DOCSLIB.ORG

Cuscuta Spp. (Dodder)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cuscuta Spp. (Dodder) Cuscuta spp. (Dodder): cA Literature RevieW" of Its Biology and Control Division of Agricultural Sciences BULLETIN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 1880 P RINTED AUGUST 1976 This review cites and summarizes lite.rature published for the last 25 years on Cuscuta spp. (dodder) - parasitic plants that attack many commercial crops in California, as well as other plant pests in themselves hard to control. Following the introduction, the review is organized topically in the following sequence: taxonomy, host species, disease transmission, flower and seed formations, dormancy and germination, anatomy and cytology, biology, chemical com­ position, metabolism, translocation, growth and development, chemical control, biological control, and cultural control. 2 Cuscuta spp. (Dodder): A LITERATURE REVIEW OF ITS BIOLOGY AND CONTROL A single dodder plant may cover mum) or swamp dodder (C. gro­ INTRODUCTION several square feet and produce novii), and largeseed dodder (C. thousands of "hard" seeds, the indecora). primary method of reproduction. Cuscuta (dodder) are parasitic Some seeds germinate the season This review summarizes the liter­ plants with slender thread-like, after they are produced, but many ature on dodder that has been yellow-to-orange, twining stems, will remain dormant in the soil for published since Gaertner's (1950) and inconspicuous flowers that coil years. Therefore, once a field publication, "Studies of Germina­ about and fasten to their host plants becomes infested with dodder seed, tion, Seed Identification, and Host with wart-like attachments called it may be a problem for several Realtionships in Dodder, Cuscuta haustoria. About 170 species of this years - even though no additional spp." Occasionally, it is necessary to genus occur; Munz (1963) lists 16 in seed are produced. In the labor­ cite some of the older literature in California. atory, "hard-seed" dormancy of order to put the subject in prospec­ dodder seed can be broken by soak­ tive. Well over a thousand publi­ Tomatoes and alfalfa are the pri­ ing the seeds in concentrated cations have been written in at mary commercial crops parasi­ sulfuric acid or by scarification. Cer­ least a dozen languages since 1950. tized by dodder in California. tain species have been reported to Tomatoes are usually attacked by overwinter in the stems of some Following the introduction, this Cuscuta campestris, but in San Joa­ woody plants, although dodder is review has been topically organized quin County C. californica has also usually an annual. in the following sequence: tax­ been a problem. Alfalfa has been onomy, host species, disease reported to be attacked by C. In the field, dodder seeds germinate transmission, flower and seed for­ campestris, C. indecora, C. epi­ in the soil and are dependent initial­ mations, dormancy and germina­ thymum, C. planiflora, and C. ly upon the food stored within the tion, anatomy and cytology, biol­ racemosa. The first two species are seed. The dodder plant will die if it ogy, chemical corporation, metab­ probably the most serious. Aspar­ does not attach to a suitable host olism, translocation, growth and agus, clovers, cucurbits, and plant within several days after ger­ development, chemical control, bio­ onions are also parasitized by dod­ mination, since it cannot produce logical control, and cultural con­ der; C. campestris and/or C. the food necessary to sustain its trol. californica and perhaps other dod­ growth. Once a dodder plant has at­ der species are involved. Citrus tached attached to a host plant, orchards and citrus nursery stock the part of the dodder stem between TAXONOMY plantings have been invaded by C. the point of attachment and the soil subinclusa. This species has also dies. Then the dodder plant is total­ Gaertner (1950) reviewed the tax­ been found in a number of naturally ly dependent on the host plant for onomic history of Cuscuta. The occuring woody species including its food, inorganic salts, and water. genus Cuscuta was first established Ceanothus, Rhus, Prunus, Sal'ix, Consequently, the host plant has by Tournefort in 1700 and has since Aesculus, Sambucus, Eriogonum, less food for its own growth and been monographed four times, most and Quercus. Many common her­ yields of crop plants are reduced. recently by Yuncker (1932). Be­ baceous annual and perennial cause of the ecotylendonous na­ weedy species also are hosts for cer­ Some of the common names used for ture of the embryo, Cuscitta was tain dodder species; i.e., C. Cuscuta, besides dodder, are tangle first believed to be a monocot. campestris has been found in gut, love vine, strangle gut, devil's However, taxonomist now consider knotweed, pigweed, lambsquarters, gut, witch's shoelaces, and angel's Cuscuta to be a member of the field bindweed, cheeseweed, mal­ hair. In general, we have used the · Dicotyledoneae. low, and alkali mallow. The fact scientific names given by the that many of the hosts of dodder authors for these species. However; Although