Edagraffiti: the Book Paul Mclellan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

EDAgraffiti: The Book Paul McLellan EDAgraffiti: the book Copyright © 2010 Paul McLellan To purchase: www.lulu.com 2 3 CHAPTER 1: MAJOR INDUSTRY TRENDS 8 What did Moore really say? 9 Why EDA differs from ERP by more than one letter 11 Recutting the semiconductor pie 13 Tragedy of the commons and EDA 14 Lithography for dummies 15 Design For Manufacturing 17 For sale, fab, cost $40/second 20 Fab5 21 Arma virumque cano 23 Japan, lost in introspection 27 ARM, Atom, PowerPC 29 ESL and software signoff 32 The Economist on semiconductor 34 iSuppli report on process transitions 35 What will I want from my devices? 38 Changes in relative value 40 What should EDA do next? 42 GM and Cadence 44 Take the E out of EDA 45 EDA press 47 Mac and PC 49 PowerPC 51 Semiconductor cost models 53 Software signoff again 55 Is silicon valley dead? 57 Entrepreneurs ages 59 Designing a chip is like 61 EDA for the next 10 years 62 The VHDL and Verilog story 64 Shake that EDA malaise 65 CHAPTER 2: MANAGEMENT 68 Three envelopes 68 Semiconductor is not EDA 70 Finance 73 Two million per salesperson 75 Twelve-o-clock high 79 Startups and big companies: your end of the boat is sinking 81 Ready for liftoff 82 Customer support 85 Test cases 87 Strategic errors 89 4 Emotional engineers 91 CEO: a dangerous job 93 Channel choices 95 You comp plan is showing 97 Board games 99 Hiring and firing in startups 101 Application Engineers 104 The career path train doesn’t stop every day 106 How do you get a CEO job? 107 Managing your boss 109 Integration and differentiation 110 Big company guys don’t do small 112 Being CEO 114 Getting out of EDA 116 Hunters and farmers: EDA salesforces 117 Running a salesforce 119 How long should you stay in a job? 121 Spending money effectively 122 Interview questions 124 Acquistions: cull the managers 125 CHAPTER 3: MARKETING 128 City Slickers Marketing 128 Intel only needs one copy 129 Super models 131 Why does EDA have a hardware business model? 134 The arrogance of ESL 136 Ferrari vs Formula 1 138 He who goes first loses 140 All purpose EDA keynote 142 No sex before marriage in EDA 144 Standards 146 Semi equipment and EDA 148 It’s like football only with bondage 151 Pricing. Vases and coffee pots 153 A real keynote: move up to software 155 Competing with free EDA software 157 It’s turtles all the way down 159 Don’t listen to your customers 161 The art of presentations 163 Swiffering new EDA tools 165 Presentations without bullets 167 Creating demand in EDA 169 Finger in the nose 170 Corporate CAD cycle 172 Licensed to bill 174 DAC 176 5 The Denali party 178 Value propositions 180 Being too early to market 181 Barriers to entry 183 CHAPTER 4: ENGINEERING 186 Where is all open source software? 186 Open source again 188 Why is EDA so buggy? 189 Groundhog Day 191 Power is the new timing 193 Power again 195 Multicore 198 Internal development 201 Process variation: you can’t ignore statistics any more 204 CDMA tales 206 Another look at internal development 208 CHAPTER 5: FINANCE AND INVESTMENT 211 Venture capital for EDA is dead 211 Venture capital for your grandmother 213 EDA: not boring enough 214 One hit wonders 216 Will you greenlight my chip 218 Crushing fixed costs 220 Technology of SOX 222 EDA and startups: $7M to takeoff 223 EDA startups: channel costs $6M 225 FPGA software 227 Wall Street Values 228 Royalties 230 SaaS for EDA 232 Why are VCs so greedy? 234 Term sheets 236 The antiportfolio 238 CEO pay 240 CHAPTER 6: BOOKS 243 Innovator’s dilemma 243 The book that changed everything 245 Relevance lost 247 Crossing the chasm 248 Mr Rodgers goes to Washington 251 Early exits 252 Four steps to the epiphany 253 6 Chips and Change 255 The Flaw of Averages 257 CHAPTER 7: OFF-TOPIC 260 What color is a green card? 260 China and India 262 Visa. Priceless 264 Downturn 265 Old standards 267 San Francisco: silicon valley’s dormitory 269 Patent trolls 270 Patents 272 Where does everybody come from? 275 Public affluence private squalor 277 7 Introduction This book is an outgrowth from the blog EDAgraffiti on EDN magazine online. Although the basis of the book is the original blog entries, there is new material and the old material has been updated and reorganized. When moving the material from a blog into a book I had to decide what to do about what were links to other parts of the web. I decided that rather than putting in long URLs in footnotes, which are unpleasant to type, I’d make sure that there was enough information to find everything with a search engine. So, for example, rather than giving an explicit URL for a book on Amazon, if you have the title it should be straightforward to find. I’d like to thank Ed Lee and Jim Hogan for encouraging me to do the blog in the first place, and the editors of EDN magazine for hosting it. Jim also created the map of semiconductor company relationships that appears in this book. My son Sam designed the EDAgraffiti logo and wall. The blog is here. Paul McLellan San Francisco, March 2010 Email: [email protected] 8 Chapter 1: Major industry trends What did Moore really say? Every EDA marketing presentation starts off by pointing out that Moore’s law is making some problem worse. Of course, just the problem that the EDA product pitched in the rest of the presentation is designed to solve. Everyone sorta knows Moore’s law but few people realize just what it was he said over 40 years ago, and just how prescient he was, or have even read his original paper. In 1965, Gordon Moore was Head of R&D at Fairchild. This was several years before Moore left Fairchild to found Intel. Moore noticed that the number of transistors on the integrated circuits that Fairchild was building seemed to double every two years, as shown in the graph here from Moore’s original article. As he pointed out there, "Integrated circuits will lead to such wonders as home computers, automatic controls for automobiles, and personal portable communications equipment." Remember that this was 1965, when an integrated circuit contained 64 transistors: this was an extraordinary prediction. 9 Surprisingly, over 40 years on, semiconductors seem still to be increasing in complexity at this rate. Gordon Moore’s original remark is, of course, now known as “Moore’s Law” and is expected to continue for some time. Exponential growth like this over a sustained period of time, rather like compound interest, has a dramatic effect. In the seventies a chip may have contained a few hundred transistors. Today a chip can contain billions of transistors and in the future the predictions are for chips with several hundred billion transistors. This is how all the electronics for a high-end mainframe computer can be compressed into a single chip. Only we attach a radio to it and call it a cell-phone. Or we put a lens on it and call it a digital camera. Or we attach a dish to it and call it satellite TV. Or we take it on a plane and use it to write about Moore’s Law. But it is possible to look at Moore’s Law the other way round: the cost of any given functionality implemented in electronics halves every two years or so. Over a period of twenty years this is a thousand-fold reduction. A video-game console, which is so cheap that children can buy them from their allowances, has far more computing power and much better graphics than the highest-end flight simulators of the 1970s, which cost millions of dollars. An ink-jet printer has far more computing power than NASA had at its disposal for the moon-shots (supposedly a total of 1 MIPS1 on all the computers they had put together). It is this exponential driving down of electronic costs that had transformed so many aspects of our lives in the last twenty years or so since integrated circuits became cheap enough to go into consumer products. Here is Gordon Moore again, this time from a 1995 Fortune article: “The whole point of integrated circuits is to absorb the functions of what previously were discrete electronic components, to incorporate them in a single new chip, and then to give them back for free, or at least for a lot less money than what they cost as individual parts. Thus, semiconductor technology eats everything, and people who oppose it get trampled.” Moore’s Law started as an observation, became a prediction, and eventually transformed into a blueprint for the semiconductor 10 industry. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors is largely an analysis of what it will take to make Moore’s Law continue to be true. Moore’s Law has thus become a self-fulfilling prophecy for the time being. Of course the really interesting question is for how much longer? 1 Have you noticed that people like to write or say 1 MIP as if MIPS was plural. But, of course, the S stands for “seconds”. End of today’s nitpicking. Why EDA differs from ERP by more than one letter What is it about EDA that makes it different from other software businesses? When the CFO of Texas Instruments buys Oracle or SAP, he or she doesn’t study what algorithms they use in their relational database.
Recommended publications
  • When Is a Microprocessor Not a Microprocessor? the Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I

    When Is a Microprocessor Not a Microprocessor? the Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I

    Ross Bassett When is a Microprocessor not a Microprocessor? The Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I In the early 1990s an integrated circuit first made in 1969 and thus ante­ dating by two years the chip typically seen as the first microprocessor (Intel's 4004), became a microprocessor for the first time. The stimulus for this piece ofindustrial alchemy was a patent fight. A microprocessor patent had been issued to Texas Instruments, and companies faced with patent infringement lawsuits were looking for prior art with which to challenge it. 2 This old integrated circuit, but new microprocessor, was the ALl, designed by Lee Boysel and used in computers built by his start-up, Four-Phase Systems, established in 1968. In its 1990s reincarnation a demonstration system was built showing that the ALI could have oper­ ated according to the classic microprocessor model, with ROM (Read Only Memory), RAM (Random Access Memory), and I/O (Input/ Output) forming a basic computer. The operative words here are could have, for it was never used in that configuration during its normal life­ time. Instead it was used as one-third of a 24-bit CPU (Central Processing Unit) for a series ofcomputers built by Four-Phase.3 Examining the ALl through the lenses of the history of technology and business history puts Intel's microprocessor work into a different per­ spective. The differences between Four-Phase's and Intel's work were industrially constructed; they owed much to the different industries each saw itselfin.4 While putting a substantial part ofa central processing unit on a chip was not a discrete invention for Four-Phase or the computer industry, it was in the semiconductor industry.
  • Outline ECE473 Computer Architecture and Organization • Technology Trends • Introduction to Computer Technology Trends Architecture

    Outline ECE473 Computer Architecture and Organization • Technology Trends • Introduction to Computer Technology Trends Architecture

    Outline ECE473 Computer Architecture and Organization • Technology Trends • Introduction to Computer Technology Trends Architecture Lecturer: Prof. Yifeng Zhu Fall, 2009 Portions of these slides are derived from: ECE473 Lec 1.1 ECE473 Lec 1.2 Dave Patterson © UCB Birth of the Revolution -- What If Your Salary? The Intel 4004 • Parameters – $16 base First Microprocessor in 1971 – 59% growth/year – 40 years • Intel 4004 • 2300 transistors • Initially $16 Æ buy book • Barely a processor • 3rd year’s $64 Æ buy computer game • Could access 300 bytes • 16th year’s $27 ,000 Æ buy cacar of memory • 22nd year’s $430,000 Æ buy house th @intel • 40 year’s > billion dollars Æ buy a lot Introduced November 15, 1971 You have to find fundamental new ways to spend money! 108 KHz, 50 KIPs, 2300 10μ transistors ECE473 Lec 1.3 ECE473 Lec 1.4 2002 - Intel Itanium 2 Processor for Servers 2002 – Pentium® 4 Processor • 64-bit processors Branch Unit Floating Point Unit • .18μm bulk, 6 layer Al process IA32 Pipeline Control November 14, 2002 L1I • 8 stage, fully stalled in- cache ALAT Integer Multi- Int order pipeline L1D Medi Datapath RF @3.06 GHz, 533 MT/s bus cache a • Symmetric six integer- CLK unit issue design HPW DTLB 1099 SPECint_base2000* • IA32 execution engine 1077 SPECfp_base2000* integrated 21.6 mm L2D Array and Control L3 Tag • 3 levels of cache on-die totaling 3.3MB 55 Million 130 nm process • 221 Million transistors Bus Logic • 130W @1GHz, 1.5V • 421 mm2 die @intel • 142 mm2 CPU core L3 Cache ECE473 Lec 1.5 ECE473 19.5mm Lec 1.6 Source: http://www.specbench.org/cpu2000/results/ @intel 2006 - Intel Core Duo Processors for Desktop 2008 - Intel Core i7 64-bit x86-64 PERFORMANCE • Successor to the Intel Core 2 family 40% • Max CPU clock: 2.66 GHz to 3.33 GHz • Cores :4(: 4 (physical)8(), 8 (logical) • 45 nm CMOS process • Adding GPU into the processor POWER 40% …relative to Intel® Pentium® D 960 When compared to the Intel® Pentium® D processor 960.
  • Amd Filed: February 24, 2009 (Period: December 27, 2008)

