County of Peterborough County Council Addendum Agenda Wednesday, April 19, 2017 - 9:30 a.m. Council Chamber, County Court House Page
1. Call To Order
2. Moment of Silent Reflection
3. Moment of Silence (if required)
4. Roll Call
5. Adoption of Agenda
Be it resolved that County Council adopts the agenda as circulated.
6. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest
7. Adoption of Minutes
9 - 21 Be it resolved that County Council adopts the minutes of the Regular County Council meeting of April 5, 2017 as circulated. Minutes
8. Delegations, Petitions and Presentations
23 - 37 a. 9:35 a.m. Brianna Salmon, Executive Director, Peterborough GreenUp Association and Jane Gray, Education and Engagement Advisor, Peterborough-Kawartha Regional Centre of Expertise (RCE) Re: UN RCE Designation Be it resolved that County Council receives the presentation of Brianna Salmon, Executive Director, Peterborough GreenUp Association and Jane Gray, Education and Engagement Advisor, Peterborough-Kawartha Regional Centre of Expertise, regarding UN RCE Designation. Presentation
39 - 58 b. 9:45 a.m. Casey Ready, Executive Director of Community Counselling & Resource Centre (CCRC) and Rosemary O'Donnell, Chairperson
Page 1 of 250 County of Peterborough County Council - Regular Meeting Addendum Agenda Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Page of Havelock Hub Collaborative and Manager of the Housing Resource Centre Re: The Havelock Hub Be it resolved that County Council:
1. Receives the delegation from Casey Ready, Executive Director of Community Counselling & Resource Centre (CCRC) and Rosemary O'Donnell, Chairperson of Havelock Hub Collaborative and Manager of the Housing Resource Centre regarding the Havelock Hub; and
2. Requests staff to refer this matter to Linda Mitchelson, City of Peterborough, Manager of Social Services requesting a response as to how the Havelock Collaborative (through their sponsor agency CCRC) fits into the Social Services service delivery model and the new Wellness plan and that this information be brought back to County Council for consideration of the Havelock Collaborative’s request for funding in 2018. Presentation
9. Referrals
10. Staff Reports
59 - 131 a. Planning Re: Revised Development Charges By-law Report Be it resolved that:
1. Council receive this staff report and Background Study; and,
2. That Council pass a Development Charges By-law effective May 1, 2017 that sets the following charges:
Residential: Single-Detached, Semi-Detached Duplex $7627.74 (>103m2) per unit Single-Detached & Semi-Detached $5085.16 Duplex(<103m2) per unit and Multiple Residential Small Multiple Residential (< 93m2) & Apartment $3955.12 per unit
Page 2 of 250 County of Peterborough County Council - Regular Meeting Addendum Agenda Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Page
Non-residential: Industrial Uses no charge (exempt) Other Non-residential uses First 250 sq. m. exempt, then $11.77 per sq. m. thereafter. Report Comment Response Table Draft Development Charges By-law Revised Background Study
133 - 135 b. Peterborough County/City Paramedics Re: 2017 Emergency Preparedness Week Be it resolved that the Council of the Corporation of the County of Peterborough, do hereby proclaim the week of May 7th to 13th, 2017, to be Emergency Preparedness Week in Peterborough County and encourage all citizens to participate in educational activities on emergency preparedness. Report Proclamation
137 - 163 c. Human Resources Re: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Prevention Plan Be it resolved that HR-38 – Traumatic Mental Stress Policy and HR- 39 – Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma Policy, be approved and adopted by by-law. Report PTSD Prevention Plan Traumatic Mental Stress Policy - HR-38 Traumatic Mental Stress - Anti Stigma Policy - HR-39
11. Staff Reports for Information Only
165 a. Finance Report prepared by: Trena DeBruijn, Director of Finance/Treasurer Re: Investment Report By-law 2010-68 Recommendation: Receive for information.
Page 3 of 250 County of Peterborough County Council - Regular Meeting Addendum Agenda Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Page Report
167 - 196 b. Finance Report prepared by: Yvette Peplinskie, Deputy Treasurer Re: Accounts for the month of February, 2017 Recommendation: Receive for information. Report Accounts
197 c. Finance Report prepared by: Chris Allen, Purchasing Coordinator Re: Purchasing Awards - March, 2017 Recommendation: Receive for information. Report
199 - 223 d. Administration - Clerk's Division Report prepared by: Elizabeth Hope, Administrative Services Assistant Re: Correspondence Report Recommendation: Receive for information. Report AMO Watch File - April 6, 2017 Ministry of Education Letter Parks Canada Letter - Trent-Severn Waterway City of Peterborough Social Services 2016 Year End Statistical Report Homeownership Assistance Loan Program Peterborough Renovates Program
225 - 236 e. Administration - CAO Report prepared by: Gary King, CAO Re: 2017 First Quarter Activity Report Recommendation: Receive for information. Report
237 - 238 f. Administration Report prepared by: Warden Joe Taylor Re: Meetings Attended during March, 2017 Recommendation: Receive for information. Report
239 g. Administration Report prepared by: Deputy Warden Mary Smith
Page 4 of 250 County of Peterborough County Council - Regular Meeting Addendum Agenda Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Page Re: Meetings Attended during March, 2017 Recommendation: Receive for information. Report
12. Correspondence - Action Items
241 - 242 a. Ministry of Transportation letter dated March 13, 2017 Re: Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF) Be it resolved that County Council:
1. Receives the letter from the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario dated March 13, 2017 regarding the Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF) Phase One (Ontario) Transfer Payment Agreement.
2. Directs the Clerk to prepare the necessary by-law authorizing the County to enter into the Transfer Payment Agreement with the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. Letter
243 - 244 b. Township of Cavan Monaghan resolution dated February 23, 2017 Re: Cost of Electricity Be it resolved that County Council receives/supports the Township of Cavan Monaghan's resolution requesting municipalities post their most recent electricity bill containing a complete breakdown of all the various charges such as those with a service type general service demand and to display that bill for the month of April. Resolution
245 - 246 c. Municipality of Port Hope resolution dated April 4, 2017 Re: Banning of Incineration Be it resolved that County Council receives/supports the Municipality of Port Hope's resolution requesting the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change revise existing legislation to explicitly ban construction of incinerators, and phase out use of existing incinerators in Ontario. Resolution
13. Committee Reports
247 - 248 a. Immediate Past Warden Councillor J. Murray Jones Nominating Committee Re: Minutes of April 5, 2017
Page 5 of 250 County of Peterborough County Council - Regular Meeting Addendum Agenda Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Page Be it resolved that County Council receives and adopts the Nominating Committee meeting minutes of April 5, 2017. Minutes
14. Liaison Reports from External Committees, Boards and Agencies
a. Affordable Housing Action Committee - Councillor Matthews
b. Agricultural Advisory Committee - Councillor Windover
c. Fairhaven Committee of Management - Councillor Gerow
d. Peterborough Public Health - Councillor Smith
e. Peterborough County Federation of Agriculture - Councillor Low
15. Resolutions
16. Notices of Motion
17. New Business
18. Closed Session
Under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, S. 239(2) to consider:
(a) the security of the property of the municipality or local board
(b) personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees
(c) a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board
(d) labour relations or employee negotiations
(f) advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for purpose
19. Rise from Closed Session With/Without a Report
Page 6 of 250 County of Peterborough County Council - Regular Meeting Addendum Agenda Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Page 20. Adoption of Amended Agenda to Add Closed Session Items Being Reported
21. Reading and Passing of By-laws
a. (Subject to Council Approval) A By-law to authorize the Corporation of the County of Peterborough to enter into an Agreement with Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Transportation relating to the Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF) Phase One (Ontario) Transfer Payment. (By-law No. 2017-24) (Refer to Agenda Item 12.a.)
b. (Subject to Council Approval) A By-law to adopt the Traumatic Mental Stress Policy (HR-38). (By-law No. 2017-26) (Refer to Staff Report item 10.c.)
c. (Subject to Council Approval) A By-law to adopt the Traumatic Mental Stress - Anti-Stigma Policy (HR-39). (By-law No. 2017-27) (Refer to Staff Report Item 10.c.)
d. (Subject to Council Approval) A By-law to Establish Development Charges for the County of Peterborough and to repeal By-law No. 2016-83. (By-law No. 2017-19) (Refer to Staff Report Item 10.a.)
22. Confirming By-law
Be it resolved that County Council passes the confirming by-law to adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of Council at today’s meeting in respect to each report, motion, resolution or other action passed and taken by Council and that this confirming by-law shall be signed by the Warden and the Clerk, sealed with the Seal of the Corporation and Numbered By-law No. 2017-25.
23. Future Meeting Schedule
249 - 250 Future Meeting Schedule April - August, 2017 Future Meeting Schedule
24. Adjournment
Page 7 of 250 Page 8 of 250 County of Peterborough Meeting of County Council Minutes Wednesday, April 5, 2017
1. Call To Order
A quorum of Council being present, Warden Taylor called the meeting to order at 9:38 a.m.
2. Moment of Silent Reflection
The Warden invited Councillors to stand for a moment of silent reflection so that Council, staff and members of the public could quietly reflect on their duty to the community that they are trying to serve.
3. Moment of Silence
4. Roll Call
The Clerk conducted the roll call.
Present: Warden Joe Taylor (Otonabee-South Monaghan), Deputy Warden Mary Smith (Selwyn), Councillors Rodger Bonneau (Asphodel-Norwood), John Fallis (Cavan Monaghan), Ronald Gerow (Havelock-Belmont-Methuen), Doug Hutton (North Kawartha), J. Murray Jones, (Douro- Dummer), Terry Low (Asphodel-Norwood), Jim Martin (Havelock-Belmont-Methuen), Bev Matthews (Trent Lakes), Scott McFadden (Cavan Monaghan), Karl Moher (Douro-Dummer), David Nelson (Otonabee-South Monaghan), Sherry Senis (Selwyn) and Ron Windover (Trent Lakes).
Absent: Councillor Rick Woodcock (North Kawartha)
Staff Chris Barry, Deputy Chief, Operations; Trena DeBruijn, Present: Director of Finance/Treasurer; Sheridan Graham, Director, Corporate Projects & Services; Gary King, Chief Administrative Officer; Patti Kraft, Director of Human Resources; Randy Mellow, Chief of Paramedics; Iain Mudd, Manager of Planning; Peter Nielsen, Manager, Engineering & Design; Yvette Peplinskie, Deputy
Page 1
Page 9 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Treasurer; Sally Saunders, Clerk; Tara Stephen, Manager, Waste Management; and Bryan Weir, Director of Planning.
5. Adoption of Agenda
163-2017 Moved by: Councillor Fallis Seconded by: Councillor Senis
Be it resolved that County Council adopts the agenda as circulated. Carried
6. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
7. Adoption of Minutes
164-2017 Moved by: Councillor Matthews Seconded by: Councillor Windover
Be it resolved that County Council adopts the minutes of the Regular County Council meeting of March 15, 2017 as circulated. Carried
8. Delegations, Petitions and Presentations
a. Sheridan Graham, Director, Corporate Projects & Services Re: County Court House 2017 Capital Works Report
The Director, Corporate Projects & Services, reviewed the report advising Council that in order to lower the budget impact, staff recommend the deferral of two identified items (totaling $95,000), with staff doing their best to maintain them until they can be addressed. Mrs. Graham responded to Council questions.
165-2017 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Nelson
Be it resolved that County Council:
Page 2
Page 10 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
1. Receives the Director, Corporate Projects & Services report regarding the County Court House 2017 Capital Works Report.
2. Defers the following County Court House projects to the 2018 draft budget:
a. Driveway/parking repairs and replacements - $80,000 b. Sidewalks and concrete repairs - $15,000. Carried b. Trena DeBruijn, Director of Finance/Treasurer Re: Budget Discussions and Answers
The Director of Finance/Treasurer advised that with Council approval of the reduction of the $95,000 above, the budget increase now sits at 2.96%. She added that the Warden has reviewed Warden’s accounts, trimming an additional $15,140 from the budget leaving the budget increase at 2.92%. She responded to Council questions. The Warden advised that at the Council Meeting of June 28th, further discussion of the County budget process and timelines will occur.
Adoption of 2017 Budget
166-2017 Moved by: Councillor Senis Seconded by: Councillor Low
Be it resolved that County Council adopts the 2017 budget at 2.92% which is net of the estimated assessment growth impact of 1% and that the Clerk be directed to prepare the By-law adopting the 2017 budget for the Corporation of the County of Peterborough. Carried
9. Referrals
There were no referrals brought forward.
10. Staff Reports
a. Planning Re: Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium – File No.15CD-12001 Draft Plan of Subdivision - File No. 15T-12002
Page 3
Page 11 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Lot 25, Concession 9, Chandos Ward Township of North Kawartha
The Manager of Planning reviewed his report concerning property located at 328 Winters Bay Road comprising approximately 29.39 hectares (72.6 acres) in area, located at the east end of Chandos Lake in an area commonly known as Winters Bay. Mr. Mudd noted that the proponents made a complete application to the County on September 12, 2012 for the approval of a 7-lot seasonal residential plan of subdivision and a common elements condominium that will provide internal roadways for accessing the subdivision lots and exclusive use areas for certain lots within the subdivision. He explained that the lots created by the application for plan of subdivision would be accessed by the internal common condominium road, which will intersect with Winters Bay Road, a municipal road. The common element condominium road will be owned and maintained by the condominium corporation (comprised of owners from the 7 subdivision lots). He added that individual on- site water and sewage services will service the proposed lots, however, water will be taken from the lake rather than from an individual well. Water quality treatment will be installed in each of the seven dwellings.
Mr. Mudd listed the numerous studies which were distributed for review and comment. He informed Council that the subject lands are identified as “Shoreland Area” and “Rural” in the County Official Plan; the area subject to development is entirely within the “Shoreland Area”. He reviewed the requirements of the Official Plan, the Local Component of the County Official Plan, the Township Zoning By-law, the Provincial Policy Statement and the Growth Plan.
Mr. Mudd reported on the statutory public meeting which was held on January 16, 2016 by the North Kawartha Township Council, with fifty members of the public in attendance. A second public meeting was held on June 18, 2016 with approximately 30 members of the public in attendance along with County staff. The public concerns were compiled and responses prepared by County and Township planners. Because of the peer review process for all studies, and conditions of draft plan approval, all concerns are considered to be addressed.
Page 4
Page 12 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Mr. Mudd concluded his report by advising that Haastown Holdings Inc. made application for the creation of a 7-lot recreational residential plan of subdivision, together with a common elements plan of condominium. An Official Plan amendment has been undertaken to change the land use designation to “Seasonal Residential” which would permit this type of development. No agencies objected to the plan. Some agencies requested specific conditions be imposed on the development of the plan in order to address certain regulations and/or standards that relate to the particular agency’s mandate, which is standard practice for subdivision and condominium proposals. He responded to Council questions.
167-2017 Moved by: Councillor Bonneau Seconded by: Councillor Moher
Be it resolved that the application for approval of a common elements plan of condominium submitted by Haastown Holdings Inc. (County file 15CD-12001) be granted draft plan approval, with conditions, and the required Notice of Decision be circulated in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act; and,
That the application for approval of a plan of subdivision submitted by Haastown Holdings Inc. (County file 15T-12002) be granted draft plan approval, with conditions, and the required Notice of Decision be circulated in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act; and,
Further that the Director of Planning be authorized to date stamp and sign the draft plan certificates if no appeals are received at the conclusion of the appeal period. Carried
b. Peterborough County/City Paramedics Re: Single Source Justification PCCP – Fleet Ambulance Purchases
The Deputy Chief, Operations reviewed the report advising that the PCCP fleet of 15 ambulances is comprised of 100% Crestline Ambulances. He referred to the benefits of having a standardized fleet from both a paramedic and maintenance perspective. Deputy Chief Barry explained that the ambulance has a fully integrated vehicle electronic system, which monitors and enhances vehicle efficiency and safe performance, tracks mileages and service intervals for the PCCP legislated
Page 5
Page 13 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
maintenance program. He explained that this purchase falls under the Single Source provisions of the County’s Purchasing Policy. He responded to Council questions.
168-2017 Moved by: Councillor Jones Seconded by: Councillor Smith
Be it resolved that Council authorizes a single source award to Crestline Coach Ltd. for the provision of three (3) new ambulances – at a total cost of $438,778.70. Carried
c. Public Works - Engineering & Design Re: T-06-2017 for Hot Mix Paving
The Manager, Engineering & Design, reported on the two submissions received for the Hot Mix Paving Tender. Mr. Nielsen summarized the bids received versus the estimated budget for each of the County road locations resulting in $150,814.64 deficit. He recommended the identified deficit be funded by savings/adjustments to other projects which are included in the 2017 draft budget. He concluded his report by recommending that the tender be awarded to Coco Paving Inc., the lowest compliant bid received. He responded to Council questions.
169-2017 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Fallis
Be it resolved that the tender T-06-2017 for Hot Mix Paving be awarded to Coco Paving Inc. in the amount of $2,292,930.29 (including HST).
And further, that a by-law be passed to authorize the Warden and Clerk to enter into an Agreement with Coco Paving Inc. for tender T-06-2017 Hot Mix Paving. Carried
11. Staff Reports for Information Only
The Warden asked if any member of Council would like to deal with any item of the staff report for information separately.
a. Administration - Clerk's Division Report prepared by: Katie McLean, Administrative Services Assistant
Page 6
Page 14 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Re: Correspondence Report
170-2017 Moved by: Councillor Fallis Seconded by: Councillor Low
Be it resolved that County Council receives the above noted Staff Report for Information Only item a. Carried
12. Correspondence - Action Items
a. Northeastern Manitoulin & The Islands resolution dated March 17, 2017 Re: Hydro - Equal Delivery Fees
171-2017 Moved by: Councillor Moher Seconded by: Councillor Bonneau
Be it resolved that County Council receives the Northeastern Manitoulin & The Islands resolution dated March 17, 2017 calling on the Province of Ontario to:
1. Treat all of Ontario Hydro’s customers equally and eliminate the delivery fees for residents of The Town of Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands.
2. Explain to the municipalities which cost cutting measures or alternative revenue sources will be put in place to replace the revenue losses it experiences from the elimination of the delivery charge to its customers. Carried
b. Township of Selwyn resolution dated March 14, 2017 Re: Toronto-Peterborough-Ottawa High Frequency Passenger Rail Service
172-2017 Moved by: Councillor Low Seconded by: Councillor Matthews
Be it resolved that County Council supports the Township of Selwyn's resolution dated March 14, 2017 requesting the Minister of Transportation seriously consider VIA's proposal for dedicated tracks to support its High-Frequency rail service
Page 7
Page 15 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
between Toronto-Peterborough-Ottawa for both passengers and freight companies. Carried
c. Municipality of East Ferris resolution dated March 28, 2017 Re: Building Code B-08-09-03
173-2017 Moved by: Councillor Moher Seconded by: Councillor Bonneau
Be it resolved that County Council receives the Municipality of East Ferris' resolution dated March 28, 2017 requesting the Honourable Bill Mauro, Minister of Municipal Affairs, not move forward with proposed Building Code Change B-08-09-03, requesting mandatory five year septic tank pump out and records retention by the owner. Carried
13. Committee Reports
a. Councillor Bev Matthews Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee Re: Minutes of March 28, 2017
b. Warden Taylor Awards and Bursaries Committee Re: Minutes of March 30, 2017
174-2017 Moved by: Councillor Hutton Seconded by: Councillor Fallis
Be it resolved that County Council receives and adopts:
1. The Lang Pioneer Village Advisory Committee meeting minutes of March 28, 2017.
2. The Awards and Bursaries Committee meeting minutes of March 30, 2017. Carried
14. Liaison Reports from External Committees, Boards and Agencies
a. Peterborough Economic Development (PED) - Gary King, CAO and PED Board Member reported that the PED relocation
Page 8
Page 16 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
from Wolfe Street to the Venture North Building on George Street has been delayed a couple of weeks. County Councillors will be invited to the ribbon-cutting Ceremony and a tour of the new facility. Mr. King advised that the AGM is scheduled for April 27th at the Market Hall. Topics such as the City/Cavan Monaghan/County questions and the provincial intention to move forward with formal regional economic development plans were also discussed. He added that the “Dining Under Water Experience” was sold out. The audited financial statements were reviewed. b. Greater Peterborough Chamber of Commerce – Councillor Senis reported that the board meeting was held on March 21st and the 2016 auditor’s report, along with various committee reports, were received. She advised that the 128th AGM was held on March 29th at the Holiday Inn with guest speaker, Hendrik Brakel, Senior Director of Economic, Financial and Tax policy for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. She noted that his comments indicated that “technology is displacing not just low skilled jobs but also middle skill jobs.” He emphasized that due to the “close the borders populism” which has become fashionable internationally, it is a big advantage for Canada to be the open country in a world of “close the borders populism”. Please click on the following link for Mr. Brakel’s presentation.
c. Peterborough Housing Corporation - Councillor Matthews reported that the March 20th Rezoning Meeting in Havelock for the proposed assisted living/affordable housing and long term care development was held. The 20-day appeal process has started. She expanded by advising that the Township advised that the PHC has recently sold the George Street property for slightly more than the list price. Councillor Matthews has asked the PHC to make a presentation to County Council regarding the McRae building and other PHC programs.
175-2017 Moved by: Councillor Bonneau Seconded by: Councillor Hutton
Be it resolved that the Liaison Representative Reports and supporting documentation be received for information. Carried
Council recessed from 10:55 a.m. until 11:11 a.m.
Page 9
Page 17 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
15. Resolutions
There were no resolutions presented for Council consideration.
16. Notices of Motion
There were no notices of motion presented.
17. New Business
There were no new business items presented.
18. Closed Session
176-2017 Moved by: Councillor Windover Seconded by: Councillor Nelson
Be it resolved that under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, s. 239(2) County Council move into closed session at 11:12 a.m. to consider:
(a) the security of the property of the municipality or local board
(b) personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees
(c) a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board
(d) labour relations or employee negotiations
(f) advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for purpose. Carried
19. Rise from Closed Session With/Without a Report
177-2017 Moved by: Councillor Bonneau Seconded by: Councillor Hutton
Page 10
Page 18 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Be it resolved that County Council rise from closed session at 11:56 a.m. without a report. Carried
20. Adoption of Amended Agenda to Add Closed Session Items Being Reported
There were no items being reported.
21. Reading and Passing of By-laws
Due to time constraints, the Warden dispensed with the reading of the by- law. The Clerk highlighted the listed by-law.
a. A By-law to adopt the 2017 Budget of the Corporation of the County of Peterborough. (By-law No. 2017-20)
178-2017 Moved by: Councillor Windover Seconded by: Councillor Senis
Be it resolved that County Council passes by-law a. and that this by-law shall be signed by the Warden and the Clerk, sealed with the Seal of the Corporation and Numbered. Carried
22. Confirming By-law
179-2017 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Fallis
Be it resolved that County Council passes the confirming by-law to adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of Council at today’s meeting in respect to each report, motion, resolution or other action passed and taken by Council and that this confirming by- law shall be signed by the Warden and the Clerk, sealed with the Seal of the Corporation and Numbered By-law 2017-23. Carried
23. Future Meeting Schedule
April . 5 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 5 1:00 p.m. Nominating Committee (County Court House, Boardroom) . 6 9:30 a.m. Awards and Bursaries Committee (North Kawartha
Page 11
Page 19 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Community Centre - Site Visit) . 19 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 26 3:00 p.m. Accessibility Advisory Committee (Selwyn, Lower Boardroom) . 27 9:30 a.m. Land Division Committee (Council Chambers)
May . 3 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 8 1:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Pre-Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 8 2:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 17 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 23 9:30 a.m. Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (County Court House, Boardroom) . 24 3:00 p.m. Accessibility Advisory Committee (County Court House, Boardroom) . 26 10:00 a.m. Awards and Bursaries Committee – North Kawartha Community Centre Set-up . 26 7:00 p.m. Awards and Bursaries Committee – Recognition Awards Ceremony (North Kawartha Community Centre) . 31 9:00 a.m. Special County Council Meeting (Road Tour)
June . 7 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 7 *FCCM Awards and Bursaries Committee – 2017 Critique (Boardroom) . 8 2:30 p.m. JSSC Pre-Meeting (Boardroom) (Subject to Confirmation) . 8 3:45 p.m. JSSC Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 19 1:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Pre-Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 19 2:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 21 3:00 a.m. Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting (Selwyn, Lower Boardroom) . 27 9:30 a.m. Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (County Court House, Boardroom) . 28 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 28 8:45 a.m. Awards and Bursaries Committee – Bursary Award Selection (Boardroom)
July . Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee – Annual Field Trip (Location, Date and Time TBD)
Page 12
Page 20 of 250 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, April 5, 2017
August . 2 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 13 n/a Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO) Annual Conference (Ottawa, Ontario, The Shaw Centre) (August 13th to 16th) . 23 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers)
*FCCM – Following County Council Meeting
24. Adjournment
180-2017 Moved by: Councillor Bonneau Seconded by: Councillor Hutton
Be it resolved that the County Council meeting adjourn at 11:57 a.m. Carried
______Joe Taylor Warden
______Sally Saunders County Clerk
Page 13
Page 21 of 250 Page 22 of 250 @
UNITED NATIONS UNWERSITV
Peterboroug|1-Kawar(ha- Haliburlon REGIONAL ; CENTRE OF EXPERTISE
Page 23 of 250 % on education for sustainable development PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL csrmzs or EXPERTISE an education forsusminable development
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Page 24 of 250 PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL csrmzs or EXPERTISE on educa?un forsuxminable development
"Regi'onc11Cenfres ofExpertise aspire to tmnsinte giohni objectives into the context ofthe iocoi communities in which they operate. RCE vision Page 25 of 250 PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE or EXPERTISE an education forsustainable development
RCEs HELP TO MEET UN COMMITMENTS TO EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (ESD)
POLICV SUPPORT
WHOLE-INSTITUTIONS APPROACH
EDUCATORS Page 26 of 250
VOUTH
LOCAL COMMUNITIES RCE NETWORK
REGIONAL czrmzz or: zxpznnsz on education fe, sustainable development Page 27 of 250
I
4 K4 ...“:“.. :x>:§?v;4‘lv"‘3~ ”§L’5f$Z”x§f§§’§ '-’;A‘~_‘L:~>,t,>;m;N Fuuv mm REGIONAL czmnz or zxpznnsz on eduzntfon forsustainable development
LEADERSHIP OF THE BUSINESS COMMUNITV
- shared watershed - similar geographic features
economic needs and strengths Page 28 of 250 PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE FORMAL EDUCATION on education forsustainable development Page 29 of 250 ENVIRONMENT CULTURE BUSINESS m 3(é?é;borough °“”’K“"“"”“?[3 Chamber of Commerce Gree 2:::::°e:::;:.v paaborough O EC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Peterborough \ Haliburton School ? ' of Art + Design /{)3 FlemingCollege
E Page 30 of 250 C°mml§'3'~t1‘3§ N BEATS 3. BRAIDS ADDRESSING CHALLENGES
REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE on education forsustainable development
ENVIRONMENT SOCIO-CULTURAL
- resource depletion and - income inequality, climate change poverty, and housing
- transportation and - aging population urban sprawl - racism and co|onia|ism - habitat and biodiversity loss Page 31 of 250 - water quality and access PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE on education forsustainable development
—- L _ 1 1 —— 1 J \ DRE _ _ _ - — EMPLOYMENT 5 § K THROUGH ; .. § Pos'r- , \ Scl-IooL GRADE 12 SECONDARY 8' RESEARCH
TO FACILIATE AND COORDINATE PARTNERSHIPS AND PROJECTS THAT BRIDGE FROM PRE-SCHOOL TO GREEN JOB OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: Page 32 of 250
...RESULTING IN ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS REGIONALLY THAT CAN BE SHARED INTERNATIONALLY. PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE on education forsustainable development
Indigenous Knowledge systems
age-appropriate sustainability and stewardship 2 education frameworks
Page 33 of 250 school curriculum and the spectrum of programs PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE on education forsustainable development
4 green jobs, research, and innovation
reciprocal exchanges of sustainability knowledge and 5 practice Page 34 of 250 6 meaningful local action PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE on education forsustainable development OVER THE NEXT YEAR...
PARTNERSHIPDEVELOPMENT
GOVERNANCESTRUCTURE
STRATEGICAcTIoN PLAN Page 35 of 250
EVALUATIONAND REPORTING PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE on education forsustainable development
IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS... Page 36 of 250 PETERBOROUGH- KAWARTHA- HALIBURTON REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXPERTISE on education forsustainable development
THANK You! Page 37 of 250 Page 38 of 250 • The Havelock Collaborative is a group of City based agencies that wish to improve access to their services for County based residents. Our collaboration was inspired both by limited resources and the increasingly complex and connected issues faced by rural people using our services.
• We knew a sustainable solution to would require the unique perspective and expertise of all stakeholders and resources from all sectors.
• The Collaborative formed in 2015 to tackle the great perplexing challenge of creating a permanent service model to more effectively provide our services to people living in eight diverse municipalities covering 3700 square kilometers and two first nations.
Page 39 of 250 1 Page 40 of 250 2 • The effort to provide community services delivered locally throughout Peterborough County is not new. It is widely acknowledged that rural households struggle with a range of interrelated barriers.
• These barriers and risk factors contribute to chronic instability, unemployment, susceptibility to homelessness, illness and so on.
• Other barriers are isolation, lack of affordable rental housing and lack of access to services and transportation.
• Previous outreach attempts by City based agencies have proven unsustainable due to the limited capacity, scope and impact of any single entity. Organizations already located in Havelock and other locations have challenges related to adequate space and resources.
• We agreed on our Mission knowing it would be a formidable challenge requiring sustained energy, support and resources.
Page 41 of 250 3 The member organizations of our Collaborative are keenly aware of the ongoing need for several Hubs throughout the County.
It became clear that the way to achieve this goal was to operate a pilot project in one County location to develop, test and refine a service model that could be sustained in one location and replicated in other areas of our County.
Havelock was chosen for the pilot project based on the current demand for services in this region, geographical location and levels of poverty, unemployment and established community engagement.
Page 42 of 250 4 The official opening of the Hub on Feb. 26, 2016 marked the end of an 18 month effort by twelve organizations working in a meaningful way with the local community. Collectively we developed shared values, goals, and a Workplan; obtained financial support from community funders; hired staff, found and establish a location and so on. This day also marked the beginning of operations at the hub and since that day we have worked diligently to promote and deliver services that meet community need.
Pilot Project Funding:
$50,000 Peterborough City and County (CHPI) $25,000 Community Foundation Greater Peterborough In Kind Donation of Space by Havelock Belmont Metheun Township
Original 18 month budget extended to 22 months through generous donation of space by Havelock Belmont Metheun Township at their new Medical Centre.
The Hub is open Monday all day and Wednesday afternoon and Friday morning. The current Hub Coordinator is Amanda O’Rourke. Page 43 of 250 5 Havelock Collaborative The Collaborative consists of representatives of 12 organizations and the Local Leadership Table Chair. Organizations have agreed to a Memorandum of Understanding and Terms of Reference. This group serves as the primary decision‐ making body for the hub and pilot project. Members of the Collaborative have independent mandates and roles, but also commit to a cooperative relationship in the pursuit of mutually reinforcing activities and service improvements in Havelock. Steering Committee Member organizations agree to a Steering Committee Terms of Reference. The Steering Committee plans and organizes the development of the Havelock Hub between larger, less frequent meetings; liaises with and make recommendations to the Collaborative; and is empowered to make minor decisions. Local Leadership Table This project requires strong community support and involvement to succeed. The development of a Local Leadership Table engages influential and knowledgeable community members from the Havelock area to assist the Collaborative by meeting quarterly to advise the project. Sponsor Agency The Hub unincorporated, therefore CCRC acts as the sponsor for the project, and is responsible for funding, staff and reporting.
Page 44 of 250 6 Organizations whose services are available onsite at the Hub:
The Housing Resource Centre (CCRC), Employment Planning and Counselling, Peterborough Community Legal Centre, (through SKYPE) Professional Counselling (CCRC); Credit Counselling Services (CCRC), Community Service Orders (CCRC), YWCA Food Box Program The John Howard Society.
Organizations who are members of the Collaborative and deliver services from their own premises as referral sources and community partners:
Community Care, The City of Peterborough Social Services Division, VON, Peterborough Public Health.
Page 45 of 250 7 The following services provide local access to their services at the Hub in person or via SKYPE: Housing Resource Centre: Housing Support , Counselling, Referral , Case Management, Housing Search & Vacancy Listings, Rent Supplements, Emergency Financial Assistance , Housing Search Assistance; Help to Apply for Affordable Housing and application to other municipal programs. Credit Counselling Services: Budgeting, Credit Education, Money Management, Debt Repayment Support and Bankruptcy Counselling Professional Counselling: Individual, couple or group counselling for challenges related to personal well‐being, relationships, family issues, parenting, aging, grief and loss, caregiving, separation/divorce, or any form of abuse including elder abuse and domestic violence. Community Service Orders: Local access for clients of this community justice sentencing option as a condition of probation to perform community hours at participating local placement organizations. Peterborough Community Legal Centre in the following areas of law: Ontario Works (welfare), Employment Insurance and Employment Standards (employees only), Ontario Disability, Canada Pension Plan, Residential Tenancies Act (tenants only), Consumer Protection, Human Rights Code and the Charter cases. Staff also provide presentations and workshops in the areas listed. Employment Planning & Counselling ‐ individual employment counselling, career development & employment related programs and services. YWCA Food Box ‐ program that provides fresh and healthy foods and allows families to purchase food on a sliding scale or “pay what you can afford” model.
Page 46 of 250 8 Hub staff also do outreach monthly at the Havelock Food Bank.
Page 47 of 250 8 Services available locally in Havelock has increased referrals between organizations because of improved awareness of and access to services.
Page 48 of 250 9 Page 49 of 250 10 Each count = 1 household receiving services
In December the Hub was closed for a week for the holidays.
In January the Hub was only open only 8 days due to staff turnover.
Page 50 of 250 11 Demonstrating improved access to services based on proximity to service location.
Please note the increase in services to Havelock residents in 2016/17 following the opening of the local Hub.
Page 51 of 250 12 Page 52 of 250 13 The month to month variances are not significant.
Page 53 of 250 14 This request is being submitted at this time to coincide with the municipal budget process..
This will enable the Hub to continue its growth in the Havelock area; expand services by additional agencies; evaluate and refine processes; and test the capacity of organizations to help support sustainability of the Hub
During 2018, the Collaborative is interested in assisting the County in forming a local committee to investigate the feasibility of creating a second Hub in the northern area of the County.
A final evaluation showing further demographics and service outcomes will be conducted during the fall of 2017 and presented to the community prior to the end of the pilot project.
We therefore request that County Council pass a motion recommending $50,000 in funding for continued operation of the Havelock Hub during 2018.
Page 54 of 250 15 Page 55 of 250 16 Service Success Stories
Original service request illustrates an all to common lack of awareness of available services and reluctance to ask for help especially in rural areas.
Careful coordination to meet needs
Page 56 of 250 17 Page 57 of 250 18 Thank you!
Page 58 of 250 19 The County of Peterborough County Council
To: Warden and Members of Council
From: Bryan Weir, Director of Planning
Date: April 19, 2017
Subject: Revised Development Charges By-law Report
Recommendation: That Council receive this staff report and Background Study and, That Council pass a Development Charges By-law effective May 1, 2017 that sets the following charges:
Residential: Single-Detached, Semi-Detached Duplex (>103m2) $7627.74 per unit Single-Detached & Semi-Detached Duplex(<103m2) and Multiple Residential $5085.16 per unit Small Multiple Residential (< 93m2) & Apartment $3955.12 per unit
Non-residential: Industrial Uses no charge (exempt) Other Non-residential uses First 250 sq. m. exempt, then $11.77 per sq. m. thereafter.
Financial Impact: Contribution to Development Charges Reserve
Background:
Back on December 16, 2016, County Council passed a new Development Charges (DC) By-law (No. 2016-83) to take effect on January 1, 2017. This By-law increased the then current Residential rate by $500 and held the Non-Residential Rate. Certain exemptions, as they existed in the previous by-law, were carried forward in this new By-law. The By-law was prepared at Council’s direction given at its meeting held November 16, 2016.
By-law 2016-83 was considered to be an interim Development Charges By-law due to extensive debate on information and options contained in the Development Charges Background Study (2016) as prepared by Jamie Robinson of MHBC Planning Limited and discussed by County Council on November 16, 2016.
Page 59 of 250 Page 2
At this same meeting in November 2016, Council passed the following resolution:
Be it resolved that County Council receives the information from the Director of Planning and the consultant and requests that a report be developed as soon as possible for County Council’s information relating to Development Charges Reserves and Expenditures, Assessment Tax information and possible examples where an Area-rated approach has been taken.
At its meeting held February 15, 2017, a report was prepared for Council which addressed the following matters: Provided Council with the requested information on DC Reserves and Expenditures, Assessment Tax, and Area-rated approaches; Created a comparison among various options for imposing the DC; and Provided examples of DC’s for other nearby municipalities.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Council resolved to charge the full DC Rate for Residential uses phased-in over a 5 year period. Additionally, the full Non- Residential rate would be applied after exempting Industrial uses and the first 250 square metres for other Non-Residential uses.
