Italian and "The Fourth Dimension" Author(s): Linda Dalrymple Henderson Source: Art Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, Futurism (Winter, 1981), pp. 317-323 Published by: CAA Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/776440 Accessed: 14-04-2020 16:11 UTC

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms

CAA is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Art Journal

This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Italian Futurism and "The Fourth Dimension"

Linda Dalrymple Henderson

During the first three decades of the twentieth century, artists in nearly every major modern movement were influenced by a highly popular concept known as "the fourth dimension." In this period, "the fourth dimension" signified a higher, unseen dimension of space which might hold a reality truer than that of visual perception. Linked closely to the philosophical idealism which dominated the era, belief in a fourth dimension encouraged bold, formal experi- mentation by liberating artists from the domi- nation of three-dimensional visual reality. If some artistic advocates of a fourth dimension, such as the Cubists, did not reject visual per- ception completely, Kupka, Malevich, Mondrian, and Van Doesburg found support in the idea for their creation of a totally abstract art. The Futurists Boccioni and Severini thus joined a ,: - , ' D ' : :: distinguished list of artists attracted to "the Fig. 2 Perspective cavaliere,from E. Jouffret, fourth dimension," a group ranging from Ana- Traite elementaire de geometrie a quatre lytical and Synthetic Cubists as well as Duchamp, Picabia, and Kupka, to Russian Futurists and dimensions (Paris, 1903), Fig. 41. Fig. 1 Pablo Picasso, Portrait of Ambroise Suprematists, American modernists in the Vollard, 1910, oil on canvas. Moscow, Stieglitz and Arensberg circles, Dadaists, mem- Pushkin Museum. ceptual nature of African art was the specific bers of De Stijl, and even certain Surrealists.' factor that encouraged Picasso, as he said, "to The popular, early twentieth-century view paint objects as I think them, not as I see that space might indeed have more than three sion of space, the true reality. The fourth them."4 For the theorists Metzinger, Gleizes, dimensions was an outgrowth of the develop- dimension also took on specifically mystical and Apollinaire, on the other hand, the fourth ment, during the first half of the nineteenth qualities when adopted by certain Theosophists dimension served as the major rationale for a century, of geometries of more than three and spiritualists; it functioned in this way in the Cubist painter's freedom to distort or deform dimensions, known as n-dimensional geometry.2 writings of the major hyperspace philosophers objects according to a higher law, as well as Although higher dimensions of space were descended from Hinton-P. D. Ouspensky infor his rejection of perspective.5 As Apollinaire first brought to public attention in the later Russia and Claude Bragdon in the United States. wrote on the subject of form in 1912, "It is to nineteenth century by debates about the nature The first artistic applications of a spatial the fourth dimension alone that we owe a new of geometrical axioms and the nature of space, fourth dimension were developed in Paris in norm of the perfect."6 "the fourth dimension" quickly acquired nu- the years around 1910, and the Cubist literature Apollinaire's reference in Les Peintres Cub-' merous non-geometric associations as well. inIn which they were set forth had an impact onistes of 1913 to perspective as "that miserable England, for example, the author Charles all subsequent theorizing on the subject. Al- tricky perspective, that fourth dimension in Howard Hinton developed a system of "hyper- though Picasso's evolved from his in- reverse"7 confirms the specific connection of space philosophy,"3 based on his belief that terest in Cezanne and African art, his step tothe fourth dimension with Cubist pictorial space the answer to the evils of positivism and mate- mature Analytical Cubism was unquestionably as well as with form. The ambiguous space of a rialism was for man to develop his powers encouragedof by his era's belief in a reality work such as Picasso's Portrait of Ambroise intuition in order to perceive a fourth dimen- beyond immediate visual perception. The con- Vollard of 1910 offers a striking parallel to a

