced on 7th October 2015 and is due to end on 6th April 2016. If the DCO is granted by the SoS the Council is the responsible authority for discharging planning conditions (Requirements) and enforcing against non compliance of the Order. 1.4 Under the Planning Act 2008 (PA 2008), the Local Authority in which the proposal is located is a significant statutory consultee whose involvement in the process is both consultative and informative.
  • Dawn Bodill Ecotricity (Next Generation) Ltd Russell Street Unicorn House Stroud Gloucestershire GL5 3AX Our Ref: APP/F2605/A/12

    Dawn Bodill Ecotricity (Next Generation) Ltd Russell Street Unicorn House Stroud Gloucestershire GL5 3AX Our Ref: APP/F2605/A/12

    Dawn Bodill Our Ref: APP/F2605/A/12/2185306 Ecotricity (Next Generation) Ltd Your ref: Russell Street Unicorn House Stroud Gloucestershire 25 September 2014 GL5 3AX Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEAL BY ECOTRICTY (NEXT GENERATION) LTD LAND AT WOOD FARM, CHURCH LANE, SHIPDHAM IP25 7JZ APPLICATION REF: 3PL/2011/0854/F 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, JP Watson BSc MICE FIHT MCMI, who held an inquiry into your client’s appeal under Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against the decision of Breckland District Council (“the Council”) to refuse an application for planning permission for two wind turbines with a maximum overall height of up to 100 metres, together with access tracks, crane pad areas, electricity substation and temporary construction compound, dated 29 July 2011, in accordance with application ref: 3PL/2011/0854/F. 2. The appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State’s determination on 11 October 2013, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 on the grounds that it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions and recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.

  • Pen March Wind Farm EIA Scoping Report

    Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Pen March Wind Farm EIA Scoping Report Final report Prepared by LUC May 2020 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Pen March Wind Farm EIA Scoping Report Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft S Cane-Ritchie James Hopkins Sarah Young 20.03.2020 2. Update following Innogy S Cane-Ritchie Sarah Young Sarah Young 27.04.2020 Renewables UK Ltd comments 3. Final for submission S Cane-Ritchie Sarah Young Sarah Young 21.05.2020 Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning Lancaster Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning London 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment Manchester London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment Landscape Management landuse.co.uk 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Pen March Wind Farm May 2020 Contents Potential Significant Effects of the Development 25 Chapter 1 1 Effects Scoped Out 25 Introduction 1 Approach to Mitigation 25 The Applicant 2 Questions 25 Document Structure 2 Chapter 6 26 Chapter 2 3 Ecology 26 The Environmental Impact Assessment 3 Introduction 26 Scoping 3 Existing Conditions 26 Baseline Conditions 4 29 Assessment of Effects 4 Potential Significant Effects of the Development 31 Mitigation and Monitoring 5 Effects Scoped Out 31 Uncertainty 6 Approach to Mitigation 31 Competent Expert 6 Questions 32 ES Introductory Chapters 6 Questions 6 Chapter 7 33 Ornithology 33 Chapter 3 7 Introduction

  • The Planning Act 2008 (As Amended) Mynydd Y Gwynt Wind Farm

    The Planning Act 2008 (as amended) Mynydd y Gwynt Wind Farm Examining Authority’s Report of Findings and Conclusions and Recommendation to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change _______________________________________ Philip Asquith Examining Authority 20 August 2015 This page intentionally left blank Report to the Secretary of State 1 Mynydd y Gwynt Wind Farm Examining Authority's findings and conclusions and recommendation in respect of the Mynydd y Gwynt Wind Farm application File Ref EN010020 The application, dated 30 July 2014, was made under section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 and was received in full by The Planning Inspectorate on 31 July 2014. The Applicant is Mynydd y Gwynt Limited. The application was accepted for examination on 20 August 2014. The examination of the application began on 20 November 2014 and was completed on 20 May 2015. The development proposed comprises up to 27 turbines each with a generating capacity of between 3 and 3.3 megawatts (MW), providing a total generating capacity of up to 81 - 89.1 MW, underground electrical and communications cables, a substation, control building and satellite link, widening of 9.5km of existing tracks, approximately 6.9km of new tracks and installation of a meteorological monitoring mast up to 80m high. Summary of Recommendation: The Examining Authority recommends that the Secretary of State should make the Order in the form attached. Report to the Secretary of State 1 Mynydd y Gwynt Wind Farm Report Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 4 1.1 THE PRELIMINARY MEETING ...................................................... 5 1.2 THE EXAMINATION PROCESS ....................................................