On March 15, 2017, a Statutory Public Meeting was held under the Development Charges Act, to receive comments from the public. Council heard from 3 presenters that represented the following: Township of Havelock-Belmont- Methuen, Peterborough and the Kawarthas Association of Realtors and the Peterborough and Kawarthas Home Builders Association.
Due to comments received, Council directed staff to defer this matter to a future Council meeting for a report on public input together with a revised by-law. A general account of public submissions and responses to their comments are contained in the Background Study on Page 26. A detailed account of comments received and responses to each point are included As Appendix A to this report.
One of the most significant items was the question of attributing an 85% factor for growth-related projects in the Transportation calculation of the By-law. Upon investigation of this issue, it was determined that the use of the 85% factor originated in the very first version of the County DC By-law back in 2006. This factor was never questioned since Council decided to scale back the charge and elected to implement a lesser charge than the justifiable charge. This carried through to updates in 2011 and to an amendment in 2013. When the current task of drafting a new By-law was issued, the 85% was again used based on historical context. Upon review, it is believed that utilizing this factor was not appropriate and that eligible Roads and Bridges projects should more realistically reflect the rate of growth. The rate of growth over the next 10 years is approximately 15%. Accordingly, a factor of 15% for a growth-related share has been applied for roads and Bridges projects.
In contrast, capital projects identified in the Transportation Master Plan are considered to be 100% growth-related as these constitute improvements to be
Page 60 of 250 Page 3
made as a direct result of growth. In this regard, the full factor has been applied to such projects.
This substantial change in methodology produces a significant adjustment to the final rates; one that is considered to be more justifiable, realistic and fair. The following chart creates a comparison between amounts using the Residential Charge (single-detached) and Non-Residential Charge as examples.
Type of Charge By-law 2016-83 As previously As currently (current) calculated calculated Residential $6250 per unit $13,535.05 $7,627.74 (single) Non-Residential $11.95 per sq.m. $20.68 $11.77
At its meeting on February 1, 2017, Council opted to consider the full charge of $13,535.05 phased-in over 5 years. This equated to charging $7,707.01 in the first year. The current calculation would see a new maximum charge for a single residence less than the initial phase of this option ($7,701.01 vs. $7,627.74). It is proposed that the “currently calculated” charges would remain as such for the full 5 year period with no increases during this time using an effective date of May 1, 2017.
The following chart presents the charges using the adjusted methodology:
Year Single-Detached, Multiple Small Multiple Non- Semi-Detached Residential Residential Residential Duplex (< 93m2)* (per m2) (>103m2)* Single-Detached, Semi-Detached Apartment Duplex(<103m2)*
May 1, First 250 2017 to sq.m. May 1, $7,627.74 $5,085.16 $3,955.12 exempt, 2022 then $11.77 thereafter *Represents gross floor area.
As mentioned previously, it is believed that the new charges as proposed are fair and reasonable, and that the methodology truly reflects an accurate depiction of anticipated growth and growth-related costs for County projects. In this regard, it is recommended that Council receive this staff report and Background Study and pass a Development Charges By-law effective May 1, 2017 that sets the following charges:
Page 61 of 250 Page 4
Residential:
Single-Detached, Semi-Detached Duplex (>103m2) $7627.74 per unit
Single-Detached & Semi-Detached Duplex(<103m2) and Multiple Residential $5085.16 per unit
Small Multiple Residential (< 93m2) & Apartment $3955.12 per unit
Non-residential:
Industrial Uses no charge (exempt)
Other Non-residential uses First 250 sq. m. exempt, then $11.77 per sq. m. thereafter.
Respectfully submitted,
Original signed by
Bryan Weir
Attach: Appendix A - Comment Summary Table
Page 62 of 250 County of Peterborough Development Charges Study Comments Page 1 of 4
County of Peterborough – Comment Summary Table – April 11, 2017
Organization Date of Comment Comment Reply 3 Peterborough and the March 15, 2017 Section B2 of the Background study indicates that 3,282 new Kawarthas Home Builders dwelling units are forecasted to be required over the next ten years. The Growth Plan forecasts a population of 76,000 to 2041. The2016 Association (PKHBA) That is 8,369 new residents forecasted over 10 years. population is estimated at 55,770 (based on 2011 census and building permit (Garnet Northley) The forecasted growth is only 6,000 new residents or 2,352 new data). dwellings units a full 28% fewer homes than the background study The forecasted population increase is 20,230 which equates in an additional indicates. 809 persons per year.
The 10 year population increase would be 8,090
The average household size is forecasted to decrease from 2.55 pph to 2.53 pph.
The decrease in household size will result in a demand for an additional 210 housing units to 2041.
The increase in population will result in a demand for an additional 7,996 dwellings to 2041.
This is equal to an increase of 328 dwelling units per year.
Over a 10 year period, the number of dwellings required is 3,280.
How did the data show that 10% of the population as represented by new neighbours accounts for 85% of the wear and tear on our road The 2006 Study completed by Hemson Consulting used values that were systems. around the 85% mark. Some were higher, some were lower. How does a blanket of 85% account for low growth areas where there The 85% value was used for roads projects in the 2013 and 2011 will be no net new traffic? If 85% was used as a simple average that means somewhere new studies completed by Clark Consulting. neighbours must be paying for 100% of the maintenance on the The 85% value was carried forward for this Study. roads we all enjoy? Other considerations for the 85% include: o the introduction of bike lanes on resurfacing projects; and the 85% being reflective of the average growth related share for projects. Previous growth rates were projected at a higher level; growth By comparison, this is a drastic increase from the 2011 report which is actually slower than anticipated. projected a cost of just under $8 million for growth related projects
representing approximately 9% of the overall cost carried by development charges not 85%. The background study has been updated to reference to include a 15% growth
Page 63 of 250 related share for Roads and Bridge projects and a 100% growth related share for projects that are included in the Transportation Master Plan.
The City of Peterborough’s 2014 Background Study calculated the Noted growth related percentage of road construction and maintenance at an average of just over 53% and included significant new projects as opposed to a maintenance regime.
County of Peterborough Development Charges Study Comments Page 2 of 4
4 Havelock Belmont November 14, Under Section 9. 1 - if the property is redeveloped, converted, The Development Charges are levied to ensure that the level Methuen 2016 demolished or has a change of use of the building or of service is maintained when new growth occurs. If an (Pat Kemp) structure, the Development Charges would apply. If there was accessory building is converted into a dwelling unit, then an old garage and it was converted into apartments, then the development charges would be applied as this would be the Developer would be subject to the Development Charge. How creation of a new dwelling unit. are we going to entice developers to fix up old abandoned buildings if they are going to be Municipalities have many options available to “entice” forced to pay a development charge? developers if they so choose.
The non-resident rate of $18. 88 by 2021 seems excessive. For Development Charges are only collected on the principle building. A example, if a property owner were to construct a storage shed that storage shed would be considered an accessory building whereby was 1,000 square metres the Development Charge fee would be $18, development charges would not be collected. 880. What additional services would a storage shed require? Another issue is if a ratepayer wanted to build a hunt camp they Section 7.4.2 of the draft Development Charges By-law exempts hunt would have to pay $1, 888 for a 100 square metre building. Again camps that are less than 112 m2 in gross floor area. what services would the hunt club require? It seems an extreme price to pay for a building that is used occasionally. In some cases the A Hunt camp is defined as: ratepayers would only use the facility three weeks a year. A building operated without profit or gain for the sole purpose of temporary human habitation at no other times than during established large game and waterfowl hunting seasons. For the purposes of this By-law a hunt camp is a non-residential use.
5 Havelock Belmont Methuen March 15, 2017 Under page 9 of the Development Charges Background Study, it The initial draft of the DC Background Study was made available 60 (Pat Kemp) indicates that the Background Study must be made available to the days prior to the first Statutory Public Meeting. The Report dated public at least 60 days prior to the passing of the Development February 16 is an update of the original study. The DC Background Charge By-law. The report is dated February 16, 2017; therefore you Study was made available in accordance with the requirements of the are not meeting your requirements, if the by-law is passed prior to DC Act. April 17th, 2017. On page 14 of the Background Study it is mentioned that there will be a new EMS station developed on the west side of the City of The Study has been undertaken on a County wide basis and specific Peterborough to provide balanced EMS coverage across the City. This consideration has not been given to Township or area specific costs is of NO benefit to ratepayers that live in Havelock- Belmont- and benefits. Methuen, North Kawartha or Trent Lakes. In fact, it is probably a detriment. The report states that there are four (4) EMS stations The cost of EMS services are shared between the County and the City located in the County of Peterborough. This is misleading as the of Peterborough whereby the County contributes 41.68% and the Buckhorn site is only seasonal. City contributes 58.32%. The City will pay for its share of growth related development towards EMS and the County will pay for its share.
Development Charges are collected for capital related costs not operational costs. It is understood that the Buckhorn EMS station is
Page 64 of 250 seasonal and would likely have lower operational costs it does not negate the fact that there are still capital costs associated with the building. We are surprised that the cost of additional paramedic uniforms is Capital costs reflect fixed, one-time expenses. Paramedic uniforms covered under the Development Charges By-law especially if these are capital costs associated with delivering the service and are paramedics will be working on the new car in the City of collected under Development Charges just like equipment and Peterborough. We would argue that uniforms are not a capital item vehicles are considered to be capital costs. and should not be included in the Development Charges.
County of Peterborough Development Charges Study Comments Page 3 of 4
On page 21 of the Background Study under Growth Related Studies Province has stated opposition to extending private roads. A possible we would like clarification on what study the County of Peterborough future study may examine how private road development could be would be undertaking to deal with Private Roads. considered through a criteria-based policy approach. On page 26 of the Background Study it was stated that the fee would The 2013 Development Charges By-law expired. The County passed be increased $500 for residential units for a period of one year. Less an interim By-law for a maximum period of 1 year which reflected a than three months later there is a proposal to increase an additional $500 increase to allow time to review the Background Study and $1,457.01, bringing the total to $7,707.01 in 2017. This is an additional Development Charge implementation options. increase of 23. 31%.
We concur with the recommendation that Affordable Housing be Comment noted. exempted from the bylaw under section 8. The Township of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen would recommend that The corresponding CIP would indicate whether or not projects are the Development Charges by-law address improvements under the exempt from Development Charges. This is permitted and outlined in Community Improvement Plan. Currently there is no mechanism to Sections 7.25.5.1 of the County Official Plan. exempt projects under the Community Improvement Plan and this is a vital part of any Community's revitalization plan. Has the Development Study taken into consideration the bridges that The Study has not considered these for two reasons: the County plans to transfer to the lower tier municipalities in this -any plans to transfer have not yet been finalized review? -these would not be part of any immediate plans for capital works unless an agreement to transfer has been made The charts attached to the Background Study are not legible for Accommodations can be made upon request to increase the font size someone with vision issues. of the tables, print larger tables or provide digital versions that can be viewed in larger font On page 2 of the By-law under section 1.9, reference is made to the Comment noted. 1997 Ontario Building Code. This should read 2012. On page 5 of the By-law under section 5. 1 Indexing of the The indexing of development charges based upon the Statistics Development Charge, we question what does the Statistics Canada Canada Price Index is permitted under the Development Charges Act Price Index have to do with Development Charges, which is to be Regulation “O.Reg.82/98” Section 7. This accounts for the change in based on future growth. construction costs that occurs year over year. On page 5 of the By-law under section 7.3, we need clarification on Community Care facilities are defined as: what this means? A care facility designed for persons who require nursing and/ or homecare where common facilities and medical care may be provided such as a retirement home, long-term care home or nursing home.
This development of these facilities are subject the non-residential development charge which is calculated based on the floor area of the building.
On page 6 of the By-law under section 9.1 it refers to Subsection 9.3, Comment noted. 9.4 in the draft by-law should be 9.3 and 9.5 in the however there isn't a section 9. 3. Under section 9. 1, we need draft by-law should be 9.4. This should clarify the cross reference in clarification on this section. Section 9.1. Page 65 of 250 6 Peterborough and the March 13, 2017 Our concern is that the proposed increases will not affect all The Study has been undertaken on a County wide basis and specific Kawarthas Association of landowners the same in all municipalities of Peterborough County as consideration has not been given to Township or area specific costs Realtors (PKAR) there is a very large variance in building lot sale prices. and benefits. (Barb Jinkerson and Rae McCutcheon) The Development Charges collected by the County are for County services that are provided on a County-wide basis such as EMS and County Roads. The development charges are based upon the type of residential development and the notion that the larger the size of the development the more people it can accommodate and as a result County of Peterborough Development Charges Study Comments Page 4 of 4
increase the demand on services.
Development Charges are not calculated based on the price of the property but rather the type of the development. The county should create 2 lot levy zones and place each municipality The Development Charges are to be collected on a County wide basis within 1 of the zones. These 2 zones would have different levy rates. and an area specific charge would require an area specific The municipalities with the highest lot values go into zone 1 and pay Development Charge calculation to determine specific projects for the proposed increases. The other municipalities go into zone 2 and each area. do not get hit with a lot levy increase. 1. A more level cost structure of fees for one wishing to build a Development Charges are only one of the many factors that home especially in a more remote area of the county. determine a house price. 2. Keeping new housing as affordable as possible in these outlaying municipalities. If Development Charges are not collected for growth related 3. Keeping lot levies low in Havelock-Belmont-Methuen for increases in services then existing residents will be required to pay example, and should encourage new affordable housing for for growth related increases in services through other forms of young families, thus resulting in increased enrollment at the revenue raising such as property taxes. Havelock public school and help to ensure that the school remains open.
Page 66 of 250
THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH
BY-LAW NO.2017-XX- DRAFT
A BY-LAW OF THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
WHEREAS subsection 2(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997 (“Act”) enables the Council of a Municipality to pass By-laws to impose Development Charges against lands located in the Municipality to pay for increased capital costs where the development of the land would increase the need for Municipal services as designated in the By-law and the development requires one or more of the actions set out in Section 2. (2) of the Act; and
WHEREAS The Corporation of the County of Peterborough has determined that the development of lands within the Municipality will increase the need for municipal services and Council has confirmed it’s intent to provide the said services; and
WHEREAS The Council of The Corporation of the County of Peterborough, at its meeting of February 1, 2017, considerd a Report prepared by the Director of Planning, dated February 1, 2017 and scheduled a Public Meeting for March 15, 2017 to review a Development Charge By-law. Following this Public Meeting modifications were made to the Development Charge By-law to address comments that were provided at the Public Meeting; and
WHEREAS The Council has given Notice of its Development Charges proposal in accordance with Section 12(1) of the Act, and held a Public Meeting on November 16, 2016 and a second Public Meeting on March 15, 2017 prior to which the Study and the proposed County-wide Development Charges By-law were made available to the public in accordance with Section 10 (4) and 12 (1); an asset management plan was prepared in accordance with Section 10 (2); and, Council heard comments and representations from all persons who applied to be heard, and is satisfied that no further notice is required; and
WHEREAS Council has provided notice of intent to enact the proposed County- wide Development Charges By-law.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT The Corporation of the County of Peterborough hereby enacts the following:
1. DEFINITION
1.1 Act means the Development Charges Act, 1997 as amended from time to time and includes the Regulations passed under the Act, as amended from time to time.
1.2 In this By-law:
1.2.1 All words and phrases used in this By-law that have been defined in the Act shall have the same meaning as those words and phrases in the Act;
1.2.2 Where the Development Charges Act does not specify a definition, the following definitions shall apply to the extent that they are not in conflict with the definitions in the Act;
1.3 Affordable Housing means dwelling units within assisted or social housing programs including Habitat for Humanity and assisted living.
1.4 Agricultural Use means a bona fide farming operation;
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 1 Page 67 of 250
1.5 Apartment Dwelling means a building containing 3 or more dwelling units which have a common entrance from the street level, and the occupants of which have the right to use common elements.
1.6 Area Municipality means a lower-tier municipality that forms part of the County.
1.7 Board Of Education means a board of education, public school board, secondary school board, Catholic school board or Protestant school board.
1.8 Building Or Structure means a structure occupying an area greater that 10 square metres consisting of walls and a roof or a structural system serving the same purpose as defined in the Building Code and including carports and cloth, plastic or vinyl materials supported by structural frames but does not include awnings or an exterior storage tank.
1.9 Building Code Act means the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, chapter 23, as amended and all Regulations thereto including the Ontario Building Code, 2012, as amended.
1.10 Building Permit means a Permit issued in accordance with the Building Code Act.
1.11 Capital Costs include the following:
1. Costs to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest. 2. Costs to improve land. 3. Costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures. 4. Costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve facilities including, i. rolling stock with an estimated useful life of seven years or more, ii. furniture and equipment, other than computer equipment, and iii. materials acquired for circulation, reference or information purposes by a library board as defined in the Public Libraries Act. 5. Costs to undertake growth related studies. 6. Costs of the development charge background study. 7. Interest on money borrowed to pay for other capital costs.
1.12 Commercial Care Facility means a care facility designed for persons who require nursing and/ or homecare where common facilities and medical care may be provided such as a retirement home, long-term care home or nursing home.
1.13 Commercial Use means, notwithstanding any other provisions of this By-law, lands, buildings or structures to be developed for commercial purposes for gain or profit.
1.14 Council means the Council of the Corporation of the County of Peterborough.
1.15 County means the Corporation of the County of Peterborough.
1.16 Development means the construction, erection or placing of one or
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 2 Page 68 of 250
more buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of increasing the Total Floor Area, and includes Redevelopment.
1.17 Development Charge means a charge imposed pursuant to this By- law.
1.18 Duplex means a building that is divided horizontally into two dwelling units each of which has an independent entrance either directly or through a common vestibule.
1.19 Dwelling Unit means a combination of rooms in which a kitchen, living quarters and sanitary conveniences are provided for habitation for the exclusive use of the residents and with a private entrance from outside the building or from a common hallway or stairway inside. It may include a modular home constructed in accordance with the Building Code and C.S.A. A-277 Regulations.
1.20 Existing Lot of Record means a parcel of land which existed prior to the date of passing of this Development Charges By-law.
1.21 Farm Building means that part of a bona fide farm operation encompassing barns, silos, and other ancillary development to an agricultural use, but excluding a residential use.
1.22 Gross Floor Area means the total floor area, as hereinafter defined, exclusive of any portion of the building or structure below finished grade measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls which is used for heating, the storage of goods or personal effects, laundry facilities, recreational areas, the storage or parking of motor vehicles. Private garage, carport, basement, cellar, porch, verandah or sunroom, unless such sunroom is habitable during all seasons of the year, are not included in Gross Floor Area.
1.23 Hunt Camp means a building operated without profit or gain for the sole purpose of temporary human habitation at no other times than during established large game and waterfowl hunting seasons. For the purposes of this By-law a hunt camp is a non-residential use.
1.24 Industrial Use means thre use of lands, buildings or structures in connection with:
(a) Manufacturing, producing, processing, storing or distributing an item; (b) research or development in connection with manufacturing, producing or processing an item; (c) retail sales by a manufacturer, producer or processor of something they manufactured, produced or processed, if the retail sales are at the site where the manufacturing, production, or processing takes place; (d) office or administrative purposes, if they are: i. carried out with respect to manufacturing, producing, processing, storage or distributing of an item, and ii. in or attached to the building or structure used for that manufacturing, producing, processing, storage or distribution.
1.25 Institutional Use means the use of lands, buildings or structures for institutional purposes.
1.26 Multiple Residential means, for the purposes of this By-law, a townhouse or dwelling type other than a single-detached, semi- detached, duplex or apartment.
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 3 Page 69 of 250
1.27 Non-Residential Uses means land, buildings or structures or portions thereof used, or designed or intended to be used for a use other than for a residential use.
1.28 Owner means the owner of land or a person who has made application for an approval for the development of land upon which a Development Charge is imposed.
1.29 Redevelopment means the construction, erection or placing of one or more buildings or structures on land where all or part of a building or structure has previously been demolished on such land, or changing the use of a building or structure from residential to non- residential or from non-residential to residential.
1.30 Residential Uses means land, buildings or structures or portions thereof used, designed, or intended to be used principally (or primarily) as living accommodation for one or more individuals.
1.31 Semi-Detached Dwelling means the whole of a building divided vertically into two separate dwelling units.
1.32 Services means services designated in this By-law including Schedule A to this By-law or in agreement under Section 44 of the Act, or both.
1.33 Single Detached Dwelling means a detached building containing one principal dwelling unit.
1.34 Temporary Building Or Structure means a building or structure constructed or erected or placed on land for a continuous period not exceeding eight months, or an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of increasing the total floor area thereof for a continuous period not exceeding eight months.
1.35 Townhouse Dwelling means a dwelling unit in a building divided vertically into no less than three and no more than eight dwelling units attached by common walls extended from the base of the foundation to the roof line, each dwelling unit having a separate entrance at grade.
2. IMPOSITION OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
2.1 A Development Charge shall be paid in respect of all development, as provided in this By-law.
3. APPLICATION OF THIS BY-LAW
3.1 This By-law shall apply to all lands within The Corporation of the County of Peterborough.
3.2 Nothing in this By-law prevents the approval authority or Council, as the case may be, from requiring, as a condition of an agreement under the Planning Act, SS. 51 or 53, that the owner at his or her own expense shall install or pay for local services as the approval authority or Council may require.
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 4 Page 70 of 250
4. CALCULATION OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES – GENERAL
4.1 Development Charges shall be calculated in accordance with Schedule “C.”
5. INDEXING OF THE DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
5.1 Development Charges may be adjusted, without amendment to this By-law, on the first day of January in each year, beginning with January 1, 2018, using the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Non- Residential Building Construction Price Index, in accordance with the Development Charges Act.
6. CALCULATION OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES – RESIDENTIAL
6.1 Development Charges shall apply to each dwelling unit in every development, whether single-use or mixed-use. Development that is exempt from Development Charges is outlined in Section 8.
6.2 No Development Charges are payable in the following cases:
6.2.1 Where an existing dwelling is enlarged renovated or repaired;
6.2.2 Where a maximum of two additional dwelling units are being created within an existing single detached dwelling;
6.2.3 Where a maximum of one additional dwelling unit is being created in a semi-detached or townhouse, provided the gross floor area of the additional dwelling unit is less than or equal to the gross floor area of the dwelling unit already in the building;
6.2.4 Where a maximum of one additional dwelling unit is being created in any other residential class of building, provided the gross floor area of the additional dwelling unit is less than or equal to the gross floor area of the smallest dwelling unit already in the building;
6.2.5 Where a dwelling unit is demolished and reconstruction or redevelopment occurs within 5 years.
7. CALCULATION OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES – NON- RESIDENTIAL
7.1 Development Charges shall apply to each non-residential building in every development. Development that is exempt from Development Charges is outlined in Section 8.
7.2 Development Charge shall be payble where the gross floor area of an existing non-residential building is enlarged. The payable Development Charges shall be based on the increase in Gross Floor Area.
7.3 Community care facilities shall be subject to the non-residential development charge.
7.4 No Development Charges are payable in the following cases:
7.4.1 Where a non-residential building is demolished and reconstruction or redevelopment occurs within 5 years.
7.4.2 Where a hunt camp is less than 112 m2 of gross floor area.
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 5 Page 71 of 250
8. EXEMPT BUILDINGS
8.1 Non-residential buildings used accessory to a bona fide agricultural operation shall be exempt from the Development Charge.
8.2 Buildings owned and used by the County or area municipality, or any Board of Education used for school purposes shall be exempt from the Development Charge.
8.3 Temporary buildings where the owner has completed an agreement with the County or area municipalityspecifying the owner’s obligation to remove the building.
8.4 Places of worship for religious uses that are exempt from Provincial taxes pursuant to the Provincial Land Tax Act RSO 1990, cP32 as amended.
8.5 Land owned by and used for the purposes of a Municipality or a board as defined in subsection 1 (1) of the Education Act, is exempt from a Development Charge by reason only that it is exempt from taxation under section 3 of the Assessment Act;
8.6 Buildings or structures used as public hospitals governed by the Public Hospitals Act;
8.7 Land, buildings or structures used for institutional church use and exempt from taxation under section 3 of the Assessment Act;
8.8 The development of non-residential farm buildings constructed for bona fide farm uses, which qualify as a farm business, being that which operates with a valid Farm Business Registration Number and is assessed in the Farmland Realty Tax Class;
8.9 Industrial Uses;
8.10 The first 250 square metres of a non-residential building; and
8.11 Affordable Housing.
9. REDEVELOPMENT
9.1 In accordance with Subsections 9.2, 9.3 & 9.4 where there is a redevelopment, conversion, demolition or change of use of a building or structure or part thereof, the Development Charges payable by the new or proposed development shall be credited by the amount to which the previous use of the building or structure was subject to Development Charges at the time this By-law was passed.
9.2 A credit shall not be warranted where a building or structure or part thereof was demolished and no building permit has been issued within 5 years from the date of issuance of the demolition permit.
9.3 The credit with respect to a redevelopment, conversion, demolition, or change of use of a building or structure or part thereof shall not exceed the amount of the Development Charges payable with respect to new or proposed development.
9.4 No credit shall be given with respect to the redevelopment, conversions, demolition, or change of use of a building or structure or part thereof where the existing building or structure or part thereof would have been exempt from Development Charges in accordance with this By-law.
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 6 Page 72 of 250
10. PAYMENT OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
10.1 Except as otherwise provided in this By-law, Development Charges shall be calculated and payable in full on the date that the first building permit is issued.
10.2 Except as otherwise provided in this By-law, whereby multiple building permits are required for development, Development Charges shall be calculated and payable in full, on the date that the first building permit is issued.
10.3 Except as otherwise provided in this By-law, if a development consists of two or more phases that will not be constructed concurrently and are anticipated to be completed in different years, each phase of the development is deemed to be a separate development for the purposes of payment of a Development Charge.
10.4 Except as otherwise provided in this By-law, a building permit shall not be issued until the Development Charge has been paid in full.
11. WRITTEN AGREEMENTS WITH THE COUNTY
11.1 Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, Council may enter into written agreements in regard to all matters authorized by the Act and general law.
11.2 The applicable provisions of this By-law may be varied in individual instances by the written agreements, as permitted by the Act.
11.3 Council has the power to enter into agreements to reduce or waive Development Charges that are payable under the Act and this By- law.
11.4 Agreements may give credit to the owner equal to the reasonable cost of providing services in addition to, or of a greater size or capacity, than would be required under this By-law. The credit shall not exceed the service standard used in the calculation of the Development Charge, and no credit shall be charged to any Development Charges reserve fund prescribed in this By-law or exceed the proportion of the Development Charge related to that service, payable by the owner to the County.
11.5 Agreements may provide for all or any part of a Development Charge to be paid before or after it would otherwise be payable.
11.6 Front-ending agreements entered into under the provisions of Section 44 of the Act shall be deemed to be agreements under this section.
11.7 This By-law shall prevail over any previous agreements between a property owner and the County with respect to the payment of impost fees, lot levies or Development Charges. However, where fees or charges have been paid for services included in this By-law pursuant to an agreement that was registered on the title of the lands prior to the passing of this By-law, the County shall apply that fee as a credit against the applicable Development Charge.
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 7 Page 73 of 250
12. ADMINISTRATION
12.1 A certified copy of this By-law may be registered on title to any land to which the By-law applies.
12.2 This By-law shall be administered by the Treasurer of the County.
13. RESERVE FUNDS
13.1 Monies received from payment of Development Charges shall be maintained in separate reserve funds, and shall be used only to meet the growth-related net capital costs for which the Development Charge was levied under this By-law.
13.2 Where any Development Charge, or part thereof, remains unpaid after the due date, the unpaid amount shall be added to the tax roll and shall be collected as taxes. Where any unpaid Development Charges are collected as taxes, the monies so collected shall be credited to the Development Charge reserve funds.
13.3 The Treasurer of the County shall, in each year on or before July 1, commencing 2017 for the 2016 year, furnish to Council, a statement in respect of the reserve funds established hereunder for the prior year, containing the information set out in Section 12 of O.Reg. 82/98.
13.4 The Treasurer shall make available to the publc, the statement, as well as projects whose capital costs were funded under a Development Charges By-law during the year and the manner in which any portion of the capital cost not funded under the By-law was or will be funded.
14. REFUNDS
14.1 Where this By-law or any Development Charge prescribed hereunder is amended or repealed either by order of the Ontario Municipal Board or by Council, the County shall forthwith pay the appropriate refund, calculated in accordance with the Act and Regulations passed under the Act.
15. SCHEDULES
15.1 The following schedules to this By-law form an integral part of this By-law;
15.2 Schedule “A” - Classification of Services
15.3 Schedule “B” - Components of Development Charge
15.4 Schedule “C” – Development Charge Schedule
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 8 Page 74 of 250
16. GENERAL
16.1 This By-law comes into full force and effect on May 1, 2017 and all other Development Charges By-laws are hereby repealed.
16.2 Unless repealed earlier, or unless the term of the By-law is extended by legislation, this By-law expires five years from the day it comes into force.
16.3 Where in this By-law the context so requires, words in the singular include the plural and words in the plural include the singular, and words importing the masculine gender include feminine and neutral gender.
16.4 Any portion of this By-law found to be invalid shall be severed, and the balance of the By-law shall be deemed to be valid and enforceable and shall be construed without reference to the invalid portions.
FINALLY PASSED AND ENACTED this INSERT Day of INSERT, 2017.
Warden
CAO/Clerk
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 9 Page 75 of 250
Schedule “A” Classification of Services
Transportation
Emergency Medical Services
Emergency Measures
Long-Term Care
Social Services
Administration
Health Unit
Waste Diversion
Transit
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 10 Page 76 of 250
Schedule “B” Components of Development Charge
Residential Charge Service Area Percent of Residential Charge Transportation 86.47% Emergency Medical 3.4% Services Emergency Measures 0.33% Long-Term Care 4.73% (Fairhaven) Social Services 2.77% Adminstration 0.71% Health Unit 1.51% Waste Diversion 0.01% Transit 0.07% Total 100%
Non-Residential Charge Service Area Percent of Non- Residential Charge Transportation 86.47% Emergency Medical 3.4% Services Emergency Measures 0.33% Long-Term Care 4.73% (Fairhaven) Social Services 2.77% Adminstration 0.71% Health Unit 1.51% Waste Diversion 0.01% Transit 0.07% Total 100%
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 11 Page 77 of 250
Schedule “C” Development Charge Schedule
Year Single-Detached, Multiple Small Multiple Non- Semi-Detached Residential Residential Residential Duplex (< 93m2)* (per m2) (>103m2)* Single-Detached, Semi-Detached Apartment Duplex(<103m2)*
May 1, First 250 2017 to sq.m. May 1, $7,627.74 $5,085.16 $3,955.12 exempt, 2022 then $11.77 thereafter
* The areas outlined above represent the gross floor area.
Development Charges By-law No.2017-XX County of Peterborough Page 12 Page 78 of 250 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY
Date: April 11, 2017
Prepared for: County of Peterborough
Prepared by: MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited (MHBC) 113 Collier Street Barrie ON L4M 1H2 T: 705 728 0045 Ext.222 F: 705 728 2010
Our File 90103C
Page 79 of 250 PREFACE ...... 1 SECTION A – PURPOSE OF REPORT ...... 2 SECTION B – PROJECTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH .... 3 SECTION C – DETERMINING THE RESIDENTIAL AND NON- RESIDENTIAL SPLIT ...... 5 SECTION D – HOW THIS STUDY WAS COMPLETED ...... 6 SECTION E – TRANSPORTATION ...... 11 E1. ROADS, BRIDGES AND CULVERTS ...... 11 E2. PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS ...... 11 E3. PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLES ...... 12 E4. PUBLIC WORKS SMALL EQUIPMENT ...... 12 E5. SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 12 SECTION F –EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ...... 14 F1. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES STATIONS ...... 14 F2. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES VEHICLES ...... 14 F3. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES UNIFORMs ...... 15 F4. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SMALL EQUIPMENT ...... 15 F5. SUMMARY OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 15 SECTION G – EMERGENCY MEASURES ...... 16 G1. EMERGENCY MEASURES VEHICLES ...... 16 G3. SUMMARY OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 16 SECTION H – LONG-TERM CARE ...... 17 H1. FACILITIES ...... 17 H2. FAIRHAVEN OFFICE STAFF ...... 17 H3. SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM CARE DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 17 SECTION I – PETERBOROUGH COUNTY CITY HEALTH UNIT ...... 19 I1. FACILITIES ...... 19 I2. SUMMARY OF PETERBOROUGH COUNTY CITY HEALTH UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 19 SECTION J – SOCIAL SERVICES ...... 20 J1. CAPITAL FUNDING ...... 20 J2. SUMMARY OF SOCIAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 20 SECTION K – ADMINISTRATION ...... 21 K1. OFFICE STAFF ...... 21 K2. GROWTH RELATED STUDIES ...... 21 K3. SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 22 SECTION L – WASTE DIVERSION ...... 23 L1. VEHICLES ...... 23 L2. SUMMARY OF WASTE DIVERSION DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 23 SECTION M – TRANSIT ...... 24 M1. VEHICLES ...... 24 M2. SUMMARY OF TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ...... 24
Page 80 of 250 SECTION N – NON-RESIDENTIAL CHARGE ...... 25 SECTION O – PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS ...... 26 SECTION P – SUMMARY / RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 28 P1. SUMMARY ...... 28 P2. RECOMMENDATION ...... 31
Attachments - Table 'A' Peterborough Development Charges Workbook - Appendices 1 through 9 – Background Tables
Page 81 of 250 PREFACE
This Development Charges Background Study has been prepared in accordance with the Development Charges Act and its regulations. The Development Charges Act requires the County of Peterborough to complete a Development Charges Background Study prior to enacting a Development Charges By-law. While the maximum allowable charge must be calculated, the County may choose a lesser amount of charge to implement by By-law.
Sections A through D of this Report provide an introduction to Development Charges and the methodology for calculating the maximum allowable Development Charge.
Sections E through M provide a summary of each area of the Development Charge and how the charge was calculated. These sections should be read in conjunction with Table A and Appendices 1 through 9 which are located at the conclusion of the Report.
The values in the various Tables in Sections E through M relate to the maximum allowable Development Charge that is calculated in Table A. Table A provides a detailed breakdown of how the maximum allowable Development Charge has been calculated for the County of Peterborough. Appendices 1 through 9 contain the background information that was obtained from the County and upon which Table A is based.
Section N provides a summary of the maximum allowable Non-Residential Development Charge.
Sections O and P provide Public Meeting comments and a summary of the maximum Development Charge and recommended charge to be collected.
1 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017
Page 82 of 250 SECTION A – PURPOSE OF REPORT
A1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Development Charges Background Report is to provide the basis for the preparation of a Development Charge By-law for the County of Peterborough. This Report identifies the maximum allowable Development Charge that may be levied by the County. When approved, the Development Charges By-law will apply for a maximum of five years in accordance with the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended.
Development Charges are municipal fees levied against new development to finance the growth-related capital costs associated with meeting the service requirements of new development. The underlying principle of Development Charges is that growth should pay for capital costs associated with servicing new growth and should not place a burden on existing taxpayers. When capital costs associated with new growth are not recovered from Development Charges, the result is higher taxes for existing ratepayers or a lower level of service being provided by the County.
The County of Peterborough is in the process of preparing its third Development Charges Background Study, since the Development Charges Act came into effect in 1997. The current Development Charge applies to residential development in both the rural and urban area as well as non-residential development across the County.
In 2011, the County undertook a Development Charges Study.
At the end of 2011, Council passed By-law 2011-67 to implement the 2011 Development Charges Background Report.
In 2013, County Council expressed a desire to create a Development Charge for multi-unit residential development. Subsequently, an updated Background Report and By-law were completed in 2013.
2 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 83 of 250 SECTION B – PROJECTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
B1. The intent of the Development Charges Act, 1997 is to ensure that new growth is responsible for the capital costs associated with maintaining an appropriate level of service to accommodate new growth and development. On this basis, the first step in the Development Charges process is to determine how much growth and development is expected to occur in the County. According to the Development Charges Act, 1997, the Development Charge should be calculated using a ten-year growth forecast.
B2. The Province has provided a population and employment forecast under the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (The Growth Plan). These forecasts provide the basis for new housing associated with population growth. On the basis of the Growth Plan forecasts and an average household size of 2.55 persons per household, 3,282 new dwelling units are forecasted to be required over the next ten years.
B3. The County’s Growth Management work and Statistics Canada identify an average household size of 2.55 persons per household for the County. In this Report housing styles have been classified into three categories. Table 1 provides an outline of the three classifications of housing styles.
Table 1 RESIDENTIAL HOUSING STYLES
Dwelling Unit Type Density P.P.H
Semi/ Single Detached Low 2.7 Multi Unit Medium 1.8 Apartments High 1.4 *Source: November 2013 Development Charges Report
B4. The Growth Plan also contains forecasts on the amount of jobs that will be required to 2041. Using this information, an average of 13,140 square metres of non-residential floor space is projected per year, for a total of 131,400 square metres of non-residential floor space over the next ten years.
