AutomotiveUI2011 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications November 30th – December 2nd 2011, Salzburg, Austria
Adjunct Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Salzburg, 2011 Table of Contents
Posters & Demos 3 Industrial Showcase 95 Workshop 1 113 Workshop 2 120 Workshop 3 151 Workshop 4 170
AutomotiveUI 2011
Third International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
November 29—December 2, 2011 ICT&S Center, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria
ADJUNCT PROCEEDINGS „POSTERS & INTERACTIVE DEMOS“
Organizers:
Manfred Tscheligi Conference Chair Andreas Riener, Myounghoon Jeon Poster & Demo Chairs
Andreas Riener, 2011-11-28 (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) Contents
Preface 1 Welcome Note ...... 3
I Poster Abstracts 5 The use of in vehicle data recorders and self-reported data for evaluating driving be- havior of young drivers ...... 7 Information Extraction from the World Wide Web Using a Speech Interface ...... 9 IVAT (In-Vehicle Assistive Technology): Multimodal Design Issues for TBI Drivers . . . 11 ENGIN (Exploring Next Generation IN-vehicle INterfaces): Drawing a New Concep- tual Framework through Iterative Participatory Processes ...... 13 The HMISL language for modeling HMI product lines ...... 15 Designing a Spatial Haptic Cue-based Navigation System ...... 17 Investigating the Usage of Multifunctional Rotary Knobs in the Center Stack with a Contextual Inquiry ...... 19 Driver Distraction Analysis based on FFT of steering wheel angle ...... 21 Gas Station Creative Probing: The Front Seat Passenger ...... 23 A New Icon Selection Test for the Automotive Domain Based on Relevant ISO Us- ability Criteria ...... 25 The Process of Creating an IVAT Plug-in: Mirror Checking ...... 27 Personas for On-Board Diagnostics – User types of drivers dealing with malfunction in e-cars ...... 29 On Detecting Distracted Driving Using Readily-Available Vehicle Sensors: Prelimi- nary Results ...... 31 Natural and Intuitive Hand Gestures: A Substitute for Traditional Vehicle Control? . . . 33 3D Theremin: A Novel Approach for Convenient “Point and Click”Interactions in Vehicles 35 Open Car User Experience Lab: A Practical Approach to Evaluating Car HMIs Holistically 37 Situation-adaptive driver assistance systems for safe lane change via inferring driver intent 39 Determination of Mobility Context using Low-Level Data ...... 41 Addressing Road Rage: The Effect of Social Awareness in Every Day Traffic Situa- tions – A User Study ...... 43 New Apps, New Challenges: Quality Matters in Automotive HMI Development ..... 45 The Ethnographic (U)Turn: Local Experiences of Automobility ...... 47 (C)archeology – Car Turns Outs & Automobility ...... 49 An Approach to User-Focused Development of High-Value Human-Machine Interface Concepts ...... 51 II Interactive Demos 53 The ROADSAFE Toolkit: Rapid Prototyping for Road-Testing Novel Automotive User Interfaces ...... 55 The Design and Implementation of the Human-Vehicle Interface Management System . . 57 SpeeT – A Multimodal Interaction Style Combining Speech and Touch Interaction in Automotive Environments ...... 57 Dialogs Are Dead, Long Live Dialogs: Building a Multimodal Automotive Applica- tion for Both Novices and Experts ...... 59
III Posters PDF’s 61 The use of in vehicle data recorders and self-reported data for evaluating driving be- havior of young drivers ...... 63 Information Extraction from the World Wide Web Using a Speech Interface ...... 64 IVAT (In-Vehicle Assistive Technology): Multimodal Design Issues for TBI Drivers . . . 65 ENGIN (Exploring Next Generation IN-vehicle INterfaces): Drawing a New Concep- tual Framework through Iterative Participatory Processes ...... 66 The HMISL language for modeling HMI product lines ...... 67 Designing a Spatial Haptic Cue-based Navigation System ...... 68 Investigating the Usage of Multifunctional Rotary Knobs in the Center Stack with a Contextual Inquiry ...... 69 Driver Distraction Analysis based on FFT of steering wheel angle ...... 70 Gas Station Creative Probing: The Front Seat Passenger ...... 71 A New Icon Selection Test for the Automotive Domain Based on Relevant ISO Us- ability Criteria ...... 72 The ROADSAFE Toolkit: Rapid Prototyping for Road-Testing Novel Automotive User Interfaces ...... 73 The Process of Creating an IVAT Plug-in: Mirror Checking ...... 74 Personas for On-Board Diagnostics – User types of drivers dealing with malfunction in e-cars ...... 75 On Detecting Distracted Driving Using Readily-Available Vehicle Sensors: Prelimi- nary Results ...... 76 Natural and Intuitive Hand Gestures: A Substitute for Traditional Vehicle Control? . . . 77 3D Theremin: A Novel Approach for Convenient “Point and Click”Interactions in Vehicles 78 Open Car User Experience Lab: A Practical Approach to Evaluating Car HMIs Holistically 79 Situation-adaptive driver assistance systems for safe lane change via inferring driver intent 80 Determination of Mobility Context using Low-Level Data ...... 81 Addressing Road Rage: The Effect of Social Awareness in Every Day Traffic Situa- tions – A User Study ...... 82 New Apps, New Challenges: Quality Matters in Automotive HMI Development ..... 83 The Design and Implementation of the Human-Vehicle Interface Management System . . 84 The Ethnographic (U)Turn: Local Experiences of Automobility ...... 85 (C)archeology – Car Turns Outs & Automobility ...... 86 SpeeT – A Multimodal Interaction Style Combining Speech and Touch Interaction in Automotive Environments ...... 87 An Approach to User-Focused Development of High-Value Human-Machine Interface Concepts ...... 88
Appendix 89 List of Authors ...... 91 Keyword Terms ...... 93 Technical Program Committee Members ...... 95 (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) Preface
- 1 - (This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
- 2 - Welcome Note from the Poster/Demo Chairs
It is with great pleasure that we have the opportunity to present the adjunct proceedings of the Third International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Auto- motiveUI ’11, http://auto-ui.org). Building on the success of the previous conferences, this conference is becoming the renowned international forum for the dissemination and exchange of up-to-date scientific information on theoretical and practical areas of Human-Computer Interaction in the context of cars. This year, the poster and interactive demo session is being held on the second day of the conference (December 1st, afternoon) at the ICT&S Center, University of Salzburg. The adjunct proceedings are published on the conference website and are provided on your thumb drive. Many people have devoted considerable time in reviewing and selecting those pieces of work which will be presented here. The poster and interactive demo program addresses diverse human-computer interaction issues in the context of cars, including new interactive apps, devices, toolkits and metaphor use, research and design process, methodologies, and tools appropriate for this domain, as well as studies that improve our understanding of special populations (e. g., drivers in road rage or drivers with traumatic brain injury). We have embraced all of these topics in the hope to foster a new community which aspires a recurring annual gathering on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications. In addition, we have combined many of the experiential aspects of the conference such as one minute madness for the poster session, interactive demonstrations, and exhibits. We expect that the poster and interactive demo session will be more alive than ever with these various new attempts. We encourage you to come to our poster and interactive demo session and have fruitful discussions with researchers and practitioners from all over the world. Don’t miss the ever-popular “one minute madness”, where all Poster/Demo authors will be lined up for a rapid fire, 60-second opportunity to urge attendees to visit them and learn about their work during the reception. The poster session chair, Albrecht Schmidt, will strictly enforce the one minute time limit for each presentation. We have heard that he has been hard at work devising an effective way to signal the end of a one minute time slot – we’ll have to wait until the session to find out what he will choose in the end. . . We would like to thank each and every one of you for your valuable contribution towards the success of this conference, especially the poster and interactive demo session, and to wish you a professionally rewarding and socially enjoyable stay in Salzburg. Enjoy the spirit of Salzburg!
Andreas Riener Myounghoon Jeon
- 3 - (This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
- 4 - Part I.
Poster Abstracts
- 5 - (This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
- 6 -
The use of in vehicle data recorders and self- reported data for evaluating driving behavior of young drivers Gila Albert* Einat Grimberg H.I.T – Holon Institute Tomer Toledo Or Yarok of Technology Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000 Israel Mariano Lasebnik Tsippy Lotan H.I.T – Holon Institute Or Yarok of Technology
*Email: [email protected], Tel/Fax 972 3 5026746 H.I.T, 52 Golomb St., Holon, 58102, Israel ABSTRACT turn handling, and the quality of performance of the This paper aims to evaluate the driving behaviour of detected manoeuvres is evaluated. Drivers are color- young drivers few years after licensure. The evaluation is coded according to their safety classification: green based on two kinds of data: In Vehicle Data Recorders (cautious), yellow (moderate) and red (aggressive) [3,4]. (IVDR) and Self-Reports (SR). The results show that SR are very popular tools employed in driver safety young drivers clearly perceived themselves as safer research and many studies use it even as a sole source of drivers than they are according to IVDR. The results also data. SR has many well recognized advantages, such as suggest, based on the two approaches, that young driver its ease of use andthe ability to collect large data sets improved their driving behavior while driving with relatively cheaply but suffers from well known IVDR. The analysis obtained should be considered as limitations regarding its validity as an indicator of actual exemplifying the potential of what may be done with behaviour [5]. these two evaluation approaches. This paper is based on a study done in Israel as part of the PROLOGUE project conducted within the EU FP7 [6]. General Terms Measurement, Experimentation. 2. METHODOLOGY IVDR systems have been installed in the private cars of Keywords the participants, 32 young drivers with 3-4 years of In Vehicle Data Recorders, Self-reports, Young drivers, driving experience at average age at the time the study 1. INTRODUCTION started of 20.5 ± 0.5 years. The participants were Young drivers in Israel, similar to other places over the recruited from a participants' pool that participated as globe, are involved in car crashes more than any other novice young drivers in a study conducted in Israel few age group [1,2]. The definition of a "young driver" in years ago [3]. All trips were monitored in a study period many countries refers to relatively wide age group, e.g., of 8 months. The study period was divided into three the ages of 17-24 in Israel. This paper aims to evaluate stages: the "blind profile" stage which started how young drivers in the age of 19-24 drive 3-4 after immediately after the installation, provided no feedback licensure. The evaluation was done using two tools: In and served as a baseline; the "feedback stage" that Vehicle Data Recorders (IVDR) technology and Self- followed in which participants received real-time and via reported data (SR). More specifically, we focused on the the internet feedback; the final "cool-off" stage in which relationship between these two measurements. the participants continued to drive with the IVDR but did IVDR can be used for unobtrusive recording of driving not receive any feedback. During the "blind profile" and behaviour under ordinary traffic conditions. This "cool-off" stages participants were asked to fill in specific advanced recording equipment is installed in driver's car, trip diaries regarding various characteristics of the trips tracks all trips made by the vehicle and provides they have taken in the last 48 hours, e.g., date, time, information regarding trip characteristics and safety duration, trip purpose, perceived level of trip safety, etc. levels. The manoeuvres detected during driving are classified into major categories of events, e.g., speeding, 3. RESULTS Copyright held by author(s). Table 1 presents general statistics of the trips the AutomotiveUI’11, November 29-December2, 2011, Salzburg, Austria. participants undertook. These trips are used in the Adjunct Proceedings analysis that follows. The SR compiled for specific days