Winter 1981 317 This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms contemporary illustration in a textbook on iiii:%,:L~ :~T THE ?bAN~' AS' A :P ::IX._i--:i DAH'D:Hq :------:::) A i_.~:-- THE XVIXSfr OF A UNIT CO 2 3. AND 4 SPAC0 four-dimensional geometry by E. Jouffret, pub- :IN o T E NEXT LO,VEI tSP AM iUE t}WDJ"RE-tG lished in Paris in 1903 (Figs. I and 2). IN AND S MEANS C> UNIT $ CPT_IE Ij/;SI:F Although not the source of Picasso's Cubist { [ tCD ZCO.WERE I.RIcjNAcCtrINiTAYS X0 IO MAN' Iv: MA' F : ' ANE,ANDI' THRAT /AET10ZAC 1.3 CUT/ITWURO H rA YIO I OUr. style, such illustrations would have confirmed the direction in which Cubism was developing. F FC C I f D FDI UtES WITH A-t, E-C- FS OF FLOF U?.DIWSUNITS--THE Both images seek to avoid a traditional three- fT1'-- 051/I? IAL UNEMA, NCVUgUNITA-b545 IN TH1M ADDS N,TNRD VSNQ D IOAN. D ITWARD CIT LrINEA uNITATSACH I D O IT AND AnJU NmOVEF inTH &IZT NUiU 7TO 5 AN D QTNSDr. dimensional reading of objects and space. L_cz- e WEISA jIXTP lUE itOM SSD zVD AT Ira A04NDC?E B5D TM$ MOTION vDU:a00: : Moreover, multiple viewpoints of the object - ' IFTHU CUllS A-BC-D--Q TE'? MADS are juxtaposed, just as Henri Poincare had ri W 4 au a PlaI 1 t A I F t SAHE Im I . \IA S::S CTO? Iu AJ. NAMNO Zn :: DIMENSIONAL ftqUI OCF SIX (1902), in a discussion of a possible means to AE$-Th s rtCO 5 A represent a four-dimensional object. In fact, 3(XTAFH ON EACH SIDE CF IT At?a ONZ. - ...... 5E'yOMDCCI D oii;l; :f Hi g 1he s NNk r tace (1 1 the explanation by Metzinger and Gleizes inDu SIDE FigXO CEladA MINT Bragd ASM n ,: NiMThI4Pla t 14 : : cD Prime Cubisme (1912) that the Cubist painter moves THAT X0 T:ms sPH^as. PSFTEI ?CW I : IT 'WUlfD SHRI :N (% s : s m :^U: : fT :4ge SpNa T lF c M 3) AX around his subject, gathering multiple views of it in order to produce a truer image, is based on Poincare's connection of tactile and motor

sensations with the possible perception of higher S'MI;LARY IFTH TESSET(Cr(ESNT,D 17ET. ? C UL: 4 DINS I tXIO;N A ; X : N: : ;: :EH S: :R : :t^r : AI C SOLID R0M AS TO ITS SU-ND-:IP C, I :i spatial dimensions.8 AND IF THI:S DD 'NER: CUT TH0SO:XJH TT . NTt:::T S.Anc THc1 S CUBEDS CO_.UD D; AIY. : D 1 . - The method of the Cubist painter, then, was SO F,CiM -. THR?E DIMEN$SUDAL F'EURE Ot C:QHT (i& :it analogous to that of a geometer striving to L. T = D X \ : PtPA T^E S: achieve a perception of a higher dimensional Fig. 3 Claude Bragdon, Plate 3 Fig. from 4 Claude A Primer Bragdon, Plate 14Dfrom A Primer object. If motion in time was involved in the of of Hig.herHigher...... S ace . SPac f1913) (191,). process, it was only incidental to the artist's of Higher Space (The Fourth Dimension) (Rochester, N. Y, 1913). pursuit of four-dimensional space. Yet within the tradition of a spatial fourth dimension there had developed, by the end of the nine- teenth century, a second approach to higher dimensions, an approach in which time and motion played a positive role. However, authors such as Hinton, who included time in their explanations of the fourth dimension, were not returning to the suggestion made in the eighteenth century that time itself could be defined as a fourth dimension.9 That idea was to gain widespread acceptance once again only after 1919 with the popularization of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity based on a four-dimensional space-time continuum.'0 During the nineteenth and early twentieth cen- turies, however, the interpretation of the fourth dimension as time was almost completely over- shadowed by enthusiasm about a higher spatial dimension, perpendicular to the three dimen- sions we know. Thus, Hinton believed firmly in

the existence of a fourth dimension of space Fig. 5 Frontispiece from Charles Howard Hinton, The Fourth Dimension and argued that time and motion were incom- (London andNew York, 1904). pletely understood manifestations of that addi- tional spatial dimension. Hinton's theoretical writings centered about through our three-dimensional space. the four to three-dimensional analogue of this the four-dimensional hypercube, or tesseract, To explain this process, Hinton and process, others Hinton created a series of multicolored the higher dimensional analogue of the cube frequently used the analogy of a planar cubes world standing for the three-dimensional sec- (Fig. 3, lower right). Just as a cube can be of two dimensions and the reactions tions of itsof the hypercube, which would be per- generated by the motion of a two-dimensional inhabitants to three-dimensional solids ceived passing in succession as it passed through our plane through a third dimension, a hypercube through the plane (Fig. 4). Such an event space. had The illustration reproduced here (Fig. 5) would be traced by the motion of a three- also formed the basis of the first fictional includes tale six of the twelve catalogue cubes for dimensional cube into a new, fourth perpen- based on higher dimensions, the Englishman Hinton's system, as it was presented in his dicular direction. Given the difficulty of visual- E.A. Abbott's delightful book of 1884, book Flat- The Fourth Dimension (1904). izing the four-dimensional appearance of this land: A Romance of Many Dimensions Hyperspace by a philosophy's two complemen- figure, even in a three-dimensional perspective Square."I As a sphere intersected his tary plane, approaches to higher dimensional space projection (Fig. 3, lower left), a reversal of Abbott's Flatlander perceived only a succession (motion to generate a higher solid and, in this process was more effective for Hinton's of concentric circles, first growing andreverse, then the sectioning of that solid by a space purposes. As a result, he concentrated on the decreasing in size. These circles, experienced of one less dimension) are relevant for artists three-dimensional sections which would be in time and motion, were his only clues whose to the theoretical references to the fourth produced as a four-dimensional object passed nature of the three-dimensional sphere.'2 dimension As occurred in the context of a motion-

