Dynamic Decompression of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve to Treat Meralgia Paresthetica: Technique and Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dynamic Decompression of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve to Treat Meralgia Paresthetica: Technique and Results CLINICAL ARTICLE J Neurosurg 131:1552–1560, 2019 Dynamic decompression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve to treat meralgia paresthetica: technique and results Martijn J. A. Malessy, MD, PhD,1,2 Job Eekhof, MD, PhD,2 and Willem Pondaag, MD, PhD1,2 1Leiden University Medical Center, and 2Alrijne Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands OBJECTIVE The results of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) decompression to treat idiopathic meralgia pares- thetica (iMP) vary widely. Techniques to decompress the LFCN differ, which may affect outcome, but in MP it is unknown to what extent. The authors present a new technique using dynamic decompression and discuss the outcomes. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed in a consecutive series of 19 cases. The goal of decompression was pain relief and recovery of sensation. The plane ventral to the LFCN was decompressed by cutting the fascia lata and the inferior aspect of the inguinal ligament. The plane dorsal to the LFCN was decompressed by cutting the fascia of the sartorius muscle. Subsequently, the thigh was brought in full range of flexion and extension/abduction. The authors identi- fied and additionally cut fibers that tightened and caused compression at various locations of the LFCN during movement in all patients, referring to this technique as dynamic decompression. Postoperatively, an independent neurologist scored pain and sensation on a 4-point scale: completely resolved, improved, not changed, or worsened. Patients scored their re- maining pain or sensory deficit as a percentage of the preoperative level. Statistical assessment was done using ANOVA to assess the association between outcome and duration of preoperative symptoms, BMI, and length of follow-up. RESULTS In 17 of the 19 cases (89%), the pain and/or paresthesia completely resolved. Patients in the remaining 2 cases (11%) experienced 70% and 80% reduction in pain. Sensation completely recovered in 13 of the 19 cases (69%). In 5 of the 19 cases (26%) sensation improved, but an area of hypesthesia remained. Four of these 5 patients indicated a sensory improvement of more than 75%, and the remaining patient had 50% improvement. Sensation remained un- changed in 1 case (5%) with persisting hypesthesia and mild hyperesthesia. There was no significant impact of preop- erative symptom duration, BMI, and length of follow-up on postoperative outcome. CONCLUSIONS Dynamic decompression of the LFCN is an effective technique for the treatment of iMP. Most patients become completely pain free and sensation recovers considerably. https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2018.9.JNS182004 KEYWORDS lateral femoral cutaneous nerve; meralgia paresthetica; dynamic decompression; peripheral nerve; nerve surgery AIN, paresthesia, and abnormal skin sensation on Treatment for iMP either is conservative or consists of the lateral side of the thigh result from pathology of 1) local injection with a combination of steroids with an different origins in the course of spinal nerves L2 anesthetic; 2) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF); 3) spinal cord Pand L3 to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). stimulation; or 4) surgery.34 The objective evidence base The clinical diagnosis of idiopathic meralgia paresthetica for treatment choices is weak.23 Two surgical techniques (iMP) is made when a herniated lumbar disc or a pelvic are currently in use, namely LFCN decompression and tumor is excluded and the symptoms are not caused by neurectomy. It is unknown whether one technique is supe- trauma or surgical intervention. In the 1960s, it became rior to the other.23,35 generally accepted that the cause of iMP is compression of Over time, different techniques of decompression have the LFCN in its location beneath the lateral portion of the been described, consisting of cutting 1) the inguinal liga- inguinal ligament at the site of the anterior superior iliac ment over the femoral nerve;32 2) the division of the up- spine (ASIS).21 per blade of the inguinal ligament and deep fascia of the ABBREVIATIONS ASIS = anterior superior iliac spine; iMP = idiopathic meralgia paresthetica; LFCN = lateral femoral cutaneous nerve; PRF = pulsed radiofrequency; RCT = randomized controlled trial. SUBMITTED July 11, 2018. ACCEPTED September 26, 2018. INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 7, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.JNS182004. 