Review of EU-Third Country Cooperation on Policies Falling Within the ITRE Domain in Relation to Brexit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY Review of EU-Third Country Cooperation on Policies Falling within the ITRE Domain in Relation to Brexit STUDY Abstract This study was prepared at the request of the European Parliament’s Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE). It provides a critical assessment of the implications of existing models of cooperation of third countries with the European Union in each of four thematic areas for which the ITRE is responsible (energy, electronic communications, research policy, and small business policy. The relative desirability to the EU of EEA membership, bilateral relationships (as with Switzerland), a new generation Free Trade Agreement (FTA), membership in the Energy Community, or participation in the Horizon 2020 or COSME programmes are considered. IP/A/ITRE/2017-001 June 2017 PE 602.057 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE). AUTHOR(S) Bruegel, Belgium: Bruegel, Belgium: J. Scott MARCUS, Georgios PETROPOULOS, André SAPIR, Simone TAGLIAPIETRA, Alessio TERZI, Reinhilde VEUGELERS, Georg ZACHMANN1 RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Frédéric GOUARDÈRES Dagmara STOERRING EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Irene VERNACOTOLA LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact Policy Department A or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in Month Year © European Union, Year This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. 1 The authors would like to thank and acknowledge valuable research assistance from Filippo BIONDI, Enrico NANO and Alexander ROTH. Review of EU-Third Country Cooperation on Policies Falling within the ITRE Domain in Relation to Brexit CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 1. INTRODUCTION 14 1.1 THE PROCESS TRIGGERED BY THE UK’S REFERENDUM 14 1.2 OUR APPROACH TO THE STUDY 15 1.3 OUR METHODOLOGY 15 1.4 Structure of this report 16 2. GENERAL MODELS OF PARTICIPATION IN THE EU 17 2.1. Membership in the European Economic Area (EEA) 18 2.1.1. Objectives 18 2.1.2. Treaty and legal considerations 19 2.1.3 Institutional design 19 2.1.4 Overall assessment 21 2.2. Membership in the EFTA 24 2.2.1. Objectives 25 2.2.2. Treaty and legislative considerations 26 2.2.3. Institutional design 26 2.2.4. Overall assessment 26 2.3. Other forms of cooperation with third countries 26 2.4. Comparative assessment 27 3. ENERGY 29 3.1. Market and industry structure for the countries under consideration 30 3.2. Treaty and legal considerations 34 3.2.1. Internal Energy Market 34 3.2.2. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency 35 3.2.3. Climate and Environment 36 3.2.4. Security of Supply 36 3.3. Implementation at national level 37 3.3.1. Institutional setting 37 3.3.2. Internal Energy Market 40 3.3.3. Renewable Energies and Energy Efficiency 45 3.3.4. Environment and Climate 48 3.3.5. Security of Supply 49 3.4. Comparative assessment of different arrangements 50 PE 602.057 3 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policies _______________________________________________________________________ 4. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS 53 4.1. Market factors for the countries under consideration 53 4.2. Treaty and legal considerations 59 4.3. Implementation at national level 64 4.4. Considerations for specific policy elements 68 4.5 Comparative assessment of different arrangements 72 5. RESEARCH POLICY 76 5.1. The Framework Programmes, Horizon 2020, and other forms of research cooperation 77 5.2. Research and innovation in the countries under consideration 78 5.2.1. Research and innovation in the UK 79 5.2.2. Research and innovation in Norway 79 5.2.3. Research and innovation in Switzerland 80 5.2.4. Research and innovation in the United States 80 5.3. Treaty and legal considerations of participation in the EU’s H2020 Framework Programme 82 5.3.1. Participation as an associated third country in EU’s H2020 Framework Programme 82 5.3.2. Participation of other third countries in the EU’s H2020 Framework Programme 83 5.4 Forms of participation in cooperative research with the European Union 84 5.4.2 Norway 84 5.4.3. Switzerland 84 5.4.4. The United States 85 5.5. Level of participation in EU’s Framework Programmes 87 5.5.1. The United Kingdom 87 5.5.2. Norway 89 5.5.3. Switzerland 89 5.5.4. The United States 91 5.6. Comparative assessment of different arrangements 92 6. SMALL BUSINESS AND COSME PROGRAMME-RELATED INDUSTRY ISSUES 96 6.1. The Programme for Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs (COSME) 97 6.2. Programmatic factors for the countries under consideration 99 6.3. Treaty and legal considerations 100 6.4 Implementation at national level 101 6.5. Comparative assessment of different arrangements 101 4 PE 602.057 Review of EU-Third Country Cooperation on Policies Falling within the ITRE Domain in Relation to Brexit 7. FINDINGS 105 7.1 Strengths and weaknesses of existing models of cooperation with third countries 105 7.2. Which are the preferable models for the EU? 108 REFERENCES 111 ANNEX: INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED 116 PE 602.057 5 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policies _______________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AAL Ambient Assisted Living ACER Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators ARTEMIS Advanced Research and Technology for Embedded Intelligence and Systems BAU Business as usual BEREC Body of the European Regulators of Electronic Communications BBL Balgzand Bacton Line (gas pipeline UK-Netherlands) CEER Council of European Energy Regulators CEF Connecting Europe Facility CH Switzerland CIP Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme CO2 Carbon Dioxide COSME EU programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) (A,V)DSL (Asymmetric, Very-high-bit-rate) Digital Subscriber Line DSOs Distribution System Operators EDCTP European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership EE Energy Efficiency EEA European Economic Area EEC European Economic Community EEN European Enterprise Network EFG Equity Facility for Growth EFTA European Free Trade Association 6 PE 602.057 Review of EU-Third Country Cooperation on Policies Falling within the ITRE Domain in Relation to Brexit EFSI European Fund for Strategic Investments (“Juncker Investment Plan”) EIA Environmental Impact Assesment EIF European Investment Fund EIS European Innovation Scoreboard (previously IUS, Innovation Union Scoreboard) (Chapter 5) Entreprise Investment Scheme (Chapter 6) EIT European Institute of Innovation and Technology EIP Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme ElCom Eidgenössischen Elektrizitätskommission (Swiss energy regulator) EMRP European Metrology Research Programme EMU Economic and Monetary Union ENIAC Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) in the field of nanoelectronics ENTSO-E European Network for Transmission System Operators for Electricity ENTSOG European Network for Transmission System Operators for Gas ENP European Neighbourhood Policy EPFL École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne ERA European Research Area ERAC European Research Area and Innovation Committee ERC European Research Council ESIF European Structural and Investment Funds ESD Effort Sharing Decision ETH Zürich Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich PE 602.057 7 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policies _______________________________________________________________________ EU European Union EU ETS European emission trading system EURATOM European Atomic Energy Community FCH Fuel Cells and Hydrogen FP Framework Programme for research of the European Commission FTA Free Trade Agreement FTTP Fibre to the premises FTTH Fibre to the home GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse gas(es) H2020 Horizon 2020 (8th Framework Programme for research) IEA International Energy Agency IED Integrated Energy Design IMI Innovative Medicines Initiative (I)NDC (Intended) Nationally Determined Contributions IPA Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance ITER International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor ITRE Committee on Industry, Research and Energy IUK Interconnector UK (gas pipeline UK-Belgium) JCG Joint Consultative Group JPI Joint Programming Initiative(s) JTI Joint Technology Initiative(s) KICs Knowledge and Innovation Communities LGF Loan Guarantee Facility 8 PE 602.057 Review of EU-Third Country Cooperation on Policies Falling within the ITRE Domain in Relation to Brexit LLU Local Loop Unbundling LNG Liquid natural gas M(S)CA Marie (Skłodowska-)Curie Action(s) MEPs Members of the European Parliament MNO Mobile network operator MTRs Mobile call termination rates MSIP South Korean Minister of Science, ICT and Future Planning NCPs National Contact Points NEEAP National Energy Efficiency Action Plan NERC National Electricity Regulatory Commission of Ukraine NIH National Institutes of Health
Recommended publications
  • The Turkish Diaspora in Europe Integration, Migration, and Politics