318 ArtJournal This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms la quatrieme dimension," which appeared on the front page of Comoedia on May 20, 1912.15 Just as Kupka's motion studies may have acquired a four-dimensional association, his young admirer Marcel Duchamp may have connected his own experiments in the "static representation of movement"'6 with the gen- eration of higher dimensional forms. Duchamp later talked of his Sad Young Man on a Train (1911) and the Nude Descending a Staircase (1912) (Fig. 8) as examples of his early interest in "elemental/elementary parallel- ism"'7 and the "parallel multiplication of the n-dim'l continuum to form the n+1 dim'l continuum."'8 Yet Duchamp, who knew the geometry of Jouffret as well as Hinton's ideas, must quickly have realized that there is nothing four dimensional about the motion of an object unless it moves off into a new fourth direction (as Hinton's hypercube was to have done). As Duchamp later explained, "The movement of form in time inevitably ushered us into geome-

Fig. 6 Etienne-Jules Marey, Fencer, 1882. Paris, CinemathequeJranqaise.

Fig. 9 , The Knife Grinder, 1912, oil on canvas. New Haven, Yale University Art Gallery.

try and mathematics."'9 With this realization, Duchamp gave up his motion studies (as well as conventional oil painting) to carry out the most serious study of four-dimensional geom- etry undertaken by any early twentieth-century artist, a study which culminated in The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even (The Large Glass) of 1915-1923. Fig. 7 Frantisek Kupka, Untitled drawing, A similar rejection of motion in three-dimen- ca. 1910, graphite pencil on paper. Paris, Collection Karl Flinker. sional space was made by Kazimir Malevich after he painted his one example in this mode, Fig. 8 Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a The Knife Grinder of 1912 (Fig.9).20 Male- oriented style. Kupka's painterly experiments, Staircase, No. 2, 1912, oil on canvas. vich's exploration of sequential motion in this inspired by the chronophotography of Etienne- Philadelphia Museum ofArt, The Louise and work was most likely influenced by Leger's Jules Marey (Fig. 6), appear to have taken on Walter Arensberg Collection. Essai pour les trois portraits of 1911 (Mil- a four-dimensional association for him once waukee Art Center) which was exhibited in the he was aware of Hinton's theories.'3 Most The notation on the drawing, which Kupka Jack of Diamonds exhibition in Moscow in likely introduced to Hinton's ideas through the must have added in 1912, confirms his concern February 1912. Leger's own subtle explora- Parisian Theosophical publications in which with these issues: "Displacement in three tion of motion in this painting may well have they were summarized,'4 Kupka may have come dimensions takes place in space, while that in been inspired by the chronophotography fash- to consider the forms generated in works such four dimensions by the exchange of atoms. But ion, reinforced by the Unanimiste poet Jules as Woman Picking Flowers (Musee National to fix gesture, a movement in the space of the Romains's belief in the interpenetration of d'Art Moderne, Paris) and a related drawing of canvas,-arrest several successive movements." objects in nature, as well as by Henri Bergson's about 1910 (Fig. 7) as analogous to Hinton's This statement is drawn directly from a segment description of a reality in flux within the flow generation of the hypercube by motion in time. of Gaston de Pawlowski's tale "Voyage au pays de of duration.21 Yet, Bergson himself had rejected

