DOCSLIB.ORG

Has Rouhani Started Preparing for the اﺳم اﻟﻣوﺿوع : Presidential Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Has Rouhani Started Preparing for the اﺳم اﻟﻣوﺿوع : Presidential Elections Has Rouhani Started Preparing for the : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϡγ΍ Presidential Elections? Has Rouhani Started Preparing for the : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Presidential Elections? 20/11/2016 : έηϧϟ΍ΦϳέΎΗ ΔϣΩϘΗϣϟ΍ΕΎγ΍έΩϟ΍ϭΙΎΣΑϸϟϝΑϘΗγϣϟ΍ίϛέϣ : ΏΗΎϛϟ΍ϡγ΍ : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is exerting unremitting efforts in order to boost his power to win the presidential elections set to take place on May 17th, 2017.He aims to renew his presidential mandate for another four years. In this context, Rouhani seeks to increase his popularity once again among the youth and middle class, which were the main demographics voting in the presidential elections of June 2013. These voting blocs enabled him to beat four conservative fundamentalist candidates in the first round of elections. However, this class heatedly criticized him after failing to keep most of his promises from the electoral campaign in 2013.However, these efforts are still in their early stages and may face gradually increasing challenges with the presidential elections drawing near, especially after the map of potential presidential candidates revealed that the capability of the conservative fundamentalists to unite their lines behind one candidate to compete with Rouhani became clear.Undoubtedly, the Republican candidate Donald Trump¶s win in the U.S. presidential elections may present another variable which will have a role in determining Rouhani¶s opportunities in renewing his mandate of presidency. In light of Trump¶s interest in the nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1 and Iran¶s support for terrorism, its presence in Syria, and its stance on the war against the Islamic State (ISIS), the US¶s relationship with Iran¶s president may shift.Several Justifications:It has become evident that President Rouhani is attempting to alter his political tone towards his main supporters. He gave two reasons why he did not keep f the electoral promises he announced in the period before the latest presidential elections:The first reason is that he prioritized the nuclear deal with the P5+1, as it represents, in his view, the major focus for dealing with many of the issues Iran faces, particularly economic issues. Rouhani¶s government, in this regard, relied on the fact that reaching the agreement and lifting off the international sanctions imposed upon Iran will result in bolstering its power to settle these issues especially after freezing the ban on Iranian cash abroad, Iran¶s oil exports increasing once again, and the return of major foreign companies investing in Iran.Nonetheless, many obstacles came in the way of Iran utilizing the economic returns of the nuclear agreement, and they did not provide the government with many options to deal with the issues, especially internal issues, for example, the continuation of U.S. sanctions which discourage investments from many western companies and banks. These internal issues, for examplelifting the house arrest of the Green Path of Hope movement leaders Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, are in addition to the continuing arrests of some supporters of Rouhani and are imposing severe restrictions on the public freedoms.In other words, Rouhani¶s government did not consider that its efforts to gain returns from the nuclear deal, particularly on an economic level, may face many tough challenges that would weaken its position internally, especially in light of the suspicions of the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei, and the institutions run by the conservative fundamentalists of the feasibility of the deal with the U.S.The second factor is the conservative fundamentalists¶zeal in fighting Rouhani¶s efforts to settle the ³remains´of the political crisis imposed by the 2009 protests in light of fear that this would result in widening Rouhani¶s support base and the conservative movement, prior to the significant benefits Iran that seem close at hand.Significant Escalation: During a voting session to grant trust to three new ministers nominated by Rouhani to assume ministerial portfolios in his government on Nov. 1st, 2016, he cast accusations against ³enemy brothers spreading desperation among Iranians,´in reference to the conservative fundamentalists. In other words, by escalating relationships with his political adversaries, Rouhani sought to send a direct message to his supporters that the problem was not in his falling behind in keeping his electoral promises, but in the conservative fundamentalists¶insistence to keep him from doing so. The proof here is the pressure they imposed upon him, leading him to discharge three of his government ministers. The ministers discharged were the: Minister of Culture Ali Jannati (son of Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, the head of the Iranian Guardian Council and Chairman of the Assembly of Experts), the Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports Mahmoud Goudarzi and the Minister of Education Ali Asghar Fani.Undoubtedly, the conservative fundamentalists¶focus on discharging these three particular ministers is not limited to the reasons they adopted initially t, for example, the music concerts organized by the Ministry of Culture in Iranian cities, disclosing corruption cases to the Ministry of Education, especially those related to money embezzlement from the reserves fund of teachers, and the fall-back of the Iranian Olympic mission resulting in the Olypmic games taking place in Rio de Janeiro. On top of this, the three ministries understood the mood of the people, particularly the youth, upon which Rouhani relies in his endeavors in order to retain his position for a new presidential mandate. The conservative fundamentalist current seeks to weaken the popular base upon which Rouhani relies before the elections.Military Actions:Rouhani began taking counter-steps as a response to the pressures imposed by his political adversaries. It was evident that he was eager to nominate candidates for the three empty ministerial positions. However, these nominees were refused by the former Islamic Consultative Assembly, which was controlled by the conservative fundamentalists, in 2013. The Assembly accused the nominees of taking part in the protests organized by the Green Path of Hope movement, or by what the conservative fundamentalists call, ³the disorder movement.