DOCSLIB.ORG

A Framework for Long-Term Ecological Monitoring in Olympic National Park: Prototype for the Coniferous Forest Biome

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Prepared in Cooperation with Olympic National Park. A Framework for Long-term Ecological Monitoring in Olympic National Park: Prototype for the Coniferous Forest Biome. USGS/BRD/ITR—2003-0006. Information and Technology Report. U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S. Geological Survey. Cover: Front cover images—Olympic National Park, Andrea Woodward and Erik Ackerson. Back cover image—Andrea Woodward. Design—Erik Ackerson. A Framework for Long-term Ecological Monitoring in Olympic National Park: Prototype for the Coniferous Forest Biome. By Kurt Jenkins, Andrea Woodward, and Ed Schreiner. U.S. Geological Survey. Prepared in Cooperation with Olympic National Park. USGS/BRD/ITR—2003-0006. U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Department of the Interior.. Gale A. Norton, Secretary.. U.S. Geological Survey.. Charles G. Groat, Director.. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2003.. For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services.. Box 25286, Denver Federal Center. Denver, CO 80225. For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS. World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Jenkins, Kurt, Woodward, Andrea, and Schreiner, Ed, 2003, A Framework for Long-term Ecological Monitoring in Olympic National Park: Prototype for the Coniferous Forest Biome: U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline, Information and Technology Report, USGS/BRD/ITR-2003-0006, 150 p. Key words: 1. U.S. Geological Survey. 2. Status and trends program. 3. National Park Service. 4. Inventory and monitor- ing program. 5. Long-term ecological monitoring. 6. Vital signs monitoring. 7. Conceptual ecosystem models. 8. Olympic National Park. 9. Coniferous forests. 10. Ecological indicators. 11. Environmental sampling. 12. Conceptual monitoring plan. Executive Summary iii Executive Summary. This report is the result of a five-year collaboration between scientists of the U.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Olympic Field Station, and the natural resources staff of Olympic National Park to develop a comprehensive strategy for monitoring natural resources of Olympic National Park. Olympic National Park is the National Park Serviceʼs prototype monitoring park, representing parks in the coniferous forest biome. Under the umbrella of the National Park Serviceʼs prototype parks program, U.S. Geological Survey and Olympic National Park staffs are obligated to: • develop strategies and designs for monitoring the long-term health and integrity of national park ecosystems with a significant coniferous forest component. • design exportable monitoring protocols that can be used by other parks within the coniferous forest biome (i.e., parks having similar environ- ments), and • create a demonstration area and ʻcenter of excellenceʼ for assisting other parks in developing ecological monitoring programs. Olympic National Park is part of the North Coast and Cascades Network, a network of seven Pacific Northwestern park units created recently by the National Park Serviceʼs Inventory and Monitoring Program to extend the monitoring of ʻvital signsʼ of park health to all National Park Service units. It is our intent and hope that the monitoring strategies and conceptual models described here will meet the overall purpose of the prototype parks monitoring program in proving useful not only to Olympic National Park, but also to parks within the North Coast and Cascades Network and elsewhere. Part I contains the conceptual design and sampling framework for the prototype long-term monitoring program in Olympic National Park. In this section, we explore key elements of monitoring design that help to ensure the spatial, ecological, and temporal integration of monitoring program elements and discuss approaches used to design an ecosystem-based monitoring program. Basic monitoring components include ecosystem drivers, (e.g., climate, atmospheric inputs, human pressures), indicators of ecosystem integrity (e.g., biogeochemical indicators), known threats (e.g., impacts of introduced mountain goats), and focal or ʻkeyʼ species (e.g., rare or listed species, Roosevelt elk). Monitoring system drivers and key indicators of ecosystem integrity provide the long-term baseline needed to judge what constitutes ʻunnaturalʼ variation in park resources and provide the earliest possible warning of unacceptable change. Monitoring effects of known threats and the status of focal species will provide information useful to park managers for dealing with current park issues. iv A Framework for Long-term Ecological Monitoring in Olympic National Park In Part I we describe the process of identifying potential indicators of ecological condition and present conceptual models of park ecosystems. In addition we report results from several workshops held in conjunction with Olympic National Park aimed at identifying potential indicators of change in the parkʼs ecosystem. First, we describe the responses of Olympic National Park staff to the generic question, “What is the most important resource to monitor in Olympic National Park and why?” followed by the responses from resource and land managers from areas adjoining the park. We also catalogue the responses of various expert groups that we asked to help identify the most appropriate system drivers and indicators of change in the Olympic National Park ecosystems. Results of the workshops provided the justification for selecting basic indicators of ecosystem integrity, effects of current threats to park resources, and focal resources of parks to detect both the currently evident and unforeseeable changes in park resources. We conclude Part I by exploring several generic statistical issues relevant to monitoring natural resources in Olympic National Park. Specifically we discuss trade-offs associated with sampling extensively versus sampling intensively in smaller geographic regions and describe a conceptual framework to guide development of a generic sampling frame for monitoring. We recommend partitioning Olympic National Park into three zones of decreasing accessibility to maximize monitoring efficiency. We present examples of how the generic sampling frame could be used to help ensure spatial integration of individual monitoring projects. Part II of the report is a record of the potential monitoring questions and indicators identified to date in our workshops. The presentation is organized according to the major system drivers, components, and processes identified in the intermediate-level working model of the Olympic National Park ecosystem. For each component of the park system, we develop the need and justification for monitoring, articulate park management issues, and describe key resources and ecosystem functions. We also present a pictorial conceptual model of each ecological subsystem, identify monitoring questions, and list potential indicators for each monitoring question. We conclude each section by identifying linkages of indicators to other ecological subsystems in our general ecosystem model, spatial and temporal contexts for monitoring (where and how often to monitor), and research and development needs. Part II represents the most current detailed listing of potential indicators—the material for subsequent discussions of monitoring priorities and selection of indicators for protocol development. Collectively, the sections of this report contain a comprehensive list of the important monitoring questions and potential indicators as well as recommendations for designing an integrated monitoring program. In Part I, Chapter 6 we provide recommendations on how to proceed with the important next steps in the design process: establishing priorities among the many possible monitoring questions and indicators, and beginning to research and design effective long-term monitoring protocols. Contents v Contents. Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................iii . List of Figures ..............................................................................................................................................vii . List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ ix . Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................................... x . INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 . PART I: DESIGN FOR LONG-TERM ECOLOGICAL MONITORING IN CONIFEROUS FOREST ECOSYSTEMS IN OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK........................................................................... 5 . Chapter 1. Monitoring Goals, Strategies, and Tactics.......................................................................... 5 . 1.1 The Role of Monitoring ............................................................................................................ 5 . 1.2 Monitoring Goals and Objectives: The Desired Endpoints ...............................................
Recommended publications
  • Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities

    Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities

    NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN THE FIRST 10 YEARS (1994–2003) Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities Lita P. Buttolph, William Kay, Susan Charnley, Cassandra Moseley, and Ellen M. Donoghue General Technical Report United States Forest Pacific Northwest PNW-GTR-679 Department of Service Research Station July 2006 Agriculture The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
  • Snowmobiles in the Wilderness

    Snowmobiles in the Wilderness

    Snowmobiles in the Wilderness: You can help W a s h i n g t o n S t a t e P a r k s A necessary prohibition Join us in safeguarding winter recreation: Each year, more and more people are riding snowmobiles • When riding in a new area, obtain a map. into designated Wilderness areas, which is a concern for • Familiarize yourself with Wilderness land managers, the public and many snowmobile groups. boundaries, and don’t cross them. This may be happening for a variety of reasons: many • Carry the message to clubs, groups and friends. snowmobilers may not know where the Wilderness boundaries are or may not realize the area is closed. For more information about snowmobiling opportunities or Wilderness areas, please contact: Wilderness…a special place Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (360) 902-8500 Established by Congress through the Wilderness Washington State Snowmobile Association (800) 784-9772 Act of 1964, “Wilderness” is a special land designation North Cascades National Park (360) 854-7245 within national forests and certain other federal lands. Colville National Forest (509) 684-7000 These areas were designated so that an untouched Gifford Pinchot National Forest (360) 891-5000 area of our wild lands could be maintained in a natural Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest (425) 783-6000 state. Also, they were set aside as places where people Mt. Rainier National Park (877) 270-7155 could get away from the sights and sounds of modern Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest (509) 664-9200 civilization and where elements of our cultural history Olympic National Forest (360) 956-2402 could be preserved.
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
  • 2017-18 Olympic Peninsula Travel Planner