Winter 1981 319 This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms the chronophotograph and the cinematograph. For him such "snapshot view[s] of a transi- tion"22 were antithetical to the continuous, pure time of duration. Thus, the chronophoto- graphically inspired records of the motion of three-dimensional objects painted by Kupka, Duchamp, Malevich, and Leger were not four- dimensional nor, if one were content to pursue Bergsonian duration alone, were they truly Bergsonian. Enter the Futurist painter and sculptor . In the second technique suggested by hyperspace philosophy (i.e., the visualization of a four-dimensional object by means of its successive three-dimensional sections), Boccioni was to find an alternative approach to the problem of the fourth dimen- sion. This solution, he believed, was far supe- rior to the Cubists' pure geometrical method as well as to the chronophotographic views that even his countryman had explored in such works as Dynamism of a Dog on a Leash of 1912 (Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo). Although Boccioni's earlier writings had regularly included numerous positive refer- ences to mathematics and science,23 and al- though Italy was one of the most prolific sources of scholarly literature on the fourth dimen- sion,24 it seems that Boccioni's artistic interest in the topic was aroused only through his connections with the art world of Paris. Mari- netti's frequent presence in Paris from the 1890s onward and his acquaintance with Alfred Jarry and Apollinaire25 might have provided an initial introduction to the idea. More impor- tant, however, was the position of the Futurist Severini in the midst of the Cubist avant-garde. When Boccioni and Carra traveled to Paris in October 1911, as a prelude to their Bernheim- Jeune exhibition of February 1912, the studio visits Severini arranged included the atelier of Metzinger, who particularly impressed Boc- cioni.26 If Boccioni did not hear of the fourth dimension at that time, his return trips to Paris Fig. 10 Umberto Boccioni, Unique Forms of Continuity in Space, 1913, bronze. in February and November 1912 and in June New York, The Museum of Modern Art. 1913 for his sculpture exhibition would have afforded ample opportunity to discuss the no- wrote as follows, introducing his ideas with a not line, since dynamicform is a species tion. For example, Boccioni wrote to his friend critique of earlier attempts at expressing dyna- of fourth dimension in painting and sculp- Nino Barbantini from Paris in February 1912, mism in art: ture, which cannot exist perfectly without describing the goal of his new painting in the complete affirmation of the three di- terms of a "spiritualization [which] will be It seems clear to me that this succession is mensions which determine volume: height, given by pure mathematical values, by pure not to be found in repetition of legs, arms, width, depth. geometrical dimensions...."27 In addition, and faces, as many people have stupidly I remember having read that Cubism the first major statement of Cubist views on the believed, but is achieved through the in- with its breaking up of the object and fourth dimension was soon to be published by tuitive search for the uniqueform which unfolding of the parts of the object on the Apollinaire in an article of April 1912 in Les gives continuity in space. It is the form- flat surface of the picture approached the Soirdes de Paris, a text that formed the basis type which makes an object live in the fourth dimension.... However, this pro- for one chapter of his Les Peintres Cubistes of universal. Therefore, instead of the old- cedure is nothing but the transcription March 1913. fashioned concept of sharp differentiation onto the surface of the canvas, of the Boccioni's only major discussion of the role of bodies, instead of the modern concept planes of the object which its accidental of the fourth dimension in Futurist art was writ- of the Impressionists with their subdivision, position prevents us from seeing. It is a ten and published initially in December 1913.28 their repetition, their rough indications of rational procedure which exists in relativ- It was then included, with additions, in his text images, we would substitute a concept of ity, not in an intuitive absolute. The in- Pittura sculturafuturiste (dinamismo plas- dynamic continuity as unique form. And tegral notion of the object exists, with this tico), of 1914. In the final version Boccioni it is not by accident that I say form and procedure, in the three concepts of height,