    The Turkish Diaspora in Europe Integration, Migration, and Politics

    GETTY GEBERT IMAGES/ANDREAS The Turkish Diaspora in Europe Integration, Migration, and Politics By Max Hoffman, Alan Makovsky, and Michael Werz December 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Key findings 9 Detailed findings and country analyses 34 Conclusion 37 About the authors and acknowledgments 38 Appendix: Citizenship laws and migration history in brief 44 Endnotes Introduction and summary More than 5 million people of Turkish descent live in Europe outside Turkey itself, a human connection that has bound Turkey and the wider European community together since large-scale migration began in the 1960s.1 The questions of immigra- tion, citizenship, integration, assimilation, and social exchange sparked by this migra- tion and the establishment of permanent Turkish diaspora communities in Europe have long been politically sensitive. Conservative and far-right parties in Europe have seized upon issues of migration and cultural diversity, often engaging in fearmonger- ing about immigrant communities and playing upon some Europeans’ anxiety about rapid demographic change. Relations between the European Union—as well as many of its constituent member states—and Turkey have deteriorated dramatically in recent years. And since 2014, Turks abroad, in Europe and elsewhere around the world, have been able to vote in Turkish elections, leading to active campaigning by some Turkish leaders in European countries. For these and several other reasons, political and aca- demic interest in the Turkish diaspora and its interactions
  • Agreement Between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and Their Member States, of the One Part and the Republic of Armenia, of the Other Part

    Agreement Between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and Their Member States, of the One Part and the Republic of Armenia, of the Other Part

    Council of the European Union Brussels, 25 September 2017 (OR. en) 12525/17 Interinstitutional File: ADD 1 2017/0238 (NLE) COEST 240 CFSP/PESC 817 JAI 828 WTO 207 PROPOSAL From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 25 September 2017 To: Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: JOIN(2017) 37 final - ANNEX 1 Subject: ANNEX 1 to the Joint Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part Delegations will find attached document JOIN(2017) 37 final - ANNEX 1. Encl.: JOIN(2017) 37 final - ANNEX 1 12525/17 ADD 1 CPF/wd DG C 2A EN HIGH REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNION FOR EUROPEAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND COMMISSION SECURITY POLICY Brussels, 25.9.2017 JOIN(2017) 37 final ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the Joint Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part. EN EN COMPREHENSIVE AND ENHANCED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY AND THEIR MEMBER STATES, OF THE ONE PART, AND THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, OF THE
  • Acta Juridica Hungarica

    Acta Juridica Hungarica

    ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Editor-in-Chief Vilmos Peschka Akadémiai Kiadó Budapest Member of Wolters Kluwer Group HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Acta Juridica Hungarica presents the achievements of the legal sciences and legal scholars in Hungary and details the Hungarian legislation and legal literature. The journal accepts articles from every field of the legal sciences. Recently the editors have encouraged contributions from outside Hungary, with the aim of covering the legal sciences in the whole of Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Juridica Hungarica is abstracted/indexed in Information Technology and the Law, International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Editor-in-Chief VLLMOS PESCHKA Board of Editors GÉZA HERCZEGH, ISTVÁN KERTÉSZ, TIBOR KIRÁLY, FERENC MÁDL, ATTILA RÁCZ, ANDRÁS SAJÓ, TAMÁS SÁRKÖZY Editor VANDA LAMM Manuscripts and editorial correspondence should be addressed to ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA P.O. Box 25, H-1250 Budapest, Hungary Phone: (36 1) 355 7384 Fax: (36 1) 375 7858 Orders sholuld be addressed to AKADÉMIAI KIADÓ P.O. Box 245, H-1519 Budapest, Hungary Fax: (36 1)464 8221 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.akkrt.hu Subscription price for Volume 46 (2005) in 4 issues: EUR 216 + VAT including online access and normal postage; airmail delivery EUR 20. Customers are advised to place their orders - in the USA at EBSCO Subscription Services (P.O. Box 1943, Birmingham, AL 3520-1943) - in Japan at MARUZEN Company, Ltd., Journal Divison (P.O. Box 5050, Tokyo International 100-3191) © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005 AJur 46 (2005) 1-2 ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Vol.46.
  • Decentralising Immigrant Integration: Denmark's Mainstreaming Initiatives in Employment, Education, and Social Affairs