´The ministers 9/27/2021 5:32:35 PM 1 / 3 nominated are: Reza Salehi Amiri for the Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance post, Fakhruddin Danesh for Minister of Education, and Masoud Soltanifar to take over the Minister of Youth and Sports position.These nominees, as per several reports, belong to political parties and organizations that face pressures and accusations by the conservatives, which explains the refusal of many members of the Assembly to nominate them for ministerial positions in the government. However, the supporting masses of the conservative current settled the voting battle in favor of the president¶s candidate. These supporters achieved significant results in the parliamentary elections which took place in February 2016.It can be said that through his clash with the conservative fundamentalists, Rouhani seeks to endorse these designations in order to regain the support of his supporters in the reformist movement who voted for him in former elections. This will be difficult as the movement has heatedly criticized his administration¶s performance over the last four years, however he has realized that this demographic is the most capable of supporting his efforts to renew his presidential mandate.Of course, Rouhani may rely on the fact that he is the only viable candidate for this voting bloc, as his potential competitors will most likely be from the conservative fundamentalists. However, this does not negate the possibility that this group could vote for another choice, which may impose repercussions on the current president. These choices may include boycotting the elections, particularly if they are convinced of his inability to keep his promises, similarly to how they have reacted to conservative restrictions in the past.In light of the aforementioned issues, it can be said that the steps Rouhani has recently taken do not ensure him the support of the reformist or the conservative movement in the upcoming presidential elections, particularly in light of his reluctance or ability to open more important agendas for these masses. This could lead to an escalation of tensions with his political adversaries and with the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who adopts a strict and conservative policy on most issues.There are a number of indicators in the patterns between international powers, specifically the US and Russia, the main international actors regarding the Middle East region, and the militias that are involved in the same crises.While Washington was previously critical of these various actors, going so far as to defend any opposition, this strategy has changed with the aim of supporting their own interests. For example, the utilization of the Popular Mobilization Forces and the Kurds in Iraq and Syria, come as part of a strategy to combat terrorist groups such as ISIS and Al Qaeda.A number of views assess that this transformation is being caused by expected changes in the relationship between Washington and these actors in the near future, which in turn is caused by the security status in conflict zones. As for Moscow, despite it adopting a preliminary stance that does not deal with or recognize any non-state actors, previous experience has led them to slowly change their policy and adopt a more American approach, mainly due to its experience during
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi: Decision-Making and Factionalism in Iran’S Revolutionary Guard
    The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi: Decision-Making and Factionalism in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard SAEID GOLKAR AUGUST 2021 KASRA AARABI Contents Executive Summary 4 The Raisi Administration, the IRGC and the Creation of a New Islamic Government 6 The IRGC as the Foundation of Raisi’s Islamic Government The Clergy and the Guard: An Inseparable Bond 16 No Coup in Sight Upholding Clerical Superiority and Preserving Religious Legitimacy The Importance of Understanding the Guard 21 Shortcomings of Existing Approaches to the IRGC A New Model for Understanding the IRGC’s Intra-elite Factionalism 25 The Economic Vertex The Political Vertex The Security-Intelligence Vertex Charting IRGC Commanders’ Positions on the New Model Shades of Islamism: The Ideological Spectrum in the IRGC Conclusion 32 About the Authors 33 Saeid Golkar Kasra Aarabi Endnotes 34 4 The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi Executive Summary “The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps [IRGC] has excelled in every field it has entered both internationally and domestically, including security, defence, service provision and construction,” declared Ayatollah Ebrahim Raisi, then chief justice of Iran, in a speech to IRGC commanders on 17 March 2021.1 Four months on, Raisi, who assumes Iran’s presidency on 5 August after the country’s June 2021 election, has set his eyes on further empowering the IRGC with key ministerial and bureaucratic positions likely to be awarded to guardsmen under his new government. There is a clear reason for this ambition. Expanding the power of the IRGC serves the interests of both Raisi and his 82-year-old mentor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood-Soaked Secrets Why Iran’S 1988 Prison Massacres Are Ongoing Crimes Against Humanity