  • PDF of Wind Farms

    Wind Speeds at United Kingdom Wind Farms with known locations Data collected from thewindpower.net and UL's Windnavigator and compiled by Wind Harvest Classification: Public Update: 19 June 2020 Contact: Kevin Wolf, [email protected] 1. Wind speeds will vary across wind farms. This initial estimate used Note only one lat-long per wind farm. 2. This table has an unknown accuracy level. 3. Winds at 20m agl will on average be 0.3 m/s faster than at 15m agl. Total Projected Total Wind Total known % of MW over 6.5 Farms MW over >6.5m/s by Total Wind Farms in m/s at 15m analyzed 6.5m/s at total at 15m Country (MWs) agl (MW) 15m agl agl 13,751 4,478 8,289 2,699 32.6% Wind Farm Name Power (kW) # of Turbines Wind at 80m Wind at 15m agl m/s agl m/s Fair Isle 180 3 8.91 Spurness - Repower 10,000 5 10.28 8.75 Spurness Wind Farm 8,250 3 10.28 8.75 Bu Farm 2,700 3 10.47 8.62 Cemmaes 15,300 18 9.02 8.53 Pentland Road (incorporating13,800 Beinn Mholach)6 10.44 8.34 Slieve Kirk 27,600 12 10.12 8.24 Black Hill 28,600 22 9.89 8.22 Burgar Hill 5,000 2 10.32 8.15 Srondoire Community Windfarm6,000 3 9.59 8.14 Barns of Ayre 2,700 3 9.96 8.12 Ben Aketil 23,000 10 10.03 8.11 Curryfree 15,000 6 9.87 8.07 Novar 17,000 34 9.67 8.01 Hare Hill Extension 29,750 35 9.72 7.85 Kelburn (Green Hill) 28,000 14 9.71 7.81 Ardrossan 24,000 12 9.46 7.81 Ardrossan Extension 6,000 3 9.46 7.81 Carrickatane 20,700 9 9.39 7.8 Beinneun 85,000 25 8.66 7.8 Loch Sminig 2,700 3 9.96 7.78 Millennium (Glenmoriston)40,000 16 9.16 7.76 Millennium (Glenmoriston)15,000 Extension 2 6 8.17
  • Consultation Report Appendices 5.1 Consultation Report

    Consultation Report Appendices 5.1 Consultation Report

    Consultation Report Appendices 5.1 Consultation Report Brechfa Forest Connection Development Consent Order Application - Reference EN020016 Consultation Report Appendices Appendix 9.1 to 14.7 May 2015 Regulation reference: The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5(2)(e) Consultation Report - Appendices Appendix 9.1 Copy of the Section 48 notice placed in local and national press Western Power Distribution (De Cymru) PLC Adran 48, Deddf Cynllunio 2008 Rheoliad 4, Rheoliadau Cynllunio Seilwaith (Ceisiadau: Ffurflenni a Gweithdrefn Ragnodedig) 2009 Gorchymyn Cydsyniad Datblygu ar gyfer Prosiect Cyswllt Coedwig Brechfa Hysbysiad yn rhoi gwybod am gais arfaethedig am Orchymyn Cydsyniad Datblygu (“GCD”) Hysbysir, drwy hyn bod Western Power Distribution (De Cymru) PLC (“WPD”) o Avonbank Feeder Road, Bryste, BS2 0TB yn bwriadu gwneud cais i’r Ysgrifennydd Gwladol dros Ynni a Newid Hinsawdd, o dan Adran 37 Deddf Cynllunio 2008, am y Gorchymyn Cydsyniad Datblygu a nodir uchod (y “cais”). Mae’r cais yn ymwneud ag adeiladu, gweithredu a chynnal cyswllt llinell dosbarthu trydan 132,000 folt (132kV) o Fferm Wynt Gorllewin Coedwig Brechfa, sy’n cael ei datblygu gan RWE Innogy UK Ltd, i’r rhwydwaith dosbarthu trydan presennol ger Llandyfaelog, 10km i’r de o Gaerfyrddin (y “prosiect”). Bydd y Gorchymyn Cydsyniad Datblygu, ymysg pethau eraill, yn awdurdodi’r canlynol: 1. Adeiladu cyswllt dosbarthu trydan 132kV 28.6 cilomedr (km) rhwng Is-orsaf Fferm Wynt Gorllewin Coedwig Brechfa a’r rhwydwaith dosbarthu trydan presennol ger Llandyfaelog, sy’n cynnwys; i. Llinell uwchben 25.2km; a ii. 3.4km o gebl tanddaearol; 2. Caffael (un ai drwy gytundeb neu’n orfodol) hawliau parhaol a dros dro i adeiladu, cynnal a gweithredu’r prosiect; 3.
  • Strategic Optioneering Report

