Online Agenda Information

ONLINE AGENDA INFORMATION

The online Agenda is not the official Agenda for the EI Cajon City Council, but is posted and published four days prior to the City Council Meeting for the convenience of the public. Changes may be made up to 72 hours prior to the meeting; therefore added or deleted items may not appear on the City's website at this time. The City Council's official Agenda is prepared and posted outside City Council Chambers in the kiosk 72 hours prior to every regular meeting, and 24 hours prior to every special meeting. You may call the City Clerk's Office at (619) 441-1763 after 4:00 p.m. on the Friday prior to the Tuesday meeting for information about any changes to this Agenda.

AGENDA BINDER, INCLUDING AGENDA REPORTS, IS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AFTER 4:00 P.M., THE FRIDAY BEFORE THE COUNCIL MEETING, AT THE EL CAJON BRANCH OF THE PUBLIC LIBRARY, 201 E. DOUGLAS AVENUE, PHONE (619) 588-3718. LIBRARY HOURS: Monday - Thursday 10:00 a.rn. - 8:00 p.m., Friday & Saturday 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., and Sunday 1:00 - 5:00 p.m. \

2011 9Ilar{£ewis 7(ptfii Usnry ;Mayor City ~anager

ry 7(pnariclt 9Iloralln Pofey 5M.ayor (}!rof!em City}lttorney 7(ptliieC1Qt e n :J{llnson-CoJ( CityCCer~ Councilmem6er lRJ>6tfurner (]jo6 !M.cCfellan (])eputy City 5M.anager Councilmem6er CDirector ofCEu6Cic Wo~ . 'We 9J.etissa }lyres Councilmem6er (1)irector ofCommunity (])eveCopment City Council Meeting on March 8, 2011

"'04")";:>11' Tip Tuggers (888) 580-8477

Recycling Fun Facts From Mayor Lewis Recycling one aluminum can saves enough energy to run a TV for three hours, or the equivalent ofa half a gallon ofgasoline.

March 9 - 2011 San Diego Antique Show in EI Cajon - Great collectibles, including jewelry, photos, artwork, dolls, textiles, dishes, pottery, and glassware. Held at the Ronald Reagan Community Center, 195 East Douglas Avenue, from 1:00 -5:00 p.m. Parking and admission are free and you can receive one free appraisal. Additional appraisals are $5.00 each. For more information please call (619) 887-8762.

March 17 ~ Hannv

March 19 - Heartland Lions Club Annual Fashion Show - "Dancing Through The Decades." Enjoy lunch and exciting silent & live auction items! It's from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at the Ronald Reagan Community Center, 195 E. Douglas Avenue. For more information or tickets please call (619) 449-7478.

March 19 - The Miss EI Cajon & Miss Rancho San Diego Scholarship Pageant will be held at 6:00 p.m. at the Cuyamaca College Performing Arts Theater, located at 900 Rancho San Diego Parkway. Please call (619) 938-3477 for more information. March 26 - Lend A Hand Neighborhood Clean-Up - 9:00 a.m. to 11 :00 a.m. at South Sunshine & Cypress Avenues. Volunteers will help to remove trash and identify graffiti. For more information or to register please call (619) 401-8858.

March 31 - Olaf Wieghorst Museum Fashion Show & Luncheon in the Dream Catcher Lounge at Viejas. There will be a delicious lunch and beautiful fashions from the Viejas Outlet, hours are from 12:00pm - 2:00pm. For more information please call (619) 590-3431.

April 2 - EI Cajon Police Community Forum at the Ronald Reagan Community Center, located at 195 East Douglas Avenue, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Discuss a variety of issues with local law enforcement and other City representatives. See various safety displays and a K-9 demonstration. For more information call (619) 579-3300, ext. 0104. April 2 - Multi Cultural Family Fiesta at the EI Cajon Library, 201 E. Douglas Avenue, from 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Entertainment, refreshments, free books for the children, crafts & more! Call (619) 588-3715 for more information. April 16 - Morning Glory Jazz Brunch, benefitting St. Madeleine Sophie's Center! It's from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at 2119 East Madison Avenue in El Cajon. For information or tickets go to www.stmsc.org or call (619) 442-5129.

Mark Your Calendars For The Start Of Spring Recreation Program Registration! Registration for the Spring 2011 session for Recreation programs is right around the corner! Whether you're looking for swim lessons, youth sports, instructional classes or even a fun spring camp, registration begins on March 14th. Mark your calendar and log onto our website at www.elcajonrec.org starting at 8:00 a.m. March 14th to secure a spot for your child in our wonderful programs! For more information on Instructional programs and general registration questions, call (619) 441-1516. For information on Aquatics, call (619) 441-1672, for youth sports call (619) 441-1678. Our dedicated Recreation Department staffwill be happy to assist you! March 8, 2011 3:00 p.m.

The Agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered and most items have a RECOMMENDATlON from Staff or a Commission, which Council will consider when making a final decision.

Copies of written documentation relating to each item of business on the Agenda are on file in the City Clerk's Office and in the Agenda Book next to the podium in the Council Chambers.

PLEASE COMPLETE A "REQUEST TO SPEAK" FORM FOR EACH ITEM PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK if you wish to speak about an Item on the Agenda or under Public Comment.

• CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mark Lewis

• ROLL CALL: City Clerk Kathie Rutledge

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE (The Courts have concluded that sectarian prayer as part of City Council Meetings is not permitted under the Constitution.)

• POSTINGS: The City Clerk posted Orders of Adjournment of the February 22, 2011, Meetings and the Agenda of the March 8, 2011, Meeting in accordance to State Law and Council/Agency Policy.

• PRESENTATIONS: • Cindi Fargo - EI Cajon Community Development Corporation Update

• AGENDA CHANGES:

*Backup Information Available Redevelopment Agency Items Are Identified

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -1- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00p.m. CONSENT ITEMS: (1.1 -1.11)

Consent Items are routine matters enacted by one motion according to the RECOMMENDATION listed below. With the concurrence of the City Council, a Council Member or person in attendance may request discussion of a Consent Item at this time.

*1.1 MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/Redevelopment Agency approve Minutes of the February 22, 2011, Meetings of the EI Cajon City Council/Redevelopment Agency.

1.2 WARRANTS

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve payment of Warrants as submitted by the Finance Department.

1.3 APPROVAL OF READING BY TITLE AND WAIVER OF READING IN FULL OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the reading by title and waive the reading in full of all Ordinances on the Agenda.

*1.4 RESOLUTION: FINAL REPORT FOR EMERGENCY REPAIRS ON STATE OF EMERGENCY (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the next RESOLUTION in order proclaiming the termination of a local emergency in the City of EI Cajon.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -2- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00p.m. CONSENT ITEMS: (Continued)

*1.5 FY2010 STONE GARDEN GRANT (Report: Chief of Police)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to accept the 2010-2011 San Diego County Stone Garden Grant in the total amount of $115,414.00 and to execute any grant documents and agreements necessary for the receipt and use of these funds; and 2. Appropriate San Diego County Stone Garden Grant funds in the amount of $112,714.00 for overtime and $2,700.00 for mileage, for a total of $115,414.00.

*1.6 RESOLUTION: AWARD OF BID NO. 025-11 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT EAST MAIN STREET/BALLARD STREET, Engineering Job No. 3346 (Report: Purchasing Agent)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Find the second low bidder non-responsive for failure to submit an original bid bond; 2. Appropriate additional TransNet funds in the amount of $25,000.00; and 3. Based on the above, adopt the next RESOLUTION in order and award the bid to the lowest responsive bidder, Sutherlin Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $66,986.00.

*1.7 RESOLUTION: AWARD OF BID NO. 028-11 - MOTOR VEHICLES (Report: Purchasing Agent)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the next RESOLUTION in order and award the bid to the lowest responsive bidders, Theodore Robins Ford for the Ford F-250s and Ford Econoline Vans, in the amount of $125,146.57, and City Chevrolet for the Chevrolet Impalas, in the amount of $66,768.52.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -3- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00 p.m. CONSENT ITEMS: (Continued)

*1.8 RESOLUTION: OPPOSING TAKING OF REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the next RESOLUTION in order opposing the State of California Administration's Proposal to Abolish Redevelopment Agencies in California.

*1.9 ALLOCATE REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS FOR THE CIVIC CENTER PLAZA SITE IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER PROJECT (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Finance)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/Redevelopment Agency: 1. Appropriate Redevelopment 2005 bond proceeds up to $2,300,000.00 from the Unrestricted Fund Balance (Fund 590); and 2. Increase the expenditure budget in the Redevelopment Capital Funds Activity/Project No. 590900-RDR0708 Civic Center Plaza Improvements Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to make the necessary budget adjustments and financial transactions to reflect the use of Redevelopment Funds.

*1.10 COMMUNITY EVENT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY: CAJON CLASSIC CRUISE (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Finance)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the request for a Community Event in the right-of-way to be held every Wednesday evening in the downtown area from April 6 through October 26, 2011, and an additional event on December 7, 2011, with the conditions listed in the Agenda Report.

*1.11 COMMUNITY EVENT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY: CONCERTS ON THE GREEN (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Finance)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the request for a Community Event in the right-of-way to be held every Friday evening at the Prescott Promenade from May 6 through September 30, 2011, with the conditions listed in the Agenda Report.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -4- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT:

At this time, any person may address a matter within the jurisdiction of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency that is not on the Agenda. Comments relating to items on today's agenda are to be taken at the time the item is heard. State law prohibits discussion or action on items not on the Agenda; however, Council and Agency Members may briefly respond to statements or questions. An item may be placed on a future Agenda. In addition to briefly responding to statements or questions from the public, Councilmembers may also address the City Council during this time.

2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None

3. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

*3.1 RESOLUTION: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CHAMBERS SENIOR RESIDENCES, L.P. (Report: Director of Community Development) RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency 1. Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony for the proposed First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement Between the EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency and Chambers Senior Residences, LP.; 2. Close the Public Hearing; 3. Adopt the next RESOLUTION in order to approve execution of a First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement and related documents, substantially in a form as presented, with such changes approved by the Executive Director; 4. Appropriate $1,200,000.00 from the Unrestricted Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund Balance (Fund 290); and 5. Increase the expenditure budget in Project/Activity #290900-LM0704 by $1,200,000.00 for FY201 0-11.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -5- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued)

*3.2 STATE CITIZENS' OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (CA-COPS) EXPENDITURE PLAN (Report: Chief of Police) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony; 2. Close the Public Hearing; 3. Consider the modified FY2010-11 CA-COPS Expenditure Plan, including modifications to the 2009-2010 COPS plan; and 4. Continue the Public Hearing to March 22, 2011, at 3:00 p.m.

*3.3 RESOLUTION: AMENDMENT TO FIVE (5) YEAR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP) (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council • Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony; • Close the Public Hearing; • Adopt the next RESOLUTION in order to approve the Amendment to the 2010 RTIP.

4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:

*4.1 RESOLUTION: NO PARKING ZONE - 523 South Johnson Avenue (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the next RESOLUTION in order to establish the following "No Parking" Zone:

523 South Johnson Avenue

Along the easterly curbline of South Johnson Avenue, beginning at a point 18 feet north of the southerly property line, thence northerly a distance of 140 feet. (This No Parking Zone supercedes and rescinds all previous zones within these described limits.)

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -6- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00 p.m. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: (Continued)

*4.2 RESOLUTION: OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH PARKWAY PLAZA GP, LLC (Report: Director of Community Development)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City of EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency: 1. Adopt the next RESOLUTION in order to approve execution of an Owner Participation Agreement and any related documents by the Executive Director, or designee, and Parkway Plaza GP, LLC, substantially in the form as presented with such changes approved by the Executive Director; 2. Appropriate $2,000,000.00 in ECRA 2005 Bond Proceeds from the Unrestricted Fund Balance (590); and 3. Increase the expenditure budget in the Redevelopment Capital Funds Activity 590900-RD0702 by $2,000,000.00 for FY2010-11.

*4.3 RESOLUTION: OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH JKC PALM SPRINGS AUTOMOTIVE, INC. (KIA) (Report: Director of Community Development)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City of EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency: 1. Adopt the next RESOLUTION in order to approve execution of an Owner Participation Agreement and any related documents by the Executive Director, or designee, and JKC Palm Springs Automotive, Inc., substantially in the form as presented with such changes as approved by the Executive Director; 2. Appropriate $650,000.00 in ECRA 2005 Bond Proceeds from the Unrestricted Fund Balance (590); and 3. Increase the expenditure budget in the Redevelopment Capital Funds Activity 590900-RD0702 by $650,000.00 for FY2010-11.

5. COMMISSION REPORTS: None

6. ACTIVITIES REPORTS OF MAYOR LEWIS

SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments); SANDAG (Chair, Public Safety Committee); SANDAG (Quality of Life Ad Hoc Steering Committee); LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission); Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee

*6.1 Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee - February 23, 2011 *6.2 SANDAG Board of Directors Agenda - February 25, 2011

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -7- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00 p.m. ACTIVITIES REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 7.

MAYOR PRO TEM GARY KENDRICK Heartland Communications JPA; Heartland Fire Training JPA.

*7.1 Council Activities Report

8. COUNCILMEMBER JILLIAN HANSON-COX SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments - Alternate); SANDAG (Public Safety Committee - Alternate); MTS (Metropolitan Transit System Board - Alternate); East County Economic Development Council; League of California Cities, San Diego Division; East San Diego County Gang Task Force.

8.1 Verbal Report

9. COUNCILMEMBER BOB McCLELLAN Harry Griffen Park Joint Steering Committee; Heartland Communications JPA Alternate; MTS (Metropolitan Transit System Board).

*9.1 Council Activities Report

10.

COUNCILMEMBER BILL WELLS METRO CommissionlWastewater JPA; East County Economic Development Council; Heartland Fire Training JPA - Alternate; EI Cajon Community Development Corporation.

*10.1 Council Activities Report

*10.2 DRAFT PROPOSED CHARTER

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the draft proposed Charter attached to the Agenda Report and refer same to the Special Election to be held in June 2011.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -8- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00 p.m. 11. LEGISLATIVE REPORT

*11.1 League of California Cities Legislative Bulletins dated February 18, 23, 25 and 28 and March 2, 2011 - City Advocate Weekly

12. GENERAL INFORMATION ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION

13. ORDINANCES: FIRST READING

*13.1 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2261

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council

• Make a MOTION, and second to introduce the Ordinance • Discussion • Vote • If approved, the Mayor requests the City Clerk to recite the title

An Ordinance prezoning unincorporated property located on the east side of East Main Street between Pepper Drive and Lavala Lane as C-G (General Commercial) Zone; General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC), Zone Reclassification No. 2261, APNs: 400-250-07, -08, -09 and -28

14. ORDINANCES: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION .. None

[Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -9- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00p.m. 15. CLOSED SESSIONS:

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/Redevelopment Agency adjourn to Closed Sessions as follows:

15.1 • CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Section 54956.8 of the Government Code:

Property Neaotiatina Parties Aaencv Neaotiators

491 South Lincoln Avenue Anthony and Iris Neal Executive Director/City Manager APN 488-261-81-26 Director of Community Development General Counsel/City Attorney

Under negotiation: For the Agency/Council to provide instructions to its negotiators regarding the price and terms for the possible purchase of real property.

15.2 • CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6

Agency Designated Representatives: Kathi Henry Nancy Palm Jim Lynch

Employee Organizations: EI Cajon Mid-Management and Professional Employees Group EI Cajon Municipal Employees Association EI Cajon Police Officers Association EI Cajon Police Officers Association Management Group EI Cajon Professional Firefighters International Association of Fire Fighters Local 4603 Executive, Unrepresented and Confidential Employees

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -10- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00p.m. CLOSED SESSIONS: (Continued)

15.3 • CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Section 54956.8 of the Government Code:

Pronertv Neaotiatina Parties Aaencv Neaotiators

APNs 488-152-01 through Daryl Priest Executive Director/City Manager -13; Southwest corner of Priest Development Director of Community Development Main and Magnolia Corporation General Counsel/City Attorney

Under negotiation: For the Agency/Council to provide instructions to its negotiators regarding amendment to the price or terms, or both, of the existing Disposition and Development Agreement for real property.

16. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION:

City Attorney or Representative reports on action taken in Closed Session.

ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Joint Meeting of the EI Cajon City Council and the EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency held this 8th day of March, 2011, is adjourned to Tuesday, March 22, 2011, at 3:00 p.m.

GENERAL INFORMATION:

The following item is informational and is not discussed unless the Council/Agency brings the item forward for discussion under Item No. 12 of the agenda.

*A. 2010 Annual School Review Report

NO EVENING MEETING

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council -11- March 8, 2011 and Redevelopment Agency 3:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES 1.1

JOINT MEETING OF THE EL CAJON CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

MINUTES

CITY OF EL CAJON EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 22, 2011

An Adjourned Regular Joint Meeting of the EI Cajon Cit ou cil Redevelopment Agency of the City of EI Cajon, California held T esd y, r ary 22, 2011, was called to order by Mayor/Chair Mark Lewis a 3:00 . ,·n the 0 ncil Chambers, 200 Civic Center Way, EI Cajon, Californi. his e ti wa djourned from the eM~:~I:~ Adjourned Regular Joint meetin held at l P n x, :::1 s:n- w eus No e e dricK L wis Rutledge, City Clerk/Secretary Foley, City Attorney/General Counsel Henry, City Manager/Executive Director Griffiths, Deputy Director of Public Works Ayres, Director of Community Development

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO FLAG led by Mayor Lewis and MOMENT OF SILENCE. (The Courts have concluded that sectarian prayer as part of City Council Meetings is not permitted under the Constitution).

POSTINGS: The City Clerk posted Orders of Adjournment of the February 8, 2011, meeting and the Agenda of the February 22, 2011, meetings in accordance to State Law and Council/Agency Policy.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -49 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES PRESENTATIONS:

• Recognition - Neighborhood Watch Participants • Commendation - Chuck Hansen • Presentation - Outback Steakhouse Hometown Merchant Award

AGENDA CHANGES: None

CONSENT ITEMS: (1.1 - 1.13)

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY KENDRICK, to APPROVE Consent Items 1.1 to 1.5 and Items 1.7 to 1.12, pulling Items 1.6 and 1.13, as requested by HANSON-COX.

MOTION CARRIL;&.:/L.l1V

1.1 MINUTES OF CITY COUNCILIRE E

Approve Minutes of the Febr ary City Council/Redevelo nt Ag nfJ

1.2

submitted by the Finance Department.

1.3 APPRO OF READING BY TITLE AND WAIVER OF READING IN FULL OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA

Approve the reading by title and waive the reading in full of all Ordinances on the Agenda.

1.4 OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2010 QUARTERLY TREASURER'S REPORT (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Finance and Treasurer)

Receive the quarterly Treasurer's Report for the period ending December 31, 2010.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -50 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES CONSENT ITEMS: (Continued)

1.5 SAN DIEGO GANG ENFORCEMENT COLLABORATIVE GRANT (Report: Chief of Police)

1. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to accept the 2010-11 San Diego Gang Enforcement Collaborative Grant in the total amount of $17,851.00 and to execute any grant documents and agreements necessary for the receipt and use of these funds; 2. Appropriate San Diego Gang Enforcement Collaborative Grant funds in the amount of $17,851.00 (Budget Activity 225900-PD035).

PULLED FOR DISCUSSION: 1.6 PROGRESS REPORT ON STATE OF EMERGENCY (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works

1. Determine by four-fifths vote, that there contin to e a eed for a state of emergency to facilitate repairs at various I catio s s n ted in the Agenda Report in accordance with EI Cai Muni ip Code ction 2.04.145 and Public Contract Code Section 22 50 and 0 ive th id requirements for emergency repairs in ordan ~ ith E Ca' n M ni ipal Code Section 3.20.010(C)(6); and 2. Appropriate ddition I(f)J ding i 0,000.00 from the Wastewa r Fu d. ~

1.7 EN - STAN WALTER, INC. D/B/A PRECIOUS I Cajon Boulevard

Approve the a plica 'on for a Special Operation License as submitted by John Walter for Stan Walt r nco d/b/a Precious Gems & Metals located at 1250 EI Cajon Boulevard for a business to purchase gold, silver and coins from the public.

1.8 RESOLUTION: AWARD OF BID NO. 019-11, STREET STRIPING AND REMOVAL SERVICES (Report: Purchasing Agent)

Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 18-11 to award the bid to the lowest responsive bidder, Statewide Stripes, Inc., in the amount of $54,552.00.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -51 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES CONSENT ITEMS: (Continued)

1.9 RESOLUTION: AWARD OF BID NO. 023-11, RENETTE RECREATION CENTER RENOVATION (Report: Purchasing Agent)

1. Find the second, fourth, seventh, and eleventh low bidders non-responsive for failure to perform contract work amounting to at least 50 percent of the contract price, not including "Specialty Items" and find the sixth low bidder non-responsive for failure to list the amount of work being subcontracted. 2. Based on the above, adopt the next RESOLUTION in order and award the bid to the lowest responsive bidder, EC Constructors, Inc., in the amount of $1,016,674.00.

Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 19-11 to award the bid to the lowest responsive bidder, EC Constructors, Inc., in the amount of $1,016,674.00.

1.10 RESOLUTION: AUTHORIZING THE CI DIEGO LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY TO B THE Y FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL WASTE TIR NFO ENT OGRAM (Report: Deputy City Manager/D' tor of Pu Iic W rks

Adopt RESOLUTIO NO.2 -11)to auth ~l he C ty of San D· 0 Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) t appl for uri9S nd a ~i ter t e San Diego Regional Waste Tire Enforcement Pr gl( n b half the ity of EI C . n for Fiscal Year 2011-12.

1.11 IVE (5)-YEAR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION n.'-I-~n.AM (RTIP) (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director

Direct the City Clerk to set a public hearing on March 8, 2011, at 3:00 p.m. for approval of the proposed Amendment to the 2010 RTIP.

1.12 RESOLUTIONS: STREET OVERLAY 2011- PARK AVENUE AND VICINITY, Bid No. 029-11, Engineering Job No. 3345-1 (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works)

Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 21-11 to approve Plans and Specifications and RESOLUTION NO. 22-11 to direct a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids to be opened on March 24, 2011.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -52 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES CONSENT ITEMS: (Continued)

PULLED FOR DISCUSSION: 1.13 FEMA DISASTER NUMBER 1952-DR, DECEMBER 2010 STATEWIDE STORMS (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works)

1. Authorize the retention of Shepardson Engineering to evaluate various slope failures adjacent to the public right-of-way resulting from December storms; 2. Adopt the next RESOLUTION in order designating the Director of Public Works as the authorized agent and primary contact to make an application for public assistance with California Office of Emergency Services; and 3. Appropriate $20,000.00 from TransNet to fund the geotechnical studies.

***********************************************

Consent Items Pulled for Discussion:

1.6 PROGRESS REPORT ON STATE OF EME GEN Y (Report: Deputy City Manager/Dir tor of P Iic Wor

RECOMMENDATION: That t

2. in the amount of $50,000.00 from the

DISCUSSION

Councilmember Hanson-Cox asks for clarification on the need for additional funding.

Deputy Director Griffiths explains the time and material portion of this job was not quantified at the beginning due to it being an emergency situation.

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY HANSON-COX, to ACCEPT Progress Report on State of Emergency.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -53 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES CONSENT ITEMS: (Continued)

1.13 FEMA DISASTER NUMBER 1952-DR, DECEMBER 2010 STATEWIDE STORMS (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

DISCUSSION

Councilmember Hanson-Cox asks if this job has a not to ex

Deputy Director Griffiths confirms job does have

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

PUBLIC COM,un::'M"T

Sunshine Horton speaks about her upcoming yellow-ribbon project, suggests restrooms be added for outside use in the new area outside City Hall, her concern about gangs in EI Cajon, and thanks the EI Cajon Police for their hard work.

Jillian Hanson-Cox speaks in opposition of State of California Governor's proposal to take redevelopment funding away from cities and encourages citizens to write letters of opposition to the Governor and State Legislators.

Bob McClellan referred to article in the newspaper about EI Cajon Paramedics increase in survival rate by using new method of CPR.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -54 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES 2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:

2.1 Letter from Ayad Mansour, Owner of San Diego Cash & Carry regarding existing sheds.

DISCUSSION

John Mansour speaks on behalf of San Diego Cash & Carry. Despite a rough start they are proud to be a part of this community. Mr. Mansour explains that after checking with the County he installed containers on his property and then built the sheds without realizing he needed to check with the City of EI Cajon. He provided a drawing showing the location of the sheds on his property for the Council to review.

Other Speakers supporting the request of Cash & Carry for the City Council to allow the sheds to remain on the property: Dr. Sami Jihad, Layth Wa " Fr. Nuel Gergis, Riyadh Mansour and Aisho Marcos.

ing:

lied the County, to

Director of Com enforcement is ues

Councilmemb r e tor Ayres to do what is possible while following the appropriate prorc r s to Ip this store, as the City is already struggling to keep businesses in t wn.

City Attorney Foley reminds Council this is a code enforcement issue covered by the City's ordinances and it is inappropriate for the Council to intervene in the process. These types of situations do not normally come before the Council.

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY HANSON-COX, to refer this matter to the City Manager.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -55 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

3.1 RESOLUTION: DELINQUENT REFUSE COLLECTION CHARGES (Report: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council • Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony; • Close the Public Hearing; • Adopt the next RESOLUTION in order certifying the list of property owners as delinquent in the payment of their mandatory trash service bills; and • Authorize the City Clerk to record the amount owed as a lien on the property and forward a list to the County Tax Assessor for billing on the next property tax bill.

DISCUSSION

The Public Hearing is now open.

Rhodessa Ru in- y, 326 West Chase Avenue, finds the trash fee to be too much since s orks out of town and is seldom at home. She has filed a request for a waiver with Waste Management, but is concerned that a lien may be placed on her property.

Mayor Lewis suggests Ms. Ruffin-Gay contact Waste Management to make arrangements that might reduce cost and provide smaller bins to fit her needs.

Councilmember Kendrick speaks in support of City Ordinance and states Council cannot make an exception for one citizen.