1552 J Neurosurg Volume 131 • November 2019 ©AANS 2019, except where prohibited by US copyright law Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/07/21 09:54 AM UTC Malessy et al. thigh;26 3) a small portion of the fibrous origin of the inter- TABLE 1. Data for patients who underwent decompression of the nal abdominal oblique muscle;27 and 4) a slot in the crest LFCN 28 of the ilium posterior to the ASIS. Other techniques are Variable Mean SD Median Range medial transposition of the LFCN17 and minimally inva- sive neurolysis.8 Textbooks and handbooks usually pro- Age (yrs) 50 8 54 27–61 vide fairly superficial information regarding the technique Duration of symptoms (yrs)* 61 70 23 9–223 of decompression.6,7,16,20,22,24,25,30,37,42 Follow-up (mos) 27 18 25 5–58 Many articles have reported the results of LFCN de- BMI (kg/m2) 30.2 5.5 28.2 21.5–39.2 compression. In the latest Cochrane review on treatment for i M P, 23 only 9 articles were considered of high quality Seventeen patients (12 women and 5 men) underwent 19 procedures. Two 2,13,15,29,31,33,38,41,44 men underwent LFCN decompression bilaterally. and were included. For unclear reasons, 2 * Interval between onset of symptoms and operation. studies that actually met the criteria were not used.4,39 Un- fortunately, 62,13,15,31,33,41 of these 112,4,13, 15, 29, 31, 33, 38, 39, 41,44 pa- pers could not be used to determine the relationship of the has not been described before. Here, we describe our tech- decompression technique and its outcome for the following nique in detail and present the results. reasons. First, patients with idiopathic as well as symptom- atic MP were grouped.2,13 It is known that the etiology un- derlying MP symptoms affects the outcome of decompres- Methods sion.4 Second, revision decompression or neurectomy was Patient Population performed following failed decompression, but was scored We performed a retrospective cohort study in a con- as one treatment.33 Third, results of decompression or neu- 41 secutive case series of patients who underwent dynamic rectomy were pooled. Fourth, nerves originating from LFCN decompression to treat iMP in the period between the femoral nerve were decompressed,41 which makes it 43 June 2013 and December 2017. unlikely that these nerves were the LFCN. Fifth, patients The indication for surgery was the presence in the were children15 or concerned only those with symptomatic 31 LCFN area of 1) persistent, annoying pain and/or pares- M P. thesia; and 2) abnormal sensation of the skin (hypesthe- The 5 remaining papers comprise well-delineated sia, dysesthesia, hyperesthesia, allodynia, or hyperalgesia). groups. Pain relief was obtained in 30% to 82% of the Patients had been previously treated elsewhere, but their 4,29,38,39,44 patients. Unfortunately, only 3 of these 5 articles symptoms were refractory to conservative measures, local included details regarding the surgical technique per- injection containing steroids and anesthetic, or, occasion- formed and were thus eligible for relating technique to out- ally, PRF. come.4,38,39 Benezis et al. performed ventral decompression Patients were excluded if they had prior LFCN sur- of the LFCN by opening the fascia lata and by sectioning gery. All patients were tested for symptomatic MP based the inguinal ligament. Complete pain relief was obtained on neuropathy due to prolonged external compression, in 64% of the patients.4 Siu and Chandran and Son et al. traumatic lesion in the area of the ASIS, an L2 or L3 ra- additionally addressed 3 structures dorsal to the LFCN, diculopathy, a lumbar plexopathy, a femoral neuropathy, namely a posterior sling of fascia from the inguinal liga- a lower abdominal wall procedure, or an iliac bone graft ment, the tendinous arc from the iliac fascia, and the dis- harvest. All patients had ultrasound and/or MRI examina- tal deep fascia of the thigh. Complete relief was achieved tions to rule out a retroperitoneal or intrapelvic mass. Ad- in 73% and 82% of the patients, respectively.38,39 Recently, ditional exclusion criteria were age ≤ 18 years or inability the effect on outcome of implementing technical modifica- to communicate in Dutch. tions was published.17 The number of patients per group Seventeen patients (12 women) met these criteria (Table was small and follow-up incomplete, making a meaning- 1). In 2 patients, the LFCN was decompressed bilaterally ful interpretation impossible. However, the applied surgical in separate sessions after full recovery of the first opera- modifications17 mirror the trend in time.4,38,39 Initially, only tion, amounting to 19 cases. ventral decompression was performed, and later dorsal de- The mean age of the patients at surgery was 50 years compression was added. Better outcomes were obtained (SD 8, range 27–61, and median 54 years). The mean in- with more extensive decompression. terval between onset of symptoms and operation was 61 The large variation in the reported outcome of LFCN months (SD 70, range 9–223, and median 23 months). The decompression for iMP is striking.4,29,38,39,44 This might be mean follow-up was 27 months (SD 18, range 5–58, and explained not only by inclusion bias, but also by the applied median 25 months). The mean BMI was 30.2 kg/m2 (SD surgical technique. In any case, so far all decompressions 5.5, range 21.5–39.2, and median 28.2 kg/m2).