3 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 84 of 250 B5. Once the amount of growth for Peterborough County has been projected, it is necessary to predict where growth will occur within the County. Historically, growth in the County has primarily occurred though the consent and subdivision process. It is anticipated that some development will continue to occur in rural areas though the consent process, and on existing lots of record. However, the majority of growth is anticipated to occur in the serviced settlement areas of the County in accordance with the draft Growth Management Study. It is noted that the County Development Charge is an area-wide charge.
4 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 85 of 250 SECTION C – DETERMINING THE RESIDENTIAL AND NON- RESIDENTIAL SPLIT
In order to determine the share of future growth related capital costs that should be attributed to residential development or non-residential development, a review of the County’s assessment has been undertaken. The relative proportions of residential and non-residential assessment are used to determine the allocation of capital costs between residential and non-residential uses. In Peterborough County over the past ten years residential assessment has accounted for an average of 93.86% of total assessment while commercial/industrial assessment has accounted for an average of 6.14% of total assessment. This study, assumes that the assessment split will remain constant over the next ten years and that residential and non-residential growth should each pay their proportionate share of future capital costs based on these percentages. The calculations made for average level of service for the last ten years have been calculated based on an average dwelling unit size of 2.55 persons per household.
5 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 86 of 250 SECTION D – HOW THIS STUDY WAS COMPLETED
The calculation of the Development Charge follows the methodology outlined in Section 5 of the Development Charges Act, 1997. Below is a description of the methodology used in preparing this study for the County of Peterborough:
D1. The first step in calculating the Development Charge was to anticipate the amount, type and location of development. This has already been discussed in Section B of this Report.
D2. Next, the services that are eligible to be included in the Development Charge were determined. In the case of the County of Peterborough, eligible services include:
Transportation; Emergency measures; Emergency medical services; Health services; Long-term care; Social Services; Transit; Waste diversion; and Administrative services (including planning).
D3. The next step is to determine the average level of service. The Development Charges Act, 1997 states that the average level of service that existed in the last ten years should be used as a benchmark for planning future capital requirements. For example, if an average of 1 ambulance existed for every 1,000 people in the last ten years, and the population was projected to grow by 1,000 people, an additional ambulance would be required to maintain the historical average level of service.
This is an important component of the study process since the legislation clearly requires that a County cannot collect Development Charges to facilitate an increase in the average level of service it provides, even if an increase in the level of service is planned.
In order to determine the average level of service in the last ten years, the level of service in each of the last ten years is divided by the number of
6 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 87 of 250 dwelling units for that year, and then averaged to determine an average level of service for the ten year time period. In accordance with the Regulations of the Development Charges Act, the replacement cost of municipal capital works is used to calculate the average level of service.
D4. The next step is to anticipate the increased need for service that can be attributed to new development. In the County, it is anticipated that new development will generally place the same demands on service as existing development.
D5. The capital costs required to maintain the average level of service over the next ten years is then estimated. Eligible capital costs include:
the cost to acquire land; the cost to improve land; the cost to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; and, the cost to acquire, lease, construct or improve facilities including: rolling stock with an estimated useful life of seven years or more; and furniture and equipment other than computer equipment.
Growth related studies are also permitted to be included within the Development Charge, provided the study deals with capital improvements, and is required because of expected future growth. For example, the Official Plan Review is eligible.
Interest on money borrowed to pay for the costs associated with the bulleted items above can also be included in the calculation of the charge if deemed appropriate.
In most cases, the dwelling unit share of the replacement cost for capital items (with a few exceptions) was established. The intent is that, as the population increases, a portion of that growth should also pay for the dwelling unit cost of the capital items that will eventually be needed to maintain the existing average level of service.
D6. The increase in the need for service that is attributed to growth must then be reduced by the portion of the increase that can be met using the County’s excess capacity. This means that facilities that have been oversized historically have to be reviewed.
7 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 88 of 250 D7. The increase in the need for a service must then be reduced by the extent to which it will benefit existing development and in the case of roads and related development post the ten-year Study timeframe. The determination of how the increase in the need for service will benefit existing development is subjective and requires a good understanding of the potential benefit to existing uses.
D8. The amount of money held in Development Charge reserves also needs to be factored into the Development Charge calculation. The Development Charge must be reduced by the amount of money in the reserve fund. The Development Charge Calculation utilizes the amount of money in the reserve fund at the end of 2016 and reduces it by the amount that is committed to be spent in 2017.
D9. The capital costs of the Development Charge calculation must be reduced by the amount of the grants expected to be received from other levels of government or agencies.
D10. The Development Charges Act, 1997 also requires that many of these capital costs be reduced by 10%. This is often referred to as the 10% discounting rule. The capital costs associated with road improvements and transit are excluded from the 10% discounting rule. All other areas of the calculation must be discounted by 10%.
D11. Once the amount of the net capital costs are known (after the discounts are deducted), the costs are then allocated to residential and non- residential development.
The residential share is 93.86% as described in Section C. The residential share is applied to the net capital cost after all deductions and then multiplied by the average household size according to dwelling type to derive at a Development Charge per dwelling unit.
The Development Charges Act, 1997 does not permit the collection of Development Charges for the enlargement of a dwelling unit or the creation of two or fewer additional dwelling units in an existing residential building.
Non-residential development accounts for approximately 6.14% of total assessment in the County of Peterborough. In calculating the Non- Residential Development Charge, the non-residential share of assessment is applied to the net capital after all deductions. This value is then divided by the projected amount of commercial and industrial space to be developed over the next ten years to yield a Development Charge per
8 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 89 of 250 square metre. Section N provides an outline of the Non-Residential Development Charge.
D12. On January 1, 2016, through Bill 73 amendments came into effect to the Development Charges Act, 1997.
The following is a summary of the changes to the Development Charges Act as it relates to the County of Peterborough.
Waste Diversion Prior to the amendment, the provision of waste management services was ineligible to be collected through Development Charges. Through the amendment, the provision of landfill sites and services and the provision of facilities and services for the incineration of waste are ineligible. This amendment allows municipalities to use Development Charges to help fund waster diversion. The County administers a recycling program and therefore the capital costs for recycling can now be recovered through Development Charges.
Transit The Development Charges Act current requires a mandatory 10% discount to certain services. Transit has been removed from this list and no longer requires a mandatory 10% discount. The County Care Mobile will no longer be discounted by 10%. In addition, the reporting requirements for transit have been expanded for the Asset Management Plan.
Development Charges Background Study The Development Charges Background Study must be made available to the public at least 60 days prior to the passing of the Development Charge By- law, previously it was required to be provided 20 days prior. The Background Study is now required to include an Asset Management Plan prepared in accordance with the prescribed manner of the Development Charges Act. The asset management plans must reflect full lifecycle costs. The County’s Asset Management Plan has been completed in accordance with the requirements of the Development Charges Act.
Reporting Requirements Prior to amendments, the Development Charges Act only required the Treasurer of a Municipality to provide Council with a financial statement relating to Development Charge By-laws and reserve funds, including, for the preceding year, the opening and closing balances and transactions relating to the reserve funds.
9 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 90 of 250 The amendments to the Development Charges Act require that statements should be made available to the public and identify all assets whose capital costs were funded under a Development Charges By-law during the year and the manner in which any portion of the capital cost not funded under the by-law was or will be funded.
Multiple Building Permits Section 26 of the Development Charges Act addresses when the Development Charges must be paid. A new section has been added to Section 26 whereby multi-permit developments are required to pay development charges upon the first building permit being issued.
In addition, if a development consists of two or more phases that will not be constructed concurrently and are anticipated to be completed in different years, each phase of the development is deemed to be a separate development for the purposes of Section 26.
No Additional Levies The amendment includes a provision that specifically provides that a municipality shall not impose a charge, directly or indirectly, related to a development or a requirement to construct a service related to development except as permitted by the Development Charges Act or another act. It is intended to close the door on “voluntary” payments that may be sought by municipalities outside the legislative framework.
10 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 91 of 250 SECTION E – TRANSPORTATION
Below is a description of the capital costs related to public works and transportation which are anticipated to be expended in the next ten years to accommodate growth. The detailed calculations for each capital cost item are contained on Table A, and Tables 1 through 5 of Appendix 1.
E1. ROADS, BRIDGES AND CULVERTS
The County currently maintains 715 kilometres of roads (1,430 kilometres of lanes) with a net value of approximately $63,347,589. The County also maintains 130 bridges and 26 long span culverts with an estimated value of $14,457,983 and $289,571 respectively. The County of Peterborough Public Works Department prepared a Capital Asset Management Plan in December 2013 and an updated Transportation Master Plan in 2014. It is projected that over the next ten years the County will spend $20,624,818 on growth related road projects.
Table 1 in Appendix 1 identifies the projected value of growth related road related projects to occur in the County over the next ten years. These projections were obtained from Staff.
The Development Charges Act, 1997 does not require that road improvements be discounted by a value of 10% as is the case with some other services covered in the Development Charge.
In order to maintain the historic level of service, $20,316,509 should be collected though Development Charges for future road works.
E2. PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS
The County of Peterborough maintains a number of Public Works buildings for the storage of equipment and materials. The level of service over the last 10 years for the material storage buildings has been equal to 1.6 ft2 per dwelling unit. In order to maintain the current average level of service, 5,465 ft2 of floor space will need to be added to the roads material storage buildings at an estimated cost of $150.00 per ft2. Following mandated discounts, and growth related reductions, $737,823 should be collected through Development Charges in order to maintain the existing level of service over the next ten years.
The level of service over the last ten years for equipment buildings has been equal to 0.9 ft2 per dwelling unit. In order to maintain the current
11 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 92 of 250 average level of service, 3,114 ft2 of floor space will need to be added to the roads equipment buildings at an estimated cost of per $200.00 ft2. Following mandated discounts, and growth related reductions, $560,514 should be collected through Development Charges in order to maintain the existing level of service over the next ten years.
E3. PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLES
Over the last ten years, the value of County public works vehicles with a lifespan of greater than seven years has been $50.96 per dwelling unit. Although the purchase of new vehicles is required to maintain the average level of service, these new vehicles will also benefit existing development. Following mandated discounts, and growth related reductions, $157,978 should be collected through Development Charges in order to maintain the existing level of service over the next ten years.
E4. PUBLIC WORKS SMALL EQUIPMENT
The Development Charges Act, 1997 enables the County to include small equipment within the calculation vehicles that have a service life of longer than seven years. Over the last ten years, the value of County public works small equipment with a lifespan of greater than seven years has been $39.51 per dwelling unit. Following mandated discounts, and growth related reductions, $122,476 should be collected through Development Charges in order to maintain the existing level of service over the next ten years.
E5. SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for Transportation can be found in Appendix 1, Tables 1 through 5. On the basis of the calculations made in this Section of the Report, Table 2 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for Transportation.
12 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 93 of 250
Table 2 TRANSPORTATION
Charge Per Percent of Item Dwelling Total Roads, Bridges & Culverts $5,810.01 80.7% Roads Building (Storage) $211.00 2.9% Roads Building (Equipment) $160.29 2.2% Vehicles $45.18 0.6% Small Equipment $35.03 0.49% Sub-Total: $6,261.51 86.92%
13 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 94 of 250 SECTION F –EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
This section of the Report provides a summary of the capital costs related to Peterborough County/City Paramedics (PCCP). Paramedic Services are administered by the County for the City. The funding model is based upon the Consolidated Municipal Service Agreement between the City of Peterborough and the County of Peterborough. The County contributes 41.68% of the capital costs while the City contributes 58.32%. The values have been calculated based on the average level of service provided over the last ten years. Detailed calculations for each capital cost item are contained in Table A and Appendix 2, Tables 1 through 4.
F1. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES STATIONS
The County of Peterborough currently has five paramedic stations. The headquarters is located in the City of Peterborough with additional stations located in Apsley, Buckhorn, Lakefield and Norwood. Over the last ten years the existing stations have provided an average level of service which is equal to 1.1 ft2 per dwelling unit. If the average level of service is to be maintained over the next ten years, 3,967 ft2 will have to be added to the existing stations to cover the County share of growth.
It is anticipated that a new station will be developed on the west side of the City of Peterborough to provide balanced EMS coverage across the City. Based on construction costs of EMS stations in other jurisdictions, it is conservatively estimated that it would cost $200 ft2 to build the additional floor space. At this cost, it is anticipated that $713,984 would be required to be collected through the Development Charge over the next ten years to cover the County share of growth related capital costs.
F2. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES VEHICLES
Over the last ten years the value of Emergency Medical Services vehicles has been equal to $33.19 per dwelling unit. To maintain the current level of service, $97,903 should be generated through the Development Charge over the next ten years to cover the County share of growth related capital costs.
14 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 95 of 250 F3. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES UNIFORMS
Over the last ten years the number of paramedics has increased from 48 to 60 paramedics serving the County (full and part-time). It is estimated to cost $900 to outfit each paramedic. In order to maintain the same level of service, 5.83 additional paramedics will have to be added over the next ten years. The Development Charge should generate $4,427 to cover the County share of growth related cost of additional paramedic uniforms.
F4. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES SMALL EQUIPMENT
The combined value of the all the Emergency Medical Services’ small equipment is $8,400 accordingly, the average level of service for Peterborough residents is equal to $12.33 per dwelling unit. To maintain the current level of service, after deductions from the reserve fund, $36,372 should be generated from the Development Charge to cover the growth related cost of Emergency Medical Services’ small equipment.
F5. SUMMARY OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for Emergency Medical Services can be found in Appendix 2, Tables 1 through 4. The Development Charges Act, 1997 requires that Emergency Medical Services be discounted by a value of 10%. On the basis of the calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 3 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for Emergency Medical Services.
Table 3 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Charge Per Percent Of Item Dwelling Total EMS Stations $204.18 2.83% Vehicles $28.00 0.39% Uniforms $1.27 0.02% Small Equipment $10.40 0.14% Sub-Total $243.85 3.38%
15 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 96 of 250 SECTION G – EMERGENCY MEASURES
This section of the Report provides a summary of the capital costs related to The County of Peterborough Emergency Measures Department. Emergency Measures program is funded 100% by the County. The Emergency Plan for the County of Peterborough provides co-ordinated emergency support to municipalities in the event of an emergency. The values have been calculated based on the average level of service provide over the last ten years. Detailed calculations for each capital cost item are contained in Table A and Appendix 3, Table 1.
G1. EMERGENCY MEASURES VEHICLES
The County of Peterborough currently has vehicles for the Emergency Measures Department. Over the last ten years the value of the vehicles has been equal to $27.96 per dwelling unit. To maintain the current level of service, $80,877 should be generated through the Development Charge over the next ten years.
G3. SUMMARY OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for Emergency Measures can be found in Appendix 3, Table 1. The Development Charges Act, 1997 requires that Emergency Measures to be discounted by a value of 10%. On the basis of the calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 4 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for Emergency Measures.
Table 4 EMERGENCY MEASURES SERVICES
Charge Per Percent Of Item Dwelling Total Vehicles $23.13 0.32%
Sub-Total $23.13 0.32%
16 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 97 of 250 SECTION H – LONG-TERM CARE
The County of Peterborough and the City of Peterborough jointly own and operate the Fairhaven Long-Term Care Facility. The County of Peterborough owns one third of the facility. The building has a total square footage of 157,900 with 256 long-term care beds. Capital improvements are planned for an 80,000 square foot addition to add 128 long-term care beds. The facility has 13 full time staff and 4 part-time staff. This section provides a description of capital expenditures required to maintain the current level of service based on the projected population growth over the next ten years. Detailed calculations for each capital cost item are contained in Table A and Appendix 4, Tables 1 and 2.
H1. FACILITIES
The 157,900 square foot Fairhaven building was built in 2003. The average level of service for the County’s portion over the last ten years is equal to 1.57 ft2 per dwelling unit. A total of 5,502 ft2 of building space will be required over the next ten years to maintain the current average level of service. At an estimated cost of $250 per square foot, after mandated discounts the Development Charge is required to generate $929,426 to maintain the average level of service over the next ten years.
H2. FAIRHAVEN OFFICE STAFF
As the demand for long-term care increases additional employees will be required for administrative purposes. The current staffing level is 13 full time staff and 4 part-time staff. Over the last ten years, the average value of office equipment for full-time staff has been $2,000 per staff. There has been an average of 0.04 staff per 1,000 dwelling units. In order to maintain the average level of service over the next ten years it is estimated that an additional 0.13 staff members would be required to be added. To help cover the costs of additional employees the capital costs associated with a new employee may be included in the Development Charge (excluding computer equipment). To maintain the average level of service $179,186 should be collected through the Development Charge over the next ten years.
H3. SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM CARE DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for Long-Term Care can be found in Appendix 4, Tables 1-2. The Development Charges Act, 1997 requires that long-term care be discounted by a value of 10% as is the case with most other services covered in the Development Charge. On the basis of the
17 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 98 of 250 calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 5 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for Long-Term care.
Table 5 LONG-TERM CARE
Charge Per Percent Of Item Dwelling Total Facilities $265.79 3.69% Office Equipment $51.24 0.71%
Sub-Total: $317.04 4.40%
18 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 99 of 250 SECTION I – PETERBOROUGH COUNTY CITY HEALTH UNIT
The Peterborough County City Health Unit (PCCHU) serves residents within the City of Peterborough and throughout the County. The County City Health Unit previously operated at 10 Hospital Drive, a building owned by the Board of Health and rented additional space at another location. 10 Hospital Drive was originally built to house 44 staff; the PCCHU now has over 125 staff. In 2015 PCCHU purchased three floors at 135 King Street in downtown Peterborough. Detailed calculations for each capital cost item are contained in Table A and Appendix 5, Table 1.
I1. FACILITIES
The average level of service over the last 10 years for PCCHU buildings is equal to 0.63 ft2 per dwelling unit. A total of 2,213 ft2 of building space will be required over the next ten years to maintain the current average level of service. At an estimated cost of per $200 ft2, after mandated discounts the Development Charge is required to generate $355,868 to maintain the average level of service over the next ten years.
I2. SUMMARY OF PETERBOROUGH COUNTY CITY HEALTH UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for County City Health Unit can be found in Appendix 5, Table 1. The Development Charges Act, 1997 requires that the PCCHU be discounted by a value of 10% as is the case with most other services covered in the Development Charge. On the basis of the calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 6 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for the PCCHU.
Table 6 PETERBOROUGH COUNTY CITY HEALTH UNIT
Charge Per Percent Of Item Dwelling Total Facilities $101.77 1.41% Sub-Total: $101.77 1.41%
19 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 100 of 250 SECTION J – SOCIAL SERVICES
Social services are operated by the City of Peterborough on behalf of the County of Peterborough. As part of the County budget funding is provided to the City to operate the services. Since only capital costs can be recovered by the Development Charge, a review of the budget identified that a portion of the social services, child services and social housing funding is capital related and can be recovered through Development Charges. Information is only available for the past three years. Detailed calculations for each capital cost item are contained in Table A and Appendix 6, Table 1.
J1. CAPITAL FUNDING
The average level of service over the last three years for social service funding is equal to $221.06 per dwelling unit. A total of $772,988 in capital funding will be required over the next ten years to maintain the current average level of service. After mandated discounts the Development Charge is required to generate $695,689 to maintain the average level of service over the next ten years.
J2. SUMMARY OF SOCIAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for Social Services can be found in Appendix 6, Table 1. The Development Charges Act, 1997 requires that Social Services be discounted by a value of 10% as is the case with most other services covered in the Development Charge. On the basis of the calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 7 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for Social Services.
Table 7 SOCIAL SERVICES
Charge Per Percent Of Item Dwelling Total Capital Funding $198.95 2.76% Sub-Total: $198.95 2.76%
20 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 101 of 250 SECTION K – ADMINISTRATION
The Development Charges Act, 1997 places restrictions on eligible components of the Development Charge related to administration. Most significantly, the Act precludes the inclusion of administrative buildings or additions thereto from the Development Charge. Computer systems used for administrative purposes are also not eligible. Administrative components of the Development Charge include growth related studies and office equipment. Table A and Appendix 7, Tables 1 and 2, provide a detailed breakdown of the administration Development Charge.
K1. OFFICE STAFF
As the population of the County of Peterborough increases, additional municipal employees will be required for administrative purposes. The current staffing level is 61 persons. Over the last ten years there has been an average of 1.7 staff persons per 1,000 dwelling units. In order to maintain the average level of service over the next ten years it is estimated that an 5.8 additional staff members would be required to be added. To help cover the costs of additional employees the capital costs associated with a new employee may be included in the Development Charge (excluding computer equipment). It is estimated that $1,200 is require to furnish each administrative workstation. To maintain the average level of service $6,192 should be collected through the Development Charge over the next ten years.
K2. GROWTH RELATED STUDIES
The Development Charges Act, 1997 permits the County to include growth related studies in the Development Charge. Growth related studies that are estimated to occur in the next ten years include:
Official Plan Review Development Charges Study Natural Heritage Study Private Roads Study Active Transportation Study
The cost of these studies is estimated to be $270,000 with $200,000 being growth related. Appendix 7, Table 2 provides a detailed breakdown of the costs of these studies and the proportions of each study that is considered to be growth related.
21 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 102 of 250 After mandated discounts $176,720 should be collected through Development Charges over the next ten years to cover the growth related component of these studies.
K3. SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for Administration can be found in Appendix 7, Tables 1 and 2. On the basis of the calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 8 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for Administration.
Table 8 ADMINISTRATION
Charge Per Percent of Item Dwelling Total Office staff $1.77 0.02% Growth related $50.54 0.70% Studies Sub-Total: $52.31 0.73%
22 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 103 of 250 SECTION L – WASTE DIVERSION
With the revisions to the Development Charges Act in 2015, waste diversion (recycling and composting) capital costs can now be recovered by the Development Charge. The County of Peterborough contracts recycling pick up to a third party and therefore the does not own the recycling vehicles. The County does own a vehicle for waste diversion services. Table A and Appendix 8, Table 1, provide a detailed breakdown of the Waste Diversion Development Charge.
L1. VEHICLES
The average level of service over the last ten years for the value of waste diversion vehicles with a lifespan of greater than seven years has been equal to $0.82 per dwelling unit. Following mandated discounts, and growth related reductions, $2,570 should be collected through Development Charges in order to maintain the existing level of service over the next ten years.
L2. SUMMARY OF WASTE DIVERSION DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for waste diversion can be found in Appendix 8, Table 1. The Development Charges Act, 1997 requires that waste diversion be discounted by a value of 10% as is the case with most other services covered in the Development Charge. On the basis of the calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 9 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for waste diversion.
Table 9 WASTE DIVERSION
Charge Per Percent of Item Dwelling Total Vehicles $0.74 0.01%
Sub-Total: $0.74 0.01%
23 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 104 of 250 SECTION M – TRANSIT
The City of Peterborough operates a transit system within the City limits. Outside of the City of Peterborough the County operates the Caremobile transit system in conjunction with the Central East LHIN. The Caremobile buses can accommodate up to three wheelchairs and / or up to eight seated individuals. The Caremobile vehicles travel throughout the County to take clients to destinations in the County or City of Peterborough. The service provides transportation to individuals with physical challenges who cannot access conventional transportation. Table A and Appendix 9, Table 1, provide a detailed breakdown of the Transit Development Charge.
M1. VEHICLES
The current Caremoible buses were purchased in 2012. Prior to 2012 the County operated the Caremobile system with a bus and a van. Based on user demand, in 2017 the County plans on selling the two buses and purchasing an accessible van ($60,000) and a bus ($90,000) to operate the Caremobile services.
The average level of service over the last ten years for the value of transit vehicles with a lifespan of greater than seven years has been equal to $5.30 per dwelling unit. There are no mandated discounts for transit and in order to maintain the existing level of service over the next ten years $16,403 should be collected through Development Charges.
M2. SUMMARY OF TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
A detailed breakdown of the Development Charge for Transit can be found in Appendix 9, Table 1. On the basis of the calculations made in this section of the Report, Table 10 provides a summary of the maximum Development Charge for Transit.
Table 10 TRANSIT
Charge Per Percent of Total Item Dwelling Vehicles $4.69 0.07%
Sub-Total: $4.69 0.07%
24 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 105 of 250 SECTION N – NON-RESIDENTIAL CHARGE
The County of Peterborough currently imposes a Development Charge for non- residential development.
The Development Charges Act requires the non-residential Development Charge to be calculated. Non-Residential development currently represents 6.14% of the total assessment in the County of Peterborough.
The Non-Residential Development Charge is levied per square metre of building area. The Development Charges Background Study calculates the non- residential Development Charges as identified in Table 11.
Table 11 NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
Development Charge Charge Area (per square metre) Public Works $10.24 Emergency Medical $0.40 Services Emergency Measures $0.04 Long-Term Care $0.52 Social Services $0.33 Administration $0.08 Health Unit $0.17 Waste Diversion $0.00 Transit $0.01 Total $11.77
25 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 106 of 250 SECTION O – PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS
A Public Meeting was held on November 16, 2016 to provide the public with an opportunity to provide comments. No members of the public were in attendance at the meeting but the electronic comments received prior to the meeting were presented to ensure Council was made aware of any concerns.
Electronic comments were provided by:
1. Peterborough and the Kawartha’s Home Builders Association supporting the 20% increase of the current charge;
2. Township of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen stating that the maximum calculated charge is excessive and would put the County at a disadvantage for redevelopment and new development.
3. Douro Dummer – questions were provided requesting clarity on the application of the Development Charges By-law.
A variety of perspectives on Development Charges were provided by various members of County Council. The result was that Council directed to carry forward the current charge with a $500 increase for residential units for the period of one year.
Additional options for the implementation of this Study were considered at a meeting of Council on February 1, 2017. At this meeting County Council passed a motion that 100% of the rate for Residential Development be phased-in using equal increments over the life of the By-law and that Non-Residential development be exempt from charges for the first 250 square metres with 100% of the recommended charge for any additional development beyond 250 square metres. Industrial Uses are to be exempt from Development Charges.
A second Public Meeting was held on March 15, 2017 comments were provided from some of the lower-tier municipalities, the PKHBA and the local real estate association. The comments generally expressed concern with the value of the calculated charge. Of particular concern was the roads related calculated charge.
Following the Public Meeting, Staff and the Consultant reviewed the roads related portion of the calculated Development Charge. Specifically, the “growth related” share of the anticipated roads capital projects was reviewed. In the previous Development Charge Studies that were completed in 2011 and 2013, a
26 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 107 of 250 value of 85 percent “growth related” share was used for capital projects related to roads. In the 2006 Development Charges Background Study, growth related share values were also around the 85 percent value.
Following the March 15, 2017 Public Meeting a review of the forecasted growth rate for dwelling units was undertaken. This information revealed that there are currently 21,883 dwellings in the County and there is expected to be an increase of 328 dwellings per year, over the next 10 years. This would result in an additional 3,280 new dwellings in the County over the next 10 years. This increase in number of dwellings translates into a growth rate of 15 percent over the next 10 years.
In reviewing the types of road projects that have been identified, they can generally be grouped into three categories which include:
bridge projects, road projects; and, Transportation Master Plan projects.
Bridge projects and road projects have been modified to identify that 15 percent of these projects are growth related. This is reflective of the anticipated growth rate.
Transportation Master Plan projects have been modified to identify that these projects are 100 percent growth related. This is reflective of the fact that these projects are required as a direct result of growth. For projects with a life expectancy of more than 10 years, a “benefit post period” has also been applied.
27 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 108 of 250 SECTION P – SUMMARY / RECOMMENDATIONS
P1. SUMMARY
The County of Peterborough Official Plan encourages a range of housing types to meet the needs of all income levels. Residential development has traditionally been heavily weighted towards single detached dwellings. This is primarily a function of the rural nature of the County and limited amount of servicing available.
To encourage and support the development of affordable housing in the community the Development Charge could continue to be imposed based on dwelling unit type. Different categories of detached dwellings could also be established to promote affordable housing.
The following categories have been created for the collection of the residential Development Charge:
1. Semi/ Single Detached (2.7 persons per household) 2. Multi Unit and single/semis less than 150 square metres in size (1.8 persons per household) 3. Apartments and multi units less than 112 square metres (1.4 persons per household)
Table 12 provides a summary of the maximum calculated residential Development Charge based on the average household size for different categories of housing types and sizes.
Table 12 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGE SUMMARY
Development Dwelling Unit Type Charge Low Density: Semi/ Single Detached (2.7 persons per household) $7,627.74 Medium Density: Multi Unit (1.8 persons per household) $5,085.16 High Density: Apartments (1.4 persons per household) $3,955.12
28 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 109 of 250 Table 13 provides a comparison of the 2013 calculated residential Development Charge to the calculated 2017 residential Development Charge. The calculated charge for 2017 is based on an average household size of 2.55 persons per dwelling.
Table 13 RESIDENTIAL CALCULATED COMPARISON 2013-2017
Item Calculated Calculated Calculated Change 2013 2017 2017 (2.7 p.p.h) (2.55 p.p.h) (2.7 p.p.h) (2.7 p.p.h) Public Works- $8,626.14 $6,261.51 $6,629.83 ($1,996.31) Roads Emergency $214.18 $243.85 $258.19 $44.01 Services Emergency $16.57 $23.13 $24.49 $7.92 Measures Long Term Care $558.10 $317.04 $335.68 ($222.42) Social Services - $198.95 $210.65 $210.65 Administration $52.12 $52.31 $55.39 $3.27 Health Unit $61.99 $101.77 $107.76 $45.77 Waste Diversion - $0.74 $0.78 $0.78 Transit $4.60 $4.69 $4.97 $0.37 Total $9,533.70 $7,203.97 $7,627.74 ($1,905.96)
29 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 110 of 250
Table 14 provides a comparison of the 2013 calculated non-residential Development Charge to the calculated 2017 non-residential Development Charge.
Table 14 NON - RESIDENTIAL CALCULATED COMPARISON 2013-2017
Item Calculated Calculated Change 2013 2017 Public Works- Roads $10.59 $10.24 $(0.35) Emergency Services $0.20 $0.40 $0.20 Emergency $0.02 $0.04 $0.02 Measures Long Term Care $0.44 $0.52 $0.08 Social Services - $0.33 $0.33 Administration $0.15 $0.08 ($0.07) Health Unit $0.55 $0.17 ($0.38) Waste Diversion - $0.00 $0.00 Transit $0.01 $0.01 $0.00 Total $11.95 $11.77 $(0.18)
With the introduction of the Asset Management Reporting greater access is provided to capital costs, this has a direct correlation with the increase in Development Charge. The County may wish to consider phasing to allow for an increased in Development Charge to be gradually introduced.
It is important for the County of Peterborough to limit barriers towards new development and also to maintain accountability to the existing tax base to ensure that new development pays for the cost to service new development. The use of a phasing approach could provide for an appropriate between these interests.
30 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 111 of 250 P2. RECOMMENDATION
Given the direction from Council, it is recommended that the County of Peterborough use this Study as the basis for enacting a Development Charges By-law that imposes the maximum calculated residential Development Charge for the duration of the Development Charges By-law and does not impose a Charge for Industrial Uses.
It is further recommended that the approach to Non-Residential Development Charges be carried forward from the 2013 By-law and that Non-Residential development be exempt from Development Charges for the first 250 square metres. The resultant Development Charges are outlined in Table 15.
Table 15 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES SCHEDULE
Year Single- Multiple Small Non- Detached, Residential Multiple Residential Semi- Residential (per m2)** Detached Single-Detached, (< 93m2)* Duplex Semi-Detached (>103m2)* Duplex(<103m2)* Apartment April 19, First 250 sq.m. 2017 to exempt, then $7,627.74 $5,085.16 $3,955.12 April 19, $11.77 2022 thereafter
*The areas outlined above represent the gross floor area. ** Industrial Uses are exempt from Development Charges.
