DOCSLIB.ORG

SANTA CRUZ HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY VOLUME III – March 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SANTA CRUZ HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY VOLUME III – March 2013 SANTA CRUZ HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY VOLUME III – March 2013 SANTA CRUZ HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY ‐ VOLUME III Department of Planning and Community Development CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Prepared by Archives & Architecture, LLC Selections and research by Charlene Duval, Jessica Kusz, and Kara Oosterhous, Public Historians with the Santa Cruz Historic Preservation Commission Technical architectural descriptions by Leslie Dill, Architect Evaluations by Franklin Maggi, Architectural Historian City Planning Staff: Don Lauritson, Project Manager; Juliana Rebagliati, Eric Marlatt, & Janice Lum Historic Preservation Commission Subcommittee: Judy Steen and Ian Blackwood March 2013 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 PLANNING BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 SANTA CRUZ HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY ......................................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 PERFORMANCE OF THE SURVEY ............................................................................................................................................... 9 DPR523 FORMS .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 HISTORIC EVALUATION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................................ 10 SANTA CRUZ CRITERIA FOR LISTING ON THE HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY .................................................. 11 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES CRITERIA ............................................................................ 12 FOCUSED THEMES FOR VOLUME III ........................................................................................................................................ 13 SEABRIGHT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 BLACKBURN TERRACE ................................................................................................................................................................ 14 SOQUEL AVENUE COMMERCIAL STRIP ............................................................................................................................... 15 MISSION STREET COMMERCIAL STRIP ............................................................................................................................... 16 FRONT STREET ............................................................................................................................................................................... 16 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 17 RESORT & RECREATION DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................................................... 18 EDUCATION ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 PROPERTY PAGES ............................................................................................................................................................................. 21 PROPERTIES ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 WALLS AND STAIRWAYS ........................................................................................................................................................ 115 HITCHING POSTS......................................................................................................................................................................... 121 INDEX OF PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 129 GLOSSARY OF MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL STYLES ............................................................................................................ 133 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL RESOLUTION (with Opt Outs noted)……………………………………………………… 139 3 INTRODUCTION The city of Santa Cruz is fortunate to possess a great number of distinctive buildings and structures that represent the community’s cultural and historical evolution. Many of Santa Cruz’s historic resources have been lost over time, but the city as a whole retains a significant amount of its historical buildings. The development of the city of Santa Cruz, from an early commercial port and later as a vacation resort, to the mature urban community that exists today, is represented in the architecture of its neighborhoods, the commercial, industrial, and tourist centers that drive its economy, and the educational, institutional, and religious sites that serve its populace. In recognition of