    BLOOD-SOAKED SECRETS WHY IRAN’S 1988 PRISON MASSACRES ARE ONGOING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Cover photo: Collage of some of the victims of the mass prisoner killings of 1988 in Iran. Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons © Amnesty International (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: MDE 13/9421/2018 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS GLOSSARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 METHODOLOGY 18 2.1 FRAMEWORK AND SCOPE 18 2.2 RESEARCH METHODS 18 2.2.1 TESTIMONIES 20 2.2.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 22 2.2.3 AUDIOVISUAL EVIDENCE 23 2.2.4 COMMUNICATION WITH IRANIAN AUTHORITIES 24 2.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 25 BACKGROUND 26 3.1 PRE-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 26 3.2 POST-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 27 3.3 IRAN-IRAQ WAR 33 3.4 POLITICAL OPPOSITION GROUPS 33 3.4.1 PEOPLE’S MOJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN 33 3.4.2 FADAIYAN 34 3.4.3 TUDEH PARTY 35 3.4.4 KURDISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF IRAN 35 3.4.5 KOMALA 35 3.4.6 OTHER GROUPS 36 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights After the Election
    Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights June 2017 After the Election Iranian President’s Pathway to Fulfill His Promises Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) New York Headquarters: Tel: +1 347-689-7782 www.iranhumanrights.org Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights After the Election Copyright © Center for Human Rights in Iran Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights After the Election Rouhani’s pathway to fulfill his promises: Utilize his power, negotiate the system, hold rights violators responsible, engage and empower civil society June 2017 The re-election of President Hassan Rouhani on May 19, 2017 was due in large part to the perception by the Iranian citizenry that his government would do more to improve human rights in Iran than his rivals—an outcome clearly desired by a majority of voters. During Rouhani’s campaign rallies, not only did he make explicit references to issues of political and social freedom and promises to uphold such freedoms in his second term, his supporters also repeatedly made clear their demands for improvements in human rights. Despite Iran’s tradition of giving the incumbent a second term, Rouhani’s re-election was uncertain. Many Iranians struggling with high unemployment and other economic problems did not see any improvement in their daily lives from Rouhani’s signature achievement—the nuclear deal and easing of interna- tional sanctions. Yet even though the other candidates offered subsidies and populist proposals, and Rouhani’s economic proposals were modest, he won by a large margin—far greater than his win in 2013. In addition to his rejec- tion of populist economics, Rouhani was the only candidate that talked about human rights—and the more he focused on this issue, the more his support coalesced and strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • Tightening the Reins How Khamenei Makes Decisions
    MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS POLICY FOCUS 126 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org Policy Focus 126 | March 2014 The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including pho- tocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2014 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Cover: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei holds a weapon as he speaks at the University of Tehran. (Reuters/Raheb Homavandi). Design: 1000 Colors CONTENTS Executive Summary | V 1. Introduction | 1 2. Life and Thought of the Leader | 7 3. Khamenei’s Values | 15 4. Khamenei’s Advisors | 20 5. Khamenei vs the Clergy | 27 6. Khamenei vs the President | 34 7. Khamenei vs Political Institutions | 44 8. Khamenei’s Relationship with the IRGC | 52 9. Conclusion | 61 Appendix: Profile of Hassan Rouhani | 65 About the Author | 72 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVEN UNDER ITS MOST DESPOTIC REGIMES , modern Iran has long been governed with some degree of consensus among elite factions. Leaders have conceded to or co-opted rivals when necessary to maintain their grip on power, and the current regime is no excep- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • INSS Insight No. 1482, June 6, 2021 from Election to Selection: Iran's Path to a New President
    INSS Insight No. 1482, June 6, 2021 From Election to Selection: Iran's Path to a New President Raz Zimmt The decision by Iran’s Guardian Council to disqualify the vast majority of the candidates in the coming presidential elections, including former speaker of the Majlis Ali Larijani, and Eshaq Jahangiri, First Vice-President under President Rouhani, in effect leaves the hardline cleric Ebrahim Raisi as the only candidate with real chances of winning the elections. This decision is another reflection of the regime's efforts to strengthen the conservative hegemony in the political elite, especially in advance of the struggle over the succession of Iran's leadership. The regime's blatant intervention in the election process indicates that it is determined to maintain conservative control of power centers even at the cost of further undermining public confidence, and that it estimates that it is capable of suppressing any possible protest. On May 25, 2021, following the screening of all the presidential candidates, Iran’s Guardian Council announced it had approved seven final candidates, out of the 592 candidates (including 40 women) who registered for the elections scheduled for June 18. That the vast majority of the candidates were disqualified came as no surprise. Since the beginning of the 1980s, only a few candidates have passed the screening process under the 12-member Guardian Council, half of whom are clerics appointed by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and half of whom are jurists appointed by the Judiciary Chief and approved by the Majlis. This time too, it was expected that the Council would disqualify any candidate it saw as someone who might undermine conservative hegemony in Iranian politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Supreme Leadership and Presidency and Its Impact on the Political System in Iran