    Strategic Optioneering Report

    Strategic Optioneering Report Brechfa Forest Connection Project November 2014 Strategic Optioneering Report Document Details Document prepared by Western Power Distribution Lamby Way, Rumney, Cardiff, CF3 2EQ 2 Strategic Optioneering Report Contents 1 Executive summary 6 2 Introduction 8 3 WPD network overview and regulatory obligations 12 4 Proposed Brechfa West Wind Farm development 18 5 The need case 19 6 Appraisal methodology 21 7 Review of Potential Strategic Options 24 8 Options Appraisal 27 9 Conclusions 26 Figures Figure 1 – Existing WPD Network – Geographic Plan with Brechfa West Wind Farm Identified Figure 2 – Existing WPD Network – WPD Network Diagram with Substations Figure 3 – Schematic Options for Circuit Interchange at New Lodge Substation 3 Strategic Optioneering Report Appendices Appendix 1 Summary of engineering reviews Appendix 2 Electricity Act 1989 – Extracts Appendix 3 WPD Policy Document SD2/5 – 123kV System Design Appendix 4 WPD Schedule 9 Statement Appendix 5 Overview of Technology Options Appendix 6 Connection Option Diagrams 4 Strategic Optioneering Report Glossary of Terms Term Description Cable Underground cables Conductor Overhead wires suspended from wood poles or towers (pylons) DNO [electricity] distribution network operator GT Grid Transformer GSP Grid Supply Point (132kV substation) km Kilometres (1,000 metres) kV Kilovolt (1,000 volts) MVA Megavolt Amperes MW Megawatts NGT National Grid Transmission RES Renewable Energy Systems Ltd (wind farm developer) RWE RWE Npower Renewables Ltd (wind farm developer) SP Manweb Scottish Power Manweb (DNO for North Wales) Towers Steel lattice towers often called pylons WPD Western Power Distribution 5 Strategic Optioneering Report 1 Executive summary 1.1.1 Western Power Distribution (WPD) is the electricity distribution network operator for South Wales and is regulated by Ofgem.
  • Statement of Case David C Bell

    Statement of Case David C Bell

    Section 36 Electricity Act 1989 VWP/DB/1 Statement of Case prepared by David C Bell BSc (Hons) DipUD MRTPI M CIHT in respect of an application under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for a proposed 17 turbine wind farm at Llanbadarn Fynydd, Powys, Wales. in relation to: Energy and Planning Policy for Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd May 2013 Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd – Llanbadarn Fynydd Wind Farm Statement of Case COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2013. All Rights Reserved 1 Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd – Llanbadarn Fynydd Wind Farm Statement of Case Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Scope of Evidence ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 The Statement of Matters ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Background to the Application ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 The Application ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Summary of Description of Proposed Development ...............................................................................................
  • Brechfa Forest West Wind Farm Consultation Report

    Brechfa Forest West Wind Farm Consultation Report

    BRECHFA FOREST WEST WIND FARM Consultation Report Document Reference BFW/AppDoc12/Consultation Required document as set out in Section 37(3)(c) of the Planning Act 2008 Produced October 2011- RWE Npower Renewables Ltd BRECHFA FOREST WEST WIND FARM CONSULTATION REPORT CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Foreword 1 1.2 The Developer 2 1.3 The Proposal 3 1.4 Site location 4 1.5 Role of a Consultation Report 5 2. Section 42 6 2.1 Prescribed persons 6 2.2 Local authorities for the purposes of Section 42(b) 8 2.3 Persons within one or more categories set out in Section 44 9 2.4 Section 44(c) is not relevant to the Brechfa Forest West Wind Farm proposal 10 2.5 Section 42 comments summary table 10 2.6 Summary analysis of Section 42 responses 12 2.7 Detailed responses 13 2.8 Meetings 98 2.9 Section 44 99 3. Section 47 103 3.1 Statement of Community Consultation 104 3.2 Local Authority’s comments 105 3.3 Community Liaison Group 107 3.4 Visits to local residents 108 3.5 Newsletters 109 3.6 Presentations 110 3.7 Telephone calls 111 3.8 Exhibitions 112 3.9 Documents available for viewing 115 3.10 Feedback forms 116 3.11 Summary of feedback received under Section 47 117 3.12 Feedback forms 123 3.13 RWE NRL response to summary feedback 126 3.14 Letter summaries and responses 140 BRECHFA FOREST WEST WIND FARM CONSULTATION REPORT CONTENTS 4. Section 48 151 5. Section 49 152 6.