there is some controversy species that are problems to for a few species that are mentioned on whether the genus belongs in the agriculture are also parasitic on frequently, we have used the com­ Convolvulaceae or in the Cus­ naturally occuring plants makes mon names - field dodder ( C. cutaceae, most taxonomists place eradication impossible and control campestris ), flax dodder (C. ep­ it in the Cuscutaceae. Munz and most difficult. ilinum), clover dodder (C. epithy-. Keck (1959) place heavy taxonomic 3 emphasis on cuscuta's parasitic reduction before developing new of three groups: (1) as a good food habit and considers the Cuscutaceae adaptations peculiar to its peculiar provider for dodder; (2) as a host on to be composed of the single genus, parasitic habit (Searcy, 1970; Sear­ which dodder can survive; (3) as a Cuscuta. cy and Macinnis, 1970). plant serving only to support dod­ der. Gaertner also praises Dean Yuncker's (1965) final contribution The possibility of polyploidy as an (1934, 1935) for his species-host list to the study was published post­ influence in the development of this of the United States. Although humously and is the only signifi­ genus is an intriguing question in Yuncker's (1932) monograph is an cant recent publication on the need of additional study. Moreover, excellent taxonomic addition, it con­ taxonomy of Cuscuta. Most of the as indicated in other sections of this tains no new relevant data on host information reviewed here is de­ review, data from field observations species. rived from Yuncker's two publica­ of floral biology, host relationship, tions. and general biology will no doubt in­ The results of Gaertner's study are fluence taxonomic judgements. compiled into two lists. The names The genus Cuscuta has a sub­ of 609 species parasitized by dodder cosmopolitan distribution. Al­ are presented by family in the first though some species are found in list. There is some experimental Africa, Australia, New Zealand, HOST SPECIES data for 55 of the 609 species. The Polynesia, Asia, and Europe; most names of 118 species immune to of the 170 species are found primari­ dodder are presented in a second ly in the Americas from Canada to list. Argentina. The seeds of some spe­ Since Gaertner's review of the lit­ erature in 1950, few publications cies, such as C. campestris, C. suaveolens, C. epilinum, C. epi­ have expanded our knowledge on From her literature review and ex­ thymum and C. approximata are host species of dodder; further­ periments, Gaertner concludes believed to have been accidently more, her suggested lines of in­ that: vestigation have not been fol­ dispersed along with the seeds of (1) Data on species parasitized their economic hosts. lowed. Gaertner (1950) has re­ viewed the literature on host by and species immune to species. With her 1950 review, she dodder are generally lacking; Taxonomic characters are primarily presented data from her exper­ (2) According to preliminary in­ limited to the flowers and in­ iments using material from the vestigation using nine po­ florescence. Moreover, on the following species: Cuscuta camp­ tential hosts, no species of basis of style and stigma characters, es tris, C. epilinum, C. epi­ dodder is limited to one host the genus is divided into three thymum, C. epithymum var. alba, species; subgenera. Gram mica has the C. glomerata, C. europaea, C. (3) Succulents are frequently widest distribution and is believed gronovii, C. lupuliformis, C. pen­ parasitized by dodder; to have given rise to the two other tagona, and C. suaveolens. (4) The age of the host as it af­ subgenera, Cuscuta and Monogyna. fects its growth may pro­ However, all native American spe­ According to Gaertner, problems in vide mechanical obstruc­ cies are members of the subgenera rearing both the parasite and poten­ tion to parasitism; Gram mica. tial host reduced the amount of (5) Survival and reproductive new experimental data she could capacities of the parasite are Although chromosome numbers for present. Field dodder ( Cuscuta dependent on the physio­ a few species have been reported, campestris), for example, was found logical condition of the neither of Yuncker's publications at various times to be thriving or host. (1932, 1965) contained this data. dying on tomato (Lycopersicon Three of the sixteen Californian esculentum). In this example, she cuscutas have chromosome numbers suggested that the varying results Host-parasite Relationship of 2N = 50 and 2N = 60 (Munz and were due to imbalances in the age of Keck, 1959). These numbers are the parasite and potential host. Olifirenko (1961) has compiled a list similar to the chromosome numbers Hence, Gaertner's conclusions re­ of 68 host species parasitized by first reported by Gaertner (1950) in lied heavily on reports in the Cuscuta arvensis. He is one of the her review of Cuscuta taxonomy. literature with supplements of her few individuals who has made field Gaertner suggested that the basic own research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cover Crops for Home Gardens West of the Cascades
