List of Acronyms

AO - Assisting Organization AP - Assisting Professional ASU - Administrative Support Unit CAPWA - Catubig Association for the Protection of Watershed Area CBFM - Community-Based Forest Management CBU - Capital-Build Up CENRO - Community Environment and Natural Resources Office CFDF - Community Forestry Development Fund CIC - CENRO Inspection Committee CO - Community Organizing CSD - Comprehensive Site Development DENR - Department of Environment and Natural Resources DEVELOPERS - Development for Environmental and Rural Sustainability ENRO - Environment and Natural Resources Officer FGD - Focus Group Discussion FSP - Forestry Sector Project GIS - Geographic Information System GPS - Global Positioning System HCAAP - Help Catubig Agricultural Advancement Project HIREDERA - Hinaga River Environmental Development Residents Association HLDMU - Household Land Development Management IEC - Information and Education Campaign LGU - Local Government Unit MASLOG - Maslog Forest Resource Development Association, Inc. MOU - Memorandum of Understanding M & E - Monitoring and Evaluation NGO - Non-Governmental Organization NIA - National Irrigation Authority OJT - On-the-Job Training O/M - Operation and Maintenance PENRO - Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office PO - People’s Organization SACRED - Samar Center for Rural Education and Development SIBP - Samar Island Biodiversity Foundation SMP - Survey, Mapping and Planning SUSIMO - Subproject Site Management Office SWC - Soil and Water Conservation TPEC-MPDAI - Taft People’s Economic Council Multi-Purpose Development, Association, Inc. UPS - Uninterrupted Power Supply VALUES - Visayas Association for Livelihood and Upliftment of the Ecological Systems, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ------i

I. Subproject Description ------1 1. Purpose/ Objectives 2. Subproject Scope and Dimension A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification Of Scope and Dimensions C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sectors

II. Subproject Implementation ------17 1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject 2. Implementation Period 3. Subproject Cost 4. Comments on Performance of AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors 5. Other Matters Relating to Subproject Implementation

III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------29 Relating to Recommendation(s)

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance Of the Subproject Facilities ------31 1. Present Condition of Facilities 2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance 3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure For Operation and Maintenance (by year) 4. Maintenance Method

V. Benefits Derived from the Project ------38 1. Indirect Effects

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations ------40

LIST OF TABLES:

Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the People’s Organization ------41

Table 2 : Subproject Performance ------44

Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipment ------46

Table 4 : Trainings Attended by SUSIMO ------47

Table 5a : Copra Trading (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project------49

Table 5b : Palay Trading (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project------50

Table 5c : Abaca Trading (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project------51

Table 5d : Commodity Store (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project------52

Table 5e : Sari-sari (HIREDERA)Livelihood Project------53

Table 5f : Micro Lending (HIREDERA) Livelihood project------54

Table 5g : Pump Boat Service (HIREDERA) Livelihood Project ------55

Table 5h : Copra Trading (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ------56

Table 5i : Palay Trading (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ------57

Table 5j : Commodity (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ------58

Table 5k : Micro Lending (CAPWA) Livelihood Project ------59

Table 5l : Xerox Machine Livelihood Project------60

Table 5m : Hog Raising Livelihood Project------61

Table 6 : Subproject Status Report------62

Table 7 : SMP Cost Estimate Per Activity ------63

Table 8 : Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity------64

Table 9a : Cost Estimate for Agro forestry Per Activity------65

Table 9b : Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation Per Activity------66 Table 9c : Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation Per Activity------67

Table 9d : Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation/Forestation Per Activity---- 68

Table 10 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity------69

Table 11 : Infrastructure Project------70

Table 12 : Annual Work and Financial Plan------71

ANNEXES:

1. Organizational Structure ------75

1a. SMP Contractor 1b1-1b2 CO Contractor 1c1-1c2 PO 1d1-1d3 M & E 1e. SUSIMO 1f. Infra

2. Pictures ------85

3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------87

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) revolutionized forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government when it was institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.

Before the adoption of the CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of contract reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the implementation of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using CBFM as its main strategy to rehabilitate the upland ecosystem, it empowered beneficiary communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop watershed sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened their commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation of these subprojects.

The Catubig Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is located in the province of Northern Samar covering the municipalities of Catubig and Las Navas. It is a part of the large Catubig Watershed which supplies water to the major rice growing towns of the province.

The intensive awareness and technical trainings of the members of the Catubig Association for the Protection of Watershed Area Inc.( CAPWA) and the Hinaga River Environmental Development of Residents Association Inc. (HIREDERA), the People’s Organizations contracted to do the Comprehensive Site Development (CSD), equipped them with skills to accomplish much for the Subproject. One indication of the strong commitment of the PO members was the establishment of 2,321 hectares of good quality plantations with 92.30% survival rate. The POs were able to acquire assets, to embark on capital buildup and to save community forestry development fund amounting to more than six million pesos.

In terms of employment, a total of 263,140 man days were generated out of the CSD activities and implementation of the infrastructure projects. As for manpower, 1,020 members of the POs were employed by the Subproject increasing their annual average household income by 46.44 % for CAPWA and 70.59% for HIREDERA. The annual average household income of CAPWA members increased from PHP 36,894 during the time of appraisal to PHP 54,027 during project implementation while those of HIREDERA members increased from PHP 30,471 before the project to PHP 51,979.72 during the project. With these, changes in the quality of life such as improvement of houses, purchase of household appliances, sending of children to school were noted.

The 4.81 kilometers concrete pathway on the other hand eased the mobility of the community members in the transport and marketing of products.

i More importantly, the individual stakeholders through heightened understanding and developed capabilities have zealously accepted the responsibility to undertake the maintenance and protection of their plantations thus paving the way for the sustainable development of the watershed.

ii SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

OF

CATUBIG WATERSHED REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT

Loan Agreement No. PH-P135 Forestry Sector Project

I. Subproject Description

The subproject area is located in Northern Samar covering two municipalities namely: Catubig and Las Navas. There are 18 outlying barangays covered by the watershed subproject within the two municipalities in the northern and northeastern frontiers of both towns. Catubig is approximately 354 km from Tacloban City while Las Navas is 361 kilometers passing via the San Isidro Catarman route.

It is part of the large Catubig Watershed, which supplies water to the major rice-growing towns of the province. The site has 15 creeks that drain into Catubig River just below the watershed area.

Specifically, the project site is located within the longitude 125° 02’ 19.56” and 124° 55' 19.50” and latitude 12° 17’ 41.37” and 12° 24 '46.03”.

1. Purpose/Objectives

A. Original (at the time of appraisal)

Generally, the objective of the Subproject is to rehabilitate an area of 2,427.70 hectares within the Catubig Watershed through community based forest management approach involving reforestation, agro forestry and alternative livelihood activities.

Specifically, the project aims:

a. To establish and maintain adequate forest cover within the 2,427.70 hectares of land such as forest tree plantation (1,002.62 hectares), agroforestry (637.04 hectares), and bamboo (54.20 hectares) and rattan plantation in existing secondary forest;

1 b. To develop and harness the capabilities and potentials of the communities in various aspect of resource management for effective implementation of the subproject on a sustainable basis;

c. To provide employment opportunities and livelihood activities in the communities;

d. To establish appropriate soil and water conservation measures along erosion prone areas;

e. To enhance bio-diversity and restore wildlife habitat; and

f. To develop eco-tourism potentials of the area.

B. Modification

a. Modified purpose/objectives

The objective of the Subproject is to rehabilitate an area of 2,321 hectares within the Catubig Watershed through community based forest management approach involving reforestation (1,152.62 hectares), agro forestry (637.04 hectares), rattan (477.14 hectares), bamboo (54.20 hectares) and alternative livelihood activities.

b. Reasons for the modification

During the initial implementation of the FSP, the total budget for comprehensive site development based on the appraisal report was recomputed and found out to be less than the total CSD requirement. Subsequently, corresponding adjustments of CSD budget of the Subproject scope was made taking into consideration different factors such as availability of CSD areas.

The amount allocated for the rehabilitation of the Subproject was enough to develop 2,171 hectares instead of the original 2,427.70 hectares.

However, during the actual implementation of the Subproject, the performance of the PO was rated satisfactory that qualified them

2 to avail of the expansion area of 150 hectares, which was available at the Las Navas side. This resulted to the increase in actual area for development from 2,171 to 2,321 hectares.

The distribution of target area for the CSD component was revised to offset the costing of reforestation components, which was higher based on the revised guidelines on cost estimates.

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions A.1 Please check: There has been ( revision and/or modification or  no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and dimensions.

A.2 If “revision and/or modification”, please complete the Table.

Original Scope Item and Dimension (At Revised/Modified the time of (Actual) appraisal/Planned) 1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED / CBFM

A. SMP 4,000 ha. 4,000 ha. December 1995 – December 1995 – March 1996 March 1996

B. CO 1 Sept. 1997- Sept. Sept. 1997 – Sept 1999 2000

Year 1 2,171 ha. 2,171 ha.

 IEC activities  IEC activities  Awakening  Awakening  Empowerment  Empowerment

Year 2  Empowerment  Empowerment  Institutionalizat  Institutionalizati ion on

C. CSD 1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL/ SWC

3 a. Infrastructure b. Trail and Footpath

2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES 2 a. Agroforestry 334.50 ha. 637.04 ha. b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1 Bamboo 29.65 ha. 54.20 ha. d.2 Rattan 477.14 ha. d.3 Mangrove d.4 Plantation Species 1,806.85 ha. 1,152.62 ha. e. Timber Stand Improvement

Total 2,171 ha. 2,321 ha.

3. INVENTORY RESIDUAL FOREST

4. INCOME ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

5. INFRASTRUCTURE  2 PO offices  2 bunkhouses  7 bunkhouses  5 lookout  10 lookout towers towers  50 km graded  52 km graded trail and foot- trail and foot- path path

D. INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT  Concrete pathway  4.81 km  RCDG bridge  1 unit  Bailey bridge  2 units

E. MONITORING AND 2,171 ha. EVALUATION Nov. 2001 to March 2003

Physical Validation  Verification of

4 boundaries, monument/ markers, mapping of established areas/ plantation perimeter  Seeding production inventory  Survival inventory  Height and diameter measurement and assessment of overall quality plantation  Inspection of physical infrastructure

Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment  Preparatory activities/ orientation  Primary data collection and preliminary assessment  Multi-level FGDs; PO Federation, LGUs, Communities, AO, SUSIMO  Documentation  Report Preparation

2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the  1 Kia truck office 3  1 Delica van

5  2 motorcycles  1 power generator  1 set computer w/ UPS and printer  1 GIS maptitude  2 units GPS  4 units hand held radio  1 base radio  2 units Foresters transit  1 manual typewriter  4 units Brunton compass  1 pc steel nylon tape  2 pcs. diameter tape  1 planimeter  rain gauge  1 lettering set  4 steel cabinets  1 unit camera

Research conducted NONE

Trainings 4  Follow on training on community organizing  Echo training on field data collection  National Site Coordinators’ Conference  Orientation Workshop for SUSIMO staff  Orientation Seminar for FSP

6  FSP Assessment and Planning Workshop  FSP Phase- out/Phase-in Planning Workshop  Training on Pili Propagation and Nursery Management  OJT in Forest Surveying  OJT in Improved Coffee Plantation Establishment  Update on Agro Plantation and Assessment of Livelihood Projects  Integrated Pest Management  Enhanced Forest Management Through GPS and GIS  OJT in GPS/GIS Operation  Training on Livelihood Monitoring and Supervision  Financial Management Training  Training on Survey Registration of Protected Area Occupancy

Others  Subproject Management

7 Office made of concrete materials  11 SUSIMO staff  Cross visit to Subproject sites in Regions 4, 5, 6 and 7 1 Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the POs 2Table 2 details the subproject performance in terms of area planted 3Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO 4Please refer to Table 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO

B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of Scope and Dimensions

B.1 Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject scope and dimensions.