Recommended publications
  • Electrophysiological Study of the Posterior Cutaneous Femoral Nerve
    logy & N ro eu u r e o N p h f y o s l i a o l n o Brooks, J Neurol Neurophysiol 2011, 2:5 r g u y o J Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology ISSN: 2155-9562 DOI: 10.4172/2155-9562.1000119 Research Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Electrophysiological Study of the Posterior Cutaneous Femoral Nerve: Normative Data Brooks1*, Silva C MD2, Kai MR2 and Leal GXP2 1Setor de Eletroneuromiografia do Instituto de Assistência à Saúde do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo – São Paulo- Brasil 2Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Abstract The posterior cutaneous femoral nerve provides cutaneous inervation of the posterior surface of the thigh and leg, as well as the skin of the perineum. Using Dumitru et al. [1] technique for the assessment of this nerve, we studied one hundred and sixteen limbs from fifty-eight healthy volunteers. The mean values for the posterior cutaneous femoral nerve were as follows: onset latency 2.0 msec (±0.5), amplitude 7.0µV (±2.1), nerve conduction velocity 52 m/s (±4). The assessment of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve is simple and reproducible. The results of this standardization were similar to the ones described in international literature. Keywords: Femoral nerve; Posterior cutaneous nerve Results Introduction The mean values for the posterior cutaneous femoral nerve were as follows: onset latency 2.0msec (±0.5), amplitude 7.0µV (±2,1), nerve The posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh leaves the pelvis through conduction velocity 52 m/s (±4); Table 1 summarizes our findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Extremity Focal Neuropathies
    LOWER EXTREMITY FOCAL NEUROPATHIES Lower Extremity Focal Neuropathies Arturo A. Leis, MD S.H. Subramony, MD Vettaikorumakankav Vedanarayanan, MD, MBBS Mark A. Ross, MD AANEM 59th Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Copyright © September 2012 American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine 2621 Superior Drive NW Rochester, MN 55901 Printed by Johnson Printing Company, Inc. 1 Please be aware that some of the medical devices or pharmaceuticals discussed in this handout may not be cleared by the FDA or cleared by the FDA for the specific use described by the authors and are “off-label” (i.e., a use not described on the product’s label). “Off-label” devices or pharmaceuticals may be used if, in the judgment of the treating physician, such use is medically indicated to treat a patient’s condition. Information regarding the FDA clearance status of a particular device or pharmaceutical may be obtained by reading the product’s package labeling, by contacting a sales representative or legal counsel of the manufacturer of the device or pharmaceutical, or by contacting the FDA at 1-800-638-2041. 2 LOWER EXTREMITY FOCAL NEUROPATHIES Lower Extremity Focal Neuropathies Table of Contents Course Committees & Course Objectives 4 Faculty 5 Basic and Special Nerve Conduction Studies of the Lower Limbs 7 Arturo A. Leis, MD Common Peroneal Neuropathy and Foot Drop 19 S.H. Subramony, MD Mononeuropathies Affecting Tibial Nerve and its Branches 23 Vettaikorumakankav Vedanarayanan, MD, MBBS Femoral, Obturator, and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Neuropathies 27 Mark A. Ross, MD CME Questions 33 No one involved in the planning of this CME activity had any relevant financial relationships to disclose.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Overview of Neurovascular Structures in Hip Arthroplasty
    1mon.qxd 2/2/04 10:26 AM Page 73 REVIEW Current Overview of Neurovascular Structures in Hip Arthroplasty: Anatomy, Preoperative Evaluation, Approaches, and Operative Techniques to Avoid Complications John-Paul H. Rue, MD* Nozomu Inoue, MD, PhD* Michael A. Mont, MD† A major neurovascular injury during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is uncom- Educational Objectives mon. Nevertheless, these are worri- some due to their devastating conse- As a result of reading this article, physicians should be able to: quences. As more THAs are performed 1. Identify the bony, vascular, and neural anatomy that is relevant to the each year, the chances of this potential- surgeon performing total hip arthroplasty. ly life- or limb-threatening