City Attorney Foley suggests that Ms. Ruffin-Gay make arrangements with the City Manager for payment of the bill so a lien will not be placed on the property.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -56 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued)

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY KENDRICK, to CLOSE the Public Hearing.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY McCLELLAN, to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-11 certifying the list of property owners as delinquent in the payment of their mandatory trash service bills; and authorize the City Clerk to record the amount owed as a lien on the property and forward a list to the County Tax Assessor for billing on the next property tax bill.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNA US VOTE.

3.2 ES

RECOMMEND • Open • ,,",,-,<,';..-vTION in order confirming the charges and levying

DISCUSSION

The Public Hearing is now open.

No one comes forward to speak.

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY McCLELLAN, to CLOSE the Public Hearing.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -57 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued)

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY McCLELLAN, to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 25-11 confirming the charges and levying the assessments on the next regular tax bill; and authorize the City Clerk to place a lien on delinquent properties and forward a list to the County Tax Assessor for billing on the next property tax bill.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: None

5. COMMISSION REPORTS: None

6. ACTIVITIES REPORTS OF MAYOR LEWIS

( hair, Public Safety i tee); LAFCO (Local

6.1 SANDAG B

6.2 - February 11, 2011

AS REP

ACTIVITIES REBe~·TS OF COUNCILMEMBERS

7. MAYOR PRO TEM GARY KENDRICK Heartland Communications JPA; Heartland Fire Training JPA.

7.1 Council Activities Report

AS REPORTED.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -58 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES ACTIVITIES REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS: (Continued)

8.1 Council Activities - Verbal Report

REPORT DISTRIBUTED AT COUNCIL MEETING.

Congratulates Steve Hamman on receiving "Citizen of the Year" award.

9. COUNCILMEMBER BOB M CLE LA Harry Griffen Park Joint Steering Com . ee; Hand C m unications JPA Alternate; MTS (Metropolitan Transit Syst m Board .

9.1 Council Activities R port AS REP D Also, co on receiving "Citizen of the Year" award.

10. COUNCILMEMBER BILL WELLS METRO CommissionlWastewater JPA; East County Economic Development Council; Heartland Fire Training JPA - Alternate; EI Cajon Community Development Corporation.

10.1 Council Activities Report

AS REPORTED.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -59 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES 11. LEGISLATIVE REPORT

11.1 League of California Cities Legislative Bulletins dated February 1, 4, 8, 9, 11, 14 and 17, 2011 - City Advocate Weekly

HANSON-COX advised the League of California Cities and Redevelopment Association have requested letters be sent to the Governor and State Legislators urging them not to take Redevelopment Funds away from the Cities. City Manager Henry advised a letter was sent to the City's lobbyist. HANSON-COX would like the City to adopt a RESOLUTION to be brought back for Council consideration at the next meeting.

HANSON-COX further advises the State is also considering cuts to CDBG programs, but no letters are needed at this time.

12. GENERAL INFORMATION ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION

13. ORDINANCES: FIRST READING - one

14. ORDINANC OPTION one

15. CLOSED S

RECOMMEND T t t e ity Council/Redevelopment Agency adjourn to Closed Sessio

15.1 CONFE E WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Section 54956.8 of the Government Code:

Property Negotiating Parties Agency Negotiators

619 Emerald Avenue #103 Carlos A. and Julie Executive Director/City Manager APN 487-543-25-00 Aguilar Director of Community Development General Counsel/City Attorney

Under negotiation: For the Agency/Council to provide instructions to its negotiators regarding the price and terms for the possible purchase of real property.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -60 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES CLOSED SESSIONS: (Continued)

15.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Section 54956.8 of the Government Code:

Property Negotiating Parties Agency Negotiators

610 Mollison Avenue #A Maria Rodriguez Executive Director/City Manager APN 488-371-13-15 Director of Community Development General Counsel/City Attorney

Under negotiation: For the Agency/Council to provide instructions to its negotiators regarding the price and terms for the possible purchase of real property.

15.3 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIAT - P rsuant to Section 54956.8 of the Government Code:

Property Negotiating P- ies

797 Lemon Avenue irector/City Manager APN 492-012-26-00 ommunity Dev ment General Counsel/City Attorney

n y/ uncil to provide instructions to its terms for the possible purchase of real

15.4 CONFE E WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION - pursuant to subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 54956.9:

Number of Cases: 1

City of EI Cajon v. County of San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission, Superior Court of California, County of Orange Case No. 06CC13348

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY McCLELLAN, to ADJOURN to Closed Session at 4:31 p.m.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -61 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES 16. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION AT 4:52 P.M.

City Attorney Foley reports the following actions: 15.1 Direction was given to the Agency's Real Property Negotiators. 15.2 Direction was given to the Agency's Real Property Negotiators. 15.3 Direction was given to the Agency's Real Property Negotiators.

Due to conflict of interest on item 15.4, City Attorney Foley did not participate. City Manager Henry reports the following actions: 15.4 Council gave direction to Legal Counsel.

Adjournment: Mayor Lewis adjourned the Adjourned Regular Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency held this 22nd day of Febru ry 2011, at 4:53 p.m. to Tuesday, February 22, 2011, at 7:00 p.m.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -62 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC COMMENT:

Jillian Hanson-Cox, speaks in opposition of State of California Governor's proposal to eliminate Redevelopment and Enterprise funding to cities.

Bob McClellan referred to article in the newspaper about EI Cajon Paramedics increase in survival rate by using new method of CPR.

COMMISSION INTERVIEWS:

100 INTERVIEWS FOR PERSONNEL COMMISSION AND GILLESPIE FIELD DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (Report: City Clerk)

PERSONNELC One Commissi ro ployees in the Classified Service: One Fou - January 31,2015 Applicants: *No No inati ns Received

*In accordance with Municipal Code Section 2.24.110, appointment for this vacancy shall be by the City Council from a list of three persons nominated by the employees in the Classified Service via their employee associations, except in the instance when the incumbent is to be re-nominated, then one name may be submitted for consideration. Members nominated by the employees shall not be subject to the residency requirement set out in Section 2.24.030.

MAYOR LEWIS stated that since no nominations were received, the application period will be left open until three applicants have been nominated by employees in Classified Service.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -64 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES JOINT MEETING OF THE EL CAJON CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

MINUTES

CITY OF EL CAJON EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 22, 2011

An Adjourned Regular Joint Meeting of the City Counci nd Red elopment Agency of the City of EI Cajon, California, held Tuesday, ebr ary , 011, was called to order by Mayor/Chair Mark Lewis at 7:00 m., in th Council hambers, 200 Civic Center Way, EI Cajon, California. This e ting a journ d from the Adjourned Regular Joint Meeting held at· p.m., ~e day, ebr ary 2 , 011, by order of the City Council and Redevelop ent ency!. ROLL CAL D Council/Agency a son-Cox, McClellen and Wells Council/Agency None Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick Mayor/Chair pr s Lewis Other Officers rese t: Rutledge, City Clerk/Secretary Reid, Staff Attorney/General Counsel Henry, City Manager/Executive Director Griffiths, Deputy Director of Public Works Ayres, Director of Community Development

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO FLAG and MOMENT OF SILENCE. (The Courts have concluded that sectarian prayer as part of City Council meetings is not permitted under the Constitution)

AGENDA CHANGES: None

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -63 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES COMMISSION INTERVIEWS: (Continued)

GILLESPIE FIELD DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: Two Members appointed by the Mayor with the concurrence of the City Council and will be ratified by the Board of Supervisors One four-year term to expire January 31, 2015 One four-year term to expire March 18, 2015

Applicants: Frank Bathrick Robert Davison Norman Erb Brian McKune Bob Parker - ABSENT Dana Quittner William Raver Henry Redondo Matthew Rifat Christopher Shipp - ABSENT Jeff Swiney

Interviews were conducted

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY WELLS, to appoint Robert Davison to serve a term to expire January 31,2015.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BY McCLELLAN, to appoint Jeff Swiney to serve a term to expire March 18, 2015.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -65 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES Recess called at 7:52 p.m.

Meeting called back to order at 7:59 p.m.

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

101 FY 2011·12 CDBG AND HOME ALLOCATIONS (Report: Director of Community Development)

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council • Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony; • Close the Public Hearing; • Allocate funds to projects and programs that will be ed from the FY 2011-12 Community Development Block Grant (C G) nd HOME grant programs.

Jamie Kasvikis presented and HOME funding recommendations.

ri is H u Gene H rt n - Re . nal Director of Family Health Centers of San Diego Zina Sal m - EO for Chaldean Middleeastern Social Services Rosema hnston - Interfaith Shelter Network of San Diego Estela de Los Rios - Center for Social Advocacy Marian Mann - Meals on Wheels Susan Hall - Angel's Depot Peter Callstrom - Regional Task Force on the Homeless Sean Oliver - East County Transitional Living Center Danielle Pinson - San Diego Youth Services Christine Rossi - Volunteers of America Martha Morrissey - Promising Futures, Inc. Marilee Gorham - Recreation Department Jim Redman - Police Department

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -66 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued)

Discussion ensues among Council and Staff concerning the following: • These are all worthwhile programs but only limited funds are available. • MAYOR LEWIS does not feel the EI Cajon Valley Tennis and Handball Lighting should be funded at this time; McCLELLAN agrees. • McCLELLAN inquired whether funds are available from the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing Program (HPRP) for reallocation to organizations for Emergency Vouchers to replace suggested funding reductions from Community Policing in this year's allocations. • Jamie Kasvikis advised a Public Hearing would need to be held in order to reallocate HPRP funds. • McCLELLAN requested a Public Hearing be held prior to the final allocation of FY 2011-12 CDBG and HOME Funds to discuss making reallocations from HPRP funding. • WELLS is interested in funding the SIP Program. • HANSON·COX states she would like to propo e to the funding recommendations for Council's consideration

MOTION BY LEWIS, SECOND BV cCLE Hearing. Mort AR I

MOTION Bi H NS X, f£~~N B cCLELLAN to tentatively approve r apit I u lic F:a iii' s a reduction in the Mobile Home Rehabili a io ro r lIoc Ion of $66,674 and allocating $36,674 to Famil al h C n e , Inc. for renovations to nurses stations and $30,000 tEst unty Transitional Living Center for heating/air conditi nin unit replacements, leaving $155,760 for the Mobile Home ehabilitation Program; and tentatively approving staff recommendations for the other Capital/Public Facilities projects.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

MOTION BY HANSON·COX, SECOND BY LEWIS to tentatively approve CDBG funding reducing Community Policing allocation to $152,018 and allocating $10,000 to Meals on Wheels.

NO VOTE TAKEN

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -67 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued)

UNDER DISCUSSION:

Mayor Pro Tern Kendrick suggests tentatively funding $5,000 to the Food Bank in addition to Meals on Wheels.

Councilmember Wells also wants funding for Angel's Depot in the amount of $5,000 and East County Transitional Living Center in amount of $50,000 in addition to Meals on Wheels and the Food Bank.

Council directed a Public Hearing be set March 8, 2011, to discuss reallocation of HPRP funding. City Manager Henry advises we may not be able to set it that soon, but it will be set prior to the Public Hearing in April for the final allocation FY 2011-12 CDBG and HOME funding. She reminded Council at the Mid- Year Budget Workshop held today that any reductions to Community Policing will come out of th neral Fund Budget.

MOTION BY HANSON-COX, SECOND Y approve CDBG funding with cha es to h

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

MOTiON BY HANSON-COX, SECOND BY WELLS, to tentatively approve the allocation of CDBG Grant Funds for administration activities as recommended by Staff.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

MOTION BY HANSON-COX, SECOND BY WELLS, to tentatively approve the allocation of HOME Grant Funds for administration activities as recommended by Staff.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -68 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued)

MOTION BY HANSON-COX, SECOND BY WELLS, to tentatively approve the allocation of HOME Grant Funds to the CHDO Reserve, as recommended by Staff.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

MOTION BY HANSON-COX, SECOND BY McCLELLAN, to tentatively approve the allocation of HOME Grant Funds to the First-Time Homebuyer and Rehab Pool of Funds projects, as recommended by Staff.

MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

Staff was directed to set a Public Hearing to consid r real oca 10 f funds from HPRP prior to the final approval of FY 2011-12 C G and H E allo at ons.

102

KATHIE J. RUTLEDGE, CMC City Clerk/Secretary

Joint Meeting: EI Cajon City Council February 22, 2011 And Redevelopment Agency -69 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES 1.3

APPROVAL OF READING BYTITLE AND WAIVER OF READING OF ORDINANCES ON THIS AGENDA

The City Council waives the reading of the full text of every ordinance contained in this agenda and approves the reading of the ordinance title only. r"'citY"c'i~~k"D;t~"St';~P"'1 MEETING: Mar. 8, 2011 ~ ; ~ ;,.• ;~ ...... r- i i '" V, I ITEM NO: 1.4

1 "1"1 !I'D _ l\ i l.lO""!\::~::~'J

DATE: March 1, 2011 TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick, Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan, and Wells FROM: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Final Report for Emergency Repairs on State ofEmergency RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the next resolution in order proclaiming the termination of a local emergency in the City of EI Cajon. BACKGROUND: This report is provided to inform the City Council on the status of emergency repairs needed to mitigate damage to City facilities as a result of storm damage during- the week of December 20, 2010. The City Council approved Resolution No. '04-11 on January 11, 2011, declaring a State of Emergency and authorizing expenditures to make needed repairs.

The emergency repair work at352 Dewane Drive is substantially complete except for minor punch list items. Additionally, all other necessary emergency repair work within the City of EI Cajon has been completed. As such, the need for a state of emergency to facilitate repairs at the location noted above in accordance with EI Cajon Municipal Code section 2.04.145 and Public Contract Code section 22050 no longer exists. The final cost accounting will be completed within the next two weeks but is expected to be within the budgeted amount of $200,000.

FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the emergency repairs at 352 Dewane Drive is expected not to exceed $200,000.00.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

Rob Turner Kathi J. Henry DEPUTY CITY MANAGER CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER RESOLUTION NO. -11

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON PROCLAIMING THE TERMINATION OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY.

WHEREAS, a local emergency presently exists in the City of EI Cajon in accordance with the proclamation thereof by the City Manager, as the City's Director of Emergency Services on the 1i h day of December, 2010, and its ratification by the City Council on the t t" day of January, 2011, as a result of conditions of extreme peril in the City of EI Cajon, including sudden and unexpected damages threatening the health and safety of EI Cajon residents and property owners caused by storm; and

WHEREAS, the situation resulting from said conditions of extreme peril is now deemed to be within the control of the normal protective services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of and within the City of EI Cajon.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council of the City of EI Cajon hereby proclaims the termination of the local emergency.

3/8/11 (Item 1.4)

Termination of Emergency on Dewane r"'city"'61~~k"D~t~"St~~p""l lij~, 1~~gll1J IJtf E.IJ MEETING: Mar. 8, 2011

, Hl{ Oil ITEM NO: 1.5 _

~ - 3 l-\ 8: 3W I ...! ~IR([IJf~ 11t~,g~~

DATE: February 17,2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tern Kendrick, Council Members Hanson-Cox, Wells, and McClellan

FROM: Chief of Police

SUBJECT: FY2010 Stone Garden Grant

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council takes the following actions:

1. Authorize the City Manager or designee to accept the 2010-2011 San Diego County Stone Garden Grant in the total amount of $115,414.00 and to execute any grant documents and agreements necessary for the receipt and use of these funds; 2. Appropriate San Diego County Stone Garden Grant funds in the amount of $112,714.00 for overtime and $2,700.00 for mileage for a total of $115,414.00.

BACKGROUND: Through funding provided by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security the San Diego Sherriff's Department will administer the San Diego Stone Garden Collaborative Grant which will reimburse the police department for working overtime with other Law Enforcement Agencies to collaboratively address boarder security issues through suppression operations targeting violent offenders.

FISCAL IMPACT: The City of EI Cajon is eligible to receive an allocation of 2010-2011 San Diego Gang Enforcement Collaborative Grant funds as indicated below.

AMOUNT GRANT PERIOD BUDGET ACTIVITY $115,414.00 10101/10 - 04/30/2013 225900-PD036

APPROVED BY:

pafSptecco Kathi Henry (CHIEF OF POLICE CITY MANAGER ......

RBI fII:. _ 12m! FED 28 P ll: 35

: ..

DATE: February 28, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tern Kendrick and Councilrnernbers Hanson-Cox, McClellan, and Wells

FROM: Purchasing Agent

SUBJECT: Award ofBid 025-11, Traffic Signal Modification at East Main Street/Ballard Street

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1) Find the second low bidder non-responsive for failure to submit an original bid bond. 2) Appropriate additional Transnet funds in the amount of $25,000.00. 3) Based on the above, adopt the next resolution in order and award the bid to the lowest responsive bidder, Sutherlin Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $66,986.00.

BACKGROUND: On January 11, 2011, Council approved a project to modify the traffic signal at East Main Street and Ballard Street to add a new westbound protected left-turn arrow phase. Eight prospective bidders obtained bid packages, and six responses were received and opened at 2:00 p.m. February 17, 2011. Contractors are required to submit a bid security, accompanying their sealed bid, in an amount not less than 10% of the bid amount. This requirement can be met by issuance of a check payable to the City of El Cajon, which is certified by a responsible bank or by a surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of California and satisfactory to the City.

The bid submitted by Republic ITS, Inc. failed to include a proper form of bid security because it was accompanied by a photocopy of the bid bond, rather than the properly executed original. The City Attorney has determined that for this reason, Republic's bid is non-responsive to the specifications. Purchasing, in concurrence with the Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works, recommends award of the bid to the lowest responsive bidder, Sutherlin Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $66,986.00. The summary of bids is attached and complete proposals are on file in Purchasing.

FISCAL IMPACT: $66,986.00.

An additional appropriation is necessary to increase the project budget (550000-PW3346 9065) from $60,000 to $85,000 to provide adequate funding for construction and inspection costs. Sufficient Transnet funds are available for transfer to this project. No General Funds will be used for this project.

PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

gfJ~· tJMe~ hJe:~ ':1 Dede Porter Kathi Henry 0--- PURCHASING AGENT DEPUTY CITY MANAGER! CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BID SUMMARY - BID NO. 025-11

BIDDER TOTAL BID AMOUNT

Sutherlin Contracting, Inc. (El Cajon) $66,986.00* Republic ITS, Inc. (Novato) Non-Responsive Lekas Electric, Inc. (El Cajon) $74,000.00 DBX, Inc. (Temecula) $77,609.00 Southwest Traffic Signal Service, Inc. (El Cajon) $84,327.00 HMS Construction, Inc. (Vista) $87,000.00

RECOMMENDED AWARD

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $56,595.00 RESOLUTION NO. -11

RESOLUTION AWARDING BID FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT EAST MAIN STREET/BALLARD STREET. Bid No. 025-11, Job No. 3346.

WHEREAS, bids for the Traffic Signal Modification at East Main Street/Ballard Street project were publicly opened on February 17, 2011; and

WHEREAS, six responses were received; and

WHEREAS, one bid was deemed non-responsive for failure to meet the bid specifications; and

WHEREAS, Purchasing, in concurrence with the Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works, recommends award of the bid to the lowest responsive bidder; and

WHEREAS, the City Council believes it to be in the best interests of the City to award the contract to the lowest responsive bidder.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council does hereby reject all other bids and proposals except that herein mentioned, and awards the bid for the Traffic Signal Modification at East Main Street/Ballard Street project to:

Sutherlin Contracting, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $66,986.00.

2. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute a contract for said project on behalf of the City of EI Cajon.

3/8/11 (Item 1.6)

Traf Sig Mod E Main and Ballard awd .. ··C"it·y··ci~~k··ij"~t·~··St·~~p .. ] - ME£IM: March 8, 2011 r'- OF ••. ITEM NO:. 1.7 _ P 4: 35

DATE: February 28, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tern Kendrick and Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan, and Wells

FROM: Purchasing Agent

SUBJECT: Award of Bid 028-11, Motor Vehicles

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the next resolution in order and award the bid to the lowest responsive bidders, Theodore Robins Ford for the Ford F-250's . and Ford Econoline Vans, in the amount of $125,146.57, and City Chevrolet for the Chevrolet Impalas, in the amount of $66,768.52. . BACKGROUND: On June 22, 2010, Council approved the purchase of replacement vehicles. Thirty-six prospective bidders obtained bid packages, and eight responses were received and opened at 2:00 p.m. February 24, 2011. Purchasing, in concurrence with the Director of Public Works/Deputy City Manager, recommends award ofthe bid to the lowest responsive bidders, Theodore Robins Ford, and City Chevrolet. The summary of bids is attached and complete proposals are on file in Purchasing. FISCAL IMPACT: $191,915.09. Sufficient funds are available for this purchase in Activity/Account #605000-9040 (Vehicle Replacement) and 650950-9040 (Wastewater Vehicle Replacement).

PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: Cf2J.p'~_. ~~ itftJfL. ~~e~1 (f Dede Porter Nancy alm Kathi Henry . PURCHASING AGENT DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BID SUMMARY - BID NO. 028-11

BIDDER - FORD F-250's (2) TOTAL BID AMOUNT

Theodore Robins Ford (Costa Mesa) $44,212.47 * Fairway Ford (Placentia) $44,328.59 Raceway Ford (Riverside) $44,386.18 North County Ford (Vista) $44,445.93 West Covina Motors (West Covina) $46,833.17

BIDDER - FORD ECONOLINE VANS (2) TOTAL BID AMOUNT

Theodore Robins Ford (Costa Mesa) $80,934.10* Fairway Ford (Plancentia) $83,497.36 North County Ford (Vista) $83,752.15 Raceway Ford (Riverside) $85,584.14 West Covina Motors (West Covina) $91,740.68

BIDDER - CHEVROLET IMPALAS (3) TOTAL BID AMOUNT

City Chevrolet (San Diego) $66,768.52* Inland Chevrolet (Hemet) $67,438.54 George Chevrolet (Costa Mesa) $70,527.07 West Covina Motors (West Covina) $74,314.93

* RECOMMENDED AWARD RESOLUTION NO. -11

RESOLUTION AWARDING BID FOR MOTOR VEHICLES. (Bid No. 028-11).

WHEREAS, bids for the purchase of replacement motor vehicles were publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. on February 24, 2011; and

WHEREAS, eight responses were received; and

WHEREAS, Purchasing, in concurrence with the Deputy City ManagerlDirector of Public Works, recommends award of the bid to the low bidders; and

WHEREAS, the City Council believes it to be in the best interests of the City to split the award of the bid as shown below.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby rejects all other bids or proposals, except those herein mentioned, and the bid for motor vehicles is hereby awarded to the following named bidders:

Vendor Vehicle Amount Theodore Robins Ford (2) Ford F-250s & (2) Ford Econoline Vans $125,146.57 City Chevrolet (3) Chevrolet Impalas 66,768.52 $191,915.09 for a total bid amount not to exceed $191,915.09.

2. The Purchasing Agent is hereby authorized to issue purchase orders for said vehicles.

3/8/11 (Item 1.7)

Motor Vehicles awd 1.8

RESOLUTION NO. -11

A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSAL TO ABOLISH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES.

WHEREAS, as part of its 2011-12 budget proposal, the Governor has proposed permanently abolishing California's more than 400 local redevelopment agencies; and

WHEREAS, this proposal represents more of the same misguided and illegal State budget raids of local government funds that voters have repeatedly sought to end, most recently in November 2010 when an overwhelming 61% of voters elected to stop State raids of local government funds, including redevelopment funds; and

WHEREAS, this proposal will bring very little financial benefit to the State. According to the State Controller's Office, redevelopment agencies have more than $87 billion in bond and other contractual obligations that legally must be repaid before revenues are available to any other purpose, and, in fact, according to the State Department of Finance's own budget documents, there will be zero State savings in future years from shutting down redevelopment; and

WHEREAS, this proposal will destroy local economic development, including hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in local economic activity throughout California. In fact, in EI Cajon, abolishing redevelopment will destroy all pending affordable housing projects, including a senior affordable housing project; much needed economic development activities, including grants and loans to businesses, public facility construction of much needed safety improvements; and infrastructure improvements that would be impossible without this funding; and

WHEREAS, throughout California, redevelopment activities support 304,000 jobs annually, including 170,600 construction jobs, contribute over $40 billion annually to California's economy in the generation of goods and services, and generate more than $2 billion in state and local taxes in a typical year; and

WHEREAS, eliminating redevelopment will take away one of the few tools local governments have to comply with state requirements to plan for more compact urban development supported by transit-oriented development, housing, jobs and infrastructure; and

WHEREAS, eliminating redevelopment will destroy the development of affordable housing in California. Redevelopment agencies are the second largest funder of affordable housing, behind only the federal government, responsible for over 98,000 units of affordable housing since 1993; and

(Continued on Page 2) Page 2 of 2, Resolution No. -11

WHEREAS, shutting down redevelopment agencies is a violation of multiple State and Federal constitutional provisions.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the City Council formally opposes the Administration's proposal to abolish redevelopment in California.

2. That the City Council hereby authorizes City Staff to communicate its opposition to this proposal to the Governor, the Legislature, business groups and citizens.

3/8/11 (Item 1.8)

Oppose Prop to Abolish Redev Agencies r-··City"ci~;k··jj;t~··St;~p·": 1~1tW 1!IJ1r B liJlllllJ F MEETING: March 8, 2011 ir ITEM NO: 1.9 _ 1 lOll - 3 I:::'" 8; 34 1______...1 A~~BJJ!l!U1lj!Jt

DATE: March 1,2011 TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick, .Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan and Wells FROM: Deputy City ManagerlDirector of Finance SUBJECT: Allocate Redevelopment Funds for the Civic Center Plaza Site Improvements Adjacent to the Public Safety Center Project

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council / Redevelopment Agency: 1. Appropriate Redevelopment 2005 bond proceeds up to $2,300,000 from the Unrestricted Fund Balance (Fund 590); and 2. Increase the expenditure budget in the Redevelopment Capital Funds ActivitylProject No. 590900-RDR0708 Civic Center Plaza Improvements Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to make the necessary budget adjustments and financial transactions to reflect the use of Redevelopment Funds.

BACKGROUND: On December 14, 2010, the City Council approved a change order with Ledcor Construction, Inc. to construct the Civic Center Plaza Improvements with funding from Redevelopment 2005 bond proceeds. Redevelopment funds are also an appropriate and available source of funding for the adjacent site improvements included in the Public Safety Center Project. These improvements for lighting, parking, decorative walkways, and landscaping, etc. are included in Ledcor Construction, Inc.'s existing contract scope, which is funded by Proposition O.