Please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check

 Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan, etc.)  Revision of the supply and demand estimate  Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost  Substantial revision of the design due to the unforeseeable physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc)  Natural disaster/unreasonable weather  Unreasonable circumstance beyond the control of the Executing  Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)  Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency, fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.)  Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problem  Procurement problems  Performance of contractor/supplier  Performance of consultant  Change in construction period  Others (PO initiative)

B.2. Detailed statement of reasons

8  On CSD

Large fluctuation in the Subproject Cost

For the CSD, about P31.4 million was initially released to the region to facilitate the preparation of the Subproject’s work and financial plan. The said amount is less than the actual requirement of the Subproject based on the appraisal. The cost has been affected also by the issuance of DENR Memorandum Circular No. 2001-19 which provides for the updating of cost of reforestation under the Forestry Sector Project.

Considering that the cost per hectare of reforestation component (tree plantation) was so high, it was impossible to accomplish all the targets for the said component as it would sacrifice all other components such as agro forestry and bamboo. In view of this, corresponding reduction in the scope of reforestation was made and subsequently increased the targets for bamboo and agroforestry.

Substantial revision of the design due to the unforeseeable physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc)

During the initial implementation of agroforestry component, there was a significant mortality of Black Pepper, Mango and Mangium due to their inappropriateness to the area. The SUSIMO therefore recommended that the species be replaced with Banana, Jackfruit, Toog, Abaca and Narra. They took into consideration the type of the area which is climatic type II and adequately stocked with coconut wherein fruiting of Mango and growth of Mangium are largely affected. Thus, the design of Agro forestry Component was modified that resulted to successful implementation of the component.

In the case of changes in the number of CSD infrastructures wherein seven bunkhouses and 10 lookout towers were constructed instead of two and five respectively, the number of distant barangays and the need for effective

9 monitoring have been taken into consideration. Nursery sites had to be constructed in every barangay hence they found it more useful to construct bunkhouses in each of these barangay.

The graded trails and footpath also exceeded the target because of the scattered location of the plantations. The trails and footpath were also in patches and connecting each of them resulted to the increase in their total length.

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problem

During the implementation of Subproject, it was also disclosed that part of the area intended for forest trees plantation development was not suitable for the component due to existing secondary vegetation. The said area was instead developed as rattan plantation. Establishment of rattan plantation was not part of the original plan for development.

Considering also that the area intended for forest trees plantation was planted with coconut, part of the area was instead developed as agroforestry plantation.

Due to these problems, there was a considerable decrease in the area for forest trees plantation which subsequently increased the targets and accomplishment for agro forestry and rattan.

Procurement problems

Because of the fast tracking of CSD activities, the PO was forced to procure seedlings and suckers from Mindanao to be used for agroforestry plantation. The PO suffered financial and technical problems because of high mortality of seedlings due to poor handling and acclimatization of seedlings.

This problem prompted the PO to source out planting materials within the province using locally adaptable species of good economic values. The PO was able to catch up with the backlogs and in fact accomplished more than their target for agro forestry component.

10 Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)

During the initial stage of Subproject implementation, monitoring of Subproject progress was handled by Site Coordinators (2 for Catubig) who were mainly responsible for monthly report preparation. They also addressed all concerns pertaining to Subproject implementation.

Validation of Subproject accomplishments was being done by the CENRO Inspection Committee (CIC) every time a request for payment was made by the PO. However, considering that the CICs were based in CENR offices and that members handled multiple functions, delayed payments of accomplishments has always been the problem of the stakeholders.

The DENR, in conformity with the conditions agreed between the DENR and JBIC during the project extension, created a Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO) to address concerns and issues requiring immediate attention at the project site. The SUSIMO not only facilitated the release of payment of the subproject implementers but also the smooth implementation of the subproject because of their presence in the field.

Others (Initiatives of the POs)

The excess accomplishments on agro forestry, and bamboo, and the establishment of rattan plantation can be partly attributed to the initiatives of the PO to establish more areas knowing of the benefits that can be derived from the Subproject.

Despite the reduction in some portion of the intended reforestation plantation, an expansion area of 150 hectares was approved for HIREDERA (PO in Las Navas side) for their initiative to plant more areas and for satisfactorily meeting the standard survival rate for plantation at 80%.

C. Contribution of the Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)

c.1 (Sub) Sector(s) to which the Subproject belongs

11  Electric power and gas  Telecommunication  Social Services  (Multipurpose) Dams  Telecommunication Water Supply  Power plants  Broadcasting  Sewerage  Transmission lines  Education  Distribution system  Irrigation and Flood Control  Health  Gas  Irrigation  Tourism  Others  Flood control  Others

 Transportation  Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries  Roads  Agriculture and Forestry  Bridges  Fisheries  Railways  Airport  Mining and Manufacturing  Ports  Mining  Marine transportation  Manufacturing

C.2 Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)

Item Description 1. Environmental considerations  With the project, appropriate land use and management would be applied, which would improve and sustain land production; soil erosion rate would be reduced by approximately 66.12%.; water quality and quantity of Catubig River would be improved, which would mean increased fish catch in the River and downstream coastal areas; the restored vegetation will provide habitat to diversified wildlife in the surroundings; flooding of farmlands and communities as well as the downstream would be minimized; increased irrigated rice fields within the impact area would result to sustain the serviceability of water dependent projects.

2. Socio-institutional consideration  Based on the survey conducted, majority of the respondents were willing to participate in the Subproject, both on a full-time

12 and part-time basis.

There was sufficient labor force in the communities. A total of 5,081 individuals comprising 57.4% of the total population belong to the existing workforce. Of the total population of 8,853 in 1,446 households, 1,020 members were directly available for Subproject implementation. These people shall be trained on both the social and technical aspects of forest/community resources management to further enhance their knowledge and skills. The participation of women as partners in the improvement of the social and economic condition of the household and the community as a whole will be recognized.

Strong linkages with the relevant agencies will be forged to ensure sustainability of program and projects.

3. Economic Benefits  It is expected that the Subproject would generate additional income for the households especially during the critical period, the first five years of implementation where a lot of inputs are expected from the communities.

The project is expected to raise the income from P41,205 to approximately P79,829 for a 26- year implementation period

4. Site Development and Other  It is expected that the Intangible Benefits Subproject would provide other economic benefits or direct

13 intangible benefits to the community and the country as a whole. The increase in the quantity and quality of water yield due to improved vegetation and hydrologic cycle is expected to benefit the lake and coastal systems; improve sustainability of water-dependent livelihood systems; decrease soil erosion, and improve biodiversity. This will also benefit the proposed 22 MW Hydropower Plant, which will be dependent on sustained water production from the watershed.

The stumpage build-up is sustained for the duration of Subproject implementation, a total of 1.1 million cu m of wood from forest and agro forest trees is feasible. This wood stock and the improved forest conditions created by the Subproject offers tremendous opportunities in the future both for reserved stock resource and for eco-tourism purposes.

C.3 Present situation and outlook for the future

Item Description 1. Improved awareness level of the  Results of the interview of the community on natural resource 105 respondents showed high policies, environmental issues and level of environmental awareness benefits to be derived from the despite the low educational forests attainment and their remote location from the sectors who could provide information. This awareness level can translate to effective and sustainable management of forest resources.

2. Strengthened POs with installed  97% completion of the PO

14 policies and mechanisms in milestones per SUSIMO’s in- managing a project house assessment was recorded. The existing organizational practices, linkages with other sector to enhance their skills and knowledge and increasing participation of the community manifested organizational and social development of the PO. These capabilities of the POs are expected to make the community more competent in managing the organization and community resources.

3. Increased Subproject  There was an increase in participants’ annual income and Subproject participants’ annual acquisition of assets income by 46.44% in CAPWA and 70.59% in HIREDERA. The increase is attributed largely to the CSD activities and initial livelihood projects5 implemented by the POs.

The two POs of the Subproject (CAPWA and HIREDERA) acquired assets, collected capital build-up (CBU), saved community forestry development fund (CFDF) and generated income from the initial livelihood activities amounting to more than six million pesos.

The increased income and assets are expected to improve the economic condition and living standard of the PO members.

These would also make way for the PO to do social services by way of donating for the schools, churches, and other entities within the community. The POs have already donated P26,000 to

15 Brgy. Bukid in Las Navas for the concreting of electric transmission posts, P20,000 for repair of elementary school building in the remote barangay – Brgy. Victory in Las Navas and P46,600 for the improvement of Catubig Church and Barangay Chapels.

4. Comprehensive and healthy CSD  A total area of 2,321 hectares plantations consisting of 637.04 hectares of agroforestry, 1,152.62 hectares reforestation, 54.20 hectares bamboo and 477.14 hectares rattan plantation exists in subproject. Based on the latest M & E report, the said plantations generated a weighted average survival rate of 92.30%. The presence of these vegetative covers will ensure a healthy environment and improved bio-diversity.

5. Completed infrastructures within  4.81 kilometers concrete the subproject area. pathway with one RCDG bridge, two bailey bridges and box culverts. These infrastructure projects are expected to facilitate mobility of the community members, transport and marketing of products that would eventually lead to the improvement of the living standard of the local community. 5 Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood projects being implemented by the POs

16 II. Subproject Implementation

 Organization for Implementing Subproject

Function on the Name of Organization Reasons for Subproject (1) Original (2) Changed Change Implementation

1. SMP Contractor  Visayas Assn for Livelihood and Upliftment of the Ecological Systems, Inc. (VALUES)

2. AO for CO  Samar Center for Rural Education and Development (SACRED) – for CAPWA  Bankaton D’ Salvacion Found., Inc. – for HERIDERA

3. Assisting  Geoffrey O.  Gregorio O. AP Saong Professional Saong – for Sarmiento – for resigned CAPWA CAPWA and  Gregorio O. HERIDERA Sarmiento – for HERIDERA

4. PO  Catubig Assn for the Protection of Watershed Area (CAPWA), Inc.  Hinaga River Environmental Development of Residents Assn (HIREDERA), Inc.

17

5. M & E  Taft People’s  TPEC-MPDAI – Issuance of new Contractor Economic Council for physical guidelines for M Multi-Purpose validation for & E contracting Development, Catubig Inc. (TPEC- MPDAI) – for physical and institutional and project benefit assessment for Catubig

 Maslog Forest  MASLOG, Inc. – Resource for physical Development validation for Association Las Navas (MASLOG), Inc. – for physical and institutional and project benefit assessment for Las Navas  DEVELOPERS – for institutional and project benefit assessment for Catubig and Las Navas

6. Infrastructure B. Vicencio Const- Contractor ruction

1.1 Reasons for the change

 Change in AP – Mr. Saong resigned as AP for HIREDERA in consideration of his job application to other agency. AP Sarmiento replaced him, in concurrent capacity as AP for CAPWA.

 Change in M & E contractor – the Department issued a new M & E guidelines which provide, among others that physical validation and institutional and project benefit assessment be conducted by

18 different NGO. To this effect, the existing M & E contractors for both CAPWA and HIREDERA were retained for physical validation and another NGO was hired to conduct the institutional and project benefit assessment of both Pos.

1.2 Problem arising, counter measures adopted and results

Problem Counter Measure Results 1. Frequent change of Usual disagreements All targets were CO personnel between DENR and AO completed by the AO but composition staff compelled the the contract had to be contractor to hire extended for one year. Fragmented activities additional field staff occurred due to with expertise on frequent change of community organizing. CO personnel assigned in the area. The causes of change were either termination (considering that some personnel particularly those assigned in Las Navas, were neophytes or fresh graduates and had no ample experiences on CO) or resignation.

2. AO operation was The AO adjusted their All targets were affected by the fast targets to suit with the completed before the tracking of CSD PO activities. On-the- extension expired. activities and failed job trainings for PO to accomplish the members were targets on time conducted and contract of AO was extended.