31 County of Peterborough Development Charges Background Study April 11, 2017 Page 112 of 250 TABLE 'A' COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH - DEVELOPMENT CHARGES WORKBOOK
Development Forcast Summary Assessment Summary Persons Per Household 2.55 Residential Assessment 93.86% Projected Dwelling Units 3,282 3,496.81 Non-Residential Assessment 6.14% Total Assessment 100% Projected GFA (m2) 131,400 Dwelling Unit Equivalent 215
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PERCENT OF AVERAGE GROWTH NET CAPITAL NON- PERCENT OF NON- NON- FUTURE CAPITAL GROWTH MANDATED RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL MUNICIPAL SERVICES LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURE COST PER UNIT RELATED AFTER RESERVE FUND NET CAPITAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS COSTS RELATED COST DISCOUNT (%) CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT (per dwelling) SERVICE SHARE DISCOUNT CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT (per sq. m ) CHARGE
Public Works- Roads
Roads $ 20,624,818 growth related project costs $ 20,624,818 $ 20,624,818 100% $ 20,624,818 0% $ 20,624,818 $ 308,309.48 $ 20,316,509 $ 19,068,465 80.7% $ 5,810.01 $ 1,248,044 80.65% $ 9.50 Buildings- Material Storage 1.6 sq ft per unit 5,465 $ 150.00 $ 819,803 100% $ 819,803 10% $ 737,823 $ 11,029.32 $ 737,823 $ 692,498 2.9% $ 211.00 $ 45,324 2.93% $ 0.34 Buildings 0.9 sq ft per unit 3,114 $ 200.00 $ 622,793 100% $ 622,793 10% $ 560,514 $ 8,378.82 $ 560,514 $ 526,081 2.2% $ 160.29 $ 34,432 2.23% $ 0.26 Vehicles $ 50.96 value per unit $ 178,194.73 $ 178,195 100% $ 178,195 10% $ 160,375 $ 2,397.36 $ 157,978 $ 148,273 0.6% $ 45.18 $ 9,705 0.63% $ 0.07 Small Equipment $ 39.51 value per unit $ 138,150.10 $ 138,150 100% $ 138,150 10% $ 124,335 $ 1,858.62 $ 122,476 $ 114,953 0.49% $ 35.03 $ 7,524 0.49% $ 0.06
subtotal $ 22,383,759 $ 22,383,759 $ 22,207,865 $ 331,974 $ 21,895,300 $ 20,550,270 86.92% $ 6,261.51 $ 1,345,029 86.92% $ 10.24 Emergency Services
Buildings 1.1 sq ft per unit 3,967 $ 200 $ 793,315 100% $ 793,315 10% $ 713,984 $ 44,742.68 $ 713,984 $ 670,124 2.83% $ 204.18 $ 43,860 2.83% $ 0.33 Vehicles $ 33.19 value per unit $ 116,054.26 $ 116,054 100% $ 116,054 10% $ 104,449 $ 6,545.42 $ 97,903 $ 91,889 0.39% $ 28.00 $ 6,014 0.39% $ 0.05 Paramedic Uniforms 0.0017 paramedics per unit 5.83 $ 900 $ 5,248 100% $ 5,248 10% $ 4,723 $ 295.96 $ 4,427 $ 4,155 0.02% $ 1.27 $ 272 0.02% $ 0.00 Small Equipment $ 12.33 value per unit $ 43,115.07 $ 43,115 100% $ 43,115 10% $ 38,804 $ 2,431.67 $ 36,372 $ 34,138 0.14% $ 10.40 $ 2,234 0.14% $ 0.02
subtotal $ 957,732 $ 957,732 $ 861,959 $ 54,016 $ 852,686 $ 800,305 3.38% $ 243.85 $ 52,381 3.38% $ 0.40 Emergency Measures
Vehicles $ 27.96 admin/vehicle value per unit $ 97,785 $ 97,785 100% $ 97,785 10% $ 88,006 $ 7,129.72 $ 80,877 $ 75,908 0.32% $ 23.13 $ 4,968 0.32% $ 0.04
subtotal $ 97,784.98 $ 97,785 $ 88,006.48 $ 7,129.72 $ 80,877 $ 75,908 0.32% $ 23.13 $ 4,968 0.32% $ 0.04 Long Term Care
Buildings 1.57 sq ft per unit 5,502 $ 250 $ 1,375,473.39 100% $ 1,375,473 10% $ 1,237,926 $ 308,499.77 $ 929,426 $ 872,332 3.69% $ 265.79 $ 57,095 3.69% $ 0.43 Equipment 0.04 value per 1000 units 132.59 $ 2,000 $ 265,180 100% $ 265,180 10% $ 238,662 $ 59,476.28 $ 179,186 $ 168,179 0.71% $ 51.24 $ 11,007 0.71% $ 0.08
subtotal $ 1,640,654 $ 1,640,654 $ 1,476,588 $ 367,976 $ 1,108,612 $ 1,040,510 4.40% $ 317.04 $ 68,102 4.40% $ 0.52 Social Services
Capital Costs $ 221.06 value per unit $ 772,988 $ 772,988 100% $ 772,988 10% $ 695,689 $ 695,689 $ 652,953 2.76% $ 198.95 $ 42,736 2.76% $ 0.33
subtotal $ 772,988 $ 772,988 $ 695,689 $ 695,689 $ 652,953 2.76% $ 198.95 $ 42,736 2.76% $ 0.33 Administration
Staff 1.7 staff per 1000 units 5.8 $ 1,200 $ 7,007 100% $ 7,007 10% $ 6,307 $ 114.90 $ 6,192 $ 5,811 0.02% $ 1.77 $ 380 0.02% $ 0.00 Special Studies $200,000 total cost $200,000 $ 200,000 100% $ 200,000 10% $ 180,000 $ 3,279.54 $ 176,720 $ 165,865 0.70% $ 50.54 $ 10,856 0.70% $ 0.08
subtotal $ 407,007 $ 207,007 $ 186,307 $ 3,394 $ 182,912 $ 171,676 0.73% $ 52.31 $ 11,236 0.73% $0.08 Health Unit
BuildingPage 113 of 250 0.63 sq ft per unit 2,213 $ 200 $ 442,580 100% $ 442,580 10% $ 398,322 $ 42,454 $ 355,868 $ 334,007 1.41% $ 101.77 $ 21,861 1.41% $ 0.17
subtotal $ 442,580 $ 442,580 $ 398,322 $ 42,454 $ 355,868 $ 334,007 1.41% $ 101.77 $ 21,861 1.41% $ 0.17 Waste Diversion
Vehicles $ 0.82 value per unit $ 2,855.84 $ 2,856 100% $ 2,856 10% $ 2,570 $ 2,570 $ 2,412 0.01% $ 0.74 $ 158 0.01% $ 0.00
subtotal $ 2,856 $ 2,856 $ 2,570 $ 2,570 $ 2,412 0.01% $ 0.74 $ 158 0.01% $0.00 Transit
Vehicles $5.30 municipal capital costs $ 18,546.65 $ 18,547 100.0% $ 18,547 0% $ 18,547 $ 2,144.08 $ 16,403 $ 15,395 0.07% $ 4.69 $ 1,008 0.07% $ 0.01
subtotal $ 18,547 $ 18,547 $ 18,547 $ 2,144.08 $ 16,403 $ 15,395 0.07% $ 4.69 $ 1,008 0.07% $0.01 $ 26,723,908 $ 26,523,908 $ 25,935,854 $ 809,088 $ 25,190,917 $ 23,643,438 100% $ 7,203.97 $ 1,547,479 100% $ 11.77 Appendix 1, Table 1 COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CHARGES STUDY - 2017 FORECASTED CAPITAL RELATED PROJECTS 2017-2026 Road and Related Works Growth Related Construction % Growth Growth Related Benefit Post Item Road Name/Bridge Name/ Other From To Timing Lifespan Share - Benefit Post Cost Related Share 2026 Years 2026 1 Microsurface - CR 5 City limit Hwy 7 R 2016 $ 105,000 15.00% $ 15,750 $15,750 2 Fatigue Investigation-Hope's Bridge B 2016 $ 10,000 15.00%$ 1,500 $ 1,500 3 Deck Condition Survey-Crowe Bridge Vansickle Road B 2016 $ 10,000 15.00% $ 1,500 $ 1,500 4 Load Limit Review-Westwood Bridge Westwood B 2016 $ 10,000 15.00%$ 1,500 $ 1,500 5 Underwater Investigation-CR 10 unnamed culvert CR 10 (Stewart Line) B 2016 $ 10,000 15.00% $ 1,500 $ 1,500 6 Underwater Investigation-Gannon's Narrow Bridge CR 16 B 2016 $ 10,000 15.00% $ 1,500 $ 1,500 7 Deck Condition Survey-Crowe River Bridge CR 504 B 2016 $ 10,000 15.00% $ 1,500 $ 1,500 8 Gannon's Narrows Bridge B 2016 $ 10,000 15.00%$ 1,500 $ 1,500 9 Garret's Creek Bridge B 2023 $ 17,000 15.00%$ 2,550 $ 2,550 10 CR 30 Culvert B 2025 $ 18,000 15.00%$ 2,700 $ 2,700 11 Warsaw Culvert B 2025 $ 22,000 15.00%$ 3,300 $ 3,300 12 Vibility Repair-Davidson's Bridge CR 2 R 2016 $ 30,000 15.00% $ 4,500 $ 4,500 13 Davidson's Bridge B 2016 $ 30,000 15.00%$ 4,500 $ 4,500 14 Robson Bridge B 2025 $ 35,000 15.00%$ 5,250 $ 5,250 15 Old Canal Bridge B 2023 $ 41,000 15.00%$ 6,150 $ 6,150 16 CR 23 (Buckhorn) culvert B 2017 $ 53,000 15.00%$ 7,950 $ 7,950 17 McCall Bridge B 2023 $ 57,000 15.00%$ 8,550 $ 8,550 18 Deer Bay Reach Bridge B 2025 $ 59,000 15.00%$ 8,850 $ 8,850 19 EA Drainage Design-CR 19 CR 18 Peterborough Boundary T 2016 $ 60,000 100.00% $ 60,000 0 $ 15,000 $45,000 20 Stewart Hall Bridge B 2025 $ 61,000 15.00%$ 9,150 $ 9,150 21 Microsurface-CR 10 Mt. Pleasant CKL Boundary R 2016 $ 65,000 15.00% $ 9,750 $ 9,750 22 Microsurface - CR 7 CKL Boundary R 2019$ 65,000.00 15.00% $ 9,750 $ 9,750 23 Microsurface - CR 2 OSM Boundary CR 38 R 2024$ 67,500.00 15.00% $ 10,125 $ 10,125 24 Micro - CR 2 Keene Village R 2024$ 73,000.00 15.00% $ 10,950 $ 10,950 25 CR 35 culvert B 2023 $ 74,000 15.00%$ 11,100 $ 11,100 26 Microsurface - CR 18 CR23 CR29 R 2016$ 75,000.00 15.00% $ 11,250 $ 11,250 27 Eels Creek Bridge B 2025 $ 77,000 15.00%$ 11,550 $ 11,550 28 Wigamore Bridge B 2021 $ 78,000 15.00%$ 11,700 $ 11,700 29 Chemong Bridge B 2020 $ 83,000 15.00%$ 12,450 $ 12,450 30 Watson'sBridge B 2023 $ 85,000 15.00%$ 12,750 $ 12,750 31 Squaw River Bridge B 2024 $ 85,000 15.00%$ 12,750 $ 12,750 32 Trent Canal Bridge B 2023 $ 91,000 15.00%$ 13,650 $ 13,650 33 Payne's Bridge B 2025 $ 91,000 15.00%$ 13,650 $ 13,650 34 Booths Bridge B 2017 $ 97,000 15.00%$ 14,550 $ 14,550 35 Microsurface-CR 3 Hwy 7 East 1.1 km R 2016 $ 100,000 15.00% $ 15,000 $15,000 36 EA-CR 48 Ontario St Mary Street R 2016 $ 100,000 15.00% $ 15,000 $15,000 37 EA-Design-Tullys Bridge Lily Lake Road B 2016 $ 100,000 15.00% $ 15,000 $15,000 38 Melrose Bridge B 2024 $ 100,000 15.00%$ 15,000 $ 15,000
Page 114 of250 39 EA Updates- James A Gifford Causeway CR 18 CR 16 T 2022$ 100,000.00 100.00%$ 100,000 0 $ 25,000 $ 75,000 40 Warsaw Bridge B 2024 $ 105,000 15.00%$ 15,750 $ 15,750 41 Microsurface - CR 5 Lansdowne Road City limit to Hwy 7 R 2016 $ 105,000 15.00%$ 15,750 $ 15,750 42 Squirrel Creek Bridge B 2025 $ 109,000 15.00%$ 16,350 $ 16,350 43 Gold/Beaver Lake Bridge B 2025 $ 110,000 15.00%$ 16,500 $ 16,500 44 EA/40mm overlay - CR 27 CR 3 to 0.4 km S R 2023$ 110,000.00 15.00% $ 16,500 $ 16,500 45 Coon's Bridge B 2023 $ 116,000 15.00%$ 17,400 $ 17,400 46 Jack's Creek Bridge B 2024 $ 119,000 15.00%$ 17,850 $ 17,850 47 Burns Bridge B 2025 $ 119,000 15.00%$ 17,850 $ 17,850 48 Crystal Lake Bridge B 2023 $ 123,000 15.00%$ 18,450 $ 18,450 49 Rehabilitation-Newell's Bridge B 2016 $ 126,000 15.00%$ 18,900 $ 18,900 50 Newell's Bridge B 2016 $ 126,000 15.00%$ 18,900 $ 18,900 51 Hope's Bridge B 2023 $ 127,000 15.00%$ 19,050 $ 19,050 52 Gilchrist Park Bridge B 2023 $ 127,000 15.00%$ 19,050 $ 19,050 53 EA-The Loop - localize repairs & select drainage improvements CR 12 T 2016$ 127,500.00 100.00%$ 127,500 0 $ 31,875 $ 95,625 54 DST - CR 33 Hwy 28 CR 32 R 2018$ 129,200.00 15.00% $ 19,380 $ 19,380 55 Comstock Bridge B 2024 $ 130,000 15.00%$ 19,500 $ 19,500 Appendix 1, Table 1
56 Bigelow Bridge B 2023 $ 135,000 15.00%$ 20,250 $ 20,250 57 Cedar Lake Bridge B 2024 $ 137,000 15.00%$ 20,550 $ 20,550 58 Wallace Point Bridge B 2025 $ 139,000 15.00%$ 20,850 $ 20,850 59 Microsurface - CR 2 all-way stop 2.8 km north R 2019$ 139,000.00 15.00% $ 20,850 $ 20,850 60 Trent Severn Bridge B 2022 $ 143,000 15.00%$ 21,450 $ 21,450 61 Microsurface - CR 12 CR 1 Lily Lake Road R 2018$ 145,000.00 15.00% $ 21,750 $ 21,750 62 Taylor's Bridge B 2024 $ 147,000 15.00%$ 22,050 $ 22,050 63 Eel's Creek Bridge B 2023 $ 148,000 15.00%$ 22,200 $ 22,200 64 Molyneaux Bridge B 2024 $ 148,000 15.00%$ 22,200 $ 22,200 65 Microsurface-CR 18 CR 1 S. limit of Bridgenorth R 2016 $ 150,000 15.00% $ 22,500 $22,500 66 Intersection Turning Lanes CR 18 5th Line T 2024$ 150,000.00 100.00%$ 150,000 25 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 67 Bland Culvert B 2023 $ 169,000 15.00%$ 25,350 $ 25,350 68 Microsurface-CR 23 14th CR 22 R 2016 $ 170,000 15.00% $ 25,500 $25,500 69 DST - CR 20 CR 23 Preston Rd R 2023$ 171,000.00 15.00% $ 25,650 $ 25,650 70 DST - CR 25 CR 20 to 1.8 km S R 2019$ 171,000.00 15.00% $ 25,650 $ 25,650 71 Overlay - CR 28 S. Monaghan Baileyboro R 2021$ 178,350.00 15.00% $ 26,753 $ 26,753 72 DST - CR 504 Section 504210 R 2024$ 194,750.00 15.00% $ 29,213 $ 29,213 73 DST- CR 46 2.9 km R 2016 $ 200,000 15.00% $ 30,000 $30,000 74 Borehole and core drilling regime R 2025$ 200,000.00 15.00%$ 30,000 $ 30,000 75 Microsurface - CR 507 Salmon Lake Road Haliburton Bndry R 2024$ 204,500.00 15.00% $ 30,675 $ 30,675 76 Microsurface - CR 6 CR 40 CR 44 R 2024$ 205,000.00 15.00% $ 30,750 $ 30,750 77 Bensfort Bridge B 2025 $ 209,000 15.00%$ 31,350 $ 31,350 78 DST - CR 54 CR 620 End R 2018$ 212,500.00 15.00% $ 31,875 $ 31,875 79 Microsurface - CR 28 CR 21 Northumberland Boundary R 2021$ 223,500.00 15.00% $ 33,525 $ 33,525 80 DST-CR 44 CR 46 CR 47 R 2016 $ 225,000 15.00% $ 33,750 $33,750 81 EA/50mm - CR 40 Norwood limits CR 8 R 2024$ 228,000.00 15.00% $ 34,200 $ 34,200 82 EA/40mm - CR 504 Hwy 28 CR 620A R 2018$ 228,000.00 15.00% $ 34,200 $ 34,200 83 EA/40mm - CR 620A downtown Apsley R 2018$ 228,000.00 15.00% $ 34,200 $ 34,200 84 Barr Bridge B 2023 $ 231,000 15.00%$ 34,650 $ 34,650 85 Microsurface - CR 6 CR 28 east for 4.7 km R 2024$ 235,000.00 15.00% $ 35,250 $ 35,250 86 Firehall Bridge B 2019 $ 236,000 15.00%$ 35,400 $ 35,400 87 CIR/90mm - CR 11 Hwy 115 City boundary R 2019$ 240,000 15.00% $ 36,000 $ 36,000 88 Swinton Bridge B 2023 $ 245,000 15.00%$ 36,750 $ 36,750 89 Miskwa Ziibi Bridge B 2023 $ 247,000 15.00%$ 37,050 $ 37,050 90 Microsurface-CR 29 Peterborough Boundary CR 23 R 2016 $ 250,000 15.00% $ 37,500 $37,500 91 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2016$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 92 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2017$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 93 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2018$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 94 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2019$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 95 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2020$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 96 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2021$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 97 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2022$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 98 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2023$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 99 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2024$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500
Page 115 of250 100 County Wide Steel Beem and Cable Guiderail Roadside Safet County Wide R 2025$ 250,000.00 15.00% $ 37,500 $ 37,500 101 EA Updates- CR 28 Hwy 115 Fraserville T 2018$ 250,000.00 100.00%$ 250,000 $ 250,000 102 DST - CR 504 Section 504008 R 2020$ 256,500.00 15.00% $ 38,475 $ 38,475 103 CR 35 culvert B 2024 $ 259,000 15.00%$ 38,850 $ 38,850 104 DST-CR 25 Katchewanooka Ct Miller Rd. R 2016 $ 261,250 15.00% $ 39,188 $39,188 105 Upgrade DST to HM - CR 20 Hwy 28 CR 25 R 2019$ 262,500.00 15.00% $ 39,375 $ 39,375 106 McNulty's Bridge B 2024 $ 264,000 15.00%$ 39,600 $ 39,600 107 Microsurface - CR 35 CR 2 Assumption R 2020$ 266,500.00 15.00% $ 39,975 $ 39,975 108 Baxter Creek Bridge B 2023 $ 267,000 15.00%$ 40,050 $ 40,050 109 Hickey's Bridge B 2023 $ 269,000 15.00%$ 40,350 $ 40,350 110 DST into Serpent Mounds - CR 34 R 2018$ 270,000.00 15.00%$ 40,500 $ 40,500 111 Signalization and Controls-Intersection CR 18 CR 23 T 2021$ 270,000.00 100.00%$ 270,000 30 $ 178,200 $ 91,800 112 Indian River Bridge B 2023 $ 272,000 15.00%$ 40,800 $ 40,800 113 Wellbeck's Bridge B 2024 $ 273,000 15.00%$ 40,950 $ 40,950 114 Peter's Island Bridge B 2021 $ 275,000 15.00%$ 41,250 $ 41,250 115 Heffernan's Bridge B 2024 $ 278,000 15.00%$ 41,700 $ 41,700 116 Microsurface-CR 18 CR 19 CR 1 R 2016 $ 280,000 15.00% $ 42,000 $42,000 Appendix 1, Table 1
117 Microsurface - CR 32 City limits CR 33 R 2017$ 280,000.00 15.00% $ 42,000 $ 42,000 118 Local Repairs-SST-CR 46 R 2016 $ 300,000 15.00%$ 45,000 $ 45,000 119 Pulverize local repairs; single ST on full length - CR 46 R 2016$ 300,000.00 15.00%$ 45,000 $ 45,000 120 DST - CR 47 CR 44 CR 46 R 2025$ 304,000.00 15.00% $ 45,600 $ 45,600 121 O'Leary's Bridge B 2024 $ 305,000 15.00%$ 45,750 $ 45,750 122 Westwood Bridge B 2018 $ 310,000 15.00%$ 46,500 $ 46,500 123 Catchacoma Bridge B 2023 $ 321,000 15.00%$ 48,150 $ 48,150 124 Storm sewer, C & G, HM overlay - CR 38 Warsaw south Clifford Road R 2024$ 327,000.00 15.00% $ 49,050 $ 49,050 125 Mill/overlay - CR 29 Urban limits of Buckhorn R 2019$ 332,500.00 15.00% $ 49,875 $ 49,875 126 DST - CR 11 CR 28 to bridge bridge to airport cul-de-sac R 2024$ 332,500.00 15.00%$ 49,875 $ 49,875 127 Cavan Bridge B 2023 $ 334,000 15.00%$ 50,100 $ 50,100 128 CIR/40mm overlay - CR 37 Gannons Narrows Jackmans Farm R 2024$ 342,000.00 15.00% $ 51,300 $ 51,300 129 Micro (50% share) - CR 121 CR 49 Kinmount R 2022$ 345,000.00 15.00% $ 51,750 $ 51,750 130 Crowe Bridge B 2017 $ 346,500 15.00%$ 51,975 $ 51,975 131 Otonabee River Bridge B 2022 $ 353,000 15.00%$ 52,950 $ 52,950 132 EA/50mm - CR 34 R 2025$ 359,100.00 15.00%$ 53,865 $ 53,865 133 DST - CR 10 Northumberland boundaryZion Line R 2024$ 382,500.00 15.00%$ 57,375 $ 57,375 134 Micro - CR 2 CR 38 Hastings R 2024$ 384,000.00 15.00% $ 57,600 $ 57,600 135 Micro - CR 34 Hwy 7 Keene Village R 2020$ 385,000.00 15.00% $ 57,750 $ 57,750 136 Micro - CR 23 14th to CR 22 CR 22 to S limit of Buckhorn R 2017$ 390,000.00 15.00% $ 58,500 $ 58,500 137 CIR/40mm - CR 12 City limits Ackison Road R 2018$ 399,000.00 15.00% $ 59,850 $ 59,850 138 Overlay - CR 45 Boundary 1.3 km north R 2017$ 400,000.00 15.00% $ 60,000 $ 60,000 139 Signalization and Controls-Intersection CR 1 CR 12 T 2024$ 400,000.00 100.00%$ 400,000 30 $ 264,000 $ 136,000 140 James A Gifford Causeway - CR 14/16 Intersection Controls Robinson Road T 2025$ 400,000.00 100.00%$ 400,000 30 $ 264,000 $ 136,000 141 DST - CR 31 1 km S CR 2 Paudash St R 2023$ 408,500.00 15.00% $ 61,275 $ 61,275 142 EA/50mm overlay - CR 10 Mt. Pleasant to Hooten Hooten to Ida R 2020$ 427,500.00 15.00% $ 64,125 $ 64,125 143 DST - CR 46 Section 046279 R 2025$ 442,000.00 15.00% $ 66,300 $ 66,300 144 Micro - CR 2 E. Keene Village OSM/AN boundary R 2024$ 445,000.00 15.00% $ 66,750 $ 66,750 145 CIR/90 mm - CR 10 Hwy 115 Hwy 7 R 2016 $ 450,000 15.00% $ 67,500 $67,500 146 CIP/50mm - CR 10 Hwy 7 Morton Drive R 2019$ 450,000.00 15.00% $ 67,500 $ 67,500 147 EA/50mm overlay (50% share) - CR 42 CR 30 west for 3.2 km R 2020$ 456,000.00 15.00% $ 68,400 $ 68,400 148 Rehabilitation-Trent Canal Bridge Buckhorn B 2016 $ 473,319 15.00% $ 70,998 $70,998 149 DST - CR 504 Renwick Rd. 5 km N R 2025$ 479,750.00 15.00% $ 71,963 $ 71,963 150 DST - CR 4 Warsaw Village Limits CR 6 R 2019$ 494,000.00 15.00% $ 74,100 $ 74,100 151 EA-Design and Construction-Culvert - CR 48 Cordova B 2016 $ 500,000 15.00% $ 75,000 $75,000 152 CR 10 unnamed culvert B 2016 $ 510,000 15.00%$ 76,500 $ 76,500 153 Eels Creek Bridge B 2023 $ 516,000 15.00%$ 77,400 $ 77,400 154 EA/90mm - CR 14 Gifford Causeway R 2017$ 576,000.00 15.00% $ 86,400 $ 86,400 155 Deer Bay Culvert B 2018 $ 596,000 15.00%$ 89,400 $ 89,400 156 Reconstruction-CR 4 CR 38 English Ln R 2016 $ 600,000 15.00% $ 90,000 $90,000 157 CIR/90mm - CR 1 CR 18 west of CR 12 R 2025 $ 600,000 15.00%$ 90,000 $ 90,000 158 DST - CR 21 Glamorgan Rd Millbrook R 2025$ 608,000.00 15.00% $ 91,200 $ 91,200 159 DST - CR 504 Section 504008 R 2020$ 608,000.00 15.00% $ 91,200 $ 91,200 160 DST - CR 2 Baileyboro limits 4 way stop R 2025$ 612,750.00 15.00% $ 91,913 $ 91,913 161 Rehabilitation-Lower Buckhorn Bridge Buckhorn B 2016 $ 637,436 15.00% $ 95,615 $95,615 Page 116 of250 162 Rehabilitation - CR 19 CR 18 P'boro Bndry B 2017$ 660,000.00 15.00% $ 99,000 $ 99,000 163 Douglas Bridge B 2018 $ 673,000 15.00%$ 100,950 $ 100,950 164 EA/50mm - CR 29 CR 23 west limit of Lkfld (2.2 km) R 2018$ 684,000.00 15.00%$ 102,600 $ 102,600 165 Reconstruction-CR 21 Union Cavan R 2016 $ 700,000 15.00%$ 105,000 $105,000 166 DST over Hot Mix - CR 46 R 2023$ 708,900.00 15.00%$ 106,335 $ 106,335 167 HM repair at R/R crossing + DST full section - CR 38 R 2024$ 725,200.00 15.00%$ 108,780 $ 108,780 168 DST - (N. section in 2016) - CR 44 CR 46 CR 47 R 2018$ 769,000.00 15.00%$ 115,350 $ 115,350 169 EA/50mm overlay - CR 56 Hwy 28 FR 10 R 2018$ 769,500.00 15.00%$ 115,425 $ 115,425 170 Pulverize/DST - CR 48 Freemans Corners Haliburton Boundary R 2022$ 774,250.00 15.00%$ 116,138 $ 116,138 171 Short Term Widening of CR 18 City limit CR 1 T 2022$ 800,000.00 100.00%$ 800,000 25 $ 480,000 $ 320,000 172 EA/50mm - CR 50 Northumberland bndy. ] Hwy 7 R 2018$ 850,000.00 15.00%$ 127,500 $ 127,500 173 Old Norwood Road Bridge B 2018 $ 891,000 15.00%$ 133,650 $ 133,650 174 Double CIR/90mm for 2 km + single EA/50mm for 1 km - CR 38 R 2022$ 907,500.00 15.00%$ 136,125 $ 136,125 175 CIR/90mm overlay - CR 30 Havelock S limits CR 42 R 2025$ 930,000.00 15.00%$ 139,500 $ 139,500 176 EA/50mm - CR 4 8th Line Donwood R 2018 $ 940,500 15.00%$ 141,075 $ 141,075 177 North River Bridge B 2020 $ 970,000 15.00%$ 145,500 $ 145,500 Appendix 1, Table 1
178 Burnt Mill Bridge B 2024 $ 991,000 15.00%$ 148,650 $ 148,650 179 Overlay - CR 28 Hwy 115 CR 21 R 2025$ 1,044,750.00 15.00%$ 156,713 $ 156,713 180 EA/40mm overlay - CR 37 Gannons Narrows Jackmans Farm R 2024$ 1,083,000.00 15.00%$ 162,450 $ 162,450 181 CIREAM + 50mm overlay - CR 12 CR 1 Tindle Bay Road R 2022$ 1,095,000.00 15.00%$ 164,250 $ 164,250 182 CIR/90 mm- CR 3 1.1 km east of Hwy 7 City Limits R 2016 $ 1,100,000 15.00%$ 165,000 $ 165,000 183 Steel's Bridge B 2022 $ 1,100,000 15.00%$ 165,000 $ 165,000 184 Nogie's Creek Bridge B 2021 $ 1,127,000 15.00%$ 169,050 $ 169,050 185 DST - CR 54 R 2018$ 1,137,500.00 15.00%$ 170,625 $ 170,625 186 Girven Bridge B 2019 $ 1,159,000 15.00%$ 173,850 $ 173,850 187 EA/50mm - CR 22 CR 23 CR 22 R 2020$ 1,197,000.00 15.00%$ 179,550 $ 179,550 188 EA/40mm - CR 4 Hwy 28 3rd Line R 2024$ 1,237,500.00 15.00%$ 185,625 $ 185,625 189 CIR/90mm overlay - CR 36 Nicols Cove Bridge R 2022$ 1,237,500.00 15.00%$ 185,625 $ 185,625 190 EA/40mm - CR 4 Warsaw west for 5.5 Km R 2022$ 1,281,500.00 15.00%$ 192,225 $ 192,225 191 Tully's Bridge B 2017 $ 1,312,000 15.00%$ 196,800 $ 196,800 192 EA & Design-(urbanization) - CR 4 Warsaw CR 38 English Ln R 2016$ 1,370,000.00 15.00%$ 205,500 $ 205,500 193 CIR/90mm overlay - CR 36 CR 507 1 km east of Nicol's Cove Rd. R 2020$ 1,425,000.00 15.00%$ 213,750 $ 213,750 194 EA/50mm - CR 42 R 2020$ 1,459,200.00 15.00%$ 218,880 $ 218,880 195 Crowe River Bridge B 2020 $ 1,500,000 15.00%$ 225,000 $ 225,000 196 EA/50mm - CR 14 Gifford Causeway Kawatha Lakes Boundary R 2023$ 1,539,000.00 15.00%$ 230,850 $ 230,850 197 Nichol's Cove Bridge B 2021 $ 1,562,000 15.00%$ 234,300 $ 234,300 198 EA Urban section - CR 48 Ontario St Mary Street R 2021$ 1,600,000.00 15.00%$ 240,000 $ 240,000 199 EA/50mm - CR 21 Wallace Pt Bridge P'boro bndry R 2024$ 1,613,450.00 15.00%$ 242,018 $ 242,018 200 EA & Pre-Eng w; full urbanization - CR 21 Millbrook R 2017$ 1,700,000.00 15.00%$ 255,000 $ 255,000 201 EA/50mm overlay - CR 507 Beaver Lake Rd Beaver Lake Road R 2021$ 1,749,900.00 15.00%$ 262,485 $ 262,485 202 Deer Hatchery River Bridge B 2022 $ 1,750,000 15.00%$ 262,500 $ 262,500 203 Keene Station Bridge B 2019 $ 1,781,000 15.00%$ 267,150 $ 267,150 204 James A Gifford Causeway - CR 14/18 Intersection Controls Ward Street T 2024$ 1,800,000.00 100.00%$ 1,800,000 75$ 1,566,000 $ 234,000 205 CNR Overhead Bridge B 2025 $ 1,817,000 15.00%$ 272,550 $ 272,550 206 EA/50mm overlay - CR 507 Miss. Dam Rd Beaver Lake Road R 2022$ 1,995,000.00 15.00%$ 299,250 $ 299,250 207 CR 18 Widening City limit Wild Water T 2025$ 2,020,000.00 100.00%$ 2,020,000 25$ 1,212,000 $ 808,000 208 CIR/40mm overlay - CR 507 Baker Dr Salmon Lake Road R 2025$ 2,063,400.00 15.00%$ 309,510 $ 309,510 209 EA/50mm overlay - CR 507 CR 507 Miss. Dam Road R 2021$ 2,223,000.00 15.00%$ 333,450 $ 333,450 210 EA/50mm - CR 40 Rotten Lake South for 9 km R 2023$ 2,565,000.00 15.00%$ 384,750 $ 384,750 211 Pulv & convert to DST - CR 40 CR 6 South for 9.8 km R 2023$ 2,793,000.00 15.00%$ 418,950 $ 418,950 212 James A Gifford Causeway - Culvert Repl. & permits & widen Ward Street Robinson Road T 2017$ 2,905,000.00 100.00%$ 2,905,000 50$ 2,324,000 $ 581,000 213 Widening and EA and Design- CR 18 Gore Street Champlain T 2019$ 3,200,000.00 100.00%$ 3,200,000 25$ 1,920,000 $ 1,280,000 214 Design Standard Upgrade- CR 20 CR 18 CR 23 T 2021$ 5,410,000.00 100.00%$ 5,410,000 25$ 3,246,000 $ 2,164,000 Total$ 113,548,455 $ 32,240,893 $ 11,616,075 $ 20,624,818
R Road$ 65,808,700 $ 9,871,305 $ 9,871,305 B Bridge $ 29,847,255 $ 4,477,088 $ 4,477,088 T Trans. Mas $ 17,892,500 $ 17,892,500 $ 6,276,425 Total$ 113,548,455 $ 32,240,893 $ 20,624,818 Page 117 of250 Appendix 1, Table 2
Public Works
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Area
Roads Buildings 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Douro Salt Shed 940 940 940 940 940 940 940 940 940 940 Douro Salt/ Sand Dome 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Douro Salt/ Sand Dome 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Millbrook Salt Shed 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Millbrook Sand/ Salt Dome 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Buckhorn Sand/ Salt Dome 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Buckhorn Salt Shed 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Centreline Storage Shed 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Centreline Salt Shed 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 Centreline Salt Dome 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Havelock Sand/ Salt Dome 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Havelock Salt Shed 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Havelock Storage Shed 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 312
Total 44,082 52,582 52,582 52,582 52,582 52,582 52,582 52,582 52,582 52,582 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service 1.29 1.60 1.62 1.61 1.60 1.59 1.59 1.58 1.58 1.57
10 Year Average 51,732 2 Quantity (ft /unit) 1.56 Page 118 of250 Appendix 1, Table 3
Public Works
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Area
Roads Buildings 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Douro Office/ Garage 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 Douro Equipment Storage 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 Millbrook Equipment Garages 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 Millbrook Equipment Storage 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Buckhorn Equipment Storage 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 Centreline Office 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 Centreline Quonset Hut 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Havelock Equipment Storage 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400
Total 26,691 29,791 29,791 29,791 29,791 29,791 29,791 29,791 29,791 29,791 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service 0.78 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89
10 Year Average 29,481 2 Quantity (ft /unit) 0.89 Page 119 of250 Appendix 1, Table 4
Public Works
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Cost of Road Vehicles
Road Vehicles 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
International Tandem plow 07-01$ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 187,267 $ 225,500 International Tandem plow 07-02$ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 $ 191,734 International Tandem plow 09-05 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 International Tandem plow 09-06 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 $ 213,358 International Tandem plow 10-05 $ 202,959.00 $ 202,959.00 $ 202,959.00 $ 202,959.00 $ 202,959.00 $ 202,959.00 International Tandem plow 11-05 $ 208,000.00 $ 208,000.00 $ 208,000.00 $ 208,000.00 $ 208,000.00 International Tandem plow 12-01 $ 200,683.00 $ 200,683.00 $ 200,683.00 $ 200,683.00 International Tandem plow 12-02 $ 200,683.00 $ 200,683.00 $ 200,683.00 $ 200,683.00 International Tandem plow $ 202,000.00 $ 202,000.00 Sterling Plow 08-06 $ 184,094.00 $ 184,094.00 $ 184,094.00 $ 184,094.00 $ 184,094.00 $ 184,094.00 $ 184,094.00 $ 184,094.00 Western Star Plow 13-07 $ 217,068.00 $ 217,068.00 $ 217,068.00 Freightliner Plow 14-05 $ 206,560.00 $ 206,560.00 Sterling Tandem 04-05 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 Sterling Tandem 05-06 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 $ 165,744.00 International Tandem (surplus 2015)$ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 $ 162,166.00 GMC Pick Up 13-01 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 GMC Pick Up 13-02 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 GMC Pick Up 13-03 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 GMC Pick Up 10-03 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 GMC Pick Up Short Box 13-04 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 GMC Pick Up Short Box 14-04 $ 27,614.00 $ 27,614.00 $ 27,614.00 GMC Pick Up Short Box 14-03 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 $ 27,404.00 Chevorlet Pick Up Short Box 07-04 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Chevorlet Pick Up Short Box 09-01 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 Chevorlet Pick Up Short Box 10-01 $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 Chevorlet Pick Up 09-02 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 Ford Pick Up Truck 15-02 $ 34,994.00 $ 34,994.00 Dodge Pick Up Truck 15-03 $ 25,474.00 $ 25,474.00 Chevorlet Pick Up 09-03 $ 22,859.00 $ 22,859.00 $ 22,859.00 $ 22,859.00 $ 22,859.00 $ 22,859.00 $ 22,859.00 $ 22,859.00 Fleet Service Vehicle 10-02 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 120,000.00 GMC Pick Up 10-04 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 $ 25,805.00 Chevorlet Pick Up 11-01 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00
Page 120 of250 Chevorlet Pick Up 11-02 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 Chevorlet Pick Up 11-03 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 $ 21,876.00 Chevorlet 1 Ton Patch Box 11-04 $ 53,046.00 $ 53,046.00 $ 53,046.00 $ 53,046.00 $ 53,046.00 $ 53,046.00 Chevorlet 1 Ton Flat Deck 11-05 $ 54,250.00 $ 54,250.00 $ 54,250.00 $ 54,250.00 $ 54,250.00 $ 54,250.00 Ford Crew Cab 12-03 $ 43,512.00 $ 43,512.00 $ 43,512.00 $ 43,512.00 $ 43,512.00 GMC Crew Cab 13-05 $ 44,163.00 $ 44,163.00 $ 44,163.00 $ 44,163.00 Ford Crew Cab 14-01 $ 44,825.00 $ 44,825.00 $ 44,825.00 Ford Crew Cab 14-04 $ 44,825.00 $ 44,825.00 $ 44,825.00 Ford Crew Cab Pick Up $ 41,000.00 Ford Crew Cab Pick Up $ 41,000.00
Total $ 683,644 $ 703,644 $ 953,597 $ 1,380,313 $ 1,855,806 $ 2,107,318 $ 2,661,655 $ 3,023,391 $ 3,492,419 $ 3,506,448 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service $ 19.94 $ 21.45 $ 29.30 $ 42.19 $ 56.41 $ 63.91 $ 80.36 $ 91.11 $ 104.92
Residential 10 Year Average$ 2,036,824 Quantity (value/unit)$ 50.96 Appendix 1, Table 5
Public Works
County of Peterborough
Value of Small Equipment Unit of Measure Small Equipment 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Champion Grader 00-02 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 196,248 $ 260,000 John Deere Grader 12-04 $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 330,000 Midland Shoulder Widener 14-06 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Vibratory Roller 14-07 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 JCB Backhoe 15-06 $ 82,170 $ 82,170 Case Backhoe 08-01 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 $ 97,133 Gradall 08-04 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 $ 298,080 Hyundai Rubber Tire Excavator 13-10 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 Cat 928 Loader 09-07 $ 151,040 $ 151,040 $ 151,040 $ 151,040 $ 151,040 $ 151,040 $ 151,040 John Deere Loader 12-05 $ 287,000 $ 287,000 $ 287,000 $ 287,000 $ 287,000 John Deere Loader 13-09 $ 289,000 $ 289,000 $ 289,000 $ 289,000 New Holland Tractor 10-06 $ 60,914 $ 60,914 $ 60,914 $ 60,914 $ 60,914 $ 60,914 New Holland Tractor 13-08 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 New Holland Mower 15-05 $ 8,847 $ 8,847 New Holland Mower 08-03 $ 9,279 $ 9,279 $ 9,279 $ 9,279 $ 9,279 $ 9,279 $ 9,279 $ 9,279 Float Trailer 08-05 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 $ 19,434 Utility Trailer 10-08 $ 4,135 $ 4,135 $ 4,135 $ 4,135 $ 4,135 $ 4,135 $ 4,135 Brush Chipper 11-07 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 Brush Chipper 12-06 $ 73,000 $ 73,000 $ 73,000 $ 73,000 $ 73,000 Vermeer Vacuum Trailer 13-06 $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 78,000 Fuel Tank $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Fuel Tank $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Tri-axle Float Trailer 14-08 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 Road Sweeper 15- $ 308,709 $ 308,709
Total $ 235,682 $ 630,895 $ 640,174 $ 795,349 $ 926,263 $ 1,616,263 $ 2,408,263 $ 2,710,263 $ 3,109,989 $ 3,173,741 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Level of Service $ 6.87 $ 19.23 $ 19.67 $ 24.31 $ 28.16 $ 49.01 $ 72.71 $ 81.68 $ 93.43 $ 94.97
10 Year Average$ 1,624,688 Quantity (value/unit)$ 39.51 Page 121 of250 Appendix 2, Table 1
Emergency Medical Services
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Area
EMS Stations 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Peterborough (310 Armour Road) 32,963 32,963 32,963 32,963 32,963 32,963 32,963 32,963 32,963 32,963 Alpsley (185 Burleigh Street) 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 Buckhorn (2467 County Road 36) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Lakefield (41 Concession Street) Norwood (31 King Street)
Total 36,663 37,663 37,663 37,663 37,663 37,663 37,663 37,663 37,663 37,663 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service 1.07 1.15 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.13 1.13
10 Year Average 37,563 2 Quantity (ft /unit) 1.13 Page 122 of250 Appendix 2, Table 2
Emergency Medical Services
County of Peterborough Value of Vehicles Unit of Measure EMS Vehicles 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Motorhome $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 Pick Up Truck (Superintendent)$ 54,000 $ 54,000 Pick Up Truck (Superintendent) (4399-15)$ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 ERV Paramedic (4357-09)$ 56,100 $ 56,100 $ 56,100 $ 56,100 $ 56,100 $ 56,100 $ 56,100 Ford Tarus Admin Vehicle (4385-16) $ 43,000 Ford Interceptor ERV (4808-16) $ 43,000 Pick Up Truck (Superintendent) (4376-15)$ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 Admin Pick Up Truck (4803-06)$ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 Ambulance (4533-16) $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 Ambulance (4534-16) $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 Ambulance (4543-11) $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 Ambulance (4506-12) $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Ambulance (4553-12) $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Ambulance (4554-12) $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Ambulance (4508-13) $ 141,000 $ 141,000 $ 140,375 $ 140,375 Ambulance (4500-13) $ 141,000 $ 141,000 $ 141,000 $ 141,000 Ambulance (4573-13) $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Ambulance (4507-14) $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Ambulance (4512-14) $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Ambulance (4513-14) $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Ambulance (4168-15) $ 142,100 $ 142,100 Ambulance (4532-15) $ 137,000 $ 137,000 Ambulance (4544-15) $ 121,000 $ 121,000
Total $ 121,000 $ 175,000 $ 231,100 $ 597,100 $ 718,100 $ 1,078,100 $ 1,500,100 $ 1,920,100 $ 2,319,575 $ 2,349,475 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service $ 3.53 $ 5.33 $ 7.10 $ 18.25 $ 21.83 $ 32.69 $ 45.29 $ 57.86 $ 69.69 $ 70.31
10 Year Average$ 1,100,965 Quantity (vehicle value/unit) $ 33.19 Page 123 of250 Appendix 2, Table 3
Emergency Medical Services
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Number of Paramedics 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Number of Paramedics 48 52 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 60
Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Units Level of Service 0.0014 0.0016 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0018
10 Year Average 55.2 Quantity (paramedics/dwelling unit) 0.0017 Quantity (paramedics per 1000 dwelling unit 1.67
Appendix 2, Table 4
Emergency Medical Services
County of Peterborough Value of Small Equipment Unit of Measure Small Equipment 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Power Pro Stretchers (x4) $ 74,751 $ 74,751 $ 74,751 Power Pro Stretchers $ 15,376 $ 15,376 Stretcher (Bed with cart)$ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 $ 8,006 Defibrilator and Accessories $ 444,963 $ 444,963 $ 444,963 $ 444,963 $ 444,963 $ 444,963 $ 444,963 $ 444,963 Simulator Auscultation Trainer $ 29,740 $ 29,740 $ 29,740 $ 29,740 $ 29,740 $ 29,740 $ 29,740 $ 29,740 $ 29,740 Respirator Fit Tester$ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 Respirator Trainer$ 8,336 $ 8,336 $ 8,336 $ 8,336 $ 8,336 $ 8,336 $ 8,336 $ 8,336 RA Advanced Trainer $ 6,110 $ 6,110 $ 6,110 $ 6,110 $ 6,110 $ 6,110 $ 6,110 RA Advanced Skill Trainer $ 6,670 $ 6,670 $ 6,670 $ 6,670 $ 6,670 $ 6,670 $ 6,670 Respirator Fit $ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ 15,600 Bariatric Stretcher$ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 $ 3,312 Gas Flow Analyzer$ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 NOCO Spray Machine $ 6,400 $ 6,400 Page 124 of250 Respirator Trainer Infant $ 6,644 $ 6,644 $ 6,644 $ 6,644 $ 6,644 $ 6,644 $ 6,644 EMS Base Tower $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 $ 4,895 EMS Base Tower $ 10,600 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 $ 10,600 Training Room AV Equipment $ 15,151 $ 15,151 $ 15,151 $ 15,151 $ 15,151 $ 15,151 $ 15,151 $ 15,151 $ 15,151 Trailer $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400
Total $ 57,024 $ 112,515 $ 565,814 $ 585,238 $ 585,238 $ 117,211 $ 129,537 $ 629,899 $ 645,275 $ 645,275 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service $ 1.66 $ 3.43 $ 17.38 $ 17.89 $ 17.79 $ 3.55 $ 3.91 $ 18.98 $ 19.39 $ 19.31
10 Year Average$ 407,302.60 Quantity (equipment value/unit) $ 12.33 Appendix 3, Table 1
Emergency Measures
County of Peterborough Value of Vehicles Unit of Measure EVR Vehicles 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
EVR Admin $ 51,000 51,000$ 51,000$ 51,000$ 51,000$ $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ 51,000
Total -$ -$ 51,000$ 51,000$ 51,000$ 51,000$ 51,000$ 51,000$ $ 51,000 $ 51,000 Dwelling Units 1,177 1,240 1,303 1,353 1,404 1,454 1,505 1,555 1,572 1,580 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service -$ -$ 39.14$ 37.69$ 36.32$ 35.08$ 33.89$ 32.80$ 32.44$ 32.28$
10 Year Average $ 40,800 Quantity (vehicle value/unit) $ 27.96 Page 125 of250 Appendix 4, Table 1
Long-Term Care
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Area
Buildings 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fairhaven 157,900 157,900 157,900 157,900 157,900 157,900 157,900 157,900 157,900 157900 33% of Building (County Share) 52,107 52,107 52,107 52,107 52,107 52,107 52,107 52,107 52,107 52,107
Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Level of Service 1.52 1.59 1.60 1.59 1.58 1.58 1.57 1.57 1.57 1.56
Residential 10 Year Average 157,900 County funds 33% of Fairhaven Cost per square foot $ 200.00 2 Quantity (ft /unit) 1.57
Appendix 4, Table 2
Long-Term Care
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Value of Long Term Care Office Equipment
Long Term Care Equipment 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Value of Office Equipment 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Capita Level of Service 0.00038 0.00040 0.00040 0.00040 0.00040 0.00039 0.00039 0.00039 0.00039 0.00039 Page 126 of250
10 Year Average 0 Quantity (staff/dwelling unit) 0.000038 Quantity (staff per 1000 dwelling units 0.04 Appendix 5, Table 1
County City Health Unit
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Area
Health Unit Buildings 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
185 King Street (3 Floors) 45,000 45,000 10 Hospital Drive 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
Total 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 45,000 45,000 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service 0.44 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 1.35 1.35
10 Year Average 21,000 2 Quantity (ft /unit) 0.63 Page 127 of250 Appendix 6, Table 1
Social Services
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Levy
Levies 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Social Services (% Capital) 1,527,041 1,429,026 1,340,088 Child Services (% Capital) 405,965 447,541 500,632 Social Housing (%Capital) 5,339,001 5,435,461 5,656,427
Total 7,272,007 7,312,028 7,497,147 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.15 219.67 224.34
10 Year Average$ 7,360,394.00 Quantity (cost/ per dwelling) $ 221.06 Page 128 of250 Appendix 7, Table 1
Administration
County of Peterborough
Special Studies
Growth % Growth Study Cost Related Related Special Studies 2017-2026 Cost
List Special Studies Official Plan Review$ 120,000 75%$ 90,000 Development Charges Study$ 35,000 100%$ 35,000 Development Charges Study$ 35,000 100%$ 35,000 Natural Heritage Study $ 10,000 50%$ 5,000 Private Roads Study $ 20,000 50%$ 10,000 Active Transporation Study $ 50,000 50% $ 25,000
Total $ 270,000 $ 200,000
Appendix 7, Table 2
Administration
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measurement Number of Employees
Employees 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Number of County Office Staff 48 50 52 54 55 56 57 59 61 61
Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Level of Service 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Page 129 of250
10 Year Average 0.001669935 Quantity 0.00 Quanity per 1000 dwellings 1.7 Appendix 8, Table 1
Waste Diversion
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure Cost of Waste Management Vehicles
Waste Diversion Vehicles 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Chevorlet Silverado $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Chevorlet Silverado $ 30,000
Total$ - -$ $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 60,000 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service $ - -$ $ 0.92 $ 0.92 $ 0.91 $ 0.91 $ 0.91 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 1.80
Residential 10 Year Average$ 0.82 Page 130 of250 Appendix 9, Table 1
Transit
County of Peterborough
Unit of Measure
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Caremobile Bus 2006$ 121,872 $ 121,872 $ 121,872 $ 121,872 $ 121,872 Caremobile Van 2007$ 50,961 $ 50,961 $ 50,961 $ 50,961 $ 50,961 Caremobile Bus 2012 $ 90,559.08 $ 90,559.08 $ 90,559.08 $ 90,559.08 $ 90,559.08 Caremobile Bus 2012 $ 87,922.47 $ 87,922.47 $ 87,922.47 $ 87,922.47 $ 87,922.47
Total$ 172,833 $ 172,833 $ 172,833 $ 172,833 $ 172,833 $ 178,482 $ 178,482 $ 178,482 $ 178,482 $ 178,482 Dwelling Units 34,285 32,808 32,551 32,713 32,897 32,975 33,121 33,183 33,286 33,418 Per Dwelling Unit Level of Service $ 5.04 $ 5.27 $ 5.31 $ 5.28 $ 5.25 $ 5.41 $ 5.39 $ 5.38 $ 5.36 $ 5.34
Residential 10 Year Average$ 175,657.18 Quantity (value/unit)$ 5.30 Page 131 of250 Page 132 of 250 The County of Peterborough County Council
To: Warden and Members of Council
From: Randy Mellow, Chief of Paramedics
Date: April 19, 2017
Subject: 2017 Emergency Preparedness Week
Recommendation: That the Council of the Corporation of the County of Peterborough, do hereby proclaim the week of May 7th to 13th, 2017, to be Emergency Preparedness Week in Peterborough County and encourage all citizens to participate in educational activities on emergency preparedness.
