Compare and contrast the roles of two leaders from different regions in the development of the Cold War.

Joseph Stalin and Henry Truman both played a role in the development of the ; from the moment they met in Potsdam, the different ideologies and the lack of trust between the two resulted in the first step towards decades-long divergence. Their actions and beliefs would lead to the division of Europe and the spreading of cold war tension to Asia. Although Stalin’s actions were key in Europe for causing initial tension, it can be argued that Truman’s actions with regard to Korea were key for globalizing and militarizing the Cold War.

From Potsdam in 1945, when they the two leaders met for the first time, the ’old continent’ become the stage of the first Cold War confrontations. Stalin carried out a strong sovietization program thanks to the so called “Salami Tactics” which brought Eastern Europe under Soviet control. Truman, fearing a possible expansion in Europe, introduced the , which was followed by the . Both the actions of Stalin and Truman thus played a key role in developing tensions. While Soviet action were seen in the West as “the systematic destruction of democracy, by terror, murder, corruption, lies and propaganda”. (Kruassman), the actions of Truman were seen by the Soviets as ‘dollar imperialism’ and an attempt to spread capitalist ideas throughout Eruope. Stalin reacted with the introduction of the and Cominform, starting a ping-pong dispute which led to ideological disputes from both sides, becoming the base of the Cold War.

The actions of both leaders also created a divided Germany by 1949. Both sides focused on Germany as a key strategic territory and each had different aims for the country. At Yalta and Potsdam it had been agreed that Germany should have been divided temporarily into four zones of occupation, administered by the Allied Control Council (ACC). However, while the West wanted to build up Germany, Stalin was worried that a united, economically powerful Germany would pose a threat to its security. Also, he wanted to get as much out of Germany as possible in terms of reparations. The clash in different aims between Truman and the West and Stalin led to an early breakdown over reparations’ agreements and set the stage for the ultimate division of Germany.

In 1948, Truman and the West introduced a new currency into the Western sector of Berlin. This caused resentment with Soviets who saw the new currency as the first step toward establishing a West Germany state. Stalin eventually cut off all rail and road links to west Berlin, introducing a Blockade. As described by Byrnes, this was “the first major crisis of the Cold War, setting up the stage for the decades of tension that were to follow.” Truman and Stalin therefore saw in Germany the possibility of expanding their sphere of influence, having as a consequence a further rise in tensions and escalation of the Cold War. The blockade resulted in the setting up of the FDR and then the DDR as well as the establishment of NATO in 1949 as Truman realized the importance of having military bases in Europe.

Furthermore, both Stalin and Truman engaged in an which had a dramatic impact n the conduct of the cold war. As stated by Gar Alperovitz, the dropping of the A-bomb was the first diplomatic move by the USA in the Cold War. However, if the intention was to keep Stalin in check, this did not work and by 1949 the USSR had its own . This triggered a which was have a dramatic impact on the increase in tension and to determined how the cold war was conducted in later years.

Stalin and Truman also played a role in expanding cold war tensions to Asia though it could be argued that Truman’s actions were more significant. USA’s involvement in China had no impact on

© Jo Thomas and Keely Rogers www.thinkib.net/history 1

the final result; despite the large amounts of US aid to the GMD, the CCP defeated GMD due to the incompetence of Jiang Jieshi and the popular policies of the CCP. However, with the in the USA, the ‘loss’ of China was seen as major defeat for the USA and led to pressure on Truman to prove that he was not ‘soft on Communism’. This, when North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950, Truman saw this as an advance of Communism instigated by Stalin and, under a UN flag, sent a US army to defeat the North Koreans. This prolonged the Korean conflict, which would have been a short civil war, into a three year war ultimately involving not only the UN forces but the Chinese forces, with devastating results for the Korean peninsula. The USA successfully contained the North Koreans and re-established the 38th parallel as the dividing line between North and South Korea, but it led to the implementation of NSC 68 which effectively globalized and militarized the cold war by giving the go ahead to substantially increased spending by the US on the military. The USA also set up SEATO as a result of what it saw as the new communist threat in Asia, and became committed to defending Taiwan. Stalin also bears responsibility for the escalation in tension caused by the as it was his decision to give Kim Il Sung the ‘green light’ for the invasion that led to this conflict. However, the reaction of the US to the invasion and the subsequent actions of the US in increased spending and in implementing its policy on a global scale that took the cold war to a new level.

Important to also consider are the diverse personal qualities of Stalin and Truman. As argued by John L. Gaddis “Narcism, paranoia and absolute power come together in Stalin.” Given Stalin’s suspicious nature, it is therefore not surprising that he saw the actions of the West as a threat for himself and for the USSR leading to his desire to have Satellite States around the USSR. As reported by Gaddis “as long as Stalin was running the , a Cold War was unavoidable”. On the other hand, Truman was completely blinded by the fear of Communism. This brought the American president to have a monolithic view of such ideology, according to which all Communist actions around the world were organized by the USSR.

In conclusion, both Stalin and Truman played a fundamental role in causing the Cold War and in determining the nature of the conflict. The actions of both leaders In Europe were key in the escalation of tension and both played a role in the expansion of tension into Asia, though Truman’s intervention in Korea and the implementation of NSC 68 meant that he was responsible for globalizing and militarizing the cold war in the early 1950s. The arms race also originated under the leadership of these two men. By the time the two leaders left the international scene in 1953, the world was facing high political and militarily tensions as never before in history.

© Jo Thomas and Keely Rogers www.thinkib.net/history 2