Approval of this recommended action will authorize a change in funding sources, not a change in contract scope. The actual cost for the improvements to be paid with Redevelopment funding is estimated not to exceed $2,300,000.

FISCAL IMPACT: Proposition 0 funds will be reallocated from the Public Safety Center Project to the Animal Shelter Project and other public safety facility improvements.

PREPARED B:/) APPROVED BY:

~;Jrtf/~ Itbt~ ~t(A± _ Nancy Palm Kathi Henry U DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ICjf;riil#¥PH~~Gi\\PI MEETING: March 8, 2011

1 j.... 70 11 - til,· $-'(:":! Ll i ITEM NO: 1.10 _ -~ ~ ~ I

: :

DATE: March 2, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick, Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan and Wells

FROM: Deputy City Manager/Director of Finance

SUBJECT: Community Event in the Right-of-Way: Cajon Classic Cruise

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached request for a Community Event in the right-of-way to be held every Wednesday evening in the downtown area from April 6 through October 26 and an additional event on December 7, 2011, with the conditions listed below. BACKGROUND: The EI Cajon Community Development Corporation (ECCDC), Priest Development Corporation, and POI' Favor are asking permission to hold the 11th season of the Cajon Classic Cruise with amplified music, promotional banners, food and merchandise vendors, and information booths every Wednesday eveningfrom 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. starting on April 6 through October 26, and December 7, 2011. These events are open to the public and over 5,000 attendees are anticipated weekly.

For the 2011 season, they are requesting closure of the following streets for all events: • Alley located on the Prescott Promenade • Sulzfeld Way from East Main Street north to the alley • Orange Avenue from West Main Street south to the alley (allows exit for Insurance Store parking lot) • Sunshine Avenue from West Main Street south to the alley

In addition, they are asking permission to close the parking lot east ofthe Prescott Promenade on June 29, August 3, August 17, and October 5. This year they are not requesting closure of Main Street for any of the events.

Conditions of approval will include: • All information and assurances made in the application including providing the City with a Certificate of Insurance in accordance with City Council Policy D-3. • Trash and recycling receptacles will be placed and picked up for each event at appropriate locations. • Restroom facilities to be made available to the public by restaurants in the downtown area. • Traffic Control Plan as agreed to and prepared by the Public Works Traffic Engineering Division for street closures.

FISCAL IMPACT: Any fees to be paid by the applicants.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: .7f~Y:L- 1'2G:ia;'-1Je4(/l~~ _ NanCYPa~ Kathi Henry U Deputy City Manager! CITY MANAGER Director ofFinance Ensuring the economic vitality of Downtown EI Cajon EI Cajon A non-profit 50I(c)(3) community based organization

February 24,2011 Board of Directors John McTighe Chairman of the Board Mayor Lewis and Council Members

Michael Hood City of EI Cajon Vice Chair 200 East Main Street Resource Development Co-chair EI Cajon, CA 92020 JoAnne Bushby Secretary Real Estate Development Chair RE: Cajon Classic Cruise

Cathy Zeman Chief Financial Officer Finance Committee- Chair Clean &Safe Advisory Co-chair Honorable Mayor Lewis and City Council Members: Cindi Fargo President & CEO EI Cajon Community Development Corporation, Priest Development Kirk Gentry Past Chairman of the Board Corporation, and Por Favor, Inc. are requesting permission to hold the t t" annual season of the Cajon Classic Cruise. The event will continue to be held Deborah Bailey County Representative on Wednesday evenings from 5:00 to 8:00 pm, with this season starting on

BillWells, Mayor Pro Tem April 6, continuing through October 26. Different theme nights will take place City Representative each week, including the popular National Night Out. The holiday shows will Members-at-Large: also continue with Trunk or Treat on October 26, and Parade of Lights on December 7.

Sharon Dobbins The Cajon Classic Cruise receives national recognition from media and press. Nina Frontz It not only attracts a high caliber of cars, but thousands of car enthusiasts, and Kathy Hughes people who come to enjoy a family friendly event. All this helps with the Nancy J. lewis promotion and revitalization of Downtown EI Cajon as it increases the influx of Mel'chant Promotion Co-chair people to the area. The 2010 season attracted almost 60,000 attendees! Sharrnista Mitra-Kelly Wendy Morris During the 2011 season we would like permission to close the following streets Plartin Sarno weekly: Rick Sweeney • The alley located on the Prescott Promenade

Vicki Whitmire • Sulzfeld closed from Main Street north to the alley Community Development Co-chair- • Orange closed from Main Street south to the alley (allows exit for the Cathy Zeman Insurance Store parking lot) Clean & Safe Advisory Chair • Sunshine closed from Main Street south to the alley Saad Hirmez Economic and Arts Development Co-chair We are not asking to close East Main Street nor West Main Street for any dates, as we are not planning any full road closure shows this season.

I can be reached at (619) 401-8858 for any questions regarding the event. Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely, Corporate Office 131 East Main Street, Suite 20 I EI Cajon, CA 92020 ~·Jt&VJf Tel: (619) 401-88S8 Fax:{619) 401-8870 Cindi Fargo t, www.downtownelcajon.com President and CEO

Enclosures: Application, street closure signatures, and event maps CITY OF EL CAJON SPECIAL EVENT IN THE COMMUNITY APPLICATION AND PERMIT

Type of event: Community / Promotional Event on public property X Community / Promotional Event in the public right-of-way Block Party Application date: 3/2/2011 Date of Event: Wednesdays, 4/6/11-10/26/11, 12/7/11 Time of event: 5:00-8:00 p,m, Location: Downtown EI Cajon Main Street Please complete and attach the CHECKLIST FOR SPECIAL EVENTS IN THE COMMUNITY Description of the proposed event: (purpose, number of people expected, type and nature of any vehicles, equipment or other apparatus to be used in connection with the event, any special or unusual requirements that may be created by the proposed event)

The purpose of the Cajon Classic Cruise is to help build the community and promote Downtown EI Cajon. Expected attendance is approximately 5,000 per week, with an average of 300 cars per week. EastlWest Main Streets will be open. Sponsor of the event: El Cajon CDC, Priest Development Corp., and Por Favor, Inc. Business license number: (if sponsor is a business or commercial enterprise) =E~X~O~1~6~65~ _ Responsible person who will be at the site for the duration of the event and who will be the contact person for City Officials if necessary: (this person must be 18 years or older) Name: Kathryn Courter Phone: 619-401-8858 Cell/Pager: 760-443-7717 Address: 131 E, Main Street, Ste. 201, EI Cajon, CA 92020 Name(s) and phone numbers of other(s) that will be available: Bob Hutton, cell 619-322-0585

Agreement to compensate City: The applicant agrees to compensate the City of EI Cajon for any loss or damage to public property as a result of this event. Also, the applicant will provide the City with a deposit for the City's estimated costs no later than ten (10) days prior to the event. The applicant agrees that if the actual costs exceed the deposit, the applicant will pay the City the difference within fifteen (15) days of the date of the bill from the City. A refund will be issued by the City within fifteen (15) days if the deposit exceeds the costs. Applicant agrees to clean and restore site within 24 hours after event.

Applicant's name and signature (please type or print~cS;:S:\:£~:::;r:) Date> ~,/ I I 2Cj Applicant's address/ 4.J (Y)~l N st5D'rfQl-% lEe cr2CZO Phone Gi 7' ,~ Z<..f (,.. -7%05. . I· t: f=;4, 6-0 ~1u--- A DC ~ '1 v 'me- Applicant's name and signature (please type or print) ate . 3-d. -J I Applicant's address /81/;'; ,I1ltC//l $1- Jtul...e,tJ ' qtJ/ g!?- i;;g-

Applicant's name and signature (please type or print) Date 5/z...... }1 ~. Applicant's address / e2- e A-\ 'l Jv11~\ N Phone (;'t 1 ,.... 9C(O - 9 t..() L

FOR CITY USE ONLY: REVIEW COMMITTEE: Approved 0 Denied 0 Revoked 0 Date: _v-,-:Jj,--_~,!-!",-I/ _ Reason(s) for denial/revocation:

Check list complete? Yes 0 NoD (Missing item(s):

Submitted 30 days prior t~ event? yES' (If not, City Manager or designee's approval _ Special requirements: {~':'IAJ::" t .4 OAi!Ofh.11 I(c:7/ut'£O #

Event date: WedV\fktt\/8, /Jr (, b l~n,l Oct', 2.~1 12-/:::r,2DH Event Location: WlJJOOli)f) (\ (A'\~'rn I NIC",!\/\' '?treet J (attach a sketch or diagram incidating the site or route, number and location of available parking spaces and handicapped parking spaces, number and location of sanitation facilities, number, location and amplifying range of any s9Un!pmPlifYing systems, locati4lo.f all traffic and pedestrian control devices to be used) Attached: ?1.J-!1l-11 Dated: kJv'lll L Community/Promotional event on public property __ Permission from the City Councilor Redevelopment Agency attached ~ Adequate potable water will be provided ~ One toilet for every 250 people will be provided if the event will have over 1000 participants and last more than 3 hours ~ Adequate trash and recycling receptacles will be provided __ One security person will be provided for every 250 persons attending the event ~ Communications equipment will be provided to the event monitors ~ First aid provisions and trained personnel will be provided __ If this is a sporting event, it will be conducted during daylight hours --=6- Certificate of insurance provided in accordance with Council Policy 0-3

.~ Community/Promotional event in the public right-of-way ~ Proposed traffic control plan attached ~ Street will have the least impact on vehicular and pedestrian traffic ~ Street will create the least inconvenience for the merchants or residents in the area ~ Street will provide the maximum public safety ~ Time of the event will have the least impact on the vehicular traffic ~ Adequate potable water will be provided ~ One toilet for every 250 people will be provided if the event will have over 1000 participants and last more than 3 hours ~ Adequate trash and recycling receptacles will be provided >t. One security person will be provided for every 250 persons attending event ~ Adequate traffic barricades and signing will be provided ~ Communications equipment will be provided to the event monitors ~ First aid provisions and trained personnel will be provided __ If this is a sporting event it will be conducted during daylight hours ~ Certificate of insurance provided in accordance with Council Policy 0-3

__ Block Party .__ Petition signed by the majority of the residents in the affected area and who live on the street to be blocked __ The party will commence after 10:00 a.m. and not continue after 10:00 p.m. __ Music and/or sound amplification will be kept at an acceptable level (ECMC Sec. 9.44) __ Lighted barricades will be provided along with any additional traffic control devices required __ Adult supervision will be provided at all times during the party

Do not write below this line

All applicable conditions met? --!!../_' _ Hold Harmless Agreement: (Prepared by the City Attorney) Applicable? ..L)..c...Jult=..I.A.>...(__ Prepared? _

Notes: Community Development Corporation

2011 EVENT SCHEDULE - PRELIMINARY

Cajon Classic Cruise Concerts on the Green Downtown EI Cajon Prescott Promenade Each Wednesday, 5:00pm to 8:00pm Each Friday, 6:00pm to 8:00pm (31 shows) (22 shows)

April 6 - Opening Night May6 April 13 - TBA May 13 April 20 - TBA May 20 April 27 - TBA May 27 May4- TBA June 3 May 11 - Flames on Main June 10 May 18 - Spring Cajon Speed Fest June 17 May 25 - T-Buckets Galore June 24 June 1 - Funny Car Frenzy July 1 June 8 - Vintage Vans July 8 June 15 - Camaro Evolution July 15 June 22 - Clean and Green July 22 June 29 - Call of Duty: Salute to U.S. Military July 29 July 6 - Rat Rod Invasion August 5 July 13 - My Little Deuce Coupe August 12 July 20 - Cajon Classic Convertibles August 19 July 27 - Thunderbird Evolution August 26 August 3 - National Night Out September 2 August 10- Motorcycle Mayhem September 9 August 17 - Four by Fours and More! September 16 August 24 - Horsepower Hour: Extreme Blowers September 23 August 31 - Mustang Evolution September 30 September 7 - Starz Carz Are Out Tonight! September 14 - Minis and More from Acrossthe Pond September 21 - Panels on Promenade September 28 - Autumn Cajon Speed Fest October 5 - Tractor Trendz October 12 - Low and Slow October 19 - Dragsters! Dragsters! Dragsters! October 26 - Halloween Trunk or Treat December 7 - Holiday Parade of Lights Rea Avenue s:: w co :Jo W West Main Street ~ East Main Street CD o :J -Q) C '

2011 Cajon Classic Cruise Street Closures April 6, April 13, April 20, April 27, May 4, May 11, May 18, May 25, June 1, June 8, June 15, June 22, June 29, July 6, July 13, July 20, July 27, August 3, August 10, August 17, August 24, August 31, September 1, September 14, September 21, September 28, October 5, October 12, October 19, . October 26, December 7

Sulzfeld Way- Closed from North of East Main to South of the alley Prescott Promenade Alley- Closed from East of Baptist Church to West of parking lot Orange Avenue- Closed from South of West Main to North of the alley Sunshine Avenue - Closed from South of West Main to North of the alley

Prescott Promenade Parking Lot (behind Mangia Bene) - Closed from South of second row to Douglas Street sidewalk on June 29, August 3, August 17, October 5 en e N-

I » >< I II I i < o (1) CD '""II OJ :3 ::s :;:j c co f: CD CD (I) » < CD Prescott :;:j l'.: Promenade (1)

Cajon Classic Cruise - Parking, Restroorns, Sound, and Trash

• Specialty vehicles will be parking on East and West Main Street, Sulzfeld Way, Orange Avenue, and Sunshine Avenue. Parking for other attendees is available on surrounding streets including Douglas Avenue and Rea Avenue, Prescott Promenade parking lot, and the San Diego County Courthouse parking lot. • A prior arrangement will be made with merchants on-Main Street to have public restrooms available at local Downtown EI Cajon businesses. • There will be a OJ at the North end of the Prescott Promenade amplifying music onto Main Street, as well as sound system speakers set up at select locations down Main Street. • EI Cajon CDC will empty out the city trash cans and replace the bags on Wednesday evenings. It is the city's responsibility to make sure the cans are maintained the rest of the week.

CD Trash boxes with recycle tops will also be placed next to select city trash cans in an attempt to collect recyclable trash. Park Avenue

Rea Avenue .S: 0.> (Q ::s ·0 OJ West Main Street ~ East Main Street CD o ::s -Q.) '< c c.. CD (t)

(t) » <(t) ::;j t: (t) Douglas Avenue

2011 Cajon Classic Cruise Street Closures April 6, April 13, April 20, April 27, May 4, May 11, May 18, May 25, June 1, June 8, June 15, June 22, June 29, July 6, .July 13,Juiy 20, July 27, August 3, August 10, August 17, August 24, August 31, September 7, September 14, September 21, September 28, October 5, October 12, October 19, October 26, December 7

Sulzfeld Way- Closed from North of East Main to South of the alley Prescott Promenade Alley- Closed from East of Baptist Church to West of parking lot Orange Avenue- Closed from South ofWest Main to North of the alley Sunshine Avenue - Closed from South of West Main to North of the alley CITY OF EL CAJON Special Event Permit Application

EVENT TITLE__--"-'"""""-"'-j--='--'-----"""-....t...:.-:..-.<..-<--__-.:....:.-=-- _

TIME SetUp Date: StAMe~ 12--'· DO ~to 5:00 AM~ t~U c1tt¥:J Event Hours Date: 6:00 ~/@to 9 :O[) ~) Clean Up Date: Mc;tet CO '.00 AM~to fO:OO AMEJ

TYPE OF EVENT o Ceremonies, Public Presentation WFestival or Community Event I {tvr SiwvJ o Reception o Community Theater o Musical Presentation o Art Show o Other (specify) ------

EXPECTED ATTENDANCE: (PER EVENT) ;;2000" SuOO

IS THIS EVENT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? @ NO

SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: E.\ C(;[\tJl\ ~V\At,\v\;h/\ \)( V~\Df'tllf.pAtt:t Grrr ) Yr'; est' ~~ ())\,lr\-t-r' t5iN eltfpMtrvt &rp/ ~:\,{y, Event Contact Name \

Day Time Phone (to \c\) 40 \-(6 0:)~ Evening Phone ctGD) 4/f 3- 11-F1-- (C'fJi) " Fax Number ( ~\q) trO\- 0'611> EVENTINFO~TION

Please provide a detailed description ofyour event. Include information on use of vehicles, food, animals, rides, emergency access, or any other pertinent information.

"'fht '( ~() C\O,~~,C CV~\Se., ',S 0,WetJv G\O...cr0-iv LCtr S~W"Aj i {Rk,{f,,'1 -.,l(l(e

'j V\11'\4 . SlAml'vve( vii Tti Lt.. \+~\\towe;m' S\rW10 [Al/l!t C\t\ n ~l-mt\S s'hOVJ; l1r\f_ {\R'V'.t- \$ U£\,(! C\~ Ct !\'1eaVls;to cdtraGt~L

,Vld.u "8 . ~. 1 ' S' ,crn.Cl £' (" . '') . hs ,I' : .~'S '(.U~,,{ 0')1 si;ck~\JttJ~:f. CONTACT PERSONS: cW\A \'C'1'Vl..(Wt.tttie., Name any professional event.organizer/coordinator hired by your group that is authorized . to work on your behalfto produce this event.

Name------,-.. ____--,- Phone L-J---,-_-,--~ _ Address -,--,-,..-- -:--City _ State__ Zip _

Name two persons who will be in attendance for the duration ofthe event and will be available to City officials.

NamekLt+l~qIt) Courte{ CellularlPager Number :j-(POctf-+<,' :j:jr7 Name 150b \-ht,~, CellularlPager Number (p I4- 3;).. ~ -- oSBs-

ALCOHOL: . Does the event involve the saleor use ofalcoholic beverages? [ ] Yes [}(J No Alcoholic Beverages are permitted only in the EL CAJON PLAZA area with specific permission ofCity Council and MUST be requested in advance and approved.

POWER: Will you need electricity for your event? t>

2 SALES: D Commercial Event (for Profit) ~ Non-Commercial Event (Non profit)

Is your Organization "Tax Exempt" - "Non-Profit"? r><.rYes [ ] No

Is this event a fundraising activity? [ ] Yes (>()No

Are there admission, entry, vendor,or participation fees? ·IfYes, explain purpose: f;'."Iv ; CI1vJ' nc . "- Will items or services be sold at the event?J>

·IfYes, please describe: \ E> ; , \FJ. I>,Yr' '·n [We, ·Hildy py{)({ucts IS0YVli:lJJJ/ ?ij/v;! UI\.10YVV1R1l0-n {AVCU IcJJ\! ~(v p\A\1\iG.. No'i\-e:m5 r-eidvhYlY\ "weo.pc)'l~dvw})) cdC.td'li11. 1 . .. v

FOOD: .' Are you having food conc~ssion and/or food preparation? [xJ Yes [ ] No

Please list name(s) of all food vendors Will be- rV-bV\ (MJ w ~ekl reCeAVrd /([pf~DV8i , L-ottilim '. fre~Goff Pr-OVV}-tf1{'{t~e) lV1tlivt~1j . . 5),\\~fe/I(L (IV) Vent{u( Gf6i--S)

(Use back ofpage ifnecessary)

Ifyou intend to cook food in the event area please specify method cooking: ·[ ] Gas. I] Electric [ 1Charcoal [ 1Other/ specify _

Food booths mustfollow County Department ofEnvironmental regulations. Contact the County ofSan Diego for requirements.

3 STREET CLOSURE: List any street lalley closure as a result ofthis event. Include street name(s) with points of closure: Date(s), day, and times ofrequested closing and reopening. ~ S~d V1CLO~/ .Street(s): S' \A I'\.s hi Y"I v I O'alV1f) ) z reid I fVlnrvlQ- kll7 Date(s): Wed\f\esdCl:t5 j h-:l \ (0 +0 Get 2-lv ,Dec..}, UJ II

Times: Closure: d- :DO AM@ Reopen: CO : 00 AM@J

Does this event involve a MOVING ROUTE ofany kind along streetor sidewalk:areas? [] Yes eX] No IfYes, attach a detailed map ofproposed route. Indicate the direction oftravel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route..'

"lVIUSIC: Will you have music? IX] Yes [ ] No IfYes, please specify: " Number ofstagesl Number ofBandsThr> Types ofMusic wetKlw Dr (Oid;iS, ntHSi() I Will sound be amplified? [)(J Yes 'I ]No IfYes, describe the sound equipment that will be used: \..{;t\tOI. S\) ')Ct~\Zet1 .\. b-lSt Mttih <;r·' (tVlf"l ~nrv1M>.t1(la.e JILe~ v Music Start Time: 4: 3L) AMi@) End Time: CO : 00 ~ vVillyou need an electrical outlet? [XJ Yes [ ] No

SPECIAL USE: win you be having any inflatable astra-jumps or similar devices? £>(1 Yes ( ] No

_If_Y_e_s,_pl_e_as_ed_e_sc_ri_be_:_'_vl_&_kt_b_"_bl_I,,e,,_J_\A\_iVt_P_~_(1_~1_~_S_L_Lp_e_;(_s_II_(~_e-_c_V\_r_2il,,-l'D~'S~~~~ Ji8~na(Je

4 Will you be having fireworks or pyrotechnics? [ ] Yes 1)(1 No IfYes, please describe: _

Will you be having any type ofdecorations, banners, signs, and special lighting? iX) Yes [ ] No IfYes, please describe: frePi;htvJAr~b@o£(S a\(1 5>-mn{ts,. ewy1t 9\gjY\

Please attach a detailed diagram showing the layout ofthe event including the location of the following items and any additional features that may not be listed: • Food concession • Stages, bleachers, grandstands • Food preparation areas • Vehicles / Trailers • BBQ's • Trash containers, dumpsters • First aid facilities • Hot coal container • Table and chairs • Additional lighting (night events) III Fencing, barricades • Event Parking

III Location of generators III Astro jumps / Inflatables • Canopies • Emergency Access • Booths, exhibits • Porta-potties

NOTE: The review process for these events may take up to two weeks depending on the complexity of the event and the completeness of the application. Some requirements can take a month for review and approval such as; required Insurance Policies so allow enough planning time.

5 rCit;;Ci~~kD-;;t~S;:;;~PI MEETING: March 8, 2011

ITEM NO: 1.11 ! zn -3 A 8' 34,

~ ~

DATE: March 2, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick, Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan and Wells

FROM: Deputy City ManagerlDirector of Finance

SUBJECT: Community Event in the Right-of-Way: Concerts on the Green

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached request for a Community Event in the right-of-way to be held every Friday evening atthe Prescott Promenade from May 6 through September 30,2011, with the conditions listed below. BACKGROUND: The EI Cajon Community Development Corporation (ECCDC) is asking permission to.hold the 2011 season of Concerts on the Green with amplified music, promotional banners, food, and information booths on Friday evenings from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The weekly concert series will begin on May 6 and the season will conclude on September 30, 201l. These events are open to the public and ECCDC anticipates over 10,000 attendees for the 2011 season. They are requesting permission to close the alley located on the Prescott Promenade.

Conditions of Approval will include: • All information and assurances made in the application includingproviding the City with a Certificate of Insurance in accordance with City Council Policy D-3. • Trash and recycling receptacles will be placed andpicked up for each event at appropriate locations. • Restroom facilities to be made available to the public by restaurants located near the Prescott Promenade. • Traffic Control as agreed to by the Public Works Traffic Engineering Division for the alley closure.

FISCAL IMPACT: Any fees to be paid by the applicant.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~ NancYPa~ K~~~Ulf------Deputy City Manager/ CITY MANAGER Director of Finance Ensuring the economic vitality of Downtown EI Cajon EICajon A non-profit 501(c)(3) community Co based organization

February 24, 2011 Board of Directors John McTighe Chairman of the Board Mayor Lewis and Council Members Michael Hood City of EI Cajon Vice Chair Resource Development Co-chair 200 East Main Street

JoAnne Bushby El Cajon, CA 92020 Secretary Real Estate Development Chair RE: Concerts on the Green Cathy Zeman Chief Financial Office,' Finance Committee Chair Clean & Safe Advisory Co-chair Honorable Mayor Lewis and City Council Members: Cindi Fargo President & CEO EI Cajon Community Development Corporation is seeking permission to hold Kirk Gentry the 2011 season of Concerts on the Green. The concerts will be located at the Past Chairman of the Board Prescott Promenade on Friday evenings from 6:00 - 8:00 pm, from May 6 Deborah Bailey County Representative through September 30, 2011.

BillWells, Mayor Pro Tem City Representative Concerts on the Green attracted over 10,000 attendees in 2010, and the crowd Members-at-Large: is expected to grow in 2011 as we continue to bring bands that have the

Frank Boss, Jr, biggest fan following and concertgoer turnouts. This year's performances are expected to feature a variety of family-friendly music, such as tribute bands, Sharon Dobbins classic oldies, blues, rock, and cultural music performances. Our goal is to Nina Frontz attract all previous concert attendees as well as thousands of new people who Kathy Hughes will patronize the local businesses and experience the revitalization of Nancy J. Lewis Downtown EI Cajon. Merchant Promotion Co-chair Sharmista Mitra-Kelly EI Cajon CDC is requesting permission to hold Concerts on the Green at the Wendy Morris Prescott Promenade. We are also requesting permission to close the alley that MartinSarno runs through the Prescott Promenade for our patrons' safety.