320 ArtJournal This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms his own definition of the fourth dimension. ment of 1912 that the fourth dimension "is Since "dynamic form is a species of fourth engendered by the three known dimensions."38 dimension" for Boccioni, his view of the notion What then was the relationship of higher must be closely related to "the unique form space to time and motion in Boccioni's dynamic which gives continuity in space," the title of his interpretation of the fourth dimension? His most famous sculpture (Fig. 10).31 A four- approach to hyperspace philosophy was not dimensional form for Boccioni is a "form- that of Kupka or Duchamp, who sought to type" which transcends artificial divisions in generate a higher dimensional form by the space; in other words, it "gives continuity." motion of a three-dimensional object through Boccioni's fourth dimension is an absolute, space. Instead, if Boccioni was at all influenced unmeasurable, infinite concept, as opposed to by the hyperspace philosophy of Hinton 39 or Cubism's "measured and finite" fourth dimen- an Italian parallel, it was the reverse process, sion which is only relative in Boccioni's view. the passage of a higher dimensional form Intuition and not a "rational procedure" is the through our space, that interested him. The means by which the Futurist artist can approach purpose of Hinton's system of cubes had been this fourth dimension, which is "the sum of to educate a reader's "space sense" in order the potential unfolding of the three known for him to visualize this process. Although the dimensions." Finally, in creating a "more ab- reader would actually perceive only the sections stract and symbolic" conception of reality, the of the hypercube (its eight individual colored Futurist will wisely avoid trying to define or cubes in succession), he would hopefully ex- :f .:- : : :... ..C1? delimit "the fixed and absolute measure which perience some intuition of the greater reality of the whole four-dimensional object. Fig. 11 Umberto Boccioni, Muscular creates dynamism." Dynamism, 1913, charcoal onpaper. To New explain York,Boccioni's very different under- The Museum of Modern Art. standing of the fourth dimension, his prior artistic concerns and his choice of different sources on the fourth dimension must be con- width, depth, thus I repeat, in the relative, sidered. In the evolution of his artistic theory in the finite of mensuration. If with the Boccioni had been particularly influenced by artistic intuition it is ever possible to ap- the philosophy of Bergson. Basic to his thinking, proach the concept of a fourth dimension, then, was a belief in a reality in constant flux, it is we Futurists who are getting there to be intuited by each individual within the first. In fact, with the unique form which flow of duration.32 When Boccioni began to gives continuity in space we create a form consider a fourth dimension, he naturally pre- which is the sum of the potential unfolding ferred interpretations involving time, the basic of the three known dimensions. Therefore, element in Bergson's theories. Hyperspace we cannot make a measured and finite philosophy, with its recognition of time as a fourth dimension, but rather a continuous means to higher spatial dimensions, was ideally projection of forces and forms intuited in suited to Boccioni's needs. Bergson himself their infinite unfolding. In fact, the unique had linked time with space, referring to "homo- dynamic form which we proclaim is noth- geneous time" as a fourth dimension of space ing other than the suggestion of ina hisform Essai insur les donnees immediates de la motion which appears for a moment only Fig. 12 Intersection of a Spiral and a Plane, conscience of 1889.33 Significantly, however, to be lost in the infinite succession of its from Hinton, The Fourth Dimension (1904), Bergson had used the term in a negative sense, p. 27. variety. criticizing the mind's tendency to contaminate In conclusion, we Futurists give the the pure flow of duration by spatializing it. method for creating a conception more Yet, for Boccioni the fourth dimension did An analogy Hinton had used as early as abstract and symbolic of reality, but we do imply higher spatial dimensions and was not 1888, and which was well known in this period, not define the fixed and absolute measure simply time alone (as it would have had to be was the notion of a hand with its five fingertips which creates dynamism.29 for a Bergsonian purist). Throughout Boccioni's placed on a table.40 A two-dimensional being writings of the period from 1912 to 1914, in the plane of the table would be unaware of Boccioni's understanding of the fourth di- there are frequent references to "a new inner the single "unique form" (the three-dimen- mension was obviously far more dynamic than reality,"34 "an ideal, superior plane,"35 and sional hand) "giving [the five separate fin- that of the Cubists, whose geometric approach the need of the artist to "render the invisible gerprints] continuity in [three-dimensional] he specifically rejected. Dynamism and, by which stirs and lives beyond intervening ob- space." In other words, the hand would func- implication, motion in time are essential ele- stacles."36 Boccioni's fellow Futurist Severini, tion as a higher dimensional form, transcending ments of his interpretation. Yet, Boccioni is who was later to theorize extensively on the the artificial divisions between objects in space, careful to separate himself from the analyses fourth dimension in the context of Synthetic divisions which Boccioni consistently decried. of linear sequential motion painted by Kupka, Cubism, wrote in the fall of 1913 that "we must Thus, Boccioni's striding figure, as depicted in Duchamp, and his fellow Futurist Balla, as well forget exterior reality and our knowledge of it sketches (Fig. 11), preparatory models, and a as from the chronophotographic experiments in order to create the new dimensions ... ."37 final sculpture, suggests the passage through our of the Italian photographer Bragaglia, who And Boccioni himself revealed a debt to Apol- space of a four-dimensional figure (a unique attempted to embody Futurist tenets in his linaire and Cubism's spatial fourth dimension form), whose successive states materialize and fotodinamismo.30 in his assertion that the fourth dimension dematerialize before our eyes. Beyond his criticisms of the mistaken ap- "cannot exist perfectly without the complete As the Russian mystic Ouspensky would proaches of others to higher dimensions, Boc- affirmation of the three dimensions which deter- later argue, time and motion in three-dimen- cioni's text provides several indirect clues to mine volume"-an echo of Apollinaire's state- sional space may be considered illusions that