Financial Impact: No financial impact.
Background:
Emergency Preparedness (EP) Week 2017 will be observed from May 7-13 it is a Canada-wide initiative to increase awareness of individual and family preparedness. All levels of government have an important role to play in emergency preparedness and response, but ultimately, emergency preparedness starts with the individual. Emergency Preparedness Week is designed to educate individuals on how to Plan. Prepare. Be Aware.
Peterborough County and City, Community Emergency Management Coordinators would like to extend an invitation to the public to attend the EP Week Display on Tuesday May 9th at the Evinrude Centre from 7:00-9:00 p.m. There will be displays and information available to assist you in being prepared.
Respectfully submitted,
Randy Mellow
Page 133 of 250 Page 134 of 250 Proclamation for EP Week 2017
WHEREAS The Corporation of the County of Peterborough does recognize the importance of Emergency Management in Ontario; and
WHEREAS the goal of Emergency Preparedness Week is to raise community awareness and the need to prepare for the possibility of an emergency; and
WHEREAS the safety of our community is the responsibility of each and every one of us; we must prepare now and learn how to secure a strong and healthy tomorrow.
THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the County of Peterborough hereby proclaims the week of May 7 to 13, 2017, to be EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS WEEK IN OUR COMMUNITY, This year we want to encourage all members of the County to, Plan. Prepare. and Be Aware.
Joe Taylor Warden, Peterborough County
Page 135 of 250 Page 136 of 250
The County of Peterborough County Council
To: Warden and Members of Council
From: Patti Kraft, Director of Human Resources
Date: April 19, 2017 – Staff Report with a Recommendation
Subject: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Prevention Plan
Recommendation: That HR-38 – Traumatic Mental Stress Policy and HR- 39 – Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma Policy, be approved and adopted by by-law.
Overview: In April 2016, the Ontario government passed Bill 163, the Supporting Ontario’s First Responders Act (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder), 2016. Bill 163 amended the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 to create the statutory presumption that PTSD diagnosis in a first responder is work-related, unless otherwise proven. This change now allows first responders, including our paramedics and PCCP managers, to receive faster access to treatment and the information they need to stay healthy.
This new Act is one of Ontario’s strategies to create a variety of initiatives to prevent and mitigate the risk of PTSD among first responders. Included in these initiatives is the requirement that employers, with workers covered under this Act, conduct an assessment of their PTSD resources and develop specific documents to address PTSD in the workplace.
This legislation also amended the Ministry of Labour (MOL) Act, authorizing the MOL to collect employer’s plans to prevent PTSD at the workplace. The MOL has mandated that the PTSD Prevention Plan be submitted to them by April 23, 2017 and that the plan includes policies to address traumatic mental stress and stigma associated with mental health in the workplace. The plan developed by the County is attached for your reference and follows a template provided by the MOL.
Page 137 of 250 Page 2
As mandated by the MOL, we have developed and are submitting to you the two new policies related to the PTSD Prevention Plan developed for PCCP employees.
We are requesting Council’s approval of new policies HR-38 &HR 39 – Traumatic Mental Stress and Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti Stigma and that they be adopted by By-Law.
An action plan for continued implementation and refinement of the PTSD Prevention Plan has been developed by Human Resources and PCCP Management.
Summary We respectfully request that Council approve new policies HR-38 – Traumatic Mental Stress and HR 39 –Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma, and that they be adopted by By-Law.
Respectfully submitted,
Patti Kraft Director, Human Resources
Attach. – HR-38 – Traumatic Mental Stress Policy HR-39 – Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma Policy County of Peterborough – PTSD Prevention Plan
Page 138 of 250
The County of Peterborough PTSD Prevention Plan
This PTSD Prevention Plan has been developed to outline our approach to managing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder at the County of Peterborough. The goal of this plan is to take a holistic approach across prevention, intervention and recovery and return to work.
Prepared By: Patti Kraft Randy Mellow Don Oettinger Mary Spence
Date: April 19, 2017
Company Contact Information County of Peterborough 470 Water Street Peterborough, ON K9H 3M3 (705) 743-0380 (800) 710-9586
Page 139 of 250 CONTENTS Introduction ...... 4 Prevention Focus Area ...... 4 Intervention Focus Areas ...... 5 Recovery and Return to Work Focus Area ...... 5 Goals and Objectives ...... 5 Organizational Current State ...... 5 Integration with Other Services ...... 6 Overview of PTSD, Risk Factors, Signs and Symptoms ...... 6 Causes ...... 6 Risk Factors ...... 6 Signs and Symptoms ...... 7 Intrusive Memories ...... 7 Avoidance ...... 7 Hyper-arousal Symptoms ...... 8 Legal Requirements ...... 8 Notification of Injury/Illness ...... 8 Organizational PTSD Policies ...... 9 Organizational PTSD Prevention Policy ...... 9 Organizational Anti-Stigma Policy ...... 10 Complaints Process ...... 11 Hazard Reporting ...... 11 Incident Reporting ...... 11 Health & Safety Responsibilities Standard Intervention, Recovery and Return to Work ...... 11 Recognizing and Responding to Signs and Symptoms of PTSD ...... 12 Roles and Responsibilities for Prevention, Intervention, Recovery and Return to Work ...... 12 Senior Leadership Roles...... 12 Managers and Supervisors ...... 13 Paramedic Health and Safety Committee ...... 14 Paramedic Employees ...... 14 Return to Work Coordinator ...... 14
2
Page 140 of 250 Paramedic Union ...... 14 Training ...... 15 PTSD Awareness and Anti-Stigma Training ...... 15 Recognizing Signs and Symptoms and Responding to Signs of PTSD ...... 15 Return to Work Coordination and Management ...... 15 Orientation ...... 15 Post Exposure Education and Awareness ...... 15 Training Roll-Out Plan and Documentation ...... 15 Documentation ...... 15 Screening Protocol and Early Intervention ...... 16 Screening Protocol ...... 16 Early Intervention Strategies ...... 16 Responding to a Crisis and Accessing Treatment ...... 16 Peer Support Program ...... 16 Our Goal ...... 16 Preventative and Supportive ...... 17 Employee Assistance Program (EAP) ...... 17 Community Support ...... 17 Return to Work ...... 17 Supervisor and Return to Work Coordinator (Human Resources) Considerations ...... 18 Providing Accommodation ...... 18 References ...... 19
3
Page 141 of 250
Introduction The Senior Leadership of the County of Peterborough is committed to addressing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in our workplace. This prevention plan outlines a holistic approach to addressing PTSD and the focus of this plan is to establish foundational elements based on the PTSD Framework below. Specifically this plan highlights our prevention, intervention and recovery and return to work policies and practices.
This is a living document which will be updated as our organization advances on our PTSD prevention journey.
Figure 1: PTSD Framework
Prevention Focus Area Prevention focuses on outlining the basic elements of occupational health and safety management such as understanding legal responsibilities, recognizing, assessing and controlling the hazard, developing policies and procedures, outlining roles and responsibilities and incident reporting procedures in an organization. The goal is to establish or integrate PTSD prevention practices for the promotion of a healthy and safe workplace that actively works to prevent harm to a worker mental health.
Page 142 of 250 4
Intervention Focus Areas Intervention focuses on outlining actions that can be taken to improve a situation. This includes ensuring that workers know how to report psychological injuries when they occur and are supported in doing so. It also highlights intervention options that are evidence based and that can be utilized in organizations.
Recovery and Return to Work Focus Area The Recovery and Return to Work ensures that managers understand how to accommodate a worker who is suffering from PTSD and that there are clearly established roles and responsibilities for supporting workers through this process. Recovery and return to work is an important aspect of preventing future or further injury.
Goals and Objectives The goal of the plan is to provide all Sr. Leaders, Supervisors, Managers and Workers clarity on how the County of Peterborough is addressing PTSD prevention, intervention and recovery and return to work in our organization.
The specific objectives of the plan are to:
. Outline organizational current state; . Define the legal requirements; . Explain how to identify and respond to PTSD injuries; . Establish roles and responsibilities within the organization; . Establish policies and procedures to support PTSD prevention in the organization; . State crisis intervention expectations and screening protocols; . Outline organizations intervention practices and procedures so that all supervisors and managers understand the available intervention options; . Review the duty to accommodate; . Provide examples of accommodations that may be utilized in the organization to support efficient and effective recovery and return to work.
Organizational Current State The County of Peterborough is an upper tier municipality representing eight local municipalities. We have a population of permanent year round residents of approx. 57,000, increasing in the summer months with the influx of seasonal residents and tourists.
Geographically, the County of Peterborough is approximately 150,000 hectares consisting of agricultural lands, lakes and rivers and two First Nations Reserves. Our year round tourism industry attracts thousands of visitors every year enjoying cottage country, camping, hiking and visiting our many local attractions.
Page 143 of 250 5
Our local hospital, Peterborough Regional Health Centre, is one of the County’s largest employers and is one of the busiest Emergency Departments in Ontario. We are home to two world-class learning institutions; Sir Sandford Fleming College and Trent University. These educational facilities attract students from across Ontario and Canada and are home to a large number of international students.
The County of Peterborough employs approximately 250 people including full time, part- time and seasonal. We have several departments including Administration, Planning, Finance, Human Resources, Public Works, Paramedics and Lang Pioneer Village Museum. While the majority of our services are provided to those who reside in the County, our Paramedics provide emergency medical care to citizens and visitors of both Peterborough County and the City of Peterborough with an additional population of 81,000 permanent residents.
As an employer, the County of Peterborough is committed to providing a healthy and safe workplace for our employees. In 2016, 13% of all employee injuries were related to mental stress. Of those claims, 27% resulted in lost time, a decrease from the previous year which was at 15% of injuries and 88% of lost time claims.
Integration with Other Services The County of Peterborough’s PTSD Prevention Plan is not integrated with other services. Fire and Police services are provided at the lower tier level and through the City of Peterborough municipal services.
Overview of PTSD, Risk Factors, Signs and Symptoms PTSD can develop when someone experiences, sees or learns about an event involving actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual violence.
Causes It is believed that PTSD is caused by a complex mix of: . Life experiences, including the amount and severity of trauma you have experienced since early childhood; . The way your brain regulates the chemicals and hormones your body releases in response to stress; . Inherited mental health risks such as an increased risk of anxiety or depression and inherited aspects of your personality or temperament.
Risk Factors Risk factors include: . Having a job that increases your risk of being exposed to traumatic events, this includes jobs such as first responders, corrections and military personnel; . Experiencing intense or long-lasting trauma;
Page 144 of 250 6
. Feeling horror, helplessness or extreme fear; . Seeing people get killed or hurt; . Having experienced other trauma earlier in life, including childhood abuse/ or neglect; . Having other mental health problems such as anxiety or depression; . Lacking a good support system of family and friends; . Dealing with extra stress after the event, such as loss of a loved one, pain and injury, or loss of a job or home; . Having biological (blood) relatives with mental health problems including PTSD or depression.
PTSD can increase the risk of other mental health problems such as: . Depression and anxiety; . Issues with drugs or alcohol use; . Suicidal thoughts and actions.
Signs and Symptoms Symptoms may start within 3 months of the event but can sometimes not appear until years after the event. The symptoms can make it hard for the affected person to live their everyday life and can be accompanied by depression, substance abuse, or other anxiety disorders. Following are three types of symptoms associated with PTSD1:
Intrusive Memories Also called re-experiencing symptoms, these memories can start from the persons own thoughts, or can be triggered by words, objects or situations that are reminders of the traumatic event. Intrusive memories include: . Recurring, unwanted distressing memories of the traumatic event; . Reliving the event as if it were happening again; . Upsetting dreams about the event; and . Severe emotional distress or physical reactions (heart racing, hands sweating) to something that reminds you of the event. Avoidance Avoidance symptoms may cause a person to change their routine such as avoiding things that remind them of the event as well as negative changes in thinking and moods. This includes: . Trying to avoid thinking about the event; . Avoiding places, objects, activities or people that remind you of the event; . Increased negative feelings about self or others; . Feeling emotionally numb or an inability to experience positive or negative emotions; . Feeling hopeless about the future; . Losing interest in activities that were enjoyable in the past;
1 Mayo Clinic, 2016, National Institute of Mental Health, 2016
Page 145 of 250 7
. Feeling strong guilt, depression or worry; . Memory problems including not remembering important aspects of the traumatic event; and . Difficulty maintaining close relationships. Hyper-arousal Symptoms These symptoms are changes in emotional reactions usually constant and can make a person feel stressed, angry, overwhelmed and “on guard.” The symptoms include: . Irritability, feeling tense or “on guard”; . Difficulty sleeping; . Angry outbursts or aggressive behaviours; . Being on constant guard for danger; . Feelings of overwhelming guilt or shame; . Self-destructive behaviours; . Trouble concentrating or sleeping; and . Being easily startled or frightened.
Legal Requirements At the County of Peterborough we understand that we have a legal requirement under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990 (OHSA) to take every reasonable precaution to protect workers from harm. Employers and supervisors are required to inform all workers about psychological hazards on the job and provide training to employees on how to prevent these hazards and protect themselves from harm. Workers are also required to follow policies and procedures set out by the employer. Notification of Injury/Illness Following the notification of an injury/ illness, Section 51 and 52 of the OHSA requires notification to the Ministry of Labour, Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC) or Health and Safety Representative (HSR) and trade union (if applicable) if an employee is critically injured, disabled from performing their own work or receives medical attention resulting from an incident.
The details required in these reports and the parties who must be notified are based on the severity of the injury and are outlined in the OHSA, and in Section 5 of the Industrial Establishment Regulation.
Of particular importance is the necessity in S 5(2) (j) to include steps to prevent further illness.
Reporting a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder through required channels is handled in the same manner as other injuries or illnesses. There are no special requirements set out by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) at this time. When an injury or illness occurs, the employer must submit a Form 7 Report of Injury/Illness within three days.
Page 146 of 250 8
In many cases, an employee with PTSD will require time off from work, but in some instances it may be possible to accommodate them with alternate work as they are receiving treatment. The same WSIB Form 7 is used regardless of whether the ill/injured employee loses time from work (Lost Time Injury), or only seeks medical attention (No Lost Time Injury). The employee will be sent a Form 6 by the WSIB for completion following the employers’ submission of the claim.
Organizational PTSD Policies The County of Peterborough has in place the following policies to support PTSD prevention and management in our organization:
. HR-38 – Traumatic Mental Stress Policy . HR-39 – Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma Policy . HR-30 - Health and Safety Policy . HR-35 – Return to Work/Request for Accommodation Policy . HR-24 - Workplace Bullying & Harassment Policy . HR-33 - Workplace Violence Prevention Policy
In addition, we developed the following:
. PCCP Peer Support Group – Terms of Reference
Organizational PTSD Prevention Policy The County of Peterborough considers mental health, wellbeing and psychological safety of its employees to be an important part of a productive, effective and healthy workplace. We have established a vision and program for a safe and secure workplace that addresses stigma associated with mental illnesses.
Senior Leadership of the County of Peterborough is actively involved in our mental health, wellbeing and psychological safety policy, program and services and is committed to building psychological health and safety into all aspects of our Organization’s operations, processes and procedures, particularly as this relates to incidents of traumatic mental stress and post-traumatic stress disorder.
To achieve our goals we will: . Increase awareness about mental health issues and create an open dialogue between employees, managers, leadership and the union. . Develop policies, programs and services to help all members of our organization and that are consistent with the principles of mutual respect, confidentiality and cooperation across the organization. . Support managers to help address the mental health, wellbeing and psychological safety of our employees and provide them resources and tools to address demands, conflict, emotional distress or trauma experienced by our workers.
Page 147 of 250 9
. Focus on the organizations impact on the health and well-being of all employees, not personal health status. . Evaluate the success of our program at planned intervals.
Organizational Anti-Stigma Policy The County of Peterborough is committed to fostering a workplace where our employees are protected from stigma associated with mental illness. We will ensure that all employees are treated with respect and dignity; this includes those suffering from mental illness and those who support other workers suffering from mental illness.
Harassment and acts of discrimination will not be tolerated. Anyone who is found to be stigmatizing another individual may be subject to disciplinary action. Types of behaviour and acts that contribute to stigma include:
. Prejudicial attitudes and discriminating behaviour directed towards individuals. . Trivializing or belittling people suffering from PTSD, or PTSD itself. . Insulting people who are suffering from PTSD. . Patronizing people who are suffering from PTSD by treating them as if they are not as good as other people. . Ostracizing people who are suffering with PTSD, or their friends and supports.
This policy applies to all current employees and all behaviours that are in some way connected to work including off-site meetings, training and day-to-day operations.
Senior Leadership of the County of Peterborough is responsible for providing all employees with a psychologically healthy and safe workplace, free of stigma, discrimination or harassment. The Senior Leadership of the County of Peterborough will ensure that this policy is applied in a timely, consistent and confidential manner, determining whether or not allegations are substantiated and determining what corrective action is appropriate if required.
To support a stigma-free workplace the County of Peterborough leadership will:
. Provide PTSD awareness training and education. . Regularly monitor organizational practices and systems for barriers to achieving a stigma-free workplace. . Provide an effective and fair complaints process. . Lead by example.
Managers and Supervisors are responsible for fostering a stigma-free workplace and setting an example of appropriate behaviour. This includes communicating the policy and procedures for bringing forward a complaint, addressing situations which they become aware of in a timely fashion, and taking appropriate action in a sensitive and confidential manner for all employees.
Page 148 of 250 10
Employees are responsible for treating co-workers with respect in the workplace, bringing forward complaints and cooperating with investigations into complaints. Employees are also responsible for treating all parties and situations in a sensitive and confidential manner. Complaints Process The County of Peterborough has provided information to employees regarding complaints as established in the following policies to support anti-stigma in our organization:
. HR-38 – Traumatic Mental Stress Policy . HR-39 – Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma Policy . HR-30 - Health and Safety Policy . HR-35 – Return to Work/Request for Accommodation Policy . HR-24 - Workplace Bullying & Harassment Policy . HR-33 - Workplace Violence Prevention Policy
Hazard Reporting The County of Peterborough has developed the following policies and standards to support hazard reporting including incidents related to psycho-social hazards in our organization:
. HR-38 – Traumatic Mental Stress Policy . HR-39 – Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma Policy . HR-30 - Health and Safety Policy . HR-24 - Workplace Bullying & Harassment Policy . HR-33 - Workplace Violence Prevention Policy
Incident Reporting The County of Peterborough has developed the following policies and standards to support incident reporting including incidents related to psycho-social hazards in our organization: HR-30 - Health and Safety Policy
HR-24 - Workplace Bullying & Harassment Policy HR-33 - Workplace Violence Prevention Policy Health and Safety Standard – Reporting Hazardous Conditions Health & Safety Responsibilities Standard Intervention, Recovery and Return to Work The County of Peterborough has developed the following policy to support intervention, recovery and return to work procedures in our organization:
Page 149 of 250 11
HR-35 – Return to Work/Request for Accommodation Policy
Recognizing and Responding to Signs and Symptoms of PTSD Senior Leadership, Managers and Supervisors are expected to know how to recognize and respond to signs and symptoms of PTSD in a worker or fellow Manager, Supervisor or Senior Leader.
If signs and symptoms are found to be presented it is expected that the Senior Leader, Manager or Supervisor will:
. Keep the communication lines open with the worker and ask how they or other team members can provide support to the worker. If the worker is not ready to talk wait for them to open up. If they do start to share, do not interrupt. It is often difficult for people with PTSD to ask for help, particularly if there is a concern about stigmatization. . Deal with signs and symptoms directly and as soon as possible. If signs and symptoms are recognized it is best to open the dialogue and provide support so that the worker knows they are supported in the workplace. . Provide information about the options the worker has to address PTSD. Help the worker access support and help resources, if they request or need assistance. . Encourage the worker to talk to someone they trust about what has happened, this could be team members identified in the workplace to provide peer support, family members, friends, or a manager/supervisor. . Share with the worker that what they are experiencing is a normal reaction. Provide information about signs and symptoms and when they should speak to a professional or seek additional help.
Roles and Responsibilities for Prevention, Intervention, Recovery and Return to Work This section outlines the County of Peterborough’s specific roles and responsibilities regarding the prevention and management of PTSD. Senior Leadership Roles Our Senior Leadership will:
. Understand the impact that PTSD, and other occupational stress injuries have on the organization; . Identify what health and safety programs already exist and how a PTSD Prevention program can be integrated into existing systems. This should consider: o Management Training o Employee Engagement o Anti-stigma Awareness o Communication Strategies o Civility and Respect, Anti-Stigma
Page 150 of 250 12
o Critical Incident response and management o Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) or other benefits that support a mental health and wellness program o Training individuals in strategies for resiliency and health behaviour . Identify gaps that need to be addressed using an assessment; . Determine how the organization should monitor trauma exposures; . Establish policies, procedures, initiatives and services to support the Prevention Plan and Program and monitor implementation; . Engage Managers and Supervisors in the development pf policies and procedures; . Ensure that a systematic, structured and coordinated Return to Work process and plan is followed; . Set the tone and lead by example, reducing stigma and encouraging conversations and take every reasonable precaution to protect workers; . Enforce the policies, procedures and program; . Maintain the Prevention Plan and Program, evaluate it and look for opportunities to improve it; . Ensure that early and considerate contact has been made with an injured/ill worker. Managers and Supervisors Our Managers and Supervisors will: . Be involved in the workplace assessment and participate in identifying controls; . Participate in training to be aware and ready to address the day to day aspects of PTSD prevention and management; . Receive training on how to recognize signs and symptoms of PTSD and understand the causes and risk factors and understand how to support workers suffering from PTSD; . Participate and contribute in establishing policies, procedures, initiatives and services to support the program; . Enforce the policies, procedures and Prevention Plan and Program; . Provide advice to frontline medics on methods of self-awareness and recognition that they may be experiencing symptoms related to PTSD; . Identify individuals at risk of PTSD; . Be prepared through training, coaching or other means to engage workers in discussions about psychological health and safety; . Encourage active discussion with workers about mental health and psychological safety; . Implement processes to report concerns and provide support to workers in need.; Help identify control methods that support PTSD prevention such as workplace rotations for highly exposed individuals; . Reduce stigma by participating in positive conversations; . Understand how to accommodate a worker suffering from PTSD; . Actively participate in a systematic, structured and coordinated Return to Work process and plan.
Page 151 of 250 13
Paramedic Health and Safety Committee The County of Peterborough’s Paramedic Health and Safety Committee will be engaged in the development of a PTSD Prevention Plan and Program. To actively participate the committee will: . Understand the factors of the job that impact psychological health and safety, in particular PTSD. They should develop awareness about what PTSD is, as well as the symptoms, causes and risk factors; . Be involved in the workplace assessment; . Assist the organization in developing a process for identifying workplace mental health and wellbeing issues, and in particular PTSD; . Help identify controls that can be put in place to address psychological health and safety; . Help reduce stigma related to mental illness by participating in identifying the need for education, training, and resources to address PTSD, and participating in delivering these to the organization; . Participate in training to enable support of the workforce as required; . Engage in the development of a communication plan and strategies related to address psychological health and safety, particularly PTSD; . Reduce stigma by participating in positive conversations.
Paramedic Employees Our Paramedic Employee’s will: . Comply with policies, procedures and the program; . Participate in training and education about PTSD, and required training (resiliency, anti-stigma, policies, etc.); . Report concerns, incidents so that they can be investigated and addressed; . Listen to coworkers and encourage engagement in the program if needed; . Reduce stigma by participating in positive conversations.
Return to Work Coordinator Human Resources will: . Assist the injured/ill worker to remain or return to work while they recover, while also ensuring that the worker’s return to work date is sensible, flexible and safe for the worker; . Help the worker return to the workplace post-injury/illness; . Connect and consult with the injured/ill worker and WSIB representative and make sure that everyone understands what to expect and what is expected of them; . Monitor the workers progress towards returning to work; . Help resolve issues or disputes related to the return to work.
Paramedic Union The union will: . Be consulted about policies and procedures; . Support the Return to Work Plan and process.
Page 152 of 250 14
Training
PTSD Awareness and Anti-Stigma Training The County of Peterborough is committed to providing PTSD and anti-stigma awareness training to all Paramedic Sr. Leadership, Managers, Supervisors and Workers within our organization. Our organization will develop, implement and maintain the awareness training program so that all staff are familiar with the signs and symptoms of PTSD as well as all of our policies and procedures related to prevention, intervention and return to work. The Sr. Leadership team requires that all PCCP employees are involved and participate in this training program.
Recognizing Signs and Symptoms and Responding to Signs of PTSD All Sr. Leaders, Managers and Supervisors will receive training on how to recognize the signs and symptoms of PTSD and learn the organization’s expectations on how to respond to and address these signs and symptoms.
Return to Work Coordination and Management Managers, Supervisors and Return to Work Coordinators (Human Resources) will receive training on the practices and principles of managing return to work. This includes the specific mandate that the County of Peterborough has with regards to supporting successful and safe return to work. The training will review the Return to Work process and how it relates to address the needs of a worker who is suffering from PTSD.
Orientation The PTSD awareness and anti-stigma training as well as the policies and procedures related to PTSD hazard recognition, reporting and interventions will be incorporated into the new employee orientation program.
Post Exposure Education and Awareness Education and awareness will be offered to those who have experienced a traumatic event. This education will focus on providing information about signs and symptoms, how to access care if needed and provision of contact information if they require assistance and/or resources.
Training Roll-Out Plan and Documentation Documentation These training programs will be documented and will form part of the employee’s human resources record.
Page 153 of 250 15
Screening Protocol and Early Intervention
Screening Protocol The County of Peterborough recognizes that early intervention is important for the effective treatment and prevention of PTSD. The severity of the initial traumatic event will be considered when determining the need for early intervention.
Early Intervention Strategies When workers are exposed to a traumatic event, the County of Peterborough will provide those workers with the following early interventions to minimize stress and promote prevention of PTSD. The specific early interventions that will be utilized include: . Allowing time off for the workers who have been involved in a traumatic event; . Providing workers with stigma-free counselling services to address the emotional aspects of what they have experienced; . Using debriefing sessions that focus on helping the worker put their experiences in perspective and validate what they have seen, done, thought and felt; . Providing ongoing education that gives information on PTSD, stress management and actions that workers can take for themselves; . Offering peer support programs.
Responding to a Crisis and Accessing Treatment
Peer Support Program Peer support is an intervention that leverages shared experience to foster trust, reduce stigma and create open channels of communication for seeking help, sharing information and seeking support resources. The focus of a peer support program is to establish positive coping strategies, using common language which fosters trust and credibility between team members.
Peterborough Paramedic Peer Support Group (PPPSG)
Our Goal The PPPSG is a group of Paramedics who share a deep commitment and concern for the welfare of their fellow Paramedics, particularly related to short and long-term mental health and wellness.