Rick Sweeney Attached you will find the application and event map as required. VickiWhitmire Community Development Co-chair

Cathy Zeman Thank you for your continued support. Clean & Safe Advisory Chair

Saad Hirrnea Sincerely, Economic and Arts Development Co-chair {Jt1i1tLday:p ~, Cindi Fargo President and CEO

Corporate Office Enclosure: Event application and map diagram 131 East Main Street, Suite 201 EICajon, CA 92020 Tel: (619)401-8858 Fax: (619) 401-8870 www.dcwntownelcajon.com CITY OF EL CAJON SPECIAL EVENT IN THE COMMUNITY APPLICATION AND PERMIT

Type of event: Community / Promotional Event on public property X Community / Promotional Event in the public right-of-way _ Block Party . ' Application date: 11-4/11 Date of Event: ~ck:U15b/0 thlv U)J~i;:'~f event: to :00 -0 ;OVp11 Location: £re $'cott prDV'\ItC¥1CtttR"" Please complete and attach the CHECKLIST FOR SPECIAL EVENTS IN THE COMMUNITY

Sponsor of the event: Business license number: (if sponsor is a business or commercial enterprise) Responsible person who will be at the site for the duration of the event and who will be the contact person for City Officials if necessary: (this person must be 18 years or older)

Name(s) and phone numbers of other(s) that will be available: --J.<~~1.....U.a...Ll-J.Ll1...J----l.lLl..":"--.:t:...~-=--~a,.t.....I...-.'~

Agreement to compensate City: The applicant agrees to compensate the City of El Cajon for any loss or damage to public property as a result of this event. Also, the applicant will provide the City with a deposit for the City's estimated costs no later than ten (10) days prior to the event. The applicant agrees that if the actual costs exceed the deposit, the applicant will pay the City the difference within fifteen (15) days of the date of the bill from the City. A refund will be issued by the City within fifteen (15) days if the deposit exceeds the costs. Applicant agrees to clean and restore site within 24 hours after event. . . Applicant's name (please ty,pe or print) --.l-=l....;..!!..L..j~---l..,A.i.ull-L...:~--1~:.....----f:.I-----;-----

Applicant's signature -'::"---¥~:::::":::3L!LJ~l,.L--:~-,A,I4ALJ

Applicant's address \ .::3 \

FOR CITY USE ONLY:

REVIEW COMMITTEE: Approved!Zf Denied 0 Revoked 0 Date: ...,:v::;..//t-I:....,,' 6~/~/ _ Reason(s) for denial/revocation:

Subn:itted 3~ days prior to ,event? VE5 (If not, City Manager or designee's approval _ Special requirements: (CJt!Alc/{ b'tp,t?R?>L/AI ,('Cl!F'''/.fY!J

Estimate $ Deposited on Receipt No. _ Act. Costs $ Billed $ on Paid? Refunded $ on _

Distribution: Review Committee, Permittee, Applicant CHECK LIST FOR SPECIAL EVENTS IN THE COMMUNITY This check list is to be filled out by the applicant and attached to the application

Event date: hi dt1~ S( MCl~ eJa l+JV1.\ Se{t·'?v Event Location: r(e,~7ctdt ·hc;lJf)entvJe...

(attach a sketch or diagram incidating the site or route, number and location of available parking spaces and handicapped parking spaces, number and location of sanitation facilities, number, location and amplifying range of any soUn~a!PlifYing systems, location of all traffic and pedestrian control devices to be used) Attached: 2-{24flJ Dated: _

'6. Community/Promotional event on public property __ Permission from the City Councilor Redevelopment Agency attached ~ Adequate potable water will be provided .»: One toilet for every 250 people will be provided if the event will have over 1000 participants and last more than 3 hours .s: Adequate trash and recycling receptacles will be provided __ One security person will be provided for every 250 persons attending the event -+- Communications equipment will be provided to the event monitors ~ First aid provisions and trained personnel will be provided __ If this is a sporting event, it will be conducted during daylight hours -X- Certificate of insurance provided in accordance with Council Policy 0-3

y... Community/Promotional event in the public right-of-way ~ Proposed traffic control plan attached --lL Street will have the least impact on vehicular and pedestrian traffic )( Street will create the least inconvenience for the merchants or residents in the area -X Street will provide the maximum public safety --y.::- Time of the event will have the least impact on the vehicular traffic ~ Adequate potable water will be provided -lOne toilet for every 250 people will be provided if the event will have over 1000 participants ~ and last more than 3 hours Adequate trash and recycling receptacles will be provided "I. One security person will be provided for every 250 persons attending event ~ Adequate traffic barricades and signing will be provided ~ Communications equipment will be provided to the event monitors 'i.. First aid provisions and trained personnel will be provided =x If this is a sporting event it will be conducted during daylight hours -.:i- Certificate of insurance provided in accordance with Council Policy 0-3

__ Block Party __._ Petition signed by the majority of the residents in the affected area and who live on the street to be blocked __ The party will commence after 10:00 a.m. and not continue after 10:00 p.m. __ Music and/or sound amplification will be kept at an acceptable level (ECMC Sec. 9.44) __ Lighted barricades will be provided along with any additional traffic control devices required __ Adult supervision will be provided at all times during the party

Do not write below this line

All applicable conditions met? _-1

Notes: Park Avenue

Rea Avenue I (J) s: c m ~ co Q. :J o ~ '< ID o -Q) ~ East Main Street '< CD 0 :J CD C CD CD >< CD :::J s::: CD

Douglas Avenue

2011 Concerts on the Green Alley Closures May 6, May 13, May 20, May 27, June 3, June 10, June 11, June 24, July 1, July 8, July 15, July 22, .July 29, August 5, August 12, August 19, August 26, September 2, September 9, September 16, September 23, September 30

Prescott Promenade Alley- Closed from East of Baptist Church-to West of parking lot CITY OF EL CAJON Special Event Permit Application

EVENT TITLE 'CoY1Cel+S QY\ -t'Vlc G:zYBeh

DATE(S) OF USE S/rq) 5/r3 ! 6/)b /5/;).1--, (of? I {pliO I (P/I1- I W/2-4- I :+/t; ::ti0 -':t-/ I s: -=t/'2-2- ~lit'l Bj'~ a./,;; a I (,' ~:/") t. . ct/2 LOCATION OF EVENT ( . I I ~" , ::l;/ V/I '" J v ~ { ,/ ei/elj qI"1£0; q 2.-;/ 1 !:JO (;toilulJ)' ~ Prescott Promenade Plaza \: . 0 Amphitheater 0 Judson Park o Other (specify) _

TIME SetUp

Event Hours Date: G'.oo B:oo Clean Up Date: «:) ~OO I (Q: C{)

. TYPE OF EVENT DCeremonies,Public.presentation o Festival or COIlJl1JJ1l1ity Event .' ..'o Reception o CommunityTheat~r ~.MusicalPresentation" Art Show o Other (specify) -~-- -_------'-'-----:.-..- --'-

EXPECTED ATTENDANCE: (PEREVENT) SC~C)· 150D

IS THIS EVENT OPEN TOTRE PUBLIC?' YES NO

SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: f\ C~) on ttl f\~\r1AU,VlI1'j \>~ vel 0pvtt'1/d~ COYf' fTfltf1 tYi ~it-th Y'~Y ~(+r(' Event Contact Name---'----11------n .So t~ tl\t~ Street Address__'.:-\AL../-=-\__.-'--'----\V\ __8t.-:-+~_'___'_( Slre yO I _

City ~\ Cttjtlyy State Gl\; Zip Code (11-0?-O n~) ~ 3~ Day Time Phone <\O\q ) 40 \r s Evening Phone c:l(JiD) 44- -::j ::rl :j- Fax Number clel:D £fa \- ~/o fO (cell) EVENTINFOlli~TION

-"'...... _.~"?-,---. ,.,-,.>~' ,.-- •• -', Narne~----,-_~ ~----",,~__Phone l~

<',. ''-''''>, • '-"',.

N arne two persons who will be in attendance for the duration ofthe event and will be available to City officials.

Name \((Ak~w\.jn· CXflAr+tr" Cellular/Pager Number::i- (00 .-4 Lj. 3> .-J ':7-1 J ~ ~ .Name '15u\o \l1Aiton Cellular/Pager Number (,:I({- bL)--oC!{8 S'

ALCOHOL: Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? [] Yes ~] No Alcoholic Beverages are permitted only in the EL CAJON PLAZA area with specific permission ofCity Council and MUST be requested in advance and approved.

POWER: Will you need electricity for your event? Lr\J Yes [ ] No

2 SALES: o Commercial Event (for Profit) J5J' Non-Commercial Event (Non profit)

Is your Organization "Tax Exempt" - "Non-Profit"? MYes [ ] No

Is this event a fundraising activity? [ ] Yes l><]No

Are there ad~ssion, entry, vendo:, or parti~ipation fees?p\) Ye~ ~ ] N?, 'r'; . .... M" . If Yes, explampurpose:':' ,00 vevJ011 . \, .. to :tA C\fj,' ,}' !J\.YVYidr\ 5~>..-ft I~ Will items or services be sold at the event? [Xr Yes [ ] No event-I Iov0t O\tlm\ >5'1: 071 t s.1~'-ee . . i ..\.. " .-t-e -rhe- f v...011 L- If Yes, please describe: S panSV'($ IV f.¥t(),rsrJ YV\,u'l h~ ())') '. . Sl\-G ....f-z? (X, 5e leW) \n{jffyhtcli oP'l ,I £Vb ciuct5 eli/tv! gerVlCBS,

FOOD: Are you having food concession and/or food preparation? ~] Yes [ ] No

Please list name(s) ofall food vendors 'vvil\ ,be.. frvV1&ed OJ)~ rece\ved/arPI'1.f\lRl.

(Use back ofpage ifnecessary)

If you.intend to cook food in the event area please specify methodcooking: [ 1Gas [ ] Electric [ ] Charcoal [ ] Other! specify --,-..~_'___ _'__ _

Food booths mustfollow County Department ofEnvironmental regulations. Contact the County ofSan Diego for requirements.

3 STREET CLOSURE: List any street lalley closure as a result ofthis event. Include street name(s) with points of closure: Date(s), day, and times ofrequested closing and reopening.

Street(s): Iv-escot1- frcyY)eVl{td~ 11/ley .' -. '

5/6;' G-/I':7J 51zo· S/z,1t. (p)??/Ip;;o; f.o!r:r';0 2/r) -:;-It j :t-/Bj.::J1I'Y.1 -tIV;")" Date(s):___. . , , ,.., c. Ci ,fA., Q k C;j7-.A (·.... /1/1 ' - I v , f - ( /V' ;;:>'v Times: Closure: 6'; 00 AMeY Reopen: Cj '. 60 M@)

Does this event involve a MOVING ROUTE ofany kind along street or sidewalk areas? [ ] Yes D<] No IfYes, attach a detailed map ofproposed route. Indicatethe direction oftravel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route.

lYIUSIC: . Wil1you have music? t)(] Yes [ ] No IfYes, please specify: NUlnberofstagesl Number ofBands bll Types ofMusic 411 qenf'(J S '-/ Will sound be amplified? ['iJ Yes [ ] No IfYes, describe the sound equipment that will be used: VCtrle S/ ?YDvid eel. bLj bClj/)dS Music Start Time: Co '.00 AMI@) End Time: B~ ()O AMg) 'Will you need an electrical outlet? LX] Yes [ ] No

SPECIAL USE: 'Will you be having any inflatable astro-jumps or similar devices? [ ] Yes p.q No IfYes, please describe: _

4 Will you be having fireworks or pyrotechnics? [ ] Yes l>Q No IfYes, please describe: _

Will you be having any type ofdecorations, banners, signs, and special lighting? [)\JYes [ J,No IfYes, please describe: fy-eem1.bJ;~ ~ttVW)ei'lr Di):fp:WlJ24--/ \t\~0 .14 \o{{Vlnf.,f \r)W')j IV\. {Ytmt 0+ S~~ 01'1 plJl0J (Te-:>p.)

Please attach a detailed diagram showing the layout ofthe event including the location of the following items and any additional features that may not be listed: • Food concession • Stages, bleachers, grandstands • Food preparation areas • Vehicles I Trailers • BBQ's • Trash containers, dumpsters • First aid facilities • Hot coal container • Table and chairs (I Additionallighting (night events) • Fencing, barricades • Event Parking • Location of generators • Astro jumps / Inflatables • Canopies • Emergency Access • Booths, exhibits • Porta-potties

NOTE: The review process for these events may take up to two weeks depending on the complexity ofthe event and the completeness of the application. Some requirements can take a monthfor review and approval such as; required Insurance Policies so allow enough planning time.

5 Concerts on1he G~

~ }!\~(\_O ~ \ r Ave. I < ' -~\-:-.------.1., __

. ( I i I

, " .... L I

0000 City Clerk Date Stamp MEETING: March 8,2011

ITEM NO: 3.1 _

(';5 DATe-~ February 28, 2011 TO: Agency Members: Lewis, Kendrick, Hanson-Cox, McClellan and Wells

FROM: Melissa Ayres, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CHAMBERS SENIOR RESIDENCES, L.P.

RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency: 1. Open the public hearing and accept testimony for the proposed First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement between the EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency and Chambers Senior Residences, L.P.; 2. Close the public hearing; 3. Adopt the next resolution in order to approve execution of a First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement and related documents, substantially in a form as presented with such changes approved by the Executive Director; 4. Appropriate $1,200,000 from the Unrestricted Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund Balance (Fund 290); 5. Increase the expenditure budqet in the Project/Activity #290900-LM0704 by $1,200,000 for FY2010-11.

BACKGROUND:

At the March 9, 2010 City Council Meeting, Agency members authorized the Executive Director to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement CODA") for $3,300,000 with Chambers Senior Residences, L.P. forthe development of .83 acres of Agency owned property located at the intersection of Linda Way and Chambers Street. The Agreement provides for Agency assistance of up to $3,300,000 to facilitate development of a 49 unit senior residence complex affordable for persons 65 years or older. Forty-eight of the one and two bedroom units will be rented to very low income households and the 49th unit would be rented to a moderate-income on-site manager.

- 1 - Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report First Amendment to DDA - Chambers Senior Residences, L. P. March 8, 2011 Agenda

Under the DDA, the Schedule of Performance provided the Developerfour opportunities to procure 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits during the March and July 2010 and March and July 2011 application rounds. To date, the Developer has not been successful in achieving tax credit approval and has indicated that in order to be competitive; the March 2011 application must include additional funding sources which reduce the amount of tax credits requested. It is anticipated that the additional $1,200,000 in Agency Low-Mod Housing Funds would the increase the City's tiebreaker score and significantly increase the likelihood of this project being awarded tax credits in the next round.

Based on this information, and in orderto secure Tax Creditfunding and complete the first newly constructed senior housing project in sixteen years, staff is recommending approval of $1,200,000 of additional Low and Moderate Housing Funds for the Chambers Senior Residences project. The Summary Report for the First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement is attached as "Attach. 1'" and details the financial and redevelopment aspects of this transaction.

CEQA: A Negative Declaration was adopted for this project by the City Council on July 28, 2009, which indicated that the development project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement for the additional assistance does not change the proposed development and is therefore not subject to further environmental review.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No impact to the General Fund. This request would result in an increase of funding for Project/Activity #290900-9990-LM0704 from $3,300,000 to $4,500,000 from the Low and Moderate Housing Fund. The total project costs for the 49 unit complex would then be estimated at $16,128,955, of which $4,070,000 is land purchase, $9,738,247 in site and building improvements costs, and $2,320,708 in soft costs. Perthe Agreement these costs will be funded as follows:

Source Amount Agency: Land Contribution $ 4,070,000 Agency: Financial Assistance $ 4,500,000 First Trust Deed Mortgage $ 1,650,013 9% Tax Credit Equity $ 5,537,600 Deferred Developer Fee $ 300,000 TOTAL PROJECT VALUE $16,128,955

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

Melissa Ayres Director of Community Development

- 2 - Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report First Amendment to DDA - Chambers Senior Residences, L. P. March 8, 2011 Agenda

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Summary Report 2. First Amendment to Disposition and Development Agreement 3. Project rendering

- 3 - SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EL CAJON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CHAMBERS SENIOR RESIDENCES, L.P. (A partnership of Affirmed Housing Group)

Public Hearing Date: March 8, 2011

INTRODUCTION

This document is the Summary Report ("Report") for the First Revised Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") between the EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and the Chambers Senior Residences, L.P. ("Developer/Operator"), a partnership formed by Affirmed Housing Group. The Agency and Developer/Operator is proposing to revise the DDA in order to increase the Agency's investment from $3,300,000 to $4,500,000. The Developer is pursuing 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits ("Tax Credits") to underwrite some of the development costs of this affordable, senior housing complex. In order to be competitive in procuring Tax Credits, the Developer has been notified that his application must obtain a larger funding commitment from local resources or the Agency.

This report has been prepared pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code (California Community Redevelopment Law), and sets forth the following:

• The cost of the DDA to the Agency, including land acquisition cost, site clearance cost, relocation cost, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the Agency, plus the expected interest expense on any loans or bonds to finance the DDA. • The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest uses permitted under the City of EI Cajon's General Plan and the Agency's Redevelopment Plan. • The sum of the lease payments which the Developer/Operator will be required to make, as well as an explanation of the reason, if any, the lease amount is less than fair market value.

Page 1 of 7

"Attachment 1" THE SENIOR CITIZENS PROJECT

The DDA will implement the final stages of the Chambers Senior Residences ("Project") which involves .83 gross acres of property located at the intersection of Chambers Street and Linda Way in downtown EI Cajon ("Site"); the Site is generally bounded by Chambers Street on the west and Linda Way running east and west between seven parcels; five north, the other two south and comprising the entire development. This Project is part of the Agency's greater effort to implement the City of EI Cajon's Downtown Specific Plan, to redevelop older blighted uses in downtown EI Cajon, to construct housing units what were displaced by this Project and to create affordable housing opportunities for very low, low and moderate income senior citizen households.

Project Initiation: The Project was initiated in July 2005 when the Agency adopted the Design for Development calling for an affordable housing project on the Site. Property acquisition commenced in December 2005 and, to date, the Agency has completed acquisition of all seven (7) parcels that comprise the Site. All of the tenants have been relocated and all structures have been demolished.

Agency adoption of the Design for Development also initiated the owner participation and developer solicitation process. The Agency solicited owner participation interest from all existing property owners, and reviewed development proposals from other housing developers. The initial owner participation and developer solicitation process concluded in July 2005 when the Agency elected to proceed with Paladin Partners. An Exclusive Right to Negotiate was awarded to Paladin in July 2005. Two extensions to the Exclusive were also adopted, however as the housing market collapsed, construction pricing escalated and residential construction financing was impossible to obtain, the Exclusive Agreement expired on June 30, 2008.

In June of 2009, upon receipt of a proposal from Affirmed Housing Group, Inc., the Redevelopment Agency executed an Exclusive Right to Negotiate. The Affirmed Housing Group, Inc. proposal outlined a project summary whereby 49 units of affordable senior apartment housing would be developed on the Site. This Exclusive was extended in December of 2009 allowing for the completion of financing and development negotiations.

On March 9, 2010, the City Council, acting as the Redevelopment Agency, approved and authorized execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement with Chambers Senior Residences, L.P., which was subsequently executed on March 23, 2010. The DDA provides that the Developer/Operator will lease the Site from the Agency for a 65-year period and construct a 4-story senior citizen rental complex. Further, the Developer/Operator will construct 46 parking spaces, an open space amenity, manage and operate the Site and rent the 49 units to very low, low and moderate income senior citizen households. The total value of the Project is projected to be $16,128,955, of which

Page 2 of 7 $11,967,723 is the total development cost and Agency site acquisition costs total $4,161,232.

Project Funding: The Agency will fund 100% of the Site acquisition costs and $4,500,000 of Project development costs. The Agency funds will be structured as $4,500,000 loan ("Agency Loan"). Funding sources include the Agency's 20% set-aside housing funds allocated to fund development activities associated with affordable housing.

Replacement Housing Benefit: Under California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency must replace within four years any affordable housing units demolished as the result of a redevelopment activity. When the Agency acquired, relocated tenants and subsequently demolished structures on Linda Way and Chambers Street so as to undertake new construction of affordable housing, a replacement housing obligation of fifteen (15), two (2) bedroom units, or thirty (30) bedrooms, was incurred. The Project will allow the Agency to satisfy this entire obligation.

Project Development and Rental Summary

Development: 49-unit, 4-story senior citizen rental housing complex: - 46-one bedroom (approximately 600 square feet) 3-two bedroom (approximately750 square feet) - 46-space parking for resident and guest parking - outdoor recreation area, vegetable garden, patios and walkways - final design will be in accordance with the Downtown Specific Plan Design Guidelines

Eligible Occupants: One to three person very low, low and moderate income households; persons 45 years or older may reside in units if they are a spouse, cohabitant, or a primary economic support provider to a qualifying resident.

Tenant Rent/Utifity Costs: Rents will start and most likely remain below affordable very low, low and moderate income rent levels for one- and two bedroom units as delineated by federal, state, and redevelopment housing statutes.

151 Year Rents (w/out utilities) 2009 Statute Rents VL/L/M

VL: $449 (1 bdrm) 1:: $749 (1 bdrm) M: $ 899 (1 bdrm) $506 (2 bdrm) $843 (2 bdrm) $1,011 (2 bdrm)

Page 3 of 7 Utility costs (for electricity and gas; water is included in rent) shall not exceed in the first year of operation $35/$45 per month for a one bedroom and two bedroom unit respectively.

THE DDA-ITS PURPOSE

The DDA is a contractual agreement between the Agency and the Developer/Operator that sets forth the responsibilities, time frame, and financing of Project development activities, and the terms for the subsequent Project operations. The responsibilities for each of the Agency and Developer/Operator are set forth below.

Agency Responsibilities

1. Acquire, relocate occupants, demolish structures through the Site (completed). 2. Fund 100% of the Site acquisition costs and up to $4.5M of Project construction costs. 3. Ground Lease the Site to the Developer/Operator for 65 years at $1.00/year.

Developer/Operator Responsibilities

1. Secure all planning approvals and building environmental permits. 2. Pay all applicable City, utility, school, and environmental development fees. 3. Permit Agency construction management oversight on final construction drawings, and all construction bids. 4. Design and construct all Project and site improvements for a total cost not to exceed $17,000,000. 5. Secure performance and labor and materials bonds to insure completion of Project and site improvements. 6. Assume ownership of the Project and site improvements. After the 65-year ground lease term, the Project and site improvements shall revert to the Agency or it's the successor in interest. This shall occur without any compensation to the Developer/Operator. 7. Lease the Project site for a 65-year term. 8. Establish the aforementioned first-year unit rent schedule, subject to annual increases. 9. Limit Project funded (from Project rental income) first-year operating expenses to $267,700; Project operating costs in excess of this amount shall be funded by the Developer/Operator. 10. Project funded operating expenses shall be increased annually by the percentage change in the annual CPI for the EI Cajon area. 11. Any Project revenue in excess of annual set operating costs shall be paid to the Agency.

Page 4 of 7 12. Annually fund a reserve fund for Project capital repairs; deposits shall be $300 per unit or $14,700 per year sourced from Developer/Operator resources other than Project rental income. 13. Annually pay property tax on the Project, Site improvements and the leasehold interest. First year estimated payment is $21,000; total payments over 65 years is in excess of $1 ,350,000. 14. Maintain Project Site improvements to the satisfaction of the City and Agency. If this does not occur, the Agency has the right to cure maintenance defaults and charge the Developer/Operator for costs incurred. If defaults continue, the Agency or its successor in interest (the City) has the right to terminate the lease and assume Project ownership. 15. Maintain the following insurance on the Project and all accessory Site improvements:

property damage or loss insurance in an amount not less than 100% of full insurable value; rental income or business un-interruption insurance in an amount equal to 12 months' rental income; public liability insurance in an amount of at least $2,000,000 million combined single limit; and worker's compensation insurance as required by California law.

16. All insurance policies shall name the Agency and, where applicable, the City as additional insured. 17. Permit the recordation of affordability covenants to maintain 49 units of rental housing affordable to very low, low and moderate income households for 65 years.

THE COST OF THE AGREEMENT TO THE AGENCY

The costs of the DDA to the Agency involve the following components, which are further discussed below.

• Property Acquisition • Site Occupant Relocation • Site Improvements Asbestos Abatement/Demolition • Project Construction Funding • Interest Expense of Loans or Bonds

Property Acquisition

The Agency has acquired the seven (7) parcels of property that comprise the Site; no other acquisition expenditures must be made. The total Site acquisition cost was $4,161 ,232

Site Occupant Relocation

Page 5 of 7 All Site occupants have been relocated according to a Project Relocation Plan. Total relocation costs were $123,659.

Site Improvements Asbestos Abatement/Demolition/Utility Relocation

All Site structures have been demolished. The Agency's total cost for asbestos abatement, demolition and utility relocation was $64,378.

Project Construction Funding

Developer/Operator will obtain both private financing and secure federal tax credits to assist with Project construction costs and associated site improvements. The DDA provides that the Agency shall fund up to $4,500,000, structured as the Agency Grant and the Agency Loan, to underwrite Project development costs including design, construction and Site improvement activities associated with the affordable housing portion of the Project. Agency funding will not only facilitate Project development, but will also permit subsequent unit rents to be lower than federal and state prescribed affordable rents for very low, low and moderate income households.

Interest Expense of Loans or Bonds

Project acquisition and the Agency Loan will be funded from Agency 20% housing set-aside monies. The chart below summarizes the estimated costs associated and the source of funds of the aforementioned activities.

Agency Project Costs: Site Assembly Acquisition $4,161,232 Relocation $123,659 Asbestos/Demolition $64,378 TOTAL $4,349,269

Project Construction per DDA $4,500,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $8,849,269

Source of Funds: Tax Increment $8,849,269 TOTAL SOURCES $8,849,269

Page 6 of 7 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED

The Developer commissioned a reuse appraisal by Frobose Realty Company to determine the final estimated reuse value and subsequent lease value for the Site. This firm was selected due to their experience of preparing real estate appraisals for federal tax credit applications, reuse appraisals and familiarity with the EI Cajon real estate market. The appraiser's reuse analysis involved extensive review of the DDA, rent restrictions that establish rental rates that will be affordable to very low, low and moderate income households, and the resultant impact on Project rental income. Based upon the Project's rental income, combined with the restrictions imposed by the DDA on rental rate increases (the requirement that the rents for the 65-year term of the Ground Lease must be affordable to very low, low and moderate income senior citizen households), the reuse appraisal indicated that the resulting value of the Project land and improvements would be $4,070,000 (based upon the income the Project generates at the restricted rental rates).

The reuse analysis concludes that based upon the very low, low and moderate income rent levels, the development of the proposed senior citizen housing facility is not economically viable with respect to the monetary return on the investment. While not financially feasible with respect to the monetary return, the development can only be justified with respect to the contributory benefit to the community of 49 units of rental dwellings affordable to very low, low and moderate income senior households.