Winter 1981 321 This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms result only because of our incomplete percep- text is a revised and considerably expanded by the mass of the sun. See, for example, tion of space.41 Boccioni, the follower of Berg- version of "The Artist, 'The Fourth Dimension,' Henderson, "A New Facet of Cubism," pp. son, would never have accepted this extreme and Non-Euclidean Geometry 1900-1930: A 414 - 19; and Ronald W. Clark, Einstein: The view, however. Instead, he asserted the positive Romance of Many Dimensions" (henceforth Life and Times (New York: World Publishing, value of time and motion as the most effective referred to as "The Artist..."), a doctoral 1971), pp. 227 - 66. indication of a higher, dynamic reality. A further dissertation completed at Yale University in 1975. 11 See Edwin Abbott Abbott, Flatland: A Romance comparison with Hinton is suggested by Boc- 2 By the later nineteenth century, another type of Many Dimensions by a Square (London: cioni's interest in the spiral form as an innately of geometry, known as non-Euclidean geome- Seeley & Co., 1884). dynamic shape possessing "absolute motion," try, also contributed to public interest in alter- 12 In contrast to Bragdon's didactic diagram a concern manifested in his writings and in his native kinds of space. Non-Euclidean geometry, (Fig. 4), a sphere passing perpendicularly Development of a Bottle in Space of 1912 formulated by the mathematicians Lobachevsky, through a plane would actually produce a (The Museum of Modem Art, New York).42 In Bolyai, and Riemann, studies spaces of positive, succession of increasing and decreasing circles The Fourth Dimension Hinton had demon- negative, or variable curvature and is thus a around a single point in the plane. The clearest strated the way in which the illusion of circular totally separate area of study from n-dimen- analysis of the relationship between space and motion in a plane could result when a spiral sional geometry. Although non-Euclidean geom- motion in time is to be found in Peter Demiano- passed through a plane (Fig. 12). In reality the etry never enjoyed the widespread popularity of vich Ouspensky's Tertium Organium: The "relative motion" of the point would be sub- "the fourth dimension," it did have an impact Third Canon of Thought, A Key to the Enigmas sumed within the "absolute motion" of the spiral on several artists, including Metzinger and of the World (1911), trans. from 2nd ed. (its vertical movement in a third dimension). Gleizes, Duchamp, and . (1916) by Claude Bragdon and Nicolas Bes- For Boccioni, then, the fourth dimension 3 The term "hyperspace philosophy" is not Hin- saraboff, 2nd Amer. ed. rev. (New York: Alfred had both spatial and temporal implications, as ton's but my own. It was invented in order to A. Knopf), Chs. iii-vi. Ouspensky's philosophy the "fixed and absolute measure which [at the distinguish the writings of individuals such as and particularly his elaboration of the two- same time] creates dynamism." Nevertheless, Hinton, the Russian P.D. Ouspensky, and the dimensional analogy (Ch. vi) is summarized Boccioni's fourth dimension differs radically American Claude Bragdon, all of whom explore in Henderson, "The Merging of Time and from that of Cubism, because of its emphasis the philosophical implications of higher di- Space: 'The Fourth Dimension' in Russia from on time and motion. It is a "continuing projec- mensions, from more straightforward exposi- Ouspensky to Malevich," The Structurist, no. tion of the forces and forms intuited in their tions of a geometric fourth dimension. Hinton's 15/16 (1975/1976), pp. 97-108. infinite unfolding." Boccioni's goal in Unique major theoretical texts are A New Era of 13 On Kupka and Marey, see Margit Rowell, "A Forms of Continuity in Space was a synthetic Thought (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Metaphysics of Abstraction," in Frantisek Kupka depiction of motion, a "synthetic continuity" 1888) and The Fourth Dimension (London: 1871-1975: A Retrospective (Solomon R. as opposed to the "analytical discontinuity"43 Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1904; New York: Guggenheim Museum, New York, 1975), pp. of Kupka, Duchamp, and the 1912 works of John Lane, 1904); in addition, he published 49- 67. As Rowell points out, Marey actually Balla, or the Cubists' simultaneous presentation numerous articles and short stories based on experimented with the generation of three- of multiple views of an object. Undoubtedly, the fourth dimension. dimensional virtual volumes by photographing much of Boccioni's stylistic development oc- 4 Picasso, as quoted in Ram6n G6mez de la a rotating form (p. 56). curred independently of an interest in higher Sera, "Completa y veridica historia de Picasso y 14 See, for example, C.W. Leadbeater, L'Autre dimensions. However, when he attempted to el cubismo," inRevista de Occidente (Madrid), Cote de la mort (Paris: Editions Theosophiques, bring his own theories into line with the wide- vol. xxv (July 1929), p. 100. 1910), which included an account of Hinton's ideas. spread contemporary belief in a fourth dimen- 5 For an initial discussion of Cubist interest in sion of space, Boccioni found a suitable inter- the fourth dimension, see Henderson, "A New 15 Rowell ("A Metaphysics of Abstraction," in pretation in one aspect of hyperspace philoso- Facet of Cubism: 'The Fourth Dimension' and Frantisek Kupka, p. 66) first noted the similar- phy. His Unique Forms of Continuity in Space 'Non-Euclidean Geometry' Reinterpreted," The ity of Kupka's inscription to the following is a tribute to higher dimensional space as well Art Quarterly, vol. xxxiv (Winter 1971), pp. passage from Pawlowski's "Voyage au pays de as to the dynamic reality of Bergson. 410-33. The significance of higher dimen- la quatrieme dimension" (Comoedia, 20 May In the end, "the fourth dimension" was far sions for Cubist art and theory is discussed in 1912, p. 1): less integral to the art and theory of Boccioni far greater detail in Henderson, "The Artist...," Whereas in three-dimensional displace- than it had been for the French Cubists or Ch. iiI. ment the atoms constituting a body are would be for artists such as Duchamp and 6 Guillaume Apollinaire, "La Peinture nouvelle: pushed aside and replaced by other Malevich. Nevertheless, it is a measure of the Notes d'art," Les Soirees de Paris, no. 3 (April atoms forming another body ... dis- importance of the idea in this period that 1912), pp. 90-91. placement in the country of the fourth Boccioni felt that he must claim "the fourth 7 Guillaume Apollinaire, Meditations esthetiques: dimension is enacted by what one used dimension" for Futurism and even turn it Les Peintres Cubistes (Paris: Eugene Figuiere, to call a transmutation. The world of against his Cubist rivals. 1913), p. 68. the fourth dimension being continuous, 8 On the importance of Poincare's ideas for no movement in the ordinary sense of Linda Dalrymple Henderson is an Gleizes and Metzinger, see Henderson, "A New the word can be produced as in the mobile world of three dimensions. There- assistantprofessor ofthe history ofart at the Facet of Cubism," as well as Henderson, "The fore a displacement is made through University of Texas at Austin. She has done Artist.. .," Ch. II. extensive research on art and non-Euclidean 9 D'Alembert published this idea in his 1754 an exchange of qualities between neigh- article on "dimension" in the Encyclopedie boring atoms.... When one enters the geometry and scholars are indebted to her article in The Art Quarterly in 1971. edited by himself and Diderot. Lagrange pre- country of the fourth dimension, move- sented a similar view in 1797 in his Theorie ment such as we know it, no longer Notes desfonctions analytiques. exists; there are only qualitative changes and we remain immobile, in the com- 1 The present essay is drawn from the author's 10 Einstein began to attract public notice only in mon sense of the word. forthcoming study of "the fourth dimension" November 1919, when the results of experiments in early twentieth-century art and theory to be during a solar eclipse confirmed his assertion 16 Duchamp, as quoted in "Eleven Europeans in America" (Interviews byJamesJohnson Sweeney), published by Princeton University Press. That in the General Theory that light waves are bent