The primary goals of the Peer Support Group are to: Listen – provide an empathetic ear Provide low level psychological intervention (example: provide advice regarding self-care, resources and where to get help) Identify peers who, in the assessment, could be at risk to themselves or others
Page 154 of 250 16
Facilitate access and/or pathways to professional help It is not the role of the peer support group to: Provide on-going formal interventions with a peer (example: do not provide cognitive behavioural therapy, do not have on-going or prolonged peer support involvement beyond 3 to 4 occasions) Advocate for peers in disputes that may arise between peers and management or between peers.
Preventative and Supportive The goals of this Peer Support Group are aimed at assisting in the overall well-being of Paramedics. While often they may be called upon to assist following a traumatic or highly stressful incident, they also play an important role in providing informal peer support during the course of a day’s work. Their support is two-fold: aimed at providing preventative support to assist Paramedics in maintaining their well-being; and, providing targeted peer support when traumatic or highly stressful calls or incidents have occurred.
Paramedics have been provided with the process on how to contact a member of the PPPSG. Additionally, information is available through the employee intranet including details regarding the mandate of the PPPSG, Mental Health Community Resources, and EAP – Access Flow Chart.
Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Our EAP Program offers immediate counselling services to eligible employees on a 24 hour basis and is accessible Canada-wide.
Community Support The County of Peterborough provides information to employees through the employee intranet and printed resources available at locations regarding mental health resources.
Return to Work The County of Peterborough’s Return to Work program is built on the 7 Principles of Return to Work which supports positive outcomes for our workers. The return to work process is highlighted below:
. The employer will make early and considerate contact with the injured/ill worker; . The employer will make an offer of modified work, when possible, to the injured/ill worker so they can return to work safely; . The return to work plan will be developed so that it supports the returning worker, their coworkers and their supervisor;
Page 155 of 250 17
. The supervisor will receive training in work disability prevention and will be included in the development of the workers return to work plan; . The worker will be provided an individualized Return to Work plan that focuses on the workers initial and ongoing needs; . The employer will maintain ongoing communications with healthcare providers and the WSIB to ensure that they understand the workers job and the workplaces ability to accommodate.
Supervisor and Return to Work Coordinator (Human Resources) Considerations When considering how to accommodate a worker the Supervisor and Return to Work Coordinator (Human Resources) will, based on medical information provided, review the following: . What is the worker experiencing (signs and symptoms) and what are the limitations? . How will these limitations impact the work that the worker needs to do? . Are there specific job tasks that will be problematic as a result of these limitations? . What accommodations can help address or remove these limitations? . Has the worker been asked about possible accommodations, can they help identify specifically how the organization can assist? . Does the worker’s Sr. Leadership team, Supervisor or Co-workers need training on PTSD to help facilitate a successful return? . Is the worker currently receiving care or treatment and, if so, are they continuing to follow an appropriate treatment plan (if this is known)?
Providing Accommodation The County of Peterborough values the goal of prevention of injuries and disabilities through maintaining a safe and healthy workplace. Consistent with this value is the County’s commitment to the successful recovery of injured, ill and disabled employees by assisting in early intervention and return to safe work.
It is the County’s policy to take all reasonable steps to return injured and disabled employees to their pre-injury job as quickly as possible, and to consider employees’ requests for accommodation. The County intends to provide a fair and consistent policy for assisting in the rehabilitation of employees who have been injured on the job or are suffering from a non-occupational injury, illness or disability, by working collaboratively with the union locals and the staff or third parties that form part of a recognized formal rehabilitation program. Where the employee is unable to return to their previous job, the goal will be to return them to available alternative work (if available) which is consistent with their functional abilities. Employees may request accommodation that will enable them to continue to work, as opposed to taking time off on a leave.
The County will make every effort, to the point of undue hardship, to provide meaningful employment for both temporarily and permanently disabled employees, thereby returning valuable human resources, benefits and productivity to the County.
Page 156 of 250 18
References CAMH. (2016, Feb 23). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Retrieved from Mental Health and Addiction Information A-Z: http://www.camh.ca/en/hospital/health_information/a_z_mental_health_and_addictio n_information/Post-traumatic/Pages/pstd.aspx Canadian Human Rights Commission. (2016, March 10). Resources: A Guide For Managing the Return to Work. Retrieved from Canadian Human Rights Commission: https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8 &ved=0ahUKEwjg- pGV8bbLAhWMcj4KHZJ5BzgQFggbMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chrc- ccdp.ca%2Feng%2Fcontent%2Fguide-managing-return- work&usg=AFQjCNEUcm7m3PIb6SQWNWAIskThqpWvhg&sig2=gtkdAU_fY Canadian Mental Health Association. (n.d.). Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Retrieved August 6, 2013, from Canadian Mental Health Commission: http://www.cmha.ca/mental_health/post-traumatic-stress-disorder/#.UgERF5K1GC0 Great West Life Centre for Mental Health in the Workplace. (2005). Workplace Strategies for Mental Health. Retrieved January 25, 2016, from Psychological Health and Safety: Introduction. Institute for Work and Health. (2007). Seven "Principles" for Successful Return to Work. Retrieved from Institute for Work and health: http://www.iwh.on.ca/seven-principles- for-rtw Job Accomodation Network. (2016, 01 21). Accomodation and Compliance Series: Employees with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Retrieved from Job Accomodation Network: https://askjan.org/media/ptsd.html Leka, S., & Jain, A. (2010). Health Impact of Psychosocial Hazards at Work: An Overview. Switzerland: World Health Organization. Mayo Clinic. (2016, 01 15). Diseases and Conditions: Post-traumatic stress disorder. Retrieved from Mayo Clinic: http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/post-traumatic- stress-disorder/basics/definition/con-20022540 Mental Health Commisstion. (2013, March 3). Workplace Strategies for Mental Health Facts and Figures. Retrieved August 6, 2013, from Workplace Strategies for Mental health: http://www.workplacestrategiesformentalhealth.com/display.asp?l1=2&d=2 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2005, March 5). Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: Management: NICE Guidelines [CG26]. Retrieved from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg26/chapter/1- guidance
Page 157 of 250 19
National Institute of Mental Health. (2016, 01 21). National Institute of Mental Health. Retrieved from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/post-traumatic-stress-disorder- ptsd/index.shtml Occupational Health and Safety Administration. (2016, 01 21). United States Department of Labour. Retrieved from Resilience Resources for Emergency Response: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/emergencypreparedness/resilience_resources/predeploym ent.html Phd., A. M. (2014, July 16). Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and the Workplace: What Employers and CoWorkers Need to Know. Retrieved from Gift from Within - PTSD Resources for Survivors and Caregivers: http://www.giftfromwithin.org/html/PTSD-Workplace-What- Employers-Coworkers-Need-To-Know.html Siebert, A. (2006). Resiliency Quiz - How Resilient Are You. Retrieved January 17, 2016, from Al Sierbert Resiliency Centre: http://resiliencyquiz.com/index.shtml Thomas, J. C. (2002). Handbook of Mental Health in the Workplace. California: Sage Publications. Work Safe Victoria. (2016, March 10). Return to Work. Retrieved from Work Safe Victoria: http://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/return-to-work WorkSafe BC. (2014, 12 05). www.worksafebc.com. Retrieved from WorkSafe BC: http://www2.worksafebc.com/i/posters/pdfs/2009/HF_2009_03.pdf
Page 158 of 250 20
County of Peterborough
Policy Manual
Department: Human Resources Approved April 10, 2017 Management Team: Policy #: HR-38 Revised: Subject: Traumatic Mental Stress Approved Council: April 19, 2017
Related By- 2017-26 Page: 1 of 2 Laws:
Purpose The County of Peterborough recognizes the importance of mental health, wellbeing and psychological safety of its employees to be an important part of a productive, effective and healthy workplace.
The County of Peterborough has established a vision and program for a safe and secure workplace that addresses stigma associated with mental illnesses.
Scope All Peterborough County/City Paramedic (PCCP) employees.
Policy Senior Leadership of the County of Peterborough is actively involved in our mental health, wellbeing and psychological safety policy, program and services and is committed to building psychological health and safety into all aspects of our operations, processes and procedures, particularly as this relates to incidents of traumatic mental stress and post-traumatic stress disorder.
To achieve our goals we will:
. increase awareness about mental health issues and create an open dialogue between employees, managers, leadership and the union; . develop policies, programs and services to help all members of our organization that are consistent with the principles of mutual respect, confidentiality and cooperation across the organization; . support managers to help address the mental health, wellbeing and psychological safety of employees and provide them resources and tools to address demands, conflict, emotional distress or trauma experienced by our workers;
1
Page 159 of 250
County of Peterborough
Policy Manual
. focus on the organization ’s impact on the health and well-being of employees, not personal health status; . evaluate the success of our program at planned intervals.
Training All PCCP employees of the County are required to be educated and trained on the contents of this policy and such training shall be provided by the County as required.
Copies of the Traumatic Mental Stress Policy are available to all affected employees, upon request and are available electronically on County systems.
Upon acceptance of employment, all new PCCP employees will receive a copy and an explanation of the Traumatic Mental Stress Policy. New PCCP employees will be required to review and acknowledge that they have been provided with, have read and have understood the contents within the policy.
Managers will receive additional training in order to promote and uphold this policy.
Review This policy will be monitored on an on-going basis and shall be reviewed by the County’s Human Resources department as required.
2
Page 160 of 250
County of Peterborough
Policy Manual
Department: Human Resources Approved April 10, 2017 Management Team: Policy #: HR-39 Revised: Subject: Traumatic Mental Stress - Approved Council: April 19, 2017 Anti-Stigma
Related By- 2017-27 Page: 1 of 3 Laws:
Purpose The County of Peterborough is committed to fostering a workplace where our employees are protected from stigma associated with mental illness. This organization will ensure that all employees are treated with respect and dignity, this includes those suffering from mental illness and those who support other workers suffering from mental illness.
Harassment and acts of discrimination will not be tolerated. Anyone who is found to be stigmatizing another individual may be subject to disciplinary action. Types of behaviour and acts that contribute to stigma include Prejudicial attitudes and discriminating behaviour directed towards individuals; Trivializing or belittling people suffering from PTSD or PTSD itself; Insulting people who are suffering from PTSD by treating them as if they are not as good as other people; Ostracizing people who are suffering with PTSD, or their friends or supports.
Scope This policy applies to all Peterborough County/City Paramedic (PCCP) employees and all behaviour that is in some way connected to work including off-site meetings, training and day to day operations.
Policy Senior Leadership of the County of Peterborough is responsible for providing all employees a psychologically healthy and safe workplace, free of stigma, discrimination or harassment. The leadership of the County of Peterborough will ensure that this policy is applied in a timely, consistent and confidential manner, determining whether or not allegations are substantiated and determining what corrective action is appropriate if required.
To support a stigma-free workplace the County of Peterborough’s leadership will: . provide Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) awareness training and education; 1
Page 161 of 250
County of Peterborough
Policy Manual
. regularly monitor organizational practices and systems for barriers to achieving a stigma- free workplace; . provide an effective and fair complaints process; . lead by example.
Supervisors are responsible for fostering a stigma-free workplace and setting an example of appropriate behaviour. This includes communicating the policy and procedures for bringing forward a complaint, addressing situations which they become aware of in a timely fashion and taking appropriate action in a sensitive and confidential manner for all employees.
Employees are responsible for treating co-workers with respect in the workplace, bringing forward complaints and cooperating with investigations into complaints. Employees are also responsible for treating all parties and situations in a sensitive and confidential manner.
Manager Tips for Reducing Stigma at Work/Promoting a Positive Work Environment
Establishing an effective PTSD Prevention Plan has to take into consideration the organizational culture and the individuals that work within this culture.
. To be effective it needs to consider the aspects that have potential to cause trauma and stress to workers; . As a leader it is important that you communicate the importance of this to the entire organization and share the responsibility of promoting a positive and psychologically healthy and safe work environment; . You need to also provide your managers with the tools they need to engage and communicate the importance of working in a psychologically healthy and safe way.
Below are some tips on creating a stigma free workplace and promoting a positive work environment:
. Set the tone by treating coworkers with respect and valuing their contributions; . Engage staff to helping to identify, build and implement the PTSD prevention plan, encourage ongoing input and contributions to improve the plan; . Clearly communicate the PTSD prevention plan and the reasons for new policies, procedures or structures to meet the goals of the plan; . Recognize accomplishments, and promote staff cohesiveness and dialogue; . Resolve conflicts early and quickly; . Identify training needs and provide training; . Acknowledge that work on its own is stressful as well as the exposure to traumatic incidents, explain the importance of self-awareness and awareness of others;
2
Page 162 of 250
County of Peterborough
Policy Manual
. Promote an atmosphere where attention to one's emotional state is acceptable and encouraged rather than stigmatized or disregarded; . Explain the options for assistance – through Employee Assistance Programs, Crisis Lines or other more formal channels if available, encourage active participation in these programs and address any employment concerns
Training All PCCP employees of the County are required to be educated and trained on the contents of this policy and such training shall be provided by the County as required.
Copies of the Traumatic Mental Stress – Anti-Stigma Policy are available to all affected employees, upon request and are available electronically on County systems.
Upon acceptance of employment, all new PCCP employees will receive a copy and an explanation of the Traumatic Mental Stress - Anti-Stigma Policy. New PCCP employees will be required to review and acknowledge that they have been provided with, have read and have understood the contents within the policy.
Managers will receive additional training in order to promote and uphold this policy.
Review This policy will be monitored on an on-going basis and shall be reviewed by the County’s Human Resources department as required.
3
Page 163 of 250 Page 164 of 250 The County of Peterborough County Council
To: Warden and Members of Council
From: Yvette Peplinskie, Deputy Treasurer
Date: April 19, 2017
Subject: Investment Report February 2017
Recommendation: Receive for Information
Financial Impact: Improve interest revenue earned on surplus cash.
Overview:
As at February 28th, 2017 the Corporation of the County of Peterborough had $12,319,227 invested as follows:
1. CIBC Wood Gundy: a. CIBC Guaranteed Investment Certificate (GIC), $1,500,000 at 1.15%, due June 1, 2017; b. CIBC GIC, $1,500,000 at 1.40%, due June 1, 2017; c. Laurentian Bank of Canada GIC, $1,500,000 at 1.98%, due June 1, 2018; d. Bank of Nova Scotia residual bond, $1,684,690 at 1.85%, due October 18, 2019; e. CIBC GIC, $1,717,268 at 1.70%, due July 8, 2020; f. CIBC GIC, $1,717,269 at 1.85%, due July 8, 2021. 2. Manulife Securities: a. Bank of Nova Scotia GIC, $1,000,000 at 1.86%, due May 1, 2017. 3. Promissory Note: a. The Mount Community Centre, maximum $1,700,000 at 2.5%, due April 15, 2017.
The above investments meet the criteria established by the Investment By-law.
Respectfully submitted,
Original signed by
Yvette Peplinskie
Page 165 of 250 Page 166 of 250 The County of Peterborough County Council
To: Warden and Members of Council
From: Yvette Peplinskie, Deputy Treasurer
Date: April 19, 2017
Subject: February 2017 Monthly Accounts
Recommendation: Receive for Information
Financial Impact: Budgeted and approved expenditures
Overview:
Attached is a list of accounts for the month of February 2017 for your information.
Respectfully submitted,
Original signed by
Yvette Peplinskie
Attachment – Appendix A – February 2017 Monthly Accounts
Page 167 of 250 Page 168 of 250 County of Peterborough
Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount 911 Emergency Systems Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) phone 20.63 Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 3.33 911 Emergency Systems Total 23.96 Armour Road Facility 1429637 Ontario Ltd. Feb 2-13/17 plowing Armour R 741.83 Jan 17-27 snowplowing d 299.17 Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Armour rd heat 428.41 Peterborough Utilities Services Armour rd utilities 710.60 Armour Road Facility Total 2,180.01 Child Care Peterborough, City of shared services Feb 2017 43,350.00 Child Care Total 43,350.00 Corporate Bell Canada (Box 1550) toll free line 20.54 Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) main office fax line 439.40 CDW Canada Inc. budget usb sticks 136.86 cables 718.79 headphones for online training 41.67 IT phone headsets 527.30 surge cord x 10 149.59 switch shelves 144.91 Page 169 of 250 City of Peterborough-Recreation EFeb 7, 14, Mar 9/17 room renta 615.14 Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 166.11 County of Frontenac meeting room rental Eorn 30.53 Douro-Dummer (Facility Rental) Apr 6/17 meeting room rental 181.18 eSolutions Group Ltd. intranet character design 610.56 Faces by 2 LPV face painting 50.00 Fresh Urban Plate Feb 14/17 catering 267.12
28 Page 170 of 250 County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount County Court House Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) phone 15.47 Bruce Maly Plumbing & Drain Sen North Wing bathroom issues 525.59 Chemaqua water treatment (Feb—Apr'1?) 801.36 Cintas Canda Ltd. Main office mats 160.38 Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Main office heat 3,563.50 Murray st. heat 170.29 EnviroPest Inc. Feb '17 pest control 55.97 Glen Isle Agri-Services Inc. Jan'1? snowplowing main offic 3,897.41 Peterborough Utilities Services Main office utilities 7,382.14 Murray St. utilities 302.78 Progressive Waste Solutions Can:Jan'17 garbage p/up main offi 387.66 Property Management Peterborou biweekly services 7,871.82 RBC Royal Bank ( Visa Payment A phone cases/supplies/furniture 355.11 Thyssenkrupp Elevator monthly mtc. (Feb-Apr'17) 924.17 Trent Security Systems Ltd. repair card access system 1,165.15 County Court House Total 27,611.87 CountylCity Land?ll Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 9.30 Peterborough, City of shared services Feb 2017 21,837.00 Page 171 of 250 CountylCity Land?ll Total 21,846.30 Emergency Measures Amex Bank of Canada (Corp Card: fuel 132.62 Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) phone 632.34 Receiver General for Canada (Miscradio licence renewal 726.00 Emergency Measures Total 1,490.96 Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) phone 1,147.19 Canadian Springs water 2.20
28 L9'€99 sesuedxe 6up,aauJ omoe 00'ZL aeg >|ueg 99668 'uJoooe euJoJ/esmoo opwe V auauuiedes!/\ ) )|ueg [emu 333 99' spe qo_f—spe“per 'ou| )|.lOM].9N egpatmsod Z1717 98'08Z sJgedeJ xoop awnugwpe )|oo|oau1gl |Mo Z9'€0Z pe uonoauuooAJ,unoo aqJ_ ‘sawgl )|oo.|qmw 99993 EIH-SP9AL.U9f‘
16169 U!UJPV-SP9LL.U€l‘ Page 172 of 250 098173 spe uoppauuoo /uunoo dno.I-3egpaw pue|oJ;aw Z9’/.17 sJaJ,eeMs 6SnOL|JB9M )|.|oM spuew 9 L'€LL pe uonoeuuooMunoo 'pr| p|BJ9|-| p|aya)|e1 00'0€€ pe uoppeuuoo /uunoo ;uapuodsa.uo3 auaax L[817 ugwpe-6ugppeJqs ugemnow uo.I| 6Z'ZOL seuddnsaegoo 'ou| saayuas I9 aayoa |B!.l9d|Ll| L8'9L€ 1ueu1do|eAec] gel,-3 ZZ'17€L 1ueuJes.InquJgea e?eeuwea/iogdwg aneq ‘uaqug L 1oqoJ 2 ,1o u?gsep ‘p11 dno.1-3suoumosa 6Z'Z€L pe uonoauuoo/uunoo aql ‘sMaNJauxumq Z9'17L€'17 Bugugen,M9!A9JwaJ,s/Ks 'ou| a.IeM;;os puouxega L9'Z9€ |eJ,ueJ euguoew Bumew 8Z'9L17‘l» esee| Jegdoo aoyuas |eg:>ueu!:| uapue-| 9621an £83179 J9!-"100|9UJ31U! LLOZq9:l ‘P11 M9/\!|°C| KBHI"C! 96'LLO‘l« seuddnssomeU, uer 'au| epeueg sseudxg 32|,B.lOd.lO3 LIOLL qounl uonegpew ugpung a.IeMp.IeH awoH Buounaqg 17126 L leaw Bugugemeq LL31; edno 6L|J_ ‘doqs asaaqg "°!3°-'19!'~'!WPV Imaua-3 ;unowv asuadxg a:>ua.Ia;aa aa!oAu| au.IeN Jopua/\ lllatuuedaq 9995%%69%€& 99699969 (:969%65% 69699969% €6%% (sexe_1_e|qe.Ie/xoosa pue "01/(ed ;o J,eN) “oz IUen.Iqa:] - uodaa asuadxg /(unuow waumedaq q6no.IoqJaJ,ad ;o Munoz) County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount RBC Royal Bank ( Visa Payment A HRPA membership 471.15 LAS workshop 44.42 pop supplies/OPB training cour 354.40 Roma conference expenses 248.89 Staff Development 406.02 supplies/fuel/projector screen 237.68 Rogers Wireless ( ain Account) Feb 2017 cell phones 342.93 Sage, Rhonda (Petty Cash) cream supplies/meals 17.50 Sampson, Karla Employee Mileage Reimbursement 150.75 That's a Wrap Catering Company Supe 4911 bargaining meal 109.90 Thomson Reuters Canada FOI book 139.78 UPS Canada courier Admin 95.42 courier—admin 156.64 Workplace Safety & Insurance Boa2016 wsib reconcilition 8,315.48 Xerox Canada Ltd. copier usage 522.94 General Administration Total 27,623.88 Cheese Shop, The budget meeting meal 362.01 Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 276.02 Page 173 of 250 Eastern Ontario Wardens Caucus 2017 membership 5,000.00 Imperial Coffee & Services Inc. coffee supplies 65.57 arty oo's Restaurant council meeting meal 1,208.81 Peterborough County Catt|emen's 2 tickets 50.00 RBC Royal Bank (Visa Payment A amcto course/roma accom. 915.08 pop supplies/OPB training cour 133.78 Rogers Wireless (Main Account) Feb 2017 cell phones
28 Page 174 of 250 County of Peterborough
Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Land Division Total 1,099.84 Lang Pioneer Village Admax Marketing Inc. LPV ad 950.00 Baklinski, Basi Employee Mileage Reimbursement 23.89 Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) phone 40.08 Caryi, Audrey rental car gas 31.96 Casey's Propane Inc. LPV heat 369.70 Cintas Canda Ltd. LPV mats 75.00 Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 238.82 Corrigan, Joe conference expenses 569.74 Employee Mileage Reimbursement 117.08 mileage/parking 1.00 D&L Photography LPV 2016 photography 5,500.00 De Lage Landen Financial Service copier lease 269.88 Discount Car & Truck Corporate C LPV car rental 89.63 Doris, Chris facility rental cancelled LPV 80.00 EnviroPest Inc. Feb '17 pest control 90.00 Gregory, Julia scissors 19.95 Hydro One Networks lnc.(MA|N AILang Millhydro 66.87 Page 175 of 250 LPV hydro 2,865.92 LPV Weaver shop hydro 67.03 J. E. Hastings Ltd. candy LPV 885.20 J.L. Bradshaw Ltd. LPVtoys 301.31 Jackson Water Conditioning Ltd. LPV Jan'17 water samples 90.00 Mark's Work Wearhouse LPV shirt 30.89 Merrett Building Centre LPV lumber 163.84
28 Page 176 of 250 County of Peterborough
Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Peterborough CountyICity Parame 1429637 Ontario Ltd. Feb 2-13/17 plowing Armour R 2,967.32 Jan 17-27 snowplowing d 1,196.70 Allied Medical Instruments Inc. medical supplies 8,326.23 Amex Bank of Canada (Corp Card: coveralls PCCP 3,407.55 fuel 20,974.29 Battye Mechanical Services Armour rd PCCP replace filters 201.21 Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) Aplsey PCCP phone 257.55 Lakefield PCCP phone 294.09 Non/vood PCCP phone 329.78 phone 15.47 Bell Mobility cell phones/modem lines 567.06 Carleton Uniforms Inc. uniforms 401.85 CDW Canada Inc. Clonsilla PCCP wifi ap's 1,573.41 Cintas Canda Ltd. Armour rd mats 131.28 Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 924.44 Crestline Coach Ltd. assembly strap & buckles 178.83 plug connectors 278.72 De Lage Landen Financial Service copier lease 280.38 Page 177 of 250 Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Armour rd heat 1,713.66 Clonsilla PCCP heat 984.44 Lakefield PCCP heat 503.66 Non/vood PCCP heat 176.85 EnviroPest Inc. Feb '17 pest control 81.40 Ferno Canada Inc. battery 219.15 Feb'17 tracking 1,226.21
28 Bl
91' LOL s.Ie>|ouJ,s J00[.') .1991 uaJ,q6gJ, Z9'9 LA ow JOOp pue|q/eppnq ueq was 99808 mmugqoums >|oo|un 80€|d9J 9199 uado 01,men] J0Op Jeeu 99'ZO17 peoe|de.I Buueaq J95UBL| 6L'0817 /Ueneq e|o/(3 deep 89889 yams ugpaoe|deJ 6uuds>|:>o|o
99'969‘L medsug o Page 178 of 250 66'89€‘€ Jpadsug e -|9U!l1ll5!°-|:l mo>IooIun Z€'ZLL SUO!J,BAOU9Jdood emsuo|3 '°U| 51931!|l9-IV 1191 Zv'90L 6ugJgMdggd poo/vuoN o!.n:>a|3 .l6OU2'| 0€'6€9 J9qUJn| dOOd new Jaqwu uop?um 817'6L 6ugppeJqs ugezunow UO.l| Z’v'606"17 LL, qe:| 5U[SS3OOJdeJ,ep 'au| sag6o|ouqoaJ_ Aap.Ia;u| 9L'€L9‘L oJp/RuJ,odep u1oq>|ona vz'z99 wp?u dOOd AelsdvnvNIvw)'=>uI s>uoM1aN auo OJIMH $$$$$$$$$$ W'Z917‘Z |e6a| as ueMa;s uo1|!weH /(auow s)|ogH 0A'6|.L‘ LL 95%| dOOd 9l|!SU0lO S2|,U6UJI|S9I\U| UGMO 817‘€OZ sauoudeJ,J,ueJ,es BPBUBQJEI|,S|BqO|9 8Z'6’v9‘Z ||!SUO|Q SJ9U!|O9..l/UJOOJ Bugugp 8l.|J_ ‘6SI'lOl.|9JBN\9..ll'II|,!U.?‘|:| 08'1717L‘I. 5U[MO|dMOUSdgod p|eua>|e1»s;uau1d!nb3 =9K1.Iado.Idneg 1s.u:| L8'696‘9 s?eq add 5U!.lI'II|OB}l"IUBwL|O9I|.3.l!:| LZ'€L s?eq Bugueep ogq ].Ll9l.U95BUBw30!l\J9S9.l!d ’v9'Z9L awn|9AB.l1 LZ'9ZZ‘L Suplaen sg? AL_uer 'ou| epeueg ou1a=g awexed K153/Kxuno-3q6no.Ioq.Ia;ad ;unou1v esuadxg aoua.Ia;aa 90!Ol\Ll| au1eN Jopua/\ €66BU969%%(£69 wawuedaa