PROPERTY LEASE PAYMENTS-WHY LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE

The Developer/Operator will pay $1.00 per year for the 65-year term of the Project Ground Lease, or a total of $65.00. The Agency is electing to lease the Site of $1.00 per year in order to reduce the cost of operating the Project. By reducing these costs, the Developer/Operator can rent the 49 units at rental rates that are at or below the affordable rents for very low, low and moderate income senior households. The Agency desires to do this in order to provide housing opportunities to very low, low and moderate income senior households.

Page 7 of 7 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into effective the _ day of __, 2011, by and between Chambers Seniors Residences, LP, a California limited partnership (the "Developer"), and the EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency, a public body corporate and politic (the "Agency").

RECITALS

1. . Developer and Agency entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement dated March 23, 2010 (the "Agreement"), by providing for the improvement of certain property situated within the EI Cajon Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area"), by assisting with the financing and development of four parcels (the "Site") located in the Project Area, the construction of a forty-nine (49) unit multi-family complex, with approximately 2,000 square feet of commercial space on the Site (the "Project"), and the long term maintenance of such housing at affordable housing costs for senior households of very low-income (48 units) and a family household of moderate income (1 unit).

2. Developer has attempted to secure 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits (the "Tax Credits") to fund some of the Project design and development costs; in order to be competitive in procuring Tax Credits, Developer has been notified that its application must obtain a larger funding commitment from local resources or the Agency.

3. This First Amendment to the Agreement (the "Second Amendment") is necessary to: (1) increase the Agency's investment in the Project from THREE MILLION THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,300,000) to FOUR MILLION FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($4,500,000) and (2) modify Developer annual income monitoring requirements to follow the current California Tax Credit Allocation Committee requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

F. Definitions (108) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following definition:

"TCAC" means the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. 5. Costs of Construction (306) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The Developer shall be entitled to a "Developer Fee" not to exceed the lower of One Million Four Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,450,000) or the maximum Developer Fee allowed under California Tax Credit Allocation

Page 1 of 7 Committee guidelines and regulations. The sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) from the Developer Fee shall be deferred and paid out of Project residual receipts.

6. Agency Development Loan (307) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The Agency shall provide Developer financial assistance in the maximum amount of FOUR MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($4,500,000) to assist Developer in designing and developing the Project.

B. Affordable Rental Housing (402) (4). Income of Eligible Tenants of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

The Developer shall verify the gross income of prospective and existing households as required by TCAC. Prior to the rental or lease of any residential unit to a Qualified Household and annually thereafter, Developer shall cause a Qualified Household to execute the Tenant Income Certification Form, as provided in Attachment No.8, or other form as may be required by TCAC which shall be kept in the tenant files at the Site. Within ninety (90) days after the end of each calendar year, the Developer shall submit to the Agency an Annual Income Certification Summary Report, as provided in Attachment No. 7 that summarizes which units are occupied by Qualified Low- and Very Low-Income Households, each respective unit's rent, household size and the respective Qualified Household's income. This report shall be accompanied by a certification from the Developer and includes a Developer certification that, to the best of the Developer's knowledge, the income is truthfully set forth in the report and in the corresponding income certification forms.

In said section the following text shall be deleted:

Prior to the rental or lease any residential unit to an Eligible Tenant, and annually thereafter within thirty (30) days of the anniversary date of a Qualified Household's occupancy, the Developer shall submit to the Agency a completed income computation and certification form, in the form of Attachment No. 7 hereto or such other form as may be provided by the Agency. The Developer shall obtain an income certification from each Eligible Tenant and Qualified Household that certifies that, to the best of the Developer's knowledge, the income is truthfully set forth in the income certification form. The Developer shall verify the income in one or more of the following methods:

(a) Obtain two (2) paycheck stubs from the Eligible Tenant's or Qualified Household's two (2) most recent pay periods, if any. (b) Obtain a true copy of an income tax return from the Eligible Tenant or Qualified Household for the most recent tax year in which a return was filed.

Page 2 of 7 (c) Obtain an income verification certification from the employer of the Eligible Tenant or Qualified Household. (d) Obtain an income verification certification from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services if the Eligible Tenant or Qualified Household receives assistance from such agencies. (e) Obtain a credit report from a commercial credit reporting agency. (f) Obtain an alternate form of income verification reasonably requested by the Developer, if none of the above forms of verification is available to the Developer.

A Qualified Household, who at the time of income certification qualified as an Very Low Income Household, shall continue to be deemed so qualified, until such time as the person or family's income is redetermined and the person or family is determined by the Developer to no longer be so qualified, even if such person or family's income has subsequently increased to an amount above the applicable income.

ATTACHMENT NO.4 SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT of the Agreement will be amended in part as follows: II (A). General Requirements. Pursuant to Section 307 of the Agreement, the Agency shall not expend more than Four Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($4,500,000) for the cost of developing the Project. ATTACHMENT NO.7 INCOME COMPUTATION AND CERTIFICATION FORM CHAMBERS SENIOR RESIDENCE of the Agreement will be deleted and the TCAC Tenant Income Certification Form will be inserted.

ATTACHMENT NO.8 ANNUAL INCOME CERTIFICATION SUMMARY REPORT of the Agreement, the existing text shall be deleted and the following text shall be inserted:

The undersigned, , being duly authorized to execute this certificate on behalf of a ______, hereby represents and warrants that:

1. He/she has read and is thoroughly familiar with the provisions of the Affordable Housing Agreement (the "Agreement") by and between the EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency"), and , a (the "Developer"), of which this certification is an attachment.

2. As of the date of this certificate, the followinq number of residential units within the Chambers Senior Residence complex located at ______, EI Cajon, California ("Project"), (i) are currently occupied by tenants qualifying as a Very Low Income Households at not greater than the

Page 3 of 7 rents as required by the Agreement or (ii) are currently vacant and being held available for occupancy by Eligible Tenants and have been so held continuously since the date Eligible Tenants vacated such unit, as indicated by:

3. The unit number, the rental amount charged and collected by Developer, the number of occupants and the income of the occupants for each Very Low-Income Unit in the Project is set forth below. 49 units in the Project are rented at Affordable Rent:

Unit No. Gross Rent Number of OccupantsGross Annual Household Income

Verified by:

Chambers Senior Residence, a California limited partnership Dated: ------By:

Its:

ATTACHMENT NO.9 REGULATORY AGREEMENT, 102. Affordable Rental Housing, E. Income of Tenants, of the Agreement, is hereby amended to read as follows: The Developer shall verify the gross income of prospective and existing households as required by TCAC. Prior to the rental or lease of any residential unit to a Qualified Household and annually thereafter, Developer shall cause a Qualified Household to execute the Tenant Income Certification Form, as provided in Attachment No.8, or other form as may be required by TCAC which shall be kept in the tenant files at the Site. Within ninety (90) days after the end of each calendar year, the Developer shall submit to the Agency an Annual Income Certification Summary Report, as provided in Attachment No.7, that summarizes which units are occupied by Qualified Low- and Very Low-Income Households, each respective unit's rent, household size and the respective Qualified Household's income. This report shall be accompanied by a certification from the Developer and includes a Developer certification that, to the best of the Developer's knowledge, the income is truthfully set forth in the report and in the corresponding income certification forms.

In said section the following text shall be deleted:

Page 4 of? Prior to the rental or lease any residential unit to an Eligible Tenant, and annually thereafter within thirty (30) days of the anniversary date of a Qualified Household's occupancy, the Developer shall submit to the Agency a completed income computation and certification form, in the form of Attachment No. 7 hereto or such other form as may be provided by the Agency. The Developer shall obtain an income certification from each Eligible Tenant and Qualified Household that certifies that, to the best of the Developer's knowledge, the income is truthfully set forth in the income certification form. The Developer shall verify the income in one or more of the following methods:

(a) Obtain two (2) paycheck stubs from the Eligible Tenant's or Qualified Household's two (2) most recent pay periods, if any.

(b) Obtain a true copy of an income tax return from the Eligible Tenant or Qualified Household for the most recent tax year in which a return was filed.

(d) Obtain an income verification certification from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services if the Eligible Tenant or Qualified Household receives assistance from such agencies.

(e) Obtain a credit report from a commercial credit reporting agency.

(f) Obtain an alternate form of income verification reasonably requested by the Developer, if none of the above forms of verification is available to the Developer.

A Qualified Household, who at the time of income certification qualified as an Very Low Income Household, shall continue to be deemed so qualified, until such time as the person or family's income is re-determined and the person or family is determined by the Developer to no longer be so qualified, even if such person or family's income has subsequently increased to an amount above the applicable income.

ATTACHMENT NO. 10 PROMISSORY NOTE shall be amended or modified in part as follows: 1. Loan Amount shall be amended to $4,500,000. 2. Disbursement of Loan Proceeds. Per the Agreement, the Agency is providing the Borrower a loan in the amount of Four Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($4,500,000) (the "Agency Development Loan"). ATTACHMENT NO. 12 shall be amended with the revised Attachment No. 12 Project Budget.

Page 5 of 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement to the effective the date and year first above written.

EL CAJON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic

Dated:------Kathi J. Henry, Executive Director

ATTEST:

Kathie J. Rutledge, Secretary

CHAMBERS SENIOR RESIDENCES, L.P. a California limited partnership

By: Affirmed Housing Group, Inc. Its: General Partner

Dated: _ James Silverwood, President

"Developer"

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Melissa Ayres Director, Community Development

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Morgan L. Foley General Counsel

Page 6 of 7 Chambers Senior Residences - 49 units 9% + City +-Def Dev Fee

Percent SOURCES Per Unit Total INCOME Type Otv. Subtotal %AMI Rental Income Conventional Permanent Loan $ 1,650,013 $ 33,674 10.2% Gross Net Total EI Cajon RDA Housinq Funds $ 3,300,000 $ 67,347 20,5% 1BR 4 30% $ 441 $ 417 $ 1,668 EI Cajon RDA Supplemental Fundino $ 1,200,000 $ 24,490 7.4% 1BR 5 40% $ 589 $ 565 $ 2,825 ~~_LandContribution $ 4,070,000 s 83,061 25.2% 1BR 5 45% $ 662 $ 638 $ 3,190 Waived fee $ 71,342 $ 1,456 0.4% 18R 32 46 50% $ 736 $ 712 $ 22,784 ~~omeHousino Tax Credits s 5,537,600 $ 113,012 34.3% 2BR 1 30% $ 510 $ 477 $ 477 AHG Deferred Developer Fee $ 300,000 $ 6,122 1,9% 2BR 0 40% $ 680 $ 647 $ - 28R 1 f--. 50% $ 849 $ 816 $ 816 TOTAL SOURCES $ 16,128,955 $ 329,162 100.0% 2BR Mgr 1 3 120% $ - $ - $ - "1J - OJ TOTAL 49 49 TOTAL $ 31,760 co CD Annual Residential Income $ 381,120 ...... Other Income $ 4,940 o Vacancy $ (19,303 ANNUAL INCOME 366,757 ...... $ - USES- --- Land Acquisition $ 4,070,000 $ 83,061 25.2% EXPENSES per,...._.. unit_.... ~.lition $ - $ 0.0% General Admin. (security, office equip., accounting) $ 469 $ 23,000 On & Off Site Work $ 850,000 $ 17,347 5.3% Manaqement Fee $ 469 $ 23,000 Direct Construction s 7,170,000 $ 146,327 44.5% Utilities (water, sewer, qas, electric) $ 490 $ 24,000 Construction & Soft Cost Contincencv $ 500,000 $ 10,204 3.1% On-Site Manaqer & Maintenance Payroll $ 755 $ 37,000 ~..:ecture $ 550,000 s 11,224 3.4% Property Taxes & Prop.iLiab.iEarthquake Ins. $ 204 $ 10,000 ~~nqineer $ 100,000 $ 2,041 0.6% Maintenance & Grounds $ 776 $ 38,000 Construction/predev. Loan Interest & Fees $ 282,000 $ 5,755 1.7% Partnership Manaqement $ 437 21,400 Site Security $ 80,000 $ 1,633 0.5% Resident Services $ 204 $ 10,000 Capitalized Reserves $ 173,708 $ 3,545 1.1% Replacement Reserves $ 250 $ 12,250 Taxes & Insurance $ 70,000 $ 1,429 0.4% Property Taxes $ 429 $ 21,000 Escrow & Title $ 20,000 $ 408 0,1% II ANNUAL EXPENSES $ 4,483 $ 219,650 ~lFees $ 40,000 $ 816 0.2% Development Impact Fees & Permits $ 568,247 $ 11,597 3.5% ~~redit Fees $ 55,000 $ 1,122 0.3% Environmental Consultants $ 5,000 $ 102 0.0% ~',Soft Costs (Accountinq. Appraisal, Furnishi $ 145,000 $ 2,959 0.9% Developer Fee $ 1,450,000 $ 29,592 9.0% TOTAL USES $ 16,128,955 $ 329,162 100.0% · ham errs enD• r eSI• e c s

CUP Submittal

MEETING: 3/8/11

ITEM NO:--.;:;3..:.;:::.2__

DATE: February 28, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tern Kendrick, Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan and Wells

FROM: Chief of Police

SUBJECT: State Citizens' Option for Public Safety (CA-COPS) Expenditure Plan

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony; 2. Close the Public Hearing; 3. Consider the modified FY2010-11 CA-COPS Expenditure Plan, including modifications to the 2009-2010 COPS plan; and 4. Continue the Public Hearing to March 22, 2011, at 3:00 p.m.

BACKGROUND:

Since 1996, the State ofCalifornia has annually allocated funding distributed via the County to local law enforcement to support front-line police services. Funding distribution is determined by a population-based formula. State Government Code requires that the County's Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee be provided with an expenditure plan, approved by the agency's governing board (City Council) prior to release ofthe funds.

The FY2010-11 COPS expenditure plan and modified FY2009-10 plan was originally noticed on Thursday, February 24, 2011. However, subsequent to printing of the public notice a decision was made by management to augment .the plan by using COPS funding to equip the Emergency Operations Center with computers. The computers would have access to the City's emergency operations programviathe Internet, and other support documents in the case of natural disaster, terrorist attack or other emergency situation.

The FY2010-2011 COPS expenditure plan, as modified, will fund projects including procuring safety equipment, such as tasers, for issuance to police officers and police services officers and hand-held metal detectors for use in the jail, supplementing COPS 2009-2010 funding to complete a project which provides computer hardware and software for the police Traffic Unit motorcycles, and equipping the desk officer position with CAD accessibility.

Other planned funding uses include Emergency Operations Center computers, upgrading and maintaining a mobile phone data recovery system for the investigative unit, providing stafftraining, pepper ball training rounds for the Composite Platoon, and a specialized printer for laboratory staff capable of printing fingerprints for identification and evidentiary purposes. Residual funding, ifavailable, will be used to accelerate the replacement ofP25 compliant mobile and/or portable radios.

The modified expenditure plan for FY2009-2010 COPS will reprogram funds to purchase four ruggedized laptops for police motorcycle units and conditioning equipment for police personnel. Presently, motorcycle officers don't have access to the same mobile data computers as officers in cars. These laptops provide officers with critical information as they complete their duties. Additionally, the laptops, coupled with the CAD and other software that is installed on them, provides GPS location information to Dispatch which can be essential in locatingthe unit ifthere is a critical incident or an accident and the motorcycle officer is unable to communicate their location. Finally, because physical conditioning is critical in front-line police work, FY2009-2010 funding will also be reprogrammed to buy conditioning equipment for the dedicated police fitness center, which will be located between the male and female locker rooms.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Police Department's FY2010-2011 budget appropriation will be increased in the amount of $100,000, plus interest, for this year's allocation and modified to reprogram up to $56,072.

Bu dicet Activitc IVIlY No. 215000 FY2010-2011 Expenditure Category Account Appropriation Overtime 7120 $11,169 Operating Supplies 8160 $1,075 Subscriptions and Publications 8588 $2,000 Training 8594 $1,011 Minor Equipment < $10,000 9010 $28,470 Minor Equip Computers & Peripherals 9020 $43.063 Software < $10,000 9030 $29,284 Equipment 9035 $40.000 Total $156,072

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

Kathi Henry CITY MANAGER I-CitYCi~~kD;t~St;;;;;;1 MEETING: March 8,2011

ITEM NO: 3.3 _ I I HAR -2 A 8: sl

1____1

DATE: February 28, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick, Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan, and Wells

FROM: Deputy City ManagerlDirector ofPublic Works/City Engineer

SUBJECT: Amendment to the Five (5) Year Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: • Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony; • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the next RESOLUTION in order to approve the Amendment to the 2010 RTIP. BACKGROUND: Federal and TransNet regulations require the City to conduct a public hearing for amendments to the RTIP and obtain approval from SANDAG. The five (5) year plan was adopted by City Council on June 8, 2010. The proposed action amends the approved RTIP to match prior year TransNet payments and FY 2010 year end cash fund balances in MPO ID: EL03 and EL20. This amendment also increases the amount of Transnet funds in EL21 and establishes a new project, EL25, for Slope Repair on Fletcher Parkway and Murray Drive. An additional appropriation from Transnet funds (EL21) for Street Resurfacing 11- Slurry Seals will be made at a future Council Meeting. A budget appropriation of $20,000 from Transnet funds (EL25) to evaluate slope failures on Fletcher Parkway and Murray Drive was made at the February 22,2011, City Council Meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT: All other existing project budgets are unchanged and correspond with the City's approved Capital Improvement Program.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

Rob Turner ~:~:'H;:';"w------DEPUTY CITY MANAGER CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER Attachment Table 1 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $0005) EI Cajon, City of

Mollison from Main Street to Washington, Mollison from Broadway to Greenfield, TransNet - LSI: CR Greenfield, Third Street from Lexington to Washington, Jamacha Road from Washington to south city limits, 2nd Streetll-8 overpass, Main Street from 1"8 to Travelodge - street reconstruction and overlays of 2" - 3" thick, including collectors, thoroughfares & residential streets

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

Est Total Cost: $16,885

TOTAL PRIOR· 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet -L $6,747 $6,747 $6,747 TransNet - L (Cash) $2,541 $2,541 $2,541 TransNet - LSI $5,225 $400 $825 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $5,225 TransNet-LSI(Cash) $397 $397 $397 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,975 $1,975 $1,975 TOTAL $16,885 $10,085 ; $2,800 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $16,885

Replacement of interconnect cable at various streets including Jamacha, TransNet - LSI: Maint Washington Avenue and Chase Avenue. Modification of existing traffic signal to improve traffic flow and safety at Main Street and Ballard Street. - new, upgrade or modification of traffic signals and Traffic Management Center, including rewire, modifications, replacement of signal interconnect cable, wireless video monitoring cameras and other necessary equipment; matching funds for Proposition 1B Traffic Ught Synchronization Program Grant

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $1,632

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet -L $580 $580 $580 TransNet - L (Cash) $380 $300 $80 $380 TransNet - LSI $672 $272 $100 $100 $100 $100 $672 TOTAL $1,632 $880 $352 $100 $100 $100 $100 $1,632

•• Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are subject to change when accepted by SANDAG Page 1 Wednesday, March 2, 2011 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $0005) EI Cajon, City of ...... MPO .ELl1 II Project Title: Sidewalk and other Repairs Project Description: Various locations - repair broken sidewalk, driveway, ramps, etc. TransNet - LSI: Maint

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

Est Total Cost: $1,350

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet -L $450 $450 $150 $300 TransNet - L (Cash) $250 $150 $100 $250 TransNet - LSI $150 $150 $150 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $500 $50 $150 $150 $150 $500 TOTAL $1,350 $600 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $1,200

Broadway from Main Street to City Limits - provide for new street lights which TransNet - LSI: CR include removing wooden pole mounted lights with utility underground

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Lighting improvements

Est Total Cost: $212

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $37 $37 $37 TransNet - LSI $175 $100 $25 $25 $25 $175 TOTAL $212 $100 $37 $25 $25 $25 $212

LED Light Bulb Replacement Citywide· replace led lights on all signals TransNet - LSI: Maint

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $232

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $97 $97 $97 TransNet - LSI $135 $135 $135 TOTAL $232 $97 $135 $232

•• Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are SUbjectto change when accepted by SANDAG Page 2 Monday, February 28, 2011 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $0005) EI Cajon, City of

Project Title: Street Resurfacing with slurry seals and products Project Description: Downtown EI Cajonand surrounding areas. - street resurfacing with slurryseals TransNet- LSI: Maint and asphaltrubberaggregate membrane (ARAM)

CapacityStatus: NCI ExemptCategory: Safety- Pavementresurfacing and/orrehabilitation

Est Total Cost:$2,713

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - LSI $1,609 $250 $159 $400 $400 $400 $1,609 TransNet - LSI CarryOver $1,104 $704 $400 $1,104 TOTAL $2,713 $250 $863 $400 $400 $400 $400 $2,713

SignalMaintenance All CityTrafficSignals- repainting of trafficsignal heads and otherminortraffic TransNet- LSI: Maint signal maintenance

CapacityStatus: NCI ExemptCategory: Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $140

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet - L (Cash) $24 $20 $4 $24 TransNet - LSI $80 $40 $40 $80 TransNet - LSI CarryOver $36 $36 $36 TOTAL $140 $20 $40 $40 $40 $140

JamachaRoadfrom Washington Avenueto GustavoAvenue - upgrading of traffic signalson Jamachaat the intersection of Lexington Avenue,Washington Avenue and GraniteHills Drive

CapacityStatus: NCI ExemptCategory: Other - Traffic signalsynchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $204

TOTAL PRIOR 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 PE RW CON TransNet- LSI $204 $204 $204 TOTAL $204 $204 $204

•• Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are subject to change when accepted by SANDAG Page 3 Monday, February 28,2011 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $OOOs) EI Cajon, City of

SlopeRepairFletcherParkway and FletcherParkway, Hacienda Driveto LornaPortal;, Murry Drive, Oennstedt Place to TransNet - LSI: Maint WaterStreet- Perform Geotechnical investigations, projectdesign and permenant repairsto solpe failuresadjacentto the roadway. Significant damageoccured duringDecember2010 heavyrains.

CapacityStatus:NCI ExemptCategory:Other - Damagerepair caused by unusual disasters

Est Total Cost:$350

TOTAL PRIOR 10111 11112 12113 13114 14115 PE RW CON TransNet- LSI $300 $300 $300 TransNet• LSI Carry Over $50 $20 $30 $50 TOTAL $350 $20 $330 $350

•• Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are subject to change when accepted by SANDAG Page 4 Monday, February 28, 2011 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $OOOs)

RTIP Fund Types

Ft>rfRraf Fllnrlinn ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Federal Stimulus Program) BIP/CBI Border Infrastructure Program/Corridors and Borders Infrastructure Program CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Nr Quality DEMO High Priority Demonstration Program under TEA-21 DEMO-Sec 115 High Priority Demonstration Program under FY 2004 Appropriations DEMO-Sec 117/STP Surface Transportation Program under FHWA Administrative Program (congressionally directed appropriations) DOE Department of Energy FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Section 5307 Federal Transit Administration Urbanized Area Formula Program FTA Section 5309 (Bus) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary Program FTASection 5309 (FG) Federal Transit Administration Fixed Guideway Modernization Formula program FTA Section 5309 (NS) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary - New Starts Program FTA Section 5310 Federal Transit Administration Elderly & Disabled Program FTA Section 5311 Federal Transit Administration Rural Program FTA Section 5316 (JARC) Federal Transit Administration Jobs Access Reverse Commute FTA Section 5317 (NF) Federal Transit Administration New Freedom HBP Highway Bridge Program under SAFETEA-LU HBRR Highway Bridge Repair and Rehabilitation under TEA-21 HES Hazard Elimination System (administered by Caltrans) HPP High Priority Program under SAFETEA-LU HUD Housing and Urban Development 1M Interstate Maintenance Discretionary IRR Indian Reservation Roads program ITS Intelligent Transportation System NHS National Highway System (administered by Caltrans) PLH Public Lands Highway RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Program RTP Recreational Trails Program SRTS Safe Routes to School (administered by Caltrans) TCSP Transportation & Community & System Preservation TE Transportation Enhancement Program TIGER (ARRA) Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (Federal Stimulus) T1GGER (ARRA) Transit Investment for Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction (Federal Stimulus)

"Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are SUbjectto change when accepted by SANDAG Page 5 Monday. February 28,2011 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $0005)

TSGP Transit Security Grant Program SIMa t=undina BTA Bicycle Transportation Account CMIA Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (State Prop. 1B) CR Congestion Relief FSP Freeway Service Patrol GARVEE Grant Anticipated Revenue Vehicles HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program IRI Intercity Rail Improvement (State Prop. 1B) Prop 1A - Hioh Speed Rail High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (State Prop. 1A) PTA Public Transportation Account SHOPP State Highway Operation & Protection Program SLPP State Local Partnership Program (State Prop. 1B) STIP-IIP State Transportation Improvement Program -Interregional Program STIP-RIP State Transportation Improvement Program - Regional Improvement Program TCRP Traffic Congestion Relief Program TLSP Traffic Light Synchronization Program (State Prop. 1B) TSM Transportation Systems Management / nr,,/ t="nrlirJN TDA Transportation Development Act TDA-B Transportation Development Act-Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities TransNet-78 Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - SR 78 TransNet-ADA Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Transit TransNet-B Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bike TransNet-Border Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Border TransNet-BPNS Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax extension - Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety Prooram TransNet-BRT/Ops Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bus Rapid TransiUNew Service TransNet-CP Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Commercial Paper TransNet-H Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Highway TransNet-L Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local Streets & Roads TransNet-LSG Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local Smart Growth TransNet-LSI Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local System Improvements TransNet-MC Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Major Corridors TransNet-REMP Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Environmental Mitigation Program TransNet-SMIP Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Smart Growth Incentive Program TransNet-SS Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Senior Services TransNet-T Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Transit TransNet-TSI Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax- Transit System Improvements

•• Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are subject to change when accepted by SANDAG Page 6 Monday, February 28, 2011 RESOLUTION NO. --=.11

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON AMENDING THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011 THROUGH 2015.