    Amd Filed: February 24, 2009 (Period: December 27, 2008)

    FORM 10-K ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC - amd Filed: February 24, 2009 (period: December 27, 2008) Annual report which provides a comprehensive overview of the company for the past year Table of Contents 10-K - FORM 10-K PART I ITEM 1. 1 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS ITEM 2. PROPERTIES ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES SIGNATURES EX-10.5(A) (OUTSIDE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION POLICY) EX-10.19 (SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE) EX-21 (LIST OF AMD SUBSIDIARIES) EX-23.A (CONSENT OF ERNST YOUNG LLP - ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES) EX-23.B
  • Vol. 22, No. 2 February 2018 You Can’T Buy It

    Vol. 22, No. 2 February 2018 You Can’T Buy It

    ABSOLUTELY FREE Vol. 22, No. 2 February 2018 You Can’t Buy It Artwork is by Betsy Jones McDonald which is part of the exhibit, Everchanging Tides, on view at the Charleston Artist Guild Gallery in Charleston, SC, from February 1 - 28, 2018. See the article on page 6. ARTICLE INDEX Advertising Directory This index has active links, just click on the Page number and it will take you to that page. Listed in order in which they appear in the paper. Page 1 - Cover - Charleston Artist Guild Gallery - Betsy Jones McDonald Page 3 - Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art Page 2 - Article Index, Advertising Directory, Contact Info, Links to blogs, and Carolina Arts site Page 4 - Nance Lee Sneddon Page 4 - Editorial Commentary Page 5 - The Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary, Fabulon Art & Halsey-McCallum Studios Page 5 - City Gallery at Waterfront Park Page 6 - Charleston Artist Guild, City of North Charleston & Robert Lange Studios Page 6 - Karen Burnette Garner & Whimsy Joy by Roz Page 8 - Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art & Helena Fox Fine Art Page 7 - Call for Lowcountry Ceramic Artists, Rhett Thurman, Anglin Smith Fine Art, DONALD WEBER Page 9 - Helena Fox Fine Art cont., Society of Bluffton Artists & Coastal Discovery Museum Helena Fox Fine Art, Spencer Art Galleries, The Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary, Page 10 - Art League of Hilton Head, Lander University and Main & Maxwell Corrigan Gallery & Saul Alexander Foundation Gallery Page 13 - Metropolitan Arts Council Page 14 - West Main Artists Co-op x 2 Page 8 - Emerge SC & James Smith for Governor “CHARLESTON” Page 16 - West Main Artists Co-op cont.
  • Fax86: an Open-Source FPGA-Accelerated X86 Full-System Emulator

    Fax86: an Open-Source FPGA-Accelerated X86 Full-System Emulator

    FAx86: An Open-Source FPGA-Accelerated x86 Full-System Emulator by Elias El Ferezli A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science (M.A.Sc.) Graduate Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto Copyright c 2011 by Elias El Ferezli Abstract FAx86: An Open-Source FPGA-Accelerated x86 Full-System Emulator Elias El Ferezli Master of Applied Science (M.A.Sc.) Graduate Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto 2011 This thesis presents FAx86, a hardware/software full-system emulator of commodity computer systems using x86 processors. FAx86 is based upon the open-source IA-32 full-system simulator Bochs and is implemented over a single Virtex-5 FPGA. Our first prototype uses an embedded PowerPC to run the software portion of Bochs and off- loads the instruction decoding function to a low-cost hardware decoder since instruction decode was measured to be the most time consuming part of the software-only emulation. Instruction decoding for x86 architectures is non-trivial due to their variable length and instruction encoding format. The decoder requires only 3% of the total LUTs and 5% of the BRAMs of the FPGA's resources making the design feasible to replicate for many- core emulator implementations. FAx86 prototype boots Linux Debian version 2.6 and runs SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks. FAx86 improves simulation performance over the default Bochs by 5 to 9% depending on the workload. ii Acknowledgements I would like to begin by thanking my supervisor, Professor Andreas Moshovos, for his patient guidance and continuous support throughout this work.
  • Interim Report 2010 02

    Interim Report 2010 02

    Contents Page Corporate Information 02 Operational Highlights 03 Condensed Consolidated Income Statement 04 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 05 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 06 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 08 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 09 Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 10 Independent Review Report 39 Management Discussion and Analysis 41 Disclosure of Interests 49 Disclosure under Rules 13.20 and 13.22 of the Listing Rules 52 Purchase, Sale or Redemption of the Company’s Listed Securities 53 Compliance with Code on Corporate Governance Practices 53 Compliance with Model Code for Securities Transactions by Directors 53 Information in Respect of Directors 53 Audit Committee 54 Review of Interim Results 54 Success Universe Group Limited Interim Report 2010 02 CORPORATE INFORMATION Directors Legal Advisers on Executive Directors Bermuda Laws Mr. Yeung Hoi Sing, Sonny (Chairman) Conyers Dill & Pearman Dr. Ma Ho Man, Hoffman (Deputy Chairman) Principal Bankers Chong Hing Bank Limited Non-executive Director Fubon Bank (Hong Kong) Limited Mr. Choi Kin Pui, Russelle The Bank of East Asia, Limited The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Independent Non-executive Corporation Limited Directors Mr. Luk Ka Yee, Patrick Principal Share Registrar and Mr. Yim Kai Pung Transfer Agent in Bermuda Ms. Yeung Mo Sheung, Ann Butterfield Fulcrum Group (Bermuda) Limited Company Secretary Rosebank Centre 11 Bermudiana Road Ms. Chiu Nam Ying, Agnes Pembroke, HM 08 Bermuda Financial Controller Mr. Wong Chi Keung, Alvin Branch Share Registrar and Transfer Office in Hong Kong Authorised Representatives Tricor Tengis Limited Dr. Ma Ho Man, Hoffman 26th Floor Ms.
  • 1. Definition of Computers Technically, a Computer Is a Programmable Machine

    1. Definition of Computers Technically, a Computer Is a Programmable Machine

    1. Definition of computers Technically, a computer is a programmable machine. This means it can execute a programmed list of instructions and respond to new instructions that it is given. 2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using computer? Advantages are : communication is improved, pay bill's online, people have access to things they would not have had before (for instance old people who cannot leave the house they can buy groceries online) Computers make life easier. The disadvantages are: scams, fraud, people not going out as much, we do not yet know the effects of computers and pregnancy or the emissions that computers make,. bad posture from sitting too long at a desk, repetitive strain injuries and the fact that most organizations expect everyone to own a computer. Year 1901 The first radio message is sent across the Atlantic Ocean in Morse code. 1902 3M is founded. 1906 The IEC is founded in London England. 1906 Grace Hopper is born December 9, 1906. 1911 Company now known as IBM on is incorporated June 15, 1911 in the state of New York as the Computing - Tabulating - Recording Company (C-T-R), a consolidation of the Computing Scale Company, and The International Time Recording Company. 1912 Alan Turing is born June 23, 1912. 1912 G. N. Lewis begins work on the lithium battery. 1915 The first telephone call is made across the continent. 1919 Olympus is established on October 12, 1919 by Takeshi Yamashita. 1920 First radio broadcasting begins in United States, Pittsburgh, PA. 1921 Czech playwright Karel Capek coins the term "robot" in the 1921 play RUR (Rossum's Universal Robots).
  • Class-Action Lawsuit