322 ArtJournal This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Museum of Modern Art Bulletin, vol. ville's numerical analysis of publications and Petrie establishes specific sources in Bergson's xIII/4-5 (1946), p. 20. Rowell contrasts the counted among her prominent scholars of the writings for Boccioni's ideas on the interpene- chronophotographically inspired approach of "new" geometries Eugenio Beltrami, Giuseppe tration of forms, on absolute and relative both Kupka and Duchamp to that of the Veronese, Gino Loria, Roberto Bonola, and motion, and on force-lines. Futurists in "Kupka, Duchamp, and Marey," Federigo Enriques. 33 Henri Bergson, Essai sur les donnees immedi- Studio International, vol. CLXXXIX (January- 25Jarry's interest in four-dimensional and non- ates de la conscience (Paris: Felix Alcan, February 1975), pp. 48-51. Euclidean geometries is evident in his writings 1889), pp. 82-83. 17 Duchamp, as quoted in Pierre Cabanne, Dia- of the late 1890s, such as Gestes et opinions 34 Boccioni, "The Plastic Foundations of Futurist logues with Marcel Duchamp, trans. Ron du Docteur Faustroll, pataphysicien (Paris: Sculpture and Painting" (, 15 March Padgett (New York: Viking Press, 1971), pp. 29, Eugene Fasquelle, 1911) and "Commentaire 1913), in Futurist Manifestos, ed. Apollonio, 34. pour servir a la construction pratique de la p. 88. 18 Marcel Duchamp, A l'infinitif (The White Box), machine a explorer le temps" (Mercure de 35 Boccioni, "Plastic Dynamism," in Futurist in Salt Seller: The Writings ofMarcel Duchamp France, vol. xxix [February 1899], pp. 387- Manifestos, ed. Apollonio, p. 94; also, Pittura (Marchand du sel), ed. Michel Sanouillet 96). See Henderson, "The Artist ...," pp. 93- sculturafuturiste, p. 201. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 92. 100. 36 "The Exhibitors to the Public," in Les Peintures 19 Duchamp, as quoted in Cabanne, Dialogues, On Marinetti in Paris and his connections futuristes italiens, exh. cat. (Galerie Bernheim- p. 31. with Apollinaire andJarry, see Martin, Futurist Jeune & Cie, Paris, 5-24 February 1912), p. 6; 20 Malevich's Suprematist titles such as Movement Artand Theory, pp. 28 - 37, 43. See also Gino text based on a lecture of 29 May 1911 by of Painterly Masses in the Fourth Dimension Severini, Tutta la vita di un pittore (Milan: Boccioni. confirm the continued role motion played in Garzanti, 1946), pp. 96-98. On Marinetti 37 Severini, "The Plastic Analogies of Dynamism his thinking about higher dimensions. How- and the poets of the Abbaye de Creteil, see -Futurist Manifesto" (unpub.), September- ever, 's geometric language and Marianne Martin, "Futurism, Unanism and October 1913, in Futurist Manifestos, ed. its infinite white space (free from gravity and Apollinaire," Art Journal, vol. xxviii (Spring Apollonio, p. 118. any identifiable three-dimensionality) were far 1969), pp. 258- 68. 38 Apollinaire, "La Peinture nouvelle," p. 90. removed from The Knife Grinder's simplistic 26 See Martin, FuturistArt and Theory, p. 110. 39 In his article of 1917, "La Peinture d'avant- sequential motion. See Henderson, "The Merging 27 Letter from Boccioni to Nino Barbantini, 12 garde" (pp. 461, 464), Severini mentions of Time and Space," pp. 104-5, although a February 1912, in Archivi del Futurismo, ed. both Maurice Boucher's Essai sur l'hypere- far more developed discussion of the subject Maria Drudi Gambillo and Teresa Fiori (Rome: space (Paris: Felix Alcan, 1903), which had occurs in the author's forthcoming book. De Luca Editore, [1958]), p. 40. Other letters discussed the work of Hinton, and the theories 21 On the relationship of Leger's Essaipour les reproduced by Gambillo and Fiori document of A. de Noircarme whose book Quatrieme trois portraits to the intellectual milieu of Boccioni's presence in Paris on 12 November Dimension (Paris: Editions Theosophiques, Paris, see Christopher Green, Leger and the 1912 and 21 June 1913. 1912) had linked a time-oriented hyperspace Avant-Garde (New Haven: Yale University Press, 28 For the initial, shorter version of this text, see philosophy to Theosophy. If Severini knew 1976), pp. 22 -27. Boccioni, "Plastic Dynamism" (Lacerba, 15 these works before the war, he may well have 22 Henri Bergson, Creative Evolution (1907), December 1913), in Futurist Manifestos, ed. directed Boccioni to them and even beyond trans. Arthur Mitchell (New York: H. Holt & Apollonio, pp. 92- 95. them to Hinton. Co., 1911), p. 302. 