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (TransNet Extension Ordinance); and

WHEREAS, the TransNet Extension Ordinance provides that SANDAG, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve a multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation projects eligible to use transportation sales tax (TransNet) funds; and

WHEREAS, the City of EI Cajon was provided with an estimate of annual TransNet local street improvement revenues for fiscal years 2011 through 2015; and

WHEREAS, the existing list of TransNet projects within the City of EI Cajon for fiscal years 2011-2015, and the budgeted funding for those projects, require modification due to the need to correspond to the City's five (5) year Capital Improvement Program and the City's approved budget; and

WHEREAS, the City of EI Cajon has held a noticed public meeting with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of projects prior to approval of the projects by its authorized legislative body in accordance with Section 5(A) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy 31;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. That certain City of EI Cajon Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2011-2015, approved by Resolution No. 68-10, is hereby amended as reflected in Table 1, 2010 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 10-07, attached hereto as Attachment A.

Section 2. That pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of EI Cajon certifies that no more than thirty percent (30%) of its annual revenues shall be spent on maintenance-related projects.

Section 3. That pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of EI Cajon certifies that all new projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by TransNet revenues shall accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to this requirement permitted under the TransNet Extension Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed as part of the City of EI Cajon's public hearing process.

(Continued on Page 2) Page 2 of 2, Resolution No. _-11

Section 4. That pursuant to Section 8 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of EI Cajon certifies that the required minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and road purposes will be met throughout the five-year period consistent with the most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.

Section 5. That pursuant to Section 9A of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of EI Cajon certifies that it will contribute $2,081 in exactions from the private sector (for each newly constructed residential housing unit in the city) to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP).

Section 6. That pursuant to Section 13 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of EI Cajon certifies that it has established a separate Transportation Improvement Account for TransNet revenues with interest earned expended only for those purposes for which the funds were allocated.

Section 7. That pursuant to Section 18 of the TransNef Extension Ordinance, the City of EI Cajon certifies that each project of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with TransNet project funding identification signs.

Section 8. That the City of EI Cajon does hereby certify that all other applicable provisions of the TransNet Extension Ordinance and SANDAG Board Policy 31 have been met.

Section 9. The City of EI Cajon agrees to hold harmless and defend the SANDAG Commission against any challenges related to local TransNef funded projects of the City of EI Cajon.

03108111 (Item 3.3) MEETING: March 8, 2011

ITEM NO: 4.1

DATE: March 1,2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tern Kendrick, Councilrnernbers Hanson-Cox, McClellan, and Wells

FROM: Deputy City Manager/Director of Public Works/City Engineer

SUBJECT: No Parking Zone - 523 South Johnson Avenue

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the next RESOLUTION in order to establish the following "No Parking" Zone:

Along the easterly curb line of South Johnson Avenue beginning at a point 18 feet north of the southerly property line thence northerly a distance of 140 feet. (This no parking zone supercedes and rescinds all previous zones within these described limits.)

BACKGROUND: This is a request to install a "No Parking" zone located at the two driveways that serve 523 South Johnson Avenue (Church of Christ). The Board of Trustees of the Church has expressed safety concerns for vehicles exiting their facility not being able to see oncoming traffic. The concern is with parkedvehicles adjacent to their driveways blocking the visibility of oncoming traffic.

There have been no traffic collisions at this mid-block location in the past three (3) years. A parking study indicated that the parking occupancy is approximately 40% on both sides of the subject driveway for the time period of the study.

This request appears to meet the Council's approved policy as follows: 1) Type of vehicle using street parking-continuous parking by recreational vehicles or other large vehicles which obscure sight distance (i.e., commercial vehicles in industrial areas, etc.). 2) Continuous use ofon-street parking, a continuous line ofparked vehicles (at or near 100 percent) without breaks. 3) Character of driveway user (i.e., driveway for school facility may require additional sight distance/ clearance). Council AGENDA March 8, 2011 Page 2

FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $150.00 for initial installation and routine maintenance costs.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: J2&T~ Ka~r~C4'--ttr'------Rob Turner DEPUTY CITY MANAGER CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER

Attachments Proposed No Parking Zone at 505-523 S. Johnson Ave. City of EI Cajon Traffic Engineering Division Sheet 1 of 1 Parking Study @ 505-523 S. Johnson Ave.

c i, \id nAIF' ',crih"l.larv8.i2011 i<,<\i/i ii'i

Dear Mario,

As the board of trustee's who represent the EI Cajon Church of Christ at 523 S Johnson Ave, we need your help; with a traffic/public safety matter directly in front of our buildings at 505-523 S. Johnson Ave. Currently, it is very difficult for personal vehicle's to safely exit the premises when cars are parked along the curb in front of our two buildings. People cannot see around the parked carsto adequately lookfor oncoming road traffic. Consequently, there have been many close calls and near miss accidents. In addition the front entrance area gets blocked & jammed up when vehicle's are trying to drop passengers off, the elderly, ·handicapped, etc.

Specifically, we would request the front street curb to be changed to a no parking zone. The front entrance of the church becomes extremely congested before and especially at the conclusion of various worship and meeting services. We believe that a no parking zone or at least a five minute loading zone would significantly reduce the current street congestion, increase safety and help mitigate accidents and injuries.

The length is from 505 S. Johnson Ave (pastors residence) south to the southern most driveway of 523 S. Johnson Ave (Church Bldg) It is approximately 3-5 car lengths.

Please see attached pictures & let us know if you need any other information. You can reach Steven Carlyle by cell phone at 619-277-2383.

Sincerely,

f\ 'ii, j ft! fi iAot!J(tLt! ' 1/1 •

1 y 4 // .-"<: /tdfl Steven W. Carlyle, Secretary Ray Crume /?a.;0~Y--

Dave Jorda ~' ) ) ) r - 1 o .0

, j \ ) j f') o }

; ~':,:r·.;:_::i~ .. ~..\/.~::_ .._.':_~ ;~.tE.r;~.!.C.E •...O.E ~ : CHy ;§l~:ri\(;Qf!f~\Stamp : MEETING: March 8, 2011 ,~:i\o. ITEM NO:_4_.2__ 1 [" ."n , M 03 1 ,UlI."n-)~D:J!

DATE: March 1, 2011 TO: Agency Members: Lewis, Kendrick, Hanson-Cox, McClellan and Wells FROM: Melissa Ayres, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH PARKWAY PLAZA GP, LLC.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City of EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency: 1. Adopt the next Resolution to approve execution of an Owner Participation Agreement and any related documents by the Executive Director and Parkway Plaza GP, LLC., substantially in the form as presented with such changes approved by the Executive Director; 2. Appropriate $2,000,000 in ECRA 2005 Bond Proceeds from the Unrestricted Fund Balance (590); 3. Increase the expenditure budget in the Redevelopment Capital Funds Activity 590900-RD0702 by $2,000,000 for FY2010-11.

BACKGROUND:

In an effort to assist in the economic development of Parkway Plaza Shopping Center, the Agency authorized staff to negotiate with Parkway Plaza GP, LLC. ("Parkway Plaza") for the redevelopment of the regional shopping center with a site address of 107 Fletcher Parkway ("Shopping Center") and the building previously operated by Mervyn's at 565 Fletcher Parkway ("Building").

The attached Owner Participation Agreement ("OPA") provides for Agency assistance in the form of reimbursement for exterior facade improvements and renovations relating to the site, including, but not limited to: renovation, reconfiguration and new vertical access to the second level of 565 Fletcher Parkway, construction of new facade improvements and ancillary landscaping along the north side of the enclosed mall, and renovation of the north enclosed entry of the Shopping Center. Agency assistance in the amount of $2,000,000 Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report OPA Agreement with Parkway Plaza GP, LLC March 8, 2011 Agenda has been requested to assist in offsetting the facade improvement and renovation costs and represents 13.26% of a total project budget of $15,080,020.

The terms of the Agency assistance will be in the form of a loan, accruing interest at a variable interest rate per year and loan repayment will be over a 1°year period based on net new sales taxes generated each year from the shopping center. Any principal or interest balance remaining after the 1°year period will be due in full to the Agency.

CEQA: This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines 15301 (Class 1 - Existing Facilities) because the project involves the remodel of the facade and the interior of existing buildings within an existing shopping center.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Funds for this OPA in the amount of $2,000,000 will be paid with Redevelopment 2005 Bond Proceeds under Project/Activity #590900-9990-RD0702.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

Melissa Ayres KIt~H~"~~--- Director of Community Development Executive Director

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Owner Participation Agreement

- 2 - MEETING: March 8, 2011 ITEM NO: 4.3

RECOMMENDATION: That the City of EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency: 1. Adopt the next Resolution to approve execution of an Owner Participation Agreement and any related documents by the Executive Director and JKC Palm Springs Automotive, Inc., substantially in the form as presented with such changes as approved by the Executive Director; 2. Appropriate $650,000.00 in ECRA 2005 Bond Proceeds from the Unrestricted Fund Balance (590); 3. Increase the expenditure budget in the Redevelopment Capital Funds Activity 590900-RD0702 by $650,000.00 for FY2010-11.

BACKGROUND:

In an effort to assist in the economic development of downtown, the Agency authorized staff to negotiate with JKC Palm Springs Automotive, Inc., dba Team Kia EI Cajon ("Team Kia") for the redevelopment of the Kia dealership located at 541 N. Johnson Avenue.

The attached Owner Participation Agreement ("OPA") provides for Agency assistance in the form of reimbursement for exterior facade improvements, renovations and signage relating to the site. Agency assistance for reimbursement of facade improvements, renovations and signage shall not exceed $650,000 and Agency funds will be used last, after other required financing sources have been utilized. The total project cost is estimated at $1,340,000 and Agency funds would represent 48.51 % of the total project.

Th' e terms ofthe Agency assistance will be in the form of a loan, accruing interest at three percent per year beginning with the fourth Operating Year following completion of the improvements. Loan repayment will be over a 10 year period based on sales taxes Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report OPA with JKC Palm Springs Automotive, Inc. (KIA) March 8, 2011 Agenda

generated from the Site in excess of sales tax generated twelve months prior to Team Kia obtaining control of the property. Any remaining principal or interest balance remaining after the 10 year period will be due in full to the Agency.

CEQA: This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Existing Facilities) and Section 15311 (Class 11 - Accessory Structures) because the project involves the remodel of the facade of existing buildings and the replacement of an existing freestanding sign.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Funds for this OPA in the amount of $650,000 will be paid with Redevelopment 2005 Bond Proceeds under Project/Activity #590900-9990-RD0702.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:

-J}1 ~L .0'-J Melissa Ayres 1 Kathi J. Henry . Director of Community Development Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Owner Participation Agreement

- 2 - 6.1

Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee County of San Diego FY 2010..2011

Wednesday, February 23,2011 2:30 - 3:30 PM Supervisor Jacob's EI Cajon Office 250 E Main Street, Suite 169 EI Cajon, CA 92020

8000852-7322

! l'-~ .:. <) Order of Business <1) ,':)

I. Welcome and Roll Call

II. Approval of minutes for the meeting of September 16,2010 (attachment) Action

III. Overview of October 2010 Annual Report 1. Financial Report of Indian Gaming SDF Trust

IV. State Audit of FY08!09 SDF 1. State Audit recommendations 2. Review of grant documents

V. Adoption of Schedule and Milestones for next round of competitive grants (attachment) Action

VI. Public Comments and Communications

VII. Adjournment Board Members 6.2 Jerome Stocks, Chair Deputy Mayor, Encinitas Jack Dale, First ViceChair CJ!AItIDAG~ Couneilmember, Santee Jim Janney, Second Vice Chair Mayor, Imperial Beach Matt Hall Mayor, Carlsbad Cheryl Cox BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mayor, Chula Vista Carrie Downey AGENDA Couneilmember, Coronado Carl Hilliard Deputy Mayor, Del Mar Mark Lewis Mayor, EI Cajon Friday, February 25, 2011 Sam Abed Mayor, Escondido 9 a.m. to 12 noon Art Madrid Mayor, La Mesa SANDAG Board Room Mary Teresa Sessom 401 B Street, 7th Floor Mayor, Lemon Grove San Diego Ron Morrison Mayor, National City Jim Wood Mayor, Oceanside Don Higginson Mayor, Poway AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Jerry Sanders Mayor, San Diego Tony Young • FY 2011 TransNet AND TRANSPORTATION Council President, San Diego DEVELOPMENT ACT REVENUE REVISIONS Jim Desmond Mayor, San Marcos AND FY 2012 TO FY 2016 TRANSIT REVENUE Lesa Heebner ESTIMATES Mayor, Solana Beach Judy Ritter FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEDERAL Mayor, Vista • Bill Horn FY 2010 FOR JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE Chairman, County of San Diego COMMUTE AND NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS Ron Roberts AND FY 2012 AND FY 2013 TransNet SENIOR Vice Chair, County of San Diego MINI-GRANT PROJECTS Advisory Members Vacant Imperial County • SAN DIEGO REGION AGGREGATE SUPPLY STUDY Cindy McKim, Director California Department ofTransportation Harry Mathis, Chairman Metropolitan Transit System PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING Chris Orlando, Chairman North County Transit District CAPTKeith Hamilton, USN, CEC, YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEB SITE AT WWW.SANDAG.ORG U.S. Department of Defense Scott Peters, Chairman San Diego Unified Port District Mark Muir, Director MISSION STATEMENT San Diego County Water Authority The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. Edwin 'Thorpe' Romero/Allen Lawson Southern California Tribal SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, plans, engineers, Chairmen's Association and builds public transit, and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the Remedios G6mez-Arnau region's quality of life. Consul General of Mexico

San Diego Association of Governments· 401 B Street, Suite 800. San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Gary L. Gallegos Executive Director, SANDAG (619) 699-1900 . Fax(619) 699-1905 . www.sandag.org Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Board of Directors on any item at the time the Board is considering the item. Please complete a Speaker's Slip, which is located in the rear of the room, and then present the slip to the Clerk of the Board seated at the front table. Also, members of the public are invited to address the Board on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Board of Directors may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.

This agenda and related staff reports can be accessed at www.sandag.org under Meetings on the SANDAG Web site. Public comments regarding the agenda can be forwarded to SANDAG via the e mail comment form also available on the Web site. E-mail comments should be received no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the Board of Directors meeting. Any handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Board of Directors meeting should be received by the Clerk of the Board no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TIY), or fax (619) 699-1905.

SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or see 511sd.com for route information.

DOWNTOWN SAN DIEGO

2 Rev. 021711 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA

Friday, February 25, 2011

ITEM # RECOMMENDATION

+1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES APPROVE

+A. JANUARY 14, 2011, BOARD POLICY MEETING MINUTES +8. JANUARY 28,2011, BOARD BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/cOMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

Public comments under this agenda item will be limited to five public speakers. Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Board on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Other public comments will be heard during the items under the heading" Reports." Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a "Request to Speak" form and giving it to the Clerk of the Board prior to speaking. Public speakers should notify the Clerk of the Board if they have a handout for distribution to Board members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Board members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item.

+3. ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITIEES APPROVE

This item summarizes the actions taken by the Borders Committee on January 28, by the Executive and Regional Planning Committees on February 11, and the Transportation Committee on February 18, 2011.

CONSENT (4 through 10)

+4. Trensttet REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT APPROVE PROGRAM FEE ADJUSTMENT (Marney Cox and Ariana zur Nieden)*

The TransNet Extension Ordinance requires that the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program transportation mitigation fee charged by local jurisdictions be adjusted every year on July 1 in order to maintain the purchasing power of the program for improvements to the Regional Arterial System. The Board of Directors is asked to approve a 2 percent adjustment to the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program, raising the minimum fee from $2,081 to $2,123 beginning July 1, 2011.

+5. FY 2010 AUDITED COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT INFORMATION (Lauren Warrem)*

In accordance with SANDAG Bylaws, the FY 2010 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) audit has been completed and is presented for informational purposes. Additionally, the attached report summarizes the communications from the independent auditor to the governing body, in compliance with the Statement of Auditing Standards 114. Copies of the CAFR will be distributed to each member agency.

3 +6. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT- PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, INFORMATION 2010 (Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin)*

The SANDAG Investment Policy requires that the Board of Directors be provided a quarterly report of investments held by SANDAG. This report includes all money under the direction or care of SANDAG as of December 31, 2010.

+7. QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT ON TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS INFORMATION OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2010 (Jose A. Nuncio)*

This quarterly report summarizes the current status of major highway, transit, arterial, traffic management, and transportation demand management projects in the SANDAG five-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program for the period October to December 2010.

+8. REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS TAKEN BY EXECUTIVE INFORMATION DIRECTOR (Lauren Warrem)*

In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy Nos. 003 (Investment Policy), 017 (Delegation of Authority), and 024 (Procurement and Contracting Construction), this report summarizes certain delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board of Directors meeting.

+9. REPORTS ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATIENDED ON BEHALF OF INFORMATION SANDAG (Kim Kawada)

Board members will provide brief reports orally or in writing on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board of Directors meeting.

+10. APPOINTMENT OF POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS INFORMATION (Kim Kawada)

This item summarizes the voting and advisory members appointed to the Executive, Transportation, Regional Planning, Borders, and Public Safety Committees as well as the Committee Chairs and Vice Chairs appointed by the SANDAG Chair.

REPORTS (11 through 14)

+11. FY 2011 TransNet AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPROVE REVENUE REVISIONS AND FY 2012 TO FY 2016 TRANSIT REVENUE ESTIMATES (First Vice Chair Jack Dale, Transportation Committee Chair; Sookyung Kim and Marney Cox)*

By March 1 of each year, SANDAG provides revenue estimates for the upcoming fiscal year as well as a projection for the next four fiscal years to allow the transit and local agencies to plan for capital projects and to determine operating subsidies. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors: (1) approve the revision to the FY 2011 TransNet revenue estimate; (2) accept the revision to the FY 2011 Transportation

4 Development Act (TDA) revenue estimate while maintaining the current apportionment; (3) approve the FY 2012 allocations for TransNet and State Transit Assistance and the apportionments for TDA and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) programs; and (4) approve the transit revenue estimates for FY 2013 to FY 2016 for TDA, FTA, and TransNet programs.

+12. FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEDERAL FY 2010 FOR JOB APPROVE ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE AND NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS AND FY 2012 AND FY 2013 TransNet SENIOR MINI-GRANT PROJECTS (First Vice Chair Jack Dale, Transportation Committee Chair; Danielle Kochman)*

SANDAG is responsible for administering the federal Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom programs, including the distribution of funds through a competitive selection process. Similarly, SANDAG also is responsible for distributing Senior Mini-Grant funds through a competitive process as required by the TransNet Extension Ordinance. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the JARC, New Freedom, and TransNet Senior Mini-Grant Projects proposed for selection as shown in Attachment 1.

+13. SAN DIEGO REGION AGGREGATE SUPPLY STUDY (Laurie Berman, INFORMATION Caltrans District 11 Director; Richard Chavez and Cheryl Mason)

In collaboration with Caltrans, SANDAG received a Transportation Planning Special Studies grant to explore construction aggregate supply in the San Diego region. SANDAG prepared a report identifying issues surrounding aggregate and developed Geographic Information System and other tools that policymakers could use to help identify potential aggregate sources. Staff will present the highlights and major findings from this study for Board of Directors information.

14. QUALITY OF LIFE FUNDING STRATEGY UPDATE (Rob Rundle)* INFORMATION

The Quality of Life Ad Hoc Steering Committee and the Quality of Life Stakeholders Working Group have been meeting regularly to provide input to the SANDAG Board of Directors on the development of a Quality of Life funding strategy. An update will be provided on the work that has been accomplished to date.

15. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS

If the five speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment.

+16. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) Three potential claims regarding Interstate 15 (Julie Wiley)

5 +17. CLOSED SESSION - CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9(b) AND 54956.8

One Potential Case - In re South Bay Expressway, L.P. and California Transportation Ventures, Inc., Case No. 10-04516 (Claims by debtor in bankruptcy) (Julie Wiley)

Property: State Route 125 Toll Road SANDAG Negotiators: Gary L. Gallegos, Julie Wiley, Marney Cox Property Owner Negotiators: South Bay Expressway, lP Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment for subject property

18. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, March 11, 2011, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled from Friday, March 25, 2011, at 9 a.m.

19. ADJOURNMENT

+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment * next to an agenda item indicates a San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission item

6 City Clerk Date Stamp MEETING: 3/8/11

ITEM NO: 7.1 lOll 28 A II: II

DATE: February 28, 2011

TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mayor Pro Tern Gary Kendrick SUBJECT: Council Activities Report

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council accept and file the following report of Council/Mayor activities attended during the current agenda period.

BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 53232.3(d) requires members of a legislative body to provide brief reports on meetings attended at the expense of the local agency at the next regular meeting of the legislative body.

REPORT:

Since the last City Council meeting, I have attended the following events on behalf of the City of EI Cajon:

March 8, 2011 Agenda Meeting 9:00 a.m. March 8, 2011 Council Advisory Meeting - Charter City Discussion March 8, 2011 - Council Meeting 3:00 p.m.

I will be happy to answer any questions you may have.

SUBMITTED BY, 6{L~ KmldArJc ..~ Gary Ken;rick ~)-::y Mayor Pro Tern City Clerk Date Stamp MEETING: 3/8/11

ITEM NO: 9.1

28 A Ii: i !

DATE: February 28, 2011 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Councilmember McClellan SUBJECT: Council Activities Report

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council accept and file the following report of Council/Mayor activities attended during the current agenda period.

REPORT:

Since the last City Council meeting, I have attended the following events on behalf of the City of EI Cajon:

February 25,2011 - MTS Budget Development Meeting March 8, 2011 - Council Advisory Meeting - Charter City Discussion March 8, 2011 - Council Meeting 3:00 p.m.

I will be happy to answer any questions you may have. City Clerk Date Stamp MEETING: 3/8/11

ITEM NO: 10.1

28 A ll: 10

DATE: February 28, 2011 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Councilrnernber Bill Wells SUBJECT: Council Activities Report

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council accept and file the following report of CouncillMayor activities attended during the current agenda period.

REPORT:

Since the last City Council meeting, I have attended the following events on behalfofthe City ofEl Cajon:

February 25,2011 Meeting wi City Manager March 1, 2011 Meeting wi GAFCON March 1, 2011 Meeting wi Joel Anderson's Office March 3,2011 METRO JPA March 8,2011 Council Advisory Meeting - Charter City Discussion March 8, 2011 - City Council Meeting 3:00 p.m.

I will be happy to answer any questions you may have. SUBMITTED BY,

f) e ') '1 f)" tj. j'I/t1 1') lIt! c/j etA' ~U L-0v~1 :~. Bill Wells ~ Mayor Pro Tern

1 MEETING: 3/8/11

ITEM NO: 10.2

DATE: March 3, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tern Kendrick, Councilrnernbers Hanson-Cox and McClellan

FROM: Councilmember Wells

SUBJECT: Draft Proposed Charter

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the draft proposed Charter and refer same to the Special Election to be held in June 2011.

BACKGROUND: The California Constitution gives cities the power to become a Charter City to have "supreme authority over municipal affairs". The attached draft Charter sets forth language that establishes the city's power separate from the Government Code, strives to protect revenues and exempts the city from certain provisions of California statute regulating public contracting and purchasing. .

FISCAL IMPACT: Once adopted, a savings will be realized through future contracts where city General Fund money is being used to pay contracts that do not include prevailing wages.

PREPARED BY:

Bill Wells @J2J Councilrnember '-. DRAFT CHARTER OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON

PREAMBLE

WE THE PEOPLE of the City of El Cajon declare our intent to restore to our community the historic principles of self-governance inherent in the doctrine of home-rule. Sincerely committed to the belief that local government has the closest affinity to the people governed and firm in the conviction that the economic and fiscal independence of our local government will better serve and promote the health, safety and welfare of all of the citizens of this City, we do hereby exercise the express right granted by the Constitution of the State of California to enact and adopt this Charter for the City of El Cajon.

CHARTER

Article I Municipal Affairs

Section 100. Municipal Affairs Each of the responsibilities of governance set forth and described in this Charter, and as established by the Constitutional, statutory and judicially defined law of the State of California, is hereby declared to be a municipal affair of concern, the performance of which is unique to the benefit of the citizens of the City of El Cajon.

Section 101. Powers The City shall have all powers that a City can have under the Constitution and laws of the State of California as fully and completely as though they were specifically enumerated in this Charter. The enumeration in this Charter of any particular power, duty or procedure shall not be held to be exclusive of, or any limitation or restriction upon, this general grant of power.

Section 102. Incorporation and Succession The City shall continue to be a municipal corporation known as the City of El Cajon. The boundaries of the City of El Cajon shall continue as now established until changed in the manner authorized by law. The City shall remain vested with and shall continue to own, have, possess, control and enjoy all property rights and rights of action of every nature and description owned, had, possessed, controlled or enjoyed by it at the time this Charter takes effect, and is hereby declared to be the

Page 1 of 4 successor of same. It shall be subject to all debts, obligations and liabilities, which exist against the City at the time this Charter takes effect. All lawful ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations, or portions thereof, in force at the time this Charter takes effect and not in conflict with or inconsistent herewith, are hereby continued in force until the same have been duly repealed, amended, changed or superseded by proper authority.

Article 2 Form of Government

Section 200. Form of Government The municipal government established by this Charter shall be known as the "Council-Manager" form of government. The City Council will establish the policy of the City and the City Manager will carry out that policy.

Article 3 Fiscal Matters

Section 300. Economic and Community Development The City shall encourage, support, and promote economic development and community development in the City.

Section 301. Public Works Contracts The City is exempt from the provisions of all California statutes regulating public contracting and purchasing except as provided by ordinance or by agreement approved by the City Council. The City shall establish all standards, procedures, rules or regulations to regulate all aspects of the bidding, award and performance of any public works contract, including but not limited to, the compensation rates to be paid for the performance of such work.

Section 302. PrevailingWage No City contract shall require payment of the prevailing wage schedule unless: the prevailing wage is legally required, and constitutionally permitted to be imposed, by federal or state grants pursuant to federal or state law; or the project is considered by the City Council not to be a municipal affair of the City; or payment of the prevailing wage schedule is authorized by resolution of the City Council. Payment of the prevailing wage schedule, if authorized hereunder, shall use the pertinent rates published by the State of California.

Section 303. Fair and Open Competition The City shall not, in any contract for the construction, maintenance, repair, or improvement of public works, require that a contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, or carrier engaged in the construction, maintenance, repair or improvement of public works, execute or otherwise become party to any project

Page 2 of 4 labor agreement, collective bargaining agreement, pre-hire agreement, or other agreement with employees, their representatives, or any labor organization as a condition of bidding, negotiating, being awarded, or performing work on a public works contract. Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting private parties from entering into individual collective bargaining relationships, or otherwise as regulating or interfering with activity protected by applicable law, including but not limited to the National Labor Relations Act.