injury 2. Describe the common approaches to avoid neurovascular complica- increase.1 It is crucial for the orthope- tions. dic surgeon to have a thorough under- 3. Discuss the appropriate clinical work-up of these patients. standing of the anatomy of the region 4. Describe the various neurovascular complications and how to handle and the potential complications. them. This article reviews the exposures to the acetabulum for simple and complex primary THA, as well as revision cases, with particular attention to the neu- ischium, and pubis (Figure 1). The Damage to any of these vessels by rovascular anatomy of the region. acetabulum is located at the junction of retraction, drilling, reaming, or dissec- these three bones. These bones unite tion can cause massive hemorrhage, ANATOMY anteriorly at the pubic symphysis and which can lead to exsanguination with- Bone posteriorly to the sacrum to form a ring in minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cadaveric Study of Ultrasound-Guided Subpectineal Injectate Spread Around the Obturator Nerve and Its Hip Articular Branches
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND ACUTE PAIN Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine: first published as 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000587 on 1 May 2017. Downloaded from ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Cadaveric Study of Ultrasound-Guided Subpectineal Injectate Spread Around the Obturator Nerve and Its Hip Articular Branches Thomas D. Nielsen, MD,* Bernhard Moriggl, MD, PhD, FIACA,† Kjeld Søballe, MD, DMSc,‡ Jens A. Kolsen-Petersen, MD, PhD,* Jens Børglum, MD, PhD,§ and Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, MD, PhD* such high-volume blocks the most appropriate nerve blocks for Background and Objectives: The femoral and obturator nerves are preoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture, because both assumed to account for the primary nociceptive innervation of the hip joint the femoral and obturator nerves have been found to innervate capsule. The fascia iliaca compartment block and the so-called 3-in-1-block the hip joint capsule.5 have been used in patients with hip fracture based on a presumption that local Several authors have since questioned the reliability of the anesthetic spreads to anesthetize both the femoral and the obturator nerves. FICB and the 3-in-1-block to anesthetize the obturator nerve.6–10 Evidence demonstrates that this presumption is unfounded, and knowledge Recently, a study, using magnetic resonance imaging to visualize about the analgesic effect of obturator nerve blockade in hip fracture patients the spread of the injectate, refuted any spread of local anesthetic to presurgically is thus nonexistent. The objectives of this cadaveric study were the obturator nerve after either of the 2 nerve block techniques.11 to investigate the proximal spread of the injectate resulting from the admin- Consequently, knowledge of the analgesic effect of an obturator istration of an ultrasound-guided obturator nerve block and to evaluate the nerve block in preoperative patients with hip fracture is nonexis- spread around the obturator nerve branches to the hip joint capsule.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrasound-Guided Treatment of Peripheral Entrapment Mononeuropathies John W
    AANEM MONOGRAPH ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TREATMENT OF PERIPHERAL ENTRAPMENT MONONEUROPATHIES JOHN W. NORBURY, MD,1 and LEVON N. NAZARIAN, MD2 1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville North Carolina 27834, USA 2 Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Accepted 13 May 2019 ABSTRACT: The advent of high-resolution neuromuscular ultrasound high-resolution linear-array transducers has allowed neu- (US) has provided a useful tool for conservative treatment of periph- romuscular US to emerge as a powerful tool for the diag- eral entrapment mononeuropathies. US-guided interventions require 2–6 careful coordination of transducer and needle movement along with a nosis of peripheral entrapment mononeuropathies. detailed understanding of sonoanatomy. Preprocedural planning and US-guided treatment of entrapment mononeuropathies positioning can be helpful in performing these interventions. Cortico- has also greatly expanded in recent years. Technical steroid injections, aspiration of ganglia, hydrodissection, and