    Decentralising Immigrant Integration: Denmark's Mainstreaming Initiatives in Employment, Education, and Social Affairs

    Decentralising Immigrant Integration Denmark’s mainstreaming initiatives in employment, education, and social affairs By Martin Bak Jørgensen MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE EUROPE Decentralising Immigrant Integration Denmark’s mainstreaming initiatives in employment, education, and social affairs By Martin Bak Jørgensen September 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report, part of a research project supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, is one of four country reports on mainstreaming, covering Denmark, France, Germa- ny, and the United Kingdom. Migration Policy Institute Europe thanks key partners in this research project, Peter Scholten from Erasmus University and Ben Gidley from Compas, Oxford University. © 2014 Migration Policy Institute Europe. All Rights Reserved. Cover design: April Siruno Typesetting: Rebecca Kilberg, MPI No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from MPI Europe. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.mpieurope.org. Information for reproducing excerpts from this report can be found at www.migrationpolicy.org/about/copyright-policy. Inquiries can also be directed to [email protected]. Suggested citation: Jørgensen, Martin Bak. 2014. Decentralising immigrant integra- tion: Denmark’s mainstreaming initiatives in employment, education, and social affairs. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe. TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • Energy Union a Policy Proposal for the Short and the Long Term

    Energy Union a Policy Proposal for the Short and the Long Term

    SERIES NEW DECISION-MAKERS, NEW CHALLENGES FROM THE EUROPEAN ENERGY COMMUNITY TO THE ENERGY UNION A POLICY PROPOSAL FOR THE SHORT AND THE LONG TERM Sami ANDOURA and Jean-Arnold VINOIS Foreword by Jacques DELORS JANUARY 2015 STUDIES & REPORTS 107 SERIES NEW DECISION-MAKERS, NEW CHALLENGES FROM THE EUROPEAN ENERGY COMMUNITY TO THE ENERGY UNION A POLICY PROPOSAL FOR THE SHORT AND THE LONG TERM Sami Andoura & Jean-Arnold Vinois Foreword by Jacques Delors FROM THE EUROPEAN ENERGY COMMUNITY TO THE ENERGY UNION A POLICY PROPOSAL FOR THE SHORT AND THE LONG TERM TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD by Jacques Delors 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 30 FINDINGS, 10 IMMEDIATE ACTIONS AND 10 LONG-TERM BUILDING BLOCKS 13 INTRODUCTION – ENERGY AT THE HEART OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION 21 1. From 2007 to 2014: great ambitions, adverse developments and a growing EU energy framework 23 1.1. In 2007: great ambitions for 2020 and a new energy policy for Europe 23 1.2. From 2007 to 2014: adverse global and European developments 31 1.3. Updating the energy framework: the 2030 EU energy and climate package 44 2. Critical assessment of European energy policy’s strengths and weaknesses: 30 findings 46 2.1. The good but insufficient performance of the EU internal energy market 46 2.2. The implementation of the 20/20/20 objectives: on track but at what cost? 72 2.3. The external dimension of EU energy policy emerged from the crises 88 2.4. In conclusion – The need for action 100 3. The needed technical approach: ten immediate actions for the European energy policy and its stakeholders 102 3.1.
  • Regional Cooperation: Experiences, Constraints and Opportunities Final Report

    Regional Cooperation: Experiences, Constraints and Opportunities Final Report

    2012:30 Sida Decentralised Evaluation Joakim Anger Reform cooperation in the Western Balkans - regional cooperation: experiences, constraints and opportunities Final Report Reform cooperation in the Western Balkans - regional cooperation: experiences, constraints and opportunities Final Report December 2012 Joakim Anger Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2012:30 Sida Authors: Joakim Anger The views and interpretations expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2012:30 Commissioned by Sida, Department for Reform and Selective Cooperation Copyright: Sida and the authors Date of final report: December 2012 Published by Citat 2012 Art. no. Sida61560en urn:nbn:se:sida-61560en This publication can be downloaded from: http://www.sida.se/publications SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY Address: S-105 25 Stockholm, Sweden. Office: Valhallavägen 199, Stockholm Telephone: +46 (0)8-698 50 00. Telefax: +46 (0)8-20 88 64 Postgiro: 1 56 34–9. VAT. No. SE 202100-478901 E-mail: [email protected]. Homepage: http://www.sida.se Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................. 4 Preface ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................
  • Annual Implementation Report 2018/2019

    Annual Implementation Report 2018/2019

    Annual Implementation Report Energy Community Secretariat 1 November 2019 Annual Implementation Report 2018/2019 Energy Community Secretariat 1 November 2019 Table of Contents 01 State of Implementation 7 02 Introduction 10 03 Albania 17 Electricity 18 Gas 20 National Authorities 21 Oil 22 Renewable Energy 23 Energy Efficiency 25 Environment 27 Climate 29 Infrastructure 30 Statistics 31 04 Bosnia and Herzegovina 35 Electricity 36 Gas 38 National Authorities 40 Oil 41 Renewable Energy 42 Energy Efficiency 44 Environment 46 Climate 48 Infrastructure 49 Statistics 50 Energy Community Secretariat Internet: www energy-community org Am Hof 4 E-mail: contact@energy-community org 1010 Vienna Twitter: twitter com/ener_community AUSTRIA Design: Încotro Tel:+ 43 1 535 2222 Layout: Medium d o o Fax:+ 43 1 535 2222 11 Pictures: www shutterstock com 3 05 Georgia 55 Electricity 56 Gas 58 National Authorities 60 Oil 61 Renewable Energy 62 Energy Efficiency 64 Environment 66 Climate 68 Infrastructure 69 Statistics 70 06 Kosovo* 75 Electricity 76 Gas 78 National Authorities 79 Oil 80 Renewable Energy 81 Energy Efficiency 83 Environment 85 Climate 87 Infrastructure 88 Statistics 89 07 Moldova 93 Electricity 94 Gas 96 National Authorities 98 Oil 99 Renewable Energy 100 Energy Efficiency 102 Environment 104 Climate 106 Infrastructure 107 Statistics 108 08 Montenegro 113 Electricity 114 Gas 116 National Authorities 117 Oil 118 Renewable Energy 119 Energy Efficiency 121 Environment 123 Climate 125 Infrastructure 126 Statistics 127 4 09 North Macedonia 131 Electricity
  • IR2020 / Moldova

    IR2020 / Moldova

    Moldova Annual Implementation Report 1 November 2020 Energy Community Secretariat Moldova Summary Implementation Transposition Summary Indicators Implementation Status Descriptions Assessement Implementation in the electricity sector Electricity 40% of Moldova is still at an early stage Implementation in the gas sector of Gas 33% Moldova is still at an early stage Implementation in the oil sector of Oil 20% Moldova is yet to begin Renewable Implementation in the renewable en- 58% ergy sector of Moldova is moderately Energy advanced Energy Implementation in the energy efficien- 66% Efficiency cy sector of Moldova is well advanced Implementation in the environment Environment 67% sector of Moldova is well advanced Implementation in the climate sector Climate 43% of Moldova is moderately advanced Implementation in the infrastructure Infrastructure 12% sector of Moldova is yet to begin Implementation in the statistics sector Statistics 96% of Moldova is almost completed Implementation in the cybersecurity Cybersecurity 38% sector of Moldova is still at an early stage Overall number of cases: 3 Procedure ECS-9/17 Electricity by Article ECS-7/18 Environment 102 / Moldova Moldova State of Energy Sector Reforms While Moldova has transposed the Third Energy Package in operator model, this process has slowed down significantly in both the electricity and gas sectors, the state of implementa- recent months ANRE has established entry-exit points, still with tion is lagging behind in some crucial aspect Due to the lack the temporary transmission tariffs
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co

    1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co

    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
  • Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: a Historical Perspective European Family Law Series

    Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: a Historical Perspective European Family Law Series

    HARMONISATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE EUROPEAN FAMILY LAW SERIES Published by the Organising Committee of the Commission on European Family Law Prof. Katharina Boele-Woelki (Utrecht) Prof. Frédérique Ferrand (Lyon) Dr. Cristina González Beilfuss (Barcelona) Prof. Maarit Jänterä-Jareborg (Uppsala) Prof. Nigel Lowe (Cardiff) Prof. Dieter Martiny (Frankfurt/Oder) Prof. Walter Pintens (Leuven) HARMONISATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE A tale of two millennia MASHA ANTOKOLSKAIA Antwerpen – Oxford Distribution for the UK: Distribution for North America: Hart Publishing Gaunt Inc. Salter’s Boat Yard Gaunt Building Folly Bridge 3011 Gulf Drive Abingdon Road Holmes Beach Oxford OX1 4LB Florida 34217-2199 UK USA Tel: + 44 1865 24 55 33 Tel: + 1 941 778 5211 Fax: + 44 1865 79 48 82 Fax: + 1 941 778 5252 Distribution for Switzerland and Distribution for other countries: Germany: Intersentia Publishers Stämpfli Verlag AG Groenstraat 31 Wölflistrasse 1 BE-2640 Mortsel CH-3001 Bern Belgium Switzerland Tel: + 32 3 680 15 50 Tel: + 41 (0)31 300 63 18 Fax: + 32 3 658 71 21 Fax: + 41 (0)31 300 66 88 Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: A Historical Perspective Masha Antokolskaia © 2006 Intersentia Antwerpen – Oxford http://www.intersentia.com © 2006 M.V. Antokolskaia ISBN-10: 90-5095-576-2 ISBN-13: 978-90-5095-576-8 D/2006/7849/62 NUR 822 and 828 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. For my mother ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research has been made possible by a fellowship from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  • Comparative Civil Procedure

    Comparative Civil Procedure

    R. L. R. Comparative Civil Procedure Peter GOTTWALD* I. General functions and aims of comparative law The comparison of legal systems is a special method within jurisprudence. With regard to its important functions it is world-wide also regarded as a separate branch of jurisprudence.1) There is no branch of science which may base its knowledge only on ideas and ndings being born within national boundaries. This is particularly true within our modern world of globalisation. Comparative law then leads not only to a better knowledge of foreign law but is also corresponding to the internationalisation of law and jurisprudence and the globalisation of politics, of trade, commerce and private life style. Jurisprudence is not just the science of interpreting national laws, statutes, legal principles, rules and standards. It should comprise the search for models of preventing and solving social con icts within a world-wide society. In looking what has been done beyond the own borders comparative law offers incentives and a broader scope of models of solving a problem that could be and have been developed within national boundaries. Lawyers of all legal systems of the world are by far more imaginative than one lawyer could think up within his short life. Comparative law thus may be an ecoledeverite, enrich the stock of possible solutions , and moreover offer the chance to nd better solutions for the particular time and the particular country than by restricting to local or national doctrinal disputes. If you take this earnestly, comparative law is an exciting intellectual adventure, calling for a maximum of phantasy and of discipline.
  • Audit and Accountability in Local Government in Sweden

    Audit and Accountability in Local Government in Sweden

    Audit and Accountability in Local Government in Sweden Anna Eklöf Lotta Ricklander Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions Sweden in short facts Population: 10 million inhabitants Form of government: Constitutional monarchy, parliamentary democracy. Parliament: The Riksdag, with 349 members in one chamber. Capital: Stockholm. The largest city in Sweden. Population 942 000 The three democratic levels The task of the municipalities Social services Childcare and preschools Elderly care Care for the physically and intellectually disabled Primary and secondary education Planning and building issues Health and environmental protection Refuse collection and waste management Emergency services and emergency preparedness Water and sewerage The task of the regions Healthcare Regional development Infrastructure and public transport Cultural institutions Revenues of the municipalities and regions Other revenue 5% Other revenue 5% Rents and leases 4% Fees and charges 3% Sale of services and Targeted government grants contracts 1% 3% Fees and charges 7% Grant for pharmaceutial benefits 10% General government Government grants 14% grants 5% Tax renvenue 69% Tax revenue 74% The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) SALAR represents all 290 municipalities and all 20 regions. Negociates with national government SALAR decides upon the Code of audit in Local government Municipal audit in Sweden – the role of the SAI Locally owned audit (like in Norway, Denmark, UK, the Netherlands) The SAI Riksrevisionen