the city’s rich past, the Santa Cruz Historic Preservation Plan was adopted in 1974 as an element of the General Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission was formed following the adoption of the Historic Preservation Ordinance that enabled the identification and protection of buildings, structures, and sites that have particular historic, architectural, and engineering significance to the community. The Santa Cruz Historic Building Survey was initiated as an ongoing planning project to identify and evaluate historic and architecturally significant structures deserving protection under the ordinance. The survey is based upon a statement of historic context that provides an overview of Santa Cruz, from its beginnings as the Mission Santa Cruz and the Villa de Branciforte on the Spanish frontier of North America, to its present‐day community of 60,350 residents at the north end of the Monterey Bay. Cultural resource surveys and historic context statements are technical documents created by communities throughout the United States. These documents provide a comprehensive planning tool for the identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment of historic properties. By developing and maintaining historic resource surveys and historic context studies, local governments are able to implement planning policies addressing historical and cultural resources, policies and practices that have century‐old roots in the United States. Preservation of the nation’s heritage has long been part of the national purpose. In 1966 Congress called upon the Secretary of the Interior to give maximum encouragement to state governments in the development of statewide historic preservation programs. The National Park Service (NPS) has developed methodologies for survey planning and preservation programs that are outlined in a number of published guidelines, primarily within the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. Cities such as Santa Cruz utilize and adapt these federal standards for preservation planning within the city. 4 PLANNING BACKGROUND Historical surveys, and their resulting resource inventories, provide a basis for sensitive and effective planning decisions. Santa Cruz’s surveys and inventories provide documentation that allows informed assessments of its built environment during the development review process. With the information provided in these documents, Santa Cruz planners and policy makers can understand the history of the city in a variety of ways, and Santa Cruz’s citizens can preserve and celebrate significant buildings that convey the city’s past. The current Historic Building Survey maintained by the City of Santa Cruz, and the adopted City Historic Context Statement, compile a variety of types of research, including historical patterns of development, identification of diverse community values associated with the built environment, and comprehensive evaluations of individual resources. SANTA CRUZ HISTORIC BUILDING SURVEY The Santa Cruz Historic Building Survey is contained in three volumes. Volume I was prepared in 1976 by the firm of Charles Hall Page & Associates. With amendments, it contains over 300 properties with structures that were built from approximately 1850 to 1930. Information contained in Volume I was drawn from existing sources. The Sidewalk Companion to Santa Cruz Architecture, published by John Chase in 1975, was the primary resource in establishing this first inventory of historic properties. Charles Hall Page & Associates also prepared the Santa Cruz Renovation Manual. Criteria used to determine inclusion in the survey came from a variation of the quantitative methodologies under development at that time, and included a numerical ranking system that evaluated historical significance, architectural significance, and importance to the neighborhood, original design, neighborhood
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RACE, SPACE, and PLACE: the RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, and GENTRIFICATION Keith A
    RACE, SPACE, AND PLACE: THE RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, AND GENTRIFICATION Keith Aoki * [Cite as: 20 Fordham Urb. L.J. 699 (1993)] Introduction Gentrification in United States urban housing markets of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s continues to be a controversial and complex phenomenon. [FN1] During the past twenty years, gentrification's effects on the core cities of the U.S. have been analyzed and evaluated many times over. [FN2] Descriptions of gentrification have spanned the ideological *700 spectrum, from laudatory embraces of gentrification as the solution to urban decline to denunciatory critiques of gentrification as another symptom of the widening gulf between the haves and