    Cover Crops for Home Gardens West of the Cascades WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION FACT SHEET • FS111E This fact sheet is one of a three-part series on cover crops for home gardeners. It focuses on choosing the best cover crops for gardens in Washington and Oregon, west of the Cascades. A companion fact sheet, Cover Crops for Home Gardens East of the Cascades, focuses on choosing the best cover crops for gardens in Washington and Oregon, east of the Cascades. The third fact sheet in this series, Methods for Successful Cover Crop Management in Your Home Garden, covers the management of garden cover crops, including planning, planting, managing nutrients, and terminating plants. What Is a Cover Crop? Table 1. Benefits of cover crops. • Replace soil organic matter Cover crops are plants grown to both cover and improve • Recycle nutrients the soil. They may be used as a living or dead mulch on the • Supply nitrogen (legumes only) soil surface, or they can be tilled into the soil as a “green manure.” Gardeners usually plant cover crops in the fall • Protect soil from rain and wind erosion for winter cover, but some gardeners also use cover crops • Reduce runoff and water erosion as part of a summer rotation. Cover crops can be any type • Reduce leaching of nutrients of plant but are generally grasses (including cereal grains), • Suppress weeds legumes, or grass/legume mixtures. Some non-legume • Break up compacted soil broadleaf plants can also be used. • Attract beneficial insects by providing pollen and nectar Why Grow a Cover Crop? • Reduce disease and nematodes Cover crops serve the gardener in many ways, typically by Cold-hardy cover crops protecting and improving the soil, suppressing weeds, and Gardeners usually plant these species in the fall as winter attracting beneficial insects (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Jazani Et Al., Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med., (2018) 15 (2): 58-67
    Jazani et al., Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med., (2018) 15 (2): 58-67 https://doi.org/10.21010/ajtcam.v15i2.8 INTESTINAL HELMINTHS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF TRADITIONAL PERSIAN MEDICINE VERSUS MODERN MEDICINE Arezoo Moini Jazani1,4, Ramin Farajpour Maleki1,2,4, Abdol hasan Kazemi3,4, Leila ghasemi 4 4 5 6 matankolaei , Somayyeh Taheri Targhi , Shirafkan kordi , Bahman Rahimi-Esboei and Ramin Nasimi Doost Azgomi1,4* 1Faculty of Traditional Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Siences, Tabriz, Iran; 2Neuroscience Research center (NSRC) and Student Research Committtee, Tabriz University of Medical Siences, Tabriz, Iran; 3Infectious and tropical diseases research center, Tabriz University of Medical Siences, Tabriz, Iran; 4Medical Philosophy and History Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Siences, Tabriz, Iran; 5Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Science, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; 6Department of medical parasitology and mycology, School of public health, Tehran university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. *Corresponding Author’s E-mail: [email protected] ; [email protected] Article History Received: March. 17, 2017 Revised Received: Dec. 11, 2017 Accepted: Dec.11, 2017 Published Online: Feb. 23, 2018 Abstract Background: Traditional Persian Medicine (TPM) has a history of almost 10,000 years with practice and experience aspects. The existing information and experiences of physicians such as Avicenna clearly show the vast amount of knowledge in the classification and treatment of pathogenic worms. The aim of this paper was the description of the various types of helminths along with their treatment in medieval Persia and comparing them with new medical findings. Materials and Methods: We searched main Traditional Persian Medical and pharmacological texts about etiology, manifestation, diagnosis and treatment of worms in the human digestive system and the out come was compared with the data extracted from modern medical sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species
    Appendix Color Plates of Solanales Species The first half of the color plates (Plates 1–8) shows a selection of phytochemically prominent solanaceous species, the second half (Plates 9–16) a selection of convol- vulaceous counterparts. The scientific name of the species in bold (for authorities see text and tables) may be followed (in brackets) by a frequently used though invalid synonym and/or a common name if existent. The next information refers to the habitus, origin/natural distribution, and – if applicable – cultivation. If more than one photograph is shown for a certain species there will be explanations for each of them. Finally, section numbers of the phytochemical Chapters 3–8 are given, where the respective species are discussed. The individually combined occurrence of sec- ondary metabolites from different structural classes characterizes every species. However, it has to be remembered that a small number of citations does not neces- sarily indicate a poorer secondary metabolism in a respective species compared with others; this may just be due to less studies being carried out. Solanaceae Plate 1a Anthocercis littorea (yellow tailflower): erect or rarely sprawling shrub (to 3 m); W- and SW-Australia; Sects. 