29 Boccioni, "Pittura scultura futuriste (dinamismo 40 Hinton, A New Era of Thought, p. 65. 23 The Technical Manifesto ofFuturistPainting plastico)," Poesia (Milan), 1914, pp. 196-99. 41 Had he known of it, Boccioni would also have of 11 April 1910 had referred to the "vivifying 30 On Bragaglia, see Martin, Futurist Art and rejected the interpretation, voiced most clearly current of science." See Futurist Manifestos, Theory, p. 179, as well as the text by Giovanni by Ouspensky (Tertium Organum, p. 102), ed. Umbro Apollonio, trans. Robert Brain, Lista elsewhere in this issue. which suggests that beyond the illusions of R.W. Flint, J.C. Higgitt, Caroline Tisdall (New 31 That Boccioni identified the phrase and title time and motion four-dimensional reality is York: Viking Press, 1973), p. 18. Similarly, the with the fourth dimension is confirmed by static. Pawlowski shared Ouspensky's views on text included in the Bernheim-Jeune catalogue in his article "La Peinture d'avant- this subject, as the quotation in n. 15 above of February 1912, based on a lecture of 29 May garde," Mercure de France, vol. cxxI (1 June demonstrates. 1911 by Boccioni, spoke of "a law of our 1917), pp. 451 - 68. Severini wrote that "Boc- 42 Boccioni first described Futurist sculpture as interior mathematics" (Futurist Manifestos, cioni, when defining what he calls 'dynamism,' "spiral architecture" in his preface for the ed. Apollonio, p. 50). Marinetti's later mani- in connection with our earlier researches in catalogue Ire Exposition de sculpturefuturiste festo, Geometric and Mechanical Splendour movement, alluded to a kind of fourth dimen- du peintre et sculpteur futuriste Boccioni and the Numerical Sensibility (18 March sion which would be 'the unique form giving (Galerie la Boetie, Paris, 20 June- 16 July 1914) is a further testament to the Futurist's continuity in space'" (p. 459). 1913). See Modern Artists in Art, ed. Robert L. general predilection for references to mathe- 32 In his discussion of the fourth dimension, Herbert (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, matics. See Futurist Manifestos, ed. Apollonio, Boccioni also reflects the influence of Bergson 1964), p. 48. The spiral is also discussed in pp. 154-60. On the strain of positivism ini- in his preference for the "intuitive absolute" "Plastic Dynamism," in Futurist Manifestos, tially evident among the Futurist painters, see over Cubism's "rational procedure which exists ed. Apollonio, p. 94. Marianne W. Martin, FuturistArt and Theory in relativity." In Creative Evolution Bergson, Although Boccioni presented his dual defini- 1909-1915 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968), the advocate of intuition versus intellect, had tions of motion in the catalogue preface of 1913, pp. 45, 46. asserted that "in the absolute we live and his distinctions between "absolute motion" 24 Duncan M.Y. Sommerville's Bibliography of move and have our being. The knowledge we and "relative motion" are clearest in his text Non-Euclidean Geometry, Including the The- possess of it is incomplete, no doubt, but not "Absolute Motion + Relative Motion = Dyna- ory of Parallels, the Foundations of Geometry, external or relative" (p. 199). mism" (Lacerba, 15 March 1914), in Futurist and Space of n-Dimensions (London: Harrison For further evidence of Boccioni's careful Manifestos, ed. Apollonio, pp. 150-51. & Sons, 1911) lists a total of 322 books and study of Bergson, see Brian Petrie, "Boccioni 43 Rowell, "Kupka, Duchamp, and Marey," p. 48. articles on the "new" geometries published in and Bergson," The Burlington Magazine, Italy between 1901 and 1910. Italy ranked vol. cxvi (March 1974), pp. 140 -47. In addition third behind Germany and France in Sommer- to Bergson's general philosophical influence,

Winter 1981 323 This content downloaded from 31.30.175.112 on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:11:42 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms