MS4 ANNUAL REPORT a Summary of Permit Year 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MS4 ANNUAL REPORT a Summary of Permit Year 4 MS4 ANNUAL REPORT A Summary of Permit Year 4 Chesterfield County, Virginia VSMP Permit No. VA0088609 March 2019 Chesterfield County, Virginia Permit No. VA0088609 2018 MS4 Annual Report – PY4 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... I List of Tables............................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................. iii List of Appendices....................................................................................................................................................... v SECTION 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. 1 a) The Permittee and Permit Number ..................................................................................................................... 1 b) Modifications to the MS4 Program Plan ............................................................................................................. 1 c) Reporting Dates .................................................................................................................................................. 1 d) Certification as per Part II.K. ............................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................. 3 Part I.B.1. Planning ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Part I.B.2.a) Construction Site Runoff and Post Construction Runoff from Areas of New Development and Development on Prior Developed Lands ............................................................................................................. 4 Part I.B.2.b) Retrofitting on Prior Developed Lands ................................................................................................... 6 Part I.B.2.c) Roadways ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Part I.B.2.d) Pesticide, Herbicide and Fertilizer Application ....................................................................................... 8 Part I.B.2.e) Illicit Discharges and Improper Disposal .............................................................................................. 10 Part I.B.2.f) Spill Prevention and Response .............................................................................................................. 11 Part I.B.2.g) Industrial and High Risk Runoff ............................................................................................................ 12 Part I.B.2.h) Storm Sewer Infrastructure Management ........................................................................................... 14 Part I.B.2.i) County Facilities .................................................................................................................................... 17 Part I.B.2.j) Public Education/Participation .............................................................................................................. 18 Part I.B.2.k) Training ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Part I.B.2.l) Water Quality Screening Programs ....................................................................................................... 21 Part I.B.2.m) Infrastructure Coordination ................................................................................................................ 23 SECTION 3. MONITORING PROGRAM REPORTS ................................................................................................... 24 Part I.C.1. Biological Stream Monitoring .................................................................................................................. 24 Part I.C.2. In-Stream Monitoring .............................................................................................................................. 24 Part I.C.3. Floatables Monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 25 Part I.C.4. Structural and Source Controls Compliance Monitoring and Tracking .................................................... 26 SECTION 4. TMDL IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................................. 27 Part I.D.1. Chesapeake Bay Special Condition .......................................................................................................... 27 Part I.D.2. TMDL Action Plans other than the Chesapeake Bay TMDL ..................................................................... 29 SECTION 5. SPECIFIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................... 30 Part I.A.2. Permittee Responsibilities ....................................................................................................................... 33 Part I.A.4. MS4 Program Resources ......................................................................................................................... 33 Part I.A.5. Permit Maintenance Fees ........................................................................................................................ 33 Part I.A.7. MS4 Program Review and Updates ......................................................................................................... 33 Table of Contents i Chesterfield County, Virginia Permit No. VA0088609 2018 MS4 Annual Report – PY4 List of Tables Table 1. Land Disturbance and Single-Family Residence Permits Issued and the Associated Disturbed Acres ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Table 2. Land Disturbance Activity Inspections and Number and Type of Enforcement Actions ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Table 3. Project Construction Status Updates ............................................................................................ 6 Table 4. Permittee Properties Covered Under Turf and Landscape Nutrient Management Plans ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 5. Sanitary Sewer Inspections ........................................................................................................... 10 Table 6. IHRR Program Inspections Performed ..................................................................................... 12 Table 7. IHRR Program Discharges Referred to DEQ .......................................................................... 13 Table 8. Stormwater Inspections, Maintenance, and Repairs .......................................................... 15 Table 9. Activities Performed for Privately Maintained Facilities ................................................. 15 Table 10. List of Floatable Monitoring Sites ............................................................................................ 25 Table 11. Control Measures Implemented for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Through PY4 .... 27 Table 12. Control Measures Implemented and Estimated Reduction Achieved for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL in PY4 ................................................................................................................ 28 Table 13. Control Measures Expected to be Implemented for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL in Next Reporting Year ................................................................................................................................... 28 Table 14. Location of Specific Reporting Requirements within the Annual Report ............... 30 List of Tables ii Chesterfield County, Virginia Permit No. VA0088609 2018 MS4 Annual Report – PY4 List of Abbreviations BI Department of Building Inspections BMP Best Management Practices Chesterfield County General Services - Building and Grounds BUILDING & GROUNDS Maintenance Division CE Chesterfield County Department of Community Enhancement CEU Continuing Education Unit CIP Capital Improvement Plan DEE Chesterfield County Department of Environmental Engineering DEQ Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Chesterfield County Department of Environmental Engineering DRAINAGE - Watershed Management Division Drainage Section DMR Discharge Monitoring Reports ELM Enterprise Land Management ESC Erosion and Sediment Control EXTENSION Chesterfield County Cooperative Extension FIRE & EMS Chesterfield County Fire & Emergency Medical Services Chesterfield County Fire & Emergency Medical Services - Fire FIRE MARSHAL Marshal's Office Chesterfield County General Services - Fleet Management FLEET Division HPMF High Priority Municipal
Recommended publications
  • 2016 MS4 Annual Report
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT: A SUMMARY OF MS4 PERMIT YEAR 2 PROGRESS Chesterfield County, Virginia VSMP Permit No. VA0088609 Prepared March 2017 Department of Environmental Engineering 9800 Government Center Parkway P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Chesterfield County, Virginia Permit No. VA0088609 2016 Annual Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... I List of Tables............................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................. iii List of Appendices....................................................................................................................................................... v SECTION 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................. 1 a) The Permittee and Permit Number ..................................................................................................................... 1 b) Modifications to the MS4 Program Plan ............................................................................................................. 1 c) Reporting Dates .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OFR 07 03.Pdf
    OPEN-FILE REPORT 07-03 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OPEN-FILE REPORT 07-03 SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE BON AIR QUADRANGLE: A SUPPLEMENT TO THE GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE BON AIR QUADRANGLE, VIRGINIA Mark W. Carter, C. R. Berquist, Jr., and Heather A. Bleick a A B s C D COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES Edward E. Erb, State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 2008 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES COVER PHOTOS. Xenoliths and schlieren in Petersburg Granite. A – Biotite-muscovite granitic gneiss. A dashed line marks strong foliation in the rock. Edge of Brunton compass is about 3 inches (7.6 centimeters) long. Outcrop coordinates – 37.54853°N, 77.69229°W, NAD 27. B – Amphibolite xenolith (marked by an “a”) in layered granite gneiss phase of the Petersburg Granite. Faint layering can be seen in granite between hammerhead and xenolith. Hammer is approximately 15 inches (38 centimeters) long. Outcrop coordinates – 37.5050°N, 77.5893 °W, NAD 27. C – Foliation in amphibolite xenolith (marked by a dashed line). Hammerhead is about 8 inches (20 centimeters) long. Outcrop coordinates – 37.5229°N, 77.5790°W, NAD 27. D – Schlieren (marked by an “s”) in foliated granite phase of the Petersburg Granite. Schleiren are oriented parallel to the foliation in the granite. Field of view in photograph is about 2 feet by 3 feet (0.6 meter by 0.9 meter). Outcrop coordinates – 37.5147°N, 77.5352°W, NAD 27. OPEN-FILE REPORT 07-03 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OPEN-FILE REPORT 07-03 SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE BON AIR QUADRANGLE: A SUPPLEMENT TO THE GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE BON AIR QUADRANGLE, VIRGINIA Mark W.