Section 304. Definition of Public Works For purposes of this Article, the term "public works" means: (1) A building, road, street, sewer, storm drain, water system, irrigation system, reclamation project, or other facility owned or to be owned or to be contracted for by the City of EI Cajon, that is paid for in whole with tax revenue paid by residents of the City of EI Cajon; or (2) Any other construction service or non-construction service.

Article 4 Revenue Retention

Section 400. Reductions Prohibited Revenues raised and collected by the City shall not be subject to subtraction, retention, attachment, withdrawal or any other form of involuntary reduction by any other level of government.

Section 401. Mandates Limited No person whether elected or appointed, acting on behalf of the City, shall be required to perform any function which is mandated by any other level of government, unless and until funds sufficient for the performance of such function are provided by said mandating authority.

Article 5 General Laws

Section 500. General Law Powers In addition to the power and authority granted by the terms of this Charter and the Constitution of the State of California, the City shall have the power and authority to adopt, make exercise and enforce all legislation, laws, and regulations and to take all actions and to exercise any and all rights, powers, and privileges heretofore or hereafter established, granted or prescribed by any law of the State of California or by any other lawful authority. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Charter and the provisions of the general laws of the State of California, the provisions ofthis Charter shall control.

Section 501. Council Member Compensation

Page 3 of 4 Notwithstanding the previous paragraph, salary of the Mayor and Council Members will continue to be set by California Government Code §36516, where the formula considers city population and state law.

Article 6 Interpretation

Section 600. Construction and Interpretation The language contained in this Charter is intended to be permissive rather than exclusive or limiting and shall be liberally and broadly construed in favor of the exercise by the City of its power to govern with respect to any matter which is a municipal affair.

Section 601. Severability If any provision of this Charter should be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

Article 7 Amendment

Section 700. Amendment to Charter, Revised or Repealed This Charter, and any of its provisions, may be amended by a majority vote of the electors voting on the question. Amendment or repeal may be proposed by initiative or by the governing body.

AUTHENTICATION AND CERTIFICATION

Authenticated and certified to be a true copy by Mayor Mark Lewis and City Clerk Kathie Rutledge.

Date of Municipal Election: ATTEST:

Mark Lewis, Mayor Kathie Rutledge, City Clerk

Page 4 of 4 11 LEGISL.ATIV'E REPO,RT 20111

COUNCIL BILL STATUS / BILL NO. SPONSOR SUBJECT POSITION COMMITTEE DATE LAST ACTION DATE

The Legislative Report tracks bills for the 2011·2012 Session of the California Legislature that the EI Cajon City Council! Redevelopment Agency has voted to monitor, support or oppose. Page· 1 - Updated March 1, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. for the March 8, 2011 City Council Meeting 11.1

Feb. 18,2011 Issue #19 IN THIS ISSUE: Page 4: DBG Meetings Scheduled for City Officials to Provide Feedback Page 5 Highway User Tax Revenue Updates Posted on CaliforniaCityFinance.com Finding Ways for Your City to Save Money

MORE THAN 900 MAYORS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS SIGN LETTER TO GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATORS URGING REJECTION OF PROPOSAL TO KILL REDEVELOPMENT Hundreds of Council Members and Mayors Say Unconstitutional Proposal Goes Against the Will of Voters and Will Kill Hundreds of Thousands of Local Jobs and Harm Local Economies

More than 900 mayors and city council members signed a letter delivered to Gov. Jerry Brown and the entire Legislature on Thursday, urging them to reject the Administration's proposal to abolish redevelopment in California. The letter was signed by Democrats, Republicans and Independents representing small, medium and large cities, and urban, rural and suburban communities. The mayors and council members warn that this proposal flies in the face of Proposition 22, overwhelmingly passed by voters just three months ago, that it represents more ongoing raids of local funds by the state, and that it will destroy local economic growth and job creation. For more, see Page 2.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LEGISLATURE SENDS REDEVELOPMENT ISSUE TO CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

Today, despite the flurries of phone calls created by yesterday's call to action, the Senate voted for the complete elimination of redevelopment agencies this morning. The Assembly however, adopted language that provides for a potential alternative to elimination. These and all other budget items will be sent to the full BUdget Conference Committee, which is expected to meet next week. For more, see Page 2.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

CONGRESS CONTINUES TO CONSIDER MAJOR PROGRAM CUTS Continuing Resolutions to Expire March 4

Two budget fights are presently happening in Washington, D.C. with major implications for cities: Congress has yet to pass a FY 2011 budget and earlier this week, President Barack Obama released his FY 2012 budget proposal. For more, see Page 3. '900 Mayors' Continued from Page 1...

Chris McKenzie, Executive Director of the League of California Cities, said: "This strong repudiation by hundreds of locally-elected officials reflects the overwhelming and widespread opposition that has been mobilized against the Administration's proposal from local government, business, labor, housing, community groups, and others throughout California. Local leaders are .tired of the state coming in and raiding local funds, and they're reacting forcefully and viscerally to kill this unconstitutional proposal that will destroy local job creation and economic recovery."

The letter reads, in part:

"We stand ready to work with the Administration and the Legislature to pass an honest budget that finally puts California on the road to fiscal health. However, it is important to ensure that no decisions are made ... that will make our financial problems worse."

"Unfortunately, the Administration's proposal to abolish redevelopment represents more of the same State raids oflocal funds that voters have fought to prevent, and it will jeopardize the State's prospects for an economic recovery."

'The proposal will not provide budget savings to the State or local governments..." but "(e)liminating redevelopment will have a direct and lasting negative impact on the California economy and job creation."

"We strongly urge you to reject this measure and refocus on proposals that offer real solutions to California's budget problems."

City leaders have warned that the proposal to abolish redevelopment is unconstitutional, violating numerous provisions of the state and federal constitutions. Additionally, eliminating redevelopment will have a direct and lasting negative impact on the California economy and job creation. • Redevelopment activities support an average of 304,000 full- and part-time private sector jobs in a typical year, including 170,600 construction jobs; • Redevelopment contributes over $40 billion annually to California's economy in the generation of goods and services; and • Redevelopment construction activities generate $2 billion in state and local taxes in a typical year.

Over the last few weeks, hundreds of local officials and community leaders have come to Sacramento to lobby legislators and testify in committee hearings, they've held press events in their communities highlighting the perils of the proposal, and they've logged thousands of phone calls, letters and personal meetings with legislators and staff.

For more information visit www.ProtectOurLocaIEconomy.com.

'Budget' Continued from Page 1...

Assembly

In a departure from the normal process, the Assembly Budget Committee arranged a vote on all subcommittee actions as a package rather than by line item. This committee hearing represents the only full budget committee hearing the Assembly will hold between subcommittees and the conference committee. The package ultimately passed on a party-line vote.

Each subcommittee chair presented the results of their subcommittee's work, and then committee members were given an opportunity to ask questions and make statements. Assembly Members Dan Logue (R-Linda) and Bill Berryhill (R-Ceres) raised concerns about the proposal to eliminate redevelopment, citing the lack of language and concerns that the proposal is constitutional.

The Department of Finance (DOF) responded that language would be available next week. DOF also recognized that there are difficulties with the proposal, but indicated that they could work around any constitutional issues. Assembly Member Luis Alejo (D-Salinas) indicated an interest 2 in preserving redevelopment and enterprise zones in some form. Chair Bob Blumenfield (0 Woodland Hills) sent a message to interested parties that if they have ideas for reform the door was open, but only for a short time. He was clear that any redevelopment reforms must include $1.7 billion for the General Fund and more money for schools and other local government.

Also of interest to cities, the Assembly package included the Gas Tax Swap reenactment, an amended version of the Governor's public safety realignment proposal, and cuts to State Parks. The details of the approved package are posted online at http://www.budgettrack.netiPortals/21/BudgetTrack/Oocs11/1326. pdf#xml=http://www. budgettrac k.net/desktop modules/budgettrack/pdfhitbuilder.aspx?file=1326.pdf&btsession=4&uid=493.

Senate

Prior to voting, the Senate Budget Committee members spent time discussing the implications of eliminating redevelopment. While OaF acknowledged by that language was unavailable, the OaF representative the committee that all "valid" contractual obligations would be respected.

Chair Mark Leno (O-San Francisco) noted that OaF assured him that the popular Transbay Terminal Project in San Francisco would not be impaired.

Other members asked questions about the impact of eliminating redevelopment on the state's budget. Sen. Lois Wolk (O-Oavis) remarked that her main concern was the cost to the state for backfilling losses to schools for property tax shares captured during the life of redevelopment project areas.

OaF and the Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) were questioned by Senators Mark OeSaulnier, (0 Concord), Alan Lowenthal (O-Long Beach), Rod Wright (O-Los Angeles) and Bill Emmerson (R Riverside) about the impact of eliminating redevelopment on the state budget. OaF and LAO representatives confirmed repeatedly that the state will receive no budget savings from eliminating redevelopment in future years because the Governor's proposal does not count freed up school property tax against the state's funding obligation under Proposition 98. LAO pointed out that this was a "policy choice" for the body to decide. Ultimately, the committee voted to pass the proposal on a party line vote.

Thus the political dance continues with state representatives claiming that eliminating redevelopment is necessary to offset state budget expenses, but admitting that the proposal has no such state budget benefit in the out years. Among the strongest advocates for the Administration's proposal to eliminate redevelopment in earlier subcommittee hearings was the politically powerful California Teachers Association.

Next Steps

While redevelopment agency authority remains in danger, there still is a ways to go in the political process. However the measure is drafted, it is bound to have numerous constitutional flaws. The two-house Budget Conference Committee will convene next week where the redevelopment issue will be revisited again. Floor votes will follow in the first or second week of March. Many other issues will also come into play, including the effort to secure two-thirds votes to place the Administration's proposals to extend state taxes on the ballot for a June special election.

City officials should continue to meet with their legislators on this important issue and hold them accountable for votes that will have dire consequences for local communities.

'Congress' Continued from Page 1...

FY 2011 Standoff

Since last October, the federal government has been operating on Continuing Resolutions (CRs), basically using the same funding levels as the prior year. But the current CRs will expire on Friday, March 4, and without action the federal government will come to a standstill.

3 House Republicans this week released the language to HR 1, the proposed funding bill for the remainder of FY 2011. The proposal slashes $100 billion from current year spending. Even if HR 1 passes the House, it is unlikely to become law due to the Democratic majority in the Senate and a promise from President Obama to veto the bill. This is leading to a standoff that could reach far beyond March 4.

There are several programs proposed for termination or cuts by the Republicans in FY 2011 that are of interest to cities, including: Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) hiring, Weatherization Assistance Program, and Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). Earlier this week the League sent a request for cities to ask their federal representatives to support full funding for CDBG as this program is viewed as being one of the most vulnerable. This is especially important as the House prepares to vote on a 62.5 percent (or $2.5 billion) cut and we enter into a weeklong break for Congress.

FY 2012 Budget Proposal Released

On Monday, President Obama released his budget proposal for FY 2012 which begins on Oct. 1, 2011. The proposal will result in a deficit reduction more than $1 trillion in the next 10 years and includes a freeze on discretionary spending for five years on all non-security programs.

Of importance to cities, the President proposes increases to public transit, high-speed rail, and COPS hiring grants. However, the President proposes cutting CDBG by 7.5 percent, and eliminating the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants altogether.

As budget discussions continue on the federal level, cities should take the opportunity to express their support for these programs.

COSG Meetings Scheduled for City Officials to Provide Feedback

The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) will hold a series of roundtable discussions throughout the state from Feb. 22 - March 9 regarding the state Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Local government officials will have the opportunity to attend one of the scheduled meetings or webinars to learn about future changes to the state CDBG program and provide important feedback.

Meeting discussions will include ideas on how to continue business with reduced staffing for the program and how to distribute state CDBG funding in the future. This program is for counties with fewer than 200,000 residents in unincorporated areas and cities with fewer than 50,000 residents that are not participants in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement program.

Scheduled Meeting Dates

Feb. 22, Coachella, Noon-3 p.m. City Hall, Council Chambers 1515 Sixth Street

Feb. 24, Sacramento, 1-4 p.m. California Room (470) 1800 3rd Street

March 1, Anderson, 9 a.m.-Noon Community Center 1887 Howard Street

March 2, Fort Bragg, Noon-3 p.m. Town Hall 363 North Main Street

March 3, Crescent City, 9 a.m.-Noon 4 Del Norte County Flynn Administrative Center 981 H Street

March 8, Visalia, 9 a.m.-Noon County of Tulare Main Conference Room Government Plaza 5961 S. Mooney Blvd.

March 9, Salinas, 1-4 p.m. County of Monterey, The Monterey Room, 2rd Floor 168 W. Alisal Street

CDSG Roundtable Discussion Webinars

Wednesday, March 16, 1 p.m. Register online for this Webex meeting at https://hcd.webex.com/hcd/Lphp?ED=164375682&RG=1 &UID=O&RT=MiMO

Thursday, March 17, 1 p.m. Register online for this Webex meeting at https://hcd.webex.com/hcd/Lphp?ED=164375692&RG=1&UID=0&RT=MiMO

Once the host approves your webinar registration request, a confirmation e-mail will be sent with instructions for joining the meeting.

Agenda Topics

• Review the problem • Method of Distribution (Super-NOFA) • 2009 comparison with the Super-NOFA • Regulation changes • Timeframe for the Super-NOFA release • Open discussion

HCD recommends completing the registration form (http://www.cacities.org/resource files/29541.CDBGRoundtableattenanceForm.doc) to help reserve enough space for the potential number of attendees in each meeting. Please e-mail the attached form to [email protected].

Highway User Tax Revenue Updates Posted on CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Newly updated city and county gas tax revenue estimates for FY 2010-11 and FY 2011-12 are now available on the California Local Government Finance Almanac's website at http://www.californiacityfinance.com/HUTAupdate11 0214.pdf. The new agency-by-agency estimates are based on statewide estimates from the Gov. Jerry Brown's FY 2011-12 proposed budget released last month. Included in the update are Highway User Tax (HUT) revenues allocated under Streets and Highways Code Sec 2104-2107.5 and Proposition 42 replacement HUT revenues allocated under Streets and Highways Code Sec2103.

Finding Ways for Your City to Save Money

Looking at your city's banking relationships offers a painless way of recovering and generating revenue for our cash-strapped cities.

This involves three options: • Examining your bank's fees and services; 5 • Considering purchasing card/electronic vendor payment programs that provide a rebate to your city; and • Making the most of the Community Reinvestment Act for your city.

After looking at its fee schedule and earnings with its current bank, the city of Carson switched to a regional bank and saved $75,000 in fees annually. "We're also enjoying great service," reports City Treasurer Karen Avilla.

To learn more, read "Making the Most of Your Banking Relationship" online at http://www.westerncity.com/Western-City/January-2011 /Making-the-Most-of-Your-Banking Relationship on WesternCity.com.

6 11.1

Feb. 23, 2011 Issue #20

UPDATES

BUDGET CONFERENCE COMMITTEE TO MEET TODAY Realignment, Public Safety, Enterprise Zones and Redevelopment all to be Debated

Yesterday, Assembly Member Bob Blumenfield (D-Woodland Hills), Budget Conference Committee chair announced the committee's conferees. The Senate will be represented by Sens. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco), Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), Gloria Negrete McLeod (D Chino), Bill Emmerson (R-Riverside) and Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar). The Assembly will be represented by Asms. Blumenfield, Felipe Fuentes (D-Slymar), Diane Harkey (R-Dana Point), Jim Nielsen (R-Gerber), and Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley). For more, see Page 2.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 'Conference Committee' Continued from Page 1...

The Conference Committee meets today at 10 a.m. and is scheduled to take up a variety of issues affecting local government, including redevelopment and enterprise zones. The agenda which has been posted on the Senate website at http://www.senate.ca.gov/ftp/SEN/COMMITTEE/STANDING/BFR/ home/201112ConfComMajorl ssues.pdf. The enterprise zone discussion is listed in the agenda on page 5, while the redevelopment discussion is listed on page 7.

Public safety realignment is first on the agenda. Because it relates to COPS and Booking Fees funding, this discussion is especially important to local government. Also of importance, is the broader of issue of the realignment of health and human services to counties, which includes such issues as potential reallocation of state prisoners to county jails. Counties are currently being told that funding for this realignment will come from proposed tax increases which would be effective for five years. After five years, the state has promised constitutional protections for continuing revenue for realignment. However, given the experience with constitutional protections and redevelopment, it remains a fair question whether the state will ultimately honor those protections for future county revenues.

Other likely controversial topics today include the single sales factor and increasing pressure from outside groups for pension reform.

Sen. Blumenfield has requested that the Budget Conference Committee also meet:

• Thursday, Feb. 24 at 11:00 a.m. in Room 4202

• Friday, Feb. 25, at 10:00 a.m. Room TBA

• Saturday, Feb. 26, Upon Call of the Chair, Room 4203

• Sunday, Feb. 27, Upon Call of the Chair, Room 4203

The notices will appear in both the Senate and Assembly Daily Files on Wednesday, Feb. 23, 2011.

2 11.1 Weeki

Feb. 25, 2011 Issue #21 IN THIS ISSUE: Page 5: Apply Now for EPA Smart Growth Achievement Award Navigating the Complex Rules on Gifts: What Public Officials Need to Know

LEGAL AND OPERATIONAL FLAWS EXPOSED WITH GOVERNOR'S RDA ELIMINATION PLAN Legislative Counsel Says Governor's Plan Violates Proposition 22

Aided by the availability of Gov. Jerry Brown's actual language detailing the proposed elimination of redevelopment agencies, Budget Conference Committee members began to grapple today with the meaning and complexities involved with the potential elimination of almost 400 redevelopment agencies operating under the fabric of 65 years of state law and constitutional authority. For more, see Page 2.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION RELEASES PENSION REPORT Calls for Pension Roll-Back for Current State and Local Government Workers

The Little Hoover Commission released a report yesterday urging the Governor and the Legislature to establish the legal authority for the state and local government to freeze pension benefits for current workers. The bipartisan and independent state agency is charged with recommending ways to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of state programs. For more, see Page 4.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD HOLDS WATER QUALITY FEE MEETING

Earlier today, the State Water Resources Control Board held its annual water quality stakeholder meeting to review the state Waste Discharge Permit Fund (WDPF) condition and the potential for fee increases later this year in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR), Stormwater and Land Disposal areas. Ultimately, the action to approve the potential fee increases will not occur until later this fall. For more, see Page 4. 'Redevelopment' Continued from Page 1...

Committee members queried representatives of the Department of Finance (DOF) and the Legislative Analyst (LAO) on a host of technical and legal issues: • Who would administer the duties of "successor agency?" • Who holds the liability for toxic proposal if a successor agency does not step forward? • What happens to projects that are important, but not quite under construction? • How can brownfields be cleaned up that the private sector does not want to do if this tool goes away? • Proposition 22 was mentioned often. • DOF and LOA staff were also queried on the "Big 8" alternative proposal to allow for securitization of RDA revenue streams to generate a one-time $1.7 billion, in exchange for automatic 10-year project life extensions. Staff raised a variety of concerns related to Proposition 22, Proposition 58, and the high costs associated with borrowing and granting time extensions.

But the capper came when a representative from the Legislative Counsel of California, which reviews all legislation for legality, indicated the Governor's effort to take $1.7 billion to fund state services as part of a proposal to abolish redevelopment appeared to be illegal under Prop. 22.

When asked by Assembly Member Felipe Fuentes (D-Slymar) to opine on the legality of the Administration's proposal, the lawyer from Leg Counsel's office responded:

"Prop. 22 specifically prohibits the legislature from, urn, enacting a statute that requires an (redevelopment) agency to transfer tax increment money for the benefit of the State or agency of the State orany jurisdiction (emphasis added). So, that, on the face of it, may be problematic."

To view the testimony visit www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Gv7LkGLEIM.

Assembly Member Diane Harkey (R-Dana Point) read language from the ballot title and summary prepared by the then-Attorney General Brown for Prop. 22, which assured voters the measure protected redevelopment funds. The verbatim language used in the ballot title was:

"PROHIBITS THE STATE FROM BORROW/NG OR TAKING FUNDS USED FOR TRANSPORTATION, REDEVELOPMENT, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROJECTS AND SERVICES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits the State, even during severe fiscal hardship, from delaying distribution oftax revenues for these purposes."

It is not without irony that the Governor and some legislators who are currently citing their respect for the wisdom and perspective of the voters as they seek to place $14 billion in tax extensions on the ballot, are so willingly to ignore the actions taken by these same voters less than four months ago when they passed Prop. 22 by more than 60 percent.

Governor's Language on Redevelopment Elimination Finally Released

The long-delayed language. containing the details of the Governor's proposed elimination of redevelopment was released on Wednesday. Please go to: www.dof.ca.gov/budgeting/trailer bill language/financial research and local government/docu ments/502%20RDA%20Legislation%202-23p.pdf

The League urges city managers and city attorneys to carefully review this language. The effects of this proposal would have dire consequences for cities, projects, and jobs. It also includes a provision which could undo redevelopment actions since the beginning of the year.

This latest state scheme to raid local funds will surely face strong constitutional challenges, based upon the language of Prop. 22 and other Constitutional provisions. The language also conveys a condescending tone toward the important work done by local officials and their communities.

2 The legislation would force cities that want to keep their rightful share of property taxes dedicated to redevelopment to become a "successor agency." This new agency would be subject to the dictates of an oversight board stacked with representatives who will have little accountability or concern for the welfare of the specific community. It would also be subject to oversight by the OOF, the State Controller and the County Auditor.

The loss of local authority for many is too high of a price to pay for years of subjugation. Either way however, the design of this mechanism will span disputes and harm relations between local agencies, whether they agreed with the cuts and taxes or not.

Governor Visits Conference Committee Thursday

Gov. Jerry Brown made a rare appearance before the Budget Conference Committee on Thursday.

The Governor - with a message primarily admonishing Republican legislators - insisted that legislators pass his proposed spending cuts (including the elimination of redevelopment agencies) and place his proposed $14 billion in annual tax extensions on the June ballot.

Sen. Bob Huff (R-Oiamond Bar) challenged the Governor of the representation that his plan was truly a balanced package of cuts and tax extensions. The Senator pointed out that many of the actions counted as "cuts" are not really cutting state programs, but are cutting local programs such as redevelopment. Republican legislators also expressed concern about the lack of bill lanquaqe and details for the Governor's proposal to realign over $6 billion in state health, social service and corrections responsibilities to counties that would be funded by a portion of the five year temporary tax extensions.

Assembly Member Felipe Fuentes (O-Slymar) spoke of his positive experience with the benefits of redevelopment and asked the Governor if he was open to alternatives short of elimination. While acknowledging his own experience with redevelopment as mayor of Oakland, the Governor's response was cool and noncommittal.

Regarding realignment, Sen. Bill Emmerson (R-Riverside) expressed concerns over the lack of language on the proposal. In response, the Governor promised the committee that language would be available by Monday, Feb. 28.

There was also mention of a possible "Big 8" alternative proposal to eliminating redevelopment which would allow for the state to essentially borrow redevelopment funds to solve the budget crisis; however the Governor was quick to dismiss it.

Next Steps

The Budget Committee's staff will continue to work over the weekend. A vote on this issue could occur as early next week. Legislators also appeared interested in a concept floated by Sen. Huff in which agencies that voluntarily agree to dedicate 10 percent of RDA funding toward a state securitization concept could be rewarded with 40-year extensions of project area lifespans. More legislative staff research will go into this proposal.

City officials with legislators on the Conference Committee should continue to urge them to oppose the Governor's redevelopment elimination proposal. The redevelopment proposal is flagged an urgency bill, requiring a two-thirds vote in each house. It will take Republican votes as well (at least two in each house) to get the tax extensions on the ballot because of the two-thirds vote requirement.

The League has put out a response to the contents of the language. City officials can use this as the basis of how to address this issue with Budget Conference Committee members. Please go to: www.cacities.org/resource files/29560.ROA%20Talking%20Points%20FINAL.pdf

Budget Conference Committee members are: 3 • Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco); • Sen. Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach); • Sen. Gloria Negrete McLeod (D-Chino); • Sen. Bill Emmerson (R-Riverside); • Sen. Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar; • Assembly Member Bob. Blumenfield (D-Woodland Hills); • Assembly Member Felipe Fuentes (D-Slymar); • Assembly Member Diane Harkey (R-Dana Point); • Assembly Member Jim Nielsen (R-Gerber; and • Assembly Member Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley).

'Little Hoover' Continued from Page 1...

The Commission recommends that going forward, current workers accrue benefits under more sustainable pension plans and payments to retirees would not be affected under these recommendations.

In its report, Public Pensions for Retirement Securitv. the Commission recommends a "hybrid" model that combines a lower defined-benefit pension formula with an employer-matched and risk managed defined-contribution plan. The Commission also suggests the state explore options to extend Social Security old-age benefits to all uncovered state and local public employees, following a model adopted for federal employees 25 years ago.

The Commission acknowledges the legal challenges these recommendations pose, but also made recommendations to set uniform standards for the 85 defined-benefit pension plans in California, including:

• A cap in the $80,000-90,000 range of the maximum salary that could be used to calculate pension benefits; • Eligibility ages for pension benefits that do no encourage early retirement; • A requirement that employees and employers share the normal costs of funding their pensions plans; • Clear definitions of final compensation to prevent "spiking;" • A prohibition against contribution "holidays" when employer to not pay into the funds; • A ban on retroactive pension increases; and • Steps to improve accountability and transparency.

The League will continue to monitor this issue. Please direct any questions to Natasha Karl at [email protected].

'Water' Continued from Page 1...

It is important to keep in mind that the potential fee increases will likely change (although not likely to go up any higher than currently projected) based on the final state budget which is expected to be adopted sometime between March and June. In the fall, and through emergency regulation, the State Board will adopt its final budget. Any fee increases would be implemented after the Board finalizes its budget, towards the end of 2011.