    2017-18 Olympic Peninsula Travel Planner

    Welcome! Photo: John Gussman Photo: Explore Olympic National Park, hiking trails & scenic drives Connect Wildlife, local cuisine, art & native culture Relax Ocean beaches, waterfalls, hot springs & spas Play Kayak, hike, bicycle, fish, surf & beachcomb Learn Interpretive programs & museums Enjoy Local festivals, wine & cider tasting, Twilight BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER ISLAND BRITISH COLUMBIA IDAHO 5 Discover Olympic Peninsula magic 101 WASHINGTON from lush Olympic rain forests, wild ocean beaches, snow-capped 101 mountains, pristine lakes, salmon-spawning rivers and friendly 90 towns along the way. Explore this magical area and all it has to offer! 5 82 This planner contains highlights of the region. E R PACIFIC OCEAN PACIFIC I V A R U M B I Go to OlympicPeninsula.org to find more O L C OREGON details and to plan your itinerary. 84 1 Table of Contents Welcome .........................................................1 Table of Contents .............................................2 This is Olympic National Park ............................2 Olympic National Park ......................................4 Olympic National Forest ...................................5 Quinault Rain Forest & Kalaloch Beaches ...........6 Forks, La Push & Hoh Rain Forest .......................8 Twilight ..........................................................9 Strait of Juan de Fuca Nat’l Scenic Byway ........ 10 Joyce, Clallam Bay/Sekiu ................................ 10 Neah Bay/Cape Flattery .................................. 11 Port Angeles, Lake Crescent
  • COMMON MAMMALS of OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK Roosevelt Elk the Largest and Most Majestic of All the Animals to Be Found in Olympic Na

    COMMON MAMMALS of OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK Roosevelt Elk the Largest and Most Majestic of All the Animals to Be Found in Olympic Na

    COMMON MAMMALS OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK Roosevelt Elk The largest and most majestic of all the animals to be found in Olympic National Park is the Roosevelt or Olympic elk. They were given the name Roosevelt elk in honor of President Theodore Roosevelt who did much to help preserve them from extinction. They are also known by the name "wapiti" which was given to them by the Shawnee Indians. Of the two kinds of elk in the Pacific Northwest, the Roosevelt elk are the largest. Next to the moose, the elk is the largest member of the deer family. The male sometimes measures 5 feet high at the shoulder and often weighs 800 pounds or more. Their coats are a tawny color except for the neck which is dark brown. It is easy to tell elk from deer because of the large size and the large buff colored rump patch. When the calves are born in May or June, they weigh between 30 and 40 pounds and are tawny colored splashed with many light spots and a conspicuous rump patch. Only the bull elk has antlers. They may measure as much as 5 feet across. Each year they shed the old set of antlers after mating season in the fall and almost immediately begin to grow a new set. During the summer months, some of the elk herds can be found in the high mountains; the elk move down into the rain forest valleys on the western side of the park during the winter months. About 5,000 elk live in Olympic National Park where they, like all of the animals are protected in their natural environment.
  • TRAVERSING the BAILEY RANGE Solitude and Scenery on Olympic National Park’S Premier High Route

    TRAVERSING the BAILEY RANGE Solitude and Scenery on Olympic National Park’S Premier High Route

    TRAVERSING THE BAILEY RANGE Solitude and scenery on Olympic National Park’s premier high route By Karl Forsgaard Deep in the northern wilderness of Olympic Na- tional Park, the Bailey Range Traverse crosses high, scenic country with grand views of surrounding river valleys and peaks—including 7,965-foot Mount Olympus. At each end of the traverse you’ll find popular trails – the Sol Duc River, Seven Lakes Basin and High Divide in the west, the Elwha River in the east. Be- tween those trails are several days of cross-country travel, re- quiring route-finding skills and mountaineering skills above and beyond basic backpack- ing. Good rock, snow and ice scrambling skills are essential. Sometimes you have to earn solitude: The Bailey Range Traverse in the Olympics When Bill and I started the is a rigorous combination of off-trail hiking, climbing, and snow-and-ice travel. trip in late July 2002, the up- But the views and loneliness are the payoffs. per Seven Lakes Basin was still mostly snow-covered, but east of Heart Lake earlier, so we were just the second regulations (including party size limits) the High Divide Trail and the Bailey party of the year. We did not see any apply. route above the Hoh had almost en- people on the off-trail part of the Day One: tirely melted out, so we rarely needed route . to use our ice axes (except in a few The traverse route is described Sol Duc River, Deer Lake snowfingers in creek gullies), and we in Climber’s Guide to the Olympic We left Seattle in two cars, took the never needed to use the crampons, Mountains by Olympic Mountain Bainbridge Island ferry and drove to rope or climbing hardware that we Rescue (Mountaineers, 1988) and in Port Angeles.
  • Distribution and Abundance of Hoary Marmots in North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, 2007-2008

