DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography 1. M. Aiello, M. P. Papazoglou, J. Yang, M. Carman, M. Pistore, L. Serafini, and P. Traverso. A request language for Web-services based on planning and constraint satisfaction. In Proceedings of the International VLDB Workshop on Technologies for E-Services, pages 76-85, Hong Kong, China, 2002. 2. E. Akarsu, G. C. Fox, W. Furmanski, and T. Haupt. WebFlow - high-level programming environment and visual authoring toolkit for high performance distributed computing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supercomputing, Orlando, FL, Nov. 1998. ACM SIGARCH. 3. A. S. Ali and O. Rana. UDDI extensions. Cardiff University. http://www.cs.cf.ac.uk/user/ A.Shaikhali/uddie/. 4. G. Alonso, D. Agrawal, A. E. Abbadi, M. Kamath, R. Gunthor, and C. Mohan. Advanced transaction model in workflow context. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), New Orleans, LA, USA, Feb. 1996. 5. G. Alonso, M. Kamath, D. Agrawal, A. E. Abbadi, R. Gunthor, and C. Mohan. Failure handling in large scale workflow management systems. Technical Report RJ9913, IBM Almaden Research Center, Nov. 1994. 6. G. Alonso and C. Mohan. WFMS: The next generation of distributed processing tools. Advanced Transaction Models and Architectures, 1997. S. Jajodia and L. Kerschberg (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. 7. T. Andrews et al. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services. Version 1.t. 8. A. Ankolekar, M. Burstein, J. Hobbs, O. Lassila, D. Martin, S. McIlraith, S. Narayanan, M. Paolucci, T. Payne, K. Sycara, and H. Zeng. DAML-S: Web service description for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sardinia, Italy, June 2002. 9. ANSA. The Advanced Network Systems Architecture. Technical report, Castle Hill, Cambridge, England: Architecture Project Management, 1989. 10. A. Arkin. Business process modeling language 1.0. Technical report, BPMI Consortium, June 2002. http://www.bpmi.orgj. 11. A. Arkin et al. Web Service Choreography Interface 1.0, 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsci/. 12. ATG. ATG Dynamo Personalization Programming Guide, 2002. http://www.atg.com/en/support/producLresources/. 322 Bibliography 13. B. Atkinson et al. Web Services Security (WS-Security), Version 1.0 April 2002. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/w&-secure/. 14. A. Banerji et al. Web Services Conversation Language (WSCL) 1.0. W3C technical note, Mar. 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/wscllO/. 15. W. Bausch, C. Pautasso, and G. Alonso. Programming for dependability in a service-based grid. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid), Tokyo, Japan, May 2003. 16. W. Bausch, C. Pautasso, R. Schaeppi, and G. Alonso. Bioopera: Cluster-aware computing. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, 2002. 17. BEA Systems Inc. BEA Tuxedo: The Progmmming Model, 1996. http://edocs.bea.com/wle/tuxedo/main/stref.htm. 18. BEA Systems Inc. BEA WebLogic Integmtion: Application Interymtion, 2002. http://bea.com/products/weblogic/server/index.shtml. 19. BEA Systems Inc. BEA WebLogic Server 7.0 Overview, Apr. 2002. http://bea.com/products/weblogic/server. 20. T. Bellwood et al. UDDI version 3.0, July 2002. This version is available at http://uddLorg/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm. The latest version is available at http://uddLorg/pubs/uddLv3.htm. 21. B. Benatallah, F. Casati, F. Toumain, and R. HamadL Conceptual modeling of Web services conversations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Klagenfurt/Velden, Austria, June 2003. 22. K. H. Bennett et al. Prototype implementations of an architectural model for service-based flexible software. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35), Jan. 2002. 23. T. Berner&-Lee and R. Cailliau. WorldWide Web: Proposal for a HyperText Project. European Laboratory for Particle Physics (CERN). 24. T. Berner&-Lee, R. Cailliau, J.-F. Groff, and B. Pollermann. World-Wide Web: The information universe. Electronic Networking: Research, Applications and Policy, 1(2):74-82, 1992. 25. P. Bernstein and E. Newcomer. Principles of Transaction Processing for the Systems Professional. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997. 26. P. A. Bernstein. Middleware: A model for distributed system services. Communications of the ACM, 39(2):86-98, 1996. 27. P. A. Bernstein, M. Hsu, and B. Mann. Implementing recoverable requests using queues. In Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 112-122, Atlantic City, NJ, USA, 1990. 28. A. D. Birrell and B. J. Nelson. Implementing remote procedure calls. ACM Transactons on Computer Systems, 2(1):39---59, Feb. 1984. 29. S. Bodoff et al. The J2EE tutorial. Addison Wesley, 2002. 30. Bosworth et al. Web Services Addressing (WS-Addressing), Mar. 2003. http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2003/03/w&-addressing/. 31. K. Boucher and F. Katz. Essential guide to object monitors. John Wiley & Sons, 1999. 32. D. Box et al. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1, May 2000. This version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508j. The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP /. Bibliography 323 33. D. Box et al. Web Services Policy Attachment (WS-PolicyAttachment), Dec. 2002. http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices. 34. D. Box et al. Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy), Dec. 2002. http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/default.aspx?pull= /library/ en­ us/dnglobspec/html/ws-policy.asp. 35. G. Bracchi and B. Pernici. The Design Requirements of Office Systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(2):151-170, Apr. 1985. 36. P. Brittenham, F. Cubera, D. Ehnebuske, and S. Graham. Understanding WSDL in a UDDI Registry, September 2001. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsdl/. 37. BroadVision, Inc. Broad Vision. http://www.broadvision.com/. 38. C. Bussler. B2B protocol standards and their role in semantic B2B integration engines. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 24(1), Mar. 2001. 39. C. Bussler. Process inheritance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), pages 701-705, Toronto, Canada, 2002. 40. C. Bussler. Public process inheritance for business-to-business integration. In Proceedings of the International VLDB Workshop on Technologies for E-Services, pages 19-28, Hong Kong, China, 2002. 41. F. Cabrera et al. Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination), 9 August 2002. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library /ws-coor/. 42. F. Cabrera et al. Web Services Transactions (WS-Transaction), 9 August 2002. IBM, Microsoft, BEA. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-transpec/. 43. Candle. ETEWatch: End-to-end Response Time Monitoring. http://www.candle.com. 44. H. Casanova and J. Dongarra. NetSolve: A Network Server for Solving Computational Science Problems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference, 1996. http://www.cs.utk.edu/netsolve. 45. F. Casati, S. Ceri, S. Paraboschi, and G. Pozzi. Specification and implementation of exceptions in workflow management systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(3):405-451, 1999. 46. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi. Deriving active rules for workflow enactment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Administration(DEXA '96), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Zurich, Switzerland, Sept. 1996. Springer-Verlag. 47. F. Casati and M.-C. Shan. Dynamic and adaptive composition of e-services. Infosystems, 24(3):211-238, Jan. 2001. 48. A. Cass, B. Lernerand, E. McCall, L. Osterweil, S. Sutton Jr., and A. Wise. Little-JIL/Juliette: A process definition language and interpreter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Limerick, Ireland, June 2000. 49. R. Chinnici, M. Gudgin, J.-J. Moreau, and S. Weerawarana. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 1.2, July 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsd112. 50. Commerce One, Inc. XML Common Business Library. http://www.xcbl.org. 51. Commerce One, Inc. Order Management Recommended Use: xCBL 3.5, version 1.0, November 2001. http://www.xcbl.org. 52. Computer Associates, Inc. CA Unicenter. http://www.ca.com. 324 Bibliography 53. Connolly et al. DAML+OIL (March 2001) Reference Description. W3C note, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Dec. 200l. http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference. 54. G. Coulouris, J. Dollimore, and T. Kindberg. Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design. Addison-Wesley, 3rd Edition, 2000. 55. F. Curbera, D. Ehnebuske, and D. Rogers. Using WSDL in a UDDI Registry, Version 1.07 UDDI Best Practice, May 2002. This version is available at http://www.uddi.org/pubs/wsdlbestpractices-Vl.07-0pen-20020521.pdf The latest version is available at http://www. uddi.org/pubs/wsdlbestpractices. pdf. 56. U. Dayal, M. Hsu, and R. Ladin. Business process coordination: State of the art, trends, and open issues. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), Rome, Italy, Sept. 2001. 57. Delphi Group. BPM 2002. Market Milestone Report, 2002. 58. M. Denny. Ontology building: A survey of editing tools. XML.com, November 2002. 59. K. K. Dickson Chiu, Qing Li. ADO ME-WFMS: Towards cooperative handling of workflow exceptions. In A. Romanovsky, C. Dony, J. L. Knudsen, and A. Tripathi, editors, Advances in Exception Handling Techniques, pages 271-288. Springer-Verlag, LNCS-20022, 2001. 60. Distributed Management Task Force (DMTF). Common Information Model. http://www.dmtf.org. 61. ebXML (Electronic Business using eXtensible Markup Language. ebXML-Enabling a Global Electronic Market. http://www.ebxml.org/geninfo.htm. 62. ebXML Registry Project Team. Using UDDI to Find ebXML RegReps. Technical report, http://www.ebxml.org/specs/rrUDDl.pdf, May 2001. 63. ebXML Technical Architecture Team. The Advanced Network Systems Architecture, v1.0A. Technical report, http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebTA_print.pdf, February 2001. 64. J. Eder and W. Liebhart. The Workflow Activity Model WAMO. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIs), Wien, Austria, May 1995.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BEA Weblogic Mobility Servertm Supported Configurations