(sexel e|qeJa/xooea pue ||oJ/(ed ;o1eN) “oz K.Iemqa:| - uodaa asuadxa Mqxuow ;uau.Iuedaa q6no.IoqJa1ad ;o munog County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Peterborough Countylcity Parame M & C Hydraulics Inc. air line/adap/fittings/hose re 673.24 Manulife Financial (EAP) eap Feb 2017 267.33 eap Jan 2017 263.56 Marty Moo's Restaurant PCCP training meal 201.36 McKesson Canada Corporation drugs 9,166.56 drugs ret'd (3,223.60) Medical Mart medical supplies 9,152.98 Medigas oxygen 2,224.20 oxygen/gases 2,057.55 Mellow, Randy Reimbursement of Expenses 41.41 Michelin North America (Canada) I2 new tires 373.66 Microage Technology Solutions ba?e?es 1,037.95 power adapters 661.44 Nexicom Inc Armour rd phone/fax 124.69 internet 1,561.78 pccp line 10.12 Ontario Medical Supply Inc. drugs 88.00 Ontario Municipal Employees Reti OMERS 103.68 Page 179 of 250 Peterborough Regional Health Ce: Feb'17 offload nurse 35,268.75 Jan'17 linen 5,125.24 Peterborough Utilities Services Armour rd utilities 2,889.40 Clonsilla PCCP utilities 756.59 Property Management Peterborou Feb 2017 PCCP cleaning 11,259.69 Jan'17 PCCP cleaning 2,216.07 PCCP cleaning 9,043.62
28 €9'8170‘ eog/ues ?uuemsuedggd suoneogunuuuog a?ed-seJ_ € 96903 dood senddns 611792 S1U91°9JU!S!P dOOd 6 I/Z817 SJ!Bd9JJeqmex l«[617l« suede; '/vvdJ3L|OJ€)1 991917 dggd senddns?uguealo pazgwn aoueuenugew qsgms LL'L0€'Z meudggd Aelsdv auedmd Joyadns
0Z'98L senddns Page 180 of 250 Z9'917L seuddns|eogpeLu aq_|_ ‘pn Kuedwog sua/\a;s 817'8ZZ sea!/ues |egoug|o 3-|n ‘a|:Mog.Ia;s SVLBL A], menuMeqs 90'8LL sesuadxg ,lO J,ueuJesJnqu1gea |!.ldV‘U.l31|BS ZI L99 5U!U99I0clOOd I‘9|SdV LL.q9:l Z/_' L99 Bugueep dogd Ae|sdv 39213 0103 99021 seuoqd "33 “oz qad (wnooov ugew) ssa|a.uM s.Ia6oa 0999 JGIBMdOOd Kesldv ‘Ion mam Bupluua a?maIblooa J,U8uJdO|3A9(]4,1913 tueqma ;o uog?aa Z0'6£6 ueems JoJ,oa[oJd/|an;/senddns 9929 |eew peomo 9996 s|eeuJ peo| go 6Z'179L sesuadxe 61wodeo 9Z'68L sasuedxa aoua.Ie;uoo odeo [.9392 3ABMOJ0[l.U/S|B9uJ 97093 |eew peomo/s/(9)1 801789 seuddns/s?uueeq/qua; swe V ;uauMed es!/\ ) xueg [emu 333 aunued £153/Kzunog q6no.Ioq.Ia;ad gunowv asuadx aaua.Ia;aa aogo/\u| aweN Jopua;\ zuaumeda UJ69U96969%U9H999U9%$ %9999%99% a 6969GB6999U9%69 (sexe_|_ e|qeJe/xooea pue no;/(ed _J,o1eN) “oz K..lBnJC|9;|- uodau asuadxg Mmuowmawuedaa l.|5nO.lOq.l62|9d;o A;uno3 County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Peterborough CountyICity Parame Tele?ex Medical Canada Inc. needles/stabilizers 3,963.55 TeraMach Technologies Inc. switch Clonsilla PCCP 2,545.84 UPS Canada courier PCCP 73.13 courier-pccp 3.84 Vanzuylen Alignment & Tire Servii 4 new tires 987.46 dismount winter tires 130.66 new tires on rear/tires on new 994.42 tires to new rims 531.24 Wally's Flower Wagon Disposal PCCP pump outs 824.25 PCCP pumpouts 1,068.48 Walsh, Michelle Employee Mileage Reimbursement 18.97 mileage/cme supplies 9.60 Walsh, Michelle (Petty Cash) office supplies/meals 146.56 Windsor's Drycleaning Centre laundry 5,961.79 Work Authority boots 122.10 Xerox Canada Ltd. copier usage 141.64 Peterborough CountylCity Paramedics Total 215,069.36 Planning Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 239.61 Page 181 of 250 De Lage Landen Financial Service copier lease 152.98 Imperial Coffee & Services Inc. coffee supplies 26.23 Rogers Wireless (Main Account) Feb 2017 cell phones 108.55 UPS Canada courier-planning 7.64 Xerox Canada Ltd. copier usage 48.19 Planning Total 583.20 Provincial Offences Peterborough, City of shared services Feb 2017 (32,782.00)
28 EZ
0998 Jgedal ensuo 99'917Z'l LLOZqea 5U!>I09J1S!5 ‘P11 S9!5°I°Ull39J. wsa 999« sJ,|oq/smu snoue/\ 1 I529 S|9AOL|S/J3LUu.lEL| a.IeMp.IeH awo|.| quoua?pug AV813 1ueuJes.InquJgea e?eeuwea/(o|duJ3 s!.u.|3 ‘£a|pe.Ig H5999 sJeq/sugeqo >|ug| auue =9Jgedaa aug?ug 1uou1|ag 6911 S3U!IUJQPOUJ/S9U0HdH90 K1!l!q°W H98
80'L0l« euoqd 133 Page 182 of 250 17O'6€l« euoqd 0916 euoqd J,odap )|0O|9AB|—| OZ'68 sunxe; oJnoc| Z8193 euoqd J,odep omog (oooa xog-ugew) epeueo nag 06' LL8 J,odep omoc] suede; .lO10u.lue; saoyuas |e:>!ueqaaw almeg 88'L€L 5U!-|9119|60'9L 1!Un ‘P11 '5°!'~ld9-I9°1|1V 69'66Z uop,eJ,oJ |eaq/v\ Z9'€0Z J!Bd9J10dS J!Bd8J 'ou| aoyuas 91!1 Ka|s.Iauv 82908 dgqsmqwew adns peou og.1e;uo ;o uogegoossv 99017 L‘L uonmqeual e?puq ‘pr: saxeaoossv*9weuels Kaluw LL'179Z €)|.lQd/S||BJ9l\OO/(J,e;es og;;eJ1 ':>u| sa!.usnpu| ogv Z989 L‘Z “oz uersuonoedsug 'p11 epeueg wooav 6[Z17L sesuedxe Eiugugen, uema‘swepv 82066‘ L J!BdSJugseq qoJ,eo Ae|sdv 'ou| xamoov 96'ZLZ‘9€ uop,e||e1sug He; pJen6 'ou| o!.Ie;uo 9/_z9gg sag =9-Bug =9uado - sypo onqnd (00'Z8L‘Z£) |B!|.O]_ saouayo |B!OU!I\O..|d asuadxg aaua.Ia;au aogo/\u| au1eN .lOpl.|9[\ mawuedaa $%696999H995%99%93%99% H9U5699969%% U59969
(sexe_1_e|qeJe/xooeg pue ||oJ/(ed ;o1e ) [_|.oz ILIen.Iqa:| - uodaa asuadxg Kunuowmaumedaq q6no.:oq.aa;a ;o Munog County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Des BT Engineering (Ottawa) bypass ea up to Dec 31/16 2,695.46 Nov 27-Dec 31/16 services 4,338.36 Canadian Paci?c Railway Co. Feb'17 railway crossings 1,246.50 Jan'17 railway crossings 1,246.50 Canadian Springs water 112.86 Carquest Auto Parts-Havelock hose clamps 1.38 Casey's Propane Inc. Douro depot heat 1,009.01 Havelock depot heat 1,643.46 Cavan-Monaghan Township cr21 Union St. repaving 113,054.63 CCS lndustrails anit seize/nuts/washers/screws 90.77 bolts/rapid tap/astro cut 78.58 bushings 45.39 discs/nuts/adapters 41.51 nuts 86.13 plugs/silicone 20.34 screws 58.81 smcone 396.86 tube brass inserts 77.03 Page 183 of 250 washers 13.12 Chemong Home Hardware Buildin lumber 31.99 Clark-Kavanagh Inc. steamer parts 766.01 Connelly's Minute Muffler fix exhaust 130.05 Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 382.15 De Lage Landen Financial Service copier lease 277.79 Deeth & WhiteIFitzgerald Fuels Douro storage bldg. heat 708.87
28 sugeqo 17088 ugeqo 'ou| ‘epeueg Mddnscm 601 an/v\ 99'6L SJ3UB3|O a.IeMp.IeH au1oH )|oo|aAe|.| 88'880' 199.:no/e|pueq |OJ].UOO 9[060'17L e1 uoueq>|Jo/v\/11>] dumd/dumdJ!€ 9Ul S9!-IISNPUIOOSSVH ZZ'L9L sunsugm ‘P11 ll1!U-IS-IBISUBH
8L'9ZL S85JBl.|O|,J,ppe-A1s;es sxgedaa sng =9)|on.u_ Kaung ‘H Page 184 of 250 ZVZ99 H01!/V\SPBOI8 P817L10 13113!-l199|3 Pl!n9 L9'8ZL ode eqn|uea.I5 O17'96L L-de9C|n|U99..l5 L9'8ZL aqnguaau? suonmosuog;eog.Iqn1 p|aAauao.I9 £99817 |B),U3J |e;uau uuoyun .l65U!B.l9 O6'L9L suede; ddo/seglddns some (uses ?ned) anea ‘uequs ZSXZLL suonoedsug e?puq u.Ioq>1ong P91!‘-U!'| CIHE) 8€'€179‘9 O]L|dEJ50d011710*9127.10 ':>u| Buyaaug?ug ||aMar 'a'9 O8'€Z€ p|egqspugM pepeqs Meu sse|9 omvuoseasJnog Z6'L90‘€9 ?ugmold//(qpuers AL,uer 'au| 6up|:>n.u_ Mag/ugeg 8Z'L8L‘L S1J!l4S/'59>lJ9d/S19>l09ISMd OLI.lO.|dO!da 179'17Z17‘L 1U9UJ3AOJdu.l!euup19/uJgeq.ue:| Buuaaug?ug a?e?ug 9|? L99 199M1odep >|0oJqu!w 'ou| uonnqgnsga se-3 a?puqug LZ'8‘l79‘L17€ S90!/U93.1.LIL8 U9!‘-9LlL2990 L6'LZ€‘Ol«l— 1U]M ewop eugw/>|oo|eAeH//(a|sdv 'pn Buneneoxg 'soJg ugma 99' L19 suede: a>|eJq aoyuas 9v ammaumoa 98'90 L |9lU9J ‘I38 ':>u| qor aq; uo uoa seasg ‘Bug '9 uado - S)|JOM auqnd asuadxg aaua.|a,tau aago/\u| aweN Jopua/\ auawueda 69%%U569$%9999eB€6% €B69U96999%936999H969%U9 a (sexe_|_e|qeJe/xooea pue ||OMBd;o1eN) “oz K.|emqa:| - uodaa asuadxg Kunuo waumedaq qBnoJoqJaJ,ad ;o munog County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Des Heming Ltd. pole saw stalls out under load 157.05 Hutch Tech depot repairs 918.29 Hydro One Networks |nc.(MAlN Albensford bridge lights 51.89 buckhorn bridge beacon 64.91 Buckhorn depot hydro 174.80 burnham pump house 35.80 causeway bridge beacon 27.79 causeway bridge lights 290.00 cr1&chemong rd. lights 121.49 cr10&21 flasher/1 light 50.34 cr10&sherbrooke-flasher/4 lig 26.43 cr18&19 lights h 21.43 cr18&wil|cox lights 139.30 cr2 round about 259.72 cr2&34 flasher/1 light 24.03 cr23&18 4-way stop 21.43 cr23&36 lights 441.59 cr29&18 flashers 64.46 Page 185 of 250 cr29&23 flashers 64.91 Douro depot hydro 2,997.41 Douro storage bldg. hydro 1,163.10 Havelock depot hydro 954.55 Mine dome hydro 236.10 SEL depot hydro 637.68 Wallace pt rd beacon 27.79
28 EZ
170'90€ 8LLOZ6#193910M98 P908 LVZLQ LOLOZ6#JGPJO1198D908 8A'O9Z €L66L6# J9PJO1|9S P908 99'8Z’V Z929 L6#JSPJO H98 P908 Z[€6L 1717617L6# -|9PJO 1I9S P908 d'| 5-'9!-U33 )l|"8 M9|P!3'| 821172 sueo o17_L |o.IJ,uo3 ;sn3 UMO.l){ L8'€LL sum/Jo1e|nsug/egzzou
99'O17 auedoJd peugnbu Page 186 of 250 17L'Z€L sesse? p6SS9JdLUOO Mddns6u!p|aM s,6ug)q 8L'9L17 Bumnosse.I6 91,400-/(|nr aaueumugew KuadmdBuneax 6083 seoagd Maw 'd.Io3s|e;aw equemex 69' L91‘LZ 1353 pues .l61U!M 09'90L'9Z >|ooJqmw pues J91U!M O€'L99‘6Z uJoq>|ong pues J31U!M 'dJo3 |e1gde3 equemex LL'17LL J!€d3J q6no.|oq.Ia;ad - a.Iu_ |e).| L9'6OL‘ 1U3LUd!US1193 LZZ ‘E18 N95‘ 6 L'9€ V8L ewop eugw ues ZZ'9L’v‘17€ >l00Jq|l!V\l H93 €17'Z09‘€Z >|oo|eAeH ues 1692692 omoq was 1171LV8 uJoq>|ong yes 88' L8L‘9Z Aersdvyes ‘P11JIBS J°5PU!M S + )1 173080‘LZ ufigsep =3ea 91713 sm?aluns |an6a|:| '31‘ €Z'9Z sanddnseegoo 'ou| saoyuas tg aagog |eg.Iadu1| sag =9-Bug =9uado - s)|.|oM ouqnd asuadx aaua.Ia;au aago/\u| amenJopua/\ auatuueda LU99999369%%$69996/9€B€9% €B%%%$H969%U9U969$ a (sexe_]_e|qe.Ie/xooea pue ||oJ/(ed ;o1eN) “oz IUen.Iqe:| - uodaa asuadxg Mqxuow auatuuedaa q5no.Ioq.|a;ad ;o County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Des Laidlaw Bulk Carriers LP Road Salt Order #921813 476.13 Road Salt Order #921941 296.50 Road Salt Order #922375 384.98 Road Salt Order #922376 381 .53 Road Salt Order #922384 21 5.89 Road Salt Order #922385 223.62 Road Salt Order #922449 328.90 Road Salt Order #922450 344.20 Road Salt Order #922451 355.55 Road Salt Order #922453 337.98 Road Salt Order #922454 366.89 Road Salt Order #922757 215.68 Road Salt Order #922882 300.24 Road Salt Order #922883 305.04 Road Salt Order #922916 224.41 Road Salt Order #922956 199.97 Road Salt Order #922957 199.97 Road Salt Order #922958 225.47 Page 187 of 250 Road Salt Order #923273 386.61 Road Salt Order #923275 393.59 Road Salt Order #923283 288.29 Road Salt Order #923284 290.85 Road Salt Order #923474 383.43 Road Salt Order #923690 383.08 380.99
28 99'6ZZ L€99Z6# J9P-'0 1|9S P908 99' 9 L99Z6# J9PJO 1l9S P908 6001917L9 6609Z6# J9PJO 1l9S P908 90929 8609Z6# J3P-‘O1|9S P908 99' L8 9 L6’17Z6#J9PJO 1l9S P908 2 6[9LZ ZL617Z6#J9P-‘O1|9S P908 l-Z162 ZO617Z6#-'0PJO 1|9S P908
915999 L06i7Z6#J9P-‘O1|9S P908 Page 188 of 250 AV989 00617Z6#J9P—'O1l9S P908 ZVL89 66817Z6#J9PJO 1|9S P908 91179 86817Z6#J9PJO l|9S P908 8179999 96817Z6#J9P-‘O1|9S P908 1.8999 86817Z6#J9P-JO1|9S P908 LL'Z8Z Z1.917Z6#~'9P-‘O1|9S P908 Z9' 69817Z6#-'0P-‘O1|9S P908 08133ZLZ 99817Z6#J9P-‘O1l9S P908 /_9817Z6# -'9P-‘O1|9S P908 £17903 99817Z6#JGPJO1|9S P908 0 L'9ZZ 179817Z6#J9P-‘O1|9S P908 111712 £0817Z6# -'3P-'0 1|9S P908 09982 €17L17Z6#-'9P-‘O1|9S P908 903117 [.69€Z6# -'9P-‘O1l9S P908 862617 969€Z6# J9P-‘O1|9S P908 8 L9 L9 969€Z6# J9P-'0 l|9S P908 971709 1769€Z6# J0P-‘Oll9S P908 d'| 5-19!-U93)||"8 M9|P!9'l sag =5»‘Bug =9uado - S)|JOM onqnd ;unou1v asuadx aoua.Ia;aa aogo/\u| aLuaN Jopua/\ wawuedaa UJ99%%%€:9%9999U5H969¢:9%% 69U995%%9999%U5696G (sexe _1_e|qeJe/xooea pue nomad;o1eN) “oz KJBl'I.lC|3:]- uodau asuadxg Kunuowzuaumedaa l|5l‘lO..lOqJa2|9d;o County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Des Laidlaw Bulk Carriers LP Road Salt Order #925762 461 .41 Road Salt Order #925763 453.17 Road Salt Order #925764 470.39 Road Salt Order #925765 451 .97 Road Salt Order #926144 369.02 Road Salt Order #926145 369.65 Road Salt Order #926146 368.47 Road Salt Order #926147 364.39 Road Salt Order #926148 384.89 Road Salt Order #926158 275.24 Road Salt Order #926159 249.28 Road Salt Order #926160 226.48 Road Salt Order #926161 223.93 Road Salt Order #926162 199.33 Road Salt Order #926387 350.25 Road Salt Order #926807 273.36 Road Salt Order #926808 278.94 Road Salt Order #926815 204.25 Page 189 of 250 Road Salt Order #926816 218.97 Road Salt Order #926922 309.65 Road Salt Order #926923 306.80 Road Salt Order #927088 367.65 Road Salt Order #927089 231 .55 Road Salt Order #927101 228.49 372.70
28 0170179 su?gs su?gs umuyxew 39802 eyg/\/(euMoc|01,doqs uJo.I; M01 5U!MO_|_uasua?mrmew 96893 Buyy;/esoq JSAOO q6noJ, '=>u| souneJp£H 3 '8 w 091 L0' uuoyuow JoJ,:>eJJ,uoo J,uau1u6ye aqJ_ ‘dno.I9xawoo'| 915999L 9 Log senssg 91,13 0Z'€9L 9 Log Mel/(q u?gs /(J,unoo s.IaKMe'| 5'11 Z1799 Josues |39l.|M
€9'6ZL seqoy/vxs Page 190 of 250 91.99 qoyms J3)|O0J 8999 e/ye/\ emssaud 99917 lees/deoJeyg; 915L017 /\|eA emsseJd/pgny/p|egqs1snp ’Vi7' pgnyJ,sneqxe |asegp Jaumu?aaxaKuo>I=>on4n 6O17€Z'Z17 Mes J,ueLueo 'P1'I 59l3S '8 |91U3El P|3!J3)l31 6 L'LZZ 1199138 179'L179 awop eugw yes Z 'IEISH93 ’VL'6L0‘Z ewop eugw yes 917"v88‘L >100-'q||!V\l H93 99' L83 >100-|ql!W H95 L9'€9€‘17 >|oo|eAeH yes 917'9LZ‘Z omoq yes 6Z'8176‘Z uJou>1ong yes 88'€96‘i7 /(eysdv yes W1708 9Z9LZ6# J9P-‘O1198P908 d'| slaaueo ulna Me|p!e1 sag -9 '6u3 =3uado - s)poM oyqnd ;unou1v asuadxg aoua.ua;a3 aagoAu| aweN Jopua/\ maumeda 9969%%(:6696969%€B%99%%%$% 99696995%€/99999 a (S9XBJ_e|qeJaAooa3 pue no.1/(ed;o1eN) “oz lLIen.Iqa:] - uodaa asuadxg Kunuow1uau1uedac| l.|5nO.lOq.l92|,9¢| ;o Ihunog County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Des Maximum Signs u channel posts 456.65 u channel posts/filler blocks 2,017.39 Michelin North America (Canada) Inew tires 6,292.82 Millbrook Home Hardware shop vac 48.83 Moi Parry Spring Service Ltd. repair rear springs 488.45 unicipality of Trent Lakes Jan'1? Lakehurst Road 22,036.05 National Sanitation & Supply supplies 511.80 Nexicom Inc Armour rd phone/fax 161.96 internet 373.97 Millbrook depot phone 74.80 North Kawartha, Township of Balmer rd/Jack lake rd 1,900.00 Nortrax Canada Inc. sensor/mirror 607.71 Norway Asphalt Limited coldmix 5,879.69 Ontario Good Roads Association (Staff Development 366.34 Ontario One Call Jan'17 notifications 87.31 membership credit 2017 (450.27) Ontario Wateways, Trent Severn Vextension permit Buckhorn Bri 105.00 extension permits -Buckhornd B 105.00 Page 191 of 250 parking lot license r 98.10 Overhead Door Company of Peterl PM all doors & operators 586.61 Peterborough Automotive air fresheners/fram filters 69.24 alternatore/core deposit 197.92 armashine/spray gel 139.76 batteries 15.91 67.64
28 0692 [seq/v\ gomo atuA_L|OOJ_ 99999 ea!/ues ?uue/vxsueJ,odap suoneogunwwog a?ed-seJ_ 80'€0L s|oo1 (?ugpauxs mew) s|oo_|_ uo-deus oo'9z LL02 qea uses?nedw/v\ 1.A'17Z s|eeu1/sauddns ween (uses mad) epuouu ‘a?es 9:99; seuoqd "93 “oz qed (;unooov ugew) SS6|9J!M s.|a6oa O0'L€9‘L |eMsueJ eoueouogpeJ vsgw)epeueg Jo; |eJaua-3 Jangaoau
A0' S|OO1/S3np/]€M8U3J Page 192 of 250 8917'L66'€99 999; u!Mu-sow/(133) 969:1; (9L'8./ es!/\ uo pafiueqo ayqnop _A) OO' seqwees G??/95BU!BJp93.10V zuaumedes!/\ ) )|ueg ua?oa333 179'17LZw Jeunoo 3/V\d 0929 1odec] Jaunoo 'ou| .lO2|,B|O.lnd LZ'ZL ska» 949$ *8)l9°'l 1391-0-Id €9'9LZ'9 /(1e;es 6L'8L9 |B1U3J yn 120 'ou| )1on.|l 1;!-| aonumd sese?-sJepug|o/(9 'ou| epeuea .uexe.|d Z17'99L s1u5u1eeJ1spIeue>Ie'I S69!I\.l3S S6!}!|!I|,n |.|5I'IO.lOq.|9I|,9d 990317 sepe|q J9d!MJ91U!M 90193 1depe deo/15>:/J,e>|oos/deo9/\|eA (or LL) LZ1798Z-€00#9-I P.19JS9!|ddnS 60199 seuddns>1oo1s 9909 S|OOJ, news (zL'9v) LZ’798Z-€00#9J PJ9-I|!0 8686 L un,ea.u,Jo1ouJ/eugu /(e.Ids/sa/\o|5 9A!2|O|.l.lO2|,I'IVq6no.Ioq.Ia;ad sag sg -6ug 1;» uado - s)|.|oM ouqnd asuadx a:>ua.Ia;au aagoAu| awe" Jopua/\ maumeda I-I-I9969€B99€?U999U9U995U9% 69$%%9999%%U9%%%% a (saxe_]_e|qeJe/xooea pue "01/{ed;o1eN) “oz A.Ien.Iqa:| - uodau asuadxg Aunuowauaumedaa q6no.|oq.Ia;ad ;o County of Peterborough Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Des Tool Tyme wrench 32.55 Toromont Cat fuel tube 179.08 fuel tube ret'd re#PS25081882 (80.58) Trent Security Systems Ltd. Douro depot unable to arm syst 106.85 Millbrookdepot relocate keypa 284.93 Millbrook depot repair zones 96.67 Turris Communications Ltd. new raido Unit 16-09 956.91 United Rotary Brush Corp. of Canavarious parts 2,268.24 Universal Supply Group autotech training guide 1,221.12 bolts 2.81 brake cleaner/oil absorbant/hy 573.16 diagnostics training 50.88 halogen lights ret'd re#50961 (44.14) headlight bulbs 32.03 hose nozzles/coupler/wand asse 118.37 odour-kleen 121.01 oil 42.34 oil filters/pyroplex/sealed be 155.08 Page 193 of 250 sealed beam 61.61 sealed beams 32.03 small tools 128.77 tools ret'd re#507906/507907 (128.77) update kit 209.62 various stock 119.31 3.85
28 92209 [SJ/9/\|BA Ae|eJ/A|quJesse O!p€J 80692 Alqwasse ogpeJ 019171 sasn;/eA|eA/deo no €9'€L7 esee|eJ-b/Jomeuuoo >|oo| Lew /(|quJesse esoq L17'9€L UJOL| 99'O6 U019!POOLI
A6169 .1I9“!/SJ91|!J -|!9/S1!>iJ91|!.l Page 194 of 250 89'9ZL e?ugq J0Op (129917 Z6LZ'|7#3J p,J,eJ 'dep 3.100 ) 91712 senqwesse esoq/sq|nq 86' L83 a/\|eA e>1eJq L17' Jaqweqo 3)|8JC| (6Z17LV981 L€98€#9J $3.19119>l99Jq 7) 9z'99z 1q6g|u.In1//(|qu1esse|ezeq ZL'Z€L uue|e dnxoeq uJoq Jge (vz Lvz) ’71.998#3JP.19JU!d-6 s.Io;ow Awe|o.Ia-3 MO|SU!M L0'0 L8 .Iep|oq uo|/(d/yaus "P1199!P°8 X°°|!M (39109) 93/( D99w99z#eJ p.191 smen? 991179 /(|qLuasse Bug/v\dmun; 69'9zo‘L peeuds 13$ Jepue; L8'0 Lo‘9 Mqwasse Joke/xuoo SSOJO vz'6z9 susdsns Buuds/>|oo|q dmJ,|oq ‘pr: seA!3 6u!>uA 99'z9v‘v sJeuunJ qmo/sepe|q ‘pr: sapela Kane/\ sea19'6u3 19uado - S)|JOM ouqnd ;unotuv asuadx aoua.aa;au aogo/\u| au1eN Jopua/\ auaumeda I-I- I9999U999696999959969999999€H a %G/5%%€B9969996999$ (saxe_1_a|qeJe/xooea pue no.1/(ed}O19N) “oz Men.Iqa:| - uodau asuadxa Klnnuowwatuuedaq q6noJoq.|a;ad ;o Ihunog County of Peterborough
Department Monthly Expense Report - February 2017 (Net of Payroll and Recoverable Taxes)
Department Vendor Name Invoice Reference Expense Amount Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Des Winslow Gerolamy Motors ring ret'd re#42192 (76.78) seal set/rings/bearing/hub 931.93 switch 39.85 tire chains/cables/spiders 1,950.77 transmitter 112.09 WSP Canada Inc. cr21 services 14,958.72 Wurth Canada Ltd. grease tool/ties/ear plugs 238.77 Xerox Canada Ltd. copier usage 65.33 Youwin Topsoil Inc. Jan & Feb2017 loader rental 6,075.07 Public Works - Oper. & Eng. & Design Total 1,335,190.25 Public Works - Waste Managemen ABA Recycling, Towing, & Bin Ser organics 1,023.90 Adaptive Health Care Solutions Assessment 152.64 Amex Bank of Canada (Corp Card: fuel 64.74 Astley Gilbert Ltd. Family Day ad 86.50 Bell Canada (Main-Box 9000) phone 43.84 Corporate Express Canada Inc. Jan '17 office supplies 4.71 De Lage Landen Financial Service copier lease 277.65 Imperial Coffee & Services Inc. coffee supplies 20.98 Page 195 of 250 MCS Equipment Leasing Inc. Feb 17 monitoring 44.77 etroland Media Group Jan'17 ads-WM 376.51 Nexicom Inc Armour rd phone/fax 192.64 Peterborough Automotive alternator/core deposit 197.92 Progressive Waste Solutions CanaJan'17 curbside 96,515.30 Jan'17 depots 11,101.12 Ray's Welding weld rain guards 254.40
28 Page 196 of 250 Page 1
The County of Peterborough
County Council
To: Warden and Members of Council
From: Yvette R. Peplinskie, Deputy Treasurer Chris Allen, Purchasing Coordinator
Date: April 19, 2017
Subject: Purchasing Awards – March 2017
Recommendation: That the Purchasing Awards Report – for March 2017 be received.
Financial Impact: No impact in excess of designated budget.
Overview:
In accordance with the Purchasing Policy Corp 06:
Any Tender/Proposal/Quotation Awards that are under $150,000 and are: within budget, with recommendation to the low bidder are approved by the Director and then the CAO
Any Single/Sole source award under $30,000 shall be approved by the Director and the CAO
One report monthly (see 18.4 Tender Process of Policy) should be submitted to Council (first meeting of the month), providing the details of the awards made in the previous month.
This report shall be for information report only.
Analysis:
There were no awards made in accordance with the Purchasing Policy Corp 06 for the month of March 2017 that were not approved by Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Original signed by Original signed by
Yvette R. Peplinskie Chris Allen, Deputy Treasurer Purchasing Coordinator Page 197 of 250 Page 198 of 250 The County of Peterborough County Council
To: Warden and Members of Council
From: Elizabeth Hope, Administrative Services Assistant
Date: April 19, 2017
Subject: Correspondence Report – Information Only
Recommendation: Receive for information.
Financial Impact: None
Overview:
Since the last meeting of County Council, the Information Only Correspondence items listed below have been received. Copies are available upon request from the Clerk’s Office. Copies being provided are indicated by an asterisk (*).
General Correspondence
1. Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Communications: 1. Policy Update dated April 5, 2017 regarding “Bill 68 Submission and 1/3 Tax Exemption.” 2. Policy Update dated April 7, 2017 regarding “Plate Denial for Defaulted Provincial Offences Act (POA) Fines Begins May 1, 2017.” 3. AMO Watch File dated April 6, 2017. * 2. Association of Municipal Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario (AMCTO): 1. Legislative Express dated April 3, 2017. 3. Province of Ontario: 1. News Release dated March 31, 2017 announcing “Ontario Eliminating Drive Clean Test Fee, Strengthening Program – Province Reducing Household Costs and Combating Air Pollution.” 2. News Release dated April 3, 2017 announcing “New Health Technologies Coming to Ontario – Province Supporting 15 Innovative Projects to Improve Patient Care at Home and in the Community.” 3. News Release dated April 6, 2017 announcing “Celebrating 40 Years of Foodland Ontario – Buy Local, Boost the Economy and Enjoy the Good Things Grown in Ontario.” 4. News Release dated April 10, 2017 announcing “Ontario Improving Roads, Bridges and Water Systems across the Province – Investment to Boost Economic Growth, Create Jobs in Rural Communities.”
Page 199 of 250 Page 2
4. Ministry of the Attorney General: Letter dated March 30, 2017 in response to the resolution, passed by County Council at the March 1, 2017 Council Meeting, to amend the Civil Remedies Act, 2001, to allow the Crime Stoppers program access to Proceeds of Crime funds. 5. Ministry of Education: Letter dated April 5, 2017 regarding “2017 Proportions of Enrolment for purposes of Education Act, subsections 238(2) and 257.8(3).” * 6. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care: Memorandum dated March 31, 2017 announcing “Permanent changes to the Direct Services Division, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.” 7. Parks Canada: Letter dated March 27, 2017 addressed to Warden Taylor regarding major infrastructure investments for the Trent-Severn Waterway. * 8. Trent-Severn Waterway Community Update: Email dated April 3, 2017 regarding “Walleye and Chorus Frog Survey’s Underway.” 9. City of Kawartha Lakes: Resolution dated December 13, 2016 regarding “Supporting Certified Crop Advisors.” (County Council supported the City of Belleville resolution regarding “Supporting Agricultural Experts in Their Fields” at the October 19, 2016 Council meeting.) 10. City of Peterborough: 1. Memorandum dated March 20, 2017 regarding “Social Services 2016 Year End Statistical Report.” * 2. Media Release dated March 31, 2017 announcing “Affordable Homeownership Assistance Loan Program – Funding Available.” * 3. Media Release dated March 31, 2017 announcing “Peterborough Renovates Program – Funding Available for 2017.” * 11. McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers: Letter dated March 15, 2017 regarding “Update to Project Notice – Highway 115 Pavement and Culvert Rehabilitation, Ministry of Transportation, Ontario W.P. 4298-13-01.” 12. Stewardship Ontario: Letter dated March 31, 2017 regarding “Industry Funding for Municipal Blue Box Recycling for the quarter of the 2016 Program Year.”
Communications, Minutes and Reports on County-funded Projects
13. n/a
Information Only Correspondence
14. n/a
Respectfully submitted,
Original signed by
Elizabeth Hope Administrative Services Assistant
Page 200 of 250 AMO WatchFile - April 6, 2017 Page 1 of 2
AMO Watch File not displaying correctly? View the online version | Send to a friend Add [email protected] to your safe list
April 6, 2017 In This Issue - 2017 P.J. Marshall Municipal Innovation Awards - call for submissions. - Proposed changes to one-third tax allowance. - AMO/MEDG support local economic development. - Learn about new LAS programs - attend a cost free Town Hall session. - Use cutting edge technology to perform roads assessments. - Broader Public Sector (BPS) Reporting Portal now live! - Careers with LAS, York Region, Kirkland Lake and Simcoe County.
AMO Matters Submit your municipal government project that demonstrates excellence in the use of innovative approaches to improve capital and/or operating efficiency and to generate effectiveness through alternative service delivery initiatives and partnerships. Deadline May 14, 2017.
Federal Matters The 2017 Federal Budget contained a decision to remove the one-third tax allowance of ”municipal office holders” remuneration, to be implemented in 2019 (see page 208). AMO is gathering information about this change, and will be conducting a survey of municipal treasurers to evaluate local impact in order to inform advocacy. AMO is coordinating with other provinces.
Provincial Matters The AMO/MEDG Business Burden Reduction Project has identified innovative, transferable initiatives in London, Barrie, Peterborough, Hamilton and Bruce County to facilitate local business development. MEDG is supplementing this joint project and other Ministry programs with the “Smart Moves” Conference, April 26, 2017, focused on staff development of business-friendly regulatory approaches.
AMO, LAS and ROMA Events LAS Town Hall sessions will be offered in four more locations in April and May. This year’s tour focuses on new programs, including the recently launched Roads Assessment Service. Discover all the ways LAS is helping Ontario municipalities - register today!
LAS LAS formally launched its newest service at this week's AMO Asset Management Symposium. Discover how this program targets aging road infrastructure with the goal of reducing operating and maintenance costs, while at the same time raising the average condition of Ontario road networks.
The BPS reporting portal is open for the 2017 reporting period under O. Reg. 397/11. Public Sector organizations are required report on their 2015 energy consumption by July 1, 2017. Information on how to complete the annual energy and GHG report, along with the dates and times for Ministry-hosted webinars, can be found in the toolkit area by logging into the Ministry of Energy’s Portal. Contact [email protected] if your require further information.
Careers LAS Program Manager - AMO. The Program Manager is responsible for the overall administration, marketing plan, and growth of assigned (i.e. One Investment, Natural Gas, Electricity) programs and management of the assigned program customer relationships. The position will lead the identification,
Page 201 of 250 https://amo.informz.ca/informzdataservice/onlineversion/ind/bWFpbGluZ2luc3RhbmNlaW... 4/6/2017 AMO WatchFile - April 6, 2017 Page 2 of 2
research, program and contract development, and marketing of potential new programs for LAS. The Program Manager will also act as a subject matter expert resource to the municipal sector in all issue areas relevant to assigned programs. Apply by 12:00 PM April 21, 2017 by sending your resume to [email protected].
Manager, Ontario Works Transformation #20580 - York Region. Department: Community and Health Services, Social Services Branch. Location: Newmarket. Temporary Full-Time: approximately 21 months. Please apply online at York Region Careers by April 13, 2017, quoting competition number 20580.
Chief Administrative Officer - Town of Kirkland Lake. Please submit your résumé (complete with references and covering letter) in confidence by Monday, April 24, 3:00 p.m. to: Human Resources Coordinator, Town of Kirkland Lake, P.O. Box 1757, Kirkland Lake, ON P2N 3P4. Email: [email protected], fax: 705.567.4707.
Transit Manager - County of Simcoe. To view this job description in its entirety and to apply online, please visit Simcoe County Career Opportunities. Application deadline: April 21, 2017.
About AMO AMO is a non-profit organization representing almost all of Ontario's 444 municipal governments. AMO supports strong and effective municipal government in Ontario and promotes the value of municipal government as a vital and essential component of Ontario's and Canada's political system. Follow @AMOPolicy on Twitter!
AMO Contacts AMO Watch File Team, Tel: 416.971.9856 Conferences/Events Policy and Funding Programs LAS Local Authority Services MEPCO Municipal Employer Pension Centre of Ontario Media Inquiries, Tel: 416.729.5425 Municipal Wire, Career/Employment and Council Resolution Distributions
*Disclaimer: The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) is unable to provide any warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of third-party submissions. Distribution of these items does not imply an endorsement of the views, information or services mentioned.
Association of Municipalities of Ontario Please consider the environment 200 University Ave. Suite 801,Toronto ON Canada M5H 3C6 before printing this. To unsubscribe, please click here
Page 202 of 250 https://amo.informz.ca/informzdataservice/onlineversion/ind/bWFpbGluZ2luc3RhbmNlaW... 4/6/2017 Page 203 of 250 Page 204 of 250 Page 205 of 250 Page 206 of 250 258: mu.mow» Umma23.5. Hmumou. umqxm _um_.om 3% 95% rmmmsbocbnmmB08 Em: BEE: 95H m .8 mooo vamnm mswwon33.9. Omsmam Omsmam Fmumm?coasam§ >mEm oodmsdonou EmdmmouBo I'bI Page 208 of 250 Page 209 of 250 Social Services 1 Helping people, changing lives. 2016 Year End Statistical Report Year in Review This year focused on the continuation of client service improvement strategies, including renovations to serve our clients better and improved intake processes. The Division continued to achieve many positive outcomes across our 4 strategic themes: • People we serve • Working together • Community partnerships and • Technology. People We Serve The Division served over 6000 people per month in Ontario Works and 76% almost 1000 families through the Child Care Fee Subsidy program. We clients served strive to see our clients within 5 minutes of their arrival. In 2015 we were within 5 minutes able to see 70% of clients within 5 minutes and in 2016 we improved to seeing 76% of our clients within 5 minutes. We will continue to strive to see all clients that arrive on time within 5 minutes of their appointment time. Working Together To serve our clients better we continue to work together, across all our program areas. Staff also continue to work together on a number of working groups. One of the newer groups to be established based on staff interest is the Diversity working group, to continue to promote the principles of inclusion and multi culturalism. Community Partnerships Client and staff surveys are completed every two years but this was the first year that we surveyed our partner agencies to assess their satisfaction with our services and collaboration. We were very pleased with the results. Over 83% of agency partners felt that there had been increased collaboration over the last two years. We were striving for an 80% increase. of partner agencies feel 95%we work well together Technology In 2016, the new social assistance software (SAMS) has stabilized. The province has taken great strides to Peterborough Social Services improve the functionality of the system to the 178 Charlotte Street point they began to implement enhancements Peterborough, ON K9J 8S1 to provide an improved experience for staff and clients. As SAMS has stabilized, the Toll free: 855-738-3755 Division has moved to launching some new Tel.: 705-748-8830 technology to support our business process, Fax: 705-876-4620 such as electronic document management After Hours Emergency and electronic payment options for our child Tel.: 705-740-6222 care parents. [email protected] www.peterborough.ca/socialservices Page 210 of 250 2 2016 Year End Statistical Report | Social Services Emergency Shelter Bed Nights 25000 Homelessness 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Emergency Shelter Services: Overall Peterborough continues to experience an 20000 increase in emergency shelter service usage with a 3% increase in 2016 over 2015. The women’s emergency shelter remained the same with 95% 15000 occupancy. The men’s shelter experienced a decline, while the shelter for youth and families experienced a significant increase with 83% occupancy in 2016 10000 compared to 66% in 2015. The number of youth and families accessing emergency shelters is increasing. 5000 Brock Cameron YES Total Housing Stability Fund: The Housing Stability Fund (HSF) - for people in the 21% City and County of Peterborough in receipt of Social Utility Disconnection Assistance, continues to provide assistance finding and 11% keeping housing. Most spending continues to go toward Household 6% last month’s rent deposits (46%) and Utility arrears (21%). Repairs Moving HSF Expenses Expenses 2016 16% Rent Arrears Point in Time Count: 46% Rent Deposits oint The City of Peterborough worked closely with the United Way of Peterborough and District P n TIme to complete the first Point in Time Count in Peterborough. Count Peterborough On the night of March 22, 2016 at least 120 people were experiencing homelessness. Top 3 Reasons for Homelessness • Family Breakdown • Addiction and/or 23% 28% 64% Mental Health 54% • Unsafe Housing were chronically of participants were episodically experienced homeless - 6 months identified as homeless - 3 or more homelessness or more in past year aboriginal times in past year before 26 years old The City as Service Manager for Housing and Homelessness is now legislatively required to conduct homelessness enumeration every two years starting in 2018. The City will be planning the 2018 enumeration with community partners starting in 2017. Page 211 of 250 2016 Year End Statistical Report | Social Services 3 Other Homelessness Activities: • The Homelessness Coordinated Response Team works with 165 individuals in the community dealing with a combination of addictions, mental health, brain injury, trauma and homelessness. The team is a great collaboration of community and funding partners. • The Warming Room operated for the third winter from November 2015 to April 30, 2016. This season there were 215 unique individuals who used the Warming Room for at least one overnight stay. There was an average of 18 overnight guests per night. In 2014-15, 189 people used the Warming Room, with an average of 21 overnight guests. Children’s Services 2016 continued to be a year of change in the child care and early learning sector as the Ministry of Education announced its plan to integrate and transform the child and family programs (OEYCFC’s) across Ontario. This initiative, outlined in the Ontario Early Years Policy Framework (2013) fulfills the final commitment of the framework. Starting in 2018, the Ministry will transfer responsibility of the OEYCFC’s to the municipality giving staff full responsibility for local management. To support the required planning, funding for a Data Analysis Coordinator (DAC) is also being transferred beginning 2017. In December of this year a full time DAC was hired. The Children’s Services program also focused on several other areas of service delivery in 2016: • Supporting child care service providers through the implementation of phase two regulatory changes related to the Child Care and Early Years Act. • Working collaboratively with local school boards and child care providers to plan the final phase of the School First Capital projects. New projects approved and underway in 2016 include: 1. PCVS/Pearson Child Care - relocation 2. Millbrook Elementary School/Compass Child Care - new program 3. Lakefield High School Consolidation/YMCA – relocation • Conducting a full review of the Special Needs Resource program that supports children with special needs who attend child care in our community. This review was done in collaboration with Five Counties Children’s Centre as the third party service provider. • Delivering fee subsidy to support family access to licensed child care and approved recreation programs. Fee Subsidy 2016 2015 $4, 352,339 $3,934,094 • 1344 children & • 1343 children • 975 families served •Page 980 212 families of 250 served 4 2016 Year End Statistical Report | Social Services Income Support This was a year of stability with the provincial computer system (Social Assistance Management System-SAMS). The province has taken great strides to improve the functionality of the system to the point they began to implement enhancements to provide an improved experience for staff and clients. Ontario Works benefits ~ 6227 adults and children In 2016, we successfully implemented a new process each month that changed the way social assistance clients accessed drug coverage. The Ministry is expected to continue to identify and implement initiatives to improve client experiences and outcomes and realize administrative efficiencies. Social Assistance Operations Performance Report-2016 Indicator Provincial Peterborough Number of Applications Received 208,928 2,889 Average # of Business Days from Screening to Eligibility Decision 6 4 % of Applications Processed within 4 business days 56% 67% % of Caseload Terminated 5.57% 5.89% % of Terminations Exiting to Employment 15.05% 26.2% Addiction Services The Addiction Services Program participated in the provincial renewal ASI participants and evaluation phase of the program through 2016. The final local report 10 exited Ontario Works was submitted in December 2016. The City anticipates the provincial ASI participants renewal report to be released in May 2017 that will provide information engaged in treatment on the renewal outcome including next steps for the program. In 2016, 84 10 people that participated in the ASI program exited Ontario Works for employment. At least 84 participants were engaged in treatment services with the treatment provider.The Provincial Renewal Report will direct next steps for the ASI program. Employment In 2015, the seasonally unadjusted unemployment rate for the Provincial Peterborough census area peaked at 10.0% in April improving to 5.7% Average by December and averaged 7.55% over the full year. In 2016, the local 2015: 6.6% unemployment rate improved substantially over the previous year and ~ 7.55% was below the provincial level for the full year, ranging from a high of 6.1% in February and a low of 4.2% by December, with an overall 2016: average of 5.2% (provincial average 6.6%). ~ 5.2% This includes all full and part-time workers (Stats Canada, CANSIM, Table 282-0135) Local UnemploymentPage 213 of 250 Rate Over Time 2016 Year End Statistical Report | Social Services 5 The positive local labour market conditions supported Ontario Works participants to start jobs. As a result average annual OW caseload declined and the percentage of clients working while receiving Ontario works benefits increased to 19% which was also above the provincial average of 12%. In 2016, the Social Services Division supported 110 participants to receive job specific skills training in customer/hospitality services, food services and health care services - Personal Support Worker certification. This number would have been higher but, a number of non-profit, 3rd party employment service provider programs unexpectedly ended. Training sessions that typically are run in the fall of the year did not run, due to the loss of these programs/organizations. Community Development Program(Formerly the Community Social Plan) Peterborough Council on Aging (PCOA) The Peterborough Council on Aging (PCOA) completed the draft Age-friendly Plan for the Peterborough region. The Plan is the culmination of extensive planning, research and community consultation. The Plan is being presented for adoption in 2017 to City, County, Township and First Nation Councils. The draft Plan can be found on the PCOA website at www.peterboroughcouncilonaging.ca. Ontario Works in the County County Drop in Visits County Case Managers 300 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Other Municipalities deliver Ontario Works service Asphodel Norwood North Kawartha on site in the Townships of Trent Lakes North Kawartha, Trent Lakes, 200 Asphodel-Norwood and Havelock-Belmont-Methuen. 100 Service includes drop-in hours open to the general public for questions and referrals for 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 community services. Services were extended to Cavan-Monaghan and Otonabee-South Monaghan in 2016 without drop-in hours. Meet Your Needs Program This program offers low income residents in the County free clothing, household and personal care items at one-day events. Events were held in Apsley, Buckhorn, Millbrook, Havelock, Norwood, Lakefield and Keene, often in partnership with local food banks. In 2016, 588 individuals and families were assisted by these events compared to 593 in 2015 and 541 in 2014. Homemakers Program The Homemakers Program provides light housekeeping and meal preparation for low income residents in the City and County, with a focus on seniors. The goal of this program is to help people meet their basic needs to live in their homes longer. Client levels have stabilized at 70 people. Healthy Kids Community Challenge Promotes healthy eating and physical activity to reduce and prevent childhood obesity. Through provincial funding, this program includes the City and County of Peterborough and both First Nations, to deliver programs that increase physical activity and promote drinking water over sugary beverages. Page 214 of 250 6 2016 Year End Statistical Report | Social Services Quality Assurance Through Lean projects, collaborative community partnerships and internal working groups the Social Services Division continues to advance our Quality Assurance Framework. The backbone of any customer-focused continuous improvement culture is to ensure that our customers, clients, community partners and staff have a voice. Customer-centred feedback from all four areas has played a critical role in defining the service delivery models, operational practices, tools and resources needed to proactively meet the changing needs of our communities. Technology-based solutions have further enhanced our day-to-day operations. The Division continues to actively participate in and support corporate wide technology-based projects. To best serve our city and county residents, Social Services needs to continue its efforts to maximize our resources by building strong community partnerships. In our first community agency satisfaction survey conducted in 2016 the Division surpassed its goal of 80% satisfaction with the level of collaboration. Agency Survey Surveys Response Unique 2016 Returned Rate Agencies stated they have 10759% 50 Highlights a strong working stated we relationship with stated service communicate staff is client well and centred & resolve stated we make planning is complaints 51% workload more collaborative of respondents manageable have worked with Social Services staff more than 10 years 58% 80% 84% 91% 83% of partners report “ People are reachable “Thank you for being a an increase in Strengths & easy to communicate great partner - together collaboration over with - we value our we really do make the past 2 years • High level of relationship.” a difference in our “working together” community.” Opportunities •Clarity about Social Services Programs • More contact info “Thanks for the additional related to specific outreach and services for programs clients in our community.” Peterborough Social Services Helping people, changing lives. Page 215 of 250 2016 Year End Statistical Report | Social Services 7 Mandated Service and Good Governance Ontario Works Caseload 2015 - 2016 2015 Actual 2016 Actual 2016 Budget 4000 3950 3900 3850 3800 3750 3700 3650 3600 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ontario Works County Caseload (January 2017) 100 44 Havelock - Belmont - Methuen Trent Lakes 83 78 Cavan-Monaghan Otonabee - South Monaghan 43 North Kawartha 116 Asphodel - Norwood 189 Selwyn 45 Douro - Dummer Page 216 of 250 8 2016 Year End Statistical Report | Social Services Year End Division Financial Position Community Development and Children’s Services 2016 2016 2016 % 2016 $ 2015 % Change Budget Actual Budget Budget Actual 2016 vs Jan - Dec Jan - Dec vs Actual vs Actual Jan - Dec 2015 Gross Total 11,911,538 11,711,249 98.3% 200,289 10,788,597 8.6% Expenditures Revenue: Subsidy 9,990,762 9,935,298 99.4% (55,464) 8,937,519 11.2% County Share 522,260 486,186 93.1% (36,074) 468,529 3.8% Total 10,513,022 10,421,484 99.1% (91,538) 9,406,047 10.8% Net Requirement 1,398,516 1,289,764 92.2% 108,752 1,382,550 -6.7% (City Share) Social Assistance Underspending in Social Assistance is mainly due to coming in under budget in mandatory and discretionary benefits. 2016 2016 2016 % 2016 $ 2015 % Change Budget Actual Budget Budget Actual 2016 vs Jan - Dec Jan - Dec vs Actual vs Actual Jan - Dec 2015 Gross Total 52,145,263 49,045,253 94.1% 3,100,010 49,052,151 0.0% Expenditures Revenue: Subsidy 43,769,965 41,376,441 94.5% (2,393,524) 40,631,454 1.8% County Share 1,570,111 1,447,935 92.2% (122,176) 1,589,020 -8.9% Total 45,340,076 42,824,376 94.5% (2,515,700) 42,220,473 1.4% Net Requirement 6,805,187 6,220,877 91.4% 584,310 6,831,678 -8.9% (City Share) * Please Note: These numbers are pre-audit/before year end adjustments and may not represent final numbers. ©2017 City of Peterborough. All rights reserved. Published March 2017 Page 217 of 250 Page 218 of 250 City of Peterborough Media Release For Immediate Release March 31, 2017 Peterborough, ON Affordable Homeownership Assistance Loan Program – Funding Available Renter households can now get help to realize the dream of owning their own home. The City of Peterborough offering homeownership assistance loans to eligible applicants beginning Monday, April 3, 2017. Since 2008 the Canada-Ontario homeownership assistance program has assisted over 100 renters to purchase a home in the City or County of Peterborough. The 2017 program will assist approximately 10 renter households to purchase a new or resale home in the City and County of Peterborough priced at $300,000 or below. The Homeownership Assistance Loan Program Fact Sheet, included below, provides a summary of the program requirements. “Through the 10-year Housing and Homelessness Plan, the City is committed to helping people across the housing continuum, including renters whose only barrier to becoming homeowners is that they need help with a down payment” said Rebecca Morgan Quin, Manager of the Housing Division with the City of Peterborough. “Rents are relatively high in the City of Peterborough, which can make it challenging for renters to save toward a down payment. The Homeownership Assistance Loan also helps renters move, which frees up their rental unit for another household.” Funds for this program have been provided by the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario. For more information, please contact the City’s Housing Division in person at City Hall, by telephone 705-742-7777 extension 4663 (HOME) or by email [email protected]. Application packages will available from the Housing Division at City Hall or online at www.peterborough.ca/housing beginning Monday, April 3, 2017. This information is also available on the City of Peterborough website at www.peterborough.ca. - 30 – For further information please contact the undersigned: Sally Samis, Financial Assistant, Housing Division City of Peterborough 500 George Street North Peterborough ON K9H 3R9 705-742-7777 ext. 1483 Toll-free 1-855-738-3755 extension 1483 [email protected] Page 1 of 2 Page 219 of 250 Housing Division [email protected] Homeownership Assistance Loan Program 2017 Starts April 3, 2017 Fact Sheet The City of Peterborough is offering a $15,000 loan to assist with a downpayment. The eligibility criteria for this Program include, but are not limited to, the following: Applicants: • Are currently renting; • Do not presently own a home or property; • Do not owe money to a social housing landlord; • Have a gross annual household income up to $78,400; • Will use the purchased home as the sole and principal residence; • Qualify for a mortgage from a qualified lender; and • Are least 18 years old. The Home: • Is purchased for $300,000 or less; • Is a single detached, semi-detached, townhouse, row, or apartment unit (freehold or condominium); • Is inspected by a professional home inspector (resale homes); or • Is covered under the Ontario New Home Warranty Program (new homes); • Is located in the City or County of Peterborough; and • Is of a modest size (approx. 1100 sq. ft for a 3 bedroom home) Application Process: Step 1 • Household eligibility approval • Mortgage pre-approved by qualified lender • Homeownership Education complete Step 2 • Requires signed-back Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated at least 5 days later then the date of your Step 1 Eligibility Approval Letter and with a minimum of 30 days notice of the closing date • Signed-back Loan Agreement to receive loan upon closing Other Key Points: • The loan is forgiven if the home is the sole and principal residence for 20 years, but is otherwise repayable. • The loan is registered on title as a second mortgage on closing. • Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) mortgage insurance treats the $15,000 loan as equity. • Additional funds may be available to applicants moving out of social housing. • Household assets, including any gifting amounts from friends or family, savings, GICs etc. cannot exceed $15,000. • RRSPs do count towards personal assets if they can be accessed for home purchases as per Canada Revenue Agency guidelines. • The loan amount may be decreased if $15,000 is greater than 10% of the purchase price. • Loans will be offered, subject to availability, on a first-come, first-serve basis. • The Program ends when funding has been allocated or December 1, 2017. Page 2 of 2 Page 220 of 250 City of Peterborough Media Release For Immediate Release March 31, 2017 Peterborough, ON Peterborough Renovates Program - Funding Available for 2017 Funding will available beginning Monday, April 3, 2017 for the Peterborough Renovates home repair program. This program helps low to moderate income homeowners afford necessary home repairs and upgrades. This can include energy efficiency and accessibility work. Over 150 households in the City and County of Peterborough have received a forgivable loan and/or grant through Peterborough Renovates since 2012. The types of work that may be eligible under this program include: fire and life safety related; heating systems; windows; exterior doors; roofs; septic systems; water supply systems; and accessibility projects. “Through the 10-year Housing and Homelessness Plan, the City is committed to helping improve quality of life for people across the housing continuum, including homeowners” said Rebecca Morgan Quin, Manager of the Housing Division with the City of Peterborough. “Households that received Peterborough Renovates loans reported that help to pay for repairs and accessibility upgrades improved their quality of life significantly.” To apply, contact the delivery agent Habitat for Humanity Peterborough & Kawartha Region. Their staff are available to provide more information in person at 550 Braidwood Avenue Peterborough, by telephone at 1-855-750-1456 or by email at [email protected]. Applications will be processed as funding is available. Funds have been provided by the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario. The attached Peterborough Renovates Program 2017 Backgrounder provides a summary of the program requirements. This information is also available online with the City of Peterborough as well as with Habitat for Humanity at the following websites: www.peterborough.ca and www.habitatpeterborough.ca - 30 - Page 1 of 3 Page 221 of 250 For further information please contact the undersigned: Craig J. Adams, C.E.T., rcsi Capital Planning Analyst, Housing Division City of Peterborough 500 George Street N Peterborough, ON K9H 3R9 Phone: 705-742-7777 ext. 1440 Toll-free 1-855-738-3755 ext. 1440 Fax: 705-742-5218 Email: [email protected] Page 2 of 3 Page 222 of 250 Housing Division www.peterborough.ca/housing 500 George Street North Peterborough Ontario, K9H 3R9 Peterborough Renovates Program 2017 Backgrounder Grants and forgivable loans for low and moderate income homeowners in the City or County of Peterborough are available to help with necessary home repairs and accessibility upgrades. The Peterborough Renovates Program (PRP), subject to funding availability, is offered on a first-come, first-serve basis to eligible applicants. Applicants . Maximum household income cannot exceed $33,500 to $61,500, depending on number of bedrooms in the home . The applicant must own and live in the home The Home . Is located in the City or County of Peterborough . Maximum market value is $300,000 for the Peterborough area. Farm values are based on residential value only. Applicants must provide their most recent, paid Property Tax bill . Owner may not mortgage more than 90% of the home value, inclusive of the Peterborough Renovates loan Habitat for . Applications and assistance are available at Habitat for Humanity Humanity Peterborough & Kawartha Region (http://www.habitatpeterborough.ca/peterborough-renovates/ ) . Can be contacted by phone, email or in person. Phone: 705-750-1456 or toll free at 1-855-750-1456 Email: [email protected] Address: 550 Braidwood Avenue Peterborough, ON K9J 1W1 Hours: Monday to Friday from 9:00am to 4:00pm The . Necessary repairs and upgrades may include: fire and life safety Projects related; foundation, structural, heating systems, insulation, windows, exterior doors, ventilation systems, storm water management, septic systems, water supply, and accessibility related projects. Loans and . Forgivable loans up to $25,000 (secured on title) Grants . Accessibility grants up to $5,000 (medical documentation required) . Loans are forgiven by 10% per year for 10 years, based on the anniversary date of the registration of security on title. . Funding through the Investment in Affordable Housing Program and supported by the City of Peterborough’s 10-year Housing and Homelessness Plan. More details about the program are available in the Program Guidelines Page 3 of 3 Page 223 of 250 Page 224 of 250 The County of Peterborough County Council To: Warden and Members of Council From: Gary King, CAO Date: April 19, 2017 Subject: 2017 First Quarter Activity Report Recommendation: To be received for information Background/Analysis: The first quarter of 2017 has been a very busy period for both Council and staff as there have been several additional special meetings (Strategic Planning, Draft Budget presentation, and CAO Recruitment). On the staff side, several large projects and cyclical processes are ongoing in addition to handing the regular workflow. Examples include Collective Bargaining with CUPE 4911, consultant study on compensation review/pay equity, commencement of Agricultural Heritage Barn at Lang Pioneer Village, ongoing budget review and deliberations. All of this has been in addition to the regular busy schedule this time of year including year-end financials, T4 production, ongoing winter maintenance, tendering for fleet and capital projects, to name a few. The following information provides a point form listing of the activities undertaken within each of the Departments across the Corporation during the first quarter of 2017; Administration CAO Prepared for and attended 2 day EOWC Inaugural meeting in Kingston Attended numerous meetings over the first quarter with HR Director and PCCP Chief to review labour relations issues, grievance matters, EASA mediation with the Ontario Labour Relations Board, and Collective bargaining with CUPE 4911 Reviewed inputs for/and attended special Strategic Planning meeting with Council and senior staff at Marshland Centre Page 225 of 250 Page 2 Attended Management Team meetings, Council regular and special meetings, PED Board meetings, EOWC and EORN meetings, and Joint Services Advisory Committee meeting as scheduled Attended several meetings with senior Ministry of Economic Development and Growth staff regarding development of formal “Regional Economic Development Plans” Attended several meetings with the City of Peterborough staff and County Planning Director to discuss Draft governance structure and reporting structure for the Peterborough Age-Friendly Plan Attended annual ROMA Conference in Toronto Met with HR Director to review Gallagher McDowall Consulting Compensation/Pay Equity review study results and recommendations Met with Minister of Transportation along with Warden, Councillor Woodcock, Director of Public Works and City representatives Attended a Local Employment Planning Council – Workforce Development – Economic Development consultation meeting Commenced annual visits and presentations to Township Councils regarding 2016 Accomplishments/2017 Budget, Projects and Priorities Corporate Projects & Services County Website / Communications: Launch of new corporate website, email and phone system Ongoing outreach through social media and monthly County Connection publication Preparing for new internal website Corporate Facilities: Completion of new EMS Satellite Base in West end has been ongoing Multiple repairs throughout EMS bases, shorelines, heating systems repairs etc. Fire plan review for several facilities underway. Pre-planning stages of 2017 projects underway Fundraising & Partnership Development: Media announcement of Fleming Carpentry program working with us on the PCAHB TD & Paschal McCloskey invested into the PCAHB TCRC & Trent University Jail Project Video with politicians for PCAHB Media announcement for TD, EOSCIA, HTM TCRC celebration of Community Research Page 226 of 250 Page 3 Canada 150 Peter Robinson event committee IT: New voice system changes and modifications continue. Cancellation of Bell lines no longer required will commence soon. Cyber Security Training and phish testing continues. Redesign of both PCCP EOC’s is completed. Testing of both EOC’s to be completed by end of the week of Apr 14th. Continued assistance with infoHR and GP integration. Continued decommissioning of old cabling continues at various locations. Web Appliance and Filter implementation has begun. (project was on hold pending fiber and re-routing of all Internet traffic through Water St. location) WorkTech sent notice of impending sundown on support of older WorkTech products and modules. IT is following up and working on all outstanding Pearl tickets to ensure this has no impact. Information gathering for Blade Server replacement and Cloud Services as part of the IT Infrastructure Project has commenced. Lang Pioneer Village Museum: The Aabnaabin video was presented in previewed to Peterborough County Council and the Curve Lake and Hiawatha Band Councils. Some final edits are required before the video will be ready for public screening. The Museum has applied for funding for summer student interpreter positions from Young Canada Works (YCW), Canada Summer Jobs (CSJ) and the Ontario Summer Experience Program (SEP). A substantial number of previous year employees are returning and the interview/selection process is complete for 6 new interpreters, including for the first time, an indigenous interpreter for the entire season. The Manager participated in the peer review process for 35 YCW applications from the Maritimes to support the Canadian Museum Association and to learn more about what makes for a strong application. The Visitor Experience Coordinator and the Volunteer / Administration Coordinator took part in a three day “IGNITE” experiential tourism workshop at the Explorer Edge Algonquin site. The came back with an understanding of how to develop experiences at the Museum to market and attract visitors. It was also a strong networking opportunity. This RTO 8 sponsored initiative includes follow up sessions for the participants to help support implementation of experiential tourism projects throughout the region. Page 227 of 250 Page 4 Audrey Caryi, the Museum Specialist for the Village, suffered a horseback riding accident on the evening of March 21st. Despite heroic efforts to save her life, see succumbed to her injuries and passed away on April 5, 2017. A 34 year employee of the County, Audrey’s passion, knowledge and artistic skills have had a major impact on the Village. She leaves a tremendous legacy having had a major hand in the design and planning of several buildings around the Village including the Cider Mill, Weavers Shop and the Peterborough County Agricultural Heritage Building. She will be missed. Clerk’s Division In addition to the normal cyclical functions of the Clerk’s Division as Council secretariat: Participated in: o Management Team Meetings o Land Division Committee Meetings o Special Council Meetings (Strategic Planning, Boundary Adjustment, Budget and CAO Recruitment) o Peterborough County Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers meetings o Discussions with Finance staff regarding 2017 budget and associated timelines o Mandatory Workplace Violence and Workplace Bullying and Harassment Training o Weekly Team Updates with staff o Provide updates to Team from Management Team and Council Meetings o Semi-Annual Team Meeting Conducted necessary research to draft by-laws and held discussions and/or email exchanges where appropriate with County staff, Townships and/or County solicitor to finalize by-laws. Assisted departments with their research requests. Continue work on FOI request (2017-01) and subsequent appeal by Third Party. Completed and submitted annual reports on FOI requests, Access Copyright and Public Sector Salary Disclosure (Sunshine List). Page 228 of 250 Page 5 PCCP Administration: Created, printed and began to distribute 2016 Year End Report Continue to deliver lower tier presentations on Year End information as well as PAD program Upgraded hardware in Large Boardroom to touch capable screen and software Completed web pages for the new County website Budget finalized Continue negotiation meetings with 4911 Preparing for possible unionization of Superintendents Began planning a variety of events: Ribbon cutting, AGMs, Paramedic Week, working with Canada150+ Committee, Social Committee Attended CAO Annual Update Sr. Management involved in Negotiation meetings Attended a number of meetings Professional Standards: STEMI bypass protocol design and implementation Training and orientation for student placement during preceptorship Fire department orientation: City, Trent Lakes, Monaghan Community Care Presentations: Harvey Township, Cavan Monaghan, Havelock Development of training modules for Basic Life Support Patient Care Standards implemented Provincially Implementation of new documentation standards and electronic ACR Clinical trials commenced: Cervical spinal study and qSOFA study R2MR training rolled out paramedics and Management staff PTSD plan development In-service CME delivered and since completed Operations: Met with Equipment representatives for demonstrations with Equipment Committee Attended Norwood Emergency Exercise Construction phase of Clonsilla focus of 1st quarter. Construction was well under way and since completed 3 new ambulances ordered New ERV and pickup truck to be delivered in two weeks Preparing for Buckhorn Base opening April 10 New FT Shift Superintendent hired and started April 3 Page 229 of 250 Page 6 Finance The 2017 budget continues to be high on the Finance agenda for the first quarter of 2017. The draft presentation of the 2017 budget was delivered to council in February with in depth discussion ensuing since that time. The budget was passed on April 5, 2017. Each year, much of the finance department’s resources during January, February and March are dedicated to preparations for the year-end audit, which is scheduled for the week of April 10th. To prepare for the audit teams arrival, we have been busy processing year end adjusting entries, setting up accruals, reviewing financial records and agreements, completing reconciliations, submitting year end reports, and compiling our year-end working papers’ to assist the auditors in their engagement. Preparations have begun for the work with Diamond on the optimization of our Great Plains software, as well as research into our G/L Conversion work, investigation of budgeting software and assisting with payroll reconfiguration and implementation of HRIS program. Various reporting required has been completed for Provincial Gas Tax, OPTA, MTO for Invest in Ontario. Working with Community Care on vehicle purchase and receipt of the Public Infrastructure Transit Grant. Preparation of worksheets for Strategic Planning Session with funding scenarios for Public Works Infrastructure spending. Purchasing: Very active in the purchasing department as many RFP’s, Tenders and Single Source awards over the past quarter. Beginning review of software for purchasing and P Card’s Staff have been attending OPBA Training Modules. Human Resources 2017 Recruitment 2013 2014 2015 2016 Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. YTD 1 2 3 4 Recruitment & Selection Processes (several for 23 23 33 46 10 10 multiple hires) CUPE 1306 Postings – 7 15 7 7 0 0 Inside Page 230 of 250 Page 7 CUPE 1306 Postings – 17 20 17 15 6 6 Outside CUPE 1306 – External 9 7 6 13 0 0 Recruitments CUPE 4911 Postings – 65 64 69 96 36 36 Internal CUPE 4911 - External 1 1 2 1 0 0 Recruitments Non-Union Group 7 5 3 8 2 2 Postings – Internal Non-Union Group – 10 12 2 9 2 2 External Recruitments Seasonal Recruitment – 26 27 24 24 24 24 Lang Pioneer Village Seasonal Recruitment – Public Works (Roads & 8 8 13 8 1 1 Mechanic Assistant) Seasonal Recruitment – 5 5 5 6 6 6 Waste Management Seasonal Recruitment – 2 2 2 2 2 2 Engineering & Design Seasonal Recruitment - 1 1 2 3 3 3 Courthouse Resignations & 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. YTD Retirements 1 2 3 4 Retirements 3 2 4 4 1 1 Resignations/Terminations 14 9 9 9 7 7 2017 Illness & Injury 2013 2014 2015 2016 Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. YTD 1 2 3 4 Short Term Disability 25 24 29 14 6 6 Claims Page 231 of 250 Page 8 Long Term Disability 6 3 3 3 2 2 Claims Leave of Absences 9 6 2 2 Public Works - Lost 0 10 150 248 108 108 Time Hours PCCP – Lost Time 582 2016 2000 636 596 596 Hours Courthouse / Lang – 6 0 24 0 0 0 Lost Time Hours Public Works - Injuries 5 2 6 4 1 1 Public Works - Incidents 7 9 9 8 1 1 Courthouse/Lang 2 5 9 5 0 0 Injuries Courthouse/Lang - 1 0 1 2 0 0 Incidents PCCP – Injuries 28 22 19 16 7 7 PCCP - Incidents 13 5 1 12 2 2 RTW / Request for 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Accommodations YTD 1 2 3 4 (incl. Modified) All departments 5 13 8 16 3 3 2017 Labour Relations 2013 2014 2015 2016 Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. YTD 1 2 3 4 CUPE 1306 - I/O 1 0 0 0 0 0 Grievances CUPE 1306 – I/O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arbitrations CUPE 4911 – Paramedic 8 6 5 5 2 2 Grievances CUPE 4911 – Paramedic Arbitrations 0 0 1 0 0 Page 232 of 250 Page 9 Training & 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. YTD Development 1 2 3 4 First Aid/CPR Training 11 34 0 0 Leading a Mentally Healthy 8 0 0 0 Workplace Loyalist – Managing in a Municipal Environment 4 4 2 4 0 0 New Intake Loyalist – Managing in a Municipal Environment 2 2 7 0 1 1 Graduates Conferences/Workshops 3 4 1 1 Retirement Info Session 25 0 0 0 Project Management 33 0 0 0 Seminar Lean Six Sigma – Green 2 0 0 0 Belt Workplace Investigations 5 0 0 Payroll year-end reconciliations completed T4’s issued well before Feb. 28th deadline InfoHR continued implementation Great Plains payroll simplification project underway CUPE 4911 negotiations commenced and continue Seasonal/Student Part-time terms and conditions implemented Lang organizational review CAO recruitment and selection process Seasonal recruitment and selection PTSD Prevent Plan development Manulife group benefits platform changeover Page 233 of 250 Page 10 Planning Continuation of work undertaken on Development Charges for a new 5- year By-law – Public Meeting held Presentation made to Peterborough and the Kawarthas Association of Realtors. Continuation of work on the County’s Growth Analysis Assistance provided to Otonabee-South Monaghan with its Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for Source Water Protection Continuing involvement with Township-City annexation implementation Preliminary work conducted on County Official Plan update project – draft Work Plan developed and initial meeting held with MMAH, Townships Revisions/updating of Department’s Procedural Guidelines for Plans of Subdivision/Condominiums and for Local and County Official Plan Amendments Sustainable Peterborough Awards nomination received for Planning Department’s leadership and coordinating efforts for implementation of source protection land use policies 77 requests for preliminary reviews (year-to-date) for land owners regarding proposed for lot severances. (65 for 2016 1st quarter) 1 new application for a Plan of Subdivision (24 lots) 10 Official Plan Amendment s in process including 5 new applications that have been received in 2017 Land Division 23 Land Division Consent applications received (38 for 2016 1st quarter) Land Division Committee Meeting February 26th for an education session for Committee members and for hearing of applications GIS Engaged with Geomatics team from Fleming College to develop a 3D model of Airport Obstacle Limitation Surface Ptbo & Kawarthas Tourism Kiosk map drafts provided to designer for review Canada 150+ Geocaching Program preparations nearing completion; initiating & running the program to commence in Q2 o City of Peterborough committed to contributing matching funds ($1,000) in order to participate o Presentations on geocaching made to RTO8 & Ptbo Destinations Association with interest express in the future of this tourism initiative locally (focus would be on leveraging the local caching community to build & sustain this effort) o Sites to go live on geocaching.com on Saturday, May 20th o Geocaching event to be held in coordination with Doors Open on Saturday May 6th Page 234 of 250 Page 11 Official Plan & Zoning By-Law data under regular updates on web-GIS o Significant updates are being made to Twp OSM ZBL, at Township’s direction o Corrections outstanding for Twp DD ZBL, per corrections recently received Public Works Mobile Data Collection o 2017 retroreflectivity project to be supported through a mobile GIS app (ArcGIS Collector) using an Android device until an alternative is available o Culverts to be field collected by Eng & Design staff using a similar ArcGIS Collector app to capture location and other essential details Public Works Administration CR 18 Causeway Link (Bridgenorth Bypass) o Finalization of Draft Study Design o Distribution to agencies and First Nations o Review and select alignment alternatives Ward St. Widening Project o Preliminary meeting with consulting team o Finalization of EA Study Design o Attend EA TAC meeting Research into Kinmount Bridge ownership legal issues Complete recruitment of summer seasonal staff Commence development of itinerary for Council Road Tour Develop PW Management Team Procedures Reference document Engineering & Design Crowe River Bridge – joint ownership confirmed with Marmora & Lake Draft Operating Procedure – inspection of culverts < 3m span Road Safety Audits - CR 24/Woodland; CR 2/CR 38 – reports completed Westwood Bridge load restriction ATMP – development of draft Policies, Programs and Projects Airport Road – contractor demobilized for spring; recommence in summer Buckhorn Bridges – recommenced March 1st Causeway widening – finalizing DFO application Page 235 of 250 Page 12 Operations Continual work on Winter Control operations – much busier winter than normal Reduced load season started March 1, 2017 Gravel stockpiling to remote depots for summer work programs Waste Management Coordinated MWA P&E Awards submissions and judging Conducted site visits to TL Transfer Stations to provide additional guidance to attendants on BB Program Working with Trent Lakes to begin WEEE, MHSW collections at Crystal Lake Transfer Station Haul of excess soil stockpile to Airport Rd Construction project (61,304m3 removed) Entered into 1-yr (up to 2-yr) single source with GEEP for management of WEEE Submitted 2016 MHSW Annual Reports to MOECC Commencement of data collection and analysis for 2016 Datacall Respectfully submitted, Original Signed by, Gary King CAO Page 236 of 250 The County of Peterborough County Council To: Warden and Members of Council From: Joe Taylor, Warden Date: April 19, 2017 Subject: Meetings attended during March 2017 Recommendation: Receive for Information The following is a list of meetings and functions I attended as Warden of Peterborough County during the month of March. The time spent preparing for the follow-up of these meetings and the time spent on behalf of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan is not documented. March 3 Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs Committee Meeting March 3 Courthouse Building Meeting with Gary, Sheridan and Jeff Leal March 4 Met with Mayor Ron Gerow March 5 PED Start and Grow Fair March 6 Management Team March 8 Canada 150 Flag Raising March 8 County Council March 12 Peterborough St. Patrick's Flag Raising & Parade March 15 County Council March 20 Trent University Teaching Excellence Awards March 21 Historical Society Martha Kidd Award March 22 Community Care Lakefield March for Meals March 22 Green Waste Facility meeting March 23 Funding Announcement at LPVM March 23 Roundtable with U.S. Consul General March 27 Management Team March 27 Meet with EOTA Chair Dave Gerow March 27 Meeting with Finance re Warden's Budget allocations March 28 SEL Annual Presentation with CAO March 30 ABC Meeting March 30 Autism Ontario Flag Raising March 30 United Way Campaign Announcement Respectfully submitted, Page 237 of 250 Page 2 Original signed by Joe Taylor, Warden Page 238 of 250 The County of Peterborough County Council To: Warden and Members of Council From: Mary Smith, Deputy Warden Date: April 19, 2017 Subject: Meetings attended during March 2017 Recommendation: Receive for Information The following is a list of meetings and functions I attended as Deputy Warden of Peterborough County during the month of March. The time spent preparing for the follow-up of these meetings and the time spent on behalf of the Township of Selwyn is not documented. March 1 County Council March 2 CFDC AGM March 6 Management Team March 6 BEL Rotary - Polar Plunge Judges Appreciation Dinner March 8 International Women's Day Breakfast Meeting March 8 Special County Council March 8 Peterborough Public Health Board March 12 Peterborough St. Patrick's Flag Raising & Parade March 15 County Council March 20 Trent University Teaching Excellence Awards March 22 Community Care Lakefield March for Meals March 22 PPH Board Member - Art Vowles Visitation March 22 Trent Valley Archives Canada150 Lecture March 25 Peterborough Persian New Year Celebration March 27 Management Team Respectfully submitted, Original signed by Mary Smith, Deputy Warden Page 239 of 250 Page 240 of 250 7%‘: _<__:mw:. _<_m_.o:3. moi ®m:<_A_:m 030* >n_3_:_m:m: Umma_<:. 002 5.6. >0 <0: 3m< _So<<_Em _<__:_w:<0* .2m:m_00:m:o: A_<_._.Ova ma3_:_m~m1:m:5 0.0003: _u:_0__oimam: _:¢mm::oE6 msa eu._.__uV3500 0:00 0: 00:0: 9. _:.4mm::oE_.m OmsmamA_zmQ_ 4.30 0:880 02:6 oozmmuozamsom_m8 mqsmm<0: Em: _z_uO 3mmm0u3 _u_0mmm30$ 50 ._._u>_2o<_m_0:mEm: mqa?omm 00.3 08<_:0_m_man*mo_mB_ 60303030. m0mo:_0m__ E50300 <0: <<___:30 mmmgcmmfno?_mmo_0_0_.:_Z0::m:0: 103.. <<:_o: _<_._.Osmmgm 3 039 8 m:m__Nm30 ._._u>0800mm. _u_mmmmm3m__ Em 0030.050 83. 8 ._.mm:mm3 mmmmz._<_m:mmm<9. 50 _<_::_o_0m_imam: _u0=o<0300. _<.503: m\_.moi. >00:_0:m=<. _z_u0 :3 80:00:00 m:_©:-_m :0 -m- _ <<_m: m:o__oow..o2 <_:m >:mo:3m3m o. ._.mm:mm3 mmmm?_<.m:mmm:_<_:ao__om_._.B:w: _uo__o February 23, 2017 The Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Premier 111 Wellesley Street West, Room 281 Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A1 Re: Cost of Electricity At the Regular Council meeting held February 21, 2017 the following resolution was passed; Whereas the cost of electricity in the Province of Ontario continues to escalate; And whereas citizens of Ontario are finding it increasingly difficult to afford the costs of electricity; And whereas businesses in Ontario are finding it increasingly difficult to stay in business and compete with neighbouring jurisdictions that benefit from more affordable electricity rates; And whereas municipal budgets across Ontario are being significantly impacted by escalating costs of electricity; And whereas citizens and businesses across Ontario are also impacted by increasing municipal property taxes that have resulted from escalating costs of electricity; And whereas the citizens and businesses of Ontario have a right to openness and transparency of the breakdown of municipal costs of electricity to better understand their impact on municipal budgets; And whereas a general service demand account such as a Waste Water Treatment Plant, or a Community Centre/Arena has a breakdown of the electricity used, global adjustment charge, delivery charge, regulatory charges, debt retirement charge, and HST; Therefore be it resolved that Cavan Monaghan posts a link on our home page of our municipal website to our most recent electricity bill that contains a complete breakdown of all the various charges such as those with a service type general service demand and to display that bill for the month of April; And be it resolved that this resolution be forwarded to AMO to circulate this resolution to all municipalities requesting the same; Page 243 of 250 And be it resolved that this motion be forwarded to the Premier, our MPP, and all appropriate ministries. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Elana Arthurs Clerk 705-932-9326 [email protected] cc: L. Scott, MPP, Haliburton-Kawartha Lakes-Brock Association of Municipalities of Ontario The Honourable Glenn Thibeault, Minister of Energy The Honourable Yasir Naqvi, Attorney General The Honourable Brad Duguid, Minister of Economic Development and Growth The Honourable Charles Sousa, Minister of Finance The Honourable Glen R. Murray, Minister of the Environment and Climate Change DISCLAIMER: This material is provided under contract as a paid service by the originating organization and does not necessarily reflect the view or the positions of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), its subsidiary companies, officers, directors or agents. Page 244 of 250 Page 245 of 250 Page 246 of 250 County of Peterborough Nominating Committee - Special Meeting (CAO Recruitment & Selection) Minutes Wednesday, April 5, 2017 1. Call To Order Chair, Councillor J. Murray Jones, the Immediate Past Warden, called the meeting to order at 12:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Present: Chair, J. Murray Jones, Immediate Past Warden, Warden Taylor, Councillor Gerow, Councillor Low and Councillor Matthews Staff Patti Kraft, Director of Human Resources and Sally Present: Saunders, Clerk. 2. Adoption of Agenda 1-2017 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Matthews Be it resolved that the Nominating Committee adopts the agenda as circulated. Carried 3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest There were no declarations of pecuniary interest made. 4. Adoption of Minutes 2-2017 Moved by: Councillor Low Seconded by: Councillor Taylor Be it resolved that the Nominating Committee adopts the meeting minutes of December 15, 2016 as circulated. Carried Page 1 Page 247 of 250 Minutes of Nominating Committee – Special Meeting Wednesday, April 5, 2017 5. Closed Session 3-2017 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Matthews Be it resolved that under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, s. 239(2) the Nominating Committee move into closed session at 12:32 p.m. to consider: (b) personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees. Carried 6. Rise from Closed Session With/Without a Report 4-2017 Moved by: Councillor Taylor Seconded by: Councillor Gerow Be it resolved that the Nominating Committee rise from closed session at 12:42 p.m. without a report. Carried 7. Adjournment 5-2017 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Matthews Be it resolved that the Nominating Committee meeting adjourn at 12:42 p.m. Carried ______Immediate Past Warden - Chair ______Clerk Page 2 Page 248 of 250 Future Meeting Schedule Council Authorized Meetings April . 19 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 26 3:00 p.m. Accessibility Advisory Committee (Selwyn, Lower Boardroom) . 27 9:30 a.m. Land Division Committee (Council Chambers) May . 3 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 8 1:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Pre-Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 8 2:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 17 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 23 9:30 a.m. Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (County Court House, Boardroom) . 24 3:00 p.m. Accessibility Advisory Committee (County Court House, Boardroom) . 26 10:00 a.m. Awards and Bursaries Committee – North Kawartha Community Centre Set-up . 26 7:00 p.m. Awards and Bursaries Committee – Recognition Awards Ceremony (North Kawartha Community Centre) . 31 9:00 a.m. Special County Council Meeting (Road Tour) June . 7 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 7 *FCCM Awards and Bursaries Committee – 2017 Critique (Boardroom) . 8 2:30 p.m. JSSC Pre-Meeting (Boardroom) (Subject to Confirmation) . 8 3:45 p.m. JSSC Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 19 1:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Pre-Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 19 2:00 p.m. Waste Management Committee Meeting (City Hall, General Committee Room) . 21 3:00 a.m. Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting (Selwyn, Lower Boardroom) . 27 9:30 a.m. Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (County Court House, Boardroom) . 28 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 28 8:45 a.m. Awards and Bursaries Committee – Bursary Award Selection (Boardroom) July . Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee - Annual Field Trip (Location, Date and Time TBD) Page 249 of 250 August . 2 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) . 13 n/a Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO) Annual Conference (Ottawa, Ontario, The Shaw Centre) (August 13th to 16th) . 23 9:30 a.m. County Council (Council Chambers) *FCCM – Following County Council Meeting Other Meetings/Events – For Your Information Page 250 of 250