the have- nots in America. [FN3] This Article critiques gentrification, adding an additional explanatory element to the ongoing account of the dynamics of American cities in the 1990s. The additional element is the relevance of a major aesthetic realignment in architecture and urban planning from a modernist to a post-modernist ideology in the 1970s and 1980s. This shift involved an aesthetic and economic revaluation of historical elements in older central city buildings, which accelerated the rate of gentrification, displacement, and abandonment. This Article describes how certain shifts in the aesthetic ideology [FN4] of urban planners and architects affected suburban and urban spatial distribution in the United States during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These ideological shifts arose from deeply embedded American attitudes toward city and rural life that had emerged in American town planning and architectural theory and practice by the mid-nineteenth century. Part I of this Article examines the emergence of an anti-urban Arcadian strand in nineteenth century American town planning rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE HISPANIC. POPULATION in ALTA CALIFORNIA: 1790 and the 1830'S a Thesis Submitted in Parti
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE HISPANIC. POPULATION IN ALTA CALIFORNIA: II 1790 AND THE 1830'S A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography by Carolyn Gale Me- Govern August, 1978 The thesis of Carolyn Gale Me Govern is approved: I- ShgJ}... Wang__- Robert M. Newcomp David Hornbe~k, Committee Chairman California State University, Northridge ii To Charles Leo and Doris Elizabeth Me Govern iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Completion of this thesis and the masters program at California State University, Northridge was made pbssible through the continued support and understanding of a number of individuals. My brother, Stephen T. Me Govern, provided a constant source of encouragement, for which I am very grateful. Special thanks are also owed to the other members of my family. I am equally indebted to my fellow students for the time, constructive criticisms, and moral support they contributed. In particular, I would like to express my appreciation to Darrick R. Danta, Lauralee I. Hendricks, and MartinS. Kenzer. Of the many professors at Northridge instrumental in my academic training, I would especially like to thank Dr. Arnold Court, Dr. Robert M. Newcomb, and Dr. I-Shou Wang. To demonstrate my sincere gratitude to Dr. David Hornbeck for having instilled in me the confidence neces­ sary to attempt this thesis and numerous other professional activities, I can only strive toward continued development of the invaluable foundation of scholarly skills he so patiently t::mght me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDI CATION . iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iv LIST OF TABLES . viii LIST OF FIGURES ix ABSTRACT xii Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 Cultural Resources
    Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Network Master Plan EIR Section 4.5 Cultural Resources 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.5.1 Setting a. Environmental Setting. The Master Plan corridor stretches the entire length of Santa Cruz County from the San Mateo County line north of Davenport to Railroad Avenue in Monterey County. The corridor primarily aligns with the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line right-of- way, a 32-mile, continuous travel corridor. The RTC now owns 31-miles of the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Lineis now owned by the RTC. The rail right-of-way would serve both rail service and bike/pedestrian trail functions. b. Historical Background. Prehistory. Santa Cruz County is in the Monterey Bay Area, a cultural-historical geographic region which spans the central California coastline from Big Sur northward to just south of the San Francisco Bay. This region generally corresponds to southern Costanoan language groups. The prehistory of the Monterey Bay Area is categorized according to temporal “periods,” which refer to the general social, economic, and environmental adaptations of Native California populations during a given time in prehistory. David A. Fredrickson’s Paleo-Archaic-Emergent cultural sequence (1974) is commonly used to interpret the prehistoric occupation of Central California and is broken into three broad periods: the Paleoindian Period (10,000-6000 B.C.); the three-staged Archaic Period, consisting of the Lower Archaic (6000-3000 B.C.), Middle Archaic (3000-500 B.C.), and Upper Archaic (500 B.C.-A.D. 1000); and the Emergent Period (A.D. 1000- 1800). T. Jones’ (1993) updated period sequence, which integrates data from the central California coast, consists of the Paleoindian (9000-6500 B.C.), Millingstone (6500-3500 B.C.), Early (3500-1000 B.C.), Early/Middle Transition (1000-600 B.C.), Middle (600 B.C.-A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete, Step by Step Project
    California Missions Project Complete, step by step project Thank you so much for the purchase! I hope that this resource will work really well in your classroom! Jenn Please check out my store and follow me for more resources from my classroom to yours! http://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/The-Teacher-Next-Door Please note: This is a single-user purchase. Each resource represents hours of hard work and time on my part. I know teachers enjoy sharing but please respect my work and purchase an additional license if you plan to share it with other teachers. Also, please do not post this anywhere without permission. Thanks for your understanding! Your feedback is important to me. I value positive feedback and appreciate kind ratings and comments. If you have trouble printing, see a small mistake, or have a question, please email me by going to this link: http://the-teacher-next- door.com/index.php/contact-us or use the “Ask a Question” feature on TpT, before leaving negative feedback. I will do my best to fix the problem ASAP! I really want you to be happy with your purchase. Copyright © 2015 The Teacher Next Door All rights reserved by author. Permission to copy for single classroom use only. Electronic distribution limited to single classroom use only. Not for public display. Redistributing, editing, selling, or posting this unit or any part thereof on the Internet is strictly prohibited. Placing any part of this this product on the Internet is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Purchase of this unit entitles the purchaser the right to reproduce pages for single classroom use only.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW FRANK LLOYD Wrighr CAME to MARIN COONIY, CALIFORNIA, .AND GLORIFIED SAN RAFAEL
    __.. __.0- __._. __.... __,_... ~ .. ~ _ ... __._ ~ __.. ,. __ "I I 73-5267 RADFORD, Evelyn Emerald Morris, 1921- THE GENIUS .AND THE COONIY BUILDING: HOW FRANK LLOYD WRIGHr CAME TO MARIN COONIY, CALIFORNIA, .AND GLORIFIED SAN RAFAEL. University of Hawaii, Ph.D., 1972 Political Science, general University Microfilms. A XEROX Company. Ann Arbor. Michigan @ 1972 EVELYN EMERALD MORRIS RADFORD ALL RIGHrS RESERVED ----------- ; THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED • ' .~: - THE GENIUS AND THE COUNTY BUILDING: HOW FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT CAME TO MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND GLORIFIED SAN RAFAEL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIl IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AMERICAN STUDIES AUGUST 1972 By Evelyn Morris Radford Dissertation Committee: Reuel Denney, Chairman James McCutcheon J. Meredith Neil Murray Turnbull Aaron Levine Seymour Lutzky PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. University Microfilms, A Xerox Education Company iii PREFACE Marin County has been written about as a place where charming Indian legends abound, where misty beauty evokes a breathless appreciation of natural wonders, where tales of the sea are told around cozy hearths, and where nostalgia for the old California of Mexican hidalgos and an exotic array of inter­ national characters finds responsive audience. Even today the primary interests of Marin chroniclers center on old settlers, their lives and their fortunes, and the exotic polyglot of ethnic groups that came to populate the shores of the waters that wash Marin. This effort to analyze by example some of the social processes of Marin is in large part an introductory effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz NO SOMOS ANIMALES
    University of California Santa Cruz NO SOMOS ANIMALES: INDIGENOUS SURVIVAL AND PERSEVERANCE IN 19TH CENTURY SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY with emphases in AMERICAN STUDIES and LATIN AMERICAN & LATINO STUDIES by Martin Adam Rizzo September 2016 The Dissertation of Martin Adam Rizzo is approved: ________________________________ Professor Lisbeth Haas, Chair _________________________________ Professor Amy Lonetree _________________________________ Professor Matthew D. O’Hara ________________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright ©by Martin Adam Rizzo 2016 Table of Contents List of Figures iv Abstract vii Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 Chapter 1: “First were taken the children, and then the parents followed” 24 Chapter 2: “The diverse nations within the mission” 98 Chapter 3: “We are not animals” 165 Chapter 4: Captain Coleto and the Rise of the Yokuts 215 Chapter 5: ”Not finding anything else to appropriate...” 261 Chapter 6: “They won’t try to kill you if they think you’re already dead” 310 Conclusion 370 Appendix A: Indigenous Names 388 Bibliography 398 iii List of Figures 1.1: Indigenous tribal territories 33 1.2: Contemporary satellite view 36 1.3: Total number baptized by tribe 46 1.4: Approximation of Santa Cruz mountain tribal territories 48 1.5: Livestock reported near Mission Santa Cruz 75 1.6: Agricultural yields at Mission Santa Cruz by year 76 1.7: Baptisms by month, through
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Report for the University of California, Santa
    Appendix E Cultural Resources Information Appendix E1 – Archaeological Resources Report Bay Area Division Phone: 510.524.3991 900 Modoc Street Fax: 510.524.4419 Berkeley, CA 94707 www.pacificlegacy.com Date: July 3, 2020 To: Claudia Garcia, Ascent Environmental. From: John Holson Subject: Technical Memo For Cultural Resource Studies, UC Santa Cruz, Long Range Development Plan. Pacific Legacy has prepared this memo to assist Ascent Environmental in preparing the Cultural Resources Section of the UC Santa Cruz, Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) Environmental Impact Report. Below are our findings and sections for the LRDP. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Regional Prehistory The earliest confirmed evidence of prehistoric occupation in the Santa Cruz region comes from an archaeological site (CA-SCR-177) located 4 miles northeast of the campus in the Santa Cruz Mountains near Scotts Valley. Cartier (1993) postulated that CA-SCR-177 may date to approximately 10,000 years before present (BP). This is supported by the California Central Coast Chronology (Jones et al. 2007), which posits prehistoric life in the region extending to 10,000 years BP or earlier. While few sites have been identified from the Paleoindian through the Early Archaic (8000 to 5000 BP) periods in the Santa Cruz area, numerous sites have been dated to the Middle Archaic (5000 BP to 3000 BP) and Late Archaic (3000 BP to 1000 AD) periods. The Late Prehistoric Period (1000 to about 1600 AD) has been identified from at least one site near Santa Cruz (Fitzgerald and Ruby 1997; Hylkema 1991). Archaeological evidence indicates that Native groups in the region participated in extensive trade networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Resourcesresources
    CHAPTER2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Key features of historic resources should be preserved. This chapter presents a historic overview and identifies the key features of architectural styles found in San Jose: • Vernacular or National p. 17 • Italianate and Italianate Cottage p. 18 • Greek Revival p. 19 • Carpenter Gothic or Folk Victorian p. 19 • Queen Anne p. 20 • Stick p. 21 • Shingle p. 22 • Neoclassical p. 23 • Colonial Revival p. 24 • Dutch Colonial Revival p. 24 • Craftsman p. 25 • Bungalow p. 26 • Prairie p. 27 • Tudor Revival p. 28 • Mission Revival p. 28 • Spanish Eclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival or Mediterranean Revival p. 29 • Italian Renaissance p. 30 • Art Deco p. 30 • Art Moderne p. 31 • International p. 31 • Mid-Century Modern p. 32 Guide for Preserving San Jose Homes Chapter 2: Architectural Resources CHAPTER 2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Individual building features are important to the character of San Jose. The mass and scale, form, materials and architectural details of the buildings are the elements that distinguish one architectural style from another, or even older neighborhoods from newer developments. This chapter presents an overview of those important elements of the built environment which make up San Jose. This includes a brief history of development, as well as a summary of the different types and styles of architecture found in its neighborhoods. Brief History Vendome neighborhood, just to the northwest of the The settlement of the Santa Clara Valley by Euro- present-day Hensley Historic District. This original site Americans began in 1769 with an initial exploration was subjected to severe winter flooding during the first of the valley by Spanish explorers.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County Historic Photograph Collection
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cz3db5 Online items available Santa Cruz County Historic Photograph Collection Debra Roussopoulos The University Library Special Collections and Archives University Library University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, California, 95064 Email: [email protected] URL: https://guides.library.ucsc.edu/speccoll 2017 Santa Cruz County Historic MS 427 1 Photograph Collection Santa Cruz County Historic Photograph Collection Collection number: ms427 The University Library Special Collections and Archives University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, California Processed by: Debra Roussopoulos Date Completed: 2017 Encoded by: Debra Roussopoulos Descriptive Summary Title: Santa Cruz County historic photograph collection Dates: circa 1866-1995 Collection number: MS 427 Collector: University of California Santa Cruz Collection Size: 102 linear feet Repository: University of California, Santa Cruz. University Library. Special Collections and Archives Santa Cruz, California 95064 Abstract: This collection contains original and copy prints of Santa Cruz County from 1866-1995. Physical location: Stored at Special Collections and Archives: Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English https://n2t.net/ark:/38305/f1p26x9m Access Collection open for research. Use Property rights for this collection reside with the University of California. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs. The publication or use of any work protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use for research or educational purposes requires written permission from the copyright owner. Responsibility for obtaining permissions, and for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information on copyright or to order a reproduction, please visit guides.library.ucsc.edu/speccoll/reproduction-publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Historic Sites Directory
    2014 www.californiamissionsfoundation.org HISTORIC SITES DIRECTORY MISSION SAN DIEGO MISSION SAN ANTONIO DE PADUA ASISTENCIA SAN ANTONIO DE PALA 10818 San Diego Mission Rd. End of Mission Creek Rd. PALA RESERVATION San Diego, CA 92108 P.O. Box 803 P.O. BOX 70 (619) 283-7319 Jolon, CA 93928 PALA, CA 92059 (831) 385-4478 (760) 742-3317 MISSION SAN LUIS REY 4050 Mission Avenue MISSION SOLEDAD EL PRESIDIO DE SANTA BARBARA Oceanside, CA 92057 36641 Fort Romie Rd. 123 E. CANON PERDIDO ST. (760) 757-3651 Soledad, CA 93960 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93102 (831) 678-2586 (805) 965-0093 MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 26801 Ortega Highway MISSION CARMEL ROYAL PRESIDIO CHAPEL OF MONTEREY San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 3080 Rio Rd. 500 CHURCH ST. (949) 234-1300 Carmel, CA 93923 MONTEREY, CA 93940 (831) 624-3600 (831) 373-2628 MISSION SAN GABRIEL 428 South Mission Dr. MISSION SAN JUAN BAUTISTA San Gabriel, CA 91776 406 Second St. (626) 457-7291 P.O. Box 400 San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 MISSION SAN FERNANDO (831) 623-2127 15151 San Fernando Mission Blvd. Mission Hills, CA 91345 MISSION SANTA CRUZ (818) 361-0186 126 High St. Santa Cruz, CA 95060 MISSION SAN BUENAVENTURA (831) 426-5686 211 East Main St. Ventura, CA 93001 MISSION SANTA CLARA (805) 643-4318 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053 MISSION SANTA BARBARA (408) 554-4023 2201 Laguna St. Santa Barbara, CA 93105 MISSION SAN JOSE (805) 682-4713 P.O. Box 3159 Fremont, CA 94539 MISSION SANTA INES (510) 657-1797 1760 Mission Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Properties on the Historical Building Survey - by Address
    LIST OF PROPERTIES ON THE HISTORICAL BUILDING SURVEY - BY ADDRESS Street Address APN Vol./Page # Name/Style COMMENTS 109 Alhambra Avenue 010-272-15 1/144 Craftsman 119 Alhambra Avenue 010-272-20 2/1 Vernacular 428 Barson Street 005-331-26 2/1 Vernacular 515 Barson Street 010-551-22 2/1 Queen Anne Cottage 1111 Bay Street 004-102-02 1/42 Bay House 1512 Bay Street 006-261-07 1/58 Eastlake Beach Street 1/26 Municipal Wharf 215 Beach Street 005-213-02 1/26 La Bahia Apartments CLM 400 Beach Street 005-341-16 1/28 Carousel NRHP 400 Beach Street 005-341-16 1/27 Casino 400 Beach Street 005-341-16 1/27 Natatorium 400 Beach Street 005-341-16 1/27 Roller Coaster NRHP 227 Berkeley Way 009-221-42 2/2 Colonial Revival 325 Berkeley Way 009-221-15 2/2 Craftsman 142 Bixby Street 005-331-23 1/128 Eastlake 151 Bixby Street 005-332-04 2/2 Vernacular 123 Blackburn Street 004-034-04 2/3 Vernacular 208 Blackburn Street 004-032-33 1/67 Bungalow 417 Broadway 005-302-12 1/125 Vernacular 511 Broadway 010-051-37 2/7 Vernacular 518 Broadway 010-551-03 2/7 Stick-Eastlake 817 Broadway 010-064-19 2/8 Colonial Revival 901 Broadway 010-063-20 2/8 Stick-Eastlake 1025 Broadway 010-071-25 2/8 Queen Anne-Colonial Revival 1108 Broadway 010-121-15 1/125 Eastlake 1111 Broadway 010-072-26 2/9 Eastlake 1114 Broadway 010-121-02 1/125 Eastlake 1124 Broadway 010-121-24 2/9 Vernacular 1205 Broadway 010-092-16 1/126 Brown House 1215 Broadway 010-092-14 2/9 Vernacular 1408 Broadway 011-066-23 2/10 Eastlake 210 Brook Avenue 010-234-08 1/145 Vernacular 214 Brook Avenue 010-234-09 1/145
    [Show full text]