3.1 / 3.4 Plate 1b, c Atropa belladonna (deadly nightshade): erect herbaceous perennial plant (to 1.5 m); Europe to central Asia (naturalized: N-USA; cultivated as a medicinal plant); b fruiting twig; c flowers, unripe (green) and ripe (black) berries; Sects. 3.1 / 3.3.2 / 3.4 / 3.5 / 6.5.2 / 7.5.1 / 7.7.2 / 7.7.4.3 Plate 1d Brugmansia versicolor (angel’s trumpet): shrub or small tree (to 5 m); tropical parts of Ecuador west of the Andes (cultivated as an ornamental in tropical and subtropical regions); Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitous Argonium \(Arh+\) in the Diffuse Interstellar Medium: A
    A&A 566, A29 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423727 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Ubiquitous argonium (ArH+) in the diffuse interstellar medium: A molecular tracer of almost purely atomic gas P. Schilke1, D. A. Neufeld2, H. S. P. Müller1, C. Comito1, E. A. Bergin3, D. C. Lis4;5, M. Gerin6, J. H. Black7, M. Wolfire8, N. Indriolo2, J. C. Pearson9, K. M. Menten10, B. Winkel10, Á. Sánchez-Monge1, T. Möller1, B. Godard6, and E. Falgarone6 1 I. Physikalisches Institut der Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Str. 77, 50937 Köln, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 3 Department of Astronomy, The University of Michigan, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA 4 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5 Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8112 LERMA, Paris, France 6 LERMA, CNRS UMR 8112, Observatoire de Paris & École Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France 7 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden 8 Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 9 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 10 Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany Received 28 February 2014 / Accepted 29 March 2014 ABSTRACT Aims. We describe the assignment of a previously unidentified interstellar absorption line to ArH+ and discuss its relevance in the + context of hydride absorption in diffuse gas with a low H2 fraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Horner-Mclaughlin Woods Compiled by Bev Walters, 2011-2012
    Horner-McLaughlin Woods Compiled by Bev Walters, 2011-2012 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Acer negundo BOX-ELDER Acer nigrum (A. saccharum) BLACK MAPLE Acer rubrum RED MAPLE Acer saccharinum SILVER MAPLE Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLE Achillea millefolium YARROW Actaea pachypoda DOLL'S-EYES Adiantum pedatum MAIDENHAIR FERN Agrimonia gryposepala TALL AGRIMONY Agrimonia parviflora SWAMP AGRIMONY Agrimonia pubescens SOFT AGRIMONY AGROSTIS GIGANTEA REDTOP Agrostis perennans AUTUMN BENT Alisma subcordatum (A. plantago-aquatica) SOUTHERN WATER-PLANTAIN Alisma triviale (A. plantago-aquatica) NORTHERN WATER-PLANTAIN ALLIARIA PETIOLATA GARLIC MUSTARD Allium tricoccum WILD LEEK Ambrosia artemisiifolia COMMON RAGWEED Amelanchier arborea JUNEBERRY Amelanchier interior SERVICEBERRY Amphicarpaea bracteata HOG-PEANUT Anemone quinquefolia WOOD ANEMONE Anemone virginiana THIMBLEWEED Antennaria parlinii SMOOTH PUSSYTOES Apocynum androsaemifolium SPREADING DOGBANE ARCTIUM MINUS COMMON BURDOCK Arisaema triphyllum JACK-IN-THE-PULPIT Asarum canadense WILD-GINGER Asclepias exaltata POKE MILKWEED Asclepias incarnata SWAMP MILKWEED Asplenium platyneuron EBONY SPLEENWORT Athyrium filix-femina LADY FERN BERBERIS THUNBERGII JAPANESE BARBERRY Bidens cernua NODDING BEGGAR-TICKS Bidens comosa SWAMP TICKSEED Bidens connata PURPLE-STEMMED TICKSEED Bidens discoidea SWAMP BEGGAR-TICKS Bidens frondosa COMMON BEGGAR-TICKS Boehmeria cylindrica FALSE NETTLE Botrypus virginianus RATTLESNAKE FERN BROMUS INERMIS SMOOTH BROME Bromus pubescens CANADA BROME Calamagrostis canadensis BLUE-JOINT
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Gene Losses Underlie the Genome Evolution of Parasitic Plant Cuscuta Australis
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04721-8 OPEN Large-scale gene losses underlie the genome evolution of parasitic plant Cuscuta australis Guiling Sun1,2, Yuxing Xu 1,3,4, Hui Liu 1, Ting Sun2, Jingxiong Zhang 1, Christian Hettenhausen1, Guojing Shen 1, Jinfeng Qi 1, Yan Qin1, Jing Li 1, Lei Wang 1, Wei Chang 1, Zhenhua Guo3, Ian T. Baldwin 5 & Jianqiang Wu 1 Dodders (Cuscuta spp., Convolvulaceae) are root- and leafless parasitic plants. The phy- 1234567890():,; siology, ecology, and evolution of these obligate parasites are poorly understood. A high- quality reference genome of Cuscuta australis was assembled. Our analyses reveal that Cus- cuta experienced accelerated molecular evolution, and Cuscuta and the convolvulaceous morning glory (Ipomoea) shared a common whole-genome triplication event before their divergence. C. australis genome harbors 19,671 protein-coding genes, and importantly, 11.7% of the conserved orthologs in autotrophic plants are lost in C. australis. Many of these gene loss events likely result from its parasitic lifestyle and the massive changes of its body plan. Moreover, comparison of the gene expression patterns in Cuscuta prehaustoria/haustoria and various tissues of closely related autotrophic plants suggests that Cuscuta haustorium for- mation requires mostly genes normally involved in root development. The C. australis genome provides important resources for studying the evolution of parasitism, regressive evolution, and evo-devo in plant parasites. 1 Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China. 2 Institute of Plant Stress Biology, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Department of Biology, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Evolution and Its Taxonomic Significance in Cuscuta (Dodders, Convolvulaceae)
    Plant Syst Evol (2010) 285:83–101 DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0259-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Pollen evolution and its taxonomic significance in Cuscuta (dodders, Convolvulaceae) Mark Welsh • Sasˇa Stefanovic´ • Mihai Costea Received: 12 June 2009 / Accepted: 28 December 2009 / Published online: 27 February 2010 Ó Springer-Verlag 2010 Abstract The pollen morphology of 148 taxa (135 spe- unknown in other Convolvulaceae, has evolved in Cuscuta cies and 13 varieties) of the parasitic plant genus Cuscuta only in two lineages (subg. Monogynella, and clade O of (dodders, Convolvulaceae) was examined using scanning subg. Grammica). Overall, the morphology of pollen electron microscopy. Six quantitative characters were supports Cuscuta as a sister to either the ‘‘bifid-style’’ coded using the gap-weighting method and optimized Convolvulaceae clade (Dicranostyloideae) or to one of the onto a consensus tree constructed from three large-scale members of this clade. Pollen characters alone are insuf- molecular phylogenies of the genus based on nuclear ficient to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships; however, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and plastid trn-LF palynological information is useful for the species-level sequences. The results indicate that 3-zonocolpate pollen is taxonomy of Cuscuta. ancestral, while grains with more colpi (up to eight) have evolved only in two major lineages of Cuscuta (subg. Keywords Convolvulaceae Á Cuscuta Á Dodders Á Monogynella and clade O of subg. Grammica). Complex Evolution Á Phylogeny Á Pollen morphology Á morphological intergradations occur between species when Scanning electron microscopy Á Taxonomy their tectum is described using the traditional qualitative types—imperforate, perforate, and microreticulate. This continuous variation is better expressed quantitatively as Introduction ‘‘percent perforation,’’ namely the proportion of perforated area (puncta or lumina) from the total tectum surface.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants List 6-22-2011
    Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants List 6-22-2011 Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants by Scientific Name (compiled by the Minnesota DNR’s Invasive Species Program 6-22-2011) Key: FN – Federal noxious weed (USDA–Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) SN – State noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) RN – Restricted noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) PI – Prohibited invasive species (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) PS – State prohibited weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) RS – State restricted weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) (See explanations of these classifications below the lists of species) Regulatory Scientific Name Common Name Classification Aquatic Plants: Azolla pinnata R. Brown mosquito fern, water velvet FN Butomus umbellatus Linnaeus flowering rush PI Caulerpa taxifolia (Vahl) C. Agardh Mediterranean strain (killer algae) FN Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne Australian stonecrop PI Eichomia azurea (Swartz) Kunth anchored water hyacinth, rooted water FN hyacinth Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle hydrilla FN, PI Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L. European frog-bit PI Hygrophila polysperma (Roxburgh) T. Anders Indian swampweed, Miramar weed FN, PI Ipomoea aquatica Forsskal water-spinach, swamp morning-glory FN Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) Moss ex Wagner African oxygen weed FN, PI Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl) Blume ambulia FN Lythrum salicaria L., Lythrum virgatum L., (or any purple loosestrife PI, SN variety, hybrid or cultivar thereof) Melaleuca quenquinervia (Cav.) Blake broadleaf paper bank tree FN Monochoria hastata (Linnaeus) Solms-Laubach arrowleaf false pickerelweed FN Monochoria vaginalis (Burman f.) C. Presl heart-shaped false pickerelweed FN Myriophyllum spicatum Linnaeus Eurasian water mifoil PI Najas minor All. brittle naiad PI Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers.
    [Show full text]
  • COLEUS 'FAIRWAY RUBY' Solenostemon Scutellarioides 'Fairway Ruby' Characteristics Culture Noteworthy Characteristics Problems Ga
    COLEUS 'FAIRWAY RUBY' Solenostemon scutellarioides 'Fairway Ruby' Characteristics Zone: 10 to 11 Soil: Moist, well-drained Height: 10 to 15 Inches Water: Medium Width: 12 Inches Maintenance: Low Bloom Time: Flowers not showy Flower: Insignificant Bloom Description: Blue to white Leaf: Colorful Sun: Part sun Tolerate: Shade Culture Winter hardy to USDA Zones 10-11. In other zones, grow as garden annuals or in pots that can be overwintered indoors or as houseplants. Outdoors, grow in moist, organically rich, loose soils in part shade. Soils must not be allowed to dry out. ‘Fairway Ruby’ coleus produces foliage with bright red center and wide off-white margin with green edging. Produces tiny blue or white flowers, 1/2" long anytime throughout year. Pinch out to maintain plant health, foliage color, and attractive, compact plants. Does not tolerate water logging. Water moderately when in growth and apply a balanced liquid fertilizer at alternate waterings. When in growth, apply a high nitrogen fertilizer every 2 weeks. Keep just moist. Plants grown in too much shade may become leggy. Noteworthy Characteristics Plectranthus scutellarioides, commonly known as coleus, is a tropical evergreen tender perennial that has been a popular foliage plant since at least Victorian times. It is native to Southeast Asia and Malaysia. It has been assiduously hybridized over the years into a very large number of vegetatively propagated and seed propagated strains with an almost infinite number of leaf color combinations including most colors of the spectrum except true blue. Cultivars range in size from dwarf 6” tall plants to large mounded 36” tall plants.
    [Show full text]
  • 1083 a Ground-Breaking Study Published 5 Years Ago Revealed That
    American Journal of Botany 100(6): 1083–1094. 2013. SPECIAL INVITED PAPER—EVOLUTION OF PLANT MATING SYSTEMS P OLLINATION AND MATING SYSTEMS OF APODANTHACEAE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS 1 IN PARASITIC ANGIOSPERMS S IDONIE B ELLOT 2 AND S USANNE S. RENNER 2 Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Str. 67 80638 Munich, Germany • Premise of the study: The most recent reviews of the reproductive biology and sexual systems of parasitic angiosperms were published 17 yr ago and reported that dioecy might be associated with parasitism. We use current knowledge on parasitic lineages and their sister groups, and data on the reproductive biology and sexual systems of Apodanthaceae, to readdress the question of possible trends in the reproductive biology of parasitic angiosperms. • Methods: Fieldwork in Zimbabwe and Iran produced data on the pollinators and sexual morph frequencies in two species of Apodanthaceae. Data on pollinators, dispersers, and sexual systems in parasites and their sister groups were compiled from the literature. • Key results: With the possible exception of some Viscaceae, most of the ca. 4500 parasitic angiosperms are animal-pollinated, and ca. 10% of parasites are dioecious, but the gain and loss of dioecy across angiosperms is too poorly known to infer a statisti- cal correlation. The studied Apodanthaceae are dioecious and pollinated by nectar- or pollen-foraging Calliphoridae and other fl ies. • Conclusions: Sister group comparisons so far do not reveal any reproductive traits that evolved (or were lost) concomitant with a parasitic life style, but the lack of wind pollination suggests that this pollen vector may be maladaptive in parasites, perhaps because of host foliage or fl owers borne close to the ground.
    [Show full text]