    [Show full text]
  • MS4 ANNUAL REPORT a Summary of Permit Year 5
    D^ϰEEh>ZWKZd ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨWĞƌŵŝƚzĞĂƌϱ ŚĞƐƚĞƌĨŝĞůĚŽƵŶƚLJ͕sŝƌŐŝŶŝĂ s^DWWĞƌŵŝƚEŽ͘sϬϬϴϴϲϬϵ 0DUFK ǡ ǤͲͲͺͺ͸Ͳͻ ʹͲͳͻͶȂͷ TableofContents d>K&KEdEd^͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘/ >ŝƐƚŽĨdĂďůĞƐ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ŝŝ >ŝƐƚŽĨďďƌĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ŝŝŝ >ŝƐƚŽĨƉƉĞŶĚŝĐĞƐ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ǀ ^d/KEϭ͘<'ZKhE/E&KZDd/KE͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϭ ĂͿ dŚĞWĞƌŵŝƚƚĞĞĂŶĚWĞƌŵŝƚEƵŵďĞƌ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϭ ďͿ DŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞD^ϰWƌŽŐƌĂŵWůĂŶ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϭ ĐͿ ZĞƉŽƌƚŝŶŐĂƚĞƐ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϭ ĚͿ ĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂƐƉĞƌWĂƌƚ//͘<͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘Ϯ ^d/KEϮ͘^dKZDtdZDE'DEd/DW>DEdd/KE͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘ϯ
    [Show full text]
  • DC2RVA Tier II Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(F
    12 REFERENCES D.C. TO RICHMOND SOUTHEAST HIGH SPEED RAIL 7 REFERENCES 12 Amtrak. 1999. Report to Congress: Potential Improvements to the Washington-Richmond Railroad Corridor, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C. May 1999. 87 pages. 2008. Advancing Passenger Rail in the Commonwealth of Virginia: Short Term Action Plan, Part I. Washington, D.C. 28 pages. January 2008. 2008. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2007: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 2 pages. 2010. PRIIA Section 210 FY10 Performance Improvement Plan: Cardinal. Washington, D.C. 34 pages. 2010 Fact Sheet: New Passenger Rail Service Comes to Richmond and Eastern Virginia. Washington, D.C. and Richmond, VA. 2 pages. 2011. PRIIA Section 210 FY11 Performance Improvement Plan: Crescent, Lake Shore Limited, Silver Service. Washington, D.C. 90 pages. 2011. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2011: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 3 pages. 2012. PRIIA Section 210 FY11 Performance Improvement Plan: Auto Train, City of New Orleans, Coast Starlight, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief. Washington, D.C. 84 pages. 2012. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2012: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 4 pages. 2012. The Amtrak Vision for the Northeast Corridor: 2012 Update Report. July 2012. Washington, D.C. and Richmond, VA. 2 pages. 2012. Northeast Corridor Employee Timetable No. 5. October 5, 2012. 2013. Station Program Planning Guidelines. https://spportal.my-techub.com/Sites/DC2RVA/ Project%20Communication/Reference%20Material/amtrak-station-planning-and- program-guidelines.pdf. 2013. 12-1 TIER II DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2013. Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2013: Commonwealth of Virginia. Washington, D.C. 5 pages. 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 NRHP Update Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior Springhill Historic DistrictPut 2016 Here Update National Park Service LISTED ON: NRHP: 8/2/2016 and Corrections Name of Property National Register of Historic Places Richmond, VA County and State Continuation Sheet Historic Residential Suburbs in the United States, 1830-1960 Section number Additional Documentation Page 1 Name of multiple listing (if applicable) Introduction The Springhill Historic District was originally listed in the National Register of Historic Places on February 10, 2014. Since that time, research and review conducted by independent researchers Richard Helm, Lyle Browning, William Trout and Scott Williams have provided evidence of errors in the original nomination and significant documentation of the multiple-layered evolution of two properties within the historic district: the location of the former Manchester Waterworks and the location of a late 1970s high-rise apartment building for the elderly. This additional documentation is being submitted to correct the original nomination’s numerous errors concerning these two properties and, more importantly, to provide a fuller understanding of the historic district’s significance in the areas of Industry and Community Planning and Development. The district’s historic boundaries and areas of significance have not changed as a result of this update. The original nomination included an erroneous entry for 1920 Stonewall Avenue (DHR No. 127-6180- 0062/ 127-0284) which was listed as having two contributing and two non-contributing resources. The resource referred to as an “aqueduct” in the original nomination in fact was a brick cellar and, moreover, was demolished during the 1970s.
    [Show full text]