3. Intervention of armed Some awakening The target number of men in the activities were members to benefit implementation of CO conducted at the PO from the IEC campaign activities, which field office in Poblacion was not met on time, resulted to the to avoid resistance thus delaying the delayed payment of against the CO payment of AO AO’s billings. personnel at the accomplishments.

19 barangays.

Additional Site Coordinators were also deployed to facilitate completion of subproject activities

4. Change of PO A series of meeting was The attitude of the leadership facilitated by the newly elected PO SUSIMO among PO president and officers Both POs were staff and officers. relatively improved and relatively competent They were advised to the subproject was in performing their remain calm and refuse smoothly implemented. tasks but for intervention made by HERIDERA, there influential people, which was a need to enhance are not advantageous to the management skills the interest of the of the elected association. The new set officers because of officers were also pressures from advised to consult with outside circle still concerned PO members affected them easily. and SUSIMO before During the outset of any major decision was leadership of the new made. PO president, there were also factions or organization bloc within.

5. Problems of PO on The responsibility in The maintenance and the maintenance and the protection and protection activities protection activities maintenance of were accepted and for the last six plantations was shared shouldered by the months of subproject with the individual stakeholders during the implementation. stakeholders by period and onward, which adopting the Household sustained the condition There was a Land Development of the established mandatory reduction Management (HLDMU) plantations. of the budget for approach. This approach CSD due to the was also supported with cancellation of a Memorandum of portion of loan Understanding (MOU) proceeds of the FSP. between the PO This resulted to the Management and

20 shortage of allocation individual stakeholder. for maintenance and protection of the plantation during the revision of the work and financial plan

6. The PO also The PO considered This resulted to the experienced problem change of location but no reduction in the scope of on area to be area is available. They reforestation component. developed considering also replaced Mahogany But the growth of the that the selected site seedlings with Toog. seedlings improved after was not suitable for it was replaced by reforestation. This suitable species. was aggravated by the problems on species-site matching.

7. Shortage of planting The PO was advised by The area shortfall was materials. the SUSIMO to modify recovered and the the planting design and plantation survival rate The PO encountered change species with was improved. significant mortality locally adaptable on seedlings procured planting materials. for agro forestry plantation, because of inappropriateness to areas adequately stocked with coconut

8. Intervention of The Contractor’s The local community armed group in the Engineer made constant came up with a resolution implementation of negotiation with the requesting the DENR and infrastructure hostile group while the JBIC to extend the project. SUSIMO obtained the contract of the civil work support of the contractor and proposed Allegedly, the armed residents of the to petition the armed group was demanding affected barangays to group through signature a 10% revolutionary facilitate the campaign for the latter fee, which the implementation of the to refrain from contractor refused to infrastructure projects. intervening with the give thus delaying the Project. implementation of the project. The Project was

21 completed during the extension period.

1.3 The latest organizational chart (or equivalent) for implementation of the Subproject is ( attached or  not attached)

The Organizational Charts of VALUES, BANKATON, SACRED, CAPWA, HIREDERA, TPEC-MPDAI, MASLOG, DEVELOPERS and B. VICENCIO are attached as Annex 1a to Annex 1e, respectively.

1.4 If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.

N/A

 Implementation Period

A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period

Item Original Schedule Actual Period

1. Contract NGO for December 1995 – December 1995 – SMP March 1996 March 1996

2. Contract of AO for Sept. 1997 – Sept. Sept. 1997 –Sept. CO 1999 2000

3. Contract of PO for Nov. 1997 – Nov. Nov. 1997 – June CSD 2000 2003

4. Contract of NGO for Nov. 2001 – March M & E Nov. 2001 – June 2003 2003 5. Contract of Infra June 2002 – July Component June 2002 – June 2003 2003  Completion (completion of July 2003 Subproject) November 2000

Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report

22 Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion ceremony or  final disbursement or  other than the above – completion of all subproject activities)

The completion date was scheduled for November 2000 (at the time of appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.

B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion

B.1 In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.

 Change in scope/dimension  Natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)  Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate  Problems in procurement  Inflation  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)  Legislative matters  Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems  Performance of contractor/supplier  Performance of consultant  Others (deadlines set for the completion of subproject activities)

B.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion

Change in scope and dimension (on CSD)

This is particularly true to CSD implementation. The original schedule was based on the projected completion of the original scope of the Subproject. However, with the approval of additional FSP activities wherein an expansion area of 150 hectares was included, corresponding extension of implementation schedule was made.

The expansion area was implemented during the extension period. On the other hand, maintenance activities of the original area during the extension period were also approved along with other Subproject activities.

23

Natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.) and Unusual circumstance beyond the control of Executing Agency (on Infrastructure and CO)

The unfavorable weather condition and the intervention of armed group in Las Navas area caused the delayed implementation of infrastructure projects. Allegedly, certain armed group was demanding 10% of the total contract cost as revolutionary fee. The contractor’s engineer negotiated with this group from time to time while the SUSIMO obtained support of the residents to facilitate the implementation of the infrastructure projects. Through a resolution passed by the local community, an extension was granted to the infrastructure contractor.

The intervention of armed men greatly affected also the implementation of CO activities. Some awakening activities were conducted in the PO field office in Poblacion to avoid resistance against the CO personnel at the barangays.

Procurement problems (on CSD)

Procurement of seedlings, particularly for agro forestry area caused delay in the completion of CSD targets. Pineapple suckers and coffee seeds/seedlings were procured from Mindanao. However, problems regarding poor handling and improper treatment resulted to high mortality which prompted the PO to change species and procure again seedlings from others sources.

Performance of the contractor (on CO)

Frequent changes of CO field personnel resulted to loss of focus and resulted to fragmented CO activities, thus the target completion was not met and required the extension of the contract duration.

Others (deadlines set for the completion of subproject activities – on M & E)

The contract for M & E was originally set to be completed by June 2003. However, considering the deadline set to complete all Subproject activities in the same period, the contractor facilitated the early completion of the activity by deploying 40

24 enumerators. They were able to complete the M & E earlier by March 2003.

C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay

 On CSD – An extension of the contract duration was granted to the POs to be able to complete the activities.  On Infrastructure – Negotiation with the armed-group was made by the contractor to facilitate the implementation of infrastructure projects. Subsequently, an extension of contract duration was granted by the DENR to the contractor.  On CO – Extension of contract duration was also granted.  On M & E – The contractor deployed 40 enumerators to facilitate early completion of activities..

 Subproject Cost

A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual expenditure (by Component)

Original Cost Actual Item (based on Expenditures (in appraisal in M M pesos) pesos

1. Survey, mapping and 2.430000 2.430000 planning

2. Community Organizing 3.832600 3.907800

3. Comprehensive Site 31.421187 46.302740 Development

4. Monitoring and Evaluation 6.133812 4.737853

5. Infrastructure 15.987981 17.647468 Development

6. Subproject Coordinating 2.187639 2.187639 Office

Total 61.993219 77.213500 Please refer to Tables 7, 8, 9a-d, and 10 for the details on cost of SMP, CO, CSD and M & E. List of Infrastructure projects with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table 11.

25 B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure

B.1. If there is any difference between Column 2 and Column 3 in the above Table, please choose the reason(s) from the following lists and check

 Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)  Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction period  Increase or decrease arising from inflation  Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange rate  Increase or decrease arising from a change in scope/work volume of the Subproject  Decrease arising from keen competition in tender  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems  Others

B.2 Description of the detailed reason(s) and background

Increase or decrease arising from a change in scope/work volume of the Subproject

 On CSD - The approval of the expansion area caused the increase in the cost of CSD. The updating of cost pursuant to the guidelines issued by the Department, which provide for the increase in the unit cost  On Infrastructure – In view of the changes on specifications and design of the planned infrastructure, variation orders were approved for the project, thus increasing the actual expenditure for the component.

 On M & E - The decrease in the actual expenditure for M & E was attributed to the revision of guidelines for activity wherein physical validation and institutional and project benefit assessment were to be contracted separately at a lower cost.

Unrealistic cost estimate/Technical problem

 On CO - During the initial stage of CO implementation, the region considered only the first year target for CSD as basis for CO

26 costing. Later on, the cost was adjusted to consider the whole area of the subproject hence the increase in expenditure.

 Action Taken in case of Cost Overrun and Results

 On CSD and CO – Necessary amendment of contracts were made to accommodate additional cost requirement for the activities.  On Infrastructure - Variation orders were recommended by the Site Engineer and subsequently approved by the Project. Corresponding allocation was provided to the region to accommodate these variation orders.

D. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by Year)

Calendar Year Original Cost Actual Expenditure

1996 2.430000 2.430000

1997 1.124867 -

1998 17.634761 5.098796

1999 10.213799 8.658707

2000 6.421359 13.538276

2001 2.020112 9.731496

2002 6.804581 19.209168

2003 15.343740 18.547057

Total 61.993219 77.213500 Please refer to Table 12 for the details of the Annual Work and Financial Plan.

 Comments on the Performance of SMP Contractor, Assisting Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), People’s Organizations (POs), M & E and Infrastructure Contractors

A. Performance of Performance of SMP Contractor, Assisting Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), People’s Organizations (POs), M & E and Infrastructure Contractors

27 A.1.  Overall performance  Design  Contract administration  Contract supervision  Expertise  Staff qualification  Coordinating ability  Compliance to Contracts  Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope, if any  Others

A.2 Description (in detail)

SMP Contractor

The contractor employed GIS experts, had enough equipment and satisfactorily accomplished the activities on time.

Assisting Organization

Most of the AO personnel were fresh graduates and did not have enough exposure to community organizing. On the other hand, staff with experience/expertise did not spend enough time on the field but instead focused on data consolidation and analysis.

Assisting Professionals

Performance of AP was excellent. He executed his terms of reference according to schedule.

People’s Organization

Most of the Board of Directors have low educational attainment and still dependent on SUSIMO on policy and matters requiring major decisions.

M & E Contractor

Generally, the M & E contracts were completed ahead of contract expiration even though an extension was granted to the contractor for physical validation at the Las Navas side due to the intervention of hostile groups and the scattered location of plantations.

28 Infrastructure Contractor

They have good community relations and coordinating ability with other agencies. However, their activities particularly in Las Navas were accomplished rather slowly because of the intervention of the hostile group.

 Other Matter relating to Subproject Implementation

Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and results in (B) below.

A.  Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic  Social/Distributional  Others

B. Description (in detail)

 Absence of technical assistance during the initial stage of Subproject implementation to respond to the requirements of daily subproject activities. Technical assistance was necessary considering that only one full time Site Coordinator was assigned to the Subproject.

Manuals to reinforce the technical know-how of the field personnel also came late.

 Gradual phasing-out of SUSIMO from the Subproject is necessary to make the PO self-sufficient in discharging their responsibilities as CBFMA holder.

III. Actions Taken by the SMP Contractor, AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)

 Recommendation(s) made by the SUSIMO

SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The recommendations are given hereunder or  not applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the Subproject).

29  Action Taken and Results

Recommendation Action Taken and Results

1. The Site Coordinator 1. The AO hired capable staff and recommended that AO ensured full coordination with hire/augment their technical staff the Site Coordinator in the that undertake CO activities. delivery of their services. Although the contract was extended, the activities were completed by the AO even before it expired.

2. Due to the intervention of armed 2. The concerned PO adhered to groups, the newly elected the said recommendation and President and officers of closely coordinated with the HERIDERA failed to manage SUSIMO on every action and effectively the organization. This decision relative to Subproject resulted in the emergence of implementation. The officers and factions within the PO. The members of the PO gained SUSIMO advised that they should support of the whole remain calm and refuse organization and successfully intervention, as it would affect implemented the Subproject to the implementation of the the extent that it was able to Subproject. avail of expansion area.