    Distribution and Abundance of Hoary Marmots in North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, 2007-2008

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Distribution and Abundance of Hoary Marmots in North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, 2007-2008 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NOCA/NRTR—2012/593 ON THE COVER Hoary Marmot (Marmota caligata) Photograph courtesy of Roger Christophersen, North Cascades National Park Complex Distribution and Abundance of Hoary Marmots in North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, 2007-2008 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NOCA/NRTR—2012/593 Roger G. Christophersen National Park Service North Cascades National Park Complex 810 State Route 20 Sedro-Woolley, WA 98284 June 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
  • Dungeness River Targeted Watershed Initiative FINAL REPORT

    Dungeness River Targeted Watershed Initiative FINAL REPORT

    Dungeness River Targeted Watershed Initiative FINAL REPORT For E.P.A. Targeted Watershed Grant WS‐97098101‐0 Prepared By: Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe December 2009 FIGURES Figure 1. Dungeness Watershed on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. ................................. 4 Figure 2. Dungeness Bay shellfish closure areas. ........................................................................ 6 Figure 3. Phase 1 MST (Ribotyping) sampling locations.............................................................. 9 Figure 4. Phase 2 MST (Bacteroides Target Specific PCR) sampling locations. ......................... 10 Figure 5. Mycoremediation Demonstration Site. ...................................................................... 11 Figure 6. Construction of Mycoremediation Demonstration Site............................................. 12 Figure 7. Schematic of Biofilitration Cells, with native plants and fungi in the Treatment cell and native plants only in the Control. Inflow water is split with equal volumes and fed to the two cells (not to scale). ........................................................ 13 Figure 8. Ground‐breaking excavation at the rain garden site, Helen Haller Elementary School, Sequim, WA.................................................................................................... 15 Figure 9. TWG fresh water monitoring stations and DOH marine monitoring stations. .......... 18 Figure 10. Fecal Coliform Concentration (CFU/100 ml) over 6‐Month Time Period (mean +/‐ standard deviation)...................................................................................
  • Delineation of the Dungeness River Channel Migration Zone

    Delineation of the Dungeness River Channel Migration Zone

    Delineation of the Dungeness River Channel Migration Zone River Mouth to Canyon Creek Byron Rot Pam Edens Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe October 1, 2008 Acknowledgements This report was greatly improved from comments given by Patricia Olson, Department of Ecology, Tim Abbe, Entrix Corp, Joel Freudenthal, Yakima County Public Works, Bob Martin, Clallam County Emergency Services, and Randy Johnson, Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe. This project was not directly funded as a specific grant, but as one of many tribal tasks through the federal Pacific Coastal Salmon fund. We thank the federal government for their support of salmon recovery. Cover: Roof of house from Kinkade Island in January 2002 flood (Reach 6), large CMZ between Hwy 101 and RR Bridge (Reach 4, April 2007), and Dungeness River Channel Migration Zone map, Reach 6. ii Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………….1 Legal requirement for CMZ’s……………………………………….1 Terminology used in this report……………………………………..2 Geologic setting…………………………………………………......4 Dungeness flooding history…………………………………………5 Data sources………………………………………………………....6 Sources of error and report limitations……………………………...7 Geomorphic reach delineation………………………………………8 CMZ delineation methods and results………………………………8 CMZ description by geomorphic reach…………………………….12 Conclusion………………………………………………………….18 Literature cited……………………………………………………...19 iii Introduction The Dungeness River flows north 30 miles and drops 3800 feet from the Olympic Mountains to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The upper watershed south of river mile (RM) 10 lies entirely within private and state timberlands, federal national forests, and the Olympic National Park. Development is concentrated along the lower 10 miles, where the river flows through relatively steep (i.e. gradients up to 1%), glacial and glaciomarine deposits (Drost 1983, BOR 2002).
  • Convergent Evolution of Himalayan Marmot with Some High-Altitude Animals Through ND3 Protein