    Class-Action Lawsuit

    Case 3:20-cv-00863-SI Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 279 Steve D. Larson, OSB No. 863540 Email: [email protected] Jennifer S. Wagner, OSB No. 024470 Email: [email protected] STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 209 SW Oak Street, Suite 500 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 227-1600 Attorneys for Plaintiffs [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page.] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BLUE PEAK HOSTING, LLC, PAMELA Case No. GREEN, TITI RICAFORT, MARGARITE SIMPSON, and MICHAEL NELSON, on behalf of CLASS ACTION ALLEGATION themselves and all others similarly situated, COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATION COMPLAINT Case 3:20-cv-00863-SI Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 279 Plaintiffs Blue Peak Hosting, LLC, Pamela Green, Titi Ricafort, Margarite Sampson, and Michael Nelson, individually and on behalf of the members of the Class defined below, allege the following against Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel” or “the Company”), based upon personal knowledge with respect to themselves and on information and belief derived from, among other things, the investigation of counsel and review of public documents as to all other matters. INTRODUCTION 1. Despite Intel’s intentional concealment of specific design choices that it long knew rendered its central processing units (“CPUs” or “processors”) unsecure, it was only in January 2018 that it was first revealed to the public that Intel’s CPUs have significant security vulnerabilities that gave unauthorized program instructions access to protected data. 2. A CPU is the “brain” in every computer and mobile device and processes all of the essential applications, including the handling of confidential information such as passwords and encryption keys.
  • Being a Michael Jackson Pilgrim: Dedicated to a Never-Ending Journey

    Being a Michael Jackson Pilgrim: Dedicated to a Never-Ending Journey

    UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN Being a Michael Jackson Pilgrim: dedicated to a never-ending journey S2054620 9/15/2015 Fardo Ine Eringa Master thesis Religion and the Public Domain, Faculty of Religious Studies First supervisor: dr. Mathilde van Dijk Second supervisor: dr. Kristin McGee “Heal the world Make it a better place For you and for me And the entire human race There are people dying If you care enough for the living Make a better place For you and for me.” ‘Heal The World’, Michael Jackson (1991) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research has been made possible through invaluable input and support by several individuals. I would like to express my gratitude to all those who have guided me through the writing process of this thesis. First of all, I would like to thank Mathilde van Dijk, who has supported and motivated me both with her broad knowledge in the field of pilgrimage research and with her enthusiasm. During the writing process dr. Van Dijk helped me to structure my study and supported me with extensive feedback. I very much enjoyed our collaboration and it is our personal meetings and dr. Van Dijk’s thorough feedback that have made this study to the best possible outcome. I would also like to thank Kristin McGee, who has been a wonderful second supervisor and has provided me with helpful information in the field of popular culture. Moreover, dr. McGee has provided me with valid feedback both regarding the content of my study and my English. Furthermore, I would like to thank my family for the many brainstorm sessions and their assistance through personal feedback and support during the finalizing of this research.
  • Content Marketing Members-Only Conference

    Content Marketing Members-Only Conference

    Content Marketing Members-Only Conference Wednesday, March 12, 2014 | Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. | San Francisco, CA at We’ll be live tweeting throughout the conference (@ANAMarketers), as well as posting photos and other information at facebook.com/ANA. www.ana.net Table of Contents ANA Content Marketing Members-Only Conference at Charles Schwab & Co. Agenda ............................................................................ pg 2 Speaker Bios .................................................................... pg 4 Attendees ........................................................................ pg 7 ANA Member Benefits .....................................................pg 15 www.ana.net 1 Agenda ANA Content Marketing Members-Only Conference at Charles Schwab & Co. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 2014 to expand the opportunity to engage balance different content strategies for consumers and to build brand affinity different types of brands, or measure Breakfast (8:15 a.m.) in a new way that complements tradi- real results? The next five years will see tional advertising. a strategic inflection for marketing and advertising, and content will be at the Helen Loh General Session (9:00 a.m.) core. This session will talk through the Vice President, Content and Digital Marketing business case, the process, the tactics Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. BENJAMIN MOORE USES CONTENT TO and real-life examples of how real CONNECT WITH DIFFERENT AUDIENCE Tami Dorsey brands are using content to drive real SEGMENTS Editorial Director marketing results. Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. Staying true to their namesake’s 130+ Robert Rose Chief Strategist year-old vision, Benjamin Moore & Co. INTEL DEVELOPS A BRANDED Content Marketing Institute is committed to producing the highest CONTENT FORMULA TO ENSURE quality paints and finishes in the indus- try. But marketing to their disparate REPEATED SUCCESS Lunch (12:50 p.m.) target markets (contractors to home- When Intel & Toshiba launched “The owners, as well as designers and archi- Inside Experience” in 2011 it was General Session Cont.
  • Ramp: Research Accelerator for Multiple Processors

    Ramp: Research Accelerator for Multiple Processors

    ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... RAMP: RESEARCH ACCELERATOR FOR MULTIPLE PROCESSORS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... THE RAMP PROJECT’S GOAL IS TO ENABLE THE INTENSIVE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY INNOVATION John Wawrzynek THAT THE COMPUTING INDUSTRY WILL NEED TO TACKLE THE PROBLEMS OF PARALLEL David Patterson PROCESSING. RAMP ITSELF IS AN OPEN-SOURCE, COMMUNITY-DEVELOPED, FPGA-BASED University of California, EMULATOR OF PARALLEL ARCHITECTURES. ITS DESIGN FRAMEWORK LETS A LARGE, Berkeley COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOP AND CONTRIBUTE REUSABLE, COMPOSABLE DESIGN Mark Oskin MODULES. THREE COMPLETE DESIGNS—FOR TRANSACTIONAL MEMORY, DISTRIBUTED University of Washington SYSTEMS, AND DISTRIBUTED-SHARED MEMORY—DEMONSTRATE THE PLATFORM’S POTENTIAL. Shih-Lien Lu ...... In 2005, the computer hardware N Prototyping a new architecture in Intel industry took a historic change of direction: hardware takes approximately four The major microprocessor companies all an- years and many millions of dollars, nounced that their future products would even at only research quality. Christoforos Kozyrakis be single-chip multiprocessors, and that N Software
  • Computer Architectures an Overview

    Computer Architectures an Overview

    Computer Architectures An Overview PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:35:32 UTC Contents Articles Microarchitecture 1 x86 7 PowerPC 23 IBM POWER 33 MIPS architecture 39 SPARC 57 ARM architecture 65 DEC Alpha 80 AlphaStation 92 AlphaServer 95 Very long instruction word 103 Instruction-level parallelism 107 Explicitly parallel instruction computing 108 References Article Sources and Contributors 111 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 113 Article Licenses License 114 Microarchitecture 1 Microarchitecture In computer engineering, microarchitecture (sometimes abbreviated to µarch or uarch), also called computer organization, is the way a given instruction set architecture (ISA) is implemented on a processor. A given ISA may be implemented with different microarchitectures.[1] Implementations might vary due to different goals of a given design or due to shifts in technology.[2] Computer architecture is the combination of microarchitecture and instruction set design. Relation to instruction set architecture The ISA is roughly the same as the programming model of a processor as seen by an assembly language programmer or compiler writer. The ISA includes the execution model, processor registers, address and data formats among other things. The Intel Core microarchitecture microarchitecture includes the constituent parts of the processor and how these interconnect and interoperate to implement the ISA. The microarchitecture of a machine is usually represented as (more or less detailed) diagrams that describe the interconnections of the various microarchitectural elements of the machine, which may be everything from single gates and registers, to complete arithmetic logic units (ALU)s and even larger elements.