    BEA WebLogic Mobility ServerTM Supported Configurations Version 3.5 September 2006 Copyright Copyright © 1995-2006 BEA Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Restricted Rights Legend This software is protected by copyright, and may be protected by patent laws. No copying or other use of this software is permitted unless you have entered into a license agreement with BEA authorizing such use. This document is protected by copyright and may not be copied photocopied, reproduced, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine readable form, in whole or in part, without prior consent, in writing, from BEA Systems, Inc. Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of BEA Systems. THE DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. FURTHER, BEA SYSTEMS DOES NOT WARRANT, GUARANTEE, OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE USE, OR THE RESULTS OF THE USE, OF THE DOCUMENT IN TERMS OF CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE. Trademarks and Service Marks Copyright © 1995-2006 BEA Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.BEA, BEA JRockit, BEA WebLogic Portal, BEA WebLogic Server, BEA WebLogic Workshop, Built on BEA, Jolt, JoltBeans, SteelThread, Top End, Tuxedo, and WebLogic are registered trademarks of BEA Systems, Inc. BEA AquaLogic, BEA AquaLogic Data Services Platform, BEA AquaLogic Enterprise Security, BEA AquaLogic Service Bus, BEA AquaLogic Service Registry,
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Takes on IBM and HP with Hardware, Software and Services Triple Play by Arif Mohamed
    CW+ a whitepaper from ComputerWeekly Oracle takes on IBM and HP with hardware, software and services triple play by Arif Mohamed This has been a landmark year for Oracle, the technology company headed by the charismatic and staggeringly wealthy Larry Ellison. Ellison, who is 65, has been chief executive officer since he founded Oracle in June 1977. He was listed the sixth richest person in the world in 2010. And his personal wealth of $27bn is a clear indication of Oracle’s success as an IT supplier. Oracle began the year by completing its $7.4bn acquisition of Sun Microsystems. The deal transformed Oracle from a software and consulting company, into a company able to compete on software, hardware and services. The deal gave Oracle Sun’s MySQL database, Sparc/Solaris servers, plus Sun’s storage hardware and flagship Java portfolio of tools and technologies. 2010 also marked the conclusion of an aggressive spending spree that has seen Oracle buying over 66 technology companies since 2002. These include CRM suppliers Siebel and PeopleSoft, middleware giant BEA Systems and storage specialist StorageTek. Six years on, Oracle has announced the fruits of its integration work, which began in 2004 when it bought PeopleSoft, which owned JD Edwards. Although Oracle has integrated the suites of applications from each subsequent merger to some degree, but it has now revealed a suite of software, Fusion Applications, which promises to unite them all for the first time through a common middleware layer, and run on optimised hardware from the Sun acquisition. Its Fusion Applications range of enterprise products, due out in January, will also give an upgrade path to enterprise users of Oracle’s legacy CRM and other business packages including PeopleSoft, Siebel and JD Edwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle's Open-Source Shopping Spree
    FEBRUARY 9, 2006 NEWS ANALYSIS By Sarah Lacy Oracle's Open-Source Shopping Spree The database giant is in talks to purchase at least three software companies that would help it shift customers to a subscriber-based model The open-source community may be in for a jolt. Oracle (ORCL) is plotting what could be the biggest endorsement yet by a mainstream software company for a movement that involves legions of developers across the globe who publish "open" software distributed freely over the Net, making money instead from support and maintenance. It's a bold bet for a company that gets a healthy chunk of its $16 billion in annual sales from multimillion-dollar software packages deals, but Oracle is ready to spend big on open source. Oracle is in talks to buy at least three open-source software companies in deals that could be valued at more than $600 million, BusinessWeek Online has learned. The transactions would extend the 18-month, $18 billion spending spree by Oracle Chief Executive Larry Ellison that has engulfed PeopleSoft and Siebel Systems. They would also put Oracle in control of some of the most sought-after open-source projects. Overnight, Redwood Shores (Calif.)-based Oracle would rival IBM (IBM) as the prime evangelist of a movement that's revolutionizing how software is developed and distributed (see BW Online, 2/6/06, "Open Source's New Frontiers"). TRIPLE PLAY. The largest of the three targets is Atlanta-based JBoss, which specializes in so- called middleware, the software that serves as a connection between disparate programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Tuxedo Lower Total Cost of Ownership for Mission- Critical
    Oracle Tuxedo Lower Total Cost of Ownership for Mission- Critical Applications April 2009 An Oracle White Paper Oracle Tuxedo Lower Total Cost of Ownership for Mission Critical Applications Table of Contents INTRODUCTION: CHANGING NEEDS FOR MISSION CRITICAL APPLICATIONS.... 2 YESTERDAY’S ANSWER ........................................................................................................... 3 TODAY’S SOLUTION: ORACLE TUXEDO............................................................................. 3 TUXEDO’S RICH HERITAGE ................................................................................................... 4 CUSTOMER USAGE PATTERNS AND SUPPORTING TUXEDO CAPABILITIES.......... 5 CUSTOMER USAGE PATTERN #1: E XTREME TRANSACTION PROCESSING ..................................... 5 EXTREME HIGH PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................... 5 FIVE NINES AVAILABILITY , A BSOLUTE RELIABILITY ................................................................... 5 EXTREME, L INEAR SCALABILITY ................................................................................................. 6 CUSTOMER USAGE PATTERN #2: A PPLICATION MODERNIZATION ............................................... 8 CUSTOMER USAGE PATTERN #3: SOA E NABLEMENT ................................................................ 10 TUXEDO MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES .......................................................................... 12 ORACLE TUXEDO – THE CLASSIC PLATFORM FOR APPLICATION
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Hikes Middleware License Fees: the Spoils of More
    Oracle hikes middleware license fees The spoils of more By Gavin Clarke in San Francisco Posted in Developer, 20th June 2008 07:02 GMT Oracle customers are starting to pay the price for its $23bn plus acquisition spree, with licensing hikes across all core middleware products. The database giant is hitting users of its databases and application server software with increases of between 15 per cent and 20 per cent in licensing. Users of the recently acquired BEA Systems' WebLogic application server that are hit hardest: a WebLogic Server Enterprise Edition processor license is jacked up 47 per cent. Oracle is also introducing new named-user plus pricing for Enterprise and Standard editions. The increases, detailed in Oracle's latest annual price list, have Wall Street both admiring and questioning the size of Oracle chief executive Larry Ellison's cojones in a tightening economy. Eric Savitz of TechTrader Daily called the increases an "eye-opening development", a startling admission coming from a title used to covering the machinations of American corporate business life. Citigroup analyst Brent Thill in a research note on Oracle's change reportedly said Oracle justified the move by saying it had not "installed a price increase of this magnitude 'for many years'." So what can you expect to pay? You can compare the 2008 and 2007 price lists here and here. As a taster, though: a single WebLogic Server Enterprise Edition processor license costs $25,000 compared to $17,000 under BEA. A named-user license for WebLogic Server Standard and WebLogic Server Enterprise Edition is $200 and $500 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    ORACLE CORP FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 06/29/09 for the Period Ending 05/31/09 Address 500 ORACLE PARKWAY MAIL STOP 5 OP 7 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 Telephone 6505067000 CIK 0001341439 Symbol ORCL SIC Code 7372 - Prepackaged Software Industry Software & Programming Sector Technology Fiscal Year 05/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2015, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. Table of Contents Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2009 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 000-51788 Oracle Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 54 -2185193 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, California 94065 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (650) 506-7000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Plumtree Software, Documentum, Bea Systems and Sun Microsystems Join Forces to Create Open-Source Site for Jsr 168 and Wsrp Portlets
    PLUMTREE SOFTWARE, DOCUMENTUM, BEA SYSTEMS AND SUN MICROSYSTEMS JOIN FORCES TO CREATE OPEN-SOURCE SITE FOR JSR 168 AND WSRP PORTLETS Independent Enterprise Software Vendors Align to Support Standards; Industry Analysts and Standards Bodies Applaud Effort SAN FRANCISCO, PLEASANTON, Calif., SAN JOSE, Calif. and SANTA CLARA, Calif., Nov. 10 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Enterprise software vendors Plumtree Software (Nasdaq: PLUM - News), Documentum (Nasdaq: DCTM - News), BEA Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: BEAS - News) and Sun Microsystems, Inc. (Nasdaq: SUNW - News) today announced the industry's first open-source site for organizations to share portlets developed according to the new JCP JSR 168 and WSRP OASIS standards. Available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/portlet-opensrc/ , the site is hosted by SourceForge, an independent organization that hosts a variety of Java(TM) technology and Linux open-source initiatives. Plumtree, Documentum, BEA and Sun will provide an initial library of standards- based portlets, and will provide ongoing feedback, suggestions and best practices for successful JSR 168 and WSRP portlet development. The site is open to all organizations, including customers and partners of competing portal software providers such as IBM, Vignette and SAP. Both the JCP and OASIS, the standard bodies that developed JSR 168 and WSRP respectively, today expressed support for the open-source site, known as the Portlet Open-Source Trading site, or POST. The site will help companies learn from their industry peers and share best practices for developing standards-based portlets. "Plumtree conceived of this site as part of its Radical Openness strategy, which is our long-term commitment to ensure that every major component of our solution is interoperable with customers' existing technologies, even technologies that compete with our own," said Glenn Kelman, vice president of product marketing and management for Plumtree.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Corporation
    ORACLE CORPORATION The Oracle Corporation is an American global computer technology corporation, headquartered in Redwood City, California. The company primarily specializes in developing and marketing computer hardware systems and enterprise software products – particularly its own brands of database management systems. In 2011 Oracle was the second- largest software maker by revenue, after Microsoft.[3] The company also develops and builds tools for database development and systems of middle-tier software, enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM) software and supply chain management (SCM) software. Larry Ellison, a co-founder of Oracle, served as Oracle's CEO from founding. On September 18, 2014, it was announced that he would be stepping down (with Mark Hurd and Safra Catz to become CEOs). Ellison became executive chairman and CTO.[4] He also served as the Chairman of the Board until his replacement by Jeffrey O. Henley in 2004. On August 22, 2008, the Associated Press ranked Ellison as the top-paid chief executive in the world.[5] Larry Ellison , Ellison was born in New York City but grew up in Chicago. He studied at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and the University of Chicago without graduating before moving to California in 1966. While working at Ampex in the early 1970s, he became influenced by Edgar F. Codd's research on relational database design, which led in 1977 to the formation of what became Oracle. Oracle became a successful database vendor to mid- and low- Larry Ellison in October 2009. range systems, competing with Sybase and Microsoft SQL Server, Born August 17, 1944 (age 71) which led to Ellison being listed by Forbes Lower East Side, Manhattan, New York, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pricing and Licensing of Software Products and Services: a Study on Industry Trends By
    Pricing and licensing of software products and services: A study on industry trends by Shivashis Nayak Bachelor of Engineering Regional Engineering College, Rourkela, 1996 Submitted to the System Design & Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2006 @2004 Shivashis Nayak. All rights reserved. The author grants to MIT permission to reproduce, and to distribute publicly, paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author Shivashis Nayak System Design & Management Program Certified by Michael A. Cusumano Thesis Supervisor Sloan Management Review Distinguished Professor of Management Accepted by Director System Design & Management Program OF TEOHNOLOGY FEB 1 S2008 BARKER LIBRARIES This is a blank page 2 Pricing and licensing of software products and services: A study on industry trends By Shivashis Nayak Submitted to the System Design & Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management Abstract The software product business' reached the $150 billion mark at the end of 2005. The pricing and licensing of new products, maintenance services, services and service maintenance have become an important strategy to deliver smooth and steady revenue growth. The main objective of this thesis work is to observe the trends among various revenue prospects such as product sales, maintenance sales, service sales and service maintenance sales revenue. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses are pursued to achieve the research objectives. The software industry has gone through several transformations from its debut.
    [Show full text]
  • BEA Smartconnect for Peoplesoft User's Guide
    BEA SmartConnect for PeopleSoft User’s Guide Version 5.5.012.SM April 7, 2008 Preface This document explains how to use BEA SmartConnect for PeopleSoft, which is an interface between PeopleSoft 8 and other applications. It describes how to use BEA SmartConnect for PeopleSoft with BEA SmartConnect Explorer to develop online connections to PeopleSoft 8 applications and integrate with BEA AquaLogic Service Bus (ALSB). How This Manual Is Organized The following table lists the titles and numbers of the chapters and the appendix for this manual with a brief description of the contents of each chapter or appendix. Chapter/Appendix Contents 1 Introducing BEA Provides an overview of the functionality SmartConnect for PeopleSoft provided by the BEA SmartConnect for PeopleSoft Using AquaLogic Service Bus for AquaLogic Service Bus (ALSB). 2 Configuring BEA Describes how to configure BEA SmartConnect for SmartConnect for PeopleSoft PeopleSoft by installing the PeopleSoft Component Interfaces and the TCP/IP message router. 3 Generating Component Describes how to build and compile Component Interface APIs Interface APIs to use with BEA SmartConnect for PeopleSoft. 4 Creating XML Schemas Describes how to create XML schemas for PeopleSoft business objects using BEA SmartConnect Explorer. 5 Publishing WSDL Documents Describes how to publish WSDL documents using BEA SmartConnect Explorer for use with AquaLogic Service Bus (ALSB). 6 Creating a Business Service Describes how to create a Business Service in Using BEA SmartConnect for AquaLogic Service Bus (ALSB) using BEA PeopleSoft SmartConnect for PeopleSoft. 7 Creating a Proxy Service Describes how to create a Proxy Service in Using BEA SmartConnect for AquaLogic Service Bus (ALSB) using BEA PeopleSoft SmartConnect for PeopleSoft.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellison 01-20-04 1 00008 14 by MR. SCOTT: 15 Q. All Right, Sir, As I Stated Earlier, This Will 16 Be the Deposition of T
    00008 14 BY MR. SCOTT: 15 Q. All right, sir, as I stated earlier, this will 16 be the deposition of the Lawrence Ellison pursuant to 17 Civil Investigative Demand No. 022793. 18 Do you have that in front of you, sir? It's 19 Exhibit 1 to your deposition. 20 A. Yes, I do. 21 Q. Have you had a chance to read through that? 22 A. In a cursory way, yes. Ellison 01-20-04 1 00009 1 Q. All right. So I'll just -- for the record, I 2 will point out to you on the back of it there is some 3 language, too, that's pertinent, which is the authority 4 and -- one of the authorities by which this is being done 5 and some of the laws that govern the taking of the 6 deposition. 7 You might just want to read through that, as 8 well, just to be sure you've got all the language. At 9 least you've had a chance to look at it, as you've said, 10 on a cursory basis. 11 Just let me know when you're finished. 12 A. I've finished. 13 Q. All right, sir. Now, this will be your 14 deposition pursuant to that CID. Ellison 01-20-04 2 00011 3 Q. You understand you are testifying under oath? 4 A. I do. 5 Q. And pursuant to the statutes that's printed on 6 the back of the CID, Exhibit 1, to your deposition, in 7 addition to making truthful -- well, as part of 8 testifying under oath, do you understand that if I ask 9 you a question and you have any information pertaining to 10 that question and you say you do not know or do not 11 remember having any information, that would be a 12 violation of the oath? 13 A.
    [Show full text]
  • BEA Weblogic Integration Adapter for Peoplesoft Installation and Configuration Guide
    BEAWebLogic Adapter for PeopleSoft® 8 Installation and Configuration Guide Version 8.1 Document Date: July 2003 Revised: Revised: Februrary 2004 Copyright Copyright © 2004 BEA Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Portions Copyright © 2004 iWay Software. All Rights Reserved. Restricted Rights Legend This software and documentation is subject to and made available only pursuant to the terms of the BEA Systems License Agreement and may be used or copied only in accordance with the terms of that agreement. It is against the law to copy the software except as specifically allowed in the agreement. This document may not, in whole or in part, be copied photocopied, reproduced, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine readable form without prior consent, in writing, from BEA Systems, Inc. Use, duplication or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to restrictions set forth in the BEA Systems License Agreement and in subparagraph (c)(1) of the Commercial Computer Software-Restricted Rights Clause at FAR 52.227-19; subparagraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 252.227-7013, subparagraph (d) of the Commercial Computer Software--Licensing clause at NASA FAR supplement 16-52.227-86; or their equivalent. Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of BEA Systems. THE SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. FURTHER, BEA Systems DOES NOT WARRANT, GUARANTEE, OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE USE, OR THE RESULTS OF THE USE, OF THE SOFTWARE OR WRITTEN MATERIAL IN TERMS OF CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE.
    [Show full text]