    Convergent Evolution of Himalayan Marmot with Some High-Altitude Animals Through ND3 Protein

    animals Article Convergent Evolution of Himalayan Marmot with Some High-Altitude Animals through ND3 Protein Ziqiang Bao, Cheng Li, Cheng Guo * and Zuofu Xiang * College of Life Science and Technology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China; [email protected] (Z.B.); [email protected] (C.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (Z.X.); Tel.: +86-731-5623392 (C.G. & Z.X.); Fax: +86-731-5623498 (C.G. & Z.X.) Simple Summary: The Himalayan marmot (Marmota himalayana) lives on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and may display plateau-adapted traits similar to other high-altitude species according to the principle of convergent evolution. We assessed 20 species (marmot group (n = 11), plateau group (n = 8), and Himalayan marmot), and analyzed their sequence of CYTB gene, CYTB protein, and ND3 protein. We found that the ND3 protein of Himalayan marmot plays an important role in adaptation to life on the plateau and would show a history of convergent evolution with other high-altitude animals at the molecular level. Abstract: The Himalayan marmot (Marmota himalayana) mainly lives on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and it adopts multiple strategies to adapt to high-altitude environments. According to the principle of convergent evolution as expressed in genes and traits, the Himalayan marmot might display similar changes to other local species at the molecular level. In this study, we obtained high-quality sequences of the CYTB gene, CYTB protein, ND3 gene, and ND3 protein of representative species (n = 20) from NCBI, and divided them into the marmot group (n = 11), the plateau group (n = 8), and the Himalayan marmot (n = 1).
  • Resolving the Evolutionary History of Campanula (Campanulaceae) in Western North America Barry M

    Resolving the Evolutionary History of Campanula (Campanulaceae) in Western North America Barry M

    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Biology Faculty and Staff ubP lications Biology 9-8-2011 Resolving the Evolutionary History of Campanula (Campanulaceae) in Western North America Barry M. Wendling Kurt E. Garbreath Eric G. DeChaine Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/biology_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Wendling, Barry M.; Garbreath, Kurt E.; and DeChaine, Eric G., "Resolving the Evolutionary History of Campanula (Campanulaceae) in Western North America" (2011). Biology Faculty and Staff Publications. 11. https://cedar.wwu.edu/biology_facpubs/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty and Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Resolving the Evolutionary History of Campanula (Campanulaceae) in Western North America Barry M. Wendling, Kurt E. Galbreath, Eric G. DeChaine* Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, United States of America Abstract Recent phylogenetic works have begun to address long-standing questions regarding the systematics of Campanula (Campanulaceae). Yet, aspects of the evolutionary history, particularly in northwestern North America, remain unresolved. Thus, our primary goal in this study was to infer the phylogenetic positions of northwestern Campanula species within the greater Campanuloideae tree. We combined new sequence data from 5 markers (atpB, rbcL, matK, and trnL-F regions of the chloroplast and the nuclear ITS) representing 12 species of Campanula with previously published datasets for worldwide campanuloids, allowing us to include approximately 75% of North American Campanuleae in a phylogenetic analysis of the Campanuloideae.
  • Harlequin Happenings

    Harlequin Happenings

    HARLEQUIN HAPPENINGS Newsletter of the Olympic Peninsula Audubon Society (OPAS) Www.olympicpeninsulaaudubon.org (www.olybird.org) Clallam County, Washington A Chapter of the National Audubon Society Issue 1 Jan-Feb 2017 Promoting Birding and Conservation as Community Educators, Volunteers, and Stewards OPAS Programs for January and February by Bob Boekelheide January 18, 2017, 7 p.m. at the Dungeness River Audubon Center, “The Natural World Always has a Story to Share - Celebrating What is Right with the World!” Presented by Alan Bauer. Alan Bauer is a profes- sional photographer, specializing in the natu- ral history of the Pacific Northwest. His excellent photographs have ap- peared in numerous Sooty Grouse magazines, newspa- Photo by Alan Bauer pers, books, and even in a special exhibit about spiders at Wood- February 15, 2017, 7 p.m. at the Dungeness River Audubon Center , "OPAS Member Photo Night 2017", land Park Zoo in Seat- tle. As Alan says, “The Organized by Dow Lambert. greatest value of my Time for our annual members' photo show! Do you have photographic art is to photos of birds you would like to share with others? better educate people Lucky for you, because other OPAS members want to about the beauty sur- see them, too. Alan Bauer rounding us.” Please submit your digital photos to Dow Lambert, who Celebrate what is right has generously offered to assist us projecting the imag- with the world! Sometimes we need to slow down, look es. If you wish to offer your photos for the evening, more closely, and appreciate beauty right around us.