    Study The Relationship Between the Supreme Leadership and Presidency and Its Impact on the Political System in Iran By Dr. Motasem Sadiqallah | Researcher at the International Institute for Iranian Studies (Rasanah) Mahmoud Hamdi Abualqasim | Researcher at the International Insti- tute for Iranian Studies (Rasanah) www.rasanah-iiis.org WWW.RASANAH-IIIS.ORG Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 3 I- The Status and Role of the Supreme Leadership and the Presidency in the Iranian Political System ................................................................................. 4 II- The Problems Involving the Relationship Between the Supreme Leader and the Presidency .............................................................................................. 11 III- Applying Pressure Through Power to Dismiss the President .....................15 IV- The Implications of the Conflict Between the Supreme Leader and the Presidency on the Effectiveness of the Political System ................................. 20 V- The Future of the Relationship Between the Supreme Leader and the President ........................................................................................ 26 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 29 Disclaimer The study, including its analysis and views, solely reflects the opinions of the writers who are liable for the conclusions, statistics or mistakes contained therein
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Divided? Nima Gerami
    The Domestic Politics of Iran’s Nuclear Debate LEADERSHIP DIVIDED? NIMA GERAMI LEADERSHIP DIVIDED? The Domestic Politics of Iran’s Nuclear Debate NIMA GERAMI The Washington Institute for Near East Policy www.washingtoninstitute.org Policy Focus 134 | February 2014 The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2014 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Cover: Tehran newspaper headlines following signing of the Joint Plan of Action in Geneva. Design: 1000 Colors Contents Acknowledgments | v Executive Summary | vii 1. Introduction | 1 2. Limits on Iran’s Nuclear Debate: Secrecy and Self-Censorship | 3 3. Contextualizing Nuclear Decisionmaking: The Key Stakeholders | 9 4. The Political Landscape: Elite Factionalism and the Nuclear Debate | 19 5. Critical Junctures: Internal Divisions and Nuclear Policy Shifts | 31 6. Conclusion: Lessons Learned | 40 About the Author | 42 Figures Fig 1. Overview of Nuclear Decisionmaking in Iran | 11 Table 1. Formal Members of the Supreme National Security Council | 12 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, particularly Patrick Clawson, Michael Eisenstadt, and Mehdi Khalaji, for their encouragement, insights, and support during the preparation of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East, North Africa
    MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Iran: Conflicting Assessment of China Talks OE Watch Commentary: Iran’s new “strategic partnership” agreement with China made international headlines last July but, in the months since, negotiations have been mired in the details. The negotiations began during the administration of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (2005-2013) but, as implied in the excerpt of this article from Donya-e Eghtesad, perhaps Iran’s top financial newspaper, may outlast his successor Hassan Rouhani, whose second term will end in 2021. That Donya-e Eghtesad highlights the divergence between Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and his deputy for economic affairs reaffirms the pattern in which Iran’s financial papers dryly skewer the Iranian government’s official positions without comment by juxtaposing inconsistencies. While the excerpt suggests a lack of consensus on drafts that must be worked through before anything can be finalized, the article also suggests that the threat of U.S. sanctions has also Iran President Hassan Rouhani and Chinese President Xi Jinping sign cooperation agreements in Beijing, 11 June 2018. slowed China’s willingness to deal with Iran. This in turn suggests Source: Islamic Republic News Agency, https://img9.irna.ir/d/r2/2020/07/16/3/157216967.jpg that while Tehran highlights its partnership with China as a means to counter the United States, the view from Beijing is more nuanced and appears to prioritize economic opportunity above strategic factors. End OE Watch Commentary (Rubin) “The only thing that can be done now is to wait.” Source: “Mozakirat-e Iran-Chin Motavaqaf Nashodeh Ast (Iran-China Talks Have Not Stopped),” Donya-e Eghtesad, 5 November 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East, North Africa
    MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Iran: Sanctions Don’t Impact Military Spending OE Watch Commentary: It is not often that senior Iranian military leaders sit down with the Western press but on 24 February, Hossein Dehghan did just that with the Financial Times from his office in Tehran. Dehghan is a former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) air force officer whom President Hassan Rouhani appointed to lead the ministry of defense in his first cabinet. He currently serves as an advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The Iranian press widely covered the interview in which Dehghan emphasized that the Iranian military budget had continued to grow despite US sanctions, as reported in the excerpted passage from Mehr News. His statement, which seems to telegraph to the West that US sanctions will not achieve their aims, seems at cross purposes with Iran’s other frequent information operations theme, that sanctions have undercut the health of Iranians because Hossein Dehghan sits for an interview, with a portrait of the late Qassem Soleimani in the background. Source: https://media.mehrnews.com/d/2020/02/24/3/3393218.jpg of their inability to purchase necessary medicines. After all, if Iran has several extra billion dollars with which to fund the IRGC and other military organizations, that money might easily be utilized to purchase humanitarian goods through the Swiss humanitarian channel. Iran’s increased military budget raises questions about what the Iranian military hopes to do with its enhanced budget. Dehghan did insist that Iran would neither reconsider its support to Hezbollah and other regional proxies nor would it stop work on its ballistic missile programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: Navigating Regional Influence and a Potential U.S
    MENU Policy Analysis / Fikra Forum Iran: Navigating Regional Influence and a Potential U.S. Policy Reset by Firas Elias Dec 17, 2020 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Firas Elias Firas Elias is an expert in national security and Iranian studies. Brief Analysis For Biden to reach a deal with Iran, the administration will need to address a host of difficult issues. While any changes in the U.S. policy towards Iran may have a significant impact, a nuclear deal might be a pipe dream. ran is uncertain and skeptical about the direction of new U.S. foreign policy following President-Elect Joe Biden’s I victory in the presidential elections. Accordingly, officials’ public reactions have been mixed. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has expressed doubts about the entire U.S. electoral process, while Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif have invited the president-elect to turn over a new leaf with the Iranian people. Rouhani also emphasized in a public speech that both countries could “decide and announce that they will return to conditions on January 20, 2017.” These public proposals belie a more complicated reality: the Trump years have made an impact on Iran’s political climate, and attempts to negotiate with Biden are likely to be influenced by the different internal conflicts in Iran. In particular, Tehran is wary of adding to the perception of its own weaknesses, with the U.S. attack on Qassem Soleimani, a still-raging coronavirus pandemic, and a severe economic crisis given ongoing U.S. sanctions. As such, Tehran may be willing to make progress on nuclear negotiations while simultaneously demonstrating stubbornness on the question of its regional influence—two issues that are seen as intertwined by Iran’s regional adversaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy
    Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 14, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32048 Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, a priority of U.S. policy has been to reduce the perceived threat posed by Iran to a broad range of U.S. interests, including the security of the Persian Gulf region. In 2014, a common adversary emerged in the form of the Islamic State organization, reducing gaps in U.S. and Iranian regional interests, although the two countries have often differing approaches over how to try to defeat the group. The finalization on July 14, 2015, of a “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA) between Iran and six negotiating powers could enhance Iran’s ability to counter the United States and its allies in the region, but could also pave the way for cooperation to resolve some of the region’s several conflicts. During the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. officials identified Iran’s support for militant Middle East groups as a significant threat to U.S. interests and allies. A perceived potential threat from Iran’s nuclear program emerged in 2002, and the United States orchestrated broad international economic pressure on Iran to try to ensure that the program is verifiably confined to purely peaceful purposes. The international pressure contributed to the June 2013 election as president of Iran of the relatively moderate Hassan Rouhani, who campaigned as an advocate of ending Iran’s international isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile: Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Rear
    Profile: Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani May 2020 1 Table of Contents Early Years and Path to Power ................................................................................................................. 3 Fixture of Iran’s Armed State ................................................................................................................... 3 Politics ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Exile in the Deep State ............................................................................................................................. 6 The Supreme National Security Council.................................................................................................... 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), is one of Iran’s leading strategists. His credentials span the spectrum of Tehran’s various power centers, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Islamic Republic’s regular military (Artesh), and the Ministry of Defense and Logistics (MODAFL), to name a few. There is evidence to suggest that Shamkhani has become more influential recently, particularly following the death of former IRGC- Quds Force Commander
    [Show full text]