Much of the potential fee increases come from the Governor's proposed budget, which potentially will shift general fund revenues to fee based revenues for NPDES and basin planning programs. In today's call, SWRCB staff noted that based on current budget forecasts and state budget 4 proposals could have the overall fund see fee increases averaging 20 percent in FY 2011-12. They also noted that today's numbers are still preliminary and will not be final until the State Board adopts their budget this fall.

Program FY2011-12 Potential Fee Increases NPDES program 27 percent WDR 8.6 percent Land Disposal (no tip fee) 18.7 percent Land Disposal (tip fee) 12.3 percent Stormwater 17.4 percent

League staff will keep reporting on future discussions on the potential water quality fee increases as they progress over the next few months. If you have specific questions on these programs or potential fee increases, contact Kyra Ross at [email protected] or Jennifer Whiting at [email protected].

Apply Now for EPA Smart Growth Achievement Award April 6 Application Deadline

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is pleased to announce that the application period for the 10th annual National Award for Smart Growth Achievement is now open. This award recognizes and supports communities that have successfully used smart growth principles to improve communities environmentally, socially, and economically. Open to public- and private sector entity award recipients (although all applications must include a public-sector partner) will be recognized at a ceremony in Washington, D.C., in December 2011. Awards will be given in the categories of Programs, Policies, and Regulations; Smart Growth and Green Building; Civic Places; and Rural Smart Growth. An "Overall Excellence" winner will be chosen from the four categories by the review panels.

To view the application and complete entry guidelines, please visit www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/awards.htm#2011app. Applications are due April 6.

Additional information about developing and implementing cost-effective climate and energy strategies that help further environmental goals and achieve public health and economic benefits is available on the EPA website at www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate.

Navigating the Complex Rules on Gifts: What Public Officials Need to Know

The law related to public officials' acceptance of gifts is complicated, and the concept of a "gift" is extremely broad. Here are three key points to keep in mind:

• Gifts from family members (as defined in Fair Political Practices Commission regulations) are OK and not subject to gift limit and reporting requirements; and • Gifts of approximately equal value that you exchange with friends for birthdays, holidays and similar occasions are OK and not subject to gift limit and reporting requirements. • Everything else is subject to fairly complex rules, and violating the rules carries severe penalties. To avoid inadvertently breaking the laws that govern public officials' acceptance of gifts, read "When Someone Does Something Nice for You: Practical Questions for Public Officials to Ask." Please see www.westerncity.comlWestern-City/February-2011/Gifts-Part-1-When-Someone Does-Something-Nice-For-You-Practical-Q uestions-for-Public-Officials-to-Ask/.

This article is an installment of the "Everyday Ethics for Local Officials" column in Western City magazine and part of an ongoing series about the gift laws.

5 11.1

Feb. 28, 2011 Issue #22

UPDATES

BUDGET CONFERENCE COMMITTEE CONTINUES TO MEET

The BUdget Conference Committee is meeting again today to discuss SB 69, the state's budget bill, after last week's unexpected admission by the Legislative Counsel of California that the Governor's proposal to end redevelopment was likely illegal under Proposition 22. Please see the Feb. 25 issue of City Advocate Weekly at http://www.cacities.orglindex.jsp?zone=locc&previewStory=28405 for more information.

The Budget Conference Committee is made up of Sens. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco), Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), Gloria Negrete McLeod (D-Chino), Bill Emmerson (R-Riverside) and Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar) and Asms. Blumenfield, Felipe Fuentes (D-Slymar), Diane Harkey (R Dana Point), Jim Nielsen (R-Gerber), and Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley).

Detailed information on the Budget Conference Committee process has been posted on the Senate website at http://www.sen.ca.gov/budget/

The Committee is scheduled to meet every day for the rest of the week.

City officials should continue to urge their legislators on the Conference Committee to oppose the proposal which has been flagged as an urgency bill, requiring a two-thirds vote in each house. The League has put out a response to the contents of the language which city officials can use as the basis of how to address this issue with Budget Conference Committee members. The response is available on the League's website at http://www.cacities.erg/resource files/29560. RDA%20Talking%20Points%20FINAL.pdf.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11.1

Mar. 2, 2011 Issue #23

UPDATES

HOOVER COMMISSION PENSION REPORT BECOMES PRINCIPAL FOCUS OF LEGISLATIVE HEARING

A joint orientation hearing of the Assembly and Senate PERS Committees is typically an opportunity for the members to meet with public employee stakeholder groups and identify priorities for this legislative session. Today, however, it was a very different scene during the bi annual hearing when the topic turned to the Little Hoover Commission's (Commission) recent report on public employee pensions. For more, see Page 2.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

GOVERNOR BROWN OFFERS REVISION TO REALIGNMENT PLAN FOR CORRECTIONS, FIRE RESPONSE

The Brown Administration released revised portions of its realignment plan this week impacting local public safety services, specifically corrections and fire service response, based on discussions with local stakeholders and testimony provided during the many budget subcommittee hearings. For more, see Page 2.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

NEW PROGRAM OPTIONS FROM CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES TRANS WEBINARS

The 2011 California Communities TRANs program has new features with greater flexibility. Please join one of two informational webinars describing the new Flexible Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (Flex-TRANs) Program. The newly improved program will offer rolling enrollment dates and monthly issuances commencing July 1 through Nov. 1. For more, see Page 3. 'Pensions' Continued from Page 1...

The Public Pensions for Retirement Security (http://www.lhc.ca.gov/studies/204/Report204.pdD report released last week by the Commission has received a vast and varying amount of attention for its recommendation that going forward, current workers should accrue benefits under more sustainable pension plans. The League first reported on this in the Feb. 25 issue of City Advocate Weekly (http://www.cacities.org/resource files/29569.Feb25.pdf). Essentially, the Commission wants the Legislature to consider options for public agencies to reduce benefits for current employees.

In its report, the Commission acknowledges that there is extensive case law that establishes pension benefits as a vested right to employees. However, it has indicated that public sector employers should have the same options as their private sector counterparts to change future un accrued benefits for current employees to allow "governments to reduce their overall liabilities."

League Deputy Executive Director Dwight Stenbakken testified at the hearing today, highlighting what has occurred already at the local level. He emphasized that many cities and their public employees are negotiating changes to pensions and other benefits.

Both chairs, Assembly Member Warren Furatani (D-Gardenia) and Sen. Gloria Negrete McLeod (D-Chino), acknowledged that pension reforms must be made and noted that their committees will be working on the issue this year.

The labor coalition was represented at the hearing by David Low with California School Employees Association and Terry Brennand of the SEIU State Council. Both expressed criticism of the Commission's report.

Gov. Jerry Brown, while campaigning for office, indicated that he wanted to implement pension reforms that are both fair to employees as well as taxpayers. The Governor has yet to release a specific proposal.

'Realignment' Continued from Page 1...

Parole and Incarceration

Gov. Jerry Brown's revised plan makes changes to the his January proposal in the areas of inmate supervision, probation, parole, court security, juvenile justice, and public safety mandates, in response to concerns from law enforcement associations that local facilities are not equipped to handle the potential new inmate population types or levels.

Most notably, the plan withdraws the broad realignment of non-serious, non-violent, and non-sex state inmates from the state to county facilities. Rather, it redefines which type of convictions would make state inmate ineligible for local incarceration including solicitation for murder, felony child abuse, felony domestic violence, assault on a peace officer and human trafficking. A full list of these offenses has been posted on the League's website at http://www.cacities.org/resource files/29575.RealignmentCrimeExclusionList.pdf.

Parole agreements would also follow these guidelines as well, while all other non-serious, non violent, non-sexual convictions ("non-non-nons") would fall under county jurisdiction. Counties would still be expected to manage the "non-non-nons" with, for example, records of petty theft with a prior conviction, drug possession, grand theft and fraud. The budget also provides additional funding for county-level inmates serving in jail for more than three years.

While it is a promising step for the state to maintain jurisdiction over the most serious parolees, some argue this split-level system, which relies on different models for parole revocation and supervision at the state and local levels, may hinder the goals of reducing recidivism rates and improving community safety.

Also, because the Governor's January budget assumed a greater savings in public safety, in order to still achieve savings the revised realignment plan repeals state-mandate reimbursement

2 opportunities for various local public safety programs including costs for domestic violence arrest standards and victim treatment, and child-abduction and recovery services.

Fire Service in State Responsibility Areas

The other major revision makes changes to the reassignment of lands currently under the responsibility of CALFIRE, also known as state responsibility areas (SRA). The January proposal would have directed the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to assess SRAs with higher levels of development and deem them "urban," placing them under the responsibility of the adjacent city, county or fire protection district.

Fire service stakeholders and the Legislative Analyst Office raised many concerns with the original proposal. This included an over-assumption of potential savings that could be realized, the long duration of the reassignment process, and the harm it could cause to air response capabilities and the statewide mutual aid network.

Now, the proposal instead focuses on existing contracts between local agencies and CALFIRE, shifting the funding source but not the scope on current agreements with six local JPAs and dependent and independent representing the counties of Kern, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Santa Barbara, and Ventura.

The League will provide additional details on these and other realignment proposals as more information it becomes available.

'Webinars' Continued from Page 1...

The webinars will be a combination of audio and PowerPoint presentations. Please use one of the following links to register in advance for either webinar:

Tuesday, March 8 from 10- 11am (http://r20.rs6.netftn.jsp?lIr=y05gegcab&et=11 04681395315&5=1 &e=001IPFr3ROMSlggDzN2Em 2hzFzZzixPBCGAsRB UbofpE8BM wkvZ09T59dUmCai?5r1 gPXPBflUWXabWN9 wrDLLZny- ODggXlyiepMvX3uzgRN8CZRb-Qyj8YCBUIDX9HrnyxBnMcHk3h1LfxHEmBQ==)

Thursday, March 10 from 10 -11 am (http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?lIr=y05gegcab&et=11 04681395315&s=1 &e=001IPFr3ROMSlpzEyUoILH g1wK-Lw xHCcgeaVLtWT4gml8aK NbHsRDltW90PXgtWlipzdV1TUg? J-ej8yM8XWC3NhnL tMWUKtvdwgPto-z8iKkzA?44uOmG6AwSgT7hH6XzspO?pYyoF8CxCZwnXg==)

Both webinars will contain the same information. A confirmation e-mail will be sent with log-in and dial-in instructions after registering.

Webinar Topics

• Short Term Municipal Market Overview • TRANs Issuance • Optional stand-alone or pooled TRANs • Shorter maturity options available • Economies of scale to achieve lower costs • Timelines - Rolling program enrollment deadlines • Questions and Answers

Time will be allowed for a question and answer session after the presentation. During the webinar you can 'raise your hand' using the webinar tool. Your line will then be un-muted and you will be recognized by the presenters so that you may ask your question(s).

If you have any questions or problems regarding the presentation or the program, please contact Jake Bayham of California Communities at (925) 933-9229 x230 or [email protected]. 3 13.1

ORDINANCE NO. _

AN ORDINANCE PREZONING UNINCORPORATED PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MAIN STREET BETWEEN PEPPER DRIVE AND LAVALA LANE AS C-G (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE; GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC), ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2261, APNs: 400-250-07, -08, -09 AND -28.

WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on July 12, 2005, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny Zone Reclassification Application No. 2261, as set-forth in PC Resolution No. 10124; and

WHEREAS, Zone Reclassification Application No. 2261 is a request to prezone four parcels of unincorporated land located on the east side of East Main Street between Pepper Drive and Lavala Lane as C-G (General Commercial) Zone as a prerequisite of annexation of the property to the City of EI Cajon (APNs 400-250-07, -08, -09, and -28); and

WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report (No. 74) was prepared for a Home Depot retail store development on this property; and

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 129-99 on July 27, 1999, certifying EIR No. 74, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to avoid or substantially lessen impacts of the proposed project; and

WHEREAS, on July 12, 2005, the City Council adopted an Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report No. 74 for this project, and it has reviewed and considered the information contained therein; and

WHEREAS, at its public hearing on July 12, 2005, the City Council considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff, and thereafter upheld the appeal and approved the prezoning request.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CAJON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Based upon the record as a whole, the City Council hereby makes the following findings:

A. All the recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference;

B. The prezoning of the subject properties to the C-G Zone is consistent with the City General Plan General Commercial land use designation governing the subject properties upon annexation to the City;

(Continued on Page 2) Page 2 of 2, Ordinance No. _

C. The C-G Zone is consistent with the applicable objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan because it is intended to accommodate general retail uses; and

D. Prezoning the subject properties to the C-G Zone is in the best interest of public necessity, convenience and general welfare because it will allow for the subsequent annexation of the four parcels which are surrounded by the City of EI Cajon on three sides and all City services are readily available to serve the subject properties.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby PREZONES Assessor Parcel Numbers 400-250 07, -08, -09 and -28 C-G (General Commercial) Zone as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective at the same time that the annexation becomes effective.

3/8/11 (Item 13.1)

ZR 2261 Home Depot ------1/ I I

...------....I Subject properties to be zoned e-G

Exhibit "A" City Council Ordinance No. Zone Reclassification No. 2261 1~1tW IJf HliJlllllJ MEETING: March 8, 2011 General Information "A"

DATE: March 1, 2011

TO: Mayor Lewis, Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick, Councilmembers Hanson-Cox, McClellan, and Wells

FROM: Deputy City Manager/Director ofPublic Works/City Engineer

SUBJECT: 2010 Annual School Review

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept and file the 2010 Annual School Review report.

BACKGROUND: The Annual School Review has been conducted since 1990. The attached report details requests related to traffic issues made by all public and private elementary, middle, and high schools within the City ofEI Cajon.

FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time pending possible future actions required as noted in the attached report.

PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: ~T~ ,t!IJ#1~. Rob Turner Kathi J. Henry d DEPUTY CITY MANAGER CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER 2010 ANNUAL SCHOOL REVIEW

Background This is the City's Annual School Review for the period from December 2009 through December 2010. This review, as those in the past, contains surveys from the Principals of EI Cajon schools, both public and private. All of these surveys have been summarized to include comments pertaining to either Public Works Traffic Engineering or the Police Department (see attachments). Items related to on-site concerns not under the control of the City will be referred to the School District for possible action. Also included with the review is a table summarizing a number of items completed over previous years at each school (see attachments). For each of the schools reviewed, the school safety review table includes the following information:

1. School 2. Speed limit on fronting street 3. Street classification and number of lanes 4. Traffic volumes 5. School patrol locations 6. Approximate numbers of children using school patrolled crossings 7. Accident information 8. Dates of previous service request reviews 9. General comments/requests

Based on this year's review, the overall conditions were again quite satisfactory at the majority of schools. Several of the schools continue to be concerned with vehicle speeds, parents disregarding directions made by School staff.. and traffic congestion in general. Fortunately, traffic congestion adjacent to the schools occurs for about 20 minutes at the morning school start time and then again at the afternoon dismissal time.

In the past year, the City replaced all existing school zone warning signs to be in compliance with the latest California Manual on Uniform on Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) standards.

Accident History During the past year (December 2009 through December 2010) there was one (1) accident involving a vehicle versus a school age pedestrian(s) for which a report was taken. There. was one accident involving a school-age pedestrian in the previous year as well.

This particular accident occurred at the intersection of Mollison Avenue Street at Madison Avenue in the general vicinity of Cajon Valley Middle School. This accident involved a vehicle making a northbound right-turn from Mollison Avenue to Madison Avenue colliding with a school-age pedestrian crossing the street in the crosswalk. The cause of this accident was the attributed to the driver not paying attention and failing to yield to the pedestrian in the crosswalk. A review of this accident did not reveal any field conditions that could be changed or corrected to prevent this type of accident other than greater awareness for both the motorist and the school-age pedestrian.

1 2010 SCHOOL REVIEW - ACCIDENT SUMMARY DECEMBER 31, 2009 TO DECEMBER 31, 2010

SCHOOL INJURY LOCATION X-WALK DATE AGE Cajon Valley Minor Mollison Ave./Madison Ave. Yes 05-21-10 13 Middle School

Conclusion and Recommendations The City annually applies for the "Safe Routes to School" Program Grant that would potentially install additional school sidewalks, traffic signal countdown pedestrian signal heads, and more vehicle speed feedback signs at key schools. The "Safe Routes to School" program is an annual State and Federally funded program administered by Caltrans that agencies competitively submit grant applications to help pay for safety improvements near schools. The City will apply this year and hopefully obtain grant funding in the future.

At the beginning of each school year, the vehicle speed radar trailer is placed adjacent at some of the key schools and will be placed in front of others throughout the year to remind motorists of the 25 mph speed zones when children are present. It should also be noted that the Police Department regularly rotates enforcement at schools, particularly at the beginning of the school year and this enforcement continues throughout the school year as time and staffing permits. The Police Department continues to provide a full time Police Officer at all public High Schools. During 2010, the Police Department conducted regular enforcement in and around elementary and middle schools throughout the City as-needed. This effort included targeting speeders and other types of violations before and after school when most of the traffic related problems occur. This effort has been done periodically in the past and will continue throughout 2011.

2 2010 ANNUAL SCHOOL TRAFFIC SURVEY REQUEST SUMMARY

SCHOOL REQUEST ACTION ANZA 1. Request for additional red curbs adjacent to both 1. City staff will conduct a field investigation and notify ELEMENTARY school crosswalks. the School District of findings. 1005 S. Anza St. 2. Install speed humps to control speed. 2. Speed humps are not recommended since they are 3. More Police presence for enforcement. used on primarily on residential streets. Anza Street is more of a "thorough-fare" which accommodates more traffic volume. 3. The PO will be advised of this request. BOSTONIA 1. Install more visible speed zone signs with flashing 1. The City has applied for a "Safe Routes to School" ELEMENTARY yellow beacons on Broadway. grant to help fund the installation of radar vehicle speed 1390 Broadway feedback signs but was not successful. City will re-apply in the next funding cycle. CAJON VALLEY No request. MIDDLE 395 Ballantyne St. CHASE AVE 1. Parents/vehicles continue to stop in the "No 1. The PO will be advised of this request for ELEMENTARY Stopping" area along Chase Avenue creating a safety enforcement. 195 E. Chase Ave. hazard. EMERALD 1. Safety concerns are primarily focused on the 1. Request has been forwarded to the School District. MIDDLE school site parking lot. 1221 S. Emerald Ave. FLYING HILLS 1. Install additional red curbing near existing school 1. City staff will conduct a field investigation and notify ELEMENTARY crosswalk on Heron Avenue. the School District of findings. 1251 Finch St. 2. Install an additional school crosswalk on Finch Street at Heron Avenue. GREENFIELD 1. Install a crosswalk or traffic signal to cross 1. A traffic signal would not be recommended since it MIDDLE Greenfield Drive between Camillo Way and N. Third would not meet the required guidelines (warrants) as 1495 Greenfield Dr. Street. stated in the California Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The existing traffic signal located at Greenfield Dr.lN. Third St. is located too close to the requested location. 2010 ANNUAL SCHOOL TRAFFIC SURVEY REQUEST SUMMARY

JOHNSON 1. Install a crosswalk on Madison Avenue opposite 1. This crosswalk was discussed previously with the ELEMENTARY from the parking lot exit. District and it was decided that this location wouldnot be 500 W. Madison 2. Install a traffic signal in front of the school. appropriate as it is a mid-block crossing which is not Ave. 3. Install a designated area for school buses on recommended. Madison Avenue. 2. A traffic signal would not be recommended since it would not meet the required guidelines (warrants) as stated in the California Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The existing traffic signal located at Madison Ave.lChambers Ave. is located approximately 250 feet to the east which would be too close to the requested signal location. 3. City staff will conduct a field investigation and notify the School District of findings. LEXINGTON 1. Re-paint the existing curb red on First Street and 1. City staff will conduct a field investigation and take ELEMENTARY install a "Do Not Park" or "Reserved for School Bus" appropriate action. 533 S. First St. signs in the school bus loading zone. MADISON 1. Additional red curb on Madison Avenue near the 1. Additional red curb was recently approved by City ELEMENTARY mid-block school crosswalk. Council and installed in January 2011. 1615 E. Madison Ave. MAGNOLIA 1. Parents are illegally double parking along 1. The PO will be notified for enforcement. ELEMENTARY Greenfield Drive east of the school and jaywalking 650 Greenfield Dr. with their children across the street. MERIDIAN 1. Students have difficulties judging traffic on Third 1. City staff will conduct a field investigation and take ELEMENTARY Street at Dumar Avenue. appropriate action. 651 S. Third St. MONTGOMERY 1. Post additional "No Parking" signs on the southern 1. City staff will conduct a field investigation and take MIDDLE end of Granite Hills Drive. Parents are parking in the appropriate action. The PO will be notified for 1570 Melody Ln. existing bike lanes. enforcement. NARANCA 1. Additional Police presence during school dismissal 1. The PO will be notified for enforcement. ELEMENTARY times to enforce speeding on Naranca Avenue. 1030 Naranca Ave. FLETCHER HILLS 1. Request for "all-way" stop at the intersection of 1. City staff will conduct a field investigation and take ELEMENTARY Chatham Street/Center Place. appropriate action. 2330 Center PI. 2010 ANNUAL SCHOOL TRAFFIC SURVEY REQUEST SUMMARY CHAPARRALHS No request. 1600 N. Cuyamaca st. EC VALLEY HS No request. 1035 E. Madison Ave. GRANITE HILLS No request. HS 1719 E. Madison Ave. GROSSMONT HS No request. 1100 Murray Dr. CHRISTIAN No request. ELEMENTARY- WEST 211 S. Third St. CHRISTIAN HS No request. 2100 Greenfield Dr. HOLY TRINITY No request. ELEMENTARY 509 Ballard St. OUR LADY OF No request. GRACE 2766 Navajo Rd. ST. KIERANS No request. 1347 Camillo Wy. SEVENTH DAY No request. ADVENTIST 1640 E. Madison Ave. FOOTHILLS No request. CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 2321 Dryden Rd. LITERACY FIRST No request. CHARTER 799 E. Washington 2010 EL CAJON SCHOOL SAFETY REVIEW

School Type Area Speed Location SiC Traffic Student Safety Child Ped/Bike Previous Limit Vol. Patrols Xing Accidents Review Comments/Requests Anza E R 25 10055. Anza RC/1 L Gray/Anza H -- SR 2009 Request for additional red curb St. Anza at School at school crosswalks. Bostonia EC 40 1390 P/2 M Broadway/Grape M -- SR 2009 Applied for Safe Routes to Broadway School grant but was not successful. Cajon Valley M.S. R/C 35 395 P/2 H None H 1/0 SR 2009 None. Ballantyne St. Chase E R/C 40 195 E. Chase P/2 H Chase/Prescott H -- SR 2009 Installed "No Stopping Ave. Anytime" signs on Chase Ave. Emerald M.S. R 25 1221 S. R/1 L None H -- SR 2009 None. Emerald Ave Flying Hills E R 25 1251 Finch R/1 L Heron/Finch M -- SR 2009 Request for additional red curb St. SC/1 L Swallow/Finch at school crosswalks. Fletcher E R 30 2330 5/1 M Garfield/Center PI M -- SR 2009 Request for all-way stop at Hills Center PI. Chatham/Center PI Chatham St'/Center PI. Greenfield M.S. R 35 1495 P/1 M None H -- SR 2009 Installed bus loading zone and Greenfield handicap zone on Third St. Dr. Johnson E R/C 35 500W. S/l M Madison/ H -- SR 2009 None. Madison Ave. Chambers

Lexington E R 35 533 S. First S/l M First/Redwood H -- SR 2009 Relocated vehicle speed St. feedback sign on First St. Madison E R 35 1615 E. S/l M Madison at School H -- SR 2009 Installed additional red curb at jSevick Madison Ave. school crosswalk on Madison Ave. Magnolia E R/I 35 650 P/1 H Greenfield/Victor H -- SR 2009 None. Greenfield Dr.

Meridian E R 35 651 S.Third SC/1 M Third/Wash. M -- SR 2009 None. St. L Third/Dumar M Montgomery M.S. R 40 1570 Melody S/l L None L -- SR 2009 None. 35 Ln. Naranca E R 25 1030 RC/1 L Naranca & First/ M -- SR 2009 Request to lengthen green-time Naranca Ave. Naranca at Naranca/Mollison traffic Mollison/Naranca signal. Holy Trinity E.P. R 25 509 Ballard RC/1 L None L -- SR 2009 None. St. 2010 EL CAJON SCHOOL SAFETY REVIEW

School Type Area Speed Location SiC Traffic Student Safety Child Ped/Bike Previous Limit Vol. Patrols Xing Accidents Review Comments/Requests Christian - E.P. R 35 211 S.Third SC/1 L None L -- SR 2009 None. West St. Our Lady of E.P. R/C 40 2766 Navajo P/2 H None L -- SR 2009 None. Grace Rd. St. Kierans E.P. R 25 1347 Camillo R/1 L None L -- SR 2009 None. Wy. Seventh Day E.P. R 35 1640 S/l M None L -- SR 2009 None. Adventist Madison Ave. Chaparral H.S. R/I 50 1600 N. P/2 H None L -- SR 2009 None. H.S. Cuyamaca St. EICajon H.S. R 35 1035 E. S/l M None M -- SR 2009 None. Valley H.S. Madison Ave. Granite Hills H.S. R 40 1719 E. S/l M None M -- SR 2009 None. H.S. Madison Ave. Grossmont H.S. R/C 30 1100 Murray RC/1 L None M -- SR 2009 Red curb added in existing No H.S. Dr. Parking Zone in 2009. Christian PHS R 45 2100 P/1 L None L -- SR 2009 None. H.S. Greenfield Dr. Foothills PHS R 25 2321 Dryden R/1 L None L -- SR 2009 None. Christian Rd H.S. Literacy First E.P. R/C 40 799 E. P/2 H None L -- SR 2009 None. Charter Washington Ave

LEGEND Type =E-Elementary, E.P.-Elementary Private/Parochial, M.S.- Middle School, H.S. - High School Area =R-Residential, t-lndustrlal, C-Commercial SiC =Street Classification and Number of Lanes in Each Direction, R-Residential, S-Secondary, P-Primary Arterial RC-Residential Collector, SC-Standard Collector Traffic Volume =L < 5,000, M > 5,000 ~ 12,000, H > 12,000 Children Xing =Number of Children Crossing, L-Low, M-Moderate, H-High Ped/Bike Accidents =Number of Pedestrian/Bicycle Accidents that occurred in previous year. Previous Review =SR 2009 (Year safety review was conducted.)