3. On the shortage of planting 3. This is particularly true to Agro materials, the PO was advised by forestry component of the the SUSIMO to modify the Subproject whereby pineapple planting design and change species suckers and other species were with locally adaptable planting procured from Mindanao but high materials. mortality was experienced. The PO instead used locally available species of good economic value and adopted the HLDMU approach. As a result, they were able to catch up and accomplish more than the target.

30 IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities

 Present Condition of Facilities

A. Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or  not applicable. No particular problem has occurred since initial operation started). If there have been any problem, please check the relevant space in the Table.

For the SUSIMO Initial Mainte- Manage- Item Status Others Operation nance ment

1. SUSIMO Serviceable Office 2. Computer Serviceable  3. Power Serviceable Generator 4. Zip drive Non-  serviceable  5. Brunton Serviceable 

compass  6. Grass cutter Serviceable 7. Kia Truck Serviceable 8. Motorcycle Serviceable  9. Motorboat

For the PO Initial Mainte- Manage- Item Status Others Operation nance ment

1. PO Office Serviceable 2. Warehouse Serviceable 3. Motorcycle Serviceable  4. Computer Serviceable  

5. 6-wheeler truck Serviceable  6. Xerox Machine Non- serviceable  7. Plow Serviceable 8. Video camera Serviceable

B. Please check: The problem(s) has arisen owing to the following reason(s).

31  Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic  Social/distributional  Others

C. Description (in detail)

For the SUSIMO

Initial Operation of facilities

The computer Zip Drive was not functional during its initial operation. It was brought to Tacloban for major repair.

Maintenance of facilities

The frequent and erratic power interruption in the Subproject site caused usual computer system failure. This was aggravated by the lack of computer technician in the locality. On the other hand, the problem regarding Brunton Compass resulted to the rigidity of the parcellary surveys of CSD accomplishments.

Moreover, securing the spare part of the grass cutter had been a problem also of the SUSIMO in the maintenance of said equipment.

Management of facilities

The Brunton Compass of the SUSIMO was being lent to the PO field personnel to augment their equipment. However, there were times when the equipment was not properly taken care of.

For the PO

Maintenance of facilities

The problem in maintenance of the computer system was the lack of experienced technician in the locality.

Heavy mud build-up along Catubig-Las Navas municipal road during wet season largely affected the maintenance of the HIREDERA’s 6- wheeler truck especially when hauling farm products.

The major cause in the breakdown of CAPWA’s Xerox machine was the operator’s limited experience in its operation. Further, the successive replacement of its spare parts was a big drain on the budget of the PO. They plan to auction it to recover some of the losses.

32 Management

In spite of the existing policy on the use of equipment for both POs, the use of their motorcycles and plow were poorly monitored by the associations causing them to entail high maintenance cost.

D. Aspect of utilizing Subproject facilities For the SUSIMO Item Original Plan Actual Operation

1. SUSIMO Office To be used by the Used by the SUSIMO 2. Computer SUSIMO for the for the Subproject- 3. Power Generator Subproject-related related activities except 4. Zip drive activities. for two motorcycles, 5. Brunton compass which were found to be 6. Grass cutter more useful in the 7. Kia Truck PENRO for their 8. Motorcycle monitoring of the Subproject.

For the PO Item Original Plan Actual Operation

1. PO Office To be used by the PO for Used by the PO for 2. Warehouse Subproject-related Subproject-related 3. Motorcycle activities. activities. 4. Computer/Zip Drive 5. 6-wheeler truck 6. Xerox Machine 7. Plow 8. Motorboat 9. Video camera

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

A. Name of PO

A.1. Please give the name of the SUSIMO and PO and/or Body in charge of O/M

 Administrative Support Unit (ASU) of SUSIMO Catubig  Catubig Association for the Protection of Watershed Area (CAPWA), Inc.

33  Hinaga River Environmental Development of Residents Association (HIREDERA), Inc.

A.2. Please check: The latest organizational charts (or equivalent) for O/M of the Subproject facilities is ( attached or  not available).

The Organizational Charts for the maintenance and operation of PO facilities are attached Annex 1c1 and 1c2.

A.3. If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.

The Organizational Chart of SUSIMO is not necessary considering that only one staff, the ASU head, was responsible for the maintenance and operation of SUSIMO facilities.

B. Number of staff/workers of the SUSIMO and PO or Body for Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.

SUSIMO – one (1) PO - two (2) for each PO

C. Please check and explain the following.

C.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or  insufficient). If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum number of staff and your plan for providing them

C.2. Average employment period of the present staff

SUSIMO - ten (10) years PO - six (6) years

C.3. Availability of training program to promote vocational ability of the staff, its contents and expected effects. N/A

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance (by Year)

A. Original Expected Expenditure

34 For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos) Item Maintenance Operation Total Calendar Year

CY 2000 0.050000 0.050000 CY 2001 0.097300 0.290568 0.387868 CY 2002 0.040000 0.260000 0.300000 CY 2003 0.100000 0.463000 0.563000

 SUSIMO Office  Computer/Zip Drive  Power Generator  Brunton compass  Grass cutter  Kia Truck  Motorcycle  Motorboat

Total 0.237300 1.063568 1.300868

For the PO (Unit: Mil Pesos) Item Maintenance Operation Total Calendar Year

CY 2000 The PO did not CY 2001 allot budget CY 2002 for the CY 2003 maintenance and operation  PO Office of facilities  Warehouse since the  Motorcycle budget was  Computer/Zip Drive provided as  6-wheeler truck the need  Xerox Machine arose.  Video camera  Motorboat

Total

35 B. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos) Maintenance and Item Mainte- Operation (For Operation Total Calendar Year ance expanded portion)

CY 2001  SUSIMO Office/ 0.032528 0.032528 Computer/Generator  Truck/motorcycle 0.006603 0.006603

Sub-total 0.006603 0.032528 0.039131

CY 2002  SUSIMO Office/ 0.007000 0.081389 0.088389 Computer/Generator  Truck/motorcycle 0.003750 0.032833 0.036583

Sub-total 0.010750 0.114222 0.124972

CY 2003  SUSIMO Office/ Computer/Generator 0.008700 0.034579 0.097620 0.052770 0.193669  Truck/motorcycle 0.003143 0.005000 0.004344 0.012487

Sub-total 0.011843 0.039579 0.097620 0.057114 0.206156

CY 2004 0.030000 0.060000 0.090000 Total 0.029196 0.186329 0.127620 0.117114 0.460259

For the PO (Unit: Mil Pesos) Maintenance and Item Mainte- Operation (For Operation Total Calendar Year ance expanded portion)

CY 2001  PO Office 0.026800 0.037100 0.063900  Warehouse  Motorcycle 0.002900 0.026520 0.029420  Computer/Zip 0.002000 0.033800 0.035800 Drive

36  6-wheeler truck  Xerox Machine  Motorboat 0.010500 0.015700 0.026200  Video camera

Sub-total 0.042200 0.113120 0.155320

CY 2002  PO Office 0.033465 0.071560 0.105025  Warehouse 0.003000  Motorcycle 0.005820 0.022700 0.031520  Computer/Zip 0.009725 0.037905 0.047630 Drive  6-wheeler truck  Xerox Machine 0.023800 0.023800  Motorboat 0.036500 0.035100 0.071600  Video camera

Sub-total 0.088510 0.191065 0.279575

CY 2003  PO Office 0.017000 0.022950 0.039950  Warehouse 0.008500 0.050000 0.058500  Motorcycle 0.009560 0.029480 0.039040  Computer/Zip 0.003600 0.020780 0.024380 Drive  6-wheeler truck 0.002500 0.016000 0.018500  Xerox Machine 0.018000 0.018000  Motorboat 0.012000 0.016000 0.028000  Video camera 0.001200 0.001200

Sub-total 0.062660 0.114910 0.050000 0.227570

CY 2004 0.054160 0.150710 0.204870

Total 0.193370 0.419095 0.054160 0.200710 0.867335

Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or any other improvement purposes

Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for the same.

The basis for the maintenance and operation (for expanded portion) was the actual expenditure by the SUSIMO after Subproject

37 completion and the projected mandatory expenses for electricity, water and repair of Subproject facilities. No projection was made by the PO considering that they allot budget for facilities as the need arises.

4. Maintenance Method

A. Content of Method

Monthly checks up of all the facilities were conducted to determine their condition. Once a facility was found to be defective, it would be brought immediately to the shop for repair or if only spare parts are needed for the facility, they just bought the same and facilitated the maintenance activities.

B. Frequency

Monthly for all major facilities.

C. Others, if any.

V. Benefits derived from the Subproject

 Indirect Effects

A. Please choose and check the item(s) which are dealt with this Article by you.

 Technology transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)  Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the sector(s) after completion)  Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region/community  Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned

B. Please give the details for each of the item(s) you checked

Technology Transfer

Both POs were active in community development activities implemented by other agencies within the municipalities of Catubig and Las Navas. The president of CAPWA was elected vice president of the Samar Island Biodiversity Foundation (SIBF), Northern Samar

38 Chapter in CY 2002, while the former president of HIREDERA was a member of the Technical Working Group of the same Foundation for the same year.

With the implementation of the Help Catubig Agricultural Advancement Project (HCAAP) as assisted by the NIA and the LGU of Northern Samar, the two POs have also been short-listed as potential partners. Both POs have submitted their letter of intent to manifest their interest in the said project.

With these involvements, the POs were able to share during meetings, conferences and trainings, the experiences they have applied to the Subproject.

Employment Creating

Both POs that implemented the subproject gave equal rights for women, men and youth, member and non-members, in terms of participation in Subproject activities.

Results of evaluation revealed that the project generated a total of 263,140 man days of employment of which 216,000 man days were from the CSD activities and 47,060 man days from the implementation of the infrastructure project.

Income-raising

Through the employment created by different subproject activities, the annual income of PO members increased by 46.44% for CAPWA and 70.59% for HIREDERA. This is equivalent to an increase from P36,894 before the project to P54,027.14 during the project for CAPWA and from P30,471.16 before the project to P51,979.72 during the project for HIREDERA.

Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned

Before the project, timber poaching was rampant anywhere in Catubig and Las Navas. The existence of the Subproject helped in making the community aware of the value of the forest and wise utilization of its resources and in harnessing their capability to protect it.

39 VI. Conclusions and Recommendations

. The implementation of the first ever community-based forest management project in the municipalities of Catubig and Las Navas has significantly improved the living standard of the communities

. The Subproject broadened their understanding on the importance of watershed as a life-support system.

. The issuance of Department Administrative Order No. 2000-65 and other enabling DENR policies under the FSP contributed significantly to the improvement in the overall implementation of the Subproject by making the involved community technically capable in ensuring sustainability of forest management with minimum intervention from the DENR.

. The involvement of DENR personnel (SUSIMO) gained for these people valuable experiences and lessons learned that is useful in the implementation of similar projects in the future.

 The recommended species and planting designs contained in the appraisal report should be flexible enough vis-à-vis the suitability of the species and appropriateness of the design with the prevailing bio-physical condition of the subproject.

 Key personnel of SUSIMO should be retained to assist the POs in the continuing protection and management of the watershed and CBFMA area. The POs are currently implementing livelihood projects with substantial investment involved. To ensure that business operations are effectively managed, technical advices and guidance of the SUSIMO is necessary.

 The SUSIMO in coordination with DENR-CENRO should facilitate the formation and training of environment and natural resources officers (ENROs) from among the PO members to sustainably support the protection of watershed and the surrounding forest areas.

 Being the legitimate POs with proven track record in the area, CAPWA and HIREDERA should be given preference in the implementation of similar project in the future. They should also be given the chance to be involved in projects such as the on-going

40 Help Catubig Agricultural Advancement Project (HCAAP), wherein they have expressed their interest to participate.

41 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 1. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION (HIREDERA)

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 1. Follow-up Training on Community Organizing Implementation, Livelihood NFDO 1 June 2-6, 1998 System Development and Comprehensive Site Development Activities 2. Re-orientation of POs on the New Guidelines with Action NFDO 21 February 1-2, 2001 Planning 3. On-the-job Training on Forest February 21-23, AP 11 Surveying 2001 7. Pre-membership Training and August 22-31, SUSIMO-COSU 45 Orientation on CBFM 2001 8. Pre-membership Training and September 13-26, SUSIMO-COSU 71 Orientation on CBFM 2001 9. Assessment Workshop on Community-Based Forest DENR Region 8 9 October 1-2, 2001 Management 10. Update on Agroforestry December 3-7, Plantation and Assessment of NFDO 10 2001 Livelihood Project 11. Cross-vist and Year-end Assessment with Awarding of December 18-21, Outstanding Subproject DENR Region 8 4 2001 Implementers in DENR Region 8 12. Financial Management Training TESDA-Las Navas 11 14-Feb-02

13. FSP Re-orientation Course for NFDO 2 March 6-8, 2002 SUSIMO 14. RBAC Orientation Seminar for Infrastructure Support DENR Region 8 1 21-Mar-02 Component of Catubig Subproject 15. FSP Phase-out/Phase-in November 4-8, NFDO 4 Planning Workshop 2002 16. Integrated Pest Management UEP, Catarman, 12 7-Feb-03 Northern Samar 17. Training on Livelihood SUSIMO 23 May 12-13, 2003 Implementation

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 18. Training on Livelihood NFDO 10 May 3-5, 2003 Monitoring and Supervision 19. FSP Assessment and Planning NFDO 1 May 19-21, 2003 Workshop 20. FSP-JBIC Packaging of Terminal and Subproject DENR Region 8 4 July 15-19, 2003 Completion Reports 21. Training on Pili Propagation and DA-BIARC, San December 10-14, Nursery Management Agustin, Pili, 2 2003 Camarines Sur

TRAININGS ATTENDED BY PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION (CAPWA)

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 1. Follow-up Training on Community Organizing

Implementation, Livelihood NFDO 1 June 2-6, 1998 System Development and Comprehensive Site Development Activities 2. Re-orientation of POs on the New Guidelines with Action NFDO 20 February 1-2, 2001 Planning 3. On-the-job Training on Forest February 21-23, AP 8 Surveying 2001 4. On-the-job Training on Improved Coffee Plantation AP 20 March 7-8, 2001 Establishment 5. On-the-job Training on NFDO 2 June 3-6, 2001 GPS/GIS Operation 6. Provincial Management PENRO Northern 10 27-Jun-01 Conference (MANCON) Samar 7. Pre-membership Training and August 22-31, SUSIMO-COSU 45 Orientation on CBFM 2001 8. Pre-membership Training and September 13-26, SUSIMO-COSU 42 Orientation on CBFM 2001 9. Abaca Production and FIDA-Catarman 16 Sep-01 Mushroom Culture 10. Assessment Workshop on Community-Based Forest DENR Region 8 9 October 1-2, 2001 Management # OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 11. Update on Agroforestry December 3-7, Plantation and Assessment of NFDO 14 2001 Livelihood Project 12. Cross-vist and Year-end Assessment with Awarding of December 18-21, Outstanding Subproject DENR Region 8 4 2001 Implementers in DENR Region 8 13. FSP Re-orientation Course for NFDO 2 March 6-8, 2002 SUSIMO 14. RBAC Orientation Seminar for Infrastructure Support DENR Region 8 1 21-Mar-02 Component of Catubig Subproject 15. FSP Phase-out/Phase-in November 4-8, NFDO 4 Planning Workshop 2002 16. Integrated Pest Management UEP, Catarman, 12 7-Feb-03 Northern Samar 17. Training on Livelihood SUSIMO 23 May 12-13, 2003 Implementation 18. Training on Livelihood NFDO 10 May 3-5, 2003 Monitoring and Supervision 19. FSP Assessment and Planning NFDO 1 May 19-21, 2003 Workshop 20. FSP-JBIC Packaging of Terminal and Subproject DENR Region 8 4 July 15-19, 2003 Completion Reports 21. Training on Pili Propagation and DA-BIARC, San December 10-14, Nursery Management Agustin, Pili, 2 2003 Camarines Sur Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted Survival

CY 1998 Reforestation Narra 240.68 93.19 Mahogany 151.54 90.63 Toog 217.77 93.00 sub-total 609.99 92.49

Agroforestry Mango/Abaca 2.96 79.00 Cacao/Abaca/J.Fruit 51.84 83.81 Coffee/Abaca/J.Fruit 78.40 90.30 sub-total 133.20 87.52

Rattan Palasan & other spcs. 162.28 97.22 sub-total 162.28 97.22

Bamboo Bayog 1.75 80.00 sub-total 1.75 80.00

Total 907.22 92.58

CY 1999 Reforestation Narra 82.20 96.00 Mahogany 14.30 96.00 sub-total 96.50 96.00

Agroforestry Cacao/Abaca/J.Fruit 74.26 88.27 Coffee/Abaca/J.Fruit 101.21 91.22 sub-total 175.47 89.97

Rattan Palasan & other spcs. 294.04 88.93 sub-total 294.04 88.93

Bamboo Bayog 33.75 91.70 Kawayan Kiling 19.80 82.00 sub-total 53.55 85.32

Total 619.56 90.01

CY 2000 Reforestation Firebreak 21.19 94.00 Toog 154.00 98.00 sub-total 175.19 97.52

Agroforestry Abaca 44.40 94.00 sub-total 44.40 94.00

Total 219.59 96.81 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted Survival

CY 2001 Reforestation Toog 309.81 94.89 sub-total 309.81 94.89

Agroforestry J.Fruit/Narra/Mango 279.37 89.43 sub-total 279.37 89.43

Rattan Palasan & other spcs. 26.43 99.00 sub-total 26.43 99.00

Total 615.61 92.59 Grand Total 2,361.98 92.30 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT

Procured ITEM Specifications Qty Date/year Cost (PhP) procured 1. Truck KIA cross truck, 4x4 1 9/30/2002 680,000.00 Engine, gasoline, GS 280, 3.5 2. Power generator 1 4/23/2001 44,096.00 KVA HP Brio PC Intel Pentium III 3. Computer 1 2/20/2001 70,850.00 733 mhg

4. Printer Hp Deskjet model 840 C 1 4/27/2001 5,811.52

Gamatronic Compact Model 5. UPS 1 4/15/2001 5,720.00 520VA Comb software & geographic 6. GIS maptitude 1 3/28/2001 44,460.00 data

7. GPS Global positioning Promark X 2 3/28/2001 210,000.00

VHF, FM COM Model IC- 8. Handheld radio 4 1/12/2001 59,866.56 F3GT Surveying compass, Ushikata, 10. Foresters transit 2 5/21/2001 69,680.00 model S-27 11. Base radio VHF/FM ICOM 1 1/12/2001 64,789.92

12. Manual typewriter Oliveti, 18 carriage 1 3/28/2001 8,309.60

13. Brunton compass Kataoke br., Model BCD-90 3 3/28/2001 14,664.00

14. Steel nylon tape Tajima Br. 2 4/23/2001 2,700.00

15. Diameter tape Kinglong brand, 20 meters 2 3/29/2001 1,331.20

16. Planimeter OSKK KOIZUMI 1 10/26/2001 7,800.00

17. Abney hand level Model:OSK 17251 3 5/21/2001 7,176.00

18. Rain gauge Digital rainwise 1 5/28/2001 6,300.00

19. Lettering set Leroy set 1 12/27/2001 4,992.00

20. Office tables Wood 8 6/1/2001 donated

21. Chairs Plastic 12 5/29/2001 1,140.00

22. Drafting table W27", L34", H43" 1 11/21/2001 2,500.00

23. Camera Canon Zoom 76 2 11/21/2001 7,800.00

24. Steel Cabinet 4 drawers, metalux brand 4 11/21/2001 23,600.00

25. Grass cutter Kawasaki engine 1 11/21/2001 15,250.00

Long 21-holes, PRINCE w/6 26. Binding machine 1 5/16/2001 9,895.00 spiral binders

27. Motorcycle Honda XL 125 2 168,610.56

28. Calculator Scientific FX-5000F 3 3/2/2001 6,600.00

TOTAL 1,543,942.36 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY SUSIMO

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 1. Follow-up Training on Community Organizing Implementation, Livelihood NFDO 3 June 2-6, 1998 System Development and Comprehensive Site 2. National Site Coordinators October 6-10, NFDO 1 Conference 1999 3. Echo Training on Field Data DENR Region 8 1 June 19-22, 2000 Collection 4. Orientation Workshop for November 8-10, NFDO 9 SUSIMO Staff 2000 5. Orientation Seminar on FSP for the POs with Action NFDO 12 February 1-2, 2001 Planning 6. On-the-job Training on Forest February 21-23, AP 11 Surveying 2001 7. On-the-job Training on Improved Coffee Plantation AP 10 March 7-8, 2001 Establishment 8. Enhanced Forest Management May 30-June 9, NFDO-GIS Center 2 Through GPS and GIS 2001 9. On-the-job Training on NFDO 12 June 3-6, 2001 GPS/GIS Operation 10. Provincial Management PENRO Northern 12 27-Jun-01 Conference (MANCON) Samar 11. Pre-membership Training and August 22-31, SUSIMO-COSU 9 Orientation on CBFM 2001 12. Pre-membership Training and September 13-26, SUSIMO-COSU 9 Orientation on CBFM 2001 13. Update on Agroforestry December 3-7, NFDO 12 Plantation and Assessment of 2001 Livelihood Project 14. Cross-vist and Year-end Assessment with Awarding of December 18-21, DENR Region 8 12 Outstanding Subproject 2001 Implementers in DENR Region 15. FSP8 Year-end Assessment (CY January 22-25, NFDO 1 2001) 2002 16. FSP Re-orientation Course for NFDO 1 March 6-8, 2002 SUSIMO 17. RBAC Orientation Seminar for Infrastructure Support DENR Region 8 12 21-Mar-02 Component of Catubig

18. FSPSubproject Phase-out/Phase-in November 4-8, NFDO 12 Planning Workshop 2002 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY SUSIMO

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 19. Integrated Pest Management UEP, Catarman, 12 7-Feb-03 Northern Samar 20. Training on Livelihood NFDO 12 May 3-5, 2003 Monitoring and Supervision 21. FSP Assessment and Planning NFDO 1 May 19-21, 2003 Workshop 22. Financial Management Training TESDA-Las Navas 11 July 10-12, 2003 23. FSP-JBIC Packaging of Terminal and Subproject DENR Region 8 2 July 15-19, 2003 Completion Reports 24. Training on Survey Registration of Protected SIBP 1 23-Oct-03 Area Occupancy (SRPAO) DA-BIARC, San 25. Training on Pili Propagation and December 10-14, Agustin, Pili, 2 Nursery Management 2003 Camarines Sur Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5a. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Copra Trading

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 212 members

Amount of investment : P 200,000

Date of Feasibility Study : 1-Nov-02

Date started : Mar-03

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Sanvic Enterprise (Buyer)

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from.

50 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5b. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Palay Trading

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 500 members

Amount of investment : P 391,476.01

Date of Feasibility Study : 1-Oct-02

Date started : 25-Mar-03

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : NFA Catubig

Net Income :

P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined CFDF : amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5c. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Abaca Trading

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 500 members

Amount of investment : P 246,919.75

Date of Feasibility Study : Nov-02

Date started : Mar-03

Status : Pending

Linkages Developed : AC Tan Catarman

Net Income :

P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined CFDF : amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5d. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Comodity Store

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 505 members

Amount of investment : P 170,000

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : 15-Aug-00

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Panel Dealer

Net Income :

P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined CFDF : amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5e. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Sari-sari Store

Implementer : Subchapter PO (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 45 members

Amount of investment : P 20,000

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : 10-Aug-02

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Federation-based Comodity Store

Net Income :

P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined CFDF : amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5f. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Micro-lending

Implementer : Subchapter POs (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 90 members

Amount of investment : P 20,000

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : 20-Oct-02

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : DepEd Teachers and Brgy. Council

Net Income :

P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined CFDF : amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5g. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Pump Boat Service

Implementer : PO Federation (HIREDERA)

No. of Beneficiaries : Members/non-members

Amount of investment : P 85,000

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : 15-Aug-00

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : LGU

Net Income :

P3,448,080.29 (the amount refers to the combined CFDF : amount of CFDF and CBU of the HIREDERA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5h. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Copra Trading

Implementer : Subchapter PO CAPWA - Hiparayan

No. of Beneficiaries : 35 member

Amount of investment : P 30,000

Date of Feasibility Study : Nov-02

Date started : 01-Apr-03

Status : Suspended

Linkages Developed : Catarman Copra Buyer

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,640,180 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the CAPWA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5i. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Palay Trading

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 300 members

Amount of investment : P 298,000

Date of Feasibility Study : Nov-02

Date started : 01-Mar-03

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : NFA Catubig

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,640,180 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the CAPWA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5j. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Comodity Store

Implementer : PO Livelihood Management Staff (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : 334 members

Amount of investment : P 240,000

Date of Feasibility Study : Jun-02

Date started : 01-Nov-02

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : Panel Dealer

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,640,180 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the CAPWA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5k. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Micro-lending

Implementer : Subchapter POs (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : All members, Teachers and Brgy. Official

Amount of investment : P 131,060

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : Feb-01

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : DepEd Teachers and Brgy. Councils

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,640,180 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the CAPWA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5l. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Xerox Machine

Implementer : PO Federation (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : All members, Teachers and Brgy. Official

Amount of investment : P 68,000

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : Apr-00

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed :

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,640,180 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the CAPWA from where the investment in livelihood came from.

61 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 5m. LIVELIHOOD PROJECT OF THE PO

Name of Livelihood Project : Hog Raising

Implementer : Subchapter POs (CAPWA)

No. of Beneficiaries : Subchapter Members

Amount of investment : P 32,000

Date of Feasibility Study :

Date started : Dec-02

Status : On-going

Linkages Developed : DA-Catubig

Net Income :

CFDF : P3,640,180 (the amount refers to the combined amount of CFDF and CBU of the CAPWA from where the investment in livelihood came from. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT

STATUS OF PROGRESS NAME/LOCATION OF PROJECT PROJECT COST Region (O:on going C: Completion) THE SUBPROJECT AREA (ha) (Mil peso) SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA

Catubig Watershed 8 Rehabilitation 2,361.98 75.03 C C C C C Subproject

TOTAL 2,361.98 75.03 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 7. SMP COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

TARGET UNIT OF UNIT ACTIVITY TOTAL COST OUTPUT MEASURE COST

I. SURVEY AND MAPPING

1. Monumenting and Survey 4,000 ha 62.94 251,765.66

2. Location and Monumenting of UTM corners, sections and blocks 4,000 ha 187.29 749,156.36

3. Completion of Blocking of Plantable Areas 4,000 ha 138.47 553,884.45

4. Preparation and Submission of Reports 4,000 ha 62.17 248,695.35

Sub-total 4,000 ha 450.88 1,803,501.82

II. PLANNING

1. Data Synthesis and Analysis 4,000 ha 26.83 107,301.61

2. Report Writing 4,000 ha 39.80 159,196.57

3. Admin and Supervision 4,000 ha 90.00 360,000.00

Sub-total 4,000 ha 156.62 626,498.18 T o t a l 4,000 ha 607.50 2,430,000.00 Table 8

SMP Cost Estimate Per Activity

TARGET UNIT OF UNIT ACTIVITY TOTAL COST OUTPUT MEASURE COST

I. SURVEY AND MAPPING

1. Monumenting and Survey 6,150 ha 70 430,500.00 1.1 Establishment of tie line ha 18 110,700.00 1.2 Perimeter Survey ha 26 159,900.00 1.3 Relocation of boundaries ha 26 159,900.00 2. Location and Monumenting of UTM corners, 4,150 ha 141 585,150.00 sections and blocks 3. Completion of Blocking of Plantable Areas 4,150 ha 100 415,000.00

4. Preparation and submission of reports (2 types of 6,150 ha 58.2 357,800.00 maps) 1:10,000 control map Features: 4.1 Location Map 4.2 Contour lines 20 M interval 4.3 Color coded slope categories 0-15% 15-30% 30-50% above 50% 4.4 Table of slope categories 0-15% 15-30% 30-50% above 50% Protection Forest Special Treatment Non-plantable Areas 4.5 Vegetative Cover 4.6 Rivers, Streams, Lakes 4.7 Existing and proposed structures roads, trails, buildings, nursery 4.8 Occupied areas of settlement 4.9 Boundaries of section/blocks 5.0 Existing dev't (CREF or impact project, etc) 5.1 Other important features as maybe found in the area

1:2000 control map Features:

5.2 Blocks 5.3 Slope dev't categories 5.4 Infrastructure 5.5 Contour line at 5 M interval 5.6 Location map 5.7 Other important found in the area 1,788,450.00 II. PLANNING a. Data synthesis and analysis b. Report Writing SUB-TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 6,150 ha 290.80 1,788,450.00 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 8. COMMUNITY ORGANIZING COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

UNIT of ACTIVITIES TARGET UNIT COST TOTAL COST MEASURE

1. Social Investigation 229,499.00

2. Information and Education Campaign 930,200.75

3. Documentation Process 155,036.00

4. Identification of Possible CBFMA 168,073.37

5. Organizing Activities 1,115,403.40

6. Community Activities 956,940.49

7. Others (CO staff dev't) 352,646.99

Total 2,171 ha. 1,800.00 3,907,800.00 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 9a. COST ESTIMATE FOR AGROFORESTY PER ACTIVITY

UNIT OF TARGET UNIT MAJOR ACTIVITY/ACTIVITY TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT COST 1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. procured/purchased sdlg 1,342,444.00 1.62 2,177,879.80 Sub-total sdlg 1,342,444.00 1.62 2,177,879.80 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Brushing ha. 632.44 123.26 77,953.33 b. Spot cultivation spot 570,318.50 0.55 313,675.70 c. Staking (stake & labor) spot 649,596.00 0.20 127,427.09 d. Hole digging spot 672,796.00 0.35 238,564.45 e. Planting (including hauling) spot 672,796.00 1.50 1,008,519.00 f. Tools and materials set 1 14,808.00 14,808.00 Sub-total ha. 632.44 2,815.99 1,780,947.57 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer ha. 632.44 8,011.30 5,066,667.18 b. Replanting ha. 441.04 2,046.14 902,430.27 c. Patrol Works ha. 632.44 143.98 91,061.38 d. Tools and materials set 1 6,691.20 6,691.20 Sub-total ha 632.44 9,592.77 6,066,850.03 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 133.20 84.98 11,319.73 b. Third Year ('99) ha 308.67 33.16 10,235.90 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 353.07 230.91 81,525.65 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 632.44 789.11 499,062.59 e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 632.44 1,158.50 732,680.16 f. Seventh Year ('03) ha 632.44 320.01 202,384.56 Sub-total 632.44 2,430.60 1,537,208.59 Total ha 632.44 18,282.98 11,562,885.99 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 9b. COST ESTIMATE FOR BAMBOO PLANTATION PER ACTIVITY

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. Bamboo culm cuttings (nursery raised) sdlg 65,040.00 8.93 580,807.20 Sub-total sdlg 65,040.00 8.93 580,807.20 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Spot brushing 55,300.00 0.98 54,200.00 b. Staking (stake & labor) ha 55,300.00 0.20 10,840.00 c. Hole digging ha 55,300.00 2.94 162,600.00 d. Seedling transport spot 55,300.00 3.92 216,800.00 e. Planting ha 55.30 980.11 54,200.00 Sub-total ha 55.30 9,017.00 498,640.00 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer pole cutting 55.30 12,732.18 704,089.63 b. Replanting ha 55.30 5,462.66 302,084.98 c. Patrol works ha 55.30 114.21 44,209.52 Sub-total ha 55.30 18,994.29 1,050,384.13 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 1.75 172.72 302.26 b. Third Year ('99) ha 55.30 677.73 37,478.59 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 55.30 1,517.18 83,900.26 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 55.30 1,061.20 58,684.32 e. Sixth ('02) ha 55.30 791.25 43,755.89

Sub-total ha 55.30 4,052.83 224,121.31 Total ha 55.30 42,566.96 2,353,952.64 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 9c. COST ESTIMATE FOR RATTAN PLANTATION PER ACTIVITY

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION a. Seedlings Purchased/procured sdlg 248,113.00 6.00 1,488,678.00 SUB-TOTAL sdlg 248,113.00 6.00 1,488,678.00 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Underbrushing ha 482.75 889.54 429,426.00 b. Staking (stake & labor) spot 190,856.00 0.20 38,171.20 c. Holing spot 190,856.00 0.75 143,142.00 d. Planting (inc hauling) sdlg 190,856.00 2.69 513,402.64 SUB-TOTAL ha 482.75 2,328.62 1,124,141.84 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer ha 482.75 5,472.05 2,641,630.48 b. Replanting sdlg 482.75 992.09 478,931.21 c. Patrol Works ha. 482.75 46.85 158,312.23 SUB-TOTAL ha 482.75 6,792.07 3,278,873.92 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 162.28 195.64 31,748.96 b. Third Year ('99) ha 456.32 279.86 127,705.36 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 456.32 428.35 195,464.87 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 482.75 244.27 117,919.96 e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 482.75 280.45 135,387.35

Sub-total ha 482.75 1,259.92 608,226.49 Total ha 482.75 13,464.36 6,499,920.26 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 9d. COST ESTIMATE FOR TREE PLANTATION/REFORESTATION PER ACTIVITY

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. NURSERY OPERATIONS (SEEDLING PRODN + 30%) a. Narra (245.26 Has.) sdlg 642,203.00 2.18 1,400,668.90 b. Mahogany (245.26 has.) sdlg 625,638.00 3.48 2,177,220.24 c. Toog sdlg 180,000.00 2.73 492,153.50 d. Firebreak using Banana/abaca suckers (20.10 has.) sdlg 100,000.00 2.10 210,000.00 Sub-total sdlg 1,547,841.00 2.77 4,280,042.64 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT a. Strip Brushing ha 1,191.49 772.16 920,016.00 b. Staking (stake & labor) spot 1,191,490.00 0.20 237,504.00 c. Hole digging spot 1,191,490.00 0.53 631,260.00 d. Spot hoeing spot 1,191,490.00 0.40 481,260.00 e. Planting (including hauling) sdlg 1,191,490.00 1.02 1,215,645.00 f. Firebreak Establishment (Banana - 40.1 has.) sdlg 200,500.00 2.00 401,000.00 g. Tools and materials ha. 150.00 200.00 30,000.00 Sub-total ha 1,191.49 3,287.22 3,916,685.00 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION a. Ringweeding, spot cultivation, fertilizer application ha 1,191.49 8,613.16 10,262,492.81 b. Replanting ha 1,191.49 1,646.36 1,961,624.39 c. Patrol Works ha 1,191.49 646.88 770,756.85 d. Firebreak maintenance ha 40.10 10,000.00 401,000.00 e. Tools and materials ha. 1,191.49 11.18 13,324.50 Sub-total ha 1,191.49 11,254.14 13,409,198.56 4. INFRASTRUCTURE a. Nursery/Bunkhouse no. 7.00 40,696.43 284,875.00 b. Graded trail km 20.75 6,144.58 127,500.00 c. Footpath km 32.75 3,160.31 103,500.00 d. Fireline construction sq. m 75,000.00 1.25 93,750.00 e. Fireline maintenance sq. m 75,000.00 0.75 56,250.00 f. Lookout tower no. 10.00 9,150.49 91,504.87 g. PO Office no. 2.00 200,000.00 400,000.00 h. SUSIMO Office no. 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 i. Fire fighting equipment set 14.00 2,357.14 33,000.00 Sub-total ha 1,191.49 1,166.93 1,390,379.87 5. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year ('98) ha 609.99 294.14 179,420.54 b. Third Year ('99) ha 706.49 651.79 460,483.97 c. Fourth Year ('00) ha 881.68 696.33 613,942.84 d. Fifth Year ('01) ha 1,191.49 272.15 324,261.38 e. Sixth Year ('02) ha 1,191.49 632.21 753,267.81 f. Seventh Year ('03) ha 1,191.49 104.15 124,099.02 Sub-total ha 1,191.49 2,060.84 2,455,475.56 Total ha 1,191.49 21,361.31 25,451,781.62 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 10. MONITORING AND EVALUATION COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

Target Unitof ACTIVITIES Unit Cost Total Cost Output Measure

Physical Validation Component

1. Development of appropriate tools for participatory M & E 2,171.00 ha. 44.53 96,679.50

2. Verification of boundaries, monument/markers/ mapping 2,171.00 ha. 58.33 126,631.00 of established areas/plantation perimeter

3. Seedling production inventory 2,171.00 ha. 73.88 160,385.00

4. Survival inventory 2,171.00 ha. 1,194.67 2,593,618.00

5. Height and diameter measurement and assessment of overall quality plantation 2,171.00 ha. 111.53 242,139.16

6. Inspection of physical infrastructure 2,171.00 ha. 94.46 205,079.16

7. Documentation and report preparation 2,171.00 ha. 351.60 763,321.44

Sub-total 2,171.00 ha. 1,929.00 4,187,853.26

Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment

1. Preparatory activities/orientation 165,000.00

2. Primary data collection and preliminary assessment 220,000.00

3. Formulation of findings and recommendations 41,250.00

4. Documentation 74,250.00

5. Final Report 49,500.00

Sub-total 2,171.00 ha. 253.34 550,000.00 T O T A L 2,171.00 ha. 2,182.34 4,737,853.26 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT

Infrastructure Project : Construction of Concrete Pathways and Bridges

Location : Catubig and Las Navas, Northern Samar

Contractor : B. Vicencio Construction

Contract Cost : P15,987,981.36

Revised Contract Cost : P17,647,468.16

Contract Duration : 360 calendar days

Effectivity of Notice to proceed : 21-Jun-02

Expected Completion date : 15-Jun-03

Revised Completion date : 15-Jul-03

Date of MOA with LGU : N/A

Brief description : The completed infrastructure in Catubig Side were concrete pathway with the following dimension: length - 2.38 km., pathway width - 1.2 m, shoulder width - 1 m; RCDG bridge with a total length of 18 m; and drainage system with 4 units RCBC ans 10 units RCPC.

The completed infrastructure in Las Navas Area includes the pathway within San Andres to Guiguinta with a total length of 2.25 km, width: 1.2 m; 2 units Bailey bridge with a total length of 24 m; 1 unit RCBC, 3 units RCPC and 2 units wooden bridge. The other pathway is from sta. 0+647.79 along Road 1 to Brgy. Roxas with a total length of 179.5 linear meters and a width of 1.2 m. with 2 units RCPC. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 12. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

Planned Actual 1996 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP 607.50 2,430,000.00 607.50 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 1,765.36 3,832,600.00 1,800.00 3,907,800.00 - - - - 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 1,765.36 3,832,600.00 1,800.00 3,907,800.00 - - - - - Year 1 1,180.84 2,563,603.02 1,033.17 2,243,004.95 -Year 2 584.52 1,268,996.98 233.93 507,866.56 - Year 3 - - 290.65 630,995.23 -Year 4 - - 242.25 525,933.26 C. CSD 15,272.43 31,421,186.80 19,603.36 46,302,740.08 - - - - 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 212.15 436,476.00 200.00 434,200.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath c. Plantation c.1. Riverbank Protection 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 15,060.28 30,984,710.80 19,419.53 45,868,540.08 - - - - a. Agroforestry 4,443.10 1,069,453.53 18,282.98 11,562,885.99 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 16,466.99 29,915,257.27 19,835.13 34,305,654.08 - - - - d.1. Bamboo 14,419.94 1,091,300.91 42,566.96 2,353,952.64 d.2. Rattan 13,066.27 5,764,837.03 13,464.36 6,499,920.26 d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 17,740.51 23,059,119.33 21,361.30 25,451,781.18 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component - 15,987,981.36 - 17,647,468.16 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 2,825.34 6,133,812.00 2,182.34 4,737,853.26 - - - - -Year 1 - 417,276.98 -Year 2 1,395,953.00 - -Year 3 3,066,906.00 3,080,148.02 -Year 4 1,670,953.00 1,240,428.26 2. SUSIMO - 2,187,638.69 - 2,187,638.69 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others

GRAND TOTAL 30,132.12 61,993,218.85 32,690.16 77,213,500.19 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 12. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

1997 1998 1999 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 2,171.00 1,124,867.10 - - 2,171.00 1,775,879.48 2,171.00 2,243,004.95 2,171.00 931,853.42 2,171.00 507,866.56 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 2,171.00 1,124,867.10 - - 2,171.00 1,775,879.48 2,171.00 2,243,004.95 2,171.00 931,853.42 2,171.00 507,866.56 - Year 1 2,171.00 1,124,867.10 2,171.00 1,438,735.92 2,171.00 2,243,004.95 -Year 2 2,171.00 337,143.56 2,171.00 931,853.42 2,171.00 507,866.56 - Year 3 -Year 4 C. CSD - - - - 4,114.76 15,858,881.90 2,014.22 2,855,791.13 2,057.38 9,281,945.60 2,590.78 8,150,840.82 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2,057.38 436,476.00 1,107.00 221,400.00 1,064.00 212,800.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath c. Plantation c.1. Riverbank Protection 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) - - - - 2,057.38 15,422,405.90 907.22 2,634,391.13 2,057.38 9,281,945.60 1,526.78 7,938,040.82 a. Agroforestry 240.70 1,069,453.53 133.20 130,371.08 240.70 308.67 126,660.80 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation - - - - 1,816.68 14,352,952.37 774.02 2,504,020.05 1,816.68 9,281,945.60 1,218.11 7,811,380.02 d.1. Bamboo 75.68 537,877.99 1.75 3,874.26 75.68 277,190.92 55.30 461,508.59 d.2. Rattan 441.20 2,039,275.29 162.28 353,252.96 441.20 1,854,873.74 456.32 1,615,278.56 d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 1,299.80 11,775,799.09 609.99 2,146,892.84 1,299.80 7,149,880.94 706.49 5,734,592.87 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring & Evaluation ------Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 -Year 4 2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others

GRAND TOTAL 2,171.00 1,124,867.10 - - 6,285.76 17,634,761.38 4,185.22 5,098,796.08 4,228.38 10,213,799.02 4,761.78 8,658,707.38 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 12. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

2000 2001 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) - - 2,171.00 630,995.23 - - 2,171.00 525,933.26 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites - - 2,171.00 630,995.23 - - 2,171.00 525,933.26 - Year 1 -Year 2 - Year 3 2,171.00 630,995.23 -Year 4 2,171.00 525,933.26 C. CSD 2,057.38 6,280,359.30 1,746.37 12,349,003.66 - - 2,361.98 8,581,404.31 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping - - 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath c. Plantation c.1. Riverbank Protection 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 2,057.38 6,280,359.30 1,746.37 12,349,003.66 - - 2,361.98 8,581,404.31 a. Agroforestry 240.70 353.07 1,036,070.65 632.44 4,311,469.58 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 1,816.68 6,280,359.30 1,393.30 11,312,933.01 - - 1,729.54 4,269,934.73 d.1. Bamboo 75.68 276,232.00 55.30 1,058,855.36 55.30 494,492.47 d.2. Rattan 441.20 1,870,688.00 456.32 2,479,906.71 482.75 1,014,296.84 d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 1,299.80 4,133,439.30 881.68 7,774,170.95 1,191.49 2,761,145.42 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring & Evaluation - - 2,171.00 417,276.98 2,171.00 1,395,953.00 - - -Year 1 2,171.00 417,276.98 -Year 2 2,171.00 1,395,953.00 -Year 3 -Year 4 2. SUSIMO 141,000.00 141,000.00 624,158.69 624,158.69 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others

GRAND TOTAL 2,057.38 6,421,359.30 6,088.37 13,538,275.87 2,171.00 2,020,111.69 4,532.98 9,731,496.26 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 12. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

2002 2003 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) ------1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites ------Year 1 -Year 2 - Year 3 -Year 4 C. CSD - - 2,361.98 13,278,714.55 - - 1,823.93 1,086,985.60 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping - - 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath c. Plantation c.1. Riverbank Protection 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) - - 2,361.98 13,278,714.55 - - 1,823.93 1,086,985.60 a. Agroforestry 632.44 5,613,718.86 632.44 344,595.02 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation - - 1,729.54 7,664,995.69 - - 1,191.49 742,390.58 d.1. Bamboo 55.30 335,221.97 - d.2. Rattan 482.75 1,037,185.19 - d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 1,191.49 6,292,588.54 1,191.49 742,390.58 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component 3,141,674.80 2,254,305.37 12,846,306.56 15,393,162.79 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 2,171.00 3,066,906.00 2,171.00 3,080,148.02 2,171.00 1,670,953.00 2,171.00 1,240,428.26 -Year 1 -Year 2 -Year 3 2,171.00 3,066,906.00 2,171.00 3,080,148.02 -Year 4 2,171.00 1,670,953.00 2,171.00 1,240,428.26 2. SUSIMO 596,000.00 596,000.00 826,480.00 826,480.00 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others

GRAND TOTAL 2,171.00 6,804,580.80 4,532.98 19,209,167.94 2,171.00 15,343,739.56 3,994.93 18,547,056.65 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH-P 135

TABLE 12. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL) ACTIVITIES Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 4,000.00 2,430,000.00 B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 2,171.00 3,832,600.00 2,171.00 3,907,800.00 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 2,171.00 3,832,600.00 2,171.00 3,907,800.00 - Year 1 2,171.00 2,563,603.02 2,171.00 2,243,004.95 -Year 2 2,171.00 1,268,996.98 2,171.00 507,866.56 - Year 3 - - 2,171.00 630,995.23 -Year 4 - - 2,171.00 525,933.26 C. CSD 2,057.38 31,421,186.80 2,361.98 46,302,740.08 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2,057.38 436,476.00 2,171.00 434,200.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath c. Plantation c.1. Riverbank Protection 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 2,057.38 30,984,710.80 2,361.98 45,868,540.08 a. Agroforestry 240.70 1,069,453.53 632.44 11,562,885.99 b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 1,816.68 29,915,257.27 1,729.54 34,305,654.08 d.1. Bamboo 75.68 1,091,300.91 55.30 2,353,952.64 d.2. Rattan 441.20 5,764,837.03 482.75 6,499,920.26 d.3. Mangrove d.4. Plantation Species 1,299.80 23,059,119.33 1,191.49 25,451,781.18 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component - 15,987,981.36 - 17,647,468.16 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 2,171.00 6,133,812.00 2,171.00 4,737,853.26 -Year 1 - - 2,171.00 417,276.98 -Year 2 2,171.00 1,395,953.00 - - -Year 3 2,171.00 3,066,906.00 2,171.00 3,080,148.02 -Year 4 2,171.00 1,670,953.00 2,171.00 1,240,428.26 2. SUSIMO - 2,187,638.69 - 2,187,638.69 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others

GRAND TOTAL 2,057.38 61,993,218.85 2,361.98 77,213,500.19 Annex 1a

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF VALUES, INC. (SMP Contractor)

General Assembly

Board of Director

President/Executive Director

CO Head Luzon CO Head CO Head Visayas Mindanao

COs Cebu COs Palawan COs Butuan

COs Negros COs Naawan Oriental

COs Southern COs Bukidnon Leyte

COs Leyte COs Zamboanga

COs Western Samar

COs Biliran Annex 1c1

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF CAPWA (Peoples Organization)

General Assembly

President BODs

Secretary

Vice President

Project Manager

Admin Support Unit Tech. Support Unit

Educ. & Training Officer Admin Officer

IQIS

Treasurer Book- Auditor keeper Nursery In-charge

Livelihood Forestry

Sub-chapter Presidents

VMAFA IFA HFA CUFA MFA SUFA CAFA GFA Annex 1c2

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF HIREDERA (Peoples Organization)

General Assembly

President BODs

Secretary

Vice President

Project Manager

Admin Support Unit Tech. Support Unit

Admin Officer Educ. & Training Officer

IQIS Treasurer Book- Auditor keeper

Livelihood Forestry Annex 1d1

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF TPEC-MPDAI (M & E Physical Contractor)

Board of Director

President

Admin Officer

Secretary

Treasurer

Auditor

Forester Community Agriculturist Organizer Annex 1d3

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF DEVELOPERS, INC. (M & E Institutional Contractor)

Board of President Trustees

Vice-President

Administrative Support

- Admin Officer

- Finance Officer

- Secretary - Liaison Officer

Socio- Peasant Research, Monitoring Economic Community Documenta and and Envi- Organizing tion Desk Evaluation ronmental Desk Desk Desk

Annex 1f

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF B, VICENCIO CONSTRUCTION (Infrastructure Contractor)

Project Manager

Resident/Project Manager

Administrative Officer Materials Engineer

Geodetic Equipment Gen. Const. Safety Officer Engineer Engineer Foreman

Survey Aide Mechanics Leadman First Aide

H. E. Mechanics Masons

Drivers Carpenters

Helpers Helpers

Laborers

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF MASLOG, INC. (M & E Physical Contractor)

General Assembly

President

Vice-President

Business Manager Secretary Exec Director Treasurer Auditor

Board of Directors

Committees

Education and Election and Marketing and Finance Livelihood Audit and Membership Secretariat Transportation Development Inventory

CO ORGANIZATIONAL SETUP OF BANKATON D’ SALVACION FOUNDATION, INC. (CO Contractor)

Project Officer

CO Coordinator

Area CO Area CO Area CO

CVO CVO CVO San CVO CVO CVO Mc CVO CVO CVO Bukid Roxas Andres Bugtosan Lourdes Arthur Rizal Taylor Victory

Legend: CO - Community Organizer CVO - Community Volunteer Organizer

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF SACRED (CO Contractor)

Executive Director

Micro-Finance (BOLIG) Other Development Program Programs HRD/Training

Program Manager Audit/ME HRDT Chief ME Team Program Bookkeeper Project (AUSAID) Team Supervisor Tech. (PEACE) Program Bookkeeper Agri-Literacy Health, Consultancy Asst./Comput (PACAP) and Envi. Programs er Operator TO Branch Branch Manager Manager Project Officer TO Program Manager

TO TO TO Agriculturist IM’s Project Project TO TO Part Time IM’s Officer Officer

TO TO IM’s Annex 1e

ORGABIZATIONAL STRUCTURE of the SUSIMO

SECRETARY ss

REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (RED)

PENRO

CENRO

SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT ASSISTING OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (SUSIMO)

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT

COMMUNITY SITE VALIDATION ORGANIZING AND DEVELOPMENT AND BILLING STRENGTHENING MANAGEMENT UNIT UNIT SITE

83

Portion of plantation

Agro forestry plantation Refo plantation

Farm-to-market road

PO Field Office SUSIMO Office

Monitoring and Protection Nursery

Livelihood project – People’s Organization Abaca & Copra TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Catubig Watershed Subproject Catubig Side Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 S 33 ° 4 ' W 666.63 2-3 S 80 ° 55 ' W 542.37 3-4 N 60 ° 55 ' W 672.64 4-5 S 26 ° 35 ' W 643.68 5-6 N 75 ° 28 ' W 345.20 6-7 S 58 ° 2 ' W 1,189.47 7-8 S 67 ° 35 ' E 224.22 8-9 N 89 ° 23 ' E 809.63 9-10 S 55 ° 0 ' E 322.51 10-11 N 70 ° 24 ' E 378.84 11-12 S 0 ° 10 ' W 842.63 12-13 N 89 ° 53 ' E 646.08 13-14 S 11 ° 52 ' E 640.21 14-15 S 83 ° 52 ' E 230.72 15-16 S 0 ° 37 ' W 312.95 16-17 S 89 ° 23 ' W 2,051.12 17-18 N 75 ° 27 ' W 1,057.38 18-19 N 20 ° 38 ' E 762.56 19-20 N 8 ° 29 ' W 391.61 20-21 N 5 ° 33 ' E 580.41 21-22 N 7 ° 3 ' W 429.73 22-23 N 37 ° 54 ' W 660.97 23-24 N 13 ° 59 ' W 1,169.43 24-25 N 48 ° 45 ' E 1,219.89 25-26 N 12 ° 25 ' E 638.38 26-27 N 62 ° 17 ' E 475.59 27-28 N 89 ° 34 ' E 1,389.46 28-29 S 43 ° 19 ' E 120.19 29-30 S 9 ° 14 ' W 223.20 30-31 S 16 ° 48 ' E 217.74 31-32 S 34 ° 43 ' W 357.52 32-33 S 65 ° 0 ' W 246.82 33-34 S 81 ° 26 ' W 602.49 34-35 S 39 ° 14 ' W 929.83 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Catubig Watershed Subproject Catubig Side Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 35-36 S 44 ° 17 ' E 168.61 36-37 N 47 ° 42 ' E 974.19 37-38 S 80 ° 36 ' E 548.81 38-39 N 47 ° 19 ' E 422.21 39-40 S 89 ° 40 ' E 255.38 40-41 S 76 ° 55 ' E 254.66 41-42 S 0 ° 6 ' E 797.70 42-1 S 46 ° 59 ' E 642.60 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 125 ° 10 ' 9 " lat-Y 12 24 ' 34 "

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Catubig Watershed Subproject Las Navas Side Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 30 ° 59 ' E 1,782.60 2-3 N 76 ° 6 ' E 696.60 3-4 N 67 ° 8 ' E 427.40 4-5 N 55 ° 23 ' E 733.46 5-6 S 74 ° 42 ' E 3,623.55 6-7 S 0 ° 33 ' W 611.07 7-8 S 89 ° 45 ' W 485.98 8-9 S 1 ° 46 ' W 203.80 9-10 S 89 ° 45 ' W 998.23 10-11 N 1 ° 31 ' W 519.15 11-12 S 89 ° 54 ' W 2,482.41 12-13 S 0 ° 4 ' E 512.46 13-14 S 89 ° 45 ' W 499.12 14-15 S 0 ° 4 ' E 499.31 15-16 S 61 ° 0 ' W 2,896.64 16-17 N 84 ° 19 ' E 507.30 17-18 S 0 ° 31 ' E 1,600.99 18-19 S 86 ° 44 ' E 212.34 19-20 S 0 ° 56 ' W 510.73 20-21 N 89 ° 0 ' W 395.65 21-22 N 0 ° 18 ' E 252.47 22-23 S 89 ° 5 ' W 303.94 23-24 S 0 ° 18 ' W 745.93 24-25 S 89 ° 12 ' E 510.31 25-26 S 0 ° 18 ' W 499.21 26-27 S 89 ° 50 ' W 1,003.40 27-28 N 0 ° 1 ' E 2,237.79 28-29 S 34 ° 47 ' E 2,113.67 29-30 N 89 ° 56 ' E 592.66 30-31 S 0 ° 36 ' E 305.05 31-32 S 89 ° 56 ' W 602.33 32-33 S 83 ° 26 ' E 4,857.59 33-34 S 84 ° 51 ' W 7,053.68 34-35 S 44 ° 57 ' E 715.76 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Catubig Watershed Subproject Las Navas Side Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 35-36 S 0 ° 44 ' W 497.62 36-37 S 89 ° 44 ' W 508.45 37-38 N 63 ° 14 ' W 1,344.71 38-39 N 31 ° 39 ' E 1,171.43 39-40 N 74 ° 17 ' E 423.95 40-41 N 72 ° 37 ' E 5,537.07 41-42 S 46 ° 55 ' E 400.30 42-43 S 45 ° 13 ' W 756.38 43-44 N 31 ° 59 ' W 4,607.75 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 124 ° 57 ' 46 " lat-Y 12 21 ' 31 "

This Subproject Completed Report was produced by the National Forestation Development Office (NFDO) through the valuable assistance and contribution from the DENR, Region VIII PENRO, Catarman CENRO, Pambujan and staff of the Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO)-CATUBIG

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Catubig Watershed Subproject Las Navas Side Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 30 ° 59 ' E 1,782.60 2-3 N 76 ° 6 ' E 696.60 3-4 N 67 ° 8 ' E 427.40 4-5 N 55 ° 23 ' E 733.46 5-6 S 74 ° 42 ' E 3,623.55 6-7 S 0 ° 33 ' W 611.07 7-8 S 89 ° 45 ' W 485.98 8-9 S 1 ° 46 ' W 203.80 9-10 S 89 ° 45 ' W 998.23 10-11 N 1 ° 31 ' W 519.15 11-12 S 89 ° 54 ' W 2,482.41 12-13 S 0 ° 4 ' E 512.46 13-14 S 89 ° 45 ' W 499.12 14-15 S 0 ° 4 ' E 499.31 15-16 S 61 ° 0 ' W 2,896.64 16-17 N 84 ° 19 ' E 507.30 17-18 S 0 ° 31 ' E 1,600.99 18-19 S 86 ° 44 ' E 212.34 19-20 S 0 ° 56 ' W 510.73 20-21 N 89 ° 0 ' W 395.65 21-22 N 0 ° 18 ' E 252.47 22-23 S 89 ° 5 ' W 303.94 23-24 S 0 ° 18 ' W 745.93 24-25 S 89 ° 12 ' E 510.31 25-26 S 0 ° 18 ' W 499.21 26-27 S 89 ° 50 ' W 1,003.40 27-28 N 0 ° 1 ' E 2,237.79 28-29 S 34 ° 47 ' E 2,113.67 29-30 N 89 ° 56 ' E 592.66 30-31 S 0 ° 36 ' E 305.05 31-32 S 89 ° 56 ' W 602.33 32-33 S 83 ° 26 ' E 4,857.59 33-34 S 84 ° 51 ' W 7,053.68 34-35 S 44 ° 57 ' E 715.76 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Catubig Watershed Subproject Las Navas Side Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 35-36 S 0 ° 44 ' W 497.62 36-37 S 89 ° 44 ' W 508.45 37-38 N 63 ° 14 ' W 1,344.71 38-39 N 31 ° 39 ' E 1,171.43 39-40 N 74 ° 17 ' E 423.95 40-41 N 72 ° 37 ' E 5,537.07 41-42 S 46 ° 55 ' E 400.30 42-43 S 45 ° 13 ' W 756.38 43-44 N 31 ° 59 ' W 4,607.75 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 124 ° 57 ' 46 " lat-Y 12 21 ' 31 "

This Subproject Completed Report was produced by the National Forestation Development Office (NFDO) through the valuable assistance and contribution from the DENR, Region VIII PENRO, Catarman CENRO, Pambujan and staff of the Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO)-CATUBIG