minimally invasive procedures can be useful nonsurgical treatments for aspects of performing therapeutic US-guided proce- mononeuropathies refractory to conservative care. Technical aspects dures and the current state of the science regarding US- as well as the current understanding of the indications and efficacy of guided treatment for common peripheral entrapment these procedures for common entrapment mononeuropathies are reviewed in this study. mononeuropathies are reviewed and discussed in this Muscle Nerve 60: 222–231, 2019 monograph. The expansion of high-resolution linear-array trans- TYPES OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS ducers has allowed neuromuscular ultrasound (US) Corticosteroid Injections. Corticosteroids suppress 7–9 to emerge as a powerful tool for the diagnosis and treat- proinflammatory cytokines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muscles That Act on the Lower Limb Fall Into Three Groups: Those That Move the Thigh, Those That Move the Lower Leg, and Those That Move the Ankle, Foot, and Toes
    MUSCLES OF THE APPENDICULAR SKELETON LOWER LIMB The muscles that act on the lower limb fall into three groups: those that move the thigh, those that move the lower leg, and those that move the ankle, foot, and toes. Muscles Moving the Thigh (Marieb / Hoehn – Chapter 10; Pgs. 363 – 369; Figures 1 & 2) MUSCLE: ORIGIN: INSERTION: INNERVATION: ACTION: ANTERIOR: Iliacus* iliac fossa / crest lesser trochanter femoral nerve flexes thigh (part of Iliopsoas) of os coxa; ala of sacrum of femur Psoas major* lesser trochanter --------------- T – L vertebrae flexes thigh (part of Iliopsoas) 12 5 of femur (spinal nerves) iliac crest / anterior iliotibial tract Tensor fasciae latae* superior iliac spine gluteal nerves flexes / abducts thigh (connective tissue) of ox coxa anterior superior iliac spine medial surface flexes / adducts / Sartorius* femoral nerve of ox coxa of proximal tibia laterally rotates thigh lesser trochanter adducts / flexes / medially Pectineus* pubis obturator nerve of femur rotates thigh Adductor brevis* linea aspera adducts / flexes / medially pubis obturator nerve (part of Adductors) of femur rotates thigh Adductor longus* linea aspera adducts / flexes / medially pubis obturator nerve (part of Adductors) of femur rotates thigh MUSCLE: ORIGIN: INSERTION: INNERVATION: ACTION: linea aspera obturator nerve / adducts / flexes / medially Adductor magnus* pubis / ischium (part of Adductors) of femur sciatic nerve rotates thigh medial surface adducts / flexes / medially Gracilis* pubis / ischium obturator nerve of proximal tibia rotates
    [Show full text]
  • Femoral Nerve Blocks
    Femoral Nerve Blocks Julie Ronnebaum, DPT, GCS, CEEAA Objectives 1. Become familiar with the evolution of peripheral nerve blocks. 2. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of femoral nerve blocks 3. Identify up-to-date information on the use of femoral nerve block. 4. Recognize future implications. History of Anesthesia The use of anesthetics began over 160 years ago. General Anesthesia In 1845, Horace Wells used nitrous oxide gas during a tooth extraction 1st- public introduction of general anesthesia October 16, 1846. Known as “Ether Day” ( William Morton) In front of audience at Massachusetts General Hospital First reported deat h in 1847 due to the ether Other complications Inttouctoroduction to eteteher was ppoogerolonged Vomiting for hours to days after surgery Schatsky, 1995, Hardy, 2001 History of Anesthesia In 1874, morphine introduced as a pain killer. In 1884, August Freund discovers cy clopropane for surgery Problem is it is very flammable In 1898, heroin was introduced for the addiction to morphine In 1923 Arno Luckhardt administered ethylene oxygen for an anesthetic History of Anesthesia Society History of Anesthesia Alternatives to general anesthesia In the 1800’s Cocaine used by the Incas and Conquistadors 1845, Sir Francis Rynd applied a morphine solution directly to the nerve to relieve intractable neuralgg(ia. ( first recorded nerve block) Delivered it by gravity into a cannula In 1855, Alexander Wood is a glass syringe to deliver the medication for a nerve block. ( also known as regg)ional anesthesia) In 1868 a Peruvian surgeon discovered that if you inject cocaine into the skin it numbed it. In 1884, Karl Koller discovered cocaine could be used to anesthetized the eye of a frog.
    [Show full text]
  • Meralgia Paraesthetica
    Meralgia Paraesthetica Meralgia paraesthetica is numbness or pain in the outer thigh not caused by injury to the thigh, but by injury to a nerve that extends from the thigh to the spinal column. This chronic neurological disorder involves a single nerve—the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve most often becomes injured by entrapment or compression where it passes between the upper front hip bone (ilium) and the inguinal ligament near the attachment at the ASIS. Signs and symptoms Pain on the outer side of the thigh, occasionally extending to the outer side of the knee, usually constant. A burning sensation, tingling, or numbness in the same area Multiple bee-sting like pains in the affected area Occasionally, aching in the groin area or pain spreading across the buttocks Usually more sensitive to light touch than to firm pressure Hyper sensitivity to heat (warm water from shower feels like it is burning the area) Treatments Wearing looser clothing and suspenders rather than belts Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to reduce inflammatory pain Pain killers if pain level limits motion and prevents sleep Reducing physical activity in relation to pain level. Acute pain may require absolute bed rest MP can occur in any age group but is most frequently reported in middle-age persons and is generally regarded as uncommon. The incidence rate of MP reported in Holland in 2004 was 4.3 per 10,000 persons. There is no consensus about sex predominance, but in 1 study evaluating 150 MP cases, a higher incidence was reported in men.
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    Eur opean Rev iew for Med ical and Pharmacol ogical Sci ences 2014; 18: 2766-2771 Peripheral neuropathy in obstetrics: efficacy and safety of α-lipoic acid supplementation M. COSTANTINO, C. GUARALDI 1, D. COSTANTINO 2, S. DE GRAZIA 3, V. UNFER 3 Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technologies, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy 1Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Ospedale di Valdagno (VI), Italy 2Female Health Centre, Azienda USL, Ferrara, Italy 3A.G.UN.CO. Ostetric and Gynecological Center, Rome, Italy Abstract. – OBJECTIVE : Neuropathic pain more prone to the development of neuropathic during pregnancy is a common condition due to syndromes. First and foremost, the physical the physical changes and compression around changes caused by the enlargement of the uterus pregnancy and childbirth that make pregnant women more prone to develop several medical and the development of the foetus cause postural conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome, sci - changes and nutation of the pelvic girdle that fa - atica, meralgia paraesthetica and other nerve en - cilitate the development of low back pain and en - trapment syndromes. Most of the treatments trapment neuropathies. The mutation of the usually performed to counteract neuropathic pelvic girdle is favoured during pregnancy also pain are contraindicated in pregnancy so that, by the presence of high concentrations of relaxin, the management of these highly invalidating conditions remains an issue in the clinical prac - which is produced from the tenth week of gesta - tice. We aimed to review the efficacy and safety tion and causes a laxity in the joints not only in of alpha lipoic acid supplementation in the treat - the pelvis, but also on a vertebral level, which ment of neuropathic pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercostal, Ilioinguinal, and Iliohypogastric Nerve Transfers for Lower Limb Reinnervation After Spinal Cord Injury: an Anatomical Feasibility and Experimental Study
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION J Neurosurg Spine 30:268–278, 2019 Intercostal, ilioinguinal, and iliohypogastric nerve transfers for lower limb reinnervation after spinal cord injury: an anatomical feasibility and experimental study *Ahmed A. Toreih, MD,1 Asser A. Sallam, MD, PhD,1 Cherif M. Ibrahim, MD,2 Ahmed I. Maaty, MD,3 and Mohsen M. Hassan4 Departments of 1Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma and 3Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation, Suez Canal University Hospitals; 2Department of Anatomy, Suez Canal University; and 4Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt OBJECTIVE Spinal cord injury (SCI) has been investigated in various animal studies. One promising therapeutic ap- proach involves the transfer of peripheral nerves originating above the level of injury into those originating below the level of injury. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of nerve transfers for reinnervation of lower limbs in patients suffering SCI to restore some hip and knee functions, enabling them to independently stand or even step forward with assistive devices and thus improve their quality of life. METHODS The feasibility of transferring intercostal to gluteal nerves and the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves to femoral nerves was assessed in 5 cadavers. Then, lumbar cord hemitransection was performed below L1 in 20 dogs, followed by transfer of the 10th, 11th, and 12th intercostal and subcostal nerves to gluteal nerves and the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves to the femoral nerve in only 10 dogs (NT group). At 6 months, clinical and electrophysiological evaluations of the recipient nerves and their motor targets were performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis of the of the Extremities
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.22.251.255 on 1 September 1946. Downloaded from DIAGNOSIS OF THE COMMON FORMS OF NERVE INJURY OF THE EXTREMITIES By COLIN EDWARDS, M.B., B.S., M.R.C.P., D.P.M. History-taking is the first step in diagnosis and panying diminution or loss of reflexes. In the it is useful to know how varied the causes of peri- absence of an external wound or contusion near the pheral nerve injuries can be. Otherwise the true nerve concerned these muscle changes may be the nature of a traumatic lesion sometimes may not only guide. be suspected. Look first at the most peripheral muscles and The commoner ones are the result of:- particularly those which move the hands and feet. (I) Cutting and laceration. If these are normal (indicating an intact nerve (2) Stretching, which may be sudden (e.g. supply) it is uncommon, although not impossible, stretching of the sciatic by jumping upon the for muscles to be involved whose supply leaves extended foot) causing fibre rupture and those same nerves at a more proximal level. And haemorrhage, or prolonged (e.g. lying with the proximal involvement with normal peripheral arm extended for hours above the head) muscles only occurs close to the actual spot where ischaemia. causing the nerve is injured. The state of innervation of Contusion. the muscles moving the hands and feet gives no (3) to that of the limb (4) Concussion (including that produced by a guide, however, girdle muscles,Protected by copyright. "near miss" when a missile passes through as they are supplied by comparatively short nerves neighbouring tissues without touching the nerve).
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Neuropathy in Older People Peripheral Neuropathies Are Common in Older People
    Pain 47 Peripheral neuropathy in older people Peripheral neuropathies are common in older people. Although the ageing process itself may play a part, there are multiple other causes. Peripheral neuropathy interferes with normal daily activities and leads to increased risk of falls, injury and poor quality of life. Management of peripheral neuropathy ofen needs a multidisciplinary team approach. Siyum Strait, Specialist Registrar Acute Medicine, Great Western Hospital, Swindon Pippa Medcalf, Consultant Physician, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucestershire Email [email protected] Peripheral neuropathy is one involvement, time course, type of (eg. diabetic distal symmetrical pattern of damage to the peripheral defcit or nature of the underlying polyneuropathy), purely nervous system.1 Physical signs of pathology.8 (Box 1) motor (eg. acute motor axonal peripheral neuropathy are common The patterns of nerve neuropathy), mixed motor and in older people.2 Recognition involvement that occur include sensory (eg. Charcot-Marie-Tooth of these deficits is particularly mononeuropathy, multiple disease) and autonomic. important because peripheral mononeuropathy (mononeuritis Te responsible pathology may neuropathy may contribute to the multiplex), symmetrical be axonal, demyelinating or mixed vulnerability to falls that is common polyneuropathy, radiculopathy and axonal and demyelinating. in this age group.3,4 More than 30% polyradiculoneuropathy. Peripheral neuropathies of all of patients aged over 65 years will Mononeuropathy refers to groups may involve large nerve fall at least once per year.5 involvement of major nerve trunks, fbres, small nerve fbre or both. Peripheral neuropathy singly or multiply. Radiculopathy Large nerve fibres are long, commonly causes impairment refers to involvement of nerve myelinated and enable fast of proprioception and balance